HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 2012-23 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONAND NEXUS REPORT
FOR THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, AND ESTABLISHING NEW AND REVISED
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY
WHEREAS, several policies within the City's General Plan require that new development
mitigate its share of the impacts to the natural and built environments and be fiscally neutral so
as to not result in a net economic loss for the City; and
Such General Plan policies include the maintenance of existing quality of life,
maintenance of existing service levels and funding of new facilities, the requirement of new
development to mitigate a fair share of its impacts, and calling for the use of impact fees to fund
needed improvements to serve new development, among other policies; and
In accordance with these General Plan policies, the City Council has directed staff in the
past to create development impact fees in accordance with State law. Said impact fees were
codified in Chapter 17.65 and Chapter 17.66 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code as well as
Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Chapter 230.20. Pursuant to each
ordinance set forth above, the amount of the development impact fee is to be set and/or updated
by resolution of the City Council; and
Subsequently, and periodically, staff has conducted comprehensive reviews of the City's
development impact fees to determine whether those fees are adequate to defray the cost of
public facilities related to new development; those fees are set forth in Resolutions 6164, 2006-
23, 2000-97, 2004-88, 99-60 and 96-71; 2002-129, 2004-88 and
The City contracted with Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC to provide a updated
comprehensive evaluation of the City's existing development impact fees; and
Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC prepared a report, entitled Development Impact Fee
Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach, dated October, 2011 as
amended April 27, 2012 (the "Nexus Report"), that provides an evaluation of existing
development impact fees, recommends an increase and change in methodology in certain
development impact fees, the creation of new impact fees and establishes the nexus between the
imposition of such impact fees and the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for
which the fees are charged; and
The Nexus Report has been available for public review and comment; and
The Nexus Report substantiates the need for a modification to existing fees to change
certain methodology as well as creation of new impact fees; and
1
12-3209.006/79289
Resolution No.2012-23
The City has collected development impact fees to mitigate the impacts of new
development, including fees for transportation, park land acquisition and development, library
and other public facilities since the adoption of the respective ordinances and resolutions; and
The City Council desires to repeal certain resolutions, create and update other
development impact fee resolutions in accordance with the calculations and recommendations
contained in the Nexus Report; and
In compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act, California Government Code section 66000
et seq., the City Council held a noticed public hearing on the proposed increase in development
impact fees at its regular meeting on Jurle 18 , 2012, to solicit public input
on the proposed increases to development impact fees,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
resolve as follows:
1. Findings pursuant to Government Code section 66001. The City Council finds
and determines that the Nexus Report complies with California Government Code section 66001,
and as to each of the proposed fees to be imposed on new development:
(a) Identifies the purpose of the fee;
(b) Identifies the use to which the fee will be put;
(c) Shows a reasonable relationship between the use of the fee and the type of
development project on which the fee is imposed;
(d) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities
and the type of development projects on which the fee is imposed; and
(e) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the
cost of the public facilities or portion of the public facilities attributable to the
development on which the fee is imposed.
2. Fees for Uses Consistent with the Nexus Report. The City Council hereby
determines that the fees imposed, pursuant to this resolution shall be used solely to finance the
public facilities and/or equipment and park land acquisition described or identified in the
respective ordinances and Nexus Report.
3. Approval of Items in the Nexus Report. The City Council has considered the
specific public facilities, equipment and park land acquisition cost estimates identified in the
Nexus Report and each ordinance thereto and hereby approves such public facilities, equipment
and park land acquisition cost and cost estimates and further finds that the cost estimates serve as
a reasonable basis for calculating and imposing the development impact fees as set forth in the
Nexus Report.
2
r 2-3209.006/79289
Resolution No.2012-23
4. Consistency with General Plan. The City Council finds that the public facilities
equipment and park land acquisition and fee methodology identified in the respective ordinances
and Nexus Report are consistent with the City's General Plan and, in particular, those policies
that require new development to mitigate its share of the impacts to City infrastructure and to be
fiscally neutral.
5. Differentiation among Public Facilities. The City Council finds that the public
facilities identified in the Nexus Report and funded through the collection of development
impact fees recommended in the Nexus Report are separate and distinct from those public
facilities funded through other fees presently imposed and collected by the City. To the extent
that other fees imposed and collected by the City, including Specific Plan fees are used to fund
the construction of the same public facilities identified in the respective ordinances and Nexus
Report, then such other fees shall be a credit against the applicable development impact fees.
Notwithstanding the above provision, this resolution shall not be deemed to affect the imposition
or collection of the water and sewer connection fees authorized by the Huntington Beach
Municipal Code.
6. CEQA Finding. The adoption of the Nexus Report and the increase in
development impact fees are not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act in that
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, section 15378(b) (4), the creation of government funding
mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may cause a
significant effect on the environment, is not defined as a "project" under CEQA.
7. Adoption of Report. The Nexus Report as amended April 27, 2012, including
Appendices, is hereby adopted.
8. Fee Imposed. The new Development Impact Fees set by this resolution shall not
apply to projects that have received discretionary project entitlement approval on or before June
5, 2012 and the following milestones are met:
1. Project applicant has submitted an approved application for building permits
within 180 days after the fee going into effect or no later than February 18, 2013.
2. From the time of initial building permit application, the project makes continued
progress toward satisfying plan check comments.
3. Building Permits are issued within 360 days after the fees go into effect.
An exception to the above milestones is the involvement of an outside third party
regulatory agency. In such cases the 180 days to make building permit application will begin
when the developer receives clearance from that agency. The City Manager shall have the
authority, in his/her sole discretion, to extend milestone dates for qualifying "grandfathered"
projects. All other projects are subject to the fees then in effect. All existing Development
Impact Fees remain in effect until final action is taken on this resolution and respective
ordinances. In the event any portion of this resolution is held invalid, the previously approved
development impact fee shall automatically apply.
9. Timing of Fee. The development impact fees imposed by this resolution shall be
paid pursuant to the ordinances or resolution creating each separate fee. Until final action is
3
12-3209.006/79289
Resolution No.2012-23
taken by City Council adopting the ordinances or resolution referenced herein, resolutions 6164,
2006-23, 2000-97, 99-60, 2004-88 and 96-71 shall remain in effect.
10. Amount of Fee. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Development
Impact Fees as set forth in Exhibit"A," attached hereto and incorporated herein as well as Nexus
Report Schedules 3.2, 4.3, 5.2, 6.2, 7.1, 8.1, and 8.4. Exhibit A and the Nexus Report sets forth
the methodology and aggregate amount imposed as a development impact fee for both residential
and nonresidential land uses and also sets forth the breakdown of each development impact fee
by type of facility.
The amount of the development impact fees excluding traffic impact fees shall be
automatically modified annually pursuant to the the percentage of increase or decrease in the Los
Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) or any relevant successor
for the Orange County area, from March to March of the preceding twelve (12) months.
Traffic impact fees shall be increased using the Engineering News Record's
construction cost index as reported for the twelve month period ending in March of each year.
The escalator indices provided herein shall not take effect until March of 2016.
11. Use of fee. The development impact fees shall be solely used for the purposes
described in the respective ordinances creating the fees and the Nexus Report.
Fees collected pursuant to existing ordinances and resolutions shall be maintained
and used exclusively for those purposes and accounts for these fees shall remain in effect and
shall be maintained by the City Manager or his/her designee. Fees collected under any of the
categories listed in the Nexus Report may be used to finance the construction or implementation
of any public facility listed in those categories to the extent that use of the fees may not exceed
the percentage allocated to new development of all of the public facilities listed in the category,
or sub-category.
12. Fee Determination by Type of Use.
A. Residential Development. Development impact fees for residential
development shall be based upon the type of unit constructed. The development impact fee
categories as shown in Exhibit A generally correspond to the City's land use designations in the
land use element of the City's General Plan.
B. Nonresidential Land Uses. Development impact fees for nonresidential
land uses shall be based upon the square footage of the building or other measurement detailed in
the respective development impact fee ordinances. The development impact fee categories as
shown in Exhibit A generally correspond to the City's land use designations in the land use
element of the City's General Plan.
C. Uses Not Specified. In the event that there are land uses not specified in
Exhibit A, the development impact fee for such use shall be determined by the City Manager or
4
12-3209.006/79289
Resolution No.2012-23
his/her designee who shall determine such fee based on an analysis of the impacts of the
proposed use on public facilities, equipment and/or park land.
13. Prior Resolutions Superseded. As provided herein the development impact fees
approved and adopted by this resolution shall supersede and repeal any previously adopted
development impact fee resolutions concerning the same, including 6164, 96-71, 99-60, 2000-97,
2004-88 and 2006-23, 2002-129, 2004-88.
14. Severability. If any action, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
resolution, the Nexus Report, or other attachments thereto, shall be held invalid or
unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions of this resolution the Nexus Report, or other attachments thereto or
fees levied by this resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provisions or
application of fees. In the event any section of this resolution is held invalid the previously
adopted affected fees shall be automatically reinstate as if never repealed or modified herein.
15. Effective Date. Consistent with California Government Code section 66017(a),
the fees as identified in attached Exhibit "A" adopted by this resolution shall take effect sixty
(60) days following final action taken on the respective ordinances or amendments thereto by the
City Council.
16. Appeal . Appeals of any fees, including methodology, use, land valuation etc.
created pursuant to this resolution shall be conducted as set forth in Huntington Beach Municipal
Code Chapter 17.73.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the—18 day of June 0 12
Mayor
REVI ND APPROVED: INITIA-T V ROVED:
uty rCit a er Deputy City
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney n'15 _ 3
5
12-3209.006/79289
Exhibit A
Exhibit A-3 Aternative Fee Schedule No. 3
Development Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2012) 30%
Circulation Park Land/
System Open Space
Law Fire (Streets, & Facilities
Enforcement Suppression Signals, Public Library (No Tract
Land Use Facilities Facilities Bridges) Facilities Map)
Detached Dwelling Units (per Unit) $119 $277 $1,800 $1,091 $6,802
Attached Dwelling Units (per Unit) $245 $115 $1,238 $519 $4,632
Mobile Home Dwelling Units (per Unit) $111 $475 $940 $479 $3,351
Hotel/Motel Lodging Units (per Unit) No Fee No Fee $172/trip $0.04/SF $0.23/SF
Resort Lodging Units (per Unit) No Fee No Fee $172/trip $0.04/SF $0.23/SF
Commercial/Office Uses (per sq.ft.) $0.312 $0.099 $4.175 No Fee $0.447
Industrial/Manufacturing Uses (per sq. ft.) $0.133 $0.009 $1.279 No Fee $0.393
Development Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2013) 60%
Circulation Park Land/
System Open Space
Law Fire (Streets, & Facilities
Enforcement Suppression Signals, Public Library (No Tract
Land Use Facilities Facilities Bridges) Facilities Map)
Detached Dwelling Units (per Unit) $238 $553 $2,092 $1,126 $11,540
Attached Dwelling Units (per Unit) $489 $229 $1,417 $686 $8,576
Mobile Home Dwelling Units (per Unit) $221 $950 $1,094 $588 $6,701
Hotel/Motel Lodging Units (per Unit) No Fee No Fee $172/trip $0.04/SF $0.23/SF
Resort Lodging Units (per Unit) No Fee No Fee $172/trip $0.04/SF $0.23/SF
Commercial/Office Uses (per sq. ft.) $0.625 $0.197 $4.175 No Fee $0.664
Industrial/Manufacturing Uses (per sq.ft.) $0.266 $0.018 $1.498 No Fee $0.555
Development Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2014) 90%
Circulation Park Land/
System Open Space
Law Fire (Streets, & Facilities
Enforcement Suppression Signals, Public Library (No Tract
Land Use Facilities Facilities Bridges) Facilities Map)
Detached Dwelling Units (per Unit) $356 $830 $2,385 $1,160 $16,278
Attached Dwelling Units (per Unit) $734 $344 $1,597 $852 $12,520
Mobile Home Dwelling Units (per Unit) $332 $1,425 $1,248 $697 $10,052
Hotel/Motel Lodging Units (per Unit) No Fee No Fee $172/trip $0.04/SF $0.23/SF
Resort Lodging Units(per Unit) No Fee No Fee $172/trip $0.04/SF $0.23/SF
Commercial/Office Uses (per sq. ft.) $0.937 $0.296 $4.175 No Fee $0.882
Industrial/Manufacturing Uses (per sq.ft.) $0.399 $0.027 $1.716 No Fee $0.718
Date Printed:5/24/2012,June 4 Resolution 30_60_90
Page 1
Exhibit A-3 Aternative Fee Schedule No. 3
Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2012)
Recommended Cost per 30%Increase
1000 sq.ft,dwelling unit Scenario Cost per
Adjusted Average Trip-end Additional Cost per or other unit(90%of 1000 sq.ft,dwelling
Land Use Trip Ends Distance to Trip Trip Miles Trip Mile original) unit or other unit
RESIDENTIAL LAND USES,(per Unit
Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 50.22 $ 1,737.61 /Unit $ 1,722.55 /Unit
Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 50.22 $ 1,220.35 /Unit $ 1,209.50 /Unit
Condominium/Townhouse 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 50.22 $ 1,064.66 /Unit $ 1,N4.55 /Unit
Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 50.22 $ 908.98 /Unit $ 899.59. /Unit
RESORT/TOURIST(per Unit or Enfry Doar)
Hotel 6.291 7.61 0.51 23.9 $ 64.34 1 $ 1,537.73 /Room $ 1,218.63 /Room
All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.61 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 1 $ 920.06 /Room $ 729.93 /Room
Motel 4,341 7.61 0.51 16.5 $ 64.34 1 $ 1,061.61 /Room $ 841.02 /Room
INDUSTRIAL(per 1,000 SF)
General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf $ 1,279.46 /1,000
Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf $ 12U.01 /1,000
Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf $ 566.11 /1,000
Warehousing 4.391 9.01 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 1 $ 1,273.93 1 /1,000 sf $ 910.74 /1,000
COMMERCIAL(per 1,000 SF)
Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 11,000 sf $ 1,522.61 f,000
Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,027.85 s,000
Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2.644.37 /1,000 sf $ 1,917.85 f,000
Bldg.Materials/Lumber 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf $ 4,059.85 /1,000
Store sf
Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf $ 3,242.74 f,000
Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf $ 341.00 f,000
Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf $ 817.12 f,000
Medical-Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf $ 4,559.89 f.000
General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf $ 1.470.08 f,000
Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf $ 4,175.67 f,000
Pp 9
Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf $ 1,582.76 f,000
Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf $ 8,705.20 f,000
High-Turnover Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf $ 1,228.89 f,000
/1,000
Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf $ 6,028.66 sf
Office Park 13.97 4.3 0.5 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf $ 1,930.20 f,000
OTHER(as noted)
Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre $ 424.64 /Acre
Service Station/Market 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel $ 14,894.71 /Fuel
av Position Position
Service Station w/Car 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel $ 13,743.02 /Fuel
Wash Position Position
Page 2
Exhibit A-3 Aternative Fee Schedule No. 3
Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2013)
Recommended Cost per 60%Increase Scenario
1000 sq.ft,dwelling unit Cost per 1000 sq.ft,
Adjusted Average Trip-end Additional Cost per or other unit(90%of dwelling unit or other
Land Use Trip Ends Distance to Trip Trip Miles Trip Mile original) unit
RESIDENTIAL LAND USES(per Unit)
Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 57.39 $ 1,985.69 /Unit $ 1,938.39 /Unit
Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 57.39 $ 1,394.58 /Unit $ 1,361.20 /Unit
Condominium/Townho 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 57.39 $ 1,216.67 /Unit $ 1,187.17 /Unit
use
Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 57.39 $ 1,038.76 lUnit $ 1,013.15 /Unit
RESORTITOURIST(per Unit or Entry Door)
Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room $ 1,355.39 /Room
All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 920.06 (Room $ 811.41 /Room
Motel 4.34 7.6 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 lRoom $ 936.56 /Room
INDUSTRIAL.( 1,000 SF)
General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 11,000 sf $ 1,497.69 /1,000 sf
Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf $ 1,449.18 /1,000 sf
Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf $ 662.65 /1,000 sf
Warehousing 4.39 9.01 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf $ 1,066.39 /1,000 sf
COMMERCIAL(per 1,000 SF)
Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,768.99 /1,000 sf
Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 11,000 sf $ 1,193.98 /1,000 sf
Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf $ 2,229.22 /1,000 sf
Bldg. Materials/Lumber 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf
Store
Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf
Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf $ 341.00 /1,000 sf
Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf $ 817.12 11,000 sf
Medical-Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf $ 5,299,66 /1,000 sf
General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf $ 1,708.63 /1,000 sf
Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 11,000 sf $ 4,175.67 11,000 sf
Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf
Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf
High-Turnover 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf
Restaurant
Convenience Market" L 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 1/1,000 sf 1 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf
Office Park 1 13.971 4.31 0.5 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930 20 /1,000 sf 1 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf
OTHER(as noted
Cemetery 3.071 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre $ 424.64 /Acre
Service Station/Market 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64,34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel $ 14,894.71 /Fuel
av Position Position
Service Station w/Car 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel $ 13,743.02 /Fuel
Wash Position Position
Page 3
Exhibit A-3 Aternative Fee Schedule No. 3
Scheduie of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2014)
Recommended Cost per
Adjusted Average Trip-end to Additional Cost per 1000 sq.ft, dwelling unit or
Land Use Trip Ends Distance Trip Trip Miles Trip Mile other unit(90%of original)
RESIDENTIAL LAND USES(per Unit)
Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,226.16 /Unit
Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 64.34 $ 1,563.46 /Unit
Condom inium/Town ho u 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 64.34 $ 1,364.01 /Unit
se
Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,164.55 /Unit
RESORT/TOURIST(per Unit or Entry Door)
Hotel 6.29 7.61 0.5 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room
All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.61 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 920.06 /Room
Motel 4.34 7.61 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room
IINDUSTRIAL ( per 1,000 SF)
General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf
Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf
Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf
Warehousing 4.391 9.01 0.51 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf
COMMERCIAL(per 1000 SF)
Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf
Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf
Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf
Bldg. Materials/Lumber 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf
Store
Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf
Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf
Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf
Medical-Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf
General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf
Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf
Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf
Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf
High-Turnover
Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf
Convenience Market 1 43.571 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 1 /1,000 sf
Office Park 13.971 4.3 0.5 30.0 $ 64.34 1 $' 1,930.20 1 /1,000 sf
OTHER(as noted)
Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre
avrvice Station/Market 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 Position
Service Station w/Car 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel
Wash Position
Page 4
Res. No. 2012-23
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of
Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby
certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on June 18, 2012 by the following vote:
AYES: Shaw, Carchio, Bohr, Boardman
NOES: Harper, Dwyer, Hansen
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Ci y Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California