HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnthony & Langford Architects - 1993-06-21 /
REQUES I FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION 01
Date June 21, 1993
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
Prepared by: v- LouisAPPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works
Ron Hagan, Director of Community Services 6 - °Li 19$!
Subject: MUNICIPAL PIER BUILDINGS
4/a.//93 t•LrAL =�T _ CITY CIA,
Consistent with Council Policy? [ }Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: v6y
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Proposals were requested from qualified architectural firms to prepare plans,
specifications and cost estimates for the construction of three new buildings (Phase 2) on
the City's Municipal Pier.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Approve the attached Consultant Agreement with Anthony and Langford Architects
for the preparation of plans and specifications for the restaurant, bait and tackle shop
and bermline snack shop on the pier.
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to expend $105,650 to cover contract costs of
$91,500, estimated change orders of $9,150 and anticipated reimbursable expenses of
$5,000.
3. Accept Anthony and Langford's professional liability coverage with a $25,000
deductible.
ANALYSIS:
On February 21, 1989, the City Council approved a contract with Ron Yeo FAIA to provide
conceptual designs and three dimensional models of the Pier Plaza area. On August 7,
1989, Council amended the agreement to include conceptuals of the Pier, north of the Pier
Parking and the Pier Restaurant. On May 21, 1990, the agreement was, again, amended to
include the exterior design and floor plan drawings for all buildings on the Pier. On April
6, 1992, Ron Yeo's agreement was amended a third time to include the preparation of
construction documents for the lifeguard tower and public restrooms. On June 7, 1993,
Council approved a fourth amendment; thereby, authorizing Ron Yeo to finalize the
restaurant design and modify the lifeguard tower stairways. The total cost of
architectural services to date is as follows:
Ron Yeo Contractual Services
Agreement/Amendment Description of Services Cost
Original Agreement Conceptual Design Pier Plaza $20,000
Amendment #1 Architectural Concepts for the Pier,
North of the Pier Parking Structure
and Pier Restaurant 64,000
PIO 5/85
Municipal Pier Buildings — RCA
June 21, 1993
Page 2
Ron Yeo Contractual Services (Cont.)
Agreement/Amendment Description of Services Cost
Amendment #2 Exterior Design and Floor Plans for all Buildings 18,000
Amendment #3 Construction documents for lifeguard tower and
public restrooms 41,300
Amendment #4 Finalize restaurant design and modify lifeguard
tower stairways 13,500.00
TOTAL: $156,800.00
On October 22, 1992, at staff's request, Ron Yeo provided a fee proposal for finalizing
construction documents for the bermline snack shop, bait and tackle shop and pier
restaurant. The fee of $145,000 was viewed by staff as excessive. Therefore, on May 14,
1993, proposals were solicited from six qualified architectural firms, including Ron Yeo.
Proposals Were Mailed To:
Firm Location
Anthony & Langford Huntington Beach
Blurock Partnership Newport Beach
Hanes Menser Architects Huntington Beach
Harris, Pettett & Kent Huntington Beach
Van Roon Architects Laguna Beach
Ron Yeo, FAIA Architect, Inc. Corona Del Mar
Staff received written proposals from Anthony & Langford, Hanes Menser Architects, Van
Roon Architects, and Ron Yeo, FAIA Architects, Inc. On June 1, 1993, a
multi—department committee comprised of staff from Community Develop, Community
Services, and Public Works, met and evaluated each written proposal on the following
criteria:
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
Description Maximum Score
Understanding of Project 15 Points
Approach to Project 15 Points
Experience of Firm and Subconsultants 20 Points
Qualifications and Experience of Project Team 20 Points
?ast Performance with City 5 Points
Completeness of Proposal 15 Points
Commitment to Project 10 Points
TOTAL 100 Points
Municipal Pier Buildings - RCA
June 21, 1993
Page 3
Based upon the following raw scores, only'the firms of Anthony and Langford and Ron Yeo,
FAIA Architect, Inc. were invited to an interview.
Raw Score Results
Firm City Raw Score
Ron Yeo, FAIA Architect, Inc. Corona del Mar 90.25
Anthony and Langford Huntington Beach 86.75
Van Roon Laguna Beach 50.00
Hanes Menser Architects Huntington Beach 45.50
On June 2, 1993, the same multi-department committee interviewed the two firms. The
total scores of the interview and written proposal rating sheets were then added together
and averaged to yield the following scores.
Interview Scores
Firm Raw Score
Ron Yeo, FAIA Architect, Inc. 91.25
Anthony and Langford 88.87
Based on the raw scores, Ron Yeo, FAIA Architect, Inc. placed first by a narrow margin.
Subsequent to the interviews, the sealed fee proposals of the two firms as recapped below
were opened and reviewed by staff.
The are as follows:
Fee Proposal Costs
Firm Cost
Ron Yeo, FAIA Architect, Inc. $175,200
Anthony and Langford $ 91,500
Based upon the substantial difference in costs, the Directors of Community Services and
Public Works recommend the approval of Anthony and Langford.
Anthony and Langford's Professional Liability Insurance includes a $25,000 deductible.
Resolution 6023 (Establishing Insurance and Indemnity Requirements for Contractors,
Permit Applications, and Professional Services Contractors) while not addressing the issue
of deductible limits on Professional Liability Insurance, does permit the modification or
waiver of any and all requirements as approved by Council.
Based upon Anthony & Langford's financial statement (see Attachment B), prior
performance for the City and their 43 years of business experience, the Director of Public
Works, the Risk Manager and the City Administrator recommend acceptance of their
coverage with a $25,000.00 deductible.
Municipal Pier Buildings - RCA
June 21, 1993
Page 4
FUNDING SOURCE:
Cost of Services
Item Amount
Anthony & Langford Agreement $ 91,500
Change Order Budget 9,150
Reimbursable Expenses 5,000
TOTAL COST: $105,650
Source of Revenue
The unemcumbered balance of the Pier Rebuilding Fund (E-PG-AS-154-6-27-00) is
$264,800. This balance has been set aside for design and construction services for the
buildings.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1. Award contract to Ron Yeo, FAIA Architect Inc. and authorize the Director of
Public Works to expend $197,720 to cover contract costs of $175,200, estimated
change orders of $17,520 and anticipated reimbursable expenses of $5,000.
2. Forego preparation of plans and specifications for three remaining buildings.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. :Anthony & Langford Agreement (including Insurance Certificates)
2. Anthony & Langford Financial Statement
MTU:LFS:DRN:dw
3428g/9-12
f
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AND ANTHONY AND LANGFORD FOR
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO PREPARE PLANS
FOR CERTAIN BUILDINGS ON THE MUNICIPAL PIER
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 21st. day
of June , 1993 , by and between the CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of
California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and ANTHONY AND
LANGFORD ARCHITECTS, a California corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "CONSULTANT. "
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a CONSULTANT
to provide architectural services for preparation of plans ,
specifications and cost estimates for the construction of the
following buildings on the Municipal Pier : 1) a 620 square foot
single story bermline snack shop; 2) a 800 square foot single
story bait and tackle snack shop, and 3) a 6 , 513 square foot,
two-story pierhead restaurant in the City of Huntington Beach; and
Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City
Clerk, the provisions of HBMC Chapter 3 . 03 relating to procurement
of professional service contracts has been complied with; and
CONSULTANT has been selected to perform said services ,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows :
1 . WORK STATEMENT
CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in the
Request for Proposal, dated May 14 , 1993 and CONSULTANT' S Proposal
for Architectural Services dated May 28 , 1993 , (hereinafter
AFJ547 1
collectively referred to as Exhibit "A") , which is attached hereto
and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Said
services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as "PROJECT. "
CONSULTANT hereby designates T. V. Anthony, who shall
represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all
consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement.
2 . CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE
CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly
with CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement.
3 . TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services
of the CONSULTANT are to commence as soon as practicable after the
execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A"
shall be completed no later than fifteen (15) months from the date
of this Agreement . These times may be extended with the written
permission of the CITY. The time for performance of the tasks
identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be as shown in the
Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This
schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed
by the CITY and CONSULTANT.
4 . COMPENSATION
In consideration of the performance of the services
described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a fee not to
exceed Ninety-One Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($91, 500) .
5 . EXTRA WORK
In the event CITY requires additional services not
included in Exhibit "A, " or changes in the scope of services
described in Exhibit "A, " CONSULTANT will undertake such work
AFJ547 2
after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional
compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the
prior written approval of CITY is obtained. The Director of
Public Works may authorize such additional compensation in a total
amount not to exceed Nine Thousand One Hundred Fifty Dollars
($9, 150) .
6 . METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to progress payments
toward the fixed fee set forth herein in accordance with the
progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit A" .
B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every technical
memo and report prepared by CONSULTANT shall be submitted to the
CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks . In the
event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall
identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any
such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by
CITY shall be deemed accepted.
C. The CONSULTANT shall submit to the CITY an invoice
for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall :
1) Reference this Agreement;
2) Describe the services performed;
3) Show the total amount of the payment due;
4) Include a certification by a principal member
of the CONSULTANT' S firm that the work has been
performed in accordance with the provisions of
this Agreement,; and
5) For all payments include an estimate of the
percentage of work completed.
Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is
AFJ547 3
satisfied that CONSULTANT is making satisfactory progress toward
completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall
promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made
within thirty (30) days ' of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such
approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the CITY does not
approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT in writing of the
reasons for non-approval, within seven (7) calendar days of
receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth
in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that
past performance by CONSULTANT is in, or has been brought into
compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated as provided
herein.
D. Any billings for extra work or additional services
authorized by the CITY shall be invoiced separately to the CITY.
Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above,
and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate
charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if
the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or
additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the
statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such
approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between
the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated
as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the
remainder of this Agreement.
7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
CONSULTANT agrees that all materials prepared hereunder,
including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and
AFJ547 4
office notes, calculations, maps and other documents, shall be
turned over to CITY upon termination of this Agreement or upon
PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first . In the event
this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY
in the completion of PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit. Title
to said materials shall pass to the CITY upon payment of fees
determined to be earned by CONSULTANT to the point of termination
or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is applicable. CONSULTANT
shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder.
8 . INDEMNIFICATION, DEFENSE, HOLD HARMLESS
Professional Services Consultants shall indemnify and
save and harmless CITY, its officers, and employees, from any and
all liability, including any claim of liability and any and all
losses or costs arising out of the negligent performance of this
agreement by Professional Services Consultants, its officers or
employess .
9 . WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CONSULTANT shall comply with all of the provisions of the
Workers ' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of
California, the applicable provisions of the California Labor Code
AFJ547 5
and all amendments thereto; and all similar state or federal acts
or laws applicable; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
CITY from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits,
actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature and
description, including attorney' s fees and costs presented,
brought or recovered against CITY, for or on account of any
liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason
of any work to be performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement .
CONSULTANT shall obtain and furnish evidence to CITY of
maintenance of statutory workers ' compensation insurance and
employers ' liability in an amount of not less than $100, 000 bodily
injury by accident, each occurrence, $100, 000 bodily injury by
disease, each employee, and $250, 000 bodily injury by disease,
policy limit.
10 . INSURANCE
In addition to the workers ' compensation insurance and
CONSULTANT'S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONSULTANT shall obtain
and furnish to CITY the following insurance policies covering the
PROJECT:
A. General Liability Insurance.
A policy of general public liability insurance, including
motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall indemnify CONSULTANT,
its officers, agents and employees, while acting within the scope
of their duties, against any and all claims of arising out of or
in connection with the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not
less than the following amount : combined single limit bodily
injury and property damage, including products/completed
AFJ547 6
operations liabilityand blanket contractual liability, of
$1, 000, 000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form
which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate
limit must be no less than $1, 000, 000 . Said policy shall name
CITY, its officers, and employees as Additional Insureds, and
shall specifically provide that any other insurance
coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed
excess coverage and that CONSULTANT' S insurance shall be primary.
B. Professional Liability Insurance.
CONSULTANT shall acquire a professional liability
insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder.
Said policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT'S professional
liability in an amount not less than $500, 000 per claim. A claims
made policy shall be acceptable.
11. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder,
CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject
to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing
insurance coverages as required by this Agreement; said
certificates shall provide the name and policy number of each
carrier and policy, and shall state that the policy is currently
in force and shall promise to provide that such policies will not
be cancelled or modified without thirty (30) days prior written
notice to CITY. CONSULTANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance
coverages in force until the work under this Agreement is fully
completed and accepted by CITY.
AFJ547 7
The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance
coverages shall not derogate from the provisions for
indemnification of CITY by CONSULTANT under this Agreement. CITY
or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand
the original or a copy of all said policies of insurance.
CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums
on all insurance hereinabove required.
12 . INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the
performance of this Agreement as an independent CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any
and all payments of all taxes, social security, state disability
insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other
payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and
employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with
the services to be performed hereunder.
13 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good
and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT' S services
hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not
PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by
CITY shall be made in writing through the Director of Public
Works, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as
provided herein.
14 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement is a personal service contract and the
supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONSULTANT to
AFJ547 8
any other person or entity without the consent of CITY.
15 . COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS
CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on
any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement.
16 . CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS
CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular
CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement.
No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest
in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the
California Government Code.
17. NOTICES
Any notices or special instructions required to be given
in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal
delivery to CONSULTANT' S agent (as designated in Section 1
hereinabove) or to CITY' S Director of Public Works, as the
situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed
envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United
States Postal Services, addressed as follows :
TO CITY: TO CONSULTANT:
Mr. Lou Sandoval Anthony and Langford, Inc.
Director of Public Works 16152 Beach Blvd. Ste. 201
City of Huntington. Beach Huntington Beach, CA 92647
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
18 . IMMIGRATION
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for full compliance with
the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and
shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United
States Code regarding employment verification.
AFJ547 9
19 . LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED
CONSULTANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for
payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and
that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of
services contemplated hereunder . CONSULTANT understands that
pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter § 309, the City Attorney
is the exclusive legal counsel for CITY; and CITY shall not be
liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by
CONSULTANT.
20 . ENTIRETY
The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth
the entire Agreement between the parties .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers
the day, month and year first above written.
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,
ARCHITECTS, INC. A municipal corporation
,(/ of the State
���� of California
/ • if{-LAk
T. V. An bony, Prepent
�� Mayor
By; -
Roger Willnif, Secrectary/Treasurer
ATTEST: .' • APPROVED PRO ��ED AS TO FORM:
N v%i
City Clerk � Ci At orney6..
RE A VED: ITIATED A D RO D:
City inistra or for of Public Works
AFJ547 10
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
MUNICIPAL PIER BUILDINGS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
May 14, 1993
I. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE
The City of Huntington Beach is requesting proposals from qualified architectural
firms for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and cost estimates to construct
the following buildings on the City's Municipal Pier:
1. A 620 square foot single story bermlime snack shop.
2. A 800 square foot single story bait and tackle/snack shop.
3. A 6,513 square foot two story Pierhead Restaurant.
City staff, through the design development process, has established the size, shape,
mass, colors, and materials of each building. Attached are the approved elevations
and floor plans for each structure. Each structure shall include the following
specific architectural features:
1. Exterior building surface shall be gray terrazzo.
2. Roof shall be copper with standing seams.
3. Construction techniques shall incorporate provisions for tile murals in the
recessed areas of the buildings. (Note: The finish of the area set aside for
the murals will be determined by cost. Your proposal shall include alternate
finishes and estimated costs.)
II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of architectural services, as outlined below, shall include: preparation of
construction documents, administration of bidding, technical support during
construction, and project acceptance.
Design Development Plan
1. Meet with City staff to confirm scope of work, preliminary design,
materials, budget, etc. Four Meetings
2. Coordination of tenant improvements with interior improvements. (Note:
Interior improvements will be provided by the City. These improvements, to
be contained in the project Plans and Specifications, include flooring,
ceilings, partitions, walls, utilities to tenant fixture locations, handicap lift,
stairs, and completed restrooms.) Four Meetings
•
h q
� xh . I4- A
r -
r i -
RFP: Municipal Pier Buildings
May 14, 1993
Page two
3. Confirm that buildings meet Title 24 and ADA handicap regulations.
Confirmation includes the processing of any required variances.
4. Determine utility requirements for each structure. Determination must
include an analysis of the existing Pier utility chase capacity.
5. Determine structural support requirements for each structure and compare to
current load maximum of Pier.
6. Coordinate the receipt of all tenant improvement plans.
Preparation of Construction Documents
1. Prepare all Plans, Specifications, and cost estimates including, but not limited
to, the following items:
. Pier location plans
. Respective building floor plans
. Exterior elevations and sections
. Reflected ceiling plans
. Schedules
. Roof plans
. Interior elevations
. Details
. Structural framing plans and details
. Structural calculations
. Electrical power and lighting plans
. Electrical schedules and details
. Plumbing plans, schedules, and details
. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
. Title 24 energy calculations
. Interior handicap lift plans
2. Perform all necessary investigations and measurements required to prepare the
preliminary plans and construction drawings.
3. Attend periodic meetings with City staff during the preparation of preliminary
and construction drawings and obtain all applicable building permits. (Note: A
pre-submittal "on-site" meeting has been scheduled for May 20, 1993, at 10:00
AM to discuss in detail the scope of services and intent of project. See
location map for direction to meeting.)
4. Based on an approval of the preliminary plans and cost estimates, the architect
shall prepare and provide 40 sets of the necessary construction drawings and
specifications as required to advertise the project for bids. (Note: This task
includes the cost of all miscellaneous printing, etc. for preliminary plan check
and final drawings.)
Administration of Bidding
The advertising for bids and awarding of a contract for these buildings will be
administered by City staff. However, the architect will be required to:
1. Distribute bid documents (i.e., Plans and Specifications will be purchased at
architects's office.)
r - -
RFP: Municipal Pier Buildings
May 14, 1993
Page three
2. Address and issue all addendas (includes fielding all inquiries/questions about
Plans and Specifications.)
3. Assist in informal evaluation of bids.
Technical Support During Construction
1. Interpret Plans and Specifications
2. Review all shop drawings
3. Respond to all requests for information.
4. Make recommendations on Change Orders.
5. Attend weekly job site meetings.
Project Acceptance Assistance
1. Conduct final project review and prepare "punch list."
2. Provide one acceptable set of reproducible "as—builts" mylar drawings. (Note:
10% of the contract amount will be withheld until the "as—builts" are submitted
and approved.)
III. INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM THE CITY
Preliminary plans depicting the location, size, and form of each building are attached
for reference. In addition, a conceptual cost estimate, prepared on October 4, 1991,
is included with this request.
IV. ARCHITECT'S REPRESENTATIVE
The Architect will assign a responsible representative and an alternate, who both shall
be identified in the proposal. The Architect's representative will remain in
responsible charge through project completion. If the Architect's primary
representative should be unable to continue with the project, then the Architect's
alternate representative will become the primary representative. Any other changes
in responsible representative must be approved by the City. The City will have the
right to reject other proposed changes in personnel, and may consider any other
changes in responsible personnel as a breach of the contract.
V. CITY'S REPRESENTATIVE
The Public Works Department will assign a responsible representative to assume
liaison responsibilities for the City.
VI. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The Architect shall maintain the following minimum insurance coverages during the
duration of the project:
1. General Liability Coverage — $1,000,000 CLS per occurrence (Note: If
provided coverage is under a form which includes a designated general
aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1,000,000.)
•
i r
RFP: Municipal Pier Buildings
May 14, 1993.
Page four
2. Professional Liability Coverage - $500,000 per occurrence (Note: A "claims
made" policy is acceptable.)
3. Worker's Compensation Coverage - $100,000 bodily injury by accident, each
accident; $100,000 bodily injury by disease, each employee; $250,000 bodily
injury by disease, policy limit.
VII. FORM OF AGREEMENT
The Architect will enter into an agreement with the City based on the contents of
this RFP, the Architect's proposal, and a standard form of agreement.
XIII. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
Proposals for this service are to be submitted to this office no later than 5:00 P.M. on
Friday. May 28. 1993. Seven copies of the proposal should be submitted in a sealed
envelope. Two copies of the fixed fee proposal should be submitted in a separate,
sealed envelope, marked "Fee Proposal."
Each proposal should include the following information:
1. Experience of Your Firm
a. List and describe the projects for which you have provided architectural
services which are similar in scope to the Municipal Pier Buildings. Is the
team you propose to employ on this project the same one used on identified
past projects?
b. Brief history of firm. Including length of time in business. Include
information on any sub-consultants who would be involved in the project.
c. Identify all projects within the last five years that have entered into
litigation. Explain the circumstances surrounding the issue of litigation.
2. Project Team
a. Who will be in charge of the project; what staff will be assigned to the
project, and what will be the team structure and responsibilities?
b. How long has the person in charge been with your firm?
c. List specific projects that this team has worked on together, as well as
individually.
d. What percentage of each individual's time will be devoted to this project?
e. From what location will this office operate?
3. Proposal Format
Proposals should contain no more than approximately 20 pages, including exhibits.
Fee proposals should contain only enough pages to clearly indicate the breakdown
of proposed fees. It is not necessary to include a breakdown of labor hours.
Y C
RFP: Municipal Pier Buildings
May 14, 1993
Page five
The following features should be included or incorporated in the proposal:
a. Page numbering
b. Index
c. Team organization chart with names
d. Understanding of the Project
e. Descriptions of similar projects
f. Brief resumes of key staff
g. Hourly rate schedule (fee proposal only)
IX. INTERVIEWS
A short list of firms may be required to make an oral presentation at an interview
panel after proposal evaluation.
X. EVALUATION CRITERIA
The criteria below will be used in evaluating proposals and interviews. A point value
system will be established, based on the approximate weighting indicated below. Fee
proposals will be opened for only top rated firms after ratings are completed. At that
time, fee may have some effect on the rating.
1. (15%) Understanding the project requirements
2. (15%) Approach to project
3. (20%) Experience of firm
4. (20%) Qualifications and experience of project team
5. ( 5%) Past performance record with City
6. (15%) Completeness of proposal
7. (10%) Commitment
DRN:gd
Attachments:
1. Approved Elevations and Floor Plans
2. Location Map for Pre-Submittal Meeting
3. Conceptual Cost Estimate
3421g/1-5
.;.} IEG:.•...3 t,•--NT k ....f:r� ts014r¢' ... M, 1 aa+ry,« a:g..: ; Y...,...fS'' (•.rfo.-4 !/ 4,
7,
..h: l, C
(�.
� .zax.;
[(: ) ati A i e .dVd @ $y
•w ? Y;� Y, ,,:i^:•r.4rS';?k ' ' ` 06/0./93s ,r ., x :.4: :S F ;�.;yA.,,,t,: 4;: .,r .i . n,nS�!L 3:4c;7aftii p-y,ii�y..NYytor. ; ;srr !-o-..er 3sY AROOSCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND
CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE
NARVER ASSOCIATES INC. DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE
1517 FAIR OARS AVENUE POLICIES BELOW.
SO.PASADENA, CA 91030 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
LETTE
R A SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE CO
INSURED MC TT LL R B Legion Insurance Company
Anthony & Langford LETTER C Design Professionals
Attn:Connie Scheer —'-
16152 Beach Blvd.,#201LETTEARNY rt
D
Suite#201
-
Huntington Beach,CA 92647 COMPANY
LEI FE R
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POUCY EFFECTIVE POUCY EXPIRATION WAITSLTR DATE(MM/DLYYY) DATE(MM/DDWY)
• v GENERAL LIAB1UTY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABIUTY PRODUCTS-COMP/OP ADO. t
A CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR. AES000567 03/27/92 08/15/93 PERSONAL a ADV.INJURY
OWNER'S a CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one Ike) $
MED.EXPENSE(Any one penwn)1$ 1,000
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
:20 AS TO COMBINED SINGLE
ANY AUTO GAIL CORM" LIMIT
AUTOS ALL OWNED
CITY ATTORNEY BODILY INJURY $
SCHEDULED AUTOS � _�. (Per person)
HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
NON-OWNED AUTOS Deputy City (Per accident)
GARAGE LIABILITY
PROPERTY DAMAGE _
EXCESS UAIIIUTY EACH OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE $
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM • `,fi}n; ,{�"'i �� ' '`!^ "% i'jt'`Yaps •• S
..:.Sit"'f �.fZ�e' 'n$i•'. °.�;s3�i,8r�n�3r ieYn>`,.ax.i•'n't.'F.»s�YE
WORKER'S COMPENSATION STATUTORY LIMITS c �'• ,, .0mAer xas:
x bx x fee �:3f?a>'1'e:
EACH ACCIDENT $ 1.000.000
$ AND WC1002986 09/01/92 09/01/93 DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT S 1,000,000
EMPLOYERS' UADIUTY
DISEASE--EACH EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000
OTHER
C Professional PL489646.01 03/27/93 03/27/94 $500,000 ea clm/aggreg.
Liability* $25.000 deductible en clm
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
The Certificate holder is named additional insured regarding General Project! Municipal Pier Rui]-riings.
Liability&Worker's Compensation ONLY,does NOT apply to Professional
Liability.*For Professional Liability coverages,the aggregate limit is
..ln,nn/fn 5,/i uh fNr1.
a. +y
�`i,F.fist7F1Gb1.`F�F{Q1;.i31~�Fl:..,�:,...?. ..;,,z�.r.s>?s•s.....r.J. •,,..:•:,,..;.. }•G'k 1''I'G`.>rif«.f.Ih11Cl�#' �.•"#3 i?TVi1CC CQC.. pq:•f?�4.lfflitki�kii.•�:t;aett .<
r...............•...... -•. .. ,.....:.w.....r..w....r2.,,......w«...,.,..,..... ......,.,. .... t ...w....w„�n.w,.•...,,..,.,.,,.IF,.....,,.�.,.�si.:............:.. �,.��,,;.r::;--�„i::.�.
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
City of Huntington Beach ;,Ti nr
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL �nttrieteryTt
Attn:Don Noble MAIL 30_ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED To THE
2000 Main Street �f LEFT'Huntington Beach, CA 926623
,:..�:rfyYr,:,n•,,., . :,.............. .s % AUTHOR12E O R EPR.:�E S NrlTA TVEcz�: }:a!n.�:?•: as^.•n:rY: 1(� ��
/
11A
/
.. . /F .� . . ::o}}«. :. : •!Y1aY4 in : gf. 1:0dVov : ! ia .: aa � / , M p}
.. .. ..•, .�• j i r.. .. ..t.:. {••�/i? : i ,. •>: '...vi ....y. -i. ::,.e,...:: • :::•.44 ..,,,:✓:(,,..:,....�!ii;%!%/.`,,....t„..„.i;
..:/....y.,,...rr.'r•tyLl,.:��.:.•r..::5,.i..s:..,l. .r....:'tal.!!ri.!a! y .;a'•, ..%c•I .I.f
•:>.. r.•,. !•f:•I:•9•.. ,:Ef:r .:i.,,..„, �` •:r::•v.•I•..r..fn../Y.•:•II :Ir•:
ii}.r s( t Ir :r•I q •t:
iSi !t. .i.. rrr`
!l�V�iVl�J l:l'i t�'� e�'x!.!.j,ir!ij!ifi)- J�,l�','��. r' i lira.ti,li.,;.:;.....4:i.uer•i 'i i
i. .$:. 'f�iJ1:, •l ••!1!}S�: 1 �iSi� ++��,, , ....R.,rrni'��iiilii 1ri i ininiiii "iiii' •trrrli�r'••Y:
;.,s:. 'v,.kr :4.. ..;.s:., ,� ,,R xv1 �..ar> -:G}•. f2f,.. .0 „/ h.1.. .1 .0. .1.1.....1?.rl:r:✓orra" ,7.. ..:i:`r,F',• ,.rr f:ti 'Fi':^.iYi •;,t.`.i.'°1� I` ) +:•L. r.:.,. ,.rn5:.�..u.; ,,;,i r. !:�• S2 „•},t:`t,•n � „d5 ,xo: w•h x•.� t •r .t:r 3:$ar,..a�ra.'r1r'.,p,���.���1}:s•.4 ,t..£`'r1.L& 's,.,{,£!S:rr' .,};. .t3x.....SF'•:fn;r,,uu c.99 n �„.,, 9r' •:r't' ^r , 3"•:_t ,�. • 7,Y;,^'s ,r, r'. .u.fl,vo- ;fi, }x•: ,,.:. " s; •p'a,Ym' �s v ti x,,,.. t h fi $'!' .,, o .' 4' �' •q 40 r4,1Q•Y Yf Ylls7zl m�St! !d�! �SIS!I CQ � !'s� n r t> ?� kl t:•1+� x 3' xY£ x x� �x ti.'T'b> 'S,k, . �.s:?i y.. u rr tif.. ''stk � 7�.x � ._ �%r�c'x�'HriSr r;oisS , :..4!:e. R:.!S!.' `sx ��.>.R• x•!c•.....tu�i:�f....:kks.c' 'S);�u,ex..f..R�tx;s3:Zk¢�#ia;;r. �.
•i. 4
•
INSURED: Anthony & Langford i
•
3 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLESISPECIAL ITEMS.(Continued)_
4
the total insurance available for all covered claims presented within the
policy period.The limits will be reduced by payments of indemnity and
expense.
.,„.. . . _. . . .. .. , , , .... ..• • .. .. . _ ...
•
-t
c.
•
I
!1
.1
t
, •
i
•
i.
5 ,
S.
t
{
Zi
o-
1z ,
1
A .71'n r cvr-- "O" ;m!n n,.v +.v., tI i r.C:.,!f•�
fII .vr.rrf.:i}:.r.ay. ::r:. .:f.. :�'Y'':%I fi�
}
GENERAL ENDORSEMENT
In consideration of an additional premium of ivi; '14d , it is
.Hereby uriclex_: tuod 4.And agr :d f-h.f+t the tc;llowing applies
ADDITIONAL INSURED
Check ifapplicable - ,+
7 .� � .
Md Honk 1 in{-;u' ed/s aq respects work cone by Named insured.
Check if applicable _
With respect to clr:�ims arising out of the operations oft rNamed
insured, 'such insurande as afforded by this policy s Pr
• y and
t r contributing with any other insurance
1 to O
is not ac3di c.1.Q�nS 1 T _cured/s .
'rind r
wi•ncrl" r'1c3t9t,tZ
%ITTV 'T! (IV qUnTMCATIOt"
Check if applicable
It is understood and agreed that tnf. Comps uy waivi the right of
nal lnsLlred/s, tut only as
above Additional subrogation against the � i,
respects the job or pre,uiL,es ,dest.....i_bed s . r}:e e,:tIz-t:ificatO attached
Check if applicable ccrrrar' ki u�; as insureds
;� �� pe.; r
7 5c.n, . trm r,
The naming of more than r•-•.-
under this policy shall not, tor tti:i is r'easvr. alone:, extinguish any
ins agax rst another, t:but Yis endorsement, and the
rights of one i,.�
naming of multiple insureds, shill not i c ' -ace the tr tal. liability
of the Company under this c.olicy.
Check if applicable X __ witi� x't uut. wvt<.ltiy
It is understood and agr.eed Heat li; the: overt of cE.n.'',?-?.a3± days
the
Policy for any reason other inc��n non-payment
�-Ort7�.f,icatt-'f holder by mail.
Yn
written notice will be sent to the
the event the policy is cancelled for non-payment of plei.iium, 10
days written notice will be sent: to the above
Policy No. ,%Es000567 Effective date: v3-2'2-92 to 08--_ L-33 Pxtension,
Insurance Company: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Issued to: d.NTHOT]Y & LAh1CFORn A,Rc'!-ilT°F'9E:+
t�uthori.Zf_d feprese riltative r , ---- --
Issue date: ��-u3-
— .J11-11I LI.D ZIJ .I.J.•.DO. ,....F,IJIrIL- ' UllJJ1-1L.I.- .1.11J. JC.17.V1k...L r.C-
;bi-."' ."":7M"...3";',W., ',,, ' l'',. .-. '''',! ''i. :...1- . '''.!.,' !.';',..,..:;'4';:::•.':; . :'4 i ;-V '8;1•1,.': -'1':7'i.;, •.74'''''-4'''''1' r.'''t 't iiEB:474-a1;6'0'A; "."'" •
j::j A001t1). ri --.. -,4. .' i•-! (WA,,,i 4, it) , ,' ... 4 7, :?.<9;t: •;!!!''...."...'.!:'.;• ,‘ ,:• b",.,4...„ ...
oes,(:)8/93
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND
CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE
DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE
CRYSTAL AND CUNDALL POLICIES BELOW.
432 SOUTH BREA BOULEVARD COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
BREA CA 921 „ , „..,, ... . "..._
TT
comPAN ^YA HARTFORD INSURANCE. CO
LIER
. COMPANY n
LETTER PR
INSURED .„,
ANTHONY t34 LANGFORD COMPANY r%
LETTER
16152 BEACH BLVD. =201 COMPANY r%
HUNTINGTON EACH, CA 92647 LETTER I°
.... ,
COMPANY a
LETTER
0,0§,,,,,,I,„.,..,7 ,,,,,,:. '.,,,,:;, „ .•,•,,,••,..,7;,,,„,,:, ,,,,,‘„,.. ,,,•,. ft.',:',1- ,..'.''' .j.':.;',- ..,;:',.3, . A,i1..:' ';4:" .jdU 4V'' 111,1 ,:i./...:.41-T. •cf„,v• ,, , „, ,,,„ ,,,„.„ , ,„, . .,,,,...„ ,,,,,„
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS,
•
COI ;POLICY BFFECTIVI:POLICY EXPIRATION1
TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER LIMITS
LTR DATE(MMiDDNY) DATE(MMiCIDNY) ;
GENERAL LIABILITY '
. i GENERAL AGGREGATE ;S
i „ • . _ ..
i i COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY •
1 PRODUCTS-COMP/OP A601. 1 3
L'il' "" 'I '. " -..—,.....„-.........,-.-
r1 ''..• I CLAIMS MADE, OCCUR. PERSONAL&ADV.INJURY I$
: ... .
•OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT i EACH OCCURRENCE IS
I-—I
I I FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) I S
—. „ „- .i. _
MED.EXPENSE(Any Ono pere300, $
. .
A 1 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY . 721.JECHV3709 ,03/06/93 03/06/91+ i COMBINED SINGLE I$
,_.... .,
; ANY AUTO I LIMIT
....1.1..,00,Q.g..Q,09.
i ....]ALL OWNED AUTOS ••
' BODILY INJURY
R SCHEDULED AUTOS APPROVED AS TO F0111Ia ,(Per peeeOrt) $!
;.X... . j HIRED AUTOS GAIL HUTTON ;
:BOotLY INJURY 1$
g .1NoN•owNED AUTOS C AT , i(Per accident)
! ' GARAGE LIABILITY B ----3 I;)
!----1 ! PROPERTY DAMAGE S
1)Ppiitir City Attoieney . .
EXCESS LIABILITY ! ;EACH OCCURRENCE I $
UMBRELLA FOAM :
• I AGGREGATE $
,
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM • ' , ',10P'''A. :.:;741:7,, ;7: ri,T!1: 0',,, ,. ..,';.,
. .. . ..,.• .
; j STATUTORY LIMITS ,• ,• i:d„t;,A:- •;,
WORKER'S COMPENSATION i
AND •TEACH ACCIDENT
!$
4 DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT• I $
EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY
DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE: $'
I
OTHER
0111.1.110.401.•1=1•••••' MAINIWNON
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SpECIAL ITEMS
PROJECT NAME: MUNICIPAL PIER
CERTIFICATE HOLDER IS NAMED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED
..0,A IRO* , ' ' : .. ';',,. ., ....!* ':. ,,.;;;?.iLiiie.':akf:%lik!..de.40 ,, Eli ;010*;;;',4;.4::,.;0:,1;;:4....,l.:46,40!...,."1........!..*:::',',. .J,,,,,,',44.::.1 . ,,„:•.!'4;,i
•,;1 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATJON DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL BPIEMPPRIPPINIREPI
CI1Y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
L'. MAIL al-.DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
...
ATTN DON NOBLE _.. . - . . ._ . --- - -- - - --
,!..i LEFT,
2 000 II AIN SIRE:LEI
r. I-• - -
HUNTINIGTON BCH ,, CA 92648
.. i,AUTHORIZED
• • 4.
c„.
;,:-,,! -,•• • ji,,,,,4".4 „,:•.,; •,,,,,, '
ACORD 25-30/90) ',],...4.7:' :::.'Zl . ..lie.-iif: '‘.,;:th;.):;'. 446.:..1.4•I',:,:for:-...:•,Or?jie...,;., ,;:i:.'' :LAI,' CACORD CORPORATION 1991)
1
4
1
t5bi. 7I)33V
ljtIVNI4
'
I I
ANTHONY AND LANs. FOR ] / ARCHITECTS,, INC.
BALANCE SHEET
APRII. 30, 1993
ASSETS•
•CURREt T ASSETS
Cash $6,618
Accounts Receivable $530, 323
Less Allowances For Doubtful Accounts (10,000) 520,323
Prepaid Expenses 4,398
Employee Advances 6,035
Total Current Assets 537 ,374
DEPREdIABLE ASSETS
Office Equipment 1/ts? 240
Automobile
Leasehold Improvements R7 ,h8
_35 , .08
Less: Accumulated Depreciation 215,095 20,613
OTHER ASSETS
Deposits 1 ,711
• Gooidwill 69,448 71,179
TOTAL
$629,166
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS ' F n TT T T Y
CURRENT I.TARTLTTTES
Contracts Payable $5,555
Payroll Taxes Payable 0
Accrued Expenses 44,129
Accounts Payable 209,626
Loans Payable - Officer 2,848
Total Current Liabilities 262,151
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Comion Stock $5,000
Retained Earnings 362,015 367,015
TOTAL $629, 166
Min
The accompanying letter is an integral part of this statement.
-1-
ANTHONY AND E.1NGFV)RD / ARCHITECTS, INC.
STATEMENT 01( 1NCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS
YEAR ENDED THREE MONTHS ENDED
APRIL 30, 1993 APRIL 30, 1993
' GROSS BILLING $1,363,148 $450,168
' LESS: . ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 434.900 21R 045
NET r7ES BILLED 928 ,248 100.00% 232 121 100.00%
• T.T A z.rT ,.,.,c•T c
Salar .es <: ,d C,rxtract Services 386 ,878 41.68% 13;' .664 57.58%
Rep,o,.1_,c':i : sts 27,918 3 .01% 4,939 2.13%
414,796 44.69% 138 601 59 .71%
,. IT (LOSS) - 573 ,452 55 . 3 % s2ri 40 .29%
96 '291, '!) a'39 10.07%
-,1. 44, 7;1 4 .7 7% 7.25%
. 2 619 r, )):',w !1 12%
80,902 u . T2* 1 . 8 .23%
13,467 1 !t` 4.1%
- •, _ P"Ono i j ort ':f.297. c%
44 88:i %
lc 91 '
"T ,972 0 87%
14, 659 0.66%
6 ,357 ;, 0.92%
4 ,45 0. 55%
93 . 0.10%
16. 412 1 .68%
254 51.38%
in. 62 .198 -11 09%
18,860 ; ,6,;
(70,776) -1 ;: 06%
(10,000) ..' -1.08%
:.1 282 . . -23.07%
Retain.- ' r;ninv 164 495
1 F- a - - - —1:: 4'30/92 (2 ,722)
RET, EARNINGS . ENDING $362,015 .
The accompanying letter is an integral part of this statement.
_2_
1
•
OWNERSHIP OF INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
The City acknowledges that the Design Professional 's plans and
specifications are instruments of professional service intended
for one-time use on this project only. Nevertheless , the plans
and specifications shall become the property of the City. In
consideration thereof , the City, agrees to hold harmless ,
indemnify, and defend the Architect from, and against any and all
claims , liabilities , losses , damages , and costs , including but
not limited to costs of defense arising out of the modifications ,
misinterpretation, or misuse of the- plans and specifications .
fi!,4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
�
KF 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
June 22, 1993
Anthony & Langford, Inc.
16152 Beach Blvd. , Suite 201
Huntington Beach, CA 92747
Attn: T. V. Anthony, President
The CityCouncil of the Cityof Beach at the regular meeting
Huntington9
of the City Council approved a Professional Services Contract between
the City of Huntington Beach and Anthony and Langford for Architectural
Services to prepare plans for certain buildings on the Municipal Pier.
Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement.
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
CB:bt
Enc.
(Telephone:714-536-5227)
• 1 ssi
IV
r.1 k
f
oo4i
•
• 0
OE
• •
I LL• A
•
7] 70 6! 60 7fi
.lw) 13 10 33 ]0 73 7UI I] 10 Y 1a57••
7 • I (RAMC Cows,Q• IL 1 BCRY UNC yIAQIydP �NIGIwAY
NCAO RCSrAURANT 1 q��/ - OM i iACKI[,/SHAptAIOP • 1 1R�YYORYCR PAD 1
— I CS _
1 1 L
I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 (.]
•
• :RFSTROOY BET I I UrCUARO RIR I; I I I w N
<4k.„ •
liko.e3• I I I I I I m z
, ... 1 1141 MEANING STATION(TYPICAL) I Z Z
PLAN u S
1' _00• Zm
Z
• • 1e70.77' I ►ACC a 1.*STWC Z CC
• �flLIA1HIHC wwLL W
' ) YCAN 1ep1 MATCR(4.77 uLLw) I =d
[ • 1
DECK EL 3e•ulLw l /� _ L' •
I�1 - / �L—(I� l(-- {— {L— DCCR [l. 7.5!•uLLw
•BCHI® - hd----H,--_-1,,---+=----'
—� I •Hd 1 1 11 t1 I=1 H1-1-1=1 +i O UMW aO .
. .
•
__
• ,
• •
. ,
.. . .
_ .(? I. — eo� ,Y
• MOT - 11
11-i6<c A,Re-;4EuMIN fL>tis
INTcNC.) 'To INOIGATe- LOCATGN, E
MA SING,R M a\ SIT.66: '��` "'I;UIL0NQ FINIFI-i MA:c�lok , OA)
CG. ,CeTAiL- erc. •WIU, a.
Sx^RMInteo AT IkfrURt
Ce--0 1.1 Ft-IAA,e. ...• Ili
L ''""'""1
r Arvy %, la°+I i
•uW ( / ' ' 'i
opp• p.;
..... >•
i .
orn • •
��
n z 'L.J'tsrk OW Iff7r_: ��
a 0 . .v,ati . .
fill '
or.,+ ty`O`l1�/�l3 l�dJJ�I JLtl05 J . ., .Chi-.V,.. . . l'OreA3'ra 154eaHLt •-. . ..-
Jm . ti •
f)Ill1 .:
D. ,
_ I�3d- \• ,
Y '--1 1 1 1 1 1 '
-1.------------____ . ,2,..............._______.„-t. . .
t •
o.► 14 lint LvA 13 19(Z-tW roil . -J'.M .. • • - �Gi.LVA3-1:1 1sgN11-U.-2N:••:.•_._. - -•--•
iiii. 1 iiihimmimumsdiAmmi...H: . . .
il
on
1 11
1 1
I II _ •
(
.r•
-
..1
. , • - .
. . • • ;I
.....•
• 1
1''
•
•
. . •.
•
.
. • . .
1--------------•-
N •
. . . • . - . - .-
- .
. i ! ...
. .
/„A \
‘ . .
- I I I Ilk
I
_.
- -
'4. \
. .
. - •111
. . .
. .. \ • 111
.
tir
1_
\71 1
:
•1 • .
1 ., • 0
1111 4 , __ i g
,t 1-----1
1 \
•
...- \
1
%
, 1 1.%),,, • __ _j
...
1 .
i \/
• \ •
I ,. \ / •
i• • .
0/ .
/
/ • Z I
• .
• •
•
1"' I::uo•
•
•
•
.
. ,
•
..v.
•• . ,v.c.,.,
. t .
1 - .
L
E .
1 .
F .
•
g
,
,..
, Illr
•
—,1
. • .
•
i • ,
• -
' .
j ..
. .
' I 7 ...'Nrr 1 7C.K.L.5.1 HUNTINGTON BEACH
IP c.71......4.11114.14
2 'SNACKS:1C? • PIER BUILDINGS I 1
‘•••—_____________.______
c•351P
ta.14.14 II=
I
•
•
r-�• . . coot ; ',-e . a,.
• eay
Si
f-----
H LOWE./Z LEvELs
s • O _' Va co • u.r t. (Fa1i FWNT) • 3�5
•
•
6EATIN6'
�, \ bl e LOWER LWE Evet- �•
Oil
, 16c, TOTAL-.
�, EXIT C uPPGRE1 1 F,/ w i. : \0.Ill
. :, . • / i 0 OS I,;d4{& \App
hiel• .4/ : 1._ .. •
�'(-(-
i
Aka" tit
/1.
- • 1 t-rr cur ..5th
1. ■ �� � ! WINDOW
I-0 M . •
A,, Krrcrr�N I •
DINING `"' b
1/..*.4
z
(N.:.? • \ \TO -1--- / Mt,1 / • 7 Ili
. . \ / IM 0 . pr / •
F-NT1ZY• a,
1 S•.' [nw...n
mow•
—
t-wc i a, Ill I 6
wWE I. 1--. moofc n-At'l 10949'
I 1 1 I 1
J \ •
- .
-
�� \
j -
/lIl
1 I 1 f
if
73
♦ I 11,\
..C1 110
P \ ,
/le anD a D.4 D o !o� 10� o I\
-, o 0 o Q1-Io . •
I\\
COD ODaEjb
•
f \
I
L ,-- ,,,,, .
.�\ .... \ ij f ;
` ;
l rn \ /
3 �\ - 0 z i \
-, 0 Q . O `e
0 •
n1
■
•
•
--I
I tp 1 7*
r
GI
•
a i t 4 [I:1E4'415,0 HUNTINGTON BEACH �o......+, J
1 R%ST' J cA4T PIER BUILDINGSit
RONYi. II II CC;
1 +,. ( I I
�. -- 1
,� fl
of',
•
1 - .
3113
1
5 . l' 1
t •
-I
) ..
•
I 1
-t'll-F-) 1
I \I I
—
di /1 •
,(1111°111.1111111:" .
I
. I ) '
4.
0
I ��
0-
moo•! ,
•
.
( l 1(
i I b- i cI1PZ
I I II .e.
I HTHdAfj PIER BUILDINGS
•
•
s
�o �ti
—_
BOLSA AVE. p
Mc FADDEN AVE. Pre —SUbrnitta�
N •
f \ /
EDINGERQ W _N AVE. " O n —S I e•
� zY ? Q o o W = Eli /•
HEILo ��z 3 AVE. \
m N J O a 0 0 0
. ti Q El m WARNER N W of AVE. /
I� _ Thursday
SLATER AVE. o / \
405 May 20 , 1993
co
• TALBERT AVE. r / I 1 0 :0 0 AM
A I
90 _ y
�� ELLIS `VE. /
�� ; At
GARFIELD m _AVE.
0 • i
\\ CO �'' YORKTOWN AVE. 3
Entrance to Pier
�Sl oN., AD I S AVE. tin rr \ Main St. @ Pacific Coast Hw .
1gti4 _ y
• �, INDIANAPOLIS AVE. x /
F' S n o
N `41ATLJTA g g 14 AVE. m \
0 /
0 Z HAMILTON AVE.• N
414_ BANNING / •
AVE. \ /
��
0 1/2 1 MILE
VICINITY MAP
_
•
•
•
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
PIER BUILDINGS
CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE
CAI #1143
OCTOBER 4, 1991
•
•
•
•
•
Prepared for: The City of Huntington Beach
Prepared by: Construction Analysts, Inc.
PREFACE TO THE ESTIMATE
The.following has been compiled based on discussions .with the City of Huntington Beach
representative. Documents furnished as a basis for estimating included conference
memorandums between the City of Huntington Beach and the Architect, a site plan, preliminary
floor plan and elevations for each building. Accordingly, this estimate should be used for
general budget purposes with the understanding that significant changes to the actual cost could
occur as the design is developed.
The estimate has also been adjusted for geographical location based d on local material and labor
rates as well as local construction practice.
In the current buyer's market for construction our experience shows the following results on
competitive bids, as a differential from CAI final estimates:
1 Bid +16 to 30%
2-3 Bids +.6 to 15%
4-5 Bids - 5 to 5%
6-7 Bids -10 to -4%
Accordingly, it is extremely important that the owner maintain continuous contact with the
bidders during the bidperiod to assure himself of a minimumb of 4-5 bids!
Opinion of Cost
An opinion of cost shall be construed as an indefinite evaluation of cost based upon historical
representative cost of similar structures, produced from plans and/or criteria during early stages
a es
g
of design commonly indicated as schematic or concept level. The estimator will add items which
are not on the plans and use judgement but, cannot know in total what the A & E will include
later.
Estimate of Cost
Comprised of a survey of the quantities measured from plans and specifications beyond the
schematic stage, commonly known as design development of working drawings. Historical costs
are used as the basis of pricing plus judgmental evaluation by the estimator. The estimator will
add those items which may not appear in the plan, but which he deems may later be included
bythe A & E.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
PIER BUILDINGS
CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE
CAI #1143.est
GENERAL NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS
A. The project consists of five (5) buildings to be built on the new Huntington
Beach Pier. They are:
1. Bermline Snack Shop - Approximately 620 square feet
2. Life Guard Tower - Approximately 378 square feet
3. Restroom Building - Approximately 800 square feet
4. Bait and Tackle/Snack Shop - Approximately 800 square feet
5. Pierhead Restaurant - Approximately 6510 square feet
B. All buildings are of one level except the Life Guard Tower which is three
(3) levels and the Pierhead Restaurant which is two (2) levels.
C. All buildings are of frame construction with terrazzo wall finish and a
plaster finish at all future tile insets, wood casement windows, and a copper
standing seam roof.
D. The exterior tile finish has not been included in this estimate.
E. Tenant furnishing and equipment for the Bermline Snack Shop, Bait and
Tackle/Snack Shop and the Pierhead Restaurant are not included.
F. Utilities have been figured as being available at each building site.
..... ••. ,.... ..... , . , . •
PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH PIER BUILDINGS ! DATE - 10/04/91
ESTIMATE ; CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE • JOB NO 1143
. • . ...... .....
TYPE CSI 16 DIVISION •
ARCH/ENG RON YEO, FAIA ARCHITECT, INC. PREP • M. SKERRITT s -
LOCATION •• HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA • . CHECK- R. SINDELAR
ESC FACT 2:00%. ........
.......... •
s•- " "". • • . . ........
GEO FACT I
MKT FACT 0.000./0! . . ,•
DESC PROJECT SUMMARY- • •
•
TOTAL
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE
COST
. -BERMLINE SNACK SHOP
114,714
_ .
• LIFE GUARD TOWER
112,850
• RESTROOM BUILDING
154,021
• BAIT AND TACKLE/SNACK SHOP
122,937
•
•
PIERHEAD RESTAURANT SHELL,
813,055
TOTAL ESTIMATED 3.111079 :
ALTERNATE:
1. EXTERIOR FINISH TO BE CEMENT PLASTER WITH
DRIVIT FINISH IN LIEU OF TERRAZZO FINISH. DEDUCT: (81,807)
•
•
•
1. . .
• PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH PIER BUILDINGS DATE 10/04/91
. .
1-. .ESTIMATE CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE JOB NO ' 1143 •
,.. .. . TYPE CSI 16 DIVISION .
ARCH/ENG RON YEO, FAIA ARCHITECT, INC. PREP M. SKERRI
t•
1. .LOCATION HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA CHECK R. SINDELl
. .ESC FACT 2.00%
•:
'GEO FACT 0.00% '
•MKT FACT 0.00%
BERM LINE LIFE GUARD RESTROOM BAIT&TACKLE PIERHEAD
• ITEM
' .
NO SECTION DESCRIPTION SNACK SHOP TOWER BUILDING SNACK SHOP RESTAURANT TOTAL
t .
•
. 2.1 . DEMOLITION &SPECIAL CONDITIONS 2,040 1,800 300 300 600 5,04
•
3.1 CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS 1,240 252 1,600 1,600 6,980 11,6
5.1 STRUCTURAL STEEL 0 0 0 0 14,625 14,6;
• . 5.5 MISC. IRON AND ARCH. METALS 0 18,070 4,420 0 7,100 29,5!
6.1 CARPENTRY, ROUGH 9,448 7,303 11,518 10,433 89,275 127,9
6.2 CARPENTRY, FINISH 2,090 1,020 0 1,800 7,110 12,0;
• • 7.1 . WATERPROOFING 0 531 0 0 0 5:
•
. . .7.2 • THERMAL AND SOUND INSULATION 925 596 0 1,205 4,070 6,71
7.3 ROOFING AND RIGID INSULATION 8,424 3,816 11,580 11,580 50,188 85,51
7.6 • SHEET METAL AND SKYLIGHTS 2,328 300 3,064 2,523 7,621 15,8:
• '7.9 CAULKING AND SEALANTS 300 300 300 300 2,000 3,2(
8.1 HOLLOW METAL WORK 2,596 2,115 821 2,596 4,653 12,7f
8.2 WOOD DOORS & FRAMES 0 0 0 0 3,800 3,8(
8.5,8 • GLASS, GLAZING AND SASH 7,752 8,400 3,952 . 11,172 50,328 81,6(
8.7 • FINISH HARDWARE 1,400 1,750 450 1,400 3,850 8,8:
. .
• 9.1 • LATH, PLASTER, FURRING & STUDS 2,151 0 7,164 2,151 ' 5,283 16,74
9.2 • • GYP. WALLBOARD, FURRING &STUD 2,166 2,042 0 3,334 17,514 25,0f.
• 9.3 CERAMIC TILE AND TERRAZZO 19,494 23,039 33,467 18,584 103,507 198,0
. .
9.5 ACOUSTICAL TILE 1,079 0 0 0 10,432 11,51
. .
. .
. .
. .. .
• .
_ .
• . .
•. ,
• _ . .
. -
. .
- - CAI 10/0091 HUNTINGTON BEACH PIER BUILDINGS - MATRIX SUMMARY 1
ITEM - . . BERMLINE LIFE GUARD RESTROOM BAIT&TACKLE PIERHEAD
• . ' NO .SECTION DESCRIPTION SNACK SHOP TOWER BUILDING SNACK SHOP RESTAURANT TOTAL
. . .
. .
. .
9.7 : RESILIENT FLOORING 1,400 882 0 2,000 16,122 20,4
' • . . ' 9.8 PAINTING . 1,738 3,007 1,841 2,219 10,974 19,7
.. , 10.15 . - TOILET PARTITIONS 0 0 5,400 0 1,350 6,7,
. . 10.4• . TOILET ACCESSORIES 684 429 1,961 0 2,286 5,31
•' .
10.5 • • BUILDING SPECIALTIES, GENERAL 275 275 275 275 700 1,81
14.0. CONVEYING SYSTEMS 0 0 0 0 25,000 25,01
. .
15.1 . PLUMBING • 3,900 3,575 15,585 0 24,325 47,31
. • , 15.3 HEATING, VENTILATING & AIR CON 4,960 . 2,016 0 6,400 48,825 62,21
. . 15.55. FIRE PROTECTION 1,860 1,134 .2,400 2,400 13,020 20,8'
ELECTRICAL WORK . • 9,679 3,848 11,960 11,960 91,672 129,1'
. .
• . -
.•
SUBTOTAL 0:40i.!iin'iMigi!E 87,929 86,500 118,058 94,232 623,210 iiiiiiNiiiK39:i
. •.:•.... .
. .
. .
" • • .1.1. GENERAL CONDITIONS • 8.50% 7,474 7,353 10,035 8,010 52,973 85,84
• .
17.1 CONTINGENCY 12.00% 10,551 10,380 14,167 11,308 74,785 121,fi
. .
. . • • . 17.2 ESCALATION 2.00% 1,759 1,730 2,361 1,885 12,464 20,1
. .
SUBTOTAL0 ::.g.!; ;A.;R: - 107,713 105,963 144,621 115,434 763,432 tiliiii117.i.U5tq
' • .
.. ... ...... .,..:,,,,,,,,,,,,::•,,,,,,,,::::::::: .
. .
. .
. .
. .
• BONDS 1.50% 1,616 1,589 2,169 1,732 11,451 18,5E.
• . .
•
. • •CONTRACTOR'S FEE 5.00% 5,386 5,298 7,231 5,772 38,172 61,8E.
. ..
. .
. .
•
:.'...:TOTAIESTAMMI:Y,i,:;,PRICE 114,714 112,850 154,021 122,937 813,055 Ifi11517;457
• •
• .
•
. •
• - .. . . • • .
: .
• ,
•
. .
• ,
. .. .
•
• •
• • .
.. . •
• :
. . .
- • .
. . . .
• . , . . , :. . .
. •
. •
. . . .. . '
. .
. . _ . .
- CAI 10/04/91 HUNTINGTON BEACH PIER BUILDINGS - MATRIX SUMMARY 2
: •
• -,
PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH PIER BUILDINGS DATE 10/04/91
ESTIMATE CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE JOB NO 1143
. _
TYPE CSI 16 DIVISION
- • .
ARCH/ENG RON YEO, FAIA ARCHITECT, INC PREP M. SKERRITT
LOCATION . HUNTINGTON BEACH, -CA - 1. CHECK R. SINDELAR
ESC FACT 2.00°/0
. i . • .
GEO FACT 0.000/0
MKT FACT 0.00%
•
DESC BERMLINE SNACK SHOP . . .
BLDG SF 620
ITEM
SQ Fr TOTAL
NO SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE
COST COST
2.1 DEMOLITION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
3.29 2,040
3.1 CONCRETE WORK
2.00 1,240
5.1 STRUCTURAL STEEL
0.00 NONE
5.5 MISC. IRON AND ARCHITECTUAL METALS 0.00 NONE
6.1 CARPENTRY, ROUGH
15.24 9,448
• 6.2 CARPENTRY, FINISH
3.37 2,090
7.1 WATERPROOFING
0.00 NONE
7.2 THERMAL AND SOUND INSULATION
1.49 925
7.3 ROOFING AND RIGID INSULATION
13.59 8,424
7.6 SHEET METAL AND SKYLIGHTS
3.75 2,328
7.9 CAULKING AND SEALANTS
0.48 , 300
8.1 HOLLOW METAL WORK
4.19 2,596
8.2 WOOD DOORS & FRAMES .
0.00 NONE
8.5,8 GLASS, GLAZING AND SASH
12.50 7,752
8.7 FINISH HARDWARE
2.26 1,400
9.1 LATH AND PLASTER
3.47 2,151
9.2 GYPSUM WALLBOARD
3.49 2,166
9.3 CERAMIC TILE AND TERRAZZO
31.44 19,494
9.5 ACOUSTICAL TILE
1.74 1,079
9.7 RESILIENT FLOORING
2.26 1,400
9.8 PAINTING
• 2.80 1,738
10.15 TOILET PARTITIONS
0.00 NONE
10.4 TOILET ACCESSORIES
1.10 684
10.5 BUILDING SPECIALTIES, GENERAL
0.44 275
14.0 CONVEYING SYSTEMS
0.00. NONE
15.1 PLUMBING
6.29 3,900
15.3 • HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR COND. 8.00 4,960
' 15.55 FIRE PROTECTION
.. 3.00 1,860
16.0 ELECTRICAL WORK
15.61 9,679
tni$:Qiiii.0:TAPagiMi.
141.82 i:;: ::!:?87i929,1
•
•
..... .........
•• .••.•. .. •. .. •
.. •
• •• •• • • • . . . . . . . . . . . ......
•
....... ........... .
ITEM. S S
. . . .....
•
. . SQ FT - • TOTAL
No SUMMARY OF. ESTIMATE. . .
- COST- COST - 1
. . . .
. .
. . _
. • .
1.1 - GENERAL CONDITIONS • . .8.5 0°/0
. 12,6......
, . • ........... •
17.1 CONTINGENCY . • 12.00%! ........ .....,
17.02 "10,551
: •17.2 • ESCALATION
2.00%; 2.84 1,759
•
17.3 *GEOGRAPHICAL FACTOR 0.00% • 0.00 NONE
SUBTOTAL • ;
173.73
BONDS I 1.50% 2.61 1,616•
CONTRACTOR'S FEE 5.00% 8.69 5,386
• •
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE
185.02 inii:;11.114Z41
•
•
•
• . • -
•
•
•
•
•
•
. •
•
•
•
•
•
ITEM .,
EST UNIT TOTAL
NO • DETAIL OF ESTIMATE QTY . . .............
UNIT - COST - COST
- 2.1 - DEMOLITION AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS
•
2.1001 • CORE DRILL FOR MECHANICAUELECTRICAL 1 LS ..... ............. .•
300.00 300
2.10.02 SCAFFOLD OUTBOARD SIDE OF BUILDING 58 LF
. .. . . ..... 30.00 1,740
• U BTOTAL 2�1 ' >>s _s ' ;,,,_..:,,,r,,.,.>.,,,_.....
3.1 .CONCRETE WORK
3.1001 FLOOR SLAB TREATMENT ALLOWANCE • 620 SF 2.00 1,240
SUBTOTAL;3.4> <>' S _;-,;:->:»_i.,::..•-••,...
............
•
.6.1 ROUGH CARPENTRY
6.1001 EXTERIOR WALL FRAMING 1664 BF 1.30 2,163
6.1002 WALL SHEATHING 1248 SF 0.95 1,185
•
6.1003 BOXOUT FRAMING 1296 BF 1.65 2,138
6.1004 BOXOUT SHEATHING 926 SF 1.05 972
6.1005 ROOF FRAMING 868 BF 1.30 1,128
6.1006 ROOF SHEATHING •
702 SF 0.95 666
6.1007 INTERIOR PARTITION FRAMING 420 BF 1.30 546
6.1008 ROUGH HARDWARE 1 LS • 650.00 650
SU.BT TAt' rt r
6.2 FINISH CARPENTRY
6.2001 STORAGE SHELVING 22 LF 95.00 2,090
7.2 THERMAL &SOUND INSULATION
7.2001 R-30 ROOF BATTS 620 SF 0.60 372
7.2002 R-19 THERMAL WALL BATTS 1044 SF 0.53 553
SPBTOTAL72:`
..... ......„..........._ . . . . . . . . .
. . . • ..... .
. ... ....
ITEM EST • • • • • •UNIT • • •• TOTAL
• NO DETAIL OF ESTIMATE • • . • .QTY. UNIT - COST COST
- .
. . . .
.............
7.3 ROOFING & RIGID INSULATION •
• • I.
7.3001 STANDING SEAM STAINLESS STEEL 702 : SF 12.00 8,424
•• •
pina.8;424.:,:i
. .........
7.6 SHEETMETAL • ;
7.6001 LEDGE CAP 104 LF 9.50 988 I
. 7.6002 MISC. SHEETMETAL 1 LS 300.00 • 300
7.6003 BIRD SPIKES AT LEDGE 104 LF 10.00
1,040
- • $0ITricga76.Biki•Sigi
7.9 CAULKING &SEALANTS
•
7.9001 ALLOWANCE 1 LS 300.00 300
•
WSTOANOGEM • MINO.g.01
8.1 HOLLOW METAL WORK
HOLLOW METAL FRAMES
8.1001 3-0 X 7-0 4 EA 225.00 900
HOLLOW METAL DOORS •
8.1002 3-0 X 7-0, FLUSH 2 EA 198.00 • 396
8.1003 3-0 X 7-0, 1 LITE FRENCH 2 EA 650.00 1,300
,
SO BIOMQralltniENEM: INNEZ$9:2P
8.5,8 GLASS, GLAZING AND SASH
8.5801 DIVIDED LITE WOOD OR METAL WINDOWS 204 SF 38.00 7,752
fikebitAE
•
• •
•
ITEM .. ... , . .. . . • •, . ...
• EST
., .- UNIT TOTAL
NO DETAIL OF ESTIMATE QTY •, UNIT _ COST COST
8.7 FINISH HARDWARE
8.7001 3-0 7-0 DOORS
: .... ........ 4 SET... .;.... . 350.00 1,400 •
.
9.1 LATH & PLASTER
•
......................
9.1001 EXT. CEMENT PLASTER AT FUTURE TILE WALLS 426 SF 5.05 2,151
•
.:.:.::::::..
.9.2 GYPSUM BOARD
9.2001 5/8' GYP BOARD AT WALLS 2088 SF 0.97 2,025
9.2002 5/8' GYP BOARD AT CEILINGS 118 SF
1.20 141
UU.BTOT;4`L•_9 2: < •
9.3 CERAMIC TILE AND TERRAZZO
9.3001 CERAMIC TILE AT RESTROOMS WALLS 224 SF 9.25 2,072
9.3002 . CERAMIC TILE FLOOR AT RESTROOMS 62 SF 10.50 651
9.3003 TERRAZZO EXTERIOR WALL FINISH 1082 SF 15.50 16,771
B BTQTA! '•3
9.5 ACOUSTICAL TILE
9.5001 LAY IN ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS 502 SF 2.15 1,079
$).STOTAL g 5 ` '-
9.7 RESILIENT FLOORING &CARPET
9.7001 RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING, INCLUDING BASE 560 SF 2.50 1,400
$:I�B t TA'L 7> - ' --
- -- •
. . . .
ITEM • EST : UNIT • TOTAL
NO DETAIL OF ESTIMATE QTY • UNIT_ COST • COST
• " • • • • • • • • ••• ••---- • • -
..... .
9.8 PAINTING
.... ,
• .... .
9.8001 SHEETMETAL WORK 104 SF • 1.00 104
9.8002 HOLLOW METAL FRAMES 4 EA 55.00 220
9.8003 HOLLOW METAL DOORS 4 EA .: 60.00 240
9.8004 EXTERIOR PLASTER 426 SF 0.40 170 •
9.8005 GYPSUM BOARD 2206 SF 0.40 882
9.8006 WOOD WINDOW FRAMES AND MULLIONS 204 SF 0.60 122
SUBTOTAL 9.8
•
10.4 TOILET ACCESSORIES
- -
10.4001 SOAP DISPENSER • 1 EA • - 45.00 45
10.4002 TOWEL DISPENSER 1 EA 45.00 45
10.4003 WASTE RECEPTACLE 1 EA 350.00 350
10.4004 GRAB BARS 1 EA 67.00 67
10.4005 MIRRORS
1 EA 95.00 95
10.4006 SEAT COVER DISPENSER 1 EA 55.00 55
10.4007 TOILET PAPER HOLDER 1 EA 27.00 27
•
$40X0Itglialinte
10.5 BUILDING SPECIALTIES
10.5001 ROOM SIGNAGE 1 LS 200.0Q 200
10.5002 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS IN CABINETS 1 EA 75.00 75
. . ...............
15.1 PLUMBING
FIXTURES
15.1001 LAVATORIES, WALL HUNG 1 EA 650.00 650
• 15.1002 WATER CLOSETS 1 EA 650.00 650
15.1003 ROUGH INS 2 EA 650.00 1,300
15.1004 GAS i 1 LS 650.00 650
15.1005 FLOOR DRAINS 2 EA 325.00 650
•
:&:(114:1-9TAMmitemolg
.........
..... .... ..... .....
. . . . . . . • • • •-• - •••• - • ••
. . . .
•
ITEM • • ••
• • EST . - UNIT TOTAL
NO DETAIL OF ESTIMATE • QTY UNIT. _ COST - COST
.........
- • • • •
. . . . :• . •
15.3 • HVAC •
. . , . , •
••
15.3001 • ALLOWANCE 620 ; SF 8.00 4,960
SUBTOTAL
15.55. :FIRE PROTECTION
15.5501 FIRE-PROTECTION ALLOWANCE 620 SF 3.00 1,860
.•
iggifitiii0'
16.0 ELECTRICAL
16.0001 EQUIPMENT ALLOWANCE 620 SF 2.00 1,240
16.0002 SIGNAL AND COMMUNICATION ALLOWANCE 620 SF 0.85 527
16.0003 CONDUIT AND WIRE ALLOWANCE 620 SF 3.50 2,170
16.0004 MAIN FEEDER (CONDUCTORS ONLY) 494 LF • 7.86 3,882
16.0005 LIGHTING ALLOWANCE 620 SF 2.00 1,240
16.0006 MISC. DEVICES,- PERMITS, & TEST ALLOWANCE 620 SF 1.00 620
0griQTACCANIEN
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
_ , . ...., ,-,,,,•.•,_•....,.,..,. .., ..„ .,,,.. .,. ..:.,,.._. . . ...... ,. ,, ,, .,..,...,.., ...,..;.,. ,..-.••., :: -- _.• .: .,....,.., ..,,..,.....,.,_•,..•.•, ,-•-. • •, ••••,•-•,.,^••••••• ,•.•- •• •
PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH PIER BUILDINGS i DATE 10/04/91
ESTIMATE i CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE - JOB NO 1143 :
TYPE _ : - CSI 16 DIVISION- • -
ARCH/ENG RON YEO, FAIA ARCHITECT, INC: PREP i - M. SKERRITT
LOCATION HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA CHECK R. SINDELAR
ESC FACT 2.00%:
G EO FACT . 0.000/0'
•MKT FACT 0.000/0
•
DESC BAIT AND TACKLE/SNACK SHOP
BLDG SF 800
ITEM :
. SQ Fr TOTAL
NO SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE COST COST.......•
2.1 DEMOLITION AND SPECIAL CONDITION 0.38 300
3.1 CONCRETE WORK
2.00 1,600
- 5.1 - STRUCTURAL STEEL
0.00 NONE
5.5 MISC. IRON AND ARCHITECTURAL METALS 0.00 NONE
6.1 CARPENTRY, ROUGH 13.04 10,433
6.2 CARPENTRY, FINISH
2.25 1,800
7.1 WATERPROOFING
0.00 NONE
7.2 THERMAL AND SOUND INSULATION 1.51 1,205
7.3 ROOFING AND RIGID INSULATION 14.48 11,580
7.6 SHEET METAL AND SKYLIGHTS 3.15 2,523
7.9 CAULKING AND SEALANTS 0.38 300
8.1 HOLLOW METAL WORK 3.25 2,596
8.2 WOOD DOORS & FRAMES , • 0.00 NONE
8.5,8 GLASS, GLAZING AND SASH 13.97 11,172
8.7 FINISH HARDWARE
1.75 1,400
9.1 LATH AND PLASTER 2.69 2,151
9.2 GYPSUM WALLBOARD
4.17 3,334
9.3 CERAMIC TILE AND TERRAZZO 23.23 18,584
9.5 ACOUSTICAL TILE
0.00 NONE
9.7 RESILIENT FLOORING 2.50 2,000
9.8 PAINTING
2.77 2,219
10.15 TOILET PARTITIONS 0.00 NONE
10.4 TOILET ACCESSORIES . 0.00 NONE
10.5 BUILDING SPECIALTIES, GENERAL 0.34 275
14.0 CONVEYING SYSTEMS 0.00 NONE
15.1 PLUMBING • 0.00 NONE
15.3 • HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR COND. • 8.00 6,400
15.55 FIRE PROTECTION 3.00 2,400
16.0 ELECTRICAL WORK 14.95 11,960
117.79 --:
•• ..:.• •
•
• •••••••. ..... . . .
. ITEM. • • •••.... • :
SO FT TOTAL
.
NO ....... OF ESTIMATE - • • COST 0 COST •
•• • . .
. . . . .
• .
. . . . .
1.1 GENERAL CONDITIONS 8.50% S. 10..01 17.1 CONTINGENCY 12 00%.
14.13 11,308
• .. . .
17.2 ESCALATION 2.00%. 2.36
1,885. : . .
17.3 GEOGRAPHICAL FACTOR 0.00% 0.00 NONE
• .......
• SUBTOTAL 144.29 P:i::li1l8:447.1
BONDS 1.50% 2.16
1,732
CONTRACTOR'S FEE : 5.00% 7.21 5,772
TQTAW;g0-16,4A17.0;q01.00E .
153.67 122,937
.••
•
•
•
•
• •
. ,• • •. . .
. . . . . . . . . • • • • •
• " " • ••• • •
• ' •
..... ...... .
. .
ITEM. - EST - UNIT • TOTAL
. . .
. • _ : - • UNIT COST COST
NO DETAIL OF ESTIMATE QTY. - . . . . . . .
. .
2.1 DEMOLITION AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS •
2.1001 CORE DRILL FOR MECHANICA............ 1 r• LS..... ; 300.00 300
3.1 CONCRETE WORK
3.1001 FLOOR SLAB TREATMENT ALLOWANCE 800 SF 2.00 1,600
•
• •
•
.•
6.1 ROUGH CARPENTRY •
6.1001 EXTERIOR WALL FRAMING 1850 BF 1.30 2,405
6.1002 WALL SHEATHING
1368 SF 0.95 1,299
6.1003 BOXOUT FRAMING 1175 BF 1.65 1,938
6.1004 BOXOUT SHEATHING 975 SF 1.05 1,023
6.1005 ROOF FRAMING 1154 BF 1.30 1,500
6.1006 ROOF SHEATHING 965 SF 0.95 916
6.1007 INTERIOR PARTITION FRAMING 540 BF 1.30 702
6.1008 ROUGH HARDWARE 1 LS 650.00 650
6.2 FINISH CARPENTRY
6.2001 STORAGE SHELVING 36 LF 50.00 1,800
....... .................OglOrgit4211,0
..,
7.2 THERMAL&SOUND INSULATION
7.2001 R-30 ROOF BATTS 800 SF 0.60 480
7.2002 R-19 THERMAL WALL BATTS 1368 SF 0.53 725
EiNadir;ig.gg:
. , ............ ....... .. . .
• • •• • •• ......, .
......
ITEM
EST i UNIT TOTAL
. , ....... .
NO DETAIL OF ESTIMATE .
QTY.. - UNIT • .COST COST
..... .
7.3 • ROOFING & RIGID INSULATION .....
. ..................
7.3001 STANDING SEAM STAINLESS STEEL 965 . SF 12.00 11,580
7.6 SHEETMETAL
7.6001 LEDGE CAP 114 LF 9.50 1,083
7.6002 MISC. SHEETMETAL . 1 LS 300.00 300
7.6003 BIRD SPIKES AT LEDGE . 114 LF • 10.00 1,140
0...g.TOTA7.63:600i: . .. ,
7.9 CAULKING &SEALANTS
7.9001 ALLOWANCE
1 LS 300.00 300
102110..0,1
8.1 HOLLOW METAL WORK
•
HOLLOW METAL FRAMES
8.1001 3-0 X 7-0
4 EA 225.00 900
HOLLOW METAL DOORS
8.1002 3-0 X 7-0, FLUSH 2 EA 198.00 396
8.1003 3-0 X 9-0, 1 LITE FRENCH 2 EA 650.00 1,300
• pingigggii
8.5,8 GLASS. GLAZING AND SASH
8.5801 DIVIDED LITE WOOD OR METAL WINDOWS 294 SF 38.00 11,172
... . .
................... •
8.7 FINISH HARDWARE
• 8.7001 3-0 X 7-0 DOORS 4 SET 350.00 1,400
411202.9gil
•
..... .. . . ..... . ..... ,..„. . .
• . • . .• . .
ITEM
EST - . . .
UNIT TOTAL
. . . . . .
NO -DETAIL OF ESTIMATE QTY• _ .UNIT _ • COST
COST
. .
. •••••
. ,......
9.1 .LATH & PLASTER
. • . . . 7. .......• .......:
. .
9.1001 EXT. CEMENT PLASTER AT FUTURE TILE WALLS 426 SF 5.05 2,151
SUBTOTAL91 2,151
9.2 • GYPSUM BOARD
9.2001 5/8" GYP BOARD AT WALLS 2448 SF 0.97 2,374
9.2002 5/8" GYP BOARD AT CEILINGS 800 SF 1.20 960
....
SU BTOTALY:T2Moi•mi•:•: ' -
9.3 CERAMIC TILE AND TERRAZZO •
9.3001 TERRAZZO EXTERIOR WALL FINISH 1199 SF 15.50 18,584
•
9.7 RESILIENT FLOORING &CARPET
9.7001 RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING, INCLUDING BASE 800 SF 2.50 2,000
......
9.8 PAINTING
9.8001 SHEETMETAL WORK 114 SF 1.00 114
9.8002 HOLLOW METAL FRAMES 4 EA 55.00 220
9.8003 HOLLOW METAL DOORS 4 EA 60.00 240
9.8004 EXTERIOR PLASTER 426 SF 0.40 170
9.8005 GYPSUM BOARD 3248 SF 0.40 1,299
9.8006 WOOD WINDOW FRAMES AND MULLIONS 294 SF 0.60 176
$0137..V:ThatURBRiiii
:Km:m*2,219K'
•
•
• • •
.. ......•••,..•••, •••...•••• •-••'•'••••'• -
- •
•. . •. • . • .•.. •••• •• ..•.. ••• • •
. ...... • •• • •
. • •• •• , •
• •
ITEM EST UNIT TOTAL
. . . . .............
NO . :DETAIL OF ESTIMATE - QTY -• UNIT - COST. : COST •
•.- • •• • • ............
. . ..... . .
• : •• ••••:•- • , .•.:.
;• • • . . . .
10.5 • BUILDING SPECIALTIES •
• •
•
10.5001 ROOM SIGNAGE : 1 LS 200.00 200
10.5002 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS IN CABINETS 1 EA 75.00 75
•
$Q BTOTAL 10.5 •
.15.3 ; HVAC
15.3001 ALLOWANCE 800 SF 8.00 6,400
15.55 • FIRE PROTECTION
•
15.5501 FIRE PROTECTION ALLOWANCE S . 800 SF 3.00 2,400
•
•.,
16.0 ELECTRICAL
16.0001 EQUIPMENT ALLOWANCE S • 800 SF 2.00 1,600
16.0002 SIGNAL AND COMMUNICATION ALLOWANCE 800 SF 0.85 680
16.0003 CONDUIT AND WIRE ALLOWANCE 800 SF 3.50 2,800
16.0004 MAIN FEEDER (CONDUCTORS ONLY) 570 LF 7.86 4,480 •
16.0005 LIGHTING ALLOWANCE 800 SF 2.00 1,600 ;
16.0006 MISC. DEVICES, PERMITS, & TEST ALLOWANCE 800 SF 1.00 800
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
,
PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH PIER R BUILDINGS DATE , 10/04/91
ESTIMATE CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE
JOB NO 1143
TYPE CSI 16 DIVISION
ARCH/ENG : RON YEO, FAIA ARCHITECT, INC.
PREP M. SKERRITT
LOCATION HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA . = - - ...
CHECK R. SINDELAR -
ESC FACT 2.00%
GEO FACT 0.00%
MKT FACT 0.00%' •
DESC PIERHEAD RESTAURANT SHELL •
BLDG SF 6,510
ITEM SQ FT TOTAL
NO SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE COST COST
2.1 DEMOLITION AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS 0.09 600
3.1 CONCRETE WORK 1.07 6,980
5.1 STRUCTURAL STEEL 2.25 • 14,625
5.5 MISC. IRON AND ARCHITECTURAL METALS 1.09 7,100
6.1 CARPENTRY, ROUGH 13.71 89,275
6.2 CARPENTRY, FINISH 1.09 7,110
7.1 WATERPROOFING 0.00 NONE
7.2 THERMAL AND SOUND INSULATION 0.63 4,070
7.3 ROOFING AND RIGID INSULATION 7.71 50,188
7.6 SHEET METAL AND SKYLIGHTS 1.17 7,621
7.9 CAULKING AND SEALANTS 0.31 2,000
8.1 HOLLOW METAL WORK 0.71 4,653
8.2 WOOD DOORS & FRAMES • 0.58 3,800
8.5,8 GLASS, GLAZING AND SASH 7.73 50,328
8.7 FINISH HARDWARE 0.59 3,850
9.1 LATH AND PLASTER 0.81 5,283
9.2 GYPSUM WALLBOARD 2.69 17,514
9.3 CERAMIC TILE AND TERRAZZO 15.90 103,507
9.5 ACOUSTICAL TILE 1.60 10,432
9.7 RESILIENT FLOORING 2.48 16,122
9.8 PAINTING 1.69 10,974
10.15 TOILET PARTITIONS 0.21 1,350
10.4 TOILET ACCESSORIES 0.35 2,286
10.5 BUILDING SPECIALTIES, GENERAL 0.11 700
14.0 CONVEYING SYSTEMS 3.84 25,000
15.1 PLUMBING 3.74 24,325
15.3 • HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR COND. 7.50 48,825
15.55 FIRE PROTECTION 2.00 13,020
16.0 ELECTRICAL WORK 14.08 91,672
• ;SUBTOTAL::> ` » >''E •
95.73 23 210€=
•' • . •`. r, ••..... ..-4 ..-....
•
. • •
•
. • . .. • . .
........ ................
• .
ITEM. ••
SQ FT - TOTAL
NO SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE - ....
COST - COST
. ..
.. 11 GENERAL CONDITIONS 8.50% 8.14 52,973
17:1 CONTINGENCY • 12.00%: 11.49. 74,785
17.2 ESCALATION : 2.00(3/0: 1.91 12,464
17.3 GEOGRAPHICAL FACTOR 0.00%.
0.00 • NONE
. .
•
• . . SUBTOTAL 117 27
BONDS 1.50% 1.76 11,451
• CONTRACTOR'S FEE 5.00% 5.86 38,172
•
EP610.18§5 _ _
• ••
124.89
. -
•
•
•
„ • . , ••,.........,......... ...•••••- ,....,.............,,,.,.,,.•,...•,,,,,..•••.•....,,•••,..•1.••••'.',..,.•
• • • • -• • • - •-- • ••
. . . _. . . . .
• •
.. ... : . . .
ITEM
: •• • i ••••
• .
EST .. ... - UNIT : TOTAL .•
. .
- - NO DETAIL OF ESTIMATE . ' • - . QTY • . UNIT - : - COST ' COST "
. . . . . . .
.. . _ _ . , . . .. ...
• . .. . .
2.1. DEMOLITION AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS . : • .
.;
• •••••
•
.... ...
2.1001 CORE DRILL FOR MECHANICAUELECTRICAL 1 LS 600.00 600
SU BTOTA L•2.1.::•::: -i:•i!.:;..!!:;:;;::j -.'.!, •;3765-67...
3.1 CONCRETE WORK : •
, .
•
3.1001 FLOOR SLAB TREATMENT ALLOWANCE 3250 SF 2.00 6,500
3.1002 EXIT STEPS
• 12 LF 20.00 240
4.1002 EXIT LANDING
30 SF 8.00 • 240
•
.--..i...-.....-----:---. .•.--...,
...........................
SU BTOTAL:f-3:-Vi:Ma::'']'':'''
...........,.... ,•...,.,..............,..,.. ....:
•
5.1 STRUCTURAL STEEL
• :
•
5.1001 ROOF FRAME ASSEMBLY, INCLUDING COLUMNS 3250 SF 4.50 14,625
gi.PTQThel§itiellie
•5.5 MISCELLANEOUS IRON AND ARCHITECTURAL METALS
5.5001 TRASH GATES - 1 PAIR 2000.00 2,000
5.5002 ACCESS LADDER AND ROOF HATCH 1 EA 750.00 750
5.5003 ENTRY AND EXIT HAND RAILS 30 LF 45.00 1,350
5.5004 MISC. RAILINGS AND ACCESSORIES 1 LS 3000.00 3,000
_:-
gQ019TgksMieng sonfool
.
6.1 ROUGH CARPENTRY
•
6.1001 EXTERIOR WALL FRAMING 6864 BF 1.30 8,923
6.1002 WALL SHEATHING
4576 SF 0.95 4,347
. 6.1003 BOXOUT FRAMING
4400 BF 1.65 7,260
6.1004 BOXOUT SHEATHING
2908 SF 1.05 3,053
6.1005 SECONDARY ROOF FRAMING 6384 BF 1.30 8,299
6.1006 ROOF SHEATHING i 4256 SF 0.95 4,043
• 6.1007 SECOND FLOORS FRAMING 6500 BF 1.30 8,450
6.1008 SECOND FLOOR DECKING 3250 SF 1.50 4,875
6.1009 INTERIOR PARTITION FRAMING 13000 BF 1.30 16,900
6.1010 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING 6500 BF 1.30 8,450
•
ITEM. E •
NO DETAIL OF ESTIMATE... .......:.......... .. . .... .. .: . .. EST -.. .. UNIT � TOTAL
UNIT. . COST- C•
osr
6.1 • ROUGH CARPENTRY (CONTINUED)
6.1011 FIRST FLOOR DECKING
3250 : SF 1.50 4,875 •
6.1012 INTERIOR STAIR FRAMING
2 SET 2000.00 4,000
6.1013 TRASH ROOM STAIRS
.... .......
1 SET 800.00 800
6.1014 ROUGH HARDWARE ALLOWANCE 1 LS . 5000.00 5,000
:UBTOTAL:6 1:0:0;:!,i:> ;:..::.::.;:.: ..:::. ....
6.2 - FINISH CARPENTRY •
6.2001 INTERIOR STAIRS 2 SET_ 2000.00 4,000
6.2002 LAVATORY COUNTERTOPS 13 LF 50.00 650
6.2003 ENTRY STEPS . 45 LF . - 30.00 1,350
6.2004 . ENTRY LANDING 74 SF 15.00 1,110
•
•
7.2 THERMAL&SOUND INSULATION
7.2001 R-30 ROOF BATTS 3250 SF 0.60 1,950
7.2002 R-19 THERMAL WALL BATTS 4000 SF 0.53 2,120
7.3 ROOFING & RIGID INSULATION
•
7.3001 STANDING SEAM STAINLESS STEEL 4256 SF 10.50 44,688
7.3002 POP-OUT ROOFS I 2 EA 2000.00 4,000
7.3003 ' ADD FOR CUPOLA 1 EA 1500.00 1,500
SU.BTOTAL73.: Y
7.6 SHEETMETAL
7.6001 LEDGE CAP 237 LF 9.50 2,251
7.6002 MISC. SHEETMETAL 1 LS 3000.00 3,000
7.6003 BIRD SPIKES AT'LEDGE . 237 LF 10.00 2,370
I
• • • •••• •-`•• • • •• ••. .• . .• •••••-•-• . ••• •• , ....... .. •.•.••• ,:• „„.....,•..,•,
5.. A • . . . . • • • . • •••
• • • • • . .
ITEMEST . ........... . ...... ,. .... .
UNIT • TOTAL
NO DETAIL OF ESTIMATE QTY UNIT COST • COST
7.9 CAULKING & SEALANTS -
•
7.9001 ALLOWANCE , . . . ..... . .......
1 LS 2000.00 2,000
SUBTOTAL 7 9 2,000
8.1 HOLLOW METAL WORK .........
• HOLLOW METAL FRAMES (OR EQUIVALANT) .
• 8.1001 3-0 X 7-0 1 11 EA 225.00 2,475
• HOLLOW METAL DOORS (OR EQUIVALANT)
8.1002 3-0 X 7-0 • 11 . EA 198.00 - 2,178
$DATOTALWERIgiiin
8.2 WOOD DOORS
8.2001 ENTRANCE DOOR ASSEMBLY 1 EA 3000.00 3,000
8.2002 BY-PASS DOOR ASSEMBLY 1 EA 800.00 800
•
1$0..-1.:037.A.P.Weinge
8.5,8 GLASS, GLAZING AND SASH
8.5801 DIVIDED LITE WOOD OR METAL WINDOWS 1206 SF 38.00 45,828
8.5802 POP-OUT GLAZING 100 SF 45.00 4,500
iligg$.04216f.
8.7 FINISH HARDWARE
8.7001 3-0 X 7-0 DOORS 11 SET 350.00 3,850
$riab..tAtEtIMMON. ingliff3r;OPZ
9.1
•
LATH & PLASTER •
9.1001 EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER • 1174 SF 4.50 5,283
•
. . .
.s. .Z.., ..,
. .. .
•
. . .. .... , .. .
, • . ...... . .
ITEM
EST : UNIT ! TOTAL.... .... ,... . ..... ......... . . ...
NO - DETAIL OF ESTIMATE • QTY • UNIT COST 1 COST
, .:. . ... .. .
9.2 - - -GYPSUM BOARD
, •
• •
9.2001 5/8" GYP BOARD AT WALLS . 15720 SF 0.97 15,248
9.2002 5/8" GYP BOARD AT CEILINGS (ALLOWANCE) 2337 ; SF 0.97 2,266
i
$1)PTOTAL;4:21r0;:i0k:i:
!i]!1:i••!im:17.,514.;.
.
] •
9.3 CERAMIC TILE AND TERRAZZO
.
9.3001 CERAMIC TILE AT RESTROOMS 1656 SF 9.25 15,318
9.3002 . CERAMIC TILE FLOOR AT RESTROOMS • 467 SF 10.50 4,903
9.3003 CERAMIC TILE WALLS.AT KITCHEN i - 1752 SF 9.25 16,206
. 9.3004 QUARRY TILE FLOORS AT KITCHEN - - 1103 SF 11.00 12,133 •
9.3005 TERRAZZO EXTERIOR WALL FINISH 3545 SF . 15.50 54,947
- :
V.P.TO.T.AV9INEME
iii!!•,.5.0Q.-ti::
9.5 ACOUSTICAL TILE
• 9.5001 FINISH CEILING ALLOWANCE . 4173 SF 2.50 10,432
$.01..M..t.A11219iXiiigiSKa .; ‘.........e...................,.... ...:,,,,,,,,,,,. . ilOWO............
9.7 RESILIENT FLOORING &CARPET
9.7001 RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING AT SERVICE AREAS 1922 SF 2.50 4,805
9.7002 FLOOR COVERING AT DINING AREAS 3018 SF 3.75 11,317 i
9.8 PAINTING
•
9.8001 MISCELLANEOUS METALS 1 LS 800.00 800
9.8002 SHEETMETAL WORK 300. SF 1.00 300
9.8003 HOLLOW METAL FRAMES 11 EA 55.00 605
9.8004 HOLLOW METAL DOORS 11 EA 60.00 660
9.8005 EXTERIOR PLASTER 1174 SF 0.40 469
• 9.8006 GYPSUM BOARD. i 18057 SF 0.40 7,222
9.8007 WOOD DOORS AND FRAMES 1 EA 85.00 85
9.8008 WOOD WINDOW FRAMES AND MULLIONS 1306 SF 0.60 783
!
• 9.8009 ACCESS LADDER 1 EA 50.00 50
§08TOTAI57§777M101. :=:;;;v:"="-•-r-!:
• Nail.0;974V
. .,....... .....,......
. . .
•
'''' ' ' .0 . . . • . . . • • • - • •
- •- • - . • • •••• • -••• • -•• -
•
.. . .. ,
ITEM EST UNIT : TOTAL
NO • DETAIL OF ESTIMATE • QTY UNIT • COST : COST
" .. ... . ...h. .. . . .. . . . . . . .
•: • - - . -•
! ". . • •:•. , .... .
10.15 TOILET PARTITIONS . . ..... ... .................
,
10.1501 : TOILET PARTITIONS • _
3 • EA ' 450.00 1,350
.. .. . .
,
• .. . . ...... :...... ... . -
SUBTOTAL10.15,•,'::,',•:'"-
I.......
10.4 TOILET ACCESSORIES
10.4001 SOAP DISPENSER 4 EA 45.00 180
10.4002 TOWEL DISPENSER 4 EA 45.00 180
10.4003 WASTE RECEPTACLE 4 EA 150.00 600
10.4004 GRAB BARS 8 EA 67.00 536
• 10.4005 MIRRORS - 4 EA 95.00 380
10.4006 SEAT COVER DISPENSER . _ 5 • EA 55.00 275
• 10.4007 TOILET PAPER HOLDER • 5 EA 27.00 . 135
..... ........... . . .
SUBTOTALi!::.ib-::-:::flalgilililai
g•-g8P::
-..••.....„.......,..........:„........,,,,::::::::::::::::,,
1 0.5 BUILDING SPECIALTIES •
10.5001 ROOM SIGNAGE 1. LS 400.00 400
10.5002 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS IN CABINETS 4 EA 75.00 300
$10.P.TOTAM.O.gingla iligNIRO.D.i.
:14.0 CONVEYING SYSTEMS
14.0001 WHEELCHAIR LIFTS • 2 EA 8500.00 17,000
14.0002 DUMBWAITER 1 EA 6000.00 6,000
14.0003 TRASH CHUTE 1 EA 2000.00 2,000
•
i_ i
•
c '.1 i
r
•
ITEM • EST UNIT TOTAL
- O DE
TAIL OF ESTIMATE - QTY • UNIT COST •� COST
• 15.1 - PLUMBING .
FIXTURES: •
2 EA
15.1001 LAVATORIES, WALL HUNG
• 650.00 1,300
15.1002 WATER CLOSETS 5 EA 3,250
.. 650.00
15.1003 FIXTURE ROUGH INS .
11 EA 50
650.00 7,1
15.1004 GAS ROUGH IN 1 LS 2000.00 2,000
15.1005 LAVATORIES, COUNTERTOP 2 EA • 2000.00 4,000
15.1006 URINALS
2 EA i 2000.00 4,000 '
15.1007 FLOOR DRAINS
7 EA 325.00 2,275
15.1008 HOSE BIBBS 2 EA 175.'00 350
SUBTOTAL'15a0:` :>'<>1 ....
.... ....: ..
•
15.3 HVAC
15.3001 ALLOWANCE
6510 SF 7.50 48,825
15.55 FIRE PROTECTION -
15.5501 FIRE PROTECTION ALLOWANCE 6510 SF 2.00 13,020
S0B '
'16.0 ELECTRICAL
16.0001 EQUIPMENT ALLOWANCE 6510 SF 2.00 13,020
16.0002 SIGNAL AND COMMUNICATION ALLOWANCE 6510 SF 0.85 5,533
16.0003 CONDUIT AND WIRE ALLOWANCE 6510- SF 3.50 22,785
16.0004 MAIN FEEDER (CONDUCTORS ONLY) 1020 LF 30.20 30,804
• 16.0005 LIGHTING ALLOWANCE 6510 SF 2.00 13,020
16.0006 MISC. DEVICES, PERMITS, & TEST ALLOWANCE 65.10 SF 1.00 6,510
..................:.: ...-... :::;;:: ::::::;;
1
0
90
.----
lC- 0lC0
0Al
• po D
J / ,
ACCCTECTU D AL
Ir
. 4/ sE VCEs
MUNICIPAL PIER
BUILDINGS
FOR THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
, . . ., ,,. . ., ,.. .. !!!!,
11 LInut il (I►�,��,, I ' ' i iiiiiIIIIIPI! 11( I I III I
�: �.�.r.le ny..aa �ar+ i ..
rl+_.:': -. #s- u'
May 28, ,;me .
*r
- -• . t.;,r.' - ...�-. A".._- 7,. --- _... -�
i.'.w- -r 7".. �moo. £r*e.., h . - .� }.
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD AIA
ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING
May 28, 1993
Mr. Robert E. Eichblatt, City Engineer
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
SUBJECT: Proposal for Architectural and Engineering Services
Municipal Pier Buildings (3)
Dear Mr. Eichblatt:
We are pleased to submit our proposal to provide Architectural and Engineering services to construct three
buildings on the City's Municipal Pier.
Since its inception in 1950, Anthony and Langford/Architects has developed a specialization in municipal
architecture. We have completed a wide range of projects for more than seventy public agencies, including over
fifty cities, several counties, and numerous educational entities.
We have recently completed four buildings within view of the Pier and have designed several other projects
within the City. We are thoroughly familiar with all elements of the proposed project. With our current
working relationship with the City, we are very familiar with its departments, processes, and many of its staff.
As a native of Southern California for over 50 years, and a resident of Huntington Beach for over 20 years, this
Pier and its predecessors are both familiar and dear to me. In addition, our office has been located in
Huntington Beach for nearly 20 years.
Years ago, we offered our services for the "End Cafe", and although we were not awarded that contract, the
architect who received it closed his office and was in our employ while moonlighting to complete the
construction administration phase. So we are quite familiar with the history and importance of the Pier facilities.
This is a project in which I have a very special interest, and one in which the firm of ANTHONY AND
LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS would put forth an exceptional effort.
We have experienced and dedicatedpersonnel immediatelyavailable to perform the work in accordance with
P
your schedule and requirements. We appreciate your consideration and welcome this opportunity to work with
the City on this important project.
Sincerely,
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Neill Noble, AIA
Principal
cw93530hbpierlt
Enc. (7)
16152 Beach Blvd., Suite 201, Huntington Beach, California 92647 (714) 848-1818
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LETTER OF INTRODUCTION
COMPANY PROFILE 1
SIMILAR PROJECTS /EXPERIENCE 2
PROJECT EXHIBITS 2
PROJECT TEAM INVOLVEMENT 3
PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION CHART 4
RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL & CONSULTANTS 5
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING 14
PROJECT APPROACH 15
ALTERNATE FINISHES 18
ATTACHMENT CITY'S RFP/SCOPE OF SERVICES
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Architecture•Interiors •Planning• Engineering
COMPANY PROFILE
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS CONSULTANTS: We have assembled a
(A&L), a California Corporation, was team of reputable and highly qualified
established in 1950 as a full-service engineering and design consultants with
Architectural and Engineering design firm, whom we have worked for many years. In
providing a broad scope of professional addition to structural, electrical, and
services to public and private sectors. Our mechanical engineers, we will utilize a
firm is anchored by eight licensed restaurant/food service specialist, and
architects, in addition to technical and construction cost estimating firm.
support personnel, totaling a staff of over
fifteen dedicated professionals with CLIENTS: Among our clients are more than
experience in all aspects of architectural fifty cities, the counties of Los Angeles,
design and planning. Orange, and San Bernardino, eighteen
educational entities, and numerous
OFFICE LOCATION: Our office is located at corporations and cultural organizations.
16152 Beach Boulevard, Huntington Beach,
California, and is approximately 7 miles PROJECTS: A&L has planned and designed
from the project site and within 10 minutes various public and commercial projects of
of the City Hall. all sizes, including numerous food service
facilities, retail establishments, and
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN/DRAFTING: community recreation facilities.
A&L utilizes state-of-the-art CADD systems
supported by DataCad software and AWARDS: We have received numerous
"Velocity" for solid modeling. Super-high design awards for our projects; both public
resolution graphics and large screen are and private, some of which include: The
used to provide optimum CADD McCallum Theatre of the Bob Hope Cultural
workstations that are fast and reliable with Center, Palm Desert, CA; Norwalk Arts and
the ability to quickly incorporate changes Sports Complex, Norwalk, CA; Continental
and revisions to the drawings. Three Park Office Complex, El Segundo, CA; The
dimensional perspectives are quickly La Mirada Civic Center, La Mirada, CA;
generated that include "walk-thru" and "fly- White Oak Elementary School, Westlake
by" views. We continually monitor new Village, CA; and Purex Headquarters Office
developments in both equipment and Facility, Lakewood, CA.
software to keep current with rapid
advances in technology.
1
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Architecture•Interiors •Planning• Engineering
SIMILAR PROJECTS
The majority of the following projects have been completed by the same project team
proposed for your project. Individual project experience is indicated in enclosed Resumes.
FOOD SERVICE FACILITIES
Caverly Retail Center, 201 Main St. North Orange County R.O.P.
5,000 sf containing a 2,500 sf Restaurant Orangebrook Food Service Teaching Facility
and Baskin Robbins Dining for 75
Huntington Beach, CA Fullerton, CA
Two Story Commercial Building, 221 Main St. H. Louis Lake Senior Citizen Center
10,000 sf retail building Food Service Facility
Huntington Beach, CA Dining for 180
Under construction Garden Grove, CA
Huntington Beach Central Library Whittier Senior Citizen Center
Kitchen Facility Food Service Facility
Dining for 350 Dining for 250
Huntington Beach, CA Whittier, CA
Arcadia Senior Citizen Center Santa Fe Springs Community Center
Kitchen and Banquet Rooms Food Service Facility
Dining for 350 Dining for 200
Arcadia, CA Santa Fe Springs, CA
Hughes Aircraft Company Lynwood Community Center
Employee Cafeteria and Dining Room Kitchen and Banquet Rooms
Dining for 600 Dining for 600
Ground Systems Group, Fullerton, CA Lynwood, CA
Pico Rivera Golf Course Clubhouse U.S. Naval Station NCO Club
Kitchen and Cafeteria Facilities Family Restaurant w/Dining for 100
Dining for 100 Banquet Room for 800
Pico Rivera, CA Club Room for 300
Long Beach, CA
Garden Grove Community Center
Kitchen Facility w/Dining for 500
Garden Grove, CA
We have had no projects enter into litigation during our firm's 43 years of existence.
2
PROJECT EXHIBITS
N.
waft I
il .•«NO Milli
-eei II
i friAP
.„.. _j , _ , 4.
_.
ir Pillidlialli
temeamem
• 4 „gyp �r
illi
r...,
1 ,
le
0,1 1 4, ..,
lio
__
Illr°41111;":11111"1"'".-.--... . ,
ti.
4 .. - ' 11. c- - tikily.. - 1.41•
_.. __ _ ..� _ ..._� - - - - r ,
t >` i r/
• t�
�• �r .,
\4.1k 14.4-.:--.e . . '-4-:-'. • . \4.::. 4 op....,'''__-.4). ,' 41 1 f'
- t •,, •f a � bill-
1 oATIOS pFETJzE s ��TR£4S
111111011
• 1 . • ''',•N;• >•.A, 0 t .L ... all MD
art ‘i . ,. . .
-- -''' i ii: , . i'
,... ... i 1, -4111--16----1. Sill
it\
i r1
r/ s[-_ - �qf��'
,
... ..._ 1 /1":1P.f.. ' . _ .. . .
, A ell -IP:
J
_� ram. ' . � ' •o fF, -4\
Aati,
,,,, _•:41.---... 1
iiiik . _....:.\\
Mit ,
w "'� -
�.'• S k 1 . _M--;w'- _N
.
__ `M..- e , 1 �'' f
I
• -
i •; k! AT Fal dri • 11.11M
CI _ .--
igi
.►.6. ' . - .
III-- NUM V; nil:ILI _ . 4 A,. ...
•
I 4011181111111 ill ..' ,."1". Aunia . 1 I I I I:::iproroo. 4,1, g IF
A . .... ._ c if iii, _ I .... Ing Bp . 17. Illtc; tic Allikiier , 4 / . 1 ‘
..' ••-.. A
6 . :
41111, •
. •
..-....... " .. ./..„,.,, _,.. . 1 1".".. 1 I I I I 117: - 1 1 MP a 4. r
,..... ..e.....
•I
i 1
r f.
Y
i .::11;t1 44: . ' -:. - . .-
r . . . . _.., tk , .
'.$4..a" :akili.r.1'1.1)'...1.:::;I. .1 ri _
n.
. te 41,!1111401*- it ! •
' i:1171( ( ( ( .... , ;-.7: 1P:r , ,.-'t
71.1 ..,
...---,-. . .
„,„
, v . r---1
--,
(-----1 . C_-___..T (_ , C__ __ ' ( -1- i ' t. . ,
•••;•• ill" -,...„..:,
-Ii:`-'-..-1---------1 •- .... _._ . • ,•-.
--.-
-
f4 ./. • -
' ''',"•::.4-a- 1/4 f -7z.;-.1 ---:, ... •-•---
• • •
. .
•• .... ., . --.. ...,1--, . ,. -_-•,,,,,4‘.„-_:....._ . . „. ..., ...,.. ..--...- , ..---
N , -;,. .--,,>.,,,- • -- \ ---
...._v_............ ,... .._,.., ,c,,,, . ,,,,,,..."......
, .. -. ... -."‘`..1. ., . F..... --1,• •
. .
,......-
t ' '-.----n-•`:.---• .,..0-:-'i--''' .-
-'--,/"/
: r...... .....se,,r., i. .......4- .ii -
.Z.•...:2-,'.,• r,--7 • ,::. "CI,
• 1•'• ' • • ••p..›..
' ' i ' ••• ../".... /.• , ‘Ao* - ° :'• ' 1,4 .;if' s .
Z, S
... i.Vg,., _4„„,,, ;1....• k , t 4,111‘......7.. -
- _ ____..._.
I ...... - i .4- . 4-
t '
ef. • j / /I •.. " : ,-`- .'" • - • . ,..'• -r - "' .,! •"'1,?..ri-
.
: •r". ..
! "
. . ,C ...: '. - ' '•.-""'- .0' -
• - ' '7:4 . , ',/i.:. ,'., iN.
• , re
-4'1• ., -• lt, i / • :, '
, ,••t
. . . , .
. ., if .... , .... , •
• A , f:...".... . . =4..•
' I • >
-.- a;•i , • -
• - ,:. t.1; .
•..-. „,,, ,. ., . . •
'ar-.. c = ,,••
. ...
....
' • . 4'- .. o. ,„. op. .., .. _ .
t•
. .
,• '-! . ' ..:.•• ' . .- ' --tr::-..---. •--.ef:F
f '...; -‘•,A:- .'..p.„„:-..- :si.:,..• „..;•:-,....:7.: ., ''•`.„ .. . . .14.. ,,.' .
• • ::.3
mi.
-.V
. ;,,,4•-r_ir..- .,,,A...4 : .• 44.*-7 a. . ' '/." .....-4-."/..' '4-..0e:- : :::.i?. .::' ,-DZI
(III
.'r'i ...
,
,.
,..,
.!J 1
. .
t,'3,/t.•" . ,,_ , ' . . -':....4.1
-••.:' •,-,;;.i.., - . ,, . ,
46/
,....- . . • w ,." , - '' ....-: , ":.-t, ----. , :4 ••••• ".,'•
;t4i ,cl ..,..',.. ..,.-e...i..,.. ..,;.--).11.;••,‘ , -
P
it
. „... , . .... ,
, .,.. . .....,-", ..-..4 • ,, P.,... ;,,
it",...- • 4 TA'..1 ' .... • - ' ii '' .- ' ' . ' -
71;1.1 •W •:•,( • . .-?',(r:..- . -,'• •":. 1.. /
;•l'''';;410.;., #.e e-; , i„,1' --.,-,,,,, . •. 7;,- ---
• e -' .,•,--.--.• i 4%. ,y .-0 - ' li,i..-, .4. .1 ,4./4'''' •" je -' ---'-- '..---
.1 lk--X-': 'AI)i-lr.-'14°-*-7(..1.gr... *14;14- . - /_____-/--- '•-. '''1----- 4- ''-1/4- 2-1 ii•1": 4e,' no •_• .
. .I.•$.; ....s.,,-,,.. ,......i ..:.:-.•-•,:-. r-, .1 --'- __
rIti
---._ . ,:fri.:,, ,•, . -7' I.(: 'i"" - -.,t;L:) L r j''
,4•••tc,•-•••,•%- L.:ft -.+',41SW. 1*- - '•', // i // ',..- * "-•.. --;::::-.:"...'" . • '. IA' ' '. '. P. •
.... .,.. ,
• f.,,, ..,,.i,,,,,,,,,,:!,,,,,-..'.4 . - /7--- / /// - . . ,-4-`,7/. . ,
,,:::',,,,,,,,....,•i.k.k>,-_,v_.4.,_,,., - ,-/-, ,- „.,-'-_-,,,,-....-:-.3.,.-.-.0 i: iii -",... , . . .., , , -.........‘„..„ . ..... ..
,: •.l':....,-.-• i".-1...r,";,s-t'.'..'I- ,_,-/-(e-r_ ,_ _,_,. .,, ,,,...,g.....4.,. .--2.-r..--Ziff,„:4 ,, •-;.-444 ,, " . ,1 . • ,f ,••• 1...,'; , •,,I14 ' 1...1'2 . ..":''''•-gar. ..:.:. .--.... ,,--..'"6'."-.10.-.:.... .i.'T %.- , .4 iii.':.- 4:4114.11:LtitV .'7''.-- a'It Y.•ilt::
'
f'.-..•••N =,,e •-• , , ,.,..., „.---ii ,-, ,..twv-21=1.,, w, t_ ..,... _ 0 . •-• ,,...,,.4. . ,.. .... ••
... .
•••. .
„,.. .,
•; ,....,••,• • .. . „1.1 . . ri ,(f,.. .. . • ..... ._,... . _..t.i., .__:,:i.,... ., .41 j. -='-'r.,I i'---- ' •, -...... !;:i.., . 0 • 4.1 ' '.-,
.. hr.'' ..,•••••'. ' - •., .1 c -'•'., „/ ••,• •• i• ''' ' e 1-- ., "' . ('K, '' .,..,, ? '' . i ''.4 ..ei "" .........-- '72=7...t
'' --• '-':"..i.ar,... .-- 7:-- '•.., ,' ' - IV A i i.„...ki'??4;.' 1'
..
.
` '` ' cr i ' '.'
,,• - ...;,7".: r 1 ,
, r i j 1-,„ ci...,, -in., -',_.,' .• .. •I ,_ar't. _ ,i,1 .;„..x.
,.., , • LAI t_,..' . r) t \
._......,., ,...____ • - -..,,,.....
! ., . , ,. olff.f !
_: •,,,,,,.,41 . ,. . ., - &o.0-. _ 4, . It,-,ii.#4,r*J. ,- •• • .• .. .i,t'F_,...2).- _x • • , 4 , „ -:-.-......- A w A.L, •
1 •'..,..• .•.:: ,i_ENP
. ,-- , .f•,:••74. .... liCt•'•
,i,- ,. ....
, .• • 194 7,.,-..-,1754 ..,;cilar!AI
• 16) , 4 -
, ..e., .., _. .
, , ,A,;', 4 ' •
PAY,'•.. . $'' ' 1.., ft.1,441401r: 4.,, -4.'',.4 4.:.',J,t.f.„-2.-..*..:.'i_''.i.• t 4...'.1 % 'Wir Pols
It_ett*Itgiliteigi. ' • * -vrfw.... "* /1= isqiiIiiv;.,d': •-•'.-- -; . • :‘,.... ., - ,. ,...., -...---7---,- '' -_ _ Eas -' '"ff
r: 1,..*);i ' ' • ...e,- • , ,--, '.: --' Y.fl'..-.'•-i• ' . ' ' .... ,_,f' t.'ri•," -1."'' . t.' -",r ' ''' . . ' ' ' -----t`'.4 ''....,-:.:111h;:.4,41 -: ' 4: ..• -..,',1*.-''..'-:'',...,‘..'„:i0".-.
....•.....,:i...,:::,.: i....-:.-.. - - ,--... . ..,. •- .- - . - -,./.. .....c- - --,,,,.Y •-•, , - 41,4744. _ - -;.-- - , • ---ti,"''.-
. ‘41:e ....i''..• ,:. ''' ---'..-'•.• :''-..s.---- . . ' - .- ,;',,-'..' '..--'.."-Y.: .. . ' - ' -- . - --. AK"IV:• - _ 1- .
' , , -_____ . -Vk.o........q.- .•) .'':- '.*,. .. '
, (r,
. /egg° . • - ., ...• : : . -.,-
/',1. fri'l.-14/4.12*(_.l '' * '' '' / . • . _... _
- '-t,--„,..- ' '''' ": .,,/' • ' ' ,_--._-
.
,e .
. .
._,.. _.,..,r: __ ---''!'":'16-' , . ` . • .1.'. A.
'------•-••:i
• •
..'41.T.1/ I;"il' :: .. ,'''1 j.) A ''''.' ,. , • -.''.,-..1. ,?' .,.- . _,..' ':. ••ri.,.• /- .-,r, ..,,.. ..•-:,„k,,..,..:-.• . . ..: . .. ..., . .. . ._ ___. ____-. __. ,__ ______.,,„.-.1.44PA... ,.,,t,";.:...;,/°-..;.,,;',"..y:'3
;',: V. r ' ..,-..• ,4•5_,•••• 'It'•, -, • •.•.1kVi,'.. ' - - •.• ..•••••• .'e/. '," ,,,i'•.....F.:-...", • 4. • • fi' .'' . .-..• ..-,..-.„....., • . .. .. . . - L.wy.....„.. -.-.. -.,, • --,,,.• 7^, / ''ii, i,,, .
if',I`L' ' . '•••...!....'.."' -' 'It--, Ill •' ' • ''-',r1:: .07-f.AUL' •. ' • •'- ,-' .4k,..• . -. ..- .4,1“ ..- . .-, ..",;ifr/. - . .,. ., ...,..,. • - . : - - '' -•'.:-' ..- '."--- V'f,41,,,...'"..."'" •„*.,'.,'•...411 ...." ,
x: AA 'i, >..,. 4.-,..."..4:.,.,•,.-. 7....... ...,./.,,,, joef'.....,,,_.tcl,..,..''.J..4.r.,-;:"; . .... :#,...„ %It, .,iy ,,', 17.. .. ',. ./. ,,,,,,,.;-„(....e./.. ..,. .- -
' " •.-4--is -..•,,...-- i i• „0. .- -.
• .1 --".........,, 14 4. •.' ,s -,-• of*. 7„var Apt 1" '.•.:-.-....-..Z... ,„, ,'1....Li. ,..,..../ ` •'.„,L r.' • 4........:=1,i‘. •'-'' -.4 '•
-'•„l'i• ;-'-.„.• _,-- . \
- - ! '..,,t-,:.' /,;•-/ 1,4L. .. P:r'''
N, - ;1,'u, ' '.''.. II -e. •_,;..-•
--r- . ,;:,,,,...,,42,.....,;....,..x.$ • •--...:„..-.., - - ,..... ,........ •
...i.,/ii.v,,,,,,,:,/,,e--,...":.f•,., ,„ .,-, ..*. ‘,..4.:„„,•••`,..._ _,....,j, &, •....,.. : . , •
:• -.1,4,-....;;:-..°7 •-----51,...,, ,,' .., . `"...J.1 1 ' '. . ' '4It,''..' •.:'.•?,olo•. i;,--, , ,: 7? 4 ".. .-.1.".. .. .-. 44'' '.0.**:1.1:*---:.;2•Iwie.-* 1%0'19.•';',,•';''*.•,,f.' i ''.., ,;:=C:-., * ./s.VAIIA,4*•-•",..-•' ',.. , „.
'7'1.1''I-'••.•••,'"444,52(1,,,_;:e -•••••..•,‘ 1 v * •': • i --''. .-. dy!A.:.. ,, .:,'ft; ( ••:• ,-4••.• • • -ft ,...t . .. „.. e$4.I,A „t• .. i,41;4•• ,,,..4 r'• ix. - .•.•••..(0 ..', : _•- _.. , I, ..,,.e 2, •
.". •'r 1, {..-41. • \ .-- •-•-•-• IT N.,„„ .ify- i .y. , ., , 4 • 4.• ' f • .• •• • ,. ,,,. .. ..,-, ...• •-f , Ai'. I, ,f•. 1 i ;pi
•• ';I: Lir- 2.. -\\I ,.-:;:z e•-- ). ......_If 01,-;.--.-, _. - - .. ....-„ -." i _iv ., , -,k i- -__.., - --a „- .
;...'•.-'",2"-..,...17,,,:: .-'•-...A.±,-.A.11%‘riT:2 i *lit : r--.''' ir - - '-- ''''. .'• '.e.1;7. • • .., -• '‘ ' ' .,, ....4‘.1:4;:ii` .e. •,Orit,,,• -• -, '4 4.:i,• . -. :, •,,..,:, ,i,,,..
, .4.
•
• ,.. ,,,;‘,.....ti....„,.,.. ... ,...,,,,.... . ,,:,...ei.f 4-...4.21.,..1.1
'•7.-
..,•:,.." ' '•• • "b., - 17.0)'‘‘., - •itig. -- .... .-7..T0- •••-t.,,,.... . .....: ., .2.... . _ • . . .,,.. . ... . .. . .. .„„,.,.. .. .• . i. •./1;!......,s,-,1„,,,•.*••.-..,„,.s.i, _...x. . r, .• .1, . -,;,,,,,,,fwv,.,..---, • .1, , le 7.' .. .'.. . ---7. -' ' '
. _ . " ' - -.•:-7,-''....t.....46.IN,'''"-!..:,,, i-,-
,.„. • _.t.-.
caSk ' C STEVEN LANGFORD ARCHITECTS, INC.
n leaVea. ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Architecture•Interiors •Planning•Engineering
PROJECT TEAM
A&L has assembled a team of qualified Roger Willner, Principal in Charge of
Architects and Engineers to specifically Construction Administration, will phase into
address the needs of this project. This the project as the construction documents
team will be assigned the project as their are being prepared. Roger has over 35
number one priority and will spend the time years of experience in municipal facilities
necessary to meet the agreed upon and coordination with governing agencies.
schedule. Additional personnel will be
assigned as required. Project Team Involvement:
It is difficult to assess the percent of time
All members of the proposed project team each team member would devote to the
are familiar with the City of Huntington project without knowing the requirements
Beach, and have been active in other of the schedule. If the project is not
related City projects. This is the same team interrupted by lengthy variance processing
responsible for the majority of similar and Client and governmental approvals, the
projects listed herein. in-house team members could devote nearly
100% of their time. Under ideal conditions,
The following key personnel are the following breakdown would apply:
immediately available to carry your project
to a successful conclusion: Neill Noble: 80% during the Preliminary
Phase, 20% during the Construction
Neill Noble, as Principal-in-Charge and Documents, and 10% during Construction
Project Designer, will be the contact Administration Phase.
person, responsible for the project from
beginning to end. He brings over 35 years Edward Bledowski: 20% Design
of experience to the team and has been Development, 80% during Construction
with A&L since 1968. Document Phase, and 25% during the
Construction Administration Phase.
Edward.Bledowski, Project Architect, will
be responsible for all construction Roger Willner: 15% during the
documents and the majority of construction Construction Administration Phase.
administration.
Tony Anthony: 20% during the Design
Tony Anthony, Project Review Principal, Phases, and 10% through the remainder.
will also serve as an Alternate
Representative in the event Neill Noble is Steven Langford: 100% during the
unable to continue with the project. Construction Document Phase.
3
PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - MUNICIPAL PIER BUILDINGS
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
•
NEILL NOBLE, AIA
Principal-in-Charge
T. V. ANTHONY, AIA STEVEN W. LANGFORD, AIA
Principal-Project Review Food Facilities Coordination
4
EDWARD BLEDOWSKI, AIA ROGER WILLNER, AIA
Project Architect Principal in Charge of •
Construction Administration
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL ENGINEER
- Dames & Moore F. T. Andrews, Inc.
Robert Trivison, SE Ivan Ray Cranston, PE
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER/LIGHTING DESIGN COST ESTIMATOR
GDS Design Group Construction Analysts, Inc.
Gregory Smith, PE Richard Sindelar
•
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Architecture•Interiors•Planning•Engineering
NEILL NOBLE, AIA, ARCHITECT
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE OF DESIGN
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Architecture, 1960
University of Southern California
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION:
Registered Architect:
California #C4405, 1962
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
American Institute of Architects
EXPERIENCE:
Neill Noble brings over thirty-five years of experience in architecture to the firm,
-- including his work for the California State Division of Architecture and the United
States Army Corp of Engineers. As principal-in-charge of design, Neill provides
leadership and management of all design aspects of the project, from inception through
completion. His responsibilities include defining and organizing concepts established
during the programming phase, developing all phases of design, and maintaining on-
going client communication.
In more than twenty years with Anthony and Langford/Architects, Neill has been the
project architect and chief of design on over 150 major projects throughout Southern
California; many of which have received Honor and Merit Awards from the American
Institute of Architects, California Building Officials, and the Los Angeles Beautiful
Society. As an award-winning designer, he has an organized approach to fresh design
ideas for each new project, while blending in knowledge gained from previous
experience with similar projects.
Selected Project Experience Includes:
- Caverly Retail Center, 201 Main St.
Restaurant and Baskin Robbins, Huntington Beach, CA
- Two Story Commercial Building, 221 Main St.
10,000 sf retail building, Huntington Beach, CA
- Huntington Beach Central Library Kitchen Facility
Huntington Beach, CA
- Arcadia Senior Citizen Center Kitchen and Banquet Rooms
Arcadia, CA
- Hughes Aircraft Company, Employee Cafeteria and Dining Room
Ground Systems Group, Fullerton, CA
- Garden Grove Community Center, Kitchen Facility
Garden Grove, CA
- Whittier Senior Citizen Center, Food Service Facility
Whittier, CA
5
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Architecture• Interiors • Planning•Engineering
T. V. ANTHONY II, AIA, PRESIDENT •
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Architecture, 1945
University of Southern California
Architecture, University of Kansas, 1944
REGISTRATION:
Registered Architect:
California No. C-1260, 1950
Nevada No. 714, 1971
NCARB Cert. No. 10483, 1971 •
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
-American Institute of Architects
-International Conference of Building Officials
-USC Architectural Guild
-Community Redevelopment Agency Assoc. of CA
-Industrial League of Orange County
EXPERIENCE:
Tony Anthony has been .a principal of Anthony and Langford/Architects since its origin
in 1950. As president of the firm, he is directly involved in the coordination and
development of all major projects completed by the firm. He provides general
supervision of all architectural departments from design through completion, as well as
project quality control, and administrative responsibilities.
His background and experience represents over forty-five years in all phases of
architecture. His ability to promptly identify and react to the needs and special
concerns of the client has been a consistent factor in the technical execution of the
many municipal, educational, and commercial projects developed by the firm.
Selected Project Experience Includes:
- Huntington Beach Central Library Kitchen Facility
Huntington Beach, CA
- Arcadia Senior Citizen Center Kitchen and Banquet Rooms
Arcadia, CA
- Hughes Aircraft Company, Employee Cafeteria and Dining Room
Ground Systems Group, Fullerton, CA
- Garden Grove Community Center, Kitchen Facility
Garden Grove, CA
- Whittier Senior Citizen Center, Food Service Facility
Whittier, CA
- U.S. Naval Station NCO Club, Long Beach, CA
6
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Architecture•Interiors •Planning•Engineering
•
E. ROGER WILLNER, AIA
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE OF
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
EDUCATION:
University of Southern California; Architecture, 1951
Pasadena City College; Architecture, 1948
REGISTRATION:
Registered Architect:
California No. C-2334, 1957
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: •
-American Institute of Architects
-California Council of Architects
-Construction Specifications Institute
EXPERIENCE:
Mr. Willner became a principal of Anthony and Langford/Architects in 1955 in the
position of construction administrator. He is directly responsible for construction
administration, cost control, specifications, and research into products and methods of
construction.
Contributing over 40 years of broad experience, Roger has a vast knowledge of
effective building construction methods and materials. His many years of interaction
with members of the construction industry, have greatly contributed to the firm's many
successful projects.
Selected Project Experience Includes:
- H. Louis Lake Senior Citizen Center, Food Service Facility
- Whittier Senior Citizen Center, Food Service Facility
- Santa Fe Springs Community Center, Food Service Facility
- Lynwood Community Center, Kitchen and Banquet Rooms
- U.S. Naval Station NCO Club, Long Beach, CA
- Huntington Beach Central Library Kitchen Facility
- Arcadia Senior Citizen Center Kitchen and Banquet Rooms
- Hughes Aircraft Company, Employee Cafeteria and Dining Room
Ground Systems Group, Fullerton, CA
- Garden Grove Community Center, Kitchen Facility
- Whittier Senior Citizen Center, Food Service Facility
7
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Architecture• Interiors • Planning• Engineering
EDWARD A. BLEDOWSKI, AIA
ARCHITECT
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Architecture, 1979
(Awarded Graduate Assistantship)
Bachelor of Science, Architecture, 1978
City College of the City University of New York,
School of Architecture and Environmental Studies
(Graduated Magna Cum Laude)
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION:
Registered Architect:
California #C-17580, 1986
New York #015799, 1983
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
American Institute of Architects
AWARDS:
A/A Henry Adams Certificate for Outstanding
Scholastic Achievement in Architecture
EXPERIENCE:
Edward Bledowski joined A&L in 1985. He is responsible for the development of
project schedules, manpower requirements, and consultant coordination. His decisions
are based on professional experience accrued in all phases of the architectural field,
from design inception through construction supervision. He has an in-depth knowledge
of intricate technical installations requiring close consultant coordination as well as a
familiarity with multi-phased construction schedules necessary for work at fully
operational facilities.
He has spearheaded Anthony and Langford's entrance into Computer Aided Design and
Drafting (CADD), and currently directs various CADD projects.
Selected Project Experience Includes:
- Huntington Beach Central Library, Kitchen Facility
Huntington Beach, CA
- Arcadia Senior Citizen Center, Kitchen and Banquet Rooms
- Hughes Aircraft Company, Employee Cafeteria and Dining Room
Ground Systems Group, Fullerton, CA
- Pico Rivera Golf Course Clubhouse, Kitchen and Cafeteria
Pico Rivera, CA
- Garden Grove Community Center Kitchen Facility
Garden Grove, CA
- North Orange County R.O.P. Orangebrook Food Service Facility
Fullerton, CA
8
ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT RESTAURANT SPECIALIST
STEVEN LANGFORD ARCHITECTS, INC.
18218 East McDurmott, Suite D
Irvine, CA 92714 (714) 833-9066
STEVEN W. LANGFORD, AIA
EDUCATION: Bachelor of Architecture
Southern California Institute
of Architecture
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Registered Architect
California No. C-14106
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Institute of Architects
EXPERIENCE:
Steven Langford has over 18 years of experience in municipal and commercial projects.
Prior to establishing his own practice, he acquired considerable experience with leading
Southern California architectural and interior design firms specializing in restaurant and
hospitality projects. As a result of his experience and reputation in the restaurant
industry, Mr. Langford established the firm of Steven Langford Architects in 1988,
specializing in restaurant design.
Mr. Langford has been responsible for the development of numerous projects
constructed nationally, such as Rusty Pelican, Mimmi's Cafe, UCI Kitchen Facility, Soup
Exchange, Red Onion Restaurants, and many others.
His experience includes design, contract administration, estimating, construction
• coordination and cost control.
Related Project Experience Includes:
• Houston's Restaurants • El Torito Bar and Grill
• Buffalo Ranch Steakhouses h ses Manana's Restaurants
• California Pizza Kitchens • Don Jose Restaurant
• Red Robin Restaurants • Hof's Hut, Cerritos
• Rusty Pelican Restaurants • Good Earth Restaurants
• Rusty Duck Restaurants Sacramento • Chevy's Mexican Restaurants
• Acapulco Restaurants • El Gallo Giro Huntington Park
• Black Angus Restaurants • Japengo Cafe, Hyatt Hotel
• Cask 'n Cleaver Restaurants • Kiva Grill La Jolla
• Red Onion Restaurants • Medieval Times Buena Park
• Coco's Restaurants
• Soup Exchange Restaurants
9
F. T. ANDREWS, INC. MECHANICAL ENGINEER
IVAN RAY CRANSTON, JR.
PRESIDENT
EDUCATION:
B.S., Mechanical Engineering
University of Idaho, 1961
REGISTRATION:
Registered Mechanical Engineer
CA #M14001, 1967
Certified Energy Auditor
CA #830024
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
•
-American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers
Orange Empire Chapter
-California Society of Professional Engineers, Orange County Chapter
-Association of Energy Engineers, California Chapter
-Consulting Engineers Association of California
-Institute for the Advancement of Engineering
-American Institute of Architects/OCC, Affiliate Member
EXPERIENCE:
Mr. Cranston joined F. T. Andrews in 1964. He is responsible for management, design
and preparation of construction documents, and construction supervision of mechanical
and plumbing systems for public, commercial, industrial and military projects.
Mr. Cranston's experience includes projects involving air conditioning design, low
temperature refrigeration, white rooms, plumbing design, swimming pool design, pro-
cess piping design, industrial engineering, economic evaluations, construction
estimating and field services.
Related project experience includes:
- Shogun of Japan, Huntington Beach
- Kobe Japanese Steak House, La Mirada
- American Courthouse, Santa Ana
- Pepe Lopez, Thousand Oaks
- Copa De Oro, Costa Mesa
- El Torito, Westminster, Harbor Island, Marian Del Rey
- Acacia, Garden Grove
- Crown Point, Dana Point
- Arby's, San Jose, Escondido, Long Beach, Oceanside
- Fallini's Grden Pasadena
- Dunkin Donuts
- Shakey's
10
GDS DESIGN GROUP ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
YOUNES SOUFI, MS, P.E.
CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
EDUCATION:
B.S., Electrical Engineering, 1971
University of Southern California
M.S., Electrical Engineering, 1966
University of Tehran
REGISTRATION:
Registered Electrical Engineer:
California
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
California Society of Professional Engineers
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
Illuminating Engineering Society
EXPERIENCE:
Mr. Soufi has over 20 years of experience in the field of electrical engineering. His
diversified work includes small to expansive facilities, in which he performs complete
electrical system design and engineering, construction administration and multi-
discipline coordination. He also has extensive experience in institutional, commercial
and residential projects.
Mr. Soufi is an expert in grounding systems and power distribution design (short circuit,
voltage regulation and protective relay coordination). He has written and edited
numerous transformer specifications for various applications.
Related project experience includes:
- Norwalk Community Center, Norwalk, CA
- Westminster Fire Station Addition, Westminster, CA
- Columbus Tustin Park Gymnasium, Tustin, CA
- Sports Club/LA, West Los Angeles, CA
- Sports Connection Spectrum Club, Manhattan Beach, CA
- Spa at the Center, Costa Mesa, CA
- Howell High School, Howell, MI
- Kenny Elementary School Media Ctr, Sacramento, CA
- California College, Costa Mesa, CA
11
I i
GDS DESIGN GROUP LIGHTING DESIGNER
GREGORY D. SMITH, IALD, IES
PRINCIPAL LIGHTING DESIGNER
EDUCATION:
Grand Rapids College, 1978
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
-International Association of Lighting Designers
-IlluminatingEn ineerin Society
Engineering
•
EXPERIENCE:
Mr. Smith has been active in the electrical engineering and lighting design field since
1976. He has been a member of the Illuminating Engineering Society since 1980,
serving on the Board of Managers in the Southern Arizona and Orange County chapters.
Mr. Smith is an instructor for the IES Advanced Interior Lighting Applications course
and also teaches Interior Lighting at the California College of Interior Design, Costa
Mesa.
• Project experience includes office buildings, libraries, auditoriums, recreation facilities,
hotels, and retail centers. Mr. Smith has won major design awards for design
excellence, including the IES Special Citation for the Sports Connection Club in
Manhattan Beach.
Related project experience includes:
- Huntington Beach Library Expansion, Huntington Beach, CA
- Westminster Fire Station Addition, Westminster, CA
— - Norwalk Community Center, Norwalk, CA
- Southgate Auditorium, Southgate, CA
- Ritter Ranch Street Lighting, Palmdale, CA
- Abbey Center for the Arts, Westminster, CA
- Columbus Tustin Park Gymnasium, Tustin, CA
- Kenny Elementary School Media Ctr, Sacramento, CA
- Sports Club/LA, West Los Angeles, CA
- Transit Center Depot, Claremont, CA
- Sports Connection Spectrum Club, Manhattan Beach, CA
- Spa at the Center, Costa Mesa, CA
- Howell High School, Howell, MI
12
DAMES & MOORE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
ROBERT TRIVISON, SE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
EDUCATION:
B.S., Structural Engineering
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
REGISTRATION
Structural and Civil Engineer, California
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
-Structural Engineers Association of Southern California
EXPERIENCE:
Mr. Trivison has over twenty-five years of Structural Engineering analysis, design and
drafting experience. He joined Dames & Moore in 1990. Mr. Trivison previously had a
design engineering company located in Orange, and worked on over three thousnd
projects.
Related project experience includes:
- Crazy Horse Steak House, Santa Ana, CA
- Restaurant End of Pier, 2-story, Huntington Beach, CA
- Ham's Restaurant, 1-story, Mission Viejo, CA
- Irvine Park Restaurant and Pavilion, Irvine, CA
- Spaghetti Factory, Fullerton, CA
- Asian Gardens Mini Mall, Westminster, CA
- Far West Plaza,.Retrofit & Remodel, Dana Point, CA
•
- Plaza Del Sol, 2-story, Palm Springs, CA
- Highland Plaza Addition, San Bernardino, CA
•
13
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Architecture•Interiors •Planning•Engineering
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
MUNICIPAL PIER BUILDINGS
ri in theattachedExterior finishes, although not fully
project, as described tg
RFP, consists of three buildings on the established, have been researched,
Huntington Beach Pier: selected, and are being used on other
buildings on the Pier. The tenant is
• 620 SF Snack Shop providing interior design and kitchen
• 820 SF Bait & Tackle/Snack Shop planning for the shell, which, when
• 6,513 SF Restaurant completed, will accept all fixtures and
equipment, ready for occupancy.
Preliminary designs for the three (3)
buildings, somewhat beyond the schematic To ensure the thorough coordination of all
design stage, have been provided by the restaurant equipment and interior finish
City. The Architect's scope of services for requirements into integrated bid documents,
this project will be based on the contents of we will utilize the expertise of restaurant
the RFP, our Proposal, and Standard Form specialist, Steven Langford, AIA.
of Agreement. Services will consist of the Representative experience of Steven
following five phases, as further described Langford Architects is included herein.
in Section II of the RFP:
A&L is very familiar with the City of
1) Design Development Huntington Beach, its departments,
2) Construction Documents processes, and many of its staff. We have
3) Bidding Administration recently completed four buildings within
4) Construction Administration/Support view of the Pier and have designed several
5) Project Acceptance Assistance other projects within the City. We are
thoroughly familiar with the site and all
The project has been given much thought, elements of the proposed project.
study, and master planning over the last
few years by the City and its consultants, All members of the proposed project team
and the Pier has been prepared to receive have recent experience with the City of
these new buildings. We are aware of the Huntington Beach and with projects similar
issues identified by the City requiring the in nature. In addition, this is the same
processing of zoning exceptions and project team that has worked together on
building code variances, such as building the majority of similar projects listed herein.
height and vertical circulation for the
handicapped.
14
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Architecture• Interiors •Planning•Engineering
PROJECT APPROACH
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER BUILDINGS
ORGANIZATIONAL PHASE
Anthony and Langford/Architects (A&L) Given the scale and scope of the project,
encourages a preliminary stage of work to our activities would include:
define the methodology and working
relationship between all members 1. Assembly and review of existing
involved in the project. These individuals documentation, including:
will include representatives of the City,
the tenant, A&L, and our consultants. • City criteria
• Correspondence with governing
In this phase, team leaders from each agencies
organization will meet to precisely define • Pier information
constraints of schedule and budgets as • Location of utilities
defined by project requirements. Project • Tenant information
organization and decision-making will be
clarified, and procedures will be 2. Review of project constraints:
established for documenting and
confirming information. A project goal • Zoning requirements and exceptions
statement will be prepared that includes • Environmental restrictions
quality assurance and control parameters. • Building Code reviews including
Title 24 and ADA
The principal objectives of this phase are • Special ordinances and regulations
to align perceptions of what is expected • Project budget
of each team member in each phase of • Regulatory agency requirements
service, when it is expected, and most • Structural and mechanical capacity
importantly, to establish a cohesiveness of the Pier
and continuity to the team that will serve
as the foundation of an orderly design 3. Review of the architectural program
process. (Four meetings are specified in prepared by the City, defining space
Item 1 of the RFP.) requirements for all building elements
and tenant improvements required for
FAMILIARIZATION, PROGRAMMING AND the project
DESIGN'DEVELOPMENT PHASE
Preliminary Design Documents will be
A&L emphasizes the need to assemble prepared based on the designs provided
the information available on the project, by the City, describing refinements and
to evaluate its assumptions, and to alternatives within that context.
establish a clear understanding of the
project's goals and objectives.
15
PROJECT APPROACH
Continued- 2
Upon approval of the Preliminary Design which final document modification will be
Documents, refinement of all aspects of completed prior to the project being sent
the design will be undertaken to further to bidders.
define materials, components of
construction, and engineering systems. One important benefit of A&L's
An updated schedule and a project budget organization is that those people who
will be presented. All necessary zoning have been working on the design, and are
and Building Department variances will be most familiar with the intricacies of the
processed. project, are the very people responsible
for production of Construction
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE Documents. We do not, as so often
happens in firms with separate design and
Accurate documentation and specification production departments, lose continuity
is essential to ensure implementation of during the hand-off from design to
decisions made during design. A&L production.
employs the latest techniques and
practices for expediting the production of DESIGN QUALITY REVIEW
Construction Documents, including the
use of our CADD system to produce the A major effort through this phase is in our
working drawings. design quality review. Three levels of
coordination and checking have been
Specific activities will include: established by A&L. The first level takes
place through the documentation process
• Project Management and Control and monthly coordination checks by the
• Production of Contract Documents project team related to the monthly
• 50% Construction Documents Project Control meetings.
Review
• Equipment Layout Coordination At the end of each phase, a senior staff
• Final Building System Coordination individual unrelated with the project is
• Technical Specifications assigned to thoroughly check all aspects
• Final Cost Estimate of the project documents. Prior to the
• Submission for Agency Approvals project going for construction contract
• Submission of Construction bids, our Quality Assurance Review Group
Documents for Client Review reviews the documents.
This period is also used by the team for BIDDING AND AWARD PHASE
closer coordination with mechanical,
electrical, and structural systems. A&L will assist the City in the preparation
Following final coordination within the of the Bid Package for release to bidders.
office, the Construction Documents Clarification will be provided by A&L as
package is submitted for agency and required during the Bid Period.
Client review and comment, following
16
PROJECT APPROACH
Continued- 3
A&L will also assist in the analysis of POST-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
bidders for the award of the construction
contract. As specified in the RFP, A&L's project
involvement will continue through the
Specific activities will include: Post-Construction Period. Services
involve basic technical areas such as
• Addenda Preparation start-up assistance, maintenance and
• Pre-bid Conference operation reviews, and coordination and
• Review and Evaluation production of Record Drawings.
• Award Contract
Beyond the technical areas, the office is
CONSTRUCT/ON PHASE increasingly concerned with post-
occupancy evaluations as a means of
A&L's construction administration assessing the effectiveness of project
personnel will work with the City's delivery. These studies are an important
representative during the Construction aspect of our practice. It contributes to
Phase, providing document interpretation our understanding of the use of buildings
and clarification. The A&L team during and how to make buildings work for those
this phase will include the Project who use them.
Architect, Ed Bledowski, and the chief of
our Construction Administration Division,
principal Roger Willner.
17
ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS
Architecture•Interiors•Planning•Engineering
ALTERNATE FINISHES
EXTERIOR WALL FINISH ALTERNATIVES FUTURE CERAMIC TILE WALL FINISH:
TO TILE MURALS:
1. Lath and cement plaster, painted with 1. Installed over lath and plaster;
an acrylic paint...$6.00/sf
Sandblast plaster
Add for clear anti-graffiti coating Apply leveling coat of acrylic plaster
...$1.25/sf
Thinset tile, back butter with acrylic
A number 30 sand finish (smoother than mortar
normal) can be more easily cleaned.
2. Harditexture System, by James Hardie 2. Installed over Harditexture System;
Building Products (a fiber cement board
with textured elastomeric coating Metal lath over waterproof memebrane
...$3.50/sf Cement scratch coat
Add for clear anti-graffiti coating Mortar bed
...$1.25/sf
Tile set with cement mortar bond coat
Graffiti cleansing can be accomplished
using a pressurized water spray, followed
by an application of clear anti-graffiti
coating on the affected area.
18
ATTACHMENT
CITY'S RFP / SCOPE OF WORK
ATTACHMENT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
MUNICIPAL PIER BUILDINGS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
May 14, 1993
I. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE
The City of Huntington Beach is requesting proposals from qualified architectural
firms for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and cost estimates to construct
the following buildings on the City's Municipal Pier:
1. A 620 square foot single story bermlime snack shop.
2. A 800 square foot single story bait and tackle/snack shop.
3. A 6,513 square foot two story Pierhead Restaurant.
City staff, through the design development process, has established the size, shape,
mass, colors, and materials of each building. Attached are the approved elevations
and floor plans for each structure. Each structure shall include the following
specific architectural features:
1. Exterior building surface shall be gray terrazzo.
2. Roof shall be copper with standing seams.
3. Construction techniques shall incorporate provisions for tile murals in the
recessed areas of the buildings. (Note: The finish of the area set aside for
the murals will be determined by cost. Your proposal shall include alternate
finishes and estimated costs.)
II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of architectural services, as outlined below, shall include: preparation of
construction documents, administration of bidding, technical support during
construction, and project acceptance.
Design Development Plan
1. Meet with City staff to confirm scope of work, preliminary design,
materials, budget, etc. Four Meetings
2. Coordination of tenant improvements with interior improvements. (Note:
Interior improvements will be provided by the City. These improvements, to
be contained in the project Plans and Specifications, include flooring,
ceilings, partitions, walls, utilities to tenant fixture locations, handicap lift,
stairs, and completed restrooms.) Four Meetings
RFP: Municipal Pier Build- s
May 14, 1993
Page two
3. Confirm that buildings meet Title 24 and ADA handicap regulations.
Confirmation includes the processing of any required variances.
4. Determine utility requirements for each structure. Determination must
include an analysis of the existing Pier utility chase capacity.
5. Determine structural support requirements for each structure and compare to
current load maximum of Pier.
6. Coordinate the receipt of all tenant improvement plans.
Preparation of Construction Documents
1. Prepare all Plans, Specifications, and cost estimates including, but not limited
to, the following items:
• Pier location plans
. Respective building floor plans
• Exterior elevations and sections
. Reflected ceiling plans
▪ Schedules
▪ Roof plans
. Interior elevations
▪ Details
. Structural framing plans and details •
▪ Structural calculations
▪ Electrical power and lighting plans
▪ Electrical schedules and details
▪ Plumbing plans, schedules, and details
▪ Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
. Title 24 energy calculations
▪ Interior handicap lift plans
2. Perform all necessary investigations and measurements required to prepare the
preliminary plans and construction drawings.
3. Attend periodic meetings with City staff during the preparation of preliminary
and construction drawings and obtain all applicable building permits. (Note: A
pre-submittal "on-site" meeting has been scheduled for May 20, 1993, at 10:00
AM to discuss in detail the scope of services and intent of project. See
location map for direction to meeting.)
4. Based on an approval of the preliminary plans and cost estimates, the architect
shall prepare and provide 40 sets of the ne
cessary construction drawings and
specifications as required to advertise the project for bids. (Note: This task
includes the cost of all miscellaneous printing, etc. for preliminary plan check
and final drawings.)
Administration of Bidding
The advertising for bids and awarding of a contract for these buildings will be
administered by City staff. However, the architect will be required to:
1. Distribute bid documents (i.e., Plans and Specifications will be purchased at
architects's office.)
RFP: Municipal Pier Build
May 14, 1993
Page three
2. Address and issue all addendas (includes fielding all inquiries/questions about
Plans and Specifications.)
3. Assist in informal evaluation of bids.
Technical Support During Construction
1. Interpret Plans and Specifications
2. Review all shop drawings
3. Respond to all requests for information.
4. Make recommendations on Change Orders.
5. Attend weekly job site meetings.
Project Acceptance Assistance
1. Conduct final project review and prepare "punch list."
2. Provide one acceptable set of reproducible "as—builts" mylar drawings. (Note:
10% of the contract amount will be withheld until the "as—builts" are submitted
and approved.)
III. INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM THE CITY
Preliminary plans depicting the location, size, and form of each building are attached
for reference. In addition, a conceptual cost estimate, prepared on October 4, 1991,
is included with this request.
IV. ARCHITECT'S REPRESENTATIVE
The Architect will assign a responsible representative and an alternate, who both shall
be identified in the proposal. The Architect's representative will remain in
responsible charge through project completion. If the Architect's primary
representative should be unable to continue with the project, then the Architect's
alternate representative will become the primary representative. Any other changes
in responsible representative must be approved by the City. The City will have the
right to reject other proposed changes in personnel, and may consider any other
changes in responsible personnel as a breach of the contract.
V. CITY'S REPRESENTATIVE
The Public Works Department will assign a responsible representative to assume
liaison responsibilities for the City.
VI. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The Architect shall maintain the following minimum insurance coverages during the
duration of the project:
1. General Liability Coverage — $1,000,000 CLS per occurrence (Note: If
provided coverage is under a form which includes a designated general
aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1,000,000.)
•
RFP: Municipal Pier Builc
May 14, 1993
Pag
e four
2. Professional Liability Coverage - $500,000 per occurrence (Note: A "claims
made" policy is acceptable.)
3. Worker's Compensation Coverage - $100,000 bodily injury by accident, each
accident; $100,000 bodily injury by disease, each employee; $250,000 bodily
injury by disease, policy limit.
VII. FORM OF AGREEMENT
The Architect will enter into an agreement with the City based on the contents of
this RFP, the Architect's proposal, and a standard form of agreement.
XIII. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
Proposals for this service are to be submitted to this office no later than 5:00 P.M. on
Friday, May 28, 1993. Seven copies of the proposal should be submitted in a sealed
envelope. Two copies of the fixed fee proposal should be submitted in a separate,
sealed envelope, marked "Fee Proposal."
Each proposal should include the following information:
1. Experience of Your Firm
a. List and describe the projects for which you have provided architectural
services which are similar in scope to the Municipal Pier Buildings. Is the
team you propose to employ on this project the same one used on identified
past projects?
b. Brief history of firm. Including length of time in business. Include
information on any sub-consultants who would be involved in the project.
c. Identify all projects within the last five years that have entered into
litigation. Explain the circumstances surrounding the issue of litigation.
2. Project Team
a. Who will be in charge of the project; what staff will be assigned to the
project, and what will be the team structure and responsibilities?
b. How long has the person in charge been with your firm?
c. List specific projects that this team has worked on together, as well as
individually.
d. What percentage of each individual's time will be devoted to this project?
e. From what location will this office operate?
3. Proposal Format
Proposals should contain no more than approximately 20 pages, including exhibits.-'
Fee proposals should contain only enough pages to clearly indicate the breakdown
of proposed fees. It is not necessary to include a breakdown of labor hours.
RFP: Municipal Pier Bui1c ;
May 14, 1993
Page five
The following features should be included or incorporated in the proposal:
a. Page numbering
b. Index
c. Team organization chart with names
d. Understanding of the Project
e. Descriptions of similar projects
f. Brief resumes of key staff
g. Hourly rate schedule (fee proposal only)
IX. INTERVIEWS
A short list of firms may be required to make an oral presentation at an interview
panel after proposal evaluation.
X. EVALUATION CRITERIA
The criteria below will be used in evaluating proposals and interviews. A point value
system will be established, based on the approximate weighting indicated below. Fee
proposals will be opened for only top rated firms after ratings are completed. At that
time, fee may have some effect on the rating.
1. (15%) Understanding the project requirements
2. (15%) Approach to project
3. (20%) Experience of firm
4. (20%) Qualifications and experience of project team
5. ( 5%) Past performance record with City
6. (15%) Completeness of proposal
7. (10%) Commitment
DRN:gd
Attachments:
1. Approved Elevations and Floor Plans
2. Location Map for Pre—Submittal Meeting
3. Conceptual Cost Estimate
3421g/1-5