Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCalifornia Coastal Commission - 1980-05-221 1 I Smile EnglneerfnQ Corporation 7h('1 1 f +(,.•r>: cnn•sutttnn ennineuri+ 1(coitucts !.r .ti0 rr .6 (341iy 1. irr tit + +;61 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH December 9, 1983 Attention Mr. Les Evans City Engineer 21000 Main Street. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,Proposal for Engineering Services Upgrading of a Concrete Flood Control Channel and a Concrete Box Culvert, CC 649 As resident, and businessmen in the Huntington Beach area, we share the Citv's concerr over- recent flooding incidents and the ' infacilities. We commend the h,�drau..t.. capabilities of exis r,, � m city sta:"f and council for proceeding in a timely mariner to evaluate existirig deficiencies :Ind minimize future flooding problems. Boyle EnEineering has completed over 5D drainage and flood Projects in the. South<_rr, California area in the past four years. These involved raster plans, hydraulic analysis, flood insurance sty:dies, design services, and co+,.plex seditnent transport analysis. All of Nora: irvolved heavy usage cf our in-house compul.er system. As a local example of our expertise, we were selected for ( and 'nave: alTost cc^,pl etc ' i a highly complex and cornI;uLer-based study of an update to the city of Costa Mescals 1965 'aster Plan of Drainage. We have arranged our proposal for your r Ev iew as fol lows : Iiiirodu;tion "Keys to Success", comments on RFP and product quality Sco a Detailed work plat. for Parts I and II. Fee Schedule Staff Project team organization, resumes Experience Summary of recent similar storm drain :Waster plans, project nbstravts. AQ�endix Refer _A races Request for Proposal IEXHIBIT "A' ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City of Huntington Beach -2- Mr. Les Evans December 9, 1983 Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION 'victor E. Op ncar;' Jr, E Managing Engineer, kn OC-B99-197.-00 1 5. INTRODUCTION The project description in the City's RFP dated November 15, 1983 was further clarified at a meeting with Mr. Jack Miller on November 5, 1983 and a visit to the project site on November 7, �983. The following information was developed from our research: Heil Pua Station: Discussions with the field maintenance staff revealed that the pump station was not overstressed during the 1983 storms. Flooding at Magellan and Sunshine is likely to be a problem between the curb inapt and the pump station :,ump. Channel North of Heil: The concrete lining appears tc be in good conoition :::t,h no evidence of poorly designed features. The i ♦ P i d undeveloped lard r �o .,h,. east- wculu 311ow widening and/or parallel pipes to handle additional peak- storm i(] f Box Under Heii: :he box culvert appears small in relation to the channel both upstream and do�!nstreamn of Heil. This would be a highly likely constriction that ^sight create an unacceptable inci I 1 1 1 i I 11 1 1 1 1 1 Channel. South of Heil: City Information: backwater condition during peak storm flows at ultimate development. Development on both sides would make increasing channel capacity a costly operation if it doesn't have adequate capacity to accommodate peak storm flows . The City's 1979 Master Plan appears to have adequate back-up material on -file with the City to document the recommended plan. This information ould be re --checked . Plans of existing channels will be used in the analysis phase, although new field information should be developed if channel improvements are required. "KEYS" T( SUCCESS We are keenly aware .)f the City Is desire to minimize future flooding problems like those caused by the 1983 winter storms. We feel uniquely qualified to achieve the City 's goals for the following rEasons: o A strong study team averaging over 18 years each in experience involving computer applications, flood studies, storm drain master planning, and hydraulic analysis. o An accomplished project manager with broad experience in each of the study areas who is an effective communicator. o A local Hoyle office (in Newport Beach) from whi,_h the work 44.11 be performed. o n 38-year record of time and successful completion on assignments in Orange County (including previous work for the City of Huntington Beach). o Extensive knowledge of the County :'_ocd Control System, personnel, and analysis techniques from our recent Upper Newport Bay Study. o A desire to use Huntington Beach as a positive reference for future .pork from other public agencies after the assignment is accomplished. .r.,_..__.w.__ w...�..__........».._....._._.._........._.._.._.._.,_.. i,.:+r t:r<.;,�r,.-•,-c'1 C�r�c»t7tr7 ._.._,..../ 1 1 1 Fj 1 1 1 1 SCOPE OF WORK We've reviewed the City's "Scope of Work" dated November 15, 1983 and concur with the approach and task; sequencing. Supplemental comments regarding our approach have been added for clarification of key points. TASK 1 - HYDROLCGY AND HYDRAULICS STUDY "Per four, and 'or provide all necessary studies and field investigations required to prepare the preliminary plans and working drawings. Project studies shall include: ... a hydrologic analysis of the drainage area tributary to the Heil-Gothard channel and a d-:termination of the capacity necessary to meet th•t -,,ityls design standards; ... an evaluation of the Heil pump station and inlet structure including the preparation, of any recommended improvements necessar, .o accommodate design flows." TASK 1, PART A - HYDROLOGY STUL`Y Objectives Develop estimated 10 and 25 year storm runoff from each subdrainage area using the Orange County Flood Control District S (GCFCD) Rational Method. 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 g 1 I I Methodology 1. Delineate drainage on base map using 1979 Ma.-Pter Plan a, a guide. Check and adjust using street improvement plans . Review crit!.cal areas in field , make field level. measurements where necessary. 2. Delineate ultimate land use from City's planning maps and soil type from Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) hydrology manual soils maps on 1" = 600' base map. 3. Key review point with City. 4. Assemble watershed data to form computer "hydrologic data base" for subsequent analysis of flood flows. 5. Use hydrologic data base and computer program developed by BFC to compute, summarize, and tabulate 10, 25, and 50 year frequency runoff by OCFCD rational ;method , util izing 10-year intensity duration curve. Note - when given description of ex i ;sting or proposed f ac it i t ie s , thi s program will also analyze existing hydraulic capabilities, and size proposed facilities. 1 1 1 1 1ASK 1, PART B - HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Objentives Determine the capacity and flood protection level (storm period) of existing channel and Heil Pump Station f0%; �.zo0 Methodology 1. Use City's storm drain improvement plans to determine existing and proposed facilities. 2. Meet with OCFCD staff to obtain design water surface, ¢ t current status and future plans for OCFCU regional J facilities which intercept City's storm drains. i i 3. Key review point with City. u. Assemble data to form computer "facilities data base" of i J existing and proposed storm drains. r� 5. Use the "facilities data base" and computerized storm flows J to analyze existing and proposed storm drain facilities. Analysis will include resizing proposed f acil i ties and v identification of additional facilities where existing j drains inadequate. Note Program hydrologic J storm are •- and data described in item A-7 above. b. Key review point with City. I i 7. �. Adjust proposed facilities per City review and finalize analysis. �,,,.... - _-_............_._..,.—......_.. ......,. .. .,.......,_,,,_..,. { 1 c t : ; +: • !� rf c 1 !'t 1? ` ; r r t U C r: r f.' C' .'� (r ri n ..,.. 1 1 1 FJ 1 1 1 J- I u I -] 1 I 1 I Deliverables 1. Map showing tributary area, land use and soil type, computer generated tables of hydrology calculations, and text describing methodology. 2. Identification of hydraulic problem areas for 25 year storm and backwater curve hydraulic grade line (HGL) of channF•1 based on maximum water surface in OCFCD's "C05" channel. 3. Development of "system curve" for Heil Pump Station and comparison with existing pump curves. u. Technical Memorandum summarizing investigation with recommended improvements for channel and pump station to meet 25 year storm flows. TASK 2 AND 3 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN "Preparing all preliminary puns and cost estimates for the improvement of the existing channel per design flow requirements (including the cost of all miscellaneous printing, etc.). Attending periodic meetings with City staff during the preparation of preliminary plans and working drawings." Objectives Finalize the nature of the system and set forth the strategy for carrying out the project. Methodology 1. SURVEYING, MAPPING, AND UTILITY INVESTIGATIONS o Aerial strip survey, 80' wide, 40 scale. o Ground control for aerial survey. i o Ground survey for specific controls, such as existing is inlets, location of "close" obstructions, and details i on box culvert. 1 o Utility location research from existing municipal and i utility company records. I 1 1 lJ 2. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Field investigation and report including the following: o Soil borings (minimum 10' deep) with logs along the channel alignment ( at 500' intervals or less) and in areas of structures. o Recommended safe construction slopes. o Lateral earth pressures for excavation sheeting and shoring design. o Recommendations `.'or type and depth of foundations and allowable bearing pressure. o Lateral pressures for permanent structures. a Groundwater and dewatering. ....._.____._.�... _.._ .....,.._..... r'JGt:�r•Fnr�;rT�~t�r,n:7C.-�r,:�:��,�!tt1t� 1 1 1 1 A o Settlement of channel, pipe, and structures. o Corrosion problems due to soluble salts and recommended cement types. o Compaccion requirements for backfill of pipeline and around structures. 3. PRELIMINARY DESIGN o Analysis of channel alternatives. The evaluations will include the following considerations: Topographic constraints Construction cost - including optional methods of construction Community impact from the construction activities. o identification of right-of-way requirements. An assessment will be made as to the adequacy of existing public rights -of -way and the requirements for additional easements over private properties both for the permanent facility and during construction. o Produce a preliminary estimate of cos-stru-^1Cion cos(-.. o Review preliminary plans with the City's staff. The findings of the preliminary engineering analyses will be reviewed with the City's staff and/or r representatives for input prior to proceeding with final design. TASK 4 - FINAL DESIGN PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, BID DOCUMENTS -------------------------------------------------- "Based on an approval of the preliminary plans and cost estimates, the engineer shall prepare dnd provide 40 sets of the: I (a) final worki.ng drawings (b) contract documents/specifications." i ►Methodology af Based upon the concept approved as a result of the preliminary design analysis, the channel's alignment, profile, size, strength { parameters, and other design components wi.11 be finalized for preparation of the final plans and specifications. 1f The design will culminate in the preparation of complete sets of 1 bidding documents ready for advertising. r� j Gather all available improvement plans and right-of-way i ( ;documents. Included are channe and storm„ drain ; improvements, easement documents, tract :naps, pump station plans, etc . o Perform final hydraulic design. The channel pipe si :es presented in he preliminary design phase will be r confirmed. i 1 i o Develop and calculate a detailed final alignment and profile. .The position-.ng within streets or easements will be influenced by such factors as economy, minimizing interferences with existing utilities and improvements, and the impacts upon the general community from the --onstruction activiti,:s. Alternative :methods of construction, where applicable, will be identified. o Identify and design connections. o preparation of contract documents, general provisions, and special provisions. Boyle' s general conditions and contract documents will be reviewed and modified as required in the special provisions. o Preparation of plans. The plans will be organized as follows: - Cover sheet/location map/index of -hefts - plan and profile sheets. Plan plotted at "' = 40' scale and profile plotted at 1" = 41 scale will be prepared in ink on mylar - Appurtenances and details - pump station modifications. i j, I i o Construction specifications. The technical specifications for the pipeline and appurtenances will include, in addition to the normal material -related items, special - - I � - . i ., � I , r , � - , - * I , , ( - U i. , , 1 .11 P -7 P �." 1 ) : 1 construction requirements. These will incorporate the i � requirements in area relating to such items as traffic controll pavement removal and replacement, schedule, coordination, earthwork, anu public safety. o Printing and reproduction of bid package. The contract documents, specifications, and reduced plans will be bound in one documents. Forty sets will be provided to the City i ' for advertising, construction, and record purposes. <<�C o A construction cost estimate will be broken down in accordance with the final schedule of work items contained in the final contract documents. the estimate will reflect prices indexed to the midpoint of the construction period in order to be comparable :with the anticipated bids. ' TASK 5 & 6 - ASSISTANCE DURING BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION f ------------------------------------------------- t "The engineer shall, during bid advertisement and construction r provide support, including interpretation of plans and , ti I specifications, review of shop drawings. review or =nd make recommendations on change orders. . ,� Provide one acceptable set creproducible as -built„ mylar drawings. (Note: 10% of the contract amount will he withheld until the "as-builts" are submitted and approved.;" r I 1 1 1 I � G 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 Methodology Our staff will be available during the bidding period for the purpose of providing assistance to the City staff in expediting the bidding procedure and for interpretation of the plans and specifications. During construction, our staff will provide further consultation for interpretations of plans and specifications, if necessary, and a review and recommendation of shop drawings and change orders. Said consultation would be applicable to items of work as initially contemplated by the improvement plans. Consultation regarding an expansion or change in then Scope of Work initiated by other than the consultant will be billed at our standard hourly rates. Upon completion of construction anc upon submittal by the City of a set of prints noting as -built conditions ( signed by the party in responsible charge of inspection) , Boyle will provide one set of reproducible mylars reflecting the "record" condition of the r project as actually constructed according to the inspector's records. t APPROACH TO PROJECT The following analysis represents the manner in which we would propose to accomplish the services required for this project. It is presented in a step-by-step format and is generally shown in i pictorial form by the bar graph schedule of work immediately following. "Kick -Off" Conference - Task 1 � Upon award of a contract for our services, we would initiate a conference with the City' s designated project manager. The purpose of this meeting is to identify parties and to establish procedure as to lines of communication, transmittals, and reporting; identify other City departments which may be in-olved; establish general design parameters and/or design standards to be ` P e� followed; confirm time schedules; and obtain any required i permission for entry onto the site. 1 Preliminary Design - Tasks 2 and I Upon completion of Task 1, we will proceed with a schematic layout of the recommended improvements. This phase of work will serve to identify any extraordinary problem areas, such as required right-of-way and/or, adverse soil conditions. A preliminary estimate of cost will be made at this stage and submitted with the preli,ninary plans for City review. P Y ...._�..«.. ��_._._ _.._.._.. �. �..»...... FJr t;Ir•! c:;rnf r irlfJ7 i.)r;.rr'•.11I( W1 .,, The survey would consist of establishment of ground control followed by an aerial survey. It is proposed that plan and profile sheets will contain strip topo and Ztrip photos covering the proposed alignment. 1 Tre geotechnical fieldwork would be underway at the same time together with our staff research and compilation of existing ( utility data and data rer,arding proposed facilities, such a..S proposed development. { Final Design - Task 4 �! Following the City' s review, appropriate revisions would be { incorporated into the design and the plans would be brought to roughly 95 percent completion (by second week in see Schedule of Work) including a final estivate and ` specifications. All work would then be submitted for "final" review. r� Final Revisions - Task U We have provided in our Schedule of Fork a period of approximately two weeks after final review for final touchup and rj final printing and assemoling of specifications. j � M Ma 5wM M M mom M M M M SCHEDULE OF WORK Upgrading of a Concrete Flood Control Channel and a Concrete Box Culvert TASK t Hydrologv Hydraulics Report TASK 2 & 3 Surveying Geotechnicai Prelim Design TASK 4 Final Design Specifications R/WAcquisition AAM F1=R KAAR APR IUAV _11INI _1111 i 4 i f , t 1 ` W j >- w }- W W U W° , ! W i ; CC, E t t 1 FEE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAN-HOUR ESTIMATES BY TASK Computer Costs Man -Hours ($) _.. S/P A/A D C TASK 1 - HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS STUDY A. Hydrology Study 1. Delineate Tributary Areas --- 1 16 4 --- 2. Assign Land Use and Soil Type --- 1 4 4 --- 3 . City Review --- ? 2 --- __.. 4. Assemble Data Base --- --- 4 5. Hydrologic Computer Analysis 300 1 4 --- 2 B. Hydraulic Analysis 1. Determine Existing & Proposed Facilities --- 4 2. 11ei&t With OCFCD --- 4 -.-- 1 3. City Review --- ? 2 ___ 4 4. Assemble Data Base --- --- g ___ __- 5. Hydraulic Computer Analysis 300 4 4 -__ 4 5. City Review --- 4 u ...._ _-- 7. Finalize Hydraulic Analysis 100 14 S/P = Senior/Principal Engineer A/A = Associate/Assistant Engineer D = Drafter C = Clerical .►.. .» ...�... .. ..,.....r.» f.T(7,/r, rr;t),rtc'CtifitIL:C?tr. t ...,_....._...,I r� i i A 1 _J Fee Man -Hour Estimates by Ta,-k (Continued) Computer Costs Man -Hours W S/P A/A D C C. Prepare Report 1. Prepare Master Plan Facilities Map --- --.--• 4 8 -..- 2. Prepare Report Text and Exhibits 200 4 4 8 8 Subtotal 900 31 47 24 19 TASK 2 & 3 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1. Alternative Analysis --- 4 16 16 --- 2. R/4 Analysis --- 3. Preliminary Costs -•.- 2 --- 4 4. Preliminary Plans --- 16 16 a:) __.. 5. Review with City -..- 4 4 __- --- Subtotal --- 25 52 60 4 Task 4 - Final Design Since the project will be undefined until Tasks , 2, and 3 ara completed, we propose to base the fee for Task 4 on a percent of construction cost using ASCE curve "B" as a guideline. Since preliminary work will nave been completed at this point, a 0.75 multiplier would be used to determine the final fee. For• example: Costt. Cost, incl. ASCE --ee with 0.75 Continge.­2ies Curve B Multiplier "b 100,000 9. 6,750 500,000 7% 26,250 1,000,000 6.220o 46,650 ..._,.._....... .. ... . _._ ..___ _____ _._._ ...__ ._._..........__ .._..r�.�k __ r74z:ir1 R, ri,:I t." •. 41c7 t':. i:ci r : sI i A I Fee flan -Hour Estimates by Task (Continued) Task 5 & b - Assistance During Bidding and Construction Like Task 4, the extent and complexity of the construction period is impossible to determine until the project is defined in Tasks 1; 2, and 3. Using the same rational as Task u, we propose a 0.15 multiplier based on ASCE Curve "B". For example: Const. Cost, Incl. ASCE Fee with 0.75 Contingencies Curve H Multiplier s 100,000 Qi 1,350 500,000 7% 5,250 11000,000 5.221 9,330 FEE SUMMARY Fee Range �4 Fee Summary ;.off' Hi5h l� Task 1 sp Tasks 2 & ? � 6 , 501 5 , 500.,- Task, a 0 Task 5 t 35 to 30 to b? Surveying Ceotechnical 0 100 Server 3 o dQ ------------- CPo'Lpc'�s•�il� Jt' � O 3 6115 0 .,..,.....,,. .........+........�.......,.......... w.�......,..._..,.....,.............,......-..-...---+.�.--.... 1 � < • r 1 � i. t t r ; , + r t � : ' � ' r r . �� (t r 1l : i r . l t r C..`"1 ....�..«. i 1 STAFF 'The overall responsibility for completion of this assignment will be Boyle's project manager. Four senior staff engineers are i iavailable to provide guidance and/or execute specialized areas of r! expertise in the study. Specific work assignments are made by i� 1 the project manager to the senior staff and associate/assistant ' engineers in our office. 1 An organizational chart is shown on the following page. A brief j summary of key points behind each member's selection for the key project teach follows. More detailed resumes are at the end of i i this section with career information for the named staff. j f Project Manager ! H;::rvey Gobas, PE, Senior Civil Engineer is proposed for this f i assignment. His career has seen continuous analysis and design I applications in flood control studies, facility design, and pumping applications. Excellent communication skills allow � Harvey to make our clients a "member" of the project team j vis-a-vis on -going status reports, meetings, and availability for i questions from the City's staff as as progress Specific duties are as fellows: o meet with City staff every two weeks o conduct progress and quality review procedures o be responsible for overall technical j content of study 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 9 i, I 1 I 1 1 1 City of Huntington Beach ORGANIZATIONAL CHART for Upgrading of Flood Control Channel and a Concrete Box Culvert ;cc 649 Technical Review Commi tt.ee M. Fora, PE VP/Quality Control V. Opincar, PE manager/CC Office D. Boyd, PE Principal Engineer H. Gobas, PE Project :•Manager Cordon Lutes, PE Hydrology r^•ussell Hulse, PE Cc rq,,uter Applications;' -drain icy Channel Design Al Grathwo' , PE Structural De s icn Envineers 5 Technicians as Required .�.. _.... ........... f_i(:JU.`►! �►'►l:'I!)f.'[?f 1►7i:j C�(7r/7(7f.7f1(7►'! ....,,.......,. o direct participation in study/report i o be responsible for schedule and budget Key Staff Each of the following Boyle staff are responsible for providing specialized expertise during this assignment: Gordon Lutz, PE, Senior Civil Engineer, with over 16 years experience in flood control management, planning, and design. Mr. Lutz has recently prepared complete reports similar to the Huntington Beach Study involving analysis, preliminary design, recommendations for :Waster planned facilities, and cost estimates. Mr, Lutz is the most specialized of our key staff in flood control. C. Russell Hulse, . PE, Sen for Civil Engineer , is an expert in hydraulics with over 22 years experience involving planning, design, and construction of facilities. Mr. Hulse has developed numerous hydraulic analysis programs that will be used in the Huntington Beach Study. 0. W. "Jack" Holmes, PE, Senior Civil Engineer, is experienced in the planning, design and construction of grading, paving, drainage and storm drain systems, flood control channels, detention reservoirs, dams and spillways; and miscellaneous hydraulic structures including box culverts, bridges abutments, retaining walls, junction structures and channel transitions. Project design/management experience includes: ]m 1 1 o Project eng_neer for civil design and development of a 10-acre site for a 20 mg water storage and 50 mg pumping station facility that involved extensive earthwork and unique storm water retention. o Two miles of flood control channel with large diameter storm drain pipe inlets, intercept channel and transition sections. o A 340 acre foot detention reservoir; including an inlet spillway structure and a 30-foot high earth dam with a 300-foot long overflow spillway for the Creative Communities Development project near Fontana, California. c Site drainage and a storm drain channel with transition structures and a ridge over the channel for a private development in Rancho Mirage, California. Albert H . Grathwol , PE, Senior Engineer with extensive experience in the supervision of and structural design of pu'jlic: works structures for water, storm drain and wastewater conveyance and process facilities. Specific storm drain projects include: Alameda Storm Channel 600 foot open channel and Stilling Basin chute 4t 2:1 slope with 25 foot by 62 foot stilling basin. i Los Angeles County rFlood Control District Storm Drain Bond i Issue Projects j City of Los Angeles 1-1 1 1 1 Over 30 miles of storm drains Numerous storm drain transition and junction structures between channels; box conduits, pipes I t Technical Review Committee 1 It' s the policy at Boyle to have all projects checked by t t an independent reviewer and/or committee for quality assurance. The following are responsible for this function: Maury Ford, PE, Vice President/Quality Control t 38 years experience in water resource projects and ! corporate - wide responsibility to maintain t � quality control procedures. i Victor Opincar, PE, Managing Engineer/Orange County, ' with 15 years experience in public works ;projects and F office manager with responsibility for implementation and participation in quality con.rol checks. Daniel Boyd, PE, Senior Engineer with 14 years 1 experience in flood control analysis, master planning, and design. Mr. Boyd has extensi;re recent experience in Orange County on significant and complex projects; First, as assistant project manager for the Upper Newport Bay Comprehensive Stormwzter Plan ( for the Cities of Newport Beach and Irvine, with SCAG) ; second , as project engineer for EMA's Miller -Kraemer Basin Study, and , third , special drainage studies for The Irvine Company. Because of these multi -agency studies, he has a firm understanding of the County's procedures and hydrology methodology. HARVEY GOBAS Senior Engineer 1 FIELDS of SPECIAL Water Resources COMPETENCE Environmental Engineering Solid Waste Management EDUCATION BS/Civil Engineering/University of Southern California / 1972 MS/Environmental Engineering/University of Southern Caiifornia11975 Solid Waste Management Course Study/University of Southern California, California State University at Long Beach REGRISTRATION Professional Engir.�Pr - California ( 1976) YEARS of EXPERIENCE Joined Boyle 1977 With Others 4 Years PROFESSIONAL American Society of Civil Engineers AFFILIATIONS American Water Works Association EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Responsible for preliminary site selection, preparation of plans and specifications and construction management for water transmission mains, sewer lines, water storage reservoirs, pumping stations, and wastewater treatment plant. Project manager on two water storage reservoirs for East Orange County Water District (EOCWD) and one for Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) having capacities of 1.0, 11.5, and 15.0 mg respectively. Project engineer on two water storage reservoirs in the Los Alisos Water District, El Toro, California, and city of Orange, California, having capacities of 7.5 mg and 570,000 gallons respectively. Projects involved preliminary design considerations, preparation of alternative design concepts, preparation of plans and specifications, and construction management. Project manager on various EOCWD transmission mains varying In size from 8-inch diameter to 24-inch. District engineer for Stanton County Water District, Stanton, California, and Cypress County Water District, Cypress i California. Designed water distribution networks and sewage systems serving Los Angeles County Flood Control District's publicly owned dam and reservoir sites. Res- ponsible for other ongoing operational activities at the district's dams and re- servoirs, and participated in the contract administration of earthquake safety and structural re -analysis studies of district dams conducted by several engineering consulting firms. Responsible for management of several projects for the County of Orange En- vironmental Management Agency including a feasibility study for the joint use of a water conservation basin operated by the Orange County Water District and a flood control retarding basin operated by the Orange County Flood Control District. Also project manager for Investigation and design of structural repairs :,u Fullerton Creek Flood Control Channel. Project consisted of repairs to the invert slab and backfill of a vertical wall channel following uplift of the slab due to saturation of the backfill. IHARVEY R. GOBAS 1 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1980 to Present Senior Civil Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Newport BEach, California. Serves in capacity of Engineer for the District of East Orange County Water District (EOCWD), Cypress County Water District (CCWD), Cypress, California and Stanton County Water District (SCWD), Stanton, California. Responsible for all engineering work for EOCWD including attendance at all Board of Directors meeting. Also served as project manager for 1.0 mg and 11.5 mg steel tank reservoirs with a construction cost totalling $2.4 million. Other District projects include modifications to 10 cfs water filtration plant, several miles of water transmission mains of various sizes from 8-inch through 24-inch diameter, and water metering connect'ons. Duties for CCWD and SCWD include various engineering assignments, plan checks, and attendance at District Board meetings. Additional assignments include serving as project manager for 15 mg reservoir project report, design, and contract administration phases. Project involved dual design of alternative steel and concrete reservoirs including in depth analysis of maintenance costs economic evaluations, and construction recommen- dations. Responsible for management of several projects for the County of Orange Environmental Management Agency including a feasibility study for the joint use of a water :-onservation basin operated by the Orange County Water District and a flood control retarding basin operated by the Orange County Flood Control District. An additional assignment consisted of preparation of plans and spe- cifications to repair storm damage to a vertical wall concrete flood control channel. 1977 to 1980 Associate Civil Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corpora- tion, ewport Beach, California. Designed 8- 10-inch water transmission mains, 8-inch sewer lines, and prepared associated contract documents for Moulton -- Niguel Water District, South Laguna, California, and Los Alisos Water District, El Toro, California. Project Engineer for 570,000 gallon steel tank reservoir for the city of Orange and 7.5 mg steel tank reservoir for the Los Alisos Water District involving preliminary design, preparation of alternative design concepts, preparation of plans and specifications and construction management. Project engineer for expansion of an existing aerated lagoon sewage treatment plant increasing capacity from 2 to 5.5 mg for the Los Alisos Water District. Project engineer on a $100, 000, 5-cfs water pump station and well rehabilitation project for the city of Pico Rivera, California. Checked plans and performed various engineering assignments as requested by Cypress County Water District, Cypress, California. District engineer for Stanton County Water District, Stanton, California. G L1 IHARVEY R. GOBAS 1 IPROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - Continued 1976 to 1977 Senior Civil Engineering Assistant, Los Angeles County PTood Control District, Los Angeles, California. Responsible for con- tract administration of earthquake safety and structural re -analysis studies conducted by several engineering consultants to assess the district's dams. Reviewed final reports prepared by consultants including remedial work re- commendations and subsequent remedial work contracts. Served as chairman of a task group on dam safety monitoring reporting to the California State Department of Water Resources, division of Safety of Dams. 1974 'to 1976 Senior Civil Engineering Assistant, Los Angeles County Flood Control District, Los Angeles, California. Responsible for the operational activities at 15 major dams and reservoirs. Assignments included design and site feasibility studies for 2 and 4-inch water distribution networks including valve structures, septic tank -leaching field sewage disposal systems, r water tanks, and chlorination systems service district employees and their families residing at remotely located district dams. Prepared reports dealing with anaerobic decomposition of vegetation in district reservoirs. Worked closely with county health department on water quality control for district residences. 1973 to 1974 Civil Engineering Assistant, Los Angeles County Control District, Los Angeles, California. Prepared cost estimates for division budget items, operational status reports, designed dam and reservoir appurtenant structures, and engineerinu drafting for- 15 of the district's major dams and reservoirs. 1970 to 1972 Engineering Aid 11, Orange County Flood Control strict, Santa Ana, California, (summer job). Responsible for all work permits affecting Flood Control District right-of-way. Conducted surveying operations. Ll L 1 1282 1 I� LJ I 1 1 A GORDON K. LUTES Assistant Managing Engineer FIELDS of SPECIAL Flood Control Management, Planning, Design COMPETENCE Project Management EDUCATION BS/Geological Engineering/University of California, Berkeley/ 1967 MS/Management Science/United States International University/ 1972 HEC-2 Computer Program/University of California, Davis, Extension/1978 REGISTRATION Professional Engineer - California (1971) YEARS of EXPERIENCE Joined Boyle 1978 With Others - 11 Years PROFESSIONAL American Society of Civil Engineers AFFILIATIONS EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Assistant managing engineer for Boyle Engineering Corporations Water Resources Division. Project manager for Flood Insurance Studies in New Mexico, California and Nevada for Federal Emergency Management Agency, responsible for the production of each study. To facilitate planning, scheduling and control, initiated a software package which in- cludes CPM scheduling, progress control , cost processing, on:3 resource allocation and constraints. Project manager for flooc control feasibility and design project for China Lake Investments Limited involving channel improvements, road culverts, and drop structures in Ridgecrest, California. Project manager for Carroll Canyon and Los Penosquitos hydraulic studies in California for Asset Deployment, Incorporated. HEC-2 program was used to model flood flows under existing and future conditions. Results coordinated with federal, state, and local agencies, and with a citizens' group. Experienced in managem�int and design of flood control facilities. Supervised the Flood Control District Management Group with the San Diego County Department of Sanitation and Flood Control. Coordinated the county's flood control disaster relief with the Federal Disaster Assistance Administration, the state and local Office of Emergency Services, the Soil Con- servation Service, and the U . S. Army Corps of Engineers. Staff representative to the Zone 4 and Zone 5 Flood Control Commissions. Design project engineer on airport, road and community flood control projects. As a project engineer in the California Division of High- way's hydraulics section, designed freeway drainage system, analyzed bridge waterway openings, and Investigated special drainage problems. 057.0381 1 CORDON K . LUTES I IPROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1982, to Present Assistant Manager of Boyle's San Diego Office. Res- ponsible for project staMing, budgeting and quality control. Project manager on "C" Street Double Track Design for San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development. Board (MTDB) . The project involves preparation of cost estimates and preliminary plans for two alternatives of the "C" Street double -track trolly operations. 1981 to 1982 Assistant Managing Engineer of Boyle's Water Resources Division San Diegc, California. Project manager for Meadowood Channel Improve- ment Study, Aurora, Colorado. Study involved development and evaluation of seven alternative flood control improvement plans and their costs, plus final design for 2, 500 feet of channel. Project manager for Carson City/Churchill County Nevada Flood Insurance Study. Overall responsibility for hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, flood plain mapping, and final report. Project manager for Magnolia Avenue Bridge Scour Analysis Study, San Diego County, California. Study required Identification of flood and erosion problems related to the bridge, and recommendation of alternatives to limit scour near the bridge. Project manager of Krausmeier Haus Flood Control Project, Big Bear Lake, California. Supervised hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, preliminary design of flood control improvements. Coordinated with local and state agencies. rc 1978 to 1981 Senior Civil Engineer, Boyle's Water Resources Division, man Diego, California. Project manager, Flood Insurance Studies in New Mexico, Nevada, and California for Federal Emergency Management Agency. These studies include the hydraulic analyses of approximately 300 miles of streams and rivers. Main rivers analyzed include the Kern River in California, Walker and Carson Rivers In Nevada, and Pecos River in New Mexico. Adminis- trative responsibilities include coordination with local, state and federal agencies, project planning, scheduling, and project control. Project manager on the Carroll Canyon and !_os Penasquitos Creeks hydraulic studies. These studies Included the hydrauh.- analyses of Los Penasquitos Creek from Los Penasquitos Lagoon to Sorrento Valley t oulevard, Sari Diego, California. The HEC-2 hydraulic computer program was used to model existing and future conditions. Model parameters were based on field measurements and data from the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) flood insurance study. Results of the hydraulic analyses coordinated with the city of San Diego, DWR, and a local citizens group. The study delineated the floodway and water surface elevations for 100-year frequency flows under existing and future 1 1 ICORDON K. LUTES 1 IPROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - Continued conditions. Project manager on the West China Lake Drainage Project, Ridgecrest, California, a flood control feasibility and design project for China Lake Invest- ments Limited. Project included a stabilized earth channel, a road culvert, drop structures, and an interceptor ditch. 19013 t 1978 Project Manager, count of San Die o California. o j 9 Y Diego., es"ponsigWi ies and assignments included management of Flood Control District Maintenance, field investigations, and Zone 4 and Zone 5 Commissions. Coordina- ted disaster relief resulting from the 1978 storms. Design project manager for major flood control, highway and landscape projects. Acting Research Director, Integrated Planning Office. Studied circulation element revisions to the county general plan. Used transportation models to forecast future traffic: conditions. Assistant division chief in the Transportation/Land Use Analysis Division. Pro- vided data base to evaluate, develop, and implement a balanced multi -model ® transportation system for San Diego County. Implemented a group of Federal a Highway Administration (FHWA) and Urban Mass Transit Administration (UMTA) computer transportation models. 1967 to 1973 Project Engineer, California State Division of Highways, San Diego, California. Responsibilities and assignments included engineer in Design, Advance Planning, Urban Planning, and Construction Departments. Experienced in road planning, design, and construction inspection. Designed drainage systems for freeway projects, analyzed bridge waterway openings, and investigated special drainage problems. Implemented manpower planning and scheduling systems for 150-man Design Department. I 1 1 0583 C. RUSSELL HULSE Senior Civil Engineer FIELDS of SPECIAL Waterworks and Wastewater Systems COMPETENCE Computerized Analysis, Planning and Design Hydrology EDUCATION BS/Civil Engineering/University of Southern California/ 1962 MS/Civil Engineering/Univeristy of Southern California/1965 REGISTRATION Professional Engineer - California (1967) jYEARS of EXPERIENCE Joined Boyle 1969 With Others - 8 years PROFESSIONAL American Society of Civil Engineers AFFILIATIONS American Water Works Association Orange County Water Association EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Specializes in the computerized analysis and design of waterworks and wastewater facilities. Experience includes design of pump stations, reservoirs, and water transmission mains for water systems throughout Southern California. Has written computer programs for hydraulic ,'-conomic optimization of plpelin;!s, open channel flow, backwater curves, and economic analysis of pumping stations. design for responsible engineer en i Project res n of water transmission mains for the Irvine 9 P 9 Ranch Water District; various water system improvements and replacements; com- puterized analysis of existing water distribution facilities for the city of Pico Rivera, California; design of 2 mg burled prestressed concrete reservoir and pumping station (6 pumps) for the city of Anaheim; 5 mg prestressed concrete reservoir for the Irvine Ranch Water District; raw sewage pumping station (5 pumps, 2 variable speed) for Aliso Water Management Agency; and pumping and storage facilities for reclaimed water for South Coast County Water District, South Laguna, California. Performed computerized hydrologic studies; p y gic st es; analyzed flood flows for preparation of a flood insurance study for the city of Santa Barbara, California; prepared flood studies to predict inundated areas and damages in the event of dam failure for six reservoirs ranging in size from 770 acre-feet to 1000 acre-feet in Southern California; studies of 250 square -mile area in the vicinity of Phoenix, Arizona to be used as a basis for establishing flood control improvement priorities, including hydrologic model, drainage requirements, flood plain delineation, and recommended improvements. Responsible for the hydraulic analysis of approximately 10 miles of pipelines and tunnels, ranging in size from 16 to 23 feet in diameter, and preparation of designs together with construction plans and specifications for various elements of the California State Water Project. 1 1 IC. RUSSELL HULSE 1 IPROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1975 to Present Senior Civil Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Newport Beach, California. Computerized analysis of proposed and existing domestic water and sanitary sewer facilities to determine the adequacy of the system to serve a projected population of 15,000. Design engineer for municipal water works facilities involving pumping stations and 10 miles of trans- mission ; pipeline (12 to 36 Inches in diameter) with a construction cost of $3. G million; design engineer for two water treatment plants (15 mgd capacity) , and a 9.0-million gallon steel reservoir with a construction cost of $15.0 million; responsible for economic studies of alternative treatment and pumping systems considering capital, operational, and energy costs. 1969 to 1975 Associate Civil Engineer, Boyle En 'ineering Corporation, Santa Ana, California. Design engineer for three agricultural water pump stations with Installed horsepower of 11,000 and a construction cost of $2.0 million; responsible for site layout, surge analysis, economic sizing of pumps, and discharge of pipelines using computer; computerized analysis of existing water distribution facilities for a portion of the city of Newport Beach, California. A iv' 196z to 1969 Associate Civil engineer, California Department of Water Resources, Los Angeles, r,ilifornia. Project engineer for hydraulic analysis of the Tehachapi Crossing, designs, plans, and specifications for 8.5 miles of tunnels and siphons for the California State Water Project. Operational studies consi-aered flows from 300 to 4,100 cfs and involved transient flow conditions. 1 h' 1 1 i I I I 0. W. 'JACK' HOLMES Senior Civil Engineer �J FIELDS of SPECIAL Water Systems COMPETENCE Hydraulics Structures Site Development EDUCATION BE/Civil Engineering/University of Southern California/ 1950 REGISTRATION Professional Engineer - California (1957, Civil) , (1969, Mechanical), Arizona, Florida YEARS of EXPERIENCE Joined Boyle 1974 With Others - 24 Years PROFESSIONAL American Society of Civil Engineers AFFILIATIONS National Society of Professional Engineers EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Experienced in planning, analysis and design of water and wastewater system pro- jects including hydraulic structures, pumping stations, pressure and flow control facilities, storage reservoirs, transmi3sion and distribution pipelines, !orce mains, and various other piping systems. Project/design engineer for a 50-mgd wastewater- system pumping station and 20-mg storage facility for the City of Orlando, Florida; two miles of flood control channel ` and a 340 acre-foot reservoir with inlet facility, earth dam and 300-foot long spillway for 'a private development near San Bernardino, California; a hydroelectric power generation facility for the city of La Habra, California; facility expansion of a 120-mgd wastewater treatment plant for the city of San Diego; and appurtenant facilities on the $110 million, 26-mile long Diemer Aqueduct in Orange County, California. Designed a reservoir site and yard piping for four 7.5-mg storage tanks; two pressure reducing stations; a pressure reducing and reservoir inlet facility; and agricultural and domestic water turnouts for the Antelope Valley -East Kern Water Agency. Designed three pump stations including surge control equipment and forebay facilities for Kern -Tulare Water District; and a 90-mgd influent pump station and force main for Clark County, Nevada. Designed 15 miles of pipeline including appurtenance for the Eastern Municipal Water District, Hemet, California.. Site development experience includes design of grading, drainage, and storm drain systems, water and sewer systems, streets, roadways and parking areas, miscellaneous structures, and other improvements related to various residential, recreational, industrial and commercial development projects. 18.Q8$3 i 1 1 0, W. 'JACK' HOLMES d PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1974 to Present Senior Civil Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Newport Beach. California. Responsible for pla ping, site layout, and design of roads, miscellaneous structures, piping systems and appurtenances, pumping station;, storage reservoir sites, and pressure and flow control facilities for various water and wastewater system projects including preparation of specifica- tions and reports. Served as project engineer on several water system projects and as project manager on various land development projects. Project/design engineer for a 10-acre wastewater system terminus facility con- sisting of four 5-mg balancing reservoirs, a 50-mgd pumping station with pro- visions for nine pumps of 250 to 450 HP, an operations building, service building, domestic water well, sewage disposal system and related appurteri..;,-n . for the city of Orlando, Florida; two miles of trapezoidal flood control channel and a 340 acre-foot detention reservoir, including an inlet spillway structure and 30 foot high earth dam with a 300 foot long overflow spillway for a private development near San Bernardino, California; a hydroelectric power generation facility for the city of La Habra, California; facility expansion of the 120-mgd Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant for the city of San Diego which included design of new headworks, influent screens and grit removal facilities; and appurtenant structur•..?s or, the $110 million, 26-mile long, 114- to 39-inch diameter Diemer Aqueduct for the Municipal Water District of Orange County, California. Designed the Niojave Reservoir site and yard piping for four- 7.5-mg steel storage tanks; two pressure reducing stations with capacities of 150 and 60 cfs, respectively; the 30-cfs pressure reducing and inlet facility for the Rosamond Water Treatment Plant Reservoir; and agricultural and domestic water turnouts with flow control and metering capabilities for the Ante'ope Valley -East Kerr Water Agency. Designed three pump stations, including surge control equip - merit and forebay facilities for Kern -Tulare Water District, and the 9u-mgd multiple -unit influent pump station and 66-inch diameter force main for the Clark County, Nevada, Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. Project engineer for site development of 285-acre Fairview Regional Park for the County of Orange. Project manager for site development of Serrano Park, a 554-lot residential subdivision in El Taro, California, and various other land development projects. 1973 to 1974 Civil /Project Engineer, J. F. Davidson Associates, Riverside, California. Conducted water system studies and designed water transmission mains, storage tank sites, pumping stations, deep well and hydro - pneumatic pressure systems, anti distribution networks. Designed 15 miles of 12- and 30-inch diameter steel pipeline including appurtenances for the Eastern Municipal Water District of Hemet, California. Designed flood control channels, hydraulic structures, and bridges. Also responsible for planning and design of roads, grading and drainage, and water and sewer systems for various land development projects. G 1 J�' IPROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - Ct.ntinued 0. W. 'JACK' HOLMES 1970 to 1973 Private Practice, 0. W. Holmes and Associates, Los Alamitos, California. Conducted hydrology studies and designed drainage channels, water and sewer systems, site layouts, roadways, retaining walls, miscellaneous structures, and public street improvements. Conducted topo- graphic and boundary surveys, prepared grading plans, and provided field staking for various construction projects. 1961 to 1970 Senior Project Engineer, Rockwell International Corpora- tion, Downey, California. Project engineer for ground equipment, including pneumatic and cryogenic storage, transfer and control systems, and electro- mechanical equipment. Provided direction for equipment design and preparation of specifications and estimates. Headed various special projects and coordinated interdiscipline requirements. 1958 to 1961 Engineer, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Santa Monica, California. Conducted various fluid system studies, designed test equipment and supervised testing. Responsible engineer for- design and installation of various water, steam and cryogenic storage and distribution systems; and was field engineer for fuel, pneumatic, and cryogenic systems equipment on large installation project. 1956 to 1958 Engineer, Rockwell International Corporation, Downey, Cali.ornia. Analyzed fluid system requirements, established pumping and control valve equipment design and test criteria, and prepared design and procurement specifications. Conducted various fluid system studies, designed test setups and supervised testing. 1953 to 1956 Senior- Harbor Engineer, Harbor Department, City of Long Beac , California. Structural design engineer on numerous harbor development projects; designed various timber-, steel, and reinforced concrete structures, including industrial and commercial buildings, wharves, bulkheads, bridges and approach structures, retaining walls and foundations. Conducted site planning, location and economic studies, and prepared reports, specifications and estimates. 1950 to 1953 Assistant Civil Engineer, Engineering Department, City of Long Beach, California. Designed streets and road-.vays and prepared grading and paving plans for intersections, parking lots, and various open areas. Designed open channels and storm drain systems, prepared cost estimates, and ct.%cked subdivision plans. 1 0883 I ALBERT H . CRATHWOL Senior Engineer 1 FIELDS of SPECIAL Structural Engineering for Treatment Plants, COMPETENCE Reservoirs, Pump Stations, Buildings and Bridges EDUCATION BS/Civil Engineering/Purdue University,1968 REGISTRATION Professional Engineer - California (Civil) 1971 YEARS of EXPERIENCE Joined Boyle 1983 With Others - 15 Years PROFESSIONAL American Society of Civil Engineers AFFILIATIONS EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Extensive experience in supervision of and structural design for wastewater treatment plant facilities, reservoirs, highway bridges, buildings, above and below -ground pump stations and storm drain structures. Work included structure type selection, planning, analysis, design, detailing, writing specifi- cations, and preparation of cost estimates. Experienced also in the structural design of pre-engineered building foundations, steel tank reservoir foundations, and mechanical equipment supports. Some representative bridge projects in California include: Atherton Street Bridge Improvement bridge rating determination, renovation of piers, deck Falls Canyon Bridge Tee beam Vineland Avenue Bridge Widening Two span compos-te plate girder Osborne Street Bridge Widening Composite plate girder Strathern Street Bridge Prestressed tee beams Wilbur Avenue Bridge Widening Composite plate girder Saticoy Street Bridge Widening Slab Mayall Street Pedestrian Bridge Slab Valerio Street Pedestrian Bridge Tee beam Sawtelie and Sepulveda Blvd. Bridges Renovation of piers and deck Sepulveda Subway New slab to carry 747 aircraft at LAX Additional experience relating to bridge projects included serving as project manager for Shoemaker Overl-:ass and Interchange for the City of Cerritos, California. Project included a bridge over the 91 Freeway, approach embankments, and new on and off -ramps for the freeway. 85.0183 1 ALBERT H . GRATHWOL Li-' IPROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1983 Senior Engineer, Special Design Office, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Newport Beach, California. Responsible for studies and recommendations for rehabilitation of bridges -including load carrying capacities. Currently working as project engineer on the Atherton Street Bridge Improvement which includes bridge rating determination, renovation of piers and deck. r 1977 to 1983 Senior Associate Engineer responsible for all structural of engineering., ring., PRC Toups, Orange, California. Supervised structural design of: Underground concrete reservoirs for Laguna Hills Water Company (2 MG); MCA, Universal Studios (1.5 MG) with a traffic -loaded deck; Marina Headquarters Building, public facilities, fishing piers for City of Long Beach; analysis of an existing building, providing additional supports for heavy food processing equipment, Rich of California; foundations for pre-engineered metal buildings as large as 300 feet by 600 feet; headworks and clarifier for Laguna Hills Sanitation, Inc. V Structural design of: Falls Canyon Bridge, MCA Development, Universal Studios; 3.0 MG underground reservoir, City of San Clemente; clarifiers, headworks, punip stations, vaults, tanks, Administration and Operations buildings, California Office of State Architect; headworks, chlorination, aeration tanks, pre-engineered building foundations for Corps of Englneers,Fort Irwin, California; above and below -ground pump stations and buildings for City of San Clemente, Laguna Hills Water Company and Sanitation, Inc., Moulton Niguel Water District. Construction Contract Administration: City of San Clemente transmission main, pump stations, and reservoir; Laguna Hills Water Company reservoir. 1968 to 1977 Associate Engineer, City of Los Angeles, Bureac.' of 9 Y 9 Engineering. Structural design of: Aeration tanks, channels, galleries - Terminal Island Treatment Plant (30 MGD) ; filtration tanks - Sepulveda Water Reclamation Plant (40 MGD) ; storm drain box conduit and junction structures for Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Highway and pedestrian bridges include; Vineland Avenue Bridge Widening - two span composite plate girder; Osborne Street Bridge Widening - composite plate girder; Strathern Street Bridge - prestressed tee beams; Wilbur Avenue Bridge Widening - composite plate girder; Saticoy Street Bridge Widening - slab; Mayall Street Pedestrian Bridge - slab; Valerio Street Pedestrian Bridge - tee beam; Sawtelle and Sepulveda Blvd. Bridges - renovation of piers and deck; and Sepulved4 Subway - new slab to carry 747 aircraft at the Los Angeles International Airport. 1 0183 I 1 I MAURICE E. FORD, JR. Regional Vice President FIELDS of SPECIAL Water Resources Development COMPETENCE Water System Management Construction Administration Project Management EDUCATION BS/Mechanical Engineering/California Institute of Technology / 1944 Business Administration/University of California/ Berkeley REGISTRATION Mechanical - California (1960); Civil - California (1964), F.E. - Florida (1983) YEARS of EXPERIENCE Joined Boyle 1963 With Others - 18 Years PROFESSIONAL American Society of Civil Engineers AFFILIATIONS American Water Works Association National Water Well Association Society of American Military Engineers EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Regional vice president responsible fo►- the management and operation of the San Diego office and Water Resources Division of Boyle Engineering Corporation in California. Extensive experience in water and wastewater system design, ground- water development, project and construction administration. Recent responsibilities include construction administration of the $7.0 million Eastside Water Renovation Facility for the city of San Buenaventura, California; and the 571 million DAWN (Domestic -Agricultural Water Network) project for the Antelope Valley -East Kern Water Agency, Quartz Hill, California; project manager, Water Consery II, City of Orlando, Florida for design of $60 million transmission pumping station, trans- mission pipeline and distribution center. Responsible for engineering design and construction administration of municipal water supply transmission, distribution, storage and treatment systems, including automatic: control systems, for the Carlsbad Municipal, Otay Municipal, and Yucca Valley County Water Districts in California. Served as -project manager for economic and feasibility studies for a $58 million irrigation distribution system for the 55, 000-acre Berrenda Mesa Water District in Kern County, California, with an annual water demand of 182,000 acre feet. Project manager for engineering planning and design of water and sanitation system facilities for the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Calabasas, California, and served as interim manager for the district which covers 80,000 acres and has a projected population of 100,000 people. Resident manager of Boyle Engineering Corporation's operations in Bolivia and project engineer for $15 million water resources development projects in Oruro, Santa Cruz, and Cochabamba. 1 18.1083 h IMAURICE E. FORD, JR. i I PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1983 Regional Vice President, Boyle Engineering Corporation. Responsible for management and operation of San Diego office and for corporate wide quality control program. Project engineer for groundwater injection test well program for Cicy of Orlando, Florida Water Consery I, 1_5MGD wastewater recla- mation project. Western project manager for Water Consery 11, $60 million pumping station; 12 miles of 52-inch transmission pipeline and distribution center for storage, repumping and operations for supplying citrus irrigation demands. Included a groundwater study and test program for a supplemental supply. 1980 to 1982 Regional Vice President, Boyle E: Bering Corporation, Newport Beach, California. Responsible for the managemenand operation of the San Diego office and Water Resources Division of Boyle Engineering Corporation. Responsible for corporate wide quality control program. 1979 Regional Vice President, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Ventura, California. Responsible for the management and operation of the Ventura, Bakersfield, and Lancaster branch offices. Project hydrologist for groundwater evaluation, welt' drilling and testing for Ramses Agricultural Company in Egypt. Project included five monitoring wells. Production wells were 220 feet in depth with 14 inch casing. 1978 to 1979 Vice President, Boyle Engineering Corporation, VentLIM a, a r ornra.rConsultant for construction contract administration on the $71 million DAWN (Domestic -Agricultural Water Network) project for Antelope Valley -East Kern Water Agency, Quartz Hill, California. Project includes four water treatment plants, four major pumping stations, ten distribution system storage reservoirs, two pressure reducing stations, and 100 miles of pressure distribution pipeline ranging from 60 to 12 inches in diameter, and related control and telemetry facilities and administration offices. 1974 to 1978 Vice President and Managing Lngineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Ventura, California. Project manager for planning, feasibility studies, and design of $15.0 million water and wastewater facilities (including potable and reclaimed water treatment, storage, distribution, and sewerage collection, treat- ment, and disposal) for Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Calabasas, California. Project included 150 foot high earth and rock Westlake Dam and Reservoir with 10,000 acre-foot storage capacity; and 8 mgd Tapia Water Reclamation Plant. 1968 to 1974 Principal Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Ventura, California. Project manager for the Master Plan of Water and Sewerage Facilities for Santa Barbara County, California. Supervised a major groundwater exploration and well development program for Santa Barbara County. Project Included drilling five wells ranging from 500 to 1,100 feet in depth with 1 6 -•inch I I IMAURICE E. FORD, JR. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - Continued diameters and production rates at 1,000 gpm. Drilling was accomplished both by conventional rotary and reverse circulation methods. Performed construction administration and prepared plans and specifications for well exploration, drilling and equiping of wells. Performed construction administration for $7.8 million Eastside Water Renovation Facility, a 14 mgd wastewater reclamation plant for the city of San Buenaventura, California. 1963 to 1968 Senior Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, San Diego, Ca s ornia. Resident project manager for groundwater development, water and sewerage system feasibility study, design, and construction adminis- tration for the cities of Oruro, Cochabamba, and Santa Cruz, Bolivia, with $15 million project costs partially financed by the Inter -American Development Bank. Prepared comprehensive economic water rate studies and manuals for operational organizational structure and management, all in accordance with requirements of the Inter -American Development Bank for the Oruro project which provided financing in the amount of $2.8 million. Supervised the evaluation of ground- water resources based or, test drilling for Oruro and the installation of six production well; and pumping equipment; this included nonequilibrium testing of groundwater aquifers. The wells, 12-inches in diameter, produced approxi- mately 500 gpm with selective withdrawal of excellent quality water from aquifers at dt:pths to 300 feet. Supervised the design and construction of the trans- mission facilities from the wells and the distribution system in Oruro to serve a population of 90, 000. Served as project manager for economic and feasibility studies for a $58 million irrigation distribution system for the 55, 000-acre Berrenda Mesa Water District in Kern County. California, witty an annual water demand of 182,000 acre feet. Project manager for engineering planning and design of water and sanitation system facilities for the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Calabasas, California, and served as interim manager for the district which covers 11, 000 acres and has a projected population of 100, 000. Project engineer for planning, feasibility studies, and design of water system Improvements/additions for $1.0 million Yucca Valley County Water District project, $2.0 million Carlsbad Municipal Water District project, and $1.0 million Otay Municipal Water District project, all in California. 1956 to 1963 General Manager and Chief Engineer, Escondido Mutual Water Company, Escondido, California. Managed a water company serving domestic and irrigation water to a service area of approximately 8,000 acres. 1 11 IMAURICE E. FORD, JR. U/ PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Continued l Directed 30 employees engaged in delivery of water to approximately 2,400 services; production and wholesaling power from two hydroelectric plants; engineering design, construction:, and maintenance of all pipelines and facilities; operation of 7,1300 acre-foot Lake Wohlford fishing concession and lake operation for water impounding purposes. Participated in a six -%yell program under a joint powers agreement with the Vista Irrigation District. These wells, in the Henshaw Basin, were drilled to a 300-foot depth with rotary mind rids, 12--inch casings, and produced 300 gpm each. 1951 to 1956 General Manager and Chief Engineer, Yorba Linda Water Company. Yorba Linda, California. Managed a water company serving domestic and irrigation water to a service area of 3,700 acres. Directed eight employees and was directly responsible to a five -man board of directors. Groundwater pumped from the Santa Ana River Basin was boosted to the service area and delivered to approximately 800 irrigation and domestic consumers. 1947 to 1951 California. Industrial Engineer, Columbia Steel Ccrnpany, Torrance, Time and motion studies leading to establishment of incentive rates in the Open Hearth Department. Creation and maintenance of production standards used in the standard cost accounting classification for wage establishment. Methods system. Job description and study and improvement. Q 1 1 1 1 � 1083 I 1 t I 1 I 1 A A 1 VICTOR OFINCAR, JR. Managing Engineer FIELDS of SPECIAL Project Management COMPETENCE Wastewater Facilities Planning and Design Water Facilities Planning and Design EDUCATION BS/Civil Engineering/Michigan Technological University/1967 MS/Civil Engineering/California State University, Long Beach/1973 MBA/Business Administration/California State University, Long Beach/1978 YEARS of EXPERIENCE Joined Boyle 1969 With Others - 2 Years REGISTRATION Professional Engineer - California (1970) PROFESSIONAL American Society of Civil Engineers AFFILIA"LIONS American Water Works Association Water Pollution Control Federation Orange County Water Association EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Experienced as project manager and design engineer on municipal water and wastewater projects involving treatment, collection, pumping, distribution, and reclamation. District and city engineer responsibilities have included policy formulation, conceptual planning, and economic analysis of municipal projects. Project management expertise, from project planning through design and contract administration, includes the $28 million Santiago Aqueduct regional pipeline project In Orange County, California; a $2.5 million wastewater reclamation project for March Aik• Force Base, California; a $2.0 million water storage project; and a $1.0 million telemetry and control system master plan. Municipal experience, as district engineer, includes water and sewerage plans of works for $25.0 million bond sales to finance construction. Engineering responsi- bilities included coordination and plan checking developer's proposed improvements, Implementation and updating water and sewer standards, and developing recommen- dations to governing bodies. This includes coordination of environmental documen- tation and the filing of applications to obtain federal and state grant funds. Extensive knowledge of facility design of water and sewage reclamation plants, pumping stations, and pipeline systems including use of computer programs to develop water system models, economic analysis and pumping plant design. 28.0583 I` *.CTOR OPINCAR, JR. pi PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1976 to Present Senior Civil Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, ewport Beach, California. Project manager with district engineer responsibili- ties providing consulting services to East Orange County Water District, El Toro Water District, the Santiago Aqueduct Commission, and the Los Alisos Water District, all in Orange County, California. The East Orange County Water District activities include development of a master plan for the district, public hearing presentations for a successful $6.0 million pond issue, the design of a $1.4 million water main, and planning for- a 10 million -gallon storage reservoir. Ongoing duties involve plan checking, connection fee program administration and operation/maintenance of a 10 cfs filtration plant and distribution system. Los Alisos Water District activities have included master planning reports and imple- mentation of a successful $8.0 million water bored issue. Miscellaneous projects have included three submersible sewage pumping stations, two conventional dry pit pumping stations (one with 600 hp and variable speed drives) , a 100 cfs flood channel diversion for groundwater recharge, and the development of a telemetry master plan for the Irvine Ranch Water District, Irvine, California. Project manager for a $28.0 million 17-mile-long water trans- mission pipeline to deliver treated and untreated water to Southern Orange County. Responsibilities included project design features, client/agency coordina- tion, quality control and meeting schedules set by project contractual delivery obligations. 1975 to 1976 Senior Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Newport Beach, California. Project manager with continuing assignment as district engineer for the Los Alisos Water District. Completed planning and design for construction of a 3.4 mgd buried concrete reservoir with roof designed for recreational use; three miles of trunk sewer lines through 12 inches in diameter; ten miles of water transmission main through 24 inches in diameter; and two 400 hp reclaimed water pumping stations. Finalized master plan EIR for district's future water, sewerage, and reclaimed water facilities, and com- pleted investigation of a 700 acre-foot seasonal storage reservoir. Other responsibilities included the planning and design of a $2.4 million sewage treatment and industrial project at March Air Force Base, California. This pro- ject included the demolition of one facility and the rehabilitation of a 1 mgd bio- filter plant including a raw sewage pumping station, force main, in -plant modifi- cations, and effluent pond, pumping station and a pressure main to the base golf course for reclamation. 1 1 U IVICTOR OPINCAR, JR. I I PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - ued Contrn 1973 to 1975 Associate Civil Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Santa Ana, California. Project manager assigned as district engineer for Los Alisos Water District, El Toro, California. Responsible to the Board of Directors and general manager for the planning and design of all water and wastewater projects in a 6000-acre district with a design population of 55,000. Prepared reports on alternative methods to treat sewage, imp; ovement districts for annex - able areas, and completed plans for five miles of water distribution mains and provided checking for all sewer and water improvement projects within the district. 11 Also assigned as city engineer for the city of Stanton, California. Responsibilities included reports to city council, working parttime with the public works staff, plan checking, preparation of plans for new fire station and city yard building, obtaining funding for road, park and storm drain improvement projects. 1970 to 1973 Civil Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Santa Ana, Cali ornia. Design engineer for automatic: backwash water filtration plants constructedby E1 Toro Water District, El Toro, California, and Poway Municipal Water District, Poway, California. Responsibilities included process layout, hydraulic analysis, plant piping, pumps, and chlorination equipment. Civil/ sanitary design engineer for 1 mgd activated sludge plants for the cities of Pismo Beach and Kerman, California. Responsible for process criteria, grit removal facilities, aeration tanks, pump stations, clarifiers, digestors, oxidation ponds, grading, and aesthetic considerations. 1969 to 1970 Junior Engineer, Boyle Engineer nig Corporation, Santa Ana, Ca i ornia. Assisted in the design of hydraulic systems, piping, grit hand- ling, grading and survey control for a 20 mgd biofilter plant expansion by Clark County Sanitation District, Las Vegas, Nevada. Designed control structures, piping and valves for the 10-mile Aufdenkamp transmission main constructed by Laguna Beach County Water District, Laguna Beach, California. 1967 to 1969 Junior Civil Engineer, Department of Water Resources, State of ai fornia. Assisted in the preparation of economic, hydrological, and computer studies for groundwater modeling in the Groundwater Operational Economic Unit. Analyzed engineering studies for the feasibility of projects requesting state grants in the Davis-Gr•unsky Unit. 1282 J A DANIEL W. BOYD Managing Engineer !i FIELDS of SPECIAL Water Resources Planning and Design COMPETENCE EDUCATION BS /Civil Engineering /California State Polytechnic University/1969 HEC-1, HEC-2 Computer Programs; Applications of Water Resources Council Guidelines for Flood Flow Frequency Analysis/University of California Davis Extension REGISTRATION YEARS of EXPERIENCE Professional Engineer - California (1973) Joined Boyle 1973 With Others - 4 Years PROFESSIONAL American Society of Civil Engineers AFFILIATIONS EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Manager of Boyle Engineering Corporation's Denver office, with diversified ex- perience in planning, design, economic evaluation and project management in the areas of water resources planning and design. Project Engineer for Multi --Purpose Water Supply and Flood Control Project in Nebraska. The project included hydrologic analysis for, 600-square-miles of water- shed; hydraulic studies on 100 miles of streams and rivers; evaluation of 15 alternative dam sites. Project included cost estimates, econcmic analysis and application for state funding. District Engineer for the 4-M Water District, Colusa County, California, covering approximately 18,000 acres. Responsible for preparation of an engineering and economic report on the first phase of development covering 2000 acres. Included evaluation of cropping patterns, development of irrigation system plans and specifications, and the preparation of land leveling plans. Project Manager of the hydrologic studies for the Preliminary Investigation of Agricultural Development on the Simon -Newman Ranch, Inc., in Los Banos, California. Project includes watershed yield, reservoir operation and flood studies, cost estimates, and preliminary dam design. Study involves about 7,000 acres of potentially irrigable land. Project Engineer, U. S. Justice Department vs. Escondido Mutual Water Company. Water resources and agricultural investigations for determination of water rights for six Indian reservations in the San Luis Rey River Basin, California. Project Includes investigation of surface and groundwater resources to determine water supply for domestic and agricultural purposes. Approximately 9,000 acres of potentially irrigable land are being studied. Project Engineer for investigation to determine water rights for hlescalero Apache Indian Reservation near Rio Ruidoso, New Mexico. Project includes investigation of water resources availability, layout and design of water supply facilities for about 2,000 acres of agricultural land development. 18.0283 1 J, DANIEL W. BOYD PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - Continued Responsible for the design of flood control facilities. ,Project Manager for Los Coches Creek channel project, San Diego County, California. Involved hydraulic analysis, design and preparation of plans, specificaticns and right-of-way documents for 11,500 feet of channel. Required design of reinforced -concrete, open rectangular sections, culverts, junction structures, transition structures, utility relocation, and road approaches. All designs reviewed by the County and the Corps of Engineers. Also served as Project Manager for the flood control phase of Southridge Village development project, San Bernardino County, California. Project Engineer for the Eden Gardens flood control project for the San Diego County Flood Control District. The project included a feasibility report and preliminary improvernnent plan involving approximately 2,000 feet of flood control improvements to con!ain the 100-year flow of 1,100 cfs. 1973 to 1977 Associate Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation. Project Engineer for a variety of projects for several water districts in Southern California. Projects included water system planning and the design of pumping, storage and transmission facilities. Served as Resident Engineer on a major water transmission main (5 miles of 24- and 36-inch pipe) for the Poway Munici- pal Water District. Prepared an environmental impact report for a 1911 Act project that included water transmission mains, pump station, and reservoir for the Poway Municipal Water District, and several environmental impact assessment projects in the vlivenhain Municipal Water District. Project engineer for the flood control comprehensive study for Zone 3, San Diego County Flood Contr! District. This study included field investigations, hydro- logic analyses, improvement plans, cost estimates and recommendations for imple- mentation, including sources of financing. This study area included the total area of the Sweetwater River watershed, about 220 square miles. Project Engineer for Las Pacos Road storm drain project for the city of San Marcos. This project included field investigations, hydrologic analyses, and the design for approximately 2,000 feet of single 111 x 7 ' box culvert, 500 feet of double 11, x 7' box culvert, transition structure and energy dissipating outlet structure. This project was designed to accommodate the 100-year frequency flood which varies from approximately 1,000 cfs to 2,000 cfs. Project Engineer for the general plan for flood control and storm drainage im- provements for Las Chollas Creek basin (Lemon Grove Area) for the San Diego County Flood Control District. This area is highly urbanized and the study included the development plans for collector systems and outlets for storm run- off. An environmental impact report was also prepared as part of this study. 1 E 11 DANIEL W. BOYD PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - Continued Involved hydrologic and hydraulic analyses to size flood control channels and related facilities that will prevent an increase in flood peaks after the develop- ment is built. Design done for nearly 2 miler of channel with up to 5800-cfs capacity. Familiar witi� all phases of watershed planning and management. Project manager for the Penasquitos Lagoon watershed management plan, San Diego, California. Involved hydrologic, hydraulic and sedimentation analyses of the 965-square-mile watershed. Present and future conditions were analyzed in order to develop structural and nonstructural alternatives that would reduce sedimentation problems in the lagoon. Also, Assistant Project Manager for the Upper Newport Bay -Sall Diego Creek comprehensive stormwater sedimentation control plan, Orange County, California. Project involved hydrologic analysis; sediment source and delivery analyses: geo- morphic analysis; development of alternative management systems; environmental impact report; and agency coordination and public presentations for the 118-square- mile watershed. The comprehensive plan to be composed of structural and non- !tructural measures to reduce sediment deposition in Upper Newport Bay. 1977 to 1979 Senior Engineer, Boyle Engineering Corporation. Project Engineer For Big Sandy Creek watershed project in Nebraska, a multi -purpose project to develop an irrigation water supply, provide flood protection, enhance the environment by providing a habitat for fish and wildlife, and develop areas for recreation. Project included hydrologic analysis of the 600-square-mile water- shed, and hydraulic studies for approximately 100 miles of streams and rivers. A groundwater- model was used to confirm average annual water decline and re- maining aquifer life derived from measurements at observation wells. Dam sites were selected and analyzed to determine their compatibility with the project objectives. Project included economic evaluations and preparation of applications for state and federal funding. District Engineer for the 4-M Water District Colusa County, California, covering g Y 9 approximately 18,000 acres. Project involved the preparation of an engineering and economic report on the first phase of development covering 2,000 acres. This included the evaluation of cropping patterns, the development of irrigation system plans and specifications, and the preparation of land leveling plans. Project Manager for San Diego Gas and Electric Company's water supply project and geothermal waste disposal project, Imperial County, California. Provided consulting engineering services to SDG6E concerning water supply for geothermal power plants and disposal sites for hazardous geothermal wastes. Project Manager for city of San Diego floodplain study. This project included a hydrologic analysis and the computations necessary to determine the areas of inundation for 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year frequency flood flows and the standard project flood for the Tia Juana River and Nestor Creek. The project also in- cluded the preparation of a flood insurance study. I IDANI<L W. BOYD I 1' PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE I 1982 to Present Manager, Boyle Engineering Corporation's Denver offic with diversified experience in planning, design, economic evaluation and project management in the areas of water resources planning and design. Project Manager of hydrologic studies for the Preliminary Investigation of Agricultural Development for the Simon -Newman Ranch, Inc. This project involves approximately 7,000 acres of potentially irrigable lands near Los Banos, California. Director of watershed yield analysis, reservoir operation and Flood studies, cost estimates and preliminary dam design. Project Engineer for Adams County Water Supply Project in Nebraska. This feasibility study for water supply plans to alleviate declining groundwater levels and involves quantification of water supply and design of distribution facilities. 1979 to 1982 ►Manager, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Water Resources ivision, an office staffed with specialists in hydrology, hydraulics, groundwater, and sedimentation. Staff serves entire Boyle organization in projects including water availability studies, dam design, reservoir operation optimization, and sedimentation studies. Project Engineer for water resources investigation to determine water rights for Mescalero Apache Indian Reservation near Rio Ruidoso, New (Mexico. Study performed for Bureau of Indian Affairs. Tasks included evaluation of watershed yield, description of irrigation facilities, and estimation of project costs. Project Engineer for U. S. Justice Department vs. Escondido ,Mutual Water Company water rights study. Project involves water resources and agricultural investiga- tions for six Indian reservations in the San Luis Rey River Basin, California. Surface and groundwater resources evaluated as supply for about 9,000 acres of potentially irrigable land. Project Engineer for the North Las Vegas drainage improvement study. Included refinement and expansion of existing flood insurance study hydrology for the 670-square-mile drainage basin; evaluation of a variety of drainage improvements and their costs. Alternatives included lined and unlined channels, improved bridge and utility crossings, transition and grade -stabilization structures, and �g levees. Also served as a Project Engineer for Northwest Las Vegas drainage ® study. Involved inventory and assessment of existing drainage facilities, hy- drologic analysis of 180-square-mile basin, erosion and sediment yield analysis, and development of recommended improvements and cost estimates. I I EXPERIENCE INTRODUCTION Boyle Engineering Corporation's 38 years of experience includes numerous analyses and computer model ing of existing drainage systems, storm drain master plans, and the design of all facets of a flood control system drains, pump stations, channels, retarding basins, sedimentation control , and major dam structures. We are well versed in the surveying , d a t a compilation, analysis, cost estimating, and design of flood control facilities. S?ECIFIC PROJECT --RELATED :.XPERIEN11-E Boyle has been involved in drainage master plan -type studies for a variety of clients. Listed below and summarized on the following pages are a partial listing of recent c:;Ants for whcm WE conduct eA ,master plan studies and other project- directly applicable to your study. City of Costa Mesa Amendment tc, tr,e 1969 Master Plan of Drainage Land use analysis; field inve.,,tig.3tion and ja;.a collection; excavation of existing, drainage facilities, oomputer an:,.lvsis. report, review meetings, cost estimates, recommendations. 1 1 1 I 1 Rancho Mirage Storm Drainage Master Plan _Rancho Mirage, California Field reconnaissance and data collection; inventory and evaluation of existing drainage facilities; hydrologic analysis; preliminary design of recommended improvements; cost estimation. t Storm Drainage and Flood Control Plan Los Chollas Creek, San Diego,_California j Field investigations; hydrologic analysis; improvement plans and cost estimates; environmental assessment; recommendations for implementation . Flood Control Comprehensive Plan Zone 3 San Diego County, California Field investigations, hydrologic analysis; improvement plans and cost estimates; recommendations for implementation and funding. Chevron Land Sto rm Drain Master- Plan Bakersfield, California Storm Drain Master Plan cost estimates, design ano field work for Ilighway 198 1-5 development for Chevron Land ynd Geveiopmer.t Company, 1508 18th Street, Suite 312, Baker sfi elt-41 , ifornia . Northwest Drainage Study Las Ve5as, Nevada Performed drainage study to establish wr,�?r•e storm water channels and their runoff intersect the street projects and to establish design capacities for storm dra.-r;aE ilrpr-OVements to 0 i ,parry runoff across or within said s tree~. p:r•,;- *;, for ci ,y of j ,.as Vf.w, as , �100 E . Stewa, :.as Veg as, Nev ad a. i i 1' Signal Landmark Corporation Drainage Study i Carlsbad, California Reconnaissance and data collection, flood and sediment analyses investigate mitigation measures and prepare feasibility study for Rick Engineering, 3088 Pio Pico Dr., Suite 202, Carlsbad, California. 1 Carlsbad Business Park Drainage Study Carlsbad, California Reconnaissance and data collection, flood and sediment analyses, investigate mitigation measures and prepare feasibility study, Sfor Rick Engineering, 3088 Pic Paco Dr . , Suite 202, ^ar 1 sb ad , California. ® Rancho View rlooa 1� and Erosion Study E1 Cajon, California Study existing flood and. erosion problems along rorrester Creek, recommend foasitl e measures to probi ems , for Wolff Dev.._opment, 2_..3� .1 eed ham Road, :)u:t. 200, ..1 .:3„on, Cal _t.rnza. 9 1 1 1 1 B Hydrology !� Drainage `'lady Orange County, California Preparation of hydrology and deli n for four landfill sites in Orange County, for -our,ty of Crange, 1700 S. Grano Avenue, Sant, Ana, "aiife-nia. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FLOOD CONTROL ANALYSIS Flood control analysis and preparation of master plans are specialties of Boyle Engineering Corporation. A computer -oriented firm with inhouse computer center in the Newport Beach, California facility, we utilize the most modern computer methods for the analysis of storm drainage systems and apply these techniques to virtually every significant system which we design. Our work in this field is extensive and has been one of our areas of expertise since inception of the firm in 1945. Following is a partial list of clients for .4hom we have provided all phases of flood contro'_ system analysis during the past two decades: City of Costo Mesa City of Newport Beach City of San Juan Capistrano City of Rancho Mirage Cit;: of Lemon Gr­--lve City of Sar. Diego City of Phoenix County of Orange Count of Ventura Montgomery County, Virginia Maricopa County, Arizona C=ty of Irvi.: City of Santa Ana City of Chula Vista City of Las Vegas City of Albuquerque City of nidg?^rest County of San oie3c County - f Kern Our computer prog:-:sms utilize the latest technology anti are equal to, and in many c:jses more advanced than, tl:ose in use ty ethers. For example, we have the ability tc produce graphic output cn a high-speed Fatter as a part of our modeling and ar,ilysis prccedures. This represents a significant enhancement of our ability to commur. is a':.e with the C.'0M )user- and in t urn to j communicate with our c 1 i e its. Auto,;ated gr�:phic output 1 f�f i significantly reduces error pctential and yields a superior final i 1 product. PROJECT ABSTRACTS Following are abstracts describing completed projects of Boyle applicable to the study program. Note that these are but a sampling of the many flood control master• plans, hydraulic studies, and design projects Boyle Engineering Corporation has fsuccessfully executed. t i i f1 V t i t J URBAN STORM DRAINS AND FLOOD CONTROL 1 Boyle Engineering Corporation has a staff of specialists in the field of watershed planning, flood control, and storm drainage who can assure a thorough job of planning and design, together with construction supervision and inspection. Flood -control Studies The development of long-range plans for fl000-control improvements within a drain- age basin requires full recognition of the problems, the necessary works of improvement required to provide solutions, the relative urgency of providing the improvements, and the methods for financing their installation. The first phase in the development of long-range plans for flood control is a hydrologic analysis which provides the estimated peak flood flows. These estimated flood flows are then compared to existing channel capacities to determine areas that are subject to flooding. The costs to provide solutions to flood problems cre estimated and considered in relation to benefits that would be obtained ender existinc conditions of development, and witi, future, more ;ntensive use anticipated for the continued development of the area. The needs for flood -control improvements are then considered on a priority basis to meet requirements for existing and future development. The is development for implementing the installation the next phase of plans of works of improvement. This may include plans for inlets , storm drains, and stream channel improvements through developed areas. Financing On smaller watersheds, particularly those requiring coordinated land -treatment programs, assistance may be solicited under designated watershed programs or under provisions of Fubl;c Law 566 through the U. S. Soil Conservation Service. After all opportunities for assistance from government proarams have been considered, a residual program for improvements to be installed by local financing will remain. Alternative methods for financing tLe program can then be considered. Design and Construction Boyle Engineering Corporation personnel are experienced in the design and preparation of construction plans and specifications for flood -control and storm drainage improve- ments of all types, including channel improvements, inlets, junctions, transition structures, and dams. 1 58.0975 M ® M M � M � M M � M M M M ® M M M M us CJ V d Client Cities of Asxahelm and Fullerton, CA Orar,ps County Flood Control Dlstr:ct, CA ?range County Flood Control Dlsirlct, CA Oresnge County Flood Control District, CA Clty of Westminster, fA University of Crill'ornia, Son Diego, CA Vent-:rc County Road Departrr-ni, CA Son Diego Unified Port District, CA El Coming Memorial Party, San Diego, CA San Diego County, CA Snn Diego County Flood Control District City of San Diego, CA Ventura County Flood Control Dlitrlc! Ventura County Flood Cer:'rol District, CA V*ntu.-a County Flood Control District, CA Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority, NM City of Albuquerque, NM MaricopoCounty, AZ Clark County/State of Nevoda REPRESENTATIVE FLOOD CONTROL AND STORM DRAINAGE PROJECTS Length Project _ Project Description (feet) State College Boulevard B. t d' Charnel 3,000 State Collegr Boulevard 9' x 6' Charinel 96" Pl pe State College Boulevw al. Pi" Tustin/Newport St,- . wire 66" Pipe Bolso Avenom !' Drain 78" Pipe University C. * }vs D6velopment Vorto+n sires pipe Sonia Rmu Pond Drain 12' x 6' Channel tfurbor Island Development Various sizes pipe Park Improvement: 17'-0" ot 7'-2" Pipe Gillespie Field trxdustrinl Park 18` - W- Pipe Las Pow%'oo d Storm Drain r x 11' RCBox 7' x I V dbl RCBox 7' x 96' vegetated channel Ruffin Rc<A lrxlrntrial Pori 18" - 48" Pipe 8' x 10' Triple RCBox Arr:r,o 51•-il 16' x 18' Channel t.rroyo Simi/While Oak Creek 12' x 8' to 8' x 6' Channe I Ar ndell Borranco 16' x 8' to 10' x 7' Channel Lodery Storm Drain 30" t0 600 Pipe Amo1e North Drainage Channel 20' x 80'Cliartnel 10' x 45' Channel Southeastern Mericopo County 20' - 300' s: 4 - 14.5' Stone Drainage & Flood Control UNLV, Maryland Parkway 48" to 60" Pipe 3,500 3,200 2,200 2,600 4,ow 600 5,000 3,500 3,000 13,000 18,000 14,000 15,800 10,500 451,440 4,000 Capacity Year (cfs) Constructed Cost 600 1970 $ 350,000 460 1972 404,000 210 1974 426,000 760 1971 143,000 3M 1973 223,000 Variable 1963 Continuing 1,420 1972 500,000 Variable 1966 1,400 1963 37,000 Varlabrr 1975 2,000 1976 1,000,000 1966 2,600 1968 600,000 R 'ir 1,400 1971 1,200,000 3, 500 to 11400 1970 1,800,000 variable 1976-7 1,600,030 variable 1977-78 1,600,000 470 to 1973 (tidy) 12, 900, 000 20,0GO Conttr. continuing 100 1975 400,000 1 I 1 L�� 1 1 1 n I a 1 I I N FLOOD CONTROL PR0IECTS AND WATERSHMFLOOO PLAIN STUDIES t -if AF Project and Lacstlrxl b. bc* �c . c* �. `�} e w Ps jF�. FLOOD AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS I I ' I StormDrainage and Flood Control Study Msricapa County AZ X X I X X X X) t I X X ( Flood Control Comprehensive Plan, Ione 3 San Diego County CA X X Y. X X X X Starts Drainage and Flood Control X( r Y x X K K X Ct�rnoroNenslve Plan, Las Callas Creak Lemon Crave CA ' I Northwest Las VcOas Drainage Study Las Vegas NV ' X: x i X X X ' X X l 1 ( I San Pasqual Valley Flood and i x' x x xlx XI x X I x I Sediment Control Study San Diego CA 1 � j I Las Panasttultor Lagoon � !! � � watershed Managen+ent Plan San Diego CA i X X, X X� X� X X X X f yorth Las Vices Drainage Study 4orth Las Vegas 4V X; X I X I X X x X x Chula Vista Calf Course Crainage Study Chula Vllta CA j X! x x 1 x, X± X; X X x x Y I 4} I I i I I Elan Gardens FM�od Control Stud Solana Beach CA 1 X X x X 1 X I X, X X Rancho View Estates El Cajon CA I x ; x xi x ±X ; X! X X I X FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Las Paws Storm Dram Project San trs-rnr CA X i r. x x X' Y X X w@Mt Chlrt Lake Drainage Project Rlooscrelt rA t Lade-s Staru Drainage D(verston Ind 1 l 1 Detention FaJllty Albuquerque 4ti' ! X x X. X x; X Y Fkxx! Control Works of ImorDven►ent ' 1 Arroyo Slott -White Oak Crook aeon I Arundetl BarranGa Ventura County CA I x i Y Y Y X X x aloud Control Structures i ' 9eardsley Wash and Revolon Slough Ventura County CA I t x l x X X I x I WATERSHED/FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES I i Flood Insurance Studios i She crvertsnitles and Unirw:orwrated Area Kern County CA ; x Y ! f x Flood Insurance Studies Two incorporated titles &" Thr •/ Counties 4V x i X Flood Insurance Stu^lles 'en Unincorporated Cities 4M x x x Csntrt+i Arizona Water Control Studv Sand and Cr•sv.-i %inning Cuidelines Plioeni: AI ( x l t X ( x Sic Sandy Crook watershed Study South Central 4E X x x x t x r 1 X I x x Precise Flood Plain Uscalnq within City San :)I" :A X t Y Inn of a.a 44ountatn Cods Mescalery 4M X K x! x X x x• x I x ' • ' 1. r ✓ 1. - � ' I � .tr ,• .' t � .. � , a % � f 1 r a•'F' 1 t 1. , J r r M l } lamp tip • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • + 000 t _ y ;•rll1 �a �• ' 1 ,r ■ U hA.,y 4' , } ' 1 r - • .+.� t t , �. +j .±,, 1'.J r f ••r4'J.��..�`'j; 't ;+.' 7.r �,:4i '!(/t}f.' { r�. r)t ,'I:IV ;. 41 � rjn��11� ��}rr�}f�•J� t ..#,.•,.r' �/,l ' F �: , r `+. r y tt, �+,y I�t � '�i• ', + l;L1 �I 1. /, .y' 1 tS •C 'r • '. .�C�-.! �. I'.'.1 ti' } '{ _" �1 � � .. • I, .l .. 0�•'r, .{ :Py,. �.. 'tier ,11; 1.": iray [I}; ,�} 1 , �{ L, i; r. i., _ '• r.. ,,:'.1 �' ae. f. t .'F Y +) ,i". r tt11,4• i�r'� � 1 �. � �.�' +����'C+ r�;M1 ,y•y}}iln'Y,"' 1� +* i1 ♦ :i +.Y i� 1 t •1 t ".�� 14• r `.',.i• ? •j ,r 'ry. ii,4#.'It ';�1 It��r1.i{•,7, I;�(�t•+:�1'�I �.,•,1.�,,..' ''1,, + ,s. �,'�)•'y y�M ,� �,•'t ' e c ''rr• V+: 1,• 1 �r 1 1 � ,. .�.. 7,). .�iii'?, tl jp.' ��,�' 4 1 ) �:, / , t''-t t' +-t!' j•. y, "I. r i r�+. t �I r. 11itgr �.r}r v�A 4+ ��t `�+�f• Yr +.1!/ � 1 rr ,'�•f' R �,1 ' � tf ,1'�ti 'YF. `•: _ 1.'• 1 t - � ti' � r{ r ,j •, . , ,t�� �,l.,,u{, •� t/r,'1S"'�� "�� t;. r � [ ''°'+ '`�,�. r`�.r, � ? � ti }' + , If , .•i, t + 1 •tt• .r 1 ') 'r ' 1 il'''� 1 ► -i`' I, f/ 1 � y , ., � , iy, ,1. ,{ '•. � le.:r. �4'� { ,M jt ? {�, � .I' 1.;.�'1, ti ''• � .1 'p.' t +..'� r �,� l 'fir •+ :�.., .1 .i '1 a�+ 7:, •. ,' "'•'`s 1r "3. j t` 1 '✓ ,7' ) 1' •� "'+rww'.•rh� "yA *•r'1 ':4 r Y . ��` i 1 • � r• � `i 1! 1 1r �•,' � , ii 1.,, •r ?.1 .�,. �,r} .it r:. + 4 r'y�•ry Y k'• 1 w r , ;i� ..+ *,f�t ^ r /, I �•1 , :h �.•�, A, t 1 ,i 1 `7 • t f 1 ,.1, t y,...r ` y , f+j�, .1t �'r �, � S:'1'! �} •� f•, t �. �� ,.�•, � it �1. `,. f}�, � ' �, ' ti 1:i.) � f. 1 I `.I '. 7 7• •'t .i• Sii '1�'•�,I ,•'�• ,, ii '�.f, Sr+ ,.;,. .f.,, -lip •Y'.,<t "'!� "'�i'1,.1: ! •:"„ �'r1 4 �k. ,+ t.. +•� y {•�;'�. 1' / . i t , .r t 1 •. �', s•''i`I 5hi', 1I,'.t, II Ati ■ ' *� t. �, • ,* .tir;f �...'. +S ".i, -r r ,�. t`c. rJ ''i'. r L c' j )'l,j.,t+ 1,�,{',•� '# ! {�1 7, r��'•,4`.., -.. �`. � .+. ". ,r��, }+'t £. f } 1 t ,r' ✓ f.j.* ' / .';hto C.•' t ,,,� t,/.{,• .�� Yt ,,ly t 1i �.t '?., `i 1'� .yi ,. .� `� ,, k t .."1 rl. �;. ,r- '�� •1 rr „. ��5�`'t `' ',' .�,r`?1,•�,ri (•1!�+fir: t'�1���;�;�+" t .1 _ , fy Yl •,1,4.1i'r..; n+�� 'r ,. � ,. f. ,}, !�,� F^• �' ,� r •;�.t .t a y4 �..,�",. +0. .�. y: ,%1.S..,j4f ti}. �t ,�,• �,, ,✓. ?,, �.' ., ,'li-•+ i1_Vt. i r''�.'t Gi•: 1 � �t� ., '� • � .'?1 } .'• ;•f7� ( f '1 •.1. i O� ,, hr •1 r , t N , .r, -,: ., •ir""• + 1• 1 4�1 t�- •!,4 ,'11•✓'ir r ,• � `.a � 'y ,}� , �• /•� :+e , y 7r * L S � •I I,, p'i�J t !' r t •� � ,V �t, r ,./ ..�f••y� a,. s:, 1 r e: .'r'� .#.t1' 1 Y• ',, •ti,. ,+i, .>,�`:j, �,, , .. ; + _�' ',' �: d 't d�' '� :r!r>,'. `1•,j, '.R��../ �(' ', , 't 147.. 16 r d; �' t r �' ,� " + ', i'' u ..+. } r .j t, .yY'j �•„��.,c 11 fit' ,.r. �/... $•1 f', ,�1� �!• r, A,' �; '• ♦ a'. { t • ,. �+.+ ,:j 1 �{� C'� S + tS �, .J7�.h ��*Q,j+-r.� `+ }l l.`; t; t 4M � ;� - !.- '•,1. •t•- .t �♦, Y i,i•n c - ',�' r�' {off-� r; a': •7�� 1•k{. . !• � r 'ty,f+} , '�;. ':r f tt�Yt. ,, y. r , '� 4y1` ,{ •, til, ti �•'�.:•„ '(,' r+, �. +r '` t !'+{ .•. d , �'• :�tl ,�+ 1 � r.. �„•. t i.h 1 ''/ 1- tY 1 ..i'r 1:, �7 ,� }' � .A, �' • ■, 1�'1 .'l.. }�i'• u•, Itr. :,i `J �F♦rq• • V • e •'t'.i,,. .ti 1 t.i`. _ „r`'"',,iA1 �re'�i, fi1.,�r �, :ii i,ti,i is' , ♦'* �. 1 , ti �' }�� hi i. t��+7 a:} 1r' it'j: /�j1.: �.. t'F. + � �a ♦ ti ✓ w l r7YL t , 1 �t:,, ,Jtl v'.' +' '1 '� ;''`'��l • ",� , fl � ( r `'. 'f , ��� 11 ��• �' �+.' 1 !r t, , } rr✓,•. n._� ri•11 .ne •r,r.w 4y,.{; Rom_. .r;+.�r,r� .:1� „1.,y 1;,,•. •y.•+li' �>1�:�. �,,.�' a. '1.` , _ ,. /' �I r' �f IFi -•ty 'NI+•1"�', 1 ij j.+�: '�' kt} {S` r.y, .` ,.•t�,' .. ••.;... r•Ir++ s' da r. j(4'�f'r�•{' T".y�isi ii �]}r` ' �'t,' T�,f,?/ �'�.'.'�. �• i.4 �r �..w ..�' y'1:1�. Yi.a_'J J. �.a-».:..,�+u+. •...,r<i-:V:.l,%�i.,L�r.Cr...:a4iiln•.L{.#l>'�S• L�"f• ! �1:+�II� �i �L �" 4k� ra ', l'I1�`�1�'Ir•I.�E+"•�{N'�'�. r Primay Dr'ainage and � Water Control System' 1 I Location Little Econlockhatchee River Basin Orange Count Florida Y. Services Provided Flood plain analysis, planning and preliminary design, engineering design, surveying, construction administration Project Cost $1.75 million Completion Date 1972 Owner Board of County Commissioners Orange County Post Office Box 1393 Oriando, Florida 32802 Project Description r followed the desi n Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared preliminary studies which were by g of three water control structures on the Little Econlockhatchee River in Orange County, Florida. The R. K. Michaels Dam and Water Control Structure CS-3 is primarily a flood control facility with a dam embankment 178 feet long and 14 feet high. A vehicle bridge is incorporated in the design. The control structure has a 140-foot long, uncontrolled ogee crest, plus four 6-foot wide by 8-foot high slide gates which are manually operated Design capacity is 7,500 cfs. Water Control Structure CS-4 controls storm waters with eight 12-foot wide by 6-foot high, motor -operated radial gates. The structure incorporates a two-lane, highway bridge constructed of precast concrete with a ccmposite deck. An adjacent control building houses standby pourer to operate gates. Water Control Structure CS-5 employs four 10•foot wide by 6-foot high, motor -operated radial gates. Tt;e facility includes an access road, a bridge and related embankments. H000 Enga7ccrrng Corporation 1 r� � Flood Control Corn'prehg's.ive Plan � Zone 3, San Diego County 1 1 Location Sweetwater, Las Chollas, and Telegraph Canyon Watersheds, California Services Provided Field . invests ationshydrologic anal sis, improvement plans 9Y and cost estimates. and recommendations for implementation and funding Project Cost 5105,000 Study $52,000,000 Construction Completion Date 1975 Owner/Client County of San Diego Department of Sanitat'on and Flood Control 5555 Overland Avenue San Diego. California 92123 Project Description Zone 3 includes the total drainage area of the Sweetwater River watershed, with an area of about 220 square miles, and several small drainage areas which have independent outlets into San Diego Bay. The upper Sweetwater watershed is undeveloped and includes the rugged mountains of Cuyamaca State Park and the Cleveland National Forest. The lower watershed is urbanized and includes residential, commercial and industrial development. In recent decades, the Sweetwater River has occasionally caused major flood damage and has frequently caused nuisance flooding. Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared the comprehensive plan for Zone 3 which recom- mended new and improved flood control and drainage facilities based on projected physical. economic, and social factors through the year 1G90. The plan included lined and unlined than - nets, culverts, and bridges. Recommendations were made for financing improvements with ad valorem taxes and assessment fees through the formation of special drainage areas and zone programs. A priority rating system indicated the sequence of installation on the basis of need and system effectiveness. As s basis for Its recommendatrons, Boyle engineering conducted a hydrologic analysis to determine the design capacity requirements for the improvements. The entire watershed was Idivided into subbasins and modeled using the Soil Conservation Service TS-20 computer program. 1 Btu Ertgr�rrr-rq Ccxpcxatfor, � San Pas'" clual Valley Flood � and Sediment Control Study I 1 ILocation San Diego, California Servi.;es Provided Development of a comprehensive flood and sediment control plan; data collection; hydrologic, hydraulic and sediment analyses; co- ordination with public agencies and local citizens Project Cost S51,000 Stuuy Completion Date 1980 Owner/Client City of San Diego 1222 First Avenue San Diego, California 92101 Project Description h an Pas al Valle lies in the northernmost art of the city of San Diego and includes the The S qu y p y g San Diego Wild Animal Park. The majority of the valley is an agricultural preserve with lessees who are required to grade and maintain a channel along Santa Ysabel and Santa Maria Creeks, which flow through the valley. In recent years, the combination of unregulated sand mining and relatively high rainfall has resulted in the loss of farmland and bridges. Boyle was ratained to prepare channel designs and a flood plain management plan to mitigate flood damages. To develop peak discharges for channel design and hydrographs for the Watershed -Sediment Routing Model, Boyle used the Soil Conservation Service TR-20 computer model. The 2% 5% 10% 25% 50% and 100-year floods were studied. The model was calibrated with stream gage records and estimated peak flows. The Watershed -Sediment Routing Model, developed at Colorado State University, uses a modi- fied version of the Universal Soil Loss Equation for calculat�-ig the wash load. The bed load is determined by the Meyer -Peter nd Muller formula. Sediment routing uses hydraulic conditions determined by the Corps of Enginaers HEC•2 water surface profile computer program. r' i The design alternatives include stable, unlined channels with improved junctions u. � inutar es. Sediment basins are an optional part of the design. The flood plain management plan recom- Imends that sand extraction be limited to the replenishment rate. 1 1 Iscone E K_X IL2L* w corimKX00011 sr +gin+ 1 FLOOD CONTROL STUDY ZONE II VENTURA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA The objective of this project was to define the flood problems in that portion of the Santa Zloro River Valley located in Ventura County (Zane II), prepare preliminary plans and estimated costs for their solution, establish priorities for their installation, and prepare a "12-Year Program for Flood -Control Improvements" to be financed from sources. This study was phased into thr-ne parts: (I ) hydrologic analysis, (2) preliminary phase report, and (3) a "'2-Year Program for Flood -Control Improvements." The hydrologic analysis and preliminary phase report were prepared similarly to the procedures used in the Zone III Flood -Control Study (see summary report on this study for details). An intermediate phase report was determined as not necessary for Zone II, as this study phase for Zone III provided the basic determinations regarding methods of financing and scheduling that were also applicable to Zone II . The final phase was the development of a "12-Year Program for Flood -Control Improve- ments." The total estimated cost was 530,.500,000 to be financed over a 12-year period with a combination of incomes from ad valorem taxes, acreage assessment fees as a condition for development, and the issuance of bonds. The bond program has been de- layed because of the present state of the money market. The program report has assisted in soliciting government assistance on appropriate projects and in establishing priorities for the installation of projects within the limitations of available financicl resources. 1 1 1 1 58.0<76 Ventura County Flood Control District Flood Control and Drainage, Ventura County Ventura, California 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 L, FLOOD CONTROL STUDY ZONE III VENTURA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA The objective of this project was to define the flood problems in the Calleguas Creek watershed (Zone III), prepare preliminary plans and estimated costs for their solution, establish priorities for their installation, and recommend procedures for implementing the plans for needed works of improvement in a timely manner. The study was phased into four parts: (I ) hydrologic analysis, (2) preliminary phase report, (3) intermediate phase report, and (4) a 10-y2or program for flood -control improvements. The hydrologic analysis provided estimated peak flood flows for the 10 percent, 2 percent, and 1 percent chances of occurrence (average return periods of 10 years, 50 years, and 100 years, respectively) for all waterways within the study area. The preliminary phase study defined the problem areas on the basis of existing channel capacities as compared to the estimated peak flood flows for various chances of occurrence and the damageable values under existing conditions of development and projected future use. Reconnaissance -type estimates of costs to install the flood -control works of improve- ment were made and priorities for installation were recommended. In the intermediate phase study, the projects that would be required within the following 10-year period to provide urgently needed flood protection and to permit orderly development within Zone III were agreed upon. Those projects considered susceptible to financial assistance from the federal and state governments (Corps of EngineArs authorities and Public Law 566, in combination with coordinated state legislation) were identified and actions were taken to obtain early consideration. Estimated costs for those projects required within the following 10 years and which would require local financing were refined and alternative methods for financing were considered. It was recommended that these projects be financed with a combination of incomes from ad valorem taxes, acreage assessment fees as a condition for development, and the issuance eof bonds. The final phase was the development of a bond'program report for the 10-year program of flood -control works of improvement. The total estimated costs to install this program was 532,000,000 with 525,000,000 to be financed by the issuance of Bonds. These bonds were approved by the electorate,ond the works of improvement are now being installed. Ventura County Flood Control District Flood Control and Drainage, Ventura County Ventura, California 1 1 58.0476 1 i 1 i� 1 1 1 STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL STUDY SOUTHEASTERN MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA (In association with L. H. Bell and Associates) Client; Maricopa County, Board of Supervisors Objectives To bring into focus the problems related to storm runoff and the need for measures to control this runoff under conditions of present development and in anticipation of projected future development in this area. This study was accomplished by Boyle Engineering Corporation in association with L. H. Bell and Associates. The stud area includes a total drainage area of 759 square miles, wi!h drainage plans Y q developed for 244 square miles. The study included a hydrologic analysis to estimate peak flood flows having various return periodr for design of flood channels and storm drains; design and layout of alternative concepts for flood control and storm drainage and the selection of the recommended concept; preliminary cost estimates of all proj- ect elements; and recommendations for project implementation. Boyle Engineering Ccr oration provided direction and supervision for the study; made the hydrologic analyses; developed altemative concepts and selected the recommended concept; prepared the study report; and made recommendations for project implementation. The study report is being used as a basis for obtaining federal assistance for eligible portions of the project from the Corps of Engineers and the Soil Conservation Service; and to proceed with local financing for the remaining portions. 57.0174 11 I The Arro 1 o Slrri a n I wrt•,1t° 17.3• t. rNN• }4-Oi1 C Crianne!s boll+ Bo�it, Ct'S,gttCC .^•"'�t"r.e •rs rnNc,t y almost mead -or fas",or TO ; rt`.rrN j timaAr, I,ar'S into the Comn m; c-ar,.-p 5o, �F• ong-ntai-5 Cp.Wo.r—r± Oh•S SDeC'at SthuClUft' 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Unusual Transi'llon Structure , .. 3. . . 1 � Flood Insurance Studies Q 1 I I Location 1 1 I California. Nevada, and New Mexico Services Provided Surveying, field investigations, literature search, hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, mapping, interagency coordination, public involvement Project Cost 51.936.000 Studies Completion Date 1982 Owner/Client Federal Emergency fiana ement Agency y 451 7th Street, S.W. Washington, D C. 20410 Project Description The Water Resources Division of Boyles Engineerinq has completed Federal Flood Insurance Studies it three states. These studies evaluate an area's eY fisting flood damage potential and include the following major tasks: appraisinq flood problems, obtain�ng topographic data from existing maps or aerial and land surveys for ilood•prone areas, establishing peak flood dis- charges for each source of flooding. determining flood elevation profiles, plotting flood bound - cries, and computing flood hazard factors The final product is a report and a set of maps adequate for floor -lain man:aremiont uses and fnr eslablishinq actuarial flood insurance rates. Hydraulic analysts include areas of well-defined riverine floe., with broad flood plains, as well as undefined v;ashes and alluviai fang. Peak fle4 discharac, are determined using a variety of methods including flood flo;-; frequency analyses, find rainfali•runoff modeling techniques developed by the Corps of Engineers and Soil Com ervation Service .- rrAl FJowte EnQineennq Gorr)oratkxt 1 Iw.rCXJAe E -irrwN )C r COMPUTER UTILIZATION IN WATERSHED, FLOOD CONTROL, AND STORM DRAINAGE PLANNING In a systematic approach to watershed, flood control, and storm drainage planning, Boyle. Engineering Corporation is equipped to utilize a full spectrum of computer facilities, including on-line terminals, and our in-house HP-3000 computer system. There are several computer programs which have important applications to watershed, flood control, and storm drainage planning. Hydrologic Analysis (TR-20-SCS) This program is used to compute flood hydrogrophs and route them through stream and channel reaches, and through reservoirs. Rainfall intensities, times of concentration, indexes of runoff characteristics based on soil and cover, channel and reservoir characteristics, storm pa'terns (synthetic or natural), and other parameters nre determined and serve as inputs for the program. The drainage area being studied can be divided into as many subwatersheds as desired and input with appropriate parameters. The program output provides runoff hydrogrophs computed for each subwatershed. hydrognaphs These are routed through the stream system to the junction •.vith the next subwatershed and added to the hydrograph of that subwatershed, thus continuing through the watershed to provide hydrologic information at all cc-icentration points of interest. The output can be provided in the degree of detail desired, including hydrogrophs with coordinates of flow and time. Existiag or proposed floodwater - retarding reservoirs moy be introduced into the system to determine their effects on flood flows. This program has been used by Boyle Engineering on watershed areas in excess of 1,500 square miles in size, divided into hundreds of subwatersheds, including several reservoirs, and having flows in excess of 100,000 cubic feet per second at the outlet. This program permits thorough hydrologic analyses of a watershed under existing con- ditions and with various combinations of structural measures considered as altemativps in project formulation. Hydrologic Data Comparison This program is used in conjunction with the TR-20 program to summarize, reformat, and compare data which are included in the output from the TR-20 program. Areal Adiustment of Rainfall This program is used to make point -areal adjustment of rainfall intensities and to modi''y computed peak flood flows which have been determined on the basis of point rainfall intensities used with the TR-20 program. Output is in the form of a table which may be used directly in hydrology reports. 1 1 Alternative. Channel Design The input for each reach of channel includes design capacity requirement and the channel invert elevations at the upstream and downstream ends; channel design criteria; and current local costs, including excavation, concrete, riprop, drop structures, bridges, and rights, -of -way. The computer program provides output for fou. types of cha:mel improvements as a basis for determining the least expensive alternative:. (1) tra zoidal earth section, (2) trapezoidal earth section with riprop slope protection, (3rconcrete-lined trapezoidal section, and (4) concrete -lined open rectangular section. "he computer designs the four basic types of channel improvements, co,isidering for each type u range of bottom widths. For TRAPEZOIDAL EARTH SECTION WITH RIPRAP SLOPE PROTECTION, for example, the computer considers bottom widths ranging from 20 through 68 feet in increments of 4 feet. For each bottom width, a depth of flow, Y, and a GRADE are determined so that the specified limiting velocity, V, will not be exceeded. The computer can then determine the total vertical feet of drop structures required in the reach (DROP) plus the total channel depth, D, and the critical velocity (VC) for tho's particular channel. The total DROP is then divided into a number of DROPS and the cost per foot of channel for drop structures is determined. Riprap (RR), excavation (EXCAV), the cost of bridges (COSTER), plus the right-of-way W--:th L.e then determined, followed by the engineer's ' estimate (E-EST), construction cost (CONSTR), installation cost (INSTL), and annual maintenance (MANT), annual amortization (AMOR), and total annual cost !ANUAL). The output for concrete -lined trapezoidal sections and open rectangular sections shows the volume of concrete (CONC), and volume of backfill (FILL.) in place of the drop structure and riprop data shown for the earth section and earth section with riprop. In order to use the computer output, the design engineer simply scans the annual cost column for a given reach to determine the least costly channel section having reason- able dimensions in each of the four channel types and then selects the section which is compatible with overall objectives. Designing,. Estimating, and Pl�tting of Storm -Drain Systems Th*,s design, -with computer program provides a working a complete cost estimate material quantity takeoffs, and a plotted profile of the storm -drain system. A user may specify his own design criteria based on allowable pipe sizes, minimum slopes, minimum covers, friction factor, return periods, inlet times, etc. The user may also specify unit prices for cost estimating. These unit prices apply to pipes, excavation and backfill, pavement replacement, and manholes. Design output includes pipe diameter complete with strength specification, slope, capacity full, desion flow, velocity, depth of flow, invert eleva- tions, ground elevations, and sewer depi�s for each line between manholes. Cost -estimating output includes a cost summary for each of the following: excavation and backfill, pipes, manholes, and pavement replacement. Pl:+tted output includes ground profile, drain profile, all manholes, and pipes. All slopes, diameters, station41g, and invert elevations are also printed on plot. 58.0378 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION REFERENCES The following have direct knowledge of Boyle's staff and projects. Please feel free to contact then: 1. Regarding quality of work for complex analysis involving hydrology, flood control planning and design, and hydrological analysis: o City of Costa Meta Mr. Bruce Mattern 77 Fair Drive Post Office Box 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 02627 ( 714 ) 754-5343 o County of Orange/Environmental Management Agency Mr. Jim Williams,Manager of resign 400 Civ is Center Dr i,1e 'West Santa Ana, Califori:ia 92701 (714) 8 314 -230 0 2. Regarding innovative approaches to tough problems, quality of solution, and ability to meet schedules: o Mr. Don Simpson City of Newport Beach 1824 Port Margate ?lewport Beach, Cal ifornia 0 (714) 644-4179 3. Regarding commitment of key personnel, extensive knowledge { and experien::e of key staff, and sat-sfa,.:tior, with, end work products in hydrol,.agy, hydraulics, and flood pl in mapping: o Mr. Raymonc Lenaburg Federal Emergency k1anageme .t Agency Division or Natural and Technological Hazards P►'esidio of San Franciscco Building 105 : San Francisco California9a129 (415) 556--9840 i t a CITY OF HUNTINGTON ESSACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 Paul E<. Cook Public Works Department Directcr (714) 536.5431 November 15, 1983 Hoyle Engineering 1501 Quail Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 Subject: Request for Proposal; Upgrading of and a Concrete Box. Culvert; CC 649 a Concrete Flood Control Channel Gentlemen: 7he City of Huntington Beach is requesting proposals from qualified fied civil engi-veers to prepare plans, specifications and engineer's estimate for the upgrading of a trapezoidal reinforced concrete flood control channel and a reinforced concrete box culvert. The location of the channel is agproxunately 600 feet west of Gothard Street and north of Heil Avenue (see Attach. "A") . The City's 1979 Master Plan of Drainage discusses the subject channel and concludes that it has adequate capacity to acoccmndate the drainage area. Recent review of the 1979 report indicate that an incorrect slope was used for channel analysis and both the channel and the 6 x 10 foot reinforced bore culvert under Heil Avenue are inademiate to handle design flows. In addition to the problem of channel capacity, the residents of the subdivision west of the subject flood control channel and north of Heil Avenue are concerned that the drainage system serving their neighborhood is inadequate and that flooding regularly occurs at the intersection of %iagellan and Sunshine where curb inlets are located. The inlets discharge to the Heil Avenue p=V station which pumps storm water into the adjacent channel. Wntenance personnel report no problems with the pLmp station even during the heavy storms of January and march, 1.9-3. The scope of work for which proposals are bung solicited irzluae: r 1. Perfo= and/or provide all necessary studies and field investigations required ■ to prepare the preliminary plans and working drawings. Project studies shall include: ...a hydrologic analysis of the drainage area tributary to the Heil-Gothard channel and a determination nation. of the capacity necessary to meet the City' s designs ' ,-,ds; ...art evaluation of the Heil pump station and Jnlet stracture including the preparation of any recamtended improvernnts necessary to acccmrodate design flows. Bbyle Engineering Request for Proposal November 15, 1983 Page 2 2. Preparing all preliminary plans and cost estimates for the i1%=c;venent of the existing channel per design flow requixement3 (includes the cost of all mis- cellaneous printing, etc.). 3. Attending periodic meetings with City staff during the preparation of preliminary plans and working drawings. 4. Based on an approval of the preliminary plans and oust estimates, the engineer shall prepare and provide 40 sets of the: (a) final working drawings (b) contract documents/specifications 5. The engineer shall, during bid advertisement and construction, provide sw.port including interpretation of plans and specifications, review of shop drawings, review of and make recommendations on change orders. 6. Provide one acceptable set of reproducible "as -built" mylar drawings. (Note: 10% of the contract amount will be withheld until the "as-builts" are submitted and approved.) 7. Furnish $300,000 of errors and omission insurance and all other insurances as noted in sample contract. The advertising for bids and awarding of a contract for this project will be admin- istered by City staff. In addition, City personnel will control contract administra- tion and perform the rewired construction inspections. Prcposals for this project arc to be submitted to my attention by December 9, 1983 with the notation "Flood Control Channel Upgrades" on the envelope. Each proposal should include the following information: 1. A list of similar projects. 2. A statement of your understanding of the scope of work and the steps necessary to complete the project. 3. A list of personnel, including the proposed project manager who will be assigned to work on this project, and a brief resume for each. 4. A brief outline of how you propose to handle this project, if awarded to your firm, and a time -line for completing the project. 5. Your fee based on an hourly rate or percentage of the final cost estimate. A maximum not -to -exceed fee should also be specified. After the receipt of proposals, applicants will be screened relevant to: Expertise and experience. 1. The approach to be used as outlined in the proposal. 3. Ability to complete the project in a timely and consistent rm nner. 4. Fees. J Boyle Engineering Request for Propclsal November 15, 1983 Page 3 Certain consultants may be interviewed prior to the final selection. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the City's Standard Consultant Contract (Attach. "B") and a Certificate of Insurance Form (Attach. "C"). This sample contract and insur- ance form are for your use in developing a proposal. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this project, please contact Mr. Jack Miller of this office at (714) 536-5431. Very truly yours, Les Evans City Engineer LE:DRN:jy Attach "A" 1=atioi i .Map of "B" Standard Consultant Contract "C" Certificate of Insurance For,, cc: Paul Cook Jack Miller CC File 649; "Gen Corresn" I 1 1 A I 11 1 ATTACHt�.ENT "A" T lM t, �.-A tr t.� i' C H U-1 -I GTON B EACH )I,A1 -GE COUNTY; CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY ;,AP 1HIS AGREE: ENT, „I da and an',-r-rAd into th' _ ,+a l of 19 , by an-- br t:;een the G: 'r::U;: i I.:;GTO:l ;? tTi;.tll:,c:ih'c.l CCiI'pot'3t10:`I, to a3 11C�1:,11 r .`Q/ C;:'i•^��i ✓7 Gam• I1'v01:v4u• 1!1 • �,1 �• r ��..�7-1 r •••�i:.•: ....., ✓•IP yr • J. I.,J1.:'. v..r,:v.. v^'.:.,�♦`?:.7 �•7 ..1 .7�'� �.�.^� r:S'...✓�;l�a f_.'. :1' �.. � j; �1 ; ^` �.:iJ �1��• .i1�'�� r. , :lit. '�:J 1. t'•�. 'mil/ . i u t? c u... nv f•rl ~r •, :• '� ♦ - .1 ., r.•,. .... y r1 ri �� .. . i, .J ✓.'�.•�..�I/�.:.i ✓/7 ..: t'�•�4��t. '1./L... �i1�1`�.t►i•4 ., `.. i•1 t`r"'•��.. ••t •�..i L•. o ..:.:i �.z .• pl• ti. ln:C) ! n.� :�'::♦. `,• r-?,I:�'. .`J c: � ., � i 1 i i r t� '� V ' ,l � j• 1.3 � a � • - M ,) . n 1• :.:. � r •. 11 � • •� .... ... 11 \ � t`.n�; .. ."��C 11/ t I:V:1 a/ F' ..• rc; u..J ::u•)L.. i Shal 1 includi-, u:{u :In r L. : ♦.1•� . •� 1! Sl.:":'� •J YJ a tirta, � t t:onSt:. rts an: :i:::.cP. 11 1 1 I'J:•:y7. ,3:1aii a pn.; and a:;sisn a!! coord,na,;ior. �.G.':SJL. a!i t:?signa:? a :'eg-ist?v,?dl Ci_ Angi'Ieer whoshall rppresan . and b? i:.s strip contact. and agent in all �n^sa.-ation wi ri duri.n r1•�i �,: :F t,p—ir ;,t mortis C:L t•AP;�IF.r \r .� 1 5 V :r f: • 1 m a z r a e :7 r - a v n i 1 1 r •.7J i•/ `'.. a I. in j J, •• r: po r l• S t :C? t7�,•^,S , 1 • J a. Cu! C'i. c: r_4::5 , I.. ipS ,:ian -az i'r?r 7_ iipr,.. a;:j ?ii JU �a ' .� Tye •y 1 a11�:• 11'•�. ..ur .. a:...• c• t �, •, r. i .c o s •. `� � _ J./Cl�.� �, /.7 :]J, rwft,ani, ^r 1. ��: i.J• ::'lJ;. nCJ .;'\•.. i.i•� a 4:. :/1• /�\�:1 \1 n >-nor .,t:i'j�'�' .:, •l l ... 11 :t IJT:•.• y .l ;` 7. j • � �•, .! • �.r J1. .i V .. • :t •. I. , .. • `. .. / .. i'�:11.r '..�: t ♦/ I \/ l.... . / �� ...�. r. .+ h :. " • . i .• t,�.: • 1 � �. i i . L S , c 1 i .. .. L , 1, o J z t-! ,J , C . L •w J , 3 p Z c'i. ;' � • v � �.i .: F' :; Jai . ~ «'i � ,... ri /'� :J � 1 � / ".:: r 1� : .� t' :� fi � � �,/ • \ •• ,r • / G r, t b J r . 1 u J 1 .fir p . / t. •in . • Ln e 11 Si n n. J..+ronJ 'li• C01....1 J J yr7;) J � 1 v 1 l •� , .. r J r IJ��; fr:� . • �� Ir •. .1� t�r� ti, , 1.1 +✓u:. li:....:, . s'r►a11 cr,.,,p :; i ur: a? 6oi:? pro :r:s one a: y•.P .t' r• 5 \J\f .? .ljc:... �1. Insurance 3:�r' .:G, F'.,� rtL S C): i- C. e .1 ✓ ✓•L� ✓.ra ►•'i•••►.+ ..�^• .•1.. .• v... r': al awl r. ..•':.l• L•••�: •. uS lr �Y: v.J• .".,::~ J 1..1� _ :' J ✓G l•C� \�:: .'•,�i.:�... � '.•�. .•J �.:� �.."•..:.C. G J✓�. :.r"GJ1� Gr V Sna-1 • :, .. Ir, ... � t �^�. .'N. ± --3:1' 1�1' 1 .'�. :•:•�, •'JS 1.1 ? ii ?'�� J `� r. ..7 - a. '.,. . Q _ •.• C t � " ..... • • ...�. { 5 .l �: .. .. • J 'I .. . ,J t i � I _ \ . � • .. { • L i7 � �.� .. r. � J .. � :: u , � � • . • • • _ r 1. _ • • t ,.. ���_:, .♦l♦lr► .. t •fir}. _�I..i •. :. .•..'♦ .. ... ... _..r �• _J►. ..ter ., �'• _•. J � ♦ ► . • f• (,. � •i : • ' � �. r r l rl ► ✓ : i • . �.J �J u v , ♦ • i • '' tom.. 1 i . .. r n .. .. � ' �' • . . '� (� i '9 � •- ..] / % � i/ � :^u yr. ..•/ nr •:l.7 Cl 1:1'�u , .. ~.. r :. i .. .� : • j G :: U . f ''1 i C. . , ! �: ' :1 l .. .. t �� .7 . .., t.:� t V t: '� C. C • . ..� L : ' . f • . .. • r �- i'7- _:1:;::!'a:7C�? �`l�i�• �p►'C,:C'_I1J C!'C;V_d%' whams an; r�"•'I' \.(i': e!'aL,p .:':1,..., ::la'p CQ a;?pl.lcable L„ ..I1? I o„s ia _ c� •� �� r .... ." „'S 1 i nl: A 1,7 lnsu 'ar.c o 1 .. ,i r-. Ic..arr. ica ,e of a such insurunci- oI;-ci= s v;?quirr:d by this •• n -. r .. 0 " 1 / .a t a•.iT�. e?r?::F'.. � S:1[ _ �i► ..?:l . �'t F'(1 �.7 ..,, .. .., n ....C')! I: .� 1?I ..!�( i.0 „[1P, an.'. a:tz, s;:.: :,a ���,; :•;�:: .. ;:r4 t_ni. alas s Pr�:•. �::,,,,r?n nn�: cG �� _:•� �J:,........-.:ia-, _ a _tea ''y..f'. •z .• Z C) :s_...� r r. P - r n e - - • . .. t • i � .. � a. N � .•1 r v .J ', . .... . .. 1 .. .. a ..• .r a .. ... • �. . J .. � 1. • v � ... � ♦J r � V :. 1�. 1. �-. •.•+. ., is ..F'�. �: .. . .r'.• . L:.. ::c1. 1 •1.•'`..��t"err tl .�.•'..•Sa .' c .i:I. - 1 .�� .7 �!, ♦.r F' P •1 a.. -•r.l: :. Y. u r> �. .• r .. t'�.. .. w ♦ ♦ . .�.'� .. .. . .l t.+�.+� . S, V �. . Y•.1 i L:�.7 JET• 7a• \ p4:!'1 Lit�ril. •iv �..A•� v3r1 �11 � . rlla .. J .. ;;,�1 .: 11. � ..' . � ! 1 1 1 I i .. �'� �l• .:: �� ri 12,-- 71 t:l.a C,):l .. :.3 .. i l-,c jU:.1Ilk N' 1b1'?r'3 T:1r- ?IK ---C1 „_ -nin f iv? a:, ys arter ;117.« v��.'? to p;'0,Ce?c 4S �. �:i, c3nc' Sn3::. o 0J.0 n :n 5i ~.,r ( ; �:,�w:;�a:• :,� ra:,• ti:? e:��cl.:�icn i1' a :... , G • !J -� , . l l.r .... •. '.v ! .. as .. .. . �.... .. P .. � . • .r ... • .: � 11 if v t•. ` • 1 •, • '�� •7, V � • J•1�.. l/1.• .'�1�.•r :� :1 �J rJ.{ • •• • • +...1. 1. {•3 •�:' :�i l.. � r ... :i. ... . .. ail h:•w.�... ,�. ..r . w. i•'�:'� ry' ,• . •. ,1 ~: .. ...• • .:1... .. .. ,.'. .. .. V���y ;.:1�� i J •.1 V �. �•�'�+. .7 • • r• V •••1 ."• • .. '... �..1 • ..1 l' 1 •r .. .• ✓ . .,. l:. 'a . • .. i ,. 1 .i .. . .r , 1. • �1 �•: � ;i' :] , � J :i �i -� , �. A r.. .•. �, .. � �. �. � ^ .�..� .... .: : �' �i �a 1, e • � .. J � .... .. .: 1 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 1 a' � pnt 1:r a pr':'sonai servicn t r a a n c e p"1-1 * So I, l•r-!uncer sha11 lint 5? de 1 a teC to an f ppv3rin ter ,n - i t f :•tithcut the cons- nt of (,!-Y. 3 a.��ITI�t1 ;L Pg0'1T �T�t:S i,l,:i U-, A ., C,'rjrt:'-�:.i gnat ^.i t''''i;u1a1, F.T..01 0 ee o: Ci 1 `=lI--z 10 i a duv-*' g t:ir' tI ,i.• this a5:'ar'.f".%'fla is 4-1 eof"Ct. :iESS J;i�1? .0; t e )arti?s e,,e av►- used t;i� s ❑n `'nro `✓ ;1�?�v au.r:::�r�s�c nj 4cel'S .. • . ! d .ti _. L '.1 G li �i and a i1 'r . .. �,� :1 :ia:•, ::;n:-th an year f_rs'- atl-)v-� nri: -rzn. • Cf:1 T: F x:. T.r. U" I'....F A%Zi 1, TJ ZIT'{ of mIj.yTI. G I J.. .CM. C41IJFORINIA 3, . .. ., ,. .•'.3+• .II....I,•'..� :'U1:IC11•AL �0 ,.•G�ATIGN 1 6'1 is .It•fy Inat the yr.:rL.H of .mutants as dei Ctlbed hNocr •13,s been /steed •o the Inured b/ the undln,; •+ad ahc a,e m !Jr.:r •t (a,1 Wn. 61 thole y.: •C.+l ata Cancaili.i ar ehan;ed -.•t Wat a mjr.ne/ met Nul efeet this ztmf c.:te, ine ••11..r�L•'.f Company a'1:.4 .e 1C cars :)Nur r: .rl.ten notics. 13V 'ta,l, to Gt, ' h3nt,ngton BsiWN P. 0. 3o- 711• Hoh nt.;n taoeicr, C L1!ot't1e 9264L ALL lTE•.:S *.LUST 3E COVI'LETEO, 11:IT DELETION OR CHANGi 11.1 TNFS FORM SHALL 9E SIC -!.Ea A..O DATED BY A.% AUTwC u.!f,^r REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 171SURANCE CC'.tF:.FJY A%U '. UST BE :PPRCVC0 11: I',,RfTvI;G 3Y THE C.T e :.TTCft':fy game of '•+tend Address of !ntutea _ ,.restton of :.ots : ► C;trat,ons :o be ocrformeo aetcnpt'o't of :.ark a. Operinint _ :'CLIC" tIATES ;LIt.117S OF L.Ailff Irv' •.;,Id! JF C ••a.:•:r J.rItSI.•:FU,ICE ;OLIGV NO. i �•.S� � ErfectJ.e � E•alrennA ' In 'eau/ancr :COJI i r:F1.1 IAL LIAkUt ITI � I , I I • tc: arf:.+ATlorrs I Eacr.Occ+1/ice ;• s •I. A.c A+:a . .. J•a1t LTC. •L :L •L N',J'•AL IhlUp♦ 1 I I :U(GMOelLE tfA"1LITr , I i , C'.J •J/••i ML ht/'rt .OMV 1 yy .,r •.1 O 1 1 1 S a.ti , wlr,(0 A . I. ,, •,1 a.A .4 I 1 :'T••I 1wL•• � L.LA I.JN•I 1 1 1 f!•"Lt;.f FS' 0a3.LlT'r I Addd,onN Insurer! Enaar•trrent the 'mu tr a;rer% It At t`• C•tt o: Mint-n'Iwl Gtaeh and In C:.ty ri,un41, t-id'ur all C,rt V,tu^Gt tpP I�tr; xq ;;t. ;-.r•.n.t: .'. .I.n•m.1/.on1. .`.aal Ct and one other Cty Coure.l •o amnird body. an,;, rr tieet,le anJ aoa'J•^t•ee off.cerl, ;r t^,:•u.Cc% of t^e C..t• of Hur,tl•r;ton Eai:1, Lhr.1 ♦.tin' at 1•.CCI art a i.'It•a Rat rntured) Phtuncrr, fa, the cats ct I" •Pturrj, a•T.j, luCh m%jr4r La :h; I ne tirnn.IV to •nV .nturJll;t of 1'1t C.ty of Huntln1ton BeaCh, is tht,r ImettrT n3V AD••roat. .,:.a.:•.Cc......Ar., /l• ._._ n[?A1SEV7a7t'.[.,rfl r 1 .,t r 1 • I•_ 1 :rr slly. IL 1•, •nr t ft -.I rs , I .. .:1 ..� C , v I ,r Y„• ' t r"• '1 'I' r . .I t.:.,. w. �r f.• .. . . ••.•y .., . ,,t .f • 1 t -..• I t 1'r JCrt r-.a I:r ,. All r I. :1. •. It •t •. .. . .. t .. .n . !•.. r'.! :..te } 1.IJ+.. l ,. .r i.1 • ► r v .,•../ r • .•.Ae•/1 4 . a.J,.er /t.C- 'a'. r! w ' (....•.l.f .+ter♦ ••.l C. U•!•:/r'fJ• -.. .�-�,.rr 1•• _��._ .�-_-_._w �� 11 (,r,r'•r'. ..CI !('rLt• 1.•l. rt. nt "Ci :Jtnfl/•: 3' t J I.. 1.3. , 7.' 1 !lTN14OA1•.:j AGREEMENT ____ �` "' - ! • I .. t •.1 ..,. s ! A r e. ♦ t:1 r, r r 1t ♦1C Of ♦t, r;•;tv •i r t, f ' I ' . .: t. I' 7 . : • /' r, f..,. ! 1 f+. C J't r 11 t ) l L. t F, TIPS Ili(! wilert•d Irt,, •lji•, l.2_nd _ da} May 111 tilt' St.,tt' of C11hfolr•la, lt\ 'Ind I•( I .,il�r'Ijll.t, 01111t.y.11 11" dlllt, 1'1t'l'ttrd or aipp' liltud gtlill►fled arld actull; rlrtlCEIt •C• .�-rpa.......�f:r._A..-+- •.- r r • .UMI, L+ EXeCLIt iye Director _ � TA Cali - ,5,-iQIL._._..__ CETF'�. $4=1 hrrr•rJftrr r,;llt I: thr 5 [ltt W'd ___��----City of Huntington reach _ f.t•rt!IifG'r rlllirrf !!te' .,, ;�tn;, I.,t, m'r,%K':SFTi!: "neat the contmetttr f,r and 1n ct.n<idt'ratimi of the covurantt., cundjtitln!�, aj,ret:r.ents, and stipulations of the Sate hereinafter t`Xpressed, dofr:, hert!1w aj:rt-e I.) turmoi i(' oit• St:ltr 'wi icus :'rd r-l'oviI'll r 1:: follows "t't tor... 5"rtn r- to hr• 7rV)•fl•r1Y; hy' ( .•t(:' lrt.u.ur!'.• f k� •. j.l,'7 r.r,nthf• inr. t Cat• fut j,t•rJn:P1•:n r• r:f (rar�j�;t itr,r ,�tF.r} ilal'h i'lan- Utltr hiI•Ct{)r�;Ifnha. if U9p,l SCOPE OF AGRE'D`[D7I' ?he City of Huntington Beach (hereaf ter called the Grantee) agrees to perform the wars: specified for a Coastal Energy Irl-k3ct Procjram (CEIP) Grant tinder Section 308 (b) of the Federal. Coastal Zone Man&jenent Act of 1972, as amended. SL_tci£ically, the Grantee shall ccrply with the attached Wdciotr ;pork: program and schedule, product description and schedule, and the special provisions and conditions contained in the staff report, which are integral parts of this Grant Agreer;ierit. Progress rerADrts shall tx� delivered to the California Coastal Comission in August and Novel,lxtr- , 19£;0, and a final report shall try due within 30 days of the ecx1mletiom or t-'u- -iination of the pro3ect. Wdget revisions shall c:xnply with ti:e Guidelines, for Grant t•tana�rr_nt for Coastal 1 one t,anac Brent Grants. (Prograr., 0xie 1210 ) The fltlfr.'. •t(1r1` r.;i t} ♦I t' •l a' h. t 'U!• .I )� it ,NIt' I' E1 ,S lit IEfCl {' Th1!% .rl.I11- tit .t r11►ILI ..'ll tl'1 1• .'..�.;�__-_.- .r ��Y.«..��..�....__..«..��Z��^rt..^':1_...._.___.�.�»..:...«:_•:t :'���..... .. ._-_-•.-..-.' ...._.�_..___-.�..._..:....._._.......�.�-'`^.�'SC.SSG`L•^�•...��C1T�C--.'�'1�'�3�"�' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ;� CONTRACTOR _ ifomia_Co s Cgq:pi sion_-._.C_i�y_of�Afuntingtcxi Beach ..� 7 7 Assistant Execut: e. Director Ci{y Administrator .. �...' •.':1 :>•, _._._.. • .I r - 1 ,,. n. •II r. t t .0. I3ox 190, ! i ton nrpnttmrnt of Cr,f•In.' ir•..crs ••r— use 0NLY 't'tC'30 771.00 - - � Federal_Trusc Fund #890�809-001-11421--1-7 r ++ !11 ifornia Cct:;t ai Cunnission C IP Grant_ �__ Formula30E3b) �_5.Z2ZAW_» Ft ! ., , �(I tn� ! r. rtr ., .-'.. r: ./ •r \�• .,. ,, j; :frtr tf rn;i:. tir'c ftrrr T_ft'1 .r I. n .•r I' ..t I,t.� �I.t•, +!,.. a t• 'r t t-• .�t. .. 1: .,•,� f•1 If . � ), t �.tln,f r,. „I t�17.tRlrlt. • 11♦-..-a1/- ,r �•. SIG •r, .. nl-•.»r �r .Lt....Ar,e'r", i..a•f -..-' �•�•.+rr.ems--�-a-...__-at,r_-:asxr.... .- "�Z-- ,�...�-. -sn-. --_- -- � ... -_.-_.....__...__—_.... _-. . __ _. - _ ..-z:�:-_—='x•r---.�-� REQUEST El FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION 4/a Submitted by , dames Palln Department Development Services - Date Prepared , March 7 , 1980 Backup Material Attached f] Yes ❑ No Subject CQASTAI_ F-NERQY INVACT PL1pC.RAtvl GRANT APPLICATION City Administrator's Comments 1 q?— ti� Y c; I Y COUNW., ►lporove as Recommended ��-- L=--,��c. hir� c LK Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statemert of Issue: Y Tarr, Coastal Energy Impact ),`.udy, furided by a coastal energy impact grant, identifies existing enerciv facilities, analy�res probable future act Nit ies ;and recommend,, policies and actions for the Local Coastal Plan. Additional n)onies are avail -able for analysis and actions identified as needed by the s'udy. An application for the implementation priase has been drafted ,and is ready for submissicon ►.a ttw State for funding. Recommendat ion: Authorize the .ipplicrati,on to the State Coastal for a const.ai energy impact program grant in ttre amount of $40,9B4 in artier to implement the HunU-yton Beach Const:al Energy Impact Protect.. `rhe city in -kind contribution would he. 20 percent of the total project.) Analysis The City hasbecn concerned with energy production and its related facilities since the 19201a. The current increase in the demarid .and price for oil has guarnriteed ,a longer productive life for the oil fields. Expansion o; existing energy production m-tivity and development of new sources is witicioated. The Coastal Energ; Impact Study identifirxt a number of problems and . opportunities reiated to the City's energy r5Ou sffa "Cf'. rther steady and imp lemerit ation of the st udy's recommenc)at i ons is needed. On Or_t.obrr 3.1, 1977 Courcil authorized the application for the first Coastal Energy Impart Progaam. That phase is now complete and it is time to develop implementation tools necessary to help solve some of the problems associated with er)ergy pro,' ction facilities and mist in the. facilities planning e;forts. The work program is divided into twelve work elements each with its own goal or objective and product. List M. below is a summary of those products: 1. A handbook for local governments concerning participation in regional energy issues. 2. A report or handbook on tertiary oil recovery methods and their impacts on the City, including recommendations on ways to mitigate the adverse effects and promote beneficial ors s. 3. A report on strategies for increased compatibility of oil production and other activities. 4. Reports on the feasibility of utilizing energy production areas for interim recreational uses, including, measures to avoid conflicts between the two uses. 5. A report or handbook outlining the variables in planning surface land use's in ways to preserve access to utxierground oil reserves. b. f0easurers to develop a clea►- and currant record of energy production data in a form which can be easily up -dated. 7. An analysis of the fiscal impacts of energy pro,' -,cation facilities, including a handbook to describe the methodology and assumptions. 8. A rnerno summarizing the existing oil franchise terms and if ner..essary recommending improved terms. 9. A report summarizing nil spill plans and thv-r role of City personnel .and equipment. 10. A r--port reviewing spill plans with to list of recommended improvement measures for sensitive arenas. 11. A report on the adequacy of current. monitoring and record keeping practices. 12. A report and recommendaticxis on safety of the t,-ark farm dike systems within the City. Alternatives: 1. No project. This alternative would lead to a continuation of conflicts between oil production and other land uses. 2. Authorize implementation of project furxied tntally with City monies. The project scope would need to be narrowed arxl the time frame would probably expand beyond the nine month proposal. 3. Delay application of project until adoption of local coastal program. .Any delay in applying for funds may jeopardize~ tix� ch inces for a successful application. The state's grant funds are on a compet it ive basis from a limited allovat ion. Funding Source: Staff has reviewed the availability of funding from this program and feel that the chances for a successful application are very good. The funding request will be in the amount of $40,984 (80%). The City's in -kind share will be $10,246 (20%), derived through applying the overhead, administration and clerical costs necessary for project completion. r-1 dames W. Pa1in Director Department of Development Services ft 1. Ilu• Contractor act-ves to indemnifV, (If -fend ;Ind save I►,trtnIcss till- State, its officers, agents and (•1111)loyves froin ally and all claims alld lusts ac •ruing or resiilting to at►y and all midractors, subcontractors, rntt(•ri.ilrnrn, labort•rs and any othl•r }person, first or (orlmrttion furnishing or supplying work, scn"ic•cs, imiteriak or srilq)lics in I mmetIioil %sith tlu 111 rfor.l►,Incr of this contract, and from -my ;Ili(! all claim and loss)•% accruing or rt,sultmg to ,Iti%, pt'rwn, fine or corporation who play ht, injurod or damaged by lit(- (:ontractot in tilt- 1)t,rfonnatic•t, of this (mitract. 2" The (:ontrac•tor, Ili (I tilt• agenI, and t mpIrn ct,s of ('()utr.I( tor, in the per Ionnan( t• of this aljrcemetit, shall act in .It( imlependviit capacity and not a% offi( crs or emllloyces or ,Ivclit% (if St.ltr of Califonlia. i 'I'ht• Slat(. Ina% tt,truiriatc this avrv•ern(•nl ;lit(] lit- it•lit'%rd of tilt• Im1 mt'nns• t of .I(ImOderation to Cootraclor should Conlravicir hil to 1lerforn• Ow cost rl.ults liel,111 (I(i0aint,(1 .It tilt- time ;rnci nl tht• n►:I me; herein prosidt,d. In tilt- evvid of .�tuh tvi-min.ttion 11w tit.ttt, nl.ls Ilro(ct,d \sill, thi. ssrorl. in ant immi t,r dct-mcd IIrol;cr Ilse the State. The (list tit tilt• tit,th• shall he dt,(icti- 1 from .,J\ sills) d:it, tilt- ('mitrm for tlndri this aln-ccitwnt, and On. Il,11,11m I'• i! .Ills , shall IN. paid lilt- C'onti;lc!(or Ilium dt-m Ind. "1. Withmit tilt, writs-e•11 ( mist'lll of tilt• Slatc. this a(;Irclill'lit tN 1111t h1 Ccaltractor vitht,r in whole or in part. 5 Tirric is the I•ssew t, oil this al!II-l•Inl'nt (i. No .Jtt-r'atitm (1r %ati.ition III lk, 1cmi% oil tills (ontt.tt t skill Ill• %. lid un}t•ss amid' Ili ss'ritiiiv ,III(] ,i It'd III' the Ii.lillt', licicttt, .lull no imil i► idvi,tall(lim: top ,t:ItY II!t nt not Ili(t►r11t1lawd livivill, shall 11111ding fill ass tof the hart►)•. livirto. 7. 'lilt• ctnlsideralitoil 11) Itt, Imid ('or'tr,It 101, -is Ile 1011If ill rt,tn, skill lot' in L-01u1)(• 1%;ltion for Al III ('onitat toes t•slit•nsrs fill ►1r1rd ill tilt• per lttn:l,lncc 111.1("0. inclritling trawl :oid Iocr diern, urllt,ss otliens ise t•.NI)ressls so 111os tllild. Is ft 5 t nr -ki rd Agreement No. C14V I10-15 City of Huntington Bkcach page 2 CST AND PA1'ME= As corpensation for the satisfactory performnce of the work described in this Agreement, the Ca=ission agrees to pay the Grantee a sun that shall not exceed $37,771.00. Payments shall be made in arrears upor. the submission of three copies of the invoice kncr..ii as the Request for Reimbursement to the Crx.mission. Payments may not be requested more than once a month as costs are incurred. The total of all such progress payments shall be limited to seventy-five percent (75%) of the total grant amount. The final twenty-five percent (25%) of the grant shall be reizbursad upon satisfactory ccxTletion of the grant project. TERM OF AGREDUM 'Fbe term of this Agreemnt is from May 15, 1980 to March 31, 1981. During this term, either party may terminate this Agreement at will ka,, providing thirty (30) days written notice to the other laarty. In the event of such termination, the Grantee shall take whatever W,1 cures are n essaty to prevent further costs to the Camission under this Agreeii .nt. Ttie Crxnurassion shall Lc, responsible for any reasonable and noncaticellable obligation incurred by the Grantee in the performance of this Agreement up to the effective date of termination. 'Ibis amount shall not exceed the glance of the total funds unobliaate-d under this Agreement at the tiD_� of termination. All rr.%ttirial prZALICed as a result of this Agreement shall become the prcperty of. tiie C"-v>>ission u;un terini nation of the Agreeme-nt. 71iree copies of ever-1 item I)MIuced as a re:,ult of this Agreement shall be deliverc�c3 to the Ccr-mission b_�fore the grant i., considered eoc plete. Appropriate credit to the granting agency shall 1>,? printed on all written materials. S UF:k)j7I'Rf',CPI t 3G 7be Grantee shall not canter into any ,uffi-contract exceeding $5,000 for any of the work to kye ly.-rformed under- this Ayreem_�nt unless such sut)-contract leas first been appro,A--,d by the Cck;stal Commission. Corg)etitive� bidding or requests for proposals shall be us(A unless only one veryl.or is able to supply the g,,:xxis or services nee -bed. If ea-lletitiie bids are not solicited, the Grantee small sutmit a st:atermnt to the CoastAl Commission explaining the necessity for Ole sole-sourc(-;- procurement. 'It;e costs of any sub. --contract a�-.arde d which does not cunply with these provisions shall not ik, cligible for rei,nt)ursu-,ent under t:hIs Agreiei-, ent. AU71101d7"1' Section 30334 of the Public- Resources Ccde provides tchat: 'Ibe Ccmnis,ion...rkiy...contract for ary private professional or govern--ental services if such work or services cannot satisfactorily be perfotmwd by its employees. G Standard Agreement No. Cr0 80--15 a City of lluntin jton Beach page 3 RE�otlirrlal I certify that at its meting of May 20-22, 1980, the California Coastal Commission authorized the execution of this Agreewnt. � � ran s �' �e r (IAI.I FOi �1 COIGI AL Ca•114IBS I ON APPRNAL.S This Agreemnt is subject to the approval of the California Departnent of General Services. It is exempt frcri the .approval ofthe California Departrment of Finance, and the State Personnel Board. Funding for this ,project is subject to the approval of the National oceanic aril Atmospheric Administration. 'Mia Agreewnt shall not take effect until all approvals have ixen obtained. CREDITS AND CITATIU S The cover or title page of any publication resulting f rua this Agreemnt shall include the followino credit: 711is publication was prepared with financial assistance fram the [.1.4i . Office of Crystal. zone Managemnt, flat iona l Oceanic and Atospher c rtiiministration, under the provisions of the Federal Coastal 'Iona hkanagerR:nt Act of 1972, as xTendcad, ran,J f rim the California Cem s to 1 Com- mission under the provisions of the Coastal Act of 1978. Reasonable credit for. the Grantr421r, war k shall also ix, ix-:anitted on such publications. mm uyLoyi-orI' Pft criCI• � ADDOIDU 1 The attached "Fair atploymnt Practices AdderAum" is an int&1ral part of this Agreement. FEDERAL GRANT' MMITICM Because this Agrecw. nt is partially funded fron flational (xeanic and Atmospheric Mministratior, Grant tlo. UA-79-AA-Q-Cd—l18, it is subject to all conditior1s of that grant, and, in particular, the following; ft Stanclard Agrecnr_nt No. CEIPG 80-15 City of Huntington Beach page 4 FEDEMAL GRANT' WMITIM S (continued) o Nondiscrimination. The Contractor assures tl)at the wort: carried out under this Agreement will be c.onducteci in coq:)Iiance with 'Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-4) arxl the rerluirerrrnts imposed by the regulations of the Department of Camr_-rce (30 Fed. Reel. 305; 15 CFR Fart S) issued pursuant to that 'Title, applicable and appropriate to the work supported L-7 this Agreenr:!nt. Tb ensure non-discrimination, the attached "Staterrr_nt of Assurances is an integral part of this Agreement. o Officials Not to Benefit. No menUer or delegate to Congress Jr resident Federal Commissioners shall be admitted to any share or part o:: this Agreer,�ent or to any benefit that may arise therefrom. o Access to Records and Right to Audit. 'Ilse Contractor agrees that the r3FiFroller General ofthe United StatF�r- ..-,,r any of, his duly 7iuthorired r�•presentatives, the Secretary of CCrVerce or an;, of her duly authorized representatives and the duly authorized representatives of t!:e California Coastal Camission shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure of the Federal funrtc -inck r this Agrear�-_nt, have access to .and the right to exardne any directly pertinent L000k a, (3;:)C:u;:10nts, ixgx2rs, and records of the Contractor involvirxl trar-Lsactiorus relatc_Ni to this Agre_e3txent. The Contractor agrees that paayn- nt(s) m-ide ur dot thi:; shell V*-, subject to reduction for a;rxrnts charged thereto which are fourxi can t w basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable cryits un,kCr this Agreerent. The Contractor ,hell refuml the necessary ar-►ount by check pay- able to the California Coastal C(xxrission. o Mint3nanee of' Records. A11 roluir(N) records shill t.,e riaintained until an audit is corrpl.etel and all questions arising therefrrxa are resolved or three years after the termination of this Agrc,er►-�nt, whichever is s:x)ner. FAIR E'•TLOV- =­ T PRACTICES ADDI—ENDUM 1. In the performance of this cuntract, the Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, reli- g*on, ancestry, sex, age*, or rational origin.. The Contractor will take affirm- :hive action to ensure that applicants are employed, rnd that employees ,are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, an- cestry, sex, age, or ntitional origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, de -notion, or transfer; recruit- ment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination: rates of pay or other forms of compensation: .and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor shall post in conspicuous places, available to erm_oyees and app'_ica:its for employment, notices to be provided by the State setting forth the provisions of this :'.air Employment Practices section.. 2. The Contractor aril: access to his records of employment, employment aevertiseren'-s, application forms, and other pertinent cata ,and records by the State :air 1r.ployrner.t Practices Co=,ission, o. any other- aFer.cy of the State of California designated by the awarding authority. for the purposes of investiga- tion to ascertain compliance with the Fair Employment Practices section of this contract. Remedies for 'r.illfu"_ Violation: (a) The State ..may rie`ermi_n, n :rillf•.l •:i-_•,tion cf the Pair Employment Practices arovinion to have occurred u-.on receipt of a final_ judr;- .,,ent havir:g t-:at effect from a court in �.n action, to which Contrac- tor was a party, or upon receipt of a •written :notice from the :air r..•nploymnent Practices Commission that it has investiratec and deter- mined that the Contractor has violated the Fnir :.�loyment Practices rct and h.is issued �n order, under '-pbor Core Section 1425, which has become final, or obtainers an injunction. under Labor Code Section 1420. (b) For willful violation of this F,� it-7-Mloyment Prac ticec ;provision, the State shall havq the r irht to ter.ninnte this contract either in whole or in part, and any loss or dnmake sustained by the State in securing the ~cods or services hereunder shall be borne and paid for by the Contractor and by his surety urr'.er the performance bond, if any, and the State may deduct from any moneys due or that thereafter may become due to the Contractor, the difference between the price named in the contract and the actual cost thereof to the State. • "It is un't:awful ernrloyment practice for an employer to refuse to hire or employ, or to dischnrge, dismiss, reduce, suspend, or demote, any indivi- dual between the ages of 40 and 54 solely or. the ground of age,..." (Labor Code Section: 1420.1) STD. ; (Rev. 8/731' 0 STATEMENT OF ASSURANCES The Applicant hereby assures and certifies that he will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines, and requirements including OMB Circulars No. A-95 and A-102 and Federal Management Circular 74-41 as they relate to the application, acceptance and use of federal funds for this federally assisted project. Also the Applicant assures and certifies with respect to the grant that: 1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant; that a resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant's governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be required. ?. it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights act of 1964 (P.L.88-352) and in accordance with Title VI of that Act, no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be ex- cluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity ':or which the applicant received federal financial assistance and will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. 3. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42USC 2000d) prohibiting employment discrimination where (1) the primary purpose of a grant is to provide employment or (2) discriminatory employment practices will result in unequal treatment of persons who are or should be be- nefiting from the grant -aided activity. 4. It will comply with requirements of Title II and Titles III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P.L.91-646) which provides for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of federal and federally assisted programs. 5. It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limit the political activity of employees. 6. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as they apply to hospital and educational institution employees of State and local governments. 7. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private business or other ties. 8. It will give the grantor agenc-, or the Comptroller General through any authorized representative the access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents .elated to the grant. 9. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the federal grantor Agency concerning special requirements of law, program requirements, and other administrative requirements approved in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102. '~ (_'�lijl!•:L•Ej1E '; ll!PA 1 fil�(t�tr E.�s'ir.t! � 1 ! 1 - i'�'{;►(JJ•_'J 1��)�::ii.T f;ar,e of r^pi iCall t: Ci ty of ittr"t.inr;tr.,:. .► V, cl, Da F,pril 1, 1980 Project. Title: 1 `"�� Cniist,i l I;riergy Impact: Revised: Apri L 25, 1980 Energy Imp ementation Tasks Pleas: Chen-.: Loan Project Oura ; iCn: 9 LOCAL ;'„Tr:i 0 20 PERT E%7 CE!P , 'UESTEO TOTAL GilnracT rn11,2 i 125 Sa14r•1�, any IiaciA, r, 23, 160 �, 16�� ae.,t'• .5 a _ 20 632 j 4, 632 TLTHL rt ,r�'�N', .%'1`�r,i.r J ( � � �7, 70:' 792 �U'u1'��t :,E'r.i�,�; <, 'r t r 0 '1.:,��;- (rr';r:`•„r�� ,�5;.,:,,�, ;�f;;, t', �':i C. j t 1, 440 1, �1,0 tl(jt/ ::: lF•c r` :� '�;ytZ• r1•.:!'. .: �.l',� �, �r'_, : 314 j $ 087 TO „L �r'_i.,i ,:'�;i '�:�:'(`_ES t 7, 693 30, 771 j 3$, 464 .. tis -7A. EPA tC, I 0 DIRECT SALARIES* TOTAL Asst. 16,500 Aide 8,284 Senior 508 ClaH;;Draftsman 2, 500 (Subtotal 27, 792) ' OPERATING EXPENSES Phone $80/mo. f 9 mo. 720 Supplies $80/mc. x g 1:10. 720 Printing $t30/mo. x 9 rrio. ,`0 Trave l $ 2 5/r„o . . 9 4=.f 5) (Subtota1 2,585) O'✓F:RHEAD at 9. 1 . 291 x 27, 7U:.' 8,(187 8,087) 36,464 City Contribution :,693 (20x) • `includes 20% bevefits CE71) Request: 36, 771 0 �1, � � . r l ,' . + .R �' , A w � � � � / � r�'. - .. , , � � - . ,�} � .. �'' � �. l . _ �. � � fie• � �� � " , l • Item I: Haru;bool( for Locol Government'. +'r Oic.i) lion in Rr.-gionol Energy Issues. Discutision: Miony decisions e bol)c uCtivilir.s are made by Slate and federal agencies. Cities, however, hove a s:nkv in thlr sr_ decisions doe to the fact that energy f aci li I o'es ct n have sign i f irnnt impacts on the local communities in which ; icy locate. State cnd federal cgencies oiso hove on obligation to consider !egitimote local concerns in their decision -making procerses. For these rcoso•;s, and to encourage Better planning rn . regulatico of energy rr_tivities and their impact; in the coastal zone, nn incrm-X in Cite participation with Sinte cnd federal agencies ;nvolved with enemy issues is necu.v":r y. Some of the greater -than -local energy issues ^xpected to affect the City's ca)st(;l .or'v inch i'!: Or5 Leus,_ sole ((6E3, r'e�•: plc.)tfnrrh c'x'cnsims in State waters, now offshore cd:•anced oil recovery projects, tertiary o;l recovery programs, new fuels nt the power p lont , noel several others. Gon': to ('-velop tf-,<: inforrnoti(:Yi needed by tilt° City to 1)(Ater mmitor energy issues ofic7_tin; ifs co.,stnf zone resources arvj to more eflfecti:•rl� pnrticipate with ollher (v;enc:es in r)ror),(-:'r.g 1!,& beneficial effects of enerct; cctiti'ities as v.,ell as mitigating thl ,;r irnpo--ts. ICi!K: Ptop(:e n report or which irfent:ftes 1) the rogional, Stnte cnd fed(!ral v:ith control cr inf!+;,� )cc o,. ('r en(lrgy ia(+rs, Z) the ro'e each pings in resolvin,; ) the "CCC(!tS i)ointS" for local 'rnih,t in f+" �ii('^nf(1Cj cnd dr:•Clsiorl-rnokinq r)ro,'^s5r,s of th(„r: cg-,ncie s, r;r•.rl 0 t!ic fun.:tional creos ir. :':hie!1 local governmrrlts halve n-.^re cdvlsory roles. r'r o d'.! c t 5 : ''1'•.•1,.;,:cr)'�" for 1:)CnI go'. r;lr t C(�:?c��rnin!t f'., f , f,>,:t , .. !_'i7,�?r�! crcI ;Y l t.('. r . t, r' f O (("7t O:lC) trrlr Oc ti i t Ir'$ OW! coc)Stn! Itl'1('. Wi('S ac t ivl t fed. StUi(' 11,1('lGr oil pr(.(!uc t c.tl, Onshore Oi! C:,14 O"IS, 'C;.)( forms, pip,21ir-5, plant, t(lrl<C( lvm,nol, Or-J. lhl', ho;lrjboo,.c will be rr,r,�t to the city, r.ncr n:ly prove to be a '. +!.af)lE! resn,jrre for other cities cnd cwfoties e(let v k!eveloi)rr wil f)r?',i p,-o(',jchon. Cost: 1",mrf I\!1,. 1 ;atal i1 i390/11,lo 7 mr). ; 37tlo 2 Itern 1: t"i i I i (I altar; If;l)cli.''Is of Tortiur y1?t'cO':ery trtetll(l(IS. f ?iscc,ssion: TI'c esralatinrl pricy' of oil mmle now, more (-(pensive ensive oi! ex1mc-tirr.l tc't:hnolor;ies viable. These Iv. technolivi;vs, somrtirr;('s crlll(!d "trrtinry recovor?' Mc'thok", will be em,oloycr: in the Huntrnt.ttOn Denr•I) iield, hnt!) onshore in the coostol rot)c a(td offs'X)r(: from plotforins in the State wolors. R,,,cogni7;rig the. regional and national interests in increasing (brnestic energy supplies, the City of Huntington Deorh generally sLr;)t)crts tlx! developt-rient and use of thestr new extra ticrt technologies. Thesc nrw rn(-thck!s, ho'•%•('ver, may IrT1.)C,S1,' s(tfety, environrnerltol :inn other kinds of imprick different frorn of ^orgy^_fttitxla! fcchnofoc7y. Two pilot tertiary pro,rarns re ;If��it•r'.':cry in the Huntington Oe%,rrl: ro�stal 7.nnv aIrocdy. Both involve injecting che,-nicaIs into tIv undercirc)i,nd oil zones to (rlc:litatr' oil. A third projr�r_t will he appli(:c'r from no e.xicrisiirt huilt on on existing offshore p:,)tforrn which well use a n('VV l<Ir'.I Of stt'(lnl d(I'+�.' ',)rQr'f".', lfl (: stllllf)':/ OII 7Oflt'. The. Cily needs '•, revie these ne•.v or•rf an,se..s their S,ofety Ord envircrinl('.ntal in-'rprCts. In oddition, fflese techno!Orie; •.gill very lip.-e.ly extend th(: life of tt' field si(Inifir_rntly. This will havf' impo:',s cn la--',' use patt(';ns, t')e fiscal position of the City. Infrostrucfure, an(; ether coostc! rE' ;(, .'f `CS. Th(: se ;mpoc is treed to he arse used end pk-,, . cd for. �ici71: To orl."vre t k.t ierticry rti )','C'r)' :-'ethryl) C'`!' r•' 'Iy7.oLI (1'1, ail:n.'led sr, tha sivirir_ant Ir1:^fait$ nrf? fully-Crlsiriered he -fore tho (Ili;)licrlti,' of tcchnolc• ies rnr.' t"•;t hr .'firic: eff(-cts cre ;lrcrnoted GrA ccf.'t "Se effr:c.s (,rt to t:iC• fvI:est e.lfeni rO55t(71r'. T d At.71tri)Ir(71 tertiary c .!rcctic() ;(-"r iI>1;x7�ts. cdr .""se ivlpo'_•l5 or", �,, l�:i`'r :'} ! rnr'firi.;! ones. Amer,,,' - c"it: Ci;l l'rc.it' tD (.n. t_rr_ tla7t t.�( .,�: rtprt;:t, r.rr - { •rir •Itf.i..✓ ;.io;r e d fC�r ::-1(., r.c;lsid(.ft r:r sir.. ,�i! ;)rt;r!�•-ticn pr'. IficcIIy fr)r 1, ',oS(.' It`(;!lri!)!ugit's, if vl,cce.S`r;•`'. process A reOnri or trl tlr�"J('(�l" c 't"linry ni' rf` ovt'i v ,'1',r't;?( !,or-.1. their im;'(Icts oil 11'0'i'rt'/, If.(-. 171;?;yit' t!;e c:,.'(••rs t ffvcts t:r;:l prorllot!? Ir.<t a :ere r'f,d tcoi for ot!ler 1h ciI i ( r ov, r:l:r, -11ts ' (_ r• r / n I�. ' •:: 'r for tic? rn t td" •:ill r� De a; ;)lie ,, I Jt e�x in y �I' (:':C'r r (,(:t, mr:iGr ('11 fi-1d). P elf n r er. ! •tilt', tO thcr e-K stirs(: tlii i'r:'t• or tit! 6' If t of new or( :rr7rtt.rr ctd r"2v. i crrnit!inc: i1rC.cf's; (v:•hic!i ever rery.flr7tor;• s I r a r;y ;),OVC,s ITIore r• I f is t'ctst: 5tc;f f 70tcl Hur.;!)cf,< Jr`lo <<rftt•nrf•1. rit!'!Or AWt. ' le..v Ordin(lr.cO Senicr ;'Z; ;Et t1)0 $ 2I6 Cr i.'12 l'ottll G ((7� ♦ ti �Ji l.c .? �1.) S Z QUi r' Z' %Fl�Lc7S JOILJ.)l• tfol J I:) -,ma. J'J soci t- 1 t !. .) j 1 tl fj�'; Utll ; (aIr'E�Slzij 1,Y;1'i .:.),;..)fl juo:III1..)3,,�11F1 kll i' I 11.11 'i 1;;Il.; �� SS�i ;.:.)1�,.) to?1 l.''llii:) ?! Oill f OW/(hail '11l`, SJ.h;)j:,l;S u/) iU10.� Jl(JI� J;ti�1 jl1)15 :1sC)`) 'SItJJLII0AOJ(!llJI 0I Itl,)li1!t10Doi f)Uil) :;i(J,) t l!':•1:)w")y�-; 'Sill;)tIII) AU1(ILL 11 1!',)vtlitlIO:,)1 10 'Si)Jl1 (!JCS ;liJll/.i'll.''�L',) ('Ut) .Alll.:jll:Jl'! 'Sll3l1U1111J.,: f),IlJa1)..1 1)1A.): (:;10 illi.: 1Jod01 Jtij 'i:+;I1 J.1'l1O jO 11JJi(40J(i .•Ilj t{1J,ti1 S.) .IU.1;! , NJ)U11:)1(j 1.,)l1U 1'/l I,I;:)'ill J.;od:ii Sit(I •SJI !,III .)U J.!tl'tJ 1'. ll '1(! j;) ,�1;11f' ':i(:,:I LaJ !)oi:)a)1_)t)i 1',l '.all).. „l __.. ..f .{. .i � i�. il)1j,, 11C'( J1 1 �•1-'`',J��JcI 1IMtIIi);;JOjU-) 1.)t:t) Sd J0IIkI?lU L'.1.101titII1 1)(;;)LIJl110;).i�j 1:.i'11.111:'j �IU U1 11:)jij1:,1 Stl,.ljO1i �).)1 IO(j,; IlJfl.c1 (..),C 1a•Jli j t. c1 1''! tJ "101?J!':�.il !;,1J11:�,/ltl jU•.11:., J ljl,,, ' �.1t: 1%CJ'J: j lllull! j,J.lJli,;) jU .'�J(Jil:)JI�'.1 .,1; S'i.•)S)� 'I'.''tlt',•.,.i (j!.) 'nli Uj ,./1i.:1�•,'i! ;�,,r.('1;l!tll Uf! $l))111'1'l,.,ltl,llf.;):,J ;•l1U 11fiJO ,' "a�!).,:1 'S ":l :)ja.t)UJ a�' 1:/.ltl .1 a ')•„l '.i! U .�. a �iaJ,, H 'alli• PuD 'J) S,),(1 ...�jU 1•.,:' 1'. .'j!)1.%l l) ':, 1:.,,,'.�1.)(; .'1117f;Jj!; (..It:? i ;':i,J:k11 01 .i'1:,0;t.`J�`� 'Sri(I :)Ll!1J11jU'.1', ('l.. ( :i' ::':1:;)..:).JI jLi JjJ C;i:1.J jSilj lil )iliai li..) t�;t.1` �.II (".j :?ii;Jl a,'),Io *;,:; !.WU 01 ('•dL J.ij j O f.)j ;;',Jj JDA0,11 I)UD Ul S:iS(' J,n;j J 0 U,)J1:.j.l;; ,.1111(�11U.:.:i�'J i�j1 :.:�)1.J UI :1Ll ') �l,l)l:l UST.jj :iji.1^:lllllil0') !) l,11flj5aa)J]!1S t{ /lll;�; ;WI ILj .)J IIS11!;Ojsa ;$(.L'I ' I,;) 10511 Q JJll1U ;1":U 111.) t.1J;,'r.j,)CI lei ,)J,J'.l j 'IL CX.11 AISf,0I,%;l.!(46 11iY.l; IJ6UOj l{JN-(1 DA11DO i)(I 11►1n Sw11t)JJ(l0 110 ;;:(11 1)(1) 51101;:,Unj 1J.*40 JO} SUOI#'DJA.'U liU j.).,ll r,JJ:, 1'11t11 O) fl 01 i,.1f1Ssf'Oul ;);n::.)t) tjJr,S SI JJJlI1 ;',)ql •Y-OtI iinJ; �i1ul:�ilCli7 ,I j11.:► ilcisjOd $D (JJisUl `:D 1)J;O�J11111J 1}1•;;) .10j 1lll1L::)�(! '1)i)jIl1J0;: )1 uC; ;SnUI s0 J;;1110 60 si';1 iA11 'J I(0 jU SI DOOL LJI ,):I1 'JOA-D,r.01.j ISi),1I,,,,I !U (•J(•lUlI-.:QD SabDJnOD-UJ ;,111 '11Q11:J11;)()J(I bJJII) ;)aJJ11! j1.) 1C106 I(Ju0►IEJIJ ;O.{; -);i)l.<UIIJIIJOJo(J 01 1;j;)JO Ul 'SDI; !A1 1:�O 1(0 1001.) ;)ajC'J01 S;)Sn J,)(1;o r)ll;) 1l)IJJJl11lt10J jo so;dlt1UY:) JJU i,Jirl+; II:Da'j UJ11jUli '11�.{ 1;,G!11�11UJll[ 'SlJU11f.`J;)(IU 1!0 OI ilSUIJ 6-Gic'SJid ;)A) '1SUUo dill l;Ja7l1 UtJ:) l.: r.►IL11:,J(lj:) 'l)l:Jl jU anIr,%% 1)UU A1!3JUDS J::j 'DUIII ;)l,)US ;1,1; 1� •X1!Z) 011; L;It{l!r.% Ajn;u:)o sit{; 10 1uo -kil 1xla,(o(; anulluao AIrrgol(1 IpA l!Q J A S UO I U I '!I -I( 'I)IJII all; u! wl;Jr)f)oid 11UI)1xo ()1 1)UlI1al11 ,:Ji)AOJa)J �JJ11Ja); 1:tll/ f l:.}l'1(10��i)s iJ:llsn ON) 'iJUOi' It);S(*:la ai(I1 JUJU 1'UD (if sila t.1 }(, S;)Wj)Untl Jnt,tl 0-,j?1 'S.J0jDJJ('.0 J.-l)JUj ,-)yl •ajq,.)j!;o.id ,4lrjn;(J:):;:u si I!C) jU 33!1!;u:,1ih JIUUJs )o uu!;:;oJ;xa ;c+;Ij (iulpull alo 'sasn l:ly1(1 put-) SJSI!(x{ 01 1Uo0: ' 10 sioorod 11Dws t17 palUaOl SI (t1Jllld:11b) JSt)!Irr. 'S.lU1i)JJ.iti : ,t)�5-11[)lttJ 'ot..-O'. 101SUOD UO11)u141.InI.- :,tI1 Ul SJ111/111:)U 1!0 lU SJnil J'.11 U.)tj;bU01 i:.1 III) J'o OJI1tl full;U1U7SJ ;);1I. :UC11SSilaY+C1 ';))1�,� jiil�.ul'.) �'(► i1i-sJ111n!;.i�j J ,tj1O I)tID SU0111>Mt1C'7 I'(.) ua om,10'. f �l1i( Iok:!I�;�;� .. ,JAW( ;fii1 - ,� 41I11iuij)u..iiliV .71iu) fll��lilc taliifi��� :� ul�i1 IIeri1 4 Strote.,i('r ttT lncreo:isr. O; ,c)rt' :li'ir for _Rrrrootic r) ',v ilh Prod!.ictinn in the Coust(,I Zo,le. D,CC_t,s5Wn: 'Nit1) tllr! 1)fptr.'('t+'(.� (Ir(')wth ­1 !)all-, enorry wr",+fl,;'i:Cn t,..,i recroalk'ntil (1'livitit,'s within the i untill(ltoti I'('0111 C(.,',i :I IO1'", tlh 1)f)1/'I,llrt !01 COrIfI1Ct is gr('i)t I {(nv''vc'r, 11'ti C11;''s c%-,sti!! zotie also prost'r1tS Olij)f)l tl!r',ItIC '.'.'llil:h Cris? mr;Oil mc.,:Ut(: loth ra:rr•_)ti;�l !ire; production. Two projects r,rc interesting. First, st',puk" ',trr7tevies, in c(N)peration with till? )'cfc crid the oil comp:n; s, to iniprov,:! orcv',s to the bvc:ch from Pacific Crnst 1-1ir,',.::):. Currr.r,tly, ur„wriE::i oil ilrpr_lir.c'r, i (Tall!'J t!<! N;Chcti'ay, POS;nO OhOCC1C!S t0 t1('::.:Il u;('; 5, CS;?rcil7ily fOr tllr! :days to irl)7ro'•e acccsi rni(tli I.'1CIl f',i! t)'1f}'ttlr! (:r't rVr' �jiO:'llrl''S, fr►;,�'Jlr)r1 Urlt)tr!(I lirl('!, placing occess stOrls or', then Bluffs, and p,itlls and ramps over 111;2 t ;pus to f!le beech, irl addition, l!lr',.lscrping, fenc.'rig al�;i ;)tnritings could re.-Jucc' the vis(:ui impocts of oil cc;lrpmCnt (.v(!lls, tanks, pipes) on the t;cr,ch. Th^ City is ctlmmt(y pitwning a bil(r! pnth along thr becx-h in this seine area. This 'r'ill Lc0, a goad opportunity In crnr,din-1tc O-e hike lath projr-O with strategies to iillprovc access thro(rl!, thr: oil opCrot;�)ns Crl.f to improve ti." npp,,nronce of the orea. Initial cofltoct with the oil corr,po:iies indic(ited a willingness on the. it pat to ccA,)perc;te in tt-,is klr,d of project. A S t'( "d Inrr'.'Ut)'JC projl_+ t 1'JriUid e:,tt!l)Ilsh ter~;Porci :' pa.'4S -,.) C.ct ive oil perc'eit with;,) •Ili mr7s', •r.� h; % e, 'C r�l "-r 1 rr! ';i' t O ! rt borren o-—ergetutic{l. C_ J! , 'N,uC i (1r , r !l;✓ 'JO• 1, a for 1• n � ;i(, 1rOr r':',Ci:Tll+(', t�ti' pt,,rnoiriq unit or'x; other equipment, r_c);l:c; 1)f, !-id,Jen (-.­1j ,OrC,lected by n ff'me :)d p1^'1tin',s Tllt' rest rf t:i.' perf-el col!'li 1;c t)!(-n ecl 'lath) ijrci:is art;; other crcf it^t)I_llE; cOvl(f !)(' uro'.ided. t1,,t)(,n oil t:Atro,:tl;"' •:US ::,r1'.;,f^tr`, the ? cntirr ;),-.y cv! could rt'C j Cl(: to 1',f'Y: u!,,os. t.+)S, the property rr:':r—r 4:m-S C; 1'7tcr p,nen' o ';)r"t('*,.i!v; 1,1!t lv' 01inv. f'1_ r'll.St'"I p,-opr.riy to i.(' tjsird for 1',1'J-I(t „')'t rt:C:rt".:f i! r) •:ll:lr it i`, (: .od for oil t'i.trt:l: t.Jf., I r,('r,(! `i":r!($ r l,'til'.f C!s0 irripiove f ,•r(. �: (: .,� 1)/`f :5 of H-w—''. I1 t! :01� 01 i, „ ., !„ f «)f '(1' ,•i:l:1 (('_ t' 'tit t'': t1Y' (fC„�.r,,,)'..• ,+'.: 1�� �.''. ,)t ., .. .'. +:.'" (I(1(f :r ((t_ 't•'. r i'.'11', k i'., � ;r) !^ !r� (-f,fl ,)i 'ri(' ..t1'j 1 n..f /', I(' 's � , , � nf.'t'.. t ,O t'):;?iJrl: f'I.sr! ft,rtllr'r t •,,; to r;+'Vtrlr);) 1!,,',,, C�:;),)rtll')itiE, !rl „ t�r)•,C'I; ,'l.. ,.,!i. (_' )!.' r I' n t! ,, ( +,.. t'.I;ti! I t'. i', (f• It (�O ' `. ('( I.' 'tt tiSe i rr('"1101101 1 1(::>'�•: 1,'f+"': '1:1 !1 .',� C.r ,,' '1,11)�,,r ,�l ,r :r•� , CI •1 •!� !" ' . r, rr� 1,. I1 , C'(�:t'I' (' Ili '') rr•'ll)rr�'.'1! t' ell), lf') ! of o ! (;) rulil ,. 1)!' t t St (1 ). a t 1, rP.. 111./ ,}.! f(^.'S1,ll,lt}' r!I )r.r,(' j•:I,) !"..I .� lr 'll'il',t1 rl+r flsca! j )). and I'' l::l I;r`;,li'_:;ti::yl5 l)r'if t. �'r(';,17 T: _+rk ; ri)(jr(,nv, fo, ir),,,i,. rt't)tirtr� ti.t' ;:ri)It_(:tti, if t)rITitlt:t, 00.' fvwt ;*!),�*1': of tlY'rt` their F'sc:; and lt',`jol Cost: ,,t(If 1 't i?nlTime Tot(;i �)21 m0 IQ cloys Sln,c) lU't3 Total 0 Ilerrl 5: lti+i,;nin(l for Oire to U di, roo!.iJ Oil Fivo Di— cession: About 59 "wrCefil u: 1!-! oil if' 1 11 i►nd^rr)roond pr!c.l re.w.oin`, there raven of let sc,-Otldory :"(vovery (oi-out 75 percent frtriiins aft(,r only i)rirnctry extraction). A-' ti,c price_ of oil I:li!))hs higher, this oil —'.:Bich once ►iriprofitohl,- to extract--:vill becort•r(1 Mr,re fecisihle l,) inp. (n plor) involvir,rj the• ecauipment of many companies r•:, s('verol sites) and n writor flood (o ,it~end Iry recce':-•-;' method) program cou'd be i!is!itotrd in the sr.fhern p^rt of the field. 1•ertiory e�•trr..ticn --rill Le applied in s(:•.'.'r;r! Crews, cis :•:ell. However, i'':!)d is (i .s-- y vok)(:t)Ii? rl':')'IrC L' one! r'r:'!.• w.f-s :,!JI%.(l y cover the: ni;r fogy,` ()f old oil fie;!} . A( I!%,: ;r.IT,o fame. r.ontinmk-1 (,-)rnesfic r-oo,q,., s•ipp lies (ire irnporinnt In tl>!., Recovery of t}t.)"e oil rt.."o.- res re(t(rir(:5 thr!l ;:r,r'e?„ to Ole +;n•.!er-ground pools :)of for ;( I• +;r.c` Icy r;r :i T l)rrr" f Jrn, :;r. v: 1l!r fC:C'r? uSCS rrrl+`.,i f3C p;ClnnCcf in cl .ti•0; t}>'i• con;i::c•rs t!r' pcssi1)1e irr.pcxIs frorn, ful,-rrc oi! operatlo:li fznp)ing t})=� Ifni Pr(I"r)un(:sc'rLark of rjri�-xI ocss 1)OinApr -ni 1 oUt f+lture oi! op(.�raticr)s(1, ^ici:ring tfd•ir irr;;r,:Is r-norc: wi('cspteocl. f"+,r th(?sc reasons, new uses orl ell field's n,',.ls: C+e. pl.,nre:! !o ci-c:nimmi-!ate fetus cr:ce:,s to the reservoirs once it b(.cornes ecoric)rnicatly or technoiogicai!y feasible tot •: f,m. Gc•:r!: To proper `)ic:r.,;inrl of el' '-.rl prew-vielr; ccceSs to till fie;Js Fier flJt►;re C:{1roc ioo ::hile ris fr,',!crl c;s f?Cssif)le (;i!':er Lises Ori th'! !V,'f0(X Of the f'^.lds. --Jr',Cc-lifer•,icl •.�r:•I '�f) car ( '7 s r r Oil 'tc.) ;C7:, .,tr, f r.r 1 i. fir v: i 1� C r , Con►i7C.)y }Jf'r50.)r)el _S (:.y�c~r..,,n�i� 1 ,. i)I': :11r' j !:f;•'� s'n. •`'.c. :, f'r x r c( ,. Underground C ,:,, ry1+, Pr(,),,ir• f` nl'(7n'(h(:;�IS" of flies(: ; � (. Icsc. ,. 1. ( i)(-.'_w � ►•,.r 1!�t, 1.,1+' (+ iy• ':I �'!. I� A r,,, jpr 1 or I'rir)lll. C t rli.n t :er It. j I•) 1� ;r);� �,�ir� . ern In i•: �l l i•' fact �....s ways !(�, ',ryr.,ni:'1' +7f);:('r(�r( Irl r „ � ,-i r••,5. , lh; . e � q.i ,�• +:• :• '! l-rh � ,''., . � .!• „� i. � r e, )r-• ,. i(i�)" in�� .,e)ejir:5 Cr�r►cr_rnt:cf with 71' extruoirn 1myls, Mich cre "m!plirif to r.:•w us+:s. l;.,ttr;t•t: 7':ilf rZritr` Yiln(' TotrJi 1t(.•t Oqt:) f1,'i..,, f'): in n-!e:r flit: }'.l..•)tinrllpr l.',r'rir.}; (-coStUl �or..r.._. Discosser'r): Are?fill ptri . .im K , .rr•!(ItA mli' .lie;s ri" 'r their irlli"als rl'qli es trl►li de if• lu rrgc;r.!:nr) IN nnt;h •r, wwllo,t lira},'. :tivil ini(r.ticx)) of cri(t Res:'7rch flail MW C K'S rwords r-upi.r(; -1 K. • r•'ertltr'rS r►r,, twidilim, ,iroldficunt c!i;Crc•1i•:r.+'iev lo•t•::t'r:;• Stain rand rrr>•! st'.:tus kv, W, I,rc)1;'.l6nrl . for the1neviom Lioll) (ireer)l revcriled p-.,'lo,-jr mny I)(' I�itit l�f-(1^,t�. In Mien:): records rotted to wells ware disc:overml. I' !1r li,flac i, v:hich QQ r!{r)!T,(311', ?t;:t.' r,•( l)rrl% 5,ho :, over I,i;'�;) ;,!Cir)rj well% it. I-iuntineOlco rl:`caks sbow only (,00 17!'C?t!llCln(' w4 -,L ("o(II: To 1!titcll)li;t, O cle,i! o(O r►!rrent record re` the. n'irnher, location, status and STOCK) (if .ON reek+ rrlclt('(I in Ili, City r: d flu! coastal tone in order for the City it) better I)I1:•) !or ut,.,r niiti(irile their impa'--ts. Insl(: Inw-niory th,l t`(,C otld rel"Of'i cq,i;,,mv111 in !I}r! CItj'��flft identify 1!1C`ir f11Jrnf)('r, lor:ation, sloths c11-01 n-wnVrshiil. !c(xount f,ir (liscrcpnncies be.'tvveell City r(.�c:ords and Ikose of t!Y: Stale D';Visia) of L►il and Product: A rloor and curren' record of ((On in (i form which -rin tic cosily kept up -to -fate. Cost: St;:ff R a I c Aic!e $1 8701;no T itr. r. Total I No 51690 Hem 7: F i!.c(11 fr�)cc:t An(Il�`sis of Lnerr}y Activitif.,; IJsin, C_'or;!Hater r.'iac!rl. Disc os-Jo):l: ,);I (irll:l other en r rly r):t1VItICs In nt-xj' r.( ,ir file crrlStal mr.^ have ift,pc:ls nil ifx' flSi'ai llt7� tied of tl-r_ c);Tlnv.lrllly. RCVCnI!Cs ffQr11 }Ix',t' U tl'.'ItICs t0 111',1' (^ 1ty If1CIUJC property ta,:e,, license, f,N!s, extrrtztiorl taxer, arl l oll-jer ft,(:S; casts incline use of infrastructure (-1d services. The City is dcvelopin(; a comp!ater rivxlei to cssess the fiscal irTp-)- f> of (4ifferL, ;r1'>d -)ses. The doto rcgnrJi'ny oil nctivities Firs been particulnrly difficult, to mart cut I'ccotise of o:sessment practices on s+irfnCe I�•nd, equipment and m;nc-rot rirJlis artf confusico over the location orr.1 nvmership of eq'!iprnent cmd mineral ri '1is. These difficulties helve_ pt-c-ci,(.Ied all I)(!t 111K' most rL-(;imentrry and inaccurate A more cornprc!-,vn,-l-,c an, ar.curc'1tC study :'.'oViti be une.ful tO thr' City an(I pC:silb / to o}1,or COrT?rnunities trying to ai5e sr tiff! <~`r_( comic irnp(rcts of oil extrcctinn arid related energy rx'fivities• 1!: To c a' ly Qssc.3 Ike fiscal impr.;,.ts of oi! c)'trc.cti,-(1 and related C-)ergy (): t 1 vi I IVS. Tw.i: �OI!('_ (!'►t(i !C(li:r Ir'.( F ,-,.I 'J I :,. ,l c,, (:f c- ,t, ,c: t f fror` (� (:t^ c, rr.•,c :, •, r. I (f �Si•�Itif_:, in , _ fnrr'1 ....111?T1I.;!C 'o cd'IIp.0('1- c:1(1l' si5. I!im (Irit (`•l t1 n t1;)'Iti`f r`,,.''I 11cj {•;�, Iff—Ijltl• �r'`1),'{ 11 I�. 1C1f III1!1r•(i 1; (,�11'." ({('C(�r a't n(j t, h ft.!'i4- /,i ),l)r�r r!r)•i Ij JJ UfTI �)t ,..:1� et5r.`(/ frl t le I!,o'.:�:1, sl, t`�r1 c,fh(:; cc,mlrlunit;c s ccln tire t'lis ap;)liec,!)I��. I '(`'.' (:i=' '� .��.;t;�;'Ite'r ('.-1 (1r� flSr.;ii ':n111"a.`i. /� e.�'�C11I �'!'..,1(.:'"�'.�i" (!t'SCrIU t��''a til(' tlllr.iL'l'•i 1'I1('t111'Y!`i a(d :7`.S11:T11)}Irrls. I.)11ta t'<�Il(•'t 1 Ai`!r �It ►.a-IC!1;-('l�i: �� /.�•',t )I j'� fr1,`1 ;t,l i' j.; •' ;I,l,-� iS is 2 l !,I h i io 11) d 1 i l l ll Itcm tf: Irr.:)r:'`-irl�t P, wline f-If:nc hl fIV 1)1.,!'Il5si() 1l: 'Ihf� cil;' cnllects rr.vviit,,!s from pipeline frc:nchisr.s, which in effect help, offset co;t.; t, IIlt, k i!y h., rnrrq;, c1Cti•.ities. F\vsonrch in the first CI__IP rev(`c led that II"-"! frur,chises (7(` nvt-of-(fate and were, finarcialiy unfavorohle to the City. M(x)y of these frt,nctli;v expire in the 1 8G's and the City will be able to renegotiate: tlw_se (lrrungorn.-flts of twit tinge. E 0 0 Goal: To 1i1,'r(tT5(' revem.!e,'i it) tho C ilv from pi-peline frovc•Ili';(;S. Tw3.S: Nevi(:•., the l xisting frcinch(j,es and ' �)mpnre thf-:rl 'o in older lurisdictions; ro(-orn`rTltt.r'.i imptovL-J 41orms for t!'(1`,v iron(+ ,es cjr-d o+itiii�)f optinT1; to the City regordin, �!i! ,lTll)I�(1 (Y1!atiCr) of tkose im.,)rovi'meilts. Prcc:iuc': A rnem,) s+jmrIwirizincl the: existitic _ terrns and ruco`nmendirig improved terrns cTx!optiuls for effecting those terms. f;udtlet: S}Cff 30fe Time Total Aide $1 890/rno 5 ckiys 472 It.:,rn 9: CLe Role! in Oil Sf-ill Planning, Monitoring and Clean-up. Oiscussion: The Huntino'cn l?r`,-ic'1 coastal area is ert:emely susceptible to oil spills an(! !eoks from (-')C:S act:vities, Stale tidelerids operoti(xls, tanker operotions, and or`.;hore tcnk;, ('urn;:s are{ pipelirns. UnfortUnOtCly, oil spills occur fr(-qu,.'ntiy in one, near the City's coas'r-. zrne. Ar11-etgh oil s^ills are largely tll<; of agencies outside t!,e `.�!>', rl.'.^icipnl staff or'A1 (�qu;prnent cre often invo;ved vlrith sp;ll clenn-W and cantrol eW,• r directly or by si:pporting the moin c!ec;n-!_';+ efforts wit`) crowd and traffic control, fir^ e-juipmen!, aril other personnel ar.(f Presently, there are at least {.S oil s.)'ll con tinrency plans cov('rind e.�ist:rc� frcil;ties irl or nerr tt`,c City's coastcil ,:011!?, r'.ri!; �I I C.ersonno, ca.A e(jui;" Tent have a ro!o in mo:i ' of tf+l'.r,(' pkvis. However, e` er, Jiro ro;,' is Of!en :'oq)(: or r:lerely irnp lied. There is �, great reed for c clrrificatioo of the City's invo:verllcnt regcrdirig oil spit! opertio's. ro!(' of ti'F? City it c'l spill '1`.:'Nl `;?rif`!), ror!rn �:nd tr ! • r , t�i t �•• tl1(it the t\It'. prfSC:'rlr,�{ rr��l (..,�,•�;,•r;( r,t r;r� re,;)on: a�!e,t.(ct��iy Inc, spili erv: r(�%'.' t �� i,. r.. �i { 0)1 s, i I :':'��' in ,'" )'tort l:r1i; If , nt If { �v .r,. (, r7) i('�f' Il( (' f (;s c �i I j :c • t s f P,( t 1 r t? rot o f tl1(' L,tj"S {)�!rSOflrl!I iIn.; (!!')i;"I1('1'•t. C:",')tti"t Clffl'(:t('': rT`l)nIC!j)rl (;'.';)rirtri`c"lt' t(`; ("1SUr+' tl•'.Ir lfltler$t�:'i;llfltJ of 11-se in',?,S, cnd urmoct! mo,oh-c" tint%(l'I flff('l'Ied d(!1)C:•rtiTlenIs to appro;i-i•nle rtnff and ptocec-.itcs In (i IC(jtl':tLt)' p('.rfurfll 11--cessar., rncl duties In o spill crncr Q(")Cy. Proc1, : A rep(-,rt $t+111r1:r; i, ir'q toil shill p!ori., (; .I lilt' role,, of City pvr`',cwin('I anr! (_o$t: Strlf e '1,� TolrJl 1 mo 1890 llem If): !:' oro wing SpIl! F'Ir1lls to !Ieltor Protect V,y1!niids cn{t 01hr'r Syn.iitiyv AVeM. ,(`isrossion: 'Iltcre (irea•• x1ble to,-)ur-Ce !rv'i s it) Ill( HIJ11 lon flout-h caClsinl zoly( which (ire especially vtrll . ruble to nil spill`,. Tlw? ',! include, we?tlancls south of f.?en-l) Roulr.'rord, the l_v ml Turn (w. rn(II•r)9nred {:��r.i(?4) nesting nresrrvv, and the Santa Ann fiver crld flood control chorin•Is. Crrnpi-!iensivc oil spill contingency plans shoi.;Ild ",'courlile c5pecinHy v( krib!,� mv! vulnc►oble (Trees and shrmld ploce o high priority orl protecting ticm. Pro(.edurt.s n('c-d to be ck,sigr,f!d to Gifford proteclion especially to t1r_se arcos in o spill er:ergency. Coal: To ensure tix;t all responsibl pc. -tics recognIP- these esprr_iclly valuable en(: sensitive res)i'rcc artms in their shill plans a -xi have procedures in their plans which set r, Iii(jh Iriority on pro icc tiny tIvse a; ^as. o'! -pill C-)nt Irvjk'ric-,, plfltls to see Hint _-och f(:CC) �rlrl_C i t}.r'S(' C-Sp('Clr]Il r P.,!, Well". 7r-.j rC-:C)rllmvnd improved moosures 110 provid(c tl,('s(' nrc(,s with L)C-• t!?r ;)rii1�'� tIC><1, f vt:licf) t)%• rvhI vent rcrjlllnfor j' c('-oncies, r,,s Il(?censnry, to req-tiry iinp-ov,L-d prctectier. rnec.-.mes for t`,!:se sensitive or►ns. Prod+_)c1: A reperr'I revie.•`!ng s;liI1 i)lons with (; list of rf:ct)r11rTif?f•ded irT)prC)vetz-enI rrl(Kisures fct ensitivC Grcil5. Also, ;rnp!ernenlot ic,-) limc-cohre5 f;r- the Inclu-sion of these coca$+Tres in spi!i plans. Cost: trlf f it(1t(, 4kif;'. I P"J") no 10 (!7ys Item i I: In -(-,veal 0i1 sManitotir.(1 and C:n,t(; (7('"r'r lice). The ilory! 1, !ii ty C(ifltrcl IIC::r(1 ✓f!f'lii r(-:l)-�1; l)f nil S711is In this tT'/).if' .:r1,Cl) t;n;( I!r in ilml thw- } 'Jn! frit;t'`n i`r:uch coostc! 7inC:. ,f)IIi$ Oft! :t'i)n-1 to tll' PU('.r`i. I.a' (llslCl; i:t? (�! tl.t� 1:C)'�rC:r$ $t!7ff Cfflres f►r)(T1 t"i;r;lir',rjtU(1 i�(.'(:t Ii (l)/ we ill RivC'r5rt;r'� :i7t(1 (:Olir•-11�'1 r(.'Cli;r'rlr"j JJhiof) Ur(- rt'I)C)-r('7n► {)Ilirlaln(; fU- Spll eriWr orxies req.)ire, (,i-,,lo rv(,arding tl,(' fr(-go) ncy, s�_Iri'�s, c(noi,:)t; and IOr'rltiCtt$ of :•;;'11S. u,j) tl)(' (pity I)c'rsortncl (lr.l (•:fr.!'r; rttrrrt ere nftc.'n irlvn','t`d in ;pill !'ontrc)I (r� f C1C?r,:)•i {T, (ln'f (l(? ;,r.rl11)ort to 11•,,? rne-,;n ci- i;� I,ffcrIs v:!)rr, nOi (firec.tly lhr! (,,.it'• (!(ti?i i of rt,.-.c,vd sni!l dol(i onA: ((_`Iles kill t7n(:i,-jnn: Focrd's films-. t7r^`:•'(j:1r('s v.-v'! t:) -,vhich (!"r)rotilec 11iC;t rilrre"t rr LmiIClr:nC; bill daln rr,llr..:fi(t) (;r(• (; !r'ri '11fo- Ow City to Elan for ;)il; c'rl)rryoncir.$ and to estir) aft the r"ost to t}•r- r(,:!rlr:ipOiilY of spi11 r.rilrc►f o:id clean-up. (,(IO': To r•rrrr' a rr,;:,'•)s I)y '1:' it't r,tr nI for i:t(, (lr),f 1tr C 0it('('t:01) of (11VC, 0 •,;)s '::i11 O►'(lvit!r Cf('k; bIlt' I".fi)1 fr! tl'�? C Ity 10 t"';.:I)lf' I1iQ;)('- pit10VllrlO fc)r ('ffIC:Crll r,.sl);.>'s in slii()Ct)c:jt.';. I;"1':1 r,i mil )r it (I (:');i record kc pinq, effrill- i,- f rr,(-tliod" 'nod b,,l) oIvr 171•,1ri(.t. !: -j; u '1tr.• t:•e cxI',1"i(j SjS}em 110 d,- I or, tilt)(, If ln:?il('(jim,, *'"$ Ore �1.Ifr(:(1'1t r•,rt(1 v.-:rr(lrlt ter` !r':'(.':O( i21!'r)t of (I I'1(aJl spill monitoring, and record l(t-epin� ',,'Si(-tll, or m'rn•• otIwr sire! of irnpl(i':r'tf s-,-!v:1i s3rocluCt: A report ">i'r tlx� n+;c'c!'.,cv ��f I: C+,rrerlt nle�r•,rtor•in and record keeping r a pre is s; recommendatians for irtiprovem^ %ir or chrn(jes. (:ost: Stc)f f [late Time Total Itern 12: Evoluation of Tank Farm Bike System Failure. The :nojcr tc:nw farms in ant near the coistal zone are Ior.,:,ted vary r_Inse to houses, c017-Im rce. :,:et lands and t:eoches. Although 11wse facilities are wrrour.r.'ed by dikes which :,could contain spiller' oil in c-ose, of nit occidont, it is cmccivcibl^ thet the kin,_; of Cvt'nt :•:h;ch could df-:!nog.:: il.: tooks (Such as on e,arthq+r-ikf�- or floors) could also dornage. tl � dike system. Such a catastrophe is highly unlikely. The co-) equences of oil e,copinq f rorn tit? dikes, especially if occident Tally set afire, cre scricu; enaucth to 1v^rrr�r't r,-i of flriw paiterriS crvJ the need for evoct-(7tion and other contir,r;encv plans sprcifi: to ttx-sc crews. Gnt,!: To protect tt',' +rt>I;c: s')frty uld Sen,iti'.,e f11+!Lh as ;JOsSibl�. ir, t�'<, ('.'!'.n! of rt rri :jor •i'i c:nrI asks` System f,Jik!r". ,-• -..) i.1: ,.� t+.;cr fern-.. IC1+7f tl/.' ,C:`'ri fC:r'T1J, t Y_Ir Ir.(� S' .,�(' �i (i(li'hv Ctrr:o..'1 i+).' rcor sp(,:If"- to thf's,' r)rl: pf7:11('rltl,'ti�-w' On tC3'?k f(7rr1) (!,:<t'. t"tT-,; •:itIiin t!),• city. 2 -ft REVISIONS TO THE "DETAILED WORK PROGRAM," (Exhibit IV) After our discussion viith you, we have amended our CEIP'Nork Program and our CEIP grant application. T ne scope of the work program and the amount of funds requested have both been reduced, and the tasks have been more focused toward implementing the LCP. In summery, Tasks 1, ©, 11 in the original application have teen deleted. Item, 2 and 7 have been slightly reduced. Items 9, 10 and 12 have been combined into one, more-focused,oilspill related task. Also note that they salary avid benefits rates have been reduced; a very recent analysis of the actual benefits plan for planning staff revealed a 20 percent benefits rate. The 30 percent benefits rate used in the original application reflected a City-wide average. The followin changes to the work program hnve been rnac.,i: 0 Item 1: Handbook for Local Goverim.writs. This itern has been deflated. Item 2: Mitigating Impacts of Tertior,y Recovery Methodp. The City will not develop a special permitting system for tertiary oil recovery projects, but will update existing ordinances to include Such projects, if necessary, rind will establish criteria for reviewing these_ projects. The budget ►or this item has been reduced Ds follows: TASKS STr,Ff" RATE TIME TOTAL Handbook avid Asst 500N;k 11 wks 5,500 Amendments Aiu:? 436/vrk 1 w.: 436 5r_nior 127/day 2 days 251: 6,190 Item 3: M_unicipa: Oil Code Amendments. The report on strategies ha-,1 been deleted to further focus the task toward developing irnpl(:mAnting ordinances for the t_Ct'. In addition to a review of the Oil Code and Noise Ordinnnce, the City '.rill al-:,) review its "res-ource production" designation, which rs used in the Coastal t_nnd Use Plan, and the zorina r;rstricts, zoning suffi•.es and zoning ordinorices vvhijh implement this designat i.n. This review will ensure that this designat ion rind these ordinances adequately implement Co.csta! Act policies in the '.CF'; where c,cisting ordinance; are inadequate, improved measures .vill be developed. The revised budget for thi!i item is the foEowin,: TASKS STAFF" DATE TIME TOTAL Review of Oil rode, As:,t 500/W-k 10 %vt::; 5,000 Noise Ordinar;ce, Zoning Ordinances, and 'senior 127/clay 2 clays 2,54 4:nf orcernent Review, ind 5,2514 Redur::,t - for - Criurcii Action re: impro':e:rnents. lte►n 4: itr`.7tr- ics to Inrrewa! Opportt.nities for Recreation with E'ncrg.; Production in the ('or aid Zoner.TThi7, task has rmt bet-vi changed, although t:u: focus will I)c on implementing "hest! i leas; strategies will be presented to the City Council for action. Revised budget Vj the fo(l ;vein:): TAS4 STAFF RATk= TPAE: TOTAL Mrrtinys and reports Aids �361wk 4 arks 1,744 Asst 50iJ/vrk 2 w'r.s 1101)0 :,744 Item 14: Plnnninr for Future Access to Un•icrc round Oil Fields The report or "handba)W' will ir►cludet criterin for evalunting the, irnportanre of sites for future ncce-.s to oil Zones and criteria fa; incorporating acr_em into now d,,velopments prpnred in oil-3eroducing arras. The: report will ako identify sites ►:here ru:ccss and consolidation may be particularly desiraole. The revi:,ed budget for this task is the. following: TASK STAFF RATE: TIME TOTAL Report with criteria Asst 500/wt: 0 wks 41000 find possible sites 4,000 s Item 6: Improved Data Base. This task has not been changed. The revised budget is the fcllowing: STAFF RATE TIME TOTAL Aide .436/wk 4 wks 1,744 Item 7: Computerized Fiscal Impact Analysis. The "handbook" has been deleted and the staff time spent on data collection reduced in this task. The revised budget is the following: TASK STAFF RATE TIMF TOTAL Data collection Aide 436/wk 5 wks 21180 Analysis Asst 500/wk 2 wks 1.000 3,180 Item ©: Ira r.ovincj PiEeline Franchise. Deleted. It«m 9: City lZole in Oil Spill Planning; item 10: Improving Spilt clans; Item 12: Evaluating Tank Farm hike Systems These three oi! spill-relnted tasks have been cornbined and reduced in scope. The City will use research done by other jurisdictions as a modal for its own spill contingency plan and evaluation. Rather than reviewing all cornpZny spill plans, area -wide plans will be emphasized. The City will still review plans to ensure wetlarxls an: adequately protected. Contingency plans for areas near tank fauns will be reviewed. TASE< STAFF DATE:: TIME Spill plan revier,v Aide 436AYk- 5 WKs Item 11: 1rTlpro%,ed Oil 5dill Monitoring: Deleted. ti 0 TOTAL 2,180 2,100 • • REVISED WORK PROGR.Ltl : SUMMARY SKEET ITEM 1: OUT ITEM 2: Asst 11 wks X 500/wk 5,500 Aide 1 wk x 436/wk 436 Senior 2 days x 127/day 254 1TENi 3: Asst 10 elks x 500/wk 51000 Senior 2 days x 127/clay 254 1TEti' 4: Aide 4 As x 436/wk 11744 Asst 2 wks x 5f10/wk 1,000 ITEM 5: Asst Q wks x 500/wk 41000 1TEM 6: Aide 4 viks x 436/wk 1,744 ITEM 7: Aidu 5 Wks x 436/wk 2,180 Asst Z wks x 500/-.vk 1,000 ITEM 8: OUT I TF .'wl 9,10,12: ramie 5 wks x 436/wk 2,180 Total Plaming Staff Asst Aide Sollior 0 33 Y;::s 19 wks days 4. a 6,190 5,254 2,744 4,000 i,744 3,100 ra 2,1©G :25,292 16,500 E1,2E3�i 508 �5 297 CoASIAI UIU(, *,ti IMPACf PROGRMI lame of App'i,ant; t'=t'1 of Huntington Beach U,It(! of Ikp#llrcation; April 25, 19, Project Ti 1.ic: 1980 Coa t,r ! Encrgy Impact p7-oject Start: 15 1980 l'rvc�I ar.r Energy _ �M-3), Implernentation Tasks [o:1,pjtt tion Cute: February 1981 J+,1'•I ACIII:D SII1:I:T #I�rITII; TASKS � STAFF I i t ► t�?r..o.TI.ecks S U, V U I J F 1•1 !, I , 133 10 wks. 1• I •�"l�tt•�, , , II.�� i �— —4 ;}: = eiuf, &Ite•: "I vild oLl work and p;-Oduet i;UUM1 v;;ion rvA? Ic-t (!', -1I'ltos, Cf t ime i�>: clC1:t112i� !it.2'i1�1%,e alld legal Iovi(.-w, rovis1e:nns, print inn and ctr'er tasks. 0 ' ' 9 (UAS Tr11_ CltEtlr• r MPAC 1 t'Itti';i Al-I0 PH I G I l 'I i- t'i'l)UIIC i LPL O V I N I ON All'!) 'JOIf i)1)I.I. lfdu!c of tipl)IiCJ11t: t=i [",If.P: �Anril 25, 1980 t'rojCCt Titic: er(i1_ 111,)iicL Prorrrain -�- Energy Implementation Tasks TASKS ' PRONCT � WE DATE II _ nlr.;-ctr.vrt'nnir_nk I� Deleted l Handbook � i 112 r•Liary Toch Report !-larch 1961 New Ordinances f 113 Oil Code Amendments 1980 ftt i lt(�cre,�f:inn-Oi 1 !'r_�-cu�11Gr 19130 Fc -;i1)i 1 i t'r SLitd f !)a i Penorr: ry': Pl-inniti i I' UCccn .er 1980 i cr UP(rcr(;round Acces.,; ! I I I ttt� t;(_ 1 1 i nv( r11.c'r r � October 1980 I-Cil 11111:3C UCl t' I C) ;:y �;;] .i1: l.' ;'?�1ti f<<:`�1�..,. Fr�l'ru��•" :9�i' ' fill FCht- 961 Dr! Ieted ' 111 L-1 1 fir; i � ii1.i f i r I Ili 1. f,y .i".t l!i� I1riG1 :i •i:i � ' i 1 .-•• �i i I ` NOTE: I Tasks 9, 10, 12 have bees combilied. See ikm6ndments to the Nori; Prorrr�im. I I � :1 d RESOLUTION NO. 4869 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE All APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A COASTAL ENERGY IMPACT PROGRAM GRANT TO IMPLEE— MENT POLICIES OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION IN THE CITY'S COASTAL ZONE WHEREAS, the Ci.Ly of Huntington ©each, recognizing the problems and issues identified in the attached application, Exhibit I, for a Coastal Energy Impact Program Grant, desires to provide a project which will develop pro!.lem—solving techrilques for a number, of coastal energy production prcb ems and issuer; and The City of Huntington Reach has de,.,eloped an application package to dear with these development problenis and 13sues , and ti,e California: Coastal Commission under authorlt•: of California Public Re3our::e:3 Code section 30334.5, may provlle assistance lot - such program. and receive r'inancial ar;;ristar,ce: :'rom the t1ni.te.3 State.,; Off 1 ,.e oi' Coas to 1 .one I.Innagemer,t , 1I0W, 'i'EEEPE''r'UI?E?, HE: I:' by the City i;aurlcll Q: the City of Huntington Deach that it hereby reque:3ts the Cal iforrcla Caa3ta1 GorrimIs:3lon to provide as5l:3tance, under authority of CaliCornia Public Iie:3our:c(—, Codc- section 30331t.t3, with such I'inun,:ifal as313tance a3 r.:fty be provided by the Office of Caa:c;;al Zone 11anagement, not to exceed the amount of $4�),9811- Uuch planning asuiritance 13 mare particularly de:,crit)ed in the project description, attachel, hur -- to as Exhibit 11 tr►d by t',ls ro-Cerence made a pcn rt• hc:► eof as thuligh sot out fully Herein. HE' IT F Ultii'tlEi,.- RE OL'1ED that the City '.;r1:r;::c tra L�3c of ,.E, City of Huntington Reach be ana he i:i here!,;, at3t1horized and powert!d to f:xecute in t7-.e name of tt:+' City If Huntin},ton Beach all riec(.';i.iary applical ions, c.oni rile is , and aF�'c�e;;3ent.r; and ?r,C'n(:mi'11t:: 0 '0Ih therf to to implement and cat•ry out the purpo3ea specified in th13 resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of 'duntington Beach at a regular meeting *thereof held on the 215t day of April, 1980. AZT EST : City Clerk REVIEWED AIND APPROVED: C1tX Admin 3trator 2. "'00-Pla yor 71 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 11 1 "4'1"o d'-vz!' City Attorney INITIATED AND APPROVED: Services FA Rem. 0. 41169 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COMM OF ORANGE CITY OF 111JNTINGTON BEACH ) 1, ALICIA H. WLNTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 215t day of aril , 19 80 by the following vote: AYES: Counc i lmn: .__R a t.i n S o n .. F i v 1-f yL.-R&L c y.-r-.Ma L 11 i 4 Fes. � [11 1y ! a n di r NOES: C ounc i ltaen : None AiiSENT: Councilmen: ThoLra s City Clerk And ex-officio Cler> of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California in;lrumr,<<t is a rnfrect CON' ,.r �. • • CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 631 Howard Strut, San Francisco 94105 •— (1415) 543-8555 ft 1aa:i 1?, 1q.40 TO: CALIc'CRi'llA C0l'w:Ai. CG2!b!ISSIO:i RCM: MICHAEL L. .::: f::ii -ti: CL_irE DIRECTOR ;C::'.I::;;)r'�'iIt, 1 r�L I. ' =Ii' S1's i,Ci rjiO3Rn1! (C:.T_F) G"Allis �: ^r Cc -,...:anion tiorsiderat -on at i'!RV -70 -- 22, iC+°C mee lting STA.r: R-CCXM7-::DA7I0:J 11? staff :" eco:: mt- ': :1., .1i ' ram...:.".1�5 : �'.^. i7L'S N7 :'4 the Constal Enerry _..":7rct ."r-cra n (CF P; gran ts � �) "a � � _ t� :Swnta Far't.ara County for cor.- �'+..tcant St ?:: t'-e revision :.f rr?: a�-�`.'_ .nt; oriir .noes -accordance • ' r r, ,. l.a'. :''.rl:i; c7I:C1 lr7i `-o ^:. ..: �. .: :r t:.:w:} ;:. ..•�"1'I1 : or ^t- n► ...M' .. '.1 �TTni tli} iCI Meier ice: 1I:_i i:.<a.� .:3/ :"�'i,a� `lt: 1 Win: ar- r:l rezc er t.':" ti.t.a.. 'e:._. :.r-3:... i... �a~ .. � .il. .'"i':1_'l �1-, fn•�c.r.i_ �: � . P � �. 1 .._..'? /,f.i..<1^,.n. t�a r'r'•^ �_� ..'.'. C ICS I, mil/ . ��� ..: �, . •r -'. iota. h?.._.�..... �•"7 it- S ' . •cu ... 'v:.lj' r; `Tl::: :...� :''.• 7:....:..` aut'i: `� --A c,:it _ o rls T1. r tt .' iti1. i f�.l: i :'nr'..,.,`,•, :'r. Wit. ri -:'�'• r•. w .. :1 tl _ :f .1 .7: '1'w'fl: .. on t111: f:.. i:.n► � ~::I1F � i � �.::'.' ar , �:1~ .::.. '1:•n .:i:.: �.tT^* 'wlti: :+'.d!ar :1.. ��l'w �;''�`• I 'Stiw7 4 a n ),:�:. '���J'Tr w . • �:�) , • v..•� ll I.C'��, rnNr.:Ir�r7 1 a, e . 1 ` 1. .. . ,�•. [. 1.. r:: !�. C. ' \ ~:. _ '•(; t � . •. .. .� r; f� �«i. fl . 1�t•.,^�J. � �' 1. � :C . t ..QJ ,. li Ci t."`:I�C1 •'l j:'r':.. ..:r:::... - . ♦:,. l:. ...:ii i': c'1 itii :'�: a:i•.: �'� ti:c. rrorocal tlr. ..cnl ..] .r'.^.�. ,. L ; .!lc' -al • f-rnia C.:casta'- I�I1i ri. �'.�!'.I1� L i•cY "a.:l• T 1'•.. .�.' .. '��'?:, .i 1. w, `!.. �. .. .•Z'. �i: (:/�: i t ,�.:' •1l_r/a� Lil': � .•... 4i.'i'.ji ��, Lid ru :r '•' ti. : :. �.. �'.: �'.•►:• ... :.'.�l?�� ", ;, �+ ..t, .::•f•:�.: n'i, t}... relationship of t' t::l' .T:`. 1?l`. i1..•i:.`It. `ii l.:'itt'. .fi fl'.C� t�' i:• �1.n `."., `� � 1 •'1 )Sion, i1I1C: r • • A P P L 1 C ,T: City of 'r.untin.;':c:J Aenc- ITU: 198;: CoantaI Energy Impact Progra^ - Energy Implementation nMOUN R'Elw' i.t.:,J'n. D 54r,,9�7 L (not including 510,2144 Iocai r—Itch) lrl org-nal appl:catic A,•:t;?::ri RE-CO:.tiw:i.s ED: Z'h ,tali' r eccr,r-,,'r is that th C 16.Y of Huntir `on Eeach - V.• tVI • .gy be awarde-A un interim, C:�iP crint of S701 / r 1 snot lnclud- . — JrI,C�!" locn'_ mFitch) frr .�.� :erg--' _.;Irler..erita':,On work, .oca-, plarm:n�; and analysis of :J!r tiart oil reCO:nry f. e"nod all. their regulation. �Cy C: D:.SCRI✓TIC:; ^.;(� 7b��%r::n J. LL.[? I�r�:)v:.'ia� ^••�•; 'act .., to e�t,i .'... r. l- ��rm;ttin.Jg procedure,]r , �:--4-na:cr?!; a:.. condu7t the Iit?_escar i to 1CIp'_e'er.t the enf'rty.'' ✓C� :C; ?� -: the ...:+cii_.J. .., .r}i' ►s:r!i� :erk ^rn z: an, Con- s ... , ta;;:k.:7 .:h---•. '',:r:.�ated other fu,Ic..crs C. ^:err.^en_ aze- .r i:..... '.i• re nct -:ca'--: ::Ca:,ta: energy• `m—nCts. • _i h t:r. .3 n t o: t Y. ..ir •. Ee^ lorry •..ce : th t ._., s udy; 7r:elr.ter, .] -.$. .........• r:.'... ..:a . .P:_. .. .:5,; C: , r.•^7,:.! "i . ..... Fi::'1 that the :''`• .`r'uC:S rein::-t -i: ,j•., r�.._ "E?:':t... ''.7:. :i: :r1 .'�_ '"l:f:` �•" '1 il:: .. t.G�34. t.aSUr t,S 'nil: .. ',�:_.. ..,'. .'.� ^••1:'• `::•' ... •�. �. 7.. ..'•1....,,'. 'nit:. `•,a n r, e t-�r• 3'": trtr'•• .•1^ 'J• •'• ::+? '•iis: `:) ".' .... ::"1�a _�.�..:'::''� ... t:-c y 1 ...rat ..•.... I 11.. • -4?• •w.•4. 1: 'i _.3 'l:7 �.s I.• •Ilw ..'"1 . r�.`: ^:'.) rl,e a�.r. �..ac�f ^f 4 t._ 111S:..i:r-I C.. .'i��, ,1 .. ur ..,ir�f•`: r', .:r. J`.. ••ry c; �.ti� ., .. r•�J 'C ..0 ... '-Tlr. use ^• :,::'1t:.:; �n :.••re -It .,.,..'_' .,:�' ^..:.: ,,...or �,.,. ,.1C:.Cr!S `.�: C3:' _ Cut tInC ...fit' ',';C'I''., -- -' ..�:�. .::lt`. _ ..:i: ,.,� L,' :.rr3 r!•sr•.,: .'7: a)t?•:J.� Si:,it('i::1 11: '(.'rirp ' L« (• t n 'mot t• en.,r�•. nrc- iar....n'16t11 ::lr!. �!' ,'. t.. .�:, r,r 4?' '� :Ilt1 n : ? "Fi ..• _ �r reran: .s. t ;, git:0 -. t1'..... ..- _ t �i/:... ... .:.t. a? .,:r' 'iT):'•'•fl:'3IlC^. ;,. CiL . •^-r')'. .... .. ... •? i ..• 7::.. .. :3`c'1L..u:: tP.:,r=':"]:" "'i:•+tC.._, �:: 'lC•t:: r: .. � nn•» � '.•'ii-4i '�: �:5:':!'' :F1'1'.. 1.r.. 'ir:'t':: v: :•�L'�'trit':�Il. .:(,•fir,' - �.,. 1) �. : ...4. .,�, •1. •• , i �. 7 r p �• ! ' )!' l.till� ^(?::.C:.:i,�_ . {.•Jn iJI' r r. t' _ :) "� --I.1a t ,n z `.r')al.l�:ri :+..t'::1 :•�.'- r�:tl::" 'iC^l,�r t• :C:JM.. ,s:l:C!7 r):.•J t::•:tE?:.a ,... ♦. . f •�. .: :1„•h SuI•:Z�!? 'i1'•:r'i }•r,r:tS : ...J!'.i .!; it?`. �'I ;I"�r lll:C::lM'J irl'TiS. `t. }�' I►'it• .-I.7,-ter ,.� ,;,..�. ;lI• :r"-n•'�?r• ''.!.'�},�(i: Arti• :e J:'�:ca tl?;-.; .. .sir �YtI,9^.t..:l r.t....`:' :•.:1. ►' �.i.(, 1•w. tt':'t.ElI" i.r r'.1''. �.IIi�E':i lr' .n t}l'� • is*, -It ' �.':i : E':1 ..r, I'if: i i 'wilt .r: lt�' t1. [il.: �!: r,e :r-,pac t., '• h I:'. to �,rsure that any: ' :i _'1. � '- Fi: : .• r. r :((,•.� .1• � production ^iopCsfl:..ri .:::.+ t"1::Y: i1 : �... ':'.. •" 't ..!'.'. 't: :' i ....'! t `L.,, Ln..n.lL,.f: ..!i:: i. . S};iirr?d 'wit[-i r t:i�r r:.:'.,,:1': : f: '.ir' 1: wi: �.Y'. • Y: • .:. _!i i '"7' ter' ti"I)� 4 eL4 r t}iE' tE'ntlijl . t 4•' • ' '�'•' � ...� • ' l r i �� Fi.i E? � f. .i.w� ���1 •. J. 1 . „ i 'l : .l „r` Tl : t. t: E! . ♦ l : G; ~ % Il F' n (1 L. i El. - 2 - i coastal zone. Conduct an c._ '.! numh-er, location, status and ownership, of 'wells and related e'j.:lz:.meet to elf-minate :llscrep. in•cles betweer. City records and these of the California U:':1S_on o2 Oil and dais and to help the City to better plan fcr and mitigate their _:.pacts. Y.na!• _ :si i31 :T,'I cact;_': t f .a. �+r t. r� 1- .a :- �m ' t �� �♦ w : �C;.1 l �lt..i :1 , 1:11� COCirA.ItCI' uU(iA.l. CU_1 1 r- ..,ram and ar:a-r ^,f? ;lata r•'i lr3_!:g _ -SCaI� G.^)� r and : t?'.•1'I:l:�'� IrG" 7:.1-•r"lated aCti'•Itia:i tc i•:,r,rov,/ the an:it's^^e.nt '.�: su.-fac:e :aIII t eq.I :>z[?:it ind ..,,nera? r 1•-. , ti,.a t�:.. 1 �i 1 1 r� •12-:3ction _�.♦w.J SC hat he f'- 1 f.t;r �^te.-r,i ne V. \e e-,cT:�mic i .pzic is Ca o_� ex anti rc ? pled �t:erg: ,{ct i•ritirn. ?. I;ir.rove o:_ Alans to ne ;t r"r •.('ct wetlands and other ser^iti e ci2'palJ : �:4 `!' L!. . " 1!,F. the CEIr'-itlndud c" 5P111 c:Dr:t:r:hC•n♦cy pro,ram. .. A::f�.. j '.,Gl. Department 7i 1:. 1 .�:G•'1 ... � evaluate -ir.a ec'.1i-,,n,int :':spcnse to an oil ,r:I ^or•du:~t a ` crk- fj 1• �',r ie r.t...,art�_ V 1 review ,ar s r,i ca^` �• �n n�V-;; 'I. n.•i ..IS • '�- • :"'-1. .�.. -.•wJ Y . .. t.• I-:)�_.) -:Z cc''3.7C ... ...:C:• .. �..e♦�� ♦ . •... ♦.N c3• ?r:'' :a C ,^.,�.r:•'it.:^ '�:_ �i_. CC,n.t:.n•:��':1:' plan:;q ...C:: as, t::e Scuthern Califirnin ..''i+ J r.;p) t'_.1r. _. '1"a'..r l: 7�'3 yll al E' leC r.Ct: '�a `.^•' 'ri?t a 3 'Its S::`.:::. 1' i''.. ._ `:. �" r 7 t !l,n ca r} nr .:[ar} ••n r•� } -! -a. T w'_r.:, se. e ar,d t:� .,antes A :_:c';' °1:.. .....0 ...w. _t_ :fT:::t'_S. ...'11t1111�' t-'II:.. far-7 _._:ti:i• tZssUC:nted }la:^ .7 !'7 :1:. • th..' n %ir..:l:. •: ni !C'. mo rid _• nl'�P�,.."E]. �•♦ '=Cr.wlf:�t'nC� Plans I_:.'� �. •' • 'n .. �_•"7•'.: .i ,• • .. .. .:f :•: ..a� 'hut �, ::�' };• ...a� �:-.. ... '�:.� � i' 4n :•A^rr J a A r..; "I"- •:1 . f....•.•.r'.' .. 'n�'... 1 `.a, 7'._w�... .a:f..,.,. ... .'.'?4 'matt'.. , .':�' C:....1 'J:.l 17,� t t:'ar!7,...:,.'fin ::umr _ " • "l::r. 1: .... t:.. i . ? .::: t : .... 1:.. ;"i:. I:.. `'I'r:.. rr• :�1:.'_ w iOn `'"1 . . . .•�.. �.. • -11•• : ♦ _ ". .. . •.•!1 f •. • T.... '� .•'�1:• _ •tl Y, '.1:. • ♦r. .'. .. Y, rM.. �.+ �i:nra.:�., :I:,ir:� `"n' 1 is : ♦,:i', is t:. :; f. ',. . '!t : :l '1:... :... .: C.:7 ..?a :%1_'�:. Vic: :`' :l:. . ::t. • �. ••ca' ..'°' 1:::_::`: i . 7'- .:.' ' ..••.': ~l..:..' t '..) «:..� a : !_'.::at`- ' i.i�.Fi.?t G'3: c G♦a':[a: '1 _ tI:'' 1.•3:ii: _r tip' r;r p.:i[,'. .w. ..' _ .r. .l .:r } .. •` CS i ~...:: ti:c' :7a:it'I ::' ..;?t:. '' :. .`.Ir�.li.'.r : �. °l:: •I• t ..a .•.• 7 t. -f .rc. 1 1: c�.`Ic .on and .:C7 C': 1T. 1[.'. r r a` . ...:lc 1:... • •aE�:;i'ar:t:'!:. Irfai.:e? lI::�'.i. 1 L:ltil:Iiia iUr future:1 'r! :i t'.`�r'..!':' �` :.':'.:. ...1• l:'c .3.`.i f :" ':..i^ c? t now:,Llr:acl. lI?i_'S tlfit t�E.' I)l cialic'd _.. I.:i..i _... CL'. oii, tapping •In ��. ..r: .... . ;i• t• �J1^ • !1n, !:: ur[I:hr. "ro,,md pcol rE'...:l:.: 11: .. .? .i•; nr. 1. ` ti ..:'I: . :� .... •• �t:� I . 'C' i _ .:i"i: ? r:: gher -1:"d, (a ,: �':"!l l'.''. :'" _ '• _ �' :`.i j' _ : •' fens a;;: -, f _r7.'--r .-L '7 _ .fl•', field3 r..n'; [1 r.t:T ::'?:?• ?i"c: ►: f '..:,:� I'�':n,t5 i3: I:e'w �`Iir�'71cc ic'':�?l a"•f?I:ts -cul � `:;�-,m _ F... _ D'.It "It ur" a. . r .r.l• _ _... !� ...i: � .:'� .. { .1J 1r�,-'� . "• !1`!i: • JT�/11 .r 1 :��'•: er r• . _. �orl..cnt . V .."I "1 :1. �. JJ. - " :i i t . 'r 1••.arl`..o~r� ccncerrif.d Ww `_r: .1:: t' :F: ! : w ..`1:. 1:` '. :i '�: •'!rt' r •'. ^� L► :tn'.Y Because of the exter si .-e energy de —le. , :'writ in the City, the Co.-nmission awarded a CZ'I grant of 5q,���i in February, ��yi' !n the Cit�r to inventory existing and anticirated energy facilities and actit :es and assess the attendant impacts. The product cf this grant is a report, Coa::.tal E'nerc•r impact Procram for the City of Huntington Leach, whici: serves as a background to the Industrial and EnerEy Pciicies of the vi`y'S :.GP. (Copies or the rer':)rt :long.; with staff comments shouldbe included it. thi.s mail nv t-) State Commissioners.) rrcposed work pr ogrwi is a continuat _-- of the 'wore under the previous grant and -will focus on LCiP energ.. is —olementation. The budget for the Cit••'s i1C: implementation phase does not include word: on energy - related d„atters, sc Jurlication does not exist between these two grant sources. CEIP funds are beir•g US#?d tc supply?dent LCP r..^niP Staff recc:'—end s an interim c,rint bec3:;se the prop., --sal ; }:culd he ::I; ' er as sodn as ^Su;il' to maintain the _. ri-�nentati n and to :-etniii th-r r to:. rerscn working on the enerr 'C;mt::nent. .3 t .;: 17rt-c, r f'i.......mend s n rel r act .ve s ar t-un date of May 15 1198(l Mecause cf the extent t_.;g 3n;i . "� =s�'�� "r':: :o elcrcent in this -1, &-; e is ❑ inad tJ :'E'�'. ..1t" r ant:' � "_ S'..,:h ^.'' :'? «'? `:rent . Wh. 91uate' j. �'r' .�. :12 ►�i `�.Jr:l. C1 C� h. '?C't �.._ :1•s..:•3 t^, 'r;l•'t:.' .i" '.ti': rf� �1.0 "..i:. ..:�r': .., .11i:..`) :'u.�Q nl�.e:� �. • 1 , rill• ' . • +fir CITY / OF HUMINGTON BEACHr ,• y -DEPARTMENTINTER COMMUNICATION Normantoday Latter Day Saints Church oil ffe.il, north• A4.rport. fie stated church memhers had read that the r airport ownero- applied for a zone cliant-c and inquired atus of that request.. I informed him that as to the r +* anning -ion had not made a decision yet, • to tile r'r' 1 decision �i i / th should.t le, 't Sever, 11101 ' 4 f.l 1•. • n4 Ir J 10. • t 0 TO 'ti i•( 1, ter•. ,r u�', r" 1,,'; Ili '�7 "'� �� `( {A4f ,ar _+4•�. , •I�r t f. Ir( .', .�: I.,. 'x Ae, ,'�� ?• t• ,* ,}" :ail ' r:�,,1i` �r� `� _ ,`• , 4awi`r.�''�,yt''� ,,t �+� �. f, '� ,� •(+` � i +.. ,-f f+•nt, l rl cYr" ,11' " }f1 T ' � 1 , � � Y , { � ,. � •-t� .,. i,''. i „! r ��,. ♦ .1./rr•• 1 ♦�' `.I` t' 1r ,�'�� rf ��'!.'��',+���^ry.'�jl• `�(•1'�f .'p'."I .'1,1' rr�,� F ti 'J••� ,��.' Al .''. 1�T'•,;,. �' F'... �� ,('. �' '•a y, #' `i• ,��•i,irtitr,•,;' ll.%,41,'.li�it.we p'�.' 1.�1' } '3�1w, L y •, 1 �,r.# '\: w � •!,Y,`f +;' �yl, ,I. �. I;t^� �.�Ikr.4.1 "i 4 � {�,f. .`� � .,��1 7 x: x;lr '-i^i r ',y. L r ,.Z�, .�•� e � � � ♦ ,t ,"' (r I I' , 4 ' .y ., ,}. ' 1�j1' � t .+ � "Y .y •'f I �. L ,r. ,� Y Y, r ,.�.� 'r. YY-{ I ',•�,1 r'� ).r '�i:.4 j i.�r9.. ''A, .w li. ir,Sy� ../ t'♦,,,,''� }•' :� �'�• ytr` /•, �'.: -. ,r•. r• }.'p''. .y.- ra../ �{'! I{. ,`- it fTi 4 ;... •.. t47 f �,� '�, .. • ,-1' f•. �, •j�,�k 1 �, A', •1- lt1':'..� 'rli l.U,' .ti r/ �4 1<,. ,rt »1 f- r'r, ,'�' 1 I #( F•4'r.C.1 t, �.� L a 1'tt'ti �� r I t. `' ',l� f 1 d� jr1. Y •fit �?ry �,. 'Ir' ll•r, tA1. ,�' ^., .+�.,. �Y.�4', S «r:� "�f ;.{SA4i '1 y"7� ..51; ,+i'l�hl5•°t .y1 •fi. �v y� .i= t 4'•.11. r•. _ ,1� �1• ��f'.�,,, t• i ,, 1 , r � , 1; r 1_r.r,'•� � .,, t; .L �. t ,t�. ' \.M; 11 i �: f ,�.� .� �•.,`,r . t (, tl.'.:1r li + i; •�,. �� , a '�, 1 , 1r r t � � •`'4��. ��'r. }• f �e 6.' I,t"1�t y i i tE �'i;.��li .� '3, 1�.. # ! ~� �� �r� ? �'�',t t:��';'1► •if i� "�Y, ��•�'�", ��'' •.A �I •1, �l• •� f,.i ,,� 1 ./ � ,A '.i' 1 1 1,., i1, ',� ���r `,.• 1 I r:a 1, •. ,r• ..h r,, y •�i.f.l r_�r.1 dl�j' ,I,f ie.r.l l �i y ,�' 1.M f' 4'. /�•11'r,t Lf n ,, j41 •r �,fi i" "-r .yi.'!E .. `` .,-.r:.iHl r/.t , �.. 'r r* •:('�ti� .'1 ,: ��� •ij'^Tl�t 'y.'11 f�.1.Av��' 1f! �.l '� b ry n �,/ ,. •'r'. �♦j.,'.: * '.4 ,., t rta'` '/�r ..I. •l,i +1 �� /. 1 fir �IT1` Ly, t".1''�'f �,7. +1. ,1'r, \S fl :..� •A,, � L�..,�'_ a .•+. .'1', �r � 111,E 41x ,, i .i�,{, E �` �.�':f '1 r1 4 *.w'�;� i y,�,�r�,,'f`�;,'' I,a� rl j'� »,�;�rC.,r, ��1•i�•�, '_t'��;r' ( ''- {�. M,.; Lr � 1 -) � '#,'Ii� .�, ',('.�'''m E 1f r' �' , r '�, •:y �"�'E,. rrs' }•��� ,•`1• i,,.,� Y �l� •r ( r1 � i,^ � �; '�•. `.V !y yi: } ,` r Lf, ,'i ,', rr•. r.�.. � �7. '�{,l, '� ,�t. "1 r q •''''yy r M: /f�. j ,i4..1i .b. ,t�4.r- ,,;� ': "M'• ••F' �4 ,. .r, � ",� •,( .t. - it ,+ t •'} .. • �` t •.-� �. .ft♦ �I ~4 N"'�"'� tif.� .�l r . 1�`+. i'r �.h�,, q G.iLL �h 11.i e. �, - y:}, '! r ,',L ( :1 .r,H •, ��,. i' .1+ tt��,, �,, ,ty "�.� ( j .r. 1 t. ^I ','•�ii. q, i �.;t� ! a .(:.�'i ,'t 1 ,. r' x tr," �.. r. ,a'� .i 'l; .'� '�+ t •.1#r •.��� ',C ,;, h',.1 If., rf •1; ���Y' 1' .#. ' .! ,'�' 'ii, ir r>, +� � N, 'f''4,�� � .,Iy. Y r , r4 ,�','' ,• -�,;,A � ! \.��C,t t.pr' 1 �r, r "�! jl :1 • r ,.�• ! i I' ,�� : �q. I , �' . � �.. , t' ,. , . , � a , r •' ;'r, i 1 1''fl� '''z!'� � :r! :,+•#ir ; C • f .`/' .,, p /i ,. + .�i ,u . is •,r.� .'r• '/ r ♦,�..'I3.�j� •^Y,! 'y: r 1,'. `. � 1�, .. / �'r rr,l. r.. ,1 'i 1 a' �•:!♦ i, �.-f'i\r. �'. �' «'.►„ •. �:'. .'kM .•',1 �• r' * �r''�'i ♦'�` ;rl ��.f. � "'�!',.� • 1 .' ,. 1,�••P �; j '.h; `Ij,i ��•,��.; 7, a.-A+S ,�.�, r ' 1 •;. s I a, '� ,i Y,. ��' iA iIy'. ,j1. • 'i' 4 .� •Ir ` �, ' �3 ~�' ! - .'•,. �'�; ( ♦ , � � � 'r •t- .4 r�# �'•r .l�ya r .. �. +°Y r+. f, •,�, r� i•� or �,w. `I•Afi: 'I ,4*yf ry+ >• 4, ,* '.! ":'1' .•w•. S .. ,, +. 1�..M � �,wp.,•A i+' /r ♦�.,`• �♦..-�, �. i IL:'.,..rly �a� * i� ♦ r . r 1. •4.+, 3. � � fi •. i t r: T'♦' ,!`. y f,FF • p .,'7j�1 � �'fr r•�: ,4 +� 4 {,. r''r ♦ r �{ i '♦(r '.Jrr' 'l� ,y: .. ,,.. ! I {Li r f�' + ,� � • � ,/1 ('i,'' �a T•,1 .� r•'- to '�'Y'..M: ,', ,'!' t' �`�' ft.Y,rM ai \i ""in rd,�•1 � 1` !.1 /'�•,• y +, / - J tj•��1 ► # .. /. �.1 �� �•.". r'• 1?4' y:� -1'.,' ' +L» r.' •/-;A..jY�.,.E t�, i-`Ar .. 4..26Ei .i •,• (' ' 1 'f► t •r,,t _•` �, . _ /', ,..E .':p• =7� �.. ,# T. .. �.,; Ir rrr.••r. r_:. crnr.e r r rr... .r r.•t ,� rr� _ 7J..1-,! +rr�'( -l..�=i7'"x 'ti " : :►a ,, �� l:if�.: +: L .i::s.. �! : �, �' ,�►.4 :� ,?i��. Cr'4:�, , .'Zl 0 J RESOLUTION NO. 4869 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 14UNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE AN APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A COASTAL ENERGY IMPACT PROGRAM GRANT TO IMPLE- MENT POLICIES OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION IN THE CITY'S COASTAL ZONE WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach, recognizing the problems and issues identified in the attached application, Exhibit I, for a Coastal Energy Impact Program Orar,t, desires to provide a project which will develop pc-oblem-solving techniques for a number of coastal energy production problems and issues; and The r ity of Huntingtor. Beach has developed an application paclsge to deal with these development problems and issues, and the California Coastal Commission under authority of California Public Resources Code section 30334.5, may provide assistance for such program and receive financial assistance from the United States Office of Coastal Zone Management, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that It her,,by requests the California Coastal Commission to provide assistance, under authority of California Public Resources Code section 30334.5, with -uch financial assistance as may be provided by the Office of Coastal Zone Management, not to exceed the .-.ount of $40,984. Such planning assistance ! s more particularly described In the project description, attarhed hereto as Exhibit II and by this reference made a part hereof as though set out fully herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator of the City of Huntington Beach be and he is hereby authorized and em- powered to execute in the name of the City of Huntington Beach all necessary applications , contrac is , and agreements and amendments /ahh 4/11/80 1. • 6 thereto to implement and carry out the purposes specified in this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting the reor held on the 218t day of April, 1980. ATTEST: "10, 9�& City Clerk REVIEWED AND APPROVED: CI Admin strator 2. 9 p XA; . /� _ r APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney INITIATED AND APPROVED: Services n • ti'1'ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) Res4*0. 4869 1, ALI:CIA M. WENIVORTlI, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole: number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the a..:irmative vote of more than a majority of all the tr,Vmbera of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 215t day of aril 19 80 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Thomas_ City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beech, Californ-La 9 6 COASTAL ENEKY ;MPACT P''OGRAM EXHIBIT I - APPLICATION COWER SHEET Name of Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Executive Director: James W. Palin Title: Department Director Grant Officer: J. Chenelle . Title: Adm. Analyst Project Manager: J. Catalano Mailing Address:" pox 190 Phone: Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Title: Senior Planner Project Title: 1980 Coastal Energy Impact Program Expected Project Start Date: May 1980 Months Required to Complete: 9 1 . Total Cost of Program: S 51, 230 2. Local Share: 10, 246 (if appiicab;e) S 3. Other Funds: S ! 4. CEIP Grant Requested S 40,984 . f Please check attachements: = EXHIBIT 11 L ] EXHIBIT III X EXHIBIT IV EXHIBIT V Q EXHIBIT VI EXHIBIT VII EXHIBIT VII! Project Narrative COASTAL COMMISSION USE ONLY Date Received: i Assigned To: I Proposed Budget Work Program Mork Program Schedule Product Description and Schedule Staff Assignments Resoluticn Authorizing Submittal for CEIP Assistance [� EXHIBIT IX Canpletion of State and Regional Clearinghouse A-95 Review Submit three (3) copies or caapleted applicsti7n to: ',ZIP Staff, Coastal Commission, 631 Howard Street, 4th F).cor, San Franr.iscv, CA 94105- Authorized Official Ti tle Signature Da to • lb thereto to implement and carry out the purposes specified in this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21s t day of April, 1980. ATTEST: City Clerk REVIEWED AND APPROVED: Ci A min strator 2. Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney �;►�''� INITIATED AND APPROVED: Services COASTAL ENERGY IMPACT PROGRAM EXHIBIT 11 - PROJECT IIARRATIVE dame of Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Date: April 1,1980 Project Title: 1980 Coastal E,iergy Impact Program (SEE ATTACHMENT) Please write a brief paragraph for each of the following: 1. Project Description. (May be a brief paragraph summarizing the answers to the following.) 2. State the Goals and Objectives. (May be reiterated in the work program.) 1. Describe the project's products, results, and benefits. 4. Describe the energy development and the proposal's relationship to the social, economic, and physical impacts expected or known as a result of it. Estimate the resources affected, potential losses, severity of impacts and likelihood of occurrence. S. Describe the impact area, the size of the community affected, whn will conduct the project and how it will be conducted, relevant planning capabilities, and previous energy planning experience. o. Describe the status of the Local Coastal Program and 'the project's coordination with or relationship to the LCP and/or the San Francisco Bay Plan. State other funding sources investigated, and the amount of local funding pledged to the project. �J r • • COASTAL ENERGY IMPACT PROGRAM EXHIBIT 11 - PROJECT NARRATIVE The coastal areas within and adjacent to the City of Huntington l3each have for years contained irnpor,tant energy._productionfacilities, including onshore anti offshore,oil wells and cxi electrical power plant, as well as the facilities which go 'along with these production opeVations. All of these have hod., a dramatic effect on the City's development. Through past funds from the Coastal Energy Impact Program, planning staff has identified existing facilities, previewed future facilities and recommended policies and aciions for the Local Coastal Plan. The following proposal is the next logical step in the study, the implementation of sound planning for energy production facilities within Huntington Beach's coastal zone. I. Project Description The project will consist primarily of problem solving techniques, such as, establishment of permitting procedures, drafting City ordinances, and performing the necessary studies to implement energy policies of the Local Coastal. Program, for resolving a number of coastal energy production issues. In addition, the project will provide the City with the opportunity to study and plan for the siting of new and expanding energy facilities. The project is divided into 12 work elements, each with its own goal and product; listed below is a summary of those goals and products: II. Goals and Objectives • To develop the information needed by the City to better monitor energy issues affecting its coastal zone resources and to more effectively participate with other agencies in promoting the beneficial effects of energy activities as well as mitigating their adverse impacts. • To ensure that tertiary oil recovery methods are analyzed and planned so that significant impacts are fully considered before the application of these technolov;---s and that beneficial effects are promoted, and adverse effects are mitigated to the fullest extent possible. • To promote compatibility between oil operations acid other uses in and near the coastal zone, and to attempt to reduce any adverse impacts. • To enhance the compatibility and dual goals of increased recreational opportunities and energy production in the coastal zone. • To ensure proper planning of all parameters involved in preserving access to underground oil fields for future extroction while accommodating, as much as possible, other uses on the surface of the fields. 0 a • To establish a clear and airrent record of the number, location, status anal ownership of wells and related equipment in and near the coastal zone in order for the City to batter plan for and mitigate their impacts. • To accurately assess the fiscal impacts of oil extraction and related energy activities. • To increase revenues to the City from pipeline franchises. • To define the role of the City in oil spill monitoring, control and clean-up operations, and to assure that City personnel and equipment can respond odequately and effectively in a spill emergency. To ensure that all responsible parties recognize especially valuable and sensitive resource areas in their spill plans and have procedures in their plans which set a high priority on protecting these areas. • To ensure a means by which monitoring and date collection practices regarding oil spills will provide adequate information for the City, to enable proper planning for efficient response in spill emergencies. • To protect the public safety and sensitive environmental resources as much as possible in the event of a major spill arxi dike system failure at a large tank farm. III. Products, Results and Benefits • A report or "handbook" on tertiary oil recovery methods and their impacts on the City, including recommendations on ways to mitigate the adverse effects and promote beneficial ones. Develop the text of ernendments to the existing Oil Code or draft new ordinance and new permitting process (which ever regilatory strategy proves more efficient). A report on strategies for increased compatibility between oil and other activities. The report will also review existing regulations, monitoring and enforcement practices, and will recommend improvements. Request -for -amity -Council -Action ;egording these recommended improvements. A report on the feasibility combined energy production and increased recreational activity projects, including their fiscal and legal implications. A report or "handbook" outlining the variables in planning surface land uses in ways to preserve underground access. A clear and current record of data regarding oil production equipment in a form which con be easily kept up-to-date. A cempeiter run crud fiscal onalysis on energy production activities. A "handbook" describing the model's methods and assumptions. A memo sumrnarizinq tlx- terms of existing pipeline franchises and recommending improved arrangements and options for effecting those improvements. • A report summarizing oil spill plans and the role of City personnel and equipment in each. • A report reviewing oil spill plans with a list of recommended improvement measures for sensitive areas. Also, implementation procedures for the inclusion of these recommended measures in spill plans. • A report on the adequacy of the current monitoring and record keeping practices regarding oil spills, with recommendations for improvements or changes. • A report and recommendations on tank farm dike systems within the City. The anticipated benefits of this project will include the lessening,,of adverse impacts from energy facilities and the promotion of beneficial effects. The implementation of new technologies will be employed in ways thot mitigate adverse impacts to the greatest extent possible. In addition, multiple uses within the coastal zone may be better accommodated by encouraging both an increase in oil production and allowing expanded recreational surface uses. The various reports, handbooks and model ordinances which will be produced within this work program may prove beneficial not only t.a the City of Pruntington Beach but to other communities facing similar energy production problem; as well. The intended results of this effort will be better planning and better decisions not only by the City but also by other State and federal agencies due to on increase in local participation in their decision making p ro ce ss. IV. Energy Development Impoc!s Huntingtrn Beach has a great number of energy facilities in and near the City's coastal zone. Existing facilities include hundreds of aishore oil wells, two oil production platforms in state waters, one outer continental shelf oil production Platform (under construction), a marine terminal, a power plant, transmission lines, numerous tank farms and pipelines. New and expanding energy production facilities are currently planned for or are presently occurring within tlk.- Huntington Beach coastal zone. These include an extensive redrilling and flooding prograrn from both onshore wells (through directional drilling), and offshore platform locations. Two pilot programs using tertiary recovery methods Oe: chemical injection to facilitate oil removal) are presently being ernploy-d. Alsr, a new platform has recently been installed on the outer continental shelf. with c0ditional platforms and further exploration activities anticipated. In addition, lease sales W68, p73, rind #80 are scheduled to occur within the next few . years. These will probably include tracts offshore from Huntington Beach and the City's coastal Zone will probably be impacted by related exploration and development #activities. Other proposed projects include additional flooding from on existing pOform, steam drive injection' processes, and an onshore unitization and flooding program in the southern part of 'the field. These could require redrilling, new wells, landfalls, new separation facilities, new tonks and pipelines. The higher prices of oil has guaranteed a much longer produu:tive life for the oil field than formerly believed; therefore, a great number of additional impacts may result. New activities may increase the possibility of a major oil spill in Huntington Beach; several spills already occur annually. A major spill could affect wetlands, beaches and other important coastal resources. The likelihood of occurrence will be in direct relationship to the amount of increase in oil production activity. An increase in oil production activity may also require additional land area, using a very valuable coastal resource; additional facilities will impact nearby uses. This problem exists now and will continue to grow worse until measures are taken to mitigate conflicts. The introduction of new technologies, which use new equipment and new chemicals, may create additional impacts on air and water quality, public safety, and animal and plant habitats. Due to the experimental nature of many of these techniques, it is difficult to determine tine severity of proposed impacts. Several other impacts will occur frarn new aril expanded oil facilities especially in regard to offshore oil production platforms. Visual quality, marine traffic and safety, air and water quality, and marine habitats, could all be affected. In addition, on expansion in oil facilities and production will have a fiscal impact on the City. An increase in demand for public services can be anticipated, while at the same time additional revenues will also be returned to the City. Oil production employment may also increase; however, the anticipated impact is not enough tc warrant signif;cant odo,tions to public facilities. V. Community Description Huntington Beach has a population of 170,090 on its 26 sgtnre miles of land area and 25 square miles of water area. The third largest City in Orange County, it is situated on the Southern California coast with nine miles of publicly --operated beaches. D;rectly after oil was discovered in Huntington Beach in May, 1920, the City experienced a boom growth. Nearly every major oil company had wells pumping from the Huntington Beach Oil Field. The City's coastal zone has a population of 16,000 living within the 3,200 acre area. C .1 The ccrosial area includes weticarxds between the Santo Ana River and Beach Boulevard. Irx:luded within this area is a Southern California Edison plant and talk form, mobile home parks aril a boat sales yard. The coastal area's major commercial district is between Beach Boulevard and Sixth Street along the Pacific Coast Highway, with some oil production inland. Further north to Goldenwest Avenue numerous oil extraction activities are intermixed with residential, commercial and recreational areas. North of Coldenwest the coostol zone is devoted almost exclusively; to oil facilities and production activity. The 13olso Chico area north of the oil production area is a productive wetlands and very susceptible to impacts from the adjacent activities. The northernmost part within the City's coastal zone has no oil extraction activity or equipment; however, there is a pipeline, londfall and treatment plant just outside the City's coastal zone boundary. The project work program will be conducted by the City's Department of Development Services, Planning Division. The Department has over 12 years experience with in-depth pl-arming reports acid background studies. A staff of planners and other personnel are engaged in current, advanced and environmental planning for the City. Economics, transportation, environmental, redevelopment, geography. geology, architecture, and systems specialities as well as graphics ore represented within the deportment. Under the direction of a senior planner the work will be completed by one planning assistant and one planning aide. The Department has been involved with energy production planning for several years. The most recent achievement was the completion of the Coastal Energy Impact Report for 197E-79. VI. Local Coastal Program The Draft Local Coastal Plan for the City will be completed this spring. This document incorporates many issues developed in •4he first C.E.I.P. project, which serves as a background report to the energy section. Work has already been in preparation of the Phase III work program for the Local Coastal Program which will develop appropriate implementing ordinances and actions. The work program for this project will directly relate to the Local Coastal Program's next phase. The Coastal Energy Impact Program will concentrate on the development of studies, ordinances, monitoring systems and permitting actions necessary to implement the energy policies of the Local Coastal Plan. VII. Other Funding Sources The City is continually monitoring and investigating various funding sources, among which Energy -related proqrams are of prime importance. For example the City has contacted the California Energy Commission and the Federal Department of Energy about funds for the preparation of an Energy Element within the City General Plan and funding for tl,a.- development of a Solar Energy Ordinance. However, additional fending for this program, which could be obtained in a timely manner. has not yet been found. The city will contribute 29 percent of the total project cost towards the implementation of this program. 0 E • liiiwr• 1920 ttr City of Huntington Beach has been concerned with the siting and irnpcwls ()f vnergy production facilities. This project is designed to take that concern one step 11pr1her and devclol) procedures which will prove beneficial to the City and to many other r•nminunities with similar energy related problems. to • COASTAL ENERG( IMPACT PROGRAM EXHIBIT III - PROPOSED BUDGET I ]v flame of Appl i cant:City of Flunt ington ©each Date: April 1, 1980 Project Title: 1980 Coastal Energy Impact Revised: 'Program Please Check: (X) Grant ( ) loan Droiect Duration: 9 Months Personnel Services: Salaries and 'cages Benefits (at :) TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES Operatinq EAPenseS: Travel Equipment Professional & Consultant Services Other tPrinting, Costage, phone, etc.) Indirect Charges (Overhead at TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES Other Non -Local Funds' S LOCAL MATCH @ 20 PERCENT CEIP REQUESTED TOTAL BUDGET S 2, 463 S 1, 056 S 3, 519 c 0 S 0 0 S_ 0 _ 5 6, 727 6,727 T O T A L B U o G E T 10. 246 `Specify source (such as CETA, EPA, etc.) **Including Other Funds SEE ATTACHMENT S 26, 250 S 11, 249 S 37, 499 425 S 900 S 0 S 2, 160 0 S 28, 713^ S 12, 305 S 41,018 S 425 5 900 S 0 S 2, 160 S 6, 727 c 1, 485__ S 10, 212 •• J 40, 984 51 , 210 - • • i • 01 REU SALARIES * • TOTAL Aide 165:3; Ass't 19422 Senior 551 Clerk/Typist 3000 Draftsman 1508 iSubtotal 41018) OPERATING EXPENSES Phone $80/mo x 9 mo 720 Supplies 100/mo x 9 mo 900 Printing 160/mo x 9 mo 1440 Travel 25/mo x 9 mo 425 (Subtotal 3485 ) OVERHEAD at .164 .164 x 41018 (Subtotal 6727) TOTAL 51230 'includes 30% benefits Is -3� 0 0 COASTAL ENERGY IMPACT PROGRAM EXHIBIT IV - DETAILED WORK PROGRAM Name of Applicant: City of Hun':ington Beach Date: April 1, 1980 Project Title: 198'0 Coastal Energy Impact Program SEE ATTACHMENT • • s • • E • 1980 CElf' WORK PROGRAM Itern I: µ.•;dbook for Local Governments - Participation in Regional Energy Issues. Discussion: Marty decisions about ere-gy-related activities are made by State and Ie.deral agencies. Cities, however, have a stake in these decisions due to the fact that raterg y facilities can have significant Impacts o n the local communities in which they locate. State and federal agencies also have an obligation to consider legitimate local concerns In their decision -making processes. For these reasons, and to encourage better planning and regulation of energy activities and their impacts in the coastal zone, an increase in City participotim with State and federal agencies involved with energy issues is necessary. Some of the greater -than -local energy issues expected to affect the City's coastal zone include: OCS Lease -Sale #68, new platform extensions in State waters, new offshore advanced oil recovery projects, tertiary oil recovery programs, new fuels at the power plant, and several others. Goal: To develop the information needed by the City to better monitor energy issues affecting its coastal zone resources and to more effectively participate with other agencies in promoting the beneficial effects of energy activities as well as mitigating their adverse impacts. Task: Prepare a report or "handbook" which identifies 1) Ow regional, State and federal agencies with control or influence over energy issues, 2) the role each plays in resolving those issues, 3) the "access points" for local input in the planning and decision -making processes of those agencies, and 4) the functional areas in which local governments have more than advisory roles. Products: A "Handbook" for local governments concerning participation in regional energy issues. The City of Fluntington Beach has a great number and variety of energy -related activities within the coastal zone (OCS activities, State tidelands oil production, onshore oil and gas, toik forms, pipelines, power plant, tanker terminal, etc.). This handbook will be most useful to the City, and may prove to be a valuable resource for other cities and counties involved with energy planning, development and production. Cost: Staf f Rate Time Total Aide $1890/mo 2 mo. $3780 Itr;n 2: Mitiguting Imeocts of Tertiary Recovery Methods. visCU5sibn' : The escalating price of ail has mocie new, more expensive oil extraction tee nologies viable. These new technologies, sometimes called "tertiary recovery methods", will be employed in :he i-luntington Beach field, both onshore in the coastal icxie and offshore from platforms in the State waters. Recognizing the, regional and national interests in increasing domestic energy supplies, the City of Huntington Beach generally supports the development end use of these new extraction technologies. These new methods, however, may impose safety, environmental and other kinds of impacts different from those of conventional technology. Two pilot tertiary programs are underway in the Huntington Beach coastal zone already. Both involve injecting chemicals into the tmderground oil Tones to facilitate washing -out oil. A third project will he applied from an extensio-i built on on existing offshore platform which well use a new kind of steam drive process in a shallow oil zone. The City needs to review these new technologies and assess their safety and environmental impacts. In addition, these technologies will very likely extend the life of the field significantly. This will have impacts on land use patterns, the fiscal position of the City, infrastructure, and other coastal resources. These impacts need to be assessed and plonned for. Coal: To ensure that tertiary recovery methods are analyzed and planned so that significant impacts are fully considered before the application of these technologies and that beneficial effects are promoted and adverse effects are mitigated to the fullest extent possible. Task: Inventory and study typical tertiary extraction methods and their impacts. ff—ecornmend ways to mitigate adverse impacts and to promote beneficial ones. Amend the City Oil Code to ensure that these impacts are adequately planned for and considered in new oil production proposals or write a new ordinance and establish new permitting process specifically for these technologies, if necessary. Products: A report or "handbook" on tertiary oil recovery methods and their impacts on t �e'ir City, including recommendations on ways to mitigate the adverse effects and promote beneficial ones. This handbook may become a very useful tool for other local governments where tertiary methods will be applied; (the potential exist in every older, major oil field). The text of amendments to the existing Oil Code or the draft of new ordinance and new permitting process (which ever regulatory strategy proves more efficient). Cost: Staff Rate Time Total Handbook Ass't 2158/mo �IM/mo 3 mo 474 �72 Amendments/or Aide 5 days New Ordinance Senior $2758/mo 2 days $ 276 $7222 Total %. r 3' • • Item 3: Muriici al Oil (:ode Amendments to IflMrove Compatibility Between Oil erations and t er Activities in the Coastal Zone. Discussion: The escalating price of oil will lengthen the lives of oil activities in the t 1-pWington Beach coastal zone. Small-scale operators, wh-)se equipment is located can %inall parcels adjacent to houses and other uses, are finding that extraction of small 111airitities of oil is acceptably profitable. The larger opera!ors, who - have hundreds of wells in and near the caastal zone, are using secondary and tertiary recovery method to extend production in the field. Thus, intensive oil activities will probably continue beyond the end of this century within the City. At the some time, the scarcity and value of land, especially in and near the coast, are pressing other activities very close to oil operations. Throughout Huntington Beach there are examples of residential, recreational, commercial and other uses located near oil activities. in order to accommodate the national goal of increased energy production, the City encourages continued oil octivi'fies. However, the impacts of oil octivities on other uses must be recognized, planned for and mitigated as much as possible. This is especially true now that there is such ocute pressure to use land very near oil operations for other functions and that oil operations will be active much longer thar. previously thought. Therefore, the City must find ways to improve the compatibility between oil and other land uses and must establish regulations which successfully accommodate these many uses ir, the coastal zone. Goal: To promote compatibility between oil operations and other uses in and neor the coastal zone, and to attempt to reduce any adverse impacts. Task: Using data collected in first CEIP grant regarding.impacts and conflicting uses, study strategies to increase compatibility between oil operations and other uses in and near the coastal zone. Assess the adequacy of the existing Municipal Oil Code and Noise Ordinance fa ensure compatibility regarding aesthetics and safety, and make recommendations on improved mersures to the City Council. Assess the adequacy of current monitoring and enforcement practices regarding existing and proposed municipal recpflaticins related to oil activities. Recommend improved monitoring and enforcement practices to the City Council. Products: A report on strategies for increased compatibility of oil and other activities. This report may prove useful for other planning agencies faced with the problem of M.commodating oil and other uses. The report will also review existing regulations, ronitoring and enforcement practices, and will recommend improvements. Request -for -City -Council -Action regarding the recommended irnprovemen!.s. Cost: Staff Rate Time Total Reprot on Strategies Aides 1890/rTln �2158/ino 1 mo 1890 Regulation Review Ass't I rno 2158 12158 Enforcement Review Ass't i ino Request for Council Action Senior �2158/rno 2758/rno 2 day $ 276 $6482 i 6 3.I y • Item 4: Strategics to Increase the Coastal Vie. • )ortunities for Recreation with Energy Production in Disrussion: With the projected growth of both energy production and recreational activities within the Huntington Beach coastal zone, the potential for conflict is great. However, the City's coastal zone also presents opportunities which can accommodate hotly recreation and energy production. Two projects are especially interesting. First, the City should pursue strategies, in cooperation with the State and the.oil companies, to improve access to the beach from Pacific Coast Highway. Currently, unburied oil pipelines parallel the highway, posing obstacles to beach users, especially for the handicapped. Ways to improve access might include burying active pipelines, removing unused lines, placing access signs on the bluffs, and providing paths and ramps over the pipes to the beach. In addition, landscaping, fencing and plantings could reduce the visual impacts of oil equipment (wells, tanks, pipes) on the beach. The City is currently planning a bike path along the beach in this some area. This will be a good opportunity to coordinate the bike path project with strategies to improve access through the oil operations and to improve the appearance of the area. Initial contact with the oil companies indicated a willingness on their part to cooperate in this kind of project. A second innovative project would establish temporary parks on active oil parcels within the coastal zone, which are largely vacant and fa the most part barren of vegetation. For example, the purnoing unit and other equipment could be hidden and protected by a fence and plantings. The rest of the parcel could be planted with grass and other vegetation, and benches Could be provided. When oil extraction was complete, the entire parcel could recycle to new uses. Thus, the property owner does not lose a later redevelopment opportunity; but he does allow his coastal property to be used low-impoct recreation while it is used for oil extraction. These parks could also impr:.ve the aesthetics of these parcels in the coastal zone. A number of possibilities exist for the development of energy production uses and recreational activity in a more compatible way. However, the City needs to explore these further and to develop these opportunities in a timely manner. Goal: To enhance the compatibility and dual goals of increased recreational opportunities and energy production in the coastal zone. Task: Meet with oil companies to investigate 1) strategies to improve access to the beach and to improve the appearance of oil operations on the beach and 2) strategies to wstabiish temporary parks. Study the feasibility of these projects, including their fiscal and legal Implications and prepare work programs for implementing the projects, if feasible. Products: Reports on the feasibility of these combined energy production and increased recreational activity projects, including their fiscal and legal implications. Cost: Staff Meetings d reports Aide Ass't Rote Tine Total 1890/mo 1 mo 1890 2158/mo 10 days 1079 2969 Total is • • Itern 5: Planning for Future Access to Underground Oil Fields. Discussion: About 50 percent of the oil in an underground pool rernains there even after srcon ary recovery (about 75 percent remains after only primary extraction). As the price of oil climbs higher, this oil --which was once unprofitable to extract --will become more e.:nnomically feasible to tap. Unitization (a plan involving the equipment of cnany comprnies on .several sites) and a water flood (a secondary recovery method) program could be instituted in the southern part of the field. Tertiary extraction will be applied In several areas, as well. However, coastal land is a very valuable resource and new uses quickly cover the surface of old oil `fields. At the some time, continued domestic energy supplies are important to the nation. Recovery of those oil reserves requires that access to the underground pools is not foreclosed by new surface uses. Therefore, new surface uses must be planned in a way that considers the passible impacts from future oil operations tapping the underground reserves. Lock of good access points might spread out future oil operotionsd, moking their impacts more widespread. For these reasons, new uses on oil fields must be planned to accommodate future access to the reservoirs once it becomes economically or technologically feasible to top them. Goal: To ensure proper planning of all parameters involved in preserving access to underground oil fields for future extraction while accommodating as much as possible other uses on the surface of the fields. Task: Meet with California Division of Oil and Gas staff and with oil company personnel and develop planning parameters for underground access. Prepare a "handbook" of these parameters. Product: A report or "handbook" o-tlining tlx! variables in planning surface uses in ways is to preserve underground access. :'his will be quite useful to other planning bodies concerned with oil extraction lands, which are "recycling" to'new uses. Budoe_t: Staff Rate Time Total ' Ass't $2158/mo 2 mo $4316 Item 6: Improved Data Base for Oil -Related Activities in and near the Huntington Beach Coastal Zone. Discussion: Careful planning for oil -related activities and their impacts requires reliable data regarding the number, location, prod)ctivity and status (i.e., idle, producing, injection) of wells and related equipment. Research for the previous CEIP grant revealed that the City's records regarding tlw--se matters are unclear and may be out-of-date. In (xidition, significant discrepancies between State and local records related to wells were discovered. For example, State records show over 1,000 producing wells in Huntington f3emh, which City records ;how only 800 producing well. Goal: To establish a clear and current record of the nvml)er, location, status and ownership of wells and related egeripmeni in the City and the coastal zone in order for the City to bette. plan for and mitigate their impacts. 0 s • losk: Inventory the wells caul related equipment in 0* City and identify tivir number, Invation. stales nrYl ownership. Account for discrepancies between City records and tlx)sr- of the State Division of Oil and Gas. i'rodtict: A clear and current record of these data in u form which can be easily 1­pt i,p- to-da te. Cost: Staff Role Time Total Aide S 1890/mo 1 rno $ 1890 Item 7: Fiscal Impact Analysis of Energy Activities Using Computer Model. Discussion: Oil and other energy activities in and near the coastal zone have impacts on the fiscal position of the community. Revenues from these activities to the City include property taxes, license fees, extraction taxes and other fees; costs include use of infrastructure and services. The City is developing a computer model to assess the fiscal impacts of different land uses. The data regarding oil activities has been particularly difficult to sort out bvrouse of assessment practices on surface land, equipment and mineral rights and confusion over the location and ownership of equipment and mineral rights. These difficulties have precluded all but the most rudimentary and inaccurate analysis. A more comprehensive and accurate study would be -useful to the City and possibly to other commexiities trying to assess the economic %npacts of oil extraction and related energy activities. Goal: To accurately assess the fiscal impacts of oil extraction and related energy activities. Task: Collect data regarding fiscal costs and revenues from oil related activities in a form amenable to computer analysis. Run data on the con"ter model and analyze the results. Prepare a brief "handbook" describing the methodology and assumptions used in the model, so that other communities can use this process, if applicable. Products: A computer run and fiscal analysis. A small "handbook" describing the model's metRods and assumptions. Cost: Staff Rate Time Total Data Collection Aide �21 1890/mo 30 days $2835 "Handbook" Ass't 58/rno 10 days 1079 Analysis Ass't $2158/mo !0 days 1079 $4993 Total Item B: ,Improving Pipeline Franchises. Discussion: The City collects revenues from pipeline franchises, which in effect helps o stet casts to the City imposed by energy activities. Research in the first C EIP revealed that these franchises cre out-of-date and were financially unfavorable to the City. Many of these franchise expire in the 1980's anti the CAy will be able to renegotiate these arrangements at that time. • • �J s L� Gant: To increase revenues to the City from pipeline fronchise%. Ic►ck�: Review tlr existing franchises o►id romp►ire thorn to those in o0ler jurisd'ctions; rrrorniI:erxl improved terms for these frorwhises and outline opticxis to the City regarding IN, i:nplemeotaticr: of these improvements. Product: A memo summarizing tlx- existing terms and recommending improved terms and options for effecting those terms. Budge t: Staf f Date Time Total Aide $1890/mo 5 days $472 Item 9: City Role in Oil Spill Planning, Monitoring and Cleon-up. Discussion: The Huntington Beach coastal area is extremely susceptible to oil spills and leaks - ea ram OCS activities, State tidelands operations, tanker operations, and onshore tanks, pumps and pipelines. Unfortunately, oil spills occur frequently in and near the City's coastal zone. Although oil sp?Ils are largely the responsibility of agencies outside the City, municipal staff and equipment are often involved with spill clean-up Und control either di-ectly or by supporting the main clean-up efforts with crowd and traffic control, fire equipment, and other personnel and equipment. Presently, there are at least 13 oil spill contingency plans covering existing facilities in or near the City's coastal tone, and City personnel and equirrnent have a role in many of these plans. However, the role is often vague or merely implied. There is a great need for a clarification of the City's involvement regarding oil spill opertions. Goal: To define the role of the City ;n oil spill monitoring, control and clean-up operations, and to assure that the City personnel and equipment can respond odegevitely orld effectively in a spill emergency. Tusks: Review all oil spill contingency plans and identify, where appropriate, the role of M��ity's personnel and equipment. Contact affected municipal departments to ensure their understanding of these roles, and arrange meetings among nffectnd departments to check that they have appropriate staff and procedures to adequately perform necessary and expected duties in a spill emergency. Product: A report summarizing oil spill plans and the roles of City personnel and equipment in each. Cost: Staff Rate Aide $1890/mo Time Total I mo $1890 Item 10: Ion rovi29 Spill Plans to Better Protect Wetlands and Other Sensitive Areas. • y3 Discussion: There are valuable resource areas in the Huntington Beach coastal zone which are especially vulnerable to oil splits. These include the wetlands south of Beach l3oul,-vnrd, the Least Tern (an endangered species) nesting preserve, and the Santa Ana River and flood control channels. Comprehensive oil spill contingency plans should recognize these especially vaivaF!e and vulnerable areas and should place a high priority oxi protecting them. Procedures need to be designed to afford protection especially to these areas in a spill emergency. Goal: To ensure that all responsible parties recognize these especiolly valuable and sensitive resource areas in their spill plans and have procedures in their plans which set a high priority on protecting these areas. Task: Review oil spill contingency plans to see that each recognizes these especially sensitive areas. Develop and recommend improved measures to provide these areas with better protection. Petition the relevant regulatory agencies, as necessary, to require improved protection measures for these sensitive areas. Product: A report reviewing spill plans with a list of recommended improvement measures for sensitive areas. Also, implementation procedures for the inclusion of these measures in spill plans. Cost: Staff Rate Aide $ 18 9 0/mo Time Total 10 days $945 Item 1 1: Improved Oil Spill Monitoring and Data Collection. Discussion: The Regional Water Quality Control Board keeps records of oil spills in this area, incTuding those which occur in and near the Huntington [leach coastal zone. However, not all spills are reported to the Board. The distance of the Board's staff offices from Huntington Beach (they are in Riverside) may impede prompt and accurate ckita collection regarding the spills which are reported. Proper planning for spill emergencies requires accurate data regarding the frequency, sources, amounts and locations of spills. Although the City personnel and equipment are often involved in spill control and clean-up, and provide support to the main clean-up efforts when not directly participating, the City does not record spill (iota and relies on Regional Board's file. Procedures need to be employed which guarantee that current monitoring and data collection are adequate for the City to plan for spill emergencies and to estimate the cost to the municipality of spill control and clean-up. Goal: To ensure a means by which monitoring and (iota collection of area oil spills will provide adequate information for the City to enable proper planning for efficient response in spill emergencies. Task: Review past monitoring and record keeping efforts and methods used by Regional Water District. Evaluate the existing system to determine if inadequac;es are significant aid warrant the development of a local spill monitoring and record keeping system, or some other kind of improved system. • • I'rnO t: A report cx) fix.- odequncy of fix! current monitoring and record keeping prcic ices; re.•commentictions for improvements or changes. Cost. 5taf f Rate Time Total Aide $1890/mo 5 days $102 Item !2: Evaluation of Tank Form Dike System Failure. The major tank farms in and near the coasral zone are located very close to houses, commerce, wetlands one. beaches. Although these facilities are surrounded by dikes which would contain spilled oil in care of an accident, it is conceivable that the kind of event which could damage the ranks (such as an earthquake or flood) could also damage the dike system. Such a catastrophe is highly unlikely. The consequences of oil escaping from the dikes, especially if o:-cidentially set afire, however, are serious enough to warrant an assessment of flow pattems and the need for evacuation and other contingency plans specific to these areas. Goal: To protect the Nblic safety and sensitive environmental resources as much as possible in the event of a major spill and dike system failure at a large tank farm. Task: Study the sites of the tank forms, their dike systems and the surrounding areas; recommend if evacwtion or contingency plans specific to these areas ore necessary. Product: A report and recommendations on tank farm dike system-5 within the city. Cost: 1E Staff Rote Time Total Ass't $2158/mo 10 days $1079 "'J COASTAL CNERGY 11.11►ArT PPOGRAM, EMIR IT V - WORK ;'!-'.I ,RAfI SCIIEDULE ' Name of Applicant: City of Huntington Euach Date of Application: April 1, 1980 • Project Title: 1980 Coastal Energy Impact Project Start: May 1, 1980 Program Completion Date: January 31, 1981 SEE ATTACHED SHEET M O N T H S acti.c ��w tract F� 11 I � � I ( ( I 1 i S T =.r f• 01:11HS i Di MCP I P i ION: PL; SG.' ',G' s `� f .'• 1 t? `, .fide x2 AL, •..•�•••ts•••1•a. - -.• Handbook Te;.rlrlology Ass .. 3 } (aa■■■■■■k�■■■■■■a■■a■a■.tsa■a Oil coce { rs."ie:::•I'lE'F: S Asst .. 2 ! __._� ( is..sowa■aiw...os.ar dt IC n j Asst x lj Z ( ■.■ai E .—___,-• "-=I-- --- ACCESS - ASSC „-2 1 6. improved Data 7. ; Comzuter Ana; Vsis Base Ai-4E` X 1 i � E �..••••.• Eai Asst x 1 1 ! i■i=r■i M i Aide 1 1/ ?. i�—: -�� �os••s•••�s••■;_ Hide x 1/4 1— 1 1 { { •• �- •. r : rranzhises E ! i ? 5=.:11: Plan Revie- Ai6e x 1 10. S; :=is in !-.te 1an::s , Aide x 1/2 ^ SDat a Aice r. 1/4 _ . Ta:ir: Farm D eke Asst x 1/2 } Hal _ Time Aic.v.•o••�,o ! FT i i ! L-L �"saw }: :1 1 T-1 me D::e:: DL =E— s • • I.!!,1$111t. [IILV',, 1':;)n1:1 PItUl�f�n'i L III I t; I I 'l i N AIII1►J1, AND ,00 U!jl.I_ ►I,tin,� r)I AppI i :ant.: f I II N Le: _nit- I 1 1 , 1980 Project Tit1 19R0 c.:Ua: La 121etcl ^ Im ,!EL Prouraw PRODUCT 1 ntorrlovcrnment Handbook Trm't i a r y '1 och Report t. Net, Ordinances ()i l code Amendments Iltecrc aLion--Oi I Feasibility S-Ludy Rr.-port on 111%-tnninI I fni- Underciround A(-ce,c I Wel 1 Inventory 1'ireIitic Francht::,�, Memo i011 spi 11 PIan Itevtcw ' 1mpro%-4-d Meastir (2:J for WetIands Pepor t on Sp1 I 1 Muhl t0r i tic j Dike Sys;t.vm lino l y!; i r; 9EIc C1.4TE y t October 1980 Poci•1 ber 1980 j i Perc tuber 1980 tlecc niter 19130 1 1 I I i FebruOry 1981 . , q I,t f"i,ther 1 1180 Fobt It lry I n►1 I Ve1)ru,lry F(Alt 11-11'y 19N 1 I• obi u:1 ry 1981 1'c�t�t urlr y I')b 1 Aurlu..;1 1 c)NO E r � LAIIIUIT VII - STAII 'ViSIGNEU Tll 1'.I:U,i Cr ti,ime of Applicant- �*IIY (11 lhinLinglmi lkoiwh Date: AL)rI1_1� 1080 Project Titie: 1980 GoasLal I-Awrgy Imp;jcL 11rograin +- lass if it: atioo Aldo AssistatlL $1890/mo tli;riber of Per'cen!aye of Positions Participation 1 ( 10a 1 1 � lao. I 1