Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-01-25MINUTES CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADJOURNED MEETING A video tape recording of the 7:00 p.m. portion of this meeting is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. 6:30 P.M. — Room B-8 7:00 P.M. -- Council Chamber Civic Center, 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California Monday January 25, 1999 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Green called the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 6:30 p.m. in Room B-8. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL Present: Julien, Bauer, Garofalo, Green, Dettloff, Harman, Sullivan Absent: None PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEMS There were no persons present to address Council regarding the closed session items scheduled on the agenda. (CITY COUNCIL) MOTION TO RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION — APPROVED (120.80) A motion was made by Bauer, second Harman to recess the City Council to closed session to consider the following items. The motion carried by unanimous vote. Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to meet with its designated representatives William Osness, Personnel Director, and Daniel Cassidy, Esquire, Liebert, Cassidy and Frierson, regarding labor relations matters - meet and confer with the following employee organizations: MSOA, POA, PMA, MEA, MEO, HBFA, and SCLEA. (120.80) RECONVENE IN COUNCIL CHAMBER Mayor Green reconvened the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency in the Council Chamber at 7:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL Present: Julien, Bauer, Garofalo, Green, Dettloff, Harman, Sullivan Absent: None 246 Page 2 - Council/Agency Minutes — 01/25/99 (City Council/Redevelopment Agency) Council Committee/Council Liaison Reports No reports were presented. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Green announced that general public comments are scheduled to be heard following the public hearing on the Meadowlark Specific Plan. PUBLIC HEARINGS — MEADOWLARK DEVELOPMENT Mayor Green announced that this was the time set to consider the following public hearings: (CITY COUNCIL) PUBLIC HEARING — ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 97-41ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-11NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-21 (MEADOWLARK SPECIFIC PLAN) Public hearing to consider the following: Project Applicant: City of Huntington Beach. Project Request: To amend the Meadowlark Specific Plan to: 1. Consolidate and update the current Meadowlark Specific Plan document and the Meadowlark Property Conceptual Master Plan into a single document; modify the Meadowlark Specific Plan to permit single family dwellings on small lots; and incorporate development standards for small lot development within the revised Meadowlark Specific Plan (Zoning Text Amendment); and 2. Update Conceptual Master Plan Exhibit II to reflect a reduction in densities within the residential portion of the Meadowlark Specific Plan; establish the boundaries for four residential planning areas with densities ranging between 9.5 dwelling units per net acre and 13.8 dwelling units per net acre; and incorporate said exhibit within the revised Specific Plan (Zoning Map Amendment). (*) Negative Declaration will also be considered by the City Council. Location: 600 ft. east and north of the Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street intersection. (CITY COUNCIL) APPEAL FILED BY CATTELLUS GROUP TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 154691CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97- 801NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-21 (MEADOWLARK RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Public hearing to consider the following: Project Applicant/Appellant: Bruce D'Eliscu/Catellus Residential Group Project Request: To permit subdivision and development of 48.4 acres with 313 detached single family dwellings on small -lots in conjunction with public park, open space/recreation and infrastructure improvements. Appeal Request: To have the City Council consider Tentative Tract Map No. 15469 - Conditional Use Permit No. 97-80 - Negative Declaration No. 97-21 to ensure that project findings and conditions of approval are in compliance with the proposed amendment(s) to the Meadowlark Specific Plan (Zoning 247 01/25199 — Council/Agency Agenda — Page 3 Text Amendment No. 97-41Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1 — Negative Declaration — No. 97-21. (*) This Negative Declaration will also be considered by the City Council. Location: 600 ft. east and north of the Warner Avenue and Balsa Chica Street intersection. {*) Notice is hereby given that an initial environmental assessment for the above items (Negative Declaration No. 97-21) was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental quality Act. It was determined that the above items, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effect and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department. Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk's Office by staff has been mailed, published and posted. The following communications were also set forth on the City Council Agenda regarding this public hearing and were as follows: Communication From The Director Of Planning Dated January 20, 1999 Titled Meadowlark Overview Memorandum Communication from the Director of Planning transmitting the following attachments: 1. Planning Commission Minute Action Memo dated December 10, 1998; 2. Memo from Planning Commission Chairperson Tom Livengood dated December 8, 1998. 3. Minority Report Memo from Planning Commissioners Ed Kerins and Bob Biddle dated January 21, 1999. Additional Item — Traffic Report Titled Curbside Parking — TT 15469 Huntington Beach from Austin Foust Company Submitted by Catellus Company Assistant City Administrator Fallon presented a staff report titled Meadowlark Staff Report - Huntington Beach City Council -January 25, 1999. She outlined the areas where staff and the developer could not reach an agreement. Senior Planner Scott Hess presented a detailed slide report. The slide report covered subjects including Project Components, Specific Plan Amendment, Development Proposal, Planning Commission Recommendations, Supplemental Communications, Outstanding Issues, Fire Department Critical Response Standards, Current City Standards regarding street widths, and examples of other projects developed in the city. The slide report also contained information from the Public Works Department including Meadowlark Proposed Street Section, on -street parking, Pearce Street connector, information relative to other projects developed in the city, tandem parking, Spine Road, and staff recommendation. The Community Services Department portion of the slide report included information relative to the public park issue; park size, park use, park parking and houses adjacent to the park (police issue). The slide report also covered subjects presented by the Planning Department including community aesthetics — minimal parkway width, minimal sidewalk width, front yard setback reduction and rear year setback reduction. The staff recommendation, and Staff Alternatives Nos. 1 and 2 were also reviewed in the slide report. Page 4 - Council/Agency Minutes — 01125/99 Senior Planner Hess also referred to a large mounted diagram displayed in the Council Chamber. He referred to a communication received from Planning Commissioner Livengood as well as a minority report from Planning Commissioners Porter and Kerins. Fire Chief Dolder reviewed the slide report and presented the Fire Department's concerns relative to this project including fire access problems. He displayed photo slides showing access problems in the city including problems at the St. Augustine project. Photographs of the Beachwalk project were shown to demonstrate streets which do not generally pose a problem. Fire Chief Dolder showed as an example photos of a single-family residential structure fire that occurred on January 18, 1999 showing where there was adequate access for fire response. Fire Chief Dolder responded to Mayor Pro Tern Garofalo's questions regarding street widths and roof types. Public Works Department Principal Engineer Dave Webb continued with the slide report and presented the perspective of the Public Works Department on this project. He displayed photos of streets with inadequate parking including the St. Augustine and Greystone projects. He reviewed the Pearce Street connection and spoke regarding its importance. Other slides were reviewed including slides showing poorly distributed parking in the proposed Meadowlark Development project. Fire Chief Dolder reviewed the portion of the slide report on Summary of Impacts and Staff Recommendation. Fire Chief Dolder reviewed Staff Alternative No. 1 and Staff Alternative No. 2. He informed Council that these alternatives would be suitable for staff and the community. Public Works Department Principal Engineer Dave Webb, at the request of Councilmember Bauer, reviewed the examples of the Beachwalk Development, Greenbriar Development, and Trinidad Island Development. He stated that he could respond to the questions regarding comparisons later in the meeting. Fire Chief Dolder responded to Council's questions regarding the alternatives presented and the recommendations for fire sprinklers which the Fire Department absolutely believes are needed for the alternatives. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Garofalo, Fire Chief Dolder stated that the city of San Clemente requires total sprinkling. He explained how overall fire protection coverage is done in various cities. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Garofalo, Planning Director Zelefsky stated that not all of the dialogue with the developer took place publicly so the Planning Commission had not heard all dialogue presented at this Council meeting. Councilmember Dettloff presented questions to Mr. Webb relative to the slide pertaining to small lot impact on parking. Planning Director Zelefsky clarified the previous question regarding what the Planning Commissioners had heard relative to the project, and he stated that additional information had been provided to Council as a result of the study session held with Council. Planning Director Zelefsky, in response to Councilmember Dettloff, spoke regarding the impact of putting parking on the Spine Road stating that he did not believe it would help on a day-to-day 249 01/25199 — Council/Agency Agenda — Page 5 basis. He stated that there is concern with sight visibility with people trying to pull out from the Spine Road. He stated that the Spine Road does not have direct access to the homes. Community Services Director Hagan reviewed the slide report as it pertains to the proposed public park. He reviewed the developer's proposal and the staff and Community Services Department recommendations. He spoke regarding the issue before Council on the slide relative to whether multi -use fields should be included in the neighborhood park or should sports fields needs be met by off -site improvements at surrounding school and community parks. The reasons for staff and Community Services' recommendations were reviewed by the Community Services Director. The Community Services Director reported on Councilmember Sullivan's questions regarding the possibility that the population projection of 300 children for this project could increase. He stated that probably in the future it could increase to 400-500 children. At the request of Councilmember Bauer, Community Services Director Hagan reported on the in -lieu park fees. He also reported on the feasibility of sports field use. Dave Webb, Public Works Department Principal Engineer, reported on the portion of the slide report regarding parking issues related to the proposed park. He presented a summary of the impact. Senior Planner Scott Hess reported on the portion of the slide report relative to community aesthetics. He reviewed sidewalk issues including pedestrian movement and parkways by the sidewalks as preferred by Urban Design Group (Design Guidelines Consultant) rather than the sidewalk at the curb. He reviewed the recommendations of the staff and Planning Commission and the reasons therefore. Senior Planner Hess stated that two alternatives were presented for Council consideration. Planning Director Zelefsky presented a history of the project and the problems posed by the rigidity of the site plan. He stated reasons why the rules could not be set first for this development prior to the project which had caused frustrations. In response to Councilmember Dettloff, Planning Director Zelefsky reported on the history of the issue relative to the Specific Plan and small lot subject and the fact that the rules were being developed simultaneously with the planning of the project. Planning Director Zelefsky used the development of Holly-Seacliff as an example of a development that was planned under rules already existing which was not able to be done in this project. Councilmember Dettloff questioned the City Attorney relative to the liability factor as it pertains to where staff believes that the proposed plan is not consistent with the General Plan policy. Mayor Pro Tem Garofalo questioned the minutia and detail to which he believes the city holds the developer. He commented on the Fire Department's recommendations including determining street widths through fire sprinkler requirements. Planning Director Zelefsky responded to Councilmember Bauer as to whether the staff felt pressure relative to perhaps a 600-unit project being built if this project is not approved. Discussion was held between Mayor Pro Tem Garofalo and staff regarding issues including the matter of a gated or non -gated community; the status of Pearce Street (public or private). Mayor Pro Tem Garofalo presented questions regarding street width; how the people get to Heil Avenue 250 Page 6 - Council/Agency Minutes — 01125/99 and whether it is wanted to impact a residential community with children with high speed through traffic; and whether the plan would have been for a 40-foot street if the Development Agreement had been based on a residential development. Mayor Green declared the hearing open. RICHARD HARLOW spoke regarding the history of the project including what they believe the current Specific Plan allows, street widths, the Spine Road, Pearce Street connection, which he stated was written as a protection to the adjacent neighborhood. He spoke relative to the project's comparison with the Beachwalk development. He stated that the Beachwalk development is composed of attached units. He referred to the floor mounted charts. At Mayor Pro Tern Garofalo's request, Mr. Harlow stated that he did not recall a level of awareness for fire sprinklers as has been presented tonight at this meeting. In response to Councilmember Sullivan, Richard Harlow reported on Items that are new to the developer including street width. He stated the developer had a wider pedestrian travel lane than at the Beachwalk development. He reviewed the slide report as it pertains to Fire Department access and parking on the Spine Road. Councilmember Harman requested that Mr. Harlow's presentation be shortened. Mr. Harlow stated that Council has a project that is an alternative to attached units. He spoke regarding the attributes of the project. BRUCE LEHMAN, Executive Vice President of Catellus Residential Group, presented a slide report which covered the history of the site, the Development Agreement, the response to city staff, and significant benefits. He reviewed the current 600-unit existing Specific Plan. The slide report included Small Lot examples, Typical Street Scenes -Planning Area No. 2, Concept Plan submitted in October, 1996, and the direction by Planning Commission in July, 1998, the Planning Commission testimony on July 4, 1998 by the Fire Department, negotiated park fees, perceived public safety issues, cumulative changes, and parking including 260 guest parking spaces. Mr. Lehman stated reasons why the development will not have a parking problem. He reviewed tandem parking stating people will park in this manner rather than receive a ticket on a red curb. He reviewed the parking compliance slide. He showed a letter from WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. dated January 22, 1998 as part of the slide report. He referred to the plan in regard to the previous 600-unit plan He stated that the imposition of new untested standards should not be imposed on a new development. Mr. Lehman stated that the imposition of fire sprinklers would make the plan not feasible and that the 500-unit plus plan would have to be used. Mr. Lehman reviewed the Substantial Proposed Changes portion of his slide report and the Planning Commission approved Specific Plan. He stated that it troubled him that tonight's meeting did not focus on a consensus plan. He commented on the Planning Commission Minority Report with which he disagreed and stated it was undeserved. TOM LIVENGOOD, Planning Commissioner, presented a review of the Planning Commission deliberations. He stated that a draft ordinance for Small Lots was done in May, 1998 and questioned where it was. He spoke regarding the requests from various citizens' groups for a smaller park. Mr. Livengood stated that the efforts of Planning Commissioner Phil Inglee and Planning Commissioner Gerald Chapman were a great deal of the reason why the in -lieu park fee negotiated is more than that called for in the ordinance. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Garofalo, 251 01/25/99 — Council/Agency Agenda — Page 7 Planning Commissioner Livengood commented on the fact that the Planning Commission did not receive the barrage from the Fire Department that was provided at this meeting. ROBERT CRONK addressed Council and stated that the Crest View area will have a minus in park acreage in comparison with that planned in the Meadowlark area. He informed Council that a Notice of Intent to Circulate an Initiative Petition had been filed to rezone the Crest View property, He stated that a disservice has been done to the residents of the Crest View area. RON CATT stated that he resides on Old Pirate Lane and that he is now in support of the proposal and in favor of the 2.4 acre park site. DON LUDOLPH, representing AYSO soccer, spoke regarding their needs in this area and stated that they hope that the money derived from the development will stay in that area and that improvement of local fields and lighting at Marina High School could be achieved. MIKE GREEN requested that this be a practice site for sports and that the additional fees be used for Marina High School lighting; also that improvements to local school sites could be made such as at Marine View School through cutting back the excess blacktop area. He requested that the fees be spent on hard construction costs, not design fees. BOB WISSMAN stated that he is also on the board of directors of AYSO. He spoke in support of the in -lieu fees to be paid by Cattelus Group. CHUCK BEAUREGARD, representing Save Our Kids, spoke regarding their preference for a five - acre park site; however, he believes there is a need to look at other alternatives. He spoke in support of the increased payment of in -lieu park fee agreed to by the developer. He thanked people for looking at a small park that can serve a purpose instead of just having rolling hills and a park bench. Mr. Beauregard showed the Park Assessment Study document to the Council and shared his opinion that funds to fix existing fields and parks is money well spent and makes better places to play for our children. EVA WEISZ spoke in favor of the development for reasons including people at her place of business are planning to move to this community. She stated that she strongly recommends a traffic light, not a stop sign, at Pearce Drive and Bolsa Chica and a cul-de-sac at Warner Avenue. She stated her concern that children have access to the park and that the park not be inside a gated community. SALLY GRAHAM stated that she would like the city to take the traffic plans of Moody Circle into consideration relative to what could happen detrimentally at this site. She thanked the staff for an excellent presentation. She stated that at any time of day there are people parking in the fire lanes and that the depictions shown by the Fire Department are accurate. Ms. Graham requested that money for the park not be a determining factor in the approval of this development. GERALD CHAPMAN, Planning Commissioner, stated that Planning Commissioner Inglee presented the proposal for the compromise on the park. He clarified that if Council approves a 3.4 area site the developer will only pay $182,000 in -lieu park fees to the city. He stated that during the Planning Commission meetings a representative from the Community Services Commission only appeared one time. He stated that he is an advocate of fire sprinklers. Mr. Chapman stated that the Fire Department representative had no problems with the street widths going from 28' to 32'; 252 Page 8 - Council/Agency Minutes — 01/25/99 however, there was a conflict at the December 3, 1998 meeting, and the Fire Department representative could not be present. He stated that the way to slow traffic down is to narrow the streets. CHARILEEN COVINA stated that she believes that the developer has complied with all requirements. Ms. Covina stated she has observed the area growing and feels the project would enhance the area. JOHN ERSKINE presented a letter from the Law Offices of Nossaman, Guthner, Knox and Elliott, LLP, dated January 25, 1999, Subject: Cattellus Protest of Excessive Park Fees Imposed Pursuant to Recommended Tentative Tract Map Condition of Approval No. 21Appeal of TTM No. 15469/CUP 97-80. Mr. Erskine referred to a City Attorney communication on this subject. He stated that the conditions to be imposed would require that the CC & Rs (Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions) be submitted that will require the homeowners' association to have a zero tolerance for parking violations. He referred to a communication from WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. dated January 25, 1999 titled Meadowlark Residential Project -Huntington Beach. He distributed this letter to the City Council. He spoke regarding the 5-minute fire response time issue. At the request of Councilmember Dettloff, Mr. Erskine explained the letter of protest referred to earlier in the meeting. He stated that if Council supports the Planning Commission recommendation the letter of protest will be withdrawn. Further discussion was held between Councilmember Dettloff and Mr. Erskine including that the 510-unit project would be presented to the city which had been planned since November when the first negative staff report was presented, At the request of Councilmember Harman, Mr. Erskine spoke regarding how he believes the home owners' association could enforce the parking requirements, stating that the Catellus Group was going to recommend the imposition of another condition which would require immediate towing. He stated that he believed the city could tow and surcharge the homeowners' association and that the developer is willing to write that into the CC & Rs. He stated that this could be made a condition of the conditional use permit. He responded to the WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. communication regarding the chart table which displays the street widths. The City Clerk announced that the following communications were available at her desk: 1. WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. letter dated January 25, 1999 titled Subject: Meadowlark Residential Project — Huntington Beach 2. Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, LLP, Law Offices, communication dated January 25, 1999 titled Catellus Protest of Excessive Park Fees Imposed Pursuant to Recommended Tentative Tract Map Condition of Approval No. 21Appeal of TTM No. 15469/CUP 97-80 The slide report presented by Catellus Residential earlier in the meeting titled The Fine Art of Home Building was provided to the City Clerk after the meeting. DENNIS JARAD stated that he had never seen such an up and down project as this and wonders how it could have occurred. He stated that he has a race track in front of his home on Heil Avenue, and the stop light to be put in by the developer will help. He stated that the park will be used by his six children. He spoke regarding the parking issue. 253 01/25/99 — Council/Agency Agenda — Page 9 There being no further speakers present and there being no further objections either oral or written the hearing was closed by the Mayor. At the request of Councilmember Dettloff, the Fire Chief reported on the Fire Department input through the process including the July 141h Planning Commission meeting which had been mentioned. He stated that the Fire Department has been consistent in their recommendations for sprinklers and parking requirements. He stated that the issue is how do you live in your community with these parking issues. He spoke regarding the alternatives presented which make concessions but make the project possible. Fire Chief Dolder stated that the Meadowlark project as proposed cannot park cars; meet fire standards of response. The Fire Chief responded to Mayor Pro Tern Garofalo that small lot developments are new and from what staff has seen do not seem to be working. A motion was made by Garofalo, second Julien to approve the Planning Commission recommendation as follows: 1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 97-21 with findings and mitigation measures (Attachment Nos. 2 and 3), to the Request for Council Action dated January 25, 1999. ►M 2. Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-04 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-01 for the draft Meadowlark Specific Plan with findings for approval (Attachment No. 2) to the Request for Council Action dated January 25, 1999 with three revisions approved by the Planning Commission on December 3, 1998 (Attachment No. 4) to the Request for Council Action dated January 25, 1999. and 3. Approve Introduction of Ordinance No. 3411 (Attachment No. 1) to the Request for Council Action dated January 25, 1999 - `An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by amending the Meadowlark Specific Plan (Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-04; Zoning Map Amendment No. 97 01)"with minute action changes approved on December 3, 1998 as set forth in the Request for Council Action. Councilmember Sullivan spoke regarding the reasons why he believes there are times when cars cannot be moved when an emergency occurs such as a fire or when a car is on the street and there is no one available to move the car. He stated the drawbacks of depending on parking on the Spine Road. He stated that he believes the parking will be worse than depicted on the Fire Department slide. Councilmember Sullivan stated that Mr. Harlow had not been able to point out any item that had been sprung on the applicant by staff, even when questioned by Councilmember Dettloff. Councilmember Sullivan stated that he has complete confidence in the Fire Department's integrity. Councilmember Dettloff thanked the staff for a very professional job and the Planning Commission for their work. She thanked the developer for an improved project. 254 Page 10 - Council/Agency Minutes — 01125/99 Councilmember Dettloff spoke regarding the proposed development including her agreement with the proposed park plan and parking. She spoke in support of the minimum of six feet of parkway at the sidewalk as recommended by the Planning Commission. Councilmember Dettloff stated she cannot accept the motion on the table because of the Fire Chiefs concerns. She requested that the developer not turn his back on the project if he does not get approval of the project he wants. Councilmember Harman referred to the portion of the slide report which showed the fire on January 18, 1999 at which he was present and had observed. He stated he noticed how much room the fire equipment needed, and he did not believe it could be done with the proposed street widths of this project. He referred to the slide that shows three spaces of parking for 13 homes; he referred to the slide which compared Trinidad Island/Greenbriar/Beachwalk Development relative to parking requirements and the slide which shows not enough parking for the parkway for the trees. He stated that these are some of the problems he has with the project. Councilmember Harman stated that he can live with the small lot project; that this project needs to be tightened up a bit. He stated that he favored the smaller park and that there should not be split conditions on the excess park money relative to spending it all in the two-mile radius of the development. In response to Councilmember Julien, Mr. Lehman, applicant, responded to questions regarding tandem parking, the number of guests parking spaces, and emergency access. He stated that there were additional guest parking spaces around the corner from the parking spaces to which Councilmember Harman had referred. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Garofalo, Mr. Lehman stated he would be compelled to return with his original plan if the staff recommendation is approved. Councilmember Bauer spoke regarding reasons for supporting the Planning Commission recommendation. He spoke regarding the safety concerns. Mayor Green stated that all city staff was in agreement and does not support this project. The motion made by Garofalo, second Julien failed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Julien, Bauer, Garofalo NOES: Green, Harman, Dettloff, Sullivan ABSENT: None A motion was made by Garofalo, second Sullivan to continue the decision on Zoning Text Amendment 97-4, Zoning Map Amendment 97-1, Negative Declaration 97-21-Meadowlark Specific Plan and the Appeal filled by Cattelus Group to the Planning Commission Approval of Tentative Tract Map 15469/Conditional Use Permit 97-801Negative Declaration 97-21 Meadowlark Residential Development to Monday, February 22, 1999 at 5:O0 p.m, in the Council Chamber. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Julien, Bauer, Garofalo, Green, Dettloff NOES: Harman, Sullivan ABSENT: None 255 01/25199 — Council/Agency Agenda —Page 11 ADJOURNMENT - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A motion was made to adjourn the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to Monday, February 1, 1999 at 5:00 p.m., in Room B-8, Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. ATTEST: City Clerk/Clerk / City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach and Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California Mayor/Chairman 256