Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 377 i RESOLUTION NO. 377 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, DECLAR- ING THE RESULT OF THE CANVASS AND THE RESULT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ON THE loth DAY OF APRIL, 1922. WHEREAS, HERETOFORE, the Board of Trustees of the City of Huntington Beach, by resolution and by ordinance, duly passed and adopted by said Board of Trustees, did order a, general municipal election to be held in the said City of Hunt- ington Beach on the 10th day of April, 1922, and WHEREAS, at said election so ordered, there were to be elected two City Trustees or members of the Board of Trust- ees, and WHEREAS, at said election there wars submitted to the qualified voters of said City, the said proposition as herein- after set forth, and WHEREAS, said general municipal election was in all manner and things held in accordance with the provisions of an Act of the legislature of the State of California, entitled, "An Act to Provide for and Regulate Municipal Elections in Cities of the Fifth and Sixth Class", which Act was approved on the 27th day of May, 1919, and in accordance with the Gene- ral Election Laws of the State of California, and all ordinances of the City of Huntington Beach. • NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved: That the result of the said General Municipal Election is as follows., That the whole number of votes cast in said City of Huntington Beach at said General Municipal Election was 850; that the names of the persons voted for and the number of votes given in the said City of Huntington Beach to each of such persons and the offices to fill which each person was voted for are as follows: J. H. Macklin received 402 votes for the office of City Trustee Richard Drew received 319 votes for the office of City Trustee Ed Manning received 303 voted for the office of City Trustee R. W. Edens received 207 votes for the office of City Trustee Charles P. Patton received 206 votes for the office of City Trustee Lynn Colburn received 114 votes for the office of City Trustee R. J. Prescott received 75 votes for the office of City Trustee That at said election there was submitted to the qualified voters of the said City., the following proposition: Shall each member of the Board of Trustees of the City of Huntington Beach, receive as compensation for his services as such City Trustee the sum of $25.00 per month in lieu of the present compensation granted to him. and that at said municipal election, there were cast 476 votes for said proposition and 114 against said proposition. That said Municipal Election was held and conducted with one voting precinct and that the results above set forth are the results of the ballot cast at such voting precinct and are the number of votes given in the City to each of such persons and for and against each of such propositions voted upon. 2. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Trustees of the City of Huntington Beach, do hereby declare that as a result of said general municipal election, J. H. Macklin and Richard Drew, being the presons having the highest number of votes given for each office, have been and are elected to the office of City Trustee and they do hereby further declare that the proposition above set forth was carried and that hereafter the members of the Board of Trustees shall receive the amount of compensation authorized by said proposition. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of April, 1922. President of the Board of Trust- ees of the City of Huntington Beach, California. ATTEST: Chas. R. Nutt City Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Trustees of the City of Huntington Beach, Cal. State of California, County of Orange, ss. City of Huntington Beach. 3. • I, Charles R. Nutt, City Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk- of the Board of Trustees of the City of Huntington Beach, Calif- ornia, do hereby bertify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Trustees of the City of Huntington Beach, State of California, and signed by the President of the said Board, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of April, 1922, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: _4.