HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-09-26APPROVED 11/14/95
1
MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1995
Council Chambers - Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California
STUDY SESSION - 4:00 PM
GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT REVIEW
A. Southern California Edison Presentation (Jerry Dominguez)
B. Circulation Element (traffic model review)
C. Land Use Element (FAR review, land use changes)
D. Outstanding Issues
REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
A P P P P P A
ROLL CALL: Holden, Livengood, Biddle, Gorman, Kerins, Tillotson, Speaker
AGENDA APPROVAL
Public Hearing Items B-3 and B-4 were brought for►vard in the Agenda and heard
after Item B-1. Please note that the Minutes will reflect actions taken in their original
order.
A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - (4 MINUTES PER PERSON, NO
DONATING OF TIME TO OTHERS) Anyone wishing to speak must fill out
and submit a form to speak prior to Oral Communication or Public Hearing items.
No action can be taken by the Planning Commission on this date, unless agendized.
NONE
B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
B-1 CIRCULATION ELEMENT - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.94-2/
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 94-1- COMPREHENSIVE
UPDATE OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN
(CONTINUED FROM THE SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING):
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,
CA 92648
REQUEST: This element identifies the current and future transportation needs
for the City and sets policies that ensure a safe and efficient
transportation system.
LOCATION: City Wide
General Plan Amendment No. 94-2/Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 is the
comprehensive update of the city's General Plan. Since its adoption in December of 1976,
the General Plan has undergone incremental updates to reflect the changing needs of the
city; however no comprehensive update has occurred since the initial adoption. The public
hearings on the General Plan update began on July 18, 1995. The Planning Commission at
the meeting of September 12, 1995, continued the public hearings open to the meeting of
September 26, 1995.
Circulation Element - The draft element identifies the current and future transportation
needs for the city and sets policies that ensure a safe and efficient transportation system.
The draft Circulation Element addresses a majority of the same issues currently identified
in the adopted Circulation Element. Major policies or issues are identified and highlighted
for the Commission's review. For tonight's review, the Planning Commission should
focus on the new Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Programs only. The review of specific
roadway segments and capacity is scheduled to begin at the next scheduled meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take straw votes on the draft Circulation
Element, and continue the Public Hearings on General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 and
Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 to the next scheduled Planning Commission
meeting of October 10, 1995."
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
THERE WERE NO PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED OPENED.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 2 1 (p=038)
7
L
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KERINS, SECOND BY LIVENGOOD TO
CONTINUE THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT TO THE OCTOBER 19,1995,
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, TO ALLOW STAFF TIME TO AMEND
AS RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMISSION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Livengood, Biddle, Gorman, Kerins, Tillotson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Holden, Speaker
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
B-2 LAND USE ELEMENT REVIEW LAND USE CHANGES) - GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-2 / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
NO. 94-1 - COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH
GENERAL PLAN (CONTINUED FROM THE SEPTEMBER 12, 1995
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING):
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,
CA 92648
LOCATION: City Wide
General Plan Amendment No. 94-2/Environmental Impact Report No. 94- i is the
comprehensive update of the city's General Plan. Since its adoption in December of 1976,
the General Plan has undergone incremental updates to reflect the changing needs of the
city; however no comprehensive update has occurred since the initial adoption. The public
hearings. on the General Plan update began on July 18, 1995. The Planning Commission at
the meeting of September 12, 1995, continued the public hearings open to the meeting of
September 26, 1995.
Land Use Element - The draft element identifies the location -and distribution of land uses
such as residential, commercial, or industrial and specifies the amount of building intensity.
The draft Land Use Element addresses a majority of the same issues currently identified in
the adopted Land Use Element. Major policy changes or issues are highlighted and
identified for the Commission's review. For tonight's review, the Planning Commission
should focus on the new Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Programs only. The review of
specific land use map recommendations is scheduled to begin at the next scheduled
meeting.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 3 1 (pcm038)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take straw votes on the draft Land Use
Element, and continue the Public Hearings on General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 and
Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 to the next scheduled Planning Commission
meeting of October 10, 1995."
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
Mark Porter, President Huntington Beach Tomorrow, 19561 Topeka Lane, submitted to
the Commission a list of Huntington Beach Tomorrow's recommendations for the Land
Use Element.
Monte C. Weaver, 19061 Crystal Street, stated that he owned property in the area of 21 st
and 22nd Street and wished that the rezoning of this area be brought forth with the
General Plan Amendment.
Richard Harlow, 211 Main Street, representing Delma Company, requested that the
Commission consider merging areas #16 and 471 to create a mixed use designation.
Alice Shaw, 16400 Saybrook Lane, #1, area #19, stated her concern that the mobile home
owners had not been notified of the changes that would occur.
Ray Manion, President Huntington Harbor Mobile Home Estates, 16400 Saybrook Lane,
#23, area #19, requested that the mobile home owners is this area be notified. He also
stated his concern that the proposed change would increase cost of land.
Carl Irwin, 7400 Center Avenue, 1,215, area #21, requested that residential care be added
to this areas designation.
Bill Anderson, 17066 Palmdale Street, area 925, spoke in opposition to the rezoning of
this area.
Dr. David L. Dains, DDS, 17751 Beach Boulevard, area #41, stated that the area was
currently a medical/dental area and was concerned with the proposed change to high
density residential.
Mitsuru Yamada, 7942 Speer Avenue, area #41, spoke in opposition to the rezoning from
commercial to high density residential, stating it would negatively impact the value of the
land.
George Naff, 20491 Castle Rock Circle, area #52, spoke in opposition to the proposed
land use change for this area.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 4 1 (p=038)
Don Lewis, 9532 Caithiness, area #52, spoke in opposition to the proposed changes in this
area, citing negative traffic impacts and no economic justification. Mr. Lewis submitted to
the Commission a petition of opposition with 39 signatures.
Bruce D. Mattern, 9441 Harcourt Circle, area #52, spoke in opposition to the proposed
changes due to negative traffic impacts and the children's safety.
David Elliott, 20522 Mantauk Circle, area #52, spoke in opposition to the proposed
changes, stating that the area currently has 15 commercial centers.
Debb Clay, 20271 Bancroft Circle, area 452, spoke in opposition to the proposed changes
due to negative traffic impacts and the children's safety.
Donel Gorman, 9422 Hingham Drive, area #52, spoke in opposition to the proposed
changes.
James Goldman, 20531 Paisley Lane, area 952, spoke in opposition to the proposed
changes stated that the Historic Resource Board has yet to review the area and may
designate portions as historic sites.
Kathy Goldman, 20531 Paisley Lane, area 452, spoke in opposition to the proposed
changes due to negative traffic impacts and the children's safety.
Marcie Trotsky, 9422 Coastland Drive, area 452, spoke in opposition to the proposed
changes due to negative traffic impacts, increased noise, trash and graffiti and the
children's safety.
William W. Rhoton, 20462 Whitetree Circle, area 952, spoke in opposition to the
proposed changes.
Robert Buaas, 20271 Bancroft Circle, area 452, spoke in opposition to the proposed
changes.
Tim Geddes, 21802 Windsong Circle, area #52, spoke in opposition to the proposed
changes.
Monika Mueller Galluccio, 9182 Christine Drive, area #53, spoke in opposition to the
proposed changes in this area. She stated that the redesignation of Open Space to Low
Density Residential will ruin the wetlands forever.
Rick Mortimer, 9002 Christine, area #53, spoke in opposition to the proposed changes in
this area.
Jon Ely, 22051 Hula Circle, area #53, spoke in opposition to the proposed changes in this
area. Mr. Ely submitted to the Commission a petition of opposition.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 5 1 (pcm038)
Bernice Malkin, 22351 Hardwick Lane, area 453, spoke in opposition to the proposed
changes in this area.
Janet May, 8471 Indianapolis Avenue, area #56, spoke in opposition to the proposed
changes in this area, citing excessive noise and increased vandalism.
Cheryl Browning, Roosevelt Lane, area 979, asked for clarification as to the changes that
were proposed to occur in this area.
Staff explained that they were supporting the specific plan suffix with planned
development in this area.
Hun S. Kwon, 19331-19351 Beach Boulevard, area #88, spoke in opposition to the
proposed change in this area.
Jeff Metzel, 19391 Shady Harbor Circle, area 489, President Huntington Seacliff
Homeowners Association, stated his concern that they would lose the park space in this
area if it was not designation as Open Space in the General Plan Update.
Craig Pierce, 8192 Kinder, area 495, spoke in opposition to the proposed changes stated
that area is better suited to residential and open space rather than commercial.
George Mark Bello, 18211 Lisa Lane, area #95, spoke in opposition of the proposed
change to commercial.
Irma Benevenia, 17502 Beach Boulevard, area 441, concerned that the proposed changes
to this area would include the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Board of Realtors
property, bringing it into a High Density Residential designation.
Linda Garofalo, Parish Manger St. Bonaventure Church, 16400 Springdale, area #20,
requested that the Commission consider using more `P' (Public Service) designations into
the General Plan Update.
Tamera Rooke, 20441 Newland Street, areas 46 and #52, spoke in opposition to the
proposed changes in these areas.
Terry Hoffman, 9362 Gateshead Drive, area #52, spoke in opposition to any development
in this area.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR
AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
The Planning Commission took straw votes on the Land Use Element.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 6 (p=038)
STRAW VOTES WERE TAKEN ON THE LAND USE ELEMENT'S LAND USE
MAP RECOMMENDATIONS, ITEMS 1-30, 52, 53 AND 89 AND WAS
CONTINUED OPEN TO THE OCTOBER 10,1995, PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING.
B-3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-3/PRECISE PLAN OF STREET
ALIGNMENT NO. 94-1/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT
NO. 95-1/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 94-12:
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works, 2000
Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648
PROPERTY
OWNER: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,
CA 92648
LOCATION: Walnut Avenue between Sixth Street and the alley directly to the
east of Main Street
Walnut Avenue, at the intersection of Main Street, is currently classified and planned as a
secondary arterial requiring four lanes of travel. However, at this intersection, Walnut
Avenue is presently constructed with two lanes of travel. On July 11, 1994, the City
Council directed Staff to begin the process of analyzing and reclassifying Walnut Avenue
from Sixth Street to the alley directly east of Main Street to reflect existing conditions.
General Plan Ainendment'No. 94-3\Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 94-1`: Local
Coastal Program Amendment No. 95-1 is a request to:
1 Reclassify Walnut Avenue between Sixth Street and the alley directly to the east of
Main Street from its present designation as a Secondary Arterial to a Local Street on
the City of Huntington Beach Circulation Plan of Arterial Highways; and,
2. Reduce the right-of-way width for the7 portion of Walnut Avenue between Main Street
to the alley directly to the east of Main Street from 80 feet to 70 feet. The 70 foot
right-of-way width will reflect the existing conditions and will not result in any
reduction of street width as presently constructed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports the request based upon the following reasons:
• The existing 70 foot right-of-way with two lanes of travel help to maintain the
pedestrian focus of the downtown area and continue the goals and policies of the
Downtown Specific Plan Village Concept;
PC Minutes-9/26/95 7 (p=038)
s The existing 70 foot right-of-way with two lanes of travel adequately manages existing
and projected traffic levels;
• At the intersection of Main Street, Walnut Avenue would not function efficiently as a
secondary arterial due to the amount of pedestrian activity;
• The reduction in required right-of-way would allow on the preservation of 10 feet of
property on the southeast corner of Main Street and Walnut Avenue (Standard
Market). This may encourage the property owner to rebuild or rehabilitate the
existing commercial structure;
• The proposed reclassification and reduction in right-of-way width maintains and
enhances public safety because pedestrian traffic will be facilitated by slower moving
traffic;
• The proposed circulation pattern provides convenient access into the downtown area
and access to parking.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
Richard Harlow, 211 Main Street, spoke in support of the request.
THERE WERE NO OTHER SPEAKERS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR
AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY BIDDLE, TO
APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.94-12, GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO.94-3, PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT
NO.94-1 AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 95-1
WITH FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL AND FORWARD TO THE CITY
COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Livengood, Biddle, Gorman, Kerins, Tillotson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Holden, Speaker
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-3:
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 94-1\General Plan Amendment No. 94-3\Local
Coastal Program Amendment No. 95-1 complies with the following policies of the
General Plan:
1. Land Use Element
Policy 3.4.2.8.3 Promote the revitalization of the Downtown area. By allowing the
preservation of 10 feet of private property, the property owner may be encouraged to
rebuild or rehabilitate a vacant commercial structure in the downtown core.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 8 (p=038)
2. Circulation Element
Policy 3.1.2.2.1 Develop a system of arterial streets that ensures the safe and
efficient movement of people and goods. By providing an efficient flow of vehicular
traffic along an arterial that terminates at a public parking structure in the downtown
core, efficient access to parking is provided and the safety of pedestrians is enhanced.
Policy 3.1.2.2.7 Provide a transportation system that is consistent with the efforts to
minimize adverse environmental and aesthetic effects. By providing convenient
access to parking, people may be encouraged to walk within the downtown core,
thereby reducing automobile emissions.
3. Coastal Element
Policy 4b. Promote safe pedestrian access to the beach from the inland side of
Pacific Coast Highway. By eliminating the requirement for an 80 foot right-of-way
which requires a four lane pedestrian crossing, pedestrian access and safety is
enhanced.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT
NO. 94-1:
1. The proposed reclassification and reduction in right-of-way width complies with the
goals and policies of the Downtown Specific Plan Village Concept and both the
existing and proposed General Plans by preserving the pedestrian scale of the
downtown core area, providing convenient access to parking, enhancing pedestrian
access to the beach area and providing a safe and efficient transportation system.
2. The proposed reclassification and reduction in right-of-way width improves public
safety. By reducing the length of intersection, crossings in a heavily traveled
pedestrian area, the possibility for conflicts between motor vehicles and pedestrians is
reduced.
3. The proposed circulation pattern provides convenient access into the downtown area
and access to parking. By terminating the four lane arterial requirement of Walnut
Avenue at the parking structure entrance, vehicles can quickly access the downtown
core area and parking.
4. The existing 70 foot right-of-way with two lanes of travel adequately manages existing
and projected traffic levels.
Due to the large amount of pedestrian activity in the Downtown core area, at the
intersection of Main Street, Walnut Avenue would not function efficiently as a four
lane arterial.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 9 (p=038)
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT
NO. 95-1
1. The proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 95-1 development conforms
with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Huntington Beach Coastal
Element of the General Plan, in particular Policy 4b which states "Promote safe
pedestrian access to the beach from the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway." By
eliminating the requirement for an 80 foot right-of-way and a four lane pedestrian
crossing in a heavily traveled pedestrian area, pedestrian access and safety is enhanced.
2. Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 95-1 is consistent with the Coastal Zone (CZ)
suffix, the Huntington Beach Downtown Specific Plan as well as other provisions of
the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. By reducing the
length of the pedestrian crossing Walnut Avenue, Precise Plan of Street Alignment No.
94-1 and General Plan Amendment No. 94-3 preserves the pedestrian scale of the
downtown core area.
4. The proposed Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 94-1 and General Plan
Amendment No. 94-3 conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of
Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act by eliminating the requirement for a four lane
pedestrian crossing and enhancing pedestrian access and safety in the downtown core
area.
B-4- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.95-59:
APPLICANT: Regina Markwardt, 3221 S. Artesia Street, Santa Ana,
CA 92704
PROPERTY Huntington Beach City School District, 20451 Craimer
Lane,
OWNER: P.O. Box 71, Huntington Beach, CA 92648
LOCATION: 20581 Farnsworth Lane, Clapp School (closed school on
west side of Farnsworth Lane, approximately 130 feet
south of Indianapolis Avenue)
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-59 represents a request to establish a day care and
preschool, Special Children's Connection, at the Clapp School site. Clapp School
site closed in August 1993. The applicant proposes to utilize the rear one-half of
the school and provide child care and educational programs for children ages six
(6) weeks to five (5) years. The use will be compatible with surrounding land uses
and there will be no traffic impacts. The site does need some improvements in a
couple of areas.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 10 (p=038)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports the request to establish the daycare and preschool in the Clapp
School site for the following reasons:
• It complies with the provisions of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
applicable to properties zoned Public -Semipublic District.
o Sufficient parking is available for the daycare and preschool use.
• The site will continue to provide educational opportunities.
• It is in conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan.
• There are conditions imposed to improve the site where necessary.
• It will be compatible with surrounding residential uses.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
Regina Markwardt, 3221 S. Artesia Street, applicant, stated that she was aware of
the traffic impact and parking concerns associated with the request and will take
measures to mitigate any problems that may occur.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR
AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY KERINS, TO
APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PER. -NUT NO. 95-59 WITH FINDINGS
AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
AYES: Livengood, Biddle, Gorman, Kerins, Tillotson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Holden, Speaker
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 95-59:
1. The proposed day care and preschool use will not adversely affect the General
Plan, and it is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of
Residential Low Density and the Public -Semipublic zoning designation of the
Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Institutional uses such
as preschools are encouraged within residential areas subject to conditional use
permit approval and land use compatibility.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 11 (p=038)
2. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be
detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity
or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the
neighborhood because:
a. The proposed daycare and preschool use will be located at a closed public
school site and in buildings that are properly adapted to streets, driveways,
and adjacent uses in an harmonious manner;
b. The access to and parking for the daycare and preschool does not create an
undue traffic problem;
c. The daycare and preschool will continue to provide educational
opportunities to children;
d. Proposed attendance of 50 children per day is comparable to the enrollment
of Clapp School; and
e. Sufficient parking is available for the daycare and preschool use.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.95-59
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated July 6, 1995, shall
. be the conceptually approved layout. (CD)
2. Total enrollment shall not exceed a maximum of 50 children per day without
prior approval by the Planning Commission. (CD)
3. Hours of operation shall be restricted to 7:30 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday -Friday,
except for occasional open house type events and special seasonal events. (CD)
4. Fire Department requirements are as follows:
a. Prior to occupancy, and approved fire alarm system shall be required per
the Huntington Beach Fire Code.
b. Provide fire extinguishers per the Huntington Beach Fire Code.
5. Prior to Final Inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be
completed:
a. The applicant shall restripe the parking lot so that it conforms to provisions
of Chapter 231 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision
Ordinance and Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. (CD)
PC Minutes-9/26/95 12 (pcm038)
b. A copy of the approved California Department of Social Services permit
for the proposed use shall be submitted. (CD)
c. The playground shall be resurfaced. (CD)
d. The street trees shall be removed, replaced, and/or relocated to the
satisfaction of the Landscape Division of Public Works Department. (PW)
e. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be
accomplished. (CD)
INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS
1. The daycare and preschool use shall comply with all applicable provisions of
the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, Building Division, Municipal Code and
Fire Department.
2. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid.
3. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-59 shall become null and void unless exercised
within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as
may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the
Planning Division a minimum of 30 days prior to the expiration date.
4. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this condition use
permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and
Subdivision Ordinance occurs.
B-5 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO.95-4 (CONTINUED FROM THE
AUGUST 8, 1995, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING):
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,
CA 92648
LOCATION: Not Applicable
Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) No. 95-4 is a request to amend the procedure applicable
to appeal of a decision filed by a City Council Member or a Planning Commissioner. The
amendment will change the appeal procedures to require a minimum of two City Council
members or two Planning Commissioners to file, without fee, an appeal to a decision of
the Director, Design Review Board, Environmental Assessment Committee, Subdivision
Committee, Planning Commission, or Zoning Administrator. ZTA No. 95-4 was
continued from the August 8, 1995, Planning Commission meeting to allow finalization of
the draft ordinance.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 13 (pcm038)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends continuance of the request to allow staff additional time to complete the
draft ordinance.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY KERINS, TO
CONTINUE ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO.95-4 TO THE OCTOBER 24,
1995, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Livengood, Gorman, Kerins, Tillotson
NOES: Biddle
ABSENT: Holden, Speaker
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
C. CONSENT CALENDAR
None
D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
None
E. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS/INOUIRIES
E-1 PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Commissioner Livengood - stated that the City Council GPAC Subcommittee
would be meeting September 27, 1995, at 4:00 PM.
The Commissioner's requested a special Study Session on October 3, 1995, at
5:00 PM to discuss General Plan Update issues. Staff stated that they would
arrange it.
F. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS
F-1 CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS FROM PREVIOUS MEETING
Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director - restated actions taken at the September
18, 1995 City Council meeting and stated that there no Community Development
Items for the October 2, 1995, City Council meeting.
PC Minutes-9/26/95 14 (p=038)
11
F-2 PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Herb Fauland, Associate Planner - discussed items for the October 10, 1995,
Planning Commission meeting.
G. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the October 3, 1995, special Study Session at 5:00 PM and then to the
October 10, Planning Commission Study Session at 4:00 PM and then to the
scheduled regular meeting at 7:00 PM
A MOTION WAS MADE BY GORMAN, SECOND BY TILLOTSON, TO
ADJOURN TO A 5:00 PM SPECIAL STUDY SESSION ON OCTOBER 3, 1995,
AND THEN TO A 4:00 PM STUDY SESSION ON OCTOBER 10, 1995, AND
THEN TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING AT 7:00 PM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Livengood, Biddle, Gorman, Kerins, Tillotson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Holden, Speaker
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
/kjl
PC Minutes-9/26/95 15 (pcm038)