HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-09-29•
is
MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
Room B-8 - Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach California
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 - 1:30 P.M.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Mary Beth Broeren
STAFF MEMBER: Rami Talleh, Ron Santos, Ramona Kohlmann (recording
secretary)
MINUTES: September 15, 2004
APPROVED AS SUBMITTED
ORAL COMMUNICATION: NONE
ITEM 1: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 04-25 (PETSMART ANIMAL HOSPITAL)
APPLICANT:
Michelle Alfieri, 8001 Irvine Center Dr., Ste. 4000, Irvine, CA
92618
PROPERTY OWNER:
Huntington Beach No. 1, c/o Watt Management, 2716 Ocean
Park Blvd., Ste. 3040, Santa Monica, CA 90405
REQUEST:
To permit the establishment of a 2,183 sq. ft. animal hospital in
conjunction with a 20,183 sq. ft. pet supply store in an existing
shopping center.
LOCATION:
7600 Edinger Ave. (South side of Edinger Avenue, West of Sher
Drive)
PROJECT PLANNER:
Rami Talleh
Rami Talleh, Staff Planner, displayed project plans and stated the purpose, location, zoning,
and existing uses of the requested project. Staff presented a review of the proposed project
and the suggested findings and conditions of approval as outlined in the executive summary.
Staff recommended approval of the request based upon the suggested findings and subject to
the suggested conditions as outlined in the executive summary.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
Michelle Alfieri, 8001 Irvine Center Dr., Ste. 4000, Irvine, applicant, stated that the proposed
project will serve the community.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Mary Beth Broeren, Zoning Administrator, engaged in discussions with the applicant
concerning any outdoor activities for the animals. The applicant advised that animals such as
cats or dogs will not be kept in the store.
Ms. Broeren engaged in a discussion with staff concerning the condition establishing a timeline
for obtaining a building permit for tenant improvements for the subject use, and the fact that
the applicant has already submitted the building permit application.
Ms. Broeren confirmed with the applicant that they would address the non -permitted
mezzanine issue in conjunction with the tenant improvement. Staff suggested that Suggested
Condition of Approval No. 2 be modified as follows:
2. Prior to q,, hrn ittaIissuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance
with parking and floor area ratio requirements for the second floor mezzanine located at
the northwest corner of the suite installed without permits. If the parking and floor area
requirements cannot be complied with, the mezzanine shall be removed within 60 days
from the effective date of this approval.
Ms. Broeren confirmed with the applicant their concurrence with the aforementioned
modification.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 04-25 WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL. THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN
TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS.
FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA:
The Zoning Administrator finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the
environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project consists of
negligible or no expansion of the use beyond that existing at the time the shopping center was
established.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 04-25.
1. Conditional Use Permit No. 04-25 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of a
2,183 sq. ft. animal hospital in conjunction with a 20,183 sq. ft. pet supply store in an
existing shopping center will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working
or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in
the neighborhood. The animal hospital will be an ancillary use within a proposed retail pet
supply store in an established commercial shopping center. The nearest residential uses
are located 90 feet south of the subject structure and will be adequately separated by a
loading dock screen wall, perimeter fence, and public alley. No noise impacts are
anticipated in that all activities associated with the facility will be conducted entirely indoors.
The proposed facility will not generate noise, traffic, demand for parking or other impacts at
levels inconsistent with the commercial zoning applicable to the property.
0
ZA Minutes 09/29/04 2 (04zm0929)
•
2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because the proposed
animal hospital will be an ancillary use to a retail pet supply store which will be operated in
an existing commercial shopping center, adjacent to other commercial uses of similar
nature and intensity.
3. The proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 04-25 will comply with the provisions of the base
district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and
Subdivision Ordinance. The animal hospital is allowed with approval of a conditional use
permit and complies with the parking and floor area ratio requirements.
4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is
consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Regional Commercial (CR) on the
subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the
General Plan:
a. Achieve the development of a range of commercial uses. (Goal LU 10)
b. Accommodate the development of neighborhood community, regional, office, and
visitor -serving commercial uses in areas designated on the Land Use Plan Map. (Policy
LU 10.1.1)
The proposed business will contribute to the diversity of service -commercial uses oriented
to the needs of local residents and the surrounding community in the City.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 04-25:
The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated August 16, 2004 shall be the
conceptually approved design.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with
parking and floor area ratio requirements for the second floor mezzanine located at the
northwest corner of the suite installed without permits. If the parking and floor area
requirements cannot be complied with, the mezzanine shall be removed within 60 days
from the effective date of this approval.
3. All activities associated with the proposed use shall be conducted entirely indoors.
INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION:
The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if
different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers,
and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees
and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or
annul any approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City
Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall
promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in
the defense thereof.
ZA Minutes 09/29/04 3 (04zm0929)
ITEM 2: COND
ITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 04-23 HANSON ADDITION1 0
APPLICANT/
PROPERTY OWNER: Jody Hanson, 1209 Pine Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648
REQUEST: To permit the construction of a 1,645 sq. ft. two story addition to
a single-family dwelling at an existing non -conforming 2'-6" side
yard setback along the alley in lieu of the 5 ft. minimum side yard
setback from the ultimate right-of-way line. The addition will
consist of a first floor garage and second floor office and storage
area.
LOCATION: 1209 Pine Street (West side of Pine St. between Adams Ave.
and Loma Ave.)
PROJECT PLANNER: Rami Talleh
Rami Talleh, Staff Planner, displayed project plans and photographs and stated the purpose,
location, zoning, and existing uses of the requested project. Staff presented a review of the
proposed project and the suggested findings and conditions of approval as outlined in the
executive summary.
Staff recommended approval of the request based upon the suggested findings and subject to
the suggested conditions as outlined in the executive summary. Staff stated that the applicant
has submitted a petition signed by 20 surrounding residents in support of the proposed project.
Two telephone calls were received from property owners to the north and east stating support
of the proposed project. No other written or verbal comments were received in response to the
public notification.
Mary Beth Broeren, Zoning Administrator, reviewed the photographs and project plans and a
general discussion ensued with staff concerning the alley.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
Jody Hanson, 1209 Pine Street, applicant, spoke in support of the proposed project and urged
the Zoning Administrator's approval.
David Hilborn, 1209 Lake Street, neighboring property owner, voiced support of the proposed
project, and stated that he plans to construct a similar project.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Ms. Broeren engaged in discussions with staff and the applicant concerning the 2'-6" side yard
setback along the alley from the ultimate right-of-way, construction of a new fence, and
deviation from the existing home's front architecture.
Ms. Broeren stated that it appears that the attic area is being constructed to be habitable
above the garage. She confirmed with the applicant that it is their intent to keep the attic
unfinished and completely open to the garage. Ms. Broeren advised that if, in the future, the
ZA Minutes 09/29/04 4 (04zm0929)
applicant should decide to make the attic habitable, they would have to return and apply for a
permit. She emphasized that if this were to be the case, dedications and alley improvements
may be required.
Staff stated that the foregoing would depend on the final design, as dictated by building code
requirements and Public Works Department requirements.
Ms. Broeren reviewed the petition that was signed by the neighboring property owners in
support of the proposed project. She stated that she was going to approve the request and
asked staff to modify Suggested Finding for Approval No. 1 as follows:
1. Conditional Use Permit No. 04-23 for the construction of a 1,645 sq. ft. two story addition to
a single-family dwelling, at an existing non -conforming 2'-6" side yard setback along the
alley, in lieu of the 5 ft. minimum side yard setback from the ultimate right-of-way line will
not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or
detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The
subject site is bounded by an alley to the north and east. The addition will be constructed
to match an existing 2'-6" nonconforming sideyard setback, which abuts the alley to the
north. The proposed addition will not impact the residences north of the alley since a 20 ft.
separation is provided between the proposed addition and the nearest residential
properties. Furthermore, the proposed addition will consist of a garage on the first floor
and office space above, areas that are not used as often as other living areas are used.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 04-23 WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFIED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL. THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN
TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS.
FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA:
The Zoning Administrator finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the
environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project consists of a
negligible expansion to an existing single family home.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 04-23:
1. Conditional Use Permit No. 04-23 for the construction of a 1,645 sq. ft. two story addition to
a single-family dwelling, at an existing non -conforming 2'-6" side yard setback along the
alley, in lieu of the 5 ft. minimum side yard setback from the ultimate right-of-way line will
not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or
detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The
subject site is bounded by an alley to the north and east. The addition will be constructed
to match an existing 2'-6" nonconforming sideyard setback, which abuts the alley to the
north. The proposed addition will not impact the residences north of the alley since a 20 ft.
separation is provided between the proposed addition and the nearest residential
properties. Furthermore, the proposed addition will consist of a garage on the first floor
® and office space above, areas that are not used as often as other living areas are used.
ZA Minutes 09/29/04 5 (04zm0929)
2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because the project
consists of a first and second floor addition to a single-family home in a residential
neighborhood developed with one and two-story dwellings. The proposed 2'-6" side yard
setback to the ultimate right-of-way line matches or exceeds the side yard setback of
several properties in the vicinity. The proposed two-story addition will be compatible with
the adjacent one-story homes in that an adequate buffer of 20 ft. shall be provided
between the structure and the surrounding residence.
3. The proposed first and second story addition will comply with the provisions of the base
district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and
Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO). The proposed addition complies with the applicable
development standards (building height, front and side setbacks, and lot coverage) except
for the proposed northerly side yard setback. The HBZSO authorizes additions to
nonconforming structures proposed to be constructed at the existing nonconforming yard
setbacks with approval of a conditional use permit.
4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is
consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Residential Low Density on the
subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the
General Plan:
a. L.U. 7.1.2: Require that development be designed to account for the unique
characteristics of project sites and objectives for community character as appropriate.
b. LU 9.2.1 b: Use of building heights, grade elevations, orientation, and bulk that are
compatible with the surrounding development;
Conditional Use Permit No. 04-23 accounts for the subject property's existing non-
conforming side yard setback from the ultimate property line by allowing the proposed two-
story addition to be constructed at a matching setback. The addition will be designed and
constructed to be consistent with the character of the neighborhood and compatible with
the adjacent single-family homes. The addition will be constructed with high quality
materials such as stone veneer and wood siding. The use of materials to create a visual
break in the design of the addition coupled with a 3 ft. offset in the rear will minimize the
bulk of structure. A minimum separation of 20 ft. is provided between the two-story
addition and the adjacent single story residences.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 04-23:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 13, 2004, shall be
the conceptually approved design with the exception of the following modification: A
landscaped planter shall be provided between the proposed addition and the existing
northerly property line.
2. Prior to submittal for building permits, plans shall be revised to show the final design of the
proposed second floor attic space for review by the Planning Department, Public Works
Department, and Building and Safety Department.
3. Prior to submittal for building permits for the second phase expansion as identified on the
plans received and dated September 13, 2004, the final design shall be submitted for
ZA Minutes 09/29/04 6 (04zm0929)
review and approval by the Planning Department and determined consistent with this
46 conditional use permit.
•
INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION:
The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if
different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers,
and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees
and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or
annul any approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City
Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall
promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in
the defense thereof.
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 2:00 PM BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO THE
NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ON
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2004 AT 1:30 PM.
Ma a Broeren
Zoning Administrator
:rmk
ZA Minutes 09/29/04 7 (04zm0929)