Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-10-17APPROVED 11/7/89 1 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 17, 1989 Council Chambers 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Civic Center California P P P P P ROLL CALL: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega P P Mountford, Leipzig A. CONSENT CALENDAR A-1 GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO 89-10 - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-31 - Applicant: City of Huntington Beach - For the widening of the east side of Gothard Street to ultimate right-of-way width from 65 feet south of Cedar Avenue north to Warner Avenue. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-31 AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 89-10 WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Mountford (Out of Room) ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The acquisition of right-of-way and widening of Gothard Street would help to develop a system of arterial streets and highways that ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods. (Circulation Element) 2. The acquisition of right-of-way and widening of Gothard Street would support the establishment of public transportation systems within the City that are directed toward meeting the mobility needs of the community. (Circulation Element) 3. The acquisition of right-of-way and widening of Gothard Street would provide a transportation system that is consistent with efforts to minimize adverse environmental and aesthetic effects. (Circulation Element) A-2 MINUTES DATED AUGUST 15, 1989 (CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 3, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO APPROVE MINUTES DATED AUGUST 15, 1989, AS SUBMITTED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Mountford ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED B. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, (Out of Room) B-1 PLANNING COMMISSION SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS The following sub -committee reports were presented: Commissioner Kirkland - reported action taken by the Design Review Board at the October 12, 1989 meeting. Commissioner Williams - Oil Committee met to discuss potential secondary recovery drill sites. Chairman Bourguignon - attended Oil Spill Seminar held in Santa Barbara and presented details of the conference. i. I I - PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -2- (4005d) C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS C-1 CODE AMENDMENT NO 88-12 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-8 (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 3. 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH At the September 6, 1989 Planning Commission meeting, considerable discussion ensued regarding the creation of uses with nonconforming parking based on the proposed changes to the parking standards. The public hearing was continued to allow staff an opportunity to review and revise, if necessary, the existing and proposed standards for uses which do not comply with Article 960. Staff prepared recommended changes which attempted to alleviate many of the concerns raised. These recommended changes were not discussed at the October 3 meeting; the item was continued to October 17. Since that time staff has determined that the proposed ordinance and suggested changes could be revised into a new format to make the regulations more "user-friendly". A continuance would allow staff time to make the modifications in format and bring the item back to the Commission for discussion. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Continue Code Amendment No. 88-12 and Negative Declaration No. 89-8 to the December 7, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Commission requested staff to prepare a matrix showing the Current Code, Proposed Code and staff's recommendation on each proposed change. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WILLIAMS, SECOND BY SHOMAKER, TO CONTINUE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 88-12 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-8 TO THE NOVEMBER 7, 1989 MEETING WITH A STUDY SESSION AT 5:30 PM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Mountford (Out of Room) ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-43 (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 3, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: THOMAS G. BEGIN II LOCATION: 16666 Tunstall Lane Conditional Use Permit No. 89-43 was continued by the Planning Commission on October 3, 1989, to allow time for the applicant to PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -3- (4005d) submit a detailed proposed schedule of usage of`the church facility and a letter of approval from the Oceanview School District for such use. In addition, the Commission requested that staff analyze the day care use currently in operation and make a recommendation for hours of operation that will not result in a shortage of available parking spaces. Conditional Use Permit No. 89-43 is a request to establish the Goldenwest Church of Christ in Rooms 16, 17, 19 and 20 of the closed Parkview Elementary School. On September 6, 1989, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 89-32 for a child care center in another portion of the same building. Section 9630 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code lists church uses as unclassified, permitted in any district subject to conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class l(e), Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-43 with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED James King, 9532 Netherway Drive, representing the applicant, spoke in support of the request and made himself available to answer any questions: There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A condition requiring all parking at the facility to be on -site only with street parking and parking at Murdy Park being prohibited was requested by the Commission. The Commission also suggested a condition regarding the expiration of the church's lease with the school district. Since the lease is set to expire June 30, 1990, they felt if the church chose to extend the lease and all conditions of approval were met that Conditional Use Permit No. 89-43 should be able to be extended administratively through the Community Development Department. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY MOUNTFORD, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-43 WITH FINDINGS AND ADDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -4- (4005d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the Goldenwest Church of Christ will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or to property and improvements in the vicinity. 2. The granting of the conditional use permit for the church use will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposed church is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. 4. The access to and parking for the proposed church use does not create an undue traffic problem because adequate parking and circulation are provided on site, and no excessive traffic will be generated. Potential conflicts between different uses are avoided due to no overlap in hours of operation. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and floor plans received and dated August 28, 1989 shall be the approved layout. 2. The church shall be limited to rooms 16, 17, 19, 20, and adjacent workroom of the school facility. Any expansion in the area shall require approval by the Planning Commission. 3. The church shall be limited in its use of the facility in the following manner: a. Weekdays prior to 6:30 PM - a maximum of 26 vehicles at any one time. b. Weekdays after 6:30 PM - the church shall have full use of the facility. C. Weekends (Saturday and Sunmday) - the church shall have full use of the facility. 4. Applicant shall obtain a business license from the City of Huntington Beach prior to operation. 5. The Goldenwest Church of Christ shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 6. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances and standards. PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -5- (4005d) 7. All parking at the facility shall be on -site only. Street parking and parking at Murdy Park shall be prohibited. 8. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this conditional use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. 9. Conditional Use Permit No. 89-43 shall expire at the end of the church's lease with the school district, currently set at June 30, 1990. If the lease is extended and all conditions of approval are met Conditional Use Permit No. 89-43 can be extended administratively through the Community Development Department. C-3 PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO 89-3/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO 89-36 (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 3 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: Walnut Avenue between Main and Sixth Streets This item was continued to the October 17, 1989 Planning Commission meeting in order to allow staff to further analyze potential project impacts. The City Council adopted Circulation Element Amendment No. 84-1 on June 4, 1984, establishing the general alignment of Walnut Avenue between Lake and Sixth Streets. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 86-1, establishing the precise alignment of Walnut Avenue, was adopted October 27, 1986. This precise alignment reflects 80 foot ultimate right-of-way requiring a 10 foot dedication on each side of Walnut Avenue, to be required at the time adjacent properties are redeveloped. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-3 proposes to create a modified right-of-way width of 60 feet on Walnut Avenue from Main to Sixth Street. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department posted draft Negative Declaration No. 89-36 for ten days, and no comments either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 89-36 and Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-3 and recommend adoption by the City Council. PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -6- (4005d) THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Sheryl Caverly, 201, 203 Main Street, spoke in support of the proposed precise plan of street alignment. Dianne Easterling, 203 Eighth Street, spoke in opposition to the proposed plan. She feels it is inconsistent and will create problems with a modified right-of-way width of 60 feet on Walnut Avenue from Main to Sixth Street. Bill Gallegos, 210 Fifth Street, spoke in support of keeping the 80 foot width. He feels the proposed parking structures will cause bottlenecks if the streets are narrowed. Susan Worthy, 128 Sixth Street, spoke in favor of keeping the streets at 60 foot widths. She said major restoration will be done on her property and a 60-foot street width is more desirable. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the proposed street alignment and the public hearing was closed. The Commission discussed their previous action on the Precise Plan of Street Alignment and agreed to take "no action". It was felt that they should either table the item or make a motion to not rescind their previous motion which clearly stated they recommended an 80 foot width on Walnut Avenue. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WILLIAMS, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO TAKE "NO ACTION" AND TO NOT RESCIND THE PRIOR MOTION WHICH CLEARLY STATED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED AN 80 FOOT WIDTH ON WALNUT AVENUE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-41 APPLICANT: MANOUCHEHR ZARDINEJAD LOCATION: 19092 Beach Boulevard, Suite T Conditional Use Permit No. 89-41 is a request to allow beer and wine sales at an existing 825 square foot restaurant. The restaurant has had an ABC license in the past under a different owner. Section 9636.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code requires conditional use permit approval by the Planning Commission for alcohol sales at a restaurant which is within 300 feet of a residence. PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -7- (4005d) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 1(e), Class 15301, of the California Environmental Quality Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-41 with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Manouchehr Zardinejad, 8161 E. Marseillie Drive, applicant, spoke in support of the request and agreed with all conditions of approval imposed by staff. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY MOUNTFORD, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-41 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed sale of beer and wine for on -site consumption at the existing restaurant will not create an undue traffic problem. All parking requirements are met. 2. The proposed sale of beer and wine for on -site consumption at the existing restaurant is compatible with the existing uses in the area. 3. The proposed sale of beer and wine for on -site consumption at the existing restaurant will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons working or residing in the neighborhood and will not be detrimental to the value of property and improvements in the vicinity. 4. The proposed sale of beer and wine for on -site consumption at the existing restaurant will not be detrimental to the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -8- (4005d) C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and floor plans received and dated September 18, 1989, shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. The operating hours shall be Monday through Friday from 9:30 AM to 7:00 PM, Saturday from 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM, and closed Sunday. Any increase or change in hours shall require prior approval by the Planning Commission. 3. The applicant shall obtain a license to sell alcoholic beverages from Alcoholic Beverage Control prior to the sale of alcoholic beverages. License shall be restricted to on -site consumption only. 4. There shall be no tables placed outside of the store. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 6. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 89-41 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. C-5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-50 APPLICANT: ROCCO SARRACINO LOCATION: 522 Main Street Conditional Use Permit No. 89-50 is a request to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption in conjunction with a proposed restaurant. Pursuant to Section 9636 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the sale of alcoholic beverages requires a conditional use permit. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301, Class 2, of the California Environmental Quality Act. REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: The proposed restaurant is within the Downtown Redevelopment area. Redevelopment staff has indicated that the proposed restaurant/bar use would be compatible with the existing and planned uses within the Downtown Redevelopment Project area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-50 with findings and conditions of approval. PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -9- (4005d) THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Rocco Sarracino, applicant, spoke in support of the request. He said he once attended a function at "The Greek Corner" that was held upstairs and found it quite delightful and asked if this could ever be allowed. Bill Gallegos, 210 Fifth Street, welcomed Mr. Sarracino to the area and spoke in support of the request. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. Staff suggested an added condition requiring approval by the Design Review Board on any modifications to the exterior elevation. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY MOUNTFORD, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-50 WITH FINDINGS AND AMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment of alcohol sales for on -site consumption will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building since the use is consistent with the mixed use zoning designation and the past uses of the site. 2. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 89-50 for alcohol sales for on -site consumption will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. The restaurant/bar is a permitted use within the Mixed Use designation of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 25, 1989, shall be the conceptually approved layout. Any modification to the exterior elevation must be approved by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of any building permits. PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -10- (4005d) 2. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 3. All alcohol beverage control requirements shall be met prior to alcohol sales. 4. Live entertainment shall be prohibited unless a conditional use permit for such entertainment is granted by the Planning Commission. 5. All proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. 6. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 89-50 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. C-6 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-3 APPLICANT: MARK FRANK, SPESCO LOCATION: 6952 Warner Avenue Special Sign Permit No. 89-3 is a request for the installation of two channel letter signs with almost twice the amount of square footage as that which is permitted by code. Section 9610.5(b) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code specifies the type, size and number of attached signs allowed for the subject property. Where the applicant wishes to exceed these standards, Section 9610.7 sets forth the provisions for special sign permit review by the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15311, Class 11, of the California Environmental Quality Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deny Special Sign Permit No. 89-3 with findings. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Gil Schauer, owner of the Trading Post at 6952 Warner, spoke in support of the request. He discussed his interpretation of the code. He was unclear to the definition of building frontage. He said his store faces 2 streets, 2 parking areas with 2 entrances and 2 addresses and that he is taking down 5 signs to replace with 2 nice proportionate signs. He feels that according to his reading of the code he is in compliance. He also expressed concern that as the owner of the store he felt that he should have been notified. PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -11- (4005d) Mark Frank, applicant, 701 Lakme Avenue, Wilmington, showed slides of some nonconforming signs in the area and spoke in support of the request. He presented new plans which would amend his application now requesting two signs with a total of 126 square feet in lieu of 82.5 square feet by code. Mark Miller, 4302 Pickwick, spoke in support of the request and read into the records a letter from the landlord questioning staff's recommendation for denial of the request. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. Discussion of the code requirements ensued and code violations occurring at the site were pointed out and addressed. Commission suggested a continuance and directed staff to review the code requirements and sign examples discussed by applicant, and also review the possible sign violations. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO CONTINUE SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-3 TO THE NOVEMBER 7, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-7 ZONE CHANGE NO. 89-4/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-37 APPLICANT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LOCATION: 817 Oceanhill Drive Zone Change No. 89-4 and Negative Declaration No. 89-37 constitute a request to rezone one residential lot in the Oldtown area from (Q)OTSP-2-0 (Qualified-Oldtown Specific Plan District 2-Combined with Oil) to (Q)OTSP-2 (Qualified-Oldtown Specific Plan District 2). On September 6, 1989, the Planning Commission approved a similar request to remove the -0 (combined with oil) suffix on eleven (11) residential lots in the Oldtown area. The subject parcel at 817 Oceanhill should also have the -0 suffix removed from the zoning since it has been developed with a single family home, and oil production no longer exists on the lot. I PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -12- (4005d) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development posted draft Negative Declaration No. 89-.37 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. SPECIFIC PLAN: The subject site is within the Oldtown Specific Plan area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Negative Declaration No. 89-37 and Zone Change No. 89-3 with findings and forward to City Council for adoption. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED There was no one present to speak for or against the zone change and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-37 AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 89-3 WITH FINDINGS AND FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Leipzig FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed zone change from (Q)OTSP-2-0 (Qualified-Oldtown Specific Plan District 2-Combined with Oil) to (Q)OTSP-2 (Qualified-Oldtown Specific Plan District 2) does conform with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 2. The proposed zone change from (Q)OTSP-2-0 (Qualified-Oldtown Specific Plan District 2-Combined with Oil) to (Q)OTSP-2 (Qualified-Oldtown Specific Plan District 2) is consistent with surrounding single family residential land uses. PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -13- (4005d) D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS D-1 MAIN -PIER PHASE II Presentation was made to Planning Commission. Direction was given to developer and staff. Study session was scheduled for the November 7, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. E. DISCUSSION ITEMS None F. PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES None G. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 1. Staff was requested to investigate the feasibility of drafting a letter to property owners in the Ellis-Goldenwest area (Trotter Drive) advising them that removal of any tree with greater than an 8-inch diameter requires a permit. 2. Chairman Bourguignon was directed to send a memo to the City Council requesting that Victor Leipzig be added to the Huntington Beach Wetland Coalition, representing the Planning Commission. 3. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO RESCHEDULE THE JANUARY COMMISSION MEETINGS TO JANUARY 9 AND JANUARY 16, 1990, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, NOES: Kirkland ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Leipzig 4. A list of names and addresses of Planning Commissioners and staff members was requested. H. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS Mike Adams reiterated action taken by the City Council at their October 16, 1989 meeting. PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -14- (4005d) 1 Fi I Ll I. ADJOURNMENT A MOTION WAS MADE AT 10:40 PM BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO ADJOURN TO A 5:30 PM STUDY SESSION ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1989, AND THEN TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING AT 7:00 PM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED APPROVE BY• fie. Mike Adams, Secretary anning C mmission air PC Minutes - 10/17/89 -15- (4005d)