Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-09-05MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 5. 1990 - 1:30 P.M. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Mike Strange STAFF MEMBER: Mike Connor MINUTES: The Minutes of the August 29, 1990 were approved as submitted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: ITEM 1 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO 89-11/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 89-43• Applicant: Independent Development Compancy Request: To permit a one year extension of time for: Administrative Review No. 89-11 to permit the construction of a 3,740 square foot retail building, Conditional Exception No. 89-43 to permit a 26.5 foot wide drive aisles in lieu of 27 foot wide aisles required by section 9603 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Location: 10001 Adams Ave. (Northeast corner of Brookhurst St. and Adams Ave.) Environmental This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Status: Section 15303, Class 3, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986 Mike Connor, Staff Planner, stated that this request was originally approved in 1989. Since the date of approval, the applicant has been unable to proceed with construction due to a soil contamination problem on -site. For this reason, a one-year extension of time has been requested. Staff reported that building permits have been obtained for the project. Staff stated that the applicant wishes to revise the front facade of the structure to include a canopy along Brookhurst Street. Staff recommended approval of the request with the condition that the project be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Joan Leguay, applicant, was present and spoke in support of the request. The Zoning Administrator stated that he would recommend approval of the extension with the following additional conditions: 1. SIX MONTH REVIEW OF THE REQUEST BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. 2. BUILDING PERMITS SHALL REMAIN ACTIVE. 3. PROJECT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 89-11/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 89-43 WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. ALL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN CALENDAR (10) DAYS FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of extension of time will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. All conditions from the previous Condition Letter dated August 23, 1989 shall apply. 2. The revised elevations shall be subject to review and approval of the Design Review Board. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. ZA Minutes - 9/5/90 -2- (7132d) 7 L ITEM 2: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 90-15: Applicant: Rowland Cruz 8933 S. La Cienega Blvd. FSEC. Inglewood, CA 90301 Property Owner: Vincent Stagliano P. 0. Box 8144 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Request: To permit the procesing of expired pharmacudicals with expanded office area pursuant to Section 9510.01(C) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Location: 5722 Research Drive Environmental This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Status: Section 15301, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986 Mike Connor, Staff Planner, reported that the request is to permit the processing of expired pharmacudicals with an expanded office area. This process is considered reverse -distribution by the State of California. Staff reported that the expired pharmacudicals are forwarded to the facility for documentation and sorting. The expired pharmacudicals are then packaged in cannisters, stored on -site, and transferred by truck to an incinerator facility for destruction. Eugene Fullerton, representing the applicant, was present. The Zoning Administrator inquired as to whether or not a state license was required for handling the expired pharmacudicals. Mr. Fullerton stated that he was not sure if a state or federal license was required but would consult with the applicant. The Zoning Administrator stated that proof of a state/federal license would be required prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 90-15 WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. ALL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN CALENDAR (10) DAYS. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated July 30, 1990 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Should a Traffic applicant/owner to issuance of a permit approval. Impact Fee be adopted by the City Council, the shall be responsible for paying such fee prior Certificate of Occupancy and/or final building ZA Minutes - 9/5/90 -3- (7132d) 3. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 4. Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted and marked. 5. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. 6. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 7. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 8. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The facility shall be equipped with a security system to be approved by the Police Department. 10. Fencing shall be provided and maintained. 11. The existing system and materials stored must be fully reviewed by the building division. 12. Supply quantities and concentrations of all materials shall be regulated by Chapter 9 of the 1988 Uniform Building Code and Article 80 of the 1988 Uniform Fire Code. 13. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any portion of the building, the applicant shall provide proof of all state and federal permits to operate such facility to the Department of Community Development. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 4. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Administrative Review No. 90-15 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. ZA Minutes - 9/5/90 -4- (7132d) ITEM 3: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO, 90-27: Applicant: Ariel Valli 220 Calle Cortez San Clemente, CA 92672 Property Owner: Donald Goodell 16571 Channel Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Request: To construct a 659 square foot second story addition to an existing 3,130 square foot single story residence pursuant to Section 989.5.3(b)(1) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Location: 16571 Channel Lane Environmental This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Status: Section 153001 Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986 Mike Connor, Staff Planner, reported that this item would be continued to the next Zoning Administrator meeting of September 12, 1990. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-27 WAS CONTINUED BY -THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO THE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 12, 1990. ITEM 4• HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT - JOHN WAITE REVOCATION HEARING: Petition/: Home Occupation Permit for John Waite Revocation Document Hearing Complaint: The garage is being used in connection with the business other than to park business vehicles. Location: 17401 Lido Lane Environmental This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Status: Section 15301, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986 The Zoning Administrator reported that the request is for a revocation of the home occupation permit issued to John Waite. A complaint was filed with the City that the garage is being used in connection with the subject business other than to park business vehicles. Robert Waite, representing John Waite, was present. Mike Gregory, Staff Planner, presented a staff report. Mr. Gregory stated that an initial inspection was conducted last year. At that time, the applicant stated that storage in the garage area was for hobby only. Based upon staff's findings during the inspection and ZA Minutes - 9/5/90 -5- (7132d) conversation with the applicant, the case was closed for non -violation of the home occupation permit. Hildegard Briedenstein, complaintant, was present to speak in support of revocation of the home occupation permit. Charles Briedenstein was also present to support the revocation. Mrs. Briedenstein stated that the defendant was violating his home occupation permit, creating unnecessary traffic and noise in the neighborhood, and hardship to her family and property. David L. Beatty, neighbor, was present and spoke in opposition to revocation of the home occupancy permit. Lengthy discussion ensued between the defendant, complaintant, staff and Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator stated that he would render a decision concerning this matter within ten (10) days and all parties involved would be notified of final action. CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR REVOCATION OF HOME OCCUPANCY PERMIT - JOHN WAITE, A DECISION WILL BE RENDERED WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. ITEM 5• HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT - WILLIAM BOREN REVOCATION HEARING: Petition/: Home Occupation Permit for William H. Boren - Document Revocation Hearing Property Owner: Robert L. Hunold 1634 Pacific Ranch Dr. Encinitas, CA 92024 Complaint: Persons residing off of the premises are employed at the home. Location: 17402 Lido Lane Environmental This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Status: Section 15301, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986 The Zoning Administrator reported that the request is for a revocation of the home occupation permit issued to William Boren. A complaint was filed with the City that persons residing off of the subject premises are employed at the home. William Boren, defendant, was present. Mike Gregory, Staff Planner, presented a staff report. Mr. Gregory stated that an initial inspection was conducted on November 13, 1989 and that no violations were observed. A second inspection was conducted on January 11, 1990. At that time, Mr. Gregory spoke with Mr. Boren and determined that the business was in compliance with ZA Minutes - 9/5/90 -6- (7132d) home occupation permit provisions. Based upon staff's findings, the case was closed for non -violation of the home occupation permit. Hildegard Briedenstein, complaintant, was present to speak in support of revocation of the home occupation permit. Charles Briedenstein was also present to support the revocation. Mrs. Briedenstein stated that the defendant was violating his home occupation permit and creating unnecessary traffic in the neighborhood. David L. Beatty, neighbor, was present and spoke in opposition to revocation of the home occupancy permit. Lengthy discussion ensued between the defendant, complaintant, staff and Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator stated that he would render a decision concerning this matter within ten (10) days and all parties involved would be notified of final action. CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR REVOCATION OF HOME OCCUPANCY PERMIT - WILLIAM BOREN, A DECISION WILL BE RENDERED WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 2:19 PM BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ON SEPTEMBER 12, 1990. Ci Michael Strange Zoning Administrator :ss ZA Minutes - 9/5/90 -7- (7132d)