HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-07-17APPROVED 9/18/90
MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
DULY 17, 1990
Council Chambers - Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California
STUDY SESSION - 5:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
P P P P P
ROLL CALL: Shomaker, Mountford, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland,
P P
Bourguignon, Leipzig
A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (4 MINUTES PER PERSON, NO DONATING OF
TIME TO OTHERS) Anyone wishing to speak must fill out and
submit a form to speak prior to Oral Communication or Public
Hearing items. No action can be taken by the Planning
Commission on this date, unless agendized.
None
B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
B-1 USE PERMIT NO. 90-24/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) 90-24
(CONTINUED FROM JULY 10, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
APPLICANT: JAMES C. WILSON, A.I.A.
LOCATION: 17131 Beach Boulevard (northwest corner of Beach
Boulevard and Cypress)
Use Permit No. 90-24 in conjunction with Conditional Exception No.
90-24 is a request to permit the addition of approximately 9,800
square foot commercial building with variance to landscaping and
circulation design requirements. The applications were continued
from the July 10, 1990 Planning Commission meeting, at the request
of the applicant, in an effort to allow the Planning staff,
Redevelopment staff, applicant and owner to review the existing
conditions and previously granted entitlements and to further
analyze the proposed addition.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15303, Class 3, of the California Environmental Quality Act.
REDEVELOPMENT STATUS:
The proposed project is located in the Oakview Redevelopment Project
area generally bounded by Warner Avenue on the north, Slater Avenue
on the south, Beach Boulevard on the east and Nichols Street on the
west. The Oakview Development Project area was adopted by the City
Council in November 1982 and has a project area of approximately 68
acres.
A Disposition and Development Agreement was executed on November 10,
1989, by the Redevelopment Agency and property owner/developer
Philip and Roxanne Zisakis. The Zisakis/Agency project agreement
conveys approximately 12,829 square feet of adjacent agency -owned
land for the potential development of approximately 11,000 square
feet of additional commercial floor area. On June 6, 1990, the
Zoning Administrator approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 90-111 which
subdivided and conveyed agency -owned property to the developer for
the purpose of the development of the proposed project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Use Permit No.
90-24 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-24 as modified
with findings and amended conditions as outlined, along with the
conditions of approval as outlined in the July 10, 1990 Planning
Commission staff report.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
James Wilson, Applicant, 2821 Newport Boulevard, gave a breakdown on
the parking use. He said he reviewed staff alternatives and had
concern for deliveries if the tandem parking was used. He suggested
they use the original door on site plan (on Cypress) for deliveries.
Phil Zisakis, Owner, 17131 Beach Boulevard, expressed concern over
his bay doors and tandem parking. He said deliveries will be
affected by tandem parking, and requested they use the door on
Cypress.
Charles W. Parret, 3200 Park Center Dr., Costa Mesa, spoke in
opposition to the request and staff recommendations. He was
concerned that an environmental review was not required. Mr. Parret
also stated that the circulation design would provide reciprocal
access easements between Lichter (neighboring property owner) and
the applicant. He said that Mr. Lichter would not approve this
plan. He was also concerned with the traffic circulation, noise,
gas and liability that would affect Mr. Lichter.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -2- (6867d)
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
A discussion ensued among the Commissioners regarding the expansion
for current use and future use. They also questioned what expansion
was dependent upon the proposed parking structure across the
street. They were also concerned with the parking, some felt it was
inadequate and would create a problem.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE USE
PERMIT NO. 90-24 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 90-24 WITH
MODIFIED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: Mountford, Williams
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO AMEND THE
PREVIOUS MOTION BY ALLOWING AN ENTRANCE TO THE PROJECT FROM CYPRESS
IN THE CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Williams, Ortega, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: Mountford, Kirkland
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO 90-24:
1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and existing
development of the subject property, there appears to be
exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that
does not apply generally to property or type of uses in the
same district.
2. Since the subject property was previously developed with
reduced regular established development standards, such a
conditional exception for deviations from the circulation
design standards to allow interior (4) parking credit is
necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights.
3. Granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-24 for
deviations from the circulaion design standards would not
constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations
upon properties in the vicinity.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -3- (6867d)
L
U
4. Exceptional circumstances do apply that deprive the subject
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same
zone classifications. Previous entitlements permitted
reductions and deviation from the applicable Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code requirements.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - USE PERMIT N0, 90-24:
1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed
addition and expansion to an existing 2,500 square foot
commercial building as modified will not be detrimental to:
a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the
vicinity.
b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or
building.
2. The granting of Use Permit No. 90-24 for the addition and
expansion to an existing 2,500 square foot commercial building
as modified will not adversely affect the General Plan of the
City of Huntington Beach. The proposed improvements to the
commercial building as modified will insure commercial
development that is economically viable, attractive, well
related to other land uses and satisfies the needs of the
residents of Huntington Beach.
3. The proposed addition and expansion to an existing commercial
building as modified is consistent with the goals and
objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Maps. The
Land Use Element designation of General Commercial provides
criteria for commercial uses and designates commercial/office
uses as a function of the commercial land use.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The site plan, dated May 24, 1990, shall be the conceptually
approved layout with the following modifications:
a. One (1) service bay door and drive approach shall be
permitted on Cypress Avenue along with the two (2) service
bay doors to the rear (west) of the building.
b. The approved on -site occupied floor area is as follows:
1. 1st Floor:
Glass Shop - 2,875 square feet
Office - 2,473 square feet
PC Minutes 7/17/90
-4-
(6867d)
2. 2nd Floor: Office - 4,292 square feet
3. 3rd Floor: Storage - 2,000 square feet
(Unoccupied) - 735 square feet
TOTAL - 12,375 square feet
2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner
shall complete the following:
a. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to
backflow devices and Edison transformers, on the site
plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior
yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or
other method as approved by the Community Development
Director.
b. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical
shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers;
natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking
facilities, water heaters, and central heating units; and
low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water
faucets.
c. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials as
approved by the Design Review Board on June 7, 1990.
d. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any
view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible
with the building in terms of materials and colors. If
screening is not designed specifically into the building, a
rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing
screening and must be approved.
e. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor
lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All
outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage"
onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site
plan and elevations.
f. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered
Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil
sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide
detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and
fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and
utilities.
g. The Design Review Board shall review and approve the
following:
(1) Revised site plan and elevations as modified pursuant
to Condition No. 1.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -5- (6867d)
(2) Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible
with existing structures.
(3) All signage proposed.
h. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all
conditions of approval imposed on the project printed
verbatim.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner
shall complete the following:
a. Submit copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and
elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and
approval and inclusion in the entitlement file.
b. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the
Departments of Community Development and Public Works and
must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall
include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State
Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all
proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size,
quantity), an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved
site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of
approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with
Section 9608 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
c. Landscape irrigation system shall be designed and
constructed to include a separate water line for the use of
reclaimed water subject to Water Department approval.
d. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of
Public Works for review and it must be approved (by
issuance of a grading permit). A plan for silt control for
all water runoff from the property during construction and
initial operation of the project may be required if deemed
necessary by the Director of Public Works.
e. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid.
f. The subject property shall submit an irrevocable offer for
reciprocal driveway and parking easement(s) between the
subject site and adjacent (north, west) properties. A copy
of the legal instrument shall be approved by the Community
Development Department and the City Attorney as to form and
content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office
of the County Recorder. A copy shall be filed with the
Department of Community Development.
g. Tentative Parcel Map No. 90-111 shall be recorded with the
Orange County Recorder prior to issuance of a building
permit and a copy submitted to the Department of Community
Development.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -6- (6867d)
1
h. The applicant shall file a parcel map request to
consolidate the subject lots into one (1) lot. The parcel
map shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a
copy of the recorded map filed with the Department of
Community Development prior to final inspection or
occupancy.
4. The Public Works Department requirements are as follows:
a. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet
(271) in width and shall be of radius -type construction.
b. Dedicate 7 feet on Cypress Avenue and a 28 foot corner
right-of-way radius at Beach Boulevard and Cypress Avenue.
C. Improve Cypress Avenue to Public Work's standards.
d. Underground existing overhead utilities on Cypress Avenue.
e. Construct drainage system on Cypress Avenue.
f. Submit grading plan for review and approval.
g. The developer will be responsible for the payment of any
additional fees adopted in the "upcoming" Water Division
Financial Master Plan.
5. Fire Department Requirements are as follows:
a. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and
installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations.
b. Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire
Department, shall be posted and marked.
c. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. If fire lane
violations occur and the services of the Fire Department
are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses
incurred.
d. A Class 111 wet standpipe system (combination) will be
installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department
and Uniform Building Code standards.
e. A fire alarm system will be installed to comply with
Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code
standards.
f. Fire extinguishers will be installed to comply with
Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code
standards.
PC Minutes 7/17/90
-7-
(6867d)
g. Elevators will be sized to accommodate an ambulance
gurney. Minimum 6 foot-8 inches wide by 4 feet-3 inches
deep with minimum 42 inch opening.
h. Address numbers will be installed to comply with Huntington
Beach Fire Code standards.
i. Submit to the Fire Department for approval a Fire
Protection Plan containing requirements of Fire Department
Specification No. 426.
j. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and
Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards.
6. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of
the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department.
7. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and
other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an
off -site facility equipped to handle them.
8. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems
shall be completed prior to final inspection/within twelve (12)
months.
9. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts,
equipment or trailers.
10. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building.
11. During construction, the applicant shall:
a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where
vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised
when leaving the site;
b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is
completed for the day;
c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05% by weight) for construction
equipment;
d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to
avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts);
e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts.
12. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to
8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal
holidays.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -8- (6867d)
13. Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed:
a. All signs shall be in compliance with the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code. (Article 961)
b. The applicant shall restripe the parking lot so that it
conforms to provisions of Article 960 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code and staff's alternative site plan
(Attachment No. 4).
c. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property
shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans
and conditions of approval specified herein.
d. The applicant shall post a bond with the Community
Development Department, in an amount to be determined by
the Director of Planning, to insure that the landscaping
along Cypress Avenue, as shown in staff's alternative
(Attachment No. 4) site plan, shall be constructed at such
time as the two (2) parking spaces can be replaced.
e. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein
shall be accomplished.
f. The third floor storage area windows shall be opaque or of
a similar type (non -see through) subject to the review and
approval of the Director of Planning to ensure that the
area will be used as storage. At such time as the floor
area changes use, the window areas may be changed to
provide lighting.
14. Should a Traffic Impact Fee be adopted by the City Council, the
applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying such
fee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and/or
final building permit approval.
15. The third floor lease space (storage, unoccupied) shall not be
issued a certificate of occupancy until adequate parking can be
demonstrated and/or provided.
16. Any change of use in the auto glass shop and storage area shall
require a parking study to verify adequate parking is provided
prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
17. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Use Permit
No. 90-24 if any violation of these conditions or the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs.
18. Use Permit No. 90-24 shall become null and void unless
exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or
such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning
Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the
Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration
date.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -9- (6867d)
B-2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-1 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS/ TENTATIVE
TRACT NO. 14182/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-4 (CONTINUED FROM
JULY 10, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING)
APPLICANT: THE LOUIE GROUP
LOCATION: 17182 and 17192 Ash Street
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-1 with Special Permits and Tentative
Tract No. 14182 is a request to subdivide one parcel into 7 numbered
lots and 1 lettered lot to construct 7 three-story townhomes.
Special Permits are requested for : 1) relief from one-third of the
units less than three-story; 2) reduction of access width; 3)
reduction of front -to -front building separation; 4) parking spaces
within 15 feet of the dwelling; 5) relief from the 15 foot setback
from the vehicular accessway; 6) relief from the required 20 foot
setback for fifty percent of the garages; 7) permitting the rear
yards to be credited toward the required private open -space; and 8)
a reduced minimum dimension for the main recreation area pursuant to
Section 915 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
On July 10, 1990, the Planning Commission continued this item to
July 17, 1990, due to the lateness of the hour and the absence of
the applicant.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time,
the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative
Declaration No. 90-4 for twenty-one (21) days, and no comments,
either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial
study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be
issued. Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. 90-1 with
Special Permits or Tentative Tract No. 14182, it is necessary for
the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration
No. 90-4.
REDEVELOPMENT STATUS:
The subject property is located within the Oakview Redevelopment
Project Area.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE:
On June 14, 1990, the Subdivision Committee reviewed Tentative Tract
No. 14182. After discussion between the applicant, City staff and
the Committee regarding the project, the Subdivision Committee
recommended approval to the Planning Commission by a unanimous vote
(see attached draft minutes). It should be noted, however, that the
Subdivision Committee review is limited to subdivision issues such
as vehicular access, the availability of sewer and water services,
potential impacts on police and fire services, etc. Although the
Subdivision Committee has recommended approval of Tentative Tract
No. 14182, that recommendation does not include a recommendation on
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-1 which is for the actual project.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -10- (6867d)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following
action:
A. Approve Negative Declaration No. 90-4; and
B. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 90-1 with Special Permits and
Tentative Tract No. 14182 with findings and conditions of
approval.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
Louis Hernandes, Applicant, 210 Adams, explained the purpose of the
project was to upgrade the area.
Isac Benio, Investor, 2062 Lida Lane, Anaheim, told the Commissioners
that the pupose for building this project was to improve the area, it
was not for the money.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
A discussion ensued among the Commissioners concerning affordability,
no specific market forces will make it affordable. They also want to
see a balance of rental units with for sale units. Another concern
was putting an oversize project on the land of its size and area.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MOUNTFORD, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO APPROVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-1 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, TENTATIVE TRACT
NO. 14182 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-4 WITH FINDINGS AND
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland,
Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 90-1:
1. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed 7 unit
townhome development properly adapts the proposed structures
to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses
in a harmonious manner.
2. The proposed 7 unit townhome development is compatible with
surrounding properties in terms of density, architecture and
orientation.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -11- (6867d)
3. The access to and parking for the proposed 7 unit townhome
development does not create an undue traffic problem.
4. The planned residential development for 7 unit townhomes
conforms to the provisions contained in Article 915 except for
the Special Permit requests.
5. Conditional Use Permit No. 90-1 for 7 townhomes is consistent
with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and
Land Use Map designation.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMITS:
1. The following special permits promote a better living
environment by adapting the Planned Residential Development
requirements which are compatible with the surrounding area:
a. Relief from one-third of units less than three-story.
b. Reduction of access width.
c. Reduction of front -to -front building separation.
d. Parking spaces within 15 feet of the dwelling area.
e. Relief from the 15 foot setback for the dwelling from the
vehicular accessway.
f. Relief from the required 20 foot setback for 50 percent of
the garages.
g. Permitting the rear yards to be credited toward the
required private open space.
h. A reduced minimum dimension for the main recreation area.
2. The requested special permits allow for a project that
increases the area of the useable common open space and main
recreation areas, allows for more livable units, provides
increased landscaping and reduced site coverage, provides an
additional parking space, provides generally affordable
housing, promotes housing stock recycling within the Oakview
Redevelopment Project Area, and may promote neighborhood
stability by providing "for -sale" units.
3. The requested special permits provide for maximum use of
aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, landscaping,
design and building layout.
4. The requested special permits will not be detrimental to the
general health, welfare, safety and convenience, nor
detrimental or injurious to the value of property or
improvements of the neighborhood or of .the City in general.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -12- (6867d)
0
E
5. The requested special permits are consistent with the
objectives of the Planned Residential Development standards in
achieving a development adapted to the terrain and compatible
with the surrounding environment.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT N0, 14182:
1. The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design
features of the proposed subdivision for 7 townhomes are in
compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file
with the City as well as in compliance with the State
Subdivision Map Act and the supplemental City Subdivision
Ordinance.
2. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land
use at the time that the General Plan designation of Medium
Density Residential and R2 (15 units per gross acre) zoning
were implemented.
3. The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the
proposed density of 15 units per gross acre.
4. Tentative Tract No. 14182 for 7 townhomes is consistent with
the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 90-1:
1.
2.
The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated
June 28, 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout with
the following modification:
a. Interior side yard elevations shall receive additional
architectural treatment subject to review and approval of
the Planning Director.
b. A trash enclosure shall be provided. This requirement may
be waived if Rainbow Disposal agrees to individual unit
pickup.
Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner
shall complete the following:
a. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to
backflow devices and Edison transformers, on the site
plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior
yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or
other method as approved by the Community Development
Director.
PC Minutes 7/17/90
-13-
(6867d)
b. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical
shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers;
natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of
cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating
units; and low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots
and water faucets.
C. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant
type shall be installed as approved by the Building
Department and indicated on the floor plans.
d. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials
proposed.
e. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium
vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be
used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent
"spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on
the site plan and elevations.
f. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a
registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include
on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials
to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading,
chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining
walls, streets, and utilities.
g. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a grading plan
shall be submitted to the City's Department of Public
Works. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from
the property during construction and during initial
operation of the project may be required by the Director
of Public Works if deemed necessary.
f]
h. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all
conditions of approval imposed on the project printed
verbatim.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner
shall complete the following:
a. Submit copy of the revised elevations pursuant to
Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in
the entitlement file.
b. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the
Departments of Community Development and Public Works and
must be approved.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -14- (6867d)
(1) The Landscape Construction Set shall include a
landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed
Landscape Architect and which includes all
proposed/existing plant materials (location, type,
size, quantity), an irrigation plan, a grading plan,
an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement
conditions of approval.
(2) The landscape plans shall be in conformance with
Article 960 and 915 - Planned Residential Standards of
the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The set must be
approved by both departments prior to issuance of
building permits. Any existing mature trees that must
be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with
minimum 36-inch box trees, which shall be incorporated
into the project's landscape plan.
(3) Intensified landscaping shall be provided adjacent to
the two (2) exposed carports adjacent to Ash Street.
Said landscaping shall be subject to review and
approval by the Planning Director.
c. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid.
e. Final Tract Map shall be accepted by the City Council,
recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy filed
with the Department of Community Development.
4. Fire Department Requirements are as follows:
a. Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed throughout
the project to comply with Huntington Beach Fire
Department and Uniform Building Code Standards. Shop
drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire
Department prior to installation.
b. A fire alarm system shall be installed to comply with
Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code
Standards. Shop drawings will be submitted to and
approved by the Fire Department prior to installation and
will provide the following:
(1) Manual Pulls
(2) Smoke Detectors
(3) Audible Alarms
C. Fire extinguishers shall be installed and located in areas
to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards.
d. Fire hydrants shall be installed prior to combustible
construction. Shop drawings will be submitted to the
Public Works Department and approved by the Fire
Department prior to installation. Number and placement to
be determined by the Fire Department.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -15- (6867d)
1
e. Address numbers will be installed to comply with
Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards. The size of the
numbers will be the following:
(1) The number for the building will be sized a minimum of
ten (10) inches with a brush stroke of one and
one-half (1-1/2) inches.
(2) Individual units will be sized a minimum of four (4)
inches with a brush stroke of one-half (1/2) inch.
f. Submit to the Fire Department for approval a Fire
Protection Plan containing requirements of Fire Department
Specification #426.
g. Should any abandoned oil wells or tanks be encountered,
the Fire Department shall be notified and current
standards met as required by Article 15 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code. Any abandonment of existing wells
must be to current standards as well.
5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of
the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department.
6. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and
other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an
off -site facility equipped to handle them.
7. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems
shall be completed prior to final inspection.
8. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts,
equipment or trailers.
9. During construction, the applicant shall:
a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where
vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised
when leaving the site;
b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is
completed for the day;
c. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to
avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts);
d. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts.
10. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to
8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal
holidays.
PC Minutes 7/17/90
-16-
(6867d)
11. Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, compliance with all conditions of
approval specified herein shall be accomplished.
12. This conditional use permit shall not become effective for any
purpose until an "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been
properly executed by the applicant and an authorized
representative of the owner of the property, recorded with
County Recorder's Office, and returned to the Planning
Division; and until the ten day appeal period has elapsed.
13. Should a Traffic Impact Fee be adopted by the City Council,
the applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying
such fee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
and/or final building permit approval.
14. The developer will be responsible for the payment of any
additional fees adopted in the "upcoming" Water Division
Financial Master Plan.
15. If some indication of the presence of cultural materials is
observed, all activity shall cease and the archaeologist shall
determine the appropriate course of action.
16. Should any cultural materials be encountered during the
initial site survey or during grading and excavation
activities, all activity shall cease and the archaeologist
shall determine the appropriate course of action.
17. Should any human bone be encountered during any construction
activities on the site, the archaeologist shall contact the
coroner pursuant to Section 5097.98 and 5097.99 of the Public
Resources Code relative to Native American Remains. Should
the coroner determine the human remains to be Native American,
the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted
pursuant to State Law SB 297.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 14182:
1. The tentative tract map received and dated July 5, 1990, shall
be the approved layout with the following modifications:
a. The map shall be revised to show 3 feet of Ash Street to
be vacated on the final map.
2. Driveway shall be 27 feet minimum width, radius type.
3. Construct all Public Works improvements in Ash Street,
including a street light.
4. Grading Plan and Soils Report are required.
5. Site drainage shall flow to Ash Street.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -17- (6867d)
6. Hydrology/hydraulic calculations shall be submitted for approval.
7. Private yards shall have individual area drains.
8. On -site sewer main shall be private and each dwelling unit shall
have a separate sewer lateral.
9. On -site water mains shall be dedicated to th City and located in
vehicular travelways. Each lot shall be individually metered.
10. Security gate shall be prohibited with existing driveway
configuration.
11. Developer must submit for approval by Department of Public Works
water improvemnt plans showing service connections to all lots.
12. Developer will be responsible for payment of any additional fees
adopted in the "upcoming" Water Division Financial Master Plan.
13. Low -volume fixture heads shall be incorporated in the design of
the potable water systems for each dwelling.
14. All existing unused water facilities shall be abandoned.
15. At least 30 days prior to recordation of the final tract map,
CC&R's shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney
and the Department of Community Development. The CC&R's shall
reflect the common driveway access easements, and maintenance of
all walls and common landscape areas by the Homeowners'
Association.
B-3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89-3/ZONE CHANGE NO, 89-5/
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 90-1
APPLICANT: DAVID CZAJA
LOCATION: 5142 and 5200 Warner Avenue (south side of Warner,
east and west of Leslie Lane)
General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 and Zone Change No. 89-5 is a request
to redesignate and rezone a 2.60 acre site, located on the south side
of Warner Avenue on both sides of Leslie Lane, from a General Plan
land use designation of General Commercial to Medium -High Density
Residential and zoning designation from OP (Office Professional) and
(Q)C4 (Qualified Highway Commercial, Non -Medical Uses Only) to R3-PD
(Medium -High Density Residential with a Planned Development Suffix),
respectively. They are being submitted for review and recommendation
by the Planning Commission and then forwarded to the City Council for
final decision.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -18- (6867d)
1
Although the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change do not constitute
any new development, it will allow for residential development of the
site. If approved, the amendment request will allow for development
of a maximum of 69 condominium units. No development plans have been
submitted at this time.
The Planning Commission continued this item from the July 10, 1990
meeting, due to the number of items on the agenda.
Staff has received one letter from a neighboring property owner in
opposition of the proposed general plan amendment and zone change.
At the July 10, 1990 Planning Commission study session, an additional
mitigation measure was suggested to prohibit curb cuts on Warner
Avenue to prevent possible circulation impacts to Warner Avenue. The
measure would be added to Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution
1433 and should read as follows:
11. Upon development, sites shall retain vehicular access from
Leslie Lane. No curb cuts shall be allowed along Warner
Avenue.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act,
Environmental Impact Report No. 90-1 (EIR No. 90-1) was prepared to
analyze the potential impacts of the project. The requisite procedure
that was followed is outlined below:
January 29, 1990
February 6, 1990
Staff conducted an initial study and determined
that an EIR would be necessary for the project.
A Notice of Preparation was filed with the State
Clearinghouse to notify the public of the intent
to prepare an EIR.
April 30, 1990 Notice of Completion filed with the State
Clearinghouse. The Draft EIR was available for
public review and comments for forty-five days
(comment period: April 30, 1990, to June 14,
1990).
July 10, 1990 Public hearing before Planning Commission to
certify EIR No. 90-1.
Staff did not receive any comments during the review period.
PC Minutes 7/17/90
-19-
(6867d)
Environmental Impact Report No. 90-1 was prepared by staff. The
document must be adopted and certified by the Planning Commission
prior to any action on General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 and Zone
Change No. 89-5. The environmental impact report discusses
potential adverse impacts related to light and glare, land use
compatibility, transportation/circulation, public service and
utilities, air quality, noise, growth management and archaeological
resources. The environmental impact report did not identify any
significant adverse environmental impacts which could not be
mitigated to a level of insignificance.
RECOMMENDATION•
A. Adopt and certify as adequate Environmental Impact Report No.
90-1 with added mitigation measure, by adopting Planning
Commission Resolution No. 1433 and forward to the City Council
for adoption;
B. Approve General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 by adopting Planning
Commission Resolution No. 1434 and forward to the City Council
for adoption; and
C. Approve Zone Change No. 89-5 and forward to the City Council for
adoption.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
Art Torosian, Partner Applicant, 5081 Crescent Drive, Anaheim,
believes the project will be an asset to the community. Mr. Torosian
remarked that within the Environmental Impact Report, there were no
items that could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance. He
also feels that re -zoning will eleviate some of the over commercial
development. He feels their project will be of aesthic and financial
value to the community.
David Czaja, Applicant, 16811 Lynn Street, said that phasing will
allow for full Planned Development, and will not impact sewers. He
also stated that the vacancy rate for office space is up in the area.
Bob Biddle, 1710 Pine Street, spoke in opposition to the project. He
is in favor of commercial uses in the area.
John C. Welch, 16805 Roosevelt Lane, spoke in favor of the project.
Mr. Welch is concerned with the current traffic problems. He feels
commercial development creates gridlock and is highly in favor of a
residential use.
Ken Saunders, 17083 Roundhill Drive, does not object to R1-R2
property. As a R1 property owner, he bought with the understanding
that R2 would exist on the bluff. He does, however, object to the
density.
Marlene Church, 5091 Dunbar, spoke in favor of the project. She feels
it will enhance the area.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -20- (6867d)
1
Marcy Little, 3651 Pirate Circle, spoke in favor of the project. She
thinks it will be beneficial for all.
Sally Graham, 5161 Gelding Circle, spoke in opposition. She feels it
is too dense, there is no need for more residential. She stated the
sewer systems are already at capacity. Ms. Graham also said that
traffic will be on an uprise.
Mark Browning, 16771 Roosevelt Lane, spoke in opposition to the
project. He stated that traffic, sewer, water, parking are all
problems now. Mr. Browning also stated that he doesn't believe the
builder has credibility to do the project.
Mary Ota, 5242 Warner Avenue, (Mary Ota's daughter spoke for her)
spoke in opposition to the project. She stated that currently she had
balconies that overlook her backyard and is concerned about her
privacy. She would like to see changes in the design to accomodate
the people who have lived their a long time.
Steve Mann, 16791 Green Street, spoke in favor of the project. Mr.
Mann feels the area is conducive to residential rather than
commercial. He said the current commercial buildings are aesthically
displeasing and feels there will be no adverse impacts to the area.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
The Commissioners discussed the scarcity of commercial land, and were
concerned with the sewer capacity in the area. They were also
concerned with the property owner rights with an increase of density
in place of commercial.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY SHOMAKER TO APPROVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 90-1, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: Williams, Ortega
ABSENT: Mountford
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
PC Minutes 7/17/90
1w*0
(6867d)
RESOLUTION NO. 1433
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
NO. 90-1 AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY ADOPT
AND CERTIFY AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 90-1
WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No. 90-1 was prepared
in conjunction with General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 and Zone Change
No. 89-5; and
The City of Huntington Beach was the lead agency in the
preparation of the Environmental Impact Report; and
All persons and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly
given have been heard by the Planning Commission either through
written notice or during a public hearing on July 17, 1990, and such
comments as were made were duly noted and responded to.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission
of the City of Huntington Beach as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission does hereby find that
Environmental Impact Report No. 90-1 has been completed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all
State and local guidelines.
SECTION 2: The Planning Commission has considered all
significant effects detailed in Environmental Impact Report No.
90-1, together with proposed mitigation measures to mitigate such
effects (see Exhibit A).
SECTION 3: The Planning Commission finds that through the
implementation of the aforementioned mitigation measures the
potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be
eliminated or reduced to a level of insignificance.
SECTION 4: The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington
Beach does hereby adopt and certify as adequate Environmental Impact
Report No. 90-1 and recommends that the City Council adopt and
certify as adequate Environmental Impact Report No. 90-1.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Huntington Beach on the 17th. day of July, 1990, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: Williams, Ortega
ABSENT: Mountford
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
Mike Adams, Secretary
(676ld-1,2)
Planning Commission Chairwoman
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -22- (6867d)
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89-3 AND ZONE CHANGE 89-5, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, Kirkland
NOES: Williams, Ortega, Bourguignon, Leipzig
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION FAILED
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY WILLIAMS TO DENY GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 89-3 AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 89-5, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Williams, Ortega, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: Shomaker, Mountford, Kirkland
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
B-4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 90-32
APPLICANT: CATHERINE F. MARZELLA
LOCATION: 318 Main Street
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 is a request for live entertainment
(up to 2 musicians/comedians) within an existing restaurant
(Marzella's Pizza) located at 318 Main Street in downtown Huntington
Beach. A conditional use permit is required for live entertainment
pursuant to Section 9220.1(d) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 1,
Section 15301.
COASTAL STATUS:
The project is located within the categorical exclusion area of the
non appealable portion of the Coastal Zone. Pursuant to Section
989.5.3.13(f) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code the project is
exempt from coastal development permit procedures.
REDEVELOPMENT STATUS:
The subject site is located within the Downtown Redevelopment
Project Area. Redevelopment staff has indicated that the proposed
entertainment is compatable with the existing uses in the vicinity
and supports the applicant's request.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -23- (6867d)
SPECIFIC PLAN:
The project is located within the Downtown Specific Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional
Use Permit No. 90-32 with findings and conditions of approval.
THE PUBLIC WAS OPENED
THER WERE NO PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO APPROVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-32 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland,
Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
Findings for Approval - Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32:
1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of live
entertainment (up to two (2) musicians/comedians with electronic
amplification) will not be detrimental to the general welfare of
persons residing or working in the vicinity. Adequate buffering
from residential uses is provided by parking areas and
retail/office buildings. Further, the proposed hours of
entertainment are after the business hours of surrounding retail
and office uses.
2. The proposed live entertainment will not be detrimental to
property and improvements in the vicinity of the restaurant due
to the layout and design of existing and proposed uses..
3. The proposed use is consistent with the City's General Plan and
Zoning designations which allow entertainment in conjunction
with a retail/commercial dining establishment.
Conditions of Approval - Conditional Use Permit 90-32:
1. The site plan and floor plan received and dated June 21, 1990,
shall be the conceptually approved layout.
2. Live electronically amplified music and entertainment shall be
limited to a maximum of 2 performers and shall be limited to the
following hours:
Monday through Saturday - 8:00 PM to 1:00 AM
Sunday - 3:00 PM to 10:00 PM
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -24- (6867d)
3. Dancing shall be prohibited.
4. An entertainment permit shall be submitted and approved by the
Police Department prior to the establishment of the live
entertainment within the restaurant.
5. The proposed use shall comply with all applicable fire and
building codes, including Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building
Code.
6. All activities shall comply with all applicable ordinances of
Title 5, Business License and Regulations, and Title 9, Public
Peace, Morals and Welfare of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code.
7. The proposed live entertainment shall comply with Chapter 8.40
"Noises" of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. Should
complaints be received regarding noises generated by the live
entertainment, the Planning Commission reserves the right to
require the applicant to mitigate the noise level.
8. This conditional use permit shall run with the applicant. Any
additional activities beyond those proposed (musicians and
comedians) shall require the review and approval through the
conditional use permit process.
9. The primary use of the building shall be dining and the sale of
food and beverages. Dancing and live entertainment
(comedians/musicians) shall be a secondary use.
10. A six-month review of the establishment shall be conducted by
the Planning Commission in order to assess compliance with and
the effectiveness of the adopted conditions of approval.
11. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this
conditional use permit if any violation of these conditions or
the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs.
B-5 TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 13527(R)/AMENDMENT TO CONDITION OF
APPROVAL NUMBER
APPLICANT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
LOCATION: Southeast of current terminous of Seapointe Avenue
On January 18, 1989, the Planning Commission approved Tentative
Tract Map No. 13527(R) and Conditional Use Permit No. 88-18(R). The
approval was for a 158 unit single family residential lot
subdivision. Condition of approval No. 3 for the Tentative Tract
required that Seapoint Avenue be connected to Garfield Avenue and
opened to the public prior to occupancy of the first unit. Since
the precise plan of street alignment for Seapoint Avenue has not yet
been adopted by the City Council, it is necessary, to amend
Condition No. 3 to allow limited occupancy of units prior to
construction.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -25- (6867d)
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The project was covered under previously approved Negative
Declaration No. 88-18.
COASTAL STATUS:
The project was covered under previously approved Coastal
Development Permit No. 88-24.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that condition of approval No. 3 for Final Tract
No. 13527 be amended as follows:
3. Seapointe Avenue shall be connected to Garfield Avenue and shall
be open to the public prior to occupancy of the f;UXY
seventy-fifth (75th) unit. All residents moving into the
dwellings prior to completion of Seapointe shall be notified of
the difference in emergency response times. No additional
construction start shall be permitted for the remainder of the
tract beyond the 74 units until such time as the road is
completed.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
Bill Holman, 2120 Main Street, represents applicant, had concerns
over the long delays, 11 months to get permit to build road. Also
concerned with 8 - 10 month lag time if construction cannot be
completed until the road is completed.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
A discussion ensued among the Commissioners and Fire Department
staff. Their concerns were directed at the disclaimer requested to
notify people of delayed response time for emergency services. Fire
Department staff stated the disclaimer was essential to the
homeowners, however, it had not been done before to his knowlegdge.
Temporary roads were discussed, but Fire Department staff felt this
was not adequate, nor temporary fences. The Commissioners also
discussed the burden put on the developer by delayed construction
and financial obligation in building the street.
After the discussion the condition was modified as follows:
AMENDED CONDITION NO. 3:
3. Seapointe Avenue shall be connected to Garfield Avenue and shall
be open to the public prior to occupancy of the seventy-fifth
(75th) unit. All residents moving into the dwellings prior to
completion of Seapointe shall be notified of the difference in
emergency response times. Move -ins shall be limited to
fifty-four (54) units prior to start of street construction.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -26- (6867d)
Twenty (20) additional units may be occupied after construction
has begun. No additional occupancy shall be permitted for the
remainder of the tract beyond the 74 units until such time as
the road is completed, or other measures are implemented such as
a temporary unimpeded emergency access road which addresses the
concerns of Fire, Police, Public Works and Community Development
Departments.
Chairwoman Ortega stated for the record, that she was against the
idea of a disclaimer that notified homeowners of delayed response
time for emergency services.
Commissioner Bourguignon disclosed the fact that he owns heavy
equipment that has been rented out to the applicant's contractor.
Counsel advised Commissioner Bourguignon to abstain from voting on
this item. Commissioner Bourguignon agreed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WILLIAMS, SECOND BY MOUNTFORD, TO APPROVE
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13527(R) AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL
NUMBER 2 AS MODIFIED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, Williams, Kirkland
NOES: Ortega, Leipzig
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Bourguignon
MOTION PASSED
B-6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-37 AND APPEAL OF COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-21
APPLICANT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH/CALIFORNIA RESORTS
LOCATION: 300 Pacific Coast Highway (northeast corner of
Pacific Coast Highway and Main Street)
Coastal Development Permit No. 90-21 was approved by the Zoning
Administrator on June 13, 1990. It was a request to modify Coastal
Development Permit No. 88-3 for the Pierside Pavilion by
substituting 8,000 square feet of restaurant space for 8,000 square
feet of previously approved retail space.
Commissioner Leipzig appealed the Zoning Administrator's action
based on concerns with traffic and parking, and citizen concern.
Subsequent to the filing of the appeal, the City and California
Resorts initiated Conditional Use Permit No. 90-37, to amend the
original Conditional Use Permit for Pierside Pavilion (No. 88-7),
which was approved concurrently with Coastal Development Permit No.
88-3. The modified conditional use permit will also accommodate the
additional restaurant square footage.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -27- (6867d)
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class
15301, Section 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act.
COASTAL STATUS•
The proposed project is in the non -appealable portion of the Coastal
Zone. Coastal Development Permit No. 88-3 was processed for the
original Pierside Pavilion project. The applicant wishes to
increase the restaurant square footage and decrease the retail
square footage, thereby increasing the number of parking spaces
required. Therefore, a new Coastal Development Permit was required
to address the increased intensity, pursuant to Section 989.5.3.1(b)
of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
REDEVELOPMENT STATUS:
The site is located in the Main -Pier Redevelopment Project Area.
SPECIFIC PLAN•
The site is located in the Downtown Specific Plan Area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
1. Deny the Appeal, thereby approving Coastal Development Permit No.
90-21 with findings;
2. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 90-37 with findings and
conditions of approval.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO CONTINUE THE
PUBLIC HEARINGS AFTER 11:00 P.M., BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mountford
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
Debbie Cook, 6692 Shetland Circle, spoke in opposition. She feels
there is insufficient parking in the Downtown Redevelopment area.
Bob Biddle, 1710 Pine Street, stated that the change of use was not
necessary and would be detrimental to the area.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -28- (6867d)
Doug Langevin, 8196 Pawtucket Drive, claimed he was exluded from
notification of the nights meeting. He also stated he did not
understand the generation of 47 parking spaces. He felt the
subleasing calculation for Jan's Health Food Bar were not accurate.
He also questioned the ability of the public to differentiate
between the valet parking and regular parking spaces.
Dick Harlow, California Resorts representative, discussed the
substitution of 8,000 square feet of restaurant space for 8,000
square feet of previously approved retail space. He also explained
that there will be a professional parking management company at all
times.
A discussion regarding parking ensued among the Commissioners,
concerning tandem and valet parking. They were concerned about
citizens telling the difference between normal parking and valet
parking.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY KIRKLAND TO CONTINUE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-37 AND APPEAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT NO. 90-21 TO THE JULY 24, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING IN
ORDER FOR STAFF TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS THAT AROSE AMONG THE
COMMISSIONERS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: None
. ABSENT: Mountford (out of room)
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
C. CONSENT CALENDER
None
D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
D-1 EXTENSION OF TIME - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-26 -
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
APPLICANT: ARTHUR AND NONA NELLES
LOCATION: 8311 Rolf Circle
The applicant has requested a second extension of time for
Conditional Use Permit No. 88-26 for a 650 square foot second unit
(Granny Unit) to an existing single family home. The conditional
use permit was initially approved by the Planning Commission on
October 4, 1988. A 9-mcnth extension of time, due to illness, was
granted on November 7, 1990. That extension of time expired on July
4, 1990. The applicant presently has plans in plan check and
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -29- (6867d)
requires an additional extension of time in order to pull building
permits. Staff feels that three months will be sufficient for the
applicant to clear plan check and pull permits.
Section 9843.4 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code requires that
actual construction must begin within one year of the final approval
date. However, the code specifies that the Planning Commission may
grant extensions of time, not to exceed one year, upon written
request by the applicant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a three-month extension of time for Conditional Use Permit
No. 88-26 (to October 17, 1990) with all previous conditions of
approval to remain in effect.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-26 WITH ALL
PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO REMAIN IN EFFECT, BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mountford
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
D-2 PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM NO. 90-22 - Applicant: Solberg & Lowe
Architects
APPLICANT: SOLBERG & LOWE ARCHITECTS
LOCATION: 300 Pacific Coast Highwy (northeast corner of
Pacific Coast Highway and Main Street)
Planned Sign Program No. 90-22 is a request for a sign program at
Pierside Pavilion, pursuant to Section 9610.6 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code. The sign program will allow individual
tenants to pull permits for signs that comply with criteria. The
sign program is intended to provide Pierside Pavilion with a
coordinated plan that is compatible with the surroundings and
communicates information effectively.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Planned Sign Program No. 90-22 with findings and conditions
of approval.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -30- (6867d)
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE
PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM NO. 90-22 WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mountford
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM NO. 90-22:
1. Planned Sign Program No. 90-22 will provide for signage that
reflects a common theme for the Pierside Pavilion development,
incorporating similar design elements in terms of materials,
colors, illumination, and sign type.
2. Planned Sign Program No. 90-22 provides for signs that will be
compatible with the architectural style and colors of the
building.
3. The signs will be compatible with other signs in the
surrounding area and with the Downtown Design Guidelines.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL - PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM NO, 90-22:
1. The sign program dated June 19, 1990 shall be the approved
program, with the following modifications:
a. Allow for raceways which are architecturally compatible
with the building when it is necessary for structural
reasons, and upon approval by the owner and project
architect.
b. Allow logo height of 24 inches, provided the overall area
of the sign is within the permitted maximum square footage.
c. Allow increased letter height for the theater marquee sign
to be located on the tower facing Pacific Coast Highway.
Since the sign is located on the third to fourth level
above the street, a larger letter size would provide for
appropriate scale and readability.
2. The location of the proposed signs shall be generally as shown
on the elevations dated May 24, 1990.
3. Any proposed sign that does not comply with the standards of
Planned Sign Program No. 90-22 shall be subject to review by
the Design Review Board and approval of a Special Sign Permit
by the Planning Commission.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -31- (6867d)
D-3 PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM N0, 90-8:
APPLICANT: ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
LOCATION: 16672 Beach Boulevard
Planned Sign Program 90-8 is a request for a sign program at
Marshall's Mall pursuant to Section 9610.6 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code. The sign program will allow the transfer of sign
area between tenants and allow up to a maximum of 200 square feet of
sign area for major tenants.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class
15311, Section 11 of the California Environmental Quality Act.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD:
The Design Review Board met on April 19, 1990, to review the
shopping center remodel and proposed sign program. The applicant
presented typical elevations, proposed criteria. The Board voted 4
to 0 to recommend approval of the Planned Sign Program as presented.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Planned Sign Program No. 90-8 with findings and conditions
of approval
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY LEIPZIG TO CONTINUE PLANNED
SIGN PROGRAM NO. 90-8 TO THE JULY 24, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mountford
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
D-4 ZONING CODE REWRITE COMMITTEE
Recently, the consulting firm of Blayney-Dyett was hired to rewrite
the City's zoning ordinance. In an effort to facilitate the
process, the staff has agreed with the suggestion to form an Ad -Hoc
Committee comprised of one Council member, two Planning
Commissioners and one Design Review Board member. It is anticipated
that the first meeting will be held on August 1, 1990, 4:00 P.M. -
6:00 P.M. The staff is recommending that two commissioners and an
alternate be appointed to the committee.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -32- (6867d)
Commissioners Mountford and Bourguignon appointed to the committee,
with Commissioner Williams appointed as the alternate.
D-5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-53/AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT NO.
14177
APPLICANT: SUMMERHILL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
LOCATION: 8186 Constantine Drive (south side of Constantine
Drive approximately 500 feet east of Vicent Drive)
The Summerhill Development Co. is requesting the Planning Commission
to review the previously approved 35-unit residential condominium
project as required by Condition No. l.f of Conditional Use Permit
No. 89-53. Condition No. l.f requires Planning Commission review of
modification to the project directed by the Planning Commission as
part of their approval. In order to comply with conditions of
approval, the Summerhill Development Co. has reduced the number of
units from 35 to 34 condominiums. In addition, the applicant is
requesting review of the roof decks and proposed security gate
system.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
This project is covered by Negative Declaration No. 89-46 which was
approved by the Planning Commission on January 9, 1990.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional
Use Permit No. 89-53 and Amended Tentative Tract No. 14177 with
revised findings and conditions of approval.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO APPROVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-53 AND AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT NO.
14177 WITH REVISED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mountford
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL"USE PERMIT NO 89-53:
1. The establishment of a 34-unit condominium project will not be
detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or
working in the vicinity, nor detrimental to property and
improvements in the vicinity because the project is compatible
with the surrounding area.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -33- (6867d)
2. The proposal for a 34-unit condominium project is consistent
with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and
Land Use Map.
3. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed 34-unit
residential condominium complex properly adapts the proposed
structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures
and uses in a harmonious manner as modified by special permits.
4. The access to and parking for the proposed 34-unit residential
condominium complex does not create an undue traffic problem.
5. The reduction of the planned residential development from 35 to
34 units conforms to the provisions contained in Article 915 and
will be compatible with surrounding properties.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 14177:
1. The size, depth, frontage and other design features of the
proposed one lot subdivision for 34 condominium units are in
compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file
with the City as well as with the State Map Act and the
supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance.
2. The property was previously studied for Medium Density
Residential (15 units per acre) development at the time the
General Plan designation was placed on the site, and will
accommodate the development of 34 condominiums.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
13.7 units per gross acre.
4. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land
use as well as objectives for the implementation of this type of
housing.
5. Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 14177 is consistent with the
goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan.
6. The minimum actual tape measure distance between the buildings
is 10 feet although a technical interpretation of the site plan
indicates an 8 foot side to side separation.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 89-53:
1. The site plan and roof deck plan dated received July 3, 1990,
and the floor plans and elevations dated received December 22,
1989, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the
following modifications:
a. Minimum
sideyard setback
shall be 5 feet
on
the East side and
10 feet
on the West side
for Buildings 1
and
5.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -34- (6867d)
b. Minimum side to side setback shall be 10 feet except for end
units which may be reduced to 8 feet.
c. Maximum height to the peak of the highest roof shall be 40
feet.
d. The precise configuration of security gates shall be subject
to the review and approval of Fire, Public Works and
Community Development Departments.
e. Spa or other recreational amenity to be included in each unit
subject to approval of the Director of Community Development.
2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner
shall complete the following:
a. Submit three copies of the site plan to the Planning Division
for addressing purposes. If street names are necessary,
submit proposal to Fire Department for review and approval.
b. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to
backflow devices and Edison transformers, on the site plan.
They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard
setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other
method as approved by the Community Development Director.
c. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type
shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and
indicated on the floor plans.
d. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or
detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State
acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the
60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance
shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report,
with the application for building permit(s).
e. Elevations shall depict:
1. Colors and building materials proposed.
2. Digital/key automatic garage door openers shall be
provided on the garage doors for each unit.
3. Automatic roll -up garage doors.
f. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any
view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible
with the building in terms of materials and colors. If
screening is not designed specifically into the building, a
rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing
screening and must be approved.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -35- (6867d)
g. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor
lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All
outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto
adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and
elevations.
h. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered
Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil
sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide
detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill
properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and
utilities.
j. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all
conditions of approval imposed on the project printed
verbatim.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall
complete the following:
a. Submit copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and
elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and
approval and inclusion in the entitlement file.
b. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the
Departments of Community Development and Public Works and
must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall
include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State
Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all
proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size,
quantity), an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved
site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of
approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with
Section 9608 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The set
must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of
building permits. Any existing mature trees that must be
removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with minimum
36-inch box trees, which shall be incorporated into the
project's landscape plan.
c. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public
Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a
grading permit). A plan for silt control for all water
runoff from the property during construction and initial
operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary
by the Director of Public Works.
d. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public
Works approval.
e. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -36- (6867d)
f. Final Tract Map shall be accepted by the City Council,
recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy filed
with the Department of Community Development.
g. Perimeter fencing plans for review and approval which depict
decorative materials.
h. Gated entryway (access control devices) dimensioned plans to
the Public Works and Community Development Departments. A
"statement of architecture" should be incorporated to
highlight the theme of the development. Said gated entryway
shall comply with Fire Department Standard 403. Prior to the
installation of any gates, such plan shall be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development, Fire and Public Works
departments.
i. Landscaping within public right-of-way shall be maintained by
the Homeowner's Association.
4. Fire Department Requirements are as follows:
a. Automatic sprinkler systems will be installed throughout to
comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform
Building Code Standards. Shop drawings will be submitted to
and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
b. A fire alarm system will be installed to comply with
Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code
Standards. Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved
by the Fire Department prior to installation. The system
will provide the following.
1. Water flow, valve tamper and trouble detection
2. 24-hour supervision
3. Smoke Detectors
4. Annunciation
c. Three fire hydrants will be installed prior to combustible
construction. Shop drawings will be submitted to the Public
Works Department and approved by the Fire Department prior to
installation. 3,000 GPM is needed for fireflow.
d. Fire lanes will be designated and posted to comply with
Huntington Beach Fire Department Standard No. 415.
e. Security gates will be designed to comply with Huntington
Beach Fire Department Standards No. 403.
f. Address numbers
Beach Fire Code
the following:
will be installed to comply with Huntington
Standards. The size of the numbers will be
PC Minutes 7/17/90
-37-
(6867d)
1. The number for the building will be sized a minimum of
ten (10) inches with a brush stroke of one and one-half
(1-1/2) inches.
2. Individual unit address numbers will be sized a minimum
of four (4) inches with a brush stroke of one-half (1/2)
inch.
g. Show on plans the dimensions for fire access. Includes 24'
or 27' fire lanes, turnarounds and 17' by 45' radius turns.
h. Submit to the Fire Department for approval a Fire Protection
Plan containing requirements of Fire Department Specification
#426.
5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of
the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department.
6. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and
other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an
off -site facility equipped to handle them.
7. During construction, the applicant shall:
a. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is
completed for the day;
b. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to
avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts);
c. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts.
8. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to
8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal
holidays.
9. If dewatering is necessary at the site during construction and
the discharge of dewatering wastes to surface waters is proposed,
an NPDES permit (waste discharge requirements) or a waiver must
be obtained from this office prior to initiating the discharge.
Please note that the processing of an NPDES permit may take as
long as 180 days from the date the permit application is accepted
as complete.
10. Should any cultural materials be encountered during the initial
site survey of during grading and excavation activities, all
activity shall cease and the archaeologist shall determine the
appropriate course of action.
11. Should any abandoned oil wells or tanks be encountered, the Fire
Department shall be notified and current standards met as
required by Article 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code.
any abandonment of existing wells must be to current standards as
well.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -38- (6867d)
[1
12. All oil facilities within the boundaries of the development which
are to be removed and abandoned, reabandoned or to remain must
meet all existing requirements of the City of Huntington Beach
and the State Division of Oil and Gas.
13. The project site area must be sampled and monitored for methane
gas and the results of the tests must be submitted to the Fire
Department for evaluation.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 14177:
1. The revised tentative tract map dated received July 3, 1990,
shall be the approved layout.
2. Public Works requirements are as follows:
a. All vehicular access rights to Constantine Drive shall be
released and relinquished to the City except at locations
approved by the Planning Commission.
b. If a security gate system is ever to be proposed, the design
configuration shall be approved by the Public Works
Department prior to tentative map approval.
c. Red curb will be required on Constantine Drive at the
entrance. Sight distance calculations shall be submitted by
the developer's engineer to the Public Works Department for
approval.
d. Damaged and deteriorated public improvements on Constantine
Drive shall be reconstructed per Public Works standards and
requirements.
e. Constantine Drive street cross-section shall be shown on the
Tentative Map.
f. On -site streets shall be private and constructed per Public
Works Standards (24' minimum pavement width, not including
curb and gutter).
g. On -site sewers shall be private.
h. Hydrology and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to
the Public Works Department for approval.
i. Soils report and grading plan required.
j. Developer to submit water improvement plans for approval by
the Public Works Department showing all water services, fire
hydrants, fire services and backflow devices.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -39- (6867d)
LJ
k. The water system shall be located within vehicular travelways
and dedicated to the City. The developer/homeowner's
association shall be held responsible for repairing and
enhanced pavement, if the water mains, etc. require
maintenance or repair.
1. Developer will be responsible for payment of any additional
fees adopted in the "upcoming" Water Division Financial
Master Plan, with a tentative date of April, 1990.
M. Submit hydraulic calculations to ensure water system adequacy
and line sizing.
n. The developer shall construct a separate system for reclaimed
water use (Green Acres) to irrigate landscaped areas.
o. Water system shall be looped, no dead ends. Water system to
be installed per Public Works Department and Fire Department
standards, ordinances and policies.
3. At least 60 days prior to recordation of the final tract map,
CC&R's shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney
and the Department of Community Development. The CC&R's shall
reflect the common driveway access easements, and maintenance of
all walls and common landscape areas by the Homeowners'
Association.
E. DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
F. PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES
The Redevelopment Agency is conducting two public workshops
concerning the Pierside Restaurant project, in an effort to
properly receive and address all interested parties' questions and
concerns regarding the EIR and the project in general. Chairwoman
Ortega appointed three (3) Commissioners to participate in the
public workshop they are as follows: Ed Mountford, Geri Ortega,
Kirk Kirkland.
G. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
Chairwoman Ortega: Requested staff to provide information on
conducting a workshop for the Commissioners regarding EIR's and
CEQA, which would include State and County Representives.
Commissioner Bourguignon: Commented on a national meeting in the
midwest regarding residential sprinkler systems and grading.
PC Minutes 7/17/90 -40- (6867d)
1
H. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS
Mike Adams reiterated action taken at the City Council meeting
held 7/16/90.
I. ADJOURNMENT
A MOTION WAS MADE AT 12:20 BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO
ADJOURN TO A 5:30 STUDY SESSION (AGENDA REVIEW, SUB -COMMITTEE
REPORT), TUESDAY, JULY 24, 1990, AND THEN TO THE REGULARLY
SCHEDULED MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Shomaker, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon,
Leipzig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mountford
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
/kj 1
APPROVED BY:
�f_ f
Mike Adams, Secr tary
Planning Commissiorl Chairwoman
PC Minutes 7/17/90
-41-
(6867d)