HomeMy WebLinkAboutRedevelopment Agency - 49 ' r
RESOLUTION NO. 49
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING AND APPROVING
ITS REPORT ON THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND
TRANSMITTING THE REPORT ON.THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOP-
MENT PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach cooperated
in the preparation of the Redevelopment Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project
Area with the Planning Commission and consulted with taxing agencies which levy
taxes, or for which taxes are levied, on property in the Project Area with respect
to the Plan and to the allocation of taxes pursuant to Section 33670 in compliance
with the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, Health and Safety
Code (Section 33000 et seq).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Redevelopment Agency of� the City of Huntington Beach approves
and adopts its report on :the Redevelopment Plan containing recommendations by the
Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach and the responding taxing enti-
ties; this document being attached as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and made a part
hereof.
Section 2. The Agency Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4th day of October, 1982.
ATTEST:
e
Agency Clerk Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM: INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Legal Counsel Director, Business and Industri—al Enterprise
APPROVED:
Chief Executive Offic r
EXHIBIT "A"
REPORT TO THE
CITY COUNCIL
ON THE
OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN!
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 REASONS FOR THE SELECTION OF THE PROJECT AREA 2
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC 2
CONDITIONS EXISTING IN THE AREA
3. 1 Condition of Buildings and Structures 3
3.2 Economic Disuse and Depreciated _Values 3
3.3 Lack of Public Improvements 3
3.4 Flooding 3
3.5 Increased Crime Rates 4
3.6 Increased Fire Rates 4
4.0 FINANCING THE PROJECT 4
4. 1 General Description of the Proposed Financing 4
Method
4.2 Tax Increments 5
4.3 Other Loans and Grants 6
4.4 Financial Feasibility 6
5.0 METHOD OR PLAN FOR RELOCATION OF FAMILIES OR PERSONS 6
6.0 ANALYSIS OF PRELIMINARY PLAN 7
7.0 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 7
8.0 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA 7
COMMITTEE
9.0 REPORT REQUIRED BY SECTION 65402 OF GOVERNMENT CODE 7
10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 8
11.0 COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER REPORT 8
12.0 FISCAL REVIEW REPORT 9
13.0 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT REPORT 9
14.0 ANALYSIS OF. THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER REPORT AND 10
CONSULTATIONS WITH EACH AFFECTED TAXING AGENCY
SECTION
APPENDIX A - HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
APPENDIX B - COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER REPORT
APPENDIX C - TAXING ENTITIES RESPONSES
APPENDIX D - LEGAL NOTICE AND BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS
APPENDIX E - FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
APPENDIX F - DOCUMENTATION OF BLIGHT REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report to the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach on the Redevelopment
Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project is prepared pursuant to the California
Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code, Section 33352, which states;
1133352. Every redevelopment plan submitted by the agency to the legislative body
shall be accompanied by a report containing:
(a) The reasons for the selection of the project area.
(b) A description of the physical, social and economic conditions existing in the
area.
(c) The proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the project area in
sufficient detail so that the legislative body may determine the economic
feasibility of the plan.
(d) A method or plan for the relocation of families and persons to be temporarily
or permanently displaced from housing facilities in the project area, which
method or plan shall include the provision required by Section 33411.1 that no
persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced unless and
until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such
displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their
displacement.
(e) An analysis of the preliminary plan.
(f) The report and recommendations of the Planning Commission.
(g) The summary referred to in Section 33387 (Project Area Committee
Meetings).*
(h) The report required by Section 65402 of the Government Code (real property
activities in conformance with the City's adopted General Plan).*
(i) The report required by Section 21151 of the Public Resources .Code.
(Environmental Impact Report).*
(j) The report of the county fiscal officer as required by Section 33328. (An
analysis of assessed valuations, identifying taxing agencies_ and revenues to
• each taxing agency effected by the Redevelopment Project).*
(k) The report of the Fiscal Review Committee, if any.
(1) If the project area contains low or moderate income housing, a neighborhood
impact report which describes in detail the impact of the project upon the
residents of the project area and the surrounding areas in terms of relocation,
traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilties
and services, effect on school population and quality of- education, property
assessments and taxes, and other matters affecting the physical and social
quality of the neighborhood.
*Wording within parenthesis not part of direct quote.
(m) An analysis by the agency of the report submitted by the county as required by
Section 33328 (Paragraph (j) above) which shall include a summary of the
consultation of the agency, or attempts to consult by the agency, with each of
the taxing agencies as required,by Section 33328."
This report to the Huntington Beach City Council is prepared and submitted by the
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") in accordance with Sections 33351
and 33352 of the California Community Redevelopment_ Law, which sections require the
Agency to:
- Prepare a redevelopment plan for each project area.
- Conduct public hearings thereon.
- Approve a redevelopment plan for,each project area.
Submit each redevelopment plan .to the City Council with a report containing
the information previously enumerated above.
A joint public hearing between the City Council and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment
Agency has been scheduled for 7:30 p.m., October 4, 1982 to consider approval of the
Oakview Redevelopment Plan. Subsequent to Plan approval, the Agency will submit the
Redevelopment Plan with this report to the Huntington Beach City Council.
2.0 REASONS FOR THE SELECTION OF THE PROJECT AREA
The proposed Oakview Redevelopment Project is a continuing effort by the City of
Huntington Beach to revitalize blighted areas within the community. On February 1, 1982
the City Council adopted Resolution 5090 designating a redevelopment Survey Area which
included the proposed redevelopment project. Following the designation of the Survey
Area, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to cooperate with the
Redevelopment Agency to assess the feasibility and select a redevelopment Project Area
within the Survey Area and to formulate a Preliminary Plan .for the redevelopment of the
Project Area. On April 20, 1982, the Planning Commission selected the Project Area
from within the Survey Area and formulated and adopted a Preliminary Plan for the
Oakview Redevelopment Project Area.
The final Project Area boundary description is contained in the legal notice attached to
this Report to Council as Appendix D.
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMI_C CONDITIONS
IS EXTING T IN HE ARFA� _
As demonstrated in the Documentation of Blight Report, which is attached hereto as
Appendix F and incorporated herein, the Project Area is blighted in numerous respects,
including both buildings and property.
The blighting effects which are having a substantial negative and adverse impact on the
Project Area are as follows:
2
A. Approximately one-fourth of the units in this area (particularly along Koledo
Lane, Barton Drive and Mandrell (give) do not meet the current provisions of
the Building Security sections of the City's Municipal Code .which require
enclosed parking garages for multiple dwellings. Many of these same units do
not meet current off-street, parking requirements with respect to the number
of spaces per dwelling unit. Many. of the apartments also do not have private
open space for individual units as currently required in. the City's zoning
ordinance. Many of the structures in the area are delapidated with unkept
yards, old curbs and sidewalks and broken windows.
B. The condition of structures, economic disuse and lack of capital improvements
make the property unsuitable for development by private enterprise acting
alone. These negative conditions can only be dealt with by the positive powers
of a redevelopment agency.
A more detailed description of each of the conditions contributing to growing blight in the
area follow.
3.1 Condition of Buildings and Structures
The Oakview Neighborhood is one of transition and improvement. Numerous
structures are in need of minor rehabilitation. Some of the buildings are in need of
major rehabilitation and removal. The Ocean View Elementary School has been _sold
as surplus, has been subjected to arson, is boarded . and is presently having a
substantial blighting influence on the adjacent neighborhood. The condition of
buildings and structures is illustrated in the photographs attached as Exhibit A. The
unattractive appearance of many of the structures and the amount of debris indicate
adverse living conditions within portions of the project area.
3.2 Economic Disuse and Depreciated Values
The lack of capital improvements (discussed further below) is having an adverse
effect on property values within the project area. The condition of the Ocean View
Elementary School site is having an adverse effect :on the property values in the
adjacent neighborhood.
3.3 Lack of Public Improvements
According to the Land Use Element Amendment 80-2 (page 40), a portion of the
Oakview Area water improvements is in need of general upgrading and is now only
adequate for domestic use (see Exhibit B).
' t
As evidenced in the Assessor's Parcal Maps (Exhibit C) and the photographs (Exhibit
A), this area is lacking adequate right-of-way and necessary curbs, gutters,
sidewalks and street lights.
3.4 Flooding
Because of the lack of necessary streets, the area is subjected to inadequate
drainage. After rain storms it takes months for water to fully evaporate. With
neighborhood watering some puddles become safety and health hazards.
3
3.5 Increased Crime Rates
According to the attached memorandum from the Police Department (Exhibit D),
the crime rates in the project area are substantially higher than City-wide average,
and are one of the highest rates within the City.
3.6 Increased Fire Rates
According to the memorandum from the Fire Department (Exhibit E), there are
numerous fires within the project area. There are also a very high number of
medical aid incidents within the area. Fire and medical response rates are
substantially higher than for other parts of the community.
4.0 FINANCING THE PROJECT
4.1 General Description of the Proposed Financing Method
The Agency, with the approval of the City Council, is authorized to finance the
Redevelopment Project with financial assistance from the City of Huntington
Beach, State of California, Federal Government, property tax increments, interest
income, Agency bonds, or any other available source of funds.
In carrying out the Redevelopment Plan, the Agency, with the approval of the City
Council, is also authorized to obtain advances, borrow funds and create
indebtedness. The principal and interest on such advances, funds and indebtedness
may be paid from tax increments, or any other funds available to the Agency,
subject to certain limitations as to project expenditures, annual tax increment
revenues and bonded debt.
Advances and loans for survey work and planning -and for operating capital to defray
costs attendant to normal administration of the project may be provided by the City
until adequate tax increments or other funds are available, or are sufficiently
assured to repay such loans and to permit borrowing to obtain adequate working
capital from sources other than the City. The. City; as it is able, may also supply
additional assistance through City loans and grants for various public facilities.
As available, gas tax funds from the State of California and the County of Orange
may be used to improve or provide for an adequate street system to and from, as
well as within the Project Area. As available, other sources of funding including
Federal loans and grants may be used to finance portions of Project costs.
The Agency is authorized to make such pledges as to specific advances, loans and
indebtedness as appropriate in carrying out the project.
The Agency, with the approval of the City Council, is authorized to issue bonds if
appropriate and feasible in an amount sufficient to finance all or any.part of the
project, subject to the following limitations:
4
Taxes, as defined in Section 33670 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law, shall not be divided and shall not be allocated to
the Agency in excess of $350,000 annually during the lifetime of the
Redevelopment Plan, except by amendment of the Plan.
No loans, advances or indebtedness to finance in whole or in part the
Redevelopment Project, and to be repaid from the allocation of those
taxes described in the before-mentioned Section 33670, shall be
established or incurred by the Agency beyond twenty (20) years from
the date of adoption of the Plan by the City Council, unless such time
limitation is extended by amendment of the Plan. However, such loans,
advances or indebtedness may be repaid over a period of .time longer
than such time limit.
- Without an amendment of the plan, the amount of bonded indebtedness
which the Agency shall have outstanding at any one time shall not
exceed $3,500,000.
4.2 Tax Increments
All taxes levied upon taxable property within the boundaries of the Redevelopment
Project each year, by or for the benefit of the State of California, County of
Orange, City of Huntington Beach, any district or other public corporation
(hereinafter sometimes called "taxing agencies") after the effective date -of the
ordinance approving the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area,
shall be divided as follows:
A. That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the
tax is levied each year by or for each of said taxing agencies upon the total
sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the Redevelopment
Project Area, as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the
taxation of such property by such taxing agency last equalized prior to the
effective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and, when collected,
shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes by or for
taxing agencies on all other property are paid (for purposes of allocating taxes
levied by or for any taxing agency or agecies which did not include the
territory of the Project Area on the effective date of such ordinance but to
which such territory is annexed or otherwise included after such effective
date, the assessment roll of the County of Orange last equalized on the
effective date of said ordinance shall be used in determining the assessed
valuation of the taxable property in the Project Area on said effective date);
and
B. That portion of said levied taxes each year in excess of such amount shall be
allocated to and, when collected, shall be paid into a special fund of the
Agency to pay' the principal of and interest on bonds, loans, monies advanced
to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred
by the Agency to finance or refinance in whole or in part this Redevelopment
Project. Unless and until the total assessed value. of the taxable property in
the Project Area exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property in
5
the Project as shown by the last equalized assessment roll referred to in
Paragraph 1 hereof, all of the taxes levied and collected upon the taxable
property in the Project Area shall be paid into the funds of the respective
taxing agencies. When said bonds, loans, advances and, indebtedness, if any,
and interest thereon, have been paid, all monies thereafter received from
taxes upon the taxable property in the Project shall be paid into the funds of
the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are paid.
That portion of taxes mentioned in subdivision (2) above are hereby irrevocably
pledged for the payment of the principal of and interest on the advance of .
monies, or .making loans, or the incurring of any indebtedness (whether funded,
refunded, assumed or otherwise) by the Agency to .finance or refinance in
whole or in part the Redevelopment Project.
4.3 Other Loans and Grants
Any other loans, grants or financial assistance from the United States, or any other
public or private source, will be utilized, if available, as the Agency deems
appropriate to its corporate purposes.
4.4 Financial Feasibility
A financial analysis demonstrating the financial feasibility of the project is attached
as A ppendix E.
5.0 METHOD OR PLAN FOR RELOCATION OF FAMILIES OR PERSONS
Although little, if any, displacement is likely to occur as a result of redevelopment
activities in the Oakview Project Area, the Agency shall assist all families, individuals,
businesses, or other entities displaced by the project in finding other locations and
facilities. In order to carry out the project with a minimum of hardship to persons
displaced from their homes, the Agency shall assist individuals and families in - finding
housing that is decent, safe, sanitary, within their financial means, in reasonably
convenient locations, and otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency may provide by
acquisition, construction leasing, rehabilitation, loans and grants, or other means, housing
inside or outside the Project Area for displaced persons, and to meet housing replacement
requirements of State law.
The Agency shall make relocation payments to persons (including families, business
concerns and others) displaced by the project, for moving expenses and direct losses of
personal property (businesses only) for which reimbursement or compensation is not
otherwise made. In addition, the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement
costs incurred in the sale of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation
payments to those eligible•,therefor. Such relocation payments shall' be made pursuant to
Agency rules and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of the
State of California. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate
and for which funds are available. The Agency shall make an extensive effort to relocate
existing residential tenants within the City of Huntington Beach.
6
6.0 ANALYSIS OF PRELIMINARY PLAN
The proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project is based on the
Preliminiary Plan and is in conformance with the City's adopted General Plan, as amended
to date. Conformance to the standards contained in the Preliminary Plan for the Oakview
Redevelopment Project Area will materially contribute toward the elimination of blight
and its causes. Through the encouragement of modern, attractive, economically feasible
development in conformance with the General Plan and construction of needed public
improvements, new jobs will be created both short-term and long-term, additional housing
may be provided, public uses will be expanded and economic growth will be realized.
Building intensities and population densities will be in conformance with state and local
codes, thus correcting any code violations that may exist within the Project Area. As
discussed- in greater detail in the Environmental Impact Report .prepared for this Project,
the neighborhood impact on the project area, and on the community as a whole, over the
long-term, should be positive, although short-term negative impacts caused by the
inconvenience of relocation, increased truck traffic and dust during construction cannot
be avoided if the.Project is to be implemented,
7.0 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
On September 8, 1982, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission reviewed and approved
the Environmental Impact Report on the Oakview Redevelopment Plan, and made the
finding that the Redevelopment Plan is consistent ..with the General Plan and
recommended Agency approval. The Resolution No. 1297 of the Planning Commission is
attached hereto as Appendix A and made a part of this report to Council on the
Redevelopment Plan.
8.0 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE
Section 33385 of the California Community Redevelopment Law requires the legislative
body of a city or county to call upon the residents and existing community organizations
in a redevelopment project area to form a Project Area Committee whenever the
proposed project is expected to result in the displacement of a substantial number of low
and moderate income families. Since it is anticipated that implementation of the
proposed Oakview Redevelopment Plan will not result in substantial residential
displacement, a Project Area Committee was not formed.
9.0 REPORT REQUIRED BY SECTION 65402 OF GOVERNMENT CODE
The Agency may acquire real property within the Redevelopment Project Area for streets
in order to provide adequate on-site circulation within the Project:Area as necessary for
new development in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. All such acquisitions for
public purposes, shall be consistent with the City's adopted General Plan, as amended to
date and as may be amended in the future. Furthermore, the Agency does not intend to
acquire any real property within the Project Area unless such acquisition is essential to
accomplishing the underlying objective of the Redevelopment Plan, which is to eliminate
7
blighting conditions within the Project Area. Should the Agency acquire any real property
for other than streets or other public purposes, it will subsequently dispose of such
property for uses consistent with the adopted General Plan for the. City of Huntington
Beach and be further consistent with the above-quoted section of the Government Code.
10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the Oakview Redevelopment Plan has been
completed as required by the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. During the
meeting of September 8, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission reviewed and
approved the draft EIR and forwarded it to the City Council for its approval and
certification. The final EIR will be reviewed and certified by the City Council _prior to
consideration of the adoption of the Oakview Redevelopment Plan, and then incorporated
herein as part of the Report to the City Council.
11.0 COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER REPORT
Pursuant to Section 33328 of the California Health and Safety Code, the State Board of
Equalization and the County officials charged with allocating taxes are required to
prepare and deliver, within 90 days of receipt of the Statement of Preparation, Project
legal description and maps, to the Redevelopment Agency and each of the affected taxing
agencies, a report containing the following:
A. The total assessed valuation of all taxable property within the Project Area as
shown on the base year assessment roll.
B. The identification of each taxing agency levying taxes in the Project Area.
C. The amount of tax revenue to be derived by each taxing agency from the base
year assessment roll from the Project Area, including state subventions for
homeowners, business inventory and similar such.•subventions.
D. For each taxing agency, its total ad valorem tax revenues from all property
within its boundaries, whether inside or outside the Project Area.
E. The estimated first year taxes available to the Redevelopment Agency, if any,
based upon information submitted by the Redevelopment Agency, broken down
by taxing agencies. .
F. The assessed valuation of the Project Area, by block, for the preceding five
years, except for state assessed property on the board roll.
G. The total assessed valuation of all taxable property outside of the Project
Area which is withi 300 feet from the boundaries of the Project Area as
shown on the base year assessment roll.
8
B. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the
proposed Redevelopment Plan.
C. The Secretary of the Planning Commission is hereby authorized and
directed to file this report and recommendation with the Huntington Beach Redevelop-
ment Agency.
REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Coamiission,of the City of Hunting-
ton Beach, California, on the 8th day of September 1982•
AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Paone, Winchell , Schumacher
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Porter, Mirjahangir
t
ATTEST:
ames W. Palin, Secretary Tim Paone, Chairman
r APPENDIX A
RESOLUTION NO. 1297
A RESOLUTION OF THE- PLANNING COMMISSION OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOP-
MENT PLAN, CERTIFICATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT AND REPORTING ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR SAID PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency submitted the proposed Rede-
velopment Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project to the Planning Commission for
its report and recommendation pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law;
and
WHEREAS, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency also subm'i.tted to the Planning
Commission the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Oakview Redevelopment Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the proposed Rede-
velopment Plan and the information contained in the Environmental Impact Report for
said Redevelopment Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Hunting-
ton Beach as follows:'
1. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council certify the Environ-
menta•1 Impact Report for the proposed Oakvi•ew Redevelopment Project as has been pre-
pared and completed in compliance with the -California Environmental Quality Act of .
1970 (C.E.Q.A. ) and State and local regulations and guidelines adopted pursuant thereto.,
2. The Planning Commission' s report and recommendations concerning the proposed
Redevelopment Plan are as follows:
A. That the proposed Redevelopment Plan as submitted to the Planning Commis-
sion conforms .to the .General. Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
While the ninety days have expired at the drafting of this Report to the City Council, the
fiscal information, when received, will be attached hereto as Appendix B and made a part
of this Report to the City Council on the Redevelopment Plan. Correspondence reflecting
Agency contact with the County Fiscal Officer and State Board of Equalization
concerning this is attached in Appendix B.
12.0 FISCAL REVIEW REPORT
None of the taxing entities called for formation of a Fiscal Review Committee prior to
the required deadline to analyze the fiscal impact of the proposed Redevelopment Plan.
13.0 NEIGHBORHOOD I11PACT REPORT
The City's objective in pursuing the Redevelopment Project is to' mitigate the existing
substandard conditions and to mitigate the severe.development limitations that are now,
and will continue to be in the future. Without public and private sector cooperative
action, constraints to proper utilization of the Project Area will not be overcome.
The Redevelopment Plan, as presently envisioned, while providing for the assemblage and
sale of selected properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency,
anticipates. few, if any, acquisitions. However, if owners of these 'parcels are desirous of
participating in the project, such participation will be encouraged in conformance with
the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct impact to property owners within the Project
Area would be the displacement (except for owner participants) resulting from
implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This impact will be largely attenuated with
the Agency's: (1) taking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price of properties to
be acquired at fair market value, (2) initiating such negotiations as soon as practical both
prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, (3) providing relocation
advisory assistace and benefits to all who are displaced and are qualified for benefits, (4)
ensuring ample time for pucahse of property to be negotitated and sufficient time after to
consummate the process of relocation, and (S) keeping all concerned continuously apprised
of the Agency's progress and its activities. Although the impact of relocation could be
negative, its long-term impact is expected to be positive in that relocation will afford
residences in the Project Area a unique opportunity to move to a more desirable location
of their choice with little or no capital outlay necessary from personal cash resources.
The impact from project implementation on surrounding neighborhoods is also expected to
be positive over the log term. Development of modern, well-planned commercial and
residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic impetus to the
surrounding areas. Furthermore, in achieving such development, existing blighting
influences will be irradicated from within the Project Area.
Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the community over the long term,
it is possible that in the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area
could experience certain negative impacts during the construction period resulting from
heavier truck traffic, noise and dust. However, these impacts will be mitigated by
confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray
watering as necessary to control the impact of dust. Over the long term, positive impacts
to surrounding neighborhoods will result in development of modern and well-designed
facilities which will have eliminated the blighting conditions of the Project Area while
enhancing the total social and economic vitality of the City of Huntington Beach.
9
M
As presently envisioned, 'it is the desire of the Agency to construct, or cause the
construction or rehabilitation of, approximately 100 residential units and to assist in the
creation of approximately 300,000 square feet of new commercial/office development.
The total value of improvements would be approximately $35,000,000.
Residential - 100 Units
- 1,000 vehicle trips per day increase
- 150 parking spaces increase
- 25,000 gallons of sewerage per day increase
- 30,000 gallons of water per day increase
500 pounds of solid waste per day increase
110 potential maximum student increase
220 population increase
Commercial/Office - 300,000 Square Feet
- 4,000 vehicle trips per day increase
- 1,200' parking spaces increase
- 50,000 gallons of sewerage per day-increase
- 60,000 gallons of water per day increase
- 1,500 pounds of solid waste per day increase
A population increase of 220 will probably not require the addition of
firemen and related equipment, policemen and related equipment, and will not require
additional educational facilities. It is anticipated that some changes will be required in
the traffic and circulation system, the water and sewer system 'and in the solid waste
management system.
Creation of the proposed Redevelopment Project will not affect the payment of property
taxes on existing land holdings or structures both within and outside of the Project Area.
Existing property tax will be. paid in accordance with the provisions of Propositi n 13.
However, as change of ownership occurs, and as new development is constructed, the
property will be .reappraised by the County of Orange and;' while the rate will remain the
same, the taxes paid will increase as a result of the County reappraisal.
14.0 ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER REPORT AND CONSULTATIONS
WITH EACH AFFECTED TAXING AGENCY
The analysis of the _County Fiscal Officer's Report will be provided upon receipt of the
report by the Agency (refer to Appendix B).
The staff of the Redevelopment Agency provided all taxing entities with copies of the
various documents and called and/or met with the staff of each entity's board. Responses,
requests and recommendations are included in Appendix C.
In addition, each affected taxing agency has been properly noticed regarding the joint
public hearing for the Redevelopment Plan. Should any taxing entity have further input,
they should express their concerns at that time.
10
V. A. HE_IM
AVDtTOR•CONT ROLLER
BUILOPIG
i 2 1 630 N.Dr TH 9R0A0',%4,Y
��N � Sawa AN A, CALIFORNIA 92702
5 3 / TELEPHONE: 834-2450
AREA CODE 7
OFFICE OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
May 27, 1982
Tom Tinscher
City of Huntington Beach
Housing & Community Development
P.O. Box 190
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA. 92648
Subject: Talbert-Beach Project
Oakview Project
Yorktown - Lake Project
Main - Pier Project
We have received your notice of your elan to add four project
areas to the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency.
Our office will be compiling Fiscal Review Reports for oacti pro-
ject pursuant to the requirement of ifealth arid Safety Code Section
33328. Since your designated base year is 1982-83, ;e will be an-
able to start preparing these reports until 8-20-82 when 'the new
198.2-83 roll of values is available.
We also want to state our intentions to bill your agency for the
cost of preparing these reports as authorized by Health and Safe-
ty Code Section 33328.7.
We hope this information will be of assistance to you. If you
have any questions, call me or Judy Gale at 834-2455.
Neal G. Gruber
Senior Accountant
Tax. Section
NGG:jy
cc: Warren Hayward, Assessor
George Rebella, CAO
Jim McConnell, Auditor-Controller
APPENDIX B
B-1 County Fiscal Officer Report
(To be attached upon official receipt
by the Agency)
B-2 Correspondence with County Auditor-
Controller and State Board of Equalization
STATE Of CALIFORNIA `�
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION GECRGE R. nEILLY
Firct Distr4,, Scn Froncrsco
101.0 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
ERhEST J. .,RCNc;:BUR:,. JR.
(P.O. BOX 1799, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95808) ScCDnd Dis, kt. San Diego
(916)322-2323 I'Lay 28, 1982 WILLIAM M. BENNETT
Third District, Son Rafael
• fiCHARD NEVINS
Foer,h Divr;ct, Pasadena
KENKETH CORY
CQnrroacr, Socromento
COUGLAS D. bEll.
Mr. Tom Tineher, Di-rector Execurve Secretory
•Business & Industrial Enterprise
City. of Huntington Leach
f 2000 Main Street
Huntington Leach, CA 92648
Dear Mr. Tinch.er:
This is to aclt.w.,lodge receipt, on Flay 25, 1952, of your four preliminary
filing, fox: the proposed Talbert-Beach, Oak-view, Yorkto•,oi-Lake and the
Nain-bier Redevelopment Projects. Also received ti,:er_e tl_e 0x:Oce:3Ci.1ng fees
of 8350, : 510, ;3350 and :k550, respcctively. • Your filin s are hereby
accepted.
You asked that our report reach rou prior to Au rust ?5, l�?�2. T'.,i s i ^ ro t
possible. Your t; lte1:len t;z of prclla.r:.tion provide t1lat: t;ht:, 1 52-;? roll _ .
to he the base for the future divicion of taxc,. Tll t �ro7.1 :;ill r.ot c._ic..
until A17_list 20, l71,82. (:sec. ?.052, }tev. eJ ax Code). !I-, };izc bee:: o�:r e- r x�-
i_ence that mid-September is about as early as we can produce data in situa-
tions such as this.
Because of the volume of project-,, we have to work on a f.ir.,;t; in f ilst out
basis. There are only two projects for the 19,92-0j roll thn' .t were filed
prior to yours, co wo .should be able to be-in working; on your projects
soon after the Board roll is adopted on August 20, There '',is nothing tiro car
do to speed up the process.
:sincerely,
Martin C. Rohrl:e
Utility (toll Analyst
VJ WATION DIVIUIOId
MCR:mb
cc: Orange County Assessor
Orange County Auditor
�l
APPENDIX C
TAXING ENTITIES RESPONSES
C-1 'County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
July 29, 1982
August 28, 1982
C-2 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS o; " ,;;� TELEPHONES'
AREA CODE 714
910.
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �� ' 962-2 411
0•4�,1�� 9 6 2-Z 4 1 1
P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270E
10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLI'D OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
August 18, 1982 , }fir► �n�`a
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency
Post Office Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 cony'°N
"Ilk
Attention: Mr. Tom Tincher, Director �
Business and Industrial Enterprise
Subject: Oakview and Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Projects
On August 5, our staff met with your consultant, Mr. Mike Wagner, and staff
member, Mr. Stephen Kohler, to discuss the District's concerns regarding the
City's proposed redevelopment plans. Mr. Wagner requested we correspond with
the Agency Board directly regarding this matter.
County Sanitation District No. 3 is'a taxing agency affected by subject proposed
redevelopment projects. The District is responsible for sewerage service for
It development within the area. Our costs are escalating ralfidly because of
federally mandated requirements, energy impacts and inflation. Presently the
only source of operations and maintenance revenue is ad valorem taxes. Because
of the demands placed on the District's system by the redevelopment projects and
the fact that the taxes will be frozen at the base year, the cost of service
will not be adequately covered. Therefore, the District would like to-
respectfully propose an agreement wherein the Redevelopment Agency would pay to
the District the proportionate share of the annual tax increment within the
project boundaries. The proportionate share that the District presently
receives from the basic ad valorem tax revenue for all properties within
District No. 3 is 3.566%.
Enclosed is a copy of a standard agreement that the District has used with other
redevelopment agencies.
If we may provide any further information or assistance with respect to this
agreement, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.,
r
Wayne Sylvester!v
JWS:hc Assistant General Manager
Enclosure
cc: Bruce Finlayson, Chairman, Dist. 3
Robert P. Mandic, Mayor/Director
Ron Pattinson, Councilman/vice Joint Chairman
Ruth Bailey, Councilwoman/Director
Engineering Department
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ,-( ',9;:r•_= AREA CODE 714
lk 5-10 2910
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ,.�` 962 241
(rR
All
P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
10644 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY)
July 29 , 1982
City of Huntington Beach
Post Office Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Attention: Mr. Tom Tincher , Director
Business and Industrial Enterprise
Subject: Talbert-Beach, Oakview, Yorktown-Lake and Main Pier
Redevelopment Plans
In accordance with my discussion with Mr . Mike t?yclner , the City' s
consultant , enclosed is a copy of a sample agreement developed
between the Districts and other redevelopment agencies which
provides for payment to the District of a proportionate share of
the annual tax increment within the redevelopment agency boun-
daries to pay for the costs of providing sewerage service . .
We look forward to the opportunity to discuss this matter further
at our meeting scheduled for 2 p.m. , August 5th at the Districts '
offices. If you have any questions or require further
information, please contact the undersigned.
' � J
Way11e" Sylvester
Assistan, ' 'General Manager
JWS :HJB: hc
Enclosure
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into, to be effective
this day of , 1982, by and between COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
(hereinafter referred to as "District" ) ; and
(hereinafter referred to as "Agency" ) .
RECITALS
WHEREAS , District is a County Sanitation District
organizea and existing pursuant to the County Sanitation District
Act (California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 et sea. ) and
constitutes an -independent special district providing wastewater
collection and treatment throughout most of the County of Orance ,
and specifically within the 'area of the
and
WHEREAS , Agency is a redevelopment agency existing
pursuant to the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law,
(California Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.) and
which has been authorized to transact business and exercise the
powers of a redevelopment , agency pursuant to action of the
legislative body of the community; and
WHEREAS, Agency is proposing to carry out a project
pursuant to a specific Redevelopment Plan adopted by the
legislative body, which• Plan 'includes properties located within
the jurisdictional boundaries of District; and
4
WHEREAS, the adopted Redevelopment Plan contains
provisions for the allocation of tax revenue increment; and
WHEREAS , the Agency project, by reason of the tax
increment provisions in the approved Redevelopment Plan, together
with informational data provided by District, will have certain
adverse impacts on the financial planning and administration of
District; and
WHEREAS,, Agency, pursuant to Health and Safety Code
Section 33401 may, in any year during which it owns property- in a
redevelopment project, pay directly to District an amount of
money in lieu of taxes if District would have received the
benefit of a tax which would have otherwise been levied upon such
property had it not been exempt under the Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS , pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33401 ,
Agency may also pay to District as a taxing agency with territory
located in the project area, an amount of money which, in 'the
Agency' s determination, is appropriate to alleviate any financial
burden or detriment caused to the District by the redevelopment
project; and
WHEREAS, in recognition of the authority provided by law,
the parties wish to provide for the alleviation of financial
burdens or detriments to District in accordance with the specific
terms hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
and promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree:
-2-
Section 1: Agency agrees to pay to District, and District
agrees to accept from Agency, specific financial payments as
provided in this agreement, as full alleviation of any financial
burden or detriment caused by Agency' s Redevelopment Plan to
District.
• Section 2: For each year in which Agency receives revenue
from properties within that portion of the project area located
within the jurisdictional boundaries of District pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 33670 (b) , Agency will pay to
District percent of the amount of such revenue
attributable to the levy of the one percent basic tax rate.
Section 3: Agency and District agree that the percentage
used in Section 2 above, represents District' s share of tax
generated in the Base Year of the redevelopment 'pro3ect of Agency
(1981-82) , from the levy of the general one percent basic tax
rate.
Section 4: The agreed upon payments to District as set
forth above, are subject to the following conditions and
limitations :
A. Agency' s obligation under this agreement is deemed
to constitute an indebtedness of the redevelopment
project,.
B. Payments to District are to be made solely from that
revenue received by Agency pursuant to the
provisions of Health & Safety Code Section 33670 (b) .
-3-
6
C. Agency' s obligation to make the above-referenced
payments to District is expressly subordinate to the
pledge of tax revenue by Agency to repayment of
Agency indebtedness, bonded or otherwise, issued for
purposes of carrying out the redevelopment project.
D. Agency, in determining the annual amount of Agency
indebtedness and debt service on any said
indebtedness (other than indebtedness to District as
a result of this agreement) , shall not include in
the estimated tax revenue of Agency, the amounts
estimated as payable to District under this
agreement.
E . If, during any year while this agreement remains in
effect, District is not one of the public entities
sharing in the tax revenue generated by application
of the general one percent basic tax levy against
the Base Year assessed value of the properties
located within the project, then Agency' s obligation
to make payments provided for herein shall cease.
Section 5: This agreement shall remain in force and
effect for so long as. Agency continues to exist or until such
time as District receives its share of the general one percent
tax levy on the full assessed value as provided by Health and
Safety Code Section 33670 (b) .
Section 6 : This agreement constitutes the entire
agreement between the Agency and District, and any changes ,
-4-
modifications , or amendments thereto shall be legally binding and
effective only upon the duly executed written amendment hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this
agreement on the day and year first above written.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Chairman
Thomas L. Woodruff
General Counsel
ATTEST:
Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
General Counsel
• -5- •
AGREEMENT 8
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into, to be effective
this day of , -1982, by and between COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
(hereinafter referred to as "District" ) ; and
(hereinafter referred to as "Agency" ) .
RECITALS
WHEREAS , District is a County Sanitation District
organized and existing pursuant to the County Sanitation. District
Act (California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 et sea. ) and
constitutes an independent special district providing wastewater
collection and treatment throughout most of the County of Orange,
and specifically within the area of the
and
WHEREAS , Agency is a redevelopment agency existing
pursuant to the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law,
(California Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et sea. ) and
which has been authorized to transact business and exercise the
powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the
legislative body of the community; and
WHEREAS , Agency is proposing to carry out a project
pursuant to a specific Redevelopment Plan adopted by the
legislative body, which Plan includes properties located within
the jurisdictional boundaries of District; and
J
-1-
WHEREAS , the adopted Redevelopment Plan contains
provisions for the allocation of tax revenue increment; and
WHEREAS , the Agency project, by reason of the tax
increment provisions in the approved Redevelopment Plan, together
with informational data provided by District, will have certain
adverse impacts on the financial planning and administration of
District; and
WHEREAS , Agency, pursuant to Health and Safety Code
Section 33401 may, in any year during which it owns property in a
redevelopment project, pay directly to District an amount of
money in lieu of taxes if District would have received the
benefit of a tax which would have otherwise been levied upon such
property had it not been exempt under the Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Cbde Section 33401,
Agency may also pay to District as a taxing agency with territory
located in the project area, an amount of money which, in ' the
Agency' s determination, is appropriate to alleviate any financial
burden or detriment caused to the District by the redevelopment
project; and
WHEREAS, in recognition of the authority provided by law,
the parties wish to provide for the alleviation of financial
burdens or detriments. to District in accordance with the specific
terms hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
and promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree:
,
Section l : Agency agrees to pay to District,'*and District
agrees to accept from Agency, specific financial payments as
provided in this agreement, as full alleviation of any financial
burden or detriment caused by Agency' s Redevelopment Plan to
District.
Section 2: For each year in which Agency receives revenue
from properties within that portion of the project area located
within the jurisdictional boundaries of District pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 33670 (b) , Agency will pay to
District percent of the amount of such revenue
attributable to the levy of the one percent basic tax rate.
Section 3: Agency and District agree that the percentage
used in Section 2 above , represents District' s share of tax
generated in the Base Year of the redevelopment project of Agency
(1981-82) , from the levy of the general one percent basic tax
rate.
Section 4 : The agreed upon payments to District as set
forth above, are subject to the following conditions and
limitations:
A. Agency' s obligation under this agreement is deemed
to constitute an indebtedness of the redevelopment
project.
B. Payments to District are to be made solely from that
revenue received by Agency pursuant to the
provisions of Health & Safety Code Section 33670 (b) .
-3-
C. Agency' s obligation to make the above-referenced
payments to District is expressly subordinate to the
pledge of tax revenue- by Agency to repayment of
Agency indebtedness, bonded or otherwise, issued for
purposes of carrying out the redevelopment project.
D. Agency, in determining the annual amount of Agency
indebtedness and debt service on any said
indebtedness (other •tnan indebtedness to District as
a result of this agreement) , shall not include in
the estimated tax revenue of Agency, the amounts
estimated as payable to District under this
agreement.
E. If, during any year while this agreement remains in
effect, District is not one of the public entities
sharing in the tax revenue generated by application
of the general one percent basic tax levy against
the Base Year assessed value of the properties
located within the project, then Agency' s obligation
to make payments provided for herein shall cease.
Section 5: This agreement $hall remain in force and
effect for so long as Agency continues to exist or until such
time as District receives its share of the general one percent
tax levy on the full assessed value as provided by Health and
Safety Code Section 336.70 (b) .
Section 6 : This agreement constitutes the entire
agreement between the Agency and District, and any changes,
-4-
modifications , or amendments thereto shall be legallp binding and
effective only upon the duly executed written amendment hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed tnis
agreement on the day and year first above written.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
w
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Chairman
Thomas L. Woodruff
General Counsel
ATTEST:
Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
General Counsel
-5-
C-2
A 4•e 111,.i
The Metropolitan Water Dl+sv ct of SOUthel n Cah or nia
n.,11ceof Board of Director% July 13 , 1982
The Governing Body
• Housing and Community Development
City of Huntington Beach
- P.0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Gentlemen:
Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project
Oakview Redevelopment Project
Yorktown-Lake Redevelopment Project
Main-Pier Redevelopment Project
Enclosed are certified copies of Resolutions 7913 ,
7914 , 7915 , and 7916 electing to receive allocation of taxes
pursuant to provisions of the Community Redevelof)1,-iont Law.
These resolutions were adopted by the Board of Directors of
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California at its
meeting of July 13 , 1982 .
Very truly yours ,
Karen E. Dorff
Executive Secretary
pb
Encl. (4)
1111 Sunset Boulevard,Los Angelc%,Cant r'Maihnf;addr(KS Box 9 1151,Lo%Arlgele%,t_alrt 1)001)4 'i elt,pllone 12131 25t1 G000
RESOLUTION 7913
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ELECTING TO RECEIVE ALLOCATION OF TAXES PURSUANT
TO PROVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW
WHEREAS, Section 33676 of the Community
Redevelopment Law (Sections 33 , 000 et seq. , of the Health
and Safety Code of the State of California) provides that
f any affected taxing agency, such as the District, may elect
to be allocated, in addition to that portion of taxes
allocated to the District pursuant to subdivision (a) of
Section 33670 of said Law, all or any portion of the tax
revenues allocated to a redevelopment agency pursuant to
subdivision (b) of said Section 33670 attributable to
increases in the •District' s tax rate which occur after a
redevelopment plan becomes effective.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California that this District hereby' elects to be allocated,
in addition to the portion of taxes allocated to this
District pursuant to subdivision (a ) of Section 33670 of the
Community Redevelopment Law (Sections 33 , 000 et seq. , of the
Health and Safety Code of the State of California ) , all of
the tax revenues allocated to the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment
Project of the City of Huntington Beach pursuant to
subdivision (b ) of said Section 33670 attributable to any
increases in this District' s tax rates which occur after the
tax year in which the ordinance adopting the redevelopment
plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project of the '
City of Huntington Beach becomes effective.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Executive
Secretary is hereby directed to file forthwith certified
copies of this resolution with the governing body of the
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, the Auditor-
Controller, and the Tax Collector for the County of
Orange .
I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing is a full ,
true , and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board
of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California, at its meeting held July 13 , 1982 .
Executive Secref,gy
The Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California
APPENDIX D
LEGAL NOTICE
AND
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS
l" , is !/`1 '" 'XZ.3
LEGAL NOTICE 71-30
NOTICE OF A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOP-
MENT AGENCY ON THE PROPOSED OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,
California, and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency have set October 4, 1982
at 7:30 p.m. as the time, and the Council Chambers of the City Hall , 2000 Main
Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 as the place for a joint public hear-
ing to be held by the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency to consider the
approval and adoption of the proposed Oakview Redevelopment Plan. The Agency will
implement the adopted Plan if, after the Joint public hearing, the City Council
approves and adopts the proposed Redevelopment Plan.
The purpose of the joint public hearing is to consider:
1. The Redevelopment Plan submitted by the Agency which proposes as its
scope and objective to eliminate unsafe conditions, improve overall
appearance, encourage participation, encourage new development, provide
needed public improvements and facilities.
2. The report of the Agency to the City Council on the proposed Redevelop-
ment Plan includes, but is not limited to, the report and recommenda-
tion of the Planning Commission on the •Plan and the report of the County
Fiscal Review Committee (if any). --
3. The Environmental Impact Report on the proposed Plan.
4. All evidence and testimony for and against the adoption of the Redevelop-
ment Plan.
At the above stated day, hour and place, any and all persons having any objec-
tions to the proposed Redevelopment Plan or to the regularity of any of the prior
proceedings, may appear before the Agency and the Council and show cause why the
proposed Redevelopment Plan should not be adopted.
At any time not later than the hour aforesaid set for hearing, any person
objecting to the proposed Redevelopment Plan may file in writing with the City
Clerk a statement of his objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. Any person
or organization desiring to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to be heard.
At the aforesaid hour the Council shall proceed to hear and pass upon all written
and oral objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan.
The proposed Redevelopment Plan and Environmental Impact Report are now on
file and open for public inspection in the Office of the Director of Business and
Industrial Enterprise, 20,00 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648.
Every property owner, business or tenant interested in becoming a participant,
pursuant to the Participation Rules adopted by the Agency, should submit to the
Agency a completed "Statement of Interest to Participate" within sixty• (60) days
from the date of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the Agency.
The boundaries of the proposed Redevelopment 'Plan are as defined in Exhibit
"A", as follows:
1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OAKVIEW AREA PROJECT
That portion of Section 26, Township 5 South, Range 11 West, in the
Rancho La Bolsa Chica and the Rancho Las Bolsas, City of Huntington
Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map
recorded in Book 51, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of
the County Recorder described as follows:
• Beginning at the east one-quarter corner of said Section 26 , thence
South 89° 24 ' 16" West 463. 11 feet to a point on• the southerly pro-
longatioh of the east line of Keelson Lane, a street being 60 feet
in width, 30 feet either side of centerline, said point being the
True Point of Beginning; thence along said southerly prolongation
South 0° 45 ' 06" East 40 feet to the south line of Slater Avenue, a
street 80 feet in width, 40 feet either side of centerline; thence
South 890 24 ' 16" West 1187 feet along said south line to the west
line of Tract No. 4091; thence along said west line North 00 .44 ' 31"
West 700 feet to the north line of said Tract 4091; thence along said
north line North 89° 24 ' 39" East 300 feet to the southerly extension
of the west line of Oak Lane, a street being 60 'feet in width, 30
feet either side of centerline; thence North 0" 44 ' 46" West 2041
feet along said southerly extension, the west line of Oak Lane and
its northerly extension to a line parallel with and 60 feet north
measured at right angles from the centerline of Warner Avenue; thence
along said parallel line North 89° 25 ' 46" East 1386 feet to the
centerline of Beach Blvd. , said street being 132 feet in width, 66
feet either side of centerline; thence along said centerline South
0° 45' 14" East 996 feet; thence South 89° 25 ' 00" West 283 feet;
thence South 0° 45 ' 14" East 288 feet; thence South 89° 25 ' 00" West
20 feet; thence South 00 45 ' 14" East 96 feet to the easterly exten-
sion of the north line of Tract No. 8916; thence along said north
line South 890 25 ' 00" West 576 feet to the east line of Ash Street,
a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline;
thence along said east line South 00 44 ' 46" East 10-0 feet to a curve
concave northeasterly having a radius of 50 feet; thence along said
curve southerly and southeasterly thru a central angle of 36° 52 ' 12"
an arc distance of 32. 20 feet to a point on a reverse curve concave
westerly having
a radius of 50 feet, a radial from said point bears North 520 23 '
02" east; thence along said reverse curve southeasterly, southerly,
and southwesterly thru a central angle of 78° 54 ' 35" an arc distance
of 68 . 86 feet to a compound curve concave northwesterly having a
radius of 35 feet, a radial to said point hears South 48° 42 ' 23" east;
thence along said compound curve southwesterly and westerly thru a
central angle of 48° 11 ' 23" , an arc distance of 29 . 44 feet to a point
on the south line of Mandrell Drive being 60 feet in width, 30 feet
either side of centerline; thence along said south line south 890 29 '
.00" west 11. 8 feet to the east line of tract No. 4301; thence along
said mentioned east line South 0° 44 ' 46" east 270 feet to a point
on a non-tangent curve concave southwesterlv having a radius of 70
feet, said point being on the north line of Barton Drive and the east
line of Queens Lane; thence along said curve and east line southeasterl:
and southerly thru a central angle of 770 44 ' 59" an arc distance of
95 feet; thence South 00 44 ' 52" East 2.2 feet to a curve concave north-
easterly having a radius of 70 feet; thence continuing along the east
line of Queens Lane and said mentioned curve southerly and southeaster!•
thru a central angle of 27° 38 ' 00" an arc dist<Vice of 34 feet to a
reverse curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 130 feet, a
radial to said point bears North 6111 37 ' 08" East; thence along said
reverse curve southeasterly and southerly thru a central angle of 2'-
38 ' 00" an arc distance of 63 feet to north line of Tract 4153; thence
along said north line North 891 24 ' 35" East 125 feet to the east
line of Tract 4153; thence along said east line South 00 44 ' 58" East
500 feet; thence North 890 24 ' 16" East 197 feet to the east line
of Keelson Lane; thence zlonq said east line and its southerly pro-
longation 160 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
/S/ Alicia M. Wentworth
-� City Clerk, Huntington Beach City Counce
Secretary, Huntington Beach Redevelopment Age
/S/ Charles W. Thom son
,ty ministrator, City of Huntington Beach
Executive Officer, Huntington Beach Redevelop
Agent
DATED: 8/17/82
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (714) 536-5227
APPENDIX E
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
I. PROJECTED REVENUES
A. Residential - 100 units @ $50,000/unit $ 5,000,000
B. Office - 270,000 square feet @ $100/sq. ft. 27,000,000
C. Commercial - 30,000 square feet @ $100/sq. ft. 3,000,000
D. Total market value 35,000,000
E. Estimated increment 350,000
F. Less 40% for Housing and Coverage 210,000
G. Bond or Note Issue (12% - 25 years - 7.1 X) 1,491,000
H. Net Bond Proceeds (less 30% - Reserve, Issuance, etc. ) 1,043,700
II. PROJECT COSTS
A. Street Improvements (includes curbs, gutters, side- $ 943,700
walks, paving, right-of-way acquisition and street
lighting)
B. Administration 100,000
C. Total $ 1,043,700
APPENDIX F
DOCUMENTATION OF BLIGHT REPORT
for the
OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
PREPARED BY
MICHAEL J. WAGNER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California
QUALIFICATIONS OF MICHAEL J. WAGNER
In the last seven years, Mr. Wagner has been responsible for and has participated
extensively in the preparation of the Huntington Park North Redevelopment Plan,
the Downey Redevelopment Plan, the Downey•Plan Amendments Nos. 1, 2 and 3, the
Huntington Park C.B.D. Plan Amendment, the Walnut Improvement Agency Redevelop-
ment Plan, the Las Lomas Redevelopment Plan for the City of Duarte, the Fruit
Church Specific Redevelopment Plan for the City of Fresno, and the City Indus-
trial Redevelopment Plan for the City of Irwindale.
He has also been responsible for redevelopment reports and relocation cases in
the cities of Lomita, Seal Beach, Redondo Beach and Gardena. Additionally, he
has worked with financial consultants, underwriters and bond counsel in the pre-
paration of bond issues and has been responsible for and has prepared the fiscal
data and information for the $40,000,000 City of Irwindale bond issue, the
$2,500,000 and $7,900,000 City of Duarte bond issues, the $4,100,000 Huntington
Park Tax Allocation Bond issue, and the $14,420,000 and $40,000,000 Huntington
Park Revenue Mortgage Bond issue.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 BLIGHTING CHARACTERISTICS 2
2.1 Condition of Buildings and Structures 2
2.2 Economic Disuse and Depreciated Values 2
2.3 Lack of Public Improvements 2
2.4 Flooding 2
3.0 OTHER INDICATORS OF BLIGHT 2,
3.1 Increased Crime Rates 2
3.2 Increased Fire Rates 2
4.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION 3
_ i
LIST OF EXHIBITS
A. Photographs of the Project Area
B. Land Use Element Amendment 80-2
C. Assessor's Parcel Maps for the Oakview Redevelopment
Project Area
D. Memorandum from Police Chief
E. Memorandum from Fire Chief
The relevant portion of each exhibit is attached to this report.
Complete copies of each exhibit are available for both City Council
and public inspection in the City Clerk's office.
ii
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The ordinance by the City Council adopting a redevelopment plan, pursuant
to Section 33367(d)(1) of the State Health and Safety Code, must contain
the finding that "the project area is a blighted area ."
Section 33031 of the Code defines a blighted area as an area "characterized
by the existence of buildings and structures, used or intended to be used
for living, commercial , industrial or other purposes, or any combination of
such uses, which are unfit or unsafe to occupy for such purposes and are con-
ducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile
delinquency and crime because of any one or a combination of the following
factors:
(a) Defective design and character of physical construction;
(b) Faulty interior arrangement and exterior spacing;
(c) High density of population and overcrowding;
(d) Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, sanitation, open spaces
and recreation facilities;
(e) Age, obsolescence, deterioration, dilapidation, mixed character,
or shifting of uses. "
Section 33031 of the Code goes on to say that a "blighted area is characterized
by properties which suffer from economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse
because of one or more of the following factors:
(a) An economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse resulting from
faulty planning;
(b) The subdividing and sale of lots of irregular form and shape and
inadequate size for proper usefulness and development;
(c) The laying out of lots in disregard of the contours and other topo-
graphy or physical characteristics of the ground and surrounding con-
ditions;
(d) The existence of inadequate public improvements, public facilities,
open spaces and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or
governmental action without redevelopment;
(e) A prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments and social
and economic maladjustment;
(f) The existence of lots or other areas which are subject to being
submerged by water; provided that any ecologically valuable exist-
ing features in such areas shall , to the maximum extent feasible,
be preserved."
Indications of blight would include (1) areas that are stagnant or improperly
utilized because of -defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout
or lack of accessibility, and (2) areas that contribute substantially and in-
creasingly to the problem of, and necessitate excessive and disproportionate
expenditures for, crime prevention, correction, prosecution and punishment,
the treatment of juvenile delinquency, the preservation of the public health
and safety, and the maintaining of adequate police, fire and accident protec-
tion and other public services and facilities.
This report will document that the proposed redevelopment project area is a
blighted area.
1
2.0 BLIGHTING CHARACTERISTICS
2.1 Condition of Buildings and Structures
The Oakview Neighborhood is one of transition and improvement. Numerous
structures are in need of minor rehabilitation. Some of the buildings
are in need of major rehabilitation and removal . The Ocean View Elemen-
tary School has been sold as surplus, has been subjected to arson, is
boarded and is presently having a substantial blighting influence on the
adjacent neighborhood. The condition of buildings and structures is
illustrated in the photographs attached as Exhibit A. The unattractive
appearance of many of the structures and the amount of debris indicate
adverse living conditions within portions of the project area.
2.2 Economic Disuse and Depreciated Values
The lack of capital improvements (discussed further below) is having an
adverse effect on property values within the project area. The condition
of the Ocean View Elementary School site is having an adverse effect on
the property values in the adjacent neighborhood.
2.3 Lack of Public Improvements
According to the Land Use Element Amendment 80-2 (page 40), a portion of
the Oakview Area water improvements is in need of general upgrading and
is now only adequate for domestic use (see Exhibit B).
As evidenced in the Assessor's Parcel Maps (Exhibit C) and the photographs
(Exhibit A), this area is lacking adequate right-of-way and necessary
curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lights.
2.4 Flooding
Because of the lack of necessary streets, the area is subjected to inade-
quate drainage. After rain storms it takes months for water to fully
evaporate. With neighborhood watering some puddles become safety and
health hazards.
3.0 OTHER INDICATORS OF BLIGHT
3.1 Increased Crime Rates
According to the attached memorandum from the Police Department (Exhibit
D), the crime rates in the project area are substantially higher than the
City-wide average, and are one of the highest rates within the City.
3.2 Increased Fire Rates
According to the memorandum from the Fire Department (Exhibit E), there
are numerous fires within the project area. There are also a very high
number of medical aid incidents within the area. Fire and medical re-
sponse rates are substantially higher than for other parts of the com-
munity.
2
4.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
As demonstrated in this report, the project area is blighted in numerous re-
spects, including both buildings and property. The City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach can and should make the finding that the project area is
blighted and in need of redevelopment.
The blighting effects which are having a substantial negative and adverse
impact on the Project Area can be summarized as follows:
1. Approximately one-fourth of the units in this area (particularly along
Koledo Lane, Barton Drive and Mandrell Drive) do not meet the current
provisions of the Building Security sections of the City's Municipal Code
which requires enclosed parking garages for multiple dwellings. Many of
these same units do not meet current off-street parking requirements with
respect to the number of spaces per dwelling unit. Many of the apartments
also do not have private open space for individual units as currently
required in the City's zoning ordinance. Many of the structures in the
area are delapidated with unkept yards, old curbs and sidewalks and
broken windows.
2. The condition of structures, economic disuse and lake of capital improve-
ments make the property unsuitable for development by private enterprise
acting alone. These negative conditions can only be dealt with by the
positive powers of a redevelopment agency.
LAND USE ELEMENT
AMENDMENT 80 -.2
Adopted December , 1980
Environmental Impact Report 80-3
huntington beach department of
`� development services
dr
t
The existing five multi-story nodes described in the study range in size
from 80 to 400 acres, with 10 to 25 percent of the area anticipated for
actual multi-story development. '
The applicant's project would dominate the newly designated multi-story
node and could potentially develop beyond the anticipated 10 percent of
the node area, becoming the only high-rise project within the node. This
may or may not be a problem, depending on the rate of development and
the desires of surrounding property owners. Presently, the applicant's
site is the only site within the node which could accommodate a
multi-story suffix.
In addition, a major development on this site could greatly influence the
community as a whole. A major development would definitely alter the
visual image of the arba and may encourage a new direction for
community growth such as the creation of a new activity corridor west
along Warner Avenue to Huntington Harbour. Finally, a development of
this scale and type may prove to be in direct competition with the
revitalization efforts for the Downtown Area. The Coastal Element
presents three alternative land use proposals for the Downtown Area one
of which may be precluded if, major office developments are being
provided elsewhere in the community.
2. Economic Considerations
The Planning staff, in cooperation with Ultrasystems, Inc., conducted a
fiscal impact analysis of this project and is detailed in Appendix A.
3. Public Services and Facilities
a. Sewers
The area of concern is serviced by an existing 69 inch County main
located along Warner Avenue. The Orange County Sanitation
District has indicated that this system will accommodate the
applicant's ultimate development proposal.
b. Water
There is an existing 21 inch County feeder main along Warner
Avenue. However, there is presently only one eight inch main off
the feeder to service the area of concern and a portion of Beach
Boulevard. The whole area is in need of a general upgrading and is
presently only adequate for domestic use. The project would
require a loop around the site with additional eight inch mains off
the feeder along Warner Avenue in order to adequately service the
development.
HER
40 f
EXHIBIT C
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MAPS
for the
OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
PEW
I I
Dtla L(PPE r
a r� CrC� ; y J' !riY�i4�G®�C•)i 1714
_ .7UB -TM99O ENT
MPT ROM A
BY L�. Q ENf
•'nMcr� + p rw z [ Q. rum a> .O i
r w
I .J.•N
O ✓ . O O U O
r U r v
•
O
I O
tJ r 7& •O P/ 9 7
13
Ep
O O O
H USIN R lILITAF54 0O u a
r
r1�■wr�rsr�r�■�■■�■r■r�rwr�r�r�■rlrl■t �-
OAKVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
-19-
u1-38
J
crmers
M a M Ll � ~ •
AVENUE —'
6f G2 �fN ff Of •rr 7r /S/r2
°
TRACT R A f� "� 0 .� .� - Q o
• o , , L, ' LOT i Lor/ a
w♦ a �,,, 1,-
wt-
to = 6 O
6sw LOT` +P O fc O m
9 Lor 2 5 w
/��
.se or 5 4 9/00 6 N0 „/V7B5 4e i!B •O 217 42 Q�,. p/1
e n/rriT •s rr n s
r A& `p .s° 3672
• • IT BLKC212 to x E Q aZ 283 0 �(� c BLK F
8 '
12 r47 is LOT ! 'O =13, 3 i_LOr J ss tc l:e �e
a2
Ifs go- se ris anRe ————.ve „ /e° !c Z.
BLK D " I l M LOT 4 2
14 LOT 4 O ► 16 LOT 4 _ X PARE A••A 130-35 PAR/ a
/OI G/r �20 --C--•�12 •°I - -� % .M =rt a2 � 1�t
7e ne 4e iSo 7l7 fz � i
O : I3 Lor 5 t0 x 15 Lori 5 o Lor 5 r
! AV 436
N �sr�° /ii�e sO� isi k iSe 4. e, A IY a .so �2■�
ALLEY $ 1
22
a
MARCH 1979 NOTE•ASSESSORS BLOCK A ASSESSOR S MAP
TRACT NO 436 UM /6-28 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 165 PAGE 28
TRACT NO 10485 M M 449-34,35,36 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY Of ORANGE
PARCEL MAP PM 130-55
Ic=-22
28
o- SE Cote NE /<,
e l �-
o •:
.4 of
TRACT
r w 9 oOC k 4�O a•x Oe 9 O Ok �C °- ~�V.,`x x6 x�Q r <O c • rc
,OIS :� y••15 x<rs
r if k!O.
_C. I�r �o0
66 _ t-2 SC<x 2
YRISTIN C/RCt.£
aMANORELL CO E �:+
iC !S bC
O 71 0 D E9/6
, oa 17
C`
So07
^;1 w 71 2E 29 224
� lJ -
4 (� 5103 i
Q xs O a N)
(D 'a BARTON Dell'E $A
0
c = 1\pJll
? O 3I o
ld
14 w yes w 3: 3a _ 12,
_•F) L_•EY L-L•r .ctx
23
)VARCN 1976 TRACT NO 4301 MM 177-11,12 NOTE-ASSESSORS BLO;,K 8 ASSESSORS NAP
TRACT NO 89/6 MM 369-23,24 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOY165 PAGE 22
SHOWN IN CIRCLES CO.JhTY Or ORANGE ��
• P,iR S 1/2, --,. << -a 26, 75S,R. ,
22
U c t
L.r.fr WAC76" a. E^ C
„\s 12s G, a Its°` •r. 1 s w 5:1 ' Y^ ss s6 21 u, `�°V --'�
OnO
d + • d ^� Q f 13 r O
TRACT Q 3f as e,_zE Q s E'-2f M J
rss J r3s 74
' ' ^
2 e � O 19 � i O r3•. O � i__._
d
TRACT Is
�
n,rc 3 - op d `
O O O
6 3E IB ,
3s,c 3y 7 2 B ^ O
d 4O 4O 17 O 4 s 11 ; ✓ ^
11
N i O E t v a C.4at_ -
sO 16 Qs sfr ,3)44 _=Y YC Q
16 °'
f 4: ..__era s r W;
s 4 E _O 0 14 14 �4 Iss ss c 42 • r 4 3. c-I / r 3 13 04 la
N K 125
L__Ef
,e.efr $ O ae�Er O Fv ,e. 4+
C Yo Q Vs
n 44 43 /? •s 2 2s p
W
g O9 $ 10 F O ° 10 012 O - 8 I I e 12 Y a I f ) 0m
$ `° 4301 ; `° NO 4153 NO 50574a �/ �./ �f
L SLATER 2 t AVF�'UE
III-33
MARCH /976 TRACT NO 4/55 MM /74-/2,/3 NOTE-ASSESS,'4S B.CCK 8 ASSESSOFS WF
TRACT NO 430/ MM 177-//,/2 PARCEL AuMBERS BOOK 165 PAGE `L=
TRACT NO 5057 MM /82-6,7 SriCNn 4 CIPCLES COJv7r OF ORA'v.0 \
PARCEL MAP P M /43-43
Ms
E:5
T•�
V
Q 22 1 /"r/OC
I �c
LA 23
NE ALLEY :
� NL I L_
ALLEY W o� {/I,�' LL•E
�•� CT Q
`v
Q:o o o o
sc s. so• sc e i Q
✓ACOUELYN LANE
1 - O
' 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ` 19 . J 2 20
Q o :
R s zo-ze :.
'• -•<o a 7F a 3'• 21
II 24 ALLEY N0409/ i
OAK V/EN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL V TR T
OAF VIEW SCHOOL PARK 31 £ 30 29 28 27 26 25 24
c
DA/RYV/EW C/RCL E
• < U; 34 35 �6J 4 30 01 2 2F 2OI O � l
`✓
a_ •- NOB 3 H I
N/CHOLS
J
k
i
m - 34
4
A'''ARCH /976 TRACT NO 409/ M M /74 -/O, // NOTE-ASSESSOP S BLOCK 8 ASSESSOR'S MAP
TRACT NO 8703 A/ M 369- 39,40 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 165 PAGE 24
SHOWN !N CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
142 -20 PC.17 AE!/4, tVE//4', M T5S, RI/W .
S' � 1 / tJ t♦
WARNER s /w/NTERSBUR6 AVE) g AVENUE
Sees fair ass
!9T 4aS ss S +.
s0 �
50
14!' 'A 'j Ar,
N -
d
IJ /!� 9I TI 1 J %1 I• - • I
6 06 Ac 1
L
14 fj 12 NI `p v H i I I al 3�s41- 1
fp]O a1 SC 41'!0 4r , I I NO ✓68
I cY •oE as 5 so5 9• I _ —.. C I
g SYCAMORE Ar£NUE e i n
Lc
/ r • r. i
TACT ^^��
IB C' `5 r ai :J 1 2 25 1 30 C
I� - I•
I 1�' � `5
Q O 1 0 z 1 23 �, I P M I?7 39 tie
4• I - ♦s 1 isv —__ T c 201 -
I �I 13 Q 24' .r W a c s 2
!4•c s ! rb Q i
I I I y ,I � ♦ * s sF I y, b •a as ' �___ —_ — ____ _ _ __ — _ _'_ _ _ �
• _ 1 I� IP I 1 iI 6 2
• Jr6 I �/ I 'LJ I O I IUD I--- ,ie .rs I r - I I �e /11.� fir- F
60 I G 10 la�3c t L. L� �''�� ll2 — — — — — — -7 --- —— — - -
,/ 12�
L• Io r t- 1 • 1-- r --
2 CYPRESS AVENGE - 7i 1
" - - - 1
165-28 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK B ASS£SSJf.'.� a�a•
MARCH 1951 TRACT NO 368 M M /5- 3/ PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK III r'AC£of
TRACT NO 436 M M 16- 28 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTr Of i%f •n
PARCEL MAP PM 100-9
JJA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HMTW4TCMI MACH `` ry
1 ti
To TOhi I I\llll It From ,11hi hp0111i, Analyst
Director of Business & Industrial Special Operatns, Div.
Enterprise
Subject Date
CRIh1L STATISTICS FOR REDEVELOPh11•Nf JUNE 15, 1982
AREAS
To determine the incidences of crime for the specified redevelopment
areas, a comparison of calls for service by reporting districts (RD)
was conducted from January 1, 1978 through 1981.
The reporting districts for the appropriate redevelopment projects
are as follows:
Report ing Uibtrict kedevelopAnent
461 Main - Pier
272 Oakview Neighborhood
431 Yorktown - Lake
292 Talbert - Beach
Huntington Beach is comprised of 140 reporting districts. The following
matrix shows a percentage of the total number of reporting districts
with fewer calls for service than the four in question.
Reporting District 1978 1979 1980 1981
461 991 99% 991 99%
272 -8 L_ MI 3kL 42X
431 99% 991 99% 99%
292 73t 70t 59% 67t
As you can see, RD's 461, 272 and 431 indicate the highest number
of calls in the City. In fact, in no case were they less than the
upper 4% of all reporting districts, with 292 in the upper one-third.
With the exception of RD 431, these calls for service figures are
very representative of workloads in the respective redevelopment
areas. Since the Police Department is located in RD 431, many desk
reports are filed with this RD number which reveals an erroneous
calls for service figure.
If you have further questions,regarding this study, please contact me
at S943.
JM/cal
cc: Capt. Jenkins
HE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
NUNi1NGTON flACN
To Frank H. Kelly From Roger Hosmer
Division Chief Deputy Fire Marshal
Subject INCIDENT DATA Date June 22, 1982
The following information is submitted pursuant to the request for incident data
from Tom Tincher.
Main-Pier Development Project
1981 1982
Fire Incidents 1 0
Non-Fire Incidents 6 1
Medical Aid Incidents 40 11
Oakview Neighborhood Project
1981 1982
Fire Incidents 23 6
Non-Fire Incidents 14 7
Medical Aid Incidents 63 16
Yorktown-Lake Project
1981 1982
Fire Incidents 1 1
Non-Fire Incidents 8 2
Medical Aid Incidents 26 14
Talbert-Beach Project
1981 1982
Fire Incidents 0 0
Non-Fire Incidents 0 0
Medical Aid Incidents 2 2
RH:jh
Res. No. 49
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH)
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a
meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 4th day
of October 19 82, and that it was so adopted by
the following vote:
AYES: Members:
Pattinson, MacAllister, Mandic, Finley, Bailey, Kelly
NOES: Members:
None
ABSENT: Members:
Thomas
�1�4 rll�
cretary of the Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Huntington Beach, Ca.