HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 635 i
RESOLUTION
NO. 635
Resolution canvassing special election held on
September 23rd, 1930, submitting certain propositions to
the electors of the City of Huntington Beach by a Resolu-
tion by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,
WHEREAS pursuant to Ordinance No. 338 entitled
"Ordinance submitting proposition for adopting certain Or-
dinances to the People of the City of Huntington Beach" a
special election was held in said. City on the 23rd day of
September, 1930, in accordance with the Provisions of a
certain act of the Legislature of the State of California
entitled "An Act to provide for direct legislation by cities
and towns including initiative and referendum" approved Jan-
uary 2nd, 1912, as amended, and
`MEREAS the returns of said election, have pur-
suant to lave in the premises, been returned to this Board
for official canvassing, and
WHEREAS at said election there were submitted four
separate propositions as are more particularly hereinafter
set forth, and
THE EAS the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach have this 29th day of September, 1930, met for the pur-
pose of canvassing the results of said election, and
WHEREAS the official returns of said election have
been publicly opened and declared, and
`'HEREAA6 the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach has determined that each of the said propositions so
submitted at said election have failed ' of adoption by the
following vote in each of the consolidated precincts and in
total as follows:
PROPOSITION 1 (FINANCIAL STATEMENTS)
T,'0 YES
Consolidated Election Precinct A 216 180
Consolidated Election Precinct B 124 14€3
Consolidated Election Precinct C 161 ?5
Entire City 501 403
PROPOSITION 11 (BOND TO RESTORE PROPERTY)
NO YES
Consolidated Election Precinct A 213 180
Consolidated Election Precinct B 126 141
Consolidated Election Precinct C 163 69
Entire City 502 390
PROPOSITION 111 (DISPOSAL OF WASTE `CATER)
NO YES
Consolidated Election Precinct A 199 191
Consolidated Election Precinct B 12? -148
Consolidated Election Precinct G 162 ?6
Entire City 488 415
PROPOSITION 1V (ONLY STEEL DERRICKS IN
CERTAIN PLACES)
NO YES
Consolidated Election Precinct A 219 1?2
Consolidated Election Precinct B 135 141
Consolidated Election Precinct C 1?4 62
Entire City 528 3?5
And, WHEREAS there were cast at said election the
-2r
i
following votes, to-writ: total votes case in
Consolidated Election Precinct A 39?
Consolidated Election Precinct B 2?9
Consolidated Election Precinct C 240
'Making a total vote cast in the entire city of 916
And, "MEREAS the foregoing recital shows that
votes cast NO are votes against the adoption of Proposition
No. 1 as submitted at said election and- the votes cast as
above as YES are votes in favor of the adoption of said Pro-
position No. 1, and
IIEREAS less than a majority of the votes cast on
said Proposition No. 1 were in favor thereof
THEREFORE, BE IT RTSOLVED that said Proposition
No. 1 failed of adoption.
And, WHEREAS the foregoing recital shows that votes
cast NO are votes against the adoption of Proposition No. 11
as submitted at said election and the votes cast as above as
YES are votes in favor of the adoption of said Proposition
No. 11, and
WHEREAS less than a majority of the votes cast on
said Proposition No. 11 were in favor thereof
THEREFOrREp BE IT RESOLVED that said Proposition
No. 11 failed of adoption.
And, WHEREAS the foregoing recital shows that
votes cast NO are votes against the adoption of Proposition
No. 111 as submitted at said election and the votes cast as
above as YES are votes in favor of the adoption of said Pro-
position No. 111, and
-3-
`.WHEREAS less than a majority of the votes cast
on said Proposition No. 111 were in favor thereof
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Proposition
No. 111 failed of adoption.
And, ',VHEREAS the foregoing recital shows that
votes cast NO are votes against the adoption of Proposition
No. 1V as submitted at said election and the votes cast
above as YES are votes in favor of the adoption of Propo-
sition No, 1V, and
WHEREAS less than a majority of the votes cast
on said Proposition No, 1V were in favor thereof
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Proposition
No. 1V failed of adoption.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Huntington Beach at a regular adjourned meeting
held at 7:30 o1 clock P. M. on the 29th day of September,
1930.
S. R. Bogen
MAYOR
ATTEST:
C. R, Furr
City Clerk. and Ex-officio Clerk
of the City of Huntington Beach.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH)
I, C. R. Furr, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of
-4-
i
the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced, read
and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of said City
Council held on the 29th day of September, 1930, by the fol-
lowing vote:
AXES: TRUSTEES Butcher, Conrad, Stevens, King, Bowen
NOES: TRUSTEES None ABSENT: TRUSTEES None
C. R. Furr
City Clerk and Ex-efficio Clerk
of the City of Huntington Beach.
-5-