Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-11-28MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 1995 Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California STUDY SESSION - 4:00 PM GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PRESENTATION - Review Responses to Comments on the DEIR, Outstanding Issues Matrix (White Hole & Area 23), Circulation Issues Update and Review Final Recommendations on all Elements AGENDA REVIEW REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P A P P A P ROLL CALL: Holden, Livengood, Biddle, Gorman, Kerins, Tillotson, Speaker AGENDA APPROVAL. A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - (4 MINUTES PER PERSON, NO DONATING OF TIME TO OTHERS)_ Anyone wishing to speak _must fill out and submit a form to speak prior to Oral Communication or Public Hearing items. No action can be taken by the Planning Commission -on this date, unless agendized. None B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS B-1 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-6 (APPEAL): APPLICANT: Sign Methods / Joe Cavazos, 1749 E. 28th Street, Signal Hill, CA 90806 APPELLANT: Richard Escalante, El Polio Loco, P.O. Box 15390, Irvine CA 92715 PROPERTY OWNER: Huntington Beach Associates, 17631 Fitch, Irvine, CA 92714 REQUEST: To permit the installation of four (4), 17 square foot wall signs identifying Fosters Freeze that exceed code requirements in addition to the existing El Polio Loco Restaurant wall signs. LOCATION: 16922 Goldenwest Street (approximately 250 feet north of the northeast corner of Goldenwest Street and Warner Avenue) Transmitted for your review is an appeal filed by Mr. Richard Escalante, of El Polio Loco, of the Zoning Administrator's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 95-6, a request to permit the installation of four (4), 17 square foot wall signs identifying Fosters Freeze on the existing El Polio Loco restaurant building. The signs would be in addition to the El Polio Loco wall signs. In his narrative, the appellant indicates El Polio Loco is a licensed franchisee of Fosters Freeze which constitutes one (1) business with two (2) established business concepts. 1_­" The Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, specifies a limit of one (1) _. business identification wall sign per business. Staff, in its review of the business description, determined the additional Fosters Freeze wall signs as product signs which are not permitted by code. The City Council Sign Code Subcommittee also reviewed this type of sign proposal, recommending to continue the restriction of such signs. - STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission uphold the Zoning Administrator's action and deny Special Sign Permit No. 95-6 for the following reasons: The Fosters Freeze signs will create clutter on the El Polio Loco Restaurant building, and will not be in keeping with the character of the surrounding commercial properties. • The sign proposal is not consistent with other commercial properties in the community by allowing two (2) different business identification signs for one established business (El Polio Loco). PC Minutes - 11/28/95 2 (p=042) �I THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Lloyd Frances, representing applicant, stated that the sign proposal was currently being used at other locations. He said they were adhering to the front elevation square footage, and the signs would be compatible to the surrounding area. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Kerins stated that the Sign Code Sub -Committee is currently upgrading the code to make it more liberal and modern. He stated that this request was going beyond the acceptability of the Committee. The'Commission discussed whether Foster Freeze was considered a product.or a separate business. Staff explained that El Polio Loco is a licensed franchisee of Fosters Freeze which constitutes one (1) business with two (2) established business concepts. Staff also stated that Foster Freeze would occupy 20% of the store and have a separate counter. The majority of the Commission felt that it was a separate business housed in the same building and would support the request with modifications to require the elevation on the front (west side) of the building be revised so the Foster Freeze sign copy is on the same line as the existing El Polio Loco wall sign. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KERINS TO UPHOLD THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S ACTION AND DENY SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-6 WITH FINDINGS FOR DENIAL. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY SPEAKER, TO OVERTURN THE ZONING ADMINIS'TRATOR'S ACTION -AND APPROVE SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-6 WITH F NDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Holden, Livengood, Gorman, Speaker NOES: Kerins ABSENT: Biddle, Tillotson ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED PC Minutes - 11/28/95 3 (p=042) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-6: 1. Special Sign Permit No. 95-6 for three, 17 square foot wall signs that deviate from the HBZSO in terms of product advertising is compatible with the character of the area and is needed for special circumstances defined by the applicant to and approved by the Commission. The applicant modified the request by eliminating one of the four wall signs. In addition, the conditions imposed require the "Fosters Freeze" sign to be adjacent to and on the same line as the "El Pollo Loco" wall signs that give the appearance of one sign. Also, the new signs are necessary to advertise a new business within an existing building. 2. The three (3) 17 square foot wall signs will not adversely affect other signs in the area because the new wall signs will not obstruct the visibility to other signs in the area. 3. The new signs will not be detrimental to properties located in the vicinity because the signs are located entirely on the building wall and will not exceed the maximum sign area permitted by code. In addition, the conditions imposed require the new signs to be on the same line as the existing wall signs the give the appearance of one sign. 4. The approval of Special Sign Permit No. 95-6 for the new signs will not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and will not be a hazardous distraction because the wall signs will be installed in a linear fashion and will not distract motorists vision. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 95-6: 1. The site plan and sign elevations received and dated July 11, 1995, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications required to the elevations: a. Elevations on the front (west side) of the building shall be revised so the "Foster Freeze" sign copy shall be on the same line as the'existing El Pollo Loco wall sign. b. The "Foster Freeze" sign copy on the rear of the building (east side) shall be deleted. c. The El Pollo Loco sign copy on the north elevation shall be deleted. 2. A revised set of elevations incorporating the modifications above as well as verification of DRB approval shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover sheet of all working drawing sets submitted for plancheck. PC Minutes - 11/28/95 4 (pcm042) INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS: Special Sign Permit No. 95-6 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Department of Community Development a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 2. The sign elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board (DRB). A colors and materials palette, and a colored elevation shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development prior to scheduling the DRB meeting. B-2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 94-23 (R): APPLICANT: Gaston Villalba, 221 Main Street, Suite F, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 PROPERTY OWNER: Ben Trainer, 221 Main Street, Suite G, Huntington Beach, CA 92645 REOUEST: To permit a revision to a previously approved restaurant which includes a reduction in square footage, a new menu/alcoholic beverage service and outdoor dining on the existing second floor balcony. LOCATION: 221 Main Street, Suite F (southwest corner of Main Street and Olive Avenue) Conditional Use Permit No. 94-23 (R) represents a request to amend a previously approved request for the establishment of a restaurant. On September 27, 1994, the Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit request for a 4,130 square foot restaurant; II Capriccio, with 500 square feet of outdoor dining and alcoholic beverage sales. The revised request includes a reduction in restaurant square footage to 1,120 and 396 square feet of outdoor dining, a new owner/operator, and a new menu/alcoholic beverage service. The new restaurant will tentatively be named, Surf City Cafe. Because there is no on -site parking provided at the site, the applicant and property owner have indicated that they will pay parking in -lieu fees as previously allowed at the site. PC Minutes - 11/28/95 (p=042) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 94-23 (R) with findings and suggested conditions of approval based upon the following: • It will be compatible with the surrounding uses in the existing mixed use building and the adjacent uses throughout the downtown area. A suggested condition of approval will be incorporated to insure that alcohol sales do not exceed 50% of food sales in order to prevent the establishment from becoming more of a bar than a restaurant. The use is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan, as a restaurant with outdoor dining will complement and enhance the urban atmosphere of the surrounding retail, restaurant and office uses. • The project will not create an adverse amount of additional noise or traffic impacts and parking will be provided through payment of in -lieu fees. The use is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Discussion ensued among the Commissioners and staff regarding in -lieu parking fees. There was concern among some Commissioners that the fee outlined in the report was lower than the fees currently being imposed. Staff stated that City Council had already approved a fee amount of $1,000.00 per space for this building, and legal counsel added that that approval would run with the building. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Gaston Villalba, 240 Nice Lane, 4301, Newport Beach, applicant, stated he agreed with staffs report, all conditions of approval and the payment of parking in -lieu fees. He also stated that he was available to answer any questions the Commission may have. Gary Mulligan; stated that it would be unfair to make the applicant'pay the current in -lieu "parking fees, as an agreement for the building had already been made. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY HOLDEN, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 94-23(R) WITH FINDINGS AND _ - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Holden, Livengood, Gorman, Kerins, Speaker NOES: None ABSENT: Biddle, Tillotson ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED PC Minutes - 11/29/95 6 (pcm042) J FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 94-23(R)• L The proposed 1,120 square foot restaurant with 396 square feet of outdoor dining and sales of alcoholic beverages will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of property and improvements in the area. With the conditions imposed, the second floor balcony will be enclosed with a six (6) foot high partition wall to prevent items/beverages from being spilled or thrown onto the area below. In addition, the proposed restaurant will not generate significant noise or traffic impacts. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 94-23 (R) for a new restaurant with outdoor dining and alcoholic beverage sales will be compatible with surrounding commercial and office uses because all modifications to the building with the exception of the new patio wall - will occur inside the building. The 1Qcation and layout of the proposed-mgtaurant;"as ` well as implementation of the parking in -lieu fee program and the Police Department's safety measures, properly adopts the proposed use with the surrounding mixed uses in the existing building. 3. The proposed restaurant with outdoor dining and alcohol sales will comply with the provisions of the base district which is Downtown Specific Plan District 5-Coastal Zone. The use will also comply with other applicable provisions of in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance to the extent feasible. The restaurant will be constructed within an existing building which complies with zoning regulations and will provide parking through the in -lieu fee program. 4. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 94-23 (R) for a restaurant with outdoor dining and alcohol sales will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Mixed -Use on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: a. - The Niixed-Use Land Use designation allows for restaurant and social establishments. b. The proposed restaurant is consistent with the General Plan Advisory Committee's recommendation to retain the Mixed -Use designation on the site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE. PERMIT NO. 94-23 (R): - 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 6, 1995, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The designated waiting area shall be increased to include the space between the proposed restaurant and adjacent Suite H on the second floor to the satisfaction of the Police Department; PC Minutes - 11/28/95 7 (p=042) b. Sufficient lighting shall be provided in the stairwell and elevator waiting area to the satisfaction of the Police Department; c. The height of the patio wall along the second floor balcony shall be raised from the existing height of 40" to a height of six (6) feet subject to Design Review Board review and approval. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Evidence shall be provided that the in -lieu parking fees have been paid for 10 parking spaces at a cost of $1,000.00 per space. b. Fire extinguishers shall be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington ' ~ " `Beach Fire Code Standards. c. Exit signs and exit path markings shall be provided in compliance with the Huntington Beach Fire Codes and title 24 of the California Administrative Code and will include low level exit signs. d. Fire Protection Systems shall be required for all commercial cooking devices. e. A fire alarm system shall be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and uniform Fire Code Standards. Shop drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. The system shall provide waterflow, valve tamper and trouble detection, 24 hour supervision and audible alarms. f. Automatic sprinkler systems will be installed throughout to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Building Code Standards. Shop drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to ' ' 'installation. g. Revised plans depicting compliance with Condition of Approval No. 1 above shall be submitted for review and approval of both the Community Development Department and the Police Department. 3. The use shall comply with the following: a. All requirements of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (ABC) or any ABC condition of approval that is more restrictive than the conditions imposed herein shall take precedence over these conditions. b. A minimum of 50% or 396 square feet of the 792 square foot outdoor patio terrace area shall remain accessible as open space for public use and a minimum five (5) foot wide passage way shall be provided on the balcony. PC Minutes - 11/28/95 8 (p=042) c. Upon request, the applicant shall provide written evidence that on an annual basis, alcohol sales do not exceed 50% of the gross retail food sales at the restaurant. 4. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 94- 23 (R) if any violations of these conditions, or the Huntington Beach Municipal Code or Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance occurs. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS: 1. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. 2. The project shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division and Fire Department. 1 3. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances and Standards. 4. Any signs for the restaurant proposed on or visible from the exterior of the building shall be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of sign permits. Portable signs are prohibited. 5. The Traffic Impact Fee shall be paid'at the time of final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. 6. This conditional use permit shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Community Development Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Division a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SPE�'KER, SECOND Bl' HOLD)�1"T`O HEAR" PUBLIC HEARING ITEM B-4 NEXT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Holden, Gorman, Kerins, Speaker NOES: None ABSENT: Biddle, Tillotson, Livengood (out of room) ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED (Please note the minutes ivill reflect actions taken in their original order.) PC Minutes - 11/28/95 9 (p=042) B-3 CIRCULATION ELEMENT - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-2/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 94-1 - COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN (CONTINUED FROM THE NOVEMBER 14, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING): APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA ,k 92648 REQUEST: This element identifies the current and future transportation needs for the City and sets policies that ensure a safe and efficient transportation system. LOCATION: City Wide - _% " - - General Plan Amendment No. 94-2/Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 is the comprehensive update of the city's General -Plan. Since its adoption in December of 1976, the General -flan has undergone increme a.r +_.-s:areflect the changing needs of the city; however no comprehensive update has occurred since the initial adoption. The public hearings on the General Plan update began on July 18, 1995. The Planning Commission has completed the review of the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the Circulation Element. The=Cominission continued the public hearings open on the Circulation Element since the -meeting of September 26, 1995. This has been done in an effort to finalize the land use recommendations and appropriate traffic model scenarios. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: - -T-� —Staff-recammends-thatthePlanning Commission c&ntinue review of the draftlitrcMtaatiori - ` ElCrnent-toAhe DW(Rnber'12, 1995 meetiisg-1n-d continue the Public Hea—n-n-g's on ever --Y Plan Amendment No. 94-2/Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 to the next scheduled Planning Commission meeting of December 12, 1995. --- THE PUBLIC -HEARING WAS OPENED. Jon Ely, 22051 Hula Circle, spoke in opposition to bridges crossing the Santa River, which is a cooperative study in conjunction with the cross gap connector. He stated that other mitigation to the connector should occur. He also stated that he was concerned that efterepancies had occurred in the input of numbers into the Circulation Element calculations. -THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED OPEN TO THE DECEMBER 12, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. PC Minutes - 11/28/95 10 (pcm042) The Commission discussed with staff a letter received by John F. Scott, regarding discrepancies of true numbers being used for the modeling process. The Commission asked Public Works staff to bring back an analysis and a response to the letter at the December 12, 1995, Planning Commission meeting. STRAW VOTES WERE TAKEN AND THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT WAS CONTINUED OPEN TO THE DECEMBER 12, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. B-4 LAND USE ELEMENT (REVIEW LAND USE CHANGES) - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-2 / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 94-1 - COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN (CONTINUED FROM THE NOVEMBER 14, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING): APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REQUEST: This element identifies the location and distribution of land uses, such as residential or commercial, and specifies the amount of building intensity. The Land Use Element includes policies that address design and development principles as well as policies that address monitoring and managing growth in the City. LOCATION: City Wide General Plan Amendment No. 94-2/Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 is the comprehensive update of the city's General Plan. Since its adoption in December of 1976, - the General Plan has undergone incremental updates to reflect the changing needs of the city; however no comprehensive update has occurred since the initial adoption. The public-- :Y hearings on the General Plan update began on July 18, 1995. The Planning Commission at the meeting of October 24, 1995, continued the public hearings open to the meeting of November 29, 1995. The commission reviewed two of the remaining three land use map recommendations. The two sites are identified as No. 23 (Shell/Cal Resources site) and Nos. 90 & 93 (White Hole) in the attached Table. One remaining site (No. 33) will be reviewed at the December 12, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. In addition, the Commission through-' out this process has set aside some outstanding issues for review and consideration. It is recommended that the Commission continue to take straw votes on the outstanding issues identified in the matrix. PC Minutes - 11/28/95 11 (pcm042) The revised language of the various General Plan Elements that the school districts and staff have been working on have been set aside until December 12, 1995. Staff will be meeting with the school districts and subcommittee prior to the meeting in an effort to finalize recommendations on the issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take straw votes on the proposed land use recommendations of the Land Use Element, take straw votes on the Outstanding Issues Matrix, and continue the Public Hearings on General PIan Amendment No. 94- 2/Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 to the next scheduled Planning Commission meeting of December 12, 1995. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Jeff Metzel, 19391 Shady Harbor Circle, representing Seacliff Homeowners Association, map area #23, stated that City staff, the Seacliff Homeowners Association and Bill Holman met to reach a consensus on the language in Table LU-6, land use map area 423, Sub -area 4B, Design and Development . He stated that the Homeowners Association had the following comments: include in the seventh bullet statement the word "height"; include in the ninth bullet statement the words "Pacific Coast Highway"' "Palm Avenue", and "Goldenwest Street" as arterial highways; include "neighborhood parks, which may be private" into the last bullet statement; and add bullet at the end stating that no waiver of Municipal Code be granted by a Specific Plan in this area. Bill Holman, 23 Corporate Plaza Drive, 4150, Newport Beach, representing Huntington Beach Company, map area 423, agreed with Mr. Metzel on all issues except the "...no waiver of Municipal, Code be granted by a Specific Plan.." Mr. Holman stated that no variations from City code was contrary to the purpose of doing a Specific Plan. He stated that you need this flexibility to address issues pertinent to the development and the area. John Ely, 22051 Hula Circle, spoke in regards to the entire White Hole area. Mr. Ely stated that he supported saving the wetlands and the area should be designated Conservation. Dennis Hoffz, 20471 Bushard Street, map area #52, owner of the property, stated that he opposed`any change to this area. He stated that he wants to maintain the existing zoning that has been on the property for 30 years. Fred Galluccio, 9182 Christine Drive, Environmental Board Member, stated that the White Hole area should be designated Open Space, Wetlands. PC Minutes - 11/28/95 12 (pcm042) L Jim McLaughlin, 8777 Coral Springs Court, 91-F, Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Board of Realtors, spoke regarding ERC 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.6 and 2.1.9. He stated he was opposed to public use of private property and wished to table this item for further discussion. Robert London Moore, Jr. Mills Land & Water Company, map areas 990 and 493, stated that he agreed with the GPAC recommendation for both areas, #90 being designated Mixed Use Horizontal and 993 being designated Industrial. He also stated that the GPAC did not provide for any OS-C, Open Space -Conservation uses for these areas. He felt that the GPAC correctly determined that the OS-C designation is not appropriate for the Mills and Caltrans parcels at this location. He urged the Commission to reject staffs recommendation that these parcels be designated for OS-C, Open Space -Conservation. William Curtis, 308 East Carrillo Street, Santa Barbara, map area #53, spoke in opposition to a Wetlands designation in this area. George Naff, 20491 Castle Rock Circle, map area #52, spoke in opposition to the GPAC recommendation of Commercial Neighborhood for this area. He was concerned that this designation would invite strip centers to the area so close to a middle school, creating a place for kids to meet and party, gangs and outsiders will come into the neighborhood and traffic will be excessive. Harlow Hurley, 16045 Richvale Drive, Whittier, map area #53, spoke in opposition to a Wetlands designation in this area. Janice Jones, map area 953, spoke in opposition to a Wetlands designation in this area. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED OPEN TO THE DECEMBER 12,1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. The Commissioners took straw votes on map areas 923, 4,90 and 493 (see proposed GPAC Land Use Recommendations Matrix as of December 12, 1995, General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 file). Straw votes were also taken on the Outstanding Issues Matrix (see Outstanding Issues Matrix dated December 7, 1995, General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 file). PUBLIC COMMENTS AND STRAW VOTES WERE TAKEN AND THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN TO THE DECEMBER I2, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. PC Minutes - 11/28/95 13 (p=042) C. CONSENT CALENDAR C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED OCTOBER 10, 1995• A MOTION WAS MADE BY SPEAKER, SECOND BY LIVENGOOD, TO APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED OCTOBER 10, 1995, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Holden, Livengood, Gorman, Kerins, Speaker NOES: None ABSENT: Biddle, Tillotson ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS NONE - - E. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMSANOUIRIES r--r- PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Commissioner Livengood - stated that he and Commissioner Holden were meeting with staff and School District representatives to discuss the School District language in the Draft General Plan on December 4, 1995. F., _._ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS - F-2-- CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS FROM PREVIOUS MEETING Howard Zelefsky. Planning Director - restated actions taken at the November 20, 1995, City Council meeting. Z{-2 PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Howard Zelefsky. PlanninzDirector - discussed items coming before the Commission at the December 12, 1995, Planning Commission meeting. PC Minutes - 11/28/95 14 (p=042) 1 G. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the December 12, 1995, Study Session at 4:00 PM and then to the regularly scheduled meeting at 7:00 PM A MOTION WAS MADE BY GORMAN, SECOND BY SPEAKER, TO ADJOURN TO A 4:00 PM STUDY SESSION ON DECEMBER 12, 1995, AND THEN TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 7:00 PM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Holden, Livengood, Gorman, Kerins, Speaker NOES: None ABSENT: Biddle, Tillotson ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED /kjl APP VED BY: '1�yard Zelef ecr ary PC Minutes - 11/28/95 15 (pcm042)