Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-11-08MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1995 - 1:30 P.M. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Strange STAFF MEMBERS: Wayne Carvalho, Robert Franklin, Jane Madera, Catherine Johnson, Susan Pierce, Lisa Koch MINUTES: October 18, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Approved ORAL COMMUNICATION: None ITEM 1: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-8 PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM NO. 95-10 Applicant: Graphic Installation Services, 5120 Commerce Drive, Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Property Owner: Unocal, 17700 Castleton Street, Suite 500, City of Industry, CA 91748 Request: To approve a coordinated sign program for the gas sales, food mart and car wash on site. The request includes two (2) freestanding price information signs and wall signage which exceed the maximum allowable sign area (19 square foot price signs in lieu of maximum 12 square feet; 92 square feet of wall signage in lieu of maximum 52 square feet). Location: 16971 Goldenwest Street (northwest corner of Warner Avenue) Wayne Carvalho, staff planner, stated that this was a request for a recently approved food mart, car wash and gas station located at the northwest corner of Goldenwest Street and Warner Avenue. The Planned Sign Program would include freestanding signage, as well as wall signage on both the food mart building and the car wash. The Special Sign Permit request is based on the area and height of the price signs, as well as the total sign area on both buildings. Mr. Carvalho stated that the applicant is proposing 18 square foot price signs in lieu of a maximum 12 square feet and 92 square feet of wall signage in lieu of a maximum 52 square feet. It was noted that the November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 2 subject application had gone before the Design Review Board who recommended the following: a. the major freestanding identification sign be opaque; b. the applicant remain within the parameters allowed by the sign code in terms of the total sign area; and c. the directional sign for vehicles entering the car wash be relocated south near the carwash entry. Mr. Carvalho stated that one (1) phone call was received from a commercial property owner within the area who believed the proposed sign area to be excessive and therefore was supporting staff recommendation on this request. Staff recommended approval of this request with the condition that the total sign area meet the sign code. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Maria Mitchell, representative for the applicant, was present and requested approval of this application based on the number of businesses at the given location. The applicant's goal is to maximize exposure from both Warner Avenue and Goldenwest Street. It was noted that as recommended by the Design Review Board, the applicant proposed opaque backgrounds on two of the wall signs. Ms. Mitchell questioned whether or not having opaque backgrounds allowed more square footage per signage. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-8 / PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM NO, 95-10 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-8: 1. The freestanding pricing signs and wall signage identifying "Fast Break" and "Pro Wash" will be compatible with the character of the area and are needed for special circumstances defined by the applicant. Due to the variety of uses on site, the amount of signage is necessary to adequately identify each service. 2. The proposed signs will not adversely affect other signs in the area. The sign locations are consistent with the HBZSO, and will not impact the visibility to any other sign. 3. The proposed signs will not be detrimental to properties located in the vicinity. The signs will be compatible with other commercial signs in the surrounding area. 4. The proposed signs at 16971 Goldenwest Street will not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and will not be a hazardous distraction. (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 3 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM 95-10: 1. The proposed signs are compatibly designed with each other, reflecting a common theme or design style. Based on the corporate design and colors of the different uses, the approved sign program will result in a coordinated sign program for the three (3) uses on the site. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-5 / PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM 95-10: 1. The site plan and sign elevations received and dated August 11, 1995 shall be the approved layout with the following modifications: a. The freestanding sign shall have an all white background. The sign background shall be opaque surrounding the "76" ball and may be translucent on the "pro Wash" and "Fast Break" portions of the sign. b. The directional sign identifying the entrance to the car wash shall be relocated toward the entry of the car wash drive, and shall be oriented to the south. c. The "Fast Break" wall sign on the southwest portion of the building shall be reduced to 2 ft, by 7 ft. (14 sq. ft.). d. Both "Fast Break" wall signs shall have an opaque background. e. The informational signs shall be relocated to the inside of the car wash building or on the west side of the building as referenced on the approved plan. 2. A set of revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifications described above. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height, floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has reviewed and approved the proposed changes. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature. 4. The Planning Commission reserves the right to rescind Special Sign Permit No. 95-8 and Planned Sign Program No. 95-10 in the event of any violation of the terms of the applicable zoning laws. Any such decision shall be preceded by notice to the applicant and a public hearing and shall be based on specific findings. 5. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover sheet of all working drawing sets submitted for plancheck. (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 4 6. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. ITEM 2: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-86 Applicant: Shawn Phillipson, 711 W. 17th Street, E-1, Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Property Owner: Paul Saint Hilaire, 26821 Calle Maria, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Request: To permit the construction of three (3) single family units on three (3) lots. Each unit has three (3) stories. Location: 321, 325 and 327 15th Street (northwest corner of Orange Avenue and 15th Street) Susan Pierce, staff planner, stated that this was a request to permit the construction of three (3) single family units on three (3) currently vacant lots located on 15th Street just south of Orange Avenue. Photographs were shown. It was noted that the properties are subject to the Infill Ordinance and are contingent to Conditional Use Permit approval because of the third stories. Ms. Pierce stated that the plans comply substantially to the zoning code and staff recommends approval of this request with conditions. Staff recommended that the two (2) Plan B homes be moved forward one (1) foot to make certain that the second and third story projections meet the rear setback requirements. In addition, it was recommended that the landscaping plans depict the required 40 percent of the front yard in plant material. Ms. Pierce stated that based on the homes' three (3) bedrooms, they are only required to have two (2) enclosed parking spaces each. The houses are required to have a setback of 25 feet from the property line for any portion of the house that exceeds 25 feet. Ms. Pierce requested that the site plans be modified to comply with the requirements. No phone calls for or against this request were received. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. (g:zamin:1108) 0 November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 5 Shawn Phillipson, applicant, was present and stated that he would comply with all conditions. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-86 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-86: Conditional Use Permit No. 95-86 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of three (3) new three story, single family residences will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The use is compatible with other single family residences in the vicinity and will be required to comply with the City of Huntington Beach Infill Ordinance. The property owner will be required to construct infrastructure improvements and dedicate a portion of the property for alley widening. 2. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-86 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. The use is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Medium Density Residential land use designation of the General Plan. The proposed use will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-86: The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 21, 1995 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Plan B shall be moved forward one (1) foot on lots 21 and 25. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall complete the following (PW): a. Submit a grading plan to Department of Public Works for review and approval. The plan, in addition to grading, shall include all of the required off -site improvements. b. Submit four (4) sets of landscape plans to the Department of Public Works. The landscape construction set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which includes all proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size, quantity), irrigation plan, grading plan and approved site plan, and copy of conditions of approval. The landscape plan shall be in conformance with Section 210.06R and Chapter 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 6 Subdivision Ordinance. The set must be complete and approved by both departments of Public Works and Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. c. Dedicate: i. 2.50 feet off the alley. ii. 20.00 foot radius at the corner of Orange Avenue and 15th Street. 3. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall complete the following (PW): a. Remove existing curb and replace with curb and gutter. b. Remove one-half of existing asphalt alley and replace with half concrete alley. c. Install sewer lateral to each lot. d. Install water service to each lot. e. Remove and replace existing sidewalk. f. Construct full width concrete alley apron. g. Remove existing half round drain and replace per Public Works requirements. h. Relocate existing street light. i. Remove existing palm tree. j. Remove and replace existing curb return with a 25 foot radius and install wheelchair ramp. 4. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height, floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has reviewed and approved the proposed changes. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover sheet of all working drawing sets submitted for plancheck. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, Building Division, and Fire Department. (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 7 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of Traffic Impact fees prior to final inspection. 5. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 6. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within City right-of-way. 7. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 95-86 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance occurs. ITEM 3: VARIANCE NO. 95-21 Applicant: Brent Sears Architect, 203 Argonne, #210, Long Beach, CA 90803 Property Owner: Donny Rye, 9488 Honeysuckle, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Request: To allow a 25 foot front yard setback in lieu of a 32.5 foot front yard setback for a proposed single family dwelling and to allow a 20 foot setback in lieu of a 32.5 foot setback for a six (6) foot high block wall. Location: 17711 Jockey Circle (500 feet west of Saddleback Lane, south of Ellis Avenue) Robert Franklin, staff planner, stated that this was a request to permit a minor encroachment into the required front yard setback in the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan area. Site plans were shown. Mr. Franklin noted that the subject property is quite large and irregular in shape. The request proposes to set 98 percent of the home behind the setback, with minor encroachments of a corner of a garage, a living room front wall, a volume ceiling to the living room, a second story roof overhang, and a bonus room. Staff evaluated this request and recommended approval based on the facts that the proposed property would maintain the street scene, it would maintain a usable rear yard area for the pool, and the hardship created by the lot's irregular shape. Mr. Franklin stated that three (3) property owners from the area have reviewed the site plans and one (1) phone call was received, all of whom supported the proposed project. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Brent Sears, applicant, stated that the subject property is unique in shape. The front yard along the tremendous length of curb creates an enormous front yard setback in relation to other (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 8 properties in the neighborhood. Conversely, the back yard is very small. Mr. Sears believed that the lot shape presents a hardship in that it does not allow him to use the property as he would if it were rectangular in shape. In addition, the building does not face a straight property line. Mr. Sears stated that he did take the site plans to six (6) adjacent property owners who each signed a petition in support of this request. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. VARIANCE NO 95-21 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - VARIANCE NO.95-21: The granting of Variance No. 95-21 will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and under the same zone classification. Due to the unique lot configuration, the front yard encroachments will blend into the overall development pattern in the neighborhood. A petition with six (6) adjacent neighbors was submitted in support of the request. 2. Special circumstances apply to the subject property, including size, shape and topography where the strict application of the zoning ordinance will deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The unique layout of the lot creates a situation where the unit siting needs to shift forward towards the street. The rear yard is narrow and the front yard is extremely wide. 3. The granting of Variance No. 95-27 is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of a usable rear yard for private recreation similar with other properties in the neighborhood. 4. The granting of Variance No. 95-27 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classification and is consistent with the General Plan. The average front setback of the dwelling will exceed the required front setback. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - VARIANCE NO. 95-21: The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated August 30, 1995 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height, floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has reviewed and approved the proposed changes. The Zoning Administrator reserves the (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 9 right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature. 3. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover sheet of all working drawing sets submitted for plancheck. 4. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Variance No. 95-27 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance occurs. ITEM 4: VARIANCE NO. 95-24 Applicant/ Property Owner: Associates 9 - Thomas Jacobs, 948 1 lth Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Request: To permit a revision to previously approved plans by requesting a variance to replace seven (7) proposed carports along the east property line with seven (7) open parking stalls. Location: 725, 729 and 733 Utica Street (north side of Utica, approximately 130 feet east of Beach Boulevard) Jane Madera, staff planner, was present and stated that this was a request to permit a revision to previously approved plans by requesting a variance to replace seven (7) proposed carports along the east property line with seven (7) open parking stalls. The apartment complex consists of 36 units and is located on the north side of Utica Street. The apartment complex was originally built with carports along the westerly wall, the north wall, and easterly section of the parking area. The last time the Zoning Administrator acted on this project, the request was to demolish the east carports and rebuild them against the easterly wall and then rehab all of the existing carports as well as the apartment units themselves. Since that time, the applicant reevaluated the site and requested that two (2) of the carports not be rebuilt and that they provide open parking spaces instead. Ms. Madera stated that at that time staff considered the request minor enough that it did not warrant a public hearing, therefore it was approved at staff level. (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 10 When the project originally went before the Zoning Administrator, the Police Department was not given an opportunity to comment on the rehab of the complex. The Police Department has since made comments both to the Planning Division and the property owner, sighting substantial problems with crime and drug trafficking. Ms. Madera stated that the Police Department recommended that the carports not be rebuilt against the easterly wall to improve their surveillance ability and reduce concealment of criminal activity. In response to this recommendation, the applicant has requested that a variance be approved to replace the seven (7) proposed carports along the easterly wall with seven (7) open parking stalls. Due to the concerns of the Police Department, staff stated that findings could be made for a variance and therefore recommended approval of this application with a few conditions of note. The backup for all carports and parking spaces must be 26 feet. The Building Division will not permit the proposed three (3) foot wide planter located at the end of the 10 foot wide access way (towards Utica Street) because the access way is required to be used as an exit path for emergency situations. In addition, the proposed five (5) foot high wrought iron gate may be locked to prevent access from Utica Street, however residents must have a way to exit through the gate in the event of an emergency. Staff recommended that all parking spaces be assigned to a unit. The Housing Division recommended that the window treatments originally agreed upon be included on the site plan and be a part of the final project. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Thomas Jacobs, applicant, was present and stated that due to the history of the subject property he requested approval of this variance. Mr. Jacobs noted that the carports in question would only create problems and their elimination would enable better access and lighting. It was noted that the east corridor will be supplied with security lights to help satisfy the Police Department's concerns. Jan Thomas, Crime Prevention Specialist, was present and reiterated the crime history of the apartment complex. She concurred with the variance request to replace the carports with open parking. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. VARIANCE NO 95-24 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - VARIANCE NO. 95-24: 1. The granting of a variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification. The property presents unique circumstances that warrant granting of a variance. (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 11 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The City of Huntington Beach Police Department has consistently identified severe crime problems at the subject site and has also cited difficulty in surveillance and law enforcement due to the layout of the buildings and carports. By removing the carports there will be less opportunity for loitering, crime, vandalism and fewer places to hide from the Police. The granting of a variance is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The variance will allow the Police Department to effectively patrol the area and protect the property owner's rights as well as the safety of the residents. 4. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classification and is consistent with the General Plan. The provision of open parking stalls in lieu of covered carports will improve the surveillance ability of the Police Department and substantially improve the health, welfare, and safety of the residents in the area. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - VARIANCE NO. 95-24: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 21, 1995 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The low planter at the southeast corner of the property shall be removed. The planter may be replaced with a gate that is openable from inside the complex. b. The gate at the southwest corner must also be openable from inside the complex. c. A minimum 26 foot wide back-up must be provided for all open parking and carports. d. The elevations shall include window treatments as previously agreed upon with the Housing Division. 2. A revised site plan and elevations shall be submitted depicting the modifications described above. 3. The management of the apartment complex shall assign one (1) parking stall or carport to each of the 36 units. Each stall shall be marked with an assigned number. 4. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height, floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has reviewed and approved the proposed changes. The Zoning Administrator reserves the (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 12 right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature. 5. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover sheet of all working drawing sets submitted for plancheck. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Variance No. 95-24 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance occurs. ITEM 5: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.95-27 Applicant: Karen Otis, 16871 Sea Witch Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Property Owner: Mike Logan, 3044 Blueridge, Orange, CA 92667 Request: To add a 1,280 square foot second story to an existing single story, single family dwelling. Location: 16841 Bolero Lane (Davenport Island, Huntington Harbor) Robert Franklin, staff planner, stated that this was a request to add a 1,280 square foot second story to an existing single story home. All existing and proposed square footage complies with the zoning code in terms of lot coverage. Mr. Franklin noted that there is one (1) unique feature of the home which is that the overall height of the proposed second addition will be under 26 feet. The architect indicated that the site plans have been previewed by property owners in the area and no negative comments were made. Staff recommended approval of this request. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Karen Otis, applicant, was present and stated that she has received approval from the Huntington Harbor Homeowner's Association. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 13 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-27 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-27: 1. The request to permit the remodel and addition to an existing one-story single family residence conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the General Plan. The proposed 1,280 square foot second story addition will not impact public views or access. 2. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-27 is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements, the R1 Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. The proposed development will conform with all applicable City codes. 3. At the time of occupancy, the proposed 1,280 square foot remodel and addition to an existing one-story single family residence will be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the General Plan. All infrastructure currently exist to the site. 4. The proposed 1,280 square foot remodel and addition to an existing one story single family residence conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. No public access or recreational opportunities will be affected by the new construction. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 27, 1995 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height, floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has reviewed and approved the proposed changes. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature. 3. Any proposed dock and ramp improvements shall require separate permits for the improvements located within the public waterways. 4. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. (g:zamin:1108) 0 November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 14 5. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 6. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. ITEM 6: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.95-28 Applicant: Karen Otis, 16871 Sea Witch Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Property Owner: Mary Ellen Waver & Matthew Moschetti, 16631 Edgewater, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Request: To permit the remodel of an existing single family dwelling, including the addition of 302 square feet on the first floor and 364 square feet on the second floor. Location: 3612 Courtside Circle (Huntington Harbor) Jane Madera, staff planner, stated that this was an application for a coastal development permit at an existing three (3) story house located in the Coral Cay area of Huntington Harbor. The request involves adding 302 square feet on the first floor and 364 square feet on the second floor. Ms. Madera stated that there are no proposed changes for the third floor. Staff initially questioned the setback on the proposed mechanical equipment for the reflecting pool and stated that the front setback must be a minimum 15 feet. Ms. Madera noted that the applicant is aware of the front setback requirements and has agreed to comply. No phone calls or letters have been received and the Coral Cay Homeowner's Association has already approved the proposed additions. This request meets all code requirements, staff recommended approval with conditions. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Karen Otis, applicant, was present and stated that she would comply with staff conditions. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 15 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-28 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-28: 1. The request to permit the remodel and addition to an existing two-story single family residence conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the General Plan. The proposed remodel and 666 square feet addition will not impact public views or access as none currently exist in the vicinity. 2. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-28 is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements, the Rl Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. The proposed development will conform with all applicable City codes, such as maximum height, site coverage, setbacks and parking. 3. At the time of occupancy, the proposed remodel and addition to an existing two-story single family residence will be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the General Plan. All infrastructure currently exist to the site. 4. The proposed remodel and 666 square feet addition to an existing two story single family residence conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. No public access or recreational opportunities will be affected by the new construction. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated October 2, 1995 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to final inspection, the following shall be completed by the applicant: a. One (1) 36 inch box tree, or the palm equivalent, shall be required in the front yard area. Existing trees/palms to remain may qualify. 3. All proposed dock and ramp improvements shall require separate permits for the improvements located within the public waterways. 4. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 5. Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. 6. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 16 7. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 8. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height, floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has reviewed and approved the proposed changes. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature. 9. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover sheet of all working drawings submitted for plan check. ]INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 95-28 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. ITEM 7: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO.95-10 PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM NO.84-2R Applicant: Signs and Services, Kevin McConnell, 10980 Boatman Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680 Property Owner: LIU Corp., c/o Birtcher Properties Services, 17011 Beach Blvd., Suite 826, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Request: To permit an approximate 500 square foot wall sign with six (6) foot high letters for a 4 story office building. The proposed sign exceeds the maximum height and area requirements specified in the previously approved planned sign program. Location: 17011 Beach Boulevard (southwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue) Catherine Johnson, staff planner, stated that this was a request to permit an approximate 500 square foot wall sign with six (6) foot high letters to be placed at the top of the Guardian Center located at the southwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue. The sign exceeds the maximum letter height of five (5) feet permitted by the Planned Sign Program and the maximum (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 17 200 square foot area permitted by the City sign ordinance. Ms. Johnson stated that the applicant deems the increase in size and area necessary to ensure visibility from Beach Boulevard. The Design Review Board approved the design and colors of the sign on October 19, 1995. In addition, the Design Review Board informally approved the increased height. Staff recommended approval of the request with the condition that the letter height be reduced to five (5) feet. Staff s main concern with the proposed sign, other than it exceeding maximum standards, was that it would not provide any visual relief on either side of the sign. Ms. Johnson presented a chart submitted by the applicant demonstrating letter height and visibility from varied distances. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Kevin McConnell, applicant, was present and presented pictures of the previous Guardian Center sign. Upon the signs removal, the letters were determined to be greater than five (5) feet in height. Mr. McConnell stated that he tested five (5) foot high letters on a banner and it proved not to be sufficient. The letters could not be seen from Heil Avenue, approximately 2,500 feet from the subject building. Mr. McConnell stressed the fact that this location is the western headquarters for Unisource and visibility is extremely important. It was noted that the height of the building is 180 feet, the frontage of the building is 110 feet, and the length of the sign is 82 feet. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED, SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-10 / PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM NO. 84-2R WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. ]FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-10: The Zoning Administrator may grant a special sign permit for requests for supergraphics, three- dimensional signs, and relief from the strict application of Section 233.08 subject to the findings listed below and in accordance with Chapter 248. 1. The sign is compatible with the character of the area and is needed for special circumstances defined by the applicant as the diminished visibility of the sign to traffic along Beach Boulevard if the sign was reduced to a five (5) foot letter height. 2. The sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area as it does not hinder the visibility of any other sign. 3. The sign will not be detrimental to properties located in the vicinity as the design of the sign is similar to other commercial signage in the area along Beach Boulevard. (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 18 4. The sign will not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and will not be a hazardous distraction because it is being placed just below the roof line of a 14 story building. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-10: 1. The site plan and sign elevations received and dated October 12, 1995 shall be the approved layout. 2. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to rescind this special sign permit approval in the event of any violation of the terms of the applicable zoning laws. Any such decision shall be preceded by notice to the applicant and a public hearing and shall be based on specific findings. 3. The applicant shall provide design calculations for attaching the sign to the existing building structure and a detailed structural section and elevation to locate attachments for each letter. The wind design in Uniform Building Code Chapter 23 and located in Wind Zone B shall be utilized. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS 1. The sign shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. ITEM 8: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO.95-9 Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Property Owner: City of Huntington Beach, 2000'Main Street, CA 92648 Request: Installation of new storm drain system within existing street right-of-way (Halifax Drive). No right-of-way acquisition is involved and upon completion the street surface will be returned to present condition. ]Location: Halifax Drive (between Edwards Street and Victoria Lane) Jane Madera, staff planner, stated that this was a request to install a new storm drain system within an existing street right-of-way. No right-of-way acquisition is involved and upon completion the street surface will be returned to present condition. Staff recommended approval of this request with mitigation measures. Any trees removed must be replaced on a one (1) to one (1) ratio, water trucks or sprinkler systems must be used to keep dust down, low sulfur fuel must be used for all construction equipment, and high ozone level days must be avoided. Public Works (g:zamin:1108) November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 19 must notify the residents of the area 10 days in advance and provide a description of the project, its expected duration, and a contact person for any questions or concerns they may have. Ms. Madera stated that the project is expected to last 45 working days. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 95-9 WAS APPROVED WITH MITIGATION MEASURES BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. MITIGATION MEASURES - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 95-9: During construction, the applicant shall comply with the following: a) use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b) wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c) use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight for construction equipment; d) phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); and e) discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 2. Concurrent with construction activities, the Department of Public Works shall replace at a one to one (1:1) ratio all trees which will be removed as a result of the project. Replacement trees will be 36" box size trees or the equivalent. The trees shall be located within the public right-of-way. 3. The applicant shall notify the City of Huntington Beach Fire and Police Departments of any street lane closures a minimum of 24-hours prior to the initiation of street improvement activities so that they can identify alternative emergency routes for the duration of the street closures, if necessary. 4. The applicant shall submit and implement a traffic circulation plan identifying the routes which construction equipment and trucks will use to access and depart from the area for review and approval to the Public Works Department 10 days prior to initiation of construction. The plan shall use routes which will generate the minimum number of circulation conflicts with residential, pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle traffic. 5. The applicant shall provide written notice to all residents of Halifax Drive 10 days prior to start of construction activity. The notice shall inform the residents of the nature of the project and its expected duration and provide a contact name and phone number for the project. 6. Prior to initiation of trenching activities, the applicant shall contact all utility providers to identify where existing lines within the subject rights -of -way are located. The applicant shall notify the companies of trenching activities so that impacts to existing lines and disruption to existing service can be avoided. (g:zamin:1108) I November 8, 1995 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 20 THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 3:00 P.M. BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1995. Mike Strange Zoning Administrator MS:MBB:Iek (g:zamin:1108)