Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-11-16MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1993 Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California STUDY SESSION - 5:30 PM PROPOSED GRADING ORDINANCE REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P P P P ROLL CALL: Cook, Gorman, Biddle, Richardson, Dettloff, P P Newman, Inglee A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (4 MINUTES PER PERSON, NO DONATING OF TIME TO OTHERS) Anyone wishing to speak must fill out and submit a form to speak prior to Oral Communication or Public Hearing items. No action can be taken by the Planning Commission on this date, unless agendized. Hal Woods, representing applicant for Item D-1, a non public hearing item, stated he was available to the Commission to answer any questions. B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS B-1 CODE AMENDMENT NO. 93-8: APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LOCATION: Inland side of Pacific Coast Highway between Beach Boulevard and the Santa Ana River. The City Council on June 21, 1993, directed staff to process a zone change for the "White Hole" area to bring zoning into conformance with the adopted land use plan and to complete certification of the City's Local Coastal Program. Ordinance No. 3033 was approved in 1990 which established new zoning on the subject property. That ordinance remains in effect, but is subject to certification by the California Coastal Commission. Code Amendment No. 93-8 is to amend Article 942, Coastal Conservation, and Article 969.9, Coastal Zone of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code in order to achieve consistency with the adopted land use plan and to complete certification of the City's Local Coastal Program. The amendment includes clean-up language, and will require a conceptual development plan, environmental studies and restrictions on seven (7) parcels at the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway should any portion be proposed for development. The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for action. If adopted by the City Council, Code Amendment No. 93-8 along with Ordinance No. 3033 will be submitted to the California Coastal Commission for certification. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is still evaluating the details of the proposed Ordinance and is recommending a continuance to the December 7, 1993 Planning Commission meeting. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BIDDLE, SECOND BY GORMAN, TO CONTINUE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 93-8 TO THE DECEMBER 7, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO FURTHER EVALUATE THE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cook, Gorman, Biddle, Richardson, Dettloff, Newman, Inglee NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED B-2 CODE AMENDMENT NO. 93-5/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 93-20: APPLICANT: Department of Community Services, City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 93648 LOCATION: Commercial Zones City -Wide Code Amendment No. 93-5 in conjunction with Negative Declaration No. 93-20, is a request to amend the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code to establish provisions to allow and regulate outdoor uses, i.e., carts, kiosks, and sidewalk cafes on public and private property. The provisions will be added to Article 973, Miscellaneous Provisions, and will amend Article 922, Commercial Districts, and Article 924, Visitor Serving Commercial, to refer the reader to Section 9730.88 of Article 973. PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -2- (7536d) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the request because the code amendment will establish provisions to regulate outdoor uses on public and private property in the commercial areas of the City. The concept was approved by the City Council in July 1992 with direction to staff to formulate a code amendment for adoption. The provisions will provide additional commercial opportunities in the City and will be directed toward the pedestrian consumer. Discussion ensued regarding which businesses would be grandfathered in and which must come into compliance. Staff explained that all currently approved outdoor dining would be grandfathered with the exception of Amy's the Cappucino and Hot Dog carts. The Commission also discussed their concern regarding certain businesses that should be grandfathered in that do not have current approval for outdoor dining. There was discussion regarding dividing the ordinance into two (2) sections; outdoor dining and carts and kiosks. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Dianne Easterling, 203 - 8th Street, representing Downtown Residents Homeowners' Association, stated she would like to see the wording tightened up to allow Code Enforcement to properly enforce. She also stated she was against Zoning Administrator approval of such entitlements, and would prefer that it be the Planning Commission. Vi Cowden, 124 - 16th Street, representing Downtown Residents Homeowners' Association, read into the record the addition and deletion requests to the ordinance. Scott Cowden, 124 - 16th Street, representing Downtown Residents Homeowners' Association, read additional deletions and additions to the ordinance into the record. Patrick Farrel, 612 - 9th Street, representing Downtown Residents Homeowners' Association, read additional deletions and additions to the ordinance into the record. Marie St. Germain, 505 Alabama, representing Downtown Residents Homeowners' Association, read additional deletions and additions to the ordinance into the record. Jim Banks, 505 Al-abama, representing Downtown Residents Homeowners' Association, read additional deletions and additions to the ordinance into the record. Dave Bartlett, 6082 Jade Circle, representing Rally's Burgers, concurred with staff's assessment that sidewalk dining reduces parking needs. Mike Abdelmuti, 101 Main Street, downtown property owner, stated that outdoor dining was an asset to downtown Huntington Beach. He also stated that if outdoor dining is prohibited, or over regulated, his prospective tenants would be nullifying leases. PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -3- (7536d) Bill Gallegos, 208 - 5th Street, downtown property owner, stated his concern that carts and kiosks in the downtown area would be in direct competition with the existing businesses. He also stated opposition to charging fees for outdoor dining. Thomas Lin, 209 Main Street, downtown business owner, spoke in opposition to the request. His major concern was charging parking fees for outdoor dining. Jeffrey Jacobson, 300 Pacific Coast Highway #101, downtown business owner, stated opposition to charging parking in -lieu fees for outdoor dining. He said this would adversely impact merchants and the cost will cause businesses to withdraw there requests for outdoor dining. Dennis Chapman, 9842 Cornerbrook Drive, stated his concern that the in -lieu parking fees included in the ordinance will cause downtown merchants financial burden, which in turn will be passed on to the consumer. Jinx Varona, 309-5th Street, spoke in opposition to the ordinance as it is written. Bill Winn, 8141 Terry, manager Pierside Pavilion, spoke in opposition to the proposed in -lieu parking fees for outdoor dining. He feels that the ordinance as written is too stringent. Matt Williams, Sugar Shack Cafe, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. Mr. Williams also stated that the existing businesses with outdoor dining should be grandfathered in, if this ordinance was to receive approval. Bob Winchell, 6411 Weber Circle, submitted a letter to the Commission from Huntington Beach Tomorrow expressing their concerns. Barry Ellerbrook, 19800 Beach Boulevard, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. Dave Karina, 1903 Florida, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. George Arnold, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. Christina L. Glasgow, 113 Main Street, stated her concern with the in -lieu parking fees being proposed in the ordinance and what the determining criteria would be for the fee. Dick Harlow, 211 Main Street, stated his concern with the proposed in -lieu parking fee for outdoor dining. Robert London Moore, Sr., 18090 Beach Boulevard #6, stated his opposition to the proposed ordinance. PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -4- (7536d) After Commission discussion the Planning Commission stated their desire to continue the proposed ordinance in order to form a sub -committee to discuss the possibility of dividing the ordinance into two sections. One section would be for carts and kiosks and the other would be for outdoor dining. The Chairperson appointed Commissioners Newman, Gorman and Inglee to the committee. The Commission also requested staff to further clarify the process for approval by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, the use of alcoholic beverages on public property, parking/in-lieu fees for outdoor dining and specifically who the ordinance would apply to. A MOTION WAS MADE BY RICHARDSON, SECOND BY INGLEE, TO CONTINUE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 93-5 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 93-20 TO THE DECEMBER 7, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN, IN ORDER TO CLARIFY OUTSTANDING ISSUES, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cook, Gorman, Richardson, Dettloff, Newman, Inglee NOES: Biddle ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED B-3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-29/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 93-21• APPLICANT: Caffe Classico, 910 East Birch Street, Suite 350, Brea, CA 92621 LOCATION: 101 Main Street, Suite 109 Conditional Use Permit No. 93-29 and Coastal Development Permit No. 93-21 are requests to establish a 2,181 square foot restaurant with live entertainment (Caffe Classico) at 101 Main Street. The restaurant includes a 162 square foot on -site outdoor dining area and a 409 square foot outdoor dining area on the public right-of-way (expanded sidewalk area adjacent to the curb). The restaurant will be quick serve offering breakfast, lunch and dinner. A conditional use permit is required to establish the restaurant and to allow outdoor uses and live entertainment pursuant to Section 4.7.01 of the Downtown Specific Plan. The subject property is located in the Coastal Zone. A coastal development permit is required to establish an additional restaurant on this site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Downtown Specific Plan allows visitor -service uses including restaurants. Staff feels that the use will be compatible with surrounding land uses based upon the conditions imposed and recommends approval of the project with conditions of approval. PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -5- (7536d) Staff asked the Commission to consider continuing this item to the next scheduled Planning Commission meeting, as they had been led to believe that the applicant wished to withdraw the request. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BIDDLE, SECOND BY GORMAN, TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-29 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 93-21 TO THE DECEMBER 7, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cook, Gorman, Biddle, Richardson, Dettloff, Newman, Inglee NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED- B-4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-31: APPLICANT: Family Fitness Center, 24561 North Glassell, Orange, CA 92665 LOCATION: 5858 Warner Avenue (southwest corner of Warner Avenue and Springdale Street) Conditional Use Permit No. 93-31 with a special permit for 17 percent compact parking is a request to establish a Family Fitness Center in an existing 30,000 square foot building (former Liquor Barn Store) in the retail center located at the southwest intersection of Warner Avenue and Springdale Street. The proposed fitness center requires restripping the retail center parking lot and providing 72 compact parking spaces which represents 17 percent of the total number of parking spaces provided on -site. The proposed fitness center will include the following uses: weight training, aerobics and indoor basketball. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 93-31 with a special permit for 17 percent compact parking spaces with findings. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Robert Dennis, 7521 Esfera Street, Carlsbad, representing applicant, stated that they were in concurrence with the staff report except the non -conforming pole sign. Mr. Dennis stated that in the future they may request a special sign permit for the pole sign. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -6- (7536d) 1 i L The Commission expressed concern regarding the driveway on Warner Avenue and the additional traffic generation. Don Fishback, contractor for the applicant, stated they would do a study on the actual egress and conform to any conditions Public Works would request. A MOTION WAS MADE BY GORMAN, SECOND BY DETTLOFF, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-31 WITH SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 17 PERCENT COMPACT PARKING SPACES WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Gorman,, Biddle, NOES: Cook, Richardson ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Dettloff, Newman, Inglee FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-31: 1. The establishment of the proposed 30,000 square foot fitness center in an existing retail center will be compatible with existing retail uses and with surrounding uses because of the excess 4 parking spaces, and the designation of handicap and short term parking spaces. 2. The proposed fitness center will not create a traffic or parking problem. On site parking and circulation complies with the City's requirements for parking and circulation standards. 3. The proposed fitness center is a compatible use in the City's commercial land use area and will be consistent with the City's General Plan. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 17% COMPACT PARKING SPACES: 1. The special permit for 17 percent compact parking spaces (72 spaces of the total 423 on -site) is consistent with the City's parking requirement of a maximum of 20 percent and will not result in a detrimental impact on the existing retail center or surrounding arterial highways. 2. The special permit will not adversely affect the circulation and safety of the use, structure or site, or adjacent land uses as indicated in the traffic study dated September 20, 1993. The required back up space and size of parking spaces will be provided. 3. The special permit will result in a more effective and efficient circulation pattern and parking layout. The additional parking proposed short term parking will provide ample parking for the proposed and existing retail uses. PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -7- (7536d) 4. The special permit will not be detrimental to the general public health, safety, welfare, or convenience, nor injurious to property values in the vicinity. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-31: 1. The site plan and floor plan dated received November 4, 1993 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modification: a. The proposed compact parking spaces shall be shifted to the perimeter parking areas. 2. Employees for the fitness center shall park behind the main building in the perimeter parking areas. 3. Prior to final building inspection and/or Certificate of Occupancy issuance, the parking lot shall be restripped to conform to the approved site plan. 4. The proposed fitness center shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code. 5. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 93-31 if any violation of these conditions or the 6. Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. This conditional use permit shall not become effective for any purpose until an "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been properly executed by the applicant and an authorized representative of the owner of the property and returned to the Planning Division; and until the ten day appeal period has elapsed. 7. Conditional Use Permit No. 93-31 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. B-5 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 93-12: APPLICANT: Mark Frank, 701 Lakme Avenue, Wilmington, CA 90744 LOCATION: 7088 Edinger Avenue (Nationwide Travel) Special Sign Permit No. 93-12 is a request to install a six foot (61) high, 40 square foot freestanding monument sign identifying Nationwide Travel Center at 7088 Edinger Avenue. The special sign permit request is to exceed the maximum number of freestanding signs for the center, and to have the proposed sign within 85 feet of another freestanding sign, in lieu of the minimum 200 foot separation. PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -8- (7536d) The two (2) major tenants in the existing.commercial center (Toys-R-Us and Lucky Store) identify the center with two (2) center identification signs, a 15 foot high pylon sign located off Edinger Avenue, and a seven (7) foot monument sign off Goldenwest Street. In addition, there are six (6) other freestanding signs within the center that identify businesses with their own building pad. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Because the commercial shopping center is presently identified by the Toys-R-Us/Lucky Store center identification signs off Goldenwest and Edinger, staff is recommending the Planning Commission deny the request for the additional freestanding sign. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Henry Hirsch, Nationwide Travel, submitted a letter to the Commission. Mr. Hirsch gave a brief explanation to the Commission supporting the request. Mark Frank, applicant, also gave a brief description of the request. Mr. Frank stated his concern that inadequate signage has caused businesses in this area to fail. Mr. Frank also submitted to the Commission an alternative plan that would be acceptable. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. A MOTION WAS MADE BY GORMAN, SECOND BY NEWMAN TO APPROVE SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 93-12, WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cook, Gorman, Biddle, Richardson, Dettloff, Newman, Inglee NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 93-12: 1. The proposed seven (7) foot high, 50 square foot, three (3) tenant panel freestanding monument sign (see attached Exhibit "A") will not adversely affect other signs in the area, nor will the sign obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. The sign will comply with the minimum site angle requirement for signs within the landscape planter. 2. Strict compliance with Articles 961 will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant because the proposed freestanding sign is necessary for identification of the business. The new business location in the front office building does not provide any street exposure. PC Minutes - 11/16/94 (7536d) 3. There are unusual site or building characteristics that preclude Nationwide Travel Center from yielding adequate signage from the provisions of the sign code. The office building is setback 85 feet from Edinger Avenue and does not have sufficient sign exposure to passing motorist on Edinger Avenue. 4. Due to the fact that there are special site or building conditions applicable to the site, approval of an additional freestanding sign is necessary to enjoy sign provisions enjoyed by surrounding properties. 5. Additional signage for this site would not constitute an y aesthetic impact to the site and surrounding properties. The proposed sign will be compatible with signage in the surrounding area. There are other signs in the vicinity with less than 200 feet of distance from one another. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 93-12: 1. The site plan received and dated September 24, 1993 and the sign elevation received and dated November 16, 1993 (Exhibit "A") shall be the conceptually approved layout except for the following modifications: a. The proposed sign shall comply with the minimum site angle requirement for a sign located within a landscaped planter. 2. Building and electrical permits shall be obtained prior to installation of all signs. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to rescind this special sign permit approval in the event of any violation of the applicable zoning laws. Any such decision shall be preceded by notice to the applicant and a public hearing, and shall be based on specific findings. B-6 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 93-14: APPLICANT: Alex Cetin, Warehouse Electronics, 7132 Edinger Avenue, Huntington Beach, California 92647 LOCATION: 7132 Edinger Avenue Special Sign Permit No. 93-14 is a request to install two (2), three foot, nine inch (3'-911) high, 9 square foot freestanding directional" signs on Goldenwest Street and Warner Avenue, identifying Warehouse Electronics at 7132 Edinger Avenue. The special sign permit request is to exceed the maximum number of freestanding signs for the center, and to erect the proposed signs within 80 feet (Goldenwest) and 115 feet (Edinger) of other freestanding signs, in lieu of the minimum 200 feet between signs. PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -10- (7536d) 1 The two (2) major tenants in the existing commercial center (Toys-R-Us & Lucky Store) identify the center with two (2) center identification signs, a 15 foot high pylon sign located off Edinger Avenue, and a seven (7) foot monument sign off Goldenwest Street. In_addition, there are six (6) other freestanding signs within the center that identify businesses with their own building pad. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Because the commercial shopping center is presently identified by the Toys-R-Us/Lucky Store center identification signs off Goldenwest and Edinger, staff is recommending the Planning Commission deny the request for the additional freestanding directional signs. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Adele Cetin, 7122 Sunlight Drive, applicant, stated they were requesting the signage because their business had no street visibility. Ali Cetin, 7128 Edinger Avenue, applicant, stated that competition has caused business to slow, therefore they were requesting larger signage. Alex Cetin, 7132 Edinger Avenue, applicant, explained the history of the site and their inability to be included in the existing freestanding signage. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSON PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. The Commission expressed their concern that this businesses had not been included in the signage that currently exists. They asked staff if future sign programs could be conditioned to allow the use by all tenants. Staff stated this could legally be done. The Commission stated they would support a sign on Goldenwest Street only, and outline the perimeters of the sign, but it must go to the Design Review Board for final approval. A MOTION WAS MADE BY GORMAN, SECOND BY BIDDLE, TO APPROVE SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 93-14 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cook, Gorman, Biddle, Richardson, Dettloff, Newman, Inglee NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -11- (7536d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 93-14: 1. Strict compliance with Articles 961 will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant because the proposed freestanding sign on Goldenwest Street is necessary for identification of the business. The location of the Warehouse Electronics business in the rear commercial building is over 500 feet from Goldenwest Street, and does not provide any street exposure. 2. There are unusual site or building characteristics that preclude Warehouse Electronics from yielding adequate signage from the provisions of the sign code. The location and orientation of the strip commercial building on the south side of the property does not provide business exposure on Goldenwest Street. The Warehouse Electronics business is 5,000 square feet in size and is the third largest business in the center which warrants a freestanding sign. 3. Due to the fact that there are special site or building conditions applicable to the site, approval of an additional freestanding sign is necessary to enjoy sign provisions enjoyed by other businesses in the center. The Warehouse Electronics business is 5,000 square feet in size and is the third largest business in the center which warrants a freestanding sign. 4. The proposed three (3) foot high, nine inch (3'-9") high , 9 square foot freestanding directional sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area, nor will the sign obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. The sign will comply with the minimum site angle requirement for signs within landscape planters and are adequately setback from other signs in the vicinity. 5. Additional signage for this site would not constitute an aesthetic impact to the site and surrounding properties. The proposed sign will be compatible with signage in the surrounding area. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 93-14: 1. The site plan received and dated October 15, 1993 shall be the conceptually approved layout except for the following modifications: a. The proposed sign on Edinger Avenue shall not be allowed. b. The proposed sign on Goldenwest Street shall be maximum nine (9) square feet in size (within the perimeters of three [31 feet high, by six [61 feet wide) and the total height no greater than three (3) feet, nine (9) inches. 1 PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -12- (7536d) 2. The sign elevations and design shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board and shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. 3. Building and electrical permits shall be obtained prior to installation of all signage. 4. This special sign permit shall not become effective until an i "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been signed and notorized by the applicant, and returned to the Planning Division; and until the ten (10) day appeal period has elapsed. 5. Special Sign Permit No. 93-14 shall be valid for the Warehouse Electronics business only; and is non -transferable to another business. Should the Warehouse Electronics business cease to remain, the freestanding sign shall be removed at the owner's expense. 6. The Planning Commission reserves the right to rescind this special sign permit approval in the event of any violation of the applicable zoning laws. Any such decision shall be preceded by notice to the applicant and a public hearing, and shall be based on specific findings. C. CONSENT CALENDAR C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED AUGUST 24 1993 A MOTION WAS MADE BY RICHARDSON, SECOND BY GORMAN, TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED AUGUST 24, 1994, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cook, Gorman, Richardson, Dettloff, Inglee NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Biddle, Newman MOTION PASSED C-2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 7 1993 A MOTION WAS MADE BY RICHARDSON, SECOND BY GORMAN, TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 7, 1994, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cook, Gorman, Biddle, Richardson, Dettloff, Inglee NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Newman MOTION PASSED PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -13- (7536d) D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS D-1 ONE (1) YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-30• APPLICANT/ PROPERTY Summerhill Homes, 777 California Avenue, OWNER: Palo Alto, CA 94304 LOCATION: 8186 Constantine Drive The applicant is Conditional Use d" approved by the Conditional Use unit condominium permits pursuant Beach Ordinance requesting a one (1) year extension of time for Permit No. 92-30 with 12 Special Permits, which was Planning Commission on November 4, 1992. Permit No. 92-30 permits the construction of a 48 project with a 33 percent density bonus and special to Section 915 and Section 963.7 of the Huntington Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve a one (1) year extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 92-30 with Special Permits to November 4, 1994, with all previously approved findings and conditions of approval to remain in effect. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COOK, SECOND BY NEWMAN, TO APPROVE A ONE (1) YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME TO NOVEMBER 4, 1994, FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-30 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS AND ALL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FINDINGS AND CONDITIOS OF APPROVAL TO REMAIN IN EFFECT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cook, Gorman, Richardson, Dettloff, Newman, Inglee NOES: Biddle ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED E. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS/INQUIRIES Commissioner Inglee - was told by staff that the Ocean View School District is responsible for the upkeep of the tennis courts he asked about in a previous inquiry. Staff stated they would notify the School District of the tennis courts condition. Commissioner Richardson - stated that the Chairman and another Commissioner would be reviewing the Condition Letters of the Planning Commission prior to their release in order to reduce any misinterpretations. 1 PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -14- (7536d) F. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS None G . ADJOURNMENT A MOTION WAS MADE BY GORMAN, SECOND BY RICHARDSON, TO ADJOURN TO A 5:30 PM STUDY SESSION (AGENDA REVIEW, SUB -COMMITTEE REPORT), ON DECEMBER 7, 1993, AND THEN TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cook, Gorman, Biddle, Richardson, Dettloff, Newman, Inglee NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED /kj 1 APPROVED BY: Zg�-t, Ho a d Zelefs , Se et Planning Commission Ch 'rperson PC Minutes - 11/16/94 -15- (7536d)