Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Black & Veatch Engineers - 1987-01-01
REQUAr FOR CITY COUNCII ACTION Date Fehr lar4z21,1 SBg Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator* E, ,�ppItOVED BY CITY COUNCIL Prepared by. Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works � � 1�L_ Subject: RESERVOIR HILL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (CC-7 12, Cr(y CLE Consistent with Council Policy? [>J Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: } STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The costs of engineering for the Reservoir Hill Assessment District exceeded the fee described in the original contract with Black and Veatch Engineers. RECOMMENDATION: Approve a contract amendment with Black and Veatch Engineering increasing the compensation from $112,600 to $168,000. ANALYSIS: The contract with Black and Veatch for engineering services on the Reservoir Hill Assessment District was awarded by the Citv Council on July 20, 1987. Although the work was to be completed within five months, difficulties in forming the district forced the engineer to be involved in the project for over 18 months. The costs of assessment engineering rose from $7,500 to $42,255 and design changes in the waterline added $14,000 to the project. Additional costs were incurred for attendinq progress and information meetings over a period of 18 months rather than 5 months, annual salary adjustments, and expenses of printing and as changes were made in assessment district boundaries and construction plans. The City greatly underestimated the cost of coming up with an equitable and saleable assessment district. FUNDING SOURCE: The final assessment included a reserve for engineering in the amount of $168,000. Although engineering costs exceeded this amount, no more funds are available. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny the request for additional compensation and do not approve the contract amendment. ATTACHMENTS: Amended Contract PEC:LFS:LGE:dw 1961/13 A` P10 5/85 i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I July 23, 1987 David G. Argo Regional Office Manager Black & Veatch Engineers 3100 Lake Center Drive Suite 140 Santa Ana, CA 92704 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday July 20, 1987 approved the Engineering Services Agreement between the City and your firm for Assessment Engineering and Design Services Reservoir Hill Assessment District (Pressure Zone) . Enclosed is a duly executed copy of said aqreement. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB;js Enclosure cc: Wayne Lee-Finance Don Noble-Department of Public Works Jeff Renna-Department of Public Works iiWt Lt t REQUESOFOR CITY COUNCIACTION . eWREwivit Dow Nob/E Date July 2 , 1987 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council APpVED BY Submitted by: Charles W. Tnon-pson, City Administrat r CITY CpUNCI , Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works �711' Subject: Reservoir Hill Assessment District , �; CITY C,�F1�A Consistent with Council Policy? [A Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: Statement of Issue: On May 6, 1987, staff received proposals from qualified consultants to provide assessment engineering and design services for the Reservoir Hill Assessment District. Recommendation: 1. Approve the selection of Black & Veatch Engineers to provide assessment engineering and design services for the Reserwir Hill Assessment District. 2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached consultant contract for a fee not to exceed $112,600.00. Analysis: Continued development of the Reservoir Hill area and the adjacent properties will necessitate the construction of new water mains in the area. The engineering and construction of these improvements will be paid for through the formation of an assessment district. The necessary plans/specifications and assessment engineering for these improvements are to be provided by an outside engineering consultant. Therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3.03, "Professional Services" of the Municipal Code, requests were solicited from qualified engineering firms to perform this work. On May 6, 1987, proposals were received and subsequently reviewed by staff. Based on this review, the Director of Public Works recommends the selection of Black and Veatch Engineering to provide assessment engineering and design services for this project. Funding Source: Cost of assessment engineering and design services: $112,600.00. Revenue Source: Funds of $149,500 are budgeted in the 1987-1988 fiscal account 920581 (Reservoir Hill Assessment) for these services. Alternative Actions: Deny approval of Black and Veatch and direct staff on has to proceed with these essential design services. Attachment: Consultant Contract. PIO 5/85 { , Certificate of Insurance T. 1 Is _ rH.S CCrmr-ICATC i3 %330CD AS A MAT-,eN OF RMATION UNt_r A-NU (:)NFERS NO RIGHTS UPON YOU T RTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT AN iN$UpANCE POLICY'AND DGE$NOT AfAENO-EX�OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED 8y'THE POLICIES L�3ECr This Is to Certify that RISK »� LIBERTY II Black & Veatch, ct al C � 6 p s�g MUMALb Mack & Veatch, Inc. �QY J I ame and 1500 M*adcv Lake Parkv*y address of F.Q. Box 8405 Insured. Kansas City, Ho 64114 is, a%the issue dale of this cortlhcnty,in3ured by the Comp,r,y under Itia j_ +JiVy(ios)I151od below.The Inyttiarce aftorcjeid by the liSied pollcy(ie")IS SUbf I 110 all heir term",OWWSiohS And Conditions and IS n01 allarod by any requirement,farm Or OOhdillOn Of any contract Or Otndf dOcumant with respect to which this car- tifiral6 May by issued. �'— TYPE CERT FxP DATE* OF ❑ CONTINUOUS POLICY OMIT OF POLICY ❑ EXTENDED NUMBER LIABILITY POLICY TERM COVERAGE AFFORDED UNDER W.0 EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY LAW OF THE rOLL0WIN5 STATES: Bodily Injury BY Ac6dent WORKERS' AK,AR,AZ,C.A,CO,=#DC, w E..hce. COMPENSATION 6/30/89 WC7-141-072023-178 FL,CA,HI,IL,IH,KS.KY >t . rXIs . ,XT w DaeLse 2dIC,�E,tiJ,Imo,Y9t,41�,0�, POI Um4 Opy„turns Agptepeta I Openy Damage Liability 6/30/89 TBl-141-072023-078 Z -- Pvr a kiffence W ❑ CLAIMS MADE *ng niV Y} tom_ RETRO DATE I Pn pvrl __ or9.nit et bn Jdcr J 1 uJ AS Tp FOR Atorne9 U OCCURRENCE ���7RON�� OIL C1�y neY At D ENDORSEMENTS 6(-o ll O OYY?t'. 000 CM EA(rH ACCIDENT•SiNGLE LIMIT-S.I.AND P,D,COMBINED L NON-OWNED EACH PERSON �n -X Q EACH ACCIDENT EACH ACCIDENT -f HIRED 6 30/8g I-141-072023-098 $ OR OCCURRENCE OR OCCURRENCE w J LOCATION(S)OF OPERATIONS 6 JOB M(It RppliCable) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS- 0. vA3= TRANSMISSION a neQ *If the Gcr i;i4at« axpiralivn duic is continuous or extended term, you will Ike notitied iT covernga Is terminated or roducsd beforo the care icate expiration date, Il—YOVAr, you Wt!l not Ue notiflod annually of the continudlion of coverage, Lib-erry Mutusl NOTICE OF CANCELLATION: That COMPANY WILL NOT TERMINATE OFF tn,suronce Group REDUCE THE INSURANCE Ah rUHUFD UNDER THE ABOVE POLICIES UNLESS 30 DAYS NOTICE OF SUCH TERMINATION OR HL•l3UC:TION HAS BEEN MAILED TO; AbnzrioNA.L 1!�mKp-D1 CITY OF EiTJWTM MLAM, in Q IQESS & * IZYKKS CITY OF Ilfl.'1ON BEA" �EHRTiFIr`ATE O DER-i EVJW�, CA 92648 U H D REPRESENT 06"30-" Qvdirla+ )'irk, ZZ 11A1 ISgUED Of=FICE - - __J a TN.ciim icaie i..,:.owe0 by LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE 3ROUP as resp.tas suer,In;Uran:x se:,;60 -nuc!by Thcy.-�ee. 5S 77�1 RI Company Name Nonal Indemnity Company CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE g1SK M,,,N 0E1AE4T 3024 Harney Street*Omaha,Nebraska 69131-3W -,tin certificate of Insurance is NOT an insurance policy and does Y�m d. r k e coverage afforded by tht policies listed harem. Notwithstanding any requirement,term Ur Condition of any contfal of er documt+nt with respect to which this certificate may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the policies described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such policies which may substantially limit coverage Where reference is made to an Aygivgatt-Limit,thole(ifnitf ale Cormpiny's maximum liability under th*Policy for the entire policy period regardless of the number of insvrecfs,claimants or 0-cewrences 3bZl date April 13 , 1989 NAME OF INSURED Black & Veatch, A Partnership & AM sated Companies P.O. ADDRE55 1500 Meadow Lake Parkways P.O. Box8405 Kansas City, MO 64114 POLICY NUMBER KINDS OF INSURANCE LIMITS EFFECTIVE EXPIRES COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EL50542 C] Occurrence form Ciaims-Made Form Coverages Premises Operations © ProducwCompleted Operations xg Other(Specify) §51,000,000/Clai 04-13-89, 05-;01-90 _„_ (,Architectg- & ,Eniaineers-)$5,000.0001Annu 1 Aggregate p01 {r.X T,Jmifg of Cl ai s Expeniges Cranes dl Aggregate Limit S Prudutts-Completed Operations Aggregate Limit _ Personal III Advertisrrry Inlvey Limit Each Occurrence Limit F-ue uamage LIMIT (Any One Fire) _ Medical Expvnw LIMit(Any One Person) S Aggregate limit pn Claims f,ipensas 4 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Bodily In)ury Each PCIwri $ Each Occurrence S Property Damage Each Octurrence f Bodily Inlvey and Property Damage Combined Single Limit; EXCESS LIABILITY IJ Automobile p General Liability Name of Primary Insvrer Primary Limits EMCC„LIMAS General Aggregate Lnn"t S [] Aggregate Limit inclusive of Claims Expenses Workers Compensation III StatutoryLimrts T� p AOTIt3, Emplyyer's Liability t -4vvmA VIA Other Jvr-De u'9'C1 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS&OCATIONSNEHICLES Project "19155In WrICI in the evert of any material change in or cancellation of said policies,the COMPANY w%W 8 JX167K obligated to, notif Ahr party to wh m this Cert;f,cate•s addressed C change w i:anceti ti6n, days prior �0 7ti;,Ct rliticd(r issued tu. Alexander & Alexander, Inc . P. 0. Ho 13647 City of HUntington Reach KaLnsa ity, O 64199 - -- By- - - HuntingtonTitle All tt,-100h(tf✓1) ROTE TO AGXNT Mag Copy to home Offkt►rrrmediattiyr AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND BLACK & VEATCH , ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS This Agreement is made and entered into this ST day of Febru a, , 1989 , by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and BLACK & VEATCH , ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS, a General Partnership, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR. " WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR have heretofore entered into an agreement dated July 20 , 1987 , hereinafter referred to as "AGREEMENT" , for engineering services concerning the Reservoir Hill Assessment District; and CITY and CONTRACTOR mutually desire to amend the Agreement to provide for the performance of additional tasks by CONTRACTOR, and the payment of additional compensation to CONTRACTOR in consideration of the additional work to be performed, Now, therefore, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows : 1 . ADDITIONAL WORK CONTRACTOR is to perform such additional tasks as described in the letter dated January 5, 1989 , from Mr . David G . Argo to Mr . Les Evans , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference made a part hereof . 2 . ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the additional work as described in Section 1 above , CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR an additional Fifty Five Thousand Four Hundred and no/100 Dollars ( $55 ,400 . 00 ) above the original contract price of One Hundred Twelve Thousand Six Hundred and no/100 -1- • , 0 0 ( $112 ,600 .00 ) , for a total contract amount of One Hundred Sixty Eight Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($168 ,000 . 00 ) . 3 . REAFFIRMATION Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the original Agreement shall remain the same and shall continue in full force and effect . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers the day, month, and year first above written. CONTRACTOR: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BLACK & VEATCH, ENGINEERS- ARCHITECTS, a general partnership Mayor Da id G . Argo, Regional Office Manager 4d'-f- A n Stukuenberg, Part ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FORM: t City Clerk V City Attorney PVA REVI`rE rND APPPtO D: INITIATED 7 APPROVED: i City Administrator Di ector of Public Works rf -2- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING & DESIGN SERVICES RESERVOIR HILL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (PRESSURE ZONE ) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this �p'jh day of (Q_j, , 1987 , by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, herein- after referred to as "CITY, " and BLACK & VEATCH, ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS, a General Partnership, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR. " WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of an engineering consultant to provide assessment engineering and design services for the Reservoir Hill Assessment District (Pressure Zone) in the City of Huntington Beach; and CONTRACTOR has been selected to perform said services, NOW, THEREFORE , it is agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows : 1 . WORK STATEMENT CONTRACTOR shall provide all engineering services as described in the Request for Proposal and Technical Proposal and Fee Proposal, dated May 4 , 1987 , as amended May 19 , 1987 and submitted by CONTRACTOR (hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit "A" ) , which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference . Said services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as "PROJECT. " CONTRACTOR hereby designates David G . Argo, who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consulta- tions with CITY during the performance of this Agreement . 2 . CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONTRACTOR in the prosecution of this Agreement . 1 . 3 . TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement . The services of CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than five (5 ) months from the date of this Agreement . This time may be extended with the written per- mission of CITY . The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be as shown in the Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule . This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR. 4 . COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the engineering services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CON- TRACTOR a fee not to exceed One Hundred Twelve Thousand, Six Hundred Dollars ($112 ,600 ) . 5 . EXTRA WORK In the event of authorization, in writing by CITY, of changes from the work described in Exhibit "A, " or for other written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for such Extra Work, so long as the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6 . METHOD OF PAYMENT A . CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to monthly progress payments, on the basis of the percentage of completion, toward the lump sum, set forth in Section 4 herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedule set forth in Exhibit "A. " 2 . B . Delivery of work product: A copy of every technical memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted. C . CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY an invoice for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall 1 ) Reference this Agreement; 2 ) Describe the services performed; 3 ) Show the total amount of payment due; 4 ) Include a certification by a principal member of CONTRACTOR'S firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and 5 ) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed . Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30 ) days ' of receipt of the invoice by CITY . Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld . If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of the reasons for non-approval, within seven (7 ) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or has been brought into 3 . compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof. D . Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required under para- graph 6C , and in additional shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satis- fied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing perform- ance of the remainder of this Agreement . 7 . DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CITY acknowledges that CONTRACTOR' S plans and specifi- cations are instruments of professional service; nevertheless, CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder , including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notes, calculations, maps and other documents shall be turned over to CITY and shall become its property upon PROJECT completion or earlier termination of this Agreement. In the event this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY in completion of the PROJECT; however, CITY agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend CONTRACTOR against all damages, claims and losses, including defense costs, arising out of CITY 'S re-use of CONTRACTOR'S plans and specifications, except in the completion of the PROJECT in the case of termination hereof, without CONTRACTOR' S prior written authorization. A 8 . INDEMNIFICATION, DEFENSE , HOLD HARMLESS CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless city, its officers and employees from and against any and all liability, damages, costs, losses, claims and expenses, however caused, arising from contractor ' s negligence or willful misconduct in their performance of this agreement. Any concurrent negligence or willful misconduct of city, its officers and employees shall in no way diminish CONTRACTOR' s obligations hereunder . 9 . WORKERS ' COMPENSATION CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers ' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of Divisions 4 and 5 of the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar state or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indem- nify, defend, and hold harmless CITY from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature and description, including Attorney ' s fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against CITY, for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement . 10 . INSURANCE In addition to the Workers ' Compensation Insurance and CONTRACTOR' S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish to CITY the following insurance policies covering the PROJECT: 5 . A. General Liability Insurance . A policy of general public liability insurance, in the amount of $1,000 ,000 including motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall name CITY, its officers and employees as additional insureds, and shall specifically pro- vide that any other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage and that CONTRACTOR' S insurance shall be primary. B. Professional Liability Insurance. CONTRACTOR shall acquire a professional liability insurance policy in the amount of $5 ,000 ,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate covering the work performed by it hereunder . Certificates of Insurance for said policies shall be approved in writing by the City Attorney prior to the commencement of any work hereunder . All Certificates of Insurance ( and the policies of insurance or endorsements thereof) shall provide that any such certificates and policies shall not be cancelled without thirty (30 ) days ' prior written notice to CITY . 11 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor . CON- TRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any and all payments of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation, and other payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder . 12 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in accord- ance with the standards of the profession for similar profes- 6 . sionals performing services in this area at this time . CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR ' S services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing through the City Engineer , notice of which shall be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16 herein. 13 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to any other person or entity without the consent of CITY . 14 . COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CONTRACTOR shall not apply for a patent or copyright on any item or material produced as a result of this Agreement . 15 . CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement . No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of California Government Code Sections 1090, et seq. 16 . NOTICES Any notices or special instructions required to be given in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal delivery to CONTRACTOR' S agent (as designated in Section 1 herein- above) or to CITY ' S Director of Public Works, as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, addressed as follows: 7 . TO CITY : TO CONTRACTOR Mr . Paul Cook David G. Argo Director of Public Works Regional/Office Manager CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BLACK & VEATCH ENGINEERS 2000 Main Street 3100 Lake Center Drive, Suite 140 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana, California 92704 17 . ENTIRETY The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth the entire Agreement between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agree- ment to be executed by and through their authorized officers the day, month, and year first above written. CONTRACTOR: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BLACK & VEATCH ENGINEERS &X J "P al_� David G . Argo, Regional Office Manager dn Stukuenberg, Par r EST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk 7 City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: ity min strat Aor Director of Public Works 8 . Al Certificate of Insurance 49 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON YOU THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT AN INSURANCE POLICY AND DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND,OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW. This is to Certify that F—Black and Veatch, etal Name and LIBERTY Black and Veatch, Inc. •� address of MUTUAL. Insured. 1500 Meadow Lake Parkway P.O. Box 8405 L—Kansas City, MO 64114 —J is, at the issue date oft is certificate, insured by the Company under the oclicy(ies)listed below. *The insurance afforded by the listed policy(ies)is subject to all their terms,exclusions and conditions and is not altered by any requirement,term or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued. TYPE OF POLICY CERT. EXP. DATE POLICY NUMBER LIMITS OF LIABILITY COVERAGE AFFORDED UNDER W.C. COV. B 6/30/88 WC2-141-072023-177 LAWARQF A FCAOCO DCFL BODILY 100 000 ACCIDENT WORKERS' , > > > , > $ � EA. ACCIDENT IA,IL,IN,KS,LA,MD, COMPENSATION MA,MI,MN,MS,MO,MT, BODILY1 INJURY BY DISEASE 00,000 NC,NE,NM,NY,OK,SC, $ EA. PERSON TN,TX,UT,VA,WI BODILY INJURY BY DISEASE $ 5005000 POLICY LIMIT COMPREHENSIVE BODILY INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE FORM 6/30/88 I LG1-141-072023-077 El SCHEDULE FORM EACH EACH $ OCCURRENCE $ OCCURRENCE PRODUCTS COM- A O LETED OPERATIONS $ AGGREGATE $ AGGREGATE uj u J Z CO w Q INDEPENDENT CON- COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (D:5 [ TRACTORS/CONTRAC- BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE TORS PROTECTIVE $ 1,0005000 EACH OCCURRENCE I�r CONTRACTUAL $ 150005000 AGGREGATE LX LIABILITY L OWNED 6/30/88 AS1-141-072023-097 $ 15000,000 EACH ACCIDENT-SINGLE LIMIT-B.I. AND P.D. COMBINED I—J $ EACH PERSON �Do NON-OWNED Q Q EACH ACCIDENT EACH ACCIDENT J HIRED $ OR OCCURRENCE $ OR OCCURRENCE TO FORM: w _ r �� -OrneY LOCATION(S)OF OPERATIONS&JOB N(If Applicable) DESCRIPTIQN OF Of�E�+,TI-tey FORMATION OF AN ASSESSMENT DI TRICT AND DESIGN 0 WATER TI�SMISSION MAINS. 'NOTE.You will NOT be notified annually of the continuation of this coverage.You will be notified if this coverage Is terminated or reduced. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION: THE COMPANY WILL NOT TERMINATE OR REDUCE THE INSURANCE AFFORDED UNDER THE ABOVE POLICIES UNLESS 30 DAYS NOTICE OF SUCH TERMINATION OR REDUCTION HAS BEEN MAILED TO: Additional Insured: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ITS OFFICERS & EMPLOYEES City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFICATE Huntington, CA 92648 HOLDER 70/6187 Overland Pgr DATE ISSUED OF ICE This certificate is executed by LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP as respects such Insurance as is afforded by those Companies. Liberty Mutual Insurance Group BS-745 R2 ISSUE DATE MM/DD/YY) '•, 7-2-8�1 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. ALEXANDER & ALEXANDER, INC. P. 0. Box 13647 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Kansas City, Missouri 64199 COMPANY LETTER A Continental Casualty Company COMPANY B INSURED LETTER Black & Veatch, etal ETTERNY C Black & Veatch, Inc. 1500 Meadow Lake Parkway COMCOMPANY D Kansas City, MO 64114 COMPANY E LETTER THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. Co TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS LTR GATE(MM/DO/YY) DATE(MM/DDM') GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $ CLAIMS MADE ❑OCCURRENCE PERSONAL&ADVERTISING INJURY $ OWNER'S&CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ FIRE DAMAGE(ANY ONE FIRE) $ MEDICAL EXPENSE(ANY ONE PERSON) $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO CSL $ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY SCHEDULED AUTOS INJURY (PER PERSON) $ .. HIRED AUTOS BODILY 4 INJURY _ * NON-OWNED AUTOS (PER ACCIDENT) $ r •';. GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE p 1 EXCESS LIABILITY QL EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE - OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM �� WORKERS'COMPENSATION STATUTORY AND $ (EACH ACCIDENT) EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY $ (DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT) $ )$EASE-EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER {� �t - A ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS PSF3011344 4/13/87 ' i�$�85, (J ,000 per claim PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY G-k , UU 011 aggregate ** Cii;r jTt rnS7j DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS **Claims Expenses are included in the limit. yy: AtfornO SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX- City of Huntington Beach PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL d&XI€XM 2000 Main Street MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LEFT„�t �� �►� AUTHORIZED PR SENTATIVE 11 F , INC. Proposal RESERVOIR HII_I_ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Prepared for City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California • • Lq BIauc & veatcm Engineers-Architects ' BLACK & VEATCH ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS TEL. (714) 557-1675 ' 3100 LAKE CENTER DRIVE.SUITE 140 SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 92704 ' B&V #90249.007 May 4, 1987 t Mr. Les Evans ' City Engineer City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ' Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Evans: ' Black & Veatch is pleased to submit this proposal for developing an aerial topography map of the proposed Reservoir Hill Assessment District, to design the needed water transmission mains for the area, and to determine ' the cost of these facilities and recommend an allocation of these costs to the various landowners within the assessment district. This proposal is responsive to your Request for Proposal dated April 3, 1987, and to the ' Addendum to the scope of work, issued April 22, 1987. Your request for proposal identified five specific items to be addressed in our proposal. To aid in your review, the following outline explains ' how our proposal is organized and addresses each specific item: Item Description Proposal Tab 1. Related experience of the QUALIFICATIONS firm and project team ' members 2. Understanding of the work PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ' 3. Specific experience of ORGANIZATION/STAFFING Project Personnel ' 4. Time line for project SCHEDULE completion ' 5. Fee OTHER INFORMATION Certificate of Insurance Addendum Financial Planning Black & Veatch has organized an outstanding project team for assignment to this project to insure that the City is provided with the best possible ' engineering services. tBLACK & V EATC• For this project, I will serve as the Project Manager and will be ' responsible for the technical supervision of the work and ensuring that all administrative and technical functions meet your expectations. I will provide the overall continuity of communications between the City, the Water Division, and Black & Veatch. Mr. John Ewing, as Project Engineer, will direct all technical tasks and design of the transmission mains. Mr. Ewing was selected because of his ' related water transmission design experience. Mr. Jim Lorenz, the Director of Black & Veatch's System Planning Department will review the proposed assessment district boundaries, and evaluate 1 adequacy of the proposed Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station, need for storage, and sources of supply. Mr. Lorenz's experience on more than 75 projects during the last 20 years, and his working knowledge of your existing system makes him particularly qualified. Black & Veatch's Management Services Division will be responsible for ' evaluating various assessment district financing alternatives. B&V is one of the few engineering firms which has a separate group of professionals who specialize in the financial and management services needed to determine the best method to allocate your proposed assessment district costs. ' Black & Veatch has supplemented and strengthened our team by including Psomas and Associates as a subcontractor. Psomas will be responsible for all aerial photogrammetry and development of the assessment district maps. Their field survey crews will also provide ground control for the 40 scale pipeline design drawings. Another very important option offered by the team of B&V and Psomas is the use of a field technique to aid in locating existing oil lines. Psomas has perfected the use of a field device capable of locating the horizontal and vertical position of oil lines. The proposed assessment district is in an area which has numerous operating oil wells. It is anticipated that record drawings showing the locations of these oil lines will be limited. To minimize excessive potholing costs and the potential for construction change orders during ' construction due to encountering unknown oil lines, we have included in our proposal an option to use the Metrotech device during our design and utilities search phase. ' This project has generated much excitement and anticipation among the members of our project team, and we are looking forward to the opportunity to discuss our ideas with you further. Please call me at (714) 557-1675 if ' you have any questions regarding our proposal or need additional information. ' Very truly yours, CK & EA CH ' David G. Argo, P.E. Regional Manager DGA:cad 1 SECTION I QUALIFICATIONS Black & Veatch was founded in 1915 and has become one of the largest ' engineering-architectural organizations in the world. The firm has consistently placed among the top ten design firms in the United States as ranked by Engineering News-Record. The organization includes engineers and architects with distinguished records of service covering a wide range of experience. The reputation of the firm attests to its professional and administrative abilities, as well as its dedication to the client's needs. Black & Veatch has completed ' approximately 13,000 assignments for more than 2,800 clients, many of which have been on a repeat commission basis, with the working relationship between Black & Veatch and some clients spanning more than 40 years. Of those 13,000 assignments, more than 2,800 water supply, treatment, and distribution projects have been completed. This work has included the planning, evaluation, and design of water systems for over 850 clients. 1 Once active in a few Midwestern states, Black & Veatch today is involved in projects throughout the United States, with Black & Veatch ' International serving clients in 38 countries. Service engagements consist principally of investigations and reports, facility design and construction management, rate and financial studies, feasibility studies, appraisals, preparation of bond prospectuses, presentation of expert ' testimony before courts and regulatory bodies, and other general consulting services. ' Approximately 50 percent of the Black & Veatch's 3,000 employees are engineers and architects representing every major discipline. Others in fields of special competence include economists, biochemists, rate and ' financial specialists, planners, computer analysts, hydrologists, and communications specialists. GENERAL EXPERIENCE ' The following brochure and matrix will demonstrate our water project's experience with clients nationwide. ' From our general listing we have selected some specific projects similar to the proposed Reservoir Hill Project and provided details of the work ' performed, identified involved B&V project personnel and listed a client reference. B&V has built our reputation around providing "creative" solutions and quality engineering, and we encourage you to contact our references and verify our dedication to excellence and meeting the needs ' of our clients. ' SIMILAR PROJECT EXPERIENCE Black & Veatch's excellent experience record includes many water system studies and engineering projects having requirements similar to the ' Reservoir Hill project. These projects are summarized below: water supply treatment and distribution The firm has been engaged in num- Montgomery Dam and Reservoir Colorado Springs, Colorado erous projects for clients in the area of water supply, treatment and distribution. Included in the follow- ing pages is a list of representative ' engagements and a selection of individual experience pages which outline in detail the scope of work performed. Black & Veatch experience on water supply, treatment and distribution ' includes: master planning; water management studies; development of well fields; siting studies; design of dams, tunnels, intakes, pumping stations, treatment plants, automa- tion and instrumentation systems; distribution system design including locating reservoirs and elevated or ground storage, booster pumping Homestake Pipeline Colorado Springs, Colorado stations, and sizing and design of water transmission and distribution mains. ` Projects in the area of water supply, treatment and distribution are han- died by the firm's Civil-Environmental ` f `` � � Division. Personnel within the Divi- sion have extensive experience on hydrology, hydraulic engineering, electrical, mechanical, and struc- tural engineering, chemical engi- neering, sanitary engineering, archi- " � _ tectural engineering, architecture, v and oceanography. ' Water Treatment Facilities Wichita, Kansas 4P 10 678 ' WATER PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Representative Engagements Studies Dams Water Trans- and and Intake Treatment Pump mission Storage Client& Location Reports Wells Outlets Structures Plants Stations Lines Tanks ' Albuquerque, New Mexico . . . . . . . . . . • • American Telephone& Telegraph . . . . • • ' Anschutz Mining Corporation, Fredericktown, Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . • • • ' Arapahoe Water&Sanitation District, Colorado . . . . . . . • Arlington County, Virginia . . . . . . . . . . • • Atchison, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • Atlantic, Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • Austin, Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • ' Bartlesville, Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Battle Creek, Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • ' Bay City and Bay County, Michigan . . . . • Billings, Montana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Bloomington, Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • ' Bloomington, Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . • • • Blue Springs, Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • ' Bogota, Colombia . . . • • Boulder, Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • Brooklyn Center, Minnesota . . . . . . . . . • • • Brooklyn Park, Minnesota . . . . . . . . . • • Broomfield,Colorado • ' Cape Girardeau, Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . • Casper,Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • ' Chessman Dam& Reservoir, Deckers, Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Cheyenne,Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • ' Cincinnati, Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • Claremore, Oklahoma • Colorado Springs, Colorado . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • ' Columbia, Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Dade County, Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • ' Dallas,Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Decator, Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ' WATER PROJECT EXPERIENCE f&T'D) • Representative Engagements ' Studies Dams Water Trans- and and Intake Treatment Pump mission Storage Client&Location Reports Wells Outlets Structures Plants Stations Lines Tanks ' Denver,Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Duluth, Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • ' Eden Prairie, Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • El Dorado, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • Elgin, Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Emporia, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • McClellan Reservoir, Englewood,Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . • Enid,Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . . • ' Escanaba, Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Eskieshir,Turkey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • ' Eudora, Kansas • Evansville, Indiana • • ' Fargo, North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Finca Humo -Costa Rica . . . . . . . . . . . • Fort Collins, Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • ' Fort Wainright, Alaska . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • ' Gaffney,South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . • Garnett, Kansas • • Glendale,Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ' Great Falls,Montana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Greenville, South Carolina • • • • • • • Greenwood,South Carolina . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • ' Havre, Montana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • ' Hibbing, Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • High Point, North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Hinsdale, Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • ' Holland, Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Independence, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • ' Missouri Water Company, Independence, Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • Independence, Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . • ' Indianapolis Water Company, Indianapolis, Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • ' Johnson County, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • Joplin,Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ' WATER PROJECT EXPERIENCE IST'D) • Representative Engagements ' Studies Dams Water Trans- and and Intake Treatment Pump mission Storage Client&Location Reports Wells Outlets Structures Plants Stations Lines Tanks ' Jubail,Saudi Arabia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Junction City, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • ' Kansas City, Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • Kirkwood,Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • Lake Charles, Louisiana • Lawrence, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • Leavenworth, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Lincoln,Nebraska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • ' Littleton,Colorado . . . . • Lodi,California . . . . . . . . . . . • Loveland,Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Madison,Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • Manhattan, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • ' Mankato,Minnesota • Margarita Island,Venezuela . . . . . . . . . • Marshall, Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • ' Memphis,Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • Mesa, Arizona • • ' Middletown,Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • Milwaukee,Wisconsin • • • • • • Montgomery County, Maryland . . . . . . . • • • Natchez,Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • New Brighton,Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . • • ' Newton, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • Norfolk, Nebraska • • • • • ' Six-State High Plains— Ogallala Aquifer Area Study . . . . . . . . • ' Olathe, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • Osawatomie, Kansas • • Owensboro, Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ' Paola, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • Parkersburg,West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . • ' Pereira,Colombia • • Pittsburg, Kansas • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pittsburg, Pennsylvania • Pueblo,Colorado • • • • Puerto Rico,Corps of Engineers . . . . . 0 WATER PROJECT EXPERIENCE *T'D) • • Representative Engagements ' Studies Dams Water Trans- and and Intake Treatment Pump mission Storage Client&Location Reports Wells outlets Structures Plants Stations Lines Tanks ' Rawlins,Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Rochester, Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • ' St.Charles, Missouri • • • • • • St. Louis,Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • ' St.Paul,Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • San Antonio,Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • ' San Salvador, El Salvador . . . . . . . . . . . • Santa Fe, New Mexico . . . . . . . . • • • • • Sao Paulo, Brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ' Sedalia, Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • � Seoul,South Korea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • Sheridan,Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • ' Shreveport, Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Springfield,Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • ' Tonganoxie, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • Topeka, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • ' Troy,Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Tucson, Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Corps of Engineers,Tulsa District . . . . • ' Tunis,Tunisia • Warsaw,Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ' Washington,D.0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • Waterloo, Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • ' West Des Moines, Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • Westminster, Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Wichita, Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • ' Winfield, Kansas : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : • Wylie,Texas • Wyoming, Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • Yuba City,California . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Yuma, Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • Zeeland, Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 1 • s 1 LEE'S SUMMIT, MISSOURI 1 In 1981, Black & Veatch prepared a report on the water distribution system for the City of Lee's Summit. The study evaluated the adequacy of the Lee Summit purchased water supply sources and distribution system and 1 recommended improvements to meet the rapidly growing City's water requirements through year 2000. Principal elements of the study included (1) projections of population growth and water requirements, (2) review of 1 existing facilities, and (3) computerized analyses of the distribution system to determine the ability of the system to supply present and future water requirements. 1 The report provided the City with a comprehensive master plan and a priority schedule for major water distribution system improvements. Recommended improvements included a 30 inch supply transmission main, 1 distribution mains, a 1 million gallon elevated tank, and pumping station additions. The report also recommended construction of a booster pumping station to increase the supply of purchased water to Lee's Summit from 1 Kansas City. Subsequent to the report, Lee's Summit voters approved a revenue bond issue for construction of the supply transmission main and additional 1 improvements. Since 1981 Black & Veatch has designed more than 25,000 feet of transmission mains. The diameter of these lines ranged in size from 6 through 30 inch. Features included a 275 feet cased highway 1 crossing, an exposed bridge crossing, preparation of easement legal descriptions, and construction phase contract administration. 1 The major transmission main work included alignments through developed areas of the City which required some pipeline corridor studies. Alignment had to be coordinated with park departments, highway 1 departments, and a major industry. The alignment survey was done using aerial photograph with boundary and control surveys performed by a local land surveyor. The City then secured easements with the assistance of another local survey company. Public involvement included notification by 1 the City of property owners of the pipeline alignments, with offers to meet with any owner who had questions or required additional information. 1 Project Personnel: J. B. Lorenz References: Mr. Lee Tiehen Assistant Director of Public Works City Hall 1 220 South Main Street Lee's Summit, Missouri 64063 (816) 251-2316 1 1 ' 1 b B SWEET HOME, OREGON ' John Ewing, the project engineer selected for the Y n desig phase of our project was responsible for the design of approximately 5 miles of ' transmission lines ranging in sizes from 10 to 16 inch for the City of Sweet Home, Oregon. This project involved some complex bridge crossing design. Project Personnel: John Ewing Client Reference: Mr. Dave Monson - Director of Public Works ' Telephone: (503) 367-6977 ' LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA In 1987, Black & Veatch with Psomas and Associates was retained to prepare ' a comprehensive water and sewer system masterplan. Although not yet complete, this project is proceeding on schedule within budget and was included to illustrate B&V's existing working relationship with Psomas. ' Like the Huntington Beach Project, Psomas is assisting B&V with developing 400 scale computer-generated base maps showing streets and roads, along with other major features, such as highways, railroads, lakes, and creeks. ' Project Personnel: Black & Veatch David Argo; J. B. Lorenz Psomas and Associates ' Jerry Wagner Reference: Mr. Loren Culp District Engineer Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District P. 0. Box 300 33751 Mission Trail Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 (714) 674-3146 SECTION II PROJECT UNDERSTANDING This section contains a discussion of our understanding of your proposed Reservoir Hill Assessment District project and presents our detailed work plan to determine the boundaries of the new Reservoir Hill Pressure Zone, design the transmission mains required to support the proposed future development within the area, estimate the cost of the needed facilities, ' and identify the assessment district participants and recommend an equitable distribution of costs to them. Our understanding is based on our discussions and meetings with Department of Public Works Water t Division personnel and our specialized expertise in water system planning, design, and financing. The area commonly referred to as Reservoir Hill is the highest point in the City's water system. A large portion is currently undeveloped, with present water service limited to one major subdivision near Clay Street. To support the proposed development, the existing water system will have ' to be improved in order to ensure adequate supplies and pressures. The City has started with improvements and is currently designing a new booster pump station north of Clay Street on Golden West. WORK PLAN ' The Work Plan described below includes all tasks required to complete the mapping of the area and the design of the new Assessment District Water Transmission Mains. Each major task listed in your Request for Proposal has been outlined and discussed separately to assist you in your evaluation of our proposal. In our proposal we have prepared two alternative approaches to Task I. ' For Option A we suggest the City consider deleting the 2 foot contours from the aerial photo covering the entire assessment district area. Instead a 100 scale photo with overlay showing all property lines, etc. , will be prepared. The acetate overlay will be prepared from digitized ' record data, using a CADDS system. This will reduce project design costs. Option B outlines work elements required to deliver a map in accordance with your RFP. ' TASK 1 - OPTION A - ALTERNATIVE TO RFP ' ANALYZE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY WITHIN PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY AND DESIGN AND OVERLAY FOR THE AERIAL PHOTO SHOWING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARIES. ' To complete this portion of the project B&V/Psomas proposes to: lA Obtain, by aerial photogrammetric methods, a color ' photo enlargement at a scale of 1" = 100' mounted on foam core board. -Fool_ __.. 1 • � 1B Prepare an acetate overlay at a scale of 1 = 100 showing all record property lines, street right of 1 way lines, assessors parcel numbers and existing water mains. This data will be obtained by the computer digitizing of existing record maps and 1 plans and will be computer plotted on the acetate overlay. All digital data will become a part of the project mapping data base. 1 TASK 1 - OPTION B - PER RFP Obtain aerial photogrammetric mapping at a scale of 1 1" = 100' with two foot contours over the entire proposed assessment district. 1 If this option is necessary, B&V/Psomas will perform the following: lA Conduct a field survey for the setting of sufficient 1 ground survey points to adequately control the stereo aerial photography. At this time all visible utility valves and manholes within the street right of ways 1 will be painted so as to be identified and located on the aerial photograph. 1 1B Obtain stereo aerial color photography of the entire assessment district at a photo scale of 1" = 500' and deliver one set of color contact prints to the City. 1 1C Establish additional horizontal and vertical mapping control by means of analytical aerotriangulation. 1 1D Compile base topographic maps in ink on mylar at a scale of 1" = 100' with two foot contours and spot elevations accurate to within 0.5 feet. 1 TASK 2&3 REVIEW ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, SOURCES OF SUPPLY, PUMPING AND STORAGE REQUIREMENTS AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEEDED MODIFICATIONS 1 The City will provide B&V with project water demands, fire flows, pressures and define initial assessment 1 district boundaries based on findings obtained from their current master plan studies. Black & Veatch will review this information, determine limits of 1 service area, adequacy of supplies to and from proposed booster pump station. Following our evaluation, a basic transmission main system will be defined and presented to the City for their approval before proceeding with 1 design. 1 ' TASK 4 DESIGN ALL NECESSARY WATER TRANSMISSION MAINS FROM PROPOSED BOOSTER PUMP STATION TO POINTS OF CONNECTION FOR FUTURE ' DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. OPTION A - ALTERNATIVE TO RFP ' If the City chooses Option A, B&V/Psomas would design the transmission lines by: ' 4A Set field survey control for the stereo aerial photograph needed to obtain the 1" = 40' scale strip mapping needed for the base maps. At this time all ' visible utility vales and manholes within the street right of ways will be painted so as to be identified and located on the aerial photograph which assist ' with locating existing utilities. 4B Obtain stereo aerial color photograph at a scale of 1" = 500' for the strip mapping. One set of color ' contact prints will be delivered to the City. 4C Compile strip topographic mapping of the proposed ' water line routes at a scale of 1" = 40' with one foot contours. ' 4D Prepare standard water line design base sheets showing: 1. A photo enlargement at a scale of 1" = 40' ' covering a strip 250 feet wide. 2. Topographic mapping at a scale of 1" = 40' ' with one foot contours covering a strip of 250 feet wide. ' 3. A vertical profile grid. OPTION B PER RFP ' If the City decides to proceed with Option B, Task 4 elements A through C will have been previously obtained when the 1" = 100' aerial topographic mapping of the entire assessment area was ' completed, and the controlled stereo photography used to prepare this mapping can be used to prepare the 1" = 40' scale base design sheets. ' As this mapping compilation was prepared from 1" = 500' photography on a Kern DSR Digital Plotter ("C" Factor 3000) we will be able to replot this strip mapping at a scale of 1" = 40' ' with a one foot contour interval from the original digital compilation data (same as Task 4D above) . Tasks 4E though 4G would be required for either g Option A or Option B and are described below: ' 4E Make record search of all existing utility information to determine location of interfering utilities. All ' record underground utility lines will be digatized and added on the topographic mapping portion of the base map along with the premarked utility valves and manholes. Although not included in our base price, B&V/Psomas ' has the capabilities to provide the City with additional services we believe will be very important to successfully ' designing and controlling construction costs of the proposed transmission mains. ' During the past two years Psomas has located numerous water lines along with oil and gas transmission lines for the Los Angeles County Transit District during the ' engineering design for the Long Beach to Los Angeles Rail Transit Project. By use of a Metrotech 810 electronic detection instrument we have expended over 3,000 field manhours during the location and verification of these ' underground lines. We have found this equipment to be great asset where there are concerns dealing with the potential interference from undergound water, gas, oil ' or electrical lines. This method has saved thousands of dollars in expensive and time-consuming field pothole activities. In areas where electronic measurements for horizontal or depth locations are uncertain this method ' can enable considerable savings to the field pothole activities. ' Due to the existence of the numerous oil lines within the limits of the proposed Assessment District we feel this technology and experience can be a valuable addition to ' the services we can offer to the City of Huntington Beach for this project. 4F Using input from Water Division, regarding loop criteria, ' standards, etc. size and locate water transmission mains, prepare plans and specifications and other contract documents, cost estimate and deliver one set of working ' drawings in ink on mylar. 4G Provide engineering support during the bid phase, and ' answer questions regarding interpretation of plans and specifications. 1 TASK 5 REVIEW ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO ALLOCATE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS 5A Identify and evaluate alternative methods of assessment spread and prepare a brief letter which ' summarizes the alternatives available including the relative merits of each and a recommended assessment spread. ' TASK 6 ATTEND PUBLIC HEARING MEETINGS 6A Present findings regarding assessment district cost ' allocations and represent City in public hearings regarding assessment district improvements. t 1 SECTION III ' ORGANIZATION/STAFFING ' KEY PERSONNEL We have assembled an experienced and highly qualified project team to ' provide the services necessary to complete the design of the Reservoir Hill Assessment water transmission mains in an expeditiously and in a cost-effective manner. Our project team members are specialists who are ' employed full-time in their designated type of work. We will also be utilizing key support personnel who have the specialized expertise necessary to complete your project. We have strengthened our team by adding Psomas and Associates as a subcontractor, assisting us with aerial photogrammetry, field survey, and mapping. Our project personnel have been selected and organized into a project team as shown on the following page because they bring similar experience to your project. Our proposed project team will provide a timely response to the needs of your project and will ensure a high quality determination of the appropriate new pressure zone assessment district all leading to a functional design of ' the new transmission mains system that is produced on time and within budget for the lowest possible capital cost. A brief synopsis of the role each key team member will have on your project is presented below. Detailed resumes for the project team members and key support personnel are presented on the following pages. ' David G. Argo - Project Manager As Project Manager, Mr. Argo will be responsible for ensuring continuity ' with the work conducted by Black & Veatch for the Water Division. He will monitor the administrative functions on the project and coordinate communications between Black & Veatch and the City and Water Division staffs. Mr. Argo is Regional Manager of our Orange County office and has ' 16 years of experience in the planning, design, construction, and operation of wastewater facilities. He has extensive experience related to utility management, groundwater basin management, water supply, advanced water and wastewater treatment, wastewater reclamation, and demineralization techniques. As Assistant Manager and Chief Engineer for the Orange County Water District, Mr. Argo has been directly involved with the design of the Water District's reclaimed water distribution system. This project consisted of over 20 miles of pipeline, ranging in sizes from 6 to 42 inch. 1 • • 1 _ 1 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1 1 PROJECT MANAGER 1 David G. Argo, P.E. 1 PROJECT ENGINEER 1 John D. Ewing, P.E. 1 . PROJECT CONSULTANT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ANALYST PROJECT MAPPING & AERIAL 1 PHOTOGRAMMETRY J. B. Lorenz, P.E. Paul Hoback, P.E. Jerry A. Wagner 1 1 1 1 Huntington Beach California 1 Reservoir Hill Assessment District PROJECT ORGANIZATION 1 1 John D. Ewing - Project Engineer ' Mr. Ewing, as Project Engineer, will have first-line responsibility for the technical portions of the work, day-to-day coordination with the project team, and technical coordination with the Water Division. He will ' see that the Project Manager is kept informed on the progress of the project, including any needs or problems. He will be directly responsible for the timely prosecution of the work, supervision of the technical ' personnel, and direction of all phases of the work. Mr. Ewing's experience includes over eight years of management and design of water supply and wastewater collection and treatment projects for an ' engineering firm in Oregon. His responsibilities ranged from project management and engineering for sewerage facilities master planning to detailed design and startup for water supply and wastewater facilities. His project experience also includes computer and pump control analysis along with network analyses for water supply, treatment and distribution projects for several utilities and communities in the Pacific Northwest. ' The Sweet Home, Oregon, project which he directed has been included in our specific related experience section of our proposal. ' James B. Lorenz - Project Consultant As Project Consultant, Mr. Lorenz will be responsible for technical review ' of the proposed assessment district area, evaluation of Booster Pump Station, need for storage, and adequacy of supply sources. Mr. Lorenz has served as project manager, project consultant, or project ' engineer for 100 water system studies involving water distribution system analyses and master planning. Recent master plans on which Mr. Lorenz has served as project manager include Battle Creek, Michigan; Janesville and ' Franklin, Wisconsin; Colorado Springs, Colorado; Topeka and Johnson County Water District No. 1, Kansas; and St. Joseph, Joplin, and Kansas City, Missouri. ' Mr. Paul Hoback - Assessment District Analyst Mr. Hoback specializes in rate, financial, management and assessment ' district related matters associated with water utilities, similar to those being requested by the City of Huntington Beach. He has been associated with Black & Veatch for nearly 24 years. Mr. Hoback's recent experience ' with similar studies relevant to the District's project includes the responsibility for preparation of studies for Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency, Illinois; Los ' Angeles, California; Cincinnati, Springfield, and Dayton, Ohio; Henrico County, Virginia; Greenville, South Carolina; Topeka, Kansas; and Tyler, Texas. ' His work in Los Angeles involves developing the Bond Feasibility Studies for financing the City of Los Angeles Hyperion Treatment Plant Expansion, a one billion dollar project. ' Jerry A. Wagner - Project Mapping & Aerial Photo rammetr Y ' As Psomas's Director of Digital Mapping Services, Mr. Wagner will be responsible for preparing Assessment District color aerial photograph with acetate overlay showing all property lines needed and the 40 scale maps ' with 1 foot contour over the entire length of the new transmission mains. Both the strip mapping and photography will be incorporated into the Plan and Profile design sheets. 1 1 tDAVID G. ARGO PROJECT DIRECTOR EXPERIENCE: ' Mr. Argo offers extensive experience related to advanced waste treatment, wastewater reclamation, and demineralization techniques. As Assistant Manager and Chief Engineer for the Orange County (California) Water District, Mr. Argo has been directly involved with the design, ' construction, and operation of Water Factory 21 in Southern California, which provides an alternative water supply that is injected into the groundwater basin. In addition to injection facilities, Water Factory 21 ' includes a 15 mgd advanced waste treatment reclamation plant and a 5 mgd reverse osmosis plant that is currently the world's largest operating demineralization facility. ' He has served as principal investigator for several EPA and OWRT research projects that have an included evaluation of advanced waste treatment with regard to the effectiveness of energy requirements in removing virus ' and trace organics. Alternative desalination techniques have also been evaluated. Mr. Argo's work includes many studies to improve and reduce the cost of water reclamation through the unique application of reverse ' osmosis processes. Mr. Argo has served as a private consultant on a wide variety of projects. He has prepared various technical reports on advanced waste ' treatment for governmental organizations and has acted as a special consultant to several consulting engineering firms and private companies. He served as a member of a special consulting panel to the South Lake ' Tahoe Public Utility District on a detailed evaluation of the District's wastewater treatment system, and as consultant to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation on a groundwater recharge project located in ' Orlando. He was awarded the Thomas R. Camp medal by the Water Pollution Control Federation for outstanding contributions in engineering related to advanced wastewater treatment and water reclamation and reuse. ' Mr. Argo is currently serving as special consultant to the Denver Water Board on its potable reuse demonstration project. ' PERSONAL DATA Education: ' 1970, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, B.S. , Civil Engineering 1971, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, M.S. , Sanitary Engineering ' Registered Professional Engineer: California Joined Black & Veatch: ' 1986 t JOHN D. EWING PROJECT ENGINEER EXPERIENCE: ' Mr. Ewing is a project engineer with extensive experience in water supply, treatment, systems. His project responsibilities range from facilities planning and process design to startup and operator training. Mr. Ewing recently headed the project team designing improvements to the City of Burlingame's wastewater treatment facilities. These improvements allowed the facility to accommodate wide fluctuations in wet weather flows ' which affect the processes as well as the plant discharge capacity. Several site, facilities, and sludge handling modifications were also involved which were complicated by severe site constraints. The project included a 100 kw digester gas cogeneration system retrofit. Mr. Ewing's experience includes over eight years of management and design ' of water supply and wastewater collection and treatment projects for an engineering firm in Oregon. His responsibilities ranged from project management and engineering for sewerage facilities master planning to detailed design and startup for water supply and wastewater facilities. His project experience also includes computer and pump control analysis along with network analyses for water supply, treatment and distribution projects for several utilities and communities in the Pacific Northwest. ' Mr. Ewing also provided the guidance for one of the first trickling filter solids contact (TF/SC) projects in the U.S. for the City of Silverton, ' Oregon. This project received innovative technology funding from EPA in part because it was one of the first applications of TF/SC technology and incorporated flexibility to optimize physical and biological controls not previously utilized. ' PERSONAL DATA Education: 1975, Washington State University, B.S. , Bacteriology and Public Health 1978, Washington State University, M.S. , Environmental Engineering ' Registered Professional Engineer: Oregon, Washington, California Member: Pacific Northwest WPCA ' Joined Black & Veatch 1985 JAMES B. LORENZ PROJECT CONSULTANT EXPERIENCE: ' Mr. Lorenz is a recognized authority in water supply, distribution analysis, and master planning for water systems. He has extensive experience in the use of computer models for water distribution system analysis and troubleshooting of distribution systems. As project manager or project engineer, Mr. Lorenz has been responsible for conducting most of the water distribution system computer analyses ' carried out by Black & Veatch in the last 20 years including the recent water distribution study for the City of Topeka, Kansas. He has prepared periodic distribution analyses and master plans since 1964 for Colorado ' Springs, Colorado, and Madison, Wisconsin. Recent modeling projects have involved transfer of the computer models and hydraulic analysis programs to the client's computer facilities and training City personnel to conduct ongoing hydraulic analyses. Mr. Lorenz has directed distribution analysis ' studies and installed programs for use by the client's personnel for Columbia and Cape Girardeau, Missouri; Lincoln, Nebraska; Cincinnati, Ohio; and Calcutta, India. He has prepared distribution system master plans for more than 15 clients including Spokane County, Washington; Battle Creek, Michigan; Bloomington, Minnesota; Troy, Ohio; Parkersburg, West Virginia; Superior, Wisconsin; ' Bloomington, Illinois; Greenville, South Carolina; Kansas City, Lee's Summit, Blue Springs, Jefferson City, Fort Leonard Wood, and Sedalia, Missouri; Calcutta, India; Jubail, Saudi Arabia; Sao Paolo, Brazil; and ' Water District No. 1 of Johnson County, Newton, Emporia, Olathe, and Wichita, Kansas. ' Mr. Lorenz has served as project engineer, project manager, or design consultant for numerous water system facilities. He has been responsible for the design of water distribution and transmission mains for Sedalia and Jefferson City, Missouri; water treatment plant improvements for E1 ' Dorado, Kansas, and Sedalia and Warsaw, Missouri; and a 32 mgd pumping station for Battle Creek, Michigan. Mr. Lorenz is currently responsible for design of a major capital improvements program for upgrading the water ' system at Lee's Summit, Missouri. Mr. Lorenz is author or coauthor of several articles pertaining to the ' design and operation of water distribution systems. PIPELINE EXPERIENCE (16 inch and larger) ' TOTAL LOCATION LENGTH SIZE RESPONSIBILITY YEAR feet inches ' Lee's Summit, MO 28,000 16-30 Project Manager 1982-85 Springfield, OH 139000 16 Project Consultant 1985 ' Colorado Springs, CO 16,500 60 Project Consultant 1983 Parkersburg, WV 13,600 16-20 Project Manager 1977 Battle Creek, MI 32,600 16-30 Project Manager 1975 1 � • 1 _ PERSONAL DATA 1 Education: 1957, University of Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, B.S. , Civil Engineering 1 Registered Professional Engineer: Missouri, Michigan, Wisconsin 1 Member: ASCE, NSPE, AWWA, MSPE 1 Joined Black & Veatch: 1957 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 PAUL E. HOBACK ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ANALYST ' EXPERIENCE: Since joining the firm, Mr. Hoback has served on a variety of engagements concerning the economic aspects of engineering. His principal area of experience is the comprehensive analysis of utility rates including studies of revenue requirements, revenue bond feasibility, cost of service ' allocations, and rate design. In a number of studies, Mr. Hoback has participated in formal presentation of the study results to governing bodies, public meetings, or regulatory agencies -- including presentation ' of testimony in formal rate hearings. He has presented papers regarding utility rates and financing to a number of organizations. ' Mr. Hoback has performed studies on the economic feasibility of alternative water supply sources, general rate policies, financial aspects of service extensions, cost accounting and customer classification, requirements and alternatives for an automated customer billing system, ' model sewer use regulation, policies for enforcement of payment of utility charges, annual reports on utility financial operation, miscellaneous utility service charges, and productivity improvement. Among Mr. Hoback's other assignments have been the analysis of indirect costs attributable to mineral content of municipal water supplies, and comparison of costs of conventional and demineralized municipal water supplies for the Office of Saline Water, U.S. Department of the Interior; and studies of construction, operation, and maintenance costs and staffing requirements of wastewater treatment plants of a broad range of sizes and ' types for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Clients he has served include municipalities ranging in size from small rural communities to large metropolitan districts, investor-owned utilities, governmental agencies, and industry. PERSONAL DATA Education: 1963, University of Missouri, B.S. , Mechanical Engineering ' Registered Professional Engineer: Alabama, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia ' Member: ASME, AWWA ' Joined Black & Veatch: 1963 f CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , RESERVOIR HILL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROJECT ' PROJECT SPECIFIC RESUME FOR JERRY A. WAGNER ' Firm : Psomas & Associates Title : Digital Mapping Supervisor ' Discipline : Computer Based Geographic Information Systems RESPONSIBILITIES Manage liaison with municipalities , governmental agencies and ' utilities to meet their automated mapping and database information management requirements . Provide consulting for identification , development and implementation of client needs for computer hardware and peripherals as well as software . Serve ' as quality control and responsiveness manager to assure customer needs are met . ' PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ' Experience since 1980 in computerized mapping services . Provided consulting services to the County of Santa Barbara for assessing needs and selecting a mapping information management system . Designed and implemented a MIMS System for the Cities of Yorba ' Linda , Villa Park and San Diego Naval Station . Assisted Southern California Edison in the implementation of a new form of mapping which directly reduced outside mapping costs by 50 percent . SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE RELATING TO THIS PROJECT ' Geographic and data base mapping for the cities of Santa Ana , Bell , Fountain Valley , Yorba Linda , Villa Park , Santa Barbara , and for the San Diego Naval Station . ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RESERVOIR HILL A•SSMENT DISTRICT PROJECT ' PROJECT SPECIFIC RESUME FOR ' FRED W . HENSTRIDGE ' Firm: Psomas & Associates Title : Survey & Mapping Project Manager Discipline : Land Surveyor RESPONSIBILITIES ' Direct projects survey team and responsible for final results . Maintain communications with client , public agencies and other design professionals involved with the project . Develop ' proposals , scopes of service and work plans ; maintain project schedule , quality control and manage the contract and budget . PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ' 30 years experience in civil engineering and land surveying with extensive background in planning and directing the surveying and mapping for major freeway design and construction projects , preliminary route and right-of-way acquisition studies , large geodetic control and mapping surveys and construction design surveys for urban rail transit projects . Expertise in complex boundary analysis , right-of-way acquisition and mapping computerized geographic information and land record systems , and aerial photogrammetric mapping along with coordination of survey ' activities and research with City and County Governmental Agencies on all levels . 10 years experience with CalTrans . SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE RELATING TO THIS PROJECT Aerial mapping , base line control , topographic , utility location , right-of-way acquisition surveys , construction layout surveys , ' bridge surveys and construction as-built surveys for the design and construction of the Long Beach to Los Angeles Rail Transit Project . ' 57 miles of strip mapping and control surveys for the Concept Design of the Orange County Rail Transit System. ' Right-of-way , base line control and design mapping surveys for the Century Freeway from Norwalk to E1 Segundo . ' Right-of-way , geodetic control and aerial mapping surveys for the Transit Way Concept Design Project along the Costa Mesa Freeway ( I -55 ) from Newport Beach to the Riverside Freeway ( I -91 ) . ' PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION ' Registered Land Surveyor in California , Nevada , Oregon , Arizona and Colorado . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , RESERVOIR HILL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROJECT ' PROJECT SPECIFIC RESUME FOR ' DAVID DE GROOT ' Firm: Psomas & Associates Title : Survey Supervisor ' Discipline : Land Surveyor RESPONSIBILITIES ' Directs all field and office Surveying and Mapping functions with respect to personnel , procedure , technical standards and equipment . PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ' 30 years experience in civil engineering and land surveying with extensive background in directing the surveying and mapping for major arterial highway construction projects , preliminary route ' and right-of-way acquisition studies , flood control , and mapping surveys along with construction design surveys for urban rail transit projects . Expertise in precise level net surveys , t right-of-way acquisition and mapping , land subdivisions and aerial photogrammetric mapping . Over 20 years experience with the Orange County Surveyors Office . ' SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE RELATING TO THIS PROJECT Aerial mapping , base line control , topographic , utility location , ' right-of-way acquisition surveys , construction layout surveys , bridge surveys and construction as-built surveys for the design and construction of the Long Beach to Los Angeles Rail Transit ' Project . Right-of-way , geodetic control and aerial mapping surveys for the Transit Way Concept Design Project along the Costa Mesa Freeway ' ( I -55 ) from Newport Beach to the Riverside Freeway ( I -91 ) . PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION ' Registered Land Surveyor in California . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , RESERVOIR HILL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROJECT PROJECT SPECIFIC RESUME ' FOR JEREMY EVANS ' Firm : Psomas & Associates Title : Project Surveyor ' Discipline : Land Surveyor RESPONSIBILITIES ' Provide surveying expertise necessary to meet the design specifications and agency regulations . Works with other team members and technical staff to furnish day to day survey ' information and maps . Conducts land survey records research with public agencies and title companies . ' PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Experience since 1976 in surveying and mapping , boundary ' analysis , control surveys , construction design surveys , right-of-way mapping and survey field crew supervision . Particular recent experience in right-of-way and construction design surveys for the Long Beach - Los Angeles Rail Transit ' Project . Also working with developers , title companies and public agencies while providing numberous subdivision and parcel map surveys , construction design surveys , property ownerships and ' tax assessment maps , and A .L .T .A . surveys in the City of El Segundo . ' SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE RELATING TO THIS PROJECT Aerial mapping , base line control , topographic , utility location , right-of-way acquisition surveys , construction layout surveys , ' bridge surveys and construction as-built surveys for the design and construction of the Long Beach to Los Angeles Rail Transit Project . ' Right-of-way , geodetic control and aerial mapping surveys for the Transit Way Concept Design Project along the Costa Mesa Freeway ( I -55 ) from Newport Beach to Riverside Freeway ( I -91 ) . PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Registered Land Surveyor in California . ' SECTION IV SCHEDULE 1 SCHEDULE 1 It is our understanding that you want to proceed with the Reservoir Hill Assessment District Transmission Mains Project as soon as possible. The ' project team is prepared to begin work on your study immediately upon receipt of your authorization. We understand while 180 calendar days have been allowed to complete the project, our schedule is flexible and can be adjusted if desired. Therefore, we propose to complete the project within 150 days and will work to meet any reasonable deadlines you may have. A tentative project schedule is provided on the following page for the ' execution of each major phase of the Work Plan, assuming a project start in June. This schedule depends on flow and pressure data being available from your master plan studies at the start of the project. Our schedule allows for 10%, 50% and 90% review of our construction Plans and ' Specifications by the City's staff. We will conduct the design phase of our work effort from Black & Veatch's ' Santa Ana office. The Project Engineer, John Ewing, works in this office as does your Project Manager. They will be assisted by our Project Consultant, Mr. Jim Lorenz. He was selected to provide your design team ' an overview and the advantage of his more than 30 years of water system's design experience in determining the area to be included in the Assessment District, the adequacy of the pump station and supply source. ' Psomas and Associates, our subcontractor, will provide all aerial mapping and surveying support to complete your project. They are located in Irvine, and have worked together with Black & Veatch and your project team ' members on other projects. Our project team will be supported by our Management Services Division. They provide us the in-house expertise to evaluate the various methods of allocating assessment district costs. We have provided detailed information concerning their qualifications in Section 5, Other Information of this proposal. U )c J-) q — -x •r•I •x a� -X O cd •r1 z q P +J H x -x o a w (1) n H is is cd cn ' CO a x x v rn w •x -x w n W c7 •x ic -�. � r•a p ax -x o p Cf) is is _ o U-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- x is r1 H W W is -x +J (3) 1"� -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- x ) w 4 to 0 � a •r� cn P. ' +J 0 a) o rn v •r•I +- a Cd O co ♦~ u r1 r U 41 U N H 0 •r-I N z H Q ro v 41 4 O �-4 4-1 rz p, cn cn O m H v co r-1 No •11 co 0 •r1 U to a p �r1 oOi U q rx U Iz Q) >~ p •H cn On 41 G N N cn F N •rl co >~ cn cd -0 r= CO 1~ x W cn rz O �F: f-q O r-1 H (A O ' q w U) > co O U P4 W m R.•ri 41 W N G $" r-+ u cd 4J rl Z1 cxl) U) m cn •r1 !~ 71 3 10 10 cn U p -:4 -!c Cl) a) m on 1~ cd H H - a o z •r1 H d P., u) H v P. > D rl r I p ' a cn r1 O O 4 p ro v co q a w w ro >4 a �+ Q)) D co ro Q)) z ca 4.1 w xH mv =ia q ww o U ' M r-•I N Lr) �D ' x x x x x M cn � � H H H H H FEE BASIS a. In accordance with your Request for Proposal, our proposed fee to complete your Reservoir Hill Assessment Project is provided herein in a separate sealed envelope. II FIN 8 4 S I is Y Y 3 L� > a • r �+ 4 e t ,+ fCrY4ji�'t W, r : h z t r • ' CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ' Attached is a sample copy of Black & Veatch's Certificate of Insurance which will apply during the project. Mr. Dennis Schapker has discussed ' our insurance coverage with the City's Contracts Administrator, and we believe we can comply with the City's insurance requirements. h 8 Certificate of Insurance THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFIDTION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON YOU THE CEIOATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT AN INSURANCE POLICY AND DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND,OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW. ' This is to Certify that LIBERTY Name and ' F-EM s l �� r address of MUTUAL ' .; j� Insured. „.E,t.r,,,.,..5�..,�E�or..,.. ,.E,t..u•a.�o,.E"wwuccr.a. 1.500 XUDW LAU PAREW BE.n wSUY.,CE JMNna.—pp5'7 r. ' P.O. aa¢ SW3 Li'.iimm ND 64114 is, at the issue date of certificate, insured by the Company under the policy(ies)listed below. *The insurance afforded by the listed policy(ies)is subject to all their terms,exclusions and conditions and is norallered by any requirement,term or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate ' may be issued. TYPE OF POLICY CERT. EXP. DATE POLICY NUMBER LIMITS OF LIABILITY COVERAGE AFFORDED UNDER W.C. COV. B LAW OF THE FOLLOWING STATES: BODILY INJURY BY ACCIDENT ' WORKERS' AZ,AZ,CA,Co,DC,FL, $ 100 000 EA. ACCIDENT 6/30/37 til>M-141-072023-417 IA,]1,1Z,HS,1A,,i BODILY INJURY BY DISEASE COMPENSATION W=-141-472023-027 j*kkXJM M3JWJC, $ 100,000 EA. PERSON WC1-141-072023-037(IA)NC,]MtIK,1l,()K+$C, BODILY INJURY BY DISEASE ' TA9TZ,DT,YA91ff $ sin ow POLICY LIMIT COMPREHENSIVE BODILY INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE E ' L! EACH EACH SCHEDULE FORM $ OCCURRENCE $ OCCURRENCE -- PRODUCTS COM- } LETED OPERATIONS 6/30/87 LG1-141-072023r-076 $ AGGREGATE $ AGGREGATE ' Lu J w Q INDEPENDENT CON- COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT O ] TRACTORS/CONTRAC- BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE TORS PROTECTIVE ' $1,000,000 EACH OCCURRENCE CONTRACTUAL \ /l AGGREGATE $ LIABILITY V 1,owl wo EACH ACCIDENT-SINGLE LIMIT-B.I. AND P.D. COMBINED ' O _ OWNED $ EACH PERSON Q Q11 NON-OWNED 6/30/87 AS1-141-072 EACH ACCIDENT EACH ACCIDENT J fj HIRED $ OR OCCURRENCE $ OR OCCURRENCE I ' w 2 h-- O ' LOCATION(S)OF OPERATIONS&JOB N(If Applicable) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS: ' 'NOTE:You will NOT be not-fled annually of the continuation of th-s co,erage.You will be notified if tins co'+eroge rs terminated or reduced. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION: THE COMPANY WILL NOT TERMINATE OR ' REDUCE THE INSURANCE AFFORDED UNDER THE ABOVE POLICIES UNLESS _30 DAYS NOTICE OF SUCH TERMINATION OR REDUCTION HAS BEEN MAILED TO: AUTHORIZED NTATIVE t CERTIFICATE HOLDER{ DATE ISSUED oFfiCE L_ ' This certificate is executed by LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY as respect'such-nswonce as is afforded by That Campony. it is eeecwed by LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY as tesoects such insurance as is afforded by That Company.v,s e.ecwed by LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION as respects such imurartce as.s afforded by That Comoany BS T45 RI SUE DATE(MM/DD/YY) PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. ALEXANDER & ALEXANDER, INC. P. O. BOX 13647 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Kansas City, Missouri 64199 COMPANY LETTER A Continental Casualty Company COMPANY INSURED LETTER COMPANY C Black & Veatch, etal LETTER Black & Veatch, Inc. COMPANY D 1500 Meadow Lake Parkway LETTER Kansas City, MO 64114 COMPANY E LETTER rBEO HIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, TWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTH DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED REIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI- IONS OF SUCH POLICIES. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFE OLiCY EXPIRATION ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS LTR GATE(MM/00 DATE)MWDO^ GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY \ PROOUCTS COMP,OPS AGGREGATE $ CLAIMS MADE 7000URRENCE V PEPSONAL&ADVERTISING INJURY $ OWNER'S S CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ fiRE DAMAGE TANY ONE;RE) $ MEDICAL EXPENSE TANY ONE PERSON) $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO CSL ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY NJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS .PER PERSON) $ HIRED AUTOS 80CILY NJURv NON-OWNED AUTOS 'PER Cp0EN') $ GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE $ EACH , . EXCESS LIABILITY AGGREGATE :.�. :iCCt,RAENCE $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKERS'COMPENSATION Is EaCn ACC DENT) AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY J CSEASE POLICY''MIT rj C SEASE EACH EMP_-Y- OTHER A ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS PSF7021241 4/13/87 4/13/88 45,000,000 per claim PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY aggregate ** DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS **Claims Expenses are included in the limit. SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE Ek PIRATICN GATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 15 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESE TATIVE 1n'7o i1 '10 hi.vyhmnry c n n . r- ADDENDUM ' Enclosed is a signed copy of Addendum 1. Because of a typing error on the Addendum, we understand the time to submit our proposal was extended to May 6, 1987, per a telephone call from Mr. Ed Barckley of the City's Water Division. 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 Paul E. Cook PECEIVED Public Works Department Director APR 241987 (714) 536-5431 BLACK &VEATCH April 22 , 1987 1 ' Mr. David Argo Black & Veatch 3100 Lake Center Drive Suite 140 Santa Ana, California 92704 SUBJECT: Addendum to Scope of Work Exhibit A Request for Proposal for Reservoir Hill Assessment ' District (Pressure Zone) Dear Mr. Argo: Please note the following changes in the Scope of Work, page 1 Exhibit A. Item ?/- shall now read as follows : Review preliminary assessment district boundary and recommend ' property additions or deletions based on topography, and ease of service to the properties within and adjacent to preliminary boundary. Item 4 : shall now read as follows : Design all necessary water transmission mains from proposed ' Reservoir Hill Booster Station to the points of connection for future distribution system, per enclosed map Exiiibit E. Information on sizes of mains will be available by June 1, 1987 , from the City of Huntington Beach. The design shall be 40 scale plan and profile. Design of the transmission system shall include items a-e of original request for proposal . Very truly yours, /7 f r yyerintendent Re S JRR: EB: bb ' enclosure : Exhibit E Alignment of existing and proposed major lines . 0 • tPage two Reservoir Hill Assessment District ' (Pressure Zone) This is to acknowledge receipt of revisions of Addendum No. 1 . It is understood that the revisions of this document will be included in our bid. Company Name By ' Date ' FINANCIAL PLANNING The Management Services Division of Black & Veatch provides a wide range of financial planning services to utilities. These services are based on ' extensive experience gained through years of conducting financial, rate, and operations studies for a variety of public and private utility clients and include comprehensive and strategic financial planning assistance through capital improvements financing analyses; revenue requirements ' studies; cost of service rate design; utility policy studies; assistance in the development of ordinances and contracts for services; analysis of customer service requirements; management audits; operations reports, organization and staffing evaluations, accounting and management information systems; database management; and other computer-related studies. The management services staff includes economists, financial analysts, engineers, computer system specialists, accountants, attorneys, and organized development specialists whose combined experience provides us with a multi-disciplined capability that is rare among consulting firms. As a result, we custom-tailor our services to meet your specific objectives. Through research and analysis of pertinent data, our ' professionals will assist you in determining and evaluating the benefits and disadvantages, as well as the costs associated with your proposed project. 1 `vl A N A G E M E N T S E R V I C E S Pik ��\�� ' Q Black & veatcm Engineers-Architects • • 1 O F F I C E S , Black & Veatch, a partnership International Orlando 305/855-7665 ' founded in 1915,today ranks as Black&Veatch International, 8008 South Orange Avenue one of the ten largest engineer- P.O.Box 8405 Orlando,Florida 32809 ing-architectural firms in the Kansas City,Missouri 64114 Overland Park 913/339-2000 United States. The firm is or- 913/339-8700 11401 Lamar ganized into major service Telex: 42523 BLAKVINT OLPK Overland Park,Kansas 66211 groups to best match its capa- Cable address: BLACVEATCH Philadelphia 215/988-9633 bilities to the specialized needs Ten Penn Center of clients. One of these is the Regional Offices Philadelphia,Pennsylvania 19103 ' Management Services Division Asheboro 919/672-3600 Phoenix 602/957-2795 which provides services in val- 110 West Walker Avenue 3020 East Camelback Road uation, rate, financial, and Asheboro,North Carolina 27203 Phoenix,Arizona 85016 feasibility matters related to Austin 512/343-2214 Raleigh 919/467-9913 ' public and investor-owned fa- 3508 Far West Boulevard 117 Edinburgh South cilities, as well as assistance Austin,Texas 78731 Cary,North Carolina 27511 in regulatory compliance and Baton Rouge 504/926-3743 analysis of electronic data St.Louis 314/532-7940 ' Y 4521 Jamestown Avenue 1415 Elbridge Payne Road processing systems. Baton Rouge,Louisiana 70W8 Chesterfield,Missouri ad For more information on how Boston 617/890-4340 San Diego Missouri 638 3017 Black & Veatch can assist you 260 Bear Hill Road 3420 Camino Del Rio North in areas related to financial and Waltham,Massachusetts 02154 San Diego,California 92108 ' management services, please Cincinnati 513/984-6630 San Francisco 415/944-5770 contact: 9900 Carver Road P.O.Box 4247 Charles W. Keller Cincinnati,Ohio 45242 Walnut Creek,California 945% Executive Partner and Head, Dallas 214/770-1500 Seattle 206/885-1222 ' Management Services Division 5728 LBJ Freeway 18210 Redmond Way Black & Veatch Dallas,Texas 75240 Redmond,Washington 98052 1500 Meadow Lake Parkway Denver 303/671-4200 Tampa 813/733-3138 Kansas City, Missouri 64114 1400 South Potomac Street 380 Main Street ' 913/339-2000 Aurora,Colorado 80012 Dunedin,Florida 33528 Detroit 313/259-5300 Washington 301/986-8980 200 Renaissance Center 7315 Wisconsin Avenue Detroit,Michigan 48243 Bethesda,Maryland 20814 ' Las Vegas 702/798-8206 6075 South Eastern Avenue Las Vegas,Nevada 89119 Myrtle Beach 803/449-1591 ' 1103 48th Avenue North Myrtle Beach,South Carolina 29577 K & V E A T C H ttsIn these complex times, the success JdRRj�^/ of your organization depends a great +% deal on its responsiveness to change— �._. � , change dictated by market require- ments, expansion needs, sources of =_ �� ai►� funds, profit goals, and the role of \�� • . government. At Black & Veatch, we have experienced professionals who can help you manage these com- ``• \\/� Alex changes. They provide related ' consulting services of unusual scope ���, '''\ \ •' _ •• that incorporate the latest in modern technology. One of the largest engineering-arch- itectural firms in the United States, Black & Veatch has been engaged in more than 12,000 projects since the partnership was formed in 1915. We also have served more than 2,700 z �a clients throughout the world—includ- �\ ing public and investor-owned util- ities, regulatory and government agencies, and industrial and com- mercial businesses. A number of our projects have in- volved financial and management ' services performed by a seasoned staff of economists, financial ana- lysts, engineers, computer system specialists, accountants, attorneys, and organizational development specialists. Their combined exper- tise provides us with a multidisci- ' Alined capability that is rare among consulting firms. As a result, we can custom tailor.our services to meet your specific objectives. And with ' the growing use of computer tech- nology,we are able to perform these services in a more cost-effective ' manner than ever before. We invite your attention to the fol- lowing pages which further describe t our financial and management ser- vices. For your convenience, the information has been organized into sections . . . Utility Rates. . . Financial ' Analysis and Planning . . . Manage- ment Services . . . and Data Process- ing. If you would like more informa- tion, please contact one of our offices listed on the opposite page. rr �` s * 4w �° x n, �. w' r a TO 40 on Ai - y Ar 4r S 4r S 4-w. ' U T I L I T Y R A T E S ' Our specialists in utility rates have Related Services Representative Clients conducted more than 1,200 rate • Development of revenue Anheuser-Busch, Inc. studies for public and investor- requirements Atlanta Gas Light Company ' owned utilities in the water, waste- Cost of service analysis Baltimore, Maryland water, gas, electric, and telecom- y Black Hills Power & Light Company munications fields, as well as indus- • Rate design California Food ' trial users and regulatory agencies. • Utility rate software Processors Association We can provide assistance and direc- Regulatory analysis and assistance Charleston, South Carolina tion for your staff on segments of a Connecticut Public Utilities study—or we can perform the entire • Expert witness testimony Control Authority study from developing cost-of-service • Rate case applications Dallas, Texas data to presenting expert witness Denver, Colorado testimony. East Kentucky Power Cooperative ' Many of our specialists have com- Fairfax County, Virginia bined engineering and finance Gas Service Company degrees, and some have utility work- Greenville, South Carolina ' ing experience. We take pride in Indianapolis Water Company providing you with a fair, sound Jasper, Alabama analysis that is sensitive to conflict- Kansas City, Missouri ing interests. Manhattan, Kansas t Midlands Energy Company New Orleans, Louisiana Orange & Rockland Utilities, ' New York Orlando Utilities Commission Santa Cruz Properties, Inc., Arizona St. Louis, Missouri Sussex County, Delaware Topeka, Kansas U.S. Steel Corporation tWyoming Public Service Commission 1 1 ��%/t✓ rwihr•inar mmwrl as k . I 1t ti 4a and{s • � x ksxt-y e 1 • • 1 F I N A N C I A L 1 At Black & Veatch, we provide com- Related Services Representative Clients prehensive financial analysis and • Feasibility studies Alabama State Docks planning services backed by more Amax Specialty Metals, Inc. 1 than 70 ears of experience and the Financial planning p y Y P Bogota, Colombia combined advantage of financial • Bond prospectuses Centel Corporation and engineering expertise. These • Financing assistance Detroit, Michigan 1 services range from feasibility stud- Cost manuals Earth Resources, Inc. ies to detailed financial planning, Fayetteville, Arkansas and also cover such areas as proper- • Property valuations Gas Research Institute ty valuation and depreciation,prepa- • Depreciation studies Greenville, South Carolina 1 ration of official statements for fi- Operations reports Indianapolis Water Company nancing, and economic and demo- Intercontinental Diversified graphic studies. • Cogeneration studies Corporation 1 Our financial studies form a sound • Utility diversification Kissimmee, Florida basis for capital investment decisions • Energy loss studies Michigan Consolidated Gas and assist you in responsibly meet- Company ing your requirements for capital • Socioeconomic impact Maryland State Parks and 1 resources. Through the research • Utility accounting assistance Planning Commission and analysis of pertinent data, our Mississippi Lime Company professionals can help you deter- Nantahala Power & Light Company 1 mine and evaluate the benefits, dis- Norfolk, Virginia advantages, and costs associated Overland Park, Kansas, with proposed projects. Convention and Visitors Bureau 1 P.T. Permata Inka Halmahera, Indonesia Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Sebring Utilities Commission 1 Tarrant County, Texas U.S. Department of Commerce 1 1 1 1 101 _ } gym, r 1 • • 1 M A N A G E M E N T 1 Effective use of human resources is Representative Services Representative Clients critical to the success of any business • Management audits Albuquerque, New Mexico organization. We can help you eval-1 Arapahoe Count Colorado uate your current policies and pro- • Productivity measures p y Bristol, Tennessee grams in this important area, and • Staffing studies Burlington, Iowa restructure them, if necessary, to • Organizational development Cincinnati, Ohio 1 better meet your organization's short • Legal assistance Colorado Springs, Colorado and long term goals. stance East Bay Municipal Utility Our professionals perform analyses • Institutional studies District, California 1 of staffing, organization, and man- • Utility diversification General Silos Company, Egypt agement for utilities, municipalities, • Operations reports High Point, North Carolina industry, and government agencies • Regulatory analysis Jacksonville, Florida e throughout the world. These studies g y y Montana Consumer Council 1 result in recommendations that pro- • Contract negotiations New Orleans, Louisiana vide practical methods for improving • Planning studies Nebraska Rural Electric Association operational management and per- North Dakota Public Service 1 sonnel practices within existing so- Commission cial,economic,and legal parameters. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company P.T. Permata Inka Halmahera, Indonesia 1 Parkersburg, West Virginia South Dakota Public Service Commission 1 Thornton, Colorado Wyoming Public Service Commission 1 1 1 1 II►p�'i ate.__ ���w��`. � � � ,g .. � � . ' �..,. �" �;�: r #�`, �� ` � �� _',� _. ,. _-ra � c �., �� �` �9 �_ �r.- x N e4p' ' '��:,,_ $,: �' - 'ilj^11� �r��b ���A,;x4 1 k �'4 �,r� � r.., �... �^ �... D A T A P R O C E S S I N G 1 Data processing is playing an increas- Related Services Representative Clients ingly important role in nearly all • Software design Albuquerque, New Mexico business operations,and we can pro- Arapahoe County, Colorado vide you with the computer resources • Management information systems y p Boulder, Colorado you need to initiate or expand your • Hardware configurations Baltimore County, Maryland own system. We maintain state-of- • Analysis of system needs Black Hills Power & Light Company the-art computer hardware and soft- Charlottesville, Virginia ware to accommodate diverse types • Artificial intelligence YP Columbus, Ohio of information processing needs. • Scheduling and tracking systems Columbus & Southern Ohio Our data processing professionals • Microcomputer templates Electric Company provide user assistance and training, • Fixed asset accounting systems Kansas City Power & Light Company and also develop custom software Metropolitan District Commission applications for specific project re- • Inventory control systems (Boston, Massachusetts) 1 quirements. • Financial planning Metropolitan Sewer District In addition to our software services, • Decision support systems of Greater Cincinnati, Ohio we can help you assess other data Metropolitan Sewer District 1 processing requirements including (St. Louis, Missouri) information needs, evaluation of Nantahala Power & Light Company existing procedures, development Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company of recommendations, and prepara- PLN, Jakarta, Indonesia 1 tion of an implementation plan. Our Provo, Utah assessments take into consideration St. Louis, Missouri all reasonable alternatives and eval- San Diego, California ' uate their associated cost, capability, Sewerage & Water Board and performance. of New Orleans, Louisiana Topeka, Kansas Washington Suburban 1 Sanitary Commission 001 1 1 1 r �� A m.. 1 • 0 ' M A N A G E M E N T S E R V I C E 1 1 Z]Blacic & Veatch ' Engineers-Architects