Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council - 2012-66
EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 14, 2012 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING PARK LAND DEDICATION FEES (QUIMBY FEES) PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 3960 AND THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT WHEREAS, the California Government Code contains specific enabling legislation for the acquisition and development of community and neighborhood parks by a City; and This legislation, codified as Section 66477 of the Government Code and known commonly as the "Quimby Act," establishes criteria for charging new development for park facilities based on specific park standards. The Quimby Act allows the City to require the dedication of land or the payment of fees or combination thereof(Quimby Fees) to help mitigate the impacts of property improvements; and The City has adopted amended Ordinance No. 3960 which enables the City to charge development based on the Quimby Act maximum standard of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3960 the amount and location of land to be dedicated or the fees to be paid bear a reasonable relationship to the use of the park by the future inhabitants of the subdivision. In addition, the Ordinance provides that the legislative body has adopted a general plan containing a recreational element, and the park and recreational facilities are in accordance with definite principles and standards contained therein. The ordinance specifies how,when, and where it will use the land or fees, or both, to develop park or recreational facilities and that the fees collected under the ordinance shall be committed within five years after the payment of such fees; and The City retained Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC to recalculate some of the City's existing Development Impact Fees as well as Quimby Fees in light of future development's impacts on City's existing and future parks systems. The recalculated Quimby Fees are contained in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report (Nexus Report) Chapter 8 and the accompanying Master Facilities Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference; and The Nexus report provides that the park acquisition and development cost for residential subdivisions consists of$871,200 per acre for land acquisition, $508,644 per acre for park land development (improvements) and $77,780 per acre for community center space acquisition. Based on the total of these costs, the report recommends that the City charge new development for the maximum allowable amount of park acreage as allowed in the Quimby Act, which equates to a park land in-lieu fee of$6,130.01 per new resident. The cost methodology is further identified in Chapter 8 of the Nexus report attached hereto; and The City Council finds that Resolution No. 2012-66 is necessary for the changing needs and orderly development of the community, is necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan, and is consistent with other elements of the General Plan, 12-3445/83691.docx I Resolution No. 2012-66 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Residential Quimby Fees and Average Number of Persons Per Dwelling. The Park Land In-Lieu fee and average number of persons per dwelling for new residential subdivisions shall be set as follows: OF \ e hal % ,�\ c Resident �1t Detached Dwelling Units 2.913 $6,130.01 $17,857 Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 $6,130.01 $13,385 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.822 $6,130.01 $11,169 This fee shall not apply to parcels on which residential development is prohibited or to commercial or industrial subdivisions where no residential parcels are established. 2. Park Land Acquisition And Development Cost Per Acre. Where only partial park land dedication is provided such partial dedication shall be credited towards the payment of in lieu fees at a rate of$871,200 per acre for land acquisition and $508,644 per acre of park development (improvements). 3. Severability. If any section, phrase, sentence, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision; and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall go in effect concurrently with Ordinance No. 3960 12-3445/83691.docx 2 Resolution No. 2012-66 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1 ,t day of Octnhpr 12. Mayor REVIE D APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City a a r Cl ty Attor-Ley INITIAT A D PROVED: Direct of P an Ing and Building Attachments: Nexus Report Chapter 8 Master Facilities Plan 12-3445/83691.docx 3 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.;2012-66 Exhibit A HB -211- Item 7. - 36 Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Development Impact lee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of fkMttngton Beach, California October, 2011 (Amended April 27,2012) Copyright,2OW, 2010&2011 by Revenue& Cost Special, L.L C. All rights reserved No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon =ay be reproduced or copied m agy fanu or by any means--graphic, electronic, meehamcal, mc1admr g any photaoopymg,recording, taping or taping or mformation storage and retrieval systems without wnrttan permission Of- Revenue&Cost Specialisis, L.L.C. 1519 East Chapman Avenue, Suite C Fullerton, CA 92931 (714)992-9020 Item 7. - 37 xB -212- Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Farm Land A,cquisltion and Park Facilities Development (including Open Space) This Chapter summarizes the City's existing inventory of parks and identifies the ratio of park land (and park facilities improvements) per resident allowable under the Quimby Act (§66477 of the Government Code) for residential developments involving the subdivision of land and AB1600 (§66000) for the construction of residential developments not involving the subdivision of land. The existing per capita standard is then utilized to calculate the park dedication requirement for future residential development. EXISTING PARKS AND PARK IMPROVE'MENTS SYSTEM Openn space notwithstanding, intensive parks and recreational facilities constitute one of the City of City of Huntington Beach's greatest needs both with respect to facilities for current residents and future citizens. The provision of a well-planned park system, with a variation in the size and nature of facilities offered, is an important amenity to residents of any city, the City of City of Huntington Beach included. A mixture of'passive and active uses and facilities and programs which appeal to a broad spectrum of potential park and trail users are considered optimal in most urban cities. The City currently has at its disposal(and within general control)some 999.09 acres of park, beach and specialty uses for use by the City's many residents. However, not all of these acres are owned by the City, many are leased or owned by other agencies made available to the City via a joint use agreements with the various school districts or are S.C.E_ right-of-way. The current acres dedicated to park use (and owned or under long-term control by the City) can reasonably well serve the City's current needs. However if the number of owned park acres remains static at 778.41 acres, the City may not be able to continue to meet recreational demands in light the probable 9.0%increase in the City's population. At an attempt to achieve a high level of fairness, the City's owned park acreage will be used as the standard for calculating the park standard and the development impact fee schedule. The figure is a Government Code statute-based calculation and thus does not include other park opportunities in the area such as Harriet Weider Regional Park, which while clearly serving the City residents, are not City-facilities and thus cannot be programmed by the City. The City has a General Plan standard target of 5.0 acres per 1,000 acres per residents and the calculation of target does include the park acres of other agencies (i.e. the regional park and state-owned beach land) within the calculation of that General Plan Iluntingtori Beach 2011-I2 Development Impact Fee Calculation.Report 89 HB -213- Item 7. - 38 Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land AMisition and Park.Facilities Development target. That is completely acceptable for General Plan issues,and the City does meet that General Plan standard. Future residential development, by increasing the City's population, will impact the City's park system by requiring additional athletic fields, adequate space for various athletic activities and community center space. Given the magnitude of growth projected in this and other reports,the challenge facing the City will be to provide new facilities and park land to serve the recreational needs of these new residents. Without additional park land acquisition and development of currently owned but underutilized park land during the remaining period of private residential development, the City's parks will become overcrowded and overused, with the ultimate result becoming a negative experience for park users. Existing Park Land and O,,pen Space Land Currently,the City owns(or has long tern control of) approximately 778.41 acres of traditional park land, about 87.9%(683.9 acres) of it, developed. The entire list of parks and their acreage is identified on Schedule 8.1 at the conclusion of this Chapter with a summary by type in Table 8-1. Central bark is the largest developed park, representing just under a half of the park system acreage and provides the greatest variety of sports and passive uses. Table 8-1 Current Park Total Inventory -."_-_w•`_____ _ __ - 'ram--_ '--.._--...' ,�p.��•.._ Neigftborhood Parks 183.79 129.74 Communi lS orts Parks 546.82 470.81 Other (beaches, etc) 268.48 177.86 Total Acres (Owned) 999.09 778.41 City Park Standard. Table 8-2, following, is a comparison of the acreage of parks to the City of Huntington Beach's current population and indicates that the City presently possesses a total standard of 5.248 acres of park land per 1,000 residents, (999.09 park acres—". [190,377 resident's 1,000], rounded), however as stated previously, the owned acreage will be used to calculate the standard and resulting impact fee. The City presently owns 778.41 acres and thus possesses an owned standard of 4.089 acres of owned park land per 1,000 residents, (778.41 owned park acre's - [190,377 resident's - 1,0001, rounded). This is above the benchmark of 3.0 acres per Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 90 Item 7. - 39 HB -214- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.,2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acac�isltion and Park Facilities Development 1,000 persons contained in Section 66477 of the California Government Code relating to dedication of parks. Table S-2 Calculation.of Actual City-awned and Developed Park Acres Standard _...-----_......---�-T��. ..:�:,z:_-,}xi:µ=�+:�i_=__=<-�—_=�'a�:-•`�':,—:� ,�_��._�.x _,- .�,-�.= -;-��.•�- .�.�,-�—_ = Lam•.. � ,.....__ W � _ '�-��S`J'-� .:��`�-.n-=- `' Current Park Acres 999.09 778.41 Current City Pa elation 190,377 190,377 Population Stated in Thousands 190.377 190.377 Park Acres2er 1,000 Po ulation 5.248 4.089 The Quimby Act, to be discussed later, allows a minimum standard of 3.0 acres per thousand resident's even if the City has not attained that standard. However,the park acres owned standard for the City of Huntington Beach, at 4.089 acres per 1,000 resident's, exceeds that minimum standard and thus the Quimby allowable minimum standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000 new residents is irrelevant and the 4.089 acresl1,000 resident's standard will be used for Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development. Though not particularly relevant to the City of Huntington Beach, the Quimby Act has a cap on land dedications required as a part of the subdivision of land of 5.0 acres per thousand (Government Code §66447 (a)(2). Planned Improvements. In addition to the ongoing improvement of the remaining 115.85 acres' available for increased residential development,the City will need to acquire 70.5 additional park acres, per Table 8-3, and develop these new parks to serve the additional 17,089 residents anticipated to live in City of Huntington Beach at General Plan build-out. (This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page] Hwitington Beach 2011-12 Development,Impact Fee Calculation Report 91 HB -215- Item 7. - 40 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 G'harpter 8 Park.€.and Acuisition and Park Facilities DeveW menr Table 8-3 Calculation of Required Park Acres per Allowable Standard Future Added Population 17,089 Pa ulation Stated in Thousands 17.089 Allowable City of Huntin n Beach Park Standard 1 4.128 Parks Acres Required to Maintain Standard 70.5 The 70.5 acres could be constructed in any of the following configurations: Mini or"Pocket"Parks-This type is the smallest of the park type designations,usually an acre or less. Mini parks are generally not planned due to higher maintenance costs. They are usually the result of the acquisition of an unusual parcel oftentimes with historical or community significance. Tarbox, Booster, Trinidad or Baily Parks are good examples of this category. Local or Neighborhood Parks-These parks are generally 3,0 to six acres and serve local(walk- in distance)users. Not surprisingly, the City has a number of these parks, roughly forty-nine at an average of about 3.5 acres in size. Neighborhood Parks, per the category title, are intended to serve walk-in populations nearby the park and typically are not highly programmed with City-run activities. Community - These parks, to be functional, are usually closer to ten acres or larger and are designed to meet the needs of the entire community. These needs include youth and adult sports organizations, clubs or associations and large scale community events such as 4' of July celebrations or festivals. Langenbeck, Baca, Bartlett, Carr and Gisler Parks are good examples of a broad-based use community park. Sport Parks- These park., again as titled, are highly infrastructure-developed to meet the active sports needs of both youth and adults. Edison and Greer Parks are good examples of the City's sports parks.. The proposed park improvements that could be contained within the roughly 65 needed acres and the existing standard(Table 8-2)are consistent with the City's Park and Recreation Element of the General Plan. The City's 3.785 acres per 1,000 population standard speaks reasonably well for the City as a three-acre per 1,000 population standard is the common minimum, but frequently Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calcination Report 92 Item 7. - 41 xB -216- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 i Chanter 8 Park Land AWuisition and Park Facilities De2gWmen unmet,target ofmuuicipalities and recreation and park special districts throughout California. City staff has plans and has identified parcels that would assist help reach the 5.0 acres per 1,000 standard at General Plan build-out, CALCULATION OF PAID DEDICATION STANDARD Unlike the other facilities discussed in this Report, the California Government Code contains specific enabling legislation for the acquisition and development of community and neighborhood parks by a City. This legislation, codified as Section 66477 of the Government Code and known commonly as the "Quimby Act," establishes criteria for charging new development for park facilities based on specific park standards. This Report will recommend the adoption of Quimby- style park fees over an AB 1600-style development impact fee for developments requiring the subdivision of land and an AB 1600 fee for non subdivided land. Allowable Park Standard As stated earlier, under Section 66477 of the Government Code, the City may charge new residential development based on a standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000 population if the City does not presently possess a ratio of 3.0 acres per 1,000 for the existing population. The Government Code also enables a city to charge development based on a standard higher than 3.0 acres (to a maximum of 5.0 acres) if the City currently exceeds the minimuzr, benchmark ratio of 3.0 acres per 1,000 persons. Schedule 8.1 indicates that the City exceeds that minimum standard (with 3.785 acres11,000 residents) and may then impose a fee in order to maintain that standard. The law states that "if the amount of existing neighborhood and community park area ... exceeds the [3 acres of park area per 1,000 person] limit ... the legislative body may adopt the calculated amount as ahigher standard not to exceed 5 acres per 1,000 persons." Park fees may be required by the City provided that the City meets certain conditions including: a The amount and location of land to be dedicated or the fees to be paid shall bear a reasonable relationship to the use of the park by the future inhabitants of the subdivision. • The legislative body has adopted a general platy containing a recreational element,and the park and recreational facilities are in accordance with definite principles and standards contained therein. ® The city ... shall develop a schedule specifying how, when, and where it will use the land or fees, or both, to develop park or recreational facilities ... Any fees collected under the ordinance shall be committed within five years after the payment of such fees_ Once a per capita standard for parks is determined, the cost of residential development's impact on the City's park system can then be computed as follows: Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 93 HB -21 7- Item 7. - 42 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities DeRelo meat Park-land Acquisition Costs. Land costs will vary significantly from one park to another. The park land to be acquired must be suitable for park construction and is somewhat conservatively estimated at approximately$871,200 per acre(or$2O.001square foot)which has been used in the park development impact fee calculation, as a dew park development impact fee for ordinary residential dwelling development. This is consistent with the cost of recent development for detached dwelling development in the more northerly areas of the City of Huntington Beach area. However,the use of this $20.00 per square foot figure could be criticized if a developer can show that the cost of the residential land they are developing is currently valued at less than the $871,200/acre figure. Conversely the City should retain the ability to increase this impact fee in areas where the cost of land exceeds the$20.00 per square foot figure. The fee recommendation at the end of the Chapter will recognize this need for flexibility. Park Development Costs. Park development costs are based upon the very recent construction of Schedule 8.3, a current schedule of common park costs and typical improvements by type of park. Schedule 8.2 identifies the three types parks'that the City will likely construct over General Plan build-out6 and the costs of the types and numbers of improvements generally included in each of the fallowing and are summarized from Schedule 8.2, identifies the factors in the average costs to develop an acre of parr land for the three types,based on figures which are consistent with the probable improvements and costs to build similar parks incurred by other communities. For cost estimate purposes, roughly forty-five acres of Central Park has been identified as higher cost sports park acres with the remainder as Community Park. Sixty acres of beach land has been categorized as neighborhood park due to the nature of the more limited improvement costs. The table also indicates the three major types of parks. The existing 834.06 developed park acres'cost the City an estimated $258,698,242 construct as parks for an average construction cost of $310,168 per acre. Table S-4 Average Park Construction Cost per Acre Type Park Costz .: .,, Cn Mn, Park - trod lie' hborhood/Mini Park 271.01. $223,441 $60,559,816 CEnmuni Park 229.15 $289,296 $66,292,242 Sports/Regional Park 333.90 $394,884 $131,851,622 $258f698,242 Total Cost -`-`_``-: r:. ._' - - -_ Total Acres 834.06-== =` 834.06 Cost/Acre rounded 4�=` _ =_== _= $310 169 Huntington Beach.2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 94 Item 7. - 43 HB -218- Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land acquisition and Park Facilities.Development The $310,1681acre is then increased.by 15% to $356,693 to account for the park architectural costs and 24'% to $442,299iacre to account for project administration, plan check, engineering, inspection and materials testing costs. Lastly,the$422,299 per acre figure is increased by 15% to $508,644 for a typical park project contingency. Schedule 8.2 shows this in numeric detail. Schedule 8.3 details the average park construction cost by type of parr. The Existing Park Community Center Inventory.' The City has a number of facilities dedicated for use as public uses facilities (as opposed to staff facilities). The existing 118,020 square feet of Community Use Facilities are identified in Table 8-5, following. Table 8-5 Inventory of EAsting Park Community Use Facilities Cortoriiiuiriit Ise Beach Public Service Center 2,561 City Gymnasium and Pool Facility 23,600 Edison Community Center 11,065 Harbor View Clubhouse . 27203 Huntington Beach Municipal Art Center 11,092 Huntington Beach Youth Shelter 5,600 Junior Lifeguard ITeadquarters 5,922 Labe Park Clubhouse 3,000 Lake View Clubhouse 2,000 LeBard Clubhouse 1,000 Murdy Community Center 11,000 Newland Barn 6,000 Newland House Museum 2,750 Oak View Community Center 10,000 Rodgers Senior Center 14,000 Seniors Outreach Center 2,700 Shipley Nature Center Interpretive Building 1,863 Terry Park Community Center 1,664 Total Community Use Facilities Square Feet 118,02fl Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 95 HB -219- Item 7. - 44 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Develoment The City has 118,020 public use community center square feet as identified in Table 8-5 previous. When divided by the City's 849.58 acres of developed park land the result indicates an average of 138.92 square feet of community center per acre of developed park. At the development cost of$480.00 per square foot of community center,there is a cost of$66,680 for the 138.92 average square feet of public uses facilities per acre of existing developed park (138.92 square feet multiplied by the$480 per square foot of community center construction). The$66,680 represents the future cost of maintaining the existing square feet of community center per acre of park, and as a resat, per capita. Average Park Acquisition and Development Cost per CaLpita. The combined park acquisition and development cost is $1,446,524 per acre ($871,200/acre for acquisition, $508,644 per acre for development and $77,780 for community center space acquisition). If the City were to charge development for the maximum allowable amount of park acreage as allowed in the Quimby Act and as recommended here, then the City would need to acquire 4.128 acres of new park land for every potential 1,000 new residents to the City. The 4,128 acres of land acquisition and park and community center improvements per 1,000 persons would be $6,130,008 or about 6,130.01 per new resident. Table 8-6 and Schedule 8.1 calculates the cost,per type of residential dwelling,to develop 4.089 acres, which represents the required park land cost for 1,000 persons. Table 8-6 Summary of Quimby Park/AB1600 Development Impact Fees for Residential Dwelling Construction 3 esd�t Tea X7t - eseiesi E., m Detached Dwelling-Units 2.913 $6,130.01 $17,857 Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 $6,130.01 $13,385 Mobile Home Dwelli Units 1.822 1 $6,130.01 f $11,169 The development impact fees for .residential detached dwelling development involving the subdivision of land, as identified in Table 8-6, should be adopted under the auspices of the Quimby Act. The development impact fees for residential dwelling units not requiring the subdivision of a parcel,will need to be adopted as an AB 1600-supported development impact fee. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 96 Item 7. - 45 HB -220- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Qpen Space Fees for Business Uses. Imagine a community without any (or very,little) park or open space. There a small number of such communities in the greater Los Angeles area. All private development benefits from the acquisition of land that is never developed, and exists, at a minimum, as a buffer from all other businesses. Schedule 8.4 identifies the cost for park land (as open space) for the business type land-uses. Again, the City owns 778.4 acres of park space which at a minimum acts as open space for all land uses. There are 10,271.8 acres of privately held developed land within the City's limits. Asa result there is 0.0758 acres of park/open space for each developed privately held acre. The O.0758 acres of open space per privately held acre is the recommended standard to be applied to the development of vacant parcels zoned for the business uses of commercial and resort lodging, commercial/office and industriallmanufacturing rises. The open space laird acquisition cost will be limited to 25% of the$20.00 per square foot (or $871,ZOO per acre) acquisition cost based upon the premise that business use benefits largely from the open space component and but does not require the benefits of developed parks and that open space land acquisition costs are less than land appropriate for parks. The cost to acquire that 0.0578 acre of park land would be $16,605. Again the coast is limited to only open space land acquisition,but does not include the development component o€that lazed as a park, That will fall to the developers of residentially zoned land that will generate park users (residents). Business acres benefit from the parks as open areas that make the City a desirable location for that business. The $300,000 per acre of development will be divided by the varying units from the three differing types of business uses in Table 8-7, Schedule 8.5 is summarized in Table 8-7 following, `table 9-7 Cost Calculation for Business Uses Commercial Lodging Unit 36 $16,505 $458 Resort Lodging Unit 46 $16,505 $359 Commercial/Office S uare Feet 17,300 $16,505 $0,954 Industrial Square Feet 21,390 $16,505 $0.772 Note: A lodging unit is defined as keyed room. Land Acquisition Cost Adiustment ChallenN. As mentioned previously,the use of$871,200/acre as the default park land acquisition cost is based upon the assumption that parks acreage would likely be close in proximity and thus similar in cost to residential land value of the private project the park is intended to serve. However, if the developer or contractor of a Home can provide Huntington Beach 2017-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 97 HB -221- Item 7. - 46 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development evidence(acceptable to the City), in the form of a recent purchase agreement or appraisal of the property they will be developing that the current land value is worth less than the$971,200{acre (or a$20.00/square foot), the development impact fee could be adjusted accordingly by placing the actual cost of land acquisition into the Schedule 8,1 calculation. Again, if the City wishes to adopt such an adjustment, the terms under which the challenge may be matte and proved should be included in the Development Impact Fee Ordinance. Similarly, if a development is closer to the beach area and land costs are higher,the City should be able to impose a park development impact fee consistent with the local land acquisition costs. Schedule 8.1 shows this calculation. RECAP OF RECOMMENDED PARK LAND ACQUISITION AND PARK FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. • Schedule 8.1 contains the maximum Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees to be imposed upon residential development based upon the facts presented in this Chapter for default or standard residential developments. * Schedule-8.4 contains the maximum Park/Open Space Land Acquisition Impact Fees to be imposed upon business development based upon the facts presented in this Chapter. CHAPTER ENDNOM 1. Adoption of a Quimby Act fee requires a Park:"plan". 2.The figure has relevance for municipalities that have large tracts of land available for subdivisions in the thousands or more. 3.The Quimby Act does allow use of revenues raised by the adoption of a Quimby Act Park Impact Fee to be used for rehabilitation of existing parks. 4. California Government Code, Title 7, Division 2, Section 66477(b). 5.Totaling the roughly 64.7 acres of park land acquisition and development that could be expected to be financed by imposing the proposed development impact fees over General Plan build-out. 6. Mini parks are not included in the mix as they are very costly to construct on a per acre cost and generally are expensive maintenance factors. Mini parks are rarely planned for but generally occur as a result of a land donation or as the recognition of a historical site. 7.11ased upon the 1,006,58 acres of parkland available, less the 45.01 acre Weider County Regional Park and the 127.51 un-improved park acres of City Parks. Huntington Beach 201I-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 98 Item 7. - 47 HB -222- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and nexus Report Park Quimby Fee for Dwellings on a Sub-divided Parcel,and; AB1600 Fee for Dwelling on Non-subdivided Parcels tx '<* - 7 Lake Park 4.75 0.00 4.75 Lake View Park 2.16 2.16 2.16 Lamb Park 2,60 2.60 0.00 Lambert Park 3.50 3.50 3.50 Langenbeck Park 17.02 9.24 17.02 Lark Skew Park 3.65 0.00 3.65 LelBard Park 4.99 3.01 4.99 Manning Park 2.46 2.46 2.46 Marina Park 9.34 9.34 9.34 Marine View Park 2.96 0.00 2.96 McCallen Park 5.64 5.84 5.84 Meadowlark Golf Course 98.00 98.00 98.00 Moffett Park 2.38 2.38 2.38 Murdy Park 16.04 16.04 16.04 Newland Park 2.94 2.94 2.94 Oak View Center Park 1.31 0.00 1.31 Weider Regional(County-owned) 45.01 0.00 23.01 Pattinson Park 3.51 3.51 3.51 Perry Park 1.88 1.88 1.88 Pleasant View Park 2.17 0.06 2.17 Prince Park 0.22 0.22 0.22 Robinwood Park ; 1.41 0.00 1.41 Rodgers Senior Center Site 2.01 2.01 2.01 Schroeder Park 2.37 0.00 2.37 Seabridge Park 3.91 3.91 8.91 Seeley Park 3.37 3.37 3.37 Sowers Park 2.65 2.65 j 2165 Sun View Park 2.45 0.00 2.45 Talbert Park 5,44 5.44 6.44 Tarbox Park 0.44 0.44 0.44 T Park 4.81 4.81 4.81 Triangle Park 1.11 1.11 1.11 Trinidad Park 0.75 0.76 0.75 Wardlow Park 8.36 8.36 8.36 Wieder Park 4.80 4.80 4.80 Worthy Community Park 7.00 7.00 1 7.00 Total Acres(UwnediDeveloped) 999.09 778.41 849.58 Current Population 190,377 190,377 190,377 Population11,000 190.38 190.39 190.38 Current Standard 6.248 4.089 ; 4.463 99 Revenue&Cost specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton,92831 CA HB -223- Item 7. - 48 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Park Quimby Fee for Dwellings on a Sub-divided Parcel,and; A91 SOO Foe for Dwelling on Non-subdivided Parcels I....,- F-Acres/1,000 Population Standard 5,248 4.D89 4.4�63] Quimby Maximum Allowable 5.DOD 4.089 4.463 F- 174 Acquisition Cost per Acre(1) $871,2D0 Construction Cost per Acre(2) Community Center Construction $66,680 Total Component cost, $871,200 ---$-6-75,324 CM X Standard $3,562,3377 $2,567,6571 On' Population Served by Standard 1,000-07 1.000. Cost per Resident $6,130.Oi . ......... Detached Dwelling Units 2.913 $10,377 $7,480 $17,857 Attached Dwelling Cnit-s-- 2.257 $8,040 $5,795 $13,835 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.822 $6,491 $4,678 I. Current estimate of$20-00 per acre acquisition cost for land consistent with park use. 2. See Schedule 9.3 for typical park amenity construction cost details. 100 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA Item 7. - 49 HB -224- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.2 City of Huntington Beach Park Site Inventory Improvement Cost Residential Park Development Impact Fee Galculation of Average Park Acre Construction Cost a: Prince Park 0.22 $223,441 $49,157 French Pads 0.33 $223,441 $73,736 Tarbox Park 0.44 $223,441 $98,314 Davenport Beach 0.46 $223,441 $102,783 Humbolt Beach Park 0.48 $223,441 $107,252 Gity CyrnlPool Site 0.50 $223,441 $111,721 Rnley Park 0.56 $223,441 $125,127 Bailey Park 0.59 $223,441 $131,830 Trinidad Park 0.75 $223,441 $167,581 Booster Park 0.85 $22$,441 $189,925 Triangle Paris 1.11 $223,441 $248,020 Banningf Magnolia Park i 0.00 $223,441 $0 Oak View Center Park 1.31 $223,441 $292,708 Robinwood Park 1.41 $223,441 $315,052 Franklin Park 1.52 $223,441 $339,631 Perry Park 1.88 $223,441 $420,070 Rodgers Senior Center Site 2.01 $223,441 $449,117 Helme Park 2.02 $223,441 $451,361 Bauer Park 2.04 $223,441 $455,820 Lake View Park 2,16 $223,441 $482,633 Pleasant View Park 2.17 $223,441 $484,868 Drew Park 2.28 $223,441 $",446 Circle View Park 2.31 $223,441 $516,149 Schroeder Park 2.37 $223,441 $529,556 Bushard Park 2.38 $223,441 $531,790 'Moffett Park 2.38 $223,441 $591,790 Sun View Park 2.4-5 $223,441 $547,431 Manning Park 2.46 $223,441 $549,665 Burke Park 2-50 $223,441 $558,503 Arevelos Park 2.58 $223,441 $576,478 Lamb Park 0.00 $223,441 $0 Sowers Park 2.65 $223,441 $592,119 Eader Park 2.68 $223,441 $598,823 Hawes Park 2.68 $223,441 $598,823 Boisa View Park 2.70 $223,441 $603,291 College View Park 2.70 $223,441 $603,291 Conrad Park 2.71 $223,441 $605,526 Clegg-Stacey Park 2,80 $223,441 $625,636 Golden View Park 2.81 $223,441 $627,870 Newland Park 2.94 $223,441 $656.917 Maven View Park 2.95 $223,441 $659,152 Marine View Park 2.96 $223,441 $661,386 Clem View Park 3.02 sm,44i $674,793 Seeley Park 3.37 $223,441 $752,997 101 Lambert Park 3.50 $223,441 $782,044 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA HB -225- Item 7. - 50 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.2 City of Huntington Beach Park Site Inventory Improvement Cost Residential Park Development Impact Fee Calculation of Average Park Acre Construction Cost ........... Patlinson Park 3.61 $223.441 $784,279 Farquhar Park 3.52 $223,441 $786,513 Hope View Park 3.61 $223,441 $806,623 Lark View Park 3.65 $223,441 $815,561 Seabridge Park 3.91 $223,441 $873,655 Harbour View Park 4.02 $223,441 $898.234 Green PaTk 4.04 $223,441 $902,703 Lake Park 4.75 $223,441 $1,061,346 Nieder Park 4.80 $223,441 $1,072,518 �Terry Park 4.81 $223,441 $1,074,752 Le Bard Park 4.99 $223,441 $1,114,972 Talbert Park 5,44 $223,441 $1,215,520 McCallen Park 5.84 $22-3,441 $1,304,897 Discovery Well Park 6.60 $223,441 $1,474,712 Gibbs Park 6.93 $223,441 $1,526,104 Wardlow Park 8.36 $223,441 $1,867,969 Marina Park 9.34 $223,441 $2,086,941 Meadowlark Golf Course 98.00 $223,441 $21,897,243 Carr Park 10.72 $289,296 $3,101,256 Irby Park 2.91 $289,296 $841,862 Gisler Park 11.67 $269,296 $3,376,088 'Baca Park 14-35 $289,296 $4,151,402 Langenback Park 17.02 $289,296 $4,923,823 Bluff Top Park 19-66 $289,296 $5,687,565 Bartlett Park 2.00 $289,296 $578,593 [Beach, City-leased 90.62 $289,296 $26,216,029 Beach, City-owned 60.20 $289,296 $17,415,636 Worthy Park 7.00 $394,884 $2,764,185 Greer park 10.44 $394,884 $4,122,584 Murdy Park 16.04 $394,884 $6,333,932 Edison Park 47.18 $394,684 $18,630,607 Huntington Central Park 253.24r-$394,884 $100,000,314 Total 834.06 $258,698,680 Total Park Acres 834.06 Average Construction Cost/Acre $310,168 Community Input, Design, Engineering 115.00% Sub-total Park Construction Cost $356,693 Project Administation, Solls<Materials Testing, etc. 124.00% Sub-total Park Construction Cost $442,29-9 Contingency 115-000/0 Total Park Construction Cost $508,54 102 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L,C- Fullerton,92831 CA Item 7. - 51 HB -226- Exhibit"All - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park Pub Imps, Roadicurb, gutter, etc. .$200 Linear-Foot 1,040 $2108,000 2,704 $540.800 Lg Pk GradlngfirrigatiorVTurf $37,500 Acre 0 $0 T-5 -$562,500 Sm Pk GradingfIrrigation/Turf $42,750 Acre 5 $213,750 0 $10 Plant Material: Trees-5, 24 gallon boxlacr,e $149 Each 60 $8,540 225 $33,525 Trees-15, 15 gallon/acre $290 Each 30 $8,700 75 $21,750 Shrubs-10,five gallon $30 Each 40 $1,200 160 $4,500 Shrubs-30, one gallon $8 Each 120 $960 450 $3,600 Play apparatus Curbing, 450' per large $4130 Linear Foot 0 $0 450 '585 Curbing, 225' per small $41,30 Linear Foot 225 $9,293 225 $9,293 Play equipment- large $123,750 Lot 0 $0 1 $123,750 Play equipment- medium $99,000 Lot 1 $99,000 0 $0 Play equipment-small $67,500 Lot - 0 .$0 2 $135,000 Sand/Other Surfacing $5,775 Lot 1 $5,775 3 $17,325 Buildings: Restroom - Small $182,000 Each 1 $132,000 1 $132,000 RestrODM-Large $181,500 Each -0 $0 1 $181,500 Equipment-storage facility $99,000 Each 0 $0 0 $0 Combined Restroorri/Concession $297,000 Each 0 $0- 1 $297,000 - Parking Lot 4ff A.C.W/60 Rock base $8.30 Square-foot 12,000 $99,600 40,000 $332,000 V-gutter $13.20 Linear Foot 300 $3,960 Boo $10,560 Drain inlet $990 Each 1 $990 2 $1,980 Drain Inlet connector $330 Each 1 $330 2 $660 Storm draln line $19.80 Linear Foot 300 $5,940 200 $3,960 Drive approach $2,970 Each 1 $2,970 4 $11,880 Perimeter curbing $16-50 Linear Foot 490 $8,085 800 $13,200 Striping $0,50 Linear Foot To 0 $200 1,300 wo Lighting $2,970 Each 2 $5,940 18 $53,460 -Lot signage $330 Lot 1 $330 3 $990 Entrance $4,950 Lot 1 $4,950 3 $14,850 Curb and Gutter $15.27 Linear Foot 3,780 $57,721 3,232 $49,353 Storm Drainage Fa6liffies Inlets $1,320 Each 2 $2,640 4 $5,280 Connections $Z,145 Each 2 $4,290 4 $8,580 Lateral (to arterial) $82,50 Linear Foot 45 $3,713 so $6,600 Sewer Facilities Connection to arterial $4,125 Lot 1 $4,125 1 $4,125 Line in street $107.30 Linear Foot 29 $3,112 80 $8,584 Line in park $24.80 Linear Fool 125 $3,100 1,500 $37,2100 103 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 HB -227- Item 7. - 52 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates,by Type of Park . .......... Paw Fire Hydrant -$4,950 Each 1 $4,950 6 $29,700 Street Lights Standards $2,475 Each 3 $7.425 20 $49,5130 Duct work/wiring $1,568 Each 3 $4,704 12 $18,816 Water Facilities -- : $11 metered service $4,125 Each i $4,125or 1 $4,125 Backf1low device $4,125 Each 1 $4,126 1 $4,125 Line in street $19.80 Linear Foot 1,320 $26,136 120 $2,376 Water fountains $1,155 Each 1 $11,1155 8 $9,240 Fountain lines in park $19,80 Linear Foot 200 $3,960 1,000 .$191800 Benchesffables Tables, cement pads $2,475 Each 4 $9,900 60 $148,500 Individual grills $825 Each 2 $1,650 30 $24,760 Benches, cement pads $90 Each 4 $3,632 3D $27,240 Bleachers $5,775 Each 0 $0 0 $0 Large Covered Picnic Area(lot) $123,750 Each 0 $0 2 $247,500 Individual Covered Picnic Pad $24,750 Each 1 $24,750 10 $247,500 User Electrical Service park $16,500 Each 0 $0 1 $16,500 Electrical Service per Area $2,063 Each 1 $2,063 6 $12,378 Game Courts $0 $0 Basketball Courts $66,000 Each 1.0 $66,000 1 Basketball Court Lighting $57,750 Each 0 $0 0 $G' Fenced Tennis Courts $99,000 Each 0 $o 2 $198,000 Tennis Court Lighting $57,750 Each 0 $o 0 $0 Baseball Field-Competitive $82,500 Each 0 $0 0 $0 Ballfield Lighting $4112,500 Per two fields - 0 $0 0 $0 Baseball Field-Recreational $24,750 Each 1 $24,750 6 $148,500 Pedestrian walkway 5' Wide $22.28 Linear Foot Soo $11.140 21,000 $44,560 61 Wide $28-88 Linear Foot 10.0 $2,888 500 $14,440 91 Wide $37.13 Linear Foot 100 $3,713 500 $18,565 Miscellaneous Flatwork $6.20 Linear Foot 500 $3,100 8,500 $52,700 Small Park Signage $4,538 Lot 1 $4,538 0 $0 Large Park Signage $24.750 Lot 0 $0 1 $24,750 Bike Rack/Pad $2,890 Each 1 $2,890 6 $17,340 Natural Element Improvement(Lake, a $826,000 Each 0 $0 D $0 Small Concrete Stage $41 ,250 Each 0 $0 0 $0 Small Ampitheater stage only, graded $82,500 Each 0 $o -0 $o Large Arnpitheater with bowl 1 $247,500 Each 0 $0 1_1 $247,5001 Total Cost ......... 1,117,206 -'i $4,339,444 Totaf Acres ... . ...... SEEM 15 Average Cost per A $223,441 72w'"12 $289,296 NO r5 01 ml 104 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Item 7. - 53 HB -228- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park A trl#tost�tt� ta� 2(3t PrF[ Pub Imps, Road/curb, gutter, etc. $200 Linear Foot 2,704 $540,800 Lg Pk Grading/lrrigationlTurf $37,500 Acre 20 $750,000 Sm Pk GradingllrrigationlTurf $42,750 Acre 0 $0 Plant Material: 7rees-5, 24 gallon boxlaere $149 Each 150 $22,350 Trees-15, 15 gallonlacre $290 Each 50 $14,500 Shrubs-10, five gallon $30 Each t00 $3,000 Shrubs-30, one gallon $8 Each 300 $2,400 Play apparatus Curbing, 450' per large $41.30 Linear Foot 450 $18,585 Curbing, 225' per small $41.50 Linear Foot 225 $9,293 Play equipment -large $123,750 Lot 0 $0 Play equipment- medium $99,000 Lot 1 $99,000 Play equipment-small $67,600 Lot 2 $135,000 Sand/Other Surfacing $5,775 Lot 3 $17,325 Buildings: Restroom -Small $132,000 Each 1 $182,000 Restroom- Large $181,500 Each 1 $181,500 Equipment storage facility $99,000 Each 1 $99,000 Combined RestroomfOoncession $297,000 Each 2 $594,000 Parking Lot 4" A.C. W16" Rock base $6.30 Square foot 40,000 $332,000 V-gutter $13.20 Linear Foot 800 $10,560 Drain Inlet $990 Each 2 $1,980 Drain Inlet connector $330 Each 2 $660 Storm drain line $19.80 Linear Foot 200 $3,960 Drive approach $2,970 Each 4 $11,880 Perimeter curbing $16.50 Linear!root 800 $13,200 Striping $0.50 Linear Foot 1,300 $650 Lighting $2,970 Each 18 $63,460 Lot signage $330 Lot 3 $990 Entrance $4.950 Lot 3 $14,850 Curb and Gutter $15.27 Linear Foot 1,664 $25,409 Storm Drainage Facilities Inlets $1,320 Each 4 $5,280 Connections $2,145 Each 4 $8,580 Lateral(to arterial) $82.50 Linear Foot 80 $6,600 Sewer Facilities Connection to arterial $4,125 Lot 1 $4,125 Line in street $107.30 Linear Foot $0 $8,584 Line in park $24,80. Linear Foot 1,500 $37,200 105 Revenue&Cast Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 xB -229- Item 7. - 54 Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park .,law Rim Fire Hydrant $4,950 Each 1 $4,950 Street Lights Standards $2,475 Each 20 $49,500 Duct workiwiring $1,568 Each 5 $7,840 Water Facilities 3" metered service $4,125 Each 1 $4,71 P-6 Backflow device $4,125 Each 1 $4,125 Line in street $19-80 Linear Foot 1 120 $2,376 Water fountains $1,155 Each 8 $9,240 Fountain lines in park $19-80 Linear Foot 1,000 $19,800 Senches[Tables Tables,cement pads $2,475 Each 30 $74,250 Individual grills $825 Each 10 $8,250 Benches, cement pads $908 Each 15 $13,620 Bleachers $5,775 Each 8 $46,200 Large Covered Picnic Area{lot) $123,750 Each 0 $0 Individual Covered Picnic Pad $24,750 Each 4 $99'DOO User Electrical Service park $16,500 Each 1 $16,500 Electrical Service per Area $2,063 Each 4 $8,252 Game Courts $0 Basketball Courts $66,000 Each 3 $198,000 Basketball Court Lighting $57,750 Each a $462,000 Fenced Tennis Courts $99,000 Each 8 $792,000 Tennis Court Lighting $57,750 Each 8 $462,000 Baseball Field-Competitive $82,500 Each a $6601000 Ballfield Lighting $412,500 Per two fields 4 $1,650,000 Baseball Field - Recreational $24,750 Each 0 $0 Pedestrian Walkway 5' Wide $22-28 Linear Foot 11000 $22,280 6' Wide $28.88 Linear Foot 250 $7220 9'Wide $37-18 Linear Foot 250 $9,283 Miscellaneous Flatwork $6.20 Linear Foot 4,000 $24,800 Small Park Signage $4,538 Lot 0 $0 Large Park Signage $24,750 Lot 1 $24,750 Bike Rack/Pad $2,890 Each 6 $17,340 Natural Element Improvement(Lake, e $825,000 Each 0 $0 Small Concrete Stage $41,250 Each 1 $41,25. Small Ampftheater stage only, graded $82,500 Each 0 $0 Large Ampitheater with bowl $247,500 Each D $0 Total Cost ....... $7,897,671 Total Acres 20.00 Avers ge Cost per A- $394,884 106 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Item 7. - 55 HB -2-30- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.'2012-66 Schedule&4 City of Huntington Beach 2011--12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Open Space Land Acquisition for Business Uses Land Acquisition Development Impact Fee Calculation Total City-owned Park/Open Space Acres 778.4 Current City--wide Privately Developed Acres 10,271.8 Current Open Space Standard per.Developed Acre 0.0758 AcrWDeveloped Acre Standard -�= 0.0758 Acquisition Cost r Acre �$871,200 Cost X Open Space Standard $66,037 Open Space Land Value 25.00°l0 Adjusted Land Cost $16,509.24 V > ' 'A Af' `f Commercial Lodging Keyed Units 36 $459 per Keyed Unit Resort Lodging Keyed Units 46 $359 per Keyed Unit Commercial Acres(in Square Feet) 17,300 $0.954 per Square Foot Industrial Lases(in Square Feet) 21,390 $0.772 per Square 1=oot 107 Revenue&Cast Specialists,L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA xB -23 1- Item 7. - 56 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Master Facflrties flair for the City of Huntington .Beach, Cafiforia October, 2011 (Amended April z7,2012) Copyrights 2009, 2010&2011 by Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. All rights reserve& No part of this work covered by the capyT ght hereon nwy he reproduced or copied is any form or by any means--&aphrc, clef-&Omc,mechaurcal,mduding any photos PTM9, recording, tatting or taping or wfvrmadon storage and rcuieval systems without wriaw psrrsZissian p2: Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. 1519 East Chapman Avemre, S&te C Fullerton, CA 92831 (714)992 9020 Item 7. - 57 HB -232- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 evenue k V Vt ecialXsts, LLC Serving Local Gowrnineru:s,Since 1975 October 17, 2011 (amended April 27, 2012) Honorable Mayor and City Council Via Mr. Fred Nilson, City Manager City of Huntington.Beach - City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: City o,f Huntington Beach piaster Fatuities Plan Honorable Mayor, City Council, and City Manager Wilson., The following Document, the proposed Master Facilities Plan(MFP)is hereby submitted for City Council review and consideration_ The proposed MFP is the result of many hours of work between City staff and Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. staff. This document represents a long-range program of identification and recognition of the entirety of infrastructure and physical ` needs necessary to meet the service demands of an ever-growing residential population and business community. The information included in this proposed MFP identifies capital needs throughout the community and is primarily based on the numerous elements of the Huntington Beach Comprehensive General Plan, it's many elements, Master Plans .and other official documents. The City`s five-year Capital Improvement Plan and the proposed development impact fees will be a function of the entire list of proposed projects listed in this document. Stated in a slightly different way, the list of projects contained herein needs to be agreed to by the City Council in order to increase the validity of both of the two above mentioned doeinnents. This Master Facilities Plan contains the following. • A Table of Contents • A Guide to the Master Facilities Plan • A Project Summary schedule A section containing all Law Enforcement capital needs s A section containing all of the Fire SuppressionlMedlic capital needs • A section containing a)1 of the Streets, Bridges and Signals projects • A section containing ailf�tlettorn Larainuiystm improvements ® A section cons-w=.g t t '?� z ollection expansion needs, ^- ,.._ 1413 -233- Item 7. - 58 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Page Two, October 17, 2011 (antended 04127112) A1FP Letter to the City of Huntington Beach a A section containing all of the Park Land Acquisition and Development of Recreation Facilities including Community Use Facilities projects. In addition to the efforts of Bob Hall, Deputy City Manager in coordinating the flow of information, the following staff were instrumental in identifying the required projects: M. Todd Broussard P,E.- Principal Civil Engineer (Storm Drainage) David C. Dominguez - Facilities Development and Concessions Manager Eric G. E'nberg -Division ChieflFire Operations Tim B. Engle C=munity Services Director Kevin Justen,- Senior Administrative Anatyst-Fire Tung M Kao -Info Systems Specialist Darrin Maresh: Fire Development Specialist Tony Olmos -- City Engineer Jerry Thompson - General Services Manager Bill Reardon -Fire Marshall/Division Chief .Dan Richards - Customer Support/GIS Manager Bob Stachelskd - Transportation Manager Chuck Thomas - Police Captain Jerry Thompson- General,Services Manager Bob lingenroth-Director of Finance RCS appreciates the efforts of the listed staff and any others whose efforts RCS may have been unaware of for their assistance in generating the information provided within this Master Facilities Plan, and we look forward to meeting with the City Council in order to implement and achieve maximum use this comprehensive report. Sincerely, SCOTT THORPE Vice President Item 7. - 59 HB -234- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No. 2012-66 City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities flan Table of Contents Guide to Master Facilities Plan i-Vi Master Facilities Plan Cost Summary - All Projects I O Srefii 5< .i`,.n..."7i;.u:Jva;j.m,}Y.w�e 4Y.i''`,�:;<{Y'#.•i`•Y;e'^".',;?Vi.':4'ni-dam;.`w "- ,'.'roz4" 9��XY� .}.w}•:,x...'^54.:. ,nt.,.r.:..<•�t'Ja.:co�e�r:a»! .{,^Su..�at,n-xc >--:*xa s,<;ktik^'�7.�. a^'.< �:xt,xgxr x: .:a.x k l{. ...,.rt S:4 tio;sR �: -s r o-:. :: <:9-r-¢gx..:r.<.:: xax'<"4: <.2, v e.,..'.-c.'a., xt.w}..;aZ..�:;.;.;a.,w Via..•. ,rv.::eWayM?S?•F-. - ..:uutot:>?t"x<:-x«-i,:f) �w.." 3s$'�'cr%% -rtir: :o>x.-.,1i3 xa'•°i° Z - < 8'.�' '? .:snd+<?%"`-.:'i�.a>cA, �Lx •id-" 'ri p9%•. in--0Cx r.n?#.Z:$i v:':ii�":•i+w".x..i.- �.� ,.r'vfi• � _ .............s>��,}.''c:4.xY..:cK-xA,.atinix�n. Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost Summary 5 LE-W1 Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space 6 LE-002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles 7 LE-003 Acquire Additional Sworn Office Issued Equipment 8 LE-004 Acquire Law Enforcement Specialty Equipment 9 _ : 'a—rxpx , Y- pr.,xt-%,'p'i"3'4i+Ga4•.<:'#:;:a:,\ti%�:j:%?<.:JSvax:nv.. - .�I.'.4:S4ni...r rxi:;Ca+ r,t:•; :; .:'E.,. k;<= x^x^veYY}�w:{^y .xk:<. ,^.4}..,,x.'(.w:« xpxwL:,V`' •%..rax:.i�,+.t:bcJ<:4i;4.'..aR'.f...F? ...w •.wa.r.,':i#.M::.r.rrr:..vix4 - �p.` G::r ♦<. n.;..•a. g.:_ - - esi:<eh': ,.aj.,#:tL.•, i�•`irr :.f���. c7<,:i'S...�S�n .ee': 'N•a+<k•e `f•... N�4\2::TY,>}Yx4:t `x1, x¢%-Ti:'ra y>VYi XV•v v)T~ ..l {} J.i.:J�:)?p -�Y'' ��� `" �.tn.��.t�.e�\.jkxtr�x<p�::%i3:Lia#::i:R3?:&::x- -1..,.-:"n,]`J1p-'.S':•,e :n�n-:1--4d.>::n� .0.0.4.4>F}NW � .�X....-V•`�� ':e.:2�4>.4X,...�4u� i'v<cz:2xlxk?Ef,%i"JS..�. b:tpc,.Q.,4,:..<A.'htd.:Y,YT.,,,....,•,..rw.•.fY,.. ....,...,,,..i.. - ..$:::F$:':r.'..,'.r>. �.:...._ Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost Swnffiary 11 FS-W1 Relocate Station #8 (Heil) 12 FS-W2 Construct Station#8 (Heil) Apparatus Storage Facility 13 FS-003 Construct a Single Bay/Quarters at Station#4 (Magnolia) 14 FS Acquire an Engine Company and Ambulance for Station #4 (Magnolia 15 FS-W5 Acquire an Engine Company for Station#1 (Gothard) 16 FS--006 Acquire an Engine Company for Station 92 »'?.`4d=�.e.:.w-r"F:.W-"�F:.�:",..<::.rn..:.•:R,h?.',.•'>^.,::.•h:r}<:...:.'..:p'F,.....�:',r.:.'i{a r.�z.i<:A.z'dp:».\.�:'.�',.:...Fk8 3,.,.-.£�.::;,.-,•,..:....a...�,•_t?.}p.s_s.i Y.:.':+:A.:.'t.-.i:s...,t-._;x:;;T::.rl,:}rh..._,..y./:..vr..,x..,.,:,:j,>...::..1vap,..v v•.r�..n..c.:..::..a.;.o,a.a::.�:..+...:.,,.._.,,t...._v�.,ww.tr,t.•+.t:..::.,..L+>::AJ_n'_,F....,.,'f.< ...Y. f.>'>,::.a.)<,:..%�}YW-_.-<:.�4.v-->.x.,-Y-):'.�>..r::.ti.i.:`Tx+}!xy".Ga<>3r'\}:,'::d:•1F::.a7>d<.:f jOs T�L�....x,?)�,:.::.:�.e.-3'+..b:..nax,..+...7$w..::;..a,-;mi.,..£4.#.evx:.yr:.,::'..`x..f3..".e:._.a�C ; (.•.r.M.�.$-.;r"; u, riY::r.L=xi3 )x•Sn i.rsid'`zvt..w::n.s•�.`%?,:r'a.}tt,`e 4 J:.:.�..h..�.:t^\>w..`.J.,-..jk'..c--c?:rix]<k.:•h�.�:.RIqxYi{-,"..,•�kk. <:Qx3•G•.�pxTw ¢^ra x3..�..,..x1p� 7 . %t # i .k T p c: ti [:� ffx : n3�x;E. 5::.�;.:.:•«.x:.. ...,..�:...a,,...:xcw.�.a;; . Circulation (Streets, Bridges and Signals) System Cost Summary 19 ST-001 Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue 21 ST-002 Beach Boulevard and Heil Avenue 22 ST-003 Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue 23. ST-004 Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue 24 ST--005 Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue 25 ST-006 Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue 26 ST-007 Beach Boulevard and Yorktown Avenue 27 ST-008 Pacific Coast Highway and Warner Avenue 28 ST-009 Pacific Coast Highway and Goldenwest Street 29 ST-010 Pacific Coast Highway and Brookhurst Street 30 ST-011 Goldenwest Street and Bolsa Avenue 31 ST-012 Goldenwest Street and Slater Avenue 32 ST-013 Newland Street and Talbert Avenue 33 ST-014 Newland Street and Warner Avenue 34 ST-015 Newland Street and Yorktown Avenue 35 ST-016 Gothard Street and Slater Avenue 36 ST--017 Gothard Street and Talbert Avenue 37 ST-018 Ward Street and Garfield Avenue 38 xs -235- Item 7. - 60 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Table of Contents ST-019 Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue 39 ST-020 Miscellaneous Traffic Signals/Intersection Improvements 40 ST-021 Public Works Maintenance Building 41 ST-022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles 42 ?:a:aX•}\'r.f:<FS:'?Jlt�::�i:?:.:,:\\:Y'.w'i:}:{!.�'wvJ:��.,+i(A-�rkS.p•..v..;ti-:w-y::.::�.:..r..�:::^::.ate-.,v�h`:+Yti.,.. — - .ns-r.-.- v %av i.`Mua]::RM!r 01111 -:Ha:x tt::%g ,h�:xr3:, �<;: rr..z:_.w:--�:>r3'_S.>�:i;r v5n3C_�.ao-�3:7h ^+�c Storm Drainage Collection System Cost Summary 44 SD--001 Santa Ana River & Talbert Channel Region (SD Region#1) 45 SD--t102 Coastal and Bolsa Chica Wetlands Region (SD Region #2) 46 SD-W3 Slater Channel Region (SD Region #3) 47 SD-004 Wintersburg Channel Region (SD Region#4) 48 SD-005 Bolsa Chica Channel & Harbour Region (SD Region#5) 49 SD-006 Public Works Maintenance Building 50 yn+yvv... - ,,.»>;a .tt✓�xt}h e3;oy'c'fl'lia:'::2:: xar.t }:w..:'• - __ ""-:aY..w:+a:e:.:t.iqx<1' i'S J+ _.�.. :.<<.< %:�'-K.ra ..'!}�.'� .w+ku :'Zi:>:>�i :Y`-G.=:v" +..va- .,\:jk:j-:Y•^T,-:.. Y<+N.!ivnw .Yttl:.t C. :tL} '::Y':.G'.M }{ ";'>�' .:tC�:}. 't'kjY:.;.�G.:s x..:,.,....... ',�• '++:�<Y::SrG-:{:u'�...bHVc::N`�`" - xL.. q S.7., <...;!t�::` i::ex3'o'•:r'.x.t�.}>v..:i.., _ '°';4..:�:a�cC._ :K:klr.: +':?:: .v°i:aw..t,•. .}.t✓.:s>'�.o}xo�:;`zn .,_.+'.i'b;i-z:-.r..=,.a.ax.:�•-:-:..J::-}:.±.a. ..a.'+'3'a::.}a:�.^'.�-�9:`.iA:4`.L[:Sa:!>...,"¢•..;Y.G.-":i',.-x�,?z":p::y.n...:..Cr.rnKahh: :.G t-r :.4$.�).-..._:. .I1;tN.'.. _ F. •.{0::-!.r4, ...k JW..i. .c}i.. `x..y.+.,.axe:-: - e'iJ$:'{S'. j;l..,:'=T: ..l ry Iv n v •+::a ,:'..s ixa>:a>; 0=r<.n.. .�.-...�v+�fZnv - , ..::-..x.. _...... <Yv?:;`E.Y'.^:'.•..to:£oL;ux:>,Ic...rJ.�:<t:....�.>:y'Rkac$: Public Library Facilities and Collection Cost Summary 52 PL-001 Expand Banning Library 53 PL--002 Expand Main Street Library 54 PL-003 Expand Library Collection Items 55 �xt :xz-: .,wtxssctxa• as.>-3:,�.'o ?:xn:rt- x,:!<.; =:a:,a.xn. - ark•• - ^`xko-axwh x"-o'P" •x9:ta:wx{:a3.-a..a.a'< x-}r^^.+.:tax�:a`n x�.-:..xz!a:i-x!.�::b •i>^---4x-.-<::>.�,^_o,;4.,..4Y....,.xt.}.ta„t �- -. .,. � ;;`;',�,..,;,...,�..,x.«-,�.-i.a:x,xz�ue�vr._. ._s',.u?;:n. x,:;a;::?:�L;;��:�,> ..:�:Mrx ...!ca...,.a•,..,1. r:.:,..ra,--`::w:er-:irc;,::-::...' _ .>�r r,_ . - - .x� i`����,..Y4:� :'sip^ - .::�:tii......•1.,.,.............._....._..+.r..��:..,v�:v:.+m..,-_v.,•.'r:..:,M3..��....:s..t:.'���--*'.�'..� ..o'.....nx.}., ., ?� aaxx -.: � �+...-,. ..:..s'�.m,.,:�.:aw.cuw>.acwwrt>JCG. AS;T Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Cost Summary 57 PK-001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan and EIR 59 PK-W2 Irby Park Phase Il 60 PK-W3 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR, RAP and Development 61 PK-004 Le Bard Park Expansion Master Plan and Development plan 62 PK--W5 Blufftop Park Trail Improvements 63 PK-006 Edinger Dock Development 64 PK-007 '9Pardlow Field Reconfiguration Design/Construction 65 PK 00S City--Wide Parks Master Plan 66 PK--009 Central Park Habitat Plan 67 PK-010 Central Park Acquisiton of Encyclopedia.Lots 68 PK-011 Central Park Development of Remy 86 Acres 69 PK-012 Central Park Rebuild Two Restaurant Facilities 70 PK-013 General Youth Sports Facilities Grants 71 PK-014 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase 11 72 PK-015 Beach Playground 73 PK--016 Central Park Development of Foriner Gun Range 74 PK-017 Warner Dock Renovation and Expansion 75 Item 7. - 61 HB -236- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Table of Contents PK-018 Lamb Park Design and Development 76 PK--019 Central bark Sports Complex Team Room 77 PK-020 Future Parks Acquisition (Possible Closed School Sites) 78 CF-001 Central Park Senior Center 79 CF-002 Edison Community Center Gymnasium 80 CF--003 1'Vlurdy Community Center Gymnasium 81 CF-004 Oak View Recreation Center Expansion 82 xB -237- Item 7. - 62 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 CrrY OF 14MINGTON BEACH GUIDE TO T E MASTER FACILITIES PLAN The Master Facilities Plan is a compilation of projects identified by City staff as being needed for the City of Huntington Beach through theoretical General Plan build-out of the City. The Plan is based on input from City staff,recommended projects contained in the City's several Master Plans for infrastructure and an occasional recommendation from RCS staff. The Master Facilities Plan generally provides for three major types of projects. The first group of projects provides for the maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the City's varied infrastructure, including its streets, storm drains and other public facilities. These projects represent a very small portion of the needed replacement of the City's fixed assets identified at more than$1.435 million of depreciable fixed assets which are being consumed, conservatively, at an annual rate of just over $19.1 million, (assuming a conservative 75 year infrastructure lifetime). The$1.435 billion figure excludes significant amounts of owned park land,not subject to depreciation, at approximately $678.2 million. The following table indicates the replacement costs of the various infrastructure owned by the City. Table MFP-1 Replacement Value of Existing Infrastructure Infrastructure Replacement Value Law Enforcement $71,246,699 Fire Suppression/Medic $61,234,227 Circulation System(1) $533,539,375 Storm Drainage astem.(1) $203,631,313 Library Space/Collection $76,593,112 Park Improvements $488,783,370 Total $1,435,028,096 (1)Does not include millions of dollars owned in land right-of-way and Excludes"local' facilities, those limited to neighborhood facilities. The second group of projects are needed to serve future development and include such projects as widening of streets, creation of additional parkland or construction of a new fire station. These projects are proposed to be funded through the development impact fees recommended in the companion to this document called Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for City of Huntington Beach. z Item 7. - 63 HB -238- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan The last group of projects are proposed to enhance the quality of life for all City residents and spur economic growth in the community. These projects include the construction of a cmmnunity centers, libraries and parks that expand the existing level of service. Goal of the Master Facilities Flan. The Master Facilities Plan is not intended to be the final word on capital improvement projects needed for the City, but rather a starting point for discussions between policy-makers(i.e., the City Council), City management staff and the public prior to the formulation of a Five-or Six-Year Capital Improvement Plata(CIP). The Masrer Facilities Plan begins the process of identifying all growth-related capital projects required to accommodate new City development through General Plan build-Out. This document, as all capital improvement . programs should be, is rooted in the philosophy that for the document to have any meaningful value to future residents and staff members, it must be.constantly updated and revised as new legislation is adopted and as the environment and the City itself changes over the years. In short, the Master Facilities Plan is intended as a fluid, not static, document. Thus, it is essential that periodic updates be performed to add new projects or delete completed or no longer needed projects. The Master Facilities Plan represents the starting point for fulfillment of the following purposes: Planning - The Plan implements the standards and goals contained in the City's General Plan when applicable and proposes improvement projects which are constructed and located in conformance with the General Plan. Financial Planning - A Facilities Plan or CIP should consider the scheduling and availability of financing sources in order to achieve an orderly and comprehensive process. Individual project descriptions in this document detail the project's relationship to other recommended improvements and other scheduling constraints. This effort should always be a high priority of the City in order to insure that efforts between departments are coordinated and to avoid construction made more costly by duplication of construction efforts (i.e. a water pipe installed one year after a road is constructed). A sound capital planning process can also help to rationally plan projects for the purposes of long-term financing. Taxpayers can accrue savings when capital financing is coordinated such that long--teen financing can be sized and timed to achieve the lowest possible financing costs. Budgeting-The following projects should provide the outline for preparation of the Five- Year Capital Improvement Plan in the future. The first year of the CIP then is inoarpo- rated into the City's Annual Budget. Note: the scope of services did not include the HB -239- Item 7. - 64 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan identification of what year the projects will be needed therefore the project costs default to the last column. Master Facilities Planning Process. The Master Facilities Plan represents an interdepartmental effort to identify needed projects through the theoretical point of build-out of the City. Management staff was then asked to allocate projects as a first step towards prioritizing all projects for the Plan, Criteria considered by the management team in evaluating projects included.: a Does the project generate operating savings or otherwise enhance the ability of the department to deliver services? i Did the project reduce or eliminate safety or health hazards? • Was the project needed to provide adequate levels of service to future residents or prevent deterioration of service to existing residents? a Was the project recommended in any of the City's engineering or planning Master Plans, the Corporate Plan or any other adopted City document? • Did the project have a significant positive effect on the community? Funding Analysis. The following summary section of this Plan includes aprojection of historical and potential revenue sources for the financing of the listed capital improvement projects. Development impact fee revenues were estimated based on the proposed rates recommended in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, For the purposes of this Report it was assumed that development will occur evenly over the period of build-out for the.City. Other revenue sources were projected based on discussions with City staff,but are shown only for informational purposes. Given the magnitude of costs shown in this Report, RCS recommends that a more detailed financial strategy for construction of these improvements (i.e., a Capital Financing Plan) be conducted by the City within the immediate future. Such a document would seek to ftu-ther identify and quantify potential financing sources for the City. It should be noted that the Master Facilities Plan emphasizes the total capital needs of the City, in contrast to the more traditional Capital Improvement Program approach which places more of an emphasis on reducing total needs to only reasonably assured revenue sources. The process of further scheduling projects on a year-to-year basis should continue onward during the Capital Improvement Program process, Organization of the Master Facilities Plan. The Master Facilities Plan is divided into eight major sections, according to the category of capital improvement. Each will ultimately be quantified as Item 7. - 65 HB -240- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Guide to the Huntington Peach Master Facilities Plan a separate development impact fee in the companion document. The eight types of improvements are: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment-These are projects needed for the City's Police Department, including expansion of the Police Station and acquisition of additional communication equipment and response vehicles, Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities and Response Vehicles - This program includes facilities necessary to accommodate new development support with the existing level of service provided by the City's Fire Department. This section contains the need for one fire station relocation, expansion of second, construction of additional vehicle storage space and a number of additional response apparatus. Circulation(streets,bridges and signals)System-These proj ects consists of future street additional traffic signals and 'intersection improvements. Storm Drainage Collection System-These projects include the constriction of new storm drain lines, channels and other facilities for the purposes of storm drainage. Public Library Facilities and Collection-This program provides for the expansion of the City--owned library facilities. The project consists of the building expansion and expansion of the collection inventory. Park Laud Acquisition and Park Facilities Development-The acquisition and develop- ment of new parks,the construction of recreational facilities for the City and improvement of existing undeveloped parklands are accomplished through this program. It also includes opea space acquisition and the construction of a number community/recreation/gymnasium centers for classes, meetings, sports activities and other general public uses. At the beginning of each of these sections is a summary of projects in that category and proposed project cost. Next, is an individual project description for each project submitted, detailing the proposed scope of the project, the submitting department, justification and listing of related. projects. The table on the following page indicates the total project expenditures($403,399,096)identified as necessary through build-out. Some of this amount, about$22.3 million would be financed by other revenues or government agencies. iv HB -241- Item 7. - 66 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Table MFP-2 Cost of Future Infrastructure Infrastructure Project Totals Lave Enforcement Facilities, et. al. $10,100,895 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities et. al. $11,941,972 Circulation (Streets/Bridges/Signals) $2.8,537,800 Storm Drainage Collection System $207,494,050 Library Facilities/Collection $7,841,369 Parr Land Acquisition &Improvements $137,483,000 Total $403,399,086 Fairness and reason(as well as the more important State and Federal statutes and court decisions) dictate that not all of the projects will qualify for development impact fee funding (i.e. some projects are replacements or service level increasing, etc.). If the City adopts the development impact fees that represent the General PIan Build-out need-based impact fees(Schedule 2.1 in the companion Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report), 42.6% of the required finding(or$172.1 million)would be raised with development impact fees. Existing Development Impact Fee Fund balances of$3.6 million will provide 0.9% of the total project funding and other sources (inter-governmental support) will finance 5.7% ($23.0 million) This leaves 50.8%, or $204.8 million of the total project costs as unfunded, to be financed by other sources such as fees, rates, existing taxes or voter approved additional taxes, inter-governmental transfers and the rare occasional grant. Relationship to Development Impact Fee Report. The Master Facilities Plan was prepared in conjunction with the City's Development Impact Fee Calculation And Plexus Report,also prepared by RCS, LLC. Projects listed in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report correspond to projects found in this document and contain the same numbering sequence as the Master Facilities Plan. The Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report is also contains eight chapters specific to each one of these infrastructure sections according to the same category of projects described on the previous page. Thus, a reader who wants to find more information on Law Enforcement Project No.1(Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space found on Schedule 3.1 of the Development Impact Fee Calculation and New Report may turn to Project No. LE-001 of the Master Facilities Plan. For readers of the Master Facilities P&w who wish to understand the determination of development v Item 7. - 67 HB -242- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Guide to the Huntington Beach Duster Facilities Plan impact fee financing more fury, refer to the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, Chapter One. vi HB -243- Item 7. - 68 Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Play Master Project List 719,WThru G.P.Build-out LE-001 AddWonal Law Enforcement FaclJlty Space $7,597,l65 LE002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles $1,751,040 LE003 Acquire Additional s'+orn Officer Issued Equipment $3271890 LE-004 Acquire Law Enforcement Specialty Equlpment $425,000 F"5001 Retocate Fire Station#8(Hell) $7,169,470 FS002 Construct Station#8(Hell)Apparatus Storage Facility $1,716,044 FS003 Construct A Single Say/Quarters At Station#t4(Magnolia) $1,266,458 FS-004 Acquire An Engine And Ambulance For Station#4(Magnolia) $740,000 FS005 Acquire An Additions!Engine For Station#1 (Gnthard) $525,000 FS005 Acquire An Additional Engine For Station#2(Murdy) $526,000 LG001 Beach Boulevard And Edinger Avenue $600,000 LGD02 Beach Boulevard And Heil Avenue $1,000,000 LG003 Beach Boulevard And Warner Avenue $400,000 L0004 Beach Boulevard And Slater Avenue $500,000 LO005 Beach BcoJevatd And Talbert Avenue $1f©t}0,000 LGW06 Beach Boulevard And Garfield Avenue $1,000,000 LG007 Beach Boulevard And Yorktown Avenue $500,0D0 LG408 Pacific Coast Hig�ray And Warner Avenue $2,000,000 LGO09 Pacific Coast Highway And Goldenwest Street $750,000 LOD10 Pacific Coast Highway And Brookhurst Ste-et $750,000 LG011 Goldenwest Street And Boise Avenue $500,000 LG012 Goldenwest Street And Slater Street $50,000 L0013 Newland Street And Talbert Avenue $500,00D LG014 Newland Street And Warner Avenue fI,000 LG015 Nevrrarid Street And Yorktown Avenue $300,000 I V:1.33.0 Data:5=2012 Tlma;10:56 AM Huntington B000h Odabar,2011 begs: t Item 7. - 69 HB -244- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Mauer Facilities Plan Master Pr©jecct List Tow Thru 1.0016 Gothard Street And Slater Avenue $50a,000 LGO17 Gothard Street And Talbert Avenue $264,000 LGO13 Ward Street And Garfield Avenue $8,800 LGO19 Brookhurst Street And Adams Avenue $10,000;000 LGO20 Miscellaneous Traffic Signalllntersection improvements $5,000,000 LG021 Public Works Maintenance Building $2,870,D00 LGO22 Puglia Works Maintenance Vehicles $65,000 SDOD1 Santa Ana River&Talb—art Channel Region(SD Region#1) $23,728,000 SM02 Coastaf And Bolsa Chlca Wetlands Region(SD Region42,) $21,527,000 5D003 Slater Channel Region(SD Region,43) $34,235,000 90004 Wintersburg Channel Region(81)Region 04) S2.8,749,00D SDOD5 Eblsa Chica Channel&Harbour Region(SD Region*5) $98,549,000 S9006 Public works Maintenance Building $705,050 Pik001 Expand Banning Branr h Library $5,288,470 Pi=002 Expand Main Street Branch Library $1,651.375 PL-003 Expand Library Collection Items $921,524 PK001 Barliatt Park Conceptual Plan And E1R $5,400,0a0 PE4002 Irby Park Phase 11 $500,000 PE4008 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR,RAP And Development $4,325,000 PK004 Le,Bard park Expanslon Master Plan And Development Tian $1A50,000 PKD05 Bluirtop Park Trall Improvements $1,000,000 PK006 Edinger Dock Development $700,000 P007 Wardlow Feld ReconCgurabon Design/Construction `I=t,000 000 P14008 City-Wide Parks Master Plan $350,000 PK009 Central Park Habitat Dian $250,000 2 V:1.35.0 Date;5l(nDI2 Ti ne:10:55 AM Huntingtotl Boach OcWxr,2011 Papq; 2 xs -245- Item 7. - 70 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Master Project List TotgdThru U'R BUIW-oLn PK010 Central Park Acquisiton Of Encyclopedia Lots $1,020,000 PKN 1 Centrat Park Development Of Remaining 86 Acres $20,000,OOD PK012 Central Paris Rebuild Two Restaurant Facilities $800,0DD PK013 General Mouth Sports i=aclllties Grants $4,500,000 PK014 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase II $2,500,000 PKOIS Beach Playground $350,000 PK016 Central Paris Development Of Former Gun Range Area $3,0M,000 PK017 Warner Doric Renovation And Expansion $800,ODD PKD18 iamb Park Design And Development $1,100,000 PKD19 Cer}tral Park Sports Complex Team Room $10D,000 PK020 Future Parks Acquisrtion (Possible Closed School Sites) $69,686,6D0 PK021 Central Park Senior Center $22,000,040 PK-022 Edison Community Center Gymnasium $2,975,000 PK023 Murdy Communrty Center Gymnasiumn $2,976,OD0 PK024 Oak View Recreation Center Expansion $800,000 ._.., ._--_—.- ... _-_.. ._•-------Total All Projects 3 fit;t.33.0 r�ztn_W2012 Trme;11;01 AM dantington Beach October,2{J11 Page: 3 Item 7. - 71 xB -246- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 City of Huntington Beach Park Land acquisition and Park Facilities Development 56 xB -247- Item 7. - 72 I—•I J • 'I Huntington Beach w Master Facilities Plan Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development 2a1�-18 Through Project BUM 2011-12 2412-13 2013-14 20114. 1b Solid Out OutTota! PK401 MOHRParkComeplual Plan And£IR $+10UM S0 SO $0 $5,uca000 $5,400,nW PK-002 Why Park Ph8$e•11 30 s0 $0 s0 $50DA00 $400,000 PK-003 Ganlral Park Former Gun Range Mn.RAFAM Oexelolment 3325,09a $a gq f0 54,000,000 IAA WG PK-004 Le t3ard Part[Expanslcn Master Plan And IOU811eprnnM Plan $250,000 $0 $0 $fl $1,200,000 $1,460,p00 PK 405 MuMap Park Tr2II Improycment% - $0 8o 3o 114 $1,0pD,000 $1.000,0DO PK-006 Edinger Vook Development So $0 $0 $0 $7CD,00D %700,000 PK-DO7 VrtiFdluwMedReconfigureficnUesigrdOonsWcfon $120,000 $0 s0 $0 $e90,000 g1,000,000 PK-OW City-4h0eYarksf OSWPlatl $0 60 a0 50 $350,000 $860,000 PK-900 Central Park Ha1)1ra1 Plan So 30 s0 $0 $750MO $260,00D PK-D10 Central ParkAcquiftnOfErnc dopadiaLob SD so $A 50 S11,020AU0 $1 020,000 PK-Oty Cen"I Perg DeteloprneMrt 6f Rernaining N Acr_s V SO $0 .$p $20,OOgOUD 520,ODO,400 PIG-012 Cantrel Perk ReBuIId Two Rest n"nt FadIlUes s0 $0 30 90 $800.000 $800,000 PK-4113 GereeW Youth Wrts Fadlf06s GrdLnts $150,09D 3150,00 $150,000 $15D,000 53.000,000 $4,500,000 r� P4•014 Mu Yauih S Cam Inc Phase It�Y t� P SO 50 Sp $0 $2,500,000 9$800,OOD PK-D15 ilmrch Playgmvnd 50 $0 $s? $3w ma $360,OOp PK•nie CanlraFParkDevatoDmenlQlFommrOunRaumoArOa $p 30 .¢D SD $aocO,OpO $3,000,000 r PK-017 Warner Dock Renovailcn And Fxpenaion $0 yD S0 Q0 "O000 *8001ct10 7y O PK-Dl$ LSMaPokDa?signAnrAO vo]opmeni S4 SO WL 90 51,100,90D $1,100,D00 G M-014 Cenba1 Park SpWsComFttxTeam Room y0 3p SD 511 $1CO.000 yyCd,ODO O `J PK-02o Future Parks AoqulsMon(PoaslWe Closed Wmf Sllaaj $t1 50 g0 90 $59189a,000 $52 ass,0b0 OZ PK-a21 Caatral PerksenWrCenier 50 $0 So $0 .522,0DO,000 =,OOg000 No PK•n?2 FffmunOwurnur:yCanter%rnnesiam $4 $9 SO $D $2,873,000 $2973,(}0D N • o� rn ter v 1.12.0 Dsbw. 5MZ 2012 Time~11_02 AM Hurltinglon Beach October,2011 Page: 1 Huntington Beach Blaster Fadlitles Plan Park Land Acquisitian And Park Facilities ©errelopm®t-A 2015-16 Through ProjatlBuild 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 sulmout Out Total PK,023 Iduc-dy Community Center Gynviastum SO SO So S0 {2,iT75,0oD 52,975,DOD PR-024 Oak Vh3,ArRemalonUentarExpansion SQ 5H So $0 S800,0D0 SHCO,OOD TOTALS $1,2d5,a00 SteD,ODp $150,DCO �s150,000 $135704,000 $137483,00a Win 1)Ifpmject 6ming is not a component of tht3 eftt thma 90 prajoM default to that -Mfu RUN Out'Bmount. kz7 a O O z O N N e~t V:1,12,0 Date: 5f0212012 Tiime:111:02 AM Hurtlingtan Beach¢ctaber.2U11 Pale: 2 CD J 1 , J ' .p Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail lydrostru tuW. Pat Land Acquisition And Patk Eedlities Development Project Number: Title PK 001 Bartlett€'arkC.anceptuetl Plan And EIR Submitting Departments: CommunRy5erAces Project Description The project consists of the environmental assessment and conceptual plan forthe remaining 28 acre Bartlett Park largely an Environmentally Sensitive HttbitalArea(ESHA}_The preliminary plans include anatural-passive use consisting of trails,trailhead kiosks,and Emited naturiil parking. JusfficdWn/Consequences olAvoidance: The parkimprovements are needed for protection of the currently open orvacantparcel. Roughly FIB a of the park would remain untouched with improvements designed to pwtectthat 90 0. Relationship to Generst Pfaa Development: Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consisteatwith the Cayes General Pian Recreation Elementend indirectlysupportthe additional residents resulting from new development, The project is also tapa&yincreasing. Allocation TD General Platt Ruildout: Reference Document Project Timing The design mid environment assessment companant is planned for 2009 to 2010. The first construction component is planned for between 201 a and 2020. 20'E5-16 PROPOSED E?PENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 1hrough BWid-out Total all Yeats 1.Design Engineering IAdministratic 400,0D0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5D0,00.00 900,000.00 2.Lend Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.DO O.OD 3.Const wOon D,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000,900.00 4,DOO,000.00 4.Contingency D.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 5D0,000.00 6011.000-w 5-Equipment 1 Other O.DD 0.00 O.Do 0.00 0.00 O-Do TOTAL COST: 4Do,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,00,000.0D 5�400,000,00 59 V:1,08-0 Date: 4127/2012 Tuine.11:36 ATA Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 75 Hs -250- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No. 2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project [detail Infrastructure: Park LnrLd Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Numbar. Tits PK 002 Irby Park Phasell Submitting Departments: Commtmity Services Project Description: The projact consists of the development of the remaining eight acres. Construct bio-filter and waterretenfitln area In addiion,constructt'ails, passive pocket areas.interpretive signs and a small area of neighborhood park improvements(dimbing apparatus,benches,picnictables} adjacerttto the neighborhood area The more active portion would be designed in atashionto protect the more natural areas_ Justification,'Consequences of Avoidance: The park needs a combination of passive/active irnprovemen%to create a balance of active uses with protection of the avatar retention needs,The water retention needs would receiva apprapriationsfrom storm drainage sources.a State PublicWorks Grant Relafionship to General Plan Development LOB diced relationship,but the improvements are consistent with the Gity's General Plan Recreatw Element rind indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development.The project is also capacity increasing. AI location Tot General Plan Buildout Reference Document Proja Mming: Based upon receiptof State(F=DubCcWorks)Grant The project isin conjunction trAh a PW State Grant-matchingfurtds. 2M5-15 PP,OPOSED EXPENDITURES 2D11-12 20V-13 2013.14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Yews 1.Design 1 Engineering f Administrant D.DD 0.00 0.00 D,C* 50,0D0.00 50,wo.00 2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way D.00 "a 0.00 n.00 0-00 0.00 3.Construction 0.00 D.oD 0.00 0.00 400.000.DD 400,000.Da 4.Contingency 0.00 am 0.0D 0.00 5D,OOD.OD 50,000.00 5.Equipment!Other 0.00 0.00 4.0D 0.00 0.00 0.04 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 s00,000:DD 50G,000,OD 60 V:1.08.0 Date: 427/2012 Time:11:36 AM Huntin%on Beach October.2011 xB -251- Item 7. - 76 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Perk Facilities Development Project iNumberJTitle PK 003 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR,RAP And Development Submitting Departments_ Community Services Project Description: The project consists of an Environmental lmpaC Review,Remedial Action Plan and ultimately a development plan, The gun range has been inactive for overten years rand the accumulated lead in the soil and use of creosote wwd presents an environmental problem and mustbe remadiated lbetore re-use, Phase I consists of preparation of an Environmental Impact Reportand Remedial Action Plan-Phase It($2-0 million)is an estimate of the range remedietion. Phase ill(also,$2.0 million)is the actual site improvemenis io turn it into an active park use proposed atlhistme to be askals park Ju5tffica6on/Consequences of Avoidance; The roughly five acre gun range nrea is part of the Cilyrs major regional pads and needs to be used to its meArnum potential in a yet to be determined manner, Relationship to General Plan Development: Little direft relationship.butthe improvements are consistent Wth the City's General Plan Recreation Clement and indirecttysupportthe additional residetrts resulting from new development The projeuLis also cap$eity increasing. Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00% Reference Document ProjertTiming: The stuct*epart site remed-iation and site improvements are planned for a period between 2010 and 2020, 2015-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITILPES 2011-12 2012.13 2013.14 2014-15 through Suild-cut TOW ail Years 1.Design/Engineering 1 Administra6c 325,oaa.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325,000,00 2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way TWO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.ConstruclJon 0.00 0,00 0.00 0100 4,000,000.00 4,0K000-00 4, Cnnfingenry O,DD 0.00 0-00 0.00 0,00 0,00 5.Equipment/Otter 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COST: 325,000.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 4,000,000.00 4,325,000.00 61 V:1.08.0 Date: 412712012 rime:11:36 AM Huntington Beach Dcbober,2tt11 Item 7. - 77 xB -252- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Focilifers Development Project NumberiTitle PK 001 Le Bawd Park Expansion Master Plan And Development Plan Submitting Departments. Comm unity Services Project D ascription: Undertake the Park Master Plan and construction documents necessmy to expand the turf area and park amenities on the twc remaining undeveloped acres, The improvementswill be completed in a single phase. Improvements also inciudethe elimination of drainage problems and construction oferemp to the SwaA kikverTrail. Justification/Consequences of Avoidance: The park improvements are necessary to complete the parkand maximize the roughly five acres available atthis park, Relationship to General Plan Development Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentwith the aVs General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly supportthe additional residents reesuiting from new development.The project is also capacity increasing. Allocation To General Plan Huildvut 0.00% Reference Document: Project Tm ing: As park-related ravenu es become wailabie. 2Di5-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-is 2013-14 zat a-,5 through ek;td-out Toad all Years 1.Design f Engineering f Administratic 250,OD0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 260,000.00 2.Lend Acquisll_ian 1 Rbht Of way 0.00 ciao o_DO 0.00 0-00 0.00 3.construction 0.011 0.0D O.w a00 1,200,ODO.00 1,200,000.00 4.Contingency O.Do O.DD D.DD 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.Equipment!Other U0 0.00 Q.DD 0.DO D,DO 0.00 TOTAL COST: 250,00D_00 O.OD 0.0D 0.00 1,200,000.00 1,450,000.00 62 V-.1.08.0 Date: 4127r2012 7sne:11:n AM Huntington Beach October,2011 HB -253- Item 7. - 78 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66. Hunbngton Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Dark Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development ProjectNumber(Trile PK 005 Blufftop Park Trail Improvements 'Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Description: Construct irprovements to the wasting two and a hell-mile long asphaktrai(including aspEittrail systemfor pedestrian endwheeledtratfic. The project inciudes 15 r for citizen input project designJenglneering,soils and materials testing,project plan check and construction inspedian. The project also includes a st&ttdard 19%for project contingancy. Justification J Consequences of Avoidance. The project is necessaryte reduce the rain of erosion of the very important blufftop area. Relationship to General Plan Development: Nons directly,the improvements are primarily necessaryta maintain an m sting asset AlIam ion To General Plan BuBdout: 0.00'�e Reference Document Project Timing: As revanues permit 2015-16 PROPOSED ED<PENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2D14-16 through Build-ad Total all rears 1.Design f Engineering 1 Administratic 0.00 o,DO 0.00 (].DO 12O,013D.00 120,000.00 2.Land Aoqulsltion/Bight Of Way 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0a 3.Constructlon 0.DO 0.00 0.00 0.00 800,000.00 8OD,OOO.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,00OX 80,OOa.00 5.Equipment Mer 0_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.Do 0,00 TOTAL COST: 0.00, am 0.00 a.OD 1,000,ODD.D0 1.00,000.0D 63 V:1.08.0 Date: 4127f2012 Tune:f 1:35 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 79 xB -254- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Bead Master Facilities Plan Project Detail infrastructure: Park LandAcquishion And Pa*Facilities Development Project Nurrkber.JTille PK RU Edinger Dock Development Submitting Departments: CommunatyServices Project Description: Canstruct a new dock and boat launch. Jus6fscation I Consequences of Avoidance: The improvements needto be made to meetthe recreational boating needs of the communiV. Raleiionship to General Plan Development Utde directrelationship,butthe improvements are consistentwith the CiVs Genera(Plan Recreafian Element and indirectly supportthe adcRiorral residents resuWng from new developmenL Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.30 a Reference Document ProjactTiming: WNrl priorityand as Park Fund revenues become available. 21715-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2D12-13 2D13-14 2014-15 omough aund-� Trim all rears 1.Design I Engineering I AdminiWatic 0.00 4.bo 0.00 tl 00 50,000.00 50,000.00 2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way a_00 0.00 0100 a,00 0.00 0.00 3.CUnstwction 0.00 0-00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.03 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.00 60o,000.00 600,000.00 b.EqulpmentI Other 0,00 a.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 60,000,00 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 700,000.rro n0,000.0a 64 V:1.08.0 Date: 412712012 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Eeach October,2911 xB -255- Item 7. - 80 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project:Detail Infrastructure: Park Lend Acquisition And Park Fa Rties Development Project Numtter.JTille PK 007 Wardlow Feld Reconfiguration DesigrVConsiruction SubmitfingDeparimetts: Community Services Project Description: Reconfigure the parkta accommadata s youth sports field and plan for ectditional parking. Construction costs for the I""Me league field and parking lot are inducted at$380,000. Justification j Consequences of Avoidance: The parks earlier configuration is inefficient in temts of space. Relationship to General Plan Development: Uttle direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentwith the Qtys General Plan Recxvation Element and in&eclly supportthp additional residents resulting tram new development Allocation To General Plan Buildout DAM Reference Document: Project Timing: 2010. 2015-10 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 20 1-12 2012-13 2M3-14 2014-16 1huough 9und-a.n Tool d years 1.Design!Engineering/Administrant 120,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120,0X00 2.Land Acqulsition/bight Of Way o.00 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 800,000.00 wi,o©o.00 +4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,000.0u 80,000.00 5.EqL iprnent/Other 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COST: 120,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 seo,000.00 1,000,t100.OD 65 V;1.08.0 Date:412 772 0 1 2 Time:11:36 AM Huntirngton Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 81 Hs -256- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail i Infraslruchare: Perk Land Acquisition And Park FecilitesDevBlopment Project Number-.]Titie PK 008 Cityide Perks Master Plan SubmittingDepartmerits: Comrntt*Services Project Description: The project consists solely of the preparation of a Parks Master Plan_ Justification 1 Consequences of Avoidance: A Master Plan of Parks is needed to insure the continued rational programmed development of the City parks system. Relationship to General Plan Development A Park Master Plan for the continued development of the City's Pack system is directly related to General Plan development Allocation To General Plan Buildout: Q ODD Reference Dowment Project Timing: The project is scheduled for the period of 21t10 to 2020, 2015-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 zXS-14 2014-15 throw Build-out Total all Yeats i.Design!Engineering 1 Administratic 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 350,000.00 350,000.o0 2.Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 S.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 ME! 0.00 0.00 0.30 TOTAL COST_ 0.00 0.0 0.00 C,00 350,OOD.RO 350,400.40 56 V:1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time.11.35 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 xB -257- Item 7. - 82 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail lr&estructurm Park Lend Acquisition And Perk i=acilities Development Project Number/Trtle PK 009 Contra]ParkHabitatPlan Submilfing Departments: CommunityServicas Project Description: Complete an enhanced habitat plan for entire Central Parkarea,The plan is necessaryfor mitigating the roptorforaging wee reletadto the areas slated for wrialrudlon of the proposed Central Park Senior Center.The results may indicate the need for a nne-to-one basis Within the park.That is,all negative impacts must be fully mitigated, Justification i Consequences of Avoidance: The area proposed forihe Senior Citizens Center has been vacant fore great deal of time and has become a raptor'fora*g area, The Cloy needs to study the entire park area and determine it and howthe impact of the proposed development of the Senior Center can be mitigated on a park-wide basis, Relationship to General Pion Devetopment Little direct reEatiunship,butthe improvements are consistentwilh the C iS/s General:Plan Recreation Elementand indirecilysupponihe additional residents resultingfrom new development Allocation To General Plan Buildoui: Reference Document ProjectTiming; As revenues permit zats-18 PROPOSED E>PENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013 14 2014-15 through BUH&OU1 To1ar au Yeats 1.Design I Engineering I Administratic 0_00 020 0.00 a_oo 250.000,00 250.OD0.00 2.Land Acquisition t Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 O.Do 0.00 0,00 0,DO 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.Contingency 0.00 UD 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.Equipment/Other 0,00 0.00 0.D0 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COST_ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0o 254000.00 250,000.OD 67 V:1.08.0 DatB: 412712012 Time:f 11:35 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 83 xB -258- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Hur fingt©n Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail i Irdrastructure: Park LnndAcquisitionAndParkFrcilitiesDevelopment Project Number./Title PK 010 Central ParkAcquisiktn Of Encyclopedia.Lots Submitting Departments: 03mmunityServices ProjectDescription: The expenditmes allow forthe acquisition of fi"ne privately owned lots located within park boundaries at approximately t20,690 per lot. The small,lndividuat tots are located generally north of Ellis,south of Edwards and west of Golden WestAyenues. Justification f Cansequences of Avoidance: The acquisition of the small lots is necessary to allow for the complete development andtl'tus 1no�dmixation,of Central Park Reletianship to General Plan Development Little direct relationship,but the improvements are consistent with the CiVs General Plan Becreali©n Element and indireLly support the additional residents resulting from new development The project is also capacity increasing, Allocation To General Plan Buildaut Reference Docuhant Project Timing: As Park Fund revenues permit 2P76-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-1 a 2013-14 2D14-15 4vough Build-out Total all Years 1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.Lard Acquisition/Right Of Way 0,00 0.00 0.0D 0_00 1,020,000.00 1,020,000.DD 3.Construction 0.00 0.30 0.00 a.oD 0.00 0.0D 4.Contingency 0.00 U0 O.oD 0.00 0.00 D.00 5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 CLOD 0.00 0.00 0.0o TOTAL COST: 0.00 O.00 D.DD 0.00 1,020,000.00 1,020,D00,00 68 V:1.0a.0 Date: 412T/2012 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 HB -259- Item 7. - 84 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development ProiactNumfsedTi#e PK 011 Central Park Development Of Remaining 86 Acres Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Description: Complete the mmtly passive area of the park near Ellis and Golden WestAvenues.wAth troils,picnic areas.arestroomwideddigond parking per the Central Park Master Plan. Justification I Consequences of Avoidance: The improvements are necessaryto mabmize the usu of this major park Reledionshipto General Plan Development Lillie direct relationship,hutthe improvements are consistentwith the Cily's General Pian Recreation Element and indirectly supportthe additional residents resulting from new development The project is also capacity increasing. Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00 P Reference Document Proj eot Turning: As parkcap0al revenues permiL 2R75-Sfi PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 &rough 8sdld-au Total all Years 1. Design f Engineering I Administratic 0_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.01) 0.00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,D00,000 0o 20,000,00.00 4.Contingency D,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.DO 6,Equipment i Other D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01) 20,0D0,000.0D 20,000,D00.00 69 V:1,08.0 Date: 4/2712012 Tune:11:35 AM Huntinglon Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 85 1413 -260- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: PartcLand.Acquisition And Park Fatalities Development Project Nunnberj-noe PK 012 Centrai Park RabOdTwo Resteurnm Facilities SubmMngDepartments: CommunityServiaes Project Description: Rebuild the'Park Bench Cafe"and"Alice's Restaurant. Justfication I Consequences of Avoidance: The facilities ere neadythlrtyysars old and in need of replacement. Relationship to General Plan Development These improvements are largely concession-based improvements end thus financedvrith longterm concession revenues, Allocation To Deneref Plan Buildout 0.00% Reference Document: ProjectTiming: As revenues permitand as negations are completed. 2015-16 PROPOSED F.XPENDTTURES 201 i-12 2012-13 2043-14 2014-i5 through 90d-out Total all Years t, Design I Engineering IAdministratic O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.Land Acquisi ion I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S.Construction 0.00 D-00 0-00 0.00 800,000.D0 804,00D.00 4,Contingency D.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0-00 0-00 S.ZquipmentI Other 0.00 0.00 t-oo 0.00 0.00 4.Do TOTAL COST; 0.00 0100 0.04 4,00 800,000.0o e0QDoa00 70 V; 1.08.0 Date: 412712012 7ime:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 HB -261- Item 7. - 86 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master i=acilitles plan Project Detail Inheamfourat Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Daveloprnent Pr0}ed plumber: -T fe PK OU Gsnerell Youth Sparta Faci€itios Grouts SubmKing DLpartrn2 Ms: Communk,,Servicas Project Dest-ripfion: The proposed expendtim ads me seed money for grants obtained by volunteeryouth sports progftMs.Tne project consists of$150,001)per year In grant rxssistancc, Justifrcniinn jCohsequences ofAveidance: The City hw had alanTterm policy ofetssisting 1=1 groups lavarage Mymoney for common park omeim rvmmants. Ftinloilonshipta GorreretPlan Development tittle dims mlationsh€p,but1he improvsmants tore ronsistentwitf,the C€tys GenerEt Plan Recrangun Element and lndirudys,ippwrithe additional residents row1fing from newdevelopmem NlocakortTzt Genera?Plw Buildoct: OWN iWarewe Dacuritent: Project Timing: A9 requested by focal groups tha have success in obtaining grants oroherfmandal essistrance, 2015-1G PROPOSED EXPIE-NDI tUF1F_S 2071-12 2D12.13 2015-14 2014-is twaig,Bald-aui TOLU all ygm 1.Design 1 E.nginaering f Administratk 0,01) 0,a7 0,00 I1.Oa 0.0 010 2.Laruf Anquisition i Right Of Wq 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ct.Oo 0.80 0,0q 3,Constru6bon 1&0,000,00 150,000.00 15DXQ.00 150,0Ot1,00 3,9UD,0DD,00 4,500,000,00 4,Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 a.DO Q.OD O,QQ S.EquipmentlOtirer 0.00 0.00 DAD tLoa 0,05 D.00 TOTAL COST. 153,000,po 16o,o0D,00 150100.00 150,00.00 3,e00,000,aG 4.500,ow0,00 71 V:1.D8,0 Date; 5/0212012 The;1GA6AM Huntingion Beach October.2071 Item 7. - 87 xB -262- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail irrfre-structurs: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number:/Title PK 014 tvlurdyYouth Sports Complex Phase II Submitting Departmerds: Community Services Project Description: Reconfigure the current parWscheol configuration to increaseyouth sports capabilities.The City and schoc3 distridyAll amend the etdsting joint use agreement and the Citywill construct a sports field on schooi property.There ufell also be perking lot improvements Wth additional spaces mild a turn-around. Justification/Consequences of Avoidance: The wdsfing field configuration does notmwdmize the existing field spacefor use byyouth sports associations and the re-design ofthe existing park and school parcels will address this shortcoming. Reiationship to General Plan Development The eAsting field configuration does notmaximizethe ebsting fiald space for use byyouth sports assodatons andthe re-designwriN address Ns. A31ocation To General Plan Buildout Reference Document: Project Timing: As revenues permit ie PROPOSED EXPENDITUR .ES =1-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 trmugh eu6d-out Total all Years t-Design I Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.w 0.00 0.00 2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 0.00 0-00 3.Construction 0.00 0,00 0.0a 0.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,ti OM 4.Confingwcy 0,00 0.00 n.oa 0.00 0,00 0.00 5.Equipment I Other 11-00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0-00 0-00 TOTAL COST: a0o a.oa 0.0a a.ao 2,500,000.00 Z50a,000.00 72 V:1-08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Tune:11:36AM Huntington Beach October,2011 xB -263- Item 7. - 88 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastrpcture: Park Land AcquisitionAnd Park Fatalities Development Project Number/Tide PK 915 Beach Playground Submitting Departments: Community Semices Project Description: Construct a tot lot/youth playground with capabilityto serve the needs of two different age groups. The improvemsnt would be located on the Gtybeach north of the pier cidjacentto 13lufftop Pwl<at 9th Street The park would have asphalt access with eturn sbouL Justification/Consequences of Avoidance: The improvements are intended to improve the bench day experience for youths. Relationship to General Plan Development The existing field configuration does not maxen*ethe existing field space for use byyoath sports associations and the redesign will address this. Ailocntion To General Plan Ruitdout: Reference Document Project Timing: As revenues permit 2015-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES =1-12 2012.13 M3-14 2014-15 thmughBuHd- d Total all Years 1.Design/Engineering I Administratk 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 2,Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 3.Construction 0.40 0.00 0.00 O.OD 350,000,00 350,000.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 5.Equlpment I Other 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0100 D.00 150,000.00 350,000,00 73 V:1.08,0 Date: 4127=12 Tvne:11:36 AM Huntington Beach Odobet.2011 Item 7. - 89 HB -264- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Hunlinglon Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Prcl ect Numbs rJTits PK 016 Csntral Park Development Of Former Gun Range Area SubmittingOepartments: Community5ervices Project Dasnrfption: The projectt consists of the removal ofthe existing gun range and designingfoonstruc tinga skate parkfacility. Justificaiion.I Consequences of Avoidance: The City currently has no fatalities of its awn for in-fins skating and skateboarding in this area otihe community and w%need to offsetthe loss of the e:dsling Huntington Beach High School skats facility. Relationship to General Plan Development None direclt6 butthe proposed skatefacdlityis capacity increasing. AJlacrdon To General Ran pulldout 0.00 g i4aference Document Project Timing: The project design is plannedfor 2010 and the construction between 2010 and 2020. 20t6-t6 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012.13 =3-14 2D14-15 drowhhild-oar Tout all Years 1,Design f Engineering l Admirustratic 0.00 0.00 0.130 0.00 350,000.00 360,MoO 2.Land Acquisition!Right Of Way D_00 9.DD 100 0.00 0.00 9.00 3,Construction a.00 O.DD 0.00 D.DD 2,490,00.00 2,4013,0DD.DD 4_Contingency 0,00 0.00 0,00 D,DD 240,00100 241%000.00 5.EgtiiPment I Other D.0D 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 TOTAL COST, 0.0D 9.00 0,90 D.00 3,ODD,099.00 3,000,0D9,00 74 V.1.08.0 Data: 4/2712012 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 xB -265- Item 7. - 90 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: PaAl-andAc:quishionAndParkFaclTdiesDevelopment ProjectNumbec�Titie PK 017Wamer Dark Renovetion And Expansion Submitting Departments: Community SSMCeS Project Description: Improve the Edinger Dock area by dredging the theca end adding fourto six docks or slips. There would also be improements merle to the public boot launch ramp_ Justificaion f Consequences of Avoidance: The area serves the yacht dub activities as well as casual boaters. Releionship to General Plan Development: L'fftle direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentv4ththe Ws General Plan Recreation Element and indirectlysupportthe additional residents resulting from new development The project is eisa capn*increasing. Allocation To General Plan Buildout O.OD e Reference Document Project Timing: The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction between 2010 and 20211. 2015-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2a14-15 through Build-out Tanat all Years 1.Design 1 Engineering!Adminisbatk Call ono 0.00 D.00 96p00.0D 95,000.00 2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way O.Do 0.00 0.00 0.Do 0.00 0.00 3.Construction 0_0o aao O.aD 0.D0 0.00 0.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0_00 64D,0D0.00 640,000.04 5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94,000.00 64,000.30 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Q.DO 6fl0,000.00 800,DOD.aD 75 V:1.08.0 Date: 4127/2012 Tmw-:11:35 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 91 HB -266- Exhibit"A' - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure_ Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number./Title PY 018 Lemb ParkDesign And.Development Submitting Departments: CammunitySetvices Project Descripiiert, Design,engineer and constructpark improvements on the ZA acre Lamb Park site.The improvements would include lighted sports facilities (bolltiald and sportsfield)and other neighborhood fbdures such as benches,sidewaiks,drinking fountains and a play apparatus onthe parcel, a closed school site. Justification I Consequences of Avoidance: The park improvements,=6y sports oriented,are necessaryto complete the park and rnmdmize the roughly2.4 acres availimble.at this perk Relationship to Generol Pian Development Little direc�relntionship,butthe improvements are consistentwith the CitVs General Plan Recreotion Element and iindirectiy supportthe eddifianel residents resulting from new development The project is also capacity increasing, Allocation To General Plan Buildout D Da%6 Referencs Document Project Timing: The project design is planned for Z010 and the construction between ZQ10 and 21I20. z015-16 PROPOSED EXPENDFTURES 2D11-12 2012-13 2013.14 2014-15 Through Buiid out Tntai adl Years 1.Design i Engineering 1 Admfnistratic 0,00 0.00 0.0D doe 132,000.00 132,000.00 2.Land Acquisition J Right Of Way 0.00 0,0D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B80,000.00 880,0DD.D0 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88,000_00 88,00D.G0 5.Equipment l Other 0.00 TIM 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.00 TOTAL COST, 0.00 UD 0.00 0.00 1.100,000.00 1,1D0,000.00 76 V.1, &0 Date: Q712012 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 xB -267- Item 7. - 92 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No. 2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Lend Acquisition And Paris Facilities Development ProjeaNumbeci'Dile PK 919C.2ntra(Park Sports Complex Team Room Submitting Departments, Community Services Project Description: Construct a team-morn at the sports complex The facility would be used tytearrts for during game breaks, The facility would have eleetricai service and possibly u drinking fountain but would not include showedlocker facilities. Arstiftc0an j Consequences of Avoidance: The facility will provide sports teams with a location for team discussions,changing and personal effects security, ReEatiortship to General Plan Development L!We direct relafianship,but the improvements are consistentwiih the Gigs General Plan Recreation Element and in&ecily support The additional residents resulting from new development.The proocl is also capacatyincreasing. Allocation To General Plan Buildout: Reference Document Project Timing: The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction between 201 D and 202D. 2015-16 PROPOSEDEXPENDFfiURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013.14 2014-15 CxoughBWId-out Tatar at Yeas 1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0,0e 0.01) 0.0a 0.00 2,Land Acquisition/Bight Of Way 0.00 0.00 a,00 11.0 0,00 a.00 $.Construction 0,00 0,0D O.DD o.D0 100,0ao.00 100,000.00 4.Contingency 0,00 0.00 0.0o 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.Equlipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 a.110 0,00 0.00 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.oa a.ao 0,0o toa,00aon 100,oaa.00 77 V:1,08.0 Date: 4P2712012 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 93 HB -268- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Hun n # n Beach Master Facftities Plan Projed Detail Irtwmclure: Po*Land AcquisIton And PcarkPAclilBesDewtopnent Pjsct hlnmber11-itle PK 010 Future ParkcAogq�.-ihnn(Possible aossc School Shea) Sut mAdi tg Deptsftents: Ccxnrnutiity Ss icas Pro(ecx Descdpfion: Argtrirs apprwdrnnmfy S8 sus of land suitiableter ddvMaptnent of adrve and passitire parlcssuch as including neigfbodVoci,cGmmuniy and spells parks. %bantf©I siiasvmuld Ind ude closed schocl sites. Land acquisrtion Is estirncdEd rg$20.00 per squarefaot or$B71,120 par seas. JUS111cation j Cansequertr~ps oMmidancp; The Cft}r naafis to aNulre apprcudmate)v 1 GO sass in mderto maei the Ganeml flan target of ED acres per 1,=residents, FkalManship to Ganertl RerDevatr3pmerrt The City's General Plan currentiy identifies atarget of 5.0 acres at rscmtAlon opporturkes per one thousand residents. Afnaton To Ganartd Ron Buifdout 0.00%. Reforence apcurnent; Prof act Tlmiog: The prrslectdosign is pianned for 2010 and ihs construction between 2011?and 2020, 2015-is F'RUPOSED FEXPEW17UPES Zpi 1-i2 2012.13 2013.14 2D14.16 1rmzh guikkLt Total Q Yesm 1.Design I F- g eerlq IAdminfstratic a,ao 0.00 0.00 0,0o D.00 0.00 2.Land ACquisl on i Rlght Of Way 0_00 a,00 U0 0,00 5Q 588,000Aa 68,588,aG0,04 3.Ccnstnlstton 0,00 0.00 0,0d 0.00 D.06 D,DO 4,Contingency 0.00 0,00 D.tlO 0,R6 0.00 0.00 5,e4uiPr(*ntIOther t1,00 0,00 0.00 0,a0 O,t>D o.aD TOTAL COST: A.OD 0.00 0.00 0.0n 59,58e 0D0,0o M,SB11,D00,00 "79 V;1,Da.0 Date: 510712012 't srre,11:00 AM Hunfingtcrn Seaah October.2011 xs -269- Item 7. - 94 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park LandAcquistiian And%rkFbclfttiesDevelopment ProjectNumberlT-roe PK 021 Central Park Senior Center Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Description: Conslr=45,000 square foot Senior Centei in Central Perk The faciiitywouid have a large multi-purpose room a number of smaller classrooms,awarming kitchen fitness center,game room with pool tables,and enciflary offices.Therewould also be a garden patio with a waterteature,turf and gardens.The facifitywouid have parking for 250 vehicles. Justification I Consequences of Avoidance: The City currently has a de-facto standard of 0.1320 square feet or general purpose community use facility space per resident based upon the City's I 8,820 square feet of public use facilities available to the 190,377 residents.The CltyWishes to maintain,if not improve,this standard byconstruc#an. The 0.520 square foot per person is not the standard for senior only facilities,butfor all community use facilities available to cite entire residential population. RelatiansWpto General Plan Development: The proposed land-use database indicates additional residential dwe0ings thatwoufd likely result in roughly 17,089 additional residents requiring et least 1 U95 square feet of public use space in orderto maintain the existing level of service(LOS) Allocation To General Plan Sufldout 0.30i Reterence Dacumerrt: Prajed Timing: The construction aft'ne facility is on-hold pending litigation. 2015-�6 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 20t2-13 20i3-14 2014-15 throughBL-Md-out Totata6Years 1.Design/Engineering IAdministratic 0-00 0.00 0-00 0-00 2,200,o0Q,00 2,200,000,00 2.Land Aoquisbon/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,600,000.00 17,600,000.00 4-Conthigency 0,00 O.Oo 0.00 0.00 1,760,000.00 1,760,000.00 5.Equipment I Other 0.00 0.00 O.00 0.03 440,000.00 440,000.Oo TOTAL COST; 0.00 aoo 0.00 0.00 22,000,Ooo.00 22,000,000.00 79 v:1.08.0 Date:4/27/2012 7ime;11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 95 xB -270- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail i Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Fodhes Development Project Number../Title PK 022 Edison Community Center Gymnasium Submitting Departments: COmmu*Services project Description: Construct a 7,000 squarefoot gymnasium contiguous to the Edison Community Center. The facilitywouid be a.basic"high schooll design or grade v th a single mein basketball court thet can be broken down into two smalierfull-courts orfour half-courts for practice sessions.The fedslitywouId also have locker roams and restrooms. Justification IConsequences of Avoidance: Due to higher demands of their own,the lecal high school gymnasiums are no longer as available as they once were_As a result.the City is finding it more difficult to meet the Cky`syouth indoor sports needs. Relationship to General Plan Develapment: The proposed land-use database indicates addifianal residential dwelUngs 1hatwould likelyresult inroughty 17,089 additional residents requiring at least 10,5?5 square ieet of public use space in orderto maintain the existing level of servte(LDS) Allocation To General Plan 6u3dDUt 0.00% Reference Document: ProjectTiming: The expansion is planned for construction between 2010 and 2020. 2D15-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 20t2-13 2013-14 2014-18 troughsulld*A Total allYess 1.Design/Engineering!Administratic 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 357,000.00 357,000,00 2.Land Acquistion!flight Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.Construction 0.0D 0.00 D.Go DAD 2,300,006.00 2,380,0DD.01) 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 ODD 0.00 236,000,00 238,000.00 S. Equipment I Other 0.00 D.OD 0,0o• 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,97&OD0.oD 2.975,DDD.DD so V:1.0&.0 Date:412V2012 Time;11:35 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 xB -271- Item 7. - 96 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facil'iftles Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number.(Title PK M Murdy Community Center Gymnasium Submitting Depertnaents: Community Services Project Description. Construct a 7,000 square(oat gymnasium contiguous to the M urdy Community Center.The fecflity would be a basic"high school"design or grade with a single main beskettratl courtihat can be broken down into two smaller tull-courts or four half-courts for practice sessions. The facility would also have locker rooms and restrcoms. Justification/Consequences of Avoidance; The City currently h as a de-facto.standard of€I.620 square feet or general purpose cummunity use facility space per resident based upon the City 118,020 square feet of public use facilities available to The 190,377 residents. The Citywishes to maintain,if not improve,this standard by construction. The 0.620 square foot per person is not the standard for senior onlyfacilifies,butfor all community use facilities available to the entire residential population. Relationship to General Plan Development: T he proposed land-use database indicates additional residential dwellings that would likely result in rougVy 17,089 additional residents requiring at least 10,595 square feet of public use space In orderto maintain the aAsting level of service(LDS) Aflacetion To General Plan Buildout: 9.00% Reference Document Project Timing: The expansion is planned for construction between 2010 and 2020. zols.is PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-1s =2-14 2014-15 thnxVh Build-uut Total all Years I.Design I Engineering 1 Admirdstratic o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 357,000.00 357,000.00 2.Land Acquistion I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 0,00 0.00 3.Constructian 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,280,000.04 z,M,000.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 238,000.00 Z38.000.00 5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0100 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,975,000.00 2975,000.00 81 V.1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time:11:39 AM Huntington Beach October.2011 Item 7. - 97 HB -272- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No. 2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities.Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facx ities Development ProjectNumber.ITille PK 024 Oak View Recm don Canter Expansion Submitting Departments: Community Saivices Project Description: Construct a roughly Z,U00 square foot expansion to the e)asting 10,000 squara foot OekViiew Recreation Community Center.The facilitywould consist of a game room,multipurpose room and a restroorn. JustificationjConsequences of Avoidance: The facility is necessary(or planned)to maximize the fairy small facility. Relationship to General Plan Development The proposed land-use dattsbase indicates additional residentital dwellings thatwould likely resultin roughly17.089 additionsd residents requiring at least 10,58E square feet of public use space in orderto maintain the ex;sting level of service(LOS) Allocation To General Pien Buildout 0. % Rafe rence.Document: PmJadTsming: The expansion is planned for construction between 201 D and 2020. 2n15-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Bwd-oui Total an Years 1.Design/Engineering!Adrninistrad, D.OD O.aD D.DO 0.0D sD,DaD.oO so,acm-oo 2.Land Acquistion I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 D.DO 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.Constmcfion "0 0.00 O,DO 0.00 540,0DO.o0 640,00D.o0 4.Contingency 10,00 O.DO 0.00 0.00 KODO.OD 64,0ouxo 5.EqulpmentI Other 0.00 "a 0.00 D.00 15,000.00 16,000.DD TOTAL CAST: D.OD 0,00 0,00 D.QO 80O,D00.00 800,000.00 82 V:1.08.0 [late: 4127MI2 Time: 5:26 PM Huntington Beach October,n11 xB -273- Item 7. - 98 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 End of Sian 83 Item 7. - 99 HB -274- Res. No. 2012-66 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on October 01, 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Shaw, Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr, Boardman NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CitArlerk and ex-officio erk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California