Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRedevelopment Agency - 177 RESOLUTION NO. 177 A RESOLUTION OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING ITS REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ON THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, AND TRANSMITTING SAID REPORT AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WHEREAS, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") has prepared a Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan") for the proposed Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project (the "Project") ; and Health and Safety Code §33352 states that every redevelopment plan submitted by a redevelopment agency to the legislative body shall be accompanied by a report to the legislative body on the redevelopment plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency does hereby resolve as follows : SECTION 1: The Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency approves and adopts its Report to the City Council on the Redevelopment Plan for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. SECTION 2 • The Executive Director of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency is hereby authorized and directed to transmit the aforesaid Report and Plan for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project to the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. -1- 177 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach on the 19th day of June, 1989 . C airman "L'v ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Secretary of the Red velopment Agency Attorn 41 Agency of the City of Huntington �"� Beach REVI D AND PPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: 71 e, j Executi ,e birecto Di for of Economic Development -2- 177 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ' JUNE 1989 x T Y REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ON THE AMENDED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AMENDMENT• NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PREPARED BY: URBAN FUTURES, INCORPORATED In Cooperation With The HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JUNE 1989 l T REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FOR AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I . Introduction 1 II. Reasons For Selection of the Project Area 3 III . Description of the Physical , Social and Economic Conditions in the Project Area 9 A. Existing Physical Conditions 9 1 . Project Location 9 2 . Land Uses and Acreages 9 3 . Buildings and Structures 13 a. Deficiencies, Deterioration and Dilapidation 13 b. Defective Design and Character of Physical Construction 22 C. Faulty Interior Arrangement and Exterior Spacing 22 d. Age and Obsolescence 25 e. Mixed and Incompatible Buildings and Land Uses 29 4 . Properties 30 a. Traffic Circulation Deficiencies 30 b. Deficient Street, Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, and Lighting Facilities 31 C. Drainage System Deficiencies 38 d. Water Distribution Deficiencies 42 B. Existing Social Conditions 44 1 . Project Area Population 44 2 . Prevalence of Social Maladjustment 44 C. Existing Economic Conditions 51 1 . Prevalence of Depreciated Values and Impaired Investments 51 i Page IV. Preliminary Assessment of Proposed Method of Financing Redevelopment of the Project Area 53 V. Description of How the Specific Projects Proposed Will Improve or Alleviate the Physical and Economic Conditions Existing in the Project Area 57 VI . Plan and Method of Relocation 60 VII . Analysis of the Preliminary Plan 61 VIII . Report and Recommendation of the Planning Commission 62 IX. Report REquired by Section 65402 of the Government Code 63 X. Project Environmental Review 64 XI . Summary of Meetings and Information Presented to Property Owners, Residents, and Community Organizations 65 XII . Report of the Fiscal Review Committee 66 XIII . Neighborhood Impact Report 67 XIV. Report of the County Fiscal Officer and Analysis Thereof by the Agency 74 XV. Fiscal Impact Analysis 75 APPENDIX A - Proposed Public Improvements/Projects APPENDIX B - Legal Description APPENDIX C - Matricies of Blighting Conditions Within the Project Area and Proposed Improvements ii LIST OF FIGURES Ficmre # Pacre 1 Regional Location Map 10 2 Project Area Map 11 3 Existing Land Uses Map 12 4 Deteriorated Structures Map 16 5 Street Infrastructure Deficiencies Map 32 6 Drainage System Deficiencies Map 39 7 Water System Deficiencies Map 43 LIST OF TABLES Table # Page 1 Land Uses in the Project Area 9 2 Structural Conditions in the Project Area 15 3 Structural Conditions in the Project Area 15 by Land Use iii LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS Photo # Page Deficiencies, Deterioration, and Dilapidation 1 18 2 18 3 19 4 19 5 20 6 20 7 21 8 21 Defective Design and Character of Physical Construction 9 23 10 23 11 24 12 24 Faulty Interior Arrangement and Exterior Spacing 13 26 14 26 15 27 16 27 Deficient Street , Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, and Lighting Facilities 17 33 18 33 19 34 20 34 21 35 22 35 23 36 24 36 Drainage System Deficiencies 25 40 26 40 27 41 28 41 Prevalence of Social Maladjustment 29 46 30 46 31 47 32 47 33 48 34 48 35 49 36 49 iv REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FOR AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT I . INTRODUCTION The Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency is proposing the adoption of Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project. Ordinance 2582 , approving and adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project, was adopted by the Huntington Beach City Council in November 1982 . The proposed amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project only involves a change in the .limitation on the tax increments which may be allocated to the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670, as well as an updating of the documents related to the redevelopment plan adoption process to the current standards of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et. seq. ) . The amended Redevelopment Plan will not change the original Project Area boundaries or the original restrictions on eminent domain. This amendment is necessary for achieving the purposes of the California Community Redevelopment Law since the existing tax increment limitation, which stipulates that the Redevelopment Agency may not collect more than $350, 000 in tax increments during any one fiscal year, does not provide sufficient funds for the successful implementation of this Project. 1 r This Report to the City Council on the Amended Redevelopment Plan for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project has been prepared pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33352 . The purpose of this Report is to advise the City Council of the reasons for the selection of the Project Area; to describe the physical, social , and economic conditions existing in the Project Area; to describe how the proposed public improvements/projects will improve or alleviate blighted conditions existing within the Project Area; to indicate the methods of financing for the Redevelopment Project; to set forth the plan and method of relocation of any property owners or businesses displaced by the Project; to analyze the Preliminary Plan; to include the Report and Recommendation of the Huntington Beach Planning Commission; to include the Program Environmental Impact Report for this Project; to include the Report of the County Fiscal Officer and the Report of the Fiscal Review Committee; to describe the impact of the Project upon the residents of the Project Area and the surrounding areas ; and to summarize the consultations of the Redevelopment Agency with the affected taxing entities and the public. 2 development and redevelopment of the Project Area in a manner consistent with. the policies and goals of the Huntington Beach General Plan. The redevelopment of the Project Area would implement California Community Redevelopment Law. The bases for implementing the Redevelopment Law can be stated as follows: 1 . The City has a need to provide and make improvements to certain public facilities and services in the Project Area in order to reduce the continuing process of deterioration which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. 2 . Redevelopment can provide a means to assist existing owners in upgrading and improving their properties. 3 . The Redevelopment Project provides a means of eliminating or rehabilitating deteriorating structures and other blighting influences which constitute poor environments for Project Area residents, property owners, and operators of businesses . 4 . The Project Area is currently characterized by economic blight caused by properties which suffer from an economic decline due to the prevalence of depreciated values and impaired investments, the existence of lots of inadequate size for proper use, and the existence of inadequate public facilities, improvements and utilities. 5 . Portions of the Project Area currently contain characteristics of physical blight caused by buildings which are deteriorating due to age and obsolescence. 6 . These deficient conditions dominate and injuriously affect the Project Area such that the Project Area is deficient as a whole. 5 r r 7 . The blighted conditions constitute a serious physical, social, and economic burden on the City. 8 . The City has the desire to improve the Project Area in order that the existing deficient conditions which constitute physical, social and economic liabilities can be reduced or eliminated in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of the Project Area and the people of the City of Huntington Beach. 9 . The blighted conditions which exist in the Project Area are a hindrance to the proper development of the City and cannot be eliminated or improved without public assistance. 10 . There is poor visual quality to much of the Project Area including: a . Inadequate landscaping, buffering and setbacks from public rights-of-way; b . Inadequately maintained buildings ; C . Unsightly overhead utility lines and poles ; d. Poorly maintained vacant lots; e. Rights-of-way lacking landscaping; and f . Public improvements in need of extensive repairs and/or modifications. 6 T 1 C. The redevelopment of the Project Area may include, but will not be limited to, the actions outlined below. The Agency proposes to eliminate and prevent the spread of blight within the Project Area by the following actions: 1. Installation, construction, reconstruction, redesign, or reuse of streets, utilities, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, handicap ramps, and other public improvements as permitted in accordance with the Huntington Beach General Plan and the City' s Zoning Ordinance. 2 . Construction and/or reconstruction of various flood control and storm drainage facilities . 3 . Provision and/or upgrading of traffic signals, channelization, lighting and signing of various intersections, and correction of other existing circulation deficiencies within the Project Area. 4 . Completion of various water system projects including the replacement, construction, and improvement of water lines, water storage and treatment facilities, and water meters in order to provide adequate fire flows and domestic water supplies . 5 . Undergrounding of utilities in the Project Area. 6 . Improvement and development of recreational facilities for local residents. 7 . Construction and improvement of public protection facilities, including police and fire facilities. 8 . Construction and improvement of vehicle parking facilities . 7 I III . DESCRIPTION OF THE PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN THE PROJECT AREA A. Existing Physical Conditions The purpose of this section is to provide a description of the existing conditions within the proposed Project Area for Amendment No. One to the oakview Redevelopment Project, which for the purpose of analysis in this document is referred to as the "Project Area. " 1 . Project Location The Project Area in its regional context is shown in Figure 1. The overall location and boundaries of the approximately 68 acre Project Area, is presented in Figure 2 . The legal description of the Project Area is provided in Appendix A. 2 . Land Uses and Acreages The breakdown of land uses within the Project Area by approximate ti acreage is shown in Table 1. Figure 3 illustrates the existing land uses throughout the, Project Area. TABLE 1 LAND USES IN THE PROJECT AREA Land Use Acres $ of Proiect Area Single Family Residential 8 . 04 11 . 82% Multi-Family Residential 26 . 12 38 . 41% Commercial 10 . 47 15 . 40% Vacant 1. 15 1. 69% Streets, Alleys, and R-O-W 22 . 22 32 . 68% TOTAL 68 . 00 100 . 00% Source: Urban Futures, Inc. 1988 9 GLENDAL 134 GLENDORA 01 5 PASA ENA 21 • ROSEMEAO 21 BEVERLY HILLS 10 COVINA i WEST POMONA LOS ANGEI.ES 10 j 80 — 1 ' �J / INGLEWOOD • WHITTIER 57 / 1 LOS AN_GELES COUNTY I dF t ORANGE COUNTY 091`I,�o�ti�ti 710 110 PARAMOUNT '' FULLERTON 91 91 r- TOR RANCE I ANAHEIM 00 CYPRESS GARDEN 55 LONG GROVE • RANCHO • BEACH • 22 PALOS VERDES WESTMINSTER • SANTA Los Anpaiss Harbor ANA 5 Pac+nc Ocean HUNTINGTON BEACH • 55 IRVINE NEWPORT BEACH \ AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT N Regional Location Map 0 5 10 Mies 10 FIGURE 1 1 WARNER AVE. 11 FIR D z Y AN R AVE BELSiTO Gf1 s — w W CYPRESS AVE CYPRESS 11 i T ] \�1 J < W Y 1 Q O i I MANDRELL DR KRISTIN CR. z � > J . .- � _4 n.a-.t:)...MA�/'•hy 1...��y�a � n a�P!:'i..... .. r 4�» r 0 w o BARTON DR _ ._--_ m J 1 1 Y 1 Z NAGON LR --- - - "- Z ---- J — -- --- - - Z ----- -- W- -or — - (n -- -- } — 1 Q� �0 �X Q - WL SLATER AVE. I I i 1 AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT N Project Area Map ►/////////I Project Area Boundaries SCALE 0 200 400 feet FIGURE 2 {Ik11K1 AVE ry FIR D nu .i Y A R AVE X.X. 3i t � r N BELSIT w w -- fF•{f{is r CYPR SS AVE • CYPRESS ••: Yf J � W I : G®® KRISTIN CR. � MANDREL L DR 0 Z J J m 2 U " \ 5BARTON DR. O Z — Z J Z J U J NAGON OR J Z. — �w W Z �Li 0 --- SLATER AVE. I-fJ J I i AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Existing Land Uses Map //// Project Area Boundaries N Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential SCALE Commercial 0 200 400fft{ O Vacant FIGURE 3 The makeup of existing land uses within the Project Area clearly differentiates the northern and southern portions of the Project Area. The northern portion is characterized by a mixture of older single family houses, sometimes more than one on the same lot, and newly contructed multi-family structures. Many of these older single family houses are in need of substantial rehabilitation and do not have adequate front yard setbacks. The northeast corner of the Project Area contains the Charter Centre, a 400, 000 square foot commercial retail and office complex. The southern portion of the Project Area primarily consists of multi-family 4-plex structures, most of which are in need of some rehabilitation. 3 . Buildings and Structures a. Deficiencies , Deterioration and Dilapidation One of the causal factors evidencing the presence of structural blight within the Project Area is the existence of deficient buildings . A windshield survey was conducted in December 1988 by Urban Futures staff to determine the condition of structures in the Project Area. Structures within the Project Area were rated separately according to a predetermined scale based upon criteria of structural integrity and level of maintenance. only primary structures capable of containing a major land use activity were evaluated. Due to the nature of the survey, the ratings were derived from a visual evaluation and do not represent a detailed building by building structural analysis . Each structure received one of four possible ratings . A structure was rated sound if it appeared well maintained and no physically blighting characteristics were evident. Structures displaying some degree of physical decline were rated either deficient, deteriorated, or dilapidated, depending upon the severity of the degeneration. The following is the general guideline for these ratings, which are derived from nationally accepted rating standards. 13 Sound The structure is no more than 25 years old and has no noticeable deficiencies in the structural condition of roof, walls, or foundation. It appears to have adequate plumbing and electrical service and is subject to a regular program of maintenance. Exterior walls and other surfaces are well painted and clean, and windows and doors are intact. Deficient The structure could be older than 25 years, however, has been maintained adequately to eliminate any major structural defects. It may show signs of deferred maintenance such as peeling paint, broken windows, or cracked plaster. The roof may show signs of minor water leaks . Deteriorated The structure shows signs of structural deterioration such as sagging roof or walls or crumbling foundation. It may appear to have leaky plumbing or hazardous electrical service illustrated by exposed wiring, and holes may be apparent in roof or walls . Paint may be largely peeled or faded or even nonexistent, and broken windows are often apparent. Dilapidated The building is structurally unsound and maintenance is nonexistent. Its fitness for human occupation is highly questionable and the state of deterioration and neglect is such that it is a candidate for demolition. 14 TABLE 2 STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS IN THE PROJECT AREA Rating Number of Structures Sound 23 Deficient 122 Deteriorated 51 Dilapidated 0 TOTAL 196 Source: Urban Futures, Inc. 1988 Out of the total 196 structures rated, 173 or 88 . 27% are at least deficient and in need of some rehabilitation. It can be generally stated that maintenance is irregular and such conditions as peeling paint, loose roof shingles, weathered facades, and cracked foundations are common. A total of 26 . 02% of all structures are deteriorated such that these structures require substantial upgrading. The existing structures present the Project Area with an image problem which negatively impacts potential development opportunities. When clustered together, such structures create definite pockets of substandard quality and blight. The breakdown of this structural rating by existing land uses in presented in Table 3 . The locations of all properties containing deteriorated structures in shown in Figure 4 . TABLE 3 STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS IN THE PROJECT AREA BY EXISTING LAND USE Single Family Multi-Family Commercial TOTAL Sound 3 11 9 23 Deficient 27 94 1 122 Deteriorated 23 28 0 51 Dilapidated 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 53 133 10 196 Source: Urban Futures, Inc. 1988 15 r r � AtNR AVE;. FIR D z J Y AORE AVE AN BELSIT Des T^ W W CYPRESS AVE CYPRESS i 2 3 \✓1 J � W Y +� Q MANDRELL DR KRISTIN CR. 0 Z J J m S U Q -- O OBARTOON DR. o T - cI z - — J Z NAGON CR Z O w — U w w CLOY SLATER AVE. I ! z AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Structural Deterioration Map N Project Area Boundaries Locations of Properties Containing Deteriorated Structures SCALE �� 0 _00 400 feet FIGURE -4 Photographs #1-#8 on the following pages provides visual evidence of the physically blighted conditions present within the Project Area. Photo #1 displays peeling paint, weathered stucco facade, and a dilapidated fence on a multi-family structure on Mandrell Drive. Photos #2 and #8 illustrates the degree of physical degeneration found in many carport structures throughout the Project Area. Also commonplace are garage structures in need of substantial rehabilitation, as shown in photo #4 . Many multi-family structures are characterized by cracked foundations, as shown in photos #5 and #7 . The existence of structural blight within a Project Area constitutes a social liability upon the community because of the social problems associated with living or working in deficient structures . These problems include increased safety risks from fire, accidents, floods, and other unpredictable events . It also creates unhealthy conditions resulting from poor heating, ventilation, insulation, and sanitation, as well as personal alienation, maladjustment, and the loss of community cohesion and pride. The physical blight caused by structural deficiencies also constitutes an economic liability for the City. Its presence depresses property values and tax revenues as well as commercial/business sales tax revenues . Additionally, such conditions negatively impact potential development opportunities . The residential structures within the Project Area are typically characterized by a lack of adequate maintenance such that rehabilitation efforts are now required to insure the safety, health, and welfare of Project Area residents. However, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency presently does not have adequate funds to finance the needed rehabilitation programs . Aft 17 Deficiencies, Deterioration, and Dilapidation 1 . Apartment building displaying peeling paint, weathered facade, and cracked foundation due to deferred maintenance. Also evident in this photo is a deteriorated sidewalk and lack of property maintenance (barren dirt yard devoid of grass) . . en y wi'��_3,LFL�•••►aY•WYO+ 'r+•• la..y:.:}...._:.-.___wc.'� .Y'3•'S...�Y�_Ar•1� �� � � s 2 . Carport wall exhibiting advanced structural deterioraton and graffiti. The lower left hand corner of this photo also displays a large pothole in alley pavement. 18 r Deficiencies, Deterioration, and Dilapidation (cont.) I 3 . Apartment building displaying deferred maintenance in the form of peeling paint and weathered facade . w, ;.;'a . u 4 . Garage structure with peeling paint, crumbling wall , and graffiti . 19 Deficiencies, ! - - • • Dilapidations S f • •r structural rehabilitation. 6. Deteriorated siding on residential property. 20 .yam t i Deficiencies, Deterioration, and Dilapidation (cont.) f ' r ` n it •1 � � s �.;.Mf'�, _ -"�' •7=,4�5:' 1 L'.'t�� •'� �.. rC\�..nl.•.�/�l}i1'�f }y' �t P � •:. .ii f�.�'+'4�j`'/ 1 "♦ ��I.,•� N!�''f�,,�jt,� .a. ,�if��^�����: '���}17:i�.��wL j.7' , •.�JV.':(c7�.:i K�l'!b�i�Tii:i"l.�...'�V!f� '..'.t 7 . Apartment building displaying cracking foundation.. 1 8 . Dilapidated carport wall in need of replacement. 21 b. Defective Design and Character of Physical Construction Many residential structures within the Project Area clearly display poor construction quality in terms of both physical size and structural composition. This condition is particularly evident in many of the single family homes in the northern portion of the Project Area, particularly on Sycamore Avenue, Cypress Avenue, and Ash Street. Many single family structures are of such diminutive proportions that overcrowded living conditions are likely to occur. Examples of such structures are shown in photos #9 and #10 . These structures also display defective physical characteristics due to both low quality construction materials and deferred maintenance. Photo #11 illustrates a residential structure characterized by roll-on asphalt roofing and deferred maintenance. The southern portion of the Project Area also displays physical defects in many of the multi-family residential structures . Many of these structural deficiencies, such as cracked foundations and neglected exterior surfaces, relate to deferred maintenance of such a prolonged period that some degree of rehabilitation is now necessary. All streets in the southern portion of the Project Area display these conditions, with the most notable examples on Mandrell Drive, Koledo Lane, Queens Lane, and Barton Drive. Photo #12 displays the effects of deferred property maintenance on the entry steps to a 4-plex on Queens Lane. C. Faulty Interior Arrangement and Exterior Spacing As previously mentioned, many Project Area residential structures are of proportions that are likely to create overcrowded housing conditions . Overcrowding not only diminishes personal privacy and the quality of life for Project Area residents, but also provides an environment where communicable diseases can readily flourish. 22 Defective Design and Character of Physical Construction 9 . Undersized residential structure located in rear of vacant property. Aft � t11 -= =! lab 10 . Residential structure on Warner Avenue displaying lack of property improvements. 23 ..'sic.� +t iy��' �•;;1R�..• • }�! t� �i � w •ty . �• rt In terms of exterior spacing, many single family residential structures in the northern portion of the Project Area are characterized by inadequate front yard setbacks. Many residential structures on Warner Avenue, Sycamore Avenue, Ash Street, and Cypress Avenue have front yard setbacks of only 10-15 feet. Photos #13 and #14 on the following page displays the close proximity of two single family residences to Sycamore Avenue. The house in photo #13 has no continuous buffers between the structure and roadway, and is further impacted by the parking structure located directly across the street. Photo #15 displays a single family structure with an inadequate front yard setback from Warner Avenue. This situation creates congested living conditions by subjecting residents to higher levels of noise, dust, air pollution, and visual impacts from passing motor vehicles, particularly for those residents on or adjacent to Warner Avenue, which is a major arterial for the City. The southern portion of the Project Area is characterized by multi-family 4-plex structures with rear garages containing two second floor dwelling units . These garage/duplexes are located directly adjacent to the rear alleys, without any provision for setbacks or other buffers that would reduce the noise impacts of vehicular activities . Photo #16 displays a residential unit of a multi-family structure fronting an alley, with the structure and alley separated only by a series of bollards . The 4-plexes on Jacquelyn Lane, Koledo Lane, Queens Lane, Barton Drive, and Mandrell Drive are characterized by a lack of adequate setbacks or landscape buffers between buildings, thereby creating a congested environment for local residents . d. Age and Obsolescence The overall condition o1c a City' s housing stock is determined by the following factors : age, quality of construction, and regularity of maintenance. Obsolescence applies mainly to residential and commercial buildings where size, layout, and other design features are no longer suitable for current uses. The obsolescence of 25 f. "#r Faulty Interior Arrangement and Exterior Spacing , s 13 . Undersized residential inadequate front • setback. fi�� �� its ♦�. ftw 14 . Residential property displaying overcrowded conditions due to inadequate front and side yar s 7 +• +wr .. .,ham..... • setbacks. e 4 ,'�� •, A, ey' 'yiI[!'�1 Faulty Interior Arrangement and Exterior Spacing (cont.) lidn- 15 . Deteriorated residential property inadequate .. Avenue. w y n • Apartment - abutting alley. structures throughout the Project Area has important implications for identifying blight and justifying redevelopment. Residential structures throughout the Project Area are characterized by declining structural conditions due to the cumulative effects of age and deferred maintenance. Many Project Area structures which are over 25 years old have not been subject to an adequate program of maintenance. These findings are essential to the community since residential structures over 25 years in age are most likely to display signs of deterioration resulting from deferred maintenance. The 4-plexes which characterize the southern portion of the Project Area are generally 25-30 years old and clearly display signs of age and neglect, such as weathered facades and cracked foundations. Many of the single family structures in the northern portion of the Project Area, particularly on Sycamore Avenue, Cypress Avenue, Ash Street, and the northern portion of Oak Lane, are well over 25 years in age and display varying signs of advanced deterioration. Although many Project Area residential structures are in urgent need of rehabilitation, the Redevelopment Agency presently does not have adequate funds to support such efforts . In terms of obsolescence, the diminutive size and inadequate setbacks characteristic of many single family structures in the northern portion of the Project Area severely impair the ability of such structures to provide safe, sanitary, and decent housing for Project Area residents . These features negatively impact the functional usefulness of such residences, thereby accelerating their structural obsolescence . Due to the age of the existing buildings located throughout the Project Area and the high cost involved in maintenance and upkeep, it is very likely that most of these structures will continue to decline in appearance and structural soundness, further contributing to the blighting conditions within the Project Area. Although there is a need to provide new affordable housing for many Project Area residents, the Redevelopment Agency does not presently have adequate funds to aid in the construction of new replacement housing. 28 e. Mixed and Incompatible Buildings and Land Uses There are portions of the Project Area which are characterized by an incompatible mixture of residential and commercial land uses . Many patrons of the Charter Centre complex use local Project Area streets for access to the parking garage on Ash Street, and sometimes park on local streets such as Elm Street and Cypress Avenue. Residents adjacent to this commercial/office complex are therefore subjected to higher levels of noise, dust, air pollution, and visual impairments from non-resident vehicular use of local streets. Conversely, business owners and patrons of the Charter Centre are negatively impacted by the structural deterioration evident in many adjacent residences . The physical decline of these residential structures creates the potential for a negative experience due to the unattractive visual impacts of this neighborhood, and may discourage patrons from returning to the Charter Centre. Structural rehabilitation and proper landscaping are needed to mitigate the negative visual impacts and provide some level of noise insulation. Conflicting mixtures of land uses and structures create a more difficult and expensive reed to establish mitigating measures to reduce and/or eliminate incompatibility. Mixed and incompatible uses negatively influence property values and the resultant quality of new developments . In many cases, maintenance of land and structures is neglected due to the negative physical, social , and economic atmosphere created by these conflicts. All of these factors interrelate and result in reduced tax revenue to the community, increased costs of public services (e.g. , police, fire) , and a decline in public services and facilities . In summary, the existing structural deficiencies, age, and conflicting land uses all contribute to the blighting -influences evident in the Project Area. Redevelopment will provide the necessary mechanisms for alleviating and/or reversing these deficiencies in a rational, comprehensive long-range approach. 29 r 4 . Properties Some properties within the Project Area are suffering from economic maladjustment, deterioration or disuse because of inadequate public improvements, facilities and utilities, and parcels of irregular form, shape or size. a. Traffic Circulation Deficiencies The Project Area contains portions of the following arterials: Beach Boulevard, Warner Avenue, and Slater Avenue. All other Project Area streets are considered to be local streets (60 foot right-of-way) . As detailed in a technical memorandum from POD, Inc. , to City staff, Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue are classified as major arterials (120 foot right-of-way) and Slater Avenue is considered a secondary arterial (80 foot right-of-way) . Beach Boulevard, which is also a State Highway under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, is the heaviest traveled street in the City. The internal circulation system within the Project Area is considered to be an incomplete grid pattern which restricts access between the northern and southern portions of the Project Area. Although four Project Area streets intersect with Slater Avenue, only Queens Avenue enables passage to the northern section via Barton Drive to Koledo Lane to Mandrell Drive, which connects with both Oak Lane and Ash Street. The northern portion of the Project Area is considered to be an incomplete grid system in that access to Beach Boulevard is interrupted by the Charter Centre and access to Nichols Street (a north-south local street located west of the Project Area) is interrupted by the Oakview School and Community Center. As previously mentioned, local streets in the northern portion service not only resident traffic flows, but also patrons of the Charter Centre utilizing the parking garage located at the northeast corner of Sycamore Avenue and Ash Street. Furthermore, due to the current traffic congestion at the intersection of Warner Avenue and 30 Beach Boulevard, many motorists traveling east-bound on Warner Avenue who wish to turn south-bound on Beach Boulevard by-pass this intersection by taking Ash Street south-bound to Cypress Avenue east-bound to the Cypress/Beach intersection. This spill-over of through-traffic and the constant flow of Charter Centre patrons results in significantly heavier traffic volumes than normally experienced on local residential streets. In addition to the heavy traffic volumes created by external pressures, many streets in the Project Area, particularly in the northern portion, are in substandard condition and require substantial improvements. Street widths range from the required 60 foot right-of-way for local streets down to only 20 feet of street pavement. These narrow streets are also characterized by deteriorating surfaces, incomplete lighting, and a lack of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks . Project Area streets in this condition include Sycamore Avenue, Ash Street, Cypress Avenue, and Elm Street. The substandard widths and surfaces of these streets, along with the spill-over impacts of through-traffic and Charter Centre patrons , impedes the successful flow of traffic and creates higher levels of noise, air pollution, and traffic delays . Emergency vehicles for fire, police, and health services are also negatively impacted by impaired road access due to narrow and congested streets . In summary, inadequate street capacity, poor circulation, and inadequate access all create significant circulation problems in traffic flow throughout the Project Area. b. Deficient Street, Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, and Lighting Facilities Deficiencies in the street system facilities are evident throughout the Project Area, as shown in Figure 5. Cracked street pavements and potholes characterize many street surfaces in the Project Area, particularly in the northern streets such as Sycamore Avenue, Ash Street, Cypress Avenue, and Elm Street. Deteriorating street surfaces include many local streets, as shown in photo #17; and even along Warner Avenue, as shown in photo #18 . The northern portion of 31 11111uuuselt R AVE. I _ FIR D i J i W � � S LSI T -- W _ W CYPRESS' 1 �I I a .n o � MANDRELL OR KRISTIN CR. \\ _ Z m cowBARiON••flR.• -J — - z WAGON DR --- — - - w — - -' -- U) -- -— W UJ La SLATER AVE. 11 AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Street Infrastructure Deficiencies Map I////I Project Area Boundaries N '""N• Locations of Inadequate Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Facilities •••••••••• Locations of Inadequate Lighting Facilities SCALE _ 200 400 Wt Locations of Deteriorating Street Pavements FIGURE 5 14 10, "Y a7 '�..' '" ♦ ek , 1x� 1.: f. 7A4 pdpt A 1 y y t r _ { to, X r f� a- • t S h`A'i �°"'ray� ��`"�'�3' ,'•' r 3�r,,}�"�;'•a i. ��� 1" :�,jt� , ��el(*�'����.."� ,' ty���`�$�""�.�`F r ` �' ji� a '�.. y5� +f�..,��t��iKv` .��j,>y 3�t• •�.' > t y�r�a',y,�ryly��+.hy{�j�" �1rj '-t i'�"S„ t°f+i r.L''�•� ,ywn %: yw f�_ .'} . ��, s� ��� �k•� ry � t ,{ � �, icy ,. �1 t ,� • • `�`vi��I j.��'1 � h ri t.b'� 't.., t Lid ,.. r M1p� low r � J�(✓i + �Gfj; —fit b= f J� r:�'1 � rJ _ 1 S I i. •{gyp k � r e I' "��}r.'v8_�� • Deficient Street, Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, and Lighting Facilities (cont.) 21 . Local street with inadequate resurfacing, as well as lack of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. -- '-�:eK' .ram-' �-_ - - -.� (y•_,a..-_.__ - - 22 . cypress Avenue displaying deteriorated street surface, potholes, and drainage problems by vacant property. 35 Deficient Street, Curb, Gugter, Sid�ewalk;,,and Lighting Facilities (cont.) :y,• li q c rr x' v • + I � `. .c . 23 . Deteriorated sidewalk and lack of property maintenance on Mandrell Avenue. 'K^ 'Rio - 24 . Alleyway displaying deteriorated surface and drainage deficiencies. 36 the Project Area is generally characterized by narrow, disintegrating streets that lack curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, as evidenced in photos #19-#21 . Photo #22 displays a portion of Cypress Avenue characterized by cracked street pavement, potholes, and a lack of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Photo #23 shows a cracked and uneven sidewalk on Mandrell Drive with inadequate asphalt resurfacing. Many Project Area alleys are also in need of resurfacing, as shown in photo #24 . Specifically, Sycamore Avenue is characterized by a lack of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, with the exception of the northern portion of the street adjacent to the Charter Centre parking garage. This street is very narrow and the surfacing is in a state of almost complete disintegration, particularly west of the Ash Street intersection. Street lighting on Sycamore Avenue is incomplete and inadequate. Ash Street north of Cypress Avenue is also very narrow and in a state of structural deterioration . This portion of Ash Street is lacking in curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, and also does not have adequate street lighting. Cypress Avenue is a narrow and deteriorating street with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks provided on only a few properties . Oak Lane lacks curbs, gutters, and sidewalks along the east side of the street north of Cypress Avenue. Elm 'Street is also lacking curbs , gutters , and sidewalks north of Cypress Avenue, with the exception of the eastern portion which abuts the Holiday Spa structure, and has an incomplete provision of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks south of Cypress Avenue. Street surface cracking is also evident along Elm Street. Barton Drive is characterized by incomplete street lighting facilities . Jacquelyn Lane is characterized by cracked street pavements and cracked curbs . The provision of adequate street surfaces is necessary for safe and smooth flowing vehicular access. Narrow streets in an advanced state of disrepair, coupled with the spillover of non-resident traffic, tends to slow traffic flows and thus extends the travel time of motorists on these local streets . 37 The lack of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks often results in standing water on the roadside shoulders, forcing pedestrians to utilize street surfaces for passage. The pedestrian use of street surfaces creates potentially hazardous situations as motorists and pedestrians attempt to share local streets of substandard width. This condition is extremely critical due to the fact that most daytime pedestrian travel consists of small children coming or going to school . The lack of sidewalks and adequate street lighting also creates potentially dangerous night time travel conditons for pedestrians . Substantial improvements are also needed for the Project Area alleys . Cracked pavements, potholes, standing water, and overgrown vegetation are commonplace in many alleyways. The poor condition of these alleys not only impedes vehicular circulation, but also imposes potential traffic and pedestrian conflicts through the lack of proper lighting and haphazard parking. The Project Area in general is in urgent need of substantial street surface rehabilitation, along with the construction of adequate curbs, gutters , sidewalks, and street lights . Although the provision of these street infrastructural facilities is essential for the safety, health, and welfare of Project Area residents, the Redevelopment Agency does not presently have adequate funding to provide these facilities. C. Drainage System Deficiencies The lack of curbs and gutters in the many portions of the Project Area prevents storm water from being effectively channeled off the street surfaces, leading to health and safety hazards for local residents . Despite the presence of underground storm drainage lines along Beach Boulevard, Warner Avenue, Ash Street, and Sycamore and Cypress Avenues between Ah and Elm Streets, the lack of above-ground drainage facilities results in long-standing puddles of water which contribute to unhealthful living conditions by providing a habitat for disease carrying insects. The locations of storm drainage deficiencies throughout the Project Area are shown in Figure 6. 38 WARNER AVE. FIR D z __ J 6ELSiTO GFi s i--` w w CYPRESS' N I KRISTIN CR co I S I V �-- U -- - — -- ----- - --- - -— J NAGON DR -- -- -- - ---- - -- — - - — __.. ----- - - Z --- Lr SLATER AVE. I ! I Z i I AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Drainage Deficiencies Map N Project Area Boundaries +•••♦•♦ Locations of Streets with Inadequate Drainage Facilities SCALE zoo 400 reef FIGURE 6 . • A A Deficiencies 25 . Standing storm water - to lack of above ground drainage facilities deteriorated street surface, and fill discarded shopping carts on Sycamore Avenue. ,�..ti: ram.. „� �. .�f� � �• !,�� LA 26 . Inadequate drainage facilities (curbs and gutters) , lack of sidewalks, and deteriorated street surface. 40 +�-� ._ .rat � a� � • �� -+c i Drainage System Deficiencies (cont.) i za? _ - _- ^� �►T Cam• , .. 1h - - �, •` v� - .A ' -DIY 27 . Storm drainage deficiencies and cracked street surface along south side of Cypress Avenue. �.(••Wib .. •I 28 . Lack of proper storm drainage and incomplete provision of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on Elm Street. 41 Photos #25-#28 clearly display these deficiencies along Sycamore Avenue, Cypress Avenue, and Elm Street. As a result of the Project Area' s lack of adequate above-ground storm drainage facilities, even small amounts of rainfall can cause puddling along street shoulders, becoming -not only an inconvenience but also a health and safety hazard. As the streets lacking curbs and gutters typically also lack sidewalks, ' pedestrians are forced on to the street surface and must compete with motor vehicles for the limited street pavement space. These drainage system inadequacies are factors which contribute to both physical and economic blight within the Project Area. These conditions help promote physical blight since some properties are not being served by adequate drainage facilities which meet public health standards. These existing conditions also lead to economic blight by contributing to potential depreciated property values and overall investment decline since existing drainage facilities are not adequate to serve new development within the Project Area. d. Water Distribution Deficiencies The Project Area is characterized by a number of water lines which are only 6 inches in diameter. While 6 inch water lines are considered the minimally acceptable size for single family residential neighborhoods, modern construction standards call for a minimum diameter of 8 inches for new water distribution lines since 6 inch lines are not always capable of providing needed fire flows during peak demand periods . As shown in Figure 7 , Queens Lane, Barton Drive, Jacquelyn Lane, Elm Street, and portions of Oak Lane, Cypress Avenue, and Sycamore Avenue ,are characterized by 6 inch water lines. Furthermore, some Project Area residents must rely on private wells for thcir drinking water, which are often characterized by inconsistent supplies and variable water quality. Since the provision of adequate drinking water is essential to the public health and welfare, the revitalization of the Project Area cannot be fully achieved without an adequate water supply and distribution system. 42 WARNER AVE. Z FIR D --- AVE 5i AVE CYPRESS L < MANDRELL DR KRISTIN CR Ci Z X 0 0 M 0 LJ 0 Z —J NAGON OR 3: Z SLATER AVE Z AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Water System Deficiencies Map N Project Area Boundaries Locations of Streets with Substandard - Sized Water Lines SCALE F===F 0 200 400 feet FIGURE 7 B. Existincr Social Conditions 1 . Project Area Population The 1980 U.S . Census reported a total population of 170, 486 for the City of Huntington Beach. According to the California Department of Finance, the total Citywide population is now at 187, 740 as of January 1988 . Therefore, the City' s population has grown 10 . 1% from 1980 to 1988 , which translates into an average annual growth rate of 1. 3% . The steady growth in population experienced by Huntington Beach in recent years has put increased pressure on Huntington Beach ' s public services and facilities. As Huntington Beach ' s population continues to expand throughout the City, there will be greater pressure to improve and expand upon the infrastructure within the Project Area. The current residential population of the Project Area is estimated to be 1, 620 persons . This figure was calculated by multiplying the total number of residential units for all single and multi-family structures (592 dwelling units) by the average household size of 2 . 736 for the City of Huntington Beach, as reported by the Department of Finance (although the average Project Area household size is likely to be greater than the Citywide average, a more specific average for the Project Area is not presently available) . Since the population of the entire City is 187 , 740, the Project Area contains approximately 0 . 86% of the Huntington Beach population. 2 . Prevalence of Social Maladjustment Social maladjustment reflected in the forms of crime, juvenile delinquency, welfare dependency, and unemployment, is another indication of blighting conditions in the Project Area. According to the statistical division of the Huntington Beach Police Department, crime rates in the Project Area are among the highest in the City. Although the Project Area represents less than one percent of the total Citywide population, an average of about ten percent of 44 all Citywide hom6cides and assaults occur within its reporting district ( the 272 reporting district, which is bounded on the north by Warner Avenue, on the east by Beach Boulevard, on the south by Slater Avenue, and on the west by Gothard Street) . There were a total of 2 , 396 police calls in this reporting district for 1986 and 2 , 577 police calls during 1987 , representing a very high 7 . 6% annual increase. Even more significant is the fact that the average annual number of police calls for a reporting district in the City is about 600 calls . Therefore, the Project Area reporting district had over four times as many police calls in 1987 as the average reporting district . Reports of crime in residential areas implies security hardware deficiencies, poor physical design, obtrusive shrubbery, and deficient street lighting. Crime occurring in commercial areas implies deficiencies in the physical security of commercial buildings such as structural design, floor plan layout, landscaping, lighting, circulation systems, and parking structures . As previously mentioned, many Project Area streets have inadequate lighting facilities . The lack of adequate street lighting coupled with the mature trees and bushes surrounding many residential structures provides convenient concealment for burglars . Furthermore, the narrow and poorly paved streets throughout the Project Area results in patrolling problems due to the incomplete circulation system. Crime is often related to high unemployment and underemployment levels . According to a recent status report prepared by the City, the percentage of families in the Project Area falling below the poverty level is nearly double the percentage for the rest of City. Female heads of household in the Project Area are also nearly double the Citywide average, and the unemployment rate is significantly higher for the Project Area in comparison w`.th the overall City rate. The prevalence of social maladjustment is also determined by the existence of vandalism and property neglect . Photos #29-#33 display vandalism in the form of graffiti on houses, fences, garage doors, and public signs . The presence of graffiti often indicates the 45 Prevalence of Social Maladjustment •- ., .- ..•,,;-it�%� '. - i► � t - `""��1 `.�' .�„�;,....: _ -.4 .�� -aj•.:. ,fir. ,; - 29 . Vandalism evidenced by graffiti on apartment wall . ST TIP K It MIDENT KI 1 ATo�RS'exEVEr � ;• � -�'= �` ry •t1 + TOWS MMM f`�AT w $' 1 C" ING 30 . Graffiti-covered public sign. 46 Prevalence of Social Maladjustment (coot.) .w 1 s , r -_ _ _ .:sb�::.�,' 'r3''` �. '�''�``•'-i,'�)'�j�{t'�:,'!;a.�•}r.t'{I}��s:�ts.��'.�r�..j�Z4 j; �s�•s. ^r.n r}.''ft+e }!IJ.'..J•tYR'., 31 . Graffiti-covered fence on Oak Lane. '4s •1 t � 4 32 . Deteriorated garage structure exhibiting graffiti. 47 Prevalence,of'.Social,Maladjustment (cont.) 33 . Residential structure exhibiting deferred maintenance, graffiti, and front yard used as parking space. 34 . Prevalence of discarded debris and graffiti. 48 Prevalence of • • • • • • 35 . • constructionon • yard of • buildinq. own 36 . Discarded furniture and debris on Sycamore 49 �'• �,� �'�, .+:,�` � ,,,,r* P Via„ .� ,t�i L y < ua.w•w.i.,..rib t. :`j ./, r . existence of juvenile delinquency and even gang-related activities . The Project Area 's high crime rate and the predominance of graffiti throughout the Area appears to verify the occurrence of juvenile related offenses. Social maladjustment is also indicated by the lack of property upkeep throughout the Project Area. Photos #33-#36 clearly display this condition in the form of discarded furniture, paint cans, various debris, and landscaped open space areas used for parking automobiles . The accumulation of discarded materials and debris on residential properties may indicate a lack of neighborhood pride among some local residents . This attitude often reflects a feeling of alienation from the community and a sense of powerlessness towards any effort to upgrade existing conditions . Redevelopment can provide the mechanism to help local residents rehabilitate their properties and provide City officials with the funds for infrastructural and public protection improvements , thereby increasing community cohesion and improving the quality of life for Project Area residents . At present, however, the Redevelopment Agency does not have sufficient funding to initiate these needed improvements . 50 C. Existing Economic Conditions Currently the City of Huntington Beach lacks the financial resources to fully fund public improvements that could support the type of beneficial development necessary for a healthy economic base. Therefore, an amended Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area is proposed in an effort to alleviate and/or reverse the blighting conditions described herein. 1 . Prevalence of Depreciated Values and Impaired Investments Two indicators of economic blight are defined as the prevalence of depreciated land values and impaired investments. Briefly, depreciated land values are simply the decline in the assessed value of property due to many of the factors previously mentioned, including physical problems such as inadequate public facilities and the prevalence of social maladjustment . Impaired investments result from the same conditions and are basically a socio-economic reaction to depreciated values . An impaired investment is a rented or leased residential , commercial, or industrial property on which the values or the return on the owner' s equity is diminishing or has stopped altogether, and/or the equity itself is in danger of being partially or totally lost . One key indicator of impaired investments is a prevalence of deferred maintenance on the part of local property owners, as evidenced in photos #1-#8 of this Report. Another indicator is the lack of public infrastructural improvements such as street surfacing, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting. This lack of public improvements tends to depress property values and discourages local property owners from investing in structural improvements to their properties . These general conditions such as inadequate infrastructure and public amenities or the inaccessibility of the parcel due to inadequate street improvements deters the potential developer from investment. 51 This discourages economic investments that would convert economically underproductive or unproductive parcels into productive land uses. The failure of the property owners to fully utilize these parcels is evidence of the impaired investments resulting from inadequate public improvements and public facilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without the aid of redevelopment. Although most of this underutilized land in the Project Area has the potential for improvement through structural rehabilitation or new construction, it is unlikely that this will occur without assistance from the Redevelopment Agency. The lack of improvements on these parcels is indicative of the inability of the private market to bring about their utilization. The combination of the cost for needed pre-development improvements, assembly or division of parcels, marginal economic activity and/or inability of the parcel owner to invest make these parcels undevelopable without public assistance. Redevelopment Agency actions that will make these parcels viable for development are essential in order to facilitate development of the vacant and underutilized land within the Project Area. One such action would be the establishment of a "land write-down pool" by the Redevelopment Agency. These programs are described in Appendix A of this document. The existence of underutilized and unproductive parcels in the Project Area is indicative of the prevalence of impaired investments, which is a factor contributing to economic blight. The end result is a serious social and economic burden on the community caused by deferred structural maintenance, overall property neglect, unsightly vacant lots, inhibited growth in property values and tax revenues, and unrealized housing opportunities. 52 IV. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA A. General Financing Methods Available to the Redevelopment Agency and Proposed Method of Financing the Project The amended Redevelopment Plan for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project will provide the framework for the various "tools" of financing available to the Redevelopment Agency. A summary of financing methods are discussed below: Once a Redevelopment Plan is adopted by the City, the Redevelopment Agency is authorized to finance the Project with tax increments, interest income, Agency bonds, loans from private institutions, proceeds from the sale or lease of property, financial assistance from the City, County, State of California, Federal Government, or any other public agency, or any other legally available source. The City may, in accordance with the iaw, make advances and expend money as necessary to assist the Agency in carrying out the Project. Any such assistance stall be on terms established by an agreement between the City and the Agency. As available, gas tax funds from the State of California and the County may be used for the street system. As available, federal loans and grants will be used to finance portions of Project costs. The Agency is authorized to issue tax exempt bonds if appropriate and feasible in an amount sufficient to finance all or any part of the Project. Tax exempt bonds could be issued to finance mortgages, to establish a revolving loan fund, or to establish any other kind of housing assistance program. Loans could be of the deferred interest type to keep monthly costs down. Mortgage Revenue Bond proceeds could also be used for construction in rehabilitation areas. In addition, tax increment secured bonds or notes could be used to 53 "benefits" of housing rehabilitation in redevelopment areas. Assessment district bonds can be used for the financing of infrastructure improvements. The Agency is authorized to obtain advances, borrow funds and create indebtedness in carrying out the Plan. The principal and interest on such advances, funds, and indebtedness may be paid from tax increments or any other funds available to the Agency. All taxes levied upon taxable property within the Project Area each year by or for the benefit of the State of California, any district, or other public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called "taxing agencies") after the effective date of the Ordinance approving the Redevelopment Plan will be divided as follows: 1 . That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for each of the taxing agencies upon the total sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the Redevelopment Project as shown upon the assessment .roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by such taxing agency, last equalized prior to the effective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid to the respective taxing agencies as taxes by or for said taxing agencies on all other property are paid (for the purpose of allocating taxes levied by or for any taxing agency or agencies which did not include the territory of the Project on the effective date of such ordinance but to which such territory is annexed or otherwise included after such effective date, the assessment roll last equalized on the effective date of said ordinance shall be used in determining the assessed valuation of the taxable property in the Project on said effective date) ; and 2 . That portion of the levied taxes each year in excess of such amount shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into a special fund of the Agency to pay the principal of and interest on bonds, loans, moneys advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, 54 refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the Redevelopment Project. Unless and until the total assessed value of the taxable property in the Project exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property in the Project as shown by the last equalized assessment roll referred to above, all of the taxes levied and collected upon the taxable property in the Project shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies . When said bonds, loans, advances and indebtedness , if any, and interest thereon, have been paid, all moneys thereafter received from taxes upon the taxable property in the Project shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are paid. 3 . That portion of tax revenues allocated to the Agency pursuant to the paragraph (2) above which is attributable to increases in the rate of tax imposed for the benefit of any affected taxing agency which levy occurs after the tax year in which the Ordinance adopting the Plan becomes effective, shall be allocated to such affected taxing agency to the extent the affected taxing agency has elected in the manner required by law to receive such allocation. Taring agencies may request receipt of property taxes which are the result of inflationary increases in assessed value of up to 2% of base year. No loan, advance or indebtedness to be repaid from such allocation from taxes established or incurred by the Agency to finance in whole or in part the Redevelopment Project shall be established or incurred after a date to be determined following the date of adoption of the Ordinance approving and adopting the Redevelopment Plan. Such loan, advance or indebtedness may be repaid over a period of time longer than such time limit. Such time limitation may be extended only by amendment of the Redevelopment Plan. The amount of bonded indebtedness, to be repaid, in whole or in part from such allocation of taxes, which can be outstanding at one time shall at a limit to be determined, cannot be changed without -an amendment of the Redevelopment Plan. 55 Any other loans, grants, guarantees or firanciai assistance from the Unitad States or any other public or private source will be utilized if available as appropriate in carrying out the Project. B. Estimated Project Costs As illustrated. in Appendix A of this document, the estimated cost associated with the effective redevelopment of the Project Area in 1989 dollars is $601160, 000 . C. Assessment of Economic Feasibility of Project and Reasons for Including Tax Increment Allocation Provisions At the time of document preparation the information requested from the County, in accordance with Section 33328 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, was not available . When this information is received, it will be incorporated into future documents . Without the tax increment allocations, the City and/or Agency would be severely limited in their ability to provide those needed improvements that would improve and alleviate the existing blighted conditions in the project Area as described in Section III of this Report . 56 nrq( RIPTION OF HOW THE SPECIFIC PROJECTS PROPOSED WILL IMPROVE OR A' f_EVIATE THE PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EXISTING IN THE PROJECT AREA. Included in Appendix A of this document are the proposed public improvements/projects that are intended to alleviate and/or reverse the physical, social and economic conditions that are characteristic of blight within the Project Area (Section III) . The proposed public improvements/projects are grouped in four (4) main categories : (1) infrastructure; (2) housing programs ; (3) community development programs; and (4 ) community facilities . The following describes how these proposed public improvements/projects will alleviate and/or reverse those blighted conditions within the Project Area. A. Infrastructure The proposed infrastructural improvements are designed to alleviate and/or reverse existing deficiencies within the Project Area, and NOR city as a whole, as described in detail in Section III . These improvements/projects have been developed by the Agency to encourage rehab ilit.aton and redevelopment of properties by addressing those limiting and deficient elements of the infrastructure that most seriously impact the Project Area. The proposed improvements/projects focus on construction and rehabilitation of water and drainage facilities, underground utilities and lighting, circulation programs, community development programs and community facilities . 1 . Circulation The proposed circulation system improvements/projects are designed to alleviate and/or reverse existing circulation problems within the Project Area as described in detail in Section III . These improvements/projects focus generally on improving street and intersection capacities by widening, realignment, and signalization, and the construction or rehabilitation of off-street parking facilities . 57 2 . Water System Improvements The proposed water system improvements are designed to alleviate and/or reverse existing deficiencies within the Project Area, and City as a whole, as described in detail in Section III. These improvements/projects focus on the rehabilitation of existing wells and/or to provide funding for new water sources and enlargement of aged, deteriorated and undersized transmission mains. 3 . Storm Drain Improvements The proposed storm drain improvements are designed to alleviate and/or reverse existing drainage deficiencies within the Project Area, and City as a whole, as described in detail in Section III. These improvements/projects focus on the construction, rehabilitation and enlargement of aged, deteriorated, undersized and needed drainage facilities such as street curbs and gutters. 4 . Underground Utility and. Lighting Improvements The proposed underground utility and lighting improvements are designed to improve the image of the Project Area by improving the visually offensive view of the Area by placing overhead lines underground and providing an improved lighting system. B. Housing Programs The proposed housing programs have been designed to meet housing inadequacies within the Project Area and City as a whole for the benefit of low and moderate income households . These proposed programs include housing rehabilitation, relocation assistance and the development of new low and mor4.erate income housing within the City. 58 C. Community Development Programs The proposed community development programs have been designed to meet the needs of businesses within the Project Area, and City as a whole, and to improve the economic conditions of the area as described in detail in Section III . Proposed programs include rehabilitation, funding of area studies, and the provision of land write-down and land assembly monies. D . Community Facilities The proposed improvements to community facilities have been designed to improve and alleviate existing deficiencies as described in detail in Section. III . The proposed improvements/projects focus on upgrading existing facilities and additional services for the primary benefit of City residents . The proposed public improvements/projects identified in Appendix A were developed to alleviate, improve and generally reverse the blighted conditions within the Project Area, and City as a whole. They will be implemented as funds are received and/or allocated from a variety of sources as described in Section IV and as social and development needs dictate. 59 VI . PLAN AND METHOD OF RELOCATION The Amended Redevelopment Plan (Sections 411, 412 , 413) specifies the method of relocation for property owners and businesses displaced by Agency activities . The Agency shall assist in the relocation of all persons displaced by Agency acquisition of property in the Project Area. The Agency intends to accomplish all redevelopment pursuant to the Amended Redevelopment Plan with as little displacement of property owners and businesses as possible. The Agency is authorized to pay all relocation payments to provide relocation advisory assistance in conformity with the adopted Relocation Plan and the California Relocation Assistance Guidelines or as otherwise required or authorized by law. A1.1 relocation shall be conducted in accordance with Article 9, Chapter 4 of the California Community Redevelopment Law. 60 VII . ANALYSIS OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN The Preliminary Plan for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project describes the boundaries of the Project Area, contains general statements regarding permitted land uses, layouts of principal streets , population densities, building intensities, and building standards proposed as the basis for the redevelopment of the Project Area. The Preliminary Plan also shows how the purpose of the California Community Redevelopment Law would be attained through the proposed Amendment, explains how the proposed Amendment conforms to the General Plan of the City, and describes generally the impact of the proposed Amendment upon residents thereof and upon the surrounding neighborhoods . The Amended Redevelopment Plan for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project conforms with the standards and provisions of the Preliminary Plan. Project Area boundaries are as proposed in the Amended Redevelopment Plan (map and legal description) . The Amended Redevelopment Plan proposes the land uses and principal streets indicated in the Preliminary Plan. Proposed building standards remain as previously adopted for local use. The City of Huntington Beach has an adopted General Plan which includes all the elements mandated by State law. The Preliminary Plan conforms to the General Plan and its required elements. 61 VTTT, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. The Report and Recommendation of the Planning Commission has been prepared in accordance with Section 33346 of the California Community Redevelopment Law and transmitted to the Redevelopment Agency. This Report is included in the Report to the City Council under separate cover. 62 ?Y . REPORT REQUIRED BY SECTION 65402 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE This Report is included in the Report and Recommendation of the Planning Commission and is provided as part of the Report to the City Council under separate cover. 63 X. PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Program Environmental Impact Report for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project has been prepared in accordance with State law and the local guidelines for implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1,970, as amended. The Final Environmental Impact Report is included under separate cover as part of this Report to the City Council . 64 XI . SUMMARY OF MEETINGS AND INFORMATION PRESENTED TO PROPERTY OWNERS, RESIDENTS, AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS This information is included under separate cover as part of this Report to the City Council . 65 XII . REPORT OF THE FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A Fiscal Review Committee has been formed and a Report of this Committee is currently being prepared. This Report and the Agency's response to this Report are included under separate cover as part of this Report to the City Council . 66 XIII . NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT REPORT A. Relocation The Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency has adopted a Plan for relocation of any persons displaced as a result of this Project. The methods for assisting any displaced persons are outlined in sections 412 , 413 , and 414 of the Amended Redevelopment Plan for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project. B. Traffic Circulation A number of public improvements to streets and rights-of-way within and adjacent to the Project Area are being proposed according to the Amended Redevelopment Plan. The Project Area is primarily a grid pattern with major arterials playing a significant role in moving vehicular traffic as well as connecting segments of the Project Area. This circulation system also provides access to property in the Project Area . It is generally proposed that the Agency will upgrade streets by resurfacing, improving freeway access, realignment, restriping, signalization , construction, and/or reconstruction where required or desired. in addition, sidewalks, gutters, and other usual infrastructure will be upgraded during the process of improving the Project Area . These physical improvements will result in safer and more efficient traffic circulation throughout the Project Area. Street, alley, and/or established new rights-of-way will occur in accordance with the Amended Redevelopment Plan. C. Environmental Quality Some of the basic objectives of this Project are the improvement of residential and commercial properties, as well as public facilities, within the Project Area. It is anticipated that the Project will allow the Agency to assist developments by providing financial assistance in the form of increased public improvements, the ability 67 to finance mortgages at below market rates, rehabilitation loans and other methods of establishing a more viable area to live, work, and play. The potential environmental impacts of this Project have been evaluated in detail in the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for this Project, which has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) , as amended. The EIR is a part of the Report to" the City Council on the Amended Redevelopment Plan for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project. All proposed future development or Agency activity will be reviewed by the City for compatibility with adjacent uses and the potential impact upon adjacent properties. In addition, specific environmental analysis of future major projects will take place as as required by CEQA. D. Availability of Community Facilities and Services The Project is not expected to create a significant adverse impact on community facilities and services . Project implementation activities include provisions for additional public improvements, utilities and other facilities which may be required as a result of the Project. As the Project Area is improved, buildings will be less of a fire hazard and a better physically developed Project Area will influence and reduce the demand for other public protection services (e.g. , police, fire) . The impact of the Project on the community facilities and services is evaluated in the EIR for this Project. The EIR is a part of the Report to the City Council on the Amended Redevelopment Plan for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project. E. Effect on School Population and Quality of Education One of the primary purposes for this Amended Project is to provide a mechanism for the financing of public works improvements . However, the Agency also intends to eliminate and prevent the spread of blight 68 in the Project Area by providing housing for families of all income levels, including low and moderate income families. The addition of new residential units is not anticipated to significantly impact local educational facilities and services. However, if the Agency does propose any large residential developments, then any potential adverse impacts to the schools will be identified and appropriate mitigation measures will be considered in connection with that specific development. F. Property Assessment and Taxes The Project will be funded principally through tax increment financing rather than through special assessments, new taxes, or general funds. Any increase in property taxes is regulated by law, and therefore the improvement of properties adjacent to redevelopment projects will have .little effect on property taxes of residential properties . However, the revitalization of the Project Area may have a positive effect on the market value of properties in adjacent neighborhoods, resulting in some increase in assessed valuation as properties change ownership and are reassessed. The system of tax increment financing does not in any way alter the rate of property tax applicable to property owners in the Project Area, but instead simply modifies the allocations among taxing agencies of the property taxes that are received from the Project Area. G. Number of Persons Expected to be Displaced by the Project It is anticipated that few residential units will be eliminated by the proposed Amendment. The Agency intends to accomplish redevelopment pursuant to the Amended Redevelopment Plan with as little displacement of persons as is reasonably feasible. Refer to Appendix A of this document for a list of the proposed housing programs for the Project Area. One of the primary Agency objectives is to provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing for families of all income levels, including low and moderate income families. In addition, it is a primary purpose of the Project to provide a _ 69 t mechanism for the financing of public works improvements. Such actions should not result in any significant displacement actions. The following are exerpts from the Amended Redevelopment Plan for Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project: The terms "affordable rent" , "replacement dwelling unit" , "persons and families of low or moderate income" and "very low income households" as used herein shall have the meanings as defined by the Redevelopment Law and other State and local laws and regulations pertaining thereto (Section 430) . To the extent required by Health and Safety Code Section 33334 . 3 , the Agency may, inside or outside the Project Area, acquire land, donate lard, improve sites , or construct or rehabilitate structures in order to provide housing for persons and families of low or moderate income. The Agency may also provide subsidies to, or for the benefit of, such persons and families or households to assist them in obtaining housing within the City (Section 431) . Whenever dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market as part of the Project, the Agency shall , within four years of such destruction or removal , rehabilitate, develop or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable rents within the City (Section 432) . To the extent required by Health and Safety Code Section 33413 , at least thirty percent (301) of all new or rehabilitated dwelling units developed within the Project Area by, the Agency shall be for persons and families of low and moderate income; and of such thirty percent (30%) , not less than fifty (50%) thereof shall be for very low income households. At least fifteen percent (15A) of all new or rehabilitated units developed within the Project Area by public or private entities or persons other than the Agency shall be for 70 persons and families of low and moderate income; and of such fifteen percent (15%) , not less than forty percent (40%) thereof shall be for very low income households. The percentage requirements set forth in this Section shall apply in the aggregate to housing in the Project Area and not to each individual case of rehabilitation, development or construction of dwelling units. The Agency shall require, by contract or other appropriate means, that whenever any low and moderate income housing units are developed within the Project Area, such units shall be made available on a priority basis for rent or purchase, whichever the case may be, to persons and families of low and moderate income displaced by the Project; provided, however, that failure to give such priority shall not affect the validity of title to the real property upon which such housing units have been developed (Section 433 ) . To the extent required by Healrh and Safety Code Section 33413 , the g ency shall require that ;;he aggregate number of dwelli1 units rehabilitated , developed or constructed pursuant tc Sections 432 and 433 shall remain for persons and families of low and moderate income and very low income households, respectively, for not less than the period set forth in Section 900 for the duration of this Plan (Section 434 ) . If insufficient suitable housing units are available in the City for use by persons and families of low and moderate income displaced by the Project, the Agency may, to the extent of that deficiency, direct or cause the development, rehabilitation or construction of housing units within the City, both inside and outside of the Project Area (Section 434) . The Project Area will serve as a housing relocation resource for this Project and other redevelopment projects undertaken by the Agency as needed, as well as provide readily available parcels for the expansion of low and moderate income housing in the City. 71 The 1"gency shall assist in the relocation of all .persons (including families, business concerns, and others) displaced by Agency acquisition of property in the Project Area. The Agency intends to accomplish all redevelopment pursuant to this Plan with as little displacement of persons from businesses or residences as is feasible. In order to carry out the Project with a minimum of hardship to persons displaced from their homes, the Agency shall assist individuals and families in finding housing that is decent, safe, sanitary, within their financial means, in reasonably convenient locations, and otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency is also authorized to provide housing outside the Project Area for displaced persons (Section 413) . The Agency is authorized to pay all relocation payments and provide relocation advisory assistance in conformity with the California Relocation Assistance Guidelines or as otherwise required or authorized by law to all Project Area residents and business concerns relocated from the Project Area. All relocation shall be conducted t in accordance with Article 9, Chapter 4 of the Redevelopment Law (Section 414) . The Agency is authorized and directed to advise, encourage, and with the consent of the owner, assist in the rehabilitation of property in the Project Area not owned by the Agency. The Agency is also authorized to rehabilitate, or to cause to be rehabilitated, buildings or structures in the Project Area to the greatest extent permitted by law (Section 420) . As necessary in carrying out this Plan, the Agency is authorized to move or to cause to be moved any standard structure or building or any structure or building which can be rehabilitated to a location within or outside the Project Area (Section 421) . H. Funding Proposed for Low and Moderate Income Housing Except as otherwise provided in Health and Safety Code Section 33334 . 2 , not less than twenty percent (20%) of all taxes which are 72 allocated to the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purpose of increasing and improving the City's supply of housing low persons and families of low or moderate income and very low income households. I . Projected Timetable for Meeting Rehabilitation and Replacement Housing Objectives Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project is principally focused on eliminating the conditions that are characterized in Health and Safety Code Sections 33031 and 33032 which presently predominate the Project Area. Housing needs in the Project Area will be addressed in accordance with the Housing Element to the Huntington Beach General Plan and the Amended Redevelopment Plan. The provisions of Amendment No. One to the Oakview Redevelopment Project and the associated Amended Redevelopment Plan shall be effective, and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to the Amended Redevelopment Plan may be made effective for forty (40) years from the date of adoption of the Amended Redevelopment Plan by the. City Council . All replacement housing obligations will be met as rapidly as is feasible, and in any event, by r►ot later than four (4) years following the destruction or removal of dwelling units housing persons or families of low and moderate income from the low and moderate income housing market as part of this Project. 73 XIV. REPORT OF THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER AND ANALYSIS THEREOF BY THE AGENCY The Report of the County Fiscal Officer, as required by Health and Safety Code Section 33328, and the Agency's analysis of this Report are included in this Report to the City Council under separate cover. 74 Xv. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33328 , the Agency has offered to hold fiscal consultations with all affected taxing entities on property in the Project Area with respect to the Amended Redevelopment Plan and to the allocation of taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670. A summary of these consultations is included as part of this Report under separate cover. 75 APPENDIX A PROPOSED PtiBLIC IMPROVEMENTS/PROJECTS HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROJECTS LIST --------------------------_------------------------------------------ 1. . A. Street reconstruction/improvements , including but not limited to: Paving, curbs , gutters , sidewalks and landscape/hardecape elements NORTH OAKVIEW $ 21700 , 000 SOUTH OAKVIEW $ 2 , 200, 000 B. Alleyway improvement projects, including but not limited to: Reconstruction, repaving, and repairs Provision of safe and secure parking Provision of sanitary trash enclosures Drainage improvements 2 . CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS : Barton Street extension, Mandrell Street and Kriston Street connections and all other studies, improvements , or construction necessary to facilitate the purposes of the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan including but not limited to transit studies or facilities , street scan, and intersection enhancement . $ 2 , 000 , 000 * Study and implementation of program to reduce speed limits and impose weight restrictions on public streets in Project Area . 3 . STREET LIGHTING : Installation of additional street lighting $ 200 , 000 4 . INSTALLATION OF NEW TRAFFIC SIGNALS : $ 2001000 1 5 . UNDERGROUND UTILITIES : Provision of underground utilities including but not limited to electrical, telephone, cable T.V. , and street lighting throughout the Project Area, such provision may also include removal of existing overhead utilities. b . SEWER SYSTEM: Funds for studies to assess the need for and/or the timing of improvements. Extension, reconstruction, repair or upgrading of the sewer system throughout the Project Area. 7 . WATER SERVICE: Funds for studies to monitor the level and quality of water from private wells in the Project Area and to assess the need for and/or the timing of improvements. Extension, reconstruction, repair or upgrading of the domestic water delivery system throughout the Project Area and including improvements in the treatment system and facilities. 8 . DRAINAGE FACILITIES : Funds for studies to assess the need for and/or timing of improvements. Extension, reconstruction, repair or upgrading of the storm drain system. 9 . ABANDONMENT OF WATER WELL: All demolition, capping of well , grading, regrading or repairs as necessary to remove well and attendant equipment; plus installation of new water maids and connection to private properties . $ 250, 000 10. HOUSING PROGRAMS : Rehabilitation of housing units, including but not limited to exterior painting, structural and unit improvements , landscape/hardscape improvements, enclosure or reconstruction of carports or conversion of carports to garages on private apartment units . $ 1, 200, 000 Provision of Rehtal Assistance to Low Income Residents Provision of Housing Assistance to Senior Citizens Development of new housing projects and/or relocate housing units within or outside the Project Area . 2 I 11 . CHARTER CENTRE/GUARDIAN SAVINGS & LOAN Land acquisition, relocation, demolition, extension of van public utilities, street and road improvements, and other expenses in connection with the expansion and alteration of the Charter Centre/Guardian Savings & Loan. $ 5, 000, 000 * Parking garage improvements, including but not limited to noise abatement and screening. 12 . OTHER PROGRAMS : A. Expansion/Renovation of the Oakview Day Care Center and provision of child care assistance to low income residents B. Expansion/Renovation of the Oakview Community Center C. Provision of Police/Community Relations Program, facilities and equipment i D. Provision of Employment Program, facilities and equipment i E. Provision of Education and Recreation Programs , facilities and equipment F. Provision of enhanced Library services, facilities and equipment G. Provision of relocation assistance to any displaced household H. Provision of enhanced fire protection services, facilities and equipment I . Land acquisition or street improvements and other public purposes . i J . Landscaping , street beautification and irrigation program including, but not limited to, installation of street trees and groundcover in parkways K. Provision of park and open space improvements * L. Provision of funds to study and/or monitor air quality in the Project Area, in particular those areas adjacent to the Charter Centre/Guardian Savings parking garage i i M. Improvements to Ocean View Elementary school District ' facilities, including but not limited to: 1. Purchase of portable classrooms for student housing and multi-use purpose $ 140, 000 2 . Recreational facilities available for school activities and community use such as improvements to athletic fields for Little League, community, and physical education Classes $ 95 , 000 3 . Installation of outdoor lighting $ 25, 000 4 . Construction of outdoor lunch area with roofing $ 45, 000 5 . Rehabilitation of school building roofs $ 125, 000 N. Improvements to Huntington Beach Union High School District facilities, including but not limited to: I. Recreational facilities available for school activities and community use such as: a. Ocean View High School swimming pool $ 500, 000 b. Ocean View High School tennis court $ 200, 000 c. Ocean View High School ball field $ 150, 000 2 . Ocean View High School classrooms $ 2 , 400, 000 3 . District adult education classrooms $ 750, 000 4 . District administration buildings, warehouse, and computer center $ 3 , 000, 000 TOTAL KNOWN COST OF ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS/PROJECTS $60, 180, 000 t 4 NOTES : 1 . THE DOLLAR FIGURES ABOVE ARE ESTIMATED COSTS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED AS A LIMIT ON EXPENDITURES FOR INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS WHICH MAY REQUIRE A GREATER OR LESSER AMOUNT. MOREOVER, THE ESTIMATED COSTS ARE PRESENTED IN 1989 DOLLARS AND DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR INFLATION OR BORROWING COSTS WHICH MAY SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE THE ACTUAL EXPENDITURE THROUGH THE LIFE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2 . THE PROJECTS ABOVE REPRESENT THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. HOWEVER; SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY AND THE PROJECT ARLA WILL BE ACHIEVED IF LESS THAN THE FULL LIST OF PROJECTS ABOVE IS ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH THE LIFE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. 3 . THE TYPES AND NATURE OF PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE AGENCY WILL EVOLVE OVER TIME AND ARE DEPENDENT UPON SUCH CONTINGENCIES AS OWNER PARTICIPATION, DEVELOPER INTEREST AND MARXETABILITY, AND FINANCING CAPABILITY . * Projects identified through public meeting and recommended by Project Area property owners . 5 APPENDIX B PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION OAKVIEW AREA PROJECT That portion of Section 26, Township 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho La Bolsa Chica and the Rancho Las Bolsas, City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, , as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder described as follows : Beginning at the east one-quarter corner of said Section 26, thence South 89 degrees 24 ' 16" West 463 . 11 feet to a point on the southerly prolongation of the east line of Keelson Lane, a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence along said southerly prolongation South 0 degrees 45 ' 06" East 40 feet to the south line of Slater Avenue, a street 80 feet in width, 40 feet either side of centerline; thence South 89 degrees 24 ' 16" West 1187 feet along said south line to the west line of Tract No. 4091 ; thence along said west line North 0 degrees 44 ' 31" West 700 feet to the north line of said Tract 4091; thence along said north line North 89 degrees 24 ' 39" East 300 feet to the southerly extension of the west line of Oak Lane, a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence North 0 degrees 44 ' 46" West 2041 feet along said southerly extension, the west line of Oak Lane and its northerly extension to a line parallel with and 60 feet north measured at right angles from the centerline of Warner Avenue; thence along said parallel line North 89 degrees 25 ' 46" East 1386 feet to the centerline of Beach Boulevard, said street being 132 feet in width, 66 feet either side of centerline; thence along said centerline South 0 degrees 1 45 ' 14" East 996 feet; thence South 89 degrees 25 ' 00" West 283 feet; thence South 0 degrees 45 ' 14" East 288 feet; thence South 89 degrees 25 ' 00" West 20 feet; thence South 0 degrees 45 ' 141, East 96 feet to the easterly extension of the north line of Trace No. 8916; thence along said north line South 89 degrees 25 ' 001, West 576 feet to the east line of Ash Street, a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence along said east line South 0 degrees 44 ' 46" East 100 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 50 feet; thence along said curve southerly and southeasterly thru a central angle of 36 degrees 52 ' 12" an arc distance of 32 . 20 feet to a point on a reverse curve concave westerly having a radius of 50 feet, a radial from said point bears North 52 degrees 23 ' 02" east; thence along said reverse curve southeasterly, southerly, and southwesterly thru a central angle of 78 degrees 54 ' 35" an arc distance of 68 . 86 feet to a compound curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 35 feet, a radial to said point bears South 48 degrees 42 ' 23" east; thence along said compound curve southwesterly and westerly thru a central angle of 48 degrees 11 ' 2311 , an arc distance of 29 . 44 feet to a point on the south line of Mandrell Drive being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence along said south line South 89 degrees 29 ' 00" west 11. 8 feet to the east line of Tract No. 4301; thence along said mentioned east lire South 0 degrees 44 ' 46" east 270 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 70 feet, said point being on the north line of Barton Drive and the east line of Queens Lane; thence along said curve and east line southeasterly and southerly thru a central angle of 77 degrees 44 ' 59" an arc distance of 95 feet; thence South 0 degrees 44 ' 52" East 22 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 70 feet; thence continuing along the east line 2 of Queens Lane and said mentioned curve southerly and southeasterly thru a central angle of 27 degrees 38 ' 00" an arc distance of 34 feet to a reverse curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 130 feet, a radial to said point bears North 61 degrees 37 ' 08" East; thence along said reverse curve southeasterly and southerly thru a central angle of 27 degrees 38 , 00" an arc distance of 63 feet to north line of Tract 4153 ; then along said north line North 89 degrees 24 ' 35" East 125 feet to the east line of Tract 4153 ; thence along said east line South 0 degrees 44 ' 58" East 500 feet; thence North 89 degrees 24 ' 16" East 197 feet to the east line of Keelson Lane; thence along said east line and its southerly prolongation 160 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 3 APPENDIX C MATRICES OF BLIGHTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (The following Matrix Block Number Map indicates the areas within each block number designat-on used for Matrices 1 and 2) i r WARNER AVE z FIR 0 z 3YCAMOAE AVE I LSM Da—s W W I I CYPRESS AVE CYPRESS Z 3 \ � V I � � Y � 0 MANDRELL OR KRISTIN CR.�---�� z J I 1 1 I I m 90 W o BARTON DR. \ W 01 Y I _ z r— Z u J z J J WAGON CR z r w —A l j of - z Z ¢ f W 'SLATER AVE I I AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Matrix Block Number Map N ���...•����. Project Area Boundaries 1 - 14 Block Numbers SCALE i i 0 200 40011 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, Connie Brockway , do hereby certify that I am the Secretary of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and that the foregoing Resolution was fully adopted at a regular meeting held on June 19, 1989, by the following vote: AYES: 5 MEMBERS: MacAllister, Green, Winchell, Mays, Erskine NOES: 4 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 1 MEMBERS: Silva ABSTAIN: 1 MEMBERS: Bannister A��A Secretary -3- 177 Res. No. 177 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a meeting of said Redevelopment_ Agency held on the 19th day of June 1989 , and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: Members: MacAllister, Green, Winchell, Mays, Erskine NOES: Members: None ABSENT: Members: Silva ABSTAIN: Bannister My mop- er o t e eve opmeST Agency of the City- of Huntington Beach, Ca. 177