HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-01-24MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
Room B-8 - Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach California
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2007 - 1:30 P.M.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Mary Beth Broeren
STAFF MEMBER: Tess Nguyen, Andrew Gonzales, Ron Santos, Jeanie
Cutler (recording secretary)
MINUTES:
NONE
ORAL COMMUNICATION: NONE
ITEM 1: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-041 (METRO PCS WIRELESS
COMMUNICATION FACILITY):
APPLICANT:
Ryan Hammersmith, 15131 Triton Lane #106, Huntington Beach,
CA 91770
PROPERTY OWNER:
Scott Haney, Southern California Edison, 2244 Walnut Grove
Ave., Rosemead, CA 91770
REQUEST:
To permit the installation of a wireless communication facility
consisting of antennas on an existing Edison tower and
equipment cabinets located at the base of the tower within an
enclosure.
LOCATION:
10160 Atlanta Avenue (south of Spar Circle, west of Santa Ana
River)
PROJECT PLANNER:
Tess Nguyen
Tess Nguyen, Staff Planner, displayed project plans and photographs and stated the purpose,
location, zoning, and existing uses of the requested 'project. Staff presented an overview of
the proposed project and the suggested findings and conditions of approval as presented in
the executive summary emphasizing the suggested modifications to the plans.
Staff recommended approval of the request based upon the suggested findings and subject to
the suggested conditions as presented in the executive summary. Staff stated that a
neighboring property owner came to the Planning Counter on January 17, 2007 with questions
related to the aesthetics of the project. No other verbal or written comments were received in
response to the public notification.
Mary Beth Broeren, Zoning Administrator, confirmed with staff the existence of 'a general
40 access road which is currently being used by Southern California Edison employees.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
THERE WERE NO PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST
AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Ms. Broeren confirmed with Ryan Hammersmith, Applicant, the location of the existing access
area to the structure.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR
DAYS.
FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA:
The Zoning Administrator finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the
environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to section 15303—New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures of
the CEQA Guidelines because the project consists of the installation of small new equipment
and facilities in small structures.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COND ITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-041
1 . Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-041 to install a wireless communication facility, consisting
of antennas attached to an existing Southern California Edison tower at a height of
approximately 50 ft. and an equipment enclosure located at grade, beneath the tower, will
not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or
detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The
proposed facility will not generate noise, traffic, and demand for additional parking or other
impacts detrimental to surrounding property.
2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because the proposed
facility will be located on and adjacent to existing Southern California Edison transmission
towers, on an existing SCE right-of-way. The design of the facility, which features
antennas painted to match the tower to which it is attached, and an equipment shelter
constructed of masonry with a tiled roof, and pain r ted with an earth -tone color, will ensure
compatibility of the proposed facility with surrounding uses.
3. The proposed conditional use permit will comply with the provisions of the base district and
other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the H.untington Beach Zoning and Subdivision
Ordinance, including the provisions of HBZSO Section 230.96—Wireless Communication
Facilities.
4. The granting of the conditional use permit wii - ll'not adversely affect the General Plan. It is
consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property. In
addition, it is consistent with the following goals, and policies of the General Plan:
GAZONING ADMINISTRATOR\ZAMIN\07\07zmOl24.DOC 2 (07=0124)
0
a. L.U. 2: Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure,
0 utility infrastructure, and public services.
b. U.D. 2.2: Minimize the visual impact of oil production facilities and other utilities where
they encroach upon view corridors or are visually incompatible with their surrounding
uses,
c. U. 5.1: Ensure that adequate natural gas, telecommunication and electrical systems are
provided.
d. U.5.1.1: Continue to work with service providers to maintain current levels of service
and facilitate improved levels of service.
The proposed facility will enhance wireless communications in the community by improving
signal transmission and reception in the project vicinity. In addition, the proposed installation
of antennas with an existing transmission tower, and the use of compatible materials to screen
the equipment cabinets, will minimize the project's visual impacts.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-041
The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated October 20, 2006 shall be
the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications:
a. The proposed wireless communication equipment enclosure shall be modified to
include a mansard roof along the perimeter of the enclosure but open at the center of
the roof to provide ventilation for the equipment inside. (DRB)
b. The proposed wireless communication equipment enclosure shall be painted with an
earth -tone color. (DRIS)
2. Any graffiti on the proposed wireless 'communication equipment 'enclosure shall be
removed by the applicant within 72 hours of being notified. (DR1B)
3. Prior to building permit final, any trenching done during the construction of the wireless
communication facility shall be repaired to the original condition. (DRB)
INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION:
The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if
different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers,
and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees
and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or
annul any approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City
Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall
promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in
the defense thereof.
G:VONING ADMINISTRATOR\ZAMIN\07\07ZM0124.DOC 3 (07=0124)
ITEM 2: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -NO. 2006-042 (METRO PCS-WIRELE
COMMUNICATION FACILITY
I
APPLICANT:
Ryan Hammersmith, 15131 Triton Lane #106, Huntington Beach,
CA 92649
PROPERTY OWNER:
Scott Haney, Southern California Edison, 2244 Walnut Grove
Ave., Rosemead, CA 91770
REQUEST:
To permit the installation of a wireless communication facility
consisting of antennas on an existing Edison tower and
equipment cabinets located at the base of the tower within an
enclosure
LOCATION:
20470 Ravenwood Lane (south of Warwick Drive, west.of Santa
Ana River in Le Bard Park)
PROJECT PLANNER:
Tess Nguyen
Tess Nguyen, Staff Planner, displayed project plans and photographs and stated the purpose,
location, zoning, and existing Uses of the requested project. Staff presented an overview of
the proposed project and the suggested findings and conditions of approval as presented in
the executive summary.
Staff recommended approval of the request based upon.the suggested findings and subject to
the suggested conditions as presented in the executive summary. Staff stated that one phone
call was received with concerns relating to the impact of the construction with the park, and
Merrilee Madrigal, local resident, submitted a letter in opposition to the project. No other
written or verbal comments were received in response to the public notification.
Mary Beth Broeren, Zoning Administrator confirmed with staff that changes may be necessary
to the access easement of the conceptual master pla ' n for Le Bard Park based on comments
. received from the Community Services Department.
Ms. Broeren, stated that she had read the letter from Ms. Madrigal.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
Merrilee Madrigal, 10231 Cliff Drive, orange Coast River Park Committee member, local
resident, and Director of HB Park Foundation, spoke in opposition to the project stating she is
working with the City's Community Services Department to put together a park plan. Ms.
Madrigal's concerns were, related to flooding and drainage issues and she stressed the need
for a watershed plan and biological study prior to approving the project. Ms. Madrigal urged the
Zoning Administrator to conside ' r postponing the project until after the Environmental Review of
the Le Bard Park Master Plan is completed.
Ryan Hammersmith, Applicant, spoke in support of the project and emphasized the need to
avoid postponing the project, stating his willingness to work with City departments to approve
the grading and the conceptual plan.
E
G:\ZONING ADMINISTRATOR\ZAMIN\07\07ZM0124�DOC 4 - (07=01 24)
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Ms. Broeren stressed her familiarity with the project site, the conceptual plan and the
Environmental Review process that the City is undertaking. Ms. Broeren stated she did not
believe it necessary to postpone the project because it is considered a minor structure, and the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) allows minor projects to go forward with
categorical exceptions.
Ms. Broeren stated her understanding of the drainage issue and what is currently occurring on
site, however she did not believe that the project would cause any further drainage issues, nor
would it present any health and safety issues that would warrant postponing the project until
the Environmental Review is completed,
Ms. Broeren stated that the grading plan would be reviewed prior to approval by the Public
Works Department, and the condition requiring the site be returned to its original grade
addressed the short term drainage issues. The Zoning Administrator stated that because
there is an existing wireless communication building on the site, it is evidence to the fact that
the drainage situation that has not been exacerbated by those structures.
The Zoning Administrator stated her agreement with the DRB recommended conditions. She
also noted to the applicant that the Community Services Department had outlined their access
plan based upon the conceptual park plan and that plan could change as a result of the
Environmental Review process. Ms. Broeren stressed the need for the- applicant to advise his
client regarding possible changes and for flexibility when working with the Community Services
is Department.
Ms. Broeren stated that she was going to approve the requested Conditional Use Permit with
the suggested conditions based upon the findings recommended by staff. .
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-042 WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10)
CALENDAR DAYS.
FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA:
The Zoning Administrator finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the
environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to section 15303—New Construction or Conversion of Smafi Structures of
the CEQA Guidelines because the project consists of the installation of small new equipment
and facilities in small structures.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-042
1. Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-042 to install a wireless communication facility, consisting
0 of antennas attached to an existing Southern California Edison tower at a height of
GAZONING ADMINISTRATORZAMI N\07\07=01 24. DOC 5 (07zm0124)
approximately 50 ft. and an equipment enclosure located at grade, beneath the tower, will
not be detrimental the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or
detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The
proposed facility will not generate noise, traffic, and demand for additional parking or other
impacts detrimental to surrounding property.
2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because the proposed
facility will be located on and adjacent to existing Southern California Edison transmission
towers, on an existing SCE right-of-way. The design of the facility, which features
antennas painted to match the tower to which it is attached, and an equipment shelter
constructed of masonry with a tiled roof to match an existing equipment shelter adjacent to
the subject site, will ensure compatibility of the proposed facility With surrounding uses.
3. The proposed conditional use permit will comply with the provisions of the base district and
other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision
Ordinance, including the provisions of HBZSO Section 230.96—Wireless Communication
Facilities.
4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is
consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property. In
addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan:
a. L.U. 2: Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation
infrastructure, utility infrastructure, and public services.
b� U.D. 2.2: Minimize the visual impact of oil production facilities and other utilities is
where they encroach upon view corridors or are visually incompatible with their
surrounding uses.
c. U. 5.1: Ensure that adequate natural gas, telecommunication and electrical systems
are provided.
d. U.5.1.1: Continue to work with service providers to maintain current levels of service
I and facilitate improved levels of service.
The proposed facility will enhance wireless communications in the community by improving
signal transmission and reception in the project vicinity. In addition, the proposed installation
of antennas with an existing transmission tower, and the use of compatible materials to screen
the equipment cabinets, will minimize the project's visual impacts.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-042
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated October 20, 2006 shall be
the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications:
a. The access easement on the site plan shall be revised to comply with the Master
Plan for Le Bard Park as approved by the City Council. (The Plan is pending
approval).
40
G:70NING ADMINISTRATOR\ZAMIN�07XO7ZM0124.boc 6 (07=0124)
2. Building permits shall not be issued until Environmental Assessment No. 06-09 for the
0 Master Plan for Le Bard Park is completed.
3. Any graffiti on the proposed wireless communication equipment enclosure shall be
removed by the applicant within 72 hours of being notified. (DRB)
4. Prior to building permit final, any trenching done during the construction of the wireless
communication facility shall be repaired to the original condition. (DR1B)
INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION:
The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if
different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers,
and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees
and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack,. set aside, void or
annul any approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City
Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall
promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in
the defense thereof.
ITEM 3: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2006-017 (WONG ROOM ADDITION):
APPLICANT:
Dennis Braeutigam, 696 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 226, Pasadena,
CA 91101
PROPERTY OWNER:
Dr. Ing Liong Wong, 16891 Bolero Lane, Huntington Beach, CA
92649
REQUEST:
To permit a 548 sq. ft. first and second floor addition to an
existing two-story residence located adjacent to Huntington
Harbor
LOCATION:
16891 Bolero Lane (west side of Bolero Lane, near comer of
Bolero Lane and Finisterre Drive)
PROJECT PLANNER:
Andrew Gonzales
40
Andrew Gonzales, Staff Planner, displayed project plans and photographs and stated the
purpose, location, zoning, and existing uses of the requested project. Staff presented an
overview of the proposed project and the suggested findings and conditions of approval as
presented in the executive summary.
Staff recommended approval of the request based upon the suggested findings and subject to
the suggested conditions as presented in the executive summary. Staff stated that no written
or verbal comments were received in response to the public notification.
Mary Beth Broeren, Zoning Administrator, confirmed with staff the 5 ft. roof pitch requirement
does not apply due to the height of the structure being less than 30 ft.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
GAZONING ADMINISTRATOR\ZAMIN\07\07zmOI24.DOC 7 (07zm0124)
Dennis Braeutigam, Applicant, stated his availability to answer any questions and presented
the Zoning Administrator with a colored drawing of the project. 0
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS.
FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA:
The Zoning'Administrator finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the
environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project consists of an
addition less than 50% of the existing single-family home.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2006-017:
Coastal Development Permit No. 2006-017 ' for the construction of a 548 sq. ft. first and
second floor addition to an existing single-family home with an overall building height to
match the existing home at 20 ft. 6 in., as proposed, conforms with the General Plan,
including the Local Coastal Program land use designation of Residential Low -Density. The
project is consistent with Costal Land Use Policy C 1. 1 - I to encourage development within,
contiguous to or in close proximity to existing developed areas able to accommodate it.
The proposed construction will occur on a previously developed site, contiguous to existing
residential development.
2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning
district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The project complies
with all other applicable development regulations, including maximum building height,
minimum yard setback, minimum on -site parking, and site coverage.
3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in
a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. The proposed addition will be
constructed on a developed site in an urbanized area with all necessary services and
infrastructure available, including water, sewer, and road.
4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of
Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The project will not impede public access or
impact public views to coastal resources.
INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION:
The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if
different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers,
and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees is
G:ZONING ADMINISTRATOR\ZAMIN\07�07ZM0124.DOC 8 (07=0124)
A& and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or
annul any'approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City
Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall
promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in
the defense thereof.
ITEM 4: VARIANCE NO. 2006-013 (BISSON INDUSTRIAL BUILDING):
APPLICANT/
PROPERTY OWNER: Monty Bisson, 15651 Container Lane, Huntington Beach, CA
92649
REQUEST: To permit a zero side yard setback in lieu of 30 ft. required for a
2,500 sq. ft., 15 ft. high, metal awning structure.
LOCATION: 15651 Container Lane (west side of Container Lane, between Mc
Fadden Avenue and Research Drive)
PROJECT PLANNER: Andrew Gonzales
Andrew Gonzales, Staff Planner, displayed project plans and photographs and stated the
purpose, location, zoning, history, and existing uses of the requested project. Staff presented
an overview of the proposed �project and the suggested findings and conditions of approval as
presented in the executive summary. -
Staff recommended approval of the request based upon the suggested findings and subject to
the suggested conditions as presented in the executive summary. Staff stated that one inquiry
was received with questions of a general nature and no comments or concerns were stated.
No other written or verbal comments were received in response to the public notification.
Mary Beth Broeren, Zoning Administrator, asked staff about the Development Standards Matrix
and confirmed that the floor area ratio maximum is not applicable to an unenclosed structure.
Ms. Broeren advised staff that the plans are to be corrected to remove the maximum site
coverage requirement before completing Plan Check.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
Paul Ginder, 15632 Container Lane, neighboring property owner, stated his major concerns
related to parking issues and the presence of product being stored in the outside parking lot,
and presented a letter to the Zoning Administrator outlining such.
Monty Bisson, Applicant, spoke infavor of the project and stated the reasons for the parking
issues were related to the pending installation of new storage racks.
Dan Beauchamp, Architect for the project, stated that he expected to have a building permit for
the storage rack installation within 30 days which would resolve the parking issues.
Ms. Broeren engaged in discussions with Mr. Bisson concerning Rainbow Disposal's access to
the prop", storage in the parking lot, and alternate storage options in the case of any further
delay. Ms. Broeren stated that outdoor storage within the city requires approval and noted that
Code Enforcement would follow up in 60 days to ensure that the parking lot was not being
used for storage purposes.
G:7-ONING ADMINISTRATOR\ZAMIN\07\07zmOI24.DOC 9 (07ZM0124)
Mr, Ginder and Mr. Bisson agreed on working together to come to a positive resolution in
relation to any concerns or issues they may have.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Ms. Broeren stated she would approve the variance with the suggested findings and conditions
as recommended by staff and asked staff to follow up with Code Enforcement, and have the
site plan corrected with respect to the site coverage issue.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-013 WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10)
CALENDAR DAYS.
FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA
The Zoning Administrator finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the
environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project consists of an
addition less than 50% of the existing industrial building.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - VARIANCE NO. 2006-013:
I . The granting of Variance No. 2006-013 for a zero side yard setback in lieu of 30 feet
required for an approximately 2,500 square foot, 15 feet high, metal awning structure will
not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with li ' mitations upon other properties
in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification, The subject property is located
within a developed industrial area with properties of similar building setbacks. The
proposed awning, located between existing buildings and a parking lot, will expanse a
portion of the rear subject property and will not generate additional noise, traffic, parking, or
other impacts detrimental to surrounding property and consistent with the subject property's
industrial zoning, The site provides the necessary parking to accommodate the proposed
structure.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including
surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone
classification. The metal awning structure shall adjoin a portion of an existing building in
order to provide shelter to employees and products from weather related elements during
shipping activities. The awning shelter will cover a portion of the site's parking lot and abut
a building with a zero side yard setback located on the neighboring property. The awning
encroachment will not remove or create the need for additional onsite parking. Pursuant to
the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, structures within an industrial
district are permitted with a zero side yard setback if not abutting a residential district,
provided that the opposite side yard is a minimum of 30 feet which the existing industrial 40
G:\ZONING ADMINISTRATOR\ZAMIN\07\07zmOI24.DOC 10 (07=01 24)
building exceeds. The metal awning structure will not be enclosed and will utilize the
roofed area along the rear portion of the property for parking purposes only.
3. The granting of a variance is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more
substantial property rights. Due to the nature of the proposed business, the proposed
awning will allow necessary protection for shipping activities. The existing building is
developed to site capacity, and the metal awning structure allows modernization of the
subject building without interfering with parking and access.
4. The granfing of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to property in the same zone classification. The subject site is located within a
developed industrial area and bounded by buildings constructed to their corresponding
property line. Minimum side yard setbacks will be maintained along a majority of the
northerly property line allowing for site access. Adequate buffers on the subject property
and adjacent lots will be maintained.
5. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with
the Land Use Element designation of Industrial Limited (1-172-d) on the subject property. In
addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan:
a. LU 12.1.1 Accommodate the continuation of existing and development of new
manufacturing and similar uses in the area designated on the Land Use Plan Map in
accordance with Policy LU 7. 1. 1.
b. ED 1.1 Enhance the City's marketing potential in terms of retail, office, industrial, and
visitor serving activity. This would allow Huntington Beach to provide for retail, office,
and industrial opportunities that serve the current and project population and enhance
sales and occupant tax revenue.
c. ED 2.5.1 Encourage and assist existing and potential industrial owners to update,
modernize, and expand their industrial properties.
The granting of the variance will aid to sustain the operation of an existing business, and
ensure that an evolving business remains within the City of Huntington Beach by providing
opportunities for the owner to modernize their property in order to remain competitive within
a specific field. The proposed metal awning structure allows the subject property owner to
tailor their site to accommodate to the operational characteristics of their business without
relocating to a site outside of Huntington Beach.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VARIANCE NO. 2006-013
The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 15, 2006, shall be
the conceptually approved design.
INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION:
The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if
different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers,
and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees
and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or
annul any approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City
G:)ZONING ADMINISTRATOR7-AMIN\07\07zmOl24.DOC I I (07=0124)
Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall
promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in
the defense thereof.
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 2:1 OPM BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO THE
NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ON
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 31, 2007 AT 1:30 PM.
Mary beth groeren
Zoning Administrator
JC
0
0
G:\ZONING ADMINISTRATOR\ZAMIN\07\07zmOI24.DOC 12 (07=01 24)