The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996-04-08MINUTES CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, April 8, 1996 Call To order Mayor Sullivan called the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 5;00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. City Council/Redevelopment Agency Roll Call Present: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo Absent: None Pledge Of Alleciiance The Pledge of Allegiance was given by those present in the Council Chamber. Introduction Of 1996 Waitakere, New Zealand Student Ambassadors - Sister City Association (150.30) The 1996 Waitakere, New Zealand Student Ambassadors were introduced to the City Council and audience by representatives of the Sister City Association. (City CouncillRedevelopment Agency) Study Session No. 3 - General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 - Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 - Comprehensive Update Of The Huntington Beach General Plan - Continued From March 11, 1996 City Council Study Session (440.50) Presented for City Council consideration was a staff report submitted by Melanie Fallon, Community Deve4opment Director, dated April 8, 19%. The City of Huntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan is the "constitution" for the City. The "constitution" contains the citizen's vision for the future of the city and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies. These policies are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 and Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 is the comprehensive update of the city's General Plan which includes the review and certification of an Environmental Impact Report. The City Council to date, has conducted two Study Sessions on the update of the draft General Plan (February 26 and March 11), and a public hearing on March 25, 1996. At the City Council study session on March 11, 1996 the Council continued the Study Session on the Draft General Flan to the meeting of April 8, 1996. 194 Page 2 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04/08/96 Attached to the staff report is a packet of communications received from the public regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment. Late Communications Regarding The General Plan Amendment And Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 Were Announced By the City Clerk (440,50) Pursuant to the Brown Act, the City Clerk announced the following late communications regarding agenda items which had been received following the distribution of the agenda. Slide Presentation pertaining to the Draft General Plan, Study Session No, 3 Communication from Hank Cunningham, Cunningham and Associates, Consultants, dated March 26, 1996, regarding the Economic Development Element Communication from Jerry Dominguez, Region Manager, Southern California Edison Company regarding the Edison Generating Station Fax and communication from Jon Ely dated March 29, 1996 and April 3, 1996, regarding the Edison Generating Station Community Development Department Staff Presentation The Community Development Director, Melanie Fallon, introduced Linda Niles, Senior Planner; Brian James, Senior Planner; Bruce Gilmer, Associate Traffic Engineer; and Jim Otterson, Traffic Engineer_ Linda Niles, Senior Planner, informed Council of the Community Development Department's presentation outline including public hearing procedure, proposed language changes, review of March 25, 1996 Council actions, issues from March 25, 1996 public hearing, and Circulation Element, Land -Use Element and Land Use Changes. She presented slides and reviewed the procedure used and actions taken at previous meetings and the procedure for this meeting. Ms. Niles presented a slide report which reviewed proposed language changes in the Land Use Element Page Nos. 220 through 225 including the Americans With Disabilities Act language; corrections in the Land Use Table LU. 4 and language regarding exiting mobilehome parks_ Mobile Home Overlay Councilman Garofalo proposed that wording be included in the Mobilehome Overlay relative to the density cap remaining at its current density and staff stated that this was a good suggestion. Senior Planner Niles presented a review of the March 25, 1996 actions and issues from the public hearing_ 195 04108196 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 3 Public Comments On Previous Straw Vote Items (440.50) Jerry Dominguez, Regional Manager, Southern California Edison Company, stated that he had met with Senior Planner Brian James and had presented a letter to Council. He spoke regarding the proposed General Plan and his concern with aspects of the proposed amendment including the fact that he believed his company was being discouraged from using the permit process. Mr. Dominguez stated that the letter before Council summarizes the issues of concern. Discussion was held between Councilman Garofalo and Mr. Dominguez regarding landscaping plans of the Southern California Edison Company. The Community Development Director read proposed changes to Page No. 243. Mr. Dominguez was questioned by Councilman Bauer regarding the areas of the document that he believed discouraged use of the permit process. The Community Development Director referred to Page No. 243 UD 2.2.5 "Discourage the construction of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities that visually impair the city's coastal corridor and entry nodes (1-UD 2 and I-UD 6) as discussed. Councilman Bauer stated that wherever this appears in the document he would recommend changes such as set forth by the Community Development Director be made. Councilman Bauer questioned if a type of landscaping could be used for Magnolia Avenue and Newland Street as the fence which has been used on Pacific Coast Highway between Goldenwest Street and the cliffs which has, although not perfect, improved the area. He requested that the full Council be advised of the status of the area of the power plant which is the gateway to the city, as construction is now proceeding. Councilman Bauer also requested that grants be explored as well as establishing a cooperative effort with the Southern California Edison Company. Discussion was held between Councilman Bauer and the Community Development Director. Councilman Bauer asked the Community Development Director if she could update the Council on meetings attended on such issues. The Community Development Director stated that the Council was welcome to sit in on meetings held on Southern California Edison and County Sanitation District issues. Councilwoman Dettloff stated her agreement that on Page No. 248 the word "discourage" should be changed. Jon Ely addressed Council and stated that he believed "discourage" should be used as it is a stronger word but that he does not have an objection to the proposed language. Mr. Ely spoke regarding the future of such facilities and the importance of proper planning so that visual impairment does not occur. He stated that as the Edison Plan is not 300 feet near anyone that a public hearing must be held and the community must be made aware rather than have the Zoning Administrator "rubber stamp". Page 4 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04/08/96 Senior Planner Niles read the portions where a public hearing could be placed in the document. Councilman Harman questioned whether the word "explore" on Page No. 242 should be more definitive. Senior Planner Niles stated staff would report back with recommended wording. Councilman Garofalo questioned if there was a relationship in the city ordinances between the height of a project and the notification process. The Community Development Director reported on the public hearing requirements. Straw Vote - Accepted Modified Wordina Motion A motion was made by Leipzig, second Dettloff, that a straw vote be taken to accept the modified wording and as modified further (LID 2.2.5) and leaving out specific examples and making them generic examples; also when easy and convenient, to introduce some positive language. The motion carried unanimously. Herb Fauland, Senior Planner, reviewed the Circulation Element. He reviewed the Proposed Language Changes. He referred to changes on classifications of road ways. Traffic Engineer Otterson presented a review of the Circulation Element including Traffic Modeling. Councilman Green asked if consideration was given to conservation of fuels when determining trips. Traffic Engineer Otterson reported on how they did in a round -about -way and not directly. He reported on trip generation rates and reviewed the Level of Service Tables. Traffic Engineer Otterson reviewed the Department of Public Works December 12, 1995 reply to a letter received by the Planning Commission, dated November 27, 1995, from Mr. John F. Scott regarding what Mr. Scott believes to be deficiencies. Councilman Garofalo asked a question relative to the traffic modeling as it affected the economic aspects of the General Plan Amendment. Senior Planner ,lames reported. Councilman Garofalo stated that he believed the city is an island where people can get around the city but if they could get through the city, the city would be helped economically. Councilman Garofalo referred to the late communication from Cunningham and Associates, consultants. Councilman Harman questioned the charts showing streets currently, and those streets to be widened. He presented questions regarding the physical ability to widen lanes such as in Bolsa Chica area. 197 04/08/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 5 Mr. Otterson reported that in the areas that staff considers to be a tight fit, the word "potential, rather than "proposed" be used. Senior Planner Fauland referred to material in their binder in the Circulation Element Page 312-13 - Table CE-1, regarding identified road way capacities and the potential road way segments using Adams Avenue as an example of potential need for right-of-way if the land use generates that type of activity. He reported on the reasons why the Planning Commission had not made a formal recommendation on a Traffic Modeling Scenario. The Community Development Director stated that she believed the state or county may not mandate this particular standard but that the city must have a standard and that there may be flexibility and would like to return to Council. The City Administrator reported on the Gothard-Hoover Connection issue. Councilwoman Dettloff presented questions regarding the Circulation Element and confirmed that small decisions made now affect the end plan. Discussion was held regarding the feasibility of the Hoover-Gothard Connection ever being done. The Traffic Engineer reported on this issue. Discussion was held regarding Traffic Modeling Scenarios 1, 2, and 3 on Page Nos. 159, 176 and 183 of the General Plan. Motion To Continue General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 And Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 To May 6, 1996 -Approved A motion was made by Garofalo, second Dettloff, to continue the General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 and Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 to the final City Council Study Session scheduled for May 6, 1996. The motion carried unanimously with Councilman Green out of the room. Councilman Garofalo stated that he would like the Gothard-Hoover issue revisited and a city strategy developed; that the City Administrator return with an action plan to expedite the Gothard-Hoover Extension. Senior Planner James reviewed the Land Use Element and reported on recommended language on Page Nos. 223 and 224. He presented slide photographs of projects in the city and mixed uses in the City.of Santa Monica. The Community Development Director addressed Council regarding mixed use and stated that she knows the city can do better, citing policy set forth in the General Plan Amendment. She gave reasons why mixed use is desirable including pedestrian uses, bus corridors encourage mass transit, and solutions to urban sprawl. She cited San Diego, San Francisco and Boston as good examples. The Community Development Director spoke regarding the American dream of single family residential which she stated will always be there but that mixed use should too, become a part of the American dream. m Page 6 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04108/96 Senior Planner James responded to Councilwoman Dettloff and stated that Beach Boulevard, north of Warner Avenue all the way up and including the mall are the major areas recommended for mixed use. He also cited areas where the Planning Commission did not agree with the General Plan Advisory Committee relative to mixed use south of Warner Avenue. Councilman Garofalo thanked the Community Development Director. He stated that he believes the city must find a project to implement the dream the Community Development Director envisions. Councilman Bauer stated what he believed the nature of Huntington Beach; that of a city of single family detached homes. He cited the difference between Santa Monica and Huntington Beach, Councilman Green questioned the Community Development Director as to what the components are to good mixed use. The Community Development Director replied that -extensive pre -planning was done in Santa Monica. She reported further. Councilman Green inquired regarding plans for Single Room Occupancy. The Community Development Director reported. She reported on mixed use to revitalize Beach Boulevard which would never be able to have a demand for all the commercial available. Councilman Leipzig stated that he agreed with Councilman Bauer relative to mixed use. The City Administrator reported on mixed use. Senior Planner James reported on Major Issues and the correlation of development with public services and infrastructure. Discussion was held between Councilman Bauer and Mr. James regarding whether development has been stopped because of inadequate infrastructure. Planning Director Zelefsky presented the example at the southwest corner of Goldenwest Street and Warner Avenue where the sewer lift station has to be done. Also that traffic signals on projects must be put in on developments in the city. Councilman Bauer confirmed that the Growth Management Element adopted some time ago was included, with a few recommended changes and that it would be an attachment. The City Administrator reported on the Growth Management Plan as it relates to Police and Fire responsibilities, citing the need to modify if the city is not meeting the standards. Discussion was held regarding the loss of commercial - industrial in relation to the loss of residential - what has the city gained? 199 04/08/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 7 The Planning Director addressed the issue stating that a more definitive picture needs to be presented to Council. Councilman Garofalo stated that he believed the wrong tool of measurement was being used. He stated that he believed the city must strive toward the highest and best use of industrial. Councilman Garofalo requested a bench mark on single family - multi -family that shows where we are today and where we propose to go. Councilman Leipzig stated that he believed the city will find it is the intensity of uses being changed, not so much the use. He requested that something that has never been presented before be presented, which is what would be realistically possible under the existing General Plan, because that has to be taken into consideration before the city compares it to what is being planned. Extensive discussion was held regarding the time anticipated for parcel recycling and development of the remaining acreage in the city. Councilman Garofalo stated that there needed to be a plan to rehabilitate the strip mall sites. Land Use Maps Senior Planner James reviewed the individual Land Use Changes, referring to the matrix in the staff report. He presented photographs on a slide of various areas in the city. Discussion was held regarding the land at Indianapolis Avenue and Bushard Street (Area No. 52 and Area No. 40). Planning Director Zelefsky reported on policy regarding parcels which could be designated either of two ways and recommended that this policy of one acre exception in the current General Plan be discontinued. The Community Development Director reported that she believed the City Attorney's Office position would be that the Land Use has to be designated for the property owner and the surrounding property owners. She reported on Area No. 52. Councilman Leipzig presented a review of the legality of the one acre exception policy. Councilman Harman presented questions on Area No. 52 and the other areas that are inconsistent. Discussion was held regarding efforts which should be made to reconcile land use on Area No. 52_ Councilman Leipzig asked if "Planning Reserve" could be used for these types of areas such as No. 40 or No. 52. The Community Development Director stated she would like to bring this back with the City Attorney's input. PWO Page 8 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04/08/96 Councilman Harman requested that legal consequences be reported on, if the city attempts to change to residential after 25 yeas of commercial. Senior Planner James continued with the land use presentation utilizing slide photographs. Councilman Garofalo questioned Area No. 74 as to the difference between the Planning Commission, staff, and GPAC Committee. Mr. James reported that there will be a public hearing on the entire General Plan Amendment which includes all areas. Councilman Bauer presented questions regarding the areas at Huntington Harbour near the Harbour Bay Club as it relates to a builder wanting to build residential but that the people believe the Coastal Commission or someone indicated what was originally a beach there should still continue to be a beach and there is not a beach there currently. Also at issue with the residents is a recreational easement designated by the State Lands Commission. Brian James, Senior Planner, referring to Area No: 77 Page No. 43 stated that some residents had raised concerns. He presented staff's recommendation. Councilman Bauer stated that the tennis courts, the club, the original beach, the parking lot and the adjacent area needed to be ironed out. He requested it be studied and if necessary set for future public discussion. The property owner of Area No. 52 stated that he had been under a misunderstanding as he was under the impression the inconsistency on his property could remain. Motion To Continue General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 And Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 To May 6, 1996 T^� A motion was made. by Green, second Garofalo, to continue the General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 and Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 to the final City Council Study Session schedule for May 6, 1996. The motion carried unanimously. Public Comments Mary Hodge spoke in support of funding for senior services provided by the Senior Outreach Program and cited the needs of her 96 and 85 year old friends that are being met by these programs and which allow them to live independently. She stated that she too welcomed the monthly surplus food program and the yoga classes. Harold Schecter, Council on Aging President, spoke in support of senior services as senior needs will increase in the future. He cited the reasons why he believes it is undesirable to have a senior site at a school site that it should be at the Central Park. Councilman Garofalo stated that he believed Mr. Schecter is representing the group extremely well. 201 04/08/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 9 Wade Hawley stated that he wished to clarify questions from the last meeting regarding the Library. He responded to Councilman Greens questions regarding construction of the Library. Mr. Hawley referred to the loan of Park Acquisition and Development funds for the Art Center and stated that if the Library should be required to repay, so should the Art Center be required to do so_ He stated that he believed the issue of parking meters will be divisive to the community and that their opposition will be communicated. Discussion was held between the Council and Mr. Hawley. The City Administrator stated that he has requested a complete report from the Administrative Services Director. Ron Hagan, Community Services Director, stated that both the Library and the Art Center are able to use Park Acquisition and Development funds. He stated that a comprehensive parking plan will be provided. Recess - Reconvene The Mayor called a recess of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency at 9:30 p.m. The Mayor reconvened the meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency in the Council Chamber at 9:40 p.m. The City Administrator stated that the closed session on labor relations would be eliminated. (City Council/Redevelopment Agency) Budget Study Session - Review of Potential Expenditure Reductions For Departments (320.20) Discussion was held between the City Administrator and Council regarding procedures by which to determine budget priorities. Police Department Report The Police Chief presented a slide report titled Huntington Beach Police Department Budget Presentation, dated April 8, 1995. He reviewed the areas of reduction listed in his report and the Management Criteria for Determining Proposed Cuts. In response to Councilman Garofalo, the City Administrator stated that $4,000,000 was the shortfall. Councilwoman Dettloff stated that she believed the Council must set its priorities. She stated that it was extremely important for Council to know its absolute priorities so that the community groups as well as Council will not have divisiveness. She stated that consideration of fee increases should also be explored in order to maintain required services. 202 Page 10 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04/08/96 Community Services Budget Report Community Services Director Hagan presented a slide report and the different budget options and reported on the Budget Reduction Exercise - Community Services Document which had been announced earlier in the meeting by the City Clerk. He recommended Option A - Across the Board Cuts. Considerable discussion was held regarding revenue producing programs. The City Administrator reported on the reasons why budget cuts should not be made along the lines of revenue generating departments and those departments that do not generate revenue. Effects of reduction of the Marine Safety Program was discussed at the request of Mayor Sullivan. Councilman Bauer stated that fees must be charged for services provided. He requested the City Administrator present $2,000,000 in cuts and $2,000,000 in revenues for Council consideration_ (City Council) Appointment to Fourth_ of July Executive Board Announced --She Garrels (110,20) Councilman Leipzig announced the appointment of Sherry Garrels to the Fourth of July Board. (City Council Proposed Selection Plan For City Treasurer - Reinstatement Of Sala Range - Resolution -No. 96.32 (720.10) The City Council considered a communication from Deputy City Administrator Franz transmitting the proposed selection plan to fill the vacant City Treasurer position by interim appointment and transmitting Resolution No. -96-32 which re-establishes the previous salary for the City Treasurer position. A motion was made by Leipzig, second Green, to adopt the proposed selection plan for the City Treasurer and to adopt Resolution No. 96-32 - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REINSTATING THE SALARY OF THE CITY TREASURER." The resolution re-establishes the salary for the City Treasurer position from Range 552 ($5,931 - $7,348 per month) to its former Range 531 ($5,342 - $6,618 per month) effective April 8, 1996. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: None 203 04/08/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 11 Recess - Closed Session The Mayor called a recess of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency to consider the following closed session items: Closed Session - Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to give instructions to the Agency's negotiator, David Biggs, Economic Development Director, regarding negotiations with Wayne Comeau, et al., Allan Crossley, et al., Toyota of Huntington Beach (Lessee), concerning the lease of the property located at 18861 Beach Boulevard, A.P. No. 159-111-07, and 18881 Beach Boulevard, A.P. Nos. 159-111-08/09_ Instruction wiil concern price and terms of payment. Subject: Property Negotiations (Possible Leasehold Interest). (400.50) Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to give instructions to the City's negotiators, Michael Ubenuaga and Ron Hagan regarding negotiations with H.B,P.O.A. concerning the lease of the property located at 18221 Gothard Street. Subject: H.B.P.O.A. Lease of Gun Range. Instruction will concern price and terms of payment_ (120.80) Reconvene The Mayor reconvened the meetings of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency. Adjournment - City Council/Redevelopment Agency The Mayor adjourned the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to Monday, April 15, 1995, at 5:00 p.m., in Room B-8, Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. City Clerk/Clerk City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, and Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach California Mayor/Chairman 204 General Plan Land Use Recommendations - City Council Review Planning Commission approved December 12, 1995 Staff Analysis & Recommendations - 418196 FXIS'TING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY .. EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION No. LOCATION '>' FLAN,.. COMMITTEE'. 2aNIhiG DISCUSSION STAFF:RECOMMENDATIONS :', 1tECOi41l►II;NDATIONS DESIGNATION :; DESIGNATION M. 1 Southwest RL corner of (Residential Banning Ave. & Low Bushard St. Density) (DM 22) CN - F1 CG - FP2 (Commercial (Commercial Neighborhood, General, Density 0.35 FloodpWn) FAR) Change from Residential to Commercial to reflect existing zoning and existing conditions Agree with PC & GPAC: provides consistency between Zoning and General Plan Agree with Staff & GPAC: recommend change from Residential to Commercial Neighborhood (CN-Fl) designation (Straw Vote 5-0) 2: South'side of... RH P (RH'- 30) :' : RH Add Public (P) Disagree with PC, do not Disagree with Staff :& s. Hamilton AVe. (Residential Public`-. (Residential designation'to decrease.;densify from 30 to GPAC. recommend 300' west of High underlying High Density) identify ...:. 7 du/ac, agree with GPAC: change from Residential Brookhurst St. Density) '. Residential church school no'change to existing:. -High to Residential':Low; .' High I?erisity Residential High Density with Public(P) (DM 20)` 3Q un ac (RH) designation, only add designation; decrease in Public (P) designation: density from 30 to 7 dulac, P (RL '7) NOTE: inconsistent with zoning (Straw Vote 5- 0) 3. Northwest RL CN - F1 CG Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend Atlanta Ave. & Low Density Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and change from Residential Newland St. Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan to Commercial FAR) zoning and existing Neighborhood (CN-Fl) (DM 13) conditions designation (Straw Vote 5-0) PC approved 12/12/95 (glcc1ndus1) EXISTING.:GENERAL PLAN:. 'GEN[ZAL` Apvi56(2Y, E7CISTING PLANNING Ci); tMI,SSIQN NO.?: ;LOCATION ' ' PLAN. ': ':COMMITTEE <': ZONING DISCUSSION STAFFRECONIMENDATIONS RECOMMEND ;TIDNS .. DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 4. Atlanta Ave. east RL P (RL - 6.5) RL Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: of Leasure Ln. (Residential Public - (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Low underlying Low Density) identify Residential Low Density Public (P) designation; (DM 14) Density) Low Density churchtschool (RL) designation, retain retain maximum.7.0 dulac Residential, maximum 7.0 unlac (Straw Vote 5-0) 6.5 unlac 5. Northwest: , Recreation P (Public) RA - RL ;. Public designation Agree with.PC &GPAC:. > Agree,with Staff & GPAC:> earner of (Residential . for a Utility right new designation for. utility recommend Public (P) . Magnolia fit. & Agriculture;; of way . right of way designation to identify Hamilton Ave. Residential utility right of way, (Straw Law Density).:. Vote 5-0) (DM 14) :' 6. Southwest RL CN - F1 CG - FP2 Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change to Indianapolis Ave Low Neighborhood, General, Commercial to between Zoning and Commercial Neighborhood & Newland St. Density) Density 0.35 Floodpiain) reflect existing General Plan (CN-FI) designation FAR) zoning and existing (Straw Vote 6-1) (DM 13) conditions �r•n"r. Deleted; change to General of t'. shai' S a (Residen" (Co ereial `�nzn � Residentia>�e a Plan designation has been l eiglt(►oviiead': DeMjt� 0,45. ,.. General; .. F10ed} 04116461 t previously approved.. (DA4 . �Y) - --- - s 8. Northwest RL CN - F1 Q - CG - FP2 Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: corner of (Residential (Commercial (Qualified, Residential to provides consistency recommend change from Bushard St. & Low Neighborhood, Commercial Commercial to between Zoning and Residential to Commercial Litchfield Dr. Density) Density 0.35 General, reflect existing General Plan Neighborhood (CN-FI) FAR) Floodplain) zoning and existing designation (Straw Vote 5- (DM 6) conditions 0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 2 (glcclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL,PANIj GFIYERAI; IAV SORY ;EXISTING PLEINNINCCO?1MISSIOiY NO. LOCATION PLAN <: COMMITTEE ZONING I iSCI3SSION STAFPUgOMMENDATIONS RECOMMEND.,, DESIGNATION DESIGNATrON : ;, . . 9, Southwest RM OS P (Open OS - PR - FP2 : Change Residential : Agree with PC&, GPAC: Agree with -Staff& GPAC: corner of (Residential Space -Park) (Open Space, . to Open Space ark. provides .consistency recommend change from Delaware St. & Medium Parks and m to reflect existing between Zoning;and Residential to Open Space. Detrart Ave. _ Density) . Recreation, park < General Plan . _ Park (QS�P) designation _ . . ., Flood lain p } (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 12) W. Pse€3E Coast RH MV F8 S P"7 —.n'Change &am Agf ee with G PAQ, Deleted; change to General Highway (Residential {Mixed Use (Downtown residential Modified to enfer- - to Plan designation has been fraatage High Vms - eeminere amendments madee previously approved between Density) Density-1.5 District -#I, Downtown Speeifie Plan 6th St. & Tflt-. FAR -{Mid} - 0.35 ]CAR r!— Visitor See-y:..rr(approved final) April 1 �1 �'f1 �'T 'f , Specific Plan) 11. Southwest RM CN F1- D CG Change.from Agree with PC &GPAC: Agree with Staff &GPAC:'. corner of : (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change from Alabama St. &.... Medium Neighborhood, General) :' Commercial to between Zomng and Residential -to `Commercial Adams Ave. Density) l]ensity 0.35 . reflect existing General Plan ' .. Neighborhood' (CN.T1 D) . FAR, Design zoning and existing designation {Straw Uate 5- (DM 12) Qverlay) conditions U} 12. Northeast corner RM OS - P (Open RM-0 Change Residential Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: of Huntington (Residential Space - Park) (Residential to Open Space Park change to reflect existing recommend change from St. & Wichita Medium Medium to reflect existing conditions (will require Residential to Open Space - Ave. Density) Density, Oil park (Boys and future zone change) Park (OS-P) designation Overlay) Girls Club) (Straw Vote 5-0) NOTE: (DM 2) inconsistent with zoning Approved as of December 12, 1995 3 (glcclndusl) EXIS ING : GENERAL PLAN :. GENERAL AI?YISibRY :; FASTING . PLANNING COi ��'YIISSION NO LOCATIQH :: PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING`:... QISCUSSION STAFF IiECOMMEIYDATIONS RECUhiMENi3 TION$ DESIGNATION ` DESIGNATION ` 13. Southwest: RM P (RM , 15) RM Add Public (P) Agree with PC & Agree with Staff & GPAC: corner of Clay (Residential Public (Residential designation to GPAC no change to recommend change to add Ave: & Delaware . Medium underlying Medium identify existing Residential Public (P) designation Density) Residential Density} churclilschodl .edturn . ensity. (RM} : (Straw:Vote:S-0)' M eum designation (DM 2) Density 15 unlac' 14. corner Northeast co er RM P RM - 15 ( ) RM Add Public P� { ? Agree with PC & g Agree with Staff & GPAC: g , of Clay Ave. & (Residential Public - (Residential designation to GPAC: no change to recommend change to add Delaware St. Medium underlying Medium identify existing Medium Density Public (P) designation Density) Residential Density) church/school Residential (RM) (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 2) Medium designation Density 15 unlac a South side of IG (Industrial P (I) Public - . IL (Industrial Add Public (P) Agree with PC & Agree with Staff & GPAC:. Garfield Ave., General) underlying Limited) designation to GPAC: no change to recommend change to 'add GothaM St. & . Industrial identify City'.s existing Industrial (I) Public (P)designation Hurt'ington St. Water Yard ':: designation (Straw Vote 5-()) (DM 2) 1.6. Southwest Mixed MH - F3 -30 - Pacifica Modify existing Agree with PC: disagree Agree with Staff: corner of Main Development SP (Mixed Community. Mixed Use with GPAC; change to recommend change to Mixed St. & Florida St. Use Plan designation to Mixed Use designation Use and add Specific Plan (East of Florida) Horizontal, reflect existing use and add Specific Plan (SP) designation (Straw Density 1.0 and conditions Vote 6-0-1 abstain) (DM 39) FAR, 30 unlac, f Specific Plan) Approved as of December 12, 1995 4 (glccindus! ) EXISTING . GENERAL PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION GENERAL - ADVISORY EXISTING NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING. DISCUSSION:. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS R1:CQMMI NDA' [[7N5 :.: bESIGNATIbN . DESIGNATION X 17. Southwest RM P (RMH - 25) RMH Add Public (P) Agree with PC & Agree with Staff & GPAC: corner of Ellis (Residential Public - (Residential designation to GPAC: increase in recommend to add Public Ave. & Chapel Medium underlying Medium High identify density from 15 to 25 (P) designation, increase Ln. Density) Residential Density) church/school, du/ac, provides density from 15 to 25 du/ac Medium High increase density consistency between (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 40) Density 25 from 15 to 25 du/ac Zoning and General Plan un/ac 18. Park site; RM OS Park . OS - PR (Open Change Residential Agree with PC & GPAC:. Agree with Staff & GPAC: northeast.of (Residential (Open Space,; Space, Parks P to Open S ace Park P P provides consistent P �' recommend change from g Pacific Coast Medium Park) and :: to reflect existm g between Zoning and 1; Residential to.0 en S ace p Highway & Denslty) .: :.., Recreation} . park General Plan Park (OS-P) deslgnation Warner Ave. : :;. . ;(Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 35) I9. Northeast of RL RM - 15 RMP Land use change to Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Heil Ave. & (Residential (Residential (Residential reflect existing with GPAC: recommend recommend retain existing Saybrook Ln. Low Density) Medium Manufactured density of Mobile Mobile Home overlay Residential Low Density 7.0 (DM 23) Density 15 Home Park) Home Park, un/ac) increase density from 7 to 15 du/ac and retain existing dulac and add Mobile Residential Low Density Home Overlay (Straw Vote designation 5-0) 20, 300' Northwest RL P (RL - 6.5) RL Add Public (P) . Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: of Heil Ave. & . `, (Residential :. Public - (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Springdale St. Low. Density) underlying Low Density) identify Residential Low Density - Public (P) designation; Residential church/school (RL) designation, retain_ retain. maximum 7,0 du/ac (DM 24) Low Density maximum 7.0 unlac (Straw Vote 5-0) . 6:5 unlac) Approved as of December 12, 1995 5 (glcclndus 1) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL. a'ADVISORY ` . EXISTCNG .. PLANNiNG_CO' (MISSION ' NO.; LOCATION PLAN ;; COMMITTEE .is- ZONING <AISCVSSION :'STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RE COMMENII��,TIQNS IIESIGNATION DESIGNATION 21. 300' Southwest SR (Senior RMH - 25 (Q) RMH Eliminates Senior Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: of Edinger Ave. Residential) (Residential (Qualified, Residential provides consistency recommend change from & Springdale St. Medium High Residential Designation, RMH between Zoning and Senior Residential to Density 25 Medium High allows senior General Plan Residential Medium High (DM 24) unlac) Density) residential (RMH-25) designation development (Straw Vote 5-0) 22,' Northeast corner. CG P (CN. - F1) CG Add Public (P) Agree with PG &GPAC. Agree with Staff & GPAC: of McFadden , (Commercial Public;= . {Commercial designation tb . no change to existing recommend change to add Ave. &:.Edwards; Genera!) under( in General dentif Commercial desi na#ion Public E desi nation; St. ' .. Commercial churchISchool (Straw .Vote.S-0) Neighborhoo {DM 17) d, Density 0,35 FAR) 23. Shell/Cal Industrial - MH - F1- 30 M2 - 01 - CZ; Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: Resources site, Resource - SP (Mixed R4 - 0 - CZ; Industrial to Mixed expands the visitor recommend change from inland side of Production Use C1 - O CZ Use serving commercial Industrial -Resource Pacific Coast Horizontal, (Industrial opportunities along the Production to Mixed -Use Highway Density 0.35 General, Oil coast, allows residential Horizontal; recommend F2- between FAR, 30 Overlay, development, 30 (.5 FAR, 30 dulac); Seapoint Ave. & unfac, Coastal Zone; incorporates property recommend "average" Golden West St. Specific Plan) Residential owner & residents density of 15 dulac (Straw High Density, comments (will require Vote 7-0) (DM 3,4 & 10) Oil Overlay, future zone change and Coastal Zone; Master/Specific Plan) Commercial Neighborhood, Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone) Approved as of December 12, 1995 6 (glcclndusl) EXISTING , GENERALPI;AN GI?NERAL Ali VISORY PX $ PING. >; PY.4NNING C¢ iINiSSIQN.....I: Np• L4CA7IQN PLAN ..... COMMITTEE ZONING :: DISCUSSIQN STAFF ItECQMMENAATIQNS RE60MMEN,"1 iTIQNs DESIGNATION.:' DESIGNATION > . 24. 1,500'. Southwest IG (Industrial_ RM -15 1G (Industrial ,. of Warner Ave. General) (Residential General) & Gothard St.. Medi urn (Mobile Home >; Density, 15 Park) unlac) (DM 31) 25. Southeast corner IG (Industrial I - F2 - H IL (Industrial of Gothard St. & General) (Industrial, Limited) Warner Ave. Density 0.5 FAR, (DM 31) Historical Overlay) - Change from ----- Agree with PC, disagree .............. Agree with Staff: Industrial to with GPAC: changeto recommend change from Residential to..:.Residential Low Density Industrial toResidential refleet.ezisting „ and add,Mobile Home I.ow:Density 7.0 dulac add. conditions (Mobile Overlay (will require ', Nlobrle' Home'.Ove.r.1ay. Home Park) future zone change) NOTE: inconsistent with Zoning.(Straw Vote 4 ,1) ; Add Historic (H) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: Overlay to area to no change to Industrial recommend to add Historic identify Historic (I) designation Overlay (Straw Vote 5-0) structures (Slater House, etc.) 26.. 50' Northwest of RL P (RL - 6.5) RL (Residential Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: Edinger Ave.' &. (Residential Public - Low. Density) designation to no change to existing recommend change to add. Golden West St. Low Density) underlying identify Residential Low Density Public (P) designation; Residential church/school : -. (RL) designation; retain. ,. retain maximum 7.0 dulac .. (DM 17) Law Density maximum 7.0.unlac (Straw' Vote 5=0) 6.5 unlac 27. 500' Northwest RL P (RL - 6.5) RL (Residential Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: of Edinger Ave. (Residential Public - Low Density) designation to no change to existing recommend change to add & Golden West Low Density) underlying identify Residential Low Density Public (P) designation; St. Residential church/school (RL) designation, retain retain maximum 7.0 du/ac Low Density maximum 7.0 unlac (Straw Vote 5-0) DM 17) 6.5 unlac Approved as of December 12, 1995 7 (glcclndus 1) EXISTING GENERALPLAN GENERAL ADVISORY:':. EXISTING PLANNING CO"OMISSION NO. LOCATION . PLAN COMMITTEE:::: ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMEND �TIONS DESIGNATION . DESIGNATION - 28. Northwest RM CN - F1 CG Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change from McFadden Ave. Medium Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and Residential Medium Density & Golden West Density) Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan to Commercial St. FAR) zoning and Neighborhood (CN-Fl) (DM 17) conditions designation (Straw Vote 5- 29.. P, Q - P,:I P (CG = P1) PS. (Public Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff.& GPAC: Northeast corner (Public, Public - Semi Public) Public, Quasi- expands commercial recommend change from of Golden West Quasi underlying Public, opportunities along Public, Quasi -Public, .` St. & Edinger Public, Commercial - Institutional to - Edinger. Corridor by Institutional to Commercial Ave: (Edinger. Institutional) General; Public'wlth changing the designation Generals(CG FI) and add frontage) Density 0.35 ;, underlying to Commercial General Public (P) designation FAR) Commercial .: with;Public. (P) (Straw Vote 5 ,Q) NOTE (DM 15) Genera] designation to identify inconsistent with zoning .:.. designation at college Golden West _.... College 30. Southeast of CG CR - F2 - D CG Upgrades existing Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: Golden West St. (Commercial (Commercial (Commercial Commercial expands regional recommend change from & Edinger Ave. General) Regional, General) designation to commercial opportunities Commercial General to 1 Density 0.5 Regional with freeway access Commercial Regional (CR- (DM 26) FAR, Design Commercial F2-D) designation (Straw Overlay) designation Vote 5-0) j 31.. South side of CG CR.- F2 - D CG Upgrades existing . Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: Edinger Ave. (Commercial (Commercial (Commercial Commercial expands regional recommend change from from Gothard General) Regional, General) designation to commercial opportunities Commercial General to St. to Parkside Density 0.5 Regional with freeway access Commercial Regional. (CR-,; Ln`: FAR, Design :, Commercial F2-D) designation {Straw (D.M 26) '; Q,verlay) designation Vote 5 tl)' Approved as of December 12, 1995 8 (glcclndusl) : EX3SI ING , : GENERAL.PLAN GENERAL AUVI50RY . EXISTING PLANNING,G[ MMI$SION NO LOCATION I ONII4IITTEE: zONtN DISCUSSIO STAFF RECOMMENDATIQNS RECQM143E1� 4ATIONS , ,> r .. ,•'-` ; 'DESI.PIGN,,Ai!i A`TibN " : ;: .. VKSIGNATION 32. 1Northeast of Gothard St. & Edinger Ave (DM 15). CG CR-F2-D (Commercial (Commercial General) Regional, Density 0.5 FAR, Design Overlay) 33. Southeast of P, Q - P; P :MV.- F8 - D McFadden Ave. (Public, (Mixed Use & Gothard.St. Quasi - Vertical, Public, Density.1.5 (DM IS} Institutional) FAR (IYIU], : . CG (Commercial General) Upgrades existing Commercial designation to Regional Commercial designation Agree with PC & GPAC: expands regional commercial opportunities with freeway access Agree with Staff & GPAC: recommend change from Commercial General to Commercial Regional (CR- F2-D) designation (Straw Vote 5-0) RL: (Residential Change from Agree. with PC & GPAC: Agree witb'Staff & GPAC: Low Density), Public, Quasi- promotes an activity recommend change from . IG (General Public, center by adding Publiq:Quasi-Public, Industrial), CG- Institutional and commerciallresidenti.al , Institutional and Mixed:..... H (Commercial.> Mixed Use to (mixed use) designation Development t& Mixed Use. '; Transit Center Area CG (Commercial Modifies Disagree with PC, agree General) Commercial with GPAC: recommend designation by mixed use to expand and adding Mixed Use revitalize opportunities (CommerciallResid for the Mall, promote the ential); Continues regional importance of Regional the site but may (not Commercial uses, required) allow may permit residential development residential in the area development ' Disagree with Staff & GPAC: eliminate mixed use, recommend change from Commercial General to Commercial Regional - FAR .5 - Specific Plan (CR - F2 - SP)) designation (Straw Vote 5-1) Approved as of December 12, 1995 9 (glcclndusl) EXISTING: GENERAL PLAN is GENER4L', ADVYSDRY ; : , E7CISTIIVG PI,ANNiNG Co! [MISSION ms NO LOCAT]ON...:_ PLAN .: C01vIN1rITE :ZONING' AISCUSSIpN STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ItECQMMEI!tL' TIONS ms . DESIGNATIQN . AESTGI�ATION 35. Aldrich Ave. CG MV - F10 - D CG -- RMH - Modifies existing Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff & south to Heil (Commercial - A (Mixed RM Commercial reduction. of residential GPAC: recommend change Ave, west side of General) Use Vertical, (Commercial designation by density from 25 to 15 from Commercial General Beach Blvd. RMH Density 1.5. General; adding Mixed Use dulac, agree with GPAC: to Mixed Use Vertical,: (Residential FAR ]MU], Residential: (CommerciallResid allows continued : decrease density from' 25 to (DM 26) Medium 1.5 FAR. [C], ': Medium High ential), continues Commercial uses :and 15. dulac_(Straw Vote 6-0 Y . High 25 dulac Density; commercial uses, " ; deelopment, permits NOTE: inconsistent with Density) RM Design Residential '." may permit ,, (not`requred) residential zoning (Residential Overlay; Me.¢ium residential" uses.and provides Medium Auto Density) development; does possible relocation of ...; Densl ty} ., .. Overlay) increase softie Auto Dealers to farm density.from 15 to future .A tb Mill :. diilae, Auta Overlay allows . Possible location of Auto. Dealers 36. Heil Ave. south CG MV - F10 - D CG RM Modifies existing Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff & to Warner Ave. (Commercial - A (Mixed (Commercial Commercial reduction of residential GPAC: recommend change east & west sides General) Use Vertical, General; designation by density from 25 to 15 from Commercial General of Beach Blvd. RM Density 1.5 Residential adding Mixed Use dulac, agree with GPAC: to Mixed Use Vertical, (Residential FAR [MU], Medium (CommerciallResid allows continued decrease density from 25 to (DM 26&27) Medium 1.5 FAR [C], Density) ential); continues Commercial uses and 15 du/ac (Straw Vote 5-1) Density) 25 dulac, commercial uses, development, permits NOTE: inconsistent with Design may permit (not required) residential zoning Overlay, residential uses and provides Auto development, does possible relocation of Overlay) increase some Auto Dealers to form density from 15 to future Auto Mall 25 dulac, Auto Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers Approved as of December 12, 1995 10 (glcclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING U AIMISSION NO. LOCATION.:. PLAN.;.', .'. COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMEN,`ATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 37. Southeast of CG MV - F10 - D RM Modifies existing. Disagree with PC Disagree with. Staff & Beach Blvd,.&,:. (Commercial (Mixed Use (Residential Commercial. reduction of residential : GPAC: recommend change Warner Ave. General) Vertical, Medium '; designation b.y density from 25 to 15. from.Conlmercial:General ': RM Density 1.5 Density) adding Mixed Use „ dulac; agree with GPAC to Mixed Use:,Vertical, (DM 30) (Residential :. .FAR jMU], (Commercial/Reside allows, continued decrease density from 25 to'> Medium. 1.S FAR �C], ntial) continues Connmercialuses and : 15 dulac (Straw Vote 5 1) Density). 25 dulac, commercial uses, deyelopm ht, permits NOTE: inconsistent w:th D may "`erml not require residential zoning Overlay) residential uses and provides development, does possible relocation of increase saiae t#Uto.Deaiers to: form:: density from 15 to future Auto Mall 25 du/ac, Auto Overlay allows possible location af; Auto Dealers 38. Northeast of RH P (RMH - 25) RMH Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: Nichols St. & (Residential Public - (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change from Warner Ave. High underlying Medium High identify Multi -Family Residential Residential High to Density) Residential Density) church/school; does designation, but does Residential Medium High (DM 26) Medium High reduce density from reduce the density from Density and add Public (P) Density, 25 35 to 25 du/ac 35 to 25 dulac designation, does decrease unlac) density from 35 to 25 du/ac (Straw Vote 6-0) 39. 200' Northwest Mixed Use RMH - 25 Q - RMH Change from Mixed Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: of Magnolia Ave. (Residential (Qualified, Use to Residential provides consistency: recommend change from & Warner Ave.: Medium High Residential Medium High between Zoning and Mixed Use to Residential Densit 25 : Y Medium High . Density to reflect ; General PIan ..:. Medium High D ensity 25 (DM 27} un/ac) Density} existing zoning and dulac (Straw Vote 6=0) 'r. conditions Approved as of December 12, 1995 11 (glcclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL: ADVISORY..... EKI3TING PLANNING CO. tNIISSIpN No. LOCATION PLAN , 'COMMITTEE ZONING. DISCUSSION:: STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: RECOMME]VI' `TIONS "DESIGMATIb1Y PSIGNATION'` 40. Southeast corner Commercial RM - IS . OP (Office.: Change frog Disagree. with PC, agree Disagree with Staff & of Warner Ave. General _. (Residential Professional) Commercial General. with GPAC change to GPAC: recommend >xo and Oak Ln. Medium to Residential' residential; Is compatible change to Commercial Density) Medium Density with adjacent designations General FAR.35 (CG (DM 31} is F1) designation (Straw Vote 6-0) . 41. East & west CG RH - 30 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: eliminate sides of Beach (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC: eliminate residential node and Blvd., Blaylock General) High Density, General) to Residential High forming residential nodes, recommend no change to Dr. south to 30 unfac) Density to form no change to commercial Commercial General - Ronald Dr. residential node, designation FAR .35 (CG - F1) breaks continuous designation (Straw Vote 5- (DM 30&31) strip commercial 0-1 absent) development 42.. Southeast of RM .P (Public) - CG.. _ Add Public (P) Agree with PC &GPAC: Agree with Staff A GPAC: Beach Blvd. & (Residential designation to (Commercial designation to identifies existing hospital recommend change from Newman Ave. Medium : _ reflect General) identify hospital; use Residential Medium Density) hospital ' removes Residential Density to Public (P) (DM 30) Medium Density (15 designation (Straw Vote 6 : ms.du lac) designation 0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 12 (glcclndus1) EXISTING GENERAL YLAI GENERA_ L -,: ADVISORY.: r EXISTING .: :;' PLANNING Cc41MI$SION NO. LOCATION PLAN : COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS : RECOMMENk'ATIONS IMSIGNATIC}N DESIGNATION' 43. East side of RM RMH - 25 RM - RMH Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Florida St.,17th (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium with GPAC: do not recommend retain existing St. to Yorktown Medium Medium High Medium to Residential create residential node Residential Medium Ave. Density) Density, 25 Density; Medium High and increase density from Density 15 dulac un/ac) Residential Density to reflect 15 to 25 dulac, retain designation (Straw Vote 6- (DM 2) Medium High existing conditions existing Residential 0) NOTE: portion of site Density) and create node, Medium Density (RMH) inconsistent with does increase density zoning from 15 to 25 dulac in some areas 44. 800' South of RM RH - 30 RM -. RMH . :: Change from . . " Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Garfield :Ave. on (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium. with GPAC: do not .-. , recommend retain existing . east side of Medium High Density, Medium - to Residential High create node anflncrease . 'Residential Medium Florida 'St. to Density) 30 unlac) :Density; Density to reflect density;from 15. to 30 Density 15 dulac Yorktown Ave.; Residential existing conditions >'. dulac, retain existing designation (Straw Vote 6 Medium High and create node, Residential Medium 0} NDTE: portion of.site (DM 2) _ = Density} does increase density Density. (RMH) inconsistent with from 15 to 30 dulac . zoning in some areas 45. 300' Southwest RM CG - F1 RM Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: of Yorktown (Residential (Commercial (Residential Residential Medium reflects existing recommend change from Ave. & Beach Medium General, Medium to Commercial conditions and uses Residential Medium Blvd. Density) Density 0.35 Density) General to reflect Density to Commercial FAR) existing conditions General (CG-F1) (DM 2) designation (Straw Vote 6- 0) NOTE: inconsistent with zoning Approved as of December 12, 1995 13 (glcclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY ': EXISTING . _: PLANNING Cni►MISSiON NO. LOCATION :' PhAN COMMUTEE ZONING DISCUSSION. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:: RECpMME]� ATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 46. East of Florida RM St., 300' south of (Residential Yorktown Ave. Medium to Adams Ave. Density) (DM 2) RH - 30 RM (Residential (Residential High Density, Medium 30 unlac) Density) Change from Residential Medium to Residential High Density to reflect existing conditions and create node, does increase density from 15 to 30 dulac in some areas Agree with PC, disagree with GPAC: do not create node and increase density from 15 to 30 du/ac, retain existing Residential Medium Density Agree with Staff: recommend retain existing Residential Medium Density 15 dulac designation (Straw Vote 6-0) 47. 100' Northeast : RM P (RH- 30) ;RM: Add Public (P) Agree with PC, modify; .; Agree with`'Staff. of Utica Ave. & (Residential Public =: `' {Residential designation'to GPAC recommendation: recommend retain existing Florida St. Medium . underlying Medium identify add Public (P)..:. Residential. Medium Density Density) . Residential . Density) . ChurchhSchool; designation to. identify ' 15 dulac`and a td Public (P}" (DM 2) High Density, does increase school or church, but do designation (Straw Vote 6 .` 30 unl.ac) density.fr6m. 15 to:. not increase.density from 0) 30 du/ac 15 to 30 dulac; retain...:.... . exi stii4 Residential Medium Density {15 dulac) 48. East of Florida RM P (RH - 30) RM Add Public (P) Agree with PC, modify Agree with Staff: St. 300' south of (Residential Public - (Residential designation to GPAC recommendation: recommend retain existing Utica Ave. Medium underlying Medium identify add Public (P) Residential Medium Density Density) Residential Density) Church/School; designation to identify 15 dulac and add Public (P) (DM 2) High Density, does increase school or church, but do designation (Straw Vote 6- 30 un/ae) density from 15 to not increase density from 0) 30 dulac 15 to 30 dulac, retain existing Residential Medium Density (15 dulac) Approved as of December 12, 1995 14 (glcclndus1) EXISTING GENERAL _PLAN GENERAL :: ADVISORY.. EXISTING PI;ANiVING C0' iMI55IO1V No.. LOCATION PLAN ;COMMITTEE: ZONING DISCUSSION: STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDXV' ?NS DESIGNATION > DESIGNATION..::: 49. 100' Northeast RIVI P (RH:. 30) RM. Add Public (P) Agree with PC, modify Agree :with 'Staff - of Adams Ave. (Residential.:.. Public = (Residential designation.to GPAC recommendation: recommend retain existing & Yorktown Medium underlying Medium ;identify. add Public (P) Residential Medium Ave, Density),-' :Residential . Density) ChurchlS600l; does designation to identify Density;l5 dd/at.and add ...High Density,:, increase density school or church, but do Public (P designation (DM 2) ": 30 unlac) from 15 to 30 du/at :' not increase density from: (Straw Vote 6`0) 15 to.30 du lac; retain existing Residentlal Medium :Density; (15 50. South side of RM CN - F1 RM - FP2 Change from Hamilton Ave. (Residential (Commercial (Residential Residential Medium 400' east of Medium Neighborhoo Medium Density to Bushard St. Density) d, Density Density, Commercial 0.35 FAR) Floodplain) Neighborhood (DM 20) Agree with PC, disagree with GPAC: retain existing medium density residential, no change to commercial designation to the west Agree with Staff: retain existing Residential Medium Density (RM-15) designation, no change to commercial designation to the west .51. Northeast corner: CC RM - 15 CG - FP2::: Change from:: Agree with PC; disagree Agree :with Staff: of Hamilton Ave: {Commercial,. (Residential :, (Commercial Commerclal`General with GPAC: existing recommend retain existing :, Brookhurst General).::::.:: Medium : General, to Residential commercial would Commercial General:(CG- Street Density; 15 Flood lain p ) :,Medlun� Densl ty become non conform , g Fl) designation (Straw ul�/ac} designations hould reflect Vote 6-0) (DM 19) : existing conditions and `. . uses, retain existing . . Commercial General designation Approved as of December 12, 1995 15 (glcclndus1) EXISTING GENFRALPLAN' GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANPIINC CON'MISSION NO. '' LOCATION m PLAN..'- COMMITTEE ZONING : 7HSCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENX3 TIONS. DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 52. Northwest RL corner of (Residential Indianapolis Low Ave. & Bushard St. Density) 53. 54. (DM 7) CN - F1 CG Change from (Commercial (Commercial Residential Low Neighborhoo General) Density to d, FAR 0.35) Commercial Neighborhood Northwest : OS-C : RL - 6.5 LUD - CZ - Change -from Open corner of Pacific . (Open Space (Residential . FP2 (Limited Space Conservation Coast Highway .: -:: .: Low Density, Use District, to Residential Low & Brookhurst Conservatio 6.5 unlac) Coastal Zone, D;ensity.in a portion St. (White`Hale n) Flaodplain) :of the White Hole . area) Area (DM 22&29) Southwest RM RL - 6.51RH - Magnolia Modify designations corner of (Residential 30 Pacific to reflect existing Magnolia St. & Medium (Residential Specific Plan and approved land Hamilton Ave. Density) Low Density, use map designations NESI (Aston) 6.5 unlac, to conform to site Residential specific plan (MDR - High Density, 15) (DM 14) 30 unlac) Agree with PC, disagree with GPAC: no change to current designation, property owner will be required to request zone change or general plan amendment at time of Agree with PC, disagree with GPAC; modify designation and map to reflect specific plan designation Agree with Staff; recommend retain existing Residential Low Density 7.0 dulac, no change to existing designation, NOTE: inconsistent with Zoning (Straw Vote 5-0) Agree with Staff. recommend. retain Open Space Conservation (OS designation (Straw Vote 4- . 1) Agree with Staff. recommend retain existing Residential Medium Density 15 dulac designation and add Specific Plan (Straw Vote 6-0) 55. 100' North of RL RM - 15 RMP Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Yorktown Ave., (Residential (Residential_ (Residential Residential Low to with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing west side of Low Medium Manufactured Residential Medium existing Residential Low Residential Low Density 7.0 Brookhurst St. Density) Density, 15 : Home Park) Density, increase in Density designation and dulac designation and add unlac) density from 7 to 15 add Mobile Home Mobile Home Overlay (DM 6) .unlac to':"reflect Overlay (Straw Vote Yo. existing :density Of Mobile Home Park Approved as of December 12, 1995 16 (glcclndusl) .F?CISiING ..€ GENERAL:PGnN GENERAL „' ADVISOIZY, sl .EXISTENG PLANNING Ci y1VIMISSION .? NO LQ fSTION:. kI.AiY 'COMMgTEE ZONING .::. IIISCUSSIi7N '.: STA,FFIZEC[)Ni1VEENDATIONS: :RECCIMMEM1.9AfiiONs . <DF5IGNATION'' DESIGNATION 56. 1000' South of Garfield Ave., west side of Brookhurst St. (DM b) CG RM - 15 (Commercial (Residential General) Medium Density, 15 unlac) CG Change from (Commercial Commercial General General) to Residential Medium Density 57. 1,000 feet south`; CG RH - 30 RH - Change from of Atlanta Ave. (Commercial (Residential'_ (Residential Commercial General east side of General) High Density, High Density) and Residential Beach'Blvd , 30 us ac) Medium to ': (Breakers RM RH Residcntial,Ztigh . Development) (Residentlal .RH = 30 (Residential ,Density, density. ; Agree with PC, disagree with GPAC: retain existing Commercial General designation Agree with PC, disagree with GPAC: A6 not increase`density to reflect y bonus designate MedEum Density 15 dulac site Medium ;: ,I {Straw Vote';6 0} Agree with Staff: recommend retain existing Commercial General (CG- Ft) designation (Straw Vote 6-0) Medium (Residential Hih.DensEty) increase from 15 to reflect exEstang:conditionS {DM 14) Density] High`Density, 30 duke 30 uilac) 58. Northwest and CG RMH - 25 CG Change from southwest of (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General Joliet Ave. & General) Medium High General) to Residential Beach Blvd. Density, 25 Medium High Density unlac) (DM 12) Agree with PC, disagree with GPAC: retain existing commercial designation school �a-iras been. removed u d site de�elafled Agree with Staff: recommend to designate entire'site Residential Agree with Staff: recommend retain existing Commercial General (CG- Fl) designation (Straw Vote 6-0) Deleted; .change to General Plan designation has been previously approved Approved as of December 12, 1995 17 (glcclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING , DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMk �ATIONS DESIGNATIOlI `IIESIGNATION 60. Southeast corner of Adams Ave. & Beach Blvd. (Seabridge Specific Plan area) (DM 13) Planned CG - F1 Community (Commercial General, Density 0.35 FAR) CG Change from Planned (Commercial Community to General) Commercial General Agree with PC, disagree with GPAC: recommend designation as Mixed Use and add Specific Plan Agree with Staff: recommend to designate as Mixed Use and add Specific Plan (Straw Vote 6-0) 61. South of Orange RM P (CN - 1). RMH - A.] Add Public (P): Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Ave. between (Residential Public - (Residential `ciesignatian'ta reflect with GPAC: add Public recommend retain 10#h St. & 11th : Medium underlying Medium High schooUchurch; change ,, (1?) designation to Residential Medium High St. Density).:. Commercial Density, from Residential Residential Medium High density and add Public (P) ., Nelghboehoo :; Small Lot..' Medium Density to {25 du/ac)';Density to designation (Straw Vote 7- (DM 12) A, Density Subdistrict) Commercial provide consistency 0) D35 FAR, Neighborhood and .. between Zoning and P;(12 22) Residential Lew General Plan P(Iblic = Density so Itzxderiying ,, 'Residential . ;, Low Density, 22 unlac 62. Northwest Mixed RMH - 25 - D CG/RMH - A Change from Mixed Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: corner of Acacia Development (Residential (Commercial Development to with GPAC: change to recommend change to Ave. & Main St, Medium High General/ Residential Medium Mixed Use Horizontal - Mixed Use Horizontal Density, 25 Residential High Density F1 (FAR 0.35) - 25 dulac (MH-Fl-25) designation (DM 12) unlac, Design Medium High to reflect existing (Straw Vote 7-0) Overlay) Density, conditions and uses Small Lot Subdistrict) Approved as of December 12, 1995 18 {glcclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL PLA1V . GENERAL ADV784RY ;: EXISTING PLANNING CC MMfSSIQN NO :.::.LOCATION < PLAN.; ..::COMMITTEE. ZaNING DISCUSSIQN STAFF ItEC04fMENDATIOPiS RECOMMEN, ATIONS DESIGNATION ` IIESIGNATION 63. Northwest . RM CN- F1 -.D CG Change from Agree with PC & GPAC- Agree. with.Staff& GPAC:. corner of 17th (Residential (Commercial : (Commercial:. Residential Medium; provides consistency ::' recommend change to St: &Olive Arse Medium ' Neighborhoo General) . Density to bit*eein Zoning and Coimmeri dal' Neighborhood Densrty); . d, Density Commercial General Plan ,modify (CN-Fl) designation; (DM 10) : 0 35 FAR, , . Neighborhood to b'pundary .line. on map'' (Straw'Vofe 6-0) . Design' reflect existingis Overlay) conditions and uses ': 64. Northwest RM CN - F1 - D CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Medium with GPAC: add Public recommend change to Orange Ave. & Medium Neighborhoo General) Density to (P) designation to Residential Medium High 17th St. (Roger's Density) d, Density Commercial Residential Medium High Density 25 du/ac and add Senior Center) 0.35 FAR, Neighborhood Density (25 du/ac) to Public (P) designation Design reflect Senior Center and (Straw Vote 6-0) NOTE: (DM 10) Overlay) city owned land inconsistent with zoning 66. South side of Yorktown Ave. between Golden West St. & Main St. (DM 2) P, P - Q, I, RL - 6-5 (Public, (Residential Quasi - Low Density, Public, 6.5 du/ac) Institutional) RL - 01 Change from Public, (Residential Quasi -Public, Low Density, Institutional to Oil Overlay) Residential Low Density Agree with PC, disagree with GPAC: add Public (P) designation to Residential Low Density and retain maximum 7.0 unlat Agree with Staff: recommend change to Residential Low Density 7.0 un/ac and add Public (P) designation (Straw Vote 7-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 19 (glcclndusI) EXISTING' GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORIC E7 ISTIP G PLANNING CQl iWsSION NO.:. LOCATION PLAN. COIVIIVIITTEE ZOPiING I XSCIISSION STA. FP RECOMMENDATIONS RECQMI4IEP[1 1TION. DESIGNATION DE$1GlATION' RM 1 F2 SP Holly Sene-liff Change from (Residential � Speei€ie Plat Residential Medium Media Density 0.9 (Industr4al/W Density to industrial Density) FAR,-Speei€ie -3) Flit} Agree with GRAQ Deleted; change to General provides Plan designation has been Zoning (Speeffir. Plan) previously approved (DM ) 1 69. Southeast eorner: RNI P (RM 15) Holly Seacl►ff :Add Public (P) Agree with PC dii ree g f Agree vrith Staff Of Crystal `.`St. & (ResEdent�al Public Specific Plan designation to . with GPAC dg not add ecarnmend retain existing Garfield Ave. Medium underlying (Residential Residential Medium ` Pubhc (P); retain existing Iiesideiitial Mrdlpm Density) Residential Medium Density (YMCA) Residential Medium Density S du! ac and add (I3M 2} .. Medium Density/IV'� Derislty designation and Specific F1aiI (SP) Density` 5. 1} add Specific Plan (SP) designation (Straw Vote 7- did 6 o) 70. Northwest IG RM - 15 IGlIL Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff. corner of (Industrial (Residential (Industrial Industrial General to with GPAC. do not recommend retain existing Huntington St. General) Medium General/ Residential Medium change to Residential Industrial (IG-F2A) & Clay Ave. Density 15 Industrial Density Medium Density, retain designation (Straw Vote 7- (Cambro site) du/ac) Limited) existing Industrial d) designation and modify (DM 2) FAR to F2A (.75). Approved as of December 12, 1995 20 (glcclndus1) EXISTING : GENERAL PLAN GE[YEIiAL ADVISORY - E7CISTING PLANNING C( IVI1 ,SSION NO. LOCATION PLAN, C4Ml►IITTEE. ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, :RECOIV MErt \ATIONS DF.SIGNATIGN" " DESIGNATION 71. Southeast corner Mixed P (MH - F3 - Pacifica Add Public (P) Agree with PC, disagree Agree with -St aff: of Delaware Development 30 - SP) Community designation with with GPAC: change to recommend change to Ave. &Main'. St. Public.:= PIan Mixed. se Mixed Use and add.: Mixed Use, addSpecific underlying ' (Coriimercial/Resident Specific Plan, modify: Plan (SP) designation and (DM39) Mixed .Use ial) designation to :'' boundary line on the'; mod fy,boun14 i line on Horizontal, reflect existing map to reflect existing map'to'reflee existing area Density 1.0 : cai ditions And uses; area {Straw:Vote 6=0-1: abstain) ., FARt 30 , unlac, Specific Plan 72. Southeast corner Mixed CG - F2 - D CO Change from Mixed Disagree with PC & Disagree with Staff and of Main St. & Development (Commercial (Commercial Development to GPAC: maintain density GPAC: recommend change Florida Ave. General, Office) Commercial Office at 25 du/ac and change to Mixed Use Horizontal, (DM 39) Density 0.5 FAR, Design Overlay) to Mixed Use decrease density from 25 to Horizontal, F2 [FAR 15 du/ac (Straw Vote 6-0-1 0.51, 25 un/ac, Design abstain) NOTE: Overlay inconsistent with zoning 73, North side of " RL P (RL.- 6.5).. RL Add Public.W) Agree.with.PC & Agree wit h..Staff.& GPAC: Garfield Ave., ': (Residential Public = (Residential designation to GPAC:: `correct location recommend retain existing ; east of Gregory Low underlying Low Density) Residential Low an map, retain: Residential.Low'Density Lane. Density) Residential Density to identify maximum 7.0.'du/ac 7.0 du/ac, add Public (P) Low Density churcf�lschool designation and correct (DMA) 6.5 dulac location on rnap (Straw Vote 0 74. Northwest RM P (RMH - 25) RMH Add Public (P) Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff & corner of (Residential Public - (Residential designation to reduction in density GPAC: recommend retain Modale Dr. & Medium underlying Medium High Residential Medium from 25 to 15 du/ac, existing Residential Chapel Lane Density) Residential Density) High Density to agree with GPAC: Medium Density 15 dulac Medium High identify church/school, provides consistency and add Public (P) (DM 40) Density 25 increase in density between Zoning and designation NOTE: du/ac from 15 to 25 du/ac General Plan, correct inconsistent with Zoning location on ma (Straw Vote 7-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 21 (glcc1ndus1) 75. 1 North side of (DM 34&35) OS-R CV F1 CF -C - CZ (Open Space (Commercial (Community Recreation) I Visitor, Facilities; Density 0.35 Civic Uses; FAR)';: Coastal Zone) RM RL -6.5 R1 - CZ (Residential (Residential (Residential Medium Low Density Low Density, Density) 6.5 dulac) Coastal Zone) Change from Residential Medium Density to .Residential Low Density 77. Huntington Mixed.Use RM - 151 CR Huntington Change from Mixed Harbour Bay .: - F1 - SP Harbour Bay : Use to Residential Club Specific (Residential Club Specific .: Medium Density and Plan Medium Plan Commercial Regional `. Density 15. (DM 34} dulac, .' Commercial Regional, Density 0,35 FAR,`Specific Plan) Agree with PC & GPAC: provides consistency between Zoning and General Plan, decrease in density from 15 to 7 unlac (retain maximum 7.0 un/ac) Agree with Staff & GPAC: recommend change to Residential Low Density 7.0 dulac (Straw Vote 7-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 22 (glcclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING . PLANNING 'OMMISSION' NO. LOCATION CLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RL:L'QM14MENDATIONS RIsCOM41E `?DAI'IONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 78. Southern OS-R (Open RL - 6.5 RL-FP2 Change from Open Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: termination of Space - (Residential (Residential Space Recreation to with GPAC: no change recommend retain Open Bolsa Chica St. Recreation) Low Density Low Density, Residential Low to existing Open Space Space designation (Straw 6.5 dulac) Floodplain) Density designation Vote 4-3) NOTE: new (DM 33) RA -CZ designation is Open Space - (Residential Park (OS-P) Agriculture, Coastal Zone) 79. Meadowlark Planned : CG, RM - 15, : Meadowlark. :. Change :from Planned Agree with PC, disagree Agree,with. Staff. Specific Plan :' Community :, RL"-.6.5 Spen icPIan Community.to with GPAC: charige'`to .. reGornmehd change to area (Commercial. Commercial General, 11IIxed Use designation Mixed Use and add Specific General, Resdential`iVledium and add Specific Plan Plan (SP) designation (DM4} :Residential Density and: (Straw Vote 7 0) Medium Residential Low `Density 15.::.slDensity `�dulac Residential...: Low Density 6.5 dulac) 80. Southwest IG P (I) Public - IL (Industrial Add Public (P) Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: corner of (Industrial underlying Limited) designation to with GPAC: church is recommend retain existing McFadden Ave. General) Industrial Industrial designation temporary use, delete Industrial (I42) & Product Lane to identify Public (P) designation designation (Straw Vote 7- church/school and retain Industrial 0) (DM 18) designation 81. Area bounded Residential RL - 6.5 Ellis Golden Change from Agree with PC., disagree Agree with Staff: by E11is:Ave. Estate; 3 (Residential West Specific p Residential Low with GPAC: modify y recommend retain existing g Garfield Ave., dulac Low Density Plan Density:3 unlac to- designation to Residential Estate 3 dulac Edwards St.; 6.5 dufac) Residential Low : Residential 1;bw:Density. (Straw Vote 7-0) Golden West St,Density 6.5 du1n `: 3 un/ac, (DM. (increase rn density Approved is of December 12, 1995 23 (glcc[ndus1) EXISTINGGENERAL PLAN GENERAL. ADVISORY"EXISTING PLANNING ONIi�TI5SION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE BONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMmi'NDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION i:. !:. 82. Northwest of Residential RL - 6.5 Holly Seacliff Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff. Edwards Ave. & Estate; 4 (Residential Specific Plan Residential Low with GPAC: do not recommend retain existing Garfield St. and du/ac and Low Density (Residential Density 4 un/ac to increase density, modify Residential Estate 4 du/ac northwest of Open Space- 6.5 du/ac) and Low Density, Residential Low designation to and Open Space -Park Seapoint St. & Recreation Open Space- 4 unlac & Density 6.5 du/ac Residential Low Density designations (Straw Vote 7- Garfield Ave. Park Open Space) (increase in density) 4 un/ac, retain Open 0) and Open Space -Park Space -Park designation (DM 38) 83. Southwest ;of IG CR - F2 - D IG (Industrial Change from Agree with PC & Agree.with Staff & GPAC: Gothard St. &. (Industrial , (Commercial General) Industrial.General'to GPAC: designate entire . recommend change to Edinger Ave. Genera])', Regional, :: Commercial: Pedigo;site as regional Comnercia] Regional (CR=: Density 0.5 .` Regional commercial, expands', F2-D)designatlorl:NOTE: (DM 26} FAR, Design .. commercial along inconsistent with zoning Overlay) Edinger corridor 84. Northeast of Mixed Use I - F2 - D IL (Industrial Change from Mixed Agree with PC & Agree with Staff & GPAC: railroad R.O.W. (Industrial, Limited) Use to Industrial to GPAC: provides recommend change to & McFadden Density 0.5 reflect existing consistency between Industrial (I-F2-D) Ave. FAR, Design conditions and uses Zoning and General designation (Straw Vote 7- Overlay) Plan 0) i (DM 15) 85. North Mixed Use CO - F4. North Change from Mixed Agree with PC, disagree'; Agree with Staff: Huntington (Commercial Huntington' .. Use to Commercial with GPAC: retain. recommend retain existing; . .Center Specific Office, Center Specific. Office to reflect Mixed Use and add ::.; Mixed Use and add Specific Plan area Density 1.25 Plan area' . existing conditions' Specific Plan (SP) Plan (SP)`.designation FAR} and uses j. (Straw Vote 7-0) (DM 15)' 86. Northwest of Mixed Use CG - F1 Q-11, Change from Mixed Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Magnolia St. & (Commercial (Qualified, Use to Commercial with GPAC: change to recommend change to Warmer Ave. @ General, Industrial General Industrial (I-FI), Industrial (I41) Riverbend Dr. Density 0.35 Limited) provides consistency designation (Straw Vote 7- FAR) between Zoning and 0) (DM 27) . General Plan Approved as of December 12, 1995 24 (glcc1ndus1) EXISTING GENEIi L PLAiV GENERAL 11 ADVISORY EXISTING PI.ANIVING )mmissm .NO. LOCATION- FLAN COMMITTEE ,ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMME"DATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION (DM 2) CG RH - 30 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: (Commercial (Residential (Commercial :. Commercial General with GPAC: eliminate :re.com: (fiend retain.existing" General) High Density General) to Residential High residential node on. , °Conninercial`General (CG- 30.un/ac) Density to create Beach Blvd retain Fl) deslgnation(Straw Vofe Residential node . - . existing Commercial 7-0) General designation " CG RH - 30 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC: eliminate recommend retain existing General) High Density General) to Residential High residential node on Commercial General (CG- 30 unlac) Density to create Beach Blvd., retain F1) designation (Straw Vote Residential node existing Commercial 7-0) General designation RI - O - :':'. Change Residential CZIRL Low Density fronn 7 (Residential to 6.5. 'dulac((Existing Low Density, Open .,Space:Areas) Oil:Overlay, ;' Coastal Zon&Wsidenti.. al Low Density] Approved as of December 12, 1995 25 (glcclndus 1) EIISTFNC GENERAL PLAN GENERAL : ADVISORY ,: EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION COMMITTEE' 7ANII![G DISCUSSION . STAFFRECOMhiNDAFFONS' RECOMM£ I)ATTONS DESIGNA t ION ` '' DESIGNATION. 90. Northeast corner 1) OS-C MH - F2 - 1) RA-0- Change from Open Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff; of Beach Blvd. (Open 25 - SP CC - CZ _ Space Conservation, with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing & Pacific Coast Space- (Mixed Use FP2 Visitor Serving existing designations to designations to be Highway (White Conservatio Horizontal, (Residential Commercial and be consistent with the consistent with the zoning Hole Area) n; 2) VSC Density 0.5 Agriculture, Oil Residential Medium zoning recommendations recommendations made by (Visitor FAR, 25 Overlay, Density to Mixed made by the California the California Coastal (DM 14) Serving du/ac, Coastal Use Horizontal Coastal Commission and Commission (Straw Vote 7- Commercial) Specific Conservation, approved by the City 0) 3) & 4) RM Plan) Coastal Zone, Council (Residential Floodplain { Medium 2) VSC - Density) CZ - FP2 4 Visitor Serving Commercial, Coastal Zone, Floodplain 3) MH - CZ - FP2 (Mobile home, Coastal Zone, Floodplain 4) M1-A-O- CZ - FP2 (Industrial Limited, Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone, Floodplain) Approved as of December 12, 1995 26 (gleclndus 1) EXI$T1NC GENEI?AL PLAN. GEh'ERAI. is ADVISORY EXISTING = PLANNING COIN, 4IISSI4N NO,.:. pCAL. " M STAPRECOMMENDATIONS ItCQMMEYII, "IQNSECOMITTEE ,. DFSLG1�f1TLbi�{ ": "DE5LGPIATIOS�4 ' . 91. Southeast of Mixed RMH - 30 North Change from Mixed. Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: railroad R.O.W. Development (Residential Huntington: . to Use Residential with GPAC: change to., recommend change to & "40S Frwy Medium Center Specific Medium Density to Mixed -Use and add Mixed Use. and add Specific Higli Density Plan reflect existing Specific Plan Plan (SP) designation (DM 15) : 30 du/ac) conditions and uses,': (Straw:Vote 7-4} add Specific ;Plan' . " '' designation 92. Southwest RM P (RM - 15) RM Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: corner of (Residential Public - (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend retain existing Newland St. & Medium underlying Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium Pasco Cir. Density) Residential Density) Density to identify Density designation Density 15 dulac and add (between Slater Medium church/school Public (P) designation & Talbert) Density 15 (Straw Vote 7-0) dulac (DM 30) 93. Northwest Planning I - F2 =.D MI - A - O - Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff; corner of Reserve .(Industrial, CC -' CZ = FPZ .: Planning Reserve to: with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing Hamilton Ave. Density 0.5 (Industrial Industrial existing designations to designations to be and Newland St. FAR, Design Limited, Oil be consistent with the ' consistent with the zoning" (Part of White Overlay) : Overlay, zoning recommendations recommendations made by Hole area) Coastal made by the California : the California Coastal Conservation, Coastal Commission and Commission (Straw Vote 7- " Coastal Zone, edb 0)(DM14) Itloodplain)" Council . Approved as of December 12, 1995 27 (glcc1ndus1 ) EXISTING. GENERAL PLAN .GENERAL AI)vI50RY - 'EXISTING '.. PLANNING 03. MISSION. NO.; : LOCATION PLANOMi4ICTTXE ZONING. ULSCUSSIONTAFFRECQMMENllATXGNS RIiC4MMEi�➢1 'XON$ : `I]ESXGNATION '-,DESXGNATIOirf , 94. 1000' Southeast RL of Magnolia St. (Residential & Adams Ave. Low Density) (DM 7) P (CG - Fl) CGIRA Public - (Commercial underlying Generall Commercial Residential General, Agriculture) Density 0.35 FAR Change from Residential Low Density to Commercial General and add Public (P) designation to reflect existing Church/School Agree with PC & GPAC: provides consistency between Zoning and General Plan Agree with Staff & GPAC: recommend change to Commercial General (CG- Fl) and add Public (P) designation (Straw Vote 7- 0) NOTE: portion of site (RA) inconsistent with zoning 95.: South side of RL;: Western. 'half ;PS (Public Serni Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff. Talbert Ave (Residential CG - I Public) Residential Low with GPAC. remove from recommend remove from . 300' east of Lowe . (Commercial Density to . consideration as part.of consideration and retain Beach Blvd. Density) General,: Commercial Gellera] the General Plan update Residential Low Density (Crest View Density; 0.35 on the west one half . and retain existing and add PublicAesignation School) FAR), of the site Residential Low,Density (Straw Vote 5-2) NOTE: Z. Eastern half designation on the entire designation js P (Rh-7) (DM 40) = RL::: 6;5 school site - add'Public (Residential (P) designation Low Density 6.5 dulac) 96. Northeast corner RL of Springdale St. (Residential and Heil Ave. Low Density) (DM 25) P (RL 6.5) Public - underlying Residential Low Density 6.5 dulac RL (Residential Add Public (P) Low Density) designation to identify school/church Agree with PC & GPAC: no change to existing Residential Low Density designation, maintain 7.0 dulac Agree with Staff & GPAC: recommend retain existing Residential Low Density 7.0 dulac and add Public (P) designation (Straw Vote 7-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 28 (glcclndusl)