The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2001-08-28PC Minutes August 28, 2001 Page 7 4. A review of the use shall be conducted by staff within six (6) months of the Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy to verify compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable Chapters of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. At that time, if there -has been a violation of the terms and conditions of Section 230.94 of the HBZSO or the conditional use permit, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the Planning Commission for revocation pursuant to Section 241.16 and 249.06 of the HBZSO. (Code Requirement) 5. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are compiled with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the Intent of the Planning Commission's action and the -conditions herein. If the proposed changes.are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 6. The applicant and/or applicants representative shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for -review and approval. INFORMATION ON.SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 01-31 shall not become effective until the ten calendar day appeal period has'elap�sed. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 01-31 shall become null and void unless exercised within'one year of the date of final approval which is August 28, 2002, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use -.-Permit No. 01-31, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. - - - - 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works; and Fire Departments I shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. . 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except -as noted herein. (01p=0828) PC Minutes August 28, 2001 Page 9 Commissioners Kerins, Shomaker, Mandic, Livengood and Kokal disclosed that they had visited the pmject site. Staff made a presentation to the Commission. - THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED: - - James Crisp, applicant, spoke in favor of the item,commended staff on a fine report and answerid questions from the Commission regarding student enrollment and number of staff. WITH NO ONE ELSE PRESENT TO SPEAK; THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED; Discussion ensu-6d reg-aiding parking ratios' and hours of religious services. AM - OTION WAS MADE BY KERINS, SECOND BY KOKAL, TO APPROVE ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 01-06 (EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH) WITH FINDINGS AND.MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Hardy, Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic Livengood, Kokal NOES: None ABSENT:'- Bbiden ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDING§ AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ENTITLEMENT, PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 01-05 FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA: The Planning Commission finds that the project.will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 of the CEQA Guidelines, because minor alterations to an existing structure are exempt from further environmental review. - .,I. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL— ENTITLEMENT PLAN MENDMENTNO.01-05: 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 01 -05 for the establishment, maintenance, operation, and expansion of an existing church and school facility by adding a 200 seat chapel with classrooms in the basement of an existing office building and a -150 seat chapel with classrooms on the second floor of the existing building will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property (01p=0828)