Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-08-15APPROVED 10/17/89 1 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 1989 Council Chambers 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, STUDY SESSION - 5:30 PM REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Civic Center California P P P P P ROLL CALL: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega P P Mountford, Leipzig A. CONSENT CALENDAR A-1 WF B-1. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 89-6 - Conveyance of property from City to Redevelopment Agency. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WILLIAMS, SECOND BY MOUNTFORD, TO FIND IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Leipzig PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Commissioner Kirkland report actions taken by the Design Review Board during their August meeting. Commissioner Ortega reported that the proposed Holly-Seacliff Master Plan is available for comments. There will be two study sessions for Planning Commission review prior to the scheduled public hearing on October 3, 1989. She also reported that the Subdivision Committee recommended denial of Tract 14017 on August 9, 1989 due to the request for medium density in an area zoned low density. This tract will be heard by the Commission on September 19, 1989. C-1 USE PERMIT NO 89-28/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-20 (CONTINUED FROM JULY 19, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: Steichen Associates LOCATION: 17751 Beach Boulevard Use Permit No. 89-28/Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-20 is a request for a 380 square foot addition to an existing 1,040 square foot dental office building, including an exterior building remodel. The conditional exception is required because after required street dedication on the exterior side of the lot, the building's setback will be 4 feet-8 inches in lieu of the 10 feet required (Section 9220.7). In addition, the development does not meet perimeter landscaping requirements; the lot has landscape planter strips between 3 feet-8 inches and 4 feet-8 inches in width in lieu of 6 feet required (Section 9608(f)). Finally, the existing building has a nonconforming front setback of 32 feet-8 inches without the additional landscaping required where a building encroaches into the 50 foot setback. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Use Permit No. 89-28 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-20 with findings and conditions of approval. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Chuck Steichen, applicant, spoke in support of the request. He asked the Commission to consider eliminating condition 2-f for reciprocal agreement and modify condition 3 for signage as Dr. Dains does not have complete control of the sign. He went on to say that Dr. Dains agreed to remove his name from the sign. William Carlson, attorney representing Dr. Dains, spoke in support of the request. He requested that the reciprocal easement agreement not be made a condition of approval but left up to the occupants of the center. Art Folger, Deputy City Attorney, asked the applicant to provide a letter stating he would not do anything to prevent the removal of the sign at this time or in the future. Fred Chemberlen, attorney representing Dr. Krough the property owner to the south, was present. He advised the Commission of a pending lawsuit to not allow a wall between the two properties. He said Dr. Krough wishes to maintain the sign for his medical practice and that removing the word "dental" would cause the sign to look unsightly. [1 PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -2- (3502d) [1 Delores Dains spoke in support of the request and urged the Commission to approve with the elimination of condition 2-f. There were no other persons to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY MOUNTFORD, TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 89-28/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-20, WITH FINDINGS AND AMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH DELETION OF CONDITION 2-f. AN AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO NOT DELETE CONDITION 2-f, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: Shomaker, Kirkland ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None AMENDED MOTION PASSED VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED TO INCLUDE CONDITION 2-f: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY KIRKLAND, TO AMEND CONDITION NO. 3 (PROPERTY OWNER WILL RAISE NO OBJECTION TO REMOVE THE SIGN AT A LATER DATE): MOTION WITHDRAWN A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY LEIPZIG TO RECONSIDER APPROVAL ACTION OF USE PERMIT NO. 89-28/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-20, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION TO RECONSIDER PASSED PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -3- (3502d) A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 89-28/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-20 WITH FINDINGS AND REVISED CONDITION NO. 3, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Leipzig FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO, 89-28: 1. The location, site layout and design of the proposed dental office expansion and remodel properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. 2. The access to and parking for the proposed dental office expansion and remodel does not create an undue traffic problem. 3. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed dental office expansion and remodel will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 4. The granting of the dental office expansion and remodel will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-20: 1. Due to the small size of the lot (94.5 feet by 68 feet) and the additional required dedication for Newman Avenue there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that do not apply generally to other property or uses in the district. 2. The granting of conditional exceptions for exterior side yard setback, front setback landscaping, and perimeter landscaping are necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 3. The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-20 for exceptions to exterior side yard setback, front setback landscaping, and perimeter landscaping will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to the conforming property in the neighborhood. 4. The conditional exceptions for exterior side yard setback, front setback landscaping, and perimeter landscaping are consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -4- (3502d) 1 5. The granting of the conditional exception from the minimum landscape planter widths of Section 9608(f) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code will not defeat the general purposes or intent of the code which is to provide landscape areas to enhance the appearance of a project to passers-by because the actual percentage of landscaping provided (8.9 percent) exceeds the minimum code requirement of 6 percent. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated July 11, 1989, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The trash enclosure shall be relocated to the south side of the building. b. A minimum 24 foot aisleway around the building shall be provided, requiring the modification/relocation of two trellis canopy columns. c. The existing perimeter wall at streetside shall be removed to allow visibility of new landscaped areas. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. A rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved. Any rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors. b. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. c. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit). A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. d. The applicant shall dedicate an additional five feet of right-of-way for Newman Avenue as well as a 25 foot radius at the corner of Beach and Newman. Public works improvements shall be constructed as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -5- (3502d) �Jm 4. 5. C-2 e. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size, quantity), an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9608 and of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits. Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with minimum 36-inch box trees, which shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. f. The subject property shall enter into an irrevocable reciprocal access agreement or irrevocable offer to dedicate a future easement between the subject site and the adjacent property to the south at such time as the property redevelops. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the Community Development Department and the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. A copy shall be filed with the Department of Community Development. g. A sign plan must be submitted depicting all proposed signs based upon the remodeled building and site improvements. Prior to final building permit approval, the existing freestanding sign shall be removed or altered to comply with Article 961 (Sign Code), or property owner shall submit a "Letter of Agreement", signed and notarized, assuring that such sign shall be made to comply when joint owner agrees. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. REVOCATION HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-5 (CONTINUED FROM JULY 18, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: FHP, Inc. LOCATION: 19066 Magnolia Street (southeast corner of Magnolia Street and Garfield Avenue) 1 PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -6- (3502d) The revocation of FHP's Conditional Use Permit No. 87-5 to operate a Senior Medical Center at Garfield Plaza Shopping Center was considered due to parking problems that have arisen at the center. On June 6, 1989, the Planning Commission formed a subcommittee consisting of FHP representatives, center tenants, landowners, and Commissioners Bourguignon and Ortega. The purpose of the subcommittee was to formulate a parking management plan addressing various measures to alleviate the parking problems. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Reaffirm Conditional Use Permit No. 87-5 and adopt measures recommended by subcommittee with status report in six months. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Margie Schiller, owner of Margie's Kitchen, spoke in opposition to the request. She was concerned that eight businesses have closed in the center since FHP opened. Helen Campbell, FHP patient, spoke in support of the request. She said she never had a problem with parking at the center. Kermit Simons, FHP patient, spoke in support of the request. He said he had been a patient at the FHP facility for over three years and never experienced a parking problem. Betty Goldberg, FHP patient, spoke in support of the request. She said before FHP opened the center had many vacant suites. She feels that the senior center is a lifeline for seniors which enables them to be productive human beings. Robert Cole Sr., FHP patient, spoke in support of the request. He gave an example of a time when he parked in front of another tenant suite and a security guard was at his car door before he could get out advising him to park behind the building and a golf cart would bring him to the entrance. He urged the Commission to reaffirm the conditional use permit. William Kanold, FHP patient, spoke in support of the request. He said over the past two years visiting to the center he never had a problem with parking. Al Goldberg, FHP patient, spoke in support of the request. He said the parking spaces assigned to other tenants are usually empty. Robert Davis, owner of the Health Food Chalet, spoke in to the request. He said he was required to meet parking requirements when his establishment opened and feels FHP the parking standards also. opposition should meet PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -7- (3502d) Freda Davis, co-owner of the Health Food Chalet, spoke in opposition to the request. She provided records she compiled on August 15 as to the number of people entering and leaving the facility which far exceeded the number of appointments approved per day by the Commission. Dr. Gary Goldstein, Sr. Vice President for FHP, spoke in support of the request. In response to complaints regarding parking problems he stated that there is a shuttle service to the FHP parking facility three miles away. He went on to say that they have hired security guards to monitor the parking area and designated spaces for tenant parking only. He said they would look into a pharmacy delivery service and consider an entrance through the rear of the building. Ron Gray, FHP General Manager, spoke in support of the request. He advised that FHP had initiated a mail out prescription program and interest among patients was growing. He urged the Commission to reaffirm the conditional use permit. There were no other persons to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO REAFFIRM ORIGINAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-3 WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED AMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 3. (AMENDED) The maximum number of scheduled and non-scheduled patient appointments (includes specialities, etc.) shall not exceed 260 per day Monday through Friday and not exceed 150 per day Saturday and Sunday. Any changes to this condition shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission and their determination of whether or not a conditional use permit would be required. 4. (AMENDED) Hours of operation shall be limited to 8 AM to 7 PM Monday through Sunday. Any additional hours of operation shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission and their determination of whether or not a conditional use permit would be required. 12. FHP will reduce the number of appointments by about 15 percent between 10 AM - noon since that is one of the peak parking demand periods of the day. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -8- (3502d) 1 13. FHP will maintain their existing parking program (ie. parking lot security guard, etc.). 14. FHP will submit an alternative parking lot layout which increases the overall number of parking spaces for the center. This alternative layout shall include tenant designated parking spaces. This layout shall be submitted in conjunction with "A" for Planning Commission consideration. 15. A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted by FHP to include the items discussed herein. In addition, FHP will work with the property owner and other tenants in the center (Century 21, Thrift & Loan, etc.) to have their employees park behind the FHP building. 16. FHP will attempt to work with the property owner to update the planned sign program for the center. It is to include upgrading individual tenant wall signs. 17. FHP will further analyze a car pooling system for patients. 18. Alternative customer entrances (rear of the building) to the other businesses within the center shall be considered where feasible. 19. A review by staff and report to the Planning Commission of these measures and their impact upon the parking area shall be conducted in six months. The Planning Commission may add, amend or delete conditions as deemed necessary. C-3 USE PERMIT N0, 89-30/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO, 89-18 APPLICANT: Dean Fronk for McDonnell Douglas Space System Company LOCATION: 5301 Bolsa Avenue The applicant's request is to construct three (3) industrial buildings (approximately 26,000 square feet total), to add on to three (3) existing industrial structures (approximately 9,300 square feet total), and to designate an area for screened outside storage (approximately 53,000 square feet). The request also includes the use of metal panels in lieu of masonry materials for some of the proposed construction. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development posted draft Negative Declaration No. 89-18 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. 4 PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -9- (3502d) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Use Permit No. 89-30 and Negative Declaration No. 89-18 with the findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Neal Thompson, City Engineer - City of Westminster, spoke in opposition to the request. He voiced concern regarding additional traffic on four major streets. There were no other persons to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY WILIAMS, TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 89-30/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 89-18 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 89-2/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO 89-32/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO, 89-10 APPLICANT: Smoky's Stables USA Inc. Fred & Alexis Burkett LOCATION: 1,000 ft. southeast of the southerly terminus of Bolsa Chica Rd. Conditional Use Permit No. 89-2 in conjunction with Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-32 and Negative Declaration No. 89-10 is a request to permit the expansion of horse facilities on the 5 acre portion (within the City) of a 12 acre temporary commercial horse facility. The expansion includes two 18-stall barns, a riding arena, a tack room, and a watchman's trailer and will accommodate the relocation of some horses from the closing Ocean View Horse Stables. Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-32 is a request to encroach approximately 145 feet into the minimum 300 foot distance requirement to a residential zone or use, and waive the perimeter fencing and landscaping requirements of Article 967, Commercial Equine Standards, of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -10- (3502d) 1 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to Section 15073 of the California Environmental Quality Act, Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 89-10 was prepared for Conditional Use Permit No. 89-2 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-32 (see Attachment No. 3). Because the California Coastal Commission is acting as a responsible agency in this case, the draft mitigated negative declaration was circulated through the State Clearinghouse and posted for a thirty (30) day public review period from July 12, 1989, to August 10, 1989. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Negative Declaration No. 89-10 and Conditional Use Permit No. 89-2 as modified by staff and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-32 for waiver of landscaping and fencing and reduced setback for watchman's trailer only with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Stephen Pace, Attorney representing the applicant, spoke in support of the request. He said condition 8-a requiring the road to be paved would be financially impractical. He urged the Commission to delete this requirement. Alexis Burkett, owner of Smoky's Stables, spoke in support of the request. D. J. Martin, 21021 A Lochlea Lane, spoke in support of the request. He indicated that the rules and regulations at the stables are enforced. Jim Tullio, 5331 Glenstone Drive, spoke in opposition to the request. He said people walk horses on public streets and horse manure is a severe problem. Also, there is over -crowding in the stables and the flies are a serious problem. He urged the Commission to deny the expansion. Patricia Keppler, 5442 Kenilworth, spoke in opposition to the request. She expressed concern over the fill dirt which has been brought onto the site and also the increased traffic on Graham Street for the stables. Shelly Burkett, daughter of the proprietor, spoke in support of the request. She said, at one time there were 33 stable facilities in the City of Huntington Beach and only 3 are left. The stable provides a service to the community with riding lessons, hay rides, pony rides, barbeque pits, horse shoes along with the stables. She urged the Commission to approve the expansion. Terry Dunavan, 5176-111 Tortaga Drive, spoke in opposition to the request and provided a petition with 75 signature opposing the expansion. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -11- (3502d) Cynthia Larson, 9676 Pettswood Drive, spoke in support of the request. She said that horse -back riding was one of the few sporting activities available for young girls and women. Kristen Bender, 21142 Shepherd Lane, spoke in support of the request. She said she has boarded at other stables and has found that Smokey's has fewer problems than other stables. Charles Beauregard, 17221 Greenleaf Lane, spoke in opposition to the request. He said the fly problem has become unbearable. There were no other persons to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY MOUNTFORD, TO DENY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-32 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-10, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: Commissioner Leipzig said he would be voting against the motion as the request for expansion required improvements to the site that would not be accomplished without the expansion. Commissioner Mountford responded that the stable is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and did not want to make a bad situation worse. Commissioner Shomaker said she would support the motion but would like to see all the conditions met. Commissioner Kirkland was concerned due to the amount of time being spent by the Commission reviewing projects that should never be approved and this is a prime example. Commissioner Ortega was concerned because the City is going in a direction that does not include equestrian. Commissioner Williams said he would be voting against the motion because horses are compatible with residential as determined in the Ellis/Goldenwest area. AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Mountford, NOES: Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Leipzig ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION FAILED 1 PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -12- (3502d) 1 A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY ORTEGA TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-32 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 89-10, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Leipzig NOES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Mountford, ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 89-2: 1. Operation of the use will not create a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, and safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood, insofar as the use is compatible with the surrounding area and in conformance with the City's General Plan. 2. The use is compatible with existing uses in the surrounding area and does not detract from the rural environment of the area. 3. The site plan and design of the existing facilities are harmonious with adjacent structures and uses in that they conform with the existing facilities. 4. The arrangement, access, and parking for the use has not created an undue traffic problem. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-32: 1. The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-32 for landscaping, fencing, and the placement of the watchman's trailer within the minimum 300' setback requirement will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the surrounding uses in the neighborhood since exceptional circumstances apply to the land which preclude detrimental effects. 2. The requested exception for landscaping, fencing, and the placement of the watchman's trailer within the minimum 300 feet setback requirement will allow the continuation of a previously established stable which is compatible with surrounding properties and does not detract from the general environment of the area, and therefore, the exception insures the preservation and use of substantial property rights. 3. Because of the location of the site upon which the use is proposed exceptional circumstances exist that do not generally apply to other properties or classes of uses in the same district due to the remoteness of the site. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -13- (3502d) 4. Conditional Exception No. 89-32 for reduced setback for horse stalls is not approved because they can be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare of the adjacent residential neighborhood. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 89-2: 1. The site plan, as modified pursuant to staff's alternative (attachment #6), shall be the conceptually approved layout. a. No structure other than those shown on the approved site plan shall be constructed. 2. This approval shall be in effect until October 20, 1991, in conjunction with the applicant's current lease agreement with Metropolitan Water District and approved permits with the County of Orange. The applicant shall be required to submit a new conditional use permit application to re-establish the temporary commercial horse facility at that time. a. The proposed stables shall be allowed for a temporary period or until October 20, 1991 when all current entitlements expire. 3. A copy of all current lease agreements for the temporary horse facility and the applicable properties shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the subject file. 4. A copy of the current liability insurance policy shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for the file and shall be available for review by the public. 5. The applicant shall provide a grading plan, soils report and compaction report to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of any permits. The applicant shall be required to eliminate runoff into the adjacent wetlands area. The grading plan must be approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to the issuance of building permits or grading permits. a. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Orange County Vector Control District shall be notified to inspect the premises to reduce the potential for rodent dispersal. b. The applicant will be required to file a Report of Waste Discharge with this Regional Board for issuance of an animal confinement facility permit. 1 PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -14- (3502d) 1 C. If dewatering is found to be necessary during construction activities, either a national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for discharge to surface waters of a Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) permit for discharge to land will be required from this office. d. The caretaker's unit shall be provided with an adequate sewer system approved by Public Works and Building Departments. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. Submit copy of the revised site plan and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. b. The applicant shall remove fill on the proposed site down to a level which is comparable to the adjacent site and which allows for adequate drainage (from approximately 9 feet down to 1 to 2 feet). The proposed structures should reach an elevation similar to or less than the existing structures on the adjacent site. C. Submit a hydrology/hydraulic study and drainage system study to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. d. The elevations of the structures will be reviewed by the Community Development Department. Measures such as landscaping, outside treatments, fencing etc. shall be provided as buffers from adjacent viewpoints. Where possible, roofs shall be sloped away from corrals or stables to prevent flooding and disease such as hoof rot and thrush. e. Submit landscape plan for review and approval. Perimeter trees and shrubs shall be shown on the site plan for dust control. Plants that are attractive to rodents, such as Algerian ivy, oleander, palm, trees, yuccas, etc. shall be avoided. f. The applicant shall submit a log containing the name of every horse, the owners name and address and location of every horse on site to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the file and thereafter on an annual basis. g. The facility shall be in accordance with the requirements of condition number 10. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -15- (3502d) 7. Ry M The Building and Safety Department requirements are as follows: a. The plans shall meet 1985 Uniform Building Code. b. Building permits required for all structures over 42 inches in height. C. The 18 stall barns shall meet all Building Code requirements including Uniform Building Code, Appendix Chapter 11 for Group M Division 3 occupancy. d. The applicant shall submit to the Building Division the following: (1) Two complete sets of signed plans which include: Fully dimensioned plot plan, floor plan, foundation plan, floor and roofing plan, structural sections and details, architectural sections and details and material specifications. The first sheet shall include: type of occupancy, gross square footage, occupant load (each area), area justification per requirements of Uniform Building Code, Chapter 5. The Fire Department requirements are as follows: a. Provide a Fire Department access road from Bolsa Chica entrance into the facility with adequate turnaround to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. b. Provide emergency water supply pursuant to Fire Department approval. c. Corrals, racks, and stalls shall be constructed of non-combustible materials or shall be constructed pursuant to Huntington Beach Fire Department Specification No. 404. d. All plans shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to construction. e. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, ordinances and standards. Special attention shall be given to water systems because accumulations of manure, bedding, and/or feed within water are ideal for fly production. a. A non -leak valve for all troughs, bowls, cups, and other water sources shall be provided in each corral. 1 PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -16- (3502d) b. Automatic valves, or sanitary drains of the water flow is continuous, shall be installed in all large troughs or cups. c. Back -siphoning devices shall be installed to protect the public water supply. An approved pressure vacuum breaker is recommended on the water line serving the paddocks. The vacuum breaker shall be at least twelve (12") inches above the highest point of the water usage, or an approved double-check valve may be acceptable. Back -siphoning devices shall not be required for automatic water cups. 10. The facility shall be maintained as follows: a. Manure shall be removed from the premises every day, unless it is kept in a covered bin or bog made of sound metal, brick, stone, concrete, or wood lined with fly -tight materials or buried in the ground and covered with earth or other materials sufficient to prevent the attraction or breeding of flies or other insects. b. Manure shall not be permitted to remain in any bin or bog for a period longer than seven (7) days. All manure removal standards shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Orange County Vector Control District. c. Rodent control shall be diligently practiced, and the entire premises shall be kept in an orderly and sanitary condition to prevent possible rodent infestation. d. All dry grains shall be stored in rodent -proof metal containers, and hay shall be stored in a covered structure on a cement slab or on a raised wood platform which maintains a minimum clearance of six (6) inches above the ground. e. In paddocks and corrals , the earth surface shall be properly graded to suit the master drainage plan so that rain water and overflows from water trough do not form ponds. f. In all enclosures where horses are maintained, the land surface of such enclosures shall be graded above the remaining land surface for drainage purposed. g. Continuous dust control of the entire premises shall be practiced providing a method for light water sprinkling of arenas and exercise pens. This method of dust control shall be indicated on the Site Plan. Dust control on the premises shall be subject to regulation contained in Chapter 8.24 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. h. All water management shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Orange County Vector Control District. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -17- (3502d) 11. i. Lighting shall be required to be shut off after 10:00 p.m., with the exception of security lighting. All outside lighting shall be provided using energy efficient lamps (e.g. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide) and shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. j. Horses shall be subject to Orange County Flood Control District regulations regarding use of the adjacent flood control channel bank. If there are limitations, the applicant shall work with the Flood Control District to provide a sign to inform people using the stable facility. k. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 1. The number of parking spaces provided on -site shall be per city code. m. Horses, hay rides and related activities shall be limited to the subject property, unless written authorization is obtained from the property owner. A copy of the authorization shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for the file. Signs shall be posted throughout the premises indicating "Riders Not to Stray Onto Private Property". During construction, the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet -down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05% by weight) for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 12. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 13. The 5 acre facility within the City boundaries shall not exceed 25 horses per acre or a maximum of 125 as permitted by Section 9670.3. 14. All land use violations within the City limits shall be abated within 90 days of final action. In addition, the applicant shall work with the County to abate any county violations. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -18- (3502d) 15. Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall improve the parking lot so that it conforms to provisions of Section 9730.52, Temporary Commercial Parking Lot, and Article 960 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. b. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. c. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. 16. This conditional use permit shall not become effective for any purpose until an "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been properly executed by the applicant and an authorized representative of the owner of the property, and returned to the Planning Division; and until the ten day appeal period has elapsed. 17. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 89-2 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. 18. A review of the use by the Planning Commission shall be conducted within six (6) months of the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or final building permit approval to verify compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable Articles of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. If, at that time, there is a violation of these conditions or code sections, Conditional Use Permit No. 89-2 may become null and void. 19. Conditional Use Permit No. 89-2 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. C-5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 89-30 APPLICANT: Lycee International de Los Angeles PROPERTY OWNER: Fountain Valley Sch. Dist. LOCATION: 19692 Lexington Lane PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -19- (3502d) Conditional Use Permit No. 89-30 is a request to establish a non-profit French American School in conjunction with the existing Pegasus School located in the Arevalos Elementary School site. The entire Arevalos School is currently being leased by the Pegasus School, a private non-profit school working with bright and gifted pre-school through fifth grade students. Conditional Use Permit No. 88-56 which established the Pegasus School required each proposed additional use on the school site to be approved pursuant to a conditional use permit. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-30 with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Mark Sibler, 19692 Lexington Lane, spoke in opposition to the request. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY ORTEGA TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-30 WITH FINDING AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: Williams ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the Montessori Pre-school with up to 60 students will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or to property and improvements in the vicinity. 2. The granting of the conditional use permit for the Montessori Pre -School with up to 60 students will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -20- (3502d) 3. The proposed Montessori Pre-school is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map because the property was originally developed as a school site. 4. The access to and parking for the proposed use does not create an undue traffic problem because adequate parking and drop-off areas are provided on site, and no excessive traffic will be generated. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and floor plans received and dated August 7, 1989 shall be the approved layout. 2. The Montessori Pre -school's hours of operation shall be limited to between 6:30 am and 6:00 pm. 3. The total enrollment for the Montessori Pre-school shall not exceed 60 students per day and the school shall be limited to three classrooms. Any expansion in number shall require approval of the the Planning Commission. 4. Prior to operation, the applicant shall obtain approval from Orange County Social Services Department. Applicant shall file with the Department of Community Development, a copy of the license issued by the Social Services Department within 90 days of approval. If the applicant fails to obtain license from Orange County Social Services Department, this conditional use permit shall be revoked with all monies spent at applicant's risk. 5. Any additional uses on the school site beyond a collective enrollment of 300 students (i.e. schools, organizations) shall require a new conditional use permit with completed traffic and parking analyses prepared by a traffic consultant to analyze current and projected traffic counts and impacts upon local streets for each existing and proposed use. 6. Applicant shall obtain a business license from the City of Huntington Beach prior to operation. 7. The Montessori Pre-school shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code including Section 9634.3, Building Division, and Fire Department. 8. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances and standards. 9. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this conditional use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -21- (3502d) C-6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 89-22 APPLICANT: Eileen Clark OWNER: Fountain Valley School District LOCATION: 19692 Lexington Lane Conditional Use Permit No. 89-22 is a request to establish a Montessori pre-school for up to sixty children at the Arevalos School site. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-22 with findings and conditions of approval: THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Mark Sibler, 19692 Lexington Lane, spoke in opposition to the request. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY ORTEGA TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-22 WITH FINDING AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Leipzig NOES: Williams ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: Kirkland, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the Montessori Pre-school with up to 60 students will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or to property and improvements in the vicinity. 2. The granting of the conditional use permit for the Montessori Pre -School with up to 60 students will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -22- (3502d) 1 3. The proposed Montessori Pre-school is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map because the property was originally developed as a school site. 4. The access to and parking for the proposed use does not create an undue traffic problem because adequate parking and drop-off areas are provided on site, and no excessive traffic will be generated. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and floor plans received and dated August 7, 1989 shall be the approved layout. 2. The Montessori Pre -school's hours of operation shall be limited to between 6:30 am and 6:00 pm. 3. The total enrollment for the Montessori Pre-school shall not exceed 60 students per day and the school shall be limited to three classrooms. Any expansion in number shall require approval of the the Planning Commission. 4. Prior to operation, the applicant shall obtain approval from Orange County Social Services Department. Applicant shall file with the Department of Community Development, a copy of the license issued by the Social Services Department within 90 days of approval. If the applicant fails to obtain license from Orange County Social Services Department, this conditional use permit shall be revoked with all monies spent at applicant's risk. 5. Any additional uses on the school site beyond a collective enrollment of 300 students (i.e. schools, organizations) shall require a new conditional use permit with completed traffic and parking analyses prepared by a traffic consultant to analyze current and projected traffic counts and impacts upon local streets for each existing and proposed use. 6. Applicant shall obtain a business license from the City of Huntington Beach prior to operation. 7. The Montessori Pre-school shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code including Section 9634.3, Building Division, and Fire Department. 8. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances and standards. 9. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this conditional use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -23- (3502d) C-7 GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO 89-5/AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 82-3 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach PROPERTY OWNER: Gerald Chapman LOCATION: 6752 Shire Circle General Plan Conformance No. 89-5 is a request by the Department of Public Works to vacate a nine (9) foot wide portion of an existing 25 foot wide equestrian/drainage easement located at 6742 Shire Circle. The Community Development Department has initiated an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 82-3 to modify the original equestrian/drainage easement located within the Country View Estates project area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (A) Find General Plan Conformance No. 89-5 in conformance with the General Plan with findings; and (B) Approve amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 82-3 with the following findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Gerald Chapman, 6742 Shire Circle, spoke in support of the request. He requested, however, that a condition be added requiring Mr. Dahl to place a bond to make improvements on the property before any future development occurs. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MOUNTFORD, SECOND BY LEIPZIG TO FIND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 89-5 IN CONFORMANCE WITH GENERAL PLAN AND APPROVE AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-3, WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Leipzig NOES: Williams ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Kirkland, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE N0, 89-5: 1. General Plan Conformance No. 89-5 for reduced/easement width encourages rational use of land and other natural resources (Land Uses). PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -24- (3502d) F� I� 2. General Plan Conformance No. 89-5 for reduced width provides an adequate level of community service facilities, improvements and maintenance in all areas of the City (Land Use). 4. General Plan Conformance No. 89-5 is consistent with the policy to develop and maintain a system of trails linking City, parks, beaches and bluffs (Recreation). FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 82-3: 1. The reduction from 25 feet to 16 feet wide is consistent with the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan zoning designation. 2. The remaining 16 foot wide equestrian/drainage easement will provide adequate internal circulation and drainage opportunities. 3. The amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 82-3 will not adversely affect the General Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 82-3• 1. The reduction of the existing equestrian/drainage easement shall conform to Exhibit A dated August 1, 1989. 2. An underground conduit shall convey the runoff from the property to the east subject to the Department of Public Works requirements. 3. All previous conditions of Conditional Use Permit No. 82-3 shall remain in effect. C-8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-26/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N0, 89-11 APPLICANT: Richard L. Anderson PROPERTY OWNER: Vasilious Panatagos LOCATION: 16355 Maruffa Circle Conditional Use Permit No. 89-26 in conjunction with Coastal Development Permit No. 89-11 is a request to permit the remodel and addition of 1,177 square feet to an existing 3,598 square foot two-story single family residence with a two -car garage on Humboldt Island in Huntington Harbour. The addition includes a 378 square foot third floor mezzanine area. Section 9110.4(a) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code states that the Planning Commission may approve building heights of thirty (30) feet and/or three (3) stories pursuant to the conditional use permit process. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -25- (3502d) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1, of the California Environmental Quality Act. RECOMMENDATION• Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-26 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-11 with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Richard Anderson, the applicant, spoke in support of the request. There was no one present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY MOUNTFORD TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-26/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-11 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 89-26: 1. The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family residence with a third floor mezzanine will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and privacy of persons working or residing in the vicinity or will not be detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the vicinity. 2. The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family residence with a third floor mezzanine is compatible with existing or proposed uses in the vicinity. 3. The location, site layout and design of the proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family residence with a third floor mezzanine is properly related to the streets, drive and other structures and uses in the vicinity in a harmonious manner. 4. The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family residence with a third floor mezzanine is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -26- (3502d) 1 J FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO, 89-11: 1. The remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family residence with a third floor mezzanine as proposed by Coastal Development Permit No. 89-11 conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element. 2. The remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family residence with a third floor mezzanine as proposed by Coastal Development Permit No. 89-11 is consistent with the CZ suffix, low density residential development standards, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. 3. Coastal Development Permit No. 89-11, at the time of occupancy, the proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family residence with a third floor mezzanine will provide infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the C-LUP. 4. The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family residence with a third floor mezzanine as proposed by Coastal Development Permit No. 89-11 conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated July 17, 1989, shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials proposed. b. The site plan shall include all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 3. The Public Works Department requirements are as follows: a. The water service to the home shall have a Water Division approved back -flow prevention system. 4. Fire Department Requirements are as follows: a. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. b. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -27- (3502d) 6. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 7. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 8. Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed: a. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. b. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. 9. This Conditional Use Permit No. 89-26 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. C-9 CODE AMENDMENT NO 89-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-14 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: City-wide REQUEST: To Amend Article 908 Definitions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code DUE TO THE LATENESS OF THE HOUR, A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY ORTEGA TO CONTINUE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 89-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-14 TO THE SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -28- (3502d) C-10 CODE AMENDMENT NO. 89-9/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-24 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: City-wide REQUEST: To amend Article 985, Design Review Board of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. DUE TO THE LATENESS OF THE HOUR, A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY ORTEGA TO CONTINUE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 89-9/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-24 TO THE SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Leipzig NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS D-1 STATUS REPORT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 88-29 Applicant: Hebrew Academy Linda Russell, Principal of Hebrew Academy, reported site improvements that have been completed and others to be completed. Staff advised they would monitor closely and report back if the improvements were not completed D-2 STATUS REPORT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 88-39/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 88-30 Applicant: Lisa Prodan Staff reported that the applicant is very close to having complete submittal for the Building Division Plan Check. Staff only to report back if work is not completed in 60 days. E. DISCUSSION ITEMS None F. PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES None G. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS None PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -29- (3502d) H. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS None I. ADJOURNMENT A MOTION WAS MADE AT 12:15 AM BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO ADJOURN TO A STUDY SESSION (HOLLY-SEACLIFF EIR/MASTER PLAN AND DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT) AT 5:30 PM, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 AND THEN TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING AT 7 PM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED APPROVED Y: Mike A ms, Secretary Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Leipzig P-lanning Co ission a rm n PC Minutes - 8/15/89 -30- (3502d)