Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1996-05-13
MINUTES CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 5:00 P.M. - Council Chamber Civic Center, 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California Monday, May 13, 1996 A videotape recording of this meeting is on file in the Office of the City Clerk Call To Order Mayor Sullivan called the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. City Council/Redevelopment Agency Roll Call Present: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo Absent None Pledge Of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was given by those present in the Council Chamber. Late Communications Announced By The City Clerk Pursuant to the Brown Act, the City Clerk announced the following late communications regarding Agenda Items which were received following the distribution of the Agenda: Communication from Dean Allison, Citizen's Advisory Board member, dated May 12, 1996, in opposition to the use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for the Huntington Beach Gym and Pool Renovation Project. Report to City Council from Melanie Fallon, Community Development Director, dated May 10, 1996 Subject: (Revised) Issues of Concern Raised by the City Council at the May 6, 1996, Study Session on the General Plan Communication from the Community Development Department titled Housing Element Background Slide Report received May 13, 1996 Slide Presentation titled Draft General Plan - Final Public Hearing - May 13, 1996, submitted by the Community Development Department Report to Council from The Economic Development Director, dated May 13, 1996, titled, Reprogramming of Community Development Black Grant (CDBG) Funds for Community Clinic. 284 Page 2 - Council/Agency Minutes- 05/13/96 (City Council) Announcement Of Public Works Department Open House The Mayor announced the Public Works Department Open House event to be held May 18, 1996 and invited the attendance of the City Councilmembers, staff, and audience. (City Council) Presentation Of Recognition Given To General Plan Advisory Committee Members And Planning Commissioners For Work On General Plan The Mayor on behalf of the City Council, thanked the staff for five years of work on the preparation of the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach. Presentations, on behalf of the City and City Council, were made to the following persons whose attendance at 39 meetings and 3,159 work hours have resulted in the development of the new General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach: Bob Biddle, former Planning Commissioner; Shirley Dettloff, former Planning Commissioner and current Councilmember; Betty Kennedy, Community Services Commissioner, Tom Livengood, Jerry Person, Roy Richardson, former Planning Commissioners; Phil Zisakis, Nick Tomaino, Dr. Tarwater, Ocean View School District representatives; Jerry Buchanan, Huntington Beach Elementary School District representatives; Jim Townsend and Mark Porter, former Planning Commissioners. The Mayor stated that the Planning Commission spent six months time, 15 study sessions, and 12 public hearings on the General Plan which has made the City Council's job so much easier. Presentations were awarded by Mayor Sullivan to the following Planning Commission members: Gary Gorman, Bob Biddle, Haydee Tillotson, Fred Speaker, Ed Kerins, Tom Livengood, and Steve Holden. Also receiving presentations were GPAC (General Plan Advisory Committee) Chairman Jack Bowland and Vice Chair, Gerald Chapman, who could not be present. Melanie Fallon, Community Development Director, expressed to the members of the Planning Commission, her appreciation and that of Planning Director Howard Zelefsky for their time and dedication devoted to the preparation of the General Plan. They presented each member with a "purple heart". (City Council) Approval Of 1996 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) HOME Action Plan - Public Hearing Held On May 6, 1996 (340.70) The City Council considered a communication from the Economic Development Director including additional staff material and reports presented at the May 6, 1996 Council meeting. Also included were the recommendations of the Citizen's Advisory Board as finalized at its May 9, 1996 meeting. (See report dated May 10, 1996 titled Finalized Citizen's Advisory Board Recommendations prepared by the Economic Development Director.) The public hearing was closed on May 6, 1996. The proposed 1996-97 Action Plan, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HQME Budget for the period between July 1, 1996 to June 30, 1997. 85 05/13/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 3 David Biggs, Economic Development Director, presented a staff report and revised staff recommendations on the Community Development Block Program particularly the capital side of the program. He reported on the increase in fund allocation from HUD (Department of Housing and Urban Development). He reported on the outcome of the May 9, 1996 Citizen's Advisory Board meeting which is included on Page No. 3 of the May 10, 1996 Memorandum from the Economic Development Director to the City Council titled, Finalized Citizen's Advisory Board Recommendations per Request For Council Action - ED 96-27. Mr. Biggs informed Council that the Citizen's Advisory Board reconsidered their previous action and the only change was the deletion of the last program (Silver Lane Roadway construction in the Washington Enhancement Area) in the amount of $75,000 which left the Citizen's Advisory Board with their list in priority order. The Economic Development Director stated the Citizen's Advisory Board voted to leave in the Budget the renovation of the City Gym and Pool. He referred to the May 13, 1996 memorandum to the City Council from the Economic Development Director titled Reprogramming of CDBG Funds For Community Clinic. He informed Council that the Citizen's Advisory Board at its May 9, 1996 meeting, adopted the following motion: Staff to investigate the amount of reprogramming funds and report the amount at the next Citizen's Advisory Board meeting of June 6, 1996, and to set aside as much of the funds for the clinic as possible and put the Huntington Beach Community Clinic on the funding list as a high priority. The Economic Development Director stated that based on this motion, staff has initiated an accelerated process to move forward with the reprogramming of funds available from the 1995-96 grant year. He reported on the main steps and timing of the issue. Richard Armendariz, Chair of the Citizen's Advisory Board, apologized to Councilmembers Garofalo and Green relative to the presentation made at the last Council meeting. Mr. Armendadz stated that the Citizen's Advisory Board was in complete agreement with the one minor amendment that the funding list should have the Huntington Beach Community Clinic as the No. 1 priority. He informed Council that he believed the communication from Dean Allison, Citizens Advisory Board Member, should be considered an individual dissent, since Mr. Allison was a member of last week's Citizen's Advisory Board meeting. Mr. Armendariz informed Council that a presentation from Doug Kato, Principal Civil Engineer of the Public Works Department, had helped the Citizen's Advisory Board members understand that the construction/improvement items in the Washington Enhancement Area, Silver Lane, could be separated which helped to make their decision to re -fund the Renovation of the Gym and Pool Project. Carol Runzel, Assistant Project Manager, responded to Councilwoman's Dettloff's question regarding Mr. Allison's letter which contended that funds could not be used for the City Gym and Pool as it is not an enhancement or target area. A motion was made by Green, second Leipzig, to approve the following actions: Approve the recommendations of the Citizen's Advisory Board as determined at its Special Meeting held May 9, 1996, as set forth in the communication dated May 10, 1996, Page No. 3 as follows: Page 4 - Council/Agency Minutes- 05/13/96 1996-97 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CDBG Entitlement of $1,762,000 As of CAB Special Meeting May 19, 1996 with Public Services as Approved by Council May 6, 1996 ESTIMATED REVENUE: CDBG Entitlement 1,762,000 Program Income 210,000 Reprogramming Funds 3,300 Continuing Rollover Projects (Former Grant Years) 2,600,000 Total CDBG Revenue: 4,575,300 EXPENDITURES: Administration (Including Fair Housing Services) 312,000 312,000 Contingency 87,520 87,520 CDBG 96-97 Projects as Recommended by CAB: 1. Code Enforcement in Enhancement Areas (Officer No. 1) 67,836 2. Code Enforcement in Enhancement Areas (Officer No. 2) 67,836 3. Handicap accessible play equipment for Oakview Tot Lot 85,000 4. Housing Rehab Loan Program 300,000 5. Phase 11 Renovation of City Gym And Pool 275,000 6. Newland • Phase One Wheelchair ramp improvements 90,000 7. Handicap Accessibility, 4 Libraries (Central, Main, Banning, and 85,598 Graham) 8. Neighborhood Improvement Program 20,000 9. Washington - Silver Lane Storm Drain Improvements 270,000 10. Washington - Silver Lane Construction 0 1,251,270 1,261,270 Public Services per Council meeting May 6, 1996 1. Ecumenical Service Alliance 24,000 2. Adult Day Services 10,000 3. Boys And Girls Club, Financial Aid 25,000 4. Feedback Foundation 5,320 5. Interval House Crisis Shelters, Children's Program 25,000 6. Hotline of Southern California 5,000 7. Huntington Beach. Community Clinic 35,000 8. Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) 14,700 9. Orange County. Council on Aging 5,000 10. Orange County. Interfaith Shelter 5,000 11. Huntington Beach Youth Shelter 5,000 12. Literacy Volunteers of America 5,000 13. Project Self -Sufficiency (Includes Program Income) 62,500 14. Community Services Program (CSP) 26,400 15. Oakview Community Center 40,500 15. Seniors Outreach Center, Part time Case Workers (2) 21,090 314,510 314,510 Continuing Projects (Estimated Rollover): Subtotal Rollover Projects 2,600,000 2,600,000 Total CDBG Estimated Expenditures: 4,575,300 287 05/13/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 5 Approve the Final Action Plan 1996-97 for the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs as referenced in the Draft Action Plan, Attachment No. 2 to the Request for Council Action dated May 6, 1996, for the amounts of $1,762,000 and $608,000 respectively; authorize its submission to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; authorize the City Administrator to execute the required certifications and to commit the remaining 25% of the Community Services cumulative budget request of recommended programs, Attachment No. 1, Exhibit No. 5, that is $41,363, for Project Self -Sufficiency, the Outreach Programs, and the Oakview programs from the 1997/98 CDBG grant, in order to fund one complete fiscal year of these programs as approved in the Action Plan. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: None (City Council) Study Session - Housing Element Update By City Staff And Consultant Firm Of Cotton, Beland and Associates (430.70) The City Council considered a communication from the Community Development Director informing Council that Cotton, Beland and Associates, consultants, had prepared a draft of the city's housing needs assessment that had been presented to the Housing Element Update Ad Hoc Committee. The Community Development Director presented a staff report. John Bridges, Principal, Cotton, Beland and Associates, presented a slide report. He presented background information including the Relation of the Housing Element to the General Plan Update, the role of the State Department of Housing and Community Development, Approach and Process for Housing Element Update, Summary of Housing Needs and Potential Housing Programs. (City Council) Final Public Hearing - General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 - Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 - Comprehensive Update Of The Huntington Beach General Plan (440.50) The Mayor announced that this was the date set for the third and final public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 and Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 which is the comprehensive update of the city's General Plan which includes the review and certification of an Environmental Impact Report. A report titled Issues of Concern Raised By The City Council at the May 6, 1996 Study Session on the General Plan prepared by the Community Development Department had been provided in the City Council Agenda Packets. The Mayor announced the procedure to be followed. The Community Development Director reported that few cities have taken on the challenge of preparation of a complete General Plan and that she was very proud of the city staff and the citizens for their work and participation. Page 6 - Council/Agency Minutes.- 05/13/96 The City Clerk announced a communication from the Community Development Director, dated May 10, 1996, titled REVISED Issues of Concern raised by the City Council at the May 6, 1996 Study Session on the General Plan. Linda Niles, Senior Planner, reviewed the public hearing procedure and proposed Language Changes, Level of Service Issues, Master Plan of Arterial Highways and Bridges, Development Threshold, Policy LU 2.1.4 and Mixed Use Concept in the five set -aside Land Use Areas and Land Use Changes. She stated that Council would be asked to take straw votes for each of these items and then Council would make a motion on the Environmental Impact Report and finally the motion for approval of the General Plan which would include the straw votes made by Council. Senior Planner Niles reviewed the language modifications in the Historical and Cultural Resources Element, and the Utilities Element. Herb Fauland, Senior Planner, reviewed the document announced earlier in the meeting titled REVISED Issues of Concern raised by the City Council at the May 6, 1996 Study Session on the General Plan which included a review of the Circulation Element as well as the issue of the proposed bridges across the Santa Ana River. He reported on how the wording suggested in Jon Ely's communication regarding the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) limits the city. Robert Eichblatt, City Engineer, reported that the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the City of Costa Mesa were conducting meetings on this issue. Brian James, Assistant Planner, reviewed the Land Use Element Proposed Language Changes. The words "not to exceed the existing density" was recommended by Council to be placed on the Mobile Home overlay. Assistant Planner James reviewed the remaining Land Use Changes Slide Report portion and reviewed photographs, slides, and a wall map relative to Area Nos. 2, 74, and 72. Councilman Harman stated that he would be abstaining from consideration of Area No. 72 due to a possible conflict of interest and he would not be discussing or voting on the item. Assistant Planner James reviewed the Mixed Use Areas and discussion was held regarding the staff and Planning Commission recommendation on this issue and as to how the city will have its position on Mixed Use understood by potential developers; also how Mixed Use interacts with Specific Plans. Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director, spoke regarding the feasibility of an "overlay standard' for Mixed Use. Councilman Bauer spoke regarding Mixed Use and his objection to residential demand on service and that Mixed Use will not stop the number of trips per day. He cited the lack of examples presented. Councilman Bauer stated that if an opportunity For Mixed Use does arise the General Plan can be changed. He stated that prime commercial should not be lost. Councilman Garofalo spoke regarding Area No. 34 - Huntington Center and stated that every tool needs to be kept available for this area such as Mixed Use. He stated that he concurred with the Planning Commission on Area Nos. 35, 36, and 37 for density but not Mixed Use. 05113196 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 7 The Mayor declared the public hearing open. Fred Danks requested low density for mobile home parks. Councilman Garofalo confirmed with staff that the Mobile Home Park wording would reflect that density would not increase. Mark Porter, President of Huntington Beach Tomorrow, thanked the City Council, Planning Commission, and staff for the opportunity to participate. He stated that the concerns of Huntington Beach Tomorrow were with the Urban Design Element and that he was glad to see Councilwoman Dettloff had an item on this subject on this meeting's agenda. Mr. Porter stated he believed there were significant things that could be done on Urban Design. Janette Ditkowsky, Freeway Industrial Park representative, spoke regarding the improvements and developments in Freeway Industrial Park. She stated that she would like to see that their property not be changed as proposed because it narrows the type of uses for their property. Discussion was held between Councilman Bauer and Ms. DitkowskY. The Planning Director stated the reasons of the Planning Commission and the General Plan Advisory Committee for their recommendation, including discouraging small strip center uses. Discussion was held regarding the area involved. Staff reported on the differences between Commercial General and Commercial Regional. Councilman Garofalo spoke regarding the need for dialog between the property owner and the city in planning. Councilwoman Dettloff stated that this was an effort to upgrade the types of uses for the future as the community has often requested. Considerable discussion ensued regarding the subject of Commercial Regional Zoning. Susan Sakura, Freeway Industrial Park representative, spoke regarding Area Nos. 31 and 32 and requested that Council not "tie Freeway Industrial Park's hands". She requested that the Freeway General Commercial designation remain and stated that every lot should not as a blanket rule be made Regional. She stated that this proposed use was not part of the Environmental Impact Report with the property owner's input. In response to Councilwoman Dettloff's question, Ms. Sakura stated the properties are owned by Freeway Industrial. Mrs. Sakura presented a communication, dated May 13, 1996, to the City Council and Planning Commission from the Law Offices of Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm and Waldron. Councilman Garofalo questioned the Environmental Impact Report process and staff reported. Susan Sakura, representing Freeway Industrial Park representative, Area No. 81, spoke regarding and addressed Council in opposition to Park Land designation. 290 Page 8 - Council/Agency Minutes - 05/13/96 Jon Ely spoke regarding the issue of the Santa Ana Bridges and the General Plan of the City of Costa Mesa. He stated that he would like to see the letter that he believed Council requested the Public Works Department to prepare as to why the City of Huntington Beach cannot put the type of language in the General Plan document as has the City of Costa Mesa. He stated his disagreement with staff being uncomfortable with such language, as before at the Planning Commission and at all other levels, it was not that the language was uncomfortable; it was that it could not be done. Robert London Moore, Jr. stated he was addressing Council as a citizen and representative of Mills Land and Water Company. He requested that Council reconsider the Open Space L,-nd Conservation on Sub Areas 4E and 4F, the Mills Land and Water Company parcels at the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway. He spoke regarding Sub Area 9F, the undeveloped 16 acre parcel of Mills Land and Water Company at Newland Street and Hamilton Avenue and stated his reasons for the request including what he believed would be stripping approximately 52 acres of strategically located coastal property of any viable economic use not only for the property owner but for the city because of loss of tax and other revenues. He stated that the blight and eyesore at Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway will be perpetuated indefinitely. Mr. Moore stated that GPAC (General Plan Advisory Committee) has recommended a balance of uses. He spoke regarding the previous applications of Mills Land and Water Company which he stated the city refused to process. Robin Hoff, Attorney, Cal -Trans, State of California, spoke regarding the State of California property and stated that he wished to echo Mr. Moore's comments regarding the proposed zoning. He stated reasons why he believed that Open Space Conservation zoning was inappropriate and why Visitor Serving Commercial was appropriate. In response to Councilwoman Dettloff, Mr. Hoff stated that Cal -Trans was in agreement with the State Department of Fish and Game that it is not remedial wetlands and Cal -Trans was opposed to the Coastal Commission approval of Open Space Conservation Overlay. He responded to a question by Councilwoman Dettloff that he was not aware of anything in writing from the Attorney General on the decision made by the Coastal Commission and the decision made by Cal -Trans. He spoke regarding the comments at the Coastal Commission hearing made by the Deputy Attorney General supporting Visitor Serving Commercial (VSC) on Cal - Trans property and stated that he did not believe the Overlay was addressed at the Coastal Commission hearings held at the Airport. In response to Councilman Garofalo, Mr. Hoff stated that he was not in a position to state that Cal -Trans would take legal action if the overlay is approved. He spoke regarding the Assembly Bill that required Cal -Trans to return to Mills Land and Water Company property it had taken but does not need and that it must be done in the most favorable manner to the taxpayers. He stated that it was Cal -Trans position that the city does not need to place Open Space Conservation Overlay on top of an area that the city has already determined to be appropriate for Visitor Serving Commercial. Councilman Leipzig spoke regarding the overlay imposed on the property at the corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Beach Boulevard because of the surrounding properties being designated as wetlands, despite what Council had heard this evening from the property owner. He stated that it is a very complicated process but that it will allow the property owner development. He spoke regarding the parcel at Newland Street and Hamilton Avenue and stated that he does not believe the overlay will impede the development of this parcel. 291 05/13196 - City CouncillRedevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 9 The Planning Director responded to a question by Councilman Garofalo that Councilman Leipzig's statements were correct and that the city had just received a letter congratulating the city on ending this 17 year long issue. The Planning Director confirmed that the State Department of Fish and Game had stated that the property is wetlands. Further discussion was held regarding the designation of this property and the aspects involved. Councilman Leipzig stated that it called for comprehensive planning and that is the reason it is an overlay. The Mayor continued the public hearing open. He stated that at this time straw votes would be taken. Straw Vote - Area No. 2 - South Side Of Hamilton Avenue - 300' West Of Brookhurst Street - FAILED A motion was made by Garofalo, second Leipzig, to approve the staff recommendation on Area No. 2. Disagree with Planning Commission; do not decrease density from 30 to 7 dulac, agree with GPAC (General Plan Advisory Committee); no change to existing Residential High Density (RH) land use designation, only add Public (P) designation. Councilwoman Dettloff stated that she believed Medium Density would be more compatible. Mayor Sullivan stated that he favored Commercial. The motion FAILED by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: Leipzig, Green, Garofalo NOES: Harman, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff ABSENT: None Straw Vote - Area No. 2 - South Side Of Hamilton Avenue Residential Medium Densit - Public - Approved A motion was made by Dettloff, second Harman, to approve change from Residential High to Residential Medium Density and add Public Designation (P): (RM-15). The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: Harman, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green NOES: Leipzig, Garofalo ABSENT: None 271 Page 10 - Council/Agency Minutes - 05/13/96 Straw Vote - Area No, 72 - Southeast Corner Of Main Street And Florida Avenue - FAILED A motion was made by Dettloff, second Green, to approve the Staff Recommendation as -follows: Disagree with the Planning Commission and GPAC (General Plan Advisory Committee); maintain density at 25 du/ac and change to Mixed Use Horizontal, F2 (FAR 0.5), 30 un/ac, Design Overlay. The motion FAILED by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: Dettloff, Green, Sullivan NOES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Garofalo ABSENT: None Straw Vote - Area No. 72 - Southeast Corner Of Main Street And Florida Avenue Commercial General - Mixed Use Overlay - Approved A motion was made by Leipzig, second Garofalo, to change from Mixed Development to Commercial General with Mixed Use Overlay designation: (CG-F2-D-MU). The motion carried by unanimous roll call straw vote, with Councilman Harman abstaining. Straw Vote - Area No. 74 -!Northwest Comer Of Modale Drive And Chapel Lane - FAILED A motion was made by Leipzig, second Garofalo, to approve Staff Recommendation as follows: Disagree with Planning Commission reduction in density from 25 to 15 du/ac, agree with (GPAC) General Plan Advisory Committee: provides consistency between Zoning and General Plan, correct location on map. The motion FAILED by the following roll call straw vote: AYES. Leipzig, Green, Garofalo NOES: Harman, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff ABSENT: None Straw Vote - Area No. 74 - Northeast Corner Of Modale Drive And Chapel Lane Residential Medium Density - Public - Approved A motion was made by Sullivan, second Bauer, to approve the Planning Commission recommendations as follows: Disagree with Staff and (GPAC) General Plan Advisory Committee; recommend retain existing Residential Medium Density 15 du/ac and add Public (p) designation NOTE: inconsistent with Zoning. The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: None 293 05113196.- City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 11 Straw Vote - Area No. 34 - Huntington Center - Motion Withdrawn A motion was made by Garofalo, second Green, to approve the Staff Recommendation as follows: Disagree with Planning Commission, agree with (GPAC) General Plan Advisory Committee: recommend Mixed Use to expand and revitalize opportunities for the Mall, promote the regional importance of the site but may (not require) allow residential development in the area. Discussion was held. Senior Planner Fauland, at the request of Councilwoman Dettloff, presented staff alternatives. Following discussion, the motion made by Garofalo, second Green, was withdrawn. Straw Vote - Area No. 34 - Hunti_ngto_ n Center - Commercial Regional With Mixed Use Overlay - Approved A motion was made by Garofalo, second Leipzig, to approve change from Commercial General to Commercial Regional designation with Mixed Use Overlay: (CR-F2-SP-MU) At the request of Councilman Bauer, the City Administrator stated that he believed it should be Commercial Regional. At the request of Councilman Garofalo, Senior Planner Fauland stated the different types of development listed under Mixed Uses as defined in the General Plan Document. The motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: Leipzig, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo NOES: Harman, Bauer, Sullivan ABSENT: None Straw Vote - Area No. 35 - Aldrich Avenue South To Heil Avenue West Side Of Beach Boulevard - FAILED For Lack Of A Second A motion was made by Harman to approve the Planning Commission recommendation as follows: Disagree with Staff and (GPAC) General Plan Advisory Committee: recommend change from Commercial General to Mixed Use Vertical, decrease density from 25 to 15 du/ac. Note. Inconsistent with zoning. The motion FAILED to receive a second. Straw Vote - Area No. 35 - Aldrich Avenue South To Heil Avenue West Side Of Beach Boulevard Commercial General Maximum F.A.R. of .5 - Approved A motion was made by Garofalo, second Green, to change from Residential Medium and Residential Medium High to Commercial General designation (CG-F2). Note: Inconsistent with zoning. The motion carried by unanimous roll call straw vote. 294 Page 12 - Council/Agency Minutes - 05/13/96 A motion was made by Garofalo, second Green, that along with the Commercial General Designation, this area have a maximum F.A.R. of .5. The Motion carried by unanimous roll call straw vote. Straw Vote - Area No. 36 - Heil Avenue South To Warner Avenue East And West Sides Of Beach Boulevard - Approved A motion was made by Garofalo, second Green, to change from Residential Medium to Commercial General designation: (CG-F2) with F-2, F.A.R. of .5. Fallowing considerable discussion of the area, the motion carried by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green NOES: None ABSTAIN: Garofalo ABSENT: None Straw Vote - Area No. 37 - Southeast Of Beach Boulevard And Warner - Motion Withdrawn A motion was made by Garofalo, second Green, to change from Commercial General and Residential Medium Density to Commercial General designation with low density. The motion was withdrawn. Straw Vote -Area No. 37 - Southeast Of Beach Boulevard And Warner Commercial General - Approved A motion was made by Garofalo, second Dettloff, to change from Residential Medium to Commercial General designation (CG-F2) with F.A.R. of .5. Motion carried by unanimous roll call straw vote. Straw Vote - Land Use Element Language Changes - Approved A motion was made by Leipzig, second Dettloff, to approve the staff recommendations presented at this meeting with the changes in LU 2.1.7 and on through the Staff Report up to Page No. 48 noting that there was a consensus to change a couple of words in Table LU 3 in regard to Mobile Home Parks and with a recommendation to re -number the items in the sequence in LU 8.1.1 where "D" has been eliminated. Councilwoman Dettloff stated that she would like the School District language in Page No. 38 to require developers to meet with the appropriate School District with the intent to mitigate the impact on school facilities, prior to project approval by the permitting city authority. The makers of the motion concurred. ..295 At - 05113196.- City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 13 Councilman Harman stated on Page No. 48 "seven units per acre by" should be changed to "seven acres up to or not to exceed" the existing density of the mobile home park. The motion carried by unanimous roll tali straw vote. Straw Vote - LU 2.1.4 - Development Threshold - Approved A motion was made by Leipzig, second Harman, to approve the recommended changes on Page No. 45 of the Staff Report. The motion carried by unanimous roll call straw vote. Straw Vote - Outstanding Issues - Circulation Element - Approved A motion was made by Leipzig, second Garofalo, to approve language as proposed by Staff with some modifications presented at this meeting set forth on the Memorandum (Revised), dated May 10, 1996, Subject: Issues of Concem Raised by the City Council at the May 6, 1996 Study Session on the General Plan. The motion carried by unanimous roll call straw vote. Straw Vote - Master Plan For Arterial Highways And Santa Ana River Bridge Crossings - AA2 rp oved A motion was made by Garofalo, second Sullivan, to insert in the Revised Document the word "strong" at the beginning of Line No. 7 prior to the word "commitments" and to insert the word "unanimously" between the words "Council" and "adopted". In order to remain eligible to receive Measure M funds and Congestion Management Plan funds (Prop. 111), the City of Huntington Beach has kept certain elements of the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) on the 2010 Circulation Plan of Arterial Highways. These items include the proposed Santa Ana River Bridge Crossings and the Bolsa Chica Cross Gap Connector. These elements are required to remain on the city's Circulation Plan of Arterial Highways to maintain consistency with the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (OCMPAH). As of 1995, Measure M and Congestion Management Plan funds exceeded of S3,000,000.00 per year. In addition, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and surrounding cities are currently participating in a cooperative study to discuss the appropriateness of certain elements of the OCMPAH. The elements include but are not limited to such roadway segments as the Santa Ana River Bridge Crossings. The current OCMPAH was adopted assuming a mix of land uses based upon the adopted land Use Elements that were in place for the county and each surrounding city. Since that time, the county and the surrounding cities have adopted amendments to the land use designations or made strong commitments to their citizens regarding certain roadway segments of the OCMPAH. For example, the Huntington Beach City Council unanimously adopted Resolution No. 6544 on November 1, 1993, which recommended the county initiate the process to remove the 19th Street and Banning Avenue and the Gisler Avenue and Garfield Avenue bridges from the OCMPAH. r-T -JVl Page 14 - Council/Agency Minutes - 05/13196 The county has undertaken this issue by the formulation of the Santa Ana River Crossings Cooperative Study. These actions along with the Cooperative Study will necessitate additional review, traffic studies and environmental review that possibly will require modifications to the OCMPAH. OCTA has indicated that upon completion of the update to the Huntington Beach General Plan and the review of the General Plans of the surrounding cities, the OCMPAH is scheduled to be updated. At that time, some of the current roadway segments are likely to be modified or deleted. Due to these uncertainties, future land use and transportation planning will be based upon the changes that surrounding jurisdictions have made to their respective Land Use and Circulation Elements. The potential changes will be based on the information gathered from and the recommendations made by the Cooperative Study on the Santa Ana River Bridge Crossings. Therefore, there is the possibility that the current OCMPAH road segments may never be constructed. Councilman Harman stated that he believed Council should have more strict language regarding the bridges. Mayor Sullivan and Councilman Leipzig stated they agreed with Councilman Harman but gave reasons why they believed it necessary to vote for this motion. The motion made by Garofalo, second Sullivan, carried by the following roll call stray vote: AYES: Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo NOES: Harman ABSENT: None Straw Vote - Additional Language Changes To Historical And Cultural Resources Element And The Utilities Element -Approved A motion was made by Garofalo, second Dettloff, to approve the additional language changes as set forth on Page Nos. 34 and 35 and in the General Plan document Page No. 11-121 Historical and Cultural Resources Element and the Historic Structure Overlay. The motion carried by unanimous roll call straw vote. Straw Vote - Area No. 31 - South Side Of Edinger Avenue From Gothard Street To Parkside Lane • FAILED - Area No. 83 Southwest Of Gothard Street And Edinger Avenue Not Discussed A motion was made by Leipzig, second Garofalo, that instead of the Staff recommendation for Commercial Regional designation for Area No. 31 that the property remain Commercial General. Councilman Garofalo recommended that staff be strongly urged to develop a working relationship with the property owners of all that property to return to Council with a more comprehensive plan for development of those sites. Discussion was held between the Planning director and Council regarding the configuration of Area No. 31 and its different owners. It was determined that Area No. 83 did not need to be discussed. 297 05/13196.- City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 15 The motion was amended to break off the western most portion of Area No. 31 and to General Plan it General Commercial in lieu of the Staff Recommendation of Commercial Regional to change from Commercial General to Commercial Regional designation: (CR-172-D) and that it be designated as F.A.R..5. The motion FAILED by the following roll call straw vote: AYES: Leipzig, Green, Garofalo NOES: Harman, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff ABSENT: None The Mayor announced that the original straw vote remains which is to retain the existing General Plan designation of Commercial Regional (CR-F2-D) F.A.R. of .5, from Gothard Street to the railroad tracks. Straw Vote - All Elements Of General Plan - Approved A motion was made by Dettloff, second Leipzig, to approve by straw vote the General Plan Elements. The motion carried by unanimous roll call straw vote. Mark Porter addressed Council regarding Area No. 2 (south side of Hamilton Avenue, 300' west of Brookhurst Street) stating that the eastern portion is developed High -Density Residential and that now it is non -conforming. He spoke regarding the effect on the church. He suggested that the city take aggressive action on the Santa Ana River Bridges. Robert London Moore. Jr., representing Mills Land and Water Company, stated that he wished to set the record straight on the exchanges between Councilmembers Leipzig and Garofalo and staff on the Conservation Overlay. He stated that it was targeted at Mills Land and Water Company and that it applies to no other land owner. Mr. Moore spoke regarding the various aspects of the Overlay and the Conservation easement and its mandate to the property owner. He stated he agreed with Councilman Garofalo that there is no rational basis for placing the overlay on the VSC (Visitor Serving Commercial) parcel. Mr. Moore stated that last Friday, Mills Land and Water Company had filed legal action against the city challenging the legality of the zoning adopted in March, 1996, relative to the Cal -Trans frontage. He stated why he believed the zoning was unconstitutional, including that the zoning requires granting of Conservation easements over areas depicted as wetlands without providing for any project analysis and including in scheme the requirement of giving the remainder of the property away if the Cal -Trans VSC highway frontage is developed. There being no one further to speak on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Page 16 - Council/Agency Minutes - 05/13/96 Resolution No. 96-35 - Adopted - Certifies Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 For General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 r` A motion was made by Bauer, second Dettloff, to certify as adequate and complete Final Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 by adopting Resolution No. 96-35 - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO.94-1 FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE GENERAL PLAN." The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: None Resolution No. 96-36 - Adopted - General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 As Amended A motion was made by Bauer, second Dettloff, to approve General Plan Amendment No. 94- 2 as amended by the City Council by adopting Resolution No. 96-36 with a Statement of Overriding Considerations - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE GENERAL PLAN." Councilman Harman announced his abstention from Area Nos. 65, 72, and 36 due to a possible conflict of interest. Councilman Garofalo announced his abstention from Area No. 65 due to a possible conflict of interest. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: None (City Council) Implementation Of Urban Design Guidelines - Request For Discussion And Possible Direction From City Council (440.50) Councilwoman Dettloff spoke regarding her recommendation relative to Urban Design standards on key streets in the city. She stated that she would like to see public art and requested that specifics on the Urban Design Element return to Council in approximately 60 days or so. (City Council) Communication Submitted By Mayor Pro Tempore Ralph Bauer (440.40) The City Council considered the following communications submitted by Mayor Pro Tempore Bauer for discussion and consideration: 299 Huntington Beach General Plan Update (GPA No. 94-22) Land Use Map Recommendations - City Council Review City Council Adopted May I3, 1 996 EXISTING GENERALPLs�Y. GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLAhTIhGCOA4MISSIO^! CITY COUNCIL �D LOCATION FLAN : COtiiMTTTE$ 7A\L\C A7SCGSSION � STAFF REC01i: FN`DATIONS RECONIMENDATION5 RECOMMF�a1DATioNS DESIGNATION - DESIGNATION 1 Southwest RL CN - F1 CG - FP2 Change from corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to Banning Ave. & Low Neighborhood, General, Commercial to Bushard St. Density) Density 0.35 Floodplain) reflect existing FAR) zoning and existing (DIM 22) conditions 2 South side of RR..:.,: P (RH,: 30) Hamilton Ave. (Residential . Public 300'. west of High underlying Broolchurst St Density)::..Residential High llensEty 30 un/ac 3. Northwest RL CN - F1 corner of (Residential (Commercial Atlanta Ave. & Low Density Neighborhood, Newland St. Density 0.35 FAR) (D..1 13) CG Change from (Commercial Residential to General) Commercial to reflect existing zoning and existing conditions Agree with PC & GPAC; provides consistency between Zoning and General Plan Agree with PC & GPAC; provides consistency between Zoning and General Plan Agree with Staff & GPAC: recommend change from Residential to Commercial Neighborhood (CN-Fl) designation (Straw Vote 5-0) Staff & emend iesldential !crease En 1. Agree with Staff & GPAC: recommend change from Residential to Commercial Neighborhood (CN-Fl) designation (Straw Vote 5-0) Change from Residential Low to Commercial Neighborhood designation: (CN-Fl) - Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent Change from Residential Low to Commercial Neighborhood designation: (CN-Fl) - Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent City Council adopted 5/13/96 + (glgenpinlcclndus2) .. ' ::... �IIII - CBNERAL PLANSTING ��I IM1N E LOCATION �p'ESZONING DISCUSSION 1NEhDATI4!$RECOMMENDATIONS IECOM'll?T' I: O. *11 \5GENERAL c�RY EMISTING NO�DESIGNATION DESIGNATION IL 4. Atlanta Ave. east RL P (RL - 6.5) RL Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Add P (Public) to of Leasure Ln. (Residential Public - (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Residential Low Density Low underlying Low Density) identify Residential Low Density Public (P) designation; designation: P (RL-7) - (DM 14) Density) Low Density churchlsebool (RL) land use designation, retain maximum 7.0 du/ac Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff Residential, retain maximum 7.0 unlac (Straw Vote 5-0) absent 6.5 unlac 5 Northwest Recreation' P (Public) ; . RA - RL Public designation Agree with PC &..GPAC; Agree with to A Change from Recreation to corner of ; (Residential for a Utility right new designation for utility recommend Public (P)' Piiblie designation: (P) Magnolia & ..y Agriculture;: ofwa ri ht of wa g Y designation to Identi g.., fY $traW Vote 6-D Dettloff Hamilton Ave. Residential utility' right ofway (Straw absent . Low Density) Vote 5 0) (DM 14 6. Southwest RL CN - F1 CG - FP2 Change from Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Residential turner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change to Low to Commercial Indianapolis Ave Low Neighborhood, General, Commercial to between Zoning and Commercial Neighborhood Neighborhood designation: & Newland St. Density) Density 0.35 Floodplain) reflect existing General Plan (CN-Fl) designation (CN-Fl) - Straw Vote 6-0, FAR) zoning and existing (Straw Vote 6-1) Dettloff absent (DM 13) conditions 1 C rr+rr zn2 :; Gn x r. Deleted; change to General No action necessary r'n....haFd St :n i eioia Via; Wkat pereial Ito ` p yfdes eon eney Plan designation has been +el$1 L6w.. �-•- rz .,� $ensit3+ 1 6enerel-,zre:n,eteen 1! leedpl$in) r Mr i 4 honing and lei+ previously approved (814 6}]FAR} t3°3 eeAet existing: eertss dens 8. Northwest RL CN - F1 Q - CG - FPZ Change from Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Qualified, Residential to provides consistency recommend change from Low to Commercial $ushard St. & Low Neighborhood, Commercial Commercial to between Zoning and Residential to Commercial Neighborhood designation: Litchfield Dr. Density) Density 0.35 General, reflect existing General Plan Neighborhood (CN-FI) (CN-FI) - Straw Vote 6-0, FAR) Floodplain) zoning and existing designation (Straw Vote 5- Dettloff absent (DM 6) conditions 0) City Council adopted 5113/96 + 2 (glgenpinlcc1ndus2) EXISTING .CENERAI,J.G=I_,1r 0EXISTING.. PLAN\1ZGC0�1'vI1SSION CITYCOG\CIL ), LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE LO\Ii\G DISCUSSION STAFF AECOiiME�DATI0N5 AECOYIs4E\DATIOk5 RECOMMEADATIp\5 DESIGNATION DESIGNATION - - 9. Southwest . RM: OS'- P {Open ' OS PR - FP2: Change Residential Agree with PC & GPAC; ° Agree with Staff. &,GPAC:' Change from Residential.:, corner of (Residential Space'= Park) ` (Open Space,-: to Open Space Park; provides consistency recommend,.change from Medium to. Open Space . Aelaware St & :; Medium Parks. and to reflect existing between Zoning and Residential to Qpeo: Space- `Park designation: {OS-P);- Detroit Ave. Density) Recreation, park" General Plan :. Park (OSP)designation Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff Floodplain) (Straw Vote 576) absent. (DM 12} M. Pacific Ceara R14 *'rrr.ry -FS—S DTF °�z Change ff a In Agree with GtAA.�,-- Deleted; change to General No action necessary High'A' (Residential (Mixed4Jse (Downtown resi debtal-.`e Modified PIan designation has been frontage between High Density) VeFtweal Density 1.5 S$eFi-fie Rlanf n: Dewfttown-SpeErfie Plan previously approve ( ) �Vi�--- f ' visitor serving �r�.rv'-r.'crr��'� C-OFfiffler-eifil d April 17 199-5 '�T' f �7 0. ice-- 25 eltdae, f SPeeifie-Plait) 11. Southwest RM CN - F1 - D:. CG ' : Change from < Agree with PC; & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Residential corner of {Residential (Commercial.. (Commercial .i Residentia! to provides consistency recainmend`ehange from Medium to Coin inertial Alabama St & Medium Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and . Residential to Coiniiercial Neighborhood designation: Adams Ave Density) Density 0 35 ',: reflect existing:: General PIan Neighborhood {CN-F1-1)) (C F1' D) Straw Vote 6- FAR ,'Design zoning and existing designation (Straw Vote 5 ©, Dettloff a%sen (DM 12); Overlay) conditions ©) "' 12. Northeast corner RM OS - P (Open RM-0 Change Residential Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Residential of Huntington (Residential Space - Park) (Residential to Open Space Park change to reflect existing recommend change from Medium to Open Space - St. & Wichita Medium Medium to reflect existing conditions, may require Residential to Open Space- Park designation: (OS-P) - Ave- Density) Density, Oil park (Boys and I future zone change Park (OS-P) designation Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff Overlay) Girls Club) (Straw Vote 5-0) NOTE: absent; NOTE: (DM 2) r inconsistent with zoning inconsistent with zoning City Council adopted 5/13196 3 ((glgenpinlcOndus2) ExISTING 11 GENERAL.. No. LOCATION II ...PLAN FI D FmGXAirio.N 1[ _C O RY "ISTING. N CITY uNcri; TER ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATION PLANMRECONIMECNDATIONS-NIMISSION II RECO13MEcoNDATIONS FION $out west' RM. P (RM:- 15) RM'::.. Add Public (P) Agree. with PC & : .::::Public.. Agree withStaff& GPAC: Add (P to: g corner of Clay... 1 (Residentia_J.... ublic (Residential Oes!gnation to::. GPAC; no change to recommend change to add Residential Med:ipm.j Density'' a. Ave: Delaware -Medium underlying ium Mid' ntify identify tingResid Residential ...exj.s en Public (P) designation 0 d in, P (RM- 5) Density)St Residential Density church/khool 'Medium Density (RM) (Straw:;Vote 5-0) Straw Vote 6.-0, beftloif�:� Medium J, IsAd use design ion sit' ..... abs absent ..... ... .... ARM Density 15unlac x. .... ... ... k: . .. ... . . .... . ..... ... ..... .. . . .. .... X 14. Northeast corner RM P (RM - 15) RM Add Public (P) Agree with PC & Agree with Staff & GPAC: Add Public (P) to of Clay Ave. & (Residential Public - (Residential designation to GPAC; no change to recommend change to add Residential Medium Density Delaware St. Medium underlying Medium identify existing Medium Density Public (P) designation designation: P (RM-15) - Density) Residential Density) churchischool Residential (RM) land (Straw Vote 5-0) Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff (DM 2) Medium use designation absent Density 15 ur/ac 15.::: h Scid f side o 11G.ffindustrial. P (1) Public 7: It(Industrial : .:. Add Public (P):: Agree with PC &..: Agree with Staff GPAC. Add Public (P) to Industrial �.. Garfield Ave., IA... General): under]ying Limited) designation to GPAC; no change to.. ... ..... recommend change to add 4esignAtiomY (I. ..F2) - traw.. Gothird St .:& Industrial identify City's existing Industrial (1):: n Public (P) designation Voie 6-0, Dett off:abserit Huntington St. Water Yard an d.use Iesiffnatlon:(S.traw Vote 5-0),. & ... ..... .... .. . :X X.. A. . .. ..... ... ... . .... .... .. .. . .... 16. Southwest Mixed MH - F3 -30 - Pacifica Modify existing Agree with PC: disagree Agree with Staff- Change from Mixed corner of Main Development SP (Mixed Community. Mixed Use with GPAC; change to recommend change to Mixed Development to Mixed Use St. & Florida St 1 Use Plan designation to Mixed Use designation Use and add Specific Plan and add Specific Plan (East of Florida) Horizontal, reflect existing use and add Specific Plan (SP) designation (Straw designation: (MU-SP) - Density 1.0 and conditions Vote 6-0-1 abstain) Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff (DM 39) FAR, 30 absent un/ac, Specific Plan) City Council adopted 5/13/96 4 (g\genpinkclndus2) 17 ISTING )VI NERAL 1. UNCIL LOCATION I� DFESIPLAN GA'ATION� G OTY O' NG I� DISCUSSIOY I� STAFF RECOMMEN,"TI0\S I PREC01.39I�D4iJONS MCOS7 iE DAT ONS DESIGNATION I Southwest RM P (RMH - 25) RMH corner of Ellis (Residential Public - (Residential Ave. & Chapel Medium underlying Medium High Ln. Density) Residential Density) Medium High (DM 40) Density 25 unlac Add Public (P) designation to identify church/school, increase density from 15 to 25 du/ac Agree with PC & GPAC; increase in density from 15 to 25 du/ac, provides consistency between Zoning and General Plan Agree with Staff & GPAC: recommend to add Public (P) designation, increase density from 15 to 25 dulac (Straw Vote 5-0) Change from Residential Medium Density to Residential Medium High and add Public designation: P (RMH-25) - Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent X8;` Park site; north RM '' OS Park OS -. PR (Open Change Residential ; Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC Change from Residential of Pacific Coast <, (Residenhal (Open Space, Space, Parks to Open Space Park 'provides consistency recommend change from Medium to Open;Space- Highway'& Medium Park) and to reflect existing between Zoning and Residential to Open Space- Park designation. (OS-P) - Warner::Ave Density} Recreation) . park `: .. General Plan Park"(OS-P) designation S#raw Vote 6-0, Dettloff (Straw:. Vote S..0) absent or 19. 1 Northeast of - RL RM - 15 RMP Land use change to Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff- Retain Residential Low Heil Ave. & (Residential (Residential (Residential reflect existing with GPAC; recommend recommend retain existing Density and add Mobile Saybrook Ln. Low Density) Medium Manufactured density of Mobile Mobile Home Overlay Residential Low Density 7.0 Home Overlay designation: Density 15 Home Park) Home Park, and retain existing dulac and add Mobile (RL-7-RMP) - Straw Vote (DM 23) unlac) increase density Residential Low Density Home Overlay (Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent from 7 to 15 dulac designation 5-0) 20 300' Northwest RL P (RL - 6.5} : RL Add Public (P)` Agree with PC &s: GPAC; ` Agree with Staff & GPAC Add P (Public) to' of Heil Ave & (Residential Public -: {Residential designation to ;` no change to existing recoil3mend change to add Residential Low Density Springdale St Low Density) ' underlying :. Low Density) identify ., Residential Low Density Public: (P) designation; ; designation: P (RT 7) Residential churchlschaol (RL) land use retain maximum 7.0 du/ac Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff (DM 24) Low Dense#y ', designation, retain (Straw Vote 5-0) absent 6 5 unlac) maximum 7,0 unlac 1 City Council adopted 5/13/96 5 (glgenpin1cclndus2) :. II IIEI4ERALLAN , - II II E%STINCPIA- r� I CITY COUNCIL . RLOCATIOA ION STAFF REC04LUNDATONSRECONMEDATIO SC111 P DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 21. 300' Southwest of Edinger Ave. & Springdale St. (DM 24) SR (Senior Residential) RMH - 25 (Residential Medium High Density 25 unlac) (Q) RMH (Qualified, Residential Medium High Density) Eliminates Senior Residential Resignation, RMH allows senior residential development Agree with PC & GPAC; provides consistency between Zoning and General Plan Agree with Staff & GPAC: recommend change from Senior Residential to Residential Medium High (RMH-25) designation (Straw Vote 5-0) Change from Senior Residential to Residential Medium High designation: (RMH-25) - Straw Vote 6- 0, Dettloff absent 22 Nortlieast of . . CG P (CN FI) CG Add Public (P) < Agree with PC &' CPAC;. Agree with Staff & GPAC: A'dd P (Public) to McFadden Ave. (Commercial' Public:- (Commercial designation to :: no change to existing recomriiend change to add Commercial Neighborhood':'' Edwards St. General) underlying General) identify Commercial land'use Public (P) designation , designation: P (CN-FI) Commercial ;' churchlschool '' designation (Straw,Vote 5.0) Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff (DM 17) Neighborhoo absent d, Density 0.35 FAR) 23. ShelVCal Industrial - MH - F1 - 30 M2 - 01 - CZ; Change from Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC Change from Industrial Resources site, Resource - SP (Mixed R4 - O - CZ; Industrial to Mixed expands the visitor recommend change from Resource to Mixed Use Pacific Coast Production Use Cl - O CZ Use serving commercial Industrial -Resource Horizontal designation with Highway Horizontal, (Industrial opportunities along the Production to Mixed -Use overall 15 dulac average: between Density 0.35 General, Oil coast, allows residential Horizontal; recommend F2- (MH-F2-30-SP) - Straw Seapoint Ave. & FAR, 30 OverIay, development, 30 (.5 FAR, 30 dulac); Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent Golden West St. unfac, Coastal Zone; incorporates property recommend "average" Specific Plan) Residential owner & residents density of 15 dulac (Straw (DM 3,4 & 10) High Density, comments (will require Vote 7-0) Oil Overlay, future zone change and Coastal Zane; Master Plan/Specific Commercial Plan) Neighborhood, Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone) City Council adopted 5113/96 6 (glgeapinlec1ndus2) � DE1A p� I� PON ! EO E OZCU55IOlSTAFRCOnhENDATLOCATIO'i1 pNSIONS RECOMMEO RECOMMENDATIONS DATIONS ON FI 24 1500' Southwest IG (Industrial RM`-15 1G (Industrial > Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree;v►ith Staff: Change from Industrial of Warner Ave. General) (Residential ` General) Industrial to with GPAC; change to recommend change from General to Residerit�al Low' & Gothard St. Medium Residential to ` . Residential Low. Density '' industrial to Residential Density and add Mobile (Mobile Horne Density, 15 reflectexisting and add Mobile ;[-Tame Low DenAty 1.0 dulac; add Home Overlay designation;" Park) unlac) conditions (Mobile Overlay (will requite Mobile Home Overlay: (RL 7 RMP) Straw Vote;: Home Park) future lone change NOTE: inconsistent with 6-0j Dettloff absent (DM 31) Toning (S#raw Vote 4-1) 25. Southeast corner IG (Industrial I - F2 - H IL (Industrial Add Historic (H) Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Add Historic Overlay to of Gothard St. & General) (Industrial, Limited) Overlay to area to no change to Industrial recommend to add Historic Industrial designation: (I - Warner Ave. Density 0.5 identify Historic (I) land use designation Overlay (Straw Vote 5-0) F2-H) - Straw Vote 6-0, FAR, structures (Slater Dettloff absent (sites to be (DM 31) Historical House, etc.) determined) Overlay) 26 Sll' Northwest of RL P (RL - 6.5) RL (Residential; Add Public (P}, Agree with PC & GPAC, Agree'with Staff & GPAC Add P (Public) to ;. <a Edinger Ave. & ' (Residential Public - Low Density) designation to no change to exlshng recommend change td add Residential Law Density ,... Golden )Vest St: , Law Density)=' underlying identify I+esideiltial Lasv Density Public (P) designation; designation.=7) - Resideiitial churcklschool; (RI,} land use n retai:t maximum 7.0 dulac Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff (DM 17) Law Density designation, �retaln (Straw,Vote 5 ©), absent 6.5 unlac maximum 7.0 un/ae 27. 500' Northwest RL P (RL - 6.5) RL (Residential Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Add P (Public) to of Edinger Ave. (Residential Public - Low Density) designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Residential Low Density & Golden West Low Density) underlying identify Residential Low Density Public (P) designation; designation: P (RL-7) - St. Residential church/school (RL) designation, retain retain maximum 7.0 du/ac Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff Low Density maximum 7.0 un/ac (Straw Vote 5-0) absent DM 17) 6.5 unlac City Council adopted 5/13/96 ki (glgenp1nlac1ndus2) 28. Northwest RM CN - F1 CG Change from Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change from Medium to Commercial McFadden Ave. Medium Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and Residential Medium Density Neighborhood designation: & Golden West Density) Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan to Commercial (CN-FI) - Straw Vote 6-0, St. FAR) zoning and Neighborhood (CN-Fl) Dettloff absent (DM 17) conditions designation (Straw Vote 5- 29 P, Q. P, I P (CG = F1) P5 (Public Change from , Agree with PC & GPAC,: Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Publk, Quasi - Northeast corner (Public,'; Public Semi Public) Public, Quasi expands commercial recommend change from Publu, Institutional to of.Golden West :Quasi- `underlying Public,' opportunities along Public, Quasi -Public,. Commercial General and St. & Edinger Public, ; Commercial Institutional to . )ldinger Corridor by Institutional to Commercial add Public designation: P Ave: (Edinger' Institutional) General, Public with changing the designation General {CG-F1) and add (CG F 1) -Straw Vote frontage)' Density..0.35 underlying to Commef a] General Public (P)designation DetiioAabsent, NOTE FAR) Commercial with Public.(P) (Straw Vote 5-0) NOTE inconsistent with zoning (DM 15) General designation to identify inconsistent with zoning' designation at college Go1dtn West Coilege a' 30. Southeast of CG CR - F2 - D CG Upgrades existing Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Commercial Golden West St. (Commercial (Commercial (Commercial Commercial expands regional recommend change from General to Commercial & Edinger Ave. General) Regional, General) designation to commercial opportunities Commercial General to Regional designation: (CR- Density 0.5 Regional with freeway access Commercial Regional (CR- F2-D) - Straw Vote 6-0, (DM 26) FAR, Design Commercial F2-D) designation (Straw Dettloff absent Overlay) designation Vote 5-0) 3I. :.South side of CG CR = F. 2 - D CG Edinger Ave. (Commercial (Commercial (Commercial..':. from Gothard General) Regional, General) St. to Parkside Density 0.5: Ln. FAR; Design {DM 26) Overlay) ?grades existing Agree with PC & GPAC, " Agree with Staff &GPAC: Change from Commercial`.. �mmercial expands 'commerc'ia! recommend change from General to Commercial !signation to opportunities with Commercial General to Regional designation.;(CR- .-gional freeway access Commercial Regional (CR- F2-D) -Straw Vote 6-0; )mmercial F2-A) designation (Straw Dettloff absent signation Vote 5-0) City Council adopted 5113/96 8 (glgenp1nlcc1ndus2) EXISTING GENERAL11"N ADVISNINbCIMIMISSION:. CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION GENERAL PLAN COMM OTTEE ZONING DISCUSSIDN STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS P ECOMI MEODATIO, s RECOMME D TIONS ... DESIGNATIOA DF-SIGNATION _ 32. Northeast of CG CR - F2 - D CG (Commercial Upgrades existing Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Commercial Gothard St. & (Commercial (Commercial General) Commercial expands commercial recommend change from General to Commercial Edinger Ave General) Regional, designation to opportunities with Commercial General to Regional designation: (CR- Density 0.5 Regional freeway access Commercial Regional (CR- F2-D) - Straw Vote 6-0, (DM 15). FAR, Design Commercial F2-D) designation (Straw Dettloff absent Overlay) designation Vote 5-0) 33 Southeast of . P, Q - P, P MV -,F8 - D RL (Residential; Change from Agree with I'U GPAC; Agree with Matt sc lrYAt Change_irom Yublu, [xu.asi-:. McFadden Ave. ' (Public, (Mixed Use ' ` Law Density), Public, Quasi, promotes an activity recommend change from Public, Institutional and Gothard St Oua'si - Vertical, IG (General` Public, center. by adding Public,.Quasi-Public, Mixcd Development to Public,:.Density 1.5 Industrial), CG- Institutional and.:... commerciallresidential Institutional and Mixed Mixed Use Vertical X. Institutional)' FAR`U4U], R. (Commercial:.. Mixed Use to (mixed use) designation Development to Mixed Use designation: (MV FS-D) - MD {Mixed 0.35 FAR [C], General -High Mixed Use near a transit center Vertical (MV-F8 D) „ Straw Vote 6-6, Dettloff..:.:..:.. Development 25 unlac) Rise Overlay) Vertical designation (Straw Vote 7- absent (CommerciallResid 0)ssi ential).at the °'` Transit Center Area' s 34. Huntington CG MV - F9 - SP CG (Commercial Modifies Disagree with PC, agree Disagree with Staff and Change from Commercial. Center (Commercial (Mixed Use General) Commercial with GPAC: recommend GPAC: eliminate mixed General to Commercial General) Vertical, designation by mixed use to expand and use, recommend change Regional designation with (DM 15) Density 1.5 adding Mixed Use revitalize opportunities from Commercial General Mixed Use Overlay: (CR- FAR [MU], (CommerciatfResid for the Mall, promote the to Commercial Regional - Fx-SP-MU) - Straw Vote 4- 0.5 FAR [C], ential); Continues regional importance of FAR .5 - Specific Plan (CR 3 25 unlac) Regional the site but may (not - F2 - SP)) designation Commercial uses, require) allow residential (Straw Vote 5-1) may permit development in the area residential development :r City Council adopted 5113/96 i 9 (glgenpinlcclndus2) 7O � LOCATION .DES I : i3EO5UNCIL X T E '. � RY EXISTING G DISCUSSION _ I.: STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS �I r RECOMMENDATIONSy �I RECO NCM IE DATIOM OV: ! JJJJI Aldrich Ave. CG MV - Fi0 D:.. CG RMH Modifies existing Disagree with PC , Disagree with Staff & .' Change from Residential >' south to Hell A (Mixed RM Commercial reductlon`of residential GPAC:, recommend change Ntediu I and Residential Ave westside of General) Use Vertical, (Commercial designation by` densityfrbin 25 to 15 from Commercial General Medium High to Beach Blvd RMH Density;:.1.5 General; adding Mixed: Use dulac agree with GPAC, to Muted Use Vertical, Commercial General {Residential FAR (MU], lesidential (CoinmerclallRestd .:. allows continued decrease density from 25 to designation: (CG-F2) - (IlM 26) Medium 1:5 FAR (C], Medium High ential)i continues Commercial uses: and ..: : 15 dulac (Straw Vote 6 (i) Straw Vote 7 0, 1rTOTE: High 25 dinar, Density, ; commercial uses, development, permits NOTE: inconsistent with inconsistent with zoning Density) RM Design Residential may permit ° . (not require} residential ' zoning -xa (Residential Overlay Medium::; residential uses and provides:;, Medium Auto Density);: development, does possible relocation of X. Density} t7verlay) increase some.:• Auto Dealers to form density from 15 to future Auto Mall 25 dulac, Auta' Yi Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers 36. Heil Ave. south CG MV - F10 - D CG - RM. Modifies existing Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff & Change from Residential to Warner Ave. (Commercial - A (Mixed (Commercial Commercial reduction of residential GPAC: recommend change Medium to Commercial east & west sides General) Use Vertical, General; designation by density from 25 to 15 from Commercial General General designation: (CG- of Beach Blvd. RM Density 1.5 Residential adding Mixed Use du/ac, agree with GPAC; to Mixed Use Vertical, F2) - Straw Vote 6-0-1 (Residential FAR [MU], Medium (Commercial/Resid allows continued decrease density from 25 to abstain; NOTE: (DM 26&27) Medium 1.5 FAR (C], Density) ential); continues Commercial uses and 15 dulac (Straw Vote 6-0) inconsistent with zoning Density) 25 dulac, commercial uses, development, permits NOTE: inconsistent with Design may permit (not require) residential zoning Overlay, residential uses and provides Auto development, does possible relocation of Overlay) increase some Auto Dealers to form density from 15 to future Auto Mall 25 du/ac, Auto Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers City Council adopted 5/13/96 ; " 10 (glgenp]nlcc1ndus2) EXIST], CFNERAL CITY UINCIL ADVISORY FIA i, LOC'ATIOY 0 EG A OV C 4MITTTO 1 � WINING:: I DISCUSSION STAFFYF RECOMMENDATIONSPREC01tME.rO'llATI01Sy RECOi1ME'UATTOtiS ESIGNATI 37: ; °:Southeast of CG MV - F10 - D RM Modifies existing Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff & Change from Residential:... , Beach Blvd. & � (Coi imerciat. (Mixed Use (Residential . ; Commercial '' reduction of residential GPAC: recommend change Medwm to Commercial , Warner Ave General) Vertical, Medium designation by; density from 25 to 15 from. Cornmereial General General designation (CG- RiV1 `, _ Density 1.5 ". Density) adding. Mixed. Use dulac, agree with GPAC; to Mixed Use. Vertical; F2) Straw Vote.7-4, `k (DM 30) (Reside ntial ; FAR [MU], (Commercial/lteside allows continued decrease density from 25 to NOTE. inconsistent with: Mediums 15 FAR [C], ntial ; continues ) Commercial uses and 15 dufac ($thaw 'Vote 6 A) zoning g Density) 25 du(ac, commercial uses, development,permits NOTE.: inconsistent with Design may permit (not require) residential zoning Overlay) residential uses and provides development, does possibleYelocation of increase some Auto Dealers to„form 4ensity.frorn 15 to future Auto Mali 25 dulac, Autoso is Overlay allowsX possible location of Auto Dealers 38. Northeast of RH P (RMH - 25) RMH Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Residential Nichols St. & (Residential Public - (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change from High to Residential Warner Ave. High underlying Medium High identify Multi -Family Residential Residential High to Medium High Density and Density) Residential Density) church/school; does designation, but does Residential Medium High add Public (P) designation: (DM 26) Medium High reduce density from reduce the density from Density and add Public (P) P (RMH-25) - Straw Vote Density, 25 35 to 25 du/ac 35 to 25 dulac designation, does decrease 6-4, Dettloff absent unlac) density from 35 to 25 dulac (Straw Vote 6-4) 39 244' Northwest ` Mixed Use RMH - 25 Q - RMH Change from.Mixed Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff &: GPAC: Change from Mixed Use to of Magnolia Ave. (Residential (Qualif ed, Use to Residential provides consistency recommend' change frours Residential Medwm High & Warner Ave. Medium Hi Residential Medium Hi h >' g between Zonin and g. Mixed Use to Residential Dense desi nation: t3 g Density, 25 Medium High Density to reflect General Plan ". Medium High Density 25 .:, (RMH M) - Straw Vote 6- (DM 27) unlac); Density) existing zoning and dulac (Straw Vote 6-4) 0, Dettloff absent aditions City Council adopted 5/13196 - 11 (glgenp1nlcclndus2) Tf FJ:ISTI.'�G IIr4 : GEItiERAI,PI..4AL.- . � �ST ING NTI� PLANNING YIISCLSSIOV TAFFiEiCO1MEDA0\SLOCATION NG VDlCOA(1EvDAT Oti9 S)FSIG TON DESIGNATION: 0. Southeast corner; . Coiiunerci0a RM 15. OP (Of ice Change from Office" Disagree with PC, agree ` Disagree with Staff & ,' Retain existing of Warner Ave... :General (Residential, Professional): Professional to " with GPAC; change to GPAC. recommend no Commercial General :. and Oak Ln , Medium' ssis . Residential Meduim residential is compatible change to Commercial' designation CG Density} Density`; with adjacent designation ;: General - FAR 35 (CG Straw Vote 6 0, Dettloff (11M 31) �Flj designation (Straw : absent Vote 6-0) 41. East & west CG RH - 30 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff. eliminate Retain existing sides of Beach (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC; eliminate residential node and Commercial General Blvd., Blaylock General) High Density, General) to Residential High forming residential nodes, recommend no change to designation. (CG - Fl) - Dr. south to 30 unlac) Density to form no change to commercial Commercial General - Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff Ronald Dr. residential node, designation FAR .35 (CG - Fl) absent breaks continuous designation (Straw Vote 5- (DM 30&31) strip commercial 0-1 absent) development 4L Southeast of RM ; . P (Public) - CG Add Public (P) Agree with PC &;GPAC; Agree with Staff &.GPAC Change from Residential !" : Beach Blvd. & (Residential designation to (Commercial designation to identifies existing hospital recommend change from Medtuiii,Denslty fo Public.°' Newmari'Ave. Medium reflect Generali. identifyhospital; use Residential Medium designation: {P} = Straw Density.) hospdal < removes Residential. Density to.Public (P) Vote 6- Dettloff'abseat (DM 30) Medium Density (15 designation (Straw Vote 6 dulac) designation Oj City Council adopted 5/13/9G 12 (glgenp1nkclndus2) EXISTIIG G$4��RAI,PiAJV - RY JN EXISTING LANNING CTL LDCATIOYDESIG\A TEE ZONING DISCUSSION �I STAFFREL M. M.ENDATIONS �I gUCOWMENIDAT SX � RECOi A. CITY fE DAT 4\5 43. East side of RM Florida St., 17th (Residential St. to Yorktown Medium Ave. Density) (DM 2) RMH - 25 RA'I - RMH (Residential (Residential Medium High Medium Density, 25 Density; unlac) Residential Medium High Density) Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential Residential Medium with GPAC: do not recommend retain existing Medium Density to Residential create residential node Residential Medium designation: (RM-15) - Medium High and increase density from Density 15 dulac Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff Density to reflect 15 to 25 dulac, retain designation (Straw Vote 6- absent; NOTE: portion of existing conditions existing Residential 0) NOTE: portion of site site (RMH) inconsistent and create node, Medium Density (RMH) inconsistent with with zoning does increase density zoning from 15 to 25 dulac in some areas 44. + 900' South of RM ';: RH -..30 RM::— RMH ' < Change from Agree with PCB,. disagree Agree with Staff-::. Retain;existing.Residential: ; Garfield Ave. on (Residential (Residential . (Residentialm. Residential Medium ,with GPAC: do not recommend retain existing " Medium Density' east side of Medium High Density,' 'Medium to Residential Highh create residential diode Residential Medium designs#ion. (R14I45) - Z lb�ida St. to Density) 30 unlac}. Density; Density, to reflect aril increase density from .Density 1S dulac Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff Yorktown Ave. Residential existing conditions 15 to30 dulac, retain designation (Straw Vote 6 absent; NOTE. portion`of''' Mediurii: High ;:. and create node; existing Residential 0) NOTE: portion of site site (RMH) inconsistent ..'. (1?M Z) . < Density) does, ncrease density 1l# ium Density (RMH) inconsistent with With zoning IF 15 to 30 dulac zoning In some areas .F. 45. 300' Southwest RM CG - FI RM Change from Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Residential of Yorktown (Residential (Commercial (Residential Residential Medium reflects existing recommend change from Medium Density to Ave. & Beach Medium General, Medium to Commercial conditions and uses Residential Medium Commercial General Blvd. Density) Density 0.35 Density) General to reflect Density to Commercial designation: (CG-Fl) - FAR) existing conditions General (CC-F1) Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff (DM 2) designation (Straw Vote b- absent; NOTE: inconsistent 0) NOTE: inconsistent with with zoning zoning City Council adopted 5113/96 13 (g\genpinlcclndus2) 'NE G ATIOV 1J.. :i- DESIGNATION DES EXISTING IIi -.- II PLANNINGCONL\1ISSlOV `Ej CITY COUNCIL ZONING �I DISCUSSION 11 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS �! RECONIN7ENDATIONS II RECO;%t:,1EHDATIONS 46. East of Florida RM RH - 30 RM Change from St., 300' south of (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium Yorktown Ave. Medium High Density, Medium to Residential High to Adams Ave. Density) 30 unlac) Density) Density to reflect existing conditions (DM 2) and create node, doesincrease density from 15 to 30 du/ac in some areas 100' Northeast RM of Utica Ave. & (Residential Florida St Medium Density) (I1M 2) YoW East of Florida RM St. 300' south of (Residential Utica Ave. Medium Density) (DM 2) City Council adopted 5/13/96 P {RH - 30) RM Add Public (P) Public - ` (Residential .designation to` underlying Medium': identify: Residential Density) ChurdAchool High Density, does increase 30 anlac): density from .5 Ito 30 dulac P (RH - 30) RM Add Public (P) Public - (Residential designation to underlying Medium identify Residential Density) Church/School; High Density, does increase 30 unlac) density from 15 to 30 du/ac Agree with PC, disagree with GPAC; Do not create residential node and increase density from 15 to 30 du/ac, retain existing Residential Medium Density Agree with PC; modify GPAC recommendation add Public (P) designation to identify school or church. but do Agree with PC, modify GPAC recommendation; add Public (P) designation to identify school or church, but do not increase density from 15 to 30 dulac, retain existing Residential Medium Density (15 dufac) 14 Agree with Staff. recommend retain existing Residential Medium Density 15 dulac designation (Straw Vote 6-0) Agree with Staf recommend yeti Residential.Mec 15 di& and ad designation (St! Agree with Staff: recommend retain existing Residential Medium Density 15 dulac and add Public (P) designation (Straw Vote 6- 0) Retain existing Residential Medium Density designation: (RM-15) - Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent Retain existing Residential Medium Density and add Public designation: P (RM- 15) - Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent (glgenpinlcclndus2) �EX IN GENERAL P1.6-N 'ST G . .. ... GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING... PLANNING CO-umjssjoq CITY COUNCIL 7- ONJIN G LOCATIO COMMITTEE (issiON, STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: x. RECOMMENDATIONS s. D DEsjq ESIGNATION DESIGNATION 49— 100'Noii-th6asf JZM P (RH 7 30) Add Public (P):::. Agree with PC modify Agree with Staff. Retainexisting Residential ofAdams Ave. (Residential Public - .(Residential::,' desigiiation to QPAC recommendation' recommend retain existing Medhim Density and add& ... . ....... Yorktown, .. . Mcdium��: .... . . .... . ... .. underlying 'y �MediuM_ identify add Public (P) Him Residential Medium ...... . ..... Public Pu ic designation, P (RM. Ali Ave. Densi Density} R 'Idetial ensity &Sc oo I does .. e identify esignatiqn to iden Density 1.5 du/ac and add 15) - Straw: Vot d-O C . .. ... .. .. .. . ... .... ...... ... High Density, ..... ... ... mcieagr-&nsity school or church, butdo.:, . . . ... .... Public (P). designation. Dettloff absent:::: ...... ..... (DM 2): . . .. .... ... ... ..... . .... . ..... 30 un/a from :not increkse density from;' (Straw Vote 6 -0) ... .. ... .... . 15 to 30 didn, retain U existing Residential: ... .. .... .. . ...... .. . ... .... . : Medium Di (0' ens ty .. ...... .... . .. . .... . ... . ... . . ... .... . .... .. . .... . ... ...... .... . ...... ..... 50. South side of RM CN-Fl X.- X... RM - FP2 Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff. retain Retain existing Residential Hamilton Ave. (Residential (Commercial (Residential Residential Medium with GPAC; retain existing Residential Medium Density 400' east of Medium Neighborhoo Medium Density to existing Medium Density Medium Density (RM-15) designation: (RM-15) - Bushard St. Density) d, Density Density, Commercial Residential, no change to designations, no change to Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff 0.35 FAR) Floodplain) Neighborhood commercial designation commercial designation to absent (DM 20) to the west the west (Straw Vote 6-0) 5i.:::"" corner NortheastRM CG: - IS CG - FP2 :s: ChangeJrom:. Agree with thPC,disagree .., Agree with Staff. Retain existing Comnieftial::� ofHaniltoa Ave, (Conmercial (Residential (Commerc�at C.o... m.. .r..c. ial. General with GPAC: existing recommend:re ai-n existing General designation : C & too unt G General) M edium Genera to Residential Commercial would: Commercial G671eeit (CC- FI) - Straw:.Vke 0, .... . .. ..... Street]E�e .... ... Density, AS Floodp Medium ... b rmi become non conforming, esignation (Straw loffAbsent .. ... .... ... Un1ac ...... .. .... .... .... A..eslgia onshould uld reflect ... Vote 6 I.. . .. ...... .. .. ..... . ... . ... .... ..... ... ... ... (DM 19) .. .. ...... existing cop J�ions d' and Aii Ky. ..... .. ..... .... ... ...... .... . .. .... ... ... .... . . .... ....... ...... . . ...... . . t -uses retain existing..:.. ..... �xx ..... ... .... ... ... Commercial General & designation . ........ .. 3.: ... .... ..... A::* City Council adopted 5113/96 15 (g\genp1nNcclnd1js2) E.CISTtING .GENERALPLAN GENERAL DFISORY EXISTING PLANYI1GCOiLYlI55ION CITY COUNCIL 0. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZO'N NG DISCUSSION: STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION ---- DESIGNATION__ 52. Northwest RL CN - F1 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff, Retain existing Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Low with GPAC; no change to recommend retain existing Low Density designation: Indianapolis Low Neighborhoo General) Density to current designation, Residential Low Density 7.0 (RL-7) - Straw Vote 5-1, Ave. & Bushard Density) d, FAR 0.35) Commercial property owner will be dulac, no change to existing Dettloff absent; NOTE: St. Neighborhood required to request zone designation, NOTE: inconsistent with zoning change or general plan inconsistent with Zoning (DM '7) amendment at time of (Straw Vote 5-0) development proposal 53.`' :.Northwest " .OS-G RL - 6.5 LUD'= CZ - ` ; Change from Open Agree with PC, disagree ! Agree with Staff: Retain existing Open Space corner of Pacific .. . "(Open Space ;.(Residential FP2 (Limited Space Conservation with GPAC; retain recommend retain Open Conservation designation: Coast Highway; Low Density, Use Distract, -: to Residential Low existing Open Space Space Conservation.(OS C) (OS-C) = Straw Vote &0; Broaldlurst Conservatlo 6.5 unfac) .; Coastal Zone,:. Density in a portion Conservation designation designation (Straw Vote 4- I)ettlaff absent St. {White Hole n) Fioodplsin) of the White Hole 1} area).:. Area M 22&29) 54. Southwest RM RL - 6.51RH - Magnolia Modify designations Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential corner of (Residential 30 Pacific to reflect existing with GPAC; modify recommend retain existing Medium Density and add Magnolia St. & Medium (Residential Specific Plan and approved land designation and map to Residential Medium Density Specific Plan designation: Hamilton Ave. Density) Low Density, use map designations reflect specific plan 15 dulac designation and (RM-15•SP) - Straw Vote 6- NESI (Aston) 6.5 unfac, to conform to designation add Specific Plan (Straw 0, Dettloff absent site Residential specific plan (MDR- Vote 6-0) High Density, 15) DM 14) 30 unlac 55. ;100';North of ` RL RM:- 15 RMP Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff. Retain existing Residential Yorktown Ave (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Low to with GPAC; retain .recommend retain existing Low Density and add wesf side of Low Medium Manufactured Residential Medium existing Residential Low. Residential Low'Density 7.0 Mobile Home Overlay. Brookhurst St. Density) Density, 15 Home Park) Density, increase in Density designation and dAC designation and add designation: (RL-7 RMP) unlsc) density from 7 to 15 add Mobile Home Mobile Home Overlay Straw Vote 6-0; Dettloff (1)M 6) unlac to reflect Overlay (Straw Vote ti-0) absent existing density of Mobile Home Park City Council adopted 5/13/96 S 16 (glgenp1nlcclndus2) EXI5TIIG' NERAL I[CCENDFRAL AO: PLAr;PEI1TV COUNCIL N5 ACOIAE➢A4\SLOCATION -PLAN IfZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIORECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DFGON 56. 1000' South of CG RM - 15 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Commercial Garfield Ave., (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC; retain recommend retain existing General designation: (CG- west side of General) Medium General) to Residential existing Commercial Commercial General (CG- Fl) - Straw Vote 6-0, Brookhurst St. Density, 15 Medium Density General designation Fl) designation (Straw Dettloff absent unlac) Vote 6-0) (DM 6) S7 i,000 feet south CG RH - 3t1 RH Change from Agree with PC, disagree' Agree with Staff Change from Commercial) v of Atlanta Ave (Commercial (Residential (Residential Commercial General 4Gikh GPAC; do not recommend to designate General to Residential east side of General) High Density, High Density): and Residential > increasedensity to reflect' entire site Residential' Medium Density' Beach Blvd., 36 linfac) Medium.to density bonus, designate ' Medium Density 15 dulac designation (RM-15) - {Breakers RM .. RH Residential High entire site Medium ($tray Vote G O) Straw Vote 6-0, I7ettiaff Develo meat ; :::. P_. ) Residential (.. RH - 30 esidenhai Densit dense y density..:.. Dense Density Residential to absent Medium (Residential High Density) .;increase.from 15 to reflect existing conditions` (DM 14} '' Density) High bensity, 30 dulac 30 un/ac) g. 58. Northwest and CG RMH - 25 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Commercial southwest of (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC; retain recommend retain existing General designation. (CG- Joliet Ave. & General) Medium High General) to Residential existing commercial land Commercial General (CG- F1) - Straw Vote 6-0, Beach Blvd. Density, 25 Medium High Density use designation F1) designation (Straw Dettloff absent un/ac) Vote 6-0) (DM 12) City Council adopted 5113/96 k 17 (g\genpinlccindus2) KQ, ... LDCATIOPI EXlSTIAG PLAN `. DESIG\ATION' GENERALPIXN ADVISORY COMNII"rnE DESIGNATIOV "I5TING ZOfNING .:. - DISCUSSION -. -' - .. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS N PLA.ITI\C CON.tlIS$IOti RECOMMENDATION'S; - CITY COUNCIL -- RECOMMENDATION'S 60. Southeast corner Planned CG - F1 CG Change from Planned Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Planned of Adams Ave. Community (Commercial (Commercial Community to with GPAC; recommend recommend to designate as Community to Mixed Use & Beach Blvd. General, General) Commercial General designation as Mixed Use Mixed Use and add Specific and add Specific Plan (Seabridge Density 0.35 and add Specific Plan Plan (Straw Vote 6-0) designation: (MU-SP) - Specific Plan FAR) Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff area) absent (DM 13) 61 South of Orange RM P. (CN 1) ..: RMH - A Add Public (P) Agree with PC, disagree '' Agree with Staff. Retain existing Residential Ave. between (Residential Public - (Residential designation to reflect with GPAC, add Public.:::recommend retain Medium High Density and 10th St. & 11th Medium underlying ' Medium High scitoollchurch, change (P) designation to Residential Medium High add Public designation: P St' Density) Commerc�si ;;. Density,` from Residential" Residential Medium High density and add Pubhc.'(P) (12MH-25)' StrawVote 6- { I eighborhoo Small Lot Medium.bensity to (25 du/ac) Density to designation (Straw Vote 7 D, Dettioffabsent (DM 12) d, Density Subdistrict} Co mmercial provide consistency 0) 0.35 FAR, Neighborhood and between Zoning and P (RL-22) Residential Low General Plan Public-_` Density underlying i Residential Low Density, 22ud .: 62. Northwest Mixed RMH - 25 - D CGIRMH - A Change from Mixed Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Mixed corner of Acacia Development (Residential (Commercial Development to with GPAC; change to recommend change to Development to Mixed Use Ave. & Main St. Medium High General/ Residential Medium Mixed Use Horizontal - Mixed Use Horizontal Horizontal designation: Density, 2S Residential High Density Fl (FAR 0.35) - 25 du/ac (MH F1-25) designation (MH-FI-25) - Straw Vote } (DM 12) unlac, Design Medium High 4 to reflect existing (Straw Vote 7-0) 6-0, Dettloff absent Overlay) Density, conditions and uses Small Lot Subdistrict) City Council adopted 5/13/96 18 (glgenpinlcc1ndus2) 63, Northwest RM CN .-,F1 D :_ C.G. . Change. from Agree with PC & GPAC, Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Residential ..,; car`ner of 17th .. (Residential (Commercial (Commercial ' Residential Medium..:.provides consistency recommend change to Medium Density. to St. & Olive Ave. Medium Neigbborhoo General) Densit between ironing and Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Density) d, Bensity Commercial General Plan, modify (CN.-F1) designation designation: (CN-F1) - (BM 1©) 0 35 FAR, Neighborhood to boundary line on map (Straw Vofe 6-0) Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff Design reflect "existing >.€ absent ' Overlay) ;:: conditions and usesN. 64. Northwest RM CN - Fl - D CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Medium with GPAC; add Public recommend change to Medium to Residential Orange Ave. & Medium Neighborhoo General) - Density to (P) designation to Residential Medium High Medium High Density and 17th St. (Roger's Density) d, Density Commercial Residential Medium High Density 25 dulac and add add Public designation: P Senior Center) 0.35 FAR, Neighborhood Density (25 dulac) to Public (P) designation (RMH-25) - Straw Vote 6- Design reflect Senior Center and (Straw Vote 6-0) NOTE: 0, Dettloff absent: NOTE: (DM 10) Overlay) city owned land inconsistent with zoning inconsistent with zoning Northeast corner OP (Office MV FS SP .. CO U: Change from Office Agree with PC, disagree ` Agree with Staff. Retain existing , of Yorktown Professional): {Mixed Use (Commercial Professional to Mixed 'with GPAC, retain recommend retain existing Commercial Office and f Ave. &Mau► St ' Vertical, Of ice, Oil lJse Commercial Office Commercial Office (CD remove Specific Plan Density 1 5 Qverlay) (Commerciall..esiden `designation F2)'designation and designat;on (CO;-F2j FAR. [MU] . teal) remove Specific Plan Straw Vote 6 0, Dettloff 0.35 FAR [C], ( ) Straw Vote 6-0 absent 25 dulac) 66. South side of P, P - Q, I, RL - 6-5 RL - 01 Change from Public, Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Public, Yorktown Ave. (Public, (Residential (Residential Quasi -Public, with GPAC; add Public recommend change to Quasi -Public, Institutional between Golden Quasi - Low Density, Low Density, Institutional to (P) designation to Residential Low Density to Residential Low Density West St. & Main Public, 6.5 dulac) Oil Overlay) Residential Low Residential Low Density 7.0 unlac and add Public and add Public St. Institutional) Density and retain maximum 7.0 (P) designation (Straw designation: P (RL-7) - unlac Vote 7-0) Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff (DM 2) absent City Council adopted 5/13/96 14 (glgenp1nlcc1ndus2) EXISTING � G7r\ORAL PLeLl' EXISTING ` GENAD415O ON ERAL RY NO LOCATIPLAN C0;1114IiiTEE ZONING � DISCUSSION DESIGNATIO\ DESIG\ATION' 67, . :11'ortheast i arner RM ' RL - 6-5. .. RL Change from of 17th St:`& {fiesidentral :: :.(Residential (Residential Residential Medium Huntington Ave- Medium I ow Density,: Low Density) Density to Residcntia Density). 6.5 dulac) Low Density, {DM Z) decrease in density from 15 to 6.5 dulac 68.- *NeFthwestt %111�( 1 2'- sp earner a C-r�stsl S (Residen ifil Medium (Ifidustr al- Density &§ $peeifie Plan D--bfit�l MediUM Density to industrial . Clay Ave. Density) FAR, Specifiie gn4ustrialAV -4) AFF REC9-NuMENDATIO,NS. I FIANNRECOMMENDATIONSNCLTYCOUNCIL RF COMM FN RATIONS Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC:. Change from Residential :;: provides consistency recommend change to .. Medium to Residential Low between;Zanmg and' Residential Law Density Density designation, (RL-7)°' General Plan, retain 7.0 7.0 du/sc (Straw Vote?-0) -.StrawVote 6-0, pettloff ' unlac absent . .. it h G PAQ Deleted; change to General No action necessary provides eonsisteney-&M Plan designation has been Zefiing ( previously approved 69. Southeast corner RA1 P RM - IS)...Holi Seacliff Add Public P Agree with PC,'. disagree Agree with Staff Retain existing Residential` afCrystal St. &' (Residential Public - . . Specifte Plan designation to with GPAC, do'not add recommend retain existing Medium:Density and add..... Gaxfield Ave.''- Medium underlying '; (Residential Residential Medium Public (P) retain existing Residential Medium Specific Plan designation: XV Dens Density) . Residential Medium Densit YMCA y (YMCA) Residential Medium Density 15`dulac and add ty RM-15-Sp -Straw Vote (..x ) {DM 2) .., Medium` DensityltV - I)enslty land use Speciek Plan (SP) 6-0, Dettlo#i absent Density 15 1) designation and add' designation {Straw Vote 7- Ix du/X. ac Specific Plan (SP) 0) 70. Northwest IG RM - 15 IGlIL Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Industrial corner of (Industrial (Residential {Industrial Industrial General to with GPAC: do not recommend retain existing General designation: (IG- Huntington St. General) Medium Generall Residential Medium change to Residential Industrial (IG-F2a) Fla) - Straw Vote 6-0, & Clay Ave. Density 15 Industrial Density Medium Density, retain designation (Straw Vote 7- Dettloff absent (Cambro site) dulac) Limited) existing Industrial 0) i designation and modify (DM 2) FAR from F2 (.5) to Fla 4 City Council adopted 5/13/96 20 (glgenpinlcclndus2) ISTING PENERALPIAN EXISTING COUNCIL LOCATION 1 �>S G� ON I' ESD1G O IEE ZONING AISCUSSION STAFFREC�X. Q�1ME;QDATIONS I pRECO EMENDATIONS I� RECONI ENDATIONS 71 Southeast corner. Mixed ` P (MH - F3 - Pacifica Add Public (P) Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff.. Change from Mixed of Delaware Development 30 , SP) Community designation with with GPAC; change to recommend change to:...,.: Development to Mixed Use Ave. & Main St. Public - an Mixed Use M,zed Use and add Mixed Use, add Specific and add SpecifirPlan underlying (Conimercial/Resident:: Specific Plan;°modify Plan (SP) designation and designation: [MLI-SP) (DM 3.§)- x Mixed Use ial} designation to boundary line: on the modify boundary line on Straw; Vote 670, Dettloff forizontal, Y. reflect existing map to reflect enstmg mapao reilei existing area : absent bensity.l 0 conditions and uses area (Straw Vote 6 0 1 abstain) .. FAR,' 30 unlac, Specific Plan 72. Southeast corner Mixed CG - F2 - D CO Change from Mixed Disagree with PC & Disagree with Staff and Change from Mixed of Main St. & Development (Commercial (Commercial Development to GPAC; maintain density GPAC: recommend change Developmentto . Florida Ave. General, Office) Commercial Office at 25 dulac and change to Mixed Use Horizontal, Commercial General with Density 0.5 to Mixed Use decrease density from 25 to Mixed Use Overlay (DM 39) FAR, Design Horizontal, F2 [FAR 15 dulac (Straw Vote 6-0-1 designation: (CG-F2-D- Overlay) 0.51, 30 un/ac, Design abstain) NOTE: MU) - Straw Vote 6-0-1 Overlay inconsistent with zoning abstain <73 North side of RL , P (RL - 6 5) : RL Add Public (P) > Agree with PC & Agree with Staff & GPAC Retain: existing Resideotiai Garfield Ave., (Residential Public (Residcntial designation to GPAC; correct location recommend retain existing Low Density and'add. :east of Gregory Low underlying Law Density) Residential Low on map, retain .`: Residential Low Density Public: designation. P (RL- Lane. Density) Residential Density to identify . maximum 1.6 dulac 7.0 dulac, add Public (P) 7) -Straw Vote 6-0, 1 ow Density churchlschool designation and turrect Dettloff absent (1)M 40) 6.5 dulac location on map (Straw Vote 7-0 74. Northwest RM P (RMH - 25) RMH Add Public (P) Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff & Retain existing Residential corner of (Residential Public - (Residential designation to reduction in density GPAC: recommend retain Medium Density and add Modale Dr. & Medium underlying Medium High Residential lviedium from 25 to 15 dulac, existing Residential Public designation: P (RM- Chapel Lane Density) Residential Density) High Density to agree with GPAC: Medium Density 15 du/ac 15) - Straw Vote 7-0; Medium High identify chureWschool, provides consistency and add Public (P) NOTE: inconsistent with (DM 40) Density 25 increase in density between Zoning and designation NOTE: zoning 3 dulac from 15 to 25 dulac General Plan, correct inconsistent with Zoning location on ma (Straw Vote 7-0 City Council adopted 5/13/96 21 (glgcnpinlcclndus2) Pr LOCAT1av I I, EXISTING PLANZONING DISCUSSION. DESIGNATION . .. ... .... . OF RECOMMENDATIONS �I RECOMMENDATIONS L " RECOMMENDATIONS ONS 75 North side of OS-9 CV Fl. CF -C - CZ . Change front Open Agree with PC,disagree ; Agree with Staff Retain existing Olsen Space Warner Ave , (Open Space : '(Commercial (Community Space Recreation to with GPAC. retain recommend retain existing and add Public designation:' :661 northwest ::. -Recreation] Vlsi0r, ', l acilities Commercial Visitor existing Open Space and Open Space and add Public" P'(OS-P) - Straw Vote Of Warner Ave..::. Density 0.35 Civic Uses,...add Public (P)" " (P) designation (Straw Vote Dettloff absent & Pacific Coast FAR) Coastal Zone) designation s 7 0) : Hi hwa (DM 35) iss 76. North side of RM RL -6.5 R1- CZ Change from Agree with PC & Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Residential Warner Ave., (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium GPAC; provides recommend change to Medium to Residential Low 500' northwest Medium Low Density Low Density, Density to Residential consistency between Residential Low Density Density designation: (RL-7) of Warner Ave. Density) 6.5 du/ac) Coastal Zone) Low Density I Zoning and General 7.0 du/ac (Straw Vote 7-0) - Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff & Pacific Coast Plan, decrease in density absent Highway from 15 to 7 unlac (retain maximum 7.0 (DM 34&35) unlac) 77 Huntington Mixed- RM-15,.Cl2;: Huntington " Change from Mixed Agree with PC, disagree" Agree with Staff. Change from Mixed Harbour Bay Developfilent -.F1- SP Harbour Bay Use to Residential with GPAC. retain recommend retain existing Development 6 Mixed Use Club Specific {Resldential Club S enf- Mediuin Density and Mi ed Use designation Mued. Use and add Specific and add S eclfic Plan Plan Medium : Plan Commercial Regional ''and add Specific. Plan ta' Plan (SP} destgnation deslgnatioo. {MU SP) Density 15 reflect exist g (Straw Vote 7-0} Straw Vate 6-01 llettlofT (DM 34) :;. du/ac, conditions and uses absent Commercial. Regional;' Density 035 FAR, Specific Plan] c" City Council adopted 5/13/96 22 (glgenpinlcc1ndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLANI -- GE\ERAL ADNISORY EXISTING I! PLANNING CONLNUSSIO\ CITY COUNCIL NO, LOCATION PLAY COMMITTEE ZONING jl DISCUSSION 5TAFFRECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS RECO;4MENDATIONS .... DESSGNATIO:V DESIGNATION 78. Southern OS-R (Open RL - 6.5 RL-FP2 Change from Open Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Open Space termination of Space - (Residential (Residential Space Recreation to with GPAC; no change recommend retain Open designation: (OS-P) - Straw Solsa Chica St. Recreation) Low Density Low Density, Residential Low to existing Open Space Space designation (Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent 6.5 dulac) Floodplain) Density designation Vote 4-3) NOTE: new (DM 33) RA -CZ designation is Open Space - (Residential Park (OS-P) Agriculture, Coastal Zone 79 Meadowlark Planned CG, RM - 15, Meadowlark Change from Planned Agree with PC,;:disagreC: Agree with Staff. Change from Planned Specific Plan Community: RL - 6.5 Specific Plan Community to with GPAC: change to reconuaend.change to Community to Mixed Use; area (Commercial Commercial General, ;Mixed Use designation Mixed Use and add.Specifc and add Speei it Plan General, Residential Medium and add Specific Plan..Plan (SP) designation `- designation (MU=SP) (DVi 24) Residential Densitandy (Straw Vote 7-0) Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff.... Medium Residential Low absent Dt nslty`15 Density du/ac, Residential Law Density .. 6.5 dulac) 80. Southwest IG P (I) Public - IL (Industrial Add Public (P) Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Industrial corner of (Industrial underlying Limited) designation to with GPAC: church is recommend retain existing General designation: (I-F2 - McFadden Ave. General) Industrial Industrial designation temporary use, delete Industrial (I-F2) Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff & Product Lane to identify Public (P) designation designation (Straw Vote 7- absent church/school and retain Industrial 0) (DM 18) designation 81 Area bounded Residential RL - 4.5 Ellis Golden Change from Agree with PC;' disagree. Agree with Staff. Retain existing Residential <:: by Ellis Ave., ' Estate; 3 (Residential..West Specific '; Residential Low ;with GPAC; modify recommend retain existing Estate designation: (RL-3 Garfield:.Ave , . dulac, Low Density Plan Density,. 3 unlac to designation to Residential Estate 3 dolac = Straw! Vote 6-O .Dettloff >" Edwards' St , 6S dulac) Residential Low Residential Low Density (Straw Vote'1-0) absent X. Golden West St.;. Density 6.5 dulac 3 unlac (DM 38y (increase in density) City Council adopted 5/13/96 23 (glgenpinlcclndus2) 82. EXISTING 11, UNCIL II ;G€CERLN,GENERAL � EXISTING :.PEtOCAiIOV PLAN.. ZONING DISCUSSION AI5CUSSION DAiIDS S N'N DESIGNATION .. DESIGIATIDy . Northwest of Residential Edwards Ave. & Estate; 4 Garfield St. and dulac and northwest of Open Space- Seapoint St. & Recreation Garfield Ave. 84. 1Northeast of railroad R.O.W. & McFadden Ave. RL - 6.5 Holly Seacliff (Residential Specific Plan Low Density (Residential 6.5 dulac) and Low Density, Open Space- 4 un/ac & Park Open Space) Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential Residential Low with GPAC; do not recommend retain existing Estate and Open Space Density 4 unlac to increase density, modify Residential Estate 4 dulac Park designations: (RL-4, Residential Low designation to and Open Space -Park OS-P) - Straw Vote 6-0, Density 6.5 dulac Residential Low Density designations (Straw Vote 7- DettIoff absent (increase in density) 4 unlac, retain Open 0) and Open Space -Park I Space -Park designation IG CR - F2 - D 1 G {Industrial ?' Change. from Agree. with PC & Agree with Staff & GPAC: (Industrial (Commercial General) Industrial General to GPAC: designate entire '' re commendchange to General) . Regional, " Commercial Pedigo site as. Regional ' Commercial Regional {CR- Density.0 5 Regional :Commercial, expands F2-D) designation [COTE. FAR, Design commercial along inconsistent with zoning Overlay) Edinger corridor Mixed I - F2 - D 11, (Industrial Change from Mixed Agree with PC & Development (Industrial, Limited) Use to Industrial to GPAC; provides Density 0.5 reflect existing consistency between FAR, Design conditions and uses Zoning and General Overlay) Plan 85 North Mined " CO - F4 North :.` Change from Mixed Agree with PC disagree Huntington Development (Commercial Huntington " Use to Commercial with GPAC; retain Center Specific Offices' Center Specific Office to reflect : Mixed Use and add Flan area Density 125 Plan area existing conditions Specific Plan (SP) FAR) and uses (DM IS) 86. Northwest of Mixed CG - F1 Q-IL Change from Mixed Agree with PC, disagree Magnolia St. & Development (Commercial (Qualified, Use to Commercial with GPAC; change to Warner Ave. @ General, Industrial General Industrial (I-FI), Riverbend Dr. Density 0.35 Limited) provides consistency FAR) between Zoning and I•M 27 General Plan Agree with Staff: recommend change to Industrial (1-Fl) designation (Straw Vote 7- 0) Change from Industrial General to Commercial Regional designation: (CR'- F2-D) Straw Yote 6-0, Dettloff absent;. NOTE inconsistent'with zoning Change from Mixed Development to Industrial designation (I-F2-D) - Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent plan { ...b.. �... SP),.' 1 Straw. Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent :,.. Change from Mixed Development to Industrial designation: (I-Fl - Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent City Council adopted 5/13/96 24 (glgenp1nlcc1ndus2) G EN FXIITINI NQ, %OCATIO\ I� DESIGNATION N... ' It DCo I� MNI\G I� DISCUSSIOy �j STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS II PLANNING � RECOMMENDATIONS:::. .: REMMME.\DTIONS 87 1,000, Southeast CG ; .. RH -..30 CG Change from Agree with PC. disagree:.. Agree with Staff: Retain existing Commercial of Garfield Ave: (Commercial (Residential . {Commercial Commercial General with GPAC; eliminate recommend retain existing General "designation: (CG.:: & Beach Bivd.. General) High Density. 'General} fo Residential High Residential node'on Commercial General (CC-" F1} - Straw Vote 6- 30 unlac} Density to create Beach Blvd., retain Fl} designation (straw Vote Dettloff absent (DNi 1) Residential node existing Commercial 7-0) General°designation 88. 1,000' Southwest CG RH - 30 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff. Retain existing Commercial of Beach BIvd. (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC; eliminate recommend retain existing General designation: (CG- & Garfield Ave. General) High Density General) to Residential High Residential node on Commercial General (CG- F1) - Straw Vote 6-0, 30 unlac) Density to create Beach Blvd., retain Fl) designation (Straw Vote Dettloff absent (DM 2) Residential node existing Commercial 7-0) General designation 89 : NortSwest RL RE - 6.5 91 - O -f Change.Residential' Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: f.Clangefrom Residential corner of Palm (Residential :. . (Residential CZtRL :Low Density from 7 with GPAC; designate as I recommend change from Low to Open Space -Park o� City Council adapted 5/13/96 4 25 (glgcnp1nlcc1ndu52) EXISTING .: GE\�.RAI. PLAN . GENERAI. :. ADVISORY EXISTING I PLANNINGCOMAIISSTON CITY.COUS61L NO. � LOCATION II O GATION II b GNATIEE. I ZONING II DISCUSSION j STAFF RECOMMEADATIONS �I RECOMME1DATIONS RECONIME.NDATIONS 90. Northeast corner 1) OS-C MH - F2 - 1) RA-0- Change from Open Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff, Retain existing Open of Beach Blvd. (Open 25 - SP CC - CZ - Space Conservation, with GPAC; retain recommend retain existing Space -Conservation, & Pacific Coast Space- (Mixed Use FP2 Visitor Serving existing designations to designations to be Commercial Visitor and Highway (White Conservatio Horizontal, (Residential Commercial and be consistent with the consistent with the zoning Residential Medium Hole Area) n; 2) VSC Density 0,5 Agriculture, Oil Residential Medium zoning recommendations recommendations made by Density designations: (OS - (Visitor FAR, 25 Overlay, Density to Mixed made by the California the California Coastal C, CV, RM) - Straw Vote (DM 14) Serving dulac, Coastal Use Horizontal Coastal Commission and Commission (Straw Vote 7- 6-0, Dettloff absent Commercial) Specific Conservation, approved by the City 0) 3) & 4) RM Plan) Coastal Zone, Council (Residential Floodplain Medium 2) VSC - Density) CZ - FP2 Visitor Serving Commercial, Coastal Zone, Floodplain 3) MH - CZ - FP2 (Mobile home, Coastal Zone, Floodplain 4) MI-A-O- CZ - FP2 (Industrial Limited, Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone, Floodplain) City Council adopted 5YlV96 26 (glgenpWcc1ndus2) FXTSTIIXG �EXE CE�NF%AL iLANNTNG CO.NLVffSS1ON CITY COUNCIL:::: LOCATIO'N' COMMITTEE NG DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATION'S RFCOMMENDATIONS.., RECOMMENDATIONS ... ..... ... DIESIGNATIO DESIGNATION . ...... . . . 91 Southeast f o Mixed:: RMH. - 3.0 Ort North :Change. from Mixed :: A kce ... disagree iWithN7, dise .. ..... Agree h Staff wit.,:,::. 0 Mix d ... rail road R.O.W. opment (Residential Huntington . :Residential ....Use to esidenti ... ... ..... .... . .... .... with GPA6 change . . ..... . .... anp tq�. commend change to . .... .. . Development to Mixed Use &.405 Frwy�.. ..... ... .... Medium Center 9pecific: Mixe se and a dV add A. d:.:. MixedUsc.an add ped c: fi Plan' ..HighDensiy PI ' Specific Plan Plan ( Pj designation designation- (MU=Sp). . .. ...... ... (DM- 15)',30 dulac (Siraw Vote 7-9): Straw -0, Vote 6 Dettloff ... ..... .... . add Specific Plan t ..... ... .. .. designation .... ...... 92. Southwest RM P (RM -15) RM Add Public (p) Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Retain existing Residential corner of (Residential Public - (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend retain existing Medium Density Newland St. & Medium underlying Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium designation: (RM-15) - Pasco Cir. Density) Residential Density) Density to identify Density designation Density 15 dulac and add Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff (between Slater Medium church/school Public (P) designation absent & Talbert) Density 15 (Straw Vote 7-0) dulac (DM 30) 93:::::. Northwest Phifining J.- F2 - 1) Mt. X. 0 ChangefrOm : Agree with PC disagree Ag ree with Staff, Tom anntng:�:: Changefrom corner of R*rve (Industrial, CCCZ -...FP2..... Plafih:ih:k Reserve to.:. ..with.GPAC; reta.in. recommend retain existing.. Reserve to ODen Soare�- :X . ... Hamilton Ave. ..... . .... Density 0.5 (Industrial Industrial I u� 9a 4i!�xis Ing esignatiopsto 6sikhations; to be Conservation esignation. and Newland St.;': FAR; Design j d Oil, 1impe I . .... �x be c6fisifterit w�tl the te i�onsis. nt with t ezonmg (OS-C) -„Straw Vote 6-0 (Part of White dveflay Overlay, zoning recommendations recomnendatIOns:made bDettloff absent Hale area]Coastal A s: made by the..Califqnia "T.Coastal t Califerni"a . ... ...... . .. ... ...... Coastal t ommission. and . C mmis Sipp (Straw Vote .... MM141 CoastO;�p Pe, City of�*� Floodpl;un Council... . . .. ... .... City CounciI adopted 5113/96 27 (glgenpinlccLadus2j +I EXlsr[1G GENERAL PLAN �I ..�I1I CITY N�AjpDN�� 1ENO LOCATION PLAIN [\DISCUSSION: STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOK DATIOhS DGNIOS1DEAOV.. 94. 1000' Southeast RL P (CG - F1) CGIRA Change from Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Change from Residential of Magnolia St. (Residential Public - (Commercial Residential Low provides consistency recommend change to Low to Commercial & Adams Ave. Low underlying General/ Density to between Zoning and Commercial General (CG- General and add Public Density) Commercial Residential Commercial General General Plan Fl) and add Public (P) designation: P (CG) - (DM 7) General, Agriculture) and add Public (P) designation (Straw Vote 7- Straw Vote 6-0, Dettloff Density 0.35 designation to reflect 0) NOTE: portion of site absent; NOTE: portion of FAR existing (RA) inconsistent with site (RA) inconsistent with Church/School zoning zoning 95. South side of RL Western half PS (Public Semi: 'Change from Agree with PC disagree < Agree with Staff: Retain existing lZesidentiai Talbert Ave.` (Residential - CG - Ft..Public) >; ° Residential,Low with GPAC: remove from recommend reinove from Low Density and ad&.. 300' east 'of Low {Commercial Density to consideration as part of consideration and retain 1?ubhc designation P (RL < ' Beach MY& be: General, Commercial General' the Genera) Plan'update Residential Law Density 7) Stravr Vote b-4, (Crest View Density 0.35 on the west one half and retain existing. and add Public designation Dettloff absent School) FAR), ' . of the site Residential Low Density (Straw Vofe 5-2) NOTE Eastern half designation ort the entire designation is P (RL-7} (DM 40) - RL - 6.5 ;school site add Public':: (Residential {P) designahon Low Density 6 5 dulac) 96. Northeast corner RL P (RL 6.5) RL (Residential Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC; Agree with Staff & GPAC: Retain existing Residential of Springdale St. (Residential Public - Low Density) designation to no change to existing recommend retain existing Low Density and add and Heil Ave. Low underlying identify Residential Low Density Residential Low Density Public designation: P (RL- Density) Residential schoollchurch designation, maintain 7.0 7.0 dulac and add Public 7) - Straw Vote 6-0, (DM 25) Law Density dulac (P) designation (Straw Vote Dettloff absent 6.5 dulac 7-0) Northwest of iG I-F2 IL-H (Limited Modify FAR from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: modify Retain existing Industrial Springdale St. (Industrial (Industrial, Industrial -High F2 (.5) to Fla (.75) with GPAC: modify FAR FAR to Fla (.75) designation: (I-F2a) - Straw and Bolsa Ave. General) Density 0.5 Rise Overlay) to F2a (.75) Vote 6-0, Dettloff absent McDonnell FAR) B:;u las site City Council adopted 5113196 28 (glgenplalcclndus2) 05113196.- City CouncillRedevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 17 Procedure for Reviewing All City Actions for Conformance with the Newly Adopted General Plan Presentation of New General Plan Implementation Programs Regarding Proposed or Amended Ordinances, Programs, and Studies and Discussion of Procedure for Setting Priorities for Implementation Consistency of Newly Adopted General Plan with Existing City Council Goals and Objectives, Financial Goals, Growth Management Element and Ordinance, and Economic Development Strategy Mayor Pro Tempore Bauer spoke regarding a preamble for the General Plan to come back to Council for review. Adjournment - City Council/Redevelopment Agency The Mayor adjourned the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency to Thursday, May 16, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. in Rooms C and D, Central Library, 7111 Talbert Avenue. Said meeting of May 16, 1996 to be continued to Friday, May 17, 1996 at 2:00 p.m. in Rooms C and D, Central Library. ATTEST: 4 � � &4- -�� City Clerk/Clerk Le; Zle 0'G 0 City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, and Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach California p r G�iC' lr�� Mayor/Chairman '300