HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-01-23Adjourned Regular Minutes
City Council/RDA Meeting
City Council/Redevelopment Agency
City of Huntington Beach
Monday, January 23, 2006
3:00 P.M. — Rooms C & D
Central Library
7111 Talbert Avenue
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Call to Order
Mayor Sullivan called the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Huntington Beach to order at 3:11 p.m. in Rooms C & D, Central Library.
City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting Roll Call
Present: Bohr, Green, Coerper, Sullivan, Hardy, Hansen, Cook
Absent: None
Public Comments
Robert Dettloff, affiliated with Council on Aging, gave an update on the current condition of the
Senior Center and asked Council to place a high priority on its renovation.
Larry Gallup, resident, spoke regarding the citizen participation portion of the Strategic Plan.
He asked Council to include the word "dialogue" in the goal pertaining to communication with
residents.
Doug Traub, representing the Huntington Beach Conference and Visitors Bureau (HBCVB)
offered his assistance in the planning process. He suggested the Bureau be funded on a long-
term basis, rather than negotiating funds year -after -year. He stated the economic impact of
tourists should be spread more widely and recommended that a designated information kiosk be
placed permanently at Pier Plaza. Mr. Traub voiced his support for Council's efforts.
Ralph Bauer stated he represents the Council on Aging and spoke regarding the aging of the
community. Mr. Bauer asked Council to place its focus on renovation of the Senior Center.
The Assistant City Clerk Announced No Late Communications
Pursuant to the Brown (Open Meetings) Act, Assistant City Clerk Robin Lugar announced no
Late Communications regarding agenda items had been received by the City Clerk's Office
following distribution of the agenda packet.
(City Council) Study Session Held — City Council Strategic Plan Workshop Conducted by
Management Partners, Jan Perkins and Amy Paul. (120.30)
City Administrator Penny Culbreth-Graft introduced Jan Perkins and Amy Paul from
Management Partners, Inc. Ms. Perkins reviewed accomplishments made by Council thus far
and outlined the steps remaining in the process. Ms. Paul facilitated review of the resource
worksheets and spoke regarding phase one and phase two of the implementation.
January 23, 2006 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 2 of 6
Councilmember Green inquired about the process of correcting goals. Councilmember Cook
suggested revising City Services Goal 2 by removing reference to specific departments. Mayor
Pro Tem Coerper voiced his desire to include a reference to Police Department staffing. Mayor
Sullivan, Councilmembers Bohr and Hardy stated their preference for the proposed revised
version of the goal. Councilmember Hansen stated his preference to end the sentence of this
goal after the word "needs." Councilmember Cook suggested including the word "funding" in
the goal statement. Ms. Perkins noted that the funding component is identified as a constraint
on the accompanying matrix. Councilmember Hansen stated his opinion that other issues that
effect public services such as technology should be addressed as well. Councilmember Green
voiced her opinion that staffing is the issue with public safety. Councilmember Bohr suggested
adding the words "ensuring that the City is adequately staffed and equipped overall" after the
word "needs." Mayor Sullivan called for a motion.
A motion was made by Hardy, second Hansen to approve Councilmember Bohr's suggested
language changes to City Services, Goal 2. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bohr, Coerper, Sullivan, Hardy, Hansen, Cook
NOES: Green
Council discussed City Services, Goal 1. Councilmember Green asked what steps would lead
to reaching the goal. Councilmember Cook suggested including language that provides a
connection between affordable housing and local transportation improvements. City
Administrator Culbreth-Graft spoke regarding language revisions made by staff, and the need
for Council review and discussion on potential revisions. Mayor Pro Tem Coerper asked for
clarification on the projects directly related to achieving the goals. Councilmember Green spoke
regarding synchronization of traffic signals, traffic calming and alternate methods of
transportation, asking about the importance of the goal. Councilmember Cook voiced her
opinion in support of this goal, and also suggested language pertaining to increasing
commercial pockets within neighborhoods. Mayor Pro Tem Coerper stated his support for traffic
synchronization in areas controlled by the City, and for alternate transportation. Ms. Paul asked
if others had objections to Goal 1, and no other Councilmembers responded affirmatively.
City Administrator Culbreth-Graft referred to page 1A.2 of the agenda packet and explained
staff's intentions when creating the projects listed. She inquired whether Council should focus
on projects at this point in the meeting or not. Ms. Paul asked that Council focus on these
projects both now and later. Administrator Culbreth-Graft suggested adding the words "include
focus on trails and bikeways." Councilmember Cook clarified her intention to cut back on miles
traveled by residents, and ways to create projects that help reach this goal. Mayor Pro Tem
Coerper inquired if the City has a traffic signal program in place. Deputy City Administrator Paul
Emery and Public Works Director Robert F. Beardsley reported on a traffic signal priority list and
stated a traffic management plan does not currently exist. Mayor Pro Tem Coerper also
inquired about traffic calming methods. Director Beardsley reported on various traffic calming
measures. Mayor Sullivan stated his opinion that the focus should be on traffic synchronization
and on creating a master plan.
Ms. Paul asked if Councilmembers had questions on project detail pages 1A.4 through 1A.10 of
the agenda packet. Councilmember Hansen asked about Project 2a - the Central Net Training
Facility. Fire Chief Duane Olson reported on the Central Net Tower, which is currently being
refurbished and for which funding has already been secured. Ms. Paul indicated that the
projects listed in the report are examples of the types of projects Council had previously stated
are important. Mayor Pro Tem Coerper asked for clarification on training for fire personnel, and
Chief Olson reported.
January 23, 2006 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 3 of 6
Councilmember Bohr inquired about the funding source for Project 2b — Fire Dispatch
Communications Center. Chief Olson stated funding is already secured for the project.
Councilmember Green asked for clarification on the project listed on page 1A.4 — Core City
Services Identification. Deputy City Administrator Emery provided an explanation on
prioritization of services and development of a community survey. Councilmember Green also
inquired about page 1A.3 — City Services Goal 2, asking if the projects listed are feasible. City
Administrator Culbreth-Graft stated the projects would require a broad focus, including all key
service areas. She suggested comparisons be made between cities of similar size and staffing.
Mayor Pro Tern Coerper restated his support for increasing public safety staffing.
Councilmember Green asked if direction to staff is needed on specific projects such as the Fire
Station Relocation. Ms. Paul requested that Councilmembers only add or remove critical
information, and state their opinions on phasing projects. Councilmember Green spoke
regarding the Senior Center, clarifying she would like the feasibility study to begin in Phase 1.
Administrator Culbreth-Graft indicated both the needs assessment and the feasibility study are
currently underway. Ms. Paul stated projects could be prioritized as Phase 2 with pre -planning
initiated in Phase 1.
City Administrator Culbreth-Graft spoke regarding Project 4 — Green Building Practices and
reported that some enhancement projects have commenced. Councilmember Green asked
about the City's success at meeting standards and saving resources. Public Works Director
Beardsley reported on a City Hall energy retrofit that included switching out boilers and
improving lighting. Administrator Culbreth-Graft indicated that staff would review energy usage
in the City. Director Beardsley reported an audit was done five or six years ago.
Ms. Perkins asked for Council comments on Economic Development goals and projects.
Councilmember Cook commented on Economic Development Goal 1, stating she supports a
balanced approach to tourism. She also stated she is uncomfortable with the language of Goal
2. Revisions were discussed and the Council reached a consensus to revise the language as:
"Improve the efficiency of the development review process."
Regarding Project 1 — Downtown Design/Layout, Councilmember Cook suggested revising
language to list specific unifying attributes that make development projects flow together
visually. Councilmember Green commented on the Huntington Beach Conference and Visitors
Bureau (HBCVB)'s request for funding and asked that it be included in the projects.
Councilmember Hansen suggested adding a project: "Analyze potential for a long-term contract
with the HBCVB." Councilmember Green asked for more specifics, including a permanent
information kiosk. Councilmember Bohr stated his support for analyzing the need for a
permanent facility at Pier Plaza.
Regarding Economic Development Goal 2, Bohr suggested investigating ways to implement an
expedited plan process, for a fee. Councilmember Hansen suggested adding a fourth column to
the charts that references work done to date, similar to a backlog. Councilmember Green
suggested an ombudsman's program. Regarding page 1 B.4 of the agenda packet,
Councilmember Hardy reported a conflict between the project description and information within
the associated matrix. Administrator Culbreth-Graft indicated a correct version would be
provided.
Councilmember Green asked for the definition of economic toolbox, and Economic
Development Director Stanley Smalewitz explained funding opportunities as possible tools.
Councilmember Bohr inquired about a major arterial to the ocean referred to on page 1 B.5 of
the agenda packet, and the estimated cost. Administrator Culbreth-Graft commented on
January 23, 2006 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 4 of 6
exploring redevelopment options as an economic tool. Councilmember Hardy asked for
confirmation that the major arterial to the ocean is Beach Boulevard. Deputy Administrator Paul
Emery confirmed. Referring to page 1 B.6, Councilmember Bohr requested the Study Session
be detailed and comprehensive.
Ms. Paul transitioned discussion to Engaging the Community Goal and Projects. She reminded
Councilmembers of public comments made earlier that suggested revising verbiage. Mayor
Sullivan suggested adding the word "dialogue" after the word "involvement" in the proposed
revised version of the goal. Councilmembers agreed to this change by consensus. Regarding
page 1 C.2, Councilmember Hardy commented on the third constraint and suggested it be
reworded in a more positive manner. Councilmember Cook suggested a flyer be created that
outlines the public's opportunities to reach Councilmembers. Councilmembers directed staff to
reword the third constraint.
Regarding pages 1 C.2 and 1 C.3 of the agenda packet, Councilmember Bohr suggested adding
a project that would place more emphasis on televising programs that outline City services and
educate the public. Mayor Pro Tern Coerper directed staff to ensure reports given on Channel 3
are current, and that City Hall telephone hold messages be used as an opportunity to educate
the public about City services. Councilmember Hansen asked how the suggested survey would
be administered. Deputy Administrator Paul Emery reported on available methods.
Councilmember Cook and Mayor Sullivan commented on the crafting of survey questions, and
the purpose of the survey. City Administrator Culbreth-Graft spoke relative to survey intentions
and design. Mayor Pro Tern Coerper voiced his opinions on soliciting residents' opinions and
indicated his support for a survey. Councilmember Bohr and Mayor Sullivan also voiced their
support for a survey.
Councilmember Bohr inquired about creation of a Community Foundation, and a decision was
made by Council for staff to investigate adding this as a project. Council then referred to the
replacement page 1 B.4 presented by Economic Development Director Smalewitz. Ms. Perkins
asked for comments, and Councilmember Bohr requested a constraint be added which would
specifically address the impact of closing Main Street, including which blocks, which days,
seasons, and etc.
City Administrator Culbreth-Graft asked Director Smalewitz to explain the HUD 108 loans.
Director Smalewitz reported on low interest loans and repayment options for economic
development projects. He also indicated cost estimates for the major arterial improvement,
stating costs include acquisition of land and assumed private investment.
The Council recessed at 5:12 p.m. and reconvened at 5:34 p.m.
Discussion was held relative to Financial Goals and Projects. Regarding Goal 1, Council
agreed to accept the proposed revised version. Pertaining to Goal 2, Council agreed to retain
the original version. Councilmember Bohr spoke regarding page 1 D.2 of the agenda packet and
inquired about a long-term fiscal plan that would include new sources of funding. He also
commented on the importance of identifying the options with regards to the item on page 1 D.3.
Councilmember Hardy suggested more specific verbiage to allow Council to better understand
staff recommendations. Councilmember Cook stated she would like to hear more about the
long-term consequences of Council decisions. Ms. Perkins summarized the discussion and
suggested adding a project which creates an internal process of outlining the consequences of
Council decisions. Mayor Pro Tern Coerper requested a deadline be set for review of projects.
Regarding page 1 D.5 of the agenda packet, Councilmember Hansen inquired about changes in
tax laws. Councilmember Cook responded and spoke about the Telecom Act.
January 23, 2006 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 5 of 6
Pertaining to Infrastructure Goal 1 and Projects on page 1 E.2 of the agenda packet, Mayor Pro
Tern Coerper inquired about harbour dredging by the County. Councilmember Cook indicated
the County was only responsible for a portion of the dredging, and suggested establishing a
fund. Public Works Director Beardsley reported on a Harbour Committee Study Session and
City Attorney Jennifer McGrath reported on a subcommittee H-item request. Referring to page
1 E.5 and 1 E.6 of the agenda packet, Councilmember Green asked about pavement ratings and
liability reductions. Director Beardsley reported on the need for pavement ratings. Deputy
Administrator Emery reported on liability reductions and the goal to be proactive.
Councilmember Bohr commented on private investment in relation to these projects.
Councilmember Green suggested adding the words "encourage private investment" to the
project list. Councilmember Cook suggested adding the following: "access opportunities for
alley dedication and update of landscape code to encourage plantings that require less
resources to maintain." Councilmember Hardy pointed out similarities between the project listed
on page 1 E.7 and City Services, Goal 1. Ms. Paul announced this project would be moved to a
position under City Services - Goal 1. Councilmember Green voiced concerns with some traffic
calming measures.
Regarding Land Use Development Goals and Projects on page 1 F.1 of the agenda packet,
Councilmember Green inquired about the timing of the studies and City Administrator Culbreth-
Graft reported. Councilmembers approved the proposed revised version of Goal 3. On page
1 F.2, Councilmember Hardy commented on a specific plan for Beach Boulevard and asked for a
separate project pertaining to completion of the Edinger Corridor specific plan. Councilmember
Cook suggested adding a project related to visioning of all corridors, and Councilmember Bohr
stated his concurrence.
Referring to page 1 F.3 of the agenda packet, Councilmember Hansen suggested creating a
report that identifies upcoming school site purchase opportunities, which would include details
such as size and current and allowed use. He also suggested adding the words "school
districts" to the right column of the page. Pertaining to page 1 FA, Councilmember Hardy
suggested adding the words "neighborhood compatibility" to the far right column.
Councilmember Cook suggested reference to a Historic Preservation Ordinance. Mayor
Sullivan stated his opinion this is a citywide issue, not specific only to historic areas. Council
agreed to add to the project "a review of policies regarding neighborhood compatibility."
Regarding page 1 F.5 of the agenda packet, Councilmember Cook commented on opportunities
to change the land use in some areas. Councilmember Hansen spoke regarding economic -
driven land use changes. Councilmember Bohr suggested removing disincentives to
developers and landowners for upgrading commercial centers.
Pertaining to page 1 F.7, Project 3 - Bolsa Chica Annexation, Mayor Pro Tern Coerper inquired
about the purpose of project. Councilmember Cook reported on LAFCO requests. Mayor
Sullivan requested a cost/benefit analysis. Council agreed to keep the project on the list. Ms.
Perkins announced that Project 4 — Surplus School Site listed on page 1 F.8 would be moved
over to Land Use Development, Goal 2. Councilmember Bohr spoke regarding page 1 F.9 -
Affordable Housing asking Council to take a look at "for sale" versus rental property. Economic
Development Director Smalewitz indicated a workshop on this topic is scheduled for the future.
Councilmember Green commented on data currently available to Council regarding the Bolsa
Chica annexation. Councilmembers Hardy, Cook, and Mayor Pro Tern Coerper all stated
opinions that more information is needed regarding the costs involved with annexation. Council
agreed to add a project: "Council review of annexation costs/benefits."
January 23, 2006 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 6 of 6
Ms. Perkins asked Councilmembers to identify their choices of projects for Phase 1 (green) and
Phase 2 (yellow) by placing dots on charts hanging on the wall. Results of the dot voting
reflected Engaging the Community, Goal 1 as Phase 2 and the remaining goals as Phase 1.
The consultants suggested staff present an implementation plan to Council that addresses
phasing. Ms. Paul stated a strategic plan would be written by the consultants that reflects ail of
the planning up through this meeting. She stated it would also include suggestions for
performance measures, and that Council would receive the strategic plan by the end of
February, with the implementation plan to follow.
Ms. Perkins asked for an evaluation of the study session. Councilmembers listed positives,
including keeping the meeting focused, good presentation, organized material, and graphics.
Comments on the overall process included: brainstorming identified important projects and
priorities, the process gave a great foundation for Council to improve the City, the plan can be
taken to the community, performance measures may be useful with staff as well, and the plan
offers a good roadmap for staff to work from. City Administrator Culbreth-Graft suggested
Council eventually reprioritize goals in order to give more specific direction than Phase 1 and
Phase 2. Concerns of Councilmembers and staff were listed as follows: the meeting had a
slow start, it is a long process, it is difficult to prioritize goals, staff is concerned with phasing, the
high volume of projects, too many dots, and funding availability will determine implementation.
City Administrator Culbreth-Graft suggested the Executive Team meet and discuss phasing,
then bring a report back to Council, perhaps in conjunction with the presentation of Waterfront
Hilton funds.
Councilmembers commented on the success of this planning process. City Administrator
Culbreth-Graft voiced some concern with ending the process with the consultants at this point,
and suggested another meeting for Councilmembers to finalize prioritization of projects. Ms.
Perkins clarified that the strategic plan delivered in February will be a draft document, with staff
concurrently working on an implementation plan. Councilmembers expressed their desire to
meet again to finalize the plan. Mayor Sullivan suggested that staffs implementation plan be
given back to Council, and at that point Council determine the next step in the process.
Adjournment — City Council/Redevelopment Agency
Mayor Sullivan adjourned the adjourned regular meetings of the City Council/Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at 7:09 p.m. to Monday, February 6, 2006, at 4:00 p.m., in
Room B-8 Civic Center, 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California.
ATTEST:
,AS City Clerk -Clerk
AIR&I�PIA;i City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of th6Zity
Council of the City of Huntington Beach
and Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Huntington Beach, California
Mayor -Chair