Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-05-23MINUTES LJ HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2000 Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California STUDY SESSION — 4:30 PM DESIGN GUIDELINES —Amy Wolfe DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN (ANNUAL REVIEW) — Wayne Carvalho AGENDA REVIEW — Scott Hess PUBLIC COMMENTS — None REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P A P P P P ROLL CALL: Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Chapman, Biddle, Livengood, Speaker AGENDA APPROVAL Anyone wishing to speak must fill out and submit a farm to speak No action can he taken by the Planning Commission on this date, unless the item is agendized, Any one wishing to speak on items not on tonight's agenda or on non-public hearing items may do so during ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, Speakers on items scheduled orPUBLICHEARING will be invited to speak during the ublic hearin . (4MINUTES PER PERSON, NO DON,4TINCr OF TIME TO OTHERS) A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS B-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-66 (APPEAL) (BRISAS DEL MAR FENCE AND GATES): APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Joyce Gill, Gill Management Company. LOCATION: 409 Utica (northwest corner at Delaware) PROJECT PLANNER: Ricky Ramos • Conditional Use Permit No. 99-66 request: - Construct a six (6) feet high perimeter wrought iron fence and entrance gates within the 15 foot front yard setback (proposed at zero setback) in lieu of a maximum height of 42 inches at the Brisas Del Mar residential complex. • Reason for appeal: - The Zoning Administrator's decision to require the fence to be setback 15 feet behind the perimeter landscaping and at the building setback will not benefit the residents as it will leave their front doors and patio areas open to public access. Staffs Recommendation: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 99-66 with modifications including placing the fence at the minimum 15 feet front yard setback based upon the following: - The project as approved by the Zoning Administrator and modified by conditions will increase security for the Brisas Del Mar complex while maintaining compatibility with the area through an open view wrought iron fence design constructed and painted to be compatible with the residential complex and setback 15 feet behind the perimeter landscaping. - Adequate traffic circulation and emergency access will be maintained. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Joyce Gill, 2872 W. DeVoy Drive, Anaheim, representing applicant, stated that the staff proposed setback was not desirable, as it will leave the patios and front doors accessible, thereby negating the safety factor. Ms. Gill stated that the gates would be placed in 3 places to allow for maximum accessibility by the residents. Linda LaPointe, 409 E. Utica Avenue,A-8, resident stated that the applicant's request for fence placement would deter skateboarding and foot traffic throughout the complex and increase safety. Linda Winslow, 409 Utica, resident, stated that the fence would provide security for the complex and the applicant's proposed setback will allow the residents to enjoy the lawn area. Cristina Griffin, 409 Utica Avenue, C-23, resident, submitted photographs to the Commission stating that the gates will increase security in the complex and the applicant's setback request will allow the residents to enjoy the lawn area. Kathy Peerenboom, 409 Utica #40, resident, stated the gates would add security to the complex and the applicant's setback request will allow the residents to enjoy the lawn area. Kathleen Denney, 409 Utica, #27, resident, stated that the if the fence were to be built at the property line a security problem would still exist at the complex as the patios and doors would be exposed. She also stated that it would not be aesthetically pleasing. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. The Commission stated they would be supporting the applicant's request and would be approving the appeal with the added condition that Public Works review and approve the fencing material. PC Minutes — 5/23/00 2 (OOp=523) A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY KERINS, TO APPROVE THE APPEAL AND APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.99-66 AS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins, Chapman, Biddle, Livengood, Speaker NOES: None ABSENT: Mandic ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA: The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15303, class 3 of the CEQA Guidelines, because it involves the construction of perimeter fencing and gates which are accessories to an existing development. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.99-66: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-66 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of a six (6) feet high perimeter wrought iron fence and entrance gates within the setback area in lieu of a maximum height of 42 inches will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. It will provide increased security and safety to residents of the development. It was reviewed by the Departments of Public Works and Fire and should not negatively impact traffic safety and emergency access. The driveway corner cut-off at the California Street entrance will be provided through the use of open wrought iron fencing and should not be detrimental because of the low traffic volume along California. Pedestrian gates will be included to maintain adequate pedestrian access. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because it will not impact access to other properties in the area. The fence and security gates will be constructed and painted to be compatible with the residential complex. 3. The proposed perimeter wrought iron fence and gates will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The security fence and gates will comply with all applicable requirements, including those of the Fire and Public Works Department. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Residential Medium Density on the subject property which permits the existing residential use and typical accessory structures such as fencing and gates. PC Minutes — 5/23/00 3 (00p=523) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.99-66: 1. The site plan and fence/gate elevations received and dated October 22, 1999 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications to the approval of the Planning Department: a. Pedestrian gates shall be provided along all three street frontages. b. Call box shall be provided for both the vehicular gates (Utica and California) and pedestrian gates along all three street frontages. c. The fence and gate along Utica shall be setback ten feet from the property line in lieu of 12 feet so as not to impact vehicle parking overhang onto the landscape planter. d. The vehicular gate along California Street shall be setback three feet away from the existing parking space on -site. e. A raised island of at least 48 square feet (4 ft x 12 ft recommended) shall be constructed to protect and highlight the call box at the south entrance (Utica). Inbound and outbound truck maneuverability must be maintained with the presence of the island. The design truck shall be an SU-30 (standard moving van or delivery truck). Wheelchair access along Utica Street must also be maintained. If the selected gate control technology allows a resident to open the gate when positioned behind a visitor, then only one inbound lane is necessary. (PW) f. Supplemental outdoor lighting shall be provided for all gate areas (pedestrian and vehicular) The lighting shall utilize energy -saving lamps, shall be directed to prevent spill over onto adjacent properties, and shall not emit glare skyward. (PW) g. The fence shall be powder coated or metallized to prevent rust. 2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index. b. The applicant shall have the security fence and gate plan approved (signed off) by the Fire Department prior to submitting the plan to the Departments of Planning and Building and Safety for permit issuance. c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit a copy of the revised fencing plan pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file to the Planning Department. PC Minutes — 5/23/00 4 (00p=523) 1 b. Submit gated entryway (access control devices) plans to the Planning Department. The gated entryway shall comply with Fire Department Standard No. 403. Prior to the installation of any gates, such plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning, Fire and Public Works Departments. c. Prepare plans and analysis to conform to the Uniform Building Code 1997 edition. Engineering is required for pilasters and fencing foundation. (BD) 4. Prior to final building permit inspection and approval, the following shall be completed: a. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. b. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. c. Building complex address numbers must be unobstructed and shall be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428. (FD) d. Security gates shall be designed to comply with City Specification 403. Show gate width dimensions on plans. The minimum width should indicate a clear unobstructed opening of 24 feet. Knox lock or gate opening systems must be installed on each of the proposed gates. (FD) e. All project pool areas must also have a Knox access installed on entry gates. (FD) 5. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan and elevations are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOURIEMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-66 shall not become effective until the ten calendar day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-66 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 99-66, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. PC Minutes — 5/23/00 5 (00p=523) 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Department shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Department, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $38.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the Coun of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. B-2 CITY-WIDE URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES: APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, Department of Planning. LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT PLANNER: Amy Wolfe The Urban Design Guidelines document is intended to: - Establish design guidelines for single family and multiple family residential, commercial, and industrial uses; - Update the Downtown Design Guidelines; - Establish special consideration commercial guidelines for offices, vehicle dealerships, service stations and car washes, auto repair service, hotel and motels, drive through and drive-in businesses, big -box retail, and mixed use projects; - Provide signage guidelines; - Streetscape guidelines; - Public Art guidelines; and - District Specific Guidelines ♦ Staffs Recommendation: Review and approve the first three chapters of the draft Urban Design Guidelines document, because the proposed guidelines will: - Implement goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan for the orderly development of the City; - Enhance the City's unique identity and character and contribute to a positive City image; - Stimulate investment and strengthen the economic vitality of the City; - Contribute to a positive physical image and identity of the City; - Maintain and protect the value of property; - Maintain a high quality of life by encouraging initiative or innovation in design. PC Minutes — 5/23/00 6 (OOp=523) 11 F-� THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. THERE WERE NO PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED OPEN TO THE DUNE 13, 2000 MEETING. The Commission took straw votes on the first three chapters of the Draft Urban Design Guidelines. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY BIDDLE, TO APPROVE THE STRAW VOTES ON THE FIRST THREE CHAPTERS OF THE DRAFT URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO THE JUNE 13, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins, Chapman, Biddle, Livengood, Speaker NOES: None ABSENT: Mandic ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C. CONSENT CALENDAR C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED MAY 9, 2000 D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS None E. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS E-1 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMITTEE REPORTS None E-2 PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES/COMMENTS Commissioner Kerins — requested that staff respond to a letter received regarding improper use of storage areas at Home Depot. Commissioner Chapman — requested staff to report back on who is responsible for maintaining the landscaping at the Holly Seacliff School and who can enforce the non conformance. Assistant City Attorney stated that unless they are exempt, Code Enforcement should be notified. Staff stated that they would respond back on the issue. PC Minutes — 5/23/00 (OOp=523) Commissioner Biddle — requested that the Commission consider the letter he had sent them _ regarding finding proper areas for SRO's in the Huntington Beach community. The Commission decided they would have a study session on the issue within the next two months. F. PLANNING ITEMS F-1 CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS FROM PREVIOUS MEETING Scott Hess, Principal Planner - restated actions taken at the previous City Council meeting. F-2 PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Scott Hess, Principal Planner - reviewed items for the special Planning Commission Study Session of May 30, 2000 and the regularly scheduled meeting of June 13, 2000. G. ADJOURNMENT —Adjourn to a special May 30, 2000 Study Session at S: 00 PM. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ]KERINS, SECOND BY SPEAKER, TO ADJOURN TO A SPECIAL STUDY SESSION MEETING AT 5:00 PM ON MAY 30, 2000, AND THEN TO THE JUNE 13, 2000 REGULARLY SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION AT 4:30 PM AND MEETING AT 7:00 PM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kerins, Chapman, Biddle, Livengood, Speaker NOES: None ABSENT: Mandic ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED /kjl APPR VED BY: &,=,, 11 z H ward ZeIeUty, Secretary Plannin om ion Chairperson PC Minutes — 5/23/00 8 (00p=523)