Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-01-08 (7)i MINUTES CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Room B-B, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, January 8, 1990 A tape recording of this meeting is on file in the City Clerk's Office. Mayor Mays called the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to order.at 5:30 p.m. �QLL CALL PRESENT: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine ABSENT: done (Bannister arrived 7 p.m.) STUDY SESSION -- Holly Seacliff Master Plan The Community Development Director presented a staff report. Gene Shieh, representing FORMA Consultants, gave a slide presentation of an overview of the planning process of the project. He distributed documents entitled "Holly Seacliff General Plan Amendment Report No. 89-1", "Existing General Plan/Zoning Exhibit 3", "Proposed Land Use Plan", "General Plan Amend- ment, Land Use Comparison Table", and "General Plan Amendment, Summary of Changes" for the Holly-Seacliff Area. Hal Simmons, Senior Planner, stated that staff is in general agreement with the Holly Seacliff Master Plan but listed some concerns that he did not believe were adequately addressed by the Plan. He stated the Plan did not cover a provision for affordable housing, continuity of the Gothard Industrial Corridor --prefer to see corridor remain industrial and increase the density to obtain affordable housing in the northeast portion of the study area; to have mixed development from Ellis to Garfield, staff proposes raised density north of Garfield and east of Goldenwest increasing the housing unit from 4,300 to 5,000. He stated he believed the traffic model from LSA used to analyze this project is an adequate basis for analyzing traffic. He read the mitigation measures in the Environmental Impact Report based on using the Hoctan model (City/County traffic model) in the future. He stated that the staff recommen- dation was to certify the Environmental Impact Report, adopt the statement of overriding considerations, and to adopt the Holly Seacliff Master Plan with changes by the staff. RE=-=..RECONVEM The Mayor called a recess of Council at 6:30 p.m. The. meeting was reconvened at 7 p.m. in the Council Chamber. 138 Page 2 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 PUBLIC HEARING ON PIERSIDE VI LLA E N0f TQ BE HEARD AT THIS MEETING Mayor Mays announced that the public hearing on Pierside Village would not be heard at this meeting. The Flag Ceremony and Invocation was conducted by Pat Davis, President, Council on Aging. • ' , it it � 1 ' :tf .x : �i;i,c � 1 �; _ ; 1 i Fire Chief Picard presented a commendation to Michelle Coffield in apprecia- tion of her admirable actions in evacuating three children to safety during a fire on December 16, 1989. i f r Robg rt Reid requested Council to add a condition to the ordinance that prohib- its removing cans out of dumpsters behind bars. He stated he believed people should be able to remove the cans if they are quiet and leave the premises clean. Mayor Mays stated the city would be working with Rainbow Disposal on an imminent proposal. Michael Couev, Dave Burris, Debbie Cook, Dianne EAsierling, spoke in opposi- tion of Pierside Village. Robert London Moore. Jr., representing Mills Land & Water Co., stated that Mills was not ready to work with the coalition until the City, Coastal Commission, and Fish & Game are in agreement. He presented a letter to Council from himself for Mills Land & Water Company, dated January 3, 1990, regarding "Wetlands Coalition". Chauncey A. Alex -an er, Health Care Task Force United Way Orange County, com- mended Fire Chief Picard for his support of maintaining the trauma center at Fountain Valley. He stated he believed four trauma centers are needed.in the county and requested Council to express their support to the County Board of Supervisors. Chris Craig stated he believed a rotational election of the mayor should be Implemented. He spoke in opposition of Pierside Village. George Arnold stated there were some streets in need of painting and alleys in need of cleaning. He stated he didn't believe the surfers should b.e changing their clothes on Pacific Coast Highway. Diana Boom stated she was a supporter of the Save Our Parks Charter Amendment Initiative. She stated she did not believe the Council is responsive to the citizens of Huntington Beach but to special interest groups. She spoke in opposition of the proposed golf course in Central Park, and she invited the public to enjoy the endangered view of the sunset at 4:30 p.m. at. Ellis Avenue and Edwards Street. Page 3 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/94 Stephen Kane distributed leaflets to Council pertaining to downtown redevelop- ment and stated his opposition regarding development and construction by special interest groups. He recommended appointing a blue ribbon committee regarding land sale and use to serve for 30 days and report back to the. City of Huntington Beach. He spoke in opposition of Pierside Village. Ed Mubelt spoke in support of a track from Garfield Avenue to the city of Los Angeles to provide rail transportation. He spoke in support of putting a one cent sales tax increase for transportation on the ballot in June. Jo Christian -Craig stated she was upset that the State Lands Commission believed that the majority of people in Huntington Beach were in favor of Pierside Village. She stated she did not this to be true. She requested that study sessions be conducted with public notice so that the citizens would be aware. She stated the pier needed to be rebuilt but voiced opposition of building on the beach. James Townsend, Treasurer of Council on Aging, requested Council to support the item pertaining to the addition to the Senior Citizens Center. Charles Reincg his home has been negatively impacted due to construction blocking his ocean view. He stated he believed a new Environmental Impact Report should be issued for the proposed project in the Huntington Harbor Bay Club Specific Plan with no extra height given. Roy Richardson stated he did not agree with the process by which the park acquisition Development Fee was computed. He used a slide to present figures he believed were used to figure the fee. Bgb Biddle spoke in opposition of Pierside Village and distributed a letter to Council, dated December 29, 1989, from State Lands Commission regarding Pierside Village. Allison Arvizu stated she was in junior lifeguards and that she was in opposi- tion to building on the beach. She spoke in support of the Save Our Parks Charter Amendment initiative. Randall Vyduna spoke in support of the proposed 18-hole golf course at Central Park. J. H. KraUs spoke regarding building in the Holly-Seacliff Master Plan and wanted to know if the citizens or the developer would be paying the cost. �.1�.►1+1.`Slixll►�i.��.tGd�iLLl��'�11ii_���LS�S� �.�r���i*11L'?L7'l�. The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing continued open from December 4, 1989 to consider the following : APPLICATIOfi NUMBER: ).Zone Change No. 89-3/Negative Declaration No. 89-21, 2.Zone Change No. 89-4/Negative Declaration No. 89-37. APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 140 Page 4 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 LOCATION: 1. Z ng eChange No. 89-3: 703, 705, 709 and 711 Oceanhill Drive; 1416, 1420, 1502, 1504, 1509, 1511 and 1513 Lakeside Lane 2. Zone Change No. 89-4: 817 Oceanhill Drive EXISTING ZONE: (Q)-OTSP-2-0 (Qualified Oldtown Specific Plan District 2 - Combined with Oil Production) REQUEST: To remove the --0 (Oil Production) suffix from existing residential zoning on 12 lots in the Oldtown Area. ENVIRO MENTAL STATUS: Zone Change No. 89-3 is covered by Negative Declaration No. 89-21, which the Council will also consider. Zone Change No. 89-4 is covered by Negative Declaration 89-37, which the Council will also consider. Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk's Office by staff had been mailed, published and posted. No communications or written protests were received on the matter. The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 3029 for Council consideration - "AN ORDINANCE: OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTION 9061 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF DISTRICT MAP 12 FROM (Q) OLDTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN - DISTRICT 2 - COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION TO (Q) OLDTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN - DISTRICT 2 - ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF OCEANHILL DRIVE, AND EAST AND WEST OF LAKESIDE LANE." (In order to remove the "0" (Oil Production) suffix from existing residential zoning on 12 lots in the Oldtown area.) The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 3030 for Council consideration - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTION 9061 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF DISTRICT MAP 12 FROM (Q) OLDTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN - DISTRICT 2 - COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION TO (Q) OLDTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN - DISTRICT 2, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF OCEANHILL DRIVE AT THE NORTH TERMINUS OF LAKESIDE LANE." (In order to remove the "0" (Oil Production) suffix from existing residential zoning on 12 lots in the Oldtown area. The Community Development Director presented a staff report. The Mayor declared the public hearing open. Pat Davis, representing Angus Petroleum, stated the reason the lots were available was due to the Angus Consolidation Project. She thanked Council for their foresight on the proposed project. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written the hearing was closed by the Mayor. A motion was made by Bannister, seconded by Silva, to approve Negative Declar- ation #89-21, approve Zone Change 89-3 and after reading by title, approve introduction of Ordinance No. 3029, to approve Negative Declaration No. 89-37, approve Zone Change 89-4 and after reading by title, approve intro- duction of Ordinance No. 3030. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: None (Green - out of the room) 1 Page 5 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 (City Council) PUBLIC HEARING - HOLLY-SEACLIFF MASTER PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 89-1 - APPROVED AS MODIFIED BY COUNCIL - ADQPTED RES NQL 6097 & (SEE RECDNSInERATION ON PAGE 12 (440.30) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the following: APPLICATION NUMBER: Holly-Seacliff Master Plan & Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1 S B E T: The Holly-Seacliff Master Plan and EIR 89-1 analyze amendments and policy additions to the Huntington Beach Land Use Element, Circulation Element, Community Facilities Element, Open Space/Conservation Element, Recreation Element, Housing Element, Seismic/Safety Element, Noise Element and Coastal Element. Issues addressed include land uses, street alignments, topography, trails, parks, archaeology, sewers and other items. APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach (Initiated by Huntington Beach Company) LOCATION: The Holly-Seacliff Master Plan 'is a 768 acre area generally bounded by Ellis Avenue to the north, Huntington and Main Streets to the east, York- town and Clay Avenues to the south and the bluff edge west of Edwards Street to the west. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1. COASTAL ZONE: A portion of the subject property is within the jurisdiction of the Coastal Commission, therefore, that portion will be forwarded to the Coastal Commission for final approval. Portions of the property are located within both the Appealable and Non -appealable portions of the Coastal Zone. Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk's Office by staff had been mailed, published and posted. No communications or written protests were received on the matter. The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 6097 for Council consideration - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 89-1 FOR THE HOLLY-SEACLIFF MASTER PLAN." The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 6098 for Council consideration - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING THE HOLLY-SEACLIFF MASTER PLAN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT." The Community Development Director presented a staff report. .Gene, H5_U , representing FORMA Consultants, gave a slide presentation of an overview of the planning process. Fire Chief Picard presented a staff report. In answer to Councilwoman Winchell's inquiry, Chief Picard stated he believed the following two provisions should be added: a Mello Roos Act Provision as It relates to future development contributing towards the equipping or the location of a fire station and that the safety element be strengthened in the1 4 2 , document as it relates to paramedic and fire services. Page 6 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 Police Chief Ron Lowenberg presented a staff report. Discussion between staff and Council on widening Goldenwest to a full six -lane primary arterial. The Community Development Director stated it should be stated in the circulation element of the GPA and identified on the map. In response to Councilman Green's inquiry, Bruce Gilmer, Traffic Engineer. explained the map in regards to the arterial highway. The Mayor declared the hearing open. Daniel Scott asked Council if they were aware of the wetlands in Area Cl Pro- posed Land Use where there is a proposed four -acre park. He asked if there had been a natural Environmental Impact Report done. The Community Develop- ment Director stated that there had been one prepared. Bill Holman, representing the applicant, spoke in support of the proposed Holly-Seacliff Master Plan. He reviewed the benefits of the plan to the community, He explained the timing of the different areas of the Specific Plan. In answer to Councilman Erskine's inquiry, he stated he believed devel- opment would proceed most rapidly in plan Area B, Area D, area north of Sea - cliff Country Club, and Area C. He stated Area A would trail those areas and Area E would be the last. Diana Boom spoke of three concerns. She stated the shopping center located across the street from a K5 school should remain at seven acres. She ques- tioned whether Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan is incorporated into the plan because she wanted to make sure the interim barrier in Area B remains in tact until that five -acre portion is developed. She requested the extension of the Gothard industrial corridor to Garfield rather than stopping at Ellis Avenue. John Fisher, Holly Seacliff Homeowner's Association President, stated they are not in favor of the commercialization of Edwards Street, that it would cause a problem with the elementary school and the commercial should be at Goldenwest and Garfield Avenue. He stated nothing had been done to guarantee the five - acre parks approved in the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan. He stated the Association had $108,000 set aside to develop a community park. He requested the consideration of a fire station on the west side of Edwards Street. Gerald Chapman stated his concern about the elimination of the 16 acres of office professional space at Main and Huntington Street. He stated the pro- posal of 5.000 units in that area would eliminate adequate parking for health care facilities. He stated the people at the study sessions.were in support of the community shopping center being seven acres. ChaunCgy Alexander_, Huntington Beach Tomorrow Vice President, stated that they concluded the Holly Seacliff Environmental Impact Report for the Holly -Sea -- cliff Plan is inadequate for the following reasons: (1.) traffic data, (2.) economic evaluation of industrial versus residential land utilization, and (3.) time lines for mitigation measures discussed in the Environmental Impact Report for infrastructures. He requested the item be continued until the aforementioned section of the Environmental Impact Report are complete. 143 Page 7 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 Terry Dolton, representing Huntington Beach Tomorrow, addressed traffic con- cerns. He stated that the Holly Seacliff and Bolsa Chica developments should receive the same kind of traffic studies, that they should be evaluated with the same model and with the same data. He requested delaying implementation of the project. Tom Livgngood, representing Amigos de Bolsa Chica, requested continuing the Holly Seacliff Master Plan. He stated regional planning with the County is needed for both the Bolsa Chica and Holly Seacliff Master Plan. He stated the city traffic study was not adequate. Bob Mandic spoke in favor of the Land Use Plan that proposes 4,410 units. He stated his business is in the industrial C7 area, and he supports it remaining industrial. He spoke in opposition of mixed use. He stated that on Page 60 of the Environmental impact Report under Truck Operations, it states that business hours are to be 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. He stated he must have 24 hour business hours. He inquired who would be paying for the street improvement costs. Peter Von Elten, representing two property owners south of Garfield, stated they were in support of the staff's alternate plan 8 which is the mixed use for the Gothard strip. CL.tre Dellemann, Village Court Homeowner's Association Board of Directors which is adjacent to the Holly Seacliff area, would like medium density in the area adjacent to their homes instead of medium high. They are in support of the proposed plan. Jerry Galich spoke in favor of the Holly Seacliff Plan and in maintaining the Gothard Industrial Corridor for industrial use. Michael Ramsey spoke in support of more industrial space rather than residen- tial . He stated he believed Area C should continue to be industrial area to supply more jobs Tom Bacot, member of the Central Park Estates Homeowners' Association, stated he is opposed to the proposed area of the driving range. doesn't understand reason for commercial center since Seacliff is never full. Saddleback is owned by city and never swept, street is neglected. Ellis seems to be the alternate disposal point for Rainbow disposal. No one that parks there does anything but dumps trash. Debbie _Gook stated her request to have the acre park in the quartersection identified on the map. She stated they have the money to develop it and would like to see it spelled out on the map. Do ._14ndi iak questioned the map designation for the Class 1 bike trail and equestrian trail. The Community Development Director stated the area designated on the map would accommodate both the bike trail and the equestrian trail and that they would run parallel. Mark Porter, representing Huntington Beach Tomorrow, spoke regarding Page 15 of Holly Seacliff document stating that the idea was to have a connection between Edwards Street and Seapoint Avenue which would be good traffic plan- ning but would result in less units. He stated that he believed industrial zoning should be protected with focus on jobs not on houses. 144. Page 8 -- Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8190 There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Mays, to certify as adequate Environmental Impact Report 89-1 for the Holly-Seacliff Master Plan with facts, findings and statement of overriding consideration, including initial mitigation.on traffic impacts. Hal Simmons, Senior Planner, reported on the significant environmental effects which is the subject of overriding considerations as set forth in the document entitled, "Holly Seacliff General Plan Amendment, Volume 1, Page 38-43. Councilwoman Winchell stated she wanted wording for the mitigation of wetlands in the open space conservation element and that boundary errors exist in the document. Hal Simmons stated he would put the wording to mitigate wetlands in the Open Space Conservation Element of the document. Mike Adams, Community Development Director, stated the Council is acting on a draft document and that the errors would be corrected. The motion made by Mays, seconded by MacAllister, to certify as adequate Environmental Impact Report 89-1 for the Holly-Seacliff Master Plan with facts, findings and statement of overriding consideration, including initial mitigation on traffic impacts, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: None Discussion was held regarding a mixed use commercial site. The City Administrator stated the staff should investigate and bring back to Council infrastructure funding, method of funding additional police and fire staffing. A motion was made by Mays, seconded by Erskine, to maintain the commercial center to seven acres. The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Silva, Erskine NOES: Bannister (Later in the meeting Erskine changed his vote to "no") ABSENT: None The Community Development Director stated that in conjunction with the commer- cial center staff recommends to eliminate the commercial center of (4) four acres at Garfield and Main. Staff recommends it to be medium high residential. A motion was made by Erkskine, seconded by Mays, to disapprove of staff recom- mendation to eliminate the commercial center of (4) four acres at Garfield and Main and to leave it as shown in the proposed land use plan. The motion carried by the following roll call Straw vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None 145. ABSENT: None Page 9 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Erskine, to maintain the commer- cial Center at Garfield and Edwards, not to move it. The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Silva, Erskine NOES: Green, Mays, Bannister ABSENT: None A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Winchell, to continue to allow Industrial east of Gothard Street by changing Areas C4, C3, C2, and C5 to mixed development use but not increased in density and leave east side of transportation corridor medium density. In the mixed development area north of Garfield Avenue commercial shall not be the primary use, but shall be permitted as an ancillary part of overall development. Also, realign Gothard Street as staff recommended. The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Erskine NOES: Bannister, Silva ABSENT: None A motion was made by Erskine, seconded by MacAllister, to maintain Goldenwest as an AA major arterial from Coast Highway to Ellis with full 14' median land- scaping. The motion carried by the following roil call straw vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Mays, to put together a policy statement that the developer take care of the safety needs and fire and police area, to approve the following five policy statements stated by the Community Development Director: 1. Development should be contingent on availability of infrastructure including water, 2. Traffic mitigation measures include the emergency response language consistent with the Growth Management plan, 3. To permit resource production in limited areas, 4. Modify the safety element to include a statement that the cost associated with development of police and fire facility as well as other emergency delivery services should be partially or totally funded by developments within this project area, 5. A wetlands policy consistent with the mitigation language to be incorporated. The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote, AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion was made by Mays, seconded by Erskine, to direct staff to look at a Mello Roos or other financing mechanism for the area to take care of the fire and police department funding needs as a possibility The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: None 46 Page 10 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 A motion was made by Wi nchel l , seconded by Green, to change the reference on Page 16 policy 4.1 from referencing a golf course to the words "private open space". The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: MacAllister ABSENT: None A motion was made by Winchell, seconded by Green, to designate a minimum park site of four -acres in denoted areas and add a park in Area E. The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: Bone The Community Development Director stated the expansion of neighborhood parks will mean there is less money to develop Linear Park. A motion was made by Erskine, seconded by MacAllister, to reconsider Area 6 for park designation, to maintain it as the Planning Commission recommended with no park. The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: MacAllister, Mays, Silva, Erskine NOES: Winchell, Green ABSENT: None (Bannister - out of the room) In response to Councilman MacAllister's inquiry, Bruce Gilmer explained the Seapoint alignment with Edwards. A motion was made by Mays, seconded by MacAllister, to adopt Resolution No. 6098 as modified by Council and the straw votes. The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: None See Page 12 for motion to reconsider and final action. Public hearing closed on 3/21/88 and study session held on June 20, 1988 on an appeal by the Huntington Beach Company of the Planning Commission's denial of Zone Change No. 87-16 and Negative Declaration No. 87-49 on February 17, 1988. Zone Change No. 87-16 is a request by the Huntington Beach Company to rezone 55.5 gross acres generally located at the northwest corner of Edwards Street and Garfield Avenue which are presently designated with three different zoning classifications. The request is to change the zoning as follows: 1. Approximately 43 acres from RA-01 (Residential Agricultural combined with Oil Production) to R1-(2)-01-10,000 (Low Density Residential-2 units per acre -with a minimum 10,000 square foot lot size -combined with Oil 4 7 Production); 1 Page 11 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 2. Approximately .5 acres from RA-0-CZ (Residential Agricultural combined with Oil Production in the Coastal Zone) to R1-(2)-0-10,000-CZ (Low Density Residential-2 units per acre with a minimum 10,000 square foot lot size -combined with Oil Production in the Coastal Zone), and 3. Approximately 12 acres from RA-01-•CZ (Residential Agricultural combined with Oil Production and Drilling in the Coastal Zone) to R1-(2)-01-10,000-•CZ (Low Density Residential-2 units per .acre -with a minimum 10,000 square foot size lot -combined with Oil Production and 00.11ing in the Coastal Zone). The applicant is appealing the Planning Commission's denial based on the following reasons. 1. Huntington Beach Company disagrees with staff's analysis and findings for denial. 2. The requested zoning is clearly consistent with the General Plan and compatible with other land uses and development in the area. 3. Adequate environmental documentation exists to assess the impacts of the existing land use designation and proposed zoning. The applicant has agreed to a condition requiring supplemental environmental assessment prior to any development entitlement. 4. Approval of the requested zoning will not establish a boundary for the proposed linear park. In response to the Planning Commission's denial, the applicant has requested the addition of the "Q" suffix to the zoning to conditionally require environ- mental analysis prior to the approval of any development entitlement on the property. -ENV-IRQNMEN.IAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No.. 87-49 has been processed in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, 1986 and wi11 also be considered 'by Council. .,STATUS.: Pursuant to Section 989.5.0 a coastal development permit. is not.necessary with this application on parcels located in the coastal zone. A motion was made by Mays, seconded by Erskine, to withdraw the appeal to Planning Commission denial of Zone Change No. 87-16/Negative Declaration No. 87-49 at 'the request of the applicant. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Ninchell, Green, days, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: None RECESS - RECONVENE The Mayor called a recess of Council at 10:45 p.m: The meeting was reconvened at 11:10 p.m. Page 12 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 (City ( ounci 1 S ^POLIC HEARIN(i - REQUEST FOR TAXICA8 RATE INCREASE - COAST YELLOW RATIV 1 1 ADOPTED (940.60) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing pursuant to Section 5.48 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code to consider a request by Coast Yellow Cab Cooperative, Inc. for taxicab rate increase. Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk's Office by staff had been mailed, published and posted. No communications or written protests were received on the matter. The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 6101 for Council consideration - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING NEW SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR TAXICAB COMPANIES." The Public Works Director presented a staff report. The Mayor declared the public nearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written the hearing was closed by the Mayor. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Silva, to adopt Resolution No. 6101 establishing new rate schedule for taxicab service originating in Huntington Beach. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: None HOLLY SEACLIFF MASTER PLAN RECONSIDERATION - ACTION RE INDE - NEW ACTION TAKEN 10 AQQPT RESOLUTION N9 602D AS RE NDE BY PLANNING COMMI I (440.30) A motion was made by Erskine, seconded by MacAllister, to reconsider the MD designation, leave Planning Commission recommendation intact, to reconsider the Holly Seacliff Master Plan for that purpose alone.. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: Winchell, Green ABSENT: None A motion was made by Erskine, seconded by MacAllister, to move the Planning Commission designation for that item, mixed development north of Garfield and restore the Planning Commission recommendation as follows: industrial on the west side of Gothard Street south of Crystal Street, medium -high density and. medium density residential on the east side of Gothard Street. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: Winchell, Green ABSENT: None The City Clerk asked if the resolution should be introduced. again as amended. 1 Page 13 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 The Community Development Director stated that is correct if the maker of the motion is modifying the resolution to amend the former action on the resolution. Councilman Erskine stated that was his intent. The City Attorney suggested that Council revote. A motion was made by Erskine, seconded by MacAllister, modify the prior Resolution No. 6098 to include the Planning Commission recommendation for areas C2, C4, C5 and the area designated as M between Gothard and the trans- portation corridor and to include the Planning Commission recommended Gothard alignment. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: Winchell, Green ABSENT: None i it) _2115BLIC HEARING "EA PLANNING DENIAL F CQNQITIONAL USE PERMIT N . -CONDITIONAL EXCEPTIOM(VARIANCE) NO. - C085TAL DEVELP ENT PERMIT NO, 897-20- ADEWACY OF ENVIRONMENTALMP REPORT - APPEAL DENIED - APPLICATIQNS APPROVED(420.40) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the following appeal filed by Councilmen Jim Silva and Wes Bannister. SUBJECT: Appeal to the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 89-36/Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-53/Coastal Develop- ment Permit No. 89-20 and the adequacy of Environmental Impact Report No. 82-3 due to the amount of time and potential cumulative Impacts which have occurred within the City since the original Environmental Impact Report circulated in 1982. APPLICANT: Coultrup Development Co. APPELLANTS: Councilmen Jim Silva and Wes Bannister LOCATION: 4123 Warner Avenge (Huntington Harbor Bay Club located north of Warner Avenue approximately 100 feet west of Edgewater Lane). Z NE: Huntington Harbor Bay Club Specific Plan REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit No. 89-36/Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-53/Coastal Development Permit No. 89-20 is a request to construct a 36 unit residential condominium project in lieu of a previously approved 42 unit residential condominium project with a variance to exceed the maximum three stories and build faun stories. The appeal is based on the adequacy of Environmental Impact .Report No. 82-3. -ENY ONMENTAL STATUS: Covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 82-3 which was certified by the City Council on February 7, 1983. CQASTALT This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone. Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party. Said appeal must be in 150 1 Page 14 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8190 writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved. Said appeal must be submitted to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days of the date of the City Council's action. There is no fee for the appeal of a coastal development permit. An aggrieved person may file an appeal to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources Code, in writing to: California Coastal Commission 245 W. Broadway, Suite 380 POB 1450 Long Beach, California 90801-1450 (213) 590-5071 The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised not to begin construction prior to that date. Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk's Office by staff had been mailed, published and posted. No communications or written protests were received on the matter. The Community Development Director presented a staff report. The Mayor declared the hearing open. Jon Coultrun, applicant, explained the proposed project and stated he was available to answer questions. Councilman Silva stated he believed the bay and racket club were tied together because of locale and requested the following conditions: (1.) Dockmaster to be on site from 6 a.m. to midnight to reduce live aboards, (2.) Marina to provide a pumpout facility for the marina, (3.) Removal of side ties from marina, (4.) Because of inadequate parking at this time, close down the ban- quet facilities, (S.) Require a complete site plan which would include loca- tion of dumpsters, and requirements for frequency of pickup and enclosures of equipment, (6.) Provide a plan for worker parking, (7.) Require a copy of the CC&R's for condos to prohibit renting or subleasing of boat slips, (B.) Remove all liveaboards. Jon Coultrua, applicant, addressed the issues to which Councilman Silva spoke. The Community Development Director stated he had a letter, dated December 1989, from Mr. Ahadpour stating he would be suspending operations in the facilities as of April 1, 1990. Doris Ahadpour stated she was in the process of evicting liveaboards, the pumpout had been piped and should be in in a month, any side tie that projects past the pier headline would be removed. She stated there were none at this time. She stated that she had given notice of suspending all activity in the banquet facilities. She stated boat slips were addressed in escrow and would be addressed in the CC&R's for the condominiums. She stated that dockmasters work 7 a.m.-6p.m., but starting the next day she would put one person on second shift until 10 p.m. 1 Page 15 — Council/Agency Minutes — 1/8/90 Councilman Silva asked Doris Ahadpour if she would put these concerns in writing, and she stated she would. Jon Coultrup presented letters from persons in support of the proposed project to the Council. He agreed to Councilman Bannister's request for the developer to accept as a condition in the agreement the six—foot high fence from Edge— water all the way around Warner including the entrance for the fire department. 5-ill Hartge presented information as to the history of the proposed project. Gerry Betancourt stated he believed the proposed project would enrich the area. Sheldon Grossman spoke in support of the proposed project. Shell Gros-sman spoke in support of the proposed project. Marti Klarin requested a new Environmental Impact Report and distributed letters to the Council from residents of the water side of Edgewater who she stated had just become aware of the project. She referred to a report they had prepared which stated that the new projects built to date resulted in 8,326 trips per day and that soon the Bolsa Chica Bluffs and the wetlands. would have development. She spoke regarding traffic and safety concerns and the speed of traffic on Warner Avenue. Barbara Qevlin requested an updated Environmental Impact Report. She requested that a dock master be on duty 6 a.m. to midnight. She requested a gate in the fence. She stated she did not believe the proposed project was compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and that it would lower her property value. Donna Klein stated opposition to the proposed project due to the noise and traffic element and questioned whether the traffic would always be kept off the insfde residential streets. She stated that studies show that Warner Avenge has, traffic above the county's acceptable rate. She stated that this section of Warner Avenue was already a high accident area. ieanette Sbd r addressed the parking issue and coastal access. She handed out a list of parking needs to the Council stating the parking area was deficient. Norman Smith, President. Huntington Harbour Property Owners Association, stated the position of the Board was to request that the Environmental Impact Report be brought up to date for this project and projects planned for the future. MJchael Cavailo, Huntington Harbour Property Association Board member, stated that he believed the demolishing of the racquet club and the building of con- dominiums should trigger a new Environmental Impact Report. He stated he believed the views would be blocked. He questioned the commitment of the Ahadpours. Richard Harlow, representing Coultrup Development Company, spoke in support of the proposed project. RQY_Richar=n, Subcommittee Chairman of Environmental Board which wrote the report, stated he believed if the Coastal Commission Environmental Impact Report was read it would show the project should not be approved. 152 Page 16 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 Righ Rector, Karen Williamson, and Bill Sham, spoke in support of the proposed project. Oito Strehlow stated he did not believe there was a parking problem. Diane Rector stated she is a realtor in support of the proposed project. M. J. Knitter, architect with Knitter & Associates working with Coultrup Devel- opment Company, spoke in support of the proposed project. Discussion was held between Council and Mr. Coultrup regarding the proposed fence on Edgewater and requirements of the Coastal Commission. Mr. Harlow also spoke. Julia Baily addressed the problems of pollution of water and traffic impact. She requested a review of the Environmental Impact Report. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. A motion was made by Erskine, seconded by MacAllister, to deny the appeal, uphold the Planning Commission decision of November 7, 1989, and certify as adequate Environmental Impact Report No. 82-3 with additional geologic analy- sis, approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-36 and Conditional Exception (Vari- ance) No. 89-53 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-20 with findings and conditions of approval as set forth in the Planning Commission Minutes of November 7, 1989. Discussion Was held between Council, staff, and Jon Coultrup. A motion was made by Green, seconded by Mays, to close debate. The motion FA_ ILEA by the following roll call vote: AYES: Winchell, Green, Silva, Erskine NOES: MacAllister, Bannister, days ABSENT: None The City Attorney stated the motion to close debate required a (2/3) two- thirds majority vote to pass. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Silva, for Council to recess for five minutes. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: Winchell, Green ABSENT: None RECESS - REODNVENE The Mayor called a recess of Council at 1 a.m. The meeting was reconvened at 1:10 a.m. I1 Page 17 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 Vote on Notion The motion made by Erskine, seconded by MacAllister, to deny the appeal, up- hold the Planning Commission decision of November 7, 1989, and certify as.ade- quate Environmental Impact Report No. 82-3 with additional geologic analysis, approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-36 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-53 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-20 with findings and condi- tions of approval as set forth in the Planning Commission Minutes of November 7, 1989 as follows: Findings for Approval -- EIR No. 82-3: 1. No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which will require important revisions in EIR No. 82-3. 2. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstance under which the project is undertaken which would have required important revisions in EIR No. 82-3. 3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available. 4. The approved geologic analysis addresses specific seismic concerns. Findings for.Approval - Conditional Use Permit No. 89-36: I. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 89-36 for the construction of 36 residential condominiums in lieu of 42 residential condominiums will implement the General Plan of the City of. Huntington Beach and the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan. 2. The location, site layout, and design of the structures on the 36 unit residential condominium project will properly adapt them to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner, because final design of each renovated or reconstructed building will be' subject to Design Review Board approval. 3. The access to and parking for the proposed. 36 unit residential condomin- ium project does not create an undue parking problem because all required parking spaces will be provided on -site with 15 excess on -site parking spaces. Findings for Approval - Q4$tal Development Permit. No, 89-N: I. The proposed 36 unit residential condominium project conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Huntington Beach Coastal Element of the General Plan. 2. Coastal Development Permit No. 89-20 is consistent with the CZ (Coastal Zone) suffix, the Downtown Specific Plan, and provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. 3. At the time of occupancy, the proposed 36 unit residential condominium project will be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consis- tent with the Huntington Beach Coastal Element and Coastal Land Use Plan. of the General Plan. 154 Page 18 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 4. The proposed 36 unit residential condominium .project conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act of 1976. Findings for A r l- ConditiQnil Ex r N. 1. The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-53 for four stories in lieu of one story will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to the conforming (land, property, or improvements) in the neighborhood because views will not be blocked. 2. The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-53 of the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan will not defeat the general purposes or intent of the code which is to restrict the maximum height to 45 feet. 3. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed 36 unit residential condominium project will not be detrimental to property values of surrounding structures or the general welfare of persons resid- ing or working in the vicinity; and property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 4. The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89--53 for four stories in lieu of 3 stories will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach because the structures will still conform to the overall maximum height of 45 feet. 5. The applicant is willing and able to carry out the purposes for which Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-53 is sought and will proceed to do so without unnecessary delay. Cgndi_tions of R royal: 1. The site plan and floor plans dated received October 29, 1989, shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. The elevations dated received October 29, 1989, shall be the conceptually approved elevations with the following modifications: a. The Design Review Board shall review and approve the following: (1) Architectural treatment on all building walls. (2) Material for exposed railings within the project. (3) Perimeter fencing plans. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. Submit three copies of the site plan to the. Planning Division for addressing purposes. If street names are necessary, submit proposal to Fire Department for review and approval. 155 Page 19 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 b. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to backflow devices and Edison transformers, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director. C. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, .and central heating units; and low --volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. d. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and indicated on the floor plans. e. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acousti- cal standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL con- tours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in .the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). f. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials proposed. g. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors. If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved. h. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations. i. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. j. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. Submit copy of the revised elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. b. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Constructioh Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which 157 Page 20 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 includes all proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size, quantity), an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an. approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. (1) The landscape plan depicts installation and maintenance of the area at the terminus of Edgewater Lane and the parkway area along Edgewater Lane adjacent to the Bay Club site. (2) The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9608 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits. Any exist- ing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with minimum 36-inch box trees, which shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. c. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit). A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. d. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public Works approval. e. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. f. An Affordable Housing Agreement Plan to provide affordable housing within the Coastal Zone shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. The plan shall provide for minimum 20 percent of the housing units (7 units) either on -site, or the equivalent number off -site within three miles of the coastal zone, for persons or low or moderate income households as per the provisions of Government Code Section 65590(d). g. An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development to assure ade- quate parking is available for employees, customers, contractors, etc., during the project's construction phase. h. Submit copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificate. 5. Fire Department Requirements are as follows: a. Provide automatic fire sprinkler system throughout all buildings. b. All levels shall have combination standpipe connections. C. All roadways shall be designated fire lanes with no parking. d. Provide fire hydrants on -site and on Warner pursuant to Fire Depart- ment requirements. e. Provide emergency access gates along Warner and at Edgewater. f. Marina standpipe systems shall be upgraded to comply with current fire code requirements. I. Page 21 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 g. Every floor shall be accessed by an elevator with the minimum inter- ior dimensions: 618" wide - 4'3" deep with a 42" door. h. Each building shall have separate fire protection and life safety systems with separate addresses. 6. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 7. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other sur- plus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 8. During construction, the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; C. Use low sulfur fuel (.05% by weight) for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 9. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 10. Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed: a. Relocation of banquet parking area to west side of site adjacent to Sceptre Lane. b. The applicant shall restripe the parking lot so that it conforms to provisions of Article 960 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. c. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. d. Dedicate public access along 10-Moot bulkhead walkway adjacent to marina. e. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. 11. All diking, dredging and filling shall be performed in conformance with the Coastal Act (Section 30233). 158 Page 22 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 12. A copy of the CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development and reviewed by the City Attorney's office as to form and content. It shall include a clause prohibiting persons from living aboard any boat docket or moored at the facility. It shall also include a provision which prohibits vehicular access to Edgewater Lane to all but emergency vehicles. 13. Parking lot shall remain open during daytime hours so that the public may have access to the walkwaylbeach. 14. The applicant shall be responsible for all striping, signing, decking and red curb on Warner Avenue: 15. Warner Avenue shall be improved to Public Works Standards. 16. No parking shall be allowed on private 24-foot wide roadway. 17. The applicant shall construct all required storm drain facilities within his project limits and dedicate easements for the master -planned facility. 18. The project shall be phased so that the club facilities shall have suffi- cient parking during the construction of the residential portion. As an alternative, the club portion may be closed during the construction of the residential units, in order to assure that sufficient parking is made available during the construction of the project. 19. Conditional Use Permit No. 89-36, Coastal Development Permit No. 89-20 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-53 shall become null and void unless exercised within two (2) years of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pur- suant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 20. Should a Traffic Impact Fee be adopted by the City Council, the appli- cant/property owner shall be responsible for paying such fee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and/or final building permit approval. 21. The applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying the Park and Recreation Fees in effect at the time the final map is accepted by City Council or issuance by building permits, whichever occurs first. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Mays, Bannister, Erskine NOES: Winchell, Green, Silva ABSENT: None (CitY 1 - INNAL HMING ASSISTANCL PLAN NAP (340.70) The Mayor announced that.this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the annual Housing Assistance Plan goals for the period of October 1, 1989 through'September 30, 1990.. Legal notice as provided to. the City Clerk's Office by staff had been mailed, published and posted. No communications or written protests were received on the matter. Page 23 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/8/90 The Mayor declared the public hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed. either oral or written the hearing was closed by the Mayor. A motion was made by Bannister, seconded by Mays, to approve and authorize staff to submit the annual Housing Assistance Plan to the Department of Hous- ing and Urban Development (HUD), with a wording amendment that appears two places in the document. The document entitled "Housing Assistance P1AN (HAP) Annual Goal Narrative, Attachment #2" shall delete the words "density bonus" to be replaced with "incentives". The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: None MOTION TO DEFER REMAINDER OF AGENDA TO 1122/90 - APPROVED A robti on was made by Bannister, seconded by ,Silva, to defer the remainder of the agenda to the meeting of January 22, 1990. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: Winchell, Green ABSENT: None ADJOURNMENT - COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The Mayor/Chairman adjourned the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to Tuesday, January 16, 1990 at 7 p.m. at 538 Main Street to meet jointly with the Huntington Beach Art Center Foundation and Allied Arts Board. ATTf T: City Clerk/Clerk 7 L� Clerk of the Redeveloofient Agency and City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntingt Beach, California Mayor/Chairman C . . 160