HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance #3343 S 7-
ORDINANCE NO. 3343
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE MERGER OF
AND AMENDMENTS TO
THE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE
HUNTINGTON CENTER, MAIN-PIER, OAKVIEW,
TALBERT-BEACH AND YORKTOWN-LAKE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
AS INCORPORATED INTO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN,
may,.
FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach (the "City Council")
adopted Ordinance No. 2576 on September 20, 1982 approving and adopting the
Redevelopment Plan for the Yorktown-Lake Redevelopment Project; and
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2577 on September 20, 1982 approving
and adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project; and
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2578 on September 20, 1982 approving
and adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project, and
thereafter on September 6, 1983 by Ordinance No. 2634 amended the Redevelopment
Plan for the Main-Pier Project; and
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2582 on November 1, 1982 approving
and adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project, and
thereafter on July 5, 1989 by Ordinance No. 3002 amended the Redevelopment Plan for
the Oakview Project; and
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2743 on November 26, 1984 approving
and adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Huntington Center Commercial District
Redevelopment Project; and
The City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
(the "Agency") desire to amend and merge the Yorktown-Lake, Talbert-Beach, Main-Pier,
Oakview and Huntington Center Redevelopment Projects (the "Constituent Projects") and
create the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project (the "Project"), which will be of
substantial benefit and in the interests of the public peace, health, safety and welfare, will
contribute to the revitalization of the blighted areas through the increased economic -
vitality of the areas and through increased and improved housing opportunities in or near
the areas; and
The Agency has formulated and prepared a Redevelopment Plan for the
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project (the "Redevelopment Plan") which
1
SFIs:PMOrdinance:Mergredv
1116196-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
provides for the following redevelopment plan amendments and merger (the "Merger
Amendments"): Merges the redevelopment plans for the Constituent Projects into a
single redevelopment plan ("Plan") to be designated as the Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Project and Project Area; increases the dollar limit on the cumulative
amount of tax increment revenue the Agency may be allocated from the Project and
eliminates all preexisting annual limits; increases the dollar limit on the amount of
indebtedness that may be outstanding at any one time; extends the time frame within
which the Agency may incur indebtedness on behalf of the Project; on a selective basis,
extends the time frame within which the Agency may employ eminent domain
proceedings on nonresidential properties in the Main-Pier and Huntington Center
Commercial District areas and rescinds Resolution 48; extends the time periods within
which the Agency may undertake redevelopment activities and receive tax increment; and
expands the list of infrastructure and public facility projects that the Agency may
undertake within the Project Area; and
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources
Code Section 21000 et sec ("CEQA"}, the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and environmental procedures adopted by the
Agency pursuant thereto, the Agency prepared and circulated for public review and
comment a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Huntington Beach Redevelopment
Project (the "Draft EIR") for the proposed Project Area; and
After a duly noticed public hearing on the Draft EIR and the incorporation of
comments and recommendations received and Agency responses thereto into a Final
Environmental Impact Report (the "Final EIR"), the Agency by Resolution certified that the
Final EIR was prepared and completed in compliance with CEQA and State and local
guidelines and procedures adopted pursuant thereto; and
The Planning Commission made its Report and Recommendation on the proposed
Redevelopment Plan, and
The Agency submitted the proposed Redevelopment Plan to the City Council,
together with the Report to the City Council which includes: the reasons for selecting the
proposed Project, including a description of the physical and economic conditions existing
in the Project at the time of adoption of the Constituent Project Plans; a discussion of
Agency accomplishments to improve or alleviate the conditions of blight in the Constituent
Project Areas; a description of current physical and economic conditions existing in the
Project Area causing blight, including confirmation that the Project remains urbanized; a
description of projects proposed to alleviate the remaining conditions of blight; an
explanation of why the elimination of blight and redevelopment of the Project Area cannot
reasonably be expected to be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone or by the
use of financing alternatives other than a tax increment financing, the proposed method of
financing the redevelopment of the Project Area and an assessment of the economic
feasibility of the proposed Plan, and the need for a provision for the division of taxes
pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law; a description of how the proposed
2
SF/s:PCD:Ordhance:Mergredv
11/6196-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
projects will improve or alleviate conditions of physical and economic blight; a method and
plan for the relocation of families and persons who may be temporarily or permanently
displaced from housing facilities as a result of the proposed Amended Plan; an analysis
of the Preliminary Plan; the Report and Recommendation of the Planning Commission; a
summary record of the proceedings; the Final EIR; the report of the County Fiscal Officer
and the Agency's analysis thereof; a summary of consultations with taxing agencies; and
a Neighborhood Impact Report; and
The City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing on November 18, 1996
to consider the approval and adoption of the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the
Project Area; and
Notice of said hearing was duly and regularly published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the City of Huntington Beach once a week for four successive weeks prior to
the date of said hearing, and a copy of said notice and affidavits of publication are on file
with the City Clerk; and
Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed to residential and business
tenants and to the last known assessee of each parcel of land in the Project Area by first
class mail; and
Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return
receipt requested to the governing body of each taxing agency which levies taxes upon
property in the Project Area; and
The Agency has adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve
and adopt the proposed Redevelopment Plan; and
The Agency and the City Council certified that the information contained in the
Final EIR had been reviewed and considered, made all necessary findings and
determinations, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations and a Reporting and
Monitoring Program for lmplementation of Mitigation Measures, pursuant to the
requirements of CEQA; and
The City Council has considered the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the Agency's
Report to the City Council, other recommendations of the Agency, the Report and
Recommendation of the Planning Commission, the economic feasibility of the proposed
Redevelopment Plan , and the Final EIR; has provided an opportunity for all persons to
be heard and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for and
against any and all aspects of the proposed Redevelopment Plan, including
environmental impacts; and has responded in writing to each written objection of each
affected property owner or taxing entity.
3
SF/s:PCD:Ordinance:Mergredv
1116196-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The purposes and intent of the City Council with respect to the
Project Area, and each Constituent Project are to achieve the following goals and
objectives with respect to the Project Area:
a. Eliminate and prevent the spread of conditions of blight including:
underutilized properties and deteriorating buildings, incompatible and
uneconomic land uses, deficient infrastructure and facilities, obsolete
structures, and other economic deficiencies in order to create a more
favorable environment for commercial, office, industrial, residential, and
recreational development.
b. Expand the commercial base of the Project Area.
C. Improve public facilities and public infrastructure.
d. Improve inadequate drainage infrastructure.
e. Improve and/or provide electric, gas, telephone, and wastewater
infrastructure to both developed and undeveloped properties within the
Project Area.
f. Promote local job opportunities.
g. Encourage the cooperation and participation of residents, businesses,
business persons, public agencies, and community organizations in the
redevelopment/revitalization of the Project Area.
h. Implement design and use standards to assure high aesthetic and
environmental quality, and provide unity and integrity to developments
within the Project Area.
i. Address parcels of property that are: of irregular form and shape, are
inadequately sized for proper usefulness and development, and/or are held
in multiple ownership.
j. Remove impediments to land disposition and development through the
assembly of property into reasonably sized and shaped parcels served by -
improved infrastructure and public facilities.
k. Recycle and/or develop underutilized parcels to accommodate higher and
better economic uses while enhancing the City's financial resources.
4
SFIs:PCD:Ordinance:Mergredv
1116/96-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
I. Promote the rehabilitation of existing housing stock.
M. Increase, improve, and preserve the community's supply of housing
affordable to very low, low and moderate income households.
SECTION 2. The Merger Amendments to the Constituent Projects, as
.incorporated in that certain document entitled "Redevelopment Plan for the Huntington
Beach Redevelopment Project," the Project Area Maps and Legal Descriptions contained
therein, and such other documents as are incorporated therein by reference, are hereby
approved and adopted and are hereby incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and
made a part hereof, and the Merger Amendments and the Redevelopment Plan are
hereby designated, approved, and adopted as the official redevelopment plan for the
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project Area.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds and determines, based on
substantial evidence in the record including, but not limited to, the Agency's Report to
Council, and all documents referenced therein, and evidence and testimony received at
the joint public hearing on adoption of the Redevelopment Plan held on November 18,
1996 that:
a. The Project Area, which includes the Constituent Projects, continues to be
blighted. The redevelopment of the Project Area is necessary to effectuate
the public purposes declared in the California Community Redevelopment
Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.).
The Huntington Center Area includes office and retail uses, including the
960,000 square foot Huntington Beach Mall. The Mall comprises 58 acres,
or 36.3% of the total acreage of the Huntington Center Area.
A 24% drop of assessed values in this area between 1990 and 1996 has
undercut the Agency's ability to fund needed improvements. This funding
shortfall, coupled with an inability to incur debt after November 1996, inhibit
the Agency's ability to remove blighting conditions of the increasingly
obsolete and deteriorating Mall, traffic congestion on Edinger Avenue,
Center Avenue and Beach Boulevard, and awkward lot configurations on
Edinger. Taxable sales decreased nearly 32.3% between 1992 and 1995.
Declining Mall sales also impact nearby retail uses along the Edinger
Avenue Corridor. The Mall is characterized by a deteriorating facade and
parking lot. There is a 50% vacancy of the in-line stores. The new owner of
the Broadway anchor store space has announced its closing, and the -
prospects of finding a new tenant that could utilize the space is
discouraging. Tenants are only signing short-term leases and most in-line
stores are leased on a month-to-month basis.
5
SFIs:PCD:Ordinance:Mergredv
11/6/96-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
The property owner is constrained from making major modifications to the
Mall structure to accommodate new tenants due to the Mall's construction.
The Agency desires to assist a major renovation of the Mall that will
reposition the Mall and reestablish its economic viability. The repositioning
of the Mall cannot be undertaken in the absence of the proposed
AmendmentlMerger because the cost would exceed the revenues available
to the Agency under the Constituent Plan.
Despite the 1989 amendment of the original Constituent Plan for the
Oakview Area which provided greater capability to the Agency to enact
redevelopment programs, the following conditions have not been eliminated
since its adoption in 1983: rampant crime, widespread deterioration of
residences due to poverty, over-crowding, neglect and vandalism, and
inadequate public infrastructure. The Oakview Area continues to have the
highest crime rate in the City. The Area is still blighted by the existence of
buildings and structures in varying states of deterioration and dilapidation,
including the need for rehabilitation and repairs to damaged sidings,
weathered roofs, deteriorating walkways and driveways, and old fencing;
the existence of substandard design of lots; the existence of inadequate
public improvements, facilities and utilities, including the repair and
replacement of local roads, improvements to alley surfaces, the provision of
wheelchair access ramps for the disabled, and the improvement to storm
drains and other facilities. Other public improvement deficiencies include
congested traffic on Beach Boulevard and at the intersection of Warner
AvenuelBeach Boulevard. The area is plagued with abnormally high
business vacancies. Assessed values of property in the Area have
consistently declined over the last five years, while values in the City and
County have remained stable.
Despite the Agency's best efforts, many of blighting conditions persist in the
336-acre Main-Pier Area, including: deteriorating, aging, and seismically
unsafe commercial buildings and housing units; narrow lots under mixed
ownership that complicate the ability of the private sector to acquire and
consolidate properties; and antiquated street, water, storm drainage and
sewer systems. The Area is still blighted by the existence of buildings and
structures in varying states of deterioration and dilapidation, including the
need for rehabilitation and repairs to rotted wood sidings and porches,
missing windows and doors, aging roofs and wood decay and peeling paint;
the lack of landscaping, paved driveways and an adequate buffer from an
oil storage tank on an adjoining lot; deterioration due to deferred -
maintenance and the need for repainting and repairs to weathered eaves.
Older retail and mixed use buildings are of defective design and physical
construction; mixed retail and residential uses are of substandard design
and dilapidated; and sites exist with toxic and hazardous waste
contamination. Leasing rates for older retail space in the Area are 60-75%
6
SF/s:PCD:Ordi nance:Merg redv
11/6I96-#2
I
RLS 96-781
3343
below newer adjacent retail space causing property values to decline.
According to the County Assessor, 39.1% declined in assessed value
between 1992-93 and 1995-96. The 70-year old storm drainage system in
the Main-Pier Area continues to need improvements. In addition, other
public infrastructure is also deficient, including water, street and sewer
systems.
b. The Redevelopment Plan will redevelop the Project Area in conformity with
the California Community Redevelopment Law and in the interests of the
public peace, health, safety and welfare.
This finding is based upon the fact that the purposes of the Community
Redevelopment Law would be attained by a program of redevelopment
activities proposed by the Agency that will systematically address the
conditions of blight within the Project Area, offer financial assistance for
rehabilitation and conservation of structures in need of slight or moderate
rehabilitation, coupled with selective property acquisition, demolition and
relocation as necessary to remove the conditions of buildings suffering from
deterioration and dilapidation and defective design and character of
physical construction; improve traffic circulation deficiencies by
reconstruction and construction of streets, and intersection capacity
improvements; acquisition of lots of irregular form, shape and size for
assembly into parcels suitable for development; selectively acquire key
properties, with demolition and relocation as needed, to solve the problem
of mixed character of building and shifting uses; alleviate blighting
influences in the Project Area to create an investment environment in which
property owners and private developers have the incentive and means to
redevelop their properties; alleviate current constraints to rehabilitation and
development in the Project Area; alleviate obstacles that currently exist to
new development in commercial and industrial sectors through the
Agency's public improvements program; and, stimulate the job producing
economy in the Project Area by creating more employment opportunities for
skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled labor forces.
C. The adoption and carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan is economically
sound and feasible.
The Redevelopment Plan authorizes the Agency to finance project
implementation activities with financial assistance from the City, State,
Federal government, tax increment funds, interest income, Agency bonds, -
donations, loans from private financial institutions, the lease or sale of
Agency-owned property, participation in development or any other available
sources, both public or private. The determination of financial feasibility is
based on a projection of assumed annual resources and expenditures
spanning the remaining time during which tax increment may be allocated
7
SFIs:FCD:Ordinance:Mergredv
1116/96-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
to the Agency from the Project. The analysis provides a method for
determining the economic feasibility or sufficiency of resources to complete
the proposed Implementation Program on an annual as well as an
aggregate basis, and demonstrates the effects of inflation on the annual
program costs to the Agency. The cash flow portrayal of economic
feasibility for the Implementation Program attempts to show the use of
future resources under the existing tax increment limitation and the use of
future resources once the tax increment limitation is revised from a specific
amount to a definite period of time.
d. The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plan of the City,
including, but not limited to, the Housing Element, which substantially
complies with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with Section
65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code.
This finding is based on the Report and Recommendation of the Planning
Commission, and the fact that the land use and land use controls of the
Redevelopment Plan and the General Plan are consistent.
e. The carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan will promote the public peace,
health, safety and welfare of the City, and will effectuate the purposes and
policies of the Community Redevelopment Law.
Redevelopment will benefit the Project Area by correcting conditions of
blight and by coordinating public and private actions to stimulate
development and improve the economic and physical conditions of the
Project Area, and by increasing employment opportunities.
f. The condemnation of real property, as provided for in the Redevelopment
Plan, is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan , and
adequate provisions have been made for the payment for property to be
acquired as provided by law. The Agency may acquire real property, any
interest in property, and any improvements on property within the Project
Area by condemnation with the following exceptions:
i. Within the Yorktown-Lake Area and the Talbert-Beach Area, the
Agency shall not have the authority to acquire property by
condemnation.
ii. Within the Main-Pier Area (Original and Added), the Agency shall not have the authority to acquire, by condemnation, property on which
any persons legally reside. This limitation shall supersede any and
all previous limitations on the Agency's power of eminent domain
within the Main-Pier Areas including, but not limited to, Agency
Resolution No. 48.
8
SF/s:PCD:Ord ina nce:Mergredv
1116196-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
iii. Within the Oakview Area, the Agency shall not have the authority to
acquire, by condemnation, property which is excluded from the
Oakview Public Acquisition Map incorporated into the
Redevelopment Plan as Exhibit "D."
iv. Agency Resolution No. 48, adopted on September 7, 1982, including
any amendments thereto, is hereby repealed by this Ordinance.
g. The Agency has a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families
and persons who might be displaced, temporarily or permanently, from the
Project Area. Families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the
adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to the Community Redevelopment
Law.
The Agency has a comprehensive program for the relocation of persons,
families, businesses or tenants displaced by Agency project activities.
When such displacement occurs, the Agency will provide persons, families,
business owners and tenants displaced by Agency activities with monetary
and advisory relocation assistance consistent with the California Relocation
Assistance Law (Government Code, Section 7260 et seq.), the State
Guidelines adopted and promulgated pursuant thereto, Relocation
Assistance Rules adopted by the Agency and the provisions of the
Redevelopment Plan.
h. There are, or shall be provided, in the Project Area or in other areas not
generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and
commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the
families and persons who might be displaced from the Project Area, decent,
safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available
to displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places
of employment. Dwelling units housing persons and families of low- or
moderate-income shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of
a replacement housing plan pursuant to provisions of the Community
Redevelopment Law.
No person or family will be required to move from any dwelling unit until
suitable relocation housing is available for occupancy, and that such
housing must meet the standards established in State law and regulations.
In addition, the Agency's program includes provisions for the replacement of -
low and moderate income housing removed from the market as a result of
Agency activities.
i. All noncontiguous areas of the Project Area are either blighted or necessary
for effective redevelopment and are not included for the purpose of
9
SF1s:PMOrd inance Vergreciv
1216196-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
obtaining the allocation of taxes from the area pursuant to Section 33670
without other substantial justification for their inclusion.
The Project Area is comprised of five noncontiguous Constituent Project
Areas and is not an initial adoption of a project, but an amendment and
merger of five previously adopted redevelopment plans to complete the
redevelopment of the areas already begun. Blight in each Constituent
Project was determined during the prior adoption of each separate
redevelopment plan. This Redevelopment Plan is a compilation and
continuation of implementation of the five prior plans.
j. Inclusion of any lands, buildings, or improvements which are not detrimental
to public health, safety or welfare is necessary for the effective
redevelopment of the entire area of which they are a part, and any such
area is not included solely for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of tax
increment revenues from such area pursuant to Section 33670 of the
Community Redevelopment Law without other substantial justification for its
inclusion.
The Project is a compilation and continuation of the implementation and
completion of five previously adopted redevelopment plans.
k. The elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Project Area could
not reasonably be expected to be accomplished by private enterprise acting
alone without the aid and assistance of the Agency. Significant blight
remains within the Project Area and the blight cannot be eliminated without
the establishment of additional debt and an increase in the limitation on the
number of dollars to be allocated to the Agency.
The continued existence of blighting influences, including the lack of
adequate public improvements and facilities, and the inability of individual
owners and developers to economically remove these blighting influences
requires substantial assistance from the Agency. The private sector
investment in the Project Area will require significant public sector subsidy.
Acting alone, the private sector has not been willing or able to stem or
reverse the conditions of blight. In order to correct these physical and
economic conditions, the Agency needs additional financial resources, the
ability to issue more bonded indebtedness, expand the lists of public
projects and to assemble property for redevelopment. Under the limitations
of the Constituent Project Plans, the Agency will not have the ability to -
collect sufficient tax increment, issue bonds, undertake new projects, or
acquire property through the use of eminent domain necessary to complete
the eradication of blight within the Project Area. Thus, it is necessary for
the Agency to pursue the Amendment/ Merger to enhance its ability to meet
10
SF/s:PCD:Ordinance:Mergredv
1116196-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
Project costs throughout the Project Area by merging the Constituent
Projects.
I. The Project Area is a predominantly urbanized area as defined in the
Community Redevelopment Law.
This finding is based upon the fact that all property in the Project Area has
been or is developed for urban uses.
M. The time limitation and the limitation on the number of dollars to be
allocated to the Agency that are contained in the Redevelopment Plan are
reasonably related to the proposed projects to be implemented in the
Project Area and to the ability of the Agency to eliminate blight within the
Project Area.
An Implementation Program was developed in response to the conditions
existing in the Constituent Project Areas, and is designed to alleviate these
conditions and stimulate new investment. The Implementation Program
seeks to complete redevelopment activities for each Constituent Project
through a broad program which addresses neighborhood revitalization,
commercial rehabilitation and new development, as well as business
attraction.
n. The City Council is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be
available within three (3) years from the time occupants of the Project Area
are displaced, and pending the development of the facilities there will be
available to displaced occupants adequate temporary housing facilities at
rents comparable to those in the community at the time of their
displacement.
SECTION 4. Subject to applicable law, taxes attributable to each Constituent
Project Area merged pursuant to the Ordinance which are allocated to the Agency
pursuant to Section 33670 of the Community Redevelopment Law, pursuant express
action by the Agency, may be:
a. Allocated by the Agency to the entire merged Project Area for the purpose
of paying the principal of, and interest on, preexisting or future indebtedness
incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the
merged Redevelopment Project; -
b. Allocated by the Agency expressly to any one or more Constituent Projects.
11
SF/s:PGD:Ordinance:Mergredv
1116/96-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
Merger of the Constituent Projects itself is not deemed to be a cross-pledge of tax
increment among the Constituent Projects without specific future express action by the
Agency.
SECTION 6. All written and oral objections to the Redevelopment Plan fled
with and presented to the City Council and all written responses thereto, have been
considered by the City Council at the time and in the manner required by law, and such
written and oral objections are hereby overruled.
SECTION 6. In order to implement and facilitate the implementation of the
Redevelopment Plan hereby approved, this City Council hereby declares its intention to
undertake and complete any proceeding necessary to be carried out by the City of
Huntington Beach under the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan .
SECTION 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this
Ordinance to the Agency, whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility for
carrying out the Redevelopment Plan .
SECTION 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record with the County
Recorder of Orange County a description of the land within the Project Area and a
statement that proceedings for the continued redevelopment of the Project Area have
been instituted under the Community Redevelopment Law.
SECTION 9. The Department of Building and Safety of the City of Huntington
Beach is hereby directed for a period of two (2) years after the effective date of this
Ordinance to advise all applicants for building permits within the Project Area that the site
for which a building permit is sought for the construction of buildings or for other
improvements is within a redevelopment project area.
SECTION 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of the
description and statement recorded by the City Clerk pursuant to Section 8 of this
Ordinance, a copy of this Ordinance, and a map or plat indicating the boundaries of the
Project Area, to the Auditor and Tax Assessor of Huntington Beach County, to the
governing body of each of the taxing agencies which levies taxes upon any property in
the Project area, and to the State Board of Equalization.
SECTION 11. If any part of this Ordinance or the Redevelopment Plan which it
approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Redevelopment Plan , and this Council
hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of the Ordinance or approved the remainder of the Redevelopment Plan if such invalid portion thereof had been
deleted.
12
SFIs:PCD:ordinancemergredv
1116196-#2
RLS 96-781
3343
SECTION 12. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its
adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at
a regular meeting thereof held on the 16 th day Of December_, 1996.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM-
Citytlerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INI ED D V
Cit ra or of no Devel p ent
Assistant -"�-ity Administrator
13
S F/s:PCD:Ordi n anceMerg redv
11/6/96-#2
RLS 96-781
Ord. No. 3343
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH }
J.
1, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Beach, and ex-ofl'icio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do
hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd of December, 1996, and was again read to
said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th December, 1996, and
was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members
of said City Council.
AYES: Harman, Dettloff, Bauer, Green, Garofalo
NOES: Sullivan
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Julien
I,Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of
Huntington.Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,
do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been
published in the Independent on
19
In accordance with the City Charter of said City City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
Connie Brockwa 7
yCily Clerk of the City Council of the City
Dmu-lty QLty Clerk of Huntington Beach, California
G/ordinanc/ordbkpg
12/17/96