Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-06-20MINUTES CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, June 20, 1994 A video tape recording of this meeting is on file in the City Clerk's Office Mayor Moulton -Patterson called the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL PRESENT: Bauer, Moulton -Patterson, Winchell, Leipzig, Sullivan (arrived at 5:10 p.m.) ABSENT: Robitaille, Silva STUDY SESSION -CODE AMENDMENT NO. 91-10 -ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-32 - PROPOSED ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - DIVISION 9 REWRITE Title 22: Overlay District Oil Production Coastal Zone Floodplain Interim Study Neighborhood Conservation Planned Block Development High -Rise Mobilehome Title 25: Subdivisions General Provisions Tentative Maps Vesting Tentative Maps Final Maps and Parcel Maps Dedications and Reservations Improvements Reversions to Acreage Mergers Enforcement Susan Pierce, Associate Planner, presented the Community Development staff report. The Planning Director responded to City Council questions and clarified Councilmember Sullivan's question regarding Council approval of Final Parcel Maps. 31 Page 2 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 CLOSED SESSION The Mayor called a Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 549556.9(c) to confer with its City Attorney regarding pending litigation based on existing facts and circumstances, the legislative body of the local agency has decided to initiate or is deciding whether to initiate litigation - number of potential cases (one) - Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) Unfunded Liability. (120.80) The Chairman called a Closed Session of the Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation which has been formally initiated to which the agency is a party. The title of said litigation is Jones v. Redevelopment Agency - O.C. Superior Court Case No. 62-30-62. (400.50) The Chairman called a Closed Session of the Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to give instructions to the Agency's negotiator, Barbara Kaiser regarding negotiations with Lauro Guarno and James Koller concerning the purchase of the property located at 301 - 303 Main Street - instruction will concern price, consideration of settlement offer by two parties who are legally responsible for site remediation, alternative action: initiate litigation under the Polanco Act - Third Block West. (400.50) The Mayor called a Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the city is a party. The title of the litigation is Michael Scanlon v. City of Huntington Beach - O.C. Superior Court Case No. 67-06-35. (120.80) The Mayor called a closed session of the City council pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to meet with its designated representatives William Osness, Personnel Director and Daniel Cassidy, esq., Liebert, Cassidy and Frierson Regarding Labor Relations Matters - Meet and Confer regarding the following employee organizations: Police Officers Association (POA), Municipal Employees Association (MEA), Huntington Beach Fireman's Association (HBFA). (120.80) RECESS RECONVENE The Mayor called a recess of Council at 5:15 p.m. The meeting was reconvened by the Mayor at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. FLAG CEREMONY, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION The Flag Ceremony was presented by Celebration USA, Incorporated, whose members sang the Pledge of Allegiance Song. The introduction provided a brief historical background and the song defined the character of the American people and the principles upon which our nation is founded. 32 Page 3 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL PRESENT: Bauer, Moulton -Patterson, Winchell, Leipzig, Sullivan, Silva (arrived at 8:55 p.m.) ABSENT: Robitaille PRESENTATION - DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS - LOU SANDOVAL The Mayor presented a plaque to retiring Public Works Director, Lou Sandoval, and thanked him for his dedicated service to the City of Huntington Beach. The Mayor listed the accomplishments of the Public Department under Mr. Sandoval including the construction of the new Municipal Pier. PRESENTATION BY DEBORAH COPE, PRESIDENT, FOURTH OF JULY EXECUTIVE BOARD Deborah Cope, President, Fourth of July Executive Board, extended an invitation to Council and the audience to attend the Fourth of July Parade and related activities and presented Fourth of July T-shirts to the City Council. Deborah Cope stated that this was to be her last year of participation on the Fourth of July Executive Board and informed the Council and audience that it had been a wonderful two years PRESENTATION TO VIOLET COWDEN, RETIRED WASP - WOMEN'S AIR SERVICE PATROL, WORLD WAR 11 VETERAN AND NOMINEE TO THE AVIATION HALL OF FAME Mayor Moulton -Patterson presented a commendation to Violet Cowden, retired WASP, Women's Air Service Patrol, World War II Veteran and Nominee to the Aviation Hall of Fame. The Mayor read the Commendation which stated that Violet is a twenty-two year resident of the city and is a World War II Veteran as a Women's Air Force Service Pilot. She was born and raised in South Dakota and educated to be a teacher. She was twenty-six and a grade school teacher in 1943 when she volunteered to serve her country. Twenty-five thousand (25,000) women tried out for the WASP but only one thousand seventy-four (1,074) graduated from flight training. These women were the first women to fly military aircraft like the P-51 Mustang, logging sixty million (60,000,000) miles ferrying the fighter pilots to embarking points, towing targets, performing flight tests and simulating bombing missions. Thirty-eight died in the line of duty. Today Vi keeps the memory of the WASPS alive by speaking to schools, colleges and military bases. The Mayor told Vi how very proud the community is to have her in our city. Violet Cowden received a Standing Ovation from the City Council, City staff and all members of the community present in the Council Chamber. Vi Cowden stated that it was a great privilege and honor to serve her country during World War II. She thanked the Council and members of the audience. 33 Page 4 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 PRESENTATION OF COMMENDATION TO THE MARINA HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS SOFTBALL TEAM DIVISION 1, CIF CHAMPIONS 1994 The Mayor presented commendations to members of the Marina High School Girls Softball Team. The Mayor congratulated the team members and expressed the pride of the community. PRESENTATION - COMMENDATION TO FOUNTAIN VALLEY BOYS HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL TEAM - DIVISION 1, CIF - CHAMPIONS 1994 Mayor Moulton -Patterson presented commendations to the members of the Fountain Valley Boys High School Team, Division 1, CIF Champions 1994. The team also finished number two in the nation on the USA Today Baseball Poll. The Mayor expressed the community's pride in the team members' accomplishments. INTRODUCTION OF HUNTINGTON BEACH STUDENT AMBASSADORS AND CHAPERONS TO SISTER CITIES The Mayor introduced the Huntington Beach Student Ambassadors and chaperons to Anjo, Japan and to Waitakere, New Zealand, the sister cities to Huntington Beach. She stated that the students were selected from a large pool of qualified applicants to travel to Huntington Beach's sister cities in August of this year. PUBLIC COMMENTS The City Clerk presented a communication to Council from Bill Mello, Huntington Beach Citizens' Bureau of Investigation, re: Pension Spiking Update - City Administrator's letter to Mr. Mello dated June 16, 1994 included (160.30) Late Communications Announced by City Clerk The City Clerk announced that the following communications had been received so that speakers under public comments would be aware that the communications were available pursuant to the Brown Act. Communication from Jay Davis dated June 15, 1994 regarding the moratorium placed on infill residential building in the city. Communication from Tom Zanic, Seacliff Partners dated June 20, 1994, requesting the issuance of building permits received before June 6, 1994. Ordinance No. 3241 - Amendment to Business License Ordinance and a communication from the Huntington Beech Conference and Visitor's Bureau regarding the approval of the Grant Agreement and a communication from Tom Zanic, Seacliff Partners, dated June 17, 1994 regarding the appeal of Use Permit No. 93-90. 34 Page 5 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 Don Galitzen, President of Pier Colony, 200 Pacific Coast Highway, spoke regarding the problems of safety, noise and the quality of life relative to what the residents believe was a hasty action by the city in approval of the Wild Rides motorcycle store on Second Street. He stated that he had a petition listing signatures of a majority of the condominium owners and that he would give each Councilmember a copy and ten copies to the City Clerk. He requested that a staff member be assigned to investigate the problem. Mike Johnson, Pier Colony Resident, stated that in this area it the motorcycle shop was a hazardous safety problem. He state there was not a stop light on Second Street or an entrance on Pacific Coast Highway. He stated that there was an increase in traffic. He requested Council assistance in providing staff to get this problem resolved. Mike Seif, Pier Colony Resident, spoke regarding the children at the condominium pool which overlooks the motorcycle shop and the tough looking people . He stated that the noise is unbelievable and invited the Council to see how bad it is. The City Administrator stated that he would refer this problem to Melanie Fallon , Community Development Director. George Arnold spoke in opposition to the hiring of new employees, business licenses being issued without a public hearing if they are not zoned for it as the location that the motorcycle shop was previously a car dealership. He also stated his complaint about the alcohol permits issued downtown and suggested a cut-off time of ten p.m. Don Schultz, Wild Rides partner, stated that their business only sells parts and that there was no problem of which he knew. He stated that he would like to be involved in any meeting with the Community Development Department. Mike Baumea, Wild Rides partner, stated that he does not believe there is a problem yet and that he would like to be part of a solution. He stated that they had been open three days yet the association president had not been aware they were open. Don Baumea, Wild Rides partner, presented Council with a document that was circulated by the group challenging their business . He stated that the business had only been open a few days and that there had not been a chance for these events to happen. Paul Frysak, Citizens Bureau of Investigation representative, spoke regarding a Division Fire Chief's position retirement pay as the figures would be from a spiked retirement versus non - spiked retirement. Teddi Alves, Citizens Bureau of Investigation member, spoke regarding the figures of retirement when vacation is used and spoke regarding Councilman Robitaille's comments on the CBI report. She stated the request of CBI that Councilmember Robitaille be barred from voting on spiking issue. Jim Madden, Citizens Bureau of Investigation CBI member, paraphrased two letters from PERS to the Personnel Department which are in the material submitted. The letter received September 18, 1990 from Gary Jones, PERS, and the letter from Dale Hansen, PERS, received July 14, 1992 regarding subjects including auto allowance, vacation and employer payments. 35 Page 6 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 Bill Mello, Citizens Bureau of Investigation CBI member referring to city documents spoke regarding the procedure by which the employee contracts were negotiated and prepared. He spoke regarding the lifeguard contracts relative to spiking. Mr. Mello spoke regarding the cost liability of spiking stating that CBI believes the City Council was not made aware of the cost liability that would be caused by the spiking provisions of the new contracts and that is why the Council voted to approve the contracts. Jim Osborne, Citizens Bureau of Investigation CBI member, spoke regarding the CBI communication and the responses received from city staff regarding spiking provisions of employee contracts. He commented on letters on the matter received by CBI from the City. And on the Deputy City Administrator's statement that he found contract amendments in off -site location that increased spiking on the old contracts prior to 1991 and 1992. He requested CBI be provided with all the documents so that an independent investigation can be completed. Jim Bridges, spoke regarding employee contracts with non -representative employees. He requested cancellation by the city of the pending spiking portions of the pending retirements and that PERS be requested to eliminate the spiking portions of the previous retirements. Jeff Metzel, President of Huntington Seacliff Homeowners Association, urged deletion of the words "alleys" or "public easements" relative to the definition of infill lot on the agenda item pertaining to the single family residential moratorium issue. He requested that Council delay action until the current urgency ordinance expires. J. R. Fowler, Seacliff resident, supported the comments of Mr. Metzel and requested that additional wording be placed on the Community Development Director's recommendation as follows: Single family homes which meet one of the following criteria will also be exempt from the moratorium but will still be reviewed to determine compliance with design guidelines. Patricia Bushman, Sunline Electric Chair Sales, stated that they have put in place every safety and sanitation equipment of which they are aware for body piercing including sterilizing equipment between customers and written consent needed for minors. She stated that the state has passed AB 3787 and she informed the Council of provisions of the bill. She stated that she does not want additional fees imposed. Natalie Kotsch, International Surfing Museum representative, spoke regarding the need to put the Surf Museum on the ballot and the requirement for Measure C in the Charter. John Mertzweiler spoke regarding an arrest which had taken place downtown for possession of a gun and other criminal activities taking place. He commented on the fund-raiser for the Moulton - Patterson campaign for county supervisor. He stated that more police were needed downtown. Karen Pederson, representing Huntington Auto, requested a continuance of the agenda item relative to Resolution No. 6605 - Management and Regulation of Contract Towing Service Agencies, as she had received it on Thursday and the police person involved is not present to speak. The City Administrator informed Council that it had been planned to defer consideration of Resolution No. 6605 to a future date. 36 Page 7 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 Brent Sears, architect, requested clarification on the agenda item regarding Single Family Residential 45 Day Building Moratorium as he has completed construction drawings and would like to know where his plans fit into the proposed action. Jay Davis stated he and his architect, Mr. Sears, would like to know whether the proposed action applies to his property. Alan Segal spoke regarding the property in the city previously occupied by Weiser Lock Company and stated that he was opposed to the appeal which was to be forthcoming to Council on the action that denied the proposed swap meet on this property. Della Chadwell, Huntington Beach Mall Manager, presented reasons why she believed an indoor swap meet was not in the best economic interest of the city. She cited issues relative to the best use of city industrial and retail property. Flint Morrison spoke regarding the agenda item relative to the Fourth of July Parade. He stated his comments were not directed at the Fourth of July Executive Board which works hard to bring one of the finest parades in the state and west of the Mississippi. He stated his concerns were for the rising costs of the Fourth of July activities and the shortfall the city experiences. Traci Goodson -Smith, owner of Sneetches, Beach Boulevard, spoke regarding proposed Ordinance No. 3237 - Tattoo Establishments scheduled on the agenda. She stated that her business had not caused any problems and that she had received permission from the city . She requested that she be allowed to conduct her business for six months or a year to determine if there are any problems or if it creates a public nuisance or if the police need to come down for anything. Tom Zanic, representing Seacliff Partners, addressed Council regarding the Agenda Item relative to the Single Family Residential 45 Day Building Moratorium - Definition of Infill Lots. He spoke regarding the meetings held between the company and the neighborhood as well as meetings with city staff. He requested that Council consider allowing the issuance of those building permits that have valid applications in-house. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND LIAISON REPORTS ACTION TAKEN TO CHALLENGE CURRENT BILL TO CITY RECEIVED FROM PERS - APPROVED Councilmember Sullivan spoke regarding the Council Committee on the agenda item regarding Payment Options - PERS Unfunded Liability and it was determined that Councilmember Sullivan would report for the Council Committee as it pertained to the agenda item regarding Payment Options - PERS Unfunded Liability. Councilman Sullivan reported on the Council Committee's deliberations on the PERS matter. He stated that because of the nature of the matters a number of the committee's meetings have been in closed session. A motion was made by Sullivan, seconded by Bauer, as follows: 37 Page 8 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 The City of Huntington Beach currently has a bill for $743,632 from the Public Employees' Retirement System. The City Council is considering challenging this bill. The challenge to this bill will also inform PERS that the city may file a lawsuit challenging the cost of pension spiking in the city. The California Court of Appeal has determined that PERS improperly informed agencies that pension spiking of certain benefits was lawful. The purpose of this motion is for the Council to take action to initiate a challenge to pension spiking. The specific action which the Council is voting on is to challenge the current bill from PERS. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bauer, Moulton -Patterson, Winchell, Leipzig, Sullivan NOES; None ABSENT: Silva, Robitaille PROCESSING OF SPIKING PORTIONS OF RETIREMENT APPLICATIONS DEFERRED FOR TWO WEEK PERIOD PENDING LEGAL REVIEW Councilmember Leipzig spoke at length regarding the pension spiking problem's effect on the community and city employees. Councilmember Sullivan spoke regarding a communication from PERS received by the city on September 18, 1990, which is in the CBI presentation material and which communication he had seen for the first time. He requested clarification of the timelines involved relative to the Memorandums of Understanding which allowed spiking. Councilmember Sullivan spoke regarding the charge CBI was informed by the Personnel Department to copy documents requested by CBI. A motion was made by Sullivan, seconded by Bauer, that an emergency action is necessitated on the subject of charges to the citizens of CBI for copies of documents they require. Councilmember Leipzig stated that as an alternative he would suggest that Councilmember Sullivan request a copy of the documents. The motion made by Sullivan seconded by Bauer was withdrawn. Councilmember Winchell stated that in response to a comment made by the public earlier, she had responded through her letter of June 10, 1994, and that it would be tracked down and provided. A motion was made by Bauer that from this day forward any application for retirement not include those items which in a circular from the PERS indicates are not appropriate and that includes vacation allowance, automobile allowance and any PERS rollover that is not allowed. Councilmember Sullivan stated that in essence, not to process the spiked portion. Councilmember Bauer stated it was. Councilmember Sullivan seconded the motion. WE Page 9 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 Councilmember Winchell stated she believed the basis of the motion is on the unlawful part; that we can no longer do something that we now feel and have a court case to indicate is unlawful. She stated she would like to know the ramifications of that before we take a definitive action in terms of the Memorandums of Understandings. The City Administrator reported. The City Administrator stated that if Council makes the motion he would like the Meyers-Milias Brown Act researched. Councilmember Winchell stated the reasons she would like to hold in abeyance the processing of any more of these until the city receives a full explanation from legal counsel on the lawfulness of the proposed action. Councilmember Bauer spoke regarding the matter. The City Administrator reported on the PIERS Circulars and the city not being able to determine from PERS as to what they actually did include in the actuarial. He advised Council that he would like to have the opportunity to look at the legality of the action. A new motion was made by Bauer, seconded by Sullivan, that the city defer processing of any spiking portion of any retirement application for two weeks until such time as we can come back with a more formal, permanent policy which is based on some legal grounds; and further direct the City Administrator and the Council Committee to seek legal advice so we do this the right way two weeks from now. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Bauer, Moulton -Patterson, Winchell, Sullivan, Leipzig Noes: None Absent: Silva, Robitaille Councilmember Silva arrived at the Council meeting at 8:55 p.m. Fourth of July Report to be Presented The City Administrator stated that he would be presenting a report next week regarding the planned Fourth of July activities State Budget Update The City Administrator stated that an update on the state budget would be presented to Council soon. (CITY COUNCIL) QUALITY SERVICE MISSION, VISION AND VALUES - STATEMENT FOR CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - ADOPTED (120.30) The City Clerk presented a communication from the City Administrator submitting a Quality Service Mission, Vision and Values Statement as proposed by a city staff committee and endorsed by the Council Committee on Quality Service and Process Improvement. 39 Page 10 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 The City Administrator presented a staff report using slides. On motion by Bauer, second Moulton -Patterson, Council adopted the Quality Service Mission, Vision and Values Statement for the City of Huntington Beach by the following roll call vote: AYES: Silva, Bauer, Moulton -Patterson, Winchell, Sullivan, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Robitaille (City Council) CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING - DECISION CONTINUED FROM JUNE 6, 1994 - APPEAL BY COUNCILMEMBER DAVE SULLIVAN OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 93-90 - SEACLIFF PARTNERS - 18961 GOLDENWEST STREET - 550 FEET NORTH OF GARFIELD AVENUE BETWEEN SADDLEBACK LANE AND GOLDENWEST STREET - PERIMETER RETAINING WALLS - APPEAL GRANTED - USE PERMIT NO. 93-90 DENIED - ALTERNATIVE GRADING PLAN APPROVED (420.40) The following communications were received at the June 6, 1994 public hearing: American Landscape Supply, dated June 1, 1994; Huntington Beach School District, dated June 3, 1994; Hunsaker and Associates Irvine, Incorporated, dated June 2, 1994; Wagner and Lichman, dated June 3, 1994; and Seacliff Partners, dated June 3, 1994. The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set to consider the following subject on which a public hearing had been closed with decision continued from June 6, 1994: APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of the Planning Commission's conditional approval of Use Permit No. 93-90 APPLICANT: Seacliff Partners APPELLANT: Councilmember Dave Sullivan LOCATION: 18961 Goldenwest Street (along the northerly property lines of lots 48 through 62 of Tract No. 14009, located 550 feet north of Garfield Avenue between Saddleback Lane and Goldenwest Street. ZONE: Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan REQUEST: To permit the construction of up to 6.7 foot high tract perimeter retaining walls topped with up to six (6) foot high block walls (total of 12.0 feet) pursuant to Section 9771 (1) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15305, Class 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act. COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable 40 Page 11 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 The Community Development Director presented a staff report. She reported that the applicant had revised the plans and these plans have been conceptually approved by the Public Works Department. Following discussion, a motion was made by Leipzig, seconded by Sullivan, to sustain the appeal filed by Councilman Sullivan of the Planning Commission's conditional approval of Use Permit No. 93-90, and overrule the decision of the Planning Commission, deny Use Permit No. 93-90 and accept the alternative grading plan that avoids the need for the retaining wall. The City Clerk announced that a communication had been received from Tom Zanic, Seacliff Partners, dated June 20, 1994 regarding the appeal of Use Permit No. 93-90. Also, a communication from Jay Davis dated June 15, 1994 on the matter. Councilmember Sullivan informed the City Clerk that the communication from Jay Davis was in regarding to the agenda item relating to the moratorium on infill lots. The City Clerk stated that she would note that. The City Clerk then inquired which Findings would be included in the motion. Following discussion, the City Clerk was advised that the motion included Findings as set forth in Attachment No. 7 of the Request for Council Action dated June 20, 1994 as follows: 1. The establishment and maintenance of retaining perimeter walls will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity, and be detrimental to property values and improvements in the area. The perimeter walls will adversely impact surrounding residential properties by creating an offensive view. 2. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed retaining walls does not properly adapt the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in.a harmonious manner. The retaining walls will impact the abutting property by resulting in up to a 5.9 foot high grade differential. 3. The granting of Use Permit No. 93-33 will adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed retaining walls are not consistent with the Estate Residential land use designation of the General Plan. An additional finding was added to the motion as follows: 4. That an alternative grading plan has been developed by the applicant that eliminates the need for the application. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bauer, Moulton -Patterson, Winchell, Silva, Sullivan, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Robitaille 41 Page 12 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 91-10 - ENVIRONMENT MENT NO. 91-32 - PROPOSED ZONING AND DIVISION 9 REWRITE - APPROVED WITH CHAPTER 225 HELD IN ABEYANCE - PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED OPEN TO AUGUST 1, 1994 (640.101 The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on the following application: APPLICATION NUMBER: Code Amendment No. 91-10/Environmental Assessment No. 91-32 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, Department of Community Development REQUEST: Repeal existing Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, Division 9, and establish a new zoning and subdivision ordinance for inclusion in the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. The new ordinance updates the zoning and subdivision provisions by incorporating current planning principles and planning requirements of state law, deleting duplications and conflicts, and streamlining review processing. COASTAL STATUS: An amendment to the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program Implementing Ordinances will be filed with the California Coastal Commission following adoption by the City Council. Public Hearing Topics for June 20, 1994 TITLE 22 - Overlay District Oil Production Coastal Zone Floodplain Interim Study Neighborhood Conservation Planned Block Development High -Rise Mobilehome TITLE 25 - Subdivisions General Provisions Tentative Maps Vesting Tentative Maps Final Maps and Parcel Maps Dedications and Reservations Improvements Reversions to Acreage Mergers Enforcement Susan Pierce, Community Development Associate Planner, presented a slide report reviewing each section of Title 22 - Overlay District and Title 25 - Subdivisions. 42 Page 13 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 The Community Development Director stated she would like to further review, with report back to Council relative to Title 22 - Multi -story building: setback from residential. She stated that she believed staff would be returning with a recommendation that the proposed code read "a minimum fifty (50) foot setback or one -fifth of building height setback". The Mayor declared the hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter the hearing on this portion of the proposed rewrite of Division 9 - Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Re -write was closed. A motion was made by Leipzig, seconded by Winchell, to approve Titles 22 - Overlay Districts, and Title 254 - Subdivisions, of the Proposed Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance rewrite as recommended by the Planning Commission and with the recommended change to Title 22 - Multi - Story building: setback from residential to "A minimum fifty (50) foot setback or one -fifth of building height setback, whichever is greater'. Councilmember Sullivan expressed concerns regarding Chapter 225 of Title 22 - Overlay Districts, Planned Block Development Overlay District, as it may affect property rights. Councilmembers Leipzig and Winchell stated that they would amend their motion to hold Chapter 225 of Title 22 in abeyance. The amended motion made by Leipzig, seconded by Winchell, carried by the following vote: AYES: Bauer, Moulton -Patterson, Winchell, Silva, Sullivan, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Robitaille (City Council) PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL BY COUNCILMEMBER DAVE SULLIVAN TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-42 IN CONJUNCTION WITH DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO. 94-2 - HUNTINGTON BEACH MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION - SOUTH EAST CORNER BEACH BOULEVARD AND NEWMAN AVENUE - APPEAL DENIED - PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVED (420.40) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the following appeal: APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 93-42 and Design Review Board No. 94-2 APPLICANT: Edward Endo, Huntington Intercommunity Hospital APPELLANT: Councilmember David Sullivan LOCATION: 17772 Beach Boulevard. South east corner of Beach Boulevard and Newman Avenue. ZONE: OP (Office Professional) 43 Page 14 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 REQUEST: An appeal by Councilmember Sullivan of the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-42 in conjunction with Design Review Board No. 94-2. This represents a request to expand the Huntington Beach Medical Center by five thousand (5,000) square feet in order to increase the size and capabilities of the existing emergency room and out -patient facilities. Included in the proposed expansion is a request to delete conditions imposed by the Planning Commission through Conditional Use Permits No. 84-16 and 87-48 that required a total of nine hundred thirty-four (934) parking spaces, twenty-two (22) spaces above the requirements of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, and instead provide nine hundred twenty-five (925) parking spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act. COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable The Community Development Director presented a staff report and reported on the Special Parking Study that was conducted. She gave reasons for the Planning Commission and staff recommendation of approval of the application. The Mayor declared the public hearing open. Dr. David Baer, Emergency Physician, Huntington Beach Medical Center, addressed Council in support of the expansion. He cited the need for much needed space in the emergency department. He stated the overcrowding was causing diversion of Huntington Beach and Westminster ambulances to other facilities. Brian D. Fitzgerald, Chief Operating Officer, Huntington Beach Medical Center, gave reasons why there was sufficient parking to expand the emergency department. He stated that expansion of emergency services would provide for a safe environment which is part of the City Mission Statement adopted earlier in the meeting. He stated the possibilities which could occur when ambulances are diverted away from the nearest emergency room., Art Aviles, Chairman, Board of Trustees, Huntington Beach Medical Center, spoke in support of the application citing the benefits to the patients and community. He stated that it is now the case that as Pacifica's and Huntington Beach Medical Center's emergency facilities become overloaded, additional travel time causes increased risk to the patient. Edward Endo, architect of project, spoke in support of the applicant stating that they had met all the planning and parking requirements of the Community Development Department and the Planning Commission. Peter Green, member of Board of Directors, Huntington Beach Medical Center, stated that the proposed expansion met the needs of the community's health, safety and welfare and the intent of the Mission Statement adopted earlier in the meeting. Craig Campbell, Firefighter, City of Westminster, cited the urgent need for the expansion, stating the expansion will allow Westminster paramedics to stay in their city boundaries which will in turn lessen the need for Huntington Beach paramedics to be in Westminster. Page 15 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 Madelyn Tinkler, Administrator, Outpatient Surgery Center, stated that she was not opposed to the expansion however she believed the requirements should be applied that were required for their facility. She stated she had requested but had not received documentation relative to the fire lane exception. Discussion was held between Councilmember Bauer and Ms. Tinkler regarding what Ms. Tinkler believes will be a parking shortage. Lori A. Coleman, Attorney, Center for Special Surgery, spoke regarding the inequity of the city's application of requirements and requested Council denial of the application. Kelli Trachtman, Attorney, Outpatient Surgery Center, cited past City Council action in 1987 which did not grant a similar request for their facility. Dr. Neil A. Friedman, Post Surgical Recovery Center, stated that he believed the applicant should comply with rules and regulations and that the rules and regulations should be enforced. Discussion was held between Councilmember Silva and Dr. Friedman regarding the use of his parking structure by adjacent neighbors. Councilmember Sullivan presented questions regarding the history of the area and staff responded. Discussion was held between Council and Mr. Fitzgerald, Dr. Friedman and Ms. Trachtman. Ms. Tinkler responded to Councilmember Sullivan's question as to what she perceived to be the inequality. Discussion was held and at the request of Councilmember Bauer, the Planning Director spoke regarding the Planning Commission rationale. A motion was made by Winchell, seconded by Leipzig, to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-42 in conjunction with Design Review Board No. 94-2 and further: Uphold the deletion of conditions contained in Conditional Use Permit No. 84-16 and 87-48 that required an additional twenty-two (22) parking spaces above the requirements of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code with findings and suggested conditions of approval as outlined in Attachment No. 3 and 4 to the Request for Council Action dated June 20, 1994: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL 1. The proposed 5,000 square foot hospital expansion to an existing 135 bed hospital is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, especially the goals of promoting the provision of adequate community facilities (Policy 3.4.6.1- Community Facilities Element) and encouraging the proper location and planning of community facilities (Policy 3.4.2.6 - Land Use). Page 16 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 2. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed 5,000 square'foot hospital expansion to an existing 135 bed hospital properly adapts to existing streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. The proposed design will allow separate access for emergency vehicles and emergency room patients. The use of materials, such as brick, will match the existing structure. 3. The proposed 5,000 square foot hospital expansion is properly integrated to the other medical uses on a site and will provide more efficient medical services to the citizens of Huntington Beach. 4. The access to and parking for the proposed 5,000 square foot hospital expansion does not create an undue traffic or parking problem. As the parking study by Katz, Okitsu and Associates dated March 1, 1994, indicates, there is a surplus of parking during peak periods and the proposed expansion will not significantly increase the parking demand and the surplus will remain. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-42 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated December 27, 1993, shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to Conditional Use Permit No. 93-42 becoming effective, the following shall be complied with: (a) Submit an Acceptance of Conditions form to the Community Development Department that has been properly executed by the applicant and an authorized representative of the owner of the property. (b) The ten (10) day appeal period has elapsed. 3. The following shall be completed prior to construction: (a) Submit a copy of the revised site plans, floor plans and elevations approved by the Office of State Architect for inclusion in the entitlement file. (b) All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. (c) Obtain a grading permit from the Huntington Beach Department of Public Works. (d) A landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size, quantity), an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9608 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits. Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced on a two to one ratio with a minimum of thirty-six (36) 46 inch box trees, which shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. Page 17 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 (e) An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to City of Huntington Beach Fire Department Regulations. (f) A fire alarm system shall be approved and installed pursuant to City of Huntington Beach Fire Department Regulations. (g) The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and Standards. 4. The following shall be completed prior to occupying the expansion and complied with during occupancy. (a) Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted and marked. (b) Fire access lanes shall be maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. (c) Exit signs and exit path markings shall be approved and installed pursuant to City of Huntington Beach Fire Department and State regulations. 5. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 93-42 in conjunction with Design Review Board No. 94-2 if any violation of these conditions or of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. 6. Conditional Use Permit No. 93-42 in conjunction with Design Review Board No. 94-2 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Silva, Moulton -Patterson, Winchell, Leipzig NOES: Bauer, Sullivan ABSENT: Robitaille (City Council) PUBLIC HEARING - HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTO DEALERS BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - RESOLUTION NO. 6604 - ADOPTED - ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR 1994-95 FISCAL YEAR - 1993-94 ANNUAL REPORT - STAFF REQUESTED TO ARATE MEETINGS OF BID (460.30) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider Resolution No. 6604 - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING AN ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 TO FUND IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTO DEALERS BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT." 47 Page 18 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 The Economic Development Director presented a staff report. She stated that she had distributed to Council a revised budget, received from the auto dealers this afternoon, and which was available with the City Clerk for members of the public. Councilmember Bauer stated that Council was in receipt of a letter from one of the dealers stating concern regarding the budget. He inquired if this objection had been resolved by the new budget. The Economic Development Director stated that the people were in the audience and could address this matter. Mayor Moulton -Patterson declared the public hearing open. Don Stephens, South County Motors, requested a copy of the letter and was provided a copy by Mr. Andrusky. Mr. Stephens presented a budget he wished to share with the City Council. Mayor Moulton -Patterson stated that she would like to continue the matter as she had not had an opportunity to review the budget submitted. Jack Caswell, Huntington Beach Auto Dealers Association, gave reasons why additional time would not help. Don Stephens stated his disagreement with Mr. Caswell. Jim Opp informed Council that the District would soon deplete their funds. In response to a question by Council the City Treasurer and Economic Development Director reported. The Economic Development Director stated that the association could borrow against their trust account. Mr. Caswell responded. A motion was made by Bauer, seconded by Moulton -Patterson, to approve the Huntington Beach Auto Dealers Business Improvement District Annual Report for 1993-94; and adopt Resolution No. 6604 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO APPROVE AN ASSESSMENT FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTO DEALERS BID FOR 1994-95." The City Attorney reported on the authority of Council. Councilmember Leipzig requested that the staff be directed to have the Business Improvement District itself have regular meetings distinct from meetings of the association which is a different organization and also that meetings of the Business Improvement District be noticed. Councilmember Silva stated that he would be willing to meet with the parties involved. W Page 19 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 The motion made by Bauer, seconded by Moulton -Patterson, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bauer, Winchell, Moulton -Patterson, Leipzig NOES: Sullivan ABSTAIN: Silva ABSENT: Robitaille (City Council) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 45 DAY BUILDING MORATORIUM - DEFINITION OF INFILL LOTS - PURSUANT TO URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 3240 ADOPTED JUNE 6, 1994 - DEFINITION OF INFILL LOT ADOPTED - EXEMPTIONS NOS. 1-4 APPROVED WITH ADDITION OF NO. 5 EXEMPTION (640.10) The City Clerk presented a communication from the Community Development Director regarding a forty-five (45) day building moratorium adopted by Council on June 6, 1994, Urgency Ordinance No. 3240, on single family homes on infill lots. The Community Development Director presented the staff report including the staff recommendations for definition of an infill lot on Page 2 of the staff report as follows: "An infill lot is a vacant parcel of land intended for single family residential units excluding parcels which are separated by streets, alleys or public easements. Room additions are exempt from this definition." The Community Development Director also presented the staff recommended five exemptions from the moratorium as follows: 1. Homes that are less than twenty-five (25) feet in height. 2. Homes with are fifty (50) feet or more away from an existing single family home. 3. For custom homes which are designed as part of new subdivision of custom homes. 4. Homes which are built to the same zoning standards as adjacent homes. These homes would still be reviewed to determine compliance with the design guidelines. 5. Homes consistent with the design guidelines which were put into effect June 1, 1994. Following discussion, a motion was made by Leipzig, seconded by Moulton -Patterson, to adopt a definition of infill lot as amended from the staff recommendation to read as follows: "An infill lot is a vacant parcel of land intended for single family development which is adjacent to one or more existing single family residential units excluding parcels which are separated. by streets or alleys. Room additions are exempt from this definition." M Page 20 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Silva, Bauer, Winchell, Moulton -Patterson, Leipzig, Sullivan NOES: None ABSENT: Robitaille Following discussion, a motion was made by Leipzig, seconded by Winchell, to allow the Community Development Director to exempt Single Family Home properties that meet the four criteria that are listed in the staff report with an exemption which staff has made in their oral presentation that consistency with the design guideline policy shall constitute a fifth exemption. Councilmember Winchell clarified the rationale of the motion and Councilmember Leipzig confirmed that the homes that are twenty-five (25) feet or less in height would not need that additional examination of the design guidelines nor would those homes which are fifty (50) feet or more away from an existing single family home nor would custom homes which are partof a new subdivision, but No. 4 would have 'for custom homes which are designed as part of a new subdivision of custom homes". The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Silva, Bauer, Winchell, Moulton -Patterson, Leipzig, Sullivan NOES: None ABSENT: Robitaille Councilmember Leipzig spoke regarding the Seacliff Oil Islands G and X not within the Seacliff area and requested that staff when reviewing applications for building permits address the possibility that these two oil islands might meet one or more of these criteria. The City Attorney spoke at length on the matter including stating her concern that all properties be treated fairly and equitably and spoke regarding the procedure for exemptions. Considerable discussion was held between the Community Development Director, City Attorney and Council. It was determined that the specific exemptions were a clarification of the definition of infill. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - JONES V. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - APPROVED The City Attorney advised Council that she had a settlement of a lawsuit to report pursuant to the disclosure provisions of the Brown Act, Government Code Section 54957.1(a) (3) (A) - Jones v. Redevelopment Agency. The City Attorney reported that in Closed Session the following settlement had been approved by a vote of five Agency Members in favor: Bauer, Moulton -Patterson, Winchell, Leipzig, Sullivan and two Agency Members absent: Silva, Robitaille: A. All fourteen (14) tenants waive forty thousand dollar ($40,000) claim against city/agency. 50 Page 21 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 B. Tenants to pay nine thousand dollars ($9,000) cash to city as to one tenant. C. Tenants agree to reduce "agreed value" by fifty-one thousand dollars ($51,000) in the aggregate in favor of city. The following Agenda Items were continued to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting of June 21, 1994 at 6:30 p.m. (City Council) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING - AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS LICENSE ORDINANCE REGARDING OUTDOOR AND INDOOR SWAP MEETS AND SPECIAL EVENTS - PUBLIC MEETING JUNE 20, 1994 TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS - FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD AUGUST 1, 1994 - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (640.10) (City Council) RESOLUTIONS NOS. 6601, 6602, AND 6603 - NOVEMBER 8, 1994 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (620.20) (City Council/Redevelopment Agency) NOTICE OF COMPLETION - FLORIDA STREET AND YORKTOWN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - NASHAT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED - CC-873 - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (600.50) (City Council) AGREEMENT - LIBRARY COMPUTER SYSTEM - PURCHASE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - GEAC, COMPUTERS, INCORPORATED - WAIVER OF ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE -_DEFERRED FROM JUNE 6. 1994 - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (600.10) (City Council) EDISON COMMUNITY PARK SOFTBALL LIGHTING REPLACEMENT - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (320.45) (City Council) REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SIGN CODE COUNCIL COMMITTEE LIST - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (120.25) (City Council) ORANGE COUNTY BOLSA CHICA LINEAR PARK PROPERTY AND WATER INTEREST TRANSFER DEEDS - HOLLY-SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1 - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (650.80) (City Council) BID AWARD - R. J. NOBLE COMPANY - CC-784 - BEACH BOULEVARD SMART STREET AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ELLIS AVENUE TO INTERSTATE 405 FREEWAY - CC-784 FEDERAL ID NO. STPLN-5181 020 - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21 1994 (600.50) 51 Page 22 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 (City Council) RESOLUTION NO. 6605 - MANAGEMENT AND REGULATION OF CONTRACT TOWING SERVICES AGENCIES -FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT AGENCIES OPERATING WITHIN THE CITY - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (530.30) (City Council) AMENDMENT TO WEST ORANGE COUNTY WATER BOARD JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT - CHANGE OF FISCAL YEAR TO OCTOBER 1 - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (600.40) (City Council) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT - UNITED INSPECTION AND TESTING COMPANY - PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION - CC-969 - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (600.10) (City Council) AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT - MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INCORPORATED - CONSULTING ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR CENTRAL LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (600.10) (City Council) SOUTH BEACH RESTROOM NUMBER ONE - CC-908 - REJECT ALL BIDS - RE - ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (600.80) (City Council) RESOLUTION NO. 6606 - INCLUSION OF CITY INTO A COUNTY -WIDE RECYCLING MARKET DEVELOPMENT ZONE PROGRAM - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21 1994 (810.60) (City Council) MOBILE HOME REVIEW COMMITTEE QUARTERLY REPORT - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (430.70) (City Council/Redevelopment Agency) DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM - PARTICIPANT APPROVAL - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS - BRISAS DEL MAR - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (340.70) (City Council) GRANT AGREEMENT - HUNTINGTON BEACH CONFERENCE AND VISITORS BUREAU, INCORPORATED FOR THREE MONTH PERIOD - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21,1994 (600.10) ncil) FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION - PROVIDING FOR C POLICE/PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY SERVICES - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (320.20) 52 Page 23 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 (City Council) PAYMENT OPTIONS - PERS UNFUNDED LIABILITY - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (700.50) (City Council) APPROVAL OF TWO AGREEMENTS - DAVIS COMPANY AND DAVID GRIFFITH AND ASSOCIATES - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS, PRIVATIZATION AND REGIONALIZATION STUDIES -CONTINUED TO JUNE 21 1994 (600.10) (City Council) HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP - FUNDING REQUEST FOR ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION OF 7812 BARTON DRIVE - SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (600.10) (City Council) RESOLUTION NO. 6599 - THREE MONTH BUDGET AMENDMENT - FIFTEEN MONTH FISCAL YEAR - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (320.20) . (City Council CREATION OF NEW DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 1 POSITION - DEFERRED FROM JUNE 6, 1994 - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (700.10) (City Council) WEST ORANGE COUNTY WATER BOARD-1994/95 PRELIMINARY BUDGET - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (320.80) (City Council) ORDINANCE NO. 3236 - ADDS TATTOO ESTABLISHMENTS TO PERMITTED USES IN COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT AND HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ZONES CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (640.10) (City Council) ORDINANCE NO. 3237 - TATTOOING ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION REGULATIONS -CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (640.10) (City Council) ORDINANCE NO. 3238 - ESTABLISHES A DEFINITION FOR POOL AND BILLIARD HALLS - CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 1994 (640.10) COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Request state legislation establishing health standards and a Certification Program similar to that required by cosmetologists - Deferred from June 6, 1994 - Submitted by Councilmember Ralph Bauer - Continued to June 21, 1994 (640.40) Resolution No. 6607 - Continued to June 21, 1994 - Opposes HR3636 regarding the Nation a Communications Competition and Information Infrastructure Act of 1994 - Submitted by Councilmember Sullivan - Continued to June 21, 1994 (120.70) 53 Page 24 - Council/Agency Minutes - 06/20/94 ADJOURNMENT:- CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Mayor Moulton -Patterson adjourned the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to Tuesday, June 21, 1994 at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chamber, Civic Center, Huntington Beach, California. ATTEST: City Clerk/Clerk i Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency and City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Mayor/Chairman 54