HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 2000-39 RESOLUTION NO. 2000—39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
APPROVING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE WITH
PLC, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
REGARDING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1, KNOWN
AS THE HOLLY-SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, effective December 5, 1990, the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal
corporation ("City"), and Pacific Coast Homes, a California corporation, and Garfield Partners, a
California corporation (collectively, "Developer") entered into Development Agreement No. 90-
1 ("Development Agreement") which was recorded in the Official Records of Orange County,
California as Document No. 90-599766 on November 14, 1990; and
The Development Agreement provides for the development of a residential and
commercial development of approximately 545 acres of real property in the City (the "Project").
The development area is bounded generally by Central Park and Ellis Avenue on the north,
Huntington and Main Streets on the east, Yorktown and Clay Avenues on the south, and the City
of Huntington Beach boundary line on the west (the"Property"); and
The Development Agreement provides, among other things, for the Developer to
construct certain public facilities and to pay certain public facilities fees to the City. The
Development Agreement further provides for the City to: (1) determine the cost of the public
facilities required under the Development Agreement that are in excess of those required to
service the Project("Reimbursable Costs"); (2)reimburse Developer for its verified
Reimbursable Costs from funds generated by fees or exactions from other developments served
by the excess capacity of the public facilities, and(3) to the extent lawful, establish new impact
fee programs to apportion Reimbursable Costs to subsequent developers found to benefit from
the public facilities; and
sff/99reso/ple set agree/04/I 1/00 1
Res . No. 2000 - 39
Effective May 6, 1996, City consented to the sale of a portion of the Property from
Developer to PLC, a California general partnership ("PLC"), and the remaining portion of the
Property to MS Vickers, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("MS Vickers"); and
As a condition of the transfer, PLC agreed to assume the Developer's obligation to install
all the public facilities required under the Development Agreement; and
City and PLC are in dispute (the "Dispute")regarding the amount of Reimbursable Costs
the City is to cause to be paid to PLC in connection with police, sewer, storm drain, water,traffic
and circulation facilities (the "Public Facilities")required to be constructed by the Developer;
and
An actual dispute having arisen and PLC having invoked the arbitration clause under
Section 3.4 of the Development Agreement, PLC and City desire to settle and compromise any
and all disputes, claims, differences, actions or causes of action, whether actual or potential,
without admitting or conceding the truth of any allegations or assertions made in connection with
the Dispute.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby resolves
as follows:
SECTION 1. The Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ("Agreement")
between the City of Huntington Beach and PLC, a California general partnership, is hereby
approved and the Mayor is authorized to sign and the City Clerk is authorized to attest to the
Agreement.
SECTION 2. Section 2.2.5 (h) of the Development Agreement provides that PLC was to
construct a reservoir and a water well and dedicate it to the City. The Development Agreement
also provides that the cost of Public Facilities required under the Development Agreement,
including the water well, that are in excess of those required to serve the Project were to be
reimbursed to the Developer from funds generated by fees or exactions from other developments
sff/99reso/p1c set agree/04l11/00 2
Res. No. 2000 — 39
served by the excess capacity of the Public Facilities constructed. The City Council finds that
the water well required by the Development Agreement would serve the needs of all existing and
new developments throughout the City and the benefits of the well are not limited to the
Property. Accordingly, the Council further finds that it is reasonable and appropriate to use two
sources of fees to pay for the Reimbursable Costs due PLC. These fees are the capital surcharge
levied on monthly water bills and the capital facilities fee (connection charge) levied on all new
developments. These fees are paid into the Water Master Plan Fund of the City of Huntington
Beach, and will be used to pay for the Reimbursable Costs associated with the reservoir.
Because the Council further finds that there is not an immediate need to construct a water well at
this time, rather than require PLC to construct the water well at the cost of Two Million, Two
Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars, the City finds that it will waive that requirement pursuant to
the Agreement, and construct the well in the future, with funds from the Water Master Plan
Fund, and apply said cost credits to offset the City's Reimbursable Cost obligation.
SECTION 3. Section 2.2.7 of the Development Agreement requires that PLC construct
a police substation in the City. The police substation was to be located in an area such that it
could serve both the-Project as well as the neighboring area of the Bolsa Chica lowlands, which
was contemplated to be developed concurrently with the Project. However, the State of
California has purchased the Bolsa Chica lowlands as a conservation area, and consequently
there will be no development within the lowlands. Accordingly, in lieu of constructing a police
substation and reimbursing PLC the cost of the station to the extent that it exceeds Eight
Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars, the City finds that it will receive the substantially equivalent
benefit of the Development Agreement if the same Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars is paid
directly to the City, to be used to construct a new dispatch center in the existing police station
located adjacent to Huntington Beach City Hall.
sff/99reso/p1c set agree/04/11/00 3
Res. No. 2000 - 39
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 17 th day of Aril , 2000.
�+
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: T TED AND PROVED:
CitrAdministrator Dir to blic Works
sff/99reso/ple set agree/04/1 1/00 4
Res. No. 2000-39
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of
the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said
City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council
of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was
passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the
members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th
day of April, 2000 by the following vote:
AYES: Julien, Sullivan, Harman, Garofalo, Green, Dettloff, Bauer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
City Clerk and ex-offici Clerk of the
City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California