Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-05-09MINUTES 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2000 STUDY SESSION — 5:15 PM CODE ENFORCEMENT/HOUSING SURVEY —Mike Strange CROSSINGS AT HB (MALL) — Jane lames DESIGN GUIDELINES —Amy Wolfe AGENDA REVIEW — Herb Fauland PUBLIC COMMENTS — None REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California P P P A A P A ROLL CALL: Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Chapman, Biddle, Livengood, Speaker AGENDA APPROVAL Anyone wishing to speak must fill out and submit a form to speak. No action can be taken by the Planning Commission on this date, unless the item is agendized. Any one wishing to speak on items not on tonight's agenda or on non-public hearing items may do so during ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. Speakers on items scheduledforPUBLIC HEARING will be invited to speak during the public hearing. (4 MINUTES PER PERSON, NO DONATING OF TIME TO OTHERS) A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS B-1 RECONSIDERATION OF ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO.99-2/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1/ LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 00-1/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 99-18 (PLC 10 UNIT SUBDIVISION): APPLICANT: PLC Land Company, c/o Bill Holman LOCATION: West side of Edwards Street, approximately 150 feet south of Ellis Avenue (north of Fire Station) PROJECT PLANNER: Wayne Carvalho ♦ Negative Declaration No. 99-18 - Analyze the environmental issues relative to the proposed project. ♦ Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 - Establish Residential Low Density (Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1) zoning on the property. ♦ Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 - Amend the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan by incorporating the subject property within the legal boundaries of the plan. ♦ Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 - To reflect the changes made to the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan and Zoning Map pursuant to Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No 99-2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff s Recommendation: Recommend approval to the City Council of Negative Declaration No. 99-18, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 based upon the following: - Proposed zoning designation, and amendments to the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan and Local Coastal Program are compatible with surrounding zoning designations and uses. - Conforms to the General Plan designation of Estate Residential on the subject property. Commissioner Mandic and Commissioner Livengood stated that they had visited the project site and spoken with the applicant. Commissioner Shomaker and Commissioner Kerins stated that they had visited the project site. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Bill Holman, 23 Corporate Plaza Drive, representing applicant, stated that additional information has been provided the Commission since the last meeting. He stated that Attachment 9.1 of the Staffs report had a chronology of the project's history. He stated he was available to answer questions. Linda Moon, 5861 Liege Drive, Amigos de Bolsa Chica, spoke in opposition to the proposed request stated the proposed project would encroach on the regional park and the wetlands and would provide objectionable views from the park. Connie Warbrick, FANS President, spoke in support of the proposed request stating it would be an improvement to the area. Corrie Broussard, FANS, spoke in support of the request. Carole Ann Wall, FANS, spoke in support of the project stating it would be a beautiful project. Suzanne Buekema, FANS, spoke in support of the request stating it would make an excellent buffer and make the area more attractive. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. PC Minutes — 5/9/00 2 (OOPCM509) 0 Commissioner's Livengood and Mandic stated they would be voting against the proposed project because they wish to see the area as a park and do not have enough evidence that the area has been approved to be residential. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KERINS, SECOND BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 99-18 WITH FINDINGS AND MITIGATION MEASURES, APPROVE THE ANNEXATION OF THE 2.7 ACRE PARCEL INTO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, APPROVE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO.00-1, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO.99-2 AND ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO.00-1 WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins NOES: Mandic, Livengood ABSENT: Chapman, Biddle, Speaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION FAILED A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHOMAKER, SECONDED BY LIVENGOOD, TO DENY NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.99-18 WITH FINDINGS, DENY THE ANNEXATION OF THE 2.7 ACRE PARCEL INTO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, DENY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO.00-1, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO.99-2 AND ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO.00-1 WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Chapman, Biddle, Speaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Commissioner Shomaker and Commissioner Kerins stated that they voted no only to expedite the project to City Council. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 99-18/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO.00-1: 1. The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed residential use will impact views to and from Weider Regional Park. In addition, the proposed project may result in drainage impacts to surrounding properties. 2. The Local Coastal Program amendment to the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program to modify the boundary of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to incorporate the subject property and to establish the RL-1 zoning designation is not consistent with the existing Open Space designation in the County of Orange. PC Minutes — 5/9/00 3 (OOPCM509) FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO.99-2/ ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1: 1. Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 to establish a zoning designation of Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (RL-1) on a 2.7 acre parcel, and to incorporate the subject property into the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan is not compatible with the County of Orange General Agriculture zoning designation and the adjacent Weider Regional Park land use. 2. In the case of a general land use provision, the zoning map and text amendment are not compatible with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for, the zoning district for which it is proposed. The proposed zoning would allow estate residential uses inconsistent with the adjacent open space and public facility land uses. B-2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.99-63NARIANCE NO.99-11/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 99-13 (HASSAN THERD STORY): APPLICANT: Emad Ali Hassan LOCATION: 4461 Los Patos Drive (north of Los Patos, south of Warner) PROJECT PLANNER: Jane James Conditional Use Permit No. 99-63 request: - To allow the third story of an existing single family residence to remain as built in 1985 - Building height (including third floor) is between 30-35 feet as measured from the top of building slab to the peak of the roof Variance No. 99-11 request: - Habitable area above the second story plate line which is not contained within the confines of the roof volume as required by code - Decks and architectural features (bowed windows) as vertical projections above the roof volume with a zero foot setback from the building exterior in lieu of the five foot setback as required by code • Coastal Development Permit No. 99-13 request: - A project within the coastal zone I� PC Minutes — 5/9/00 4 (OOPCM509) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • StafFs Recommendation: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 99-63, Variance No. 99-11, and Coastal Development Permit No. 99-13 based upon the following: - Thirty-four foot high structure is less than maximum 35 foot height limit allowed since 1994 - Unique architecture contributes to diversity of Huntington Beach - No undue traffic, noise, air quality or other adverse environmental impacts - Although third story deck does afford view into adjacent property, same view is available from second story due to grade differential - Compatible with other three story residences - Compatible with General Plan goals, objectives, and policies for Low Density Residential - Variance justified by special circumstances of shape, topography, and surroundings - Variance is not a grant of special privilege as deviations would be considered for other properties with slope constraints - Complies with Coastal Act and Local Coastal Program as project does not inhibit public views or access to coastal resources. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Mr. Hassan, 4461 Los Patos Drive, applicant, gave a history of the proposed request and urged the Planning Commission to approve his request. John S. Roth, 2901 W Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 180, Newport Beach, Attorney for the applicant, urged the Commission to approve the request stating that no material detriment would occur to the neighborhood. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHOMAKER, SECONDED BY ]KERINS, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.99-63, VARIANCE NO.99-11 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 99-13 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Chapman, Biddle, Speaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEOA: The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project involves operation and maintenance of an existing single family residence. PC Minutes — 5/9/00 5 (OOPCM509) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.99-63: Conditional Use Permit No. 99-63 to allow the third story of an existing single family residence to remain as constructed in 1985, to allow third floor habitable floor area, and to allow building height between 3 0-3 5 feet as measured from the top of building slab to the peak of the roof will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The 34 foot high structure is less than the maximum 35 foot building allowed in the Low Density Residential zoning district since 1994, is designed with a unique architecture which contributes to the diversity of the Huntington Beach community, and does not create undue traffic, noise, air quality, or other adverse environmental impacts in the surrounding neighborhood. Although the subject property has a view from the third story onto the property to the west, the same view is available from the second story as a result of the close proximity of the structures to each other and the difference in grade between the two properties. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because it is constructed with stucco and has a tile roof; both features are common in the vicinity. In addition, numerous other three story homes are located within the immediate neighborhood. 3. The proposed request to allow the third story of an existing single family residence to remain as constructed in 1985, to allow third floor habitable floor area, and to allow building height between 3 0-3 5 feet as measured from the top of building slab to the peak of the roof will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, except for the variance to deviate from the third story design standards approved concurrently. The project meets all other aspects of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance in terms of setbacks, building height, parking, and site coverage. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Low Density Residential on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: a. Policy LU 7.1.3: Allow for the continued occupancy, operation, and maintenance of legal uses and structures that exist at the time of the adoption of the General Plan and become non -conforming due to use, density, and/or development requirements. b. Goal LU 9: Achieve the development of a range of housing units that provides for the diverse economic, physical, and social needs of existing and future residents of Huntington Beach. PC Minutes — 5/9/00 6 (OOPCM509) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - VARIANCE NO.99-11: 1. The granting of Variance No. 99-11 to allow habitable area above the second story plate line which is not contained within the confines of the roof volume and to allow decks and architectural features (bowed windows) with a zero foot setback from the building exterior in lieu of a five foot setback will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification. Deviations from the third story design standards for other properties with unique slope conditions would be considered within the Low Density Residential District. Additionally, there are numerous other three story homes in the vicinity that were also constructed prior to adoption of the current code requirements and do not comply with the design regulations in effect at this time. 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including, shape, topography, and surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The topography of the site includes a grade differential of approximately 10 feet, which is atypical within the Low Density Residential zoning district. Designing the structure to follow the contours of the land and retain a comparable structure in terms of size of other properties in the vicinity presents a hardship for the development of the property. 3. The granting of a variance is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The variance is necessary to allow the existing home to remain as constructed in 1985. The project was constructed under different zoning code requirements, which did not include design criteria for location and setbacks of the third story floor area or for windows and decks. A redesign of the existing residence to comply with current code requirements would substantially effect the existing floor plan at considerable cost to the property owner. 4. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classification. Although the adjacent property to the south can be viewed from the third story, the same view is available from the second story of the subject property due to the grade differential. In addition, the structure is compatible with other three story homes in the vicinity. There are numerous other three story homes within the immediate vicinity which were also constructed prior to the current zoning code standards and do not comply with today's third story design criteria. 5. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Low Density Residential on the subject property because the existing and proposed use of the structure is for a single family dwelling. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.99-13: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 99-13 for the development project conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The project is an existing single family residence, which conforms to the General Plan Land Use designation of Residential Low Density. The project will not impact public views or access to coastal resources. PC Minutes — 5/9/00 7 (OOPCM509) 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code except for any variances approved concurrently. The project meets all development regulations for the Low Density Residential zoning district, including building height, setbacks, and site coverage. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. All necessary infrastructure for the proposed development is currently in place and available at the site. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The proposed project will not impact public access to coastal amenities or public recreational opportunities as no access or recreational opportunities currently exist at the site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-63: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated June 4, 1999 shall be the conceptually approved layout. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-63, Variance No. 99-11, and Coastal Development Permit No. 99-13 shall not become effective until the ten calendar day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-63, Variance No. 99-11, and Coastal Development Permit No. 99-13 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is May 20, 2000 or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 99-63, Variance No. 99-11, and Coastal Development Permit No. 99-13, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 5. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $38.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. PC Minutes — 5/9/00 8 (OOPCM509) B-3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.99-68 (VINEYARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH): APPLICANT: Paul Bartley LOCATION: 9291 Banning (north side of Banning, between Bushard and Magnolia) PROJECT PLANNER: Ricky Ramos • Conditional Use Permit No. 99-68 request: - Permit religious services on Sundays from 10 am to 12 noon within an existing 1,595 square foot meeting room as well as Sunday school within two existing classrooms at Eader Elementary School. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff's Recommendation: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 99-68 based upon the following: - It will further General Plan goals, objectives, and policies which encourage providing religious uses that support the needs of existing and future Huntington Beach residents and businesses where they are compatible with adjacent uses. - The project as proposed and modified by the conditions of approval will be compatible with the surroundings and will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. - Adequate parking will be provided pursuant to code. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Jim Wirick, 18406 Basswood Street, Fountain Valley, representing applicant, stated that he concurred with staffs report and recommendation and was available to answer any questions. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY ]KERINS, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.99-68 WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Chapman, Biddle, Speaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEOA: The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, because it involves the operation and leasing of existing structures involving negligible or no expansion of use. PC Minutes — 5/9/00 9 (OOPCM509) Conditional Use Permit No. 99-68 for the establishment, maintenance hool cafeteria and Sunday school religious services within 1,595 square feet of the existing within two existing classrooms will not be dental t theetrimental value alue of the property anthe general welfare of d persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimentale religious improvements in the neighborhood. It will pro rnewfacility to meet on is p oposed. needs of the community. The site is fully improved and no Adequate parking required by code will be provided for the proposed use. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible th sur surrounding uses use because not intense nature. us facilities are commonly found in residential areas.proposedl take place Religious services will only take place on Sundays. Nma or roadways hservices lerefore the traffi uring the rest of the week. The project site is accessible by generated by the religious facility will not impact local residential streets. 3. The proposed use will comply with the provisionch Zonin base and1Subdivision O dstrict and other anance and pplicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Bea g any specific condition required for the proposed a s tAdequate parking would be located. The project is permitted subject to approval of an entitlement. will be provided in compliance with the zoning ordinance. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property which permits religious assembly uses. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: a. LU 9.4 Provide for the inclusion of recreational, institutional, religious, educational and service uses that support resident needs within residential neighborhoods. b. LU 13.1 Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses, such as governmental, administrative, public safety, human service, cultural, educational, religious, and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses. c. LU 13.1.2 Allow for the continuation of existing and development of new religious facilities in any land use zone where they are compatible with adjacent uses and subject to City review and approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.99-68: 1. The site plan and floor plans received and dated April 11, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index. PC Minutes — 5/9/00 10 (00PCM509) b. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) 3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed: a. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including: 1) Fire extinguishers will be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards found in City Specification No. 424. (FD) 2) A fire alarm system will be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code Standards if the maximum occupancy reaches 300 or more. The system will provide manual pull station(s), audible alarms, and smoke detectors. (FD) 3) Address numbers will be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428. (FD) 4) Exit signs and exit path markings will be provided in compliance with the Huntington Beach Fire Code and Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. (FD) 5) Provide a copy of an approved Church Seating Plan to the Fire Department. (FD) b. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. 4. Only the following uses shall be permitted: weekly religious services and Sunday school from 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM only on Sundays. 5. No other uses shall take place at the school concurrent with the religious services without the provision of additional parking in compliance with code. 6. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-68 shall not become effective until the ten calendar day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-68 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is May 20, 2001, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 99-68, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. PC Minutes — 5/9/00 11 (OOPCM509) 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Department, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 5. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $38.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the Court of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department prior to occupying the building. C. CONSENT CALENDAR C-1 'PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED MARCH 28, 2000 A MOTION WAS MADE BY KERINS, SECONDED BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED MARCH 28, 2000 AS SUBMITTED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Chapman, Biddle, Speaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED APRIL 11, 2000 A MOTION WAS MADE BY KERINS, SECONDED BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED APRIL 119 2000 AS SUBMITTED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Chapman, Biddle, Speaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED APRIL 25, 2000 A MOTION WAS MADE BY KERINS, SECONDED BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED APRIL 11, 2000 AS SUBMITTED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Chapman, Biddle, Speaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED PC Minutes — 5/9/00 12 (OOPCM509) D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS None E. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMSANQUIRIES E-1 PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS None E-2 PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES/COMMENTS Commissioner Kerins — asked staff about the status of the memo to City Council from the Planning Commission requesting additional Code Enforcement Officers for the city. Staff stated the memo was in final review. Commissioner Kerins requested that staff prepare a statement or report with a plan for the implementation of the proposed City Wide Design Guidelines. Commissioner Livengood — asked staff if the expansion of the Grace Lutheran Church being presented to the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) was at the existing or off -site location. Staff stated it was the existing location. Commissioner Livengood stated that the Zoning Administrator had approved a conditional use permit to establish beer and wine sales at Rubio's Baja Grill at 19035 Goldenwest Street (Peninsula Marketplace). F. PLANNING ITEMS F-1 CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS FROM PREVIOUS MEETING Scott Hess, Senior Planner — restated actions taken at the previous City Council meeting. F-2 PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Herb Fauland, Senior Planner — reviewed items to be heard at the May 23, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. G. ADJOURNMENT —Adjourn to the May 23, 2000 meeting. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY KERINS, TO ADJOURN TO A 4:30 PM STUDY SESSION ON MAY 23, 2000, AND THEN TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 7:00 PM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Chapman, Biddle, Speaker MOTION PASSED /kjl APPROVED BY: Howard Zelefsky, Secretary PC Minutes — 5/9/00 13 (OOPCM509)