HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-11-18MINUTES
CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
5:00 P.M. - Room B-8
7:00 P.M. - Council Chamber
Huntington Beach, California
Monday, November 18, 1996
A video tape recording of the 7:00 p.m. portion
of this meeting is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
Call To Order
Mayor Sullivan called the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Huntington Beach to order at 5:00 p.m. in Room B-8,
City Council/Redevelopment Agency Roll Call
Present: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Dettloff, Garofalo, (Sullivan arrived at 5:05 p.m.), (Green
arrived during the closed session)
Absent: None
Recess - Closed Session
The Mayor called a recess of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency to consider the
following closed session items:
Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to meet with its
designated representatives, William Osness, Personnel Director, and Daniel Cassidy, Esquire,
Liebert, Cassidy and Frierson, regarding labor relations matters - meet and confer with the
following employee organizations: Marine Safety Officers' Association, Police Officers' Association,
Police Management Association, Municipal Employees' Association, Management Employees'
Organization, Huntington Beach Firefighters' Association, and Surf City Lifesaving Employees'
Association. (120.80)
Closed Session - Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to give
instructions to the agency's negotiators, Michael Uberuaga and David Biggs, regarding negotiations
with J. T. Development concerning the sale/lease of the property located at Third
Block West Project in the Main -Pier Project Area at Main Street, Orange Avenue, Olive Avenue and
Fifth Streets. Instructions will concern price and terms of payment. Subject: Third Block West_
(400.50)
Page 2 - Council/Agency Minutes - 11/18/96
Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c) to confer with its
attorney regarding pending litigation. Based on existing facts and circumstances, the legislative
body of the local agency has decided to initiate or is deciding whether to initiate litigation. Number
of potential cases: 1. Subject: Bus Shelter Advertising (Metro Display). (120.80)
Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to give instructions to
the city's negotiator, Michael Uberuaga, regarding negotiations with Metro Display; Scott Kraft,
President; Tony Ingeneri, Vice President; concerning the lease of the property located at various
public right-of-way bus bench locations throughout Huntington Beach. Instruction will concern price
and terms of payment. Subject: Bus Shelter Advertising (Metro Display), (120.80)
Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its
attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the city is a
party. The title of the litigation is State of California v. SP America, et al. - Orange County Superior
Court Case No. 64 63 39. Subject: American Trader Oil Spill Litigation. (120.80)
Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its
attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the city is a
party. The title of the litigation is City of Huntington Beach v. Donald W. Tosh, et al. - Orange
County Superior Court Case No. 76 96 00. Subject: City v. TLC, Tosh v. City. (120.80)
Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its
attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the city is a
party. The title of the litigation is Municipal Employees Association v. City of Huntington Beach, in
the matter of In Re: Heavy Duty Equipment Operators. Subject: Municipal Employees
Association v_ City of Huntington Beach, in the Matter of In Re: Heavy Duty Equipment
Operators. (120.80)
Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (a) to confer with its
attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the city is a
party. The title of the litigation is Bloom v. City of Huntington Beach - Orange County Superior Court
Case No. 67 13 06 or Fourth District Div. No. G015412. Subject: Bloom v. City of Huntington
Beach. (120.80)
Reconvene
The Mayor reconvened the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency
at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber.
City Council/Redevelopment Agency Roll Call
Present: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo
Absent: None
11/18/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 3
Pledge Of fle lance and Invocation
The Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation were led by Huntington Beach Boy Scout Troop 15.
Scoutmaster David Van Houten
City Council Meeting Dedicated To The MeMory Of Michael Rodgers (120,70)
Mayor Sullivan informed the Council and audience that this meeting would be dedicated to the
memory of Michael Rodgers who recently passed away. Michael Rodgers was a strong community
leader who had resided in Huntington Beach since the 1960's. Due to his vision, over 7,000 senior
citizens are served per month at the Rodgers Senior Center. Mayor Sullivan listed the many other
city and county projects with which Mr. Rodgers had been involved.
Tribute To Councilmember Vic Leipzig
Each Councilmember and the City Administrator spoke regarding the ability, integrity, and
intelligence that Councilman Vic Leipzig has brought to the City Council during his past four years of
service.
Councilman Leipzig expressed his deep appreciation to the wonderful people of Huntington Beach,
his Council colleagues, the professional city staff, the people who have supported him for two
campaigns, and, above all, to his wonderful wife, Lou Ann. Councilman Leipzig stressed the
importance of all the citizens extending respect to the City Council members, whoever they may be.
County Supervisor Jim Silva presented a proclamation from the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Orange to Councilmember Leipzig. Supervisor Silva reminisced about the manner in which he
and Councilman Leipzig have, over the years, worked together.
Tom Livengood, speaking on behalf of the Amigos de Balsa Chica, thanked Councilman Leipzig for
his hard work, significantly the accomplishment of establishing the buffer for the Bolsa Chica linear
park at 50 feet when it had initially been planned for zero.
Adrian Morrison thanked Councilman Leipzig on behalf of her husband and herself for his
contribution to the city. She spoke regarding the knowledge and wisdom he brought to the City
Council. Jessica Morrison stated she is eight years old and has known "Mr. Victor" all her life. She
stated that she had passed out election materials for Councilman Leipzig and is sorry that he did not
get elected. Jessica thanked Councilman Leipzig for his work on the Balsa Chica.
Geary__ or an, Planning Commissioner, spoke regarding his high regard for Councilman Leipzig's
service on the City Council_ He informed Councilman Leipzig that when talking to the city
employees, he had found all, without exception, were sad to see him leave.
BobBiddle, Huntington Beach Tomorrow representative, extended his organization's deep
appreciation for the service that Councilman Leipzig had given to the community.
61101
Page 4 - Council/Agency Minutes - 11/18/96
Phil Smith informed Councilman Leipzig that everyone he knows appreciates Victor Leipzig. He
informed Councilman Leipzig that as his friend, he will be glad to have more of his time now that
Councilman Leipzig is not on the Council.
Councilman Leipzig stated that he believed it was important for the public to try and show at least a
modicum of respect for the very hard work Councilmembers do for the benefit of the community.
Linda Moon stated that the city has and always will be a better city for the service Councilman
Leipzig has given.
Mayor Sullivan, on behalf of the City Council, presented a commemorative plaque to Councilman
Leipzig in appreciation of his city service.
(City Council) Donation Of Funds By James Ackerman For The Completion Of The War
Memorial Honoring Veterans Who Have Given Their Lives For Our Country-(-, -± 5} 6 pp,/p
Mayor Sullivan informed the Council and audience that there is no need to consider his agenda item
requesting appropriation of funds for completion of the war memorial honoring the veterans who
gave their lives for our country as .lames Ackerman, Attorney At Law, has generously donated the
entire $15,000 to make the veterans' memorial a reality.
Recess - Reception For Councilman Leipzig
The Mayor called a recess of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency at 7:50 p.m. and
invited all in attendance to a cake and coffee reception in honor of Councilman Victor Leipzig.
ReconvQnP
The City Council and the Redevelopment Agency were reconvened at 8:20 p.m.
Proclamation
A proclamation was presented by Mayor Sullivan to Dr. Bruce Miller and Marshall Tanner, Stake
Presidents, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Committee for Family Week, proclaiming
the week of November 24-30, 1996 as Family Week in Huntington Beach. A plaque was presented
to Mayor Sullivan and the City Council on behalf of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints,
one of the sponsors of Family Week,
Late Communications Announced By The City Clerk
Pursuant to the Brown Act, the City Clerk announced the following late communications regarding
Agenda Items which had been received following the distribution of the agenda:
602
11/18/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 5
Slide Report dated November 18, 1996 from the City Administrator regarding State Proposition 218
- Potential Impact on the City of Huntington Beach
Communication from Keith Bohr faxed to the City Clerk at 6:24 p.m. on November 18, 1996 in
support of the proposed amendment merger; however, urging the City Council to review the issue of
eminent domain
Request for Council Action from the Community Development Director dated November 13, 1996
recommending the continuance of Mobile Vending Ordinance No. 3345 and Amendment No. 96-4 to
December 16, 1996
Communication dated November 18, 1996 in opposition to the proposed merger/amendment from
Joy Lyn, Bjorn Joffee, and Wayne Reinert
Communication from Jeffrey Oderman, Rutan and Tucker, L. L. P., Law Firm, dated
November 18, 1996 objecting to some of the provisions of the proposed amendment/merger of the
existing redevelopment plans for the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project Areas
Revised Agenda Page No. 10 regarding Correction of Address to 17422 and 17432
Queens Lane
Revised Request for Council Action dated November 18, 1996 from the Economic Development
Department correcting the recommended action to read Queens Lane rather than Koledo Lane
Request for Council Action from Deputy City Administrator dated November 18, 1996 regarding the
addition of Attachment No. 3 and 4 Property Transfer to Edward Sharar - Acceptance of Conditions
in Letter of Agreement - Acceptance of Easement Deed - northwest corner of Bolsa Chica and
Pearce Streets - Inclusion of Map relative to the Request for Council Action
Contract from the Public Works Department for Florida Street and Garfield Avenue traffic signal
which had changed from the May 6, 1996 Council meeting at which it was originally approved by the
City Council. The change is the addition of Section 3 HUD Regulations
Communication from Larry McNeely, resident, dated November 18, 1996, regarding support for a
Citizen Police Commission
Public Comments
Harold Schechter, president of the Council on Aging, thanked the Council for all of their work for the
seniors during the past year. He informed Council that the Council on Aging Board of Directors
planned to continue to live up to and expand the goals set for the Council on Aging by Michael
Rodgers.
603
Page 6 - Council/Agency Minutes - 11/18/96
Bob Kakuk extended his appreciation to the Council, Mrs. Rena Hewitt, the Police Officers'
Association, the Municipal Employees Association, and all the people and businesses that helped in
the fund-raising for the veterans' memorial. He thanked Councilman Garofalo for his help
distributing the fund-raising flyers. Mr. Kakuk thanked Mayor Sullivan for putting him in contact with
Mr. Ackerman who so generously donated the $15,000 necessary to realize the construction.
Mr. Kakuk extended his appreciation to the other veterans' organizations in Huntington Beach for
their assistance.
Gay Shiffman, V.F.W., Huntington Beach Post, thanked the Council, veterans' organizations, and
all the people who helped in the war memorial fund-raising efforts.
Bob Biddle, Huntington Beach Tomorrow representative, congratulated Councilman Harman and
Mayor Sullivan on their re-election and extended his appreciation to Councilman Leipzig for his
service to the city. He then read a document from Huntington Beach Tomorrow titled Resolution
Relative To Civility In Politics signed by the Board of Directors on November 14, 1996. He
presented the resolution to the City Clerk.
Joseph Mastro solo spoke in favor of the agenda item recommending the establishment of a city
police commission. He stated that throughout the community, the government of the city, and every
department in the city, there needs to be a high standard of rectitude. He stated this is particularly
important for the Police Department.
Thomas Lambert spoke in opposition to the establishment of a police commission as supported by
Huntington Beach Tomorrow. He stated his opinion that it is Huntington Beach Tomorrow that
needs to be watched. Mr. Lambert stated that he believes this action by the Mayor is a personal
attempt by the Mayor and Huntington Beach Tomorrow to try and control the Police Department.
Bob Winchell urged City Council approval of the formation of a police commission, stating that
events in the last election have significantly eroded the reputation of the Police Department and the
residents' confidence in members of the Police Department. He suggested that the police
commission be composed of seven members, each appointed by a Councilmember.
Dean Albright presented reasons in support of a police commission, including the unique problems
encountered by a beach city.
David Tamarin invited all to the Huntington Disaster Exposition at the Huntington Beach Mall on
Saturday, December 7, 1996, 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Tom Logan, Citizens Bureau of Investigation representative, spoke regarding State Proposition 218
recently passed by the voters. He read portions of an editorial from the Opinion section of the
Orange County Register dated November 18, 1996 titled Return The Money.
Floyd Phillips read his statement regarding a fund-raiser that his organization held four years ago
that was halted by the Police Department for alleged code violations. He related incidents of what
he believed were inappropriate police behavior by a few overzealous police officers. He requested
Council assistance in this regard_
11/18196 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 7
George Veszpremy spoke regarding the effect of the closing of the Power House Gym in the
downtown area. He requested Council assistance in obtaining a refund of his membership as
traveling to the new Fountain Valley gym location is very inconvenient. Mr. Veszpremy submitted a
petition listing approximately 124 persons with similar concerns.
Councilman Garofalo commented that he believed Mr. Veszpremy should seek legal advice.
Discussion was held between Councilman Garofalo and Community Services Director Hagan
regarding this subject. The City Administrator informed Council that he believed the problem
presented by Mr. Veszpremy is not city related but is probably a private matter.
Nancy_ Cannon thanked the Fire and Police Departments for services well rendered during recent
incidents of a robbery and her fall on the sidewalk. She questioned how the city has got the
reputation of safest city, citing burglaries in her neighborhood. She related how she had tripped on
a sidewalk and that the Department of Public Works had told her it would be two years before they
would get to her area of the city; that the funds that were provided were being used in north
Huntington Beach. She requested that the City Council take a walk along Adams Avenue between
Newland and Magnolia Streets and look at the sidewalks in the tract and also look at the picture in
the City Attorney's Office that shows how the streets are fixed with asphalt. Ms. Cannon requested
that Council review their priorities and ensure that the city's streets and sidewalks are safe.
Steve Gullage, Huntington Beach Mobile Home Owners' Association representative, commended
Councilman Leipzig for his service. He stated that he was very proud of the citizens for electing
Councilmembers Harman and Sullivan. Mr. Gullage stated he was sorry to hear the Police
Association was suing the Mayor over the sign issue. He informed Council that he believes many
good, dedicated police officers have had their images tarnished because of events in the recent
election. Mr. Gullage expressed his opposition to the item placed on the Agenda by Councilman
Garofalo regarding a proposed Council policy to not schedule a Council meeting within two days of
a general municipal election.
Phil Zisakis requested that Council continue the agenda item regarding an agreement between the
City Council/Redevelopment Agency and the Orange County Community Housing Corporation for
the acquisition of property on Queens Lane. He presented his concerns to Council which included
sale of such property to city employees.
(City Council/Redevelopment Agency) Council Committee/Council Liaison Reports
(City Council) Pier Plaza Subcommittee Report Regarding Efforts To Gain Private Sector
Involvement To Construct Pier Plaza - Councilman Dave Garofalo (100.10)
Councilman Garofalo reported on a new law signed by the Governor which allows local
governments to enter into long term agreements with private entities for the study, design,
development, repair, financing, construction, etc. of public facilities. Councilman Garofalo stated
that with Councilman Harman's agreement, he would return this issue to the Council Committee for
further review and analysis. He stated a report would be made to Council regarding any
opportunities for Huntington Beach to gain private sector involvement that might cause the Pier
Plaza project to be more quickly realized.
605
Page 8 - Council/Agency Minutes - 11/18/96
Tenth Annual Economic Outlook Conference - "Moviag To ether Into The 21st Century"- At
The Waterfront Hilton (460-30)
Mayor Pro Tempore Bauer announced the forthcoming Economic Outlook Conference which will
feature business and community leaders and give a view of what is likely to occur in Huntington
Beach in the next few years.
Councilman Garofalo left the meeting.
City Council/Redevelopment Agency) City Administrator's Report
City_Council) Proposition 218 - Potential Impact On City - Staff Report (640.15)
The City Council considered a communication from the City Administrator dated November 7, 1996
transmitting a memorandum from the Administrative Services Director dated October 11, 1996
together with a Preliminary Analysis of the Impact of Proposition 298 on the City dated
October 11, 1996.
Earlier in the meeting, the City Clerk had announced that the following communication on this item
had been provided to the City Council:
Slide Report dated November 18, 1996 from the City Administrator regarding State Proposition 298
- Potential Impact on the City of Huntington Beach
Administrative Services Director Franz presented a slide report. He explained the process for
property related fees and other fees. He reported on the rules relating to when a vote of the
people is required on fees and when a public hearing is required. He reported regarding the
unanswered questions relative to the enactment of Proposition 218.
Mayor Pro Tempore Bauer presented questions regarding Proposition 218 in connection with the
city's sewer fee which had been proposed. He also presented questions regarding the effect of
Proposition 218 on the city water fees and water fund.
Discussion was held between the City Administrator, Administrative Services Director Franz, and
the City Council.
(City Council) Appointment Of Council Committee To Study Advisability „Of Establishing A
Police Commission - (Harman, Sullivan, Dettloff) - Approved - Report To Council In 60 Days
(120.25)
The City Council considered the following item placed on the agenda by Mayor Sullivan which read
as follows:
Huntington Beach is the 92nd largest city in America. Many other larger cities have established
police commissions_ Huntington Beach may or may not be ready for a commission. A City Council
Committee should be appointed to study the issue and report back to the full City Council.
M.
11/18/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 9
Mayor Sullivan presented reasons for his recommendation that a Council committee be appointed to
study the feasibility of establishing a police commission.
Councilman Harman presented reasons why he believed a study is necessary, including events
during the recent election and the need to review alleged police brutality incidents. He spoke
regarding the types of things that could be looked at, including the helicopter program --does the city
need more helicopters or fewer --could the helicopters be privatized. He related an incident over the
weekend whereby a motorcycle officer was in front of his home two days in a row which he felt was
intimidating as he had never seen police presence on his small cul-de-sac street for the past 22
years. Councilman Harman volunteered to serve on the Council committee if the formation is
approved.
Councilman Leipzig stated that he would support such a study; however, he stated his reservations.
He recommended that a study of the Police Department would be helpful for broad policy issues
such as the best way to implement community -oriented policing as he is not as aware of the
workings of the Police Department as he is of other departments in the city. Councilman Leipzig
informed Council that he believes alleged police incidents should be handled with strong discipline
which he believes the city is getting from the Police Chief who has a fine reputation. Councilman
Leipzig stated that if a police commission is formed to investigate alleged misconduct, it would need
to have extensive legal support as there are many laws, including the Police Officer Bill of Rights
and legislation, with which the Police Commission would have to become familiar. He spoke against
tying the formation of a police commission to the campaign activities of the recent past.
Councilman Green advised that the scope, responsibility, and makeup of a police commission
should be closely looked at prior to its formation. Councilman Green stated that he believed staff
should report first on this issue and then a report presented at a study session followed by the
formation of a Council committee. He stated that this is the usual procedure followed.
Councilwoman Dettloff stated that she was in favor of exploring the issue. She stated that the city
has the finest police chief and, overall, the best police officers. She spoke regarding the importance
of the selection process for police commission members and her desire for input from the Police
Chief as well as information from other cities. She also stated that enforcement ability must be
explored.
A motion was made by Sullivan, second Leipzig, to establish a City Council Committee to study
whether or not a citizens' police commission is advisable. The Council Committee is to report back
to the full City Council within 60 days. (Mayor Sullivan stated that he accepted within the motion all
the suggestions made by the Councilmembers on this item). The motion made by Sullivan, second
Leipzig, carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff
NOES: Green
ABSENT: Garofalo
607
Page 10 - Council/Agency Minutes - 11/18/96
(City Council/Redevelopment Aaency) Public Hearing - Joint Public Hearing Of City Council
And Redevelopment Agency On The Proposed Redevelopment Plan For The Huntington
Beach Redevelopment Project - Final Environmental Impact Report No 96-2 And Amendlna
Ordinance No 3343 - Five Existing Redevelopment Projects Areas (Amendment/Merger) -
Resolution No. 279 And Resolution No. 99-100 - Adopted - Joint Meetina Continued To
December 2. 1996 (410.05)
Appearing on the agenda for City Council/Redevelopment Agency consideration was the following
scheduled joint public hearing to consider amendment and merger ("Amend me nt/M erger") of the
existing Redevelopment Plans for the Huntington Center Commercial District, Oakview, Talbert -
Beach, Yorktown -Lake, and Main -Pier Redevelopment Projects ("Existing Plans"), that would
establish the merged Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project Area ("Project Area"), Huntington
Beach Redevelopment Project ("Project") and Redevelopment Plan ("Merged Plan").
If adopted, the Amendment/Merger would: 1. merge the redevelopment plans for the Existing
Plans into the Merged Plan, 2. increase the dollar limit on the cumulative amount of tax increment
revenue the Agency may be allocated from the Project and eliminate all pre-existing annual limits,
3. increase the dollar limit on the amount of indebtedness that may be outstanding at any one time,
4. extend the time frame within which the Agency may incur indebtedness on behalf of the Project,
S. on a selective basis, extend the time frame within which the Agency may employ eminent
domain proceedings on non-residential properties in the Main -Pier and Huntington Center
Commercial District areas and rescind Resolution No. 48, 6. extend the time periods within which
the Agency may undertake redevelopment activities and receive tax increment, and 7. expand the
list of infrastructure and public facility projects that the Agency may undertake within the Project
Area. If adopted, the Merged Plan would allow the Agency to continue to implement activities which
will eliminate and prevent the spread of blight in the Project Area.
The Agency's Report to the City Council on the proposed Amendment/Merger will be presented at
the joint public hearing. The Report includes a Final Environmental Impact Report, the Report and
Recommendations of the Planning Commission, a summary of consultations with affected taxing
agencies, and other documentation required by the Community Redevelopment Law. Interested
persons may inspect the proposed Merged Plan and all other information pertaining thereto at the
Agency's offices at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach.
At the joint public hearing, the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency shall consider all
evidence and testimony for and against the Amendment/Merger. All persons having any objections
to the proposed Amendment/Merger or the regularity of any of the prior proceedings may appear
before the Agency and City Council and show cause why the proposed Amendment/Merger should
not be adopted.
At any time not later than the hour set for the hearing, any person or organization may file a written
statement with the City Clerk of their objections to the proposed Amendment/Merger. Any person or
organization desiring to be heard will be given an opportunity to be heard. At the public hearing, the
City Council and the Redevelopment Agency shall proceed to hear and pass upon all written and
oral objections to the proposed Amendment/Merger in accordance with the procedures of the
California Community Redevelopment Law. The City Council will make written findings in response
to written objections filed at the public hearing prior to adoption of the Amendment/Merger.
11/18/96 -City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes -Page 11
The boundaries and legal description of the boundaries of the Project Area are depicted on Exhibits
to the Request for Council Action dated November 18, 1996.
All Interested Persons are hereby invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit
evidence for or against the action outlined above. If you challenge the City
Council's/Redevelopment Agency's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, at or prior to the public hearing. If there are any further
questions please call the Economic Development Department at (714) 536-5582. Direct your
written communications to the City Clerk.
The City Council/Redevelopment Agency Agenda reflected that a communication in opposition had
been received from J. A. Wiley,
Deputy City Attorney Scott Fields inquired if any City Council/Redevelopment Agency member
owned property in any of the Redevelopment Agency Project Areas. The City Administrator
reported that his residence is in a project area, a fact of which he has previously made a record.
Maps showing the Project Areas were distributed to the City CouncillRedevelopment Agency
members in order for them to answer the question of ownership presented to them by Deputy City
Attorney Fields. The City Council/Redevelopment Agency members replied in the negative relative
to the question of ownership of property in Project Areas.
The meeting of the Redevelopment Agency was called to order
All City Council/Redevelopment Agency members were recorded present except for Councilmember
Garofalo who had left the meeting.
The Mayor/Chairman announced that this was the time and place for a joint public hearing to be
conducted by the City Council and Redevelopment Agency for the purpose of considering the
amendment and merger of the Redevelopment Agency's five existing redevelopment projects.
The Mayor/Chairman asked the City Clerk/Clerk if all of the required notices had been given
concerning the public hearing.
The City Clerk/Clerk affirmed and reported that the Economic Development Department and the
consultant took care of the notices; that her office published the required newspaper notices and the
mailings were done by the Economic Development Department. She responded to the
Mayor/Chairman that Exhibits A and B were in the publication.
Exhibits A and B were accepted in evidence without objection.
The Mayor/Chairman outlined the procedure to be followed.
Economic Development Director Biggs presented the staff report.
The Economic Development Director informed the City Council/Redevelopment Agency of a
typographical error on Section 1102, Page No. 27 of the proposed plan which reflected
$800,000,000 rather than an $850,000,000 cumulative tax increment.
Page 12 - Council/Agency Minutes - 11/18196
Earlier in the meeting, the City Clerk/Clerk had announced that the following communications on this
item had been provided to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency:
Communication from Keith Bohr faxed to the City Clerk/Clerk at 6:24 p.m. on November 18, 1996 in
support of the proposed amendment merger; however, urging the City Council to review the issue of
eminent domain
Communication dated November 18, 1996 in opposition to the proposed merger/amendment from
Joy Lyn, Bjorn Joffee, and Wayne Reinert
Communication from Jeffrey Oderman, Rutan and Tucker, L. L_ P., Law Firm, dated
November 18, 1996 objecting to some of the provisions of the proposed amendment/merger of the
existing redevelopment plans for the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project Areas
Frank Spevacek, Rosenow Spevacek Group representative, summarized the information contained
in the Agency's Report to the City Council.
The Economic Development Director reported that notices of the joint public hearing were mailed to
property owners, tenants, business owners, and affected tax agencies; that 3,722 notices were
mailed on October 15-16, 1996. He further stated that a notice was published in the Huntington
Beach Independent on October 24, October 31, November 7, and November 14, 1996.
Murray Kane, outside Redevelopment Agency legal counsel, announced that staff and consultants
have prepared and distributed certain materials and documents related to the joint public hearing
which include the report to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency concerning the proposed
redevelopment plan for the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project which had earlier been
outlined to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency in depth as well as the proposed redevelopment
plan itself. He introduced the two documents into the record and stated if there were no objections,
these materials would be made part of the record.
The City Clerk/Clerk, at the request of Mr. Kane, entered the following written correspondence
concerning the Redevelopment Plan into the record:
Communication from Jeffrey Oderman, Rutan and Tucker, Law Firm, dated November 18, 1996;
Communication from Public Economics, Incorporated, on behalf of the Coast Community College
District and the County Office of Education received today but dated November 15, 1996;
Communication from Keith Bohr dated November 18, 1996; Communication from Joy Lyn, et al,
dated November 18, 1996
The Mayor/Chairman declared the hearing open.
Jo Christian -Craig stated that she is a residential property owner in the Main -Pier Redevelopment
Project Area. She stated she was speaking specifically regarding the rescinding of Redevelopment
Agency Resolution No. 48.
Discussion ensued regarding Ms. Christian-Craig's desire not to state her address. The
Mayor/Chairman verified that it was his personal knowledge that Ms_ Christian -Craig resided in the
Main -Pier Redevelopment Project Area. Deputy City Attorney Fields stated this was sufficient.
610
11/18/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 13
Ms. Christian -Craig continued with her presentation. She presented reasons in opposition to the
removal of Redevelopment Agency Resolution No. 48. She stated that one's business is just as
important as one's home when it is one's livelihood. She informed the City Council/Redevelopment
Agency that she believes eminent domain is a power that does not have any place in our
government, especially without checks and balances.
Lynn Schang, 533 Lake Street, Huntington Beach, stated he would specifically like to address the
matter of eminent domain. He stated that he believes it is unfair for property owners to be held in
limbo any longer as to whether their property will be targeted by eminent domain. He spoke
regarding the past actions of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency relative to employment of
eminent domain, citing the examples of the Crocker Bank building and Wimpy's. He stated that he
believed if a redevelopment plan is worthwhile, it should not be hard to get two-thirds of the owners
to agree as required by Redevelopment Agency Resolution No. 48. He requested the City
Council/Redevelopment Agency to consider the historical quality and unique character of the
downtown area which is what originally attracted many of the residents to live in the project area.
He stated the historical quality and unique character are being quickly lost and the area is beginning
to look like every place else.
Gloria Treece, 505 Lake Street, Huntington Beach, presented the history of her home which has
been in her family for four generations. She stated her concern that the eminent domain provision
may possibly in the future change and apply to mixed -use residential. She spoke regarding the
amenities she believes need to be in the downtown area, such as bookstores and eating
establishments, which would develop an intimate community. She stated it appears that only the
nightclubs and bars are successful, and there are ten bars now compared to three bars years ago
when the City Council wanted to clean up the downtown area. Ms. Treece urged the City
Council/Redevelopment Agency to consider saving some of the historical pieces that the city has
such as the old bungalows and buildings.
Leia Cha, owner of the Beach Store, 121 Main Street, Huntington Beach, presented the history of
her business' presence in the downtown area and the types of problems she had encountered. She
requested that she not be caused these types of business problems again and that the city handle
the redevelopment issue correctly.
MurrayKane, Redevelopment Agency outside legal counsel, stated that the Redevelopment Agency
has received written communications as detailed by the City Clerk; that under the law, they will be
carefully reviewed and proposed responses prepared for return to the City Council/Redevelopment
Agency at the December 2, 1996 meeting for City Council/Redevelopment Agency consideration_
He recommended that the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council close the public hearing
since the testimony is finished and continue the joint meeting to December 2, 1996, at which time
the City Council/Redevelopment Agency will be requested to consider the responses to the written
communications.
Murray Kane, Redevelopment Agency outside legal counsel, and Economic Development Director
Biggs responded at length to Councilman Bauer's questions regarding the residents' concerns that
eminent domain may be exercised on their residential or residential -mixed properties.
Discussion was held between Economic Development Director Biggs and Councilman Bauer
regarding Councilman Bauer's question relative to the businesses referred to by Ms. Cha.
611
Page 14 - Council/Agency Minutes-11/18196
The City Clerk/Clerk informed the Mayor/Chairman and City Council/Redevelopment Agency
members that earlier in the hearing, she did not have the script when asked if she had the affidavits
of mailing and publication which are marked Exhibits A and B. She stated she believed that the
Exhibits A and B referred to were the newspaper publication that was published four times, of which
there is an Exhibit A and B, which is the map and the legal description. The City Clerk/Clerk stated
she did have what is called the Certificate of Mailing; that also in her office are the four newspaper
affidavits of publication. She informed City Council/Redevelopment Agency members that she
wished to make that clear as a matter of record; that they are not marked Exhibits A and B, but that
she had a Certificate of Mailing and the newspaper publication.
The Mayor/Chairman closed the joint public hearing and continued the joint meeting to consider the
Amendment and Merger to December 2, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber.
A motion was made by Dettloff, second Leipzig, to adopt Redevelopment Agency Resolution
No. 279 - A Resolution Of The Redevelopment Agency Of The City Of Huntington Beach,
California, Certifying That The Final Environmental impact Report (96-2) For The Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Project Has Been Prepared, Circulated And Completed In Compliance With CEQA
And State Guidelines For CEQA And That The Redevelopment Agency Has Reviewed And
Considered The information Contained Therein." The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garofalo
A motion was made by Harman, second Leipzig, to adopt City Council Resolution No. 96-100 - "A
Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Huntington Beach, California, Making Certain
Findings And Determinations Concerning The Final Environmental Impact Report For The
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project, Making Certain Findings Regarding The Environmental
Impacts Of The Proposed Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project, And Adopting A Mitigation
Monitoring Reporting Program And A Statement Of Overriding Considerations." The motion carried
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garofalo
(City Council) Public Hearing - Amendment Of Library Development Fee - Introduction Of
Ordinance No. 3344 - Approved (340.20)
The Mayor announced that this was the meeting set for a public hearing to consider an Amendment
to the Library Development Fee. The Fee is currently imposed on building permits for all new
residential, commercial, and industrial development. The proceeds of the Fee are used exclusively
for Library facilities and related capital improvements.
The purpose of the Amendment is to allow developers to delay payment of the Fee, and in addition,
to clarify and memorialize the City Council's intent that the Library Development Fee will apply to all
new projects.
612
11/18/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 15
Deputy City Attorney Scott Fields presented a staff report
The Mayor declared the public hearing open.
There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or
written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor.
Discussion was held among the Councilmembers, City Administrator, and Deputy City Administrator
Franz regarding the purpose of the Library Development Fee amendment.
A motion was made by Green, second Leipzig, to approve introduction of Ordinance No. 3344 after
reading by title. - "An Ordinance Of The City Of Huntington Beach Amending Ordinance No. 3333
And Chapter 17.66 Of The Huntington Beach Municipal Code Regarding A Library Development
Fee." The motion carried by the following roll tail vote:
AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green
NOES: Bauer
ABSENT: Garofalo
(Cily Council Public Hear' - Code Amendment No. 9 - IntroductiQn Of Ordinance
No. 3345 - Wlol2ile Peddlers and Vendors - Public Hgafing Continued Open To
December 16. 1996 (640.10)
The Mayor announced that this was the meeting set for a public hearing to consider Code
Amendment No. 96-4 - Introduction Of Ordinance No. 3345 - Mobile Peddlers and Vendors.
Applicant: City of Huntington Beach, Department of Community Development
Request: To permit revisions to Chapter 10.40 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code pertaining
to Peddlers and Vendors. The major revisions to the ordinance include standards for horns, time
permitted to conduct business, distance between vending vehicles, restocking requirements,
prohibits overnight parking, regulates lighting, definitions, and other revisions.
Location: Citywide
Project Planner: Michael Strange, Senior Planner
Environmental Status: The above item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Earlier in the meeting, the City Clerk had announced that the following communication on this item
had been provided to the City Council:
Request for Council Action from the Community Development Director dated November 13, 1996
recommending the continuance of Mobile Vending Ordinance No. 3345 and Amendment No. 96-4 to
December 16, 1996
613
Page 16 - Council/Agency Minutes-11118/96
The City Council was informed that the Community Development Department recommended a
continuance of the public hearing to the December 16, 1996 Council meeting_
The Mayor declared the public hearing open.
Discussion was held among Council, staff, City Attorney, and City Clerk regarding matters relating
to whether the hearings should be opened and continued open or whether the hearing should be re -
advertised.
On motion by Green, second Harman, the public hearing on Code Amendment No. 96-4 -
Introduction Of Ordinance No. 3345 - Mobile Peddlers and Vendors was continued open to the
December 16, 1996 Council meeting by unanimous vote.
Consent Calendar - Items Removed
The following items were requested by Councilmembers to be removed from the Consent Calendar
for separate consideration: Repair of Temporary Safety Fence Along Edge of Beach Bluff;
Assistance to City in Filing for State Mandated Cost Reimbursements; Default of Subdivision
Agreement -Tract Nos. 13629 and 13270; and Approval of Loan Agreement with Orange County
Community Housing Corporation.
Consent Calendar - Items Approved
On motion by Green, second Harman, Council approved the following Consent Calendar items as
recommended by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garofalo
(City Council/Redevelopment Agency) Minutes -Approved And Adopted -Approved and
adopted minutes of the Council/Agency regular meetings of September 3, 1996,
September 16, 1996, and October 7, 1996 as written and on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
(City Council) Appropriation Of Funds To Pay Legal Expenses In Conjunction With American!
Trade[ Oil Spill -James Ackerman Attorney At Law -Approved (600.10) -Appropriated
$16,000 to finalize payment of most recent quarterly billing from James Ackerman, Attorney at Law,
for assisting the city in legal matters arising from the American Trader Oil Spill.
(City Council) Agreement Between The City And Simple Green. -A Diy�iion Of Sunshine
Makers. Inc. To -Provide Scholarships In Connection With The Citv's Adont-A-B ch
Program - Approved (600.10) - Approved the Five Year Agreement between the city and Simple
Green for the Adopt -A -Beach Program and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said
agreement. (Term of Agreement November 18, 1996 through April 15, 2001).
614
11/18/96 -City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes -Page 17
(City Council.) Request From PLC Land Company For Traffic Impact Fee Reimbursement
From The City - Extension Of Seapoint Street Between The Surfcrest Project And Pacific
Coast Highway- Tentative Tract No. 14134 - Seacliff Partners - Approved (420.60) 1.
Authorized staff to appropriate $230,918 from the unappropriated traffic impact fee fund balance to
cover reimbursement to PLC Land Company and 2. authorized the Public Works Director to expend
$230,918 to PLC Land Company for reimbursement of the extension of Seapoint Street.
(City Council Superior Court Case No 76-96-00 - City v Tosh/Lewis/Chrigten, TLC Company -
Sunny's Concession And Parking Lot Located On City Operated State Beach - Legal Servi-qgs
Agreement Between City And Kane, BilIlmer & Berkman - Approved (600,10) - Approved and
authorized execution by the Mayor and City Clerk of an Agreement between the city and Kane, Ballmer,
and Berkman, a Law Corporation, relative to the Municipal and Superior Court Case regarding Donald
W. Tosh, et al. v. City of Huntington Beach.
(City Council) Declaration Of Surplus Property - Property Transfer To Edward Sharar -
Acceptance Of Conditions In Letter Of Agreement - Acceptance By Ciity Of Easement Deed -
Northwest Corner Balsa Chica And Pearce Streets - Approved (650.80) - 1. Declared the
parcel AP No. 178-222-13 surplus to the City of Huntington Beach, 2. granted the parcel
AP No. 178-222-13 to Edward C. Sharar and requested the Mayor and City Clerk to execute and
record the document, 3. accepted the conditions contained in the letter agreement dated
March 13, 1996 and executed by Dan Brennan, City Director of Real Estate Services and Mr. E. C.
Sharar, and 4. accepted the Easement Deed AP No. 178-222-14 from Sharar and authorized the
City Clerk to record same with the Orange County Recorder.
(City Council) Bid Award - Traffic Signal Installation At Florida Street And Garfield Avenues -
CC-1026 - C. T. & F., Inc. - Approved (600.55) - 1. Accepted the second low bid submitted by
C. T. & F., Incorporated for the Traffic Signal Installation at Florida Street and Garfield Avenue,
2. approved and authorized execution by the Mayor and the City Clerk of the construction contract
between the city and C. T. & F., Incorporated in the amount of $59,936 for the Traffic Signal
Installation at Florida Street and Garfield Avenue, 3. authorized the Public Works Director to
expend a total of $135,929 which includes the contract cost of $59,936, estimated construction
change orders of $5,993 and $70,000 in anticipated supplemental expenditures, and 4. accepted
and authorized execution by the Mayor and the City Clerk of the Easement Deed between the city
and Hiroyasu Nakano-Marusan, U.S.A.
(City Council) Repair Of Temporary_ Safety Fence Located Along Edge Of Beach Bluff From
Goldenwest Street North To The End Of The State Beach - Operated By The City - Continued
To December 2, 1996 (320-.45)
The City Council considered a communication from the Community Services Department
recommending modification to the Fiscal Year 1996/97 Budget to allocate $5,319 for a service
contract with the rental fence company for repair of the four foot high chain link fence located along
the edge of the bluff from Goldenwest Street north to the end of the state beach.
The Community Services Director presented a staff report. 615
Page 18 - Council/Agency Minutes - 11/18/96
Mayor Pro Tempore Bauer presented reasons why the staff recommended action may not be the
best solution.
The Community Services Director reported at length on the issue.
Further discussion was held regarding aspects of this issue, including cost and liability factors.
The City Administrator recommended that the matter be further studied, including the liability issue
which he wants to consider carefully due to the area's usage.
Mayor Sullivan questioned if signs were erected, would different languages be required to be placed
on said signs.
A motion was made by Harman, second Bauer, to continue the item regarding the modification to
the Fiscal Year 1996/97 Budget to allocate funds for the repair of the temporary safety fence along
the edge of the beach bluff from Goldenwest Street north to the end of the state beach to the
December 2, 1996 Council meeting. The motion carried unanimously_
[City Council) Assistance To City In Filing Claims For State -Mandated Cost Reimbursements
- Agreement - David M. Griffith And Associates, Ltd. - Approved (600.10)
The City Council considered a communication from the Administrative Services Department
recommending approval of an agreement between the city and David M. Griffith and Associates,
Ltd., relative to state mandated costs reimbursements.
Mayor Pro Tempore Bauer requested clarification regarding the item.
Administrative Services Director Franz explained that the state allows reimbursement of certain
state mandated costs, and this consultant assists the city in obtaining the reimbursement.
The City Clerk informed Council that in the last four years approximately $35,000 have been
refunded to the city to cover the costs of agenda preparation and posting.
On motion by Bauer, second Harman, Council approved and authorized execution of an Agreement
Between the City of Huntington Beach and David M. Griffith and Associates, Ltd. for Preparation
and Filing of Claims for State Mandated Cost Reimbursements_ The motion carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garofalo
• •,
11/18/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 19
(City Council)�aglt Of Subdivision Agreement - Apprpved Authorizption For City Attorney
To Proceed With Legal Action - Tract Nos 13629 & 13270 - Pertaining To Improvements On
Ellis Avenue Between Goldenwest And Edwards Streets - David Dahl And Golden Eagle
Insurance Company (420.60)
The City Council considered a communication from the Public Works Department recommending
that Council find Mr. David Dahl in default of Tract Nos. 13269 and 13270 Subdivision Agreement by
failing to comply with certain conditions. Said communication also requested authorization for the
City Attorney to proceed with legal action.
Mayor Pro Tempore Bauer questioned the reason for the length of time required for the city to
initiate action on Mr. Dahl.
The City Engineer reported that this is a new action relating to some of the public improvements that
are not fully funded by the Mello -Roos District and that previously the issue was relative to a lawsuit.
Deputy City Attorney Scott Fields reported on the issue, stating that he believes the subject was a
number of years old.
Mayor Pro Tempore Bauer spoke regarding the need to pursue these issues in a timely and
aggressive fashion.
A motion was made by Bauer, second Leipzig, that the City Council find that Mr. David Dahl is in
default of Tract Nos. 13269 and 13270 Subdivision Agreement by failing to comply with the final
map conditions requiring installation of the Ellis Avenue improvements between Goldenwest and
Edwards Streets, including the completion of the water system; and authorize the City Attorney to
file any and all necessary legal actions against Mr. David Dahl and the bonding company, Golden
Eagle Insurance Company.
Councilman Harman requested information regarding the length of time involved. He stated that
Ellis Avenue has been an unimproved street and for many years had a very dangerous bypass.
The City Administrator stated a report on the matter would be prepared.
Mayor Sullivan spoke regarding the need for the city to get a reputation of being tough by suing for
nonperformance after 30 days.
The motion made by Bauer, second Leipzig, carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green
NOES:
None
ABSENT:
Garofalo
617
Page 20 - Council/Agency Minutes - 11/18/96
(City Council/Redevelopment Agency) Approval QUA Loan Agreement With Orange Countt
Community Housing Corporation (OCCHC) For The Acquisition Of 17422 and 17432 Queens
Lane - Approved (600.30)
The City Council/Redevelopment Agency considered a communication from the Economic
Development Department relative to a Loan Agreement with the Orange County Community
Housing Corporation for the acquisition of property on Queens Lane.
Earlier in the meeting, the City Clerk had announced that the following communications on this item
had been provided to the City Council. -
Revised Agenda Page No. 10 regarding Correction of Address to 17422 and 17432
Queens Lane
Revised Request for Council Action dated November 18, 1996 from the Economic Development
Department correcting the recommended action to read Queens Lane rather than Koledo Lane
Councilmember Green referred to the comments made by Mr. Phil Zisakis earlier in the meeting.
He requested that Council continue this agenda item to December 2, 1996 so that he, Mr. Zisakis,
and the Economic Development Director can meet regarding Mr. Zisakis' concerns.
Economic Development Director Biggs informed Council of a deadline on this issue. He informed
Council that he was prepared to address Mr. Zisakis' concerns at this time.
The Economic Development Director explained that the waiver of insurance is requested only until
the close of escrow. He reported that one of the units approved last year was purchased by a
firefighter and that said purchase had been reviewed by the City Attorney's Office and the Orange
County Community Housing Corporation.
Allen Baldwin, Executive Director, Orange County Community Housing Corporation, reported on the
parties who are purchasing these properties under consideration on to this agenda.
On motion by Green, second Dettloff, the City Council/Redevelopment Agency approved the
following actions:
City CouncillRedevelopment Agency Actions - Approved
1. Authorized execution by the Mayor/Chairman, City Clerk/Clerk, and City Administrator/Executive
Director of a Commitment of Funds Agreement between the City and the Agency for 1995
HOME funds in the amount of $90,800 to the Redevelopment Agency, and
2. Waived the city's insurance requirements for purposes of approving the Agency loan agreement
only. Directed staff to ensure that the minimum insurance requirements are met by OCCHC by
the close of escrow.
• i'
11118/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 21
Redevelopment Agency Actions - Approved
1. Authorized execution by the Agency Chairman and Clerk of a Loan Agreement (Affordable
Housing Agreement) between Orange County Community Housing Corporation (OCCHC) for
$490,000 in HOME Investment Partnership funds for the acquisition and rehabilitation of
17422 and 17432 Queens Lane, and
2. Authorized execution by the Agency Chairman and Clerk of the Regulatory Agreement
(Attachment No. 4 to the Loan Agreement) (Affordable Housing Agreement) between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and OCCHC concerning the acquisition
of 17422 and 17432 Queens Lane and authorized the Clerk to accept Deeds of Trust,
Assignments of Rents, and Security Agreements and record upon direction of the City Attorney.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garofalo
(City Council} "Reimbursement" Resolution No. 96-101 - Adopted - Potential D bt Issue
Relative To Plans To Issue Long Term Debt To_ Finance Portion Of Pier Plaza Pr-oject And
Portion Of Countywide 800 MHz Communications System (330.30)
The City Council considered a communication from Deputy City Administrator Franz relative to city
plans to issue long term debt to finance a portion of the Pier Plaza Project and a portion of the city's
cost for the Countywide 800 MHz Communications System. By adopting a "reimbursement
resolution" now, some eligible costs being paid in advance of the debt issue can be reimbursed from
debt proceeds.
Deputy City Administrator Franz presented a staff report.
A motion was made by Leipzig, second Dettloff, to adopt Resolution No. 96-101 - 'A Resolution Of
The City Council Of The City Of Huntington Beach, California, Declaring Its Intent To Reimburse
Certain Expenditures From Proposed Tax Exempt Financing As Required By United States
Department Of Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2." The motion carried by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garofalo
(City Council} Ordinance No. 3340- Adopted - Pertaining To General Parking Regulations
(640.10)
The City Council considered Ordinance No. 3340 - "An Ordinance Of The City Of Huntington
Beach Amending Chapter 10.40 Of The Huntington Beach Municipal Code Pertaining To General
Parking Regulations. "
619
Page 22 - Council/Agency Minutes-11118196
After a reading by title, on motion by Garofalo, second Dettloff, Ordinance No. 3340 was adopted
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garofalo
(City Council/Redevelopment Agency) Council/Agpocy Agenda Items
Councilman Green informed the Councilmembers that Councilman Garofalo had to leave the
Council meeting to be with his son who was undergoing an operation. Councilman Green requested
that the City Council continue the following two items that Councilman Garofalo had scheduled on
this agenda:
LQty Council) Proposed City Council Policy Regarding Not Scheduling Council Meetings Within Two
Days Of a General Municipal Election - Deferred to December 2. 1996 (120.10)
(City_Council) Interpretation Of Election Results For Advisory Measure J (Assessment For Sports
Facilities) - Measure K (Recreational Facilities At Murdy Community Center) - Measure L
(Recreational Facilities At Huntington Central Park) - Deferred to December 2. 1996 (620.20)
A motion was made by Green, second Leipzig, to approve the continuation of the two items
submitted by Councilmember Garofalo to the meeting of December 2, 1996. The motion carried
unanimously.
(City Council) Appointment Of Pat Stier To The Huntington Beach Fourth Of July Board
Announced (110.20)
Councilmember Green, on behalf of Councilman Garofalo, announced the appointment of Pat Stier
to serve as Councilman Garofalo's appointee to the Huntington Beach Fourth of July Board.
(City Council) Privately Funded Award Program Relative To Arrest And Conviction Of
Perpetrators Of Hate Crimes In Huntington Beach - Appraved (100.10)
The City Council considered a communication from Mayor Pro Tempore Bauer recommending the
establishment of a privately funded reward program relative to the arrest and conviction of
perpetrators of hate crimes in Huntington Beach.
On motion by Bauer, second Dettloff, Council approved the recommendation presented by Mayor
Pro Tempore Bauer to establish a privately funded award program to reward individuals who have
supplied information which has lead to the arrest and conviction of perpetrators of hate crimes in
Huntington Beach. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT., Garofalo
620
11/18/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 23
Adjournment - City Council/Redevelopment Agency
The Mayor adjourned the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Huntington Beach to Monday, November 25, 1996 at 5.00 p.m. in Room B-8, Civic
Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California.
ATTEST:
w City Clerk/Clerk
CityMirk and ex-officio Clerk 6f the City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach,
and Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Huntington Beach, California
G�rts
Mayor/Chairman
621