Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-05-22MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, MAY 22, 1996 - 1:30 P.M. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Herb Fauland STAFF MEMBERS: Jane Madera, Brian James, Laura Phillips, Wayne Carvalho, Mary Beth Broeren, Lisa Koch MINUTES: March 27, 1996 and April 3, 1996 Zoning Administrator meeting minutes approved. ORAL COMMUNICATION: None ITEM 1: VARIANCE NO. 96-4 (JOHNSON PROPERTY) Applicant: Jeff Johnson Request: To permit a 23 foot turning radius (for back up into the alley) in lieu of the required 25 foot turning radius for a recently constructed garage. Location: 730 14th Street (east side of 14th Street between Palm and Crest Avenues) Jane Madera, project planner, stated that in May of 1994 the Zoning Administrator approved a use permit request for a second and third story addition above the garage. The approved plans illustrated a seven (7) foot, six (6) inch setback from a new property line created after a two and one-half (2 1/2) foot alley dedication. It was noted that the property owner obtained the proper building permits and began construction. Subsequently, the project was built with a five (5) foot, six (6) inch setback from the new property line. Since construction, the City's code changed to a five (5) foot setback; thus, the seven (7) foot, six (6) inch setback to the garage wall is no longer required. The turning radius, however, is required to be 25 feet, whereas the project currently has only 23 feet for turning radius. Staff determined that the variance could be supported because the structure on the opposite side of the alley is setback approximately two and one-half (2 1/2) feet from their property line which does afford a 25 foot turning radius. It was noted that when the residence on the opposite side of the alley recycles or building permits are obtained for a new structure, a minimum five (5) foot setback would be required and the minimum 25 foot turning radius would be met at that time. Staff recommended approval of this request. May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 2 Herb Fauland, Zoning Administrator, questioned whether or not the property owner on the opposite side of the alley has dedicated a portion of the alley. Ms. Madera stated that a dedication has not been made. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Jeff Johnson, applicant, was present and requested approval of the application. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. VARIANCE NO.96-4 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AS SUBMITTED WITH THE FINDINGS AS OUTLINED BY STAFF. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - VARIANCE NO. 96-4: 1. The granting of a variance for a 23 foot turning radius in lieu of the required 25 foot turning radius will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification. There are other properties in the area that do not meet the required minimum 25 foot turning radius because of the existing site conditions. 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including location and surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The property across the alley has not yet dedicated two (2) and one-half (1/2) feet towards alley widening; therefore, in order for the subject property to provide the required turning radius, a greater setback would be required. 3. The granting of a variance is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. This variance will allow the recently constructed garage and bedroom addition to remain in its present location. 4. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classification and is consistent with the General Plan. Because there are no structures or physical obstructions within two (2) feet of the property line at the site across the alley, the subject site actually has a true 25 foot turning radius in which to maneuver in. Also, any new construction across the alley would have to comply with dedication and/or setbacks from ultimate right-of-way in which the 25 foot turning radius would be preserved. (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 3 SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - VARIANCE NO. 96-4: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated March 7, 1996, 1996 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. A final building permit for this construction shall be obtained within 60 days of this approval action (by July 2, 1996). INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Variance No. 96-4 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance occurs. ITEM 2: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.96-22 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO.96-6 (PERSONAL COMMUNICATION POLE) Applicant: Susan DeSantis Request: To combine a 56 foot and six (6) inch high personal communication pole with the existing fire station communication pole. The request includes a petition to exceed the maximum height allowed in the Public -Semi Public Zone by five (5) feet and six (6) inches. Location: 19711 Bushard Street (northwest corner of Bushard Street and Cape Cod Drive) Brian James, project planner, stated that this was a request to permit a wireless communication pole at an existing fire station located at the northwest corner of Bushard Street and Cape Cod Drive. The proposed pole is 56 feet, six (6) inches tall and would be placed in the same location as an existing fire communication pole which is approximately 47 feet tall. It was noted that the existing fire communication pole is within the Cape Code Drive public right-of-way. The request includes a petition to exceed the maximum height allowed in the Public -Semi Public Zone by five (5) feet, six (6) inches in order to obtain the needed height for the wireless communication facility. Because the proposed pole and existing pole would be combined, thus reducing clutter, and because the use would provide a needed utility, staff recommended approval of the request. (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 4 Herb Fauland, Zoning Administrator, questioned whether or not staff received any verbal or written communication regarding this request. Mr. James stated that no communication has been received. Mr. Fauland questioned whether or not staff has discussed the need for landscaping. Mr. James stated that the request includes equipment to be located directly in front of the fire station on the existing lawn. -The equipment will be approximately 18 feet from the front property line, where there is existing landscaping (shrubs). Mr. James further stated that the Design Review Board reviewed the request and recommended that there be a landscape plan to help mask the equipment. It was noted that a landscape plan has been included as a condition of approval. Mr. Fauland questioned whether or not the Design Review Board made any recommendation as to the color of the proposed pole. Mr. James stated that the Design Review Board supported the proposed pole as submitted which is a metallic color. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Anne Fox, Representative for the applicant, was present and stated that the proposed pole is streamlined and will not detract from the neighboring areas. Ms. Fox requested approval of this application. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.96-22 / DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO.96-6 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AS SUBMITTED WITH THE FINDINGS AS OUTLINED BY STAFF. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-22 / DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO. 96-6: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 96-22 / Design Review Board No. 96-6 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of the 56 foot six inch high communications pole will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. A similar communications pole, 47 feet high, currently exists in the same location. The proposed communication tower combines the existing tower with the Personal Communications Services antenna. This eliminates the need for a separate tower facility and reduces visual clutter in the neighborhood. There is no known health risk associated with the facility. The proposed tower generates non -ionizing waves at less than 1 microwatt, less than the accepted at risk level of 60,000 microwatts; 2. The granting of 56 foot six inch high communications pole will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. The proposal conforms to the goals and (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 5 policies of the Land Use Element (Section 3.4.2.6.1, Community Facilities, and Section 3.4.2.7.1, Residential Development) by providing utility systems to meet projected demands and by encouraging the rational use of land through the combination of two facilities; 3. The proposed use will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The proposed 56 foot six inch high communications pole is located in the public right-of-way and exceeds the 50 foot height limit for the Public, Semi -Public (PS) zone. The request to exceed the height of the base district by five feet six inches is required to combine two communication facilities into one pole. The combination of two poles is preferable to reduce the visual clutter in the residential neighborhood. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-22 / DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO. 96-6: The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated April 19, 1996 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. The use shall comply with the following: a. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover sheet of all working drawing sets submitted for plancheck. b. Note on plans: "See License Agreement. Per the license agreement, new City equipment, purchased by PBMS, shall be installed on the new monopole. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following plans and items shall be submitted and/or completed by the applicant: a. A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifications described above. b. A Landscape Construction Set submitted to the Department of Public Works. The landscape construction set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which includes all proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size, quantity), irrigation plan, grading plan and approved site plan, and copy of conditions of approval. The landscape plan shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 6 Ordinance. The set must be complete and approved by both Departments of Community Development and Public Works prior to issuance of building permits. c. Obtain an encroachment permit from the Department of Public Works. A copy of the encroachment permit shall be submitted by the applicant to the Department of Community Development for inclusion in the entitlement file. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection/within twelve (12) months. 6. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height, floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has reviewed and approved the proposed changes. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. 4. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the City right-of-way. 5. Construction shall be limited to Monday through Saturday, 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and federal holidays. 6. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 96-22 / Design Review Board No. 96-6 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance occurs. ITEM 3: VARIANCE NO. 96-7 (TRAN ROOM ADDITION) Applicant: Cuong Viet Tran .Request: To allow a 360 square foot room addition to encroach five (5) feet into the required 10 foot exterior side yard setback. Location: 6701 Pimlico Circle (at terminus of cul-de-sac, southeast of Ellis Avenue and Edwards Street) (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 7 Laura Phillips, project planner, requested a one (1) week continuance of this item to allow staff to review code interpretation issues that have arisen. Ms. Phillips stated that she has spoken with the applicant who has agreed to the one (1) week continuance. Herb Fauland stated that he would open the public hearing to allow anyone present to speak on this item. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. THERE WERE NO PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST. THE PUBLIC HEARING SHALL REMAIN OPEN FOR ONE (1) WEEK. VARIANCE NO. 96-7 SHALL BE CONTINUED FOR ONE (1) WEEK TO THE MAY 29, 1996, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MEETING. ITEM 4: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.96-17 (LATTICE FENCE EXTENSION) Applicant: Bo Bottini Request: To permit an eight (8) foot high fence (six [6] feet solid fence plus two [2] feet lattice) to encroach 15 feet into the required front yard setback, along the side property line. Location: 114 Eleventh Street (east side, south of Walnut) Laura Phillips, project planner, stated that the subject fence is located between a single family residence and a motel on Eleventh Street (east side, south of Walnut). It was noted that the subject location is within the Downtown Specific Plan, District 2. Ms. Phillips stated that this application is the result of Code Enforcement activity. The fence extends out to the front property line and consists of a six (6) foot wood fence with two (2) feet of wood lattice at the top. The request is to permit the fence in its existing position. Staff reviewed the request and determined that the concerns of both the motel owner and homeowner could be met by bringing -the fence back four and one-half (4 1/2) feet to the edge of the motel. Staff recommended that 'the plans be modified to show the fence cut back four and one-half (4 1/2) feet from the right -of - 'way to the edge of the motel. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Surendi Barot, property owner of 118 Eleventh Street, was present and stated that he concurred with staffs recommendation to move the fence back to the edge of the motel. Mr. Barot requested, however, that only a six (6) foot high fence be allowed for the first 10 feet in lieu of the existing six (6) foot high fence with two (2) feet of lattice. (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 8 Bo Bottini, applicant, stated that the lattice is necessary for the privacy of the motel guests. Mr. Bottini further stated that he would comply with staffs recommendation to move the fence back four and one-half (4 1/2) feet. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Herb Fauland, Zoning Administrator, stated that a recommendation to remove the lattice would not provide the requested privacy based upon the location of the motel windows. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-17 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AS MODIFIED WITH THE FINDINGS AS OUTLINED BY STAFF. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-17: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 96-17 for the encroachment of an eight (8) foot fence within four and one-half (4 1/2) feet of the front property line will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood because the fence will ensure privacy for the residential unit and allow visibility for the motel sign. 2. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 96-17 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach because it provides for increased compatibility between an adjacent commercial and residential use. 3. The proposed use will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 because the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance allows for such exceptions to fence height within setback areas. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-17: The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated March 25, 1996 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The fence shall be set back four and one-half (4 1/2) feet from the right-of-way (back of sidewalk) to match the building line of the motel. The existing fence and lattice shall be removed in this setback area. 2. The use shall comply with the following: a. Obtain a building permit for any portion of the fence that does not currently have a permit. (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 9 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover sheet of all working drawing sets submitted for plancheck. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following plans and items shall be submitted and/or completed by the applicant: a. A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifications described above. ITEM 5: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-9 (BAILEY RESIDENTIAL ADDITION) Applicant: Robert G. Bailey Request: To permit a remodel and 1,350 square foot second story addition to an existing single family residence. Location: 16591 Peale Lane (Gilbert Island, Huntington Harbor) Wayne Carvalho, project planner, stated that this was a request to permit a remodel and 1,350 square foot second story addition to an existing single family residence. The current floor area is 2,100 square feet. Mr. Carvalho stated that the project complies with every aspect of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. It was noted that a coastal development permit is necessary due to the additional story and because it is a waterfront lot. No written or verbal communication has been received regarding this application. Staff recommended approval of the request. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Jerry Urner, representative of the Huntington Harbor Homeowners Association, was present and stated that the association has not received plans to review. Mr. Urner further stated that he would speak with the subject property owner to request two (2) full size copies of the plans, which is in accordance with the Huntington Harbor Homeowners Association's CC&Rs. Mr. Urner did not foresee any problems with the requested remodel. .Herb Fauland, Zoning Administrator, stated that the proposed remodel appears to be architecturally compatible with the existing structure, complies with the Zoning Code and should not be detrimental to the neighborhood. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE .REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-9 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AS SUBMITTED WITH THE FINDINGS AS OUTLINED BY STAFF. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 10 ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-9: The request to permit the remodel and 1,350 square foot second story addition to an existing single family residence conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the General Plan. The proposed 1,350 square foot two story addition will not impact public views or access. 2. Coastal Development Permit No. 96-9 is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements, the R1 Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. The proposed development will conform with all applicable City codes. 3. At the time of occupancy, the proposed remodel and addition to an existing single family residence will be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the General Plan. All infrastructure currently exist to the site. 4. The proposed remodel and 1,350 square foot two story addition to an existing single family residence conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. No public access or recreational opportunities will be affected by the new construction. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated April 9, 1996 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. The following shall be included on each set of working drawings submitted for plan check: a. The fireplace enclosure wall shall be setback a minimum of three feet (3') from the side property line. (BD) b. Provide new floor area calculation, including stairs, all new deck area, covered porch area, and remodeled area on cover sheet of plans. (BD) All proposed dock and ramp improvements shall require separate permits for the improvements located within the public waterways. 4. All proposed cantilevered deck improvements require separate permits for the improvements. 5. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 11 6. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 7. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height, floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has reviewed and approved the proposed changes. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. Construction hours are from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday -Saturday, excluding Holidays. 4. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 96-9 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. ITEM 6: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.96-15 (TALBERT STORAGE) Applicant: William J. Sullivan, d.b.a. Talbert Storage Request: To re-establish and permit the continued operation of the Talbert Storage facility. Location: 7612 Woodwind Drive (north of Talbert Avenue, east of Gothard Street) Wayne Carvalho, project planner, stated that this was a request to re-establish and permit the continued operation of the Talbert Storage facility. This facility's conditional use permit was originally approved in 1985 by the Planning Commission with an expiration date in 1988. This application is the result of Code Enforcement activity. Mr. Carvalho stated that the Building Division reviewed the request and has recommended handicapped access to the trailer and state required hold-downs. Staff recommended approval of this request with conditions. Such conditions include a masonry wall along the entire perimeter of the project as well as re -surfacing 'the entire site, as recommended by the Fire and Public Works Departments. The applicant has indicated that he plans to sell the subject property within five (5) years and has requested that the (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 12 said conditions be applied only if the site remains operating after the expected five (5) years. Staff concurred with the aforementioned request and recommended that the said conditions be implemented within five (5) years. Herb Fauland, Zoning Administrator, questioned whether or not any written or verbal communication had been received regarding this request. Mr. Carvalho stated that one (1) letter had been received from the property owner of the two (2) encyclopedia lots on the subject parcel, requesting that this item be continued in order for her to speak with the applicant regarding the probable selling of the subject property. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. William Sullivan, applicant, was present and requested approval of the application. Mr. Sullivan stated that he would comply with any conditions of approval. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Herb Fauland, Zoning Administrator, questioned whether or not the applicant would be able to meet code requirements in regard to the number of parking spaces, turnaround, etc. when/if the site is re -surfaced and striped. Mr. Carvalho stated that the applicant would be able to meet code requirements. Mr. Fauland stated that when/if the site is re -surfaced, 10 parking spaces must be provided on -site, as required by the Planning Commission in 1985. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.96-15 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AS SUBMITTED WITH THE FINDINGS AS OUTLINED BY STAFF. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-15: Conditional Use Permit No. 96-15 for the re-establishment, maintenance and operation of an RV Storage facility (Talbert Storage) will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The RV storage use, which has operated on this site since 1985, will continue to operate in the same capacity, and will not create negative impact to the surrounding industrial properties. 2. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 96-15 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. The continued operation of the RV storage facility is consistent with the General Industrial Land Use designation of the General Plan. 3. The proposed use will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. With the conditions imposed, the use will comply (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 13 with and provide the necessary improvements for an RV storage facility, including proper screening and paving surface. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-15: The site plan received and dated March 12, 1996 shall be the conceptually approved layout with modifications as noted on the plan. 2. The property owner shall submit working drawings for the following within 60 days from the date of this approval (by July 22, 1996), and shall receive final building permit approval within 120 days (by Sept. 20, 1996): a. The property owner shall provide handicap access to the office trailer as required by the American Disabilities Act (ADA). (BLDG.) b. Evidence of a proper anchoring system for the office trailer. (BLDG.) 3. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover sheet of all working drawing sets submitted for plancheck. 4. A minimum of ten (10) parking spaces shall be provided for office and customer use at all times. 5. The property owner shall complete the following within five (5) years from the date of this approval (by May 22, 2001): a. Install paving with all-weather material throughout, in compliance with Fire and Public Works Department specifications. b. Erect a minimum six (6) foot high masonry block wall along the perimeter of the property. The existing 15 foot landscaped front setback shall remain; new walls shall be constructed at the 15 foot setback. 6. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height, floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has reviewed and approved the proposed changes. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, Building Division, and Fire Department. (g:za:min:0522) May 22, 1996 Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes Page 14 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 96-15 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance occurs. THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 2:45 P.M. BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 29,1996. Zoning Administrator (g:za:min:0522)