HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-09-060
I
0
MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
Room B-6 - Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach California
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2000 - 1:30 P.M.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Mike Strange, Acting
STAFF MEMBER: Ron Santos, Wayne Carvalho, Ricky Ramos
MINUTES: July 12 and Aug 2, 2000 Minutes were continued to the
September 13, 2000 meeting
ORAL COMMUNICATION: None
ITEM 1• COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.00-12 (SCE TANK
DECOMISSIONING)
APPLICANT/
PROPERTY OWNER: Southern California Edison, P.O. Box 800, Rosemead, CA 91770
REQUEST: To permit the demolition of four fuel oil tanks, soil clean-up and site
contouring to predisturbance levels.
LOCATION: 21652 Newland Avenue (between Pacific Coast Highway and the
Orange County Flood Control Channel)
PROJECT PLANNER: Ron Santos
Ron Santos, Staff Planner, displayed project plans stating the location, zoning, existing use, and
purpose of the proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the request based upon the findings
and conditions as outlined in the staff report. One letter was received from the County of Orange,
Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) dated August 31, 2000, expressing concerns as to
the project's potential impact on the facility and recommended conditions thereof.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
Jerry Dominguez, 7333 Bolsa, Westminster, representing the applicant, questioned the
appropriateness of Condition 3.n. concerning improvements on Newland Street given the nature of the
current request.
Danielle Chupa, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Rosemead, representing the applicant, explained the
reason for the proposed request and also expressed opposition to Condition 3.n.
Larry Johnson, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Rosemead, representing the applicant, also questioned
the appropriateness of Condition 3.n.
Mike Strange, Acting Zoning Administrator, stated that Condition 3.n refers to a letter dated
September 23, 1997 from Melanie Fallon to Peter Lersey of SCE notifying SCE of the required
improvements along the Newland Street frontage.
Gail Pickart, Public Works Department staff member, provided an update on the status of the required
improvements on Newland Street.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.00-12 WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFIED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL. HE STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN
TEN (10) WORKING DAYS.
FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA:
The Zoning Administrator finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment
and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Section 15330 of the CEQA Guidelines. The project objective is removal of four fuel oil storage
tanks and associated facilities from the site, as well as any contaminated soil potentially serving as
source material for future groundwater contamination. This action is consistent with the CEQA
exemption for Minor Actions to Prevent, Minimize, Stabilize or Eliminate the Release or Threat of
Hazardous Waste or Hazardous Substances. The project, as conditioned, incorporates measures
designed to ensure no significant effect on the environment.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-12:
1. Coastal Development Permit No. 00-12 as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with
applicable provisions of the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The proposed
demolition project will be consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan and
Local Coastal Program:
a. LCP Section 4.2.1: Oil pumps, tanks and pipelines are located throughout the coastal zone
and are often incongruous in recreation and visitor -oriented areas. Goal (LCP Section 4.3):
Improvement of the scenic and visual .qualities of Pacific Coast Highway and other coastal
areas.
b. LCP Section 7.2.3(3): Aesthetics — Some energy facilities impose adverse visual impacts in the
coastal zone. The City is investigating techniques such as buffering, fencing, landscaping and
plantings to improve aesthetic compatibility between energy facilities and other uses.
c. Goal UD 2: Protect and enhance the City's public coastal views and oceanside character and
screen any uses that detract from the City's character.
ZA Minutes — 09/06/00 2 (OOZM0906)
j
d. Objective UD 2.2: Minimize the visual impacts of oil production facilities and other utilities
where they encroach upon view corridors or are visually incompatible with their surroundings
uses.
e. Policy UD 2.2.2: Require the removal of non -productive oil facilities and other utilities and
the restoration of the vacated site.
2. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the
base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. A public
hearing and provision of notice prior to public hearing has occurred in accordance with the
requirements of the CZ Overlay District. Adopted conditions of approval ensure compliance with
all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, including those pertaining to landscaping, grading,
construction hours, soil remediation, and property maintenance.
The proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with
the Local Coastal Program. The project site is located in an urbanized area with all services and
facilities available.
4. The project conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the
California Coastal Act. The project will not impede public access nor impact public views to
coastal resources.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.00-12:
1. The project shall occur in accordance with the project description and plans received and dated
June 29, 2000, except as modified by conditions of approval contained herein.
2. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the following shall be completed:
a. The applicant shall follow all procedural requirements and regulations of the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and any other local, state, or federal law regarding
the removal and disposal of any hazardous material including asbestos, lead, and PCB's. These
requirements include but are not limited to: survey, identification of removal methods,
containment measures, use and treatment of water, proper truck hauling, disposal procedures,
and proper notification to any and all involved agencies.
b. The applicant shall complete all Notification requirements of the South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
c. The City of Huntington Beach shall receive written verification from the South Coast Air
Quality Management District that the Notification procedures have been completed.
d. The developer shall coordinate with the Department of Public Works, in developing a truck
haul route if the import or export of material is required. This plan shall include the
approximate number of truck trips and proposed truck haul routes. It shall specify the hours in
which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction related impacts to
adjacent residents. These plans must be submitted for approval to the Department of Public
Works. (PW)
ZA Minutes — 09/06/00 3 (OOZM0906)
e. The applicant shall disclose the method of demolition on the demolition permit application for
review and approval by the Building and Safety Director. (BD)
f. A decomissioning work plan shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to
any site activity. Specific items of interest are site safety, emergency call and response,
confined space entry, hot work, transport, site security, contractor information, project
meetings and education, permits and guidelines. (FD)
g. All pertinent City, County, and State permits regarding this demolition shall be obtained prior
to application for a Fire Department permit (welding and cutting; flammable and combustible
liquid handling). (FD)
h. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing
sets used for issuance of demolition and grading permits and shall be referenced in the index.
3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed:
a. A Grading Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department
of Public Works for review and approval. (PW)
b. The applicant shall provide an on and off -site hydrology and hydraulic study as required by the
Department of Public Works. (PW)
c. The drainage area between area "A' and area `B" shall be conveyed to the 18-inch RCP (This
area currently outlets onto Edison Avenue). (PW)
d. In accordance with NPDES requirements, a "Water Quality Management Plan" shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil or Environmental Engineer. (PW)
e. Grading plans shall be submitted to the Orange County Public Facilities and Resources
Department (OCPF&RD) for review and approval relative to the proposed drainage outlet into
the flood control channel. (PW)
f. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and
approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set
shall include a landscape plan which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all
existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant
materials; an irrigation plan; a grading plan; an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement
conditions of approval.
The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision
Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. Existing mature trees that are to be removed
must be replaced at a two for one ratio with a 36-inch box tree or palm equivalent. Applicant
shall provide a consulting arborist report on all the existing trees. Said report shall quantify,
identify, size and analyze the health of the existing trees. (Code Requirement)
g. A remediation plan shall be submitted to the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments for
review and approval in accordance with City Specification No. 431-92 and conditions of
ZA Minutes — 09/06/00 4 (OOZM0906)
approval, including methods to minimize remediation related impacts on surrounding
properties. (PW)
h. The name and phone number of an on -site field supervisor hired by the developer shall be
submitted to the Planning Department and Public Works Department. In addition, clearly
visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site at 250 foot intervals indicating who to
contact for information regarding this development and any construction/ grading activity.
This contact person shall be immediately available to address any concerns or issues raised by
adjacent property owners during the construction activity. He/she will be responsible for
ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities, truck routes,
construction hours, noise, etc. Signs shall include the telephone number of the applicant's
contact, City contact (Jack Miller (714) 536-5517) regarding grading and construction
activities, and "1-800-CUT-SMOG" (for concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with
AQMD Rule No. 403). (PW)
i. The applicant shall notify all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of
the property of a tentative grading schedule at least 30 days prior to such grading. (PW)
j. The applicants grading/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403
as related to fugitive dust control. (PW)
k. A plan shall be prepared and submitted to the Public Works Department for review and
approval that details how all drainage associated with the remediation efforts shall be retained
on site and no wastes or pollutants shall escape the site. (PW)
1. A plan identifying wind barriers proposed around remediation equipment shall be prepared and
submitted to both the Public Works Department and Planning Department for review and
approval. (PW)
m. Any work within the public right-of-way will require encroachment permits and traffic control
plans prepared to City standards. (PW)
n. The applicant shall be responsible for constructing the half width street improvements along
the Newland Street frontage of the project site as set forth in the City's letter dated September
23, 1997, from Melanie Fallon to Peter Lersey of SCE.
As an alternative, the applicant may enter into an appropriate agreement, with accompanying
security, which provides for a cash deposit to be made to the City to pay for the cost of
designing and constructing the Newland Street frontage improvements.
The City will handle the design and construction of a larger Newland Street widening project
extending from Pacific Coast Highway northerly to Hamilton Avenue using the proportionate
contribution from this project as well as from other projects having similar frontage
improvement obligations. (PW)
4. The following conditions shall be complied with during grading and demolition operations:
a. Water trucks will be utilized on site and shall be available to be used throughout the day during
site grading to keep the soils damp enough to prevent dust raised by the operations. (PW)
ZA Minutes — 09/06/00 5 (OOZM0906)
b. All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 8:00 a.m., and leave the site no later than
5:00 p.m., and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only. (PW)
c. Areas to be or that are being graded shall be wet down in the late morning and after work is
completed for the day. (PW)
d. The construction disturbance area shall be kept as small as possible. (PW)
e. All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface prior to leaving
the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas. (PW)
f. Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on -site on a gravel surface to
prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets. (PW)
g. Compliance with applicable sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive
dust and noise to surrounding areas shall be required. (PW)
h. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site. (PW)
i. The remediation operations shall be performed in stages concentrating in single areas at a time
to minimize the impact of fugitive dust and noise on the surrounding areas. (PW)
j. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural
and Landscape Standards and specifications. (PW)
k. All graded areas shall receive a hydroseeded mix of erosion control plant material including
flowering perennials. All areas shall be irrigated with a temporary irrigation system and
maintained until construction of the permanent, approved facility or use is initiated. (PW)
1. Installation and/or removal of underground/aboveground flammable or combustible liquid
storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and Huntington Beach
Fire Department requirements as detailed in the Huntington Beach Oil Code — Huntington
Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 15, Section 15.32.110 and Specification 431-92 — City of
Huntington Beach Soil Cleanup Standard. (FD)
in. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight for construction equipment;
n. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage
smog alerts);
o. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts.
p. Security Gates shall have KNOX access. (FD)
5. Prior to final inspection and approval, the following shall be completed:
a. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final
inspection and within 12 months of issuance of demolition permits. (PW)
ZA Minutes — 09/06/00 6 (OOZM0906)
b. Landscaping shall be replaced along Newland Street and Edison Avenue if disturbed or
removed during the demolition or grading operation. Additional tree screening may be imposed
subject to the remaining view from neighboring areas after the berms are removed. (PW)
c. The applicant shall install a separate irrigation meter, service and backflow protection device.
The meter shall be touch read type, sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the
Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC). (PW)
d. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material,
shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them.
6. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The
Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the project plans are proposed.
Demolition permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the
proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Zoning Administrator's action and the
conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the
original entitlement reviewed by the Zoning Administrator may be required pursuant to the
HBZSO.
7. Any encroachment into Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) right-of-way or easement
will require approval from OCFCD through the County Property Permit division.
8. Work related to the proposed project shall not in any way interfere with maintenance or operation
of an OCFCD facility without prior OCFCD approval.
9. Pipes and utilities that are owned by the project proponent within OCFCD right-of-way shall be
removed before the project is completed, at project proponent's cost, to avoid conflict with any
future OCFCD improvements. All work done on OCFCD right-of-way must be approved by an
OCFCD inspector.
10. Work related to the project should not block any access road required to reach the OCFCD
facility.
INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS:
Coastal Development Permit No. 00-12 shall not become effective until the ten working day
appeal period has elapsed. For projects in the appealable area of the coastal zone, there is an
additional ten working day appeal period that commences when the California Coastal
Commission receives the City's notification of final action.
2. Coastal Development Permit No. 00-12 shall become hull and void unless exercised within one
year of the date of final approval which is September 6, 2001, or such extension of time as may
be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a
minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date.
3. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 00-12,
pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington
Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs.
ZA Minutes 09/06/00 7 (OOZM0906)
4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to
the issuance of required permits.
5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building
Department, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes,
Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein.
6. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be
prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays.
7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $43.00 for the posting of the Notice of
Exemption at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County
of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Zoning
Administrator's action.
8. The project site, including all landscaping, shall be shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner,
and in conformance with all Municipal Code requirements. Prior to removing or replacing any
landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code
requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Zoning Administrator.
ITEM 2: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.00-128/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO.00-07/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 98-22 (PLC LAND CO.4 UNIT
SUBDIVISION)
APPLICANT/
PROPERTY OWNER: PLC Land Company, c/o Bill Holman, 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 250,
Newport Beach, CA 92660
REQUEST: To permit the subdivision of 1.25 acres for the construction of four (4)
single family residences. The request includes development on a lot
with greater than a three (3) foot grade difference between the high and
low points, and retaining walls up to four (4) feet in height.
LOCATION: North side of Yorktown Avenue, approximately 250 feet east of Lake
Street
PROJECT PLANNER: Wayne Carvalho
Wayne Carvalho, Staff Planner, displayed project plans stating the location, zoning, existing use, and
purpose of the proposed project. Staff recommended approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No.
98-22 based upon the findings and conditions as outlined in the staff report, and denial of Tentative
Parcel Map No. 00-128 and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-07 based upon the findings as outlined in
the staff report. Staff stated that the reasons for denial were primarily because of incompatibility with
the area and the substantial amount of grading proposed with the single family residential plan. Staff
explained that a clustered multi -family residential project would be more compatible with the area
given the proximity to the Pacific Ranch condos and could potentially help minimize the amount of
grading as called for in the General Plan. Staff stated that several phone calls in opposition to the
proposed project, and inquiries in general, were received subsequent to the legal notices being sent.
ZA Minutes — 09/06/00 8 (OOZM0906)
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
Bill Holman, 19 Corporate Plaza Drive, Newport Beach, the applicant, made a brief presentation on
behalf of the proposed project. Mr. Holman stated that a philosophical disagreement exists with staff
as to the best and most appropriate use for the site. He explained that they have looked at alternative
plans and product types for the site and determined that the current proposal was the most logical and
garnered the most support from the adjacent homeowners of the Pacific Ranch condos.
Chuck Dinsmore, 19561 Pompano Lane, #103, neighboring resident, expressed support in keeping the
proposed project's access off Yorktown Avenue in lieu of sharing access with the Pacific Ranch
condos. Mr. Dinsmore stated that this would avoid alterations to the existing improvements and
mature landscaping. He stated that the proposal is compatible with the area given all the single family
residential development already existing in the neighborhood.
Marina Robertson, 7582 Seabluff Drive, #108, neighboring resident, expressed support of the project
and the proposed access from Yorktown Avenue. Ms. Robertson stated that the proposal is
compatible with the area.
Bill Reed, 19501 Ranch Lane, #104, neighboring resident, also expressed support in having the project
accessed from Yorktown Avenue.
Dave Walden, Walden and Associates, Project Engineer, explained that the proposed access from
Yorktown Avenue has been analyzed and it was determined to be safe and adequate. Mr. Walden
stated that the site is constrained by an earthquake fault and that the proposed grading is actually
minimal given the size and existing topography of the site.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.98-22 WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL. TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 00-128/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.00-07 WERE DENIED
WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 98-22:
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 98-22 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a
public comment period of twenty (20) days. Comments received during the comment period were
considered by the Zoning Administrator prior to action on Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 98-
22, Tentative Parcel Map No. 00-128 and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-07.
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.00-128:
1. Tentative Parcel Map No. 00-128 for the subdivision of 1.25 acres for development of four single
family residences is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. The proposed
lot configuration requires substantial grading, including approximately 6,000 cubic yards of cut
ZA Minutes — 09/06/00 9 (OOZM0906)
and 1,900 cubic yards of fill, which is not conducive to the maintenance of natural landforms. The
modification to the existing topography is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General
Plan that encourage development within existing neighborhoods to be compatible with existing
structures, including grade elevations, and orientation of adjacent developments.
2. The site is physically unsuitable for the type and density of development proposed without
substantially altering the natural topography of the site. The substantial amount of cut and fill
proposed for the site will substantially impact the aesthetic appearance of the area. The property
can be developed with an alternative design which would result in less of an impact to the existing
topography.
3. The granting of Tentative Parcel Map No. 00-128 is not consistent with the following goals and
policies of the General Plan:
Goal ERC 4: Maintain the visual quality of the City's natural landforms and water bodies.
The project proposes significant levels of cut and fill to create level pads for residential
development. The existing elevations range from approximately 51 to 70 feet, and the project
proposes to create pads that range from 56 to 60 feet. The project has not been designed in a
manner that incorporates the natural topographic characteristics of this site.
Objective ERC 4.1: Enhance and preserve the aesthetic resources of the City, including natural
areas, beaches, bluffs, and significant public views.
The project is located adjacent to the Pacific Ranch multi -family residential community and a
multi -family project across Yorktown Avenue. The existing topography of the site is highly visible
by surrounding uses. The proposal for significant grading to the site is not sensitive to the existing
topography.
Policy ERC 4.1.6: Require that future development be designed and sited to maintain the
natural topographic characteristics of the City including the minimization of the area and height
of cuts and fills.
The project proposes significant levels of cut and fill to create level pads for residential
development. The existing elevations range from approximately 51 to 70 feet, and the project
proposes to create pads that range from 56 to 60 feet. The project has not been designed in a
manner that incorporates the natural topographic characteristics of this site.
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-07:
1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-07, for the construction of a four (4) unit single family subdivision
on a site with greater than a three foot grade differential between the high and low points, and
retaining walls up to four feet in height will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons
working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in
the neighborhood. The project is not compatible with the surrounding medium density residential
uses because it does not propose a housing product type that provides a natural transition between
existing land uses. The proposed density is 3.2 and the surrounding density is 12.9 dwelling units
per acre.
ZA Minutes — 09/06/00 10 (OOZM0906)
2. The granting of the conditional use permit will adversely affect the implementation of the General
Plan goals and policies. Although the project is consistent with the Land Use Element designation
of RM-15 on the subject property, it is not consistent with the following goals and policies of the
General Plan:
Policy LU 9.3.2: Require the design of new residential subdivisions consider the following:
c. Cluster residential units and, if possible, integrate small clusters of multi family housing
within single family areas to preserve open space.
The project proposes construction of 4 single-family units on lot sizes that range from 7,471
square feet to 9,911 square feet in size. The applicant has been encouraged by City staff to
consider an alternative housing product (such as cluster housing) in an effort to preserve the
existing topography of the site and be more compatible with the surrounding multi -family
residential uses. The applicant believes that the City's request is not feasible due to issues relating
to site access, grades, and required slopes, and that their proposal is the most appropriate design of
the site.
Policy ERC 4.1.6: Require that future development be designed and sited to maintain the
natural topographic characteristics of the City including the minimization of the area and height
of cuts and fills.
The project proposes significant levels of cut and fill to create level pads for residential
development. The existing elevations range from approximately 51 to 70 feet, and the project
proposes to create pads that range from 56 to 60 feet. The project has not been designed in a
manner that incorporates the natural topographic characteristics of this site.
3. The project does not conform to Section 230.70 in that structures do not terrace with the existing
grade. Furthermore, the proposed single family product is not compatible with the surrounding
medium density residential uses.
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 2:20 PM BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO
THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 AT 1:30 PM.
F
�l v
Mike Strange, Acting
Zoning Administrator
:rmk
ZA Minutes — 09/06/00 11 (OOZM0906)