Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-06-26MINUTES Huntington Beach -Planning Commission Tuesday, June 26, 2001 Huntington Beach Civic Center 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 Study Session Room B-8 5:15 P.M. DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN ANNUAL REVIEW — Wayne Carvalho CODE ENFORCEMENT STATUS REPORT — Mike Fuentes PLANNING COMMISSION GOALS & OBJECTIVES — Herb Fauland CONDUCT OF PUBLIC MEETINGS — Herb Fauland AGENDA REVIEW — Herb Fauland MAJOR PROJECTS UPDATE = Herb Fauland PUBLIC COMMENTS — None. Regular Meeting City Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P A P - -P P P ROLL CALL: Hardy, Kerins, Shomaker, Mandic, Livengood, Kokal, Borden AGENDA APPROVAL A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. PC Minutes Page 2 6/26/01 B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 84. APPEAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 01-06 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.'01-09 (TRUE BLOCK WALL): Applicant/Appellant: Debra True Repuest: Appeal of the Zoning. Administrator's approval to permit the construction of a combination 4-foot high retaining wall and a 6-foot high block wall with a total height of ten (10) feet, along the rear property line of a through lot, in lieu of the 42-inch maximum height. Location: 17171 Westport (west side of Westport Drive, approximately 45 feet north of Courtney Lane) Project Planner: Paul DaVeiga ♦ Conditional Use Permit No. 01-09 request: - Construct a 10-foot high "combination retaining and block wall along the rear property line of a through lot. ♦ Coastal Development Permit No. 01-06 request: - Construct a 10-foot high combination retaining and block wall in the coastal zone. ♦ Staffs Recommendation: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 01-09 and Coastal Development Permit No. 01-06 with modifications based upon the following: - General Plan goal to avoid building materials, colors, and construction elements that visually dominate their setting and contrast significantly with the character of the neighborhood. - Complies with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance- ; Residential Low Density development standards. - The potential impacts including visual impacts_ will be minimized -by conditions imposed. ♦ Staffs Suggested Modifications: Conditional Use Permit No. 01-09 and Coastal Development Permit No. 01- 06: - A 24-inch wide landscape planter shall be constructed directly in front of the proposed wall and adjacent to the abutting sidewalk at the rear of the subject property. - Landscaping shall be distributed throughout the planter with sufficient height and variety of plant material to allow for visual interest and shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. Commissioner's Hardy, Kokal, Livengood and Mandic disclosed that they visited: the project site. Staff made a presentation to the Commission. The Commission inquired about landscape planter maintenance, the Huntington Harbor Property Owner's Association (HHPOA) Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs), sidewalk width, yard depth, wall height, design and material, the number of residents who support or oppose the construction of a (G:WlimAes\01 pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 3 6/26/01 ten (10) foot retaining wall and what types of walls exist on other properties within the tract. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED: Carole Garrett, HHPOA, spoke in opposition to the item and provided the Commission with digital photos showing super -imposed examples of an 11-foot retaining wall, other photos that illustrate properties from different street locations, and landscape examples she believes compliment retaining walls. She stated that she had a petition containing signatures from neighbors who oppose the applicant's request and urged the Commission to deny the block wall request. Shirley de Heras, Westport Drive resident, spoke in opposition to the item because she feels that the neighborhood properties appearances need to become more consistent. She also voiced her concerns about the HHPOA CC&R's. Joseph Falcon, Roundhill Drive resident, spoke in opposition to the applicant's request and expressed his concern with the lack of aesthetic consistency in wall design and construction (size, material and landscape embankment elements). Gerald Umer, HHPOA, informed the Commission of past activity before the Zoning Administrator with regard to wall standards for the area. He cited staffs recommendation as the past standard approved, along with lighting and landscaping for an aesthetically pleasing look-. He supports staffs recommendation. Nina Patten, Roundhill Drive resident; informed the Commission that she never received notification from any neighbors when their walls were being constructed. She supports establishing guidelines for wall design and opposes the applicant's request because it is not consistent with the goals of the City's General Plan. Julie Baily, Westport Drive resident, likes the diversity of walls within the neighborhood and supports residents rights to build any kind of, wall they wish. She supports the applicant's request to construct the wall near,the street in order to provide an extended play area within the applicant's backyard. Debra True, applicant, informed the Commission that the HHPOA is a voluntary organization. She discussed sidewalk width ,and how it varies throughout the neighborhood. She stated that 17 of the 35: homes within the neighborhood have the same sidewalk width they request in their application. She also mentioned that the need for backyard space is critical for her children's safety - due'to an alleged kidnap attempt experienced in their neighborhood. She also mentioned that a realtor advised that the value of her home would increase with the wall improvement, and that many neighbors support her request. (G AMinutes101 pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 4 6/26101 Mark True, applicant, suggested that if the Commission decides to deny their request, all walls within the neighborhood not in compliance with the goals of the City's General Plan should be removed or reconstructed. WITH NO ONE ELSE PRESENT TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED." The Commission asked staff to explain the alternative recommendation that allows for a "step-up" affect related to the landscape planter (width of planters 5' total setback each). The Commission asked about wall design, material and lighting . recommendations by the staff and HHPOA. It was suggested that the Planning Commission make a recommendation•to both parties that the standard wall material be split -faced block. - - ._ ' , - : - The Commission asked the applicant to provide an approximate cost of wall construction and the applicant replied $10,000 to $20,000, depending on material and height. = The Commission asked what the Zoning Code standards are for wall height and backyard setbacks. The Commission suggested modifying the current landscape guidelines included in the HHPOA CC&R's with help from staff and the City's Landscape Architect to establish design guidelines that ensure future consistency in wall design and construction. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MANDIC, SECOND BY BORDEN, TO APPROVE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.01=06 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.01-09 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Hardy, Kerins, Mandic, Livengood, Kokal, Borden NOES: None ABSENT: Shomaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 01-061 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.01-09 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL = COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 01.06: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 01-06 for the development of a combination 10- foot retainingiblock wall as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The proposal is for a (GWnutes101pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 5 6/26/01 combination block/retaining wall in the rear yard of a through lot. The proposed wall will not negatively impact any public views or access since there are none existing at the subject site. 2. 'The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. Walls are a permitted use in all zoning districts. The Zoning Code allows a deviation from the standards for height of walls within a required setback subject to the approval of - a Conditional Use Permit. All the required findings have been made to allow the increase in block wall height. 3. The proposed development has been provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. All infrastructure is currently in place, therefore, no further improvements to the infrastructure shall be required. 4. The development conforms to the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. No public access or recreation exists on the subject site, therefore, no impacts exist. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 01-09: Conditional Use Permit No. 01-09 for the establishment and maintenance of a 10- foot high combination retaining/block wall, consisting of a six-foot block wall on top of a four -foot retaining wall, will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed wall, as conditioned, will be developed with a landscape planter that will improve the appearance of the block wall along Westport Drive. 2. The conditional use permit for the 10-foot combination retaining/block wall will be compatible with surrounding properties because the block wall, as conditioned, will be consistent with other block wall developments on properties along Westport - Drive including those developed at 16901 and 16911 Westport Drive, which have been developed with a landscape planter. 3." The proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 01-09 for a 10-foot high combination retaining/block wall will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The Zoning Code allows for a deviation from the height requirements within the required setback area with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Residential, Low Density on the subject property. The project; as conditioned, will be developed with a 2-foot landscape setback along the adjacent sidewalk which will improve the aesthetics of the streetscape and soften the look of the proposed wall. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: (GAMinuteM01 pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 6 6126/01 a. Avoid building materials, colors, and construction elements that visually dominate their setting and contrast significantly with the character of the neighborhood. (LU 9.1.2.b) b. Include an adequate landscape setback along the street frontage that is integrated with abutting sidewalks and provides continuity throughout the neighborhood. (LU 9.2.1.e) - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 01-061 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.01-09: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated February 2, 2001 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The site plan shall be amended to depict a 24-inch wide planter in front of the proposed blockwall. The applicant shall provide a section drawing which clearly depicts an 18-inch high planter wall, a two -foot landscape planter, the proposed 10-foot retaining/blockwall, and the amount of fill which will be retained by the proposed wall. b. The site plan shall depict colors and building materials proposed. c. The site plan shall indicate the type and spacing of landscaping within the required 2-foot landscape planter. Landscaping shall be distributed throughout the planter with. sufficient height and variety of plant material to allow for visual interest. Landscaping shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. d. The proposed retaining and block wall combination, and the 2-foot wide landscape planter shall be constructed of split face block with a decorative cap to match the existing block wall at 16901 Westport in design and color. e. The applicant shall provide an automatedirrigation system to the new planter to allow for a consistent water supply to landscaping. f. All landscaping shall be maintained in'good condition and shall not encroach into the public right of way. g.- All drains must be shown on the site plan, Show type, size,, location, and discharge. (BD) 2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a: Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the second page of all working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing). (G:Winutes101 pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 7 6/26/01 3. Prior to final building inspection and approval, the following shall be completed: a. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. b. All building spoils such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. c. All existing mature trees that are to be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with a 36" box tree or palm equivalent (13' —14' of trunk height for Queen Palms and 8' — 9' of brown trunk). (PW) 4. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Zoning Administrator's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an.amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Zoning Administrator may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 01-06/Conditional Use Permit No. 01-09 shall not become effective until the ten working day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Coastal Development Permit No. 01-06/Conditional Use Permit No. 01-09 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is April 4, 2002, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 01-06/Conditional Use Permit No. 01-09, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. - 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Department, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. (G Winutes101 pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 8 6/26/01 7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $43.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Zoning Administrator's action. 8. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Zoning Administrator. B 2. ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 01-04: DESIGN REVIEW NO. 01-20 (TUNA TOWN PATIO ENCLOSURE): 'Applicant:- Bob Thornton Request: To permit the enclosure of a 600 square foot covered patio area for interior dining space. Location: 221 A Main Street (west side, south of Olive Avenue) Project Planner: Wayne Carvalho • Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 01-04 request: Enclose existing 600'sq.'ft: "covered patio area for interior dining space. Staffs Recommendation: Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 01-04 with modifications based up=the following:- - The proposed enclosure will be architecturally compatible with the existing building. - The enclosure will continue to be used for dining purposes. The enclosed dining area will comply with all zoning provisions including parking. • Staff s Suggested Modifications: Apply marble tile base element around the entire enclosure (south side). Allow option for clear glass windows to allow more light into the dining area. Commissioner's Kerins, Kokal and Borden disclosed that they visited the site. Staff made a presentation to the Commission. The Commission inquired about wall height in the dining area. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED: Bob Thornton, applicant, spoke in favor of the item and explained to the Commission that Tuna Town operates during the evening hours to upscale customers, has an approved outdoor dining area in front of the restaurant and would benefit from enclosing the patio -dining area, adjacent to the City plaza. He stated that all codes would be met. (G:Wlinutes\01 pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 9 6/26/01 Dave Silveria spoke in favor of the item stating that a side patio enclosure will clean up the existing alleyway area. Wayne Gumienny spoke in favor of the item stating that the enclosure will be aesthetically pleasing to guests and will improve the undesirability that currently exists. WITH NO ONE ELSE PRESENT TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Discussion ensued regarding outdoor dining requirements, entrance/exit options, live entertainment, occupancy levels and parking regulations. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY BORDEN, TO APPROVE ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO.01-04; DESIGN REVIEW NO.01-20 APPROVED WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Hardy, Kerins, Mandic, Livengood, Kokal, Borden NOES: None ABSENT: Shomaker' ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO.01-04 FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA: The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the minor alteration to the existing restaurant suite is exempt from further environmental review. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL — ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO.01-04: 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 01-04 for the enclosure and conversion of the 600 sq. ft. covered outdoor patio into indoor dining area will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The design of the enclosure will be compatible with the architecture of the existing building. Based upon the conditions imposed, no impacts to the surrounding businesses or property owners will occur. (GAMinutes101 pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 10 6/26/01 2. The design of the enclosed patio area will be compatible with surrounding uses. The proposed enclosure will continue to be used for restaurant purposes which are compatible with the surrounding restaurant, retail and office uses. - 3. The proposed patio enclosure will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington -Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. In addition, any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The enclosed dining area will meet all setback requirements and is provided with ample parking. 4. The granting of the entitlement plan amendment will not adversely affect the General Plan. A is consistent with the Land .Use Element designation of Mixed Use on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: a) LU 10.1.19: Require that visitor -serving commercial developments be designed to reflect -and be -compatible with their setting and/or function (e.g., design of park'buildings avoiding colors, materials, and architectural forms that visually dominate the park setting). b) Policy UD 1.1.2: Reinforce Downtown as the City's historic center and as a pedestrian -oriented commercial and entertainment/recreation district. The proposed enclosure will be compatible with the existing architecture and surrounding area with use of similar design, colors, and materials. It will provide a- unified architectural character and articulated. facades. Furthermore, the proposed development maintains the historical character of the original building. In addition, it will not impact the existing pedestrian link through the City plaza connecting Main St. and the alley between Main Street and Fifth Street. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL = ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 01- 04: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated April 10, 2001 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a.-' Elevations shall be revised for consistency with plans and elevations approved by the Design Review Board on May 12, 2001 including: (1) The marble the base located along the entire front elevation shall be carried around the side elevation for the entire length of the enclosed dining area. (2) The tint color for windows along the public plaza area shall either be a light green or clear. (G AM inutes101 pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 11 6126101 b. If outdoor lighting is included, energy. saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. 2. Prior to submittal for building permits,, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index. b. The Planning Department shall review and approve the revised site plan and elevations as modified pursuant to Condition No. 1. c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit a copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file to the Planning Department; and submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings, elevations, materials sample*board, and massing model to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file.-- 4. The final building permits) cannot be approved, and utilities cannot be released and a Certificate of Occupancy issued until the following has been completed: a.. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the'approved plans'and conditions of approval specified herein, including: 1) Fire extinguishers will be installed and located in areas. to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards. (FD) 2) ' Address numbers will be installed on all structures to comply with Fire Dept. City Specification No. 428. (FD) 3) Exit.signs and exit path markings will be provided in compliance with the Huntington Beach Fire Code and Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. Low level exit signs will'be included. (FD) 4) An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. Shop drawings shall be - submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to system installation. (FD) (GAMinutes101 pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 12 6126/01 b. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. c. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 5. The use shall comply with the following: a. Prior to the sale of alcoholic beverages, a copy of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (ABC) license, along with any special conditions imposed by the ABC, shall be submitted to the Planning Department for the file. Any conditions that are more restrictive than those set forth in this approval shall be adhered to. 6. All applicable conditions on Conditional Use Permit No. 93-19 (Restaurant), Conditional Use Permit No. 99-32 (Live entertainment/Dancing) and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-20 (Outdoor dining/alcohol on Public R.O.W.) still apply. 7. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process.. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 8. The applicant and/or applicant's representative shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 01-04 shall not become effective until the ten -calendar day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 01-04 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is June 26, 2002 or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 01-04, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any (GAMinutes\01 p=0626) PC Minutes Page 13 6/26/01 violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be.paid prior.to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday-' Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $43.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 8. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any - landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code 'requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. 9. All permanent, temporary, or promotional signs shall conform to Chapter 233 of the HBZSO. Prior to installing any new signs, changing sign faces, or installing promotional signs, applicable permit(s) shall be obtained from the Planning Department. Violations of this ordinance requirement may result in permit revocation, recovery of code enforcement costs, and removal of installed signs. 10. State -mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 11. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for new construction in the Downtown Specific Plan (SP-5) area, a Downtown Specific Plan fee shall be paid. 12. A Certificate of Occupancy must be approved by the Planning Department and issued by the Building and Safety Department prior to occupying the building. (G:Winutes101 pcm0626) PC Minutes Page 14 6/26/01 C. CONSENT CALENDAR CA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED MAY 22, 2001 A MOTION WAS MADE BY KERINS, SECOND BY HARDY, TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED MAY 22, 2001 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Hardy, Kerins, Mandic, Livengood, Kokal, Borden NOES: None ABSENT: Shomaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS None. E. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS E-1. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMITTEE REPORTS None. E-2. PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES/COMMENTS Commissioner Hardy — inquired about the transportation corridor that runs between Alabama and Lake Streets. Specifically, she asked who owned the property, who maintains it, and if it is possible for the City to purchase it. Staff replied that the property is owned by Pacific Electric Railroad, is unavailable for purchase at this time and is to be preserved for future transportation opportunities pursuant to goals and policies of the General Plan. Commissioner Kerins — None. Commissioner Shomaker — Absent. Commissioner Mandic — None. Commissioner Livengood — requested that staff investigate a patio enclosure at the property located immediately north of 17171 Westport. Staff to follow-up. Commissioner Kokal — None. (G AMinutes\01 p=0626) PC Minutes Page 15 6/26/01 Commissioner Borden — inquired if staff received a response to his inquiry of May 22 regarding the conditions listed in the advertising/park improvement agreement between Coca Cola and the City of Huntington Beach. Staff to follow-up. F. PLANNING ITEMS F-1. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS FROM PREVIOUS MEETING Herb Fauland, Senior Planner — reported on the Planning Department items heard at the June 18, 2001 City Council meeting. F-2. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Herb Fauland, Senior Planner — reviewed items for the July 10, 2001 regular Planning Commission meeting. G. ADJOURNMENT — Adjourn to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of July 10, 2001. HZ:HF:d A77BVIED Y:Y: o and Zelefsky, Secretary (G:Wl1nutes101 pcmO626) Connie Mandic, Chai erson