Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-07-02APPROVED 122'92 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JULY 2, 1991 Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California STUDY SESSION - 5:30 PM REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM Council Chambers - Civic Center Huntington Beach, California PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P A P P ROLL CALL: Richardson, Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland, Dettloff, P P Bourguignon, Leipzig A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (4 MINUTES PER PERSON, NO DONATING OF TIME TO OTHERS) Anyone wishing to speak must fill out and submit a form to speak prior to Oral Communication or Public Hearing items. No action can be taken by the Planning Commission on this date, unless agendized. None B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS - PROCEDURE: Staff Report, Commission Discussion, Public Hearing, Action B-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-27: APPLICANT: Kevin McCaan LOCATION: 316 B Main Street Staff is requesting a continuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-27 in order to advertise a conditional exception (variance) request for four (4) parking spaces. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Conditional Use Permit No. 91-27 to the July 23, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOURGUIGNON, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-27 TO THE JULY 23, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING IN ORDER FOR STAFF TO ADVERTISE A CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) REQUEST FOR FOUR (4) PARKING SPACE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richardson, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Shomaker, Newman (out of room) ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED B-2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 91-23/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 91-12• APPLICANT: Dennis M. Danahy (E.D. Lohrbach Associates) LOCATION: 3832 Seascape Conditional Use Permit No. 91-23 in conjunction with Coastal Development Permit No. 91-12 is a request to permit the construction of a new single family residence with a 410 square foot third story billiard room pursuant to Section 9110.4(a) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. A special permit is requested to allow a deviation from the required 16 foot long transition ramp with maximum five (5) percent slope when entering a parking structure from a public street pursuant to Section 9601.6(a) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 91-23 with Special Permit and Coastal Development No. 91-12 with findings and suggested conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Dennis M. Danahy, Applicant, stated he had received approval for this project from all necessary homeowner associations. He also stated he was there to answer any questions the Commission may have. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -2- (0785d) The Commission discussed their concerns regarding ventilation and possible flooding in the maids quarters and third story windows invading the privacy of neighbors. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-23 WITH SPECIAL PERMIT AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 91-12 WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richardson, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Shomaker, Newman (out of room) ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-23: 1. The proposed construction of a single family residence with a third floor 410 square foot billiard room will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and privacy of persons working or residing in the vicinity or will not be detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the vicinity. The proposal as designed, meets and or exceeds the code requirements for a third story and, therefore, will not be detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood. 2. The proposed construction of a single family residence with a third floor 410 square foot billiard room is compatible with existing or proposed uses in the vicinity. The proposed third story billiard room is within the maximum height limits for any two (2) story residence and, therefore, will be compatible with the existing and surrounding two (2) and three (3) story residences of the Huntington Harbour area. 3. The location, site layout and design of the proposed construction of a single family residence with a third floor 410 square foot billiard room is properly related to the streets, drive and other structures and uses in the vicinity in a harmonious manner. The location of the third story windows are properly related and, therefore, will be harmonious with existing structures and uses. 4. The proposed construction of a single family residence with a third floor 410 square foot billiard room is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. The General Plan allows for a wide variety of housing types and the proposal as submitted conforms to the provision of a third story addition as implemented through the zoning ordinance and the plans and policies of the Housing element of PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -3- (0785d) the General Plan. The proposed construction of a ramp to an underground parking garage deviating from the required maximum five (5) percent downward slope for the first 16 feet by special permit is properly designed to afford safe access to the underground garage. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. The proposed construction of a ramp to an underground parking garage deviating from the required maximum five (5) percent downward slope for the first sixteen (16) feet by special permit is properly designed to provide safe access to the underground garage. 2. A schematic model prepared by a licensed architect has been submitted which documents the impacts of the request and demonstrates the undercarriage of a low slung car clears the high point between the street gutter and the ramp down. 3. The special permit will not adversely affect the circulation and safety of the use, structure or site, or adjacent land uses as the schematic model demonstrates that a lengthy car with a very low undercarriage can enter the underground parking garage safely. 4. The special permit will result in a more effective and efficient circulation pattern and parking layout by providing a safe transition ramp useable by cars with very low undercarriages to an underground garage with five (5) enclosed parking spaces.-- 5. The special permit will not be detrimental to the general public health, safety, welfare or convenience, nor injurious to property values in the vicinity. A schematic model prepared by a licensed architect demonstrates the safety and workability of increasing the downward slope percentage of the transition ramp for the worst case scenario of a lengthy low -slung car entering the underground parking garage from a public street. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO, 91-12: 1. The proposed construction of a single family residence with a third floor 410 square foot billiard room as proposed by Coastal Development Permit No. 91-12 conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal element. 2. The proposed construction of a single family residence with a third floor 410 square foot billiard room as proposed by Coastal Development Permit No. 91-12 is consistent with the CZ suffix, low density residential development standards, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -4- (0785d) 3. The proposed construction of a single family residence with a third floor 410 square foot billiard room as proposed by Coastal Development Permit No. 91-12, will have available, infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the C-LUP. 4. The proposed construction of a single family residence with a third floor 410 square foot billiard room as proposed by Coastal Development Permit No. 91-12 conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated June 26, 1991 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Any modification to roof pitch which may be required due to requirements of the Uniform Building Code, shall comply with the standards for height of Section 9110.4(a) and shall be depicted on a modified site plan to be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. 3. This approval shall not constitute approval for cantilevered or projecting decks or freestanding archways greater than 42 inches in height within the setback areas. Such items will be subject to separate entitlement review. 4. Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units; and low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. b. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and indicated on the floor plans. c. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials proposed. d. The site plan (or reference page) shall include all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -5- (0785d) a. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. b. An engineering report which will assess the impact of excavation and construction of the project to surrounding properties shall be provided to adjacent residents. 6. The Fire Department requirements area as follows: a. Provide one (1) fire hydrant per Water Department and Fire Department standards prior to construction. b. Provide an automatic fire sprinkler system per Fire Department Standard 413. c. Provide a two (2) inch domestic/fire water service per Water Department standards. 7. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 8. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 9. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 10. Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed: a. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. b. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. 11. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 91-23 and Coastal Development Permit No. 91-12 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. 12. Conditional Use Permit No. 91-23 and Coastal Development Permit No. 91-12 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -6- (0785d) B-3 REVISON OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-50: APPLICANT: MICHAEL NICCOLE LOCATION: 520 Main Street - Niccole's Restaurant The proposed revision to Conditional Use Permit No. 90-50 is a request by the owner of Niccole's Restaurant to add unamplified musical accompaniment to the existing acoustical piano entertainment, add a 115 square foot dancing area on the second floor and expand the hours of operation to 1:00 AM on Monday through Thursday and Sunday nights and 2:00 AM on Friday and Saturday nights. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed revision to Conditional Use Permit No. 90-50 with findings and suggested conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Terry Olson, 611 - 6th Street, spoke in opposition to the request. Major concerns included no permit from ABC, place of business in close proximity to residences and parking problems. Susan Zisakis, 16951 Mt. Collien, Fountain Valley, spoke in opposition to the request. Ms. Zisakis is the manager of the adjacent apartment complex. She states she has had numerous complaints from her tenants regarding noise, parking and the restuarant staff being uncooperative. Gus Zisakis, 16951 Mt. Collien, Fountain Valley, spoke in opposition to the request. Mr. Zisakis is also the manager of the adjacent property. He stated they will be unable to find suitable tenants if further problems occur. He also stated he has numerous late hour noise and parking complaints. Jo Christian -Craig, 529 Lake Street, spoke in opposition to the request. Ms. Christian -Craig, is in favor of mixed -use development in the area, but feels the late hour of closing will create noise and traffic problems. Rocco Sarracino and Mike Niccole, 520 Main Street, applicants, spoke in favor of the request. They stated they will do everything possible to eliminate the above stated objections and concerns. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. The Commission discussed approval of the request with the following conditions: 1) double efforts to control employee parking in front of residences; 2) control of alley activities; and 3) come back for a 6-month review. PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -7- (0785d) Commissioner Newman stated the area is mixed use and noise should be expected. She also stated that the downtown area was being designed to draw people to the area, and the noise factor would.be a fact of life. Commissioner Richardson discussed with staff the type of music to be played. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO APPROVE REVISION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-50, WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richardson, Newman, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Shomaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - REVISIONS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 90-50• 1. The addition of musical accompaniment to the existing piano entertainment adding a small, informal dance area and extending the closing hours 1:00 AM on Tuesday through Thursday and Sunday and to 2:00 AM on Friday and Saturday nights will not be detrimental to the general welfare of the persons residing in the area. 2. The proposed revisions will not be detrimental to property values in the area. 3. The proposed revisions will not create traffic problems. 4. The granting of the revision to Conditional Use Permit No. 90-50 will not adversely affect the General Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - REVISIONS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-50• 1. The site plan and floor plan dated received June 19, 1991 shall be the approved layout. 2. Live entertainment shall be restricted to unamplified_piano and musical accompaniment. 3. Hours of operation shall be: Monday - Friday Lunch 11:30 AM to 2:00 PM Monday - Thursday Dinner 5:00 PM to 1:00 AM Friday - Saturday Dinner 5:00 PM to 2:00 AM Sunday Dinner 5:00 PM to 1:00 AM PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -8- (0785d) 4. Dance area shall be limited to 115 square feet on the second floor. 5. A six month review shall be conducted by the Planning Commission in order to monitor the following: - Alley Conditions - Site Maintenance - Noise Transmission - Employee Parking - Employee Monitoring - Hours of Operation - Live Entertainment - Limitation of Dance Area B-4 APPEAL OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S APPROVAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 91-10/USE PERMIT NO. 91-10: APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: Northeast corner of Pacific Coast Highwayt and 5th Street. This item is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of Coastal Development Permit No. 91-10 and Use Permit No. 91-10. The approval permitted the placement of one (1) 24 foot x 60 foot temporary sales trailer on the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway and 5th Street for 12 months pursuant to Section 9730.30 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The trailer will serve as a temporary relocation facility for Jack's Surf Shop. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of Coastal Development Permit No. 91-10 and Use Permit No. 91-10 in order for staff to further assess parking requirements. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO CONTINUE THE APPEAL OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S APPROVAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 91-10 AND USE PERMIT NO. 91-10 TO THE JULY 23, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING IN ORDER FOR STAFF TO FURTHER ASSESS PARKING REQUIREMENTS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richardson, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Shomaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Newman, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -9- (0785d) B-5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 90-47 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO 90-35/TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS 14007, 14009 AND 14010/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS NOS 90-44, 90-45 AND 90-46: APPLICANT: Pacific Coast Homes LOCATION: Tentative Tract Map No. 14007 - Westside of Goldenwest Street, approximately 600 feet south of Ellis Avenue. Tentative Tract Map No. 14009 - Northeast corner of Edwards Avenue at Garfield Avenue. Tentative Tract Map No. 14010 - Northwest corner of Goldenwest Street at Garfield Avenue. Conditional Use Permit No. 90-47 with Special Permits in conjunction with Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-35, Tentative Tract Map Nos. 14007, 14009 and 14010 and Negative Declarations Nos. 90-44, 90-45 and 90-46 is a request for a master plan of development to subdivide three (3) non-contiguous parcels of land totalling 51 gross acres into a 141 lot subdivision for single family estate residential development with equestrian amenities. The master plan of development includes the designation of a ten (10) gross acre site for a potential school. The special permit (maximum 10% deviation) request is to encroach into the front and rear yard setbacks by two (2) to three (3) feet. The conditional exception (variance) request is to exceed the maximum two (2) foot cut and two (2) foot depth of fill for grading, a reduction of the minimum lot frontage (flag lots) requirements and a deviation greater than the 10% permitted for the minimum front yard setback. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Mitigated Negative Declarations Nos. 90-44, 90-45 and 90-46, Conditional Use Permit No. 90-47 with Special Permits, Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-35 and Tentative Tract Map Nos. 14007, 14009 and 14010 as amended by staff with findings and suggested conditions of approval. The Commissioners discussed with staff their concern with the Design Guidelines and the resident's concerns about same. The Commission felt the guidelines should be more specific. Staff explained that they have worked with the residents associations during the specific plan and had asked for revisions on the schematic outline but received none. Staff also explained that homeowner's have been noticed and have had ample opportunity for comments— The Commission expressed concern regarding the availablity of the report to the public in a timely manner because of its complexity. They also expressed their wish that the homeowners be completly involved with the process. PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -10- (0785d) THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Tom Zanic, Urban West, stated that he agreed with the majority of the conditions staff wished to impose, but did submit a letter listing the conditions which he was not in agreement. He discussed each of these with the Commission and staff. Dwayne Dishno, Superintendent School District, spoke in opposition to the request. Mr. Dishno stated the issue of the school site was not simple. He said the school district cannot afford schools in this area and urged the Commission to deny the request. Shirley Carey, Board of Trustees, spoke in opposition of the request. Ms. Carey stated the district must maintain standards and meet needs of growing population. Marshall Krupp, Consultant to Huntington Beach School District, spoke in opposition to the request. Mr. Krupp submitted for the record a large document. Mr. Krupp stated for the record the following: - The Planning Commission was not allowing the school district sufficient time to state the facts. If the lengthy report submitted to the Commission this evening was not read prior to a decision, the Commission was denying the school districts right to be heard. - Opposed request and opposed their rights not being heard. Tamar C. Stein, Esq., representing applicant, stated the law in this area was very clear. She stated the adequacy of the school site is not under their jurisdiction and theyu cannot deny under these terms. Gerald Chapman, 6742 Shire Circle, stated he was concerned with a common theme, one cohesive unit. He said it was not his intent to halt the project, just to make it cohesive. Joel Kirschenstein, Applicant, stated his concerns over the shcool site. He rebutted Mr. Krupp's statements and stated the district cannot receive state aide with the amount of surplus schools in existance. Ron Brundle, 1885 Goldenwest Street, spoke in favor of the project. Mr. Brundle expressed his appreciation to Huntington Beach Company for donating the land for the school. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -11- (0785d) The Commission discussed the affordable housing issue. They discussed the fact that the City has yet to form a policy, but the developer was expected to comply. A straw vote was taken to decide if the Commission should continue this item to review the school district's document, to work on design guidelines and look at ' vs -ions to the a uestrian trail system. The straw vote was re q approved. ON A MOTION BY DETTLOFF, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-47 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 90-35, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS 14007, 14009 and 14010 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS NOS. 90-44/45/46, TO REVIEW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED, TO REVIEW DESIGN GUIDELINES AND REVIEW EQUESTRIAN TRAILS TO THE JULY 23, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richardson, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: Newman ABSENT: Shomaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C. CONSENT CALENDAR None D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS D-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 90-15/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO 90-22 - EXTENSION OF TIME: APPLICANT: Cambell Saturn LOCATION: 18801 Beach Boulevard The applicant is requesting a one (1) year extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-15 and Conditional Exception No. 90-22 which were approved by the Planning Commission on June 5, 1990. These approvals permitted the conversion of a used car sales lot to a new car dealership with a variance to encroach into the rear setback with a building exceeding 18 feet in height. PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -12- (0785d) r� STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a one (1) year extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-15 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-22 to June 15, 1991 with all previous conditions of approval to remain in effect and the addition of the following two (2) conditions: 4.c. The developer shall be responsible for payment of any additional fees adopted in the upcoming Water Division Master Plan. 4.d. The developer shall be responsible for paying the Traffic Impact Fee at the time of final inspection. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY RICHARDSON, TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-15 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 90-22 WITH THE ADDITION OF TWO (2) CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richardson, Newman, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Shomaker, Leipzig ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITION USE PERMIT NO, 90-15/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 90-22: 4.c. The developer shall be responsible for payment of any additional fees adopted in the upcoming Water Division Master Plan. 4.d. The developer shall be responsible for paying the Traffic Impact Fee at the time of final inspection. D-2 LIMITED SIGN PERMIT NO, 91-6: APPLICANT: Local Neon Inc. LOCATION: 16732 Beach Boulevard Limited Sign Permit No. 91-6 is a request to permit a face change to an existing non -conforming pole sign. The sign exceeds the maximum height of 7 feet permitted by Section 9160.5(b) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -13- (0785d) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Limited Sign Permit No. 91-6 with findings and suggested conditions of approval. A MOTION WAS MADE BY RICHARDSON, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO APPROVE LIMITED SIGN PERMIT NO. 91-6 WITH FINDINGS AND SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richardson, Newman, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: Dettloff ABSENT: Shomaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - LIMITED SIGN PERMIT NO. 91-6: 1. Allowing the maintenance of the sign for an additional twenty-one (21) months will not adversely affect other signs in the area. 2. The proposed extension of time will not be detrimental to property located in the vicinity of such sign, and will be in keeping with the character of the surrounding area. 3. The sign in its existing location at the corner of Beach Boulevard and Terry Drive will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. 4. Due to the unique circumstances applicable to the sign, immediate alteration, removal or replacement of the sign will result in a substantial economic hardship. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - LIMITED SIGN PERMIT NO, 91-6: 1. The site plan and sign elevation received and dated April 1, 1991, shall be the approved layout. 2. Expiration date of Limited Sign Permit No. 91-6 shall be April 10, 1993. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall file a cash bond in the amount of $5,000 with the City for the purpose of indemnifying the City for any and all costs incurred with the applicable provisions of the sign ordinance after twwenty-one months from the date of approval, or remodel of the property. PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -14- (0785d) E. DISCUSSION ITEMS Commissioner Dettloff - asked staff to compile information on the acreage available in Industrial Zones and the number of uses coming into these areas that could use the available acreage (i.e. churches). She also asked staff to clarify the action taken when a problem is mitigated. Commissioner Bourguignon - inquired about the Harbour Code status and if it included the Solar Rooms. Mike Adams, Director of Community Development, explained their will be one more meeting of the Harbour Code Committe before incorporation into Division 9. He also explained that the Solar Rooms will be brought to the Commission separately. Commissioner Richardson - thanked Bruce Crosby, Public Works for his answer to the inquiry regarding the traffic signal at Warner and Pacific Coast Highway. Commissioner Leipzig - feels that Warner and Pacific Coast Highway needs a left turn indicator. He strongly urged staff to review. Commissioner Kirkland - thanked staff for their response to his inquiry regarding the Marshall Center. F. PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES Commissioner Richardson - questioned staff as to the status of the Revocation Ordinance in which the body that enacts has the power to revoke. Mike Adams indicated it is being written in the Division 9 rewrite. Commissioner Kirkland - questioned staff as to the status of the Citizens Task Force Committee regarding affordable housing. Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director, explained the Committee will be formed after policies are reviewed by City Council and after a joint study session with City Council and Planning Commission. Commissioner Leipzig - questioned staff about the Garfield and Edwards project. Bruce Crosby explained they should be finished with that phase by January, 1992. Commissioner Kirkland - questioned staff as to the half day workshop for the Commissioners. Mike Adams stated they would bring back some dates for the workshop at the next Planning Commission meeting. PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -15- (0785d) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS None COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS Mike Adams, Director Community Development, taken at the City Council meeting of July 1, ADJOURNMENT reiterated action 1991. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY NEWMAN, TO ADJOURN TO A 5:30 PM STUDY SESSION (AGENDA REVIEW, SUB -COMMITTEE REPORT), ON JULY 23, 1991 AND THEN TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richardson, Newman, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Shomaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED 1 °/kj 1 APPROVED BY: 1 Mike Adams, Secretary P nning Commission Chairperson PC Minutes - 7/2/91 -16- (0785d)