Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Cash & Associates Engineering - 1989-01-01
0 * ��J� ddlwjom REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date November 7 , 1994 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator"" Prepared by: Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator•: Acting Director of Public Works Subject: PROJECT CC-534; RESERVOIR HILL BOOSTER STATION ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 19 9 Consistent with Council Policy? [XI Yes ( ] New Policy or Exception CrrYCL x Statement of Issue, Recommended Action, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: Statement of Issue: On September 7, 1993 , Council awarded professional services Contract Amendment No. 2 to Cash & Associates, Inc. for an amount not-to-exceed $63 , 500 to provide construction support services for Cash Contract No. 534 ; Reservoir Hill Booster Station. It has become necessary to increase the scope of services and contract amount by an additional amount not-to-exceed $15, 000 for a total contract amount of $78, 500, to encompass an extended construction contract time period and unique field conditions. Recommended Action: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to: 1. Execute Contract Amendment No. 3 with Cash & Associates, Inc. , for Project CC-534 ; Reservoir Hill Booster Station, and; 2 . Authorize the expenditure of an amount not-to-exceed $15, 000 for the additional construction support services necessary to complete the job. Analysis: The purpose of this booster station is to enhance water pressure to serve the approximately 800 acres bounded by Ellis Avenue on the north, Huntington Street on the east, Clay Avenue on the south November 7, 1994 Reservoir Hill Booster Station; CC-534 Additional Construction Support Page 2 (including Seacliff Shopping Center and Seacliff Estates) , and the bluffs on the Linear Park on the west. On July 6, 1993 , City Council took formal action to award a construction contract to Schuler Engineering in the amount of $2 ,482 , 413 . 00. Now nearing completion, this construction project is on schedule, and under budget. Throughout the project duration, construction support services have been provided by Cash & Associates, Inc. Construction support involves the intimate review of construction shop drawings, calculations and details specific to the Contractor's chosen method of construction. All of these must be consistent with the design engineer's original concepts and specifications. Construction support services are necessary in order to maintain a high level of quality control necessary for the construction of this booster station. Cash & Associates Inc. , as the project design engineer, has an intimate knowledge of the project and its specific design criteria, and has provided consistent professional services throughout the duration of the project. Cash & Associates Inc. , has recently advised staff that the services they have been providing have been significantly greater than what they had anticipated, and beyond their original scope of work. Without a contract amendment, a shortfall of construction support services may occur, as a result of the additional services they have provided throughout the project. The extent of these services is explained in a letter from Cash & Associates, Inc. , attached as Exhibit A. Additional soils testing, discrepancies between actual field conditions and historical record drawings, and extensive pump selection evaluation all contributed to the need for additional services. Additionally, the construction contract time has been extended by 115 working days, or 65 percent of the original contract time. Cash & Associates, Inc. , is requesting an additional fee not-to-exceed $15, 000 to complete their services for this project, which represents a fee increase of less than 25 percent of their original contract amount. This results in a total fee of $78, 500 for these construction support services. Typically, the fee for construction support services for this type of project is equal to approximately 5% of the total construction costs, or in this case approximately $124, 000. Staff feels that Cash's total fee of $78, 500 for complete construction support services is a fair and reasonable fee and recommends the approval of Contract Amendment No. 3 , to increase the contract by an amount not to exceed $15, 000. Note that this is a not-to-exceed fee. If additional services are not required, the actual payment to Cash & Associates will be less than $15, 000. November 7, 1994 0 Reservoir Hill Booster Station; CC-534 Additional Construction Support Page 3 Funding Source• Funds allocated for this project in the total amount of $3 , 131, 175 are budgeted in the Water Division Capital Improvement Account E- EW-PC-848-6-39-00. Of this total amount; $100, 000 has been approved in the FY 94-95 Budget for anticipated supplemental expenses necessary to complete the project. An expenditure of $15, 000 will leave a remaining $85, 000 for anticipated supplemental expenses. Consequently, no additional funds are required at this time. Alternative Actions: 1. Deny request and utilize City staff to provide construction support services. Because City Staff was not the design engineer for the project, it is not practical nor cost effective for staff to provide construction support which requires an intimate knowledge and familiarity with the design specifics. 2 . Do not approve the contract amendment and direct staff on how to proceed. Without continuous construction support and design clarification services, construction activity would stop. This action would result in a delay claim by the contractor, with a potential cost to the City of several thousands of dollars per day. 3 . Stop construction. This project is critical to the operation of the City water system. Stopping construction is not recommended because of the impact on the water system, as well as the financial settlement committed to the Contractor. Attachments• Contract Amendment No. 1 with Exhibit A: Letter of Request from Cash & Associates RS:JRR:DMD: lb AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CASH &ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. FOR THE RESERVOIR HILUOVERMYER PUMP STATION COMPLEX THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 is entered into this� day of,Ala yem be-r 1994, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR". WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR, are parties to that certain agreement, dated September 18, 1989; and Since the execution of the original agreement, CITY has requested additional work from CONTRACTOR, and CONTRACTOR has agreed to perform such additional work; CITY and CONTRACTOR wish to amend the original agreement to reflect the extra work to be performed by CONTRACTOR and the additional compensation to be paid in consideration thereof by CITY to CONTRACTOR, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows: 1. ADDITIONAL WORK CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY such additional services as described in CONTRACTOR's letter dated October 20, 1994, marked collectively as Exhibit A and attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION In consideration of the additional services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a sum not to exceed Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15, 000). 3. REAFFIRMATION Except as otherwise specifically modified herein, all other items and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1 6/k/agree/cashamnd/1 0/21/94 Y � i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this amendment as of the date first above written. CASH & ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, A municipal corporation of the State of By: f ` �`x California A. Ross Cash, President gy: �!•� /J A:- Wilfrho B. Simbol, Secretary Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED A O dwnt� ////�'7 City Clerk City Attorne ( REV WED AND APPR VED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: G - City Administra Director gpi-blic Works 2 6/k/agree/casha mnd/l 015/94 „ 11-09-94 12: 310 P ,=:: WATER OPERATIONS P02 AM OF PU L,C ,,,OM,. P0, l 1 M J �4a UATER' .. �i,Z•�. n_•.. �. LV A 90 Htr :smst"Ti OTITTZICATI00H�CA1 NC lSsaHTi Ui•9N 1.4 128ATIIICATt M0�0lAI T p01ii gay alkoI 1XIINO 0A 4114 TN1 00V111►It AI'1QAQLO 01 T411 Doti8 �.' Q{� a!{ � �rity� I IOL1Ct6C Oil. . /.�./Y►�Y�...a.......•....r.... Q + la►a..r............■4.,,...,...ra logo 4 1A�} wYaa\.•�. ... /....1.er„a•/a.•,ffa.11r•..•......-.•..YI■aa..J r•■■rtt•rf•• rMa+tl�O�iRI��!!�1 .•...f•..■.... X At "'G. +tn A.1Xiarip• �rus11 d40 ............Ise r.._ tv'v-�My `�TTr� .1...�IN.•.,i/•■■rr■\.....t1i...■. :Kwtta 11lu�• u 111A 8 perjoatn Zile. .....•f„,uarY..r..iifiii i.l f•f ry� y •� � Ao�rae�.eito4 IA�o�Lx�lA�� C 1drw'A�A L6fTR .r.....•t•........�w.lit..r..r.111.i. /if•N••f.r-....I.a.•1lli.it i•ta1 Its ' itNl �� 7 COMPmy 611TIR fl •tY.ir■a..ssy..0 1ilA >ilgs+�n y�C�1 npY �ow 4 ;Wp,%'fh�raRaffllii tif>•tiisMiit.Mrr�arirwrra�lrrsswrrirrrrsrsrr��iriiifi .rwiirNrrrrrwr..F Tµ6 {NT'JASO WAA10 A1101 "A TNa pOLiC1 if COVLIA01i F aigillra*rriFo�SC'4•OiMt►itilRAtiL'tr01T14 1140; "41 it�L1i 1t4tiUr0 Td TM4 To I {1 To .rAt.rr THAT Tr�u+ oA owlym o1 ANY 0%TiACT OR OSNtt QOGLi iNt u;Y A111►r�T i�A{� lk�.CATtD1 ITytTNi'AN0SIt0 ANY AaCU4AtiNttlT, r 11 ts�+,ta aA WAY i1RtA{4t T4i1 tksuaAN4r 1►rraaalo iY tl11 oo�tc�ar D=rat<isaoiKrrliN,.1 ruNlCf To liil.�i W412% loll 4tllT{}14ATts MA ..... A4t TAAMI, IIiCLN11{N4i� An c01 ,vlo141 as 140 P0�{Q roe ./..'a+,/attl.,,i.Y.- -•- 1,iMlTi ilr..,...Y,....i1.li,i.....,,....r•••r POL1C7 i4L0iliA 006I Y Iff pAT! vMM 01 IWIVRAN” plltl .. afr..Y Arfr rra.NllfY ♦r..rAf,.a+N�./1 ArIr1i■1.Y,Y.. 11TA� ..........r.r. .a►YI//1■Yiti., •• WILY lujuRS Yk41 e.lNsr.lnrirrM•■i�l!a. ir•'v��• r� p« /�1� l ■[.y�r.....pn,�.1 yf lir�.i'i i' }•� 1�A �, (j f �M1 I j 0 /9 8 10D 1 tY t N a tsar A04. �lj �OMpMi ;;Lrg:V$ �dlit � �llOfe QAMEA01 QCO+ [[ �A�tA t:�c�liyl�li tcoAltohN Ik�,�tli� #^ fay 1 rr+eti ~tl y ! pAt�. 0mA01 Ago. A UN0IA�WNO ijWl011r � I ••,•••• ..A,f���Q� 1 DOL6011 WARD t► i� PD ctmo 1 occ 1 1 paloau�C.ttl�cO�PLtr1D tf 1 No 006o AGO, i 4ND106006tt't pONTAAGTGRQ I Y i ID A AGO*to" PAOIRTT O rFpy. 1N+UAr l�pp0 ao p itk§OMAI INJURY .....•..If1.ur•r.r s...st.vtn••A ... ..r.....r..,,., ,.... 0016Y IXJVRV j 11 ANY AUTO 0010 1WRr ` � � lwfA ACct01KY� At. �s444G MiTo$ ;aASV NAtOS ..w..........i aa•r.f.,atia�•►ar.. ' r�o0laTr Ita ALL aMNiD AtTOt t0�►+ a T � DAMAON ,a.,..... PAI V FAA$) .......owes.wr..... ..... pp n t 1ttD rw!oi J 10YED .kS T FOPU P eCOIIY INJURY paµ-f wat, W101 L �;UT10}t, its A t:tarns DAM t $y� ➢mpu"My Ci y At;tr,.��y PAOPtArY DA#{Ilgl AA01 uAIRITr OA t:ohilitdl0 ./ritw■i.f... u....•r.w\1Y,Y. t - &do ■Nra•Y/.•i•.. +•• .... pCCc4AtUEN4X .t • ■••..a Y.wrfY �rrr...ii.a.,,. ...............• •- �f2TY .•..•ft.. �IXC�l88 %,%" A00AIOATI uM1AeL4A FORM ......• T ittAN _. ..r r.r,...r.. •./...••i./it/Nfi1 tt t..• 01Hill NAK LiMItA1LM ......................••.• ••••"'- .... ITAT410t4Y L1Mt1/ l4l�.l7 07/OT/!a o7/0�l/9! �IIJAII•101.1 wtap No OS1� r tMP. 1 0 NO�i�m G p11Ml1 iACll i..•.auyssr.ifu.■si■■tsr/•0.tt >i{Id1LaY ' � �.,....,...,,.........1 .../■•.a■■r•r a .■•aaart./•ttt a1• ■.\rs..■\•••.s•a..ra..r...••••• .... own .a..r•.•aAY.■.ii.•frt•N/...r•r.. .•Y t{ CRt T�0>rti/ AT ONtIVtR1fzLIr/1RIclAL 5100 4T wi AQ �{� o �A �1Aw a stal abd atta cued Y Ci p� tt*nt 11 res� 1331►■ 1►ylre � alrnaa �a p srllltalswrwwr■r r rMll�.rslAlrw.r V.w4Airrilssraor■wwrrlA.lrwrr 1 OrltttlOATr KO +•rr.wr. OAN1t4•A 111Ms � eraAl TAN LDIA w . •Nok0 ANY 0f ?III Ao0Y1 OII4 I TW APNPANY Li116 MA{li i » as r 0 0A 0 MYTH N04it.'1 TO t RTIf{OATI NOL01R f1AM{t0 TO tKl o is1444% �L ��18 D Y�4t�Q� r 611s�' a Yl �•••t■•at•,\aia a•/.•\..IA.//1I.IIi\..■.•■.ra\ *■ t■■,t•........ i va o�L 9 ��! L11N0 1118 Otto e _ _ affis 111 tmO_ --10-26 � 10, 44Av POI.__....._._.... F F 'll WATER OPERATIONS =' I o, u3Ak FROM F u3 "Oa iti: r bo t5 Dt-c t 4 •p v� 1 rn 1 1 db 1 BUSINE58PRO QUN9RAL aimm SIMINT hour• CAM' 1012437-01 CASH 4 ASSOCIATI55 u or x b tieiltla Ve eo ve 4e to a cy Poe c 711194 y l 119 to NiiEVIlSEI�" ON Ea (COµYgACTI N0 OPERATIONS) I CON'SIDLRA'floN OF ADDITIONAL, t'RRMIISM OF R i P ,'Y A ,ETN� ADDLIABILITY NAB IN'sulken 19 AFhORDP-D '►p011 A tOCCU AND INSURANCE, BUT ONLY h(�R AN "OC�u►tRKI r)F THE NAMEDaINSURUD FOR TNCFIIOM AND PRUXIMATEI.Y CAUS>�U E3Y THE wcKK ADDITIONAL. I NS►U R>iwp R ANY Np SUCH INSURANCE IS AFFORDED TO TAR ADDITFROMO h"AUS DINS ��NpANOY MANNER BY "QCCU)t1iEIvCE" , CLAIM OR SUtT ARI$ THIi CONDUCT OF THE ADDITIONAL INSURIiD. THS A001710NAL INSURFD It , CI'f Y OF HUNTJNCTON �kACfi lTS cB Ts Qrt•ICER5 u EMP 0 S 1 AS RESPECTS THF., ADDITIONAL INSUREDo THE F01-1- 6, G INIT ONS AND CONDITIONS APTLY IN ADDITION TO THSINXC EXCLUSION OkE�MENTT pNYHI�af'4t.IC� LIMITS AND CONDITIONS FOUND iN 7NE. o A. BXCLUBIONSi THIS INSURANCI DOES NOY AI'I�LY TO; t . DAMAOFS ARISING OUT OF ANY FRS6INSl1AS ERVICI»vaP5MIRM90 IlY OR ON BEHALP OF THE ADDITIONAL tA? THE PREPARATION OIL APPRGVAL OF MAPS, PLANS,G �CATIONs; AND INNS, RKPORTS. SURVEYS) DESNS OR S>°ECI (G) 5UPBRVISQRY, INSPQCYION OR BNGINEARING SIRVICE.5, 2, LIABILITY ASSUMED BY THV, ADDITIONAL INSUARD UNDSR AN "INSWRso CONTRACT B, CONUITIONS 1 TFIIS RNOORS9MENT SHALL NOT INCF ASE T1� POr ICY 'I�S OF INSURANCE IN T146 060 .ARAT NS O .i.ij` C—jl T i wi a r...Hiri p• _ 'IF14 FFC1' WATER OPERATIONS = 0-94 i ; u�AM FR"j?1 ut Qi—:.g .51a2 G¢t Wi124G bG•�L•.0 QO ss OA 4i4 . ilea) L►M,+�."Ku"�"�`�"r"°c►�a+ �'"coMoo i`�i` OUS IN262PRC 02NIRAL ENDORSEMENT voilcy Numb or �YI uure PAC 7012836 01 .►ASH s ASSOCIATES Sate:`-��� �0 Icy per�rlQd ��� . u or �� npr n o ve A 0 D (CONTRACTING opERATIONS) IN CONSIDE(�AYION OF ADDITIONAL PREMIUM OF i INGt.0 D , THE ADDITIONAL INSURED 15 hFFORDED "BODILY tN uRY-, AND "WFFM C�E" LIABILITY N ih15�.�kANCE, BU"' o��'t1S DR F�YN THE Wc�RKEQFET►i� N/1IMEUaiN'�URID l�ORIYHERfi M AN4 PRoximATE . . A ADDITIONAL. 1N6-1R6D. NO 'SUCH INSURANCE 15 AFFORD41D TO YHE ADDITIONAL INSORKD FOR ANY "OCCURjkEI4C4" , CLAIM ADDITIONAL ARISING ROM OR CAUSBD IN ANY MANNEF NY i THE CONDUCT OF T ia THE ADDITIONAL IN5URED 19 : CITY OF HUN TINGTON OEACH, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS AND QMPLOYOEE 1 AS RESPECTS THE ADDITIONAL tNSUREDt THE FOLLOWING EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS APPLY INQU ON TO n IN THEElN$t�R INSURING ACift88MkINT QPNS, COVERACIR THIS POLICY. AND CONDITIONS At EXCLUSIONS: THIS INSURANCE DOB°a NOT APPLY TOi 1 . BY OR ONABEHALF OF OUT THE ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL INSURBID,RViCIRS INC WDINC1�ORNtEC� 8Y OR (A) REPORTS P,ASURVIYS, DESIGNS OR 8R CIFIC RATION OR APPROVAL OF MAPS, I IONS, ATIONS; AND iH) SUPERVISORY, INSPECTION OR INGINCIRINC 61FtyICI151 9. LIABII-ITY AESUMID BY THE ADDITIONAL, INSUR615 UNDER AN i INgURED CONTRACT" , B. CONDITIONS. 1 . THIS ENDORSEMENT $HALL NOT INCREASE THE LIMITS OF INSURANCE PROVIDED IN THE 01CLARATICNS OF THIS PO►.ICY# 7=r94T l0 4, F0,' �— i • CASH & ASSOCIATES A.Ross Cash Engineering and Architecture Elliott H.Boone Randy H.Mason Wilfrido B.Simbol October 20, 1994 City of Huntington Beach RECEIVE Public Works Department, Water Division DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS P.O. Box 190 OCT ' 1994 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Ms. Deborah DeBow, P.E. WATER DIVISION Associate Civil Engineer IMINTIPIr' ON r?17.1r,11 r, Subject: RESERVOIR HILL/OVERMYER PUMP STATION ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FEE REQUEST (C&A Project No. 3600.03) Dear Ms. DeBow: After reviewing our job files and accounting records, it has become apparent that there will be a shortfall of construction support service fee funds necessary to complete the subject project. This shortfall is the result of an increased level of effort by Cash & Associates as well as our subconsultants (GEOFON, Inc., ASL Consulting Engineers and Frank Y.Tso Electrical Engineering Co., Inc.) in order to address several issues not covered in our original contract scope of work. The issues contributing to the increased level of effort include: 1. EXTENDED CONTRACT TIME The contract time for both the Contractor and Inspector have been extended by more than 100 working days. This contract extension has increased our overhead and administrative costs. 2. RECORD DRAWINGS Our plans were prepared based upon the best available record information provided by the City. Actual field conditions, differing from this record information, necessitated certain plan revisions, and additional design and drafting costs. 3. ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES The services of our Geotechnical subconsultant (GEOFON) were increased due to Contractor's scheduling of work and the need for additional compaction testing required for underground piping. 4. PUMP SELECTION At the City's request, additional effort was necessary by our Mechanical subconsultant(ASL) to ensure the City selection of the most efficient and economical pump. 5. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS For issues such as the LPG piping revisions,the Building Department required that the project plans be revised to correspond with approved shop drawings. This requirement was not known when our original fee proposal was submitted to the City, consequently additional fees are required. 5772 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 100 Huntington Beach, California 92649 (714) 895-2072 (310) 426-6145 Mailing Address: P. O. Box 2715, Huntington Beach, California 92647 FAX (714) 895-1291 A California Corporation City of Huntington Beach RESERVOIR HILUOVERMYER PUMP STATION Ms. Deborah DeBow, P.E. ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES October 20, 1994 FEE REQUEST Page 2 (C&A Project Number 3600.03) In light of the above,Cash&Associates requests authorization for additional construction support services fee in the not-to-exceed amount of FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($15,000.00) to cover this shortfall and to allow us to continue to assist the City as planned for the remainder of this project. Our fee will be on a Time &Material, Not-To-Exceed without your prior written notification basis. We appreciate your cooperation regarding this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, CASH &ASSOCIATES ���� . r Michael J. S bridge,A.I.A. Project Architect MJS:cd 0 • L-40CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH V," 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CRY CLERK November 14, 1994 Cash &Associates P. O. Box 2715 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Attention: Michael J. Schewbridge, A.I.A. Project Architect The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their meeting held November 7, 1994 approved Amendment No. 3 to Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Cash &Associates Engineers, Inc. for the Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex. Enclosed is a copy of the executed agreement for your records. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call the Office of the City Clerk (714) 536-5227. Connie Brockway City Clerk lcwh'6-e- Evelyn Schubert Deputy City Clerk cc: Deborah DeBow, Associate Civil Engineer g:cc\cbmembvermyer (Telephone:714536-5227) AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. FOR THE RESERVOIR HILL/OVERMYER PUMP STATION COMPLEX THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 7th day of September , 1993 by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. , a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR. " WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR are parties to that certain contract, dated September 18, 1989, entitled "Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Cash & Associates Engineers, Inc. for Engineering Design Services for the Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex (CC-534) ; and The original contract provides that the parties shall amend it to include the final negotiated fees for Phase II and Phase III of the Project; and CITY and CONTRACTOR wish to amend the original contract to reflect the Phase II work to be performed by CONTRACTOR and the Phase II compensation to be paid in consideration thereof by CITY and CONTRACTOR, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows : 1 . ADDITIONAL WORK COMPLETION OF RESERVOIR HILL/OVERMYER PUMP STATION AND CO-PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES . CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY such additional services as described in the letter from CONTRACTOR to CITY dated August 23, 1 AJF 1993 . Said letter(s) shall hereinafter be referred to as Exhibits "A" and "B" and incorporated herein by this reference. 2 . ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION In consideration of the engineering services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR the additional total sum Sixty Nine Thousand, Seven Hundred Twelve Dollars ($69, 712) for completion of the planning phase; and the for the construction services, the sum of Sixty Three Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($63, 500) . 3 . REAFFIRMATION Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the original contract shall remain in full force and effect . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this amendment as of the date first above written CASH & ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a a California corporation California municipal "c r oration a. cc't4— �j President , A. Ross Cash. Mayor Secretary, Wilfrido B.Simbol APPROVED AS TO FORM: Z&—!-te ��4a& ATTES : City Attorney q-d-�i3 City Clerk INITIATE �PR(AVED: R EWED AP VED Director of Public Works Administrat 2 AJF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. FOR THE RESERVOIR HILL/OVERMYER PUMP STATION COMPLEX (CC-534) THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 1990 , by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California , hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. , a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR. " WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR are parties to that certain contract, dated September 18 , 1989 , entitled "Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Cash & Associates Engineers , Inc . for Engineering Design Services for the Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex (CC-534) ; and The original contract provides that the parties shall amend it to include the final negotiated fees for Phase II and Phase III of the Project; and CITY and CONTRACTOR wish to amend the original contract to reflect the Phase II work to be performed by CONTRACTOR and the Phase II compensation to be paid in consideration thereof by CITY to CONTRACTOR, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows : 1. ADDITIONAL WORK - PHASE II CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY such additional services as described in the letter from CONTRACTOR to CITY, -1- dated May 2, 1990 , except for the following two changes in said letter : CONTRACTOR agrees to provide bid services on a time and materials basis not to exceed $10 , 200 . 00 ; and CONTRACTOR agrees to provide an engineering evaluation of the proposed hydroelectric generation system in consideration of additional compensation in the amount of $13 , 500 . 00 . Said letter shall hereinafter be referred to as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. 2 . ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION - PHASE II In consideration of the Phase II engineering services described in Section I above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR the additional total Phase II sum of Two Hundred Thirty-one Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty and no/100 Dollars ($231, 960 . 00) . The Phase II sum shall be added to the original Phase I sum of Thirty-nine Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty-eight and no/100 Dollars ($39 , 928 . 00) for a new total Phase I and II contract amount of Two Hundred Seventy-one Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty-eight and no/100 Dollars ($271, 888 . 00) . REST OF PAGE NOT USED -2- 3 . REAFFIRMATION Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the original contract shall remain in full force and effect . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this amendment as of the date first above written. CONTRACTOR CITY CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH a California corporation a California municipal corpo ation President Mayor Secretary ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: eolv� (V,C 10 -- City Clerk City Attorney i?7-o REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED A APPROVED: City Administrator Direc or of Public Works -3- • A.Ross Cash Elliott H.Boone Randy H.Mason CASH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Wilfrido B.Simbol Larry W.Nye May 2 , 1990 City of Huntington Beach Water Department P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jeff Renna/Mr. Eric Charlonne Subject: PROPOSAL RESERVOIR HILL PUMP STATION AND RELATED FACILITIES (C&A Proposal No. 93600. 00) Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we are pleased to submit this proposal for Engineering Services on the subject project. BACKGROUND Cash & Associates Engineers, in association with ASL Consultants, has provided a Report focused on the concept development for a pump station to be located at 1900 Huntington Ave. at the Water Department's Operations and Maintenance Facility. This proposal outlines the documentation necessary to con- struct the new pump station and related facilities. Project elements include: 1 . New pump station to serve the Reservoir Hill Zone. 2 . Rework of piping at existing reservoirs (OM 1&2) . 3 . Expansion of the propane storage capability. 4 . Relocation of the fluoride tanks. 5 . Provisions for a future hydroelectric generation system. 6 . Revision of emergency generator specifications. 7 . Site work. SCOPE OF WORK 1 . Provide civil, structural, mechanical and electrical calculations for agency approval and in support of construction documentation. 2 . Provide civil, structural, architectural, mechanical, electrical and instrumentation drawing and specifi- cation documentation for both agency approval and construction of the project. A California Corporation 2599 East 28th Street P.O. Box 38 Long Beach.CA 90801 (213)426-6145 FAX(213)424-5459 City of Huntington each RESERVOI HILL PUMP STATION Water Department AND RE L D FACILITIES Jeff Renna/Eric Charlonne (C&A Proposal No. 93600. 00) May 2 , 1990 Page 2 3 . Assist and coordinate the agency approval process. 4 . Implement the recommendations of the April 15 , 1990 Report with the following exception: a. Postpone the documentation for the Hydro- electric Generation System, but provide for its future integration into the project with a mini- mum disruption to the facility. 5. The Work (Phase I) shall consist of the following major project elements: a. Pump Station: Building and mechanical/electri- cal systems. Building shall incorporate the emergency generators as well as a control room. System shall include all piping and electrical interconnections with existing reservoirs as well as communication systems with the existing telemetry control systems. b. Expansion of the propane tank system composed of two (2) propane tanks, extension of the retaining walls and paving & new foundations. C. Relocation of the fluoride tanks to include foundations and a masonry containment wall. d. Provide for the future installation of a hydro- electric generation system (Phase II) . Piping and electrical conduit shall be stubbed-out to accommodate this future work. e. General site work to include grading and paving as they relate to the items mentioned above. f. Revise the "Water Warehouse Project" documenta- tion to be consistant with this Scope of Work. ITEMS EXCLUDED FROM THIS PROPOSAL 1 . Plan check and permit fees. 2 . Bid services. 3 . Construction surveillance and/or administration services. 4 . Shop drawing review. 5 . Record drawing revisions. City of Huntington Beach RESERVOIR HILL PUMP STATION Water Department AND RE14MFD FACILITIES Jeff Renna/Eric ChOlonne (C&A Pr3rosal No. 93600. 00) May 2 , 1990 Page 3 FEE Our firm fixed price for the Engineering Services described above will be $208 ,260. 00. For Engineering Services outside the Scope of Work, we propose to charge in accordance with Exhibit B, "Rate Schedule" dated January 1, 1990. Our procedure is to invoice at the end of the month for work completed during the month, or upon completion of the work if completed within thirty days. Our terms are Net 30 Days from date of invoice. Interest will be charged at ten percent per annum beginning 30 days after date of invoice. If this project is not complete by January 2 , 1991, due to no fault of C&A Engineers, the fee will be subject to renegotiation. SCHEDULE The project schedule is attached as Exhibit C. This schedule is subject to change based on Water Department comments, review periods and timely City plan check response. If this proposal is acceptable, please sign in the space provided below and return one copy to us. This letter together with Exhibit A, "General Conditions" and Exhibit B, "Rate Schedule" (attached) , is acceptable to us as our Agreement for the work. Thank you for the invitation to present this proposal and we look forward to the opportunity of working with you. Very truly yours, CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Randy H. ason, P.E. Vice President RHM:gla Enclosures City of Huntington each, RESERVOU HILL PUMP STATION Water Department AND RE14WD FACILITIES Jeff Renna/Eric Charlonne (C&A Pro osal No. 93600.00) May 2, 1990 Page 4 This proposal and the attached Exhibits A and B have been read and are understood. The undersigned authorizes CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS to proceed with the work described. By Title Date January 1, 1990 A.Ross Cash �• Elliott H.Boone Randy H.Mason CASH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS wilfrido B.Simbol EXHIBIT B Larry w.Nye RATE SCHEDULE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES ON A TIME AND MATERIAL BASIS HOURLY OVERTIME SENIOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANT $96.00 $96.00 SUPERVISING PROJECT MANAGER 96.00 96.00 PROJECT MANAGER 86.00 86.00 SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 75.00 75.00 PROJECT ENGINEER 70.00 70.00 SENIOR ENGINEER 70.00 70.00 ARCHITECT 60.00 60.00 JUNIOR ENGINEER 53.00 62.00 PROJECT DESIGNER 59.00 69.00 SENIOR DESIGNER 52.00 61.00 DESIGNER 48.00 56.00 DRAFTER 42.00 49.00 WORDPROCESSOR 42.00 49.00 CLERICAL 38.00 45.00 IN-HOUSE COMPUTERS: DRAFTING (CAD) 10.00 CALCULATIONS 10.00 - WORDPROCESSOR 10.00 In addition, for direct out-of-pocket expenses (if and when they occur) we quote the following: 1) In-House Repro: Blueprint $.10 to $1.50 per square feet-depending on type of paper Xerox $.43 to $1.20 per square feet-depending on type of paper 2) Automobile: $.25 per mile 3) Travel Expense: at Cost 4) Subsistence: While away from home office for more than one day: at Cost, but not to exceed $150.00 per day/per man. 5) Plan Check and Building Permit Fees: at Cost plus 10% markup 6) Telephone charges outside Area Codes 213, 714, 818: at cost plus 10% markup 7) Third Party Services: at Cost plus 10% markup a) Surveying b) Soils investigation c) Testing laboratory work d) Consultant and subcontract professional fees e) Printing and copy services for bidding and construction documents Payments due under this schedule shall bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum commencing thirty (30) days after the date of invoice. Terms are Net - Thirty Days. A California Corporation 2599 7,t 281h Street P.O.Box 38 tong Beach,CA 90801 (213)426 6145 FAX(213)424-5459 1 EXHt31T e ScA<d.i<1— il.TIfMJ MCI IMP STATIC. t ro jest l—,":tln xlyd.ir A— III1I wT01 ICI Ct PUP-Si IT IOR L s(i,te 76-1pr-)1 ):R.• xleds l<r{ie I:IIP1nPST Irauq<e kLn Ia a(d,te: 16-Ipr-91 ):16,. Scled.le Iil<:1:16PM PST A�JNfD 91 71 1t 3T.t.c 7' Jr. J.I Ioq Septet R..Dtt Ja.f<k Ur Apr UT Jos J.I Isq Srp Drt br Dec J.. U[IT UrlT Stat.+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 U+k br Cop St,rt U.1 1.4 1 Pa w TICE -TO r1IX tI0 1 Lry -R,-) is Iln ll-UI 41 7:IUs 7 CI01 tCl1ICIL I[POCLCOtCCLi If/C l[TOLT tl T-91 1:t0.. 1-le.TI 7:II pr 1/1 CL I RI It DCS ME PCIIOD [r®. PLCL[X{ailt oti 161 7t1I0o {reels 71-na T-91 1:11.. 71 Tee-71 ]:Il ps 1[1T7 LL11n PL1100 C 1 Y CITY WIN/LI100 1 veek. 1-J.1-)1 7:fla. l]-J sI-TI 1:11 P. S II UC Igil[it DO[MITTi C t ®. 1[IIC iro1[IK DoeM[rt3 ll reel+ 1{Jrl-ii 7:/1,• 71-Sep-91 1:II pr I YITt,DEtt 1[C I[R p {s- RAtll DEPT I[C IIR J recta 1-k p-91 1:I la. 11-kp-fl I:11p 1 CITS Pt�l[1[CI IEI IOC p 1.® flTf PL11 f![CI prL10D i reek+ ll-kp-)1 l:t/as {-10.-9/ J:Np 1 IID PC1100 P< .1 1�. AID P[IIOD {re et. 71-Sep-11 7:11,. 1{-aet-94 I:IIp I LID AAL1111C111DDE1CUn/SCLCC C )r1 IID 11:11lr I0111OOL1DM/S ICCR J testa 17-Oct-91 1:11,. 11-tor 91 I:/lp II COISiklCi l01 STAY-It C 11 R COI'llBRIO.STltt-If 1 verkf 71 br-91 ):16,. 11-Aor-71 7:IU. - II COTSitRR I01 1It100 C ll CDRSTIBC110I PCI[00 12.a.tl+ 11-Ter-11 1:1U. 7-0tt-91 1:/1p _----------------_---------------------___--------------_-------------------------------------------_------_ ------ D o.lr r r,st -LI+d ti.t C Ili ...St,r trd U,k [e roo ter del,T 1�1 I te+o.Rt em❑iet A IS le+to.< >C.,Ihi[ - - p het i,l drpe+deocl x.le Uct clor,et<r rqul,1 reek TIRE Lilt GW O,rt krparl TIRE Lift T,+k T'i],keprt ' A.Ross Cash Elliott H.Boone Randy H.Mason CASH &ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Wilfrido B.Simbol Larry W.Nye May 2, 1990 City of Huntington Beach Water Department P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jeff Renna/Mr. Eric Charlonne Subject: HUNTINGTON BEACH CIVIC CENTER THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM PROJECT EVALUATION (C&A Proposal No. 93749 . 00) Gentlemen: We are pleased to have the opportunity to propose our engineering services for a Thermal Energy Storage System on the Huntington Beach Civic Center. Cash & Associates Engineers has obtained the services of Engineered Automation Systems, Inc. (EASI) , specialists in planning, design, specification and construction compliance services for building automation and special energy systems. This includes environmental control, energy management, thermal energy storage, security, lifesafety, parking control, intercommunication, data communication and voice/data network planning and design. Attached is our Statement of Qualifications for your information. This proposal is offered for our services concerning evaluation of the potential for implementing TES, particularly considering the use of off-site generation of power, via means of hydroelectric generation system at the Water Department Facility at 1900 Huntington Ave. , and the required logistical planning. SCOPE OF WORK 1. Review the TES feasibility study prepared in October of 1987 . Review the recent study of the potential for power generation at the Overmyer Reservoir. 2 . Research the current subsidy, rebate and rate programs available from Southern California Edison relative to this TES project. 3 . Meet with City of Huntington Beach representatives to ascertain any changes to the operating status or equipment condition at the Civic Center since October of 1987 . A California Corporation 2599 East 28th Street P.O.Box 38 Long Beach,CA 90801 (213)426-6145 • FAX(213)424-5459 City of Huntington Beach HUNTINGTON BEACH CIVIC CENTER Water Department THERMAL GY STORAGE SYSTEM Jeff Renna/Eric Cha lonne PROJECTTVALUATION May 2 , 1990 (C&A Proposal No. 93749 . 00) Page 2 4. Survey the site to ascertain the available locations and capacity for water or ice storage tanks and equipment. 5. Evaluate the data collected and identify options for the implementation of TES, including any new approaches which may be appropriate. This work will be based on the loads and historical operating data from the October 1987 report and updated information collected during this work. 6. Prepare a preliminary report and meet with City representatives for review and comment. 7 . Develop a recommended approach, including a con- struction budget and schedule. 8. Prepare and submit a report of our findings and recommendations. Meet with City representatives to review the report. EXCLUSIONS)CLARIFICATIONS This work includes two meetings with City representatives to review and evaluate reports. This work does not include load calculations. FEE Our firm fixed price for the Engineering Services described above will be $13 , 500. 00. For Engineering Services outside the Scope of Work, we propose to charge in accordance with Exhibit B, "Rate Schedule" dated January 1, 1990. Our procedure is to invoice at the end of the month for work completed during the month, or upon completion of the work if completed within thirty days. Our terms are Net 30 Days from date of invoice. Interest will be charged at ten percent per annum beginning 30 days after date of invoice. If this project is not complete by January 2 , 1991, the fee will be subject to renegotiation. SCHEDULE We can complete this work within eight (8) weeks of your Notice to Proceed not to include review time by City representative. City of Huntington Beach HUNTINGTON BEACH CIVIC CENTER Water Department THERMAL STORAGE SYSTEM Jeff Renna/Eric Cha lonne PROJECTVRGY ALUATION May 2 , 1990 (C&A Proposal No. 93749. 00) Page 3 If this proposal is acceptable, please sign in the space provided below and return one copy to us. This letter together with Exhibit A, "General Conditions" and Exhibit B, "Rate Schedule" (attached) , is acceptable to us as our Agreement for the work. Thank you for the invitation to present this proposal and we look forward to the opportunity of working with you. Very truly yours, CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Randy H. Mason, P.E. Vice President RHM:gla Enclosures This proposal and the attached Exhibits A and B have been read and are understood. The undersigned authorizes CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS to proceed with the work described. By Title Date • EXHIBIT A GENERAL CONDITIONS 1 . Payment: The Engineer shall provide the Client with months statements for services rendered and reimburs- able costs incurred, and the Client shall pay these state- ments within thirty days of their presentation. In the event that a statement shall remain unpaid for thirty days or longer after its presentation to the Client , then it shall accrue interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the 30th day after its presentation. 2. Ownership of Documents: The documents prepared by the Engineer pursuant to t s greement are instruments of service and are and shall remain the Engineer' s property whether the project is executed or not. They are not to be used by the Client on other projects or extensions of the project except by agreement in writing. 3. Arbitration: All claims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties to this Agreement , arising out of, or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, may, with the consent of both parties , be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association they, in effect unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. No arbitration, arising out of, or relating to this Agreement , shall include , by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any additional party rot a party to this Agreement except by written consent containing a specific reference to this Agreement and signed by all the parties thereto. Any consent to arbitration involving an additional party shall not constitute consent to arbitration of any dispute not described herein or with any party not named or described therein. This Agreement to arbitrate and any agreement to arbitrate with an additional party or parties duly consented to by the parties thereto shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law. Notice of the demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the other party to this Agreement and with the American Arbitration Association. The demand shall be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for arbitration be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations. Page Two Exhibit A The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final, and judgement may be' entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 4. Indemnification: The Client shall indemnify the Engineer against all claims made against the Engineer concerning the project except for those claims which arise from the Engineer's actual professional negligence or willful misconduct. 5. Risk Allocation: Client and Engineer have discussed their risks, rewards and benefits of the project and the Engineer's total fee for services. The risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees that to the fullest extent permitted by law, Engineer's total liability to Client for any and all injuries, claims, losses, expense, damages, or claim expenses arising out of this Agreement from any cause or causes, shall not exceed the total amount of $50,000. Such causes include but are not limited to Engineer's negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability, breach of contract or breach of warranty. 6. Attorney' s Fees: In the event that litigation develops between the Client and the Engineer concerning or arising out of this Agreement and/or any services performed pursuant to this Agreement, then the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to recover from the other reasonable attorney' s fees and litigation costs. 7. Termination: Because of the importance of a good working relationship between the Client and the Engineer, it is hereby agreed that either party may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other party provided only that this notice is given in a good faith belief that said working relationship is less than satisfactory. Upon the termination of this Agreement by either party, the Client shall pay the Engineer for services performed and reimbursable costs incurred at rates and for items determined by the applicable terms of this Agreement. 8. Verification of Existing Conditions: In as much as the remodeling and/or rehabilitation of an existing site and/or build- ing requires that certain assumptions be made regarding existing conditions, and because some of these assumptions may not be veri- fiable without expending additional sums of money, or destroying otherwise adequate or serviceable portions of the site and/or building, the Client agrees that, except for negligence on the part of the Engineer, the Client will hold harmless, indemnify and defend the Engineer from and against any and all claims arising out of the professional services under this Agreement. . January 1, 1990 A.Ross Cash Elliott H.Boone Randy H.Mason CASH &ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Wilfrido B.Simbol EXHIBIT B Larry W.Nye RATE SCHEDULE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES ON A TIME AND MATERIAL BASIS HOURLY OVERTIME SENIOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANT $96.00 $96.00 SUPERVISING PROJECT MANAGER 96.00 96.00 PROJECT MANAGER 86.00 86.00 SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 75.00 75.00 PROJECT ENGINEER 70.00 70.00 SENIOR ENGINEER 70.00 70.00 ARCHITECT 60.00 60•00 JUNIOR ENGINEER 53.00 62.00 PROJECT DESIGNER 59.00 69.00 SENIOR DESIGNER 52.00 61.00 DESIGNER 48.00 56.00 DRAFTER 42.00 49.00 WORDPROCESSOR 42.00 49.00 CLERICAL 38.00 45.00 IN-HOUSE COMPUTERS: DRAFTING (CAD) 10.00 -- CALCULATIONS 10.00 -- WORDPROCESSOR 10.00 -- In addition, for direct out-of-pocket expenses (if and when they occur) we quote the following: 1) In-House Repro: Blueprint $.10 to $1.50 per square feet-depending on type of paper Xerox $.43 to $1.20 per square feet-depending on type of paper 2) Automobile: $.25 per mile 3) Travel Expense: at Cost 4) Subsistence: While away from home office for more than one day: at Cost, but not to exceed $150.00 per day/per man. 5) Plan Check and Building Permit Fees: at Cost plus 10% markup 6) Telephone charges outside Area Codes 213, 714, 818: at cost plus 10% markup 7) Third Party Services: at Cost plus 10% markup a) Surveying b) Soils investigation c) Testing laboratory work d) Consultant and subcontract professional fees e) Printing and copy services for bidding and construction.documents Payments due under this schedule shall bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum commencing thirty (30) days after the date of invoice. Terms are Net - Thirty Days. A California Corporation 2599 East 28th Street P.O.Box 38 • Long Beach,CA 90801 (213)426-6145 FAX(213)424-5459 ro CITY OF HUNTINGTON 2000 MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 July 19, 1989 \1r. Victor E..Opincar, Jr. [Managing Engineer Boyle Engineering Corporation P.O. Box 3030 Newport Beach, CA 9265879020 Suhjer_t: Request for Proposal Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex; CC-534 Gentlemen: The City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works is requesting proposals from qualified civil engineering firms for the preparation of a preliminary engineering design report and construction cost estimate (Phase I); preparation of final working drawings, contract soecifications and other related work, permits, etc., up to the award o.f a construction contract (Phase l); and assistance during construction (Phase III) for the subject project. The scope of work for all three phases which p^oposels are being solicited includes the following tasks: Phase I - Preliminary Design Report 1. Review all existing drawings and specifications including the following: A. Reservoir Hill Booster Station B. Overmyer Reservoir Booster Station C. Electrical Water Warehouse and Yard Improvement, Project 2. Prepare a comprehensive design analysis of the entire.proposed Booster Pump Station complex hydraulic system, structural analysis of any proposed work to meet current uniform building code requirements and American Water. Works Association guidelines and hydraulic institute standards. 3. performance of all necessary field investigations and measurements, survey., geotechnical, etc. 4. Formulate options and make recommendations to the City for the.following: A. Reservoir Hill Booster Station using the established design and pumping capacities prepared by ASL Consulting cndineers at the new location as a quide. .Analyze the option of using existing storage in the reservoir as one of it's sources as well as the main water system. r, Request for Proposal Reservoil Hill/Overmver Pump Station July 19, 1999 Page 2 F3. Relocate existing fluoride storage tanks to a suitable location within the water operation yard, if necessary. C. Permanently house emergency electrical generator(s) to Dower the water operations facility including the new water warehouse. D. tModify the existing Overmyer Booster Pump Station, to better serve existing and future needs. Demolish existing station. E. Oesign a hydroelectric generating system for energy recovery on the Overmyer Reservoir complex fill lines. F. Design an all encompassing structure to house Items A, C, O and E. 5. Suhmit a preliminary desiqn repot (minimum three copies) incorporating the results of analysis and findings of the tasks above. It shall include: _A. Oeotechnical findings. 3. Economic findings of selected alternatives. C. Sketches showing overall site plan and sections of selected alternatives.. n. ?reparation of a construction cost estimate to be used by the Citv for the establishment of a. budget. 5. provide assistance to the City in the. processing of environmental documents including filling out of required forms furnished by the City. The Oity 'Nil1 handle for environmental application processing. 7. attend a minimum of (4) four meetings with City staff during Phase 1, excluding field investigations in Task 3 above. 9. provide all processing.required for obtaining a FERC License and all exemptions .required as well as coordinating work with So Uthern California Edison Company for the hydroelectric generator(s). 9. phase I to be completed by December 15, 1989, based on the selection of a consultant by the City Council on September 18, 1989. 10. Meet with other consultants, as needed, to complete .the work. Phase IIFinal Design 1. Prepare final working drawings and contract specifications necessary for bidding. These documents will be based on decisions derived from Phase 1. Final plans to he placed on City furnished myiars with no "sticky hacks." RegUeSt for Proposal Reservoil Hill/Overmyer Purno Station July 19, 1999 Page 3 2. Provide all structural calculations for the proposed project. 3. Coordination with the City of Huntington 13each Building Division to ensure approval in the permit processing (City will apply for permits.) 4. Provide support to the City at their request during Sid advertisement. 5. Attend a minimum of (5) five meetings .with City staff during Phase II, including a ore-bid conference. 6. Submit for review, plans at the 25%, 50% and 90% completion stages, submit specifications at the 50% and 90N., stages. City will furnish the standard "Boiler Plate" specifications which includes "',,Iotice Inviting Seal Bids", "Proposal Form", "Sample Construction Contract and Standard ;eneral Special Provisions". Consultant will furnish the special or technical provisions for this project. 7. Furnish a final construction cost estimate. 9. Based on approval of preliminary olans, soecifications and final cost estimate, the consultant shall provide (40) forty sets of the followinq: A. Final construction drawings B. Contract specifications 9. Phase II must .be ready for bid. by July 16, 1990. Phase III - Construction Support 1. Provide construction support through semi-monthly meetings and be available for phone conversations relating to construction and interoretation of plans and specifications. 2. Provide shop drawings and other related submittal reviews. (;VOTE: Tasks I and 2 above will be coordinated through a City representative.) 3. Provide (1) one, acceptable to the City, reproducible set.of "Record" mylar drawings. 4. 10% of Phase I1 and III fees will bo- .aithheld until Item 3 above is accepted. ,eneral Requirements Ttie consultant shall furnish proof of the following minimum insurance requirements with their proposals: J 1. General Liability Coverage - $1,000,000 CSL per occurrence (Note: If provided coverage is under a form which includes a designated general »ggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1,000,000. -bequest for Proposal Reservoil Hill/Overmyer Pump Station July 19, 1999 Page 4 2. Professional liability coverage $500,000 per occurrence (Note: A claims made policy is acceptable). 3. Workers' Compensation coverage in an amount of not less than $100,000 bodily injury by accident, each accident $100,00-9 bodily injury by disease, each employee, $250,000 bodily injury by disease, policy limit. The advertising for bids and awardinq of a construction contract for this project will be administered by City staff. In addition, City personnel will control contract administration and perform required construction inspections. The consultant shall .recommend any special inspection procedures to be used. Proposals for this project must be submitted to the attention of Jeff Renna, Water Superintendent no later than 4:00 P.M. on Auqust 28, 1999 with the notation "Overmyer/Reservoir Hill" on the envelope (4) four sets of proposals minimum is required. Each proposal should include the following. information: I. A list of similar projects that your design team has recently worked on. 2. A statement of understanding as to the scope of work and the tasks necessary to complete the project. 3. A brief outline of how your firm will handle this project, if awarded, and time schedule for completing the.project. The project must be under constri.iction in August/September 1990. 4. A list of personnel, including the proposed project manager, who will be assigned to a design team on this project along with their brief resumes (One must be a registered structural engineer). One member of the design team shall also be highly qualifed in the design and selection.of variable speed pumping systems. 5. A detailed listing of each task to be performed, the corresponding man hours and costs for each task, number each task.as outlined. This will he used in establishing progress payments. 6. Your fee.based on an hourly rate. A.maximum not-to-exceed.fee should also be specified for Phase 1. Phase II and III may he -xoressed as a percentage of the approved construction cost estimate. A willingness to negotiate upon completion of Phase I, should also be indicated if desired. Submit Item No. 6 in a separate sealed attached envelope with the notation "fees." 7. All consultants are required to view the project site and attend a proposal development meeting on August 21, 19-99 at 10:00 A.M. The site is located at 19001 Huntington Street at Garfield Avenue iq Huntington Beach. iZequest for Proposal I�eservoil Hill/Overmyer Pump Station July 19, 1989 Page 5 After the receipt of proposals, proposals will be screened and ranked relevant to: 1. Expertise and experience. 2. The approach to be used as outlined in the proposal. 3. Ability to complete the project in a timely and consistent manner. The most qualified consultants may be intervie«ied prior to the final evaluation. After ranking of proposals, fee envelopes will he ooened and compared. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the City's Standard Consultant Contract (see Attachment "B"). Hopefully this sample contract will prove useful in developing your proposal. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this project, please contact Eric Charlonne, Project Engineer, at (714) 536-5921. Very truly your ouis F. andoval nirector of Public Works LFS:EC:lw. r_c: Les Evans, City Engineer Jeff Renna, Water Superintendent Robert Taylor, Supervisor Eric Charlonne, Protect Engineer Attachments: Attachment "A" - Location Map Attachment "B" - Samole Contract 21209 l,#4 ■111�11 e■lllil�lil maims III ■ :� w Son lllilli= MEMO �Ilillli= ®E �1® -i ■ ®� ■imIMIM NINE RZI no MORM P ilk Ia w __ = CITY OF HUNTIN 1�MAIM STREET . P..0. BOX 110o CALIFORNIA 9 8 LOUIS F. SANDOITAL fib Wwks Department p (714) 5 5431 LE'I'T R OF 'IRANSMITAL Tk,: (r G'11SU�'�i�fT Date: C�56n Project: Cat lmen: are:::se�dr� ❑ herewith ❑ wider s"rste cover ❑ by mail ❑ per your request ❑ per the request of ❑ strut iJ . t DIMS ❑'corre.•�po�dce, ❑ p�rc®I. Map ❑ esti ►tes` ❑ record WjiR ❑ lesa1 descriptions contract docunnts ❑ ceding plan .:..,.For ❑corT*ctions ❑your file ❑'Approval. ❑your. USe []distribution ❑ your information rb�3, l ✓. t 4 ._ lei VL � 1( Request for Proposal Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Punp Station Complex; CC-534 Mr. Victor .E. Opincar, Jr. Managing Engineer Boyle Engineering Corp. P.O. Box 3030 Newport Beach, CA 92658-9020 Mr. A. Ross Cash Cash & Associates Engineers P.O. Box 38 Long Beach, CA 90801 Mr. Rod Stroope CH2M Hill 2510 Redhill Suite A Santa' Ana, CA 92705 Mr. Ashok Dingra, P.E., S.E. Vice President James M. Montganery Consulting Engineer P.O. :Hok 30098 . Pasadena, ;CA 91109-7009 Mr. Doug Reinhardt ASL Consulting Engineers 2540 Redhill .Avenue. . Suite C Santa Ana, CA 92705 REQUE FOR CITY COUNT ACTION Date September 18, 1989 Submitted to: Honorable .Mayor and City Council L, - BY CITY COU Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator/ Prepared by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Worksw_ c CI,I'Y CL1` Subject: RESERVOIR HILL/OVERMYER PUMP STATION COMPL Consistent with Council Policy? ( p(Yes ( ) New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: JI STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Proposals were requested from qualified civil engineering, firms for the preparation of preliminary engineering services (Phase 1); final design (Phase 11); and construction support (Phase III) for the 2eservoir Hill/Overmyer Purnp Station Complex. RECOMMENDATION: I . Approve the selection of Cash and Associates Engineers to perform the preliminary engineering services, Phase 1, for the project. 2. Establish a project budget of $42,000.00 (this includes consultant agreement and miscellaneous costs, if required). ,,3. Authorize the :1,layor and City Clerk to execute the attached consultant agreement with Cash and Associates for a fee not-to-exceed $39,928.00. ANALYSIS: The pump station complex will house the Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station, Overmyer Pump Station and emergency electrical generators for the Water Operation Facility. This project requires the expertise of an outside consultant to establish the design criteria from review of existing plans and specifications of these facilities. The final design report will include the feasibility of constructing a hydroelectric generator system for possible energy savings and a construction cost estimate for budget year 90/91 considerations. Phase 11 and Phase III will be negotiated with the design consultant after completion of Phase I and brought back for Council approval. Therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3:03 "Professional Services" of the Municipal Code, proposals were solicited for qualified engineering firms. Proposals were received on August 28, 1989. Staff has reviewed each of the three received and recommends the selection of Cash and Associates. Request for Council Action Corrosion Engineering, Survey September 18, 1989 Page 2 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny Approval ATTACHMENTS: 1. Consultant Agreement 2. Consultant's Proposal 3. !Zequest for Proposal PEC:LFS:lw 21 86g SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2-6- I , .�. ...�� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP PROJECT LOCATION GARFIELD AVE. Ll i S ------------------- �L' m ...milli... j �Y Cl,+ -1A _ IV,S=M:�,��1 '• .h......... ' _) 1 ....-. ..�fA CF-C CF—E 5}HFVI 9 wlO,l T� ♦v[. ® r UT KAF ® � aYC. TPA CF—R TO OMTo y��' tllilllilllll� ®M .•'ter`p T 2 � a r F ADAMS AVE. 4 A.Ross Cash Elliott H.Boone Randy H.Mason CA- CASH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Wilfrido B.Simbol August 28, 1989 Larry W.Nye City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jeff Renna Water Superintendent Subject: OVERMYER/RESERVOIR HILL PUMP STATION COMPLEX; CC-534 (C&A Proposal No. 93600.00) Gentlemen: Thank you for the opportunity to submit our proposal to the City of Huntington Beach Water Department for the subject project. Our project team has developed a thorough understanding of the project based on discussions with key Water Department staff as well as i gaining experience on recent Water Department projects. All consultants on our team, with one exception, have recently worked r � for the Huntington Beach Water Department including Cash & Associates Engineers, ASL Consulting Engineers and F. Tso Electrical Engineers. . � We have identified a number of key issues which are discussed in some depth in this proposal. We have also responded with a project work plan and a group of highly experienced professionals who are well prepared to provide the necessary expertise for this initial � study as well as the following project phases. Our team is composed of experts in the design of: t o Variable speed pumps and controls of all types - ASL Consulting Engineers o Hydroelectric generator systems - ENKAR o Building structures and site civil work - Cash & Associates Engineers o Acoustic issues regarding noise generating equipment - J. Van Houten Randy S. Xason, Vice-President and Project Manager of Cash & Associates Engineers will manage Project CC-534 . His knowledge of the Site and Water Department operations will contribute to an efficient and successful project. Due to our recent project experience with the Huntington Beach Water Department, we bring a site specific understanding which includes: o Planning and Zoning coordination with the City of Huntington ' 1 Beach o Knowledge of underground utilities o Future growth plans sa t A California Corporation 2599 East 28th Street P.O.Box 38 Long Beach,CA 90801 (213)426-6145 FAX(213)424-5459 i i :J * City of HuntingtWeach OVERMYMESERVOIR HILL Mr. Jeff Renna PUMP ON COMPLEX `August 28, 1989 (C&A Proposal No. 93600.00) Page 2 o Rater Warehouse Project Master Plans o Site access and traffic understanding o Department and facility water operations relationships o Back-up fuel system sizing for the emergency generators In addition, previous designs and site-specific studies have been completed by our team which should be directly applicable to the project scope for Phase I and include: o Reservoir Hill Pump Station Design o Geotechnical Report at 19001 Huntington Ave. o Aerial Photography o Electrical Distribution Study o Emergency Generator Design Cash & Associates Engineers is very excited about this project and feel we are uniquely qualified to give the City of Huntington Beach Water Department the valuable background and experience required for a meaningful study, without "re-inventing the wheel" . Cash & Associates Engineers plans on producing all Study Docu- mentation (plans, sections and diagrams) on AutoCAD with the disks provided to the Huntington Beach Water Department as part of our final product. We hope to get the opportunity to discuss this project in more detail with City personnel during the subsequent interviews. Thank you. Very truly yours, CASH & ASSOCIA'T'ES ENGINEERS I A. Ross Cash, P. E. President ARC:gla Enclosures 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Project Organization a. Organization Chart 2. Project Approach a. Project Responsibility Chart 3. Technical Approach a. Site Plan - Existing - b. Site Plan - Proposed C. Site Plan - CC-534 d. Project Flow Chart 4. Project Schedule e 5. Similar Project Experience ` 6. Key Personnel - Resumes 7. Fee 8. Appendix a. Certificates of Insurance : 1 r PROJECT ORGANIZATION The design team proposed for this project was assembled specifically for Project CC-534 with Cash & Associates Engineers as Team Leader. The design team is composed of specialists in all aspects of this study with the capability of carrying the Phase I concepts through to Working brawings and Construction Management. All members of this team have worked either together or for the Huntington Beach Water Department on previous projects with the sole exception of ENKAR Hydroelectric Power Systems. ENKAR's experience with small hydroelectric power systems rounds out our project team thus offering a full array of project services. We are certain that the Huntington Beach Water Department will find ENKAR's contribution to this project to be unmatched. i ASL Consulting Engineers have been added to our team bringing the background and knowledge of the Reservoir Hill Pumping Station design to Project CC-534. This background will prove invaluable and reduce the involvement of the Huntington Beach Water Department's operations personnel to get the study team "up-to-speed". Randy H. Mason, P.E., the proposed Project Manager, has a thorough understanding of the Huntington Beach Water Operations Facility based on management of the "Water w Warehouse Project", currently in the final City approval stage. This project included a detailed Operations Study and Master Planning effort, requiring an in-depth understand of operations and inter-relationships of building, departments, facilities and traffic. i 1. . _J I�QL {Q w �p z z uj z w z uj ui CM � LO wLi U)a U s �� w —� z = 1 2w w 0 cc: v Cc►— O z w�} w 0 J LL L2 � wLli Z i Q z " CU z F— °*" < w a z S ow w C p a � � 2 w w s w 0 w E= o D w r� �- = � cc cc .�� Z m Q w ca = w w �r z Zww � zaa _ cr 0 -� w W �ovi J J S ui z cl: .d 0 z fr W U) zLLJ Z w uj z < < (Z)ww —i LU a Nw mce 1 �3m z . i FACILITY UNDERSTANDING Based on previous Water Department projects, we have assembled a series of exhibits which define our understanding of the site: 1. As it currently exists with operational flow, Exhibit C. 2. As it is proposed to be altered as part of the "Water Warehouse Project", Exhibit D. 3. The basic area affected by the pump station, fluoride tanks, hydroelectric power system and, emergency generator enclosure projects: CC-534, Exhibit E. Special Project Issues will be addressed in greater detail in the sections that follow. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Project CC-534 includes the following basic elements, focusing on the Phase I, Concept Development Study: r : _ 1. Evaluate the existing water system as it relates to the requirements for the Overmyer No. 1 Booster Station, the requirements of the new pump station to serve the Reservoir Hill Development Zone, and the requirements ' necessary for the possible installation of a hydroelectric generator. 2. Review all City documents as they relate to the elements of work scope as outlined above. l 3. Evaluate alternative methods available to the Water Department to provide enclosure for the emergency generators, pump stations and controls. 4. Determine the need for relocation of the existing fluoride tanks and the associated improvements, if relocation becomes necessary. 5. Determine the Water Department's concept for hydroelectric generation and determine if the opportunity exists to provide such a device. 6. Provide geotechnical input to justify alternatives for the structures proposed. 7. Provide economic analysis and construction budgets for the selected alternatives. t . . 1 i 4 � tile 133aS NO.LDNl1NnH --------------- ii -------- �(-i - �i p � I i JJ w I' j ---#q --------------'1 i IL oaf © i R� i 133N1S NOIONIINnH t i I W — I Li to Q J I W I }Q 1 W a 6 a 133N1S NO1ONI1NnH LLJ Ld ' p I � I X I f I -- - --- Z J I 1 6 Yv( Q 1 dd J 1 W I � a I Q i - -- ---------- -f �4 Q 8. Provide descriptive conceptual sketches (plans and sections) as deemed necessary to properly describe the alternative approaches proposed. 9. Assist the city in obtaining environmental permits, FERC licensing and SCEC coordination, if necessary. 10. Attend four (4) meetings with the City of Huntington Beach Water Department for coordination of the project. The subsequent design phases of the project; namely the Preliminary and Final Working Document Phases as well as Bid and Construction Assistance are noted in Exhibit G, Project Flow Chart, in subsequent sections, and are not made part of the basic services being requested in Phase I. The scope of these future services can only be properly defined at the completion of Phase I. A very preliminary assessment of Project CC-534 indicates that the following designed and specified elements of the "Water Warehouse Project" will be directly affected by CC- 534 and may require redesign: 1. Type and size of the two emergency generators. The proposed generators are not specified currently as being enclosed in a building and will require re-specification. 2. Electrical distribution system and new service. t � 3. Secondary fuel source (propane) tank sizing. 4. Layout of the proposed oil drum storage and covered material storage Jfacility near the repair shop building, if this area becomes a candidate for the fluoride tanks. These facilities can be easily re-designed, but will result in increased costs to the "Water Warehouse Project". G Additionally, Cash & Associates has determined, based on inquiries with Water Department personnel, that a comprehensive MID does not exist for the Water Department's facility and overall system Although this has not been requested by the City, we strongly urge it be included in the scope of the study for general documentation purposes. Exhibit F, which follows, represents our basic understanding of the existing Water Operations System This exhibit is included as an elementary and basic summary reflecting our current understanding of the system as relevant to the proposed project. l Location of the potential hydroelectric generators has also been indicated. I � Ill kk � y 0 a III K e I' T a I 0 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 i I I 1 1 1 I 1 I i 1 I I 1 1 I -x 0 0 ' w i Cash & Associates Engineers proposes to take the lead role as Project Manager as well as provide civil, structural and architectural study and design. We have assembled a very strong team of consultants to offer all aspects of the study and subsequent design effort as already outlined in the Organization Chart. Cash & Associates Engineers is very comfortable managing both small technical studies as well as large design efforts as exemplified in the Similar Project Experience section of this proposal. Our current project with the Huntington Beach Water Department, the Water Warehouse Project, has been accomplished utilizing a similar team approach as proposed for Project CC-534. PROJECT APPROACH The experience of Cash & Associates Engineers in leading and managing multidisciplinary project teams in complex projects will mean a well managed, thoroughly documented project which meets the quality, deadlines and budget constraints established by the City of Huntington Beach. r Cash & Associates' approach is to assign a project manager who acts as the single point- of-contact with the client organization and who is responsible for: a o Day to day management of the project team; o Coordination with the review agencies involved in the project; o Review of the performance of the project team with regard to meeting the technical quality, cost and schedule commitments. Note: Although all primary communication will be directed between the City of Huntington Beach Water Department and Cash & Associates Engineers, there may be cases where it will be appropriate to communicate directly with subconsultants with copies of the communications to C&A Engineers. Our consultants are accustomed to this relationship and will perform very efficiently and professionally. iJ Weekly meetings will be held with the project team to exchange information, make assignments and plan the manpower for the week's work activities. Upon receipt of the "Notice to Proceed", the project manager and other key team members will meet with the Water Department staff to review the project and verify the basic parameters of the work. The manager will then prepare a written project description, which will address the scheduling of tasks and which will be distributed to all members of the project team. This project description will delineate all aspects of � the project and schedules for various tasks. A scoping meeting will be held with all team members to clarify the project description, deliverables and finalize assignment of tasks and schedules. The information developed in these meetings will be the basis of the Phase I Study that follows. li 11 J The "Project Responsibility" Chart that follows indicates the basic and support roles of our project team Please make special note that much of the Master and Site Planning issues have been evaluated by Cash & Associates Engineers on the "Water Warehouse Project" as well as Reservoir Hill Pump Station issues previously addressed by ASL Consulting Engineers. The soils report produced by GEOFON, Inc. for the "Water Warehouse Project" may also suffice for this study, depending on the alternative installations proposed. 3!� i RESERVOIR HILL / OVERMYER PUMP STATION COMPLEX S REPOW MECHANICAL DES4GN VARABLE SPEED ELECTRICAL DtSTweunoN ANALYSIS SITE & FACILITY PLANNING .._....._ ........... _..........................._... .......................................................................... ........................................................................... COGT TFM.: EMBERS :.;; ::< EVALAJATiONS CASH & ASSOCIATES AAaa,P901 MGMT.) ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FRANK Y. TSO ELECTRICAL ENGINEEFUNG 0 0 0 0 VA JOHN J. N HOUTFJd O O � 1 & ASSOCIATES0 i � � ENKAR HYDROELECTRIC O 0 O O POWER SYSTEMS GEOFM INC. 0 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LEGENo: PRM4AW 0SUPPORT JEXHIBIT B TECHNICAL APPROACH Our technical approach for evaluating the Water Department facility is composed of several important tasks including client review and comment at the conclusion of each major task. There are three major project phases: Phase I - Study and Report Phase II - Design and Bid Assistance Phase III - Construction Services These phases are then further broken down into subtasks as demonstrated in the Project Flow Chart in this section. The following is a brief description of the planned effort. i PHASE I: BASIC DATA REVIEW 1. Our first step will be a brief orientation which will include identifying and meeting with the person who will serve as our key point of contact with y, Water Operations and conducting brief interviews with one or two individuals who can describe the present conditions. Based on the results of this orientation, we will adjust this study approach, as appropriate, and establish agreement to a schedule for conducting the study, particularly those steps requiring on-site work. Finally, we will identify most of the documents needed and establish the procedures for their collection. During this orientation, it would be appropriate to notify the employees about the study and how it will be conducted. 2. We will conduct in-depth interviews with selected operations personnel. These interviews will focus on two key objectives. First, we want to ensure that we gain a full appreciation of the City's pump station operations. 1 Second, the thrust of the staff interviews will be toward gaining an understanding of the various work tasks performed, the purpose of each, sequencing, and perceived problems and opportunities for improvement. These interviews are particularly important to the study since they typically provide insight which is difficult to obtain through other study techniques. 3. We will collect and review selected documents which help describe the current situation. For example, we will be interested in documents such as existing pump station drawings and pump curves, flow rate records into Overmyer No. 1, existing water distribution line documentation to the new '} Reservoir Hill Development Zone, etc. ..i ANALYSIS OF DATA/PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1. Collected:data will be analyzed and additional or missing data will be requested. 2. Preliminary calculations, necessary to sizing equipment, line sizing and adjacencies will be made. 3. Maintenance access and clearances will be established. CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRAM - ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT 1. Once we have completed the majority of the data collection and preliminary calculations, we will prepare a description of the present situation, analyze current practices, and develop and evaluate alternative facility plans and building layouts for the planned project components. An early phase of this step will focus upon defining the "most efficient and effective" arrangement Each alternative will be evaluated to determine order-of-magnitude costs and benefits, both from the standpoint of cost savings and service improvements. Some identified improvements may be stand-alone while others may require a combination of changes before substantial benefits accrue. Thus, we will consider how the plan can be economically phased so that operating disruptions will be minimized and the most significant benefits will be realized early. Special attention will be given to the effect of this installation as to how it relates to the currently planned "Water .J Warehouse Project". 2. We will develop our facility alternative plan recommendations and define how they relate to existing facilities and operations. Our recommendations will be organized in relation to the appropriate timing for implementation and ranked in accord with the cost/benefit evaluations conducted during the analysis step. 3. The study and its results will be documented in a written report which will be suitable for use as a guide during the design, engineering and construction phases. We will, first, develop a draft report for use in reviewing the study results with management and, then, we will prepare our ' final report. The review of a draft report helps ensure that our final report includes accurate and complete facts about the present situation and fully explains our rationale and assumptions which underlie the conclusions and J recommendations. The present practices, the facility plan and the practical . i improvements will be documented with descriptions, flow charts, tables and evaluations, as appropriate. Potential benefits and implementation costs will be quantified wherever practical and difficult-to-quantify benefits will be identified. .a 'Throughout this study, we will work closely with management to keep them informed of our progress, the emerging study results, and to help ensure satisfactory response to particular issues of interest. PHASE II: BASIC ARCH117,01MAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES PRELIMINARY DESIGN With the study complete and reviewed by the Water Department, the preliminary design will begin. Preliminary design is composed of the following basic elements: o Augment the topographical mapping and soils recommendations generated during Phase I, as necessary. o Evaluate the detailed design criteria outlined in the study. o Evaluate the Phase I Report conclusions for code compliance and City of Huntington Beach Planning and Zoning. o Prepare preliminary drawings and calculations, equipment selection, identify long lead times, and provide an approach to meet design criteria objectives. o Review construction cost and make strategic decisions regarding construction bid procedures and phasing. o Submit preliminary design package composed of a basis of design, preliminary drawings, outline specifications and alternative concepts sufficient to describe the architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical systems. 1 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS With approval from the Water Department of the preliminary submittal, the construction document phase will begin_ Drawings and specifications developed in this phase will be suitable for competitive bid and construction. The construction document phase will be composed of: o Detailed architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical and control } drawings. o Narrative book-type specifications. o Calculations necessary for City of Huntington Beach plan check submittal. J i o Instructions to bidders and City of Huntington Beach 'Boiler-Plate" general conditions provided by the City. o Revised opinion of probable construction cost. o Proposed job construction and phasing schedule (optional). o Administer the plan check and agency approval process. o Preparation of bid documents (50 sets). o Administer job walk and assist in bid evaluation. PHASE III: i CONSTRUCTION PHASE With the completion of the bid process and the conclusion of the permit process, construction will begin. Tasks associated with this effort include: o Attend periodic site meetings during construction. o Make interpretations of the documents on an as-needed basis. o Review shop drawings and submittals. o Review proposed field modifications, if requested. o Prepare the final "as-built" documents, relying on information provided by the Contractor and City of Huntington Beach Water Department. The following "Project Flow Chart", Exhibit G, illustrates the basic components of work i ► required for the Phase I Study as well as subsequent phases of work- Please note that Phase II cannot be fully addressed until the completion of Phase I. r, ; i V . Z C V i r� t I SPECIAL PROJECT ISSUES i ri �l I + �J � l j r i �J iL r SPECIAL PIt07ECT ISSUES Our team has identified several Special Project Issues which relate to the proposed study and warrant special attention by all those involved. A brief description of these issues follow: SITE CONDITIONS 1. The Water Operations facility at 19001 Huntington Street is a very congested site. Extensive evaluations have been previously made regarding access to equipment, on-site traffic flow, underground utilities (both controlled by the Water Department as well as pre-existing easements), and future expansion capabilities. Adding new facilities onto this property will require innovative mechanical and structural concepts. 2. The proposed new facilities will require clear access for operations and I maintenance. Methods must be designed to allow for ease of access and removal of equipment, when necessary. 3. The site power distribution system must be re-evaluated for the increased service necessary for the new pump station as well as accommodation of the hydroelectric generation system, if deemed feasible. BUILDING ENCLOSURES 1. Enclosed emergency generators require special measures to mitigate the noise created. Noise must be sufficiently deadened to allow employees to work in the building without being exposed to high levels of noise as well as mitigating noise heard by neighboring properties. This issue will be - , addressed by team member John J. Van Houten & Associates. 2. The generators also require large openings in the structure for both intake and exhaust air as well as to accommodate removal and replacement of the # € generators. Our team has experience with such installations. f! MECHANICAL ISSUES 1. Space Requirements: 'J The relocation of the proposed Reservoir Hill Booster Station to the Overmyer Site will create space allocation issues. The existing Overmyer Pump Station consists of a two pump station. The Reservoir Hill Station +® was originally designed for seven (7) pumps to meet the wide range of 7 demands. We will layout alternative pump station designs to determine the space and site requirements. We will analyze various combinations of pumps to meet L� kJ the demands of the area. Site limitations may require fewer pumps than originally proposed. j 2. Hydraulics: The Reservoir Hill portion of the proposed pump station will have two (2) suction pressures requiring evaluation. The first condition is to boost water from the existing city grid to a higher pressure zone. Another condition is to take suction directly from Overmyer Reservoir and boost to the ghigher pressure zone. The difference in suction pressure between the two cases is approximately 40 psi. Pumps will have to be selected which can operate efficiently to meet these conditions by varying the pump speed. 3. E)dsting Piping. The existing reservoir intake lines may be undersized to take suction directly from Overmyer Reservoir No. 1. The 18-inch line to the service area must be analyzed to prove its adequacy. HYDROELECTRIC POWER GENERATION 1. Hydroelectric power system issues are both administrative and technical in nature and include the following items: a. FERC Licensing and PURPA approval can take 18 months or more l and would stretch the Phase I, Scope of Work much longer than currently anticipated by the City of Huntington Beach Water JDepartment. b. Southern California Edison generally requires the City carry special liability insurance which indemnifies SCE against losses. 2. Due to the impacts stated above in Item 1, it is our initial opinion that the ' Water Department restrict the use of hydroelectric power generation to internal use, thus eliminating the need for "outside" approvals, with the exception of the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Departments. The Water Department may wish to consider utilizing the hydroelectric power generation to feed an overnight chilled water system for air conditioning load reduction as well as possibly augmenting the power supply to night security lighting. The options available to the City of Huntington Beach Water Department will be outlined in our report. SCHEDULE Exhibit H is the schedule anticipated for this project, including the major tasks and subtasks, and critical submittal milestones for the project phases. The schedule includes the anticipated start date of September 18, 1989, project phases as enumerated previously, and Water Department review periods. The schedule was generated on a Critical Path Method (CPM) Scheduling Program. This program will be utilized for all consultant-generated scheduling functions to integrate design., agency approval, bid and construction phase elements, if desired. t I , tl l i �J r �- ----------- I y 70 T •r_ If`'•d' I � � I i i I I t i rt ti , CASH g ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS August 28, 1989 A CAL IfORNLA CORPORATION City of Huntington Beach Water Department 19001 Huntington Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jeff Renna Water Superintendent Subject: PROJECT CC-534; FEE PROPOSAL (C&A Proposal No. 93600.00) Gentlemen: A summary of proposed fees for the respective phases are as follows: Phase I (T&M, NTE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $39,928.00 Phase II (Est.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9% to 12%('' Phase III (Est.) Approx. 1%±") All phases proposed on above are negotiable based on the tasks outlined and the efforts required. We have proposed on providing a comprehensive evaluation and study for the pump station related elements. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss the Scope of Work with the Water Department. Phases 11 and III are proposed as basic percentages or percent ranges of construction cost. When Phase I is complete, we will itemize all known tasks and their associated effort including a detailed drawing list. All aspects of the itemization will be open for discussion and review by the Water Department and our team. A detailed task list for Phase I follows with the anticipated effort of each consultant per task itemized. Associated average billing rates accompany these efforts. Note that for the Phase I Study, much of the work is accomplished by firm principals and lead engi- neers. This is indicative of technical studies and the degree of professional involvement we feel this study requires. The average billing rates will be lower for the Phase II effort due to a greater cross-section of firm involvement. The effort proposed is based on evaluating no more than three (3) alternative configurations of the facility_ Additional alternatives can be evaluated, but this will impact both the study cost and possibly the schedule as well. Percent of construction cost - including all fees less standard reimburseables, see Rate Schedule. P.O. Box 38 Long Beach, CA 90801 2599 East 28th Street (213) 426-6145 FAX (213) 424-5459 City of Huntington Be* PROJEC -534 .Mr. Jeff Renna FEE ZWOSAL August 28, 1989 (C&A Proposal No. 93600.00) Page 2 Task I - Data Collection/Field Investigations: a. Project Management 8hrs @ $85.00 = $ 680.00 b. Mechanical 16hrs @ $79.40 = $ 1,270.00 C. Hydroelectrical 24hrs @ $50.00 = S 1,200.00 d. Electrical -0- (complete) _ .0 e. Civil/Structural/Arch -0- (complete) = 0 f. Geotechnical Surveying -0- (complete) = 0 Reimburseables _ S 200.00 TOTAL $ 3,350.00 Task R - Analysis of Data/Preliminary Calculations: a. Project Management 8hrs @ $85.00 = $ 680.00 b. Mechanical 28hrs @ $87.00 = $ 2,436.00 C. Hydroelectrical 40hrs @ $50.00 = S 2,000.00 d. Electrical 8hrs @ $60.00 = S 480.00 e. Civil/Struct/Arch 2hrs @ $70.00 = S 140.00 f. Geotechnical/Surveying -0- (complete) = 0 TOTAI, $ 5,736.00 Task III - Preliminary Design (Unit sizing, ratings, space requirements, criteria): a. Project Management : 8hrs @ $85.00 = $ 680.00 b. Mechanical 68hrs @ $72.00 = S 4,896.00 C. Hydroelectrical 24hrs @ $50.00 = $ 1,200.00 d. Electrical 8hrs @ $60.00 = $ 480.00 e. Civil/Struct/Arch 12hrs @ $70.00 = S 840.00 f. Acoustical 4hrs @ $85.00 = $ 340.00 g. Geotechnical/Surveying -0- (complete) = 0 TOTAL $ 8,436.00 Task IV - Alternative Development: a. Project Management 12hrs @ $85.00 = $ 1,020.00 b. Mechanical 28hrs @ $87.00 = $ 2,436.00 C. Hydroelectrical 40hrs @ $50.00 = $ 2,000.00 d. Electrical 24hrs @ $60.00 = $ 1,440.00 e. Civil/Struct/Arch 32hrs @ $70.00 = $ 2,240.00 f. Acoustics 10hrs @ $85.00 = S 850.00 g. Geotechnical 8hrs @ $85.00 = $ 680.04 TOTAL $103,666.00 City of Huntington Be PROJEC-534 _ .Mr. Jeff Renna FEE PRWOSAL August 28, 1989 (C&A Proposal No. 93600.00) Page 3 Task V - Recommendations and Report: a. Project Management 22hrs @ $85.00 = $ 1,870.00 b. Mechanical 34hrs @ $72.00 = S 2,448.00 C. Hydroelectrical 40hrs @ $50.00 = S 2,000.00 d. Electrical 16hrs @ $60.00 = S 960.00 e. Civil/Struct/Arch/CAD 56hrs @ $52.00 = $ 2,912.00 f. Geotechnical 16hrs @ $85.00 = S 1,360.00 Reimburseables _ S 200.00 TOTAL $11,750.00 GRAND TOTAL $39,938.00 These tasks will be billed on a Time & Material, NTE basis. If the effort required to complete the tasks outlined is less than anticipated, these savings will be passed on to the City. If you have any questions regarding this fee proposal, please call our office. Thank you. Very truly yours, CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Randy H. Mason, P.E. Vice President RHM:gla Enclosure CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK September 8, 1993 Cash & Associates P. 0. Box 38 Long Beach, CA 90801 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting held Tuesday, September 7, 1993 approved Amendment No. 2 to Engineering Design Services Agreement between the City and Cash and Associates Engineers, Inc. , for the Reservoir Hill/Overmeyer Pump Station Complex. Enclosed is -an executed copy of the agreement for your records. Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:bt (Telephone:714-536-5227) r � REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date September 7 , 1993 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator4 Prepared by: (`'Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works Subject: PROJECT CC-534; RESERVOIR HILL BOOSTER STATION - INSPECTION SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 2- 7 iq�& Consistent with Council Policy? ( I I New Po1lqy1_qRk-xce tion Statement of Issue, Recommended Action, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments:' Statement of Issue: Pursuant to City Council authorization on July 6, 1993 , a proposal to provide construction support services for Project Cash Contract 534 ; Reservoir Hill Booster Station has been received, and the Consultant Contract Amendment is ready to be executed. Recommended Actions: 1 . Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract amendment to Cash & Associates, Inc. , for Project CC-534 , Reservoir Hill Booster Station, and; a. Authorize the expenditure of $69, 712 . 00 to Cash & Associates, Inc. , for the completion of design services. b. Authorize the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $63 , 500. 00 for construction support services. 2 . Approve an amendment to the current year budget by appropriating $48, 962 . 00 for project construction support services. Analysis: The purpose of this booster station is to enhance water pressure to serve the approximately 800 acres bounded by Ellis Avenue on the north, Huntington Street on the east, Clay Avenue on the south (including Seacliff Shopping Center and Seacliff Estates) , and the bluffs of the Linear Park on the west. September 7, 1993 Project CC-534 ; Reservoir Hill Booster Station - Inspection Services and Construction Support Page 2 Analysis - continued: On July 6, 1993 , City Council took formal action to: a. Award a construction contract to Schuler Engineering in the amount of $2 , 482 , 413 . 00. b. Appropriate $190, 000. 00 for anticipated project supplemental expenses (including $180, 000. 00 for construction support and inspection services) . C. Authorize the Director of Public Works to request proposals from qualified firms to provide the construction support and the inspection services necessary for this project. Design Cash & Associates, Inc. , provided the engineering design services for this project in accordance with the Consultant Contract Amendment dated September 18 , 1990. Due to City staff manpower deficiencies and other technical considerations, this project had been on hold until March 1993 , when design resumed. Due to this time delay and additional design considerations, additional fees in the amount of $69, 712 . 00 are necessary for the completion of the engineering design. Construction Support Construction support involves the intimate review of construction shop drawings, calculations and details specific to the Contractor's chosen method of construction. All of these must be consistent with the Design Engineer's original concepts and specifications. Construction support services are necessary in order to maintain a high level of quality control necessary for the construction of this booster station. The required construction support expertise and number of dedicated hours required for a project of this magnitude is not available from City staff members. Cash & Associates Inc. , as the project Design Engineer, has an intimate knowledge of the project, and its specific design criteria. Cash & Associates, Inc. , submitted a proposal to provide these construction support services in an amount not-to-exceed $63 , 500. 00 . Therefore, the Director of Public Works recommends that the Council approve Amendment No. 2 with Cash & Associates, Inc. , in an amount not-to-exceed $133 , 212 . 00 for both design and construction support services. September 7 , 1993 Project CC-534 ; Reservoir Hill Booster Station - Inspection Services and Construction Support Page 3 Funding Source• On July 6, 1993 , City Council appropriated $190, 000. 00 from Water Division Capital Improvement Account E-EW-PW-848-6-39-00 for project supplemental expenses which includes $180, 000. 00 construction support and inspection. On August 16, 1993 , City Council authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a consultant agreement with CMI Engineering Consultants for professional inspection services in an amount not-to-exceed $95, 750. 00, leaving a balance of $84 , 250. 00 for construction support services. Therefore, the Director of Public Works requests that $69, 712 . 00 be expended for the completion of design services and an additional $48, 962 . 00 be appropriated for construction support services. Alternative Actions: 1. Deny request and utilize City staff to provide construction support services. Because City Staff was not the design engineer for the project, it is not practical nor cost effective for staff to provide construction support which requires an intimate knowledge and familiarity with the design specifics. 2 . Deny request and direct staff on how to proceed. The Contractor is ready to begin construction within the next 30 days. It is not advisable to begin construction without professional construction support services under contract. Attachments• Consultant Agreement Amendment No. 2 . LFS:JRR:DMD:bb DECEIVED • DEPT.of UPLIC WORKS �� CASH & ASSOCIATES AUG 231993 A. Ross Cash Engineering and Architecture Elliott H.Boone WATER DiviSIUN Randy H.Mason HUNTINGTON BEACH, CF Wilfrido B.Simbol August 23, 1993 City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, Water Division P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jeff Renna Subject: COMPLETION OF THE RESERVOIR HILUOVERMYER PUMP STATION PROJECT (C&A Project No. 3600.01) Gentlemen: The following Scope of Work and related fee is required to complete the design of the Reservoir Hill Pump Station. Note that at the time the project was put on hold, $21,288 remained in the budget. PROJECT TASKS TO COMPLETE 1. Meet with City Water Department and related agencies to reacquaint all personnel regarding the scope of remaining services and the issues left to be resolved. 2. Finalize architectural,civil,structural,electrical,mechanical and control systems for the Pump Station. 3. Revise piping systems based on comments by the Water Department. 4. Revise electrical system based on comments by the Water Department. 5. Finalize the site grading and paving plans and details. 6. Assist the Water Department in the permit processing of the project. 7. Finalize details for the: a. Propane tank and distribution system. b. Fluoride tank storage system. C. Cement and meter test building. d. Revise reservoir overflow details. 8. Re-edit the specifications. 9. Re-edit the construction cost estimate. CHANGES IN SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Cash&Associates will take the lead role in submittals and review process with the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department. 5772 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 100 Huntington Beach, California 92649 (714) 895-2072 (310) 426-6145 Mailing Address: P. 0. Box 2715, Huntington Beach, California 92647 FAX (714) 895-1291 A California Corporation City of Huntington Beach • COMPLETIAVOF RESERVOIR HILL Mr. Jeff Renna PUMP STATION PROJECT August 23, 1993 (C&A Project No. 3600.01) Page 2 2. Cash&Associates will take the lead role in all coordination, submittals and processing for City Plan Check. 3. Provide design for the extension of retaining walls along the future truck wash. 4. Provide oil/water separator design and details for the future truck wash. 5. Specify and coordinate the relocation of the Gas Meter. 6. Provide a propane gas system surge tank and ranson unit design. 7. Relocate the main air compressor system into the Pump Station. 8. Relocate the main power panel system from within the Pump Station to a waterproof enclosure outside of the building. 9. Re-design the piping and valving for the future hydroturbine. 10. Expedite the completion of the work to accommodate the compressed schedule necessary for City action. FEE Cash&Associates proposes to provide the services outlined on a Time and Material, Not-to-Exceed basis. Our Team Fee for the work is as follows: 1. Services as outlined in A & B above . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $91,000.00 2. Balance remaining in contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $21,288.00 3. Additional Authorization Requested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $69,712.00 Our procedure is to invoice at the end of the month for work completed during the month, or upon completion of the work if completed within thirty days. Our terms are Net 30 Days from date of invoice. If this project is not complete by December 31, 1994 the fee will be subject to renegotiation. Thank you for the opportunity to provide continuing services to the City of Huntington Beach Water Department. Very truly yours, CASH & ASSOCIATES Randy H. ason, P.E. Executive Vice President RHM:gla Enclosures R W9 IVED �--. DEPT. 01FRLIC WORKS CACASH & ASSOCIATES A.Ross Cash Engineering and Architecture AUG 23 199? ElliottH.Boone Randy H.Mason WATER DI SIGN Wilfrido B.Simbol HUNTINGTON BEACH, C August 23, 1993 City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, Water Division P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jeff Renna Subject: RESERVOIR HILL/OVERMYER PUMP STATION COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES PROPOSAL (C&A Project No. 3600.01) Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we are pleased to submit this proposal for Construction Phase Services for the subject project. SCOPE OF WORK Cash & Associates will provide the following services: 1. Periodic site visits to verify that construction is in accordance with the intent of the Construction Drawings and Specifications. Site visits will include the involvement of: a. Cash & Associates b. ASL Consulting Engineers c. Frank Y. Tso Electrical Engineering Co., Inc. d. GEOFON, Inc. - Soils Consultant 2. Review of Shop Drawings will include: a. Reinforcing bar bending schedules b. Concrete mix designs c. Structural steel fabrication d. Architectural finishes e. Emergency generator f. Engines g. Pumps h. Valves i. Transformers j. Control equipment k. Miscellaneous items as specifically listed in the Project Specifications 3. Test Data Review will include: a. Review of excavation and compaction data. 5772 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 100 Huntington Beach, California 92649 (714) 895-2072 (310) 426-6145 Mailing Address: P. 0. Box 2715, Huntington Beach, California 92647 FAX (714) 895-1291 A California Corporation ' City of Huntington Beach RESERVOIRTfILL/OVERMYER PUMP Mr. Jeff Renna CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES August 23, 1993 (C&A Project No. 3600.01) Page 2 b. Certification that soil conditions are as anticipated. If not as anticipated, recommendations for remedial action will be made. Depending on the scope of remedial action, this work may be subject to a change in the work scope based on "unanticipated conditions" beyond our control. c. Review concrete cylinder test reports. d. Review equipment test data. e. Review pressure testing of piping systems. 4. Respond to inquiries made by the Contractor through the City Inspector assigned to the project. 5. Provide documentation for changed conditions. Major changes required due to unfor- seen conditions will be subject to a change in work scope. 6. Provide final inspection and punch lists to be utilized by the Contractor for final corrections. 7. Assist the City of Huntington Beach in the review of Payment Requests, if needed. 8. Assist the City of Huntington Beach in the review of Change Order Requests from the Contractor. FEE Cash &Associates proposes to provide the services outlined on a Time and Material, Not-to- Exceed without prior notification basis. It is anticipated that the construction of the pump house will take approximately twelve (12) months due to the variety of activities necessary for the work as well as the phasing for shut- downs and start-ups. Our Team Fee for these construction phase services is$63,500.00(Sixty Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars). Work includes involvement, as stated in the Scope of Work above, by the following consultants with the level of effort noted: 1. Cash & Associates ($30,000 dollars) 2. ASL Consulting Engineers ($24,500 dollars) 3. Frank Y. Tso Electrical Engineering Co., Inc. ($4,000 dollars) 4. GEOFON, Inc. ($5,000 dollars) The fee quoted above assume the following: 1. As on all previous projects that Cash & Associates has participated on with the City of Huntington Beach, Water Division, the Division will provide: a. A City Inspector acting as Construction Administrator/Manager. City of Huntington Beach RESERVOIOLL/OVERMYER PUMP Mr. Jeff Renna CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES August 23, 1993 (C&A Project No. 3600.01) Page 3 b. The City will make Cash & Associates aware of scheduled events requiring our review and involvement. c. The City will provide all required testing. d. The City will provide As-Built drawing documentation. Our procedure is to invoice at the end of the month for work completed during the month, or upon completion of the work if completed within thirty days. Our terms are Net 30 Days from date of invoice. If this project is not complete by December 31, 1994 the fee will be subject to renegotiation. Thank you for the invitation to present this proposal and we look forward to the opportunity of working with you. Very truly yours, CASH & ASSOCIATES Randy H'. Mason, P.E. Executive Vice President RHM:gla Enclosures CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH •� INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator FROM: DAN T. VILLELLA, Acting Deputy City Administrator SUBJECT: FUNDING REQUESTED TO ACCOMMODATE SUPPORT SERVICES FOR RESERVOIR HILL BOOSTER STATION, FIS 94-04 DATE: AUGUST 26, 1993 As required by Resolution 4832, a fiscal impact statement has been prepared for the proposed appropriation of $48,962 to accommodate the support services pertinent to the construction of the Reservoir Hill Booster Station. Upon approval of the City Council, the balance of the unaudited, undesignated Water Fund would be reduced to $5,979,000. DAN T. VILLELLA Acting Deputy City Administrator DTV:skd ISSUE DATE '.1P.+b:�L'YYl 7/1 /93 dl;l� THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND ,DUCER CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE The Dougherty Company, Inc. DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE P.Q. BOX 7277 POLICIES BELOW. Long Beach, CA 90807 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPAN LETTER Y A American Alliance Insurance Co. COMPANY B American National Fire Insurance -Co. LETTER INSURED Cash S Associates COMPANY C Associated Indemnity Corporation LETTER P.O. Box 2715 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 COM A LERY D _ COMPANY E LETTER - THIS IINDICAST O CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANC TE LISTED ERM OR CONDIICY PERIOD TION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPE HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR CT TOLWHICH THIS DING ANY CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES --"--- POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS COI TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE(MM/D01YY) DATE(MM/DD1YY) LTR _ t,� BODILY INJ�RV OCC. S GENERAL LIABILITY Excludes Professional Liability BODILY INJLwAGG. 5 _ �[ COMPREHENSIVE FORM I PROPERTY IMAGE OCC 4$ X 'PREt,'.SESiOPERATIONS _ _ � PROPERIYi:.+i.tAGEAGG. XlUNDERGROUND 1^V V V r V4u'I EXPLOSION&Co [APSEHA?ARD PAC 7012836 7/1 /93 711 /94 BI&PD Cc!,61NED OCC - I_, r PRCC_CfS C'_)%IP,`FED OPER X - BI J:PD GGtd6iNED Dd 1 X - CON—,' -i UAL I PERSCNAt % ,HY AGG ` �' X va NT CON1I 1C Lq I -- 1 —_' X _ —M PRUPEk Y L 1A'' L I r' .INJ:.iRY _.__...,,�._.�.--- -. I. .-X-_.�ar.:..__ - �_.�.. -. BODILY IN—RY F AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY (Per person; XANY r' T X CAP 7012837 I 7/1 /93 7/1 /94 - BGTI ;, Is g A0. J:'INF:D AUTOS I Priv. Pass 1 (Per aw.- _ }I Other Than I X ALL VED AUTOS l Ptiv.Pass. ` PROPERi :)AMAGE " X ,NC U 'Eii AUTOS GA�-1� 11U I ,I BODILY INJLri� 7i, - ° PROPERTv'DANIAGE °' ,.i-:..GL-I-(ABILITY ��F- 3.'`` I I COMBINED 1 000 0�0. EACH OCCURRENCE S II � I EXCESS LIABILITY AGGREGATE -I.A FORM ------ -- ^_ I r'•.N UMBRELLA FORM __ - ---..—_--..-. STAI.,l ORY LIMITS WORKER S COMPENSATION EACH Ar C R 1 ,000,000 AND WZP 70524500 7/1 /93 7/1 /94 DISEASE-_.PC-1(,: 4 1 ,000,000 DISEASE- ACI;EMPL)\EF 1 r_Q-OQr_U�Q EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY OTHER DFSCRIPTIC,N nF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSWEHICLESlSPECIAL ITEMS ALL OPERATIONS - U.S.A. Additional Insured Endorsements Attached. f 7 ��,a • - . SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE Attn:: Risk Management Division it.; I EXPII�I�TION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL cityof Huntington Beach I MAIL`30?1DAY5 W�i�TTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE y LEFT x3XlXiKATx �KJCLx14 �XLca�l4PSttXZSR 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I,I AUTHORI REP ESE NTA 08/10/93 09:51 U714 553 3302 DIANE ( JK.N)VLLL Lejyj sJ l oi93 .�' I'ItOnUCER TIll6 CfiKTIFICATE IS ISSIdFIU AS A DSATTE F[t O INFORMATION ONLY A, > CONFERS NO RICLlel'S UPON TIIE CEx'i'IFICATE IIOLDER-TUNA CEkT1FICATE Thz Crowell 111,iuronco AgrnCY DUED NVC Arv1t.hlYJ.EXTEND Olt Alm-RkTIIC COVERAnN AIII'Ord)ED BV T111E POLICI fin)MLOW P.U- Box 19501 colvrnAtvrEs AFFoxnxNG covER.A.Gr 49 Lv,l,., 11 P,.,It,4)uAL200 COh1PaNY LtCI•['F,x A Irvine, CA 92713-9501 COMPANY LETTER INSURED COMPANY 1;R'f rER C Cash& Associstns Engineers COMPANY LETTER 5772 Bolsa Ave.nua,Suite 100 Fr-OM MANY Huntington Bch CA 92649 LETTI R E T)nsign Professionals Ins, Co. ,PHIS IS 1,0 Chet IIFS'THAT'PIKE POLICIES OF INNURANCE LISTED ARLOW IIAVE BZ9N ISSLBD TO,raR INSURED NAMED ABOVE POP TIIE POLICY I'RRIOD INDICATED.NtYIVITUSTANIANC ANY RLQ(JIKRMENT,TERRt OR CONDITION OP ANY CONTRACT'()R OTHER DOCVMRNT WITH Rt SPV4-F'I'tl WIIICII Tllla CERTIFICATE.%IAY BE ISSURD OR MAY 11RkT.tIN.TfLH INt+URANCE AFFOKORD BYTIIE I'OLICIRS DESCRIBED FIkkRIN IS SUBJEC71'TO ALL TIIE TERM h. EXCLUSIONS.tiND CONIWrIONS OF FIJCII POLICIES.LIMITS SIIOWN MAY HAVE BEEN KKnU QED BY PAID CLAIMS. POLICY EXI'• LIMITS CO 'r),ry 11F INNI III A VA POLICY NUMBER L,.TE Ibth41115n'tiq D.LTD(AIbIlI)ulVtt) TR C,9NRRAL AGGREGA71.8 GENIEKAI.LIABILITY Px01).CCIMPIOP AGE. CO\1M.GPNERAL LIARIIATY PERS.&ADv.INJUk1' CLAIMS MADE =�C• KACIIOCCVRRENCK OtvN'[:K S 24 CO,rx, L I'S 1'kuT FIRE DAMACE(One Flru) tr1ED. IXP. One Per) COMBINxn SINGLE AU'll)MOla1LE LIAM1,1TY LIMIT ANY.�Vt O �c� ALL OWNED nvftlS -t'a� %OWLY INJUnv YrfiNIf111 (Per I,,,rHr,lu (;CHI:OULED Av1't>S �..,..�.i Witld HIkED AUTOS far e!!C�10d dalm the nOUILY INJURY NON-OWNf?U AUTUS Polley Wod' „N n vAt1 be re*wu d by (Peruc Idval) payments for indem ity and e"nse . CAkAGE LIABILITY PROPgkTY DAMAGE RYf F9,i I IAi111.iTY AYY j;OVLD :i.S TO 'OEM'• EAC•II O(7CukkRNCE LIMBRIELIA.rOkM CKIL HtJ'TO`1+, C ty ACCk2CATE tyl'IILKTIIANI;nutKELL.tFORM D8 uty Cit Attorney a'rn'rtrl'tikl'LI\4I15 " WGI{K F.",C'OMPL'NSA,m ON �/j J'1' UACN ACCIDENT AND I ))n RASE-POLICY LIMIT EMPLOCIiK S LIABILITY DIaKASB•EACII E. E cm-witPL46131501 11/01 J92 11/01193 1000000 EACH CLAlIv1 ^'PROFESSIONAL 2000000 AGGREGATE LIABILITY Dd.,Ckl1'TIONON 01•ERATIONylI.00ATI6NS VhIIlCLES/SI19C1nLITEMS +*E:{C:EPT IF CANCELLED FOR NUN-PAY, 10 DAY NOTICE�VILL BE GIVEN suOULD ANY OF T, :u: THE ABOv nKKIn CANCELLED CD POL1C KS IM . 1S I:I�IIKL 1"{1L 1tiXPtRATION pn'fRTF1EREOlP,')'HK ISauINu 4-:u,nPA,1 r n Ir,L NIAII. ,- D,tV:ttVRI'1'i'ENMO'I'ICE'fOTIILCEit'I'1N'IC,\TFfIOLDC.RNAMB'I)TIITIlE CITY OF HIJNTTNGTON BEACH " LOT,B •S. ATTN: L0131S F.SANDOVAL 2000 MAIN ST, AtMtO D RKVk AT Iit:NTINVT0N BEACH,CA 92648 f� 08-10-93 09: 17AM PO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE RESERVOIR HILL/OVERMYER PUMP STATION COMPLEX (CC-534) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this / 8 day of ` &Are-ft Ar-v- , 19 �_, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR. " WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of an engineering design contractor to prepare the preliminary engineering design report and construction cost estimate (Phase I) ; prepare the final working drawings, contract specifications and other related work, up to the award of a construction contract (Phase II) ; and assist during construction (Phase III) for the Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex in the City of Huntington Beach; and CONTRACTOR has been selected to perform said services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows : 1 . WORK STATEMENT CONTRACTOR shall provide all services as described in the Request for Proposal, dated July 19 , 1989 , and CONTRACTOR ' S Proposal dated August 28, 1989 , (hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit "A" ) , which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference . Said services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as "PROJECT. " -1- CONTRACTOR hereby designates Randy H. Mason, who shall represent it and �be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 2 . CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shalll assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONTRACTOR in the performance of this Agreement . 3 . TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement . The services of the CONTRACTOR, are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of Ilthis Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than 87 calendar days from the date of thisAgreement. These times may be extended with the written permission of the CITY. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be as shown in' the Scope of Services on the Work Program/ Project Schedule.) This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed by 'the CITY and CONTRACTOR. 4 . COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the engineering services (Phase I only) described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a fee not to exceed Thirty-nine Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty-eight and no/100 Dollars ($391928 . 00) . CII�TY and CONTRACTOR shall amend this agreement to include the final negotiated fees for Phase II and Phase III . 5 . EXTRA WORK In the event of authorization, in writing by the CITY, of changes from the work described in Exhibit "A" , or for other written permissiin authorizing additional work not contemplated -2- • herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for such Extra Work, so long as the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6 . METHOD OF PAYMENT A. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to progress payments toward the fixed fee set forth in Section 4 herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit A" . B. Delivery of work product : A copy of every technical memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to the CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks . In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted. C. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY an invoice for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall : 1) Reference this Agreement; 2) Describe the services performed; 3) I Show the total amount of the payment due; 4) Include a certification by a principal member of the CONTRACTOR' S firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and 5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall -3- • 1 r • promptly lllthe invoice in v p tl a p Y approve the which event ent payment shall be made within thirty (36) days ' of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of thereasons for non-approval, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that past performancelby CONTRACTOR is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof . D. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by the CITY shall be invoiced separately to the CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required under paragraph 6C, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement . 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder, including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notes, calculations, maps and other documents, shall be turned over to CII�TY upon termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first . In the event -4- this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY in the completion of PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit . Title to said materials shall pass to the CITY upon payment of feesdetermined to be earned by CONTRACTOR to the point of termination or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is applicable. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder . 8 . INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify and hold and save harmless CITY, its officers and employees from any and all liability, including any claim of liability and any and all losses or costs arising ' �out of the negligent performance of this agreement by CONTRACTOR, its officers or employees . 9 . WORKERS 'I COMPENSATION CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers ' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the California LaborlCode and all amendments thereto; and all similar state or federallacts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature and description, including attorney' s fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against CITY, for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement . CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish evidence to CITY of maintenance of statutory workers ' compensation insurance and -5- i • 1 employers liabillity in an amount of not less than $100, 000 bodily injury by accident, each occurrence, $100, 000 bodily injury by disease, each employee, and $250, 000 bodily injury by disease, policy limit . 10 . INSURANCE In addition to the workers ' compensation insurance and CONTRACTOR' S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish to CITY the following insurance policies covering the PROJECT: A. General Liability Insurance. A policy; of general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall indemnify CONTRACTOR, its officers, agents and employees, while acting within the scope of their duties, against any and all claims of arising out of or in connection with the PROJECT;I and shall provide coverage in not less than the following amount: combined single limit bodily injury and property damage, including products/completed operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of $1, 00, 000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under aform which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1, 000, 000 . Said policy shall name CITY, its officers, and employees as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage and that CONTRACTOR' S insurance shall be primary. -6- B. Professional Liability Insurance. CONTRACTOR shall acquire a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder . Said policy shall provide coverage for CONTRACTOR' S professional liability in an amount not less than $500, 000. per claim. A claims made policy shall be acceptable. 11 . CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE; ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENTS Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverages as required by Sections 9 and 10 herein; said certificates shall provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy, and shall state that the policy is currently in force and shall promise to provide that such policies will not be cancelled or modified without thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY. CONTRACTOR shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverages in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverages $hall not derogate from the provisions for indemnification of CITY BY CONTRACTOR under Section 8 of this Agreement . CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of all said policies of insurance. CONTRACTOR shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on all insurance hereinabove required. -7- 0 A separate copy of the additional insured endorsement to each of CONTRACTOR' S insurance policies, naming the CITY, its officers and employees as Additional Insureds shall be provided to the City Attorney for approval prior to any payment hereunder. 12 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor . CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any and all payments of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder . 13 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR' S services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing through the City Engineer, notice of which shall be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16 herein. 14 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to any other person or entity without the consent of CITY. -8- 1 15 . COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CONTRACTOR shall not apply for a patent or copyright on any item or mater��lial produced as a result of this Agreement, as set forth in 41 CFR 1-9 . 1. 16 . CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any regular . CITY employee inithe work performed pursuant to this Agreement . No officer or empllloyee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement' in violation of California Government Code Sections 1090 et seq. 17 . NOTICES Any notices or special instructions required to be given in writing underlthis Agreement shall be given either by personal delivery to CONTRACTOR' S agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or t'o CITY' S Director of Public Works, as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage) prepaid, and depositing the same in, the United States Postal Services, addressed as follows : TO CITY: TO CONTRACTOR: Mr. Louis Sandoval Mr . A. Ross Cash, President Director of Public Works Cash & Associates City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 38 2000 Main Street Long Beach, CA 90801 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REST OF PAGE NOT USED -9- 18 . ENTIRETY The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth the entire Agreement between the parties . 19 . COMPLIANCE WITH HBMC CHAPTER 3 . 03 This agreement has been procured pursuant to, and complies with the provisions of, Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 3 . 03 , entitled "Professional Services . " IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers the day, month and year first above written. CONTRACTOR: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, A municipal corporation of th State of Californi r' �{. ✓� .ti. Ca 9- 7 -8 9 Lac, A Ross Cash, President Mayor Randy H. Mahon, Vice President ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: • City Clerk Cit Attorney REVIA ;,APPRC?VE I ITIATED A APPROVED: i City Administrator Direct r of Public Works q -�- get sg -10- • EXHIBIT A e GENERAL CONDITIONS I . Payment : The Engineer shall provide the Client with months statements for services rendered and reimburs- able costs incurred , and the Client shall pay these state- ments within thirty days of their presentation. In the event that a statement shall remain unpaid for thirty days or longer after its presentation to the Client , then it shall accrue interest at the rate of 101 per annum from the 30th day after its presentation. 2. Ownership_ of Documents: The documents prepared by the Engineer pursuant to this -Agreement are instruments of service and are and shall remain the Engineer's property whether the project is executed or not. They are not to be used by the Client on other projects or extensions of the project except by agreement in writing. 3. Arbitration: All claims , disputes and other matters in question between the parties to this Agreement , arising out of , or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof , may , with the consent of both parties , be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association ther, in effect unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. No arbitration , arising out of, or relating to this Agreement , shall include , by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any additional party rot a party to this Agreement except by written consent containing a specific reference to this Agreement and signed by all the parties thereto. Any consent to arbitration involving an additional party shall not constitute consent to arbitration of any dispute not described herein or with any party not named or described therein. This Agreement to arbitrate and any agreement to arbitrate with an additional party or parties duly consented to by the parties thereto shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law. Notice of the demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the other party to this Agreement and with the American Arbitration Association. The demand shall be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no' event shall the demand for arbitration be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations . Page Two • Exhibit A The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final , and judgement may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 4 . Indemnification: The Client shall indemnify the Engineer against a c aims made against the Engineer con- cerning the project except for those claims which arise from the Engineer's actual professional negligence or willful misconduct. 5. Risk Allocation: Client and Engineer have dis- cussed their risks—, rewards and benefits of the project and the Engineer's total fee for services. The risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees that to the fullest extent permitted by law, Engineer's total liability to Client for any and all injuries , claims , losses , expenses, damages , or claim expenses arising out of this agreement from any cause or causes , .shall not exceed the total amount of Such causes include but are not limited to Engineerls negligence , errors, omissions , strict liabi- lity, breach of contract or breach of warranty. 6 . Attorney ' s Fees: In the event that litigation develops between e Client and the Engineer concerning or arising out of this Agreement and/or any services performed pursuant to this Agreement, then the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to recover from the other reasonable attorney's fees and litigation costs . 7 . Termination: Because of the importance of a good working re ations ip between the Client and the Engineer, it is hereby agreed that either party may terminate this Agree- ment upon written notice to the other party provided only that this notice is given in a good faith belief that said working relationship is less than satisfactory. Upon the termination of this Agreement by either party, the Client shall pay the Engineer for services performed and reimburs- able costs incurred at rates and for items determined by the applicable terms of this Agreement. January 1, 1989 A.Ross Cash Elliott H.Boone Randy H.Mason CA I- CASH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Wilfrido B.Simbol Larry W.Nye EXHIBIT B RATE SCHEDULE FOR ENGINEEING SERVICES ON A TIME AND MATERIAL BASIS HOURLY OVERTIME SENIOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANT S95.00 $95.00 SUPERVISING PROJECT MANAGER 95.00 95.00 PROJECT MANAGER 85.00 85.00 PROJECT ENGINEER 70.00 70.00 SENIOR ENGINEER 70.00 70.00 ARCHITECT 60.00 60.00 JUNIOR ENGINEER 50.00 59.00 PROJECT DESIGNER 58.00 68.00 SENIOR DESIGNER 50.00 59.00 DESIGNER 44.00 52.00 DRAFTER 37.00 44.00 WORDPROCESSOR 39.00 46.00 CLERICAL 35.00 41.00 IN-HOUSE COMPUTERS: DRAFTING (CAD) 10.00 -- CALCULATIONS 10.00 -- WORDPROCESSOR 10.00 -- In addition, for direct out-of-pocket expenses (if and when they occur) we quote the following: 1) In-House Repro: BIueprint S.10 to $1.50 per square feet-depending on type of paper Xerox S.43 to $1.20 per square feet-depending on type of paper 2) Automobile: $.25 per mile 3) Travel Expense: at Cost 4) Subsistence: While away from home office for more than one day: at Cost, but not to exceed $150.00 per day/per man. 5) Plan Check and Building Permit Fees: at Cost plus 10% markup 6) Telephone charges outside Area Codes 213, 714, 818: at cost plus 10% markup 7) Third Party Services: at Cost plus 10% markup a) Surveying b) Soils investigation c) Testing laboratory work d) Consultant and subcontract professional fees e) Printing and copy services for bidding and construction documents Payments due under this schedule shall bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum commencing thirty (30) days after the date of invoice. Terms are Net - Thirty Days. owl A California Corporation 2599 East 28th Street P.O.Box 38 Long Beach,CA 90801 (213)426-6145 FAX(213)424-5459 C1T Y OF HUNTINGT N BEACH ' 2000 MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 July 19, 1939 Mr. A. Ross Cash Cash & Associates Engineers P.O. Box 38 Long Beach, CA 90801 Subject: Request for Proposal Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex; CC-534 Gentlemen: The City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Forks is requesting proposals from qualified civil engineering firms for the preparation of a preliminary engineering design report and construction cost estimate (Phase I); preparation of final working drawings, contract soecifications and other related work, permits, etc., up to the WA/ard of a construction contract (Phase II); and assistance during construction (Phase III) for the subject project. The scope of work for all three phases which proposals are being solicited includes the following tasks: Phase I - P-eliminary Design Report 1. Review all existing drawings and specifications including the following: A. Reservoir Hill Booster Station g. Overmyer Reservoir Booster Station C. -lectrical - Water Warehouse and Yard Improvement Project 2. Prepare a comprehensive design analysis of. the entire proposed Booster Pump Station complex hydraulic system, structural analysis of any proposed work to meet current unifor-n building code requirements and American Water Works Association guidelines and hydraulic institute standards. 3. Performance of all necessary field investigations and measurements, survey, geotechnical, etc. 4. Formulate options and make recommendations-to the City for the following: A. Reservoir Hill Booster Station using the established design and pumping capacities prepared by ASI._ Consulting Engineers at the new location as a g-jide. Analyze the option of using existing storage in the reservoir as one of it's sources as well as the main water systern. Request for Proposal Reservoil '—fill/Overmver Pump Station July 19, 1999 Page 2 _ B. Relocate existing fluoride storage tanks to a suitable location within the water operation yard, if necessary. C. Permanently house emergency electrical generator(s) to cower the water operations facility including the ne,.v water warehouse. D. Modify the existing Overmyer Booster Pump Station, to better serve existing and future needs. Demolish existino station. E. Oesign a hydroelectric generating system for energy recovery on the Overmyer reservoir complex fill lines. F. !-)esign an all encompassing structure to house Items A, C, 0 and E. 5. Submit a preliminary desiqn report (minimum three copies) incorporating the results of analysis and findings of the tasks above. It shall include: A. _aeotechnical findings. B. =conomic findings of selected alternatives. C. Sketches showing overall site plan and sections of selected alternatives. n. preparation of a construction cost estimate to be used 5y the Citv for the establishment of a budget. 6. provide assistance to the City in the processing of environmental documents including filling out of required forms furnished by the City. The City will handle for environmental application processing. 7. .Attend a minimum of (4) four meetings with City staff during Phase 1, excluding field investigations in Task 3 above. 8. provide all processing required for obtaining a FERC License and all exemptions requi,ad as well as coordinating work with Southern California Edison Company for the hydroelectric generator(s). 9. Phase I to be completed by December 15, 1989, based on the selection of a consultant by the City Council on September 18, 1939. 10. Meet with other consultants, as needed, to complete the ','/ork. Phase II - in.al Design 1. Prepare final working drawings and contract specifications necessary for bidding. These documents will be based on decisions derived f our Phase I. Final plans to he placed on City furnished mylars with no "sticky backs." ReQuest for Proposal Reservoil ;-sill/Overmyer Pump Station July 19, 1989 Page 3 2. Provide all structural calculations for the proposed project. 3. Coordination with the City of Huntington 9- each Buildinq `_division to ensure anoroval in the permit processing (City will apply for permits.) 4. Provide support to the City at their, .request during bid advertisement. 5. Attend a minimum of (5) five meetings with City staff during Phase II, including a ore-bid conference. 6. Submit for review, plans at the 25%, 50% and 90" completion stages, submit specifications at the 50% and 90% stages. City will furnish the standard "Boiler Plate" specifications which includes "Notice Inviting Seal Bids", "Proposal Form", "Sample Construction Contract and Standard Ceneral Special Provisions". Consultant will furnish the special or technical provisions for this project. 7. Furnish a final construction cost estimate. 9. Based on approval of preliminary plans, specifications and final cost estimate, the consultant shall provide (40) forty sets of the follo,:vinq: A. Final construction drawings B. Contract specifications 9. Phase II must be ready for bid by July 16, 1990.. Phase III - Construction Support 1. Provide construction support through semi-monthly meetings and be available for phone conversations relating to construction and interpretation of plans and specifications. 2. Provide shop drawings and other related submittal reviews. (:VOTE: Tasks l and 2 above will be coordinated through a City representative.) 3. Provide (1) one, acceptable to the City, reproducible set of "Record" rnylar drawings. 4. 10"a of Phase II and III fees will b,� withheld until Item 3 above is accepted. �_aeneral ;requirements The consultant shall furnish proof of the followinq minimum insurance requirements with their proposals: I. reneral Liability Coverage - $1,000,000 CSL per occurrence (\'ote: If provided coverage is under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1,000,000. 1 Request for Proposal Reservoil Hill/Overmver Pump Station Ju1v 19, 1989 Paqe 4 2. Professional liability coverage - $500,000 per occurrence (Note: A claims made policy is acceptable). 3. Workers' Compensation coverage in an amount of not less than $100,000 bodily injury by accident, each accident $100,00.9 bodily injury by disease, each emoloyee, $250,OOO bodily injury by disease, policy limit_. The advertising for bids and awardinq of a construction contract for this project will he administered by City staff. In addition, City personnel will control contract administration and perform required construction inspections. The consultant shall recommend any special inspection procedures to be used. Proposals for this project must he submitted to the attention of Jeff Renna, Water Superintendent no later than 4:00 P.M. on August 28, 1999 with the notation "Overmyer/Reservoir Hill" on the envelope (4) four sets of proposals minimum is required. Each proposal should include the following information: I. A list of similar projects that your desiqn team has recently worked on. 2. A statement of understanding as to the scope of work and the tasks necessary to complete the project. 3. A brief outline of how vour firm will handle this project, if awarded, and time schedule for cornpleting the project. The project mUst be under constriction in Auqust/September, 1990. 4. A list of personnel, including the proposed project manager, who will be assigned to a design team on this project along with their brief resumes (One must be a reoistered structural engineer). One member of the design team shall also be highly qualifed in the design and selection of variable speed pumpinq systems. 5. A detailed listing of each task to be performed, the corresponding man hours and costs for each task, number each task as outlined. This will he used in establishing progress payments. 6. Your fee based on an hourly rate. A maximum not-to-exceed fee should also be specified for Phase I. Phase II and III may be exoressed as a percentage of the approved construction cost estimate. A \villingness to negotiate upon completion of Phase I, should also he indicated if desired. Submit Item No. 6 in a separate sealed attached envelope vith the notation "fees." 7. All consultants are required to view the project site and attend a proposal development meeting on .Auqust 21, 1989 at 10:00 A.M. The site is located at 19001 Huntington Street at Garfield Avenue in Huntington Beach. Request for Proposal Reservoil Hill/Overmyer Pump Station July 19, 1939 Page 5 After the receipt of proposals, proposals will -De screened and ranked relevant to: 1. Expertise and experience. 2. The approach to be used as outlined in the proposal. 3. Ability to complete the project in a timely and consistent manner. The most qualified consultants may he intervie pied prior to the final evaluation. After ranking of proposals, fee envelopes will he opened and compared. Enclosed for your info-mation is a copy of the City's Standard Consultant Contract (see Attachment "B"). Hopefully this sample contract will prove useful in developing your proposal. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this project, please contact Eric Charlonne, Project Engineer, at (714) 535-5921. Very truly your f_ouis E. oval o ublic Norks L1=S:EC:lw cc: Les Evans, City Engineer Jeff Renna, Water Superintendent Robert Taylor, Supervisor Eric Charlonne, Project Engineer Attachments: Attachment "A" - Location Map Attachment "B" - Sainole contract 2120q { ��..��.. ISSUE DATE(MM/DD/YY) n a 7/1 /89 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. The Dougherty Company, Inc. P. O. Box. 7277 -- Long Beach; California 90807 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY LETTER Associated Indemnity Corporation 2? COMPANY INSURED LETTER E Cash & Associates Engineers COMPANY P. O. BOX 38 LETTER C Long Beach, California 90801 COMPANY LETTER r _ OOMPANY E LETTER a THIS IS TO-CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. CO POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE(MM DD YY) DATE(MldrDD W) EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE GENERAL LIABILITY BODILY COMPREHENSIVE FORM INJURY $ $ PREMISESIOPERATIONS PROPERTY UNDERGROUND DAMAGE $ $ EXPLOSION 8 COLLAPSE HAZARD PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS CONTRACTUAL BI s PD u. COMBINED $ $ INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE t. PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY I$ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY IAODIAY / ANY AUTO (PER PERSON) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS(PRIV. PASS.) BODILY OTHER THAN1 ALL OWNED AUTOS(OTHER PRIV. PASS.// (PERp ACCIDENT) $ �Y HIRED AUTOS PROPERTY NON-OWNED WNED AUTOS $ GARAGE LIABILITY »: COMBINED EXCESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FORM BI&PD COMBINED $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM M STATUTORY - WORKERS' COMPENSATION $ , OO("ACH ACCIDENT A AND WZP 80408020 7/1 /89 7/1 /90 )(.ISE� ASE-POLICY LIMIT) '= EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY $ OOfiISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE) '' OTHER pp �,Jtr L p1Vl Y Ns, ,Iro- Nt uYney DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS ALL OPERATIONS - U.S.A. By �` v�'vr, - . _qB- 12-„� K6. ^d • MISS F City Of Huntington Beach SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE ??i . EX- PIRATIQN .DATE THEREOF,' THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL Xi�SDCDOXx1X Insurance and Benefits Division MAIL JO DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE i P.O. Box 190 LEFT,ENITAIKDEa7LJ(D696C(!3-DCBC DOCK(a(.xl'�l�ec1MM)OK)aKXX)OKDul� XXY Xgmco(�m(�uoaDe ara(eex�2na�cl�x. Huntington Beach, California 92648 ALIT RIZE ErPR�sE TATIVEL -7 Attention: Contracts Administrator YES-- ��� � yy � ISSUE DATE(MM/DM D � 6r foe + 0 w ♦ 11 /1 /88 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. The Dougherty Com an' Inc. 9 Y P Y,,.::, P.O. Box 7277 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Long Beach,",:Ca'lifo.rnia 90,8Q7� 11 COMPANY A I LETTER A'merlcan National Fire Insurance Com an COMPANY INSURED LETTER B Associated Indemnity Corporation Cash & Associates Engineers ETTERNY C RECEIVED P.O. BOX 38 COMPANY D NOV 41988 Long Beach, California 90801 LETTER COMPANY E CASH & ASIZOCIATES LETTER .5 • S THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.. CO TYPE OF INSURANC POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS E POLICY NUMBER r LTR DATE(MNVDD/YY) DATE(MM/DD YY) x{H�:�x- EACH I,r'-%Irs-s.' OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE GENERAL LIABILITY BODILY COMPREHENSIVE FORM INJURY $ $ PREMISESIOPERATIONS PROPERTY UNDERGROUND DAMAGE $ $ EXPLOSION&COLLAPSE HAZARD PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS A X CONTRACTUAL PAC 2795814 11 /1 /88 11 /1 /89 COMBINED $ 1,00 $ 00 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY $ 1 , 00 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BODILY ANY AUTO INJURY Y wit b�y (PER PERSON) $ ,ram ALL OWNED AUTOS(PRIV. PASS.) BODILY t€� OTHER THAN + aA` ' � A ALL OWNED AUTOS� THE PASS. ii (PER ACCIDENT) $ HIRED AUTOS BA 8 8001 tACCI"�� ESA /1 /$$ 1 1 /1 /89 � PROPERTY NON-OWNED AUTOS DAMAGE $ ; .x d GARAGE LIABILITY �Y_ BI&PD A vA COMBINED $ m 3t EXCESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FORM I COMBINED $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM 4�� J WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTORY $ (EACH ACCIDENT) B AND WZP 80343228 7/1 /88 7/1 /89 $ -0 ISEASEPOL'Cf UMIT)- EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ~—�i DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER I U0 I '0 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS ALL OPERATIONS - U.S.A. yq. o . a • City of Huntington Beach SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX- PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL 9MXe9 XDCXX Insurance and Benefits Division MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE P.O. Box 190 LEFT,AWX* t7R 5C'A DQ Of4N)A> iiHAya x es xaro�sn €oavto�t aaatom( 9�Xv41KIJc X� DCD:,74AE�, Huntington Beach, California 92648 AU Attention: Contracts Administrator :. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �- 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK June 20, 1990 Cash & Assoc. , Inc. P. 0. Box 38 Long Beach, CA 90801 Attn: A. Ross Cash, President The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting held Monday, June 18, 1990, approved Amendment No. 1 to engineering design services agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Cash and Associates Engineers , Inc. , for the Reservoir Hill/Overmeyer Pump Station Complex, CC-534. Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records . Connie Brockway City Clerk CB: bt Enc. (Telephone: 714-536-5227) REQUESO FOR CITY COUNCIARCTION -�-�-- f w . �e.. Date June 18, 1990 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator - Prepared by: (Louis F. Sandoval , Director of Public Works Subject: RESERVOIR HILL/OVERMYER PUMP STATIO APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL COMPLEX: CC 534 - FINAL DESIGN -= 19 Consistent with Council Policy? (X] Yes ( ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: In accordance with Council authorization of September 18, 1989, Cash and Associates Engineers has completed the Preliminary Design Report for the Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station complex . As per the Consultant Contract, the Final Design cost was subject to negotiation upon completion of the Preliminary Design. This negotiation is now complete and ready for Council authorization. RECOMMENDATION: 1 . Approve the attached Amendment to the Consultant Contract which consists of the following: A. Provide Final Design services for a fixed fee of $208 , 260. c"- B. Provide bid assistance and evaluation services for 4' fee<,-�m not to exceed $10, 200 . w -= �n o C. Provide a Thermal Energy Storage System Project Evaluation for a fixed fee of $13, 500. D. Extend contract completion to October 30 , 1990. 2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached Amendment to the Consultant Contract dated September 18, 1990, with Cash and Associates Engineers for a fee not to exceed $231, 960. ANALYSIS: On September 18 , 1989, Council approved the selection of Cash and Associates Engineers to prepare the Preliminary Design Report for the Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station complex. The Consultant' s Contract called for the Final Design Services to be negotiated upon completion of the Preliminary Design. PI O 5/85 Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex: CC 534 - Final Design - continued June 18 , 1990 The Preliminary Design was completed in accordance with the Contract on April 14, 1990 . Negotiations on the Final Design Services were begun soon after and are now complete. Final Design Services include the preparation of Drawings and Specifications, assistance in bid evaluations, selection and evaluation of product substitutions during the bidding period, and conducting the pre-bid conference. Also included is a feasibility study on the construction of a Thermal Energy Storage System that could be constructed in conjunction with a Hydroelectric Power Generator System that was analyzed in the Preliminary Design. The Thermal Energy Storage System Study is an analysis of the potential for providing an energy cost savings in the cooling/heating of the City Hall building. The savings would be created by utilizing electric power that would be generated by hydroelectric turbines at the Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station facility. The turbines would be turned by water flowing into Overmyer Reservoir as the reservoir fills at night. The resulting electricity generated would be used to produce and store ice or hot water that would be utilized the next day for supplemental cooling or heating. Many systems of this kind are already in use throughout the area and have proven to be quite cost effective. A study performed in October, 1987 , on the City Hall building showed that a thermal energy storage system using power purchased from Southern California Edison would be viable. This new study will couple this fact with the idea of generating electricity for the thermal energy storage system from the Water Division' s own hydroelectric generators. Therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3 . 03, "Professional Services, " of the Municipal Code, the Public Works Department recommends that the contract be amended. FUNDING SOURCE: Sufficient revenues of $231 , 960 . 00 are available in Fiscal Account E-EW-PW-921-6-39-00 . ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1 . Deny request and direct staff on how to proceed. This option would delay this project and may impact the costs for construction of the facility. The delay would slow development in the Reservoir Hill Pressure Zone. Page two Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex: CC 534 - Final Design - continued June 18, 1990 2. Do not pursue project. This option would negatively impact the Water Division' s ultimate ability to supply adequate pressure to the entire Reservoir Hill Pressure Zone when fully developed. This would slow development in the Reservoir Hill Pressure Zone. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Consultant' s Proposal dated May 2, 1990, for Final Design Services . 2 . Contract Amendment 3 . Previous Council Action September. 18 , 1990 . 4. Request for Proposal dated July 19, 1989. 5 . Consultant' s original proposal dated August 28, 1989. LSF:JRR:EC: bb EC/RCA#3-4 Page three l ISSY J ?A glyM/DO/YY) rr ® Evi yy Revised PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS : NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, The Dougherty Company, Inc. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. P.O. Box 7277 Long Beach, California 90807 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY A American Alliance Insurance Company LETTERCOMPA P y NY 13 American National Fire" Insurance Compan INSURED LET-TER y ?- Cash & Associates Engineers COMPANY P.O. Boy: 38 LETTER C Associated Indemnity Corporation Long Beach, California 90801 COMPANY <- ?. LETTER D COMPANY E LETTER 0 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. CO POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE(MWOONY) DATE(MWOONY) EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE GENERAL LIABILITY BODILY X COMPREHENSIVE FORM INJURY $ $ X PREMISES/OPERATIONS PROPERTY X UNDERGROUND EXPLOSION&COLLAPSE HAZARD DAMAGE $ $ X PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS A X CONTRACTUAL PAC" 2798842 1 1 /1 /89 7/1 /90 COMBINED $ 11000 $ 1 , 000 X INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS rr X BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE X PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY $ Incl. ;Y X DQes,N-ot_lnclude_P ofessional Liability AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 9001r n INJURY y X ANY AUTO (PER PERSON) $ X ALL OWNED AUTOS(PRIV. PASS.) BODILY B OTHER iHAN1 CAP 0948420 11 /1 /89 7/1 /90 INJJRY q, X ALL OWNED AUTOS PRIV. PASS.l 'PER ucIDENrI $ X HIRED AUTOS s s PROPERTY .W X NON-OWNED AUTOS I DAMAGE $ ' GARAGE LIABILITY BI&PD F COMBINED $ ` �-QO 0 EXCESS LIABILITY " UMBRELLA FORM CBi OMBINED $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM STATUTORY WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND $ trQO-ECH ACCIDENT) ; C WCP 80408020 7/1 /89 7/1 /90 1. O.Qtfl ISEASE-PGLICY LIMIT) EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY I $ n ISEASE"EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER------- t- �f DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/',/EHICLES/SPECIAL (TE�.MS > RE. No. 93600 Additional Insured Endorsements Attached. eNEW City of Huntington Beach SHOULD ANY OF THE ABE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX- + 2000 Main Street' s PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL XDMX9"xIX ' MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE " Huntington Beach, California 92648 LEFT,EvxgAXgPX?rC'JwRS�IDSDCt t JK�I�II �PSL X C 1�S1 LA3} 'Y TM`t. Attn : Louis F-.' Sandoval °xxl rxct�� we ai4xl s3�Ara rKT�5�4K r�i�2ScX dti�k ter: AUTHORIZED REPR IVE j ROWS . * INSURED Pnphcy NUMBER CASH S ASSOCIATES. ENGINEERS PAC 2798842 EFFECTIVE DATE POLICY PERIOD AUTHORIZED E SENT VE A 1 11 /1 /89 11 /1 /89 to 7/1 /90 GW,xJANERICMY Complete the above spaces iJ this endorsement i not each pq6cy when issued. INSURANCE COMPANIES GENERAL ENDORSEMENT ADDITIONAL INSURED (CONTRACTING OPERATIONS) IN CONSIDERATION OF AN ADDITIONAL PREMIUM OF INCLUDED, IT IS AGREED THAT SUCH INSURANCE AS IS AFFORDED BY THE POLICY FOR BODILY INJURY LIABILITY AND FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY APPLIES TO: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AS ADDITIONAL INSURED(S) , BUT ONLY WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONS PERFORMED FOR SUCH ADDITIONAL INSURED(S) BY THE NAMED INSURED. AS RESPECTS THE ADDITIONAL INSUREDS, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS APPLY: A. EXCLUSIONS: THE INSURANCE DOES NOT APPLY TO: 1 . DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF ANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PERFORMED BY OR FOR THE ADDITIONAL INSURED(S) , INCLUDING: (A) THE PREPARATION OR APPROVAL OF MAPS, PLANS, OPINIONS, REPORTS, SURVEYS , DESIGNS OR SPECIFICATIONS AND (B) SUPERVISORY, INSPECTION OR ENGINEERING SERVICES. 2. LIABILITY ASSUMED BY ADDITIONAL INSURED(S) . B. CONDITIONS: 1 . THE INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL INSUREDS) SHALL NOT INCREASE THE LIMITS OF THE COMPANY'S LIABILITY UNDER THIS POLICY. 2. THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AFFORDED TO THE ADDITIONAL INSURED(S) SHALL NOT EXCEED THE LIMITS SET FORTH ON THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ISSUED TO THE ADDITIONAL INSURED(S) . THE AFOREMENTIONED LIMITATIONS APPLY IRRESPECTIVE OF THE LIMITS PROVIDED BY THE POLICY(IES) . THIS POLICY IS SUBJECT OTHERWISE TO ALL ITS TERMS. R* 5 ® ® , ISSUE DATE(MM/DD/YY) 11/03/89 ' r' PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, R. D. Crowell Insurance Agency EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. ? 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite B3 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE x '$ Costa Mesa, CA 92626 COMPANY e I LETTE AA R ' COMPANY INSURED LETTER B is Cash & Associates Engineers COMPANY P. O. Box 38 I LETTER %1 2599 E. 28th Street ( COMPnnrY Long Beach CA 90801 LETTER ® r COMPANY LETTER E o � ofess ' onals Ins. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY 1` BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. s. CO POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE(MM/ODPIY) DATE(MWDD/'rf ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS GENERAL LIABILITY h, GENERAL AGGREGATE r COMMERCirl. GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS COMP;OPS AGGREGATE $ A. AUE OCCU -E".CE $ i § PERSONAL h ADVERTISING INJURY r� OWNER S° NiP.ACTORS PROTeCl .E EACH OCCURRENCE FIRE DAMAGE(ANY ONE FIRE) $ - MEDICAL EXPENSE(ANY ONE PERSON) $ vf, AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY y ANY AUTO CSL $ r ALL OWNED aur#For pr fessional liability coverage, thef. a gregat limit is the total insurance avail BODILY q"t + SCHEDULED AUTG, ,NJURY $ N le fo all covered claims resented within(PERPERSON) HIRED AUT ` the policy period. The li itpwill be reduced BODILY INJURY � NON-OWI NEED RI�,T�^ i I iPER $ . Sly payments of indemnity and expenses. ncclDENn GARAGE DAPII Ir, PROPERTY ' DAMAGE $ - 1 " EXCESS LIABILITY 83' EACH AGGREGATE `+ x OCCURRENCE Wit $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM g" WORKERS'COMPENSATION I STATUTORY " AND I $ (EACH ACCIDENT) I X, ' EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY $ (DISEASE POLICY LIMIT) ; la. . E. $ (DJSEASF-EAC?N MPL OYEE) -, E OTHER PL44156001 11/01/89 11/01/90 a, ;# PROFESSIONAL LIAR $500, EA CLAIM AND u� IN THE AGGREGATE t DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS x S Re: Project 3055 **EXCEPT IF POLICY IS CANCELLED FOR NON-PAYMENT OF PREMIUM, THEN 10 DAYS" NOTICE WILL BE , : GIVEN. w. SHOULD ANY OF'THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE yyTHyyE EX �r +re, City of Huntington Beach PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUaING:COMPANY WILL Efl/�Y�^J1r Xm Attn: Don Noble AVAIL*3*p DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE P. O. Box 190 LEFT, EX)(XXxx,uxx.XXXX XX�4 XFXs LX cX �� Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 IX),�XXXYXXI(XXXXxXX-X.kXXX9(,X.U�x)(XmhxsxAm-x�X-yt,, xx lku AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE TC - .:_g" r: .*:__.._ -rv��..: S�:'. •: :�a; fY.r►e hw.w:a�i ..�....�,^�-s... •:: _ �'iACAA ��e die re- •'el. a e, , -,: 1.F�h°. e GARFIELD AVENUE umm 7E, K Tor Awn mm ` ..� kiml-- w 1g agaw .�. ..,�..�... w ears sssrt �►�� Z --- - O /s•1/lif� �pyp�q � r Boom pw Z fnlO� III4011001 snot s M sw-m am = 1 PROAM CC-&U - a+ns�o AREA 11 ssarm 1 CONSULTING SERVICES FOR RESERVOIR HILL/OVERMYER PUMP STATION COMPLEX; CC - 534 CITY OF HUNIINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AUGUST 28, 1989 Ifa AMTES•ENG NMHe • A.Ross Cash Elliott H.Boone Randy H.Mason CASH &ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Wilfrido B.Simbol 191 August 28, 1989 Larry W.Nye City of Huntington Beach Water Department 19001 Huntington Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jeff Renna Water Superintendent Subject: PROJECT CC-534; FEE PROPOSAL (C&A Proposal No. 93600.00) Gentlemen: A summary of proposed fees for the respective phases are as follows: Phase I (T&M, NTE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $39,928.00 Phase II (Est.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9% to 12%(" Phase III (Est.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Approx. 1%±l'1 All phases proposed on above are negotiable based on the tasks outlined and the efforts required. We have proposed on providing a comprehensive evaluation and study for the pump station related elements. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss the Scope of Work with the Water Department. Phases II and III are proposed as basic percentages or percent ranges of construction cost. When Phase I is complete, we will itemize all known tasks and their associated effort including a detailed drawing list. All aspects of the itemization will be open for discussion and review by the Water Department and our team. A detailed task list for Phase I follows with the anticipated effort of each consultant per task itemized. Associated average billing rates accompany these efforts. Note that for the Phase I Study, much of the work is accomplished by firm principals and lead engi- neers. This is indicative of technical studies and the degree of professional involvement we feel this study requires. The average billing rates will be lower for the Phase H effort due to a greater cross-section of firm involvement. The effort proposed is based on evaluating no more than three (3) alternative configurations of the facility. Additional alternatives can be evaluated, but this will impact both the study cost and possibly the schedule as well. Percent of construction cost - including all fees less standard reimburseables, see Rate Schedule. A California Corporation • 2599 East 28th Street • P.O.Box 38 0 Long Beach,CA 90801 0 (213)426-6145 • FAX(213)424-5459 City of Huntington B h PROJE CC-534 Mr. Jeff Renna FEE PTWOSAL August 28, 1989 (C&A Proposal No. 93600.00) Page 2 Task I - Data Collection/Field Investigations: a. Project Management 8hrs @ $85.00 = $ 680.00 b. Mechanical 16hrs @ $79.40 = $ 1,270.00 C. Hydroelectrical 24hrs @ $50.00 = $ 1,200.00 d. Electrical -0- (complete) = 0 e. Civil/Structural/Arch -0- (complete) = 0 f. Geotechnical Surveying -0- (complete) = 0 Reimburseables = 200.00 TOTAL $ 3,350.00 Task II - Analysis of Data/Preliminary Calculations: a. Project Management 8hrs @ $85.00 = $ 680.00 b. Mechanical 28hrs @ $87.00 = $ 2,436.00 C. Hydroelectrical 40hrs @ $50.00 = $ 2,000.00 d. Electrical 8hrs @ $60.00 = $ 480.00 e. Civil/Struct/Arch 2hrs @ $70.00 = $ 140.00 f. Geotechnical/Surveying -0- (complete) = 0 TOTAL $ 5,736.00 Task III - Preliminary Design (Unit sizing, ratings, space requirements, criteria): a. Project Management 8hrs @ $85.00 = $ 680.00 b. Mechanical 68hrs @ $72.00 = $ 4,896.00 C. Hydroelectrical 24hrs @ $50.00 = $ 1,200.00 d. Electrical 8hrs @ $60.00 = $ 480.00 e. Civil/Struct/Arch 12hrs @ $70.00 = $ 840.00 f. Acoustical 4hrs @ $85.00 = $ 340.00 g. Geotechnical/Surveying -0- (complete) = 0 TOTAL $ 8,436.00 Task IV - Alternative Development: a. Project Management 12hrs @ $85.00 = $ 1,020.00 b. ' Mechanical 28hrs @ $87.00 = $ 2,436.00 C. Hydroelectrical 40hrs @ $50.00 = $ 2,000.00 d. Electrical 24hrs @ $60.00 = $ 1,440.00 e. Civil/Struct/Arch 32hrs @ $70.00 = $ 2,240.00 f. Acoustics 10hrs @ $85.00 = $ 850.00 g. Geotechnical 8hrs @ $85.00 = $ 680.00 TOTAL $10,666.00 City of Huntington B h PROJE CC-534 Mr. Jeff Renna It FEE PWPOSAL August 28, 1989 (C&A Proposal No. 93600.00) Page 3 Task V - Recommendations and Report: a. Project Management 22hrs @ $85.00 = $ 1,870.00 b. Mechanical 34hrs @ $72.00 = $ 2,448.00 C. Hydroelectrical 40hrs @ $50.00 = $ 2,000.00 d. Electrical 16hrs @ $60.00 = $ 960.00 e. Civil/Struct/Arch/CAD 56hrs @ $52.00 = $ 2,912.00 f. Geotechnical 16hrs @ $85.00 = $ 1,360.00 Reimburseables = 200.00 TOTAL 1175 0 GRAND TOTAL $39,938.00 These tasks will be billed on a Time & Material, NTE basis. If the effort required to complete the tasks outlined is less than anticipated, these savings will be passed on to the City. If you have any questions regarding this fee proposal, please call our office. Thank you. Very truly yours, CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Randy H. Mason, P.E. Vice President RHM:gla Enclosure • EXHIBIT A GENERAL CONDITIONS I . Payment: The Engineer shall provide the Client with monthly statements for services rendered and reimburs- able costs incurred , and the Client shall pay these state- ments within thirty days of their presentation. In the event that a statement shall remain unpaid for thirty days or longer after its presentation to the Client , then it shall accrue interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the 30th day after its presentation. 2. Ownership of Documents: The documents prepared by the Engineer pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service and are and shall remain the Engineer' s property whether the project is executed or not. They are not to be used by the Client on other projects or extensions of the project except by agreement in writing. 3. Arbitration: All claims , disputes and other matters in question between the parties to this Agreement , arising out of, or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, may, with the consent of both parties , be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. No arbitration, arising out of, or relating to this Agreement , shall include , by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any additional party not a party to this Agreement except by written consent containing a specific reference to this Agreement and signed by all the parties thereto. Any consent to arbitration involving an additional party shall not constitute consent to arbitration of any dispute not described herein or with any party not named or described therein. This Agreement to arbitrate and any agreement to arbitrate with an additional party or parties duly consented to by the parties thereto shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law. Notice of the demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the other party to this Agreement and with the American Arbitration Association. The demand shall be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for arbitration be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations . Page Two Exhibit A The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final , and judgement may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 4 . Indemnification: The Client shall indemnify the Engineer against all claims made against the Engineer con- cerning the project except for those claims which arise from the Engineer ' s actual professional negligence or willful misconduct. S. Risk Allocation: Client and Engineer have dis- cussed their risks , rewards and benefits of the project and the Engineer' s total fee for services. The risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees that to the fullest extent permitted by law, Engineer's total liability to Client for any and all injuries , claims , losses , expenses , damages , or claim expenses arising out of this agreement from any cause or causes , shall not exceed the total amount of Such causes include but are not limited to Engineers negligence , errors, omissions , strict liabi- lity, breach of contract or breach of warranty. 6. Attorne ' s Fees : In the event that litigation develops between the Client and the Engineer concerning or arising out of this Agreement and/or any services performed pursuant to this Agreement , then the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to recover from the other reasonable attorney's fees and litigation costs . 7 . Termination: Because of the importance of a good working relations-Hip between the Client and the Engineer, it is hereby agreed that either party may terminate this Agree- ment upon written notice to the other party provided only that this notice is given in a good faith belief that said working relationship is less than satisfactory. Upon the termination of this Agreement by either party, the Client shall pay the Engineer for services performed and reimburs- able costs incurred at rates and for items determined by the applicable terms of this Agreement. January 1, 1989 A.Ross Cash Elliott H.Boone Randy H.Mason 1 9 CASH &ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Wilfrido B.Simbol Larry W.Nye EXHIBIT B RATE SCHEDULE FOR ENGINEEING SERVICES ON A TIME AND MATERIAL BASIS HOURLY OVERTIME SENIOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANT $95.00 $95.00 SUPERVISING PROJECT MANAGER 95.00 95.00 PROJECT MANAGER 85.00 85.00 PROJECT ENGINEER 70.00 70.00 SENIOR ENGINEER 70.00 70.00 ARCHITECT 60.00 60.00 JUNIOR ENGINEER 50.00 59.00 PROJECT DESIGNER 58.00 68.00 SENIOR DESIGNER 50.00 59.00 DESIGNER 44.00 52.00 DRAFTER 37.00 44.00 WORDPROCESSOR 39.00 46.00 CLERICAL 35.00 41.00 IN-HOUSE COMPUTERS: DRAFTING (CAD) 10.00 -- CALCULATIONS 10.00 -- WORDPROCESSOR 10.00 -- In addition, for direct out-of-pocket expenses (if and when they occur) we quote the following: 1) In-House Repro: Blueprint $.10 to $1.50 per square feet-depending on type of paper Xerox $.43 to $1.20 per square feet-depending on type of paper 2) Automobile: $.25 per mile 3) Travel Expense: at Cost 4) Subsistence: While away from home office for more than one day: at Cost, but not to exceed $150.00 per day/per man. 5) Plan Check and Building Permit Fees: at Cost plus 10% markup 6) Telephone charges outside Area Codes 213, 714, 818: at cost plus 10% markup 7) Third Party Services: at Cost plus 10% markup a) Surveying b) Soils investigation c) Testing laboratory work d) Consultant and subcontract professional fees e) Printing and copy services for bidding and construction documents Payments due under this schedule shall bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum commencing thirty (30) days after the date of invoice. Terms are Net - Thirty Days. A California Corporation 0 2599 East 28th Street 0 P.O.Box 38 0 Long Beach,CA 90801 0 (213)426-6145 • FAX(213)424-5459 J J, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 July 19, 1999 Ar. Victor E. Opincar, Jr. Managing Engineer Boyle Engineering Corporation P.O. Box 3030 `\'e\vport Beach, CA 92658-9020 Subject: Request for Proposal Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex; CC-534 Gentlemen: The City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works is requesting proposals from qualified civil engineering firms for the preparation of a preliminary engineering design report and construction cost estimate (Phase I); preparation of final working drawings, contract specifications and other related work, permits, etc., up to the .award of a construction contract (Phase II); and assistance daring construction (Phase III) for the subject project. The scope of work for all three phases which proposals are being solicited includes the following tasks: Prase I - Preliminary Design Report 1. Review all existing drawings and specifications including the follm.ving: A. Reservoir Hill Booster Station B. Overmyer Reservoir Booster Station C. Electrical - Water Warehouse and Yard Improvement Project 2. Prepare a comprehensive design analysis of the entire proposed Booster Pump Station complex hydraulic system, structural analysis of any proposed work to meet current uniform building code requirements and American Water vVorks Association guidelines and hydraulic institute standards. 3. Performance of all necessary field investigations and measurements, survey, geotechni,cal, etc. 4. Formulate options and make recommendations to the City for the following: A. Reservoir Hill Booster Station using the established design and pumping capacities prepared by .ASI_ Consultinq Engineers at the new location as a quide. Analyze the option of using existing storage in the reservoir as one of it's .sources as well as the main water system. request for Proposal Reservoil 1 ill/Overmyer Pump Station July 19, 1999 Page 2 B. relocate existing fluoride storage tanks to a suitable location within the water operation yard, if necessary. Per-nanently house emergency electrical generator(s) to power the \,eater operations facility including the new water warehouse. D. Modify the existing Overmyer Booster Pump Station, to better serve existing and future needs. Demolish existing station. E. resign a hydroelectric generating system for energy recovery on the Overmyer reservoir complex fill lines. F. Design an all encompassing structure to house Items A, C, D and E. 5. Submit a preliminary design report (minimum three copies) incorporating the results of analysis and findings of the tasks above. It shall include: A. Ceotechnical findings. B. L conpmic findings of selected alternatives. C. Sketches showing overall site plan and sections of selected alternatives. 1 Preparation of a construction cost estimate to be used by the City for the estahlishment of a budget. 5. Provide assistance to the City in the processing of environmental documents including filling out of required forms furnished by the City. The City will handle for environmental application processing. 7. Attend a minimum of (4) four meetings with Citv staff during Phase I, excluding field investigations in Task 3 above. 9. Provide all processing required for obtaining a F ERC License and all exemptions required as \yell as coordinating work with So rthern California Edison Company for the hydroelectric qenerator(s). 9. Phase I to be completed by December 15, 1999, based on the selection of a consultant by the City Council on September 19, 1999. 10. Meet with other consultants, as needed, to complete the work. Phase II - inal Design 1. Prepare final working drawings and contract specifications necessary for bidding. These documents will be based on decisions derived from Phase I. Final plans to he placed on City furnished mylars with no "sticky backs." 0 Request for Proposal Reservoil Hill/Overmyer Pump Station July 19, 1999 Page 3 2. Provide all structural calculations for the proposed project. 3. Coordination with the City of Huntington 9e3ch Building `Division to ensure approval in the permit processing (City mill apply for permits.) 4. Provide support to the City at their, request daring hid advertisement. 5. Attend a minimum of (5) five meetings with City staff during Phase II, including a ore-bid conference. 6. Sul mit for review, plans at the 25a11' , 50' and 90% completion stages, submit specifications at the 50% and 90°'o stages. City will furnish the standard "Boiler Plate" specifications which includes "Notice Inviting Seal `aids", "Proposal Form", "Sample Construction Contract and Standard General Special Provisions". Consultant will furnish the special or technical provisions for this project. 7. Furnish a final construction cost estimate. 9. Based on approval of preliminary plans, specifications and final cost estimate, the consultant shall provide (40) forty sets of the following: A. Final construction drawings B. Contract specifications 9. Phase II must be ready for bid by July 16, 1990. Phase III - Construction Support 1. Provide construction support through semi-monthly meetings and he available fo- phone conversations relating to construction and interpretation of plans and specifications. 2. Provide shop drawings and other related submittal reviews. (^:0TE: Tasks l and 2 above will be coordinated through a City representative.) 3. Provide (1) one, acceptable to the City, reproducible set of "Record" mylar drawings. �F. 10% of Phase II and III fees will b? withheld until Item 3 above is accepted. Ceneral Requirements The consultant shall furnish proof of the following minimum insurance requirements with their proposals: 1. General Liability Coverage - $1,000,000 CSL per occurrence (;Note: If provided coverage is under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1,000,000. Request for Proposal Reservoil Hill/Overmyer Pump Station July 19, 1989 Page 4 2. Professional liability coverage - $500,000 per occurrence (Note: A claims made policy is acceptable). 3. Workers' Compensation coverage in an amount of not less than $100,000 bodily_ injury by accident, each accident $100,000 bodily injure by disease, each employee, $250,000 bodily injury by disease, policy limit. The advertising for bids and awa^ding of a construction contract for this project will be administered by City staff. In addition, City personnel will control contract administration and perform required construction inspections. The consultant shall recommend anv special inspection procedures to be used. Proposals for this project must be submitted to the attention of Jeff Renna, ';'Water Superintendent no later than 4:00 P. ✓1. on Auqust 29, 1999 with the notation "Overmyer/Reservoir Hill" on the envelope (4) four sets of proposals minimum is required. Fach proposal should include the following information: 1. A list of similar projects that your design team has recentlyworked on. 2. A statement of understanding as to the scope of work and the tasks necessary to complete the project. 3. A brief outline of how vour firm will handle this project, if awarded, and time schedule for completing the project. The project must be under constri.iction in Auqust/September, 1990. 4. A list of personnel, including the proposed project manager, who will be assigned to a design team on this project along with their brief resumes (One must be a registered structural engineer). One member of the design team shall also be highly qualifed in the design and selection of variable speed pumpinq systems. 5. A detailed listing of each task to be performed, the corresponding man hours and costs for each task, number each task as outlined. This will he used in establishinq progress payments. 6. Your fee based on an hourly rate. A maximum not-to-exceed fee should also he specified for Phase 1. Phase II and III may be exoressed as a percentage of the approved construction cost estimate. A willingness to negotiate upon completion of Phase I, should also be indicated if desired. Submit Item No. 6 in a separate sealed attached envelope with the notation "fees." 7. All consultants are required to view the project site and attend a pr000sal development meeting on Auqust 21, 1999 at 10:00 A.M. The site is located at 19001 Huntington Street at a-field Avenue in Huntington 9each. • Request for Proposal Resery/oil Hill/Overmyer Pump Station July 19, 1999 Page 5 .After the receipt of proposals, Proposals will be screened and ranked relevant to: 1. Expertise and experience. 2. The approach to be used as outlined in the proposal. 3. .Ability to complete the project in a timely and consistent manner. The most qualified consultants may be intervie,.wed prior to the final evaluation. After ranking of oroposals, fee envelopes will he ooened and compared. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the City's Standard Consultant Contract (see Attachment "3"). Hopefully this sample contract will prove useful in developing your proposal. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this project, please contact Eric Charlonne, Project Engineer, at (714) 536-5921. Very truly your { !_ouis andoval Director of Public Works LFS:E C:kv cc: Les Evans, City Engineer .Jeff Renna, tiNater Superintendent Robert Taylor, Supervisor Eric Charlonne, Project Engineer Attachments: Attachment "A" - Location Map Attachment "3" - Sarnole contract 2120q SECT10N L DISTRIw'f PvAp 2- 6-- I u CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP PROD_ ECT LOCATION GARFIELD AVE. N 4 4rwraRSZ�oa��ewani. ; CO w o II CL-Y ZIA m v_L_........r.v........._.._.p...y... D AVE. ILL OWEN AVE. F C f Yr I — NILl1AN5 AVE. L}, J J' .�.7 , Y RKTOWN Ii :fSy N AVE. EV L CF-C l CF-E I. WICHITA AVE. �I al III'�I�I� JAY CR \ 1 vENICE A'V E. 6 " T OTICA LLL_JJJJ F IIII j 1 AVE. I s mg LEI ' CF—R 70RONTO AVE. i ° EMP 00 i a5arnc cR. r" SPRINGF IELD AVE 4 � ma �•$ N. 21� �q•4y y Z_ RDCHESTER AVE. Q . M1: G f IiIII ¢ G ¢ EM W L,Ii 'I o0] z ADAMS AVE. v CITY OF rN 2000 MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92W LOUIS F. SANDOVAL Public k6 D"rtment Director (714) 53&5431 LETTER OF TRANW7TAL Tu: 6?LJ--)U'U—�-A/J"-T Date: J C� _ Project: Gent 1 ewn: We are sending ❑ herewith ❑ under separate cover ❑ by mail ❑ per your request ❑ per the request of ❑ street improvement plans ❑ correspondence ❑ parcel map ❑ estimates [3 record nap ❑ legal descriptions ❑ contract documents ❑ grading plan For: ❑corrections [] your file ❑ approval ❑ your use ❑distribution ❑ your information marks 6 y W 11 L,1\ Q A.Ross Cash Elliott H.Boone Randy H.Mason ' CASH &ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Wilfrido B.Simbol August 28, 1989 Larry W.Nye ' City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jeff Renna Water Superintendent ' Subject: OVERMYER/RESERVOIR HILL PUMP STATION COMPLEX; CC-534 ' (C&A Proposal No. 93600. 00) Gentlemen: ' Thank you for the opportunity to submit our proposal to the City of Huntington Beach Water Department for the subject project. Our project team has developed a thorough understanding of the project ' based on discussions with key Water Department staff as well as gaining experience on recent Water Department projects. All consultants on our team, with one exception, have recently worked for the Huntington Beach Water Department including Cash & Associates Engineers, ASL Consulting Engineers and F. Tso Electrical Engineers. We have identified a number of key issues which are discussed in some depth in this proposal. We have also responded with a project work plan and a group of highly experienced professionals who are well prepared to provide the necessary expertise for this initial study as well as the following project phases. Our team is composed of experts in the design of: o Variable speed pumps and controls of all types - ASL Consulting Engineers o Hydroelectric generator systems - ENKAR o Building structures and site civil work - Cash & Associates Engineers o Acoustic issues regarding noise generating equipment - J. Van Houten Randy H. Mason, Vice-President and Project Manager of Cash & ' Associates Engineers will manage Project CC-534. His knowledge of the Site and Water Department operations will contribute to an efficient and successful project. Due to our recent project experience with the Huntington Beach Water Department, we bring a site specific understanding which includes: o Planning and Zoning coordination with the City of Huntington ' Beach o Knowledge of underground utilities o Future growth plans A California Corporation • 2599 East 28th Street • P.O.Box 38 • Long Beach,CA 90801 • (213)426-6145 • FAX(213)424-5459 City of Huntington Beach OVERMYE?' RESERVOIR HILL Mr. Jeff Renna • PUMP ST�ION COMPLEX ' August 28, 1989 (C&A Proposal No. 93600. 00) Page 2 o Water Warehouse Project Master Plans o Site access and traffic understanding ' o Department and facility water operations relationships o Back-up fuel system sizing for the emergency generators ' In addition, previous designs and site-specific studies have been completed by our team which should be directly applicable to the project scope for Phase I and include: o Reservoir Hill Pump Station Design o Geotechnical Report at 19001 Huntington Ave. o Aerial Photography o Electrical Distribution Study o Emergency Generator Design Cash & Associates Engineers is very excited about this project and feel we are uniquely qualified to give the City of Huntington Beach Water Department the valuable background and experience required for a meaningful study, without "re-inventing the wheel" . Cash & Associates Engineers plans on producing all Study Docu- mentation (plans, sections and diagrams) on AutoCAD with the disks provided to the Huntington Beach Water Department as part of our final product. We hope to get the opportunity to discuss this project in more detail with City personnel during the subsequent interviews. Thank you. ' Very truly yours, ' CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS a, ✓L�, c,:Z,4 A. Ross Cash, P.E. President ' ARC:gla Enclosures ' TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Project Organization a. Organization Chart 2. Project Approach a. Project Responsibility Chart ' 3. Technical Approach a. Site Plan - Existing b. Site Plan - Proposed C. Site Plan - CC-534 d. Project Flow Chart ' 4. Project Schedule ' 5. Similar Project Experience xP 6. Key Personnel - Resumes 7. Fee 8. Appendix ' a. Certificates of Insurance PROTECT ORGANIZATION ' The designteam proposed for this project was assembled specifically for Project CC-534 P P P J P Y J with Cash & Associates Engineers as Team Leader. The design team is composed of specialists in all aspects of this study with the capability of carrying the Phase I concepts through to Working Drawings and Construction Management. All members of this team have worked either together or for the Huntington Beach Water Department on previous projects with the sole exception of ENKAR Hydroelectric Power Systems. ENKAR's experience with small hydroelectric power systems rounds out our project team thus offering a full array of project services. We are certain that the Huntington Beach Water Department will find ENKAR's contribution to this project to be unmatched. ASL Consulting Engineers have been added to our team bringing the background and knowledge of the Reservoir Hill Pumping Station design to Project CC-534. This background will prove invaluable and reduce the involvement of the Huntington Beach Water Department's operations personnel to get the study team "up-to-speed". ' Randy H. Mason, P.E., the proposed Project Manager, has a thorough understanding of the Huntington Beach Water Operations Facility based on management of the "Water Warehouse Project", currently in the final City approval stage. This project included a detailed Operations Study and Master Planning effort, requiring an in-depth understand of operations and inter-relationships of building, departments, facilities and traffic. « z co z LLi x F �I%: w § �z w § k a <� S �Of 7i w $ M 2 �Cd �LLi Lf) z z� ' w § L} �$ w w o� z §§ z § § w Q- a $� zLjj 2 v § -i 66 U §\ CL 0 -i� cr. — w Q w z Ll % z w R z Q § 2 N cc w a z § § w ) § §0 CD § kw 0- W Cl) ) 2§ § § ) IL D \ k� § cc w §cd f a ® w z < < W m I w t w Z D « 0 a za) � CC § 7% \ W > CC 0 4 ]&§ --- z ci (d w J_ vL 2 2 $ w o a: § <w .6�; 0 WX cr § o I W � § m w aj K « > (DwL k � � co a.: a 0 k $COcd cakm B 3 � FACILITY UNDERSTANDING Based on previous Water.Department projects, we have assembled a series of exhibits which define our understanding of the site: 1. As it currently exists with operational flow, Exhibit C. ! 2. As it is proposed to be altered as part of the "Water Warehouse Project", Exhibit D. 3. The basic area affected by the pump station, fluoride tanks, hydroelectric power system and, emergency generator enclosure projects: CC-534, Exhibit E. Special Project Issues will be addressed in greater detail in the sections that follow. PROTECT UNDERSTANDING iProject CC-534 includes the following basic elements, focusing on the Phase I, Concept Development Study: 1. Evaluate the existing water system as it relates to the requirements for the Overmyer No. 1 Booster Station, the requirements of the new pump station ' to serve the Reservoir Hill Development Zone, and the requirements necessary for the possible installation of a hydroelectric generator. 2. Review all City documents as they relate to the elements of work scope as outlined above. 3. Evaluate alternative methods available to the Water Department to provide ' enclosure for the emergency generators, pump stations and controls. 4. Determine the need for relocation of the existing fluoride tanks and the associated improvements, if relocation becomes necessary. 5. Determine the Water Department's concept for hydroelectric generation and determine if the opportunity exists to provide such a device. 6. Provide geotechnical input to justify alternatives for the structures proposed. 7. Provide economic analysis and construction budgets for the selected alternatives. ! ® z 133aS NOID NLLNnH ----------- :j I ------------------- F---------------- i � M I i i 1 I d iILj I i li I ------ -----� _ I a ! I! J ' ' W I " I -, ------------- I ! d 310d Alrw I I I I I I () I I I I I ZN O g OL 4 z I il]�US NOlONIlNnH --___-------i 1WA MILVW030 IWA 3ALLvaoM 3DVW ►s\ 1 I 1 I 1 I vn V" 30vtlQLS ivla3< � d j i i i n0LL0n00Ud , 1 t7 1 I I I / a dons a3L3n r-- � Fa � I I r- 1 I 1 I IL I I IL I LLJ _i * Z I 4L W > I 1 I Q I I 1 I WLL— I C � } I Q F i __ I �I I � I CL �-- . ; 39Ic -------=---J I ZWZW I 1 I IL I 1 ---- - ;\ \ I , saooa do-Taa--' • --------------� ZN Z rr ir■ r� r� rr r� ri r rr ■r r r s �a �r rr rr r rr 4 a w <1 i i3l�JiS NOlONIlNnH r-------------, TIrM 3ALLYt10a30 -MIA 3 UV=30 I I � } I ♦zx,oa I 3'JvaQis irRruvw } r rn� 0 �� i i i I NOLLOf100Nd ------------ I � I i I i a mI A0d0 I d I 8 I f ' 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I L_---J-------------- -------j I � L'--- ---I Q- dogs MUM I I F- W > i � I Q I I I ' w i a IL . I I , I I , I I fill I � I r sa000 -T,oa— --- L---------------- I 8 ZN O 8. Provide descriptive conceptual sketches (plans and sections) as deemed necessary to properly describe the alternative approaches proposed. 9. Assist the city in obtaining environmental permits, FERC licensing and SCEC coordination, if necessary. 10. Attend four (4) meetings with the City of Huntington Beach Water Department for coordination of the project. ' The subsequent design phases of the project; namely the Preliminary and Final Working Document Phases as well as Bid and Construction Assistance are noted in Exhibit G, Project Flow Chart, in subsequent sections, and are not made part of the basic services ' being requested in Phase I. The scope of these future services can only be properly defined at the completion of Phase I. ' A very preliminary assessment of Project CC-534 indicates that the following designed and specified elements of the "Water Warehouse Project" will be directly affected by CC- 534 and may require redesign: ' 1. Type and size of the two emergency generators. The proposed generators are not specified currently as being enclosed in a building and will require re-specification. 2. Electrical distribution system and new service. 3. Secondary fuel source (propane) tank sizing. 4. Layout of the proposed oil drum storage and covered material storage facility near the repair shop building, if this area becomes a candidate for the fluoride tanks. These facilities can be easily re-designed,ned but will result in increased costs to the "Water Warehouse Project". Additionally, Cash & Associates has determined, based on inquiries with Water Department personnel, that a comprehensive P&ID does not exist for the Water Department's facility and overall system. Although this has not been requested by the City, we strongly urge it be included in the scope of the study for general documentation purposes. Exhibit F, which follows, represents our basic understanding of the existing Water Operations System. This exhibit is included as an elementary and basic summary reflecting our current understanding of the system as relevant to the proposed project. Location of the potential hydroelectric generators has also been indicated. s 0 I Ilb IL 16 L.X s� II � I i V' I i i i i i L � o � ' Cash & Associates Engineers proposes to take the lead role as Project Manager as well � P P J g as provide civil, structural and architectural study and design. We have assembled a very ' strong team of consultants to offer all aspects of the study and subsequent design effort as already outlined in the Organization Chart. ' Cash & Associates Engineers is very comfortable managing both small technical studies as well as large design efforts as exemplified in the Similar Project Experience section of this proposal. ' Our current project with the Huntington Beach Water Department, the Water Warehouse Project, has been accomplished utilizing a similar team approach as proposed for Project ' CC-534. tPROTECT APPROACH The experience of Cash & Associates Engineers in leading and managing multidisciplinary ' project teams in complex projects will mean a well managed, thoroughly documented project which meets the quality, deadlines and budget constraints established by the City of Huntington Beach. ' Cash & Associates' approach is to assign a project manager who acts as the single point- of-contact with the client organization and who is responsible for: o Day to day management of the project team; o Coordination with the review agencies involved in the project; ' o Review of the performance of the project team with regard to meeting the technical quality, cost and schedule commitments. Note: Although all primary communication will be directed between the City of Huntington Beach Water Department and Cash & Associates Engineers, there may be cases where it will be appropriate to communicate directly with subconsultants t with copies of the communications to C&A Engineers. Our consultants are accustomed to this relationship and will perform very efficiently and professionally. ' Weekly meetings will be held with the project team to exchange information, make assignments and plan the manpower for the week's work activities. ' Upon receipt of the "Notice to Proceed", the project manager and other key team members will meet with the Water Department staff to review the project and verify the basic parameters of the work. The manager will then prepare a written project description, which will address the scheduling of tasks and which will be distributed to ' all members of the project team. This project description will delineate all aspects of the project and schedules for various tasks. A scoping meeting will be held with all team members to clarify the project description, deliverables and finalize assignment of tasks and schedules. The information developed in these meetings will be the basis of the Phase I Study that follows. ' The 'Project Responsibility" Chart that follows indicates the basic and support roles of our project team. Please make special note that much of the Master and Site Planning issues have been evaluated by Cash & Associates Engineers on the "Water Warehouse ' Project" as well as Reservoir Hill Pump Station issues previously addressed by ASL Consulting Engineers. The soils report produced by GEOFON, Inc. for the "Water Warehouse Project" may also suffice for this study, depending on the alternative installations proposed. RESERVOIR HILL / OVERMYER PUMP STATION COMPLEX PIOJECT RESP+CNIBILITIE REPORT ' MECHANICAL DESIGN/VARIABLE SPEED PUMPING SYSTEMS/CONTROLS ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS HYDROELECTRIC GENERATION SITE & FACILITY PLANNING COST TEAM 'MEMBERS EVALUATIONS ' CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS • . PMi, STRUCTURni, ARCH.,PROJ. MGMr.) ' ASL NGINEERRSULTING O • O O O ' FRANK Y. TSO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING O • O O O JOHN J. VAN HOUTEN ASSOCIATES O O O ENKAR HYDROELECTRIC ' POWER SYSTEMS 0 0 0 0 GEOFON, INC. O O (GEOTEWNr.40 ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LEGEND: isPRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY OSUPPORT ' EXHIBIT B ' TECHNICAL APPROACH Our technical approach for evaluating the Water Department facility is composed of several important tasks including client review and comment at the conclusion of each major task. There are three major project phases: 1 Phase I - Study and Report Phase H - Design and Bid Assistance Phase III - Construction Services ' These phases are then further broken down into subtasks as demonstrated in the Project Flow Chart in this section. The following is a brief description of the planned effort. PHASE I: ' BASIC DATA REVIEW 1. Our first step will be a brief orientation which will include identifying and meeting with the person who will serve as our key point of contact with t Water Operations and conducting brief interviews with one or two individuals who can describe the present conditions. Based on the results of this orientation, we will adjust this study approach, as appropriate, and establish agreement to a schedule for conducting the study, particularly those steps requiring on-site work. Finally, we will identify most of the documents needed and establish the procedures for their collection. During this orientation, it would be appropriate to notify the employees about the study and how it will be conducted. 2. We will conduct in-depth interviews with selected operations personnel. These interviews will focus on two key objectives. First, we want to ensure ' that we gain a full appreciation of the City's pump station operations. Second, the thrust of the staff interviews will be toward gaining an understanding of the various work tasks performed, the purpose of each, ' sequencing, and perceived problems and opportunities for improvement. These interviews are particularly important to the study since they typically provide insight which is difficult to obtain through other study techniques. 3. We will collect and review selected documents which help describe the current situation. For example, we will be interested in documents such as existing pump station drawings and pump curves, flow rate records into ' Overmyer No. 1, existing water distribution line documentation to the new Reservoir Hill Development Zone, etc. ANALYSIS OF DATA/PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1. Collected data will be analyzed and additional or missing data will be requested. 2. Preliminary calculations, necessary to sizing equipment, line sizing and adjacencies will be made. 3. Maintenance access and clearances will be established. CONCEPT DESIGN PROGRAM - ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT 1. Once we have completed the majority of the data collection and preliminary calculations, we will prepare a description of the present situation, analyze current practices, and develop and evaluate alternative facility plans and building layouts for the planned project components. An early phase of this step will focus upon defining the "most efficient and effective" arrangement Each alternative will be evaluated to determine order-of-magnitude costs and benefits, both from the standpoint of cost savings and service improvements. Some identified improvements may be stand-alone while others may'require a combination of changes before substantial benefits accrue. Thus, we will consider how the plan can be economically phased so that operating disruptions will be minimized and the most significant benefits will be realized early. Special attention will be given to the effect of this installation as to how it relates to the currently planned "Water Warehouse Project". ' 2. We will develop our facility alternative plan recommendations and define how they relate to existing facilities and operations. Our recommendations ' will be organized in relation to the appropriate timing for implementation and ranked in accord with the cost/benefit evaluations conducted during the analysis step. ' 3. The study and its results will be documented in a written report which will be suitable for use as a guide during the design, engineering and construction phases. We will, first, develop a draft report for use in reviewing the study results with management and, then, we will prepare our final report. The review of a draft report helps ensure that our final report includes accurate and complete facts about the present situation and fully ' explains our rationale and assumptions which underlie the conclusions and recommendations. The present practices, the facility plan and the practical improvements will be documented with descriptions, flow charts, tables and evaluations, as appropriate. Potential benefits and implementation costs will be quantified wherever practical and difficult-to-quantify benefits will be identified. Throughout this study, we will work closely with management � Y Y g to keep them informed of our progress, the emerging study results, and to help ensure satisfactory response to particular issues of interest. ' PHASE II: BASIC ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1 With the study complete and reviewed by the Water Department, the preliminary design will begin. Preliminary design is composed of the following basic elements: ' o Augment the topographical mapping and soils recommendations generated during Phase I, as necessary. o Evaluate the detailed design criteria outlined in the study. ' o Evaluate the Phase I Report conclusions for code compliance and City of Huntington Beach Planning and Zoning. o Prepare preliminary drawings and calculations, equipment selection, identify long lead times, and provide an approach to meet design criteria objectives. o Review construction cost and make strategic decisions regarding construction bid procedures and phasing. ' o Submit preliminary design package composed of a basis of design, preliminary drawings, outline specifications and alternative concepts sufficient to describe the architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical systems. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS With approval from the Water Department of the preliminary submittal, the construction document phase will begin. Drawings and specifications developed in this phase will be isuitable for competitive bid and construction. The construction document phase will be composed of- 0 Detailed architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical and control drawings. ' o Narrative book-type specifications. o Calculations necessary for City of Huntington Beach plan check submittal. i i � s � o Instructions to bidders and City of Huntington Beach "Boiler-Plate" general conditions provided by the City. o Revised opinion of probable construction cost. o Proposed job construction and phasing schedule (optional). o Administer the plan check and agency approval process. ' o Preparation of bid documents (50 sets). o Administer job walk and assist in bid evaluation. ' PHASE III: CONSTRUCTION PHASE With the completion of the bid process and the conclusion of the permit process, construction will begin. Tasks associated with this effort include: o Attend periodic site meetings during construction. ' o Make interpretations of the documents on an as-needed basis. o Review shop drawings and submittals. o Review proposed field modifications, if requested. o Prepare the final "as-built" documents, relying on information provided by the Contractor and City of Huntington Beach Water Department. The following "Project Flow Chart", Exhibit G, illustrates the basic components of work required for the Phase I Study as well as subsequent phases of work. Please note that Phase II cannot be fully addressed until the completion of Phase I. 1 - �, CITY OF HI ANALYZE FACILITY , OPERATIONS • HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS/ PUMP STATIONS • EXISTING RESERVOIR DESIGN & CAPACITIES • EMERGENCY SYSTEMS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS • CONTROL SYSTEMS & • PUMP STATIONS ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIZE ALTERNATIVES/ INSTRUMENTATION ECONOMIC ANAYSIS • HYDROELECTRIC GENERATING . FACILITY & MASTER • OPPORTUNITIES TO SYSTEM SITE PLAN • CITY/CONSULTANT ALT. UTILIZE HYDROELECTRIC • EMERGENCY GENERATOR • ACCESS & MAINTENANCE EVALUATION PROJECT POWER ENCLOSURE • UTILITY CONNECTIONS • LIFE-CYCLE COSTING FAMILIARIZATION • STRUCTURAL/ARCHITECTURAL . EVALUATIONS RE Q'MTS STRUCTURAL/ARCHITECTURAL • KICK-OFF MEETING EVALUATE FUTURE PLANS ALTERNATIVES • FIRST COST • FLUORIDE TANK PLACEMENT . ACOUSTIC CONSIDERATIONS PRIORITIZATION • SCHEDULING OF • GROWTH • ACOUSTICS TASKS • NEW SERVICES • PUMP CONTROLS TYPE • GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES & PARAMETERS PRODUCE SITE PLAN / • FUTURE REQUIREMENTS SKETCHES & X-SECTIONS • PRODUCE CRITICAL CALCULATIONS HYDROELECTRIC SYSTEM (MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL) AND ALTERNATIVES • CAD GENERATED TO SUPPORT RECOMMENDATIONS DOCUMENTS EVALUATE SITE PLANS i • ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION • EXISTING U/G UTILITIES • ADJACENCIES & ACCESS • MAINTENANCE WATER DEPARTMENT WATER DEPARTMENT WATER DEPARTMEN REVIEW & MEETING REVIEW & MEETING REVIEW & MEETING PHASE I f STUDIES / CON CEPTU A _ DESIGN / ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS / ALTEf INTINGTON BEACH - PROJECT FLOW CHART PROJECT CC - 534 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN FINAL DESIGN PERIOD PREPARE DRAFT AGENCY PERMIT •.'BASIC PLANS, ELEVATIONS • FURTHER DEVEL. OF • COMPLETE ALL REPORT APPUCA11ON FINAL REPORT ASSISTANCE & X-SECTIONS PLANS, ELEVATIONS CONSTRUCTION DWG & X-SECTIONS • COMPLETE SPECS.. • NARRATIVE • RE-EVALUATE • ENVIRONMENTAL • PRELIM CALCULATIONS • BEGIN DETAIL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS SKETCHES DOCUMENTATION ( EC , ELECT, STRUCT) (CSl BOOK FORMAT; DWG DOCUMENTATION • SUBMIT FOR CITY • STUDIES • INCORPORATE • CITY PLANNING • OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS • COMPLETE ALL PLAN CHECK • SKETCHES CITY COMMENTS DEPARTMENT COORD. • UP-DATE BUDGET CALCULATIONS • RECOMMENDATIONS • FERC LICENSE (1) ESTIMATE & PROJECT • DEVELOP CONSTRUCTION • FINAL CONSTRUC110 • SO. CAL EDISION CO SCHEDULE SPECIFICATIONS COST ESTIMATE COORDINATION (1) • SIZE PUMPS, GENERATORS, • RE-EVALUATE BUDGET • PROCURE LONG LEA LINE SIZING, ETC & SCHEDULE EQUIPMENT. IF APPROPRIATE WATER DEPARTMENT WATER DEPARTMENT RELEASE WATER DEPARTMENT 25 WATER DEPARTMENT 50% WATER DEPARTMENT 9 REVIEW & MEETING FOR PHASE II REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PHASE Il NATIVES / AGENCY PROCESSING PRELIMINARY & FINAL DESIGN / BID ASSIST/ y EXHIBIT G CITY COMMENT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INCORPORATION & BID * FINALIZE ALL . PERIODIC PROJECT DOCUMENTS MEETING ATTENDANCE e INCORPORATE CITY • RESPONSE TO "BOILER PLATE" INTO CONTRACTOR'S INQUIRIES SPECIFICATIONS Aft • REVIEW OF SUBMITTALS PROJECT • PRODUCE 50 COPIES & SHOP DRAWINGS COMPLETION OF ALL BID DOCUMENTS ® CONDUCT BIDDERS i PERIODIC SITE VISITS JOB WALK TO VERIFY CONFORMANCE • RESPOND TO W/ CD'S BIDDERS INQUIRIES • PREPARE FINAL AS—BUILT DOCUMENTATION PHASE Ill NCE SERVICES CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOOTNOTES: (1) IF NECESSARY ' SPECIAL PROJECT ISSUES Our team has identified several Special Project Issues which relate to the proposed study I and warrant special attention by all those involved. A brief description of these issues follow: SITE CONDITIONS 1. The Water Operations facility at 19001 Huntington Street is a very congested site. Extensive evaluations have been previously made regarding access to equipment, on-site traffic flow, underground utilities (both controlled by the Water Department as well as pre-existing easements), and future expansion capabilities. Adding new facilities onto this property will require innovative mechanical and structural concepts. 1 2. The proposed new facilities will require clear access for operations and maintenance. Methods must be designed to allow for ease of access and removal of equipment, when necessary. 3. The site power distribution system must be re-evaluated for the increased service necessary for the new pump station as well as accommodation of ' the hydroelectric generation system, if deemed feasible. BUILDING ENCLOSURES 1. Enclosed emergency generators require special measures to mitigate the noise created. Noise must be sufficiently deadened to allow employees to work in the building without being exposed to high levels of noise as well as mitigating noise heard by neighboring properties. This issue will be addressed by team member John J. Van Houten & Associates. 2. The generators also require large openings in the structure for both intake g q g and exhaust air as well as to accommodate removal and replacement of the generators. Our team has experience with such installations. ' MECHANICAL ISSUES 1. Space Requirements: The relocation of the proposed Reservoir Hill Booster Station to the Overmyer Site will create space allocation issues. The existing Overmyer ' Pump Station consists of a two pump station. The Reservoir Hill Station was originally designed for seven (7) pumps to meet the wide range of demands. ' We will layout alternative pump station designs to determine the space and site requirements. We will analyze various combinations of pumps to meet • ' the demands of the area. Site limitations may require fewer pumps than originally proposed. I2. Hydraulics: The Reservoir Hill portion of the proposed pump station will have two (2) suction pressures requiring evaluation. The first condition is to boost water from the existing city grid to a higher pressure zone. Another condition is to take suction directly from Overmyer Reservoir and boost to the ghigher pressure zone. The difference in suction pressure between the two cases is approximately 40 psi. Pumps will have to be selected which can operate efficiently to meet these conditions by varying the pump speed. 3. Existing Piping: The existing reservoir intake lines may be undersized to take suction directly from Overmyer Reservoir No. 1. The 18-inch line to the service area must be analyzed to prove its adequacy. HYDROELECTRIC POWER GENERATION 1. Hydroelectric power system issues are both administrative and technical in nature and include the following items: a. FERC Licensing and PURPA approval can take 18 months or more and would stretch the Phase I, Scope of Work much longer than currently anticipated by the City of Huntington Beach Water Department. ab. Southern California Edison generally requires the City carry special liability insurance which indemnifies SCE against losses. Q2. Due to the impacts stated above in Item 1, it is our initial opinion that the Water Department restrict the use of hydroelectric power generation to internal use, thus eliminating the need for 'outside" approvals, with the exception of the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Departments. The Water Department may wish to consider utilizing the hydroelectric power generation to feed an overnight chilled water system for air conditioning load reduction as well as possibly augmenting the power supply to night security lighting. a The options available to the City of Huntington Beach Water Department will be outlined in our report. a a 0 tSCHEDULE Exhibit H is the schedule anticipated for this project, including the major tasks and ' subtasks, and critical submittal milestones for the project phases. The schedule includes the anticipated start date of September 18, 1989, project phases as enumerated previously, and Water Department review periods. The schedule was generated on a Critical Path Method (CPM) Scheduling Program. This program will be utilized for all consultant-generated scheduling functions to ' integrate design, agency approval, bid and construction phase elements, if desired. �SEP OCT INOV 'DEC Ah Am I I I 118 j25 2 IT 1io 2z T0 l0 1� ��+ 4 lii 18 5` MUT START-W I PRELIMINARY DESIGN MEETING W MTER,DEPT #7 DRAFT REPORT SUBMITTAL M ATER DDT MEETING #4-FINALIZE I rA I � - j 12OCToi 1olJCTo? i I 1?irUvo r 104Ut!'8Y 0 b�;rra. ( I - 4r;-OFF I � REVIEW FINAL REPORTMEETING ANALYSIS Of DATA 11EETIMB WrWATER TEPT #k PERIOD-WATER DEPT PREPARATION FINAL MART SUBMITTAL 18SEF85' 2 2?SEP$9 10 190CT$9 0 17MJOV89 5 04UEC 4 j ' 1 III I I DATA I TEAM I IJ i COLLECTIOIJi BRAIN-STMING SESSIONS I k %CITY WIG # M ff RE6!•IEW t 20SEF81 5 1?OCT8? 1I5 2M. V89 0 I ALTERNATIVE I I FINAL SEECTION i DEVEOPhIENT-PRELIM I OF�NATI'VIE 190CTB? �5 I� 27NOV89 5 I i ALTERNATIVE '+D�EVELOPMENT-FINAL ` I N CT CI !I I i� I �I iti G t' Ii G j i i i I I I REPORT _ l PREP-RECOMM, ICON, SK;H i I I I � I { I I O'?NOVB" iJ i it � I I • I � I i i I I 1 1 I I I i f I LESCND t A MTLE�Tr, E n i TASK NAME u ( RANDYH. MASON START TAT .? t YM! I Not t:srd 'lei,'C 1 DEPRI111ENC1ES: FINISH START FINISH NON- TO TO TO I CCINTROLLING CONTROLLIir'G START START FIND! i - j RUN DATE 2:4A�Ir.89 R I v ; AS OF DATE :4AUGo'? E TIME LINE GRAF'HIC� SIMILAR PROJECT EXPERIENCE CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS PROJECT: Water Department Operations Facility Huntington Beach, California CLIENT: City of Huntington Beach Water Department Huntington Beach, California PROJECT Design of a new 9,000 square foot water operations warehouse, DESCRIPTION: truck wash, emergency power system, oil drum storage, fuel island, new covered storage area and vehicle canopies. Design ' includes the relayout of the Production Warehouse and Repair Shop as well as redirection of site traffic flow and access. i PROJECT: 10 Million Gallon Reservoir, No. 1 Costa Mesa, California CLIENT: Mesa Consolidated Water District Costa Mesa, California PROJECT Architectural and structural engineering design for a 10 million DESCRIPTION: gallon enclosed reservoir designed to meet UBC criteria for essential facilities. To obtain the required storage capacity within the confines of the site, the reservoir was placed 28 feet below grade and extends 18 feet above the site. Design elements included resolution of wave action due to seismic events and temperature control to allow expansion of the roof while maintaining structural integrity. ' PROJECT: Slater Avenue Storm Drain Pump Station Building Huntington Beach, California ' CLIENT: City in of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California ' PROJECT Architectural and structural design for a new concrete block DESCRIPTION: pump station building to house existing and future storm drain ' pumps. Building design featured a removable roof to facilitate pump maintenance work. Scope of Work included demolition of an existing building, installation of mufflers, piping and ' electrical design, trash rack construction and portable gantry with two ton hoist. PROJECT: Emergency Power Generation Building Thousand Oaks, California ' CLIENT: Rockwell International Corporation Science Center Thousand Oaks, California PROJECT Performed a feasibility study for location and construction DESCRIPTION: of a proposed generator building and diesel storage tank ' including an economic analysis to justify various alternatives. Following completion of the study, provided architectural, structural and civil design for working drawings and site work ' for the building and tank. ' PROJECT: OJ CT. Pump House; Water Well No. 4 ' Costa Mesa, California CLIENT: Mesa Consolidated Water District ' Costa Mesa, California PROJECT Structural design, including seismic analysis and geotechnical ' DESCRIPTION: reports to upgrade a pump house, support facilities and pile- driven foundation. ' PROJECT: Fresh Water Pump Station Water Improvement ' Long Beach Naval Station CLIENT: Long Beach Naval Station ' Public Works Department, Engineering Long Beach, California ' PROJECT Structural and architectural design for a potable water pump DESCRIPTION: station, including a 500,000 gallon reservoir and chlorination system. PROJECT: North Harbor Pump Station Long Beach Harbor CLIENT: Port of Long Beach ' Long Beach, California PROJECT Construction of a 400,000 gallon underground storm retention DESCRIPTION: basin with three 2,000 horsepower 30,000 gpm vertical turbine pumps and a 900 KW emergency diesel generator backup for this essential facility. PROJECT: Underwater Test Tank Fullerton, California ' CLIENT: Hughes Aircraft Company Ground Systems Group ' Fullerton, California PROJECT Seismic calculations and design of restraints for an existing ' DESCRIPTION: 100,000 gallon wooden test tank. The existing tank had been placed on a concrete foundation and was subject to sliding during seismic activity. Special steel restraints were designed and anchored into the concrete foundation. ' PROJECT: Fuel Oil Storage Facility Naval Fuel Defense Support Point San Pedro, California ' CLIENT: Gage-Babcock Associates (U.S. Navy, WESTDIV) Cerritos, California ' PROJECT Civil and structural engineering services for various AFFF and DESCRIPTION: water suppression systems including 1,500 gpm pump with a ' 150,000 gallon reservoir. Project also included a pump station. PROJECT: Building 573; Norton Air Force Base San Bernardino, California CLIENT: Gage-Babcock Associates ' (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) Cerritos, California PROJECT Civil and structural engineering services for the installation DESCRIPTION: of a fire protection system. The system included three 3,500 gpm fire pumps with a 300,000 gallon above-grade reservoir. This reservoir was classified as an essential facility. PROJECT: Oil Spill Prevention Facility Marine Corps Air Station Camp Pendleton, California CLIENT: U.S. Navy, Western Division San Bruno, California ' PROJECT This site was developed as an active helicopter assault landing DESCRIPTION: and crash crew training pits. The facility design included a 5,000 gallon underground oil/water separator, off-site above ' ground 50,000 gallon non-potable water storage tank, pumps and interconnecting piping. PROJECT: Electronic Beam Lithography Facility Newport Beach, California ' CLIENT: Rockwell International Corporation Semiconductor Products Division Newport Beach, California PROJECT Design for a maintenance free, 1500 square foot Class 100 DESCRIPTION: laminar flow cleanroom. Project included a 90 ton environmentally controlled air conditioning system, extensive industrial gas distribution system and special emergency exiting in the event of an accidental toxic gas leak. ' PROJECT: Chemical Storage Building Newport Beach, California ' CLIENT: Rockwell International Corporation Semiconductor Products Division ' Newport Beach, California PROJECT Design of a 7,000 square foot chemical storage building. DESCRIPTION Design included drum and pallet storage areas, explosion and spill prevention features, extra hazard sprinkler 'system, and ventilation, dust and temperature controls. PROJECT: Chemical Storage Building Fullerton, California ' CLIENT: Hughes Aircraft Company Ground Systems Group ' Fullerton, California PROJECT Design for a 1500 square foot outside storage area attached DESCRIPTION: to an existing building. New featured full perimeter containment trench, concrete block retaining wall, 6-inch concrete floor slab, steel deck roofing and an underground holding tank. PROJECT: Building 605; Anechoic Chamber Fullerton, California CLIENT: Hughes Aircraft Company Ground Systems Group Fullerton, California PROJECT Architectural and structural designs, working drawings and DESCRIPTION: specifications for the construction of a new 1,000 square foot anechoic chamber. PROJECT: Building 607; Anechoic Chamber Expansion Fullerton, California CLIENT: Hughes Aircraft Company Fullerton, California PROJECT Architectural and structural designs, construction documents DESCRIPTION: and specifications for a 1,000 square foot addition to an existing facility. PROJECT: Building 601; Anechoic Chamber Relocation Fullerton, California CLIENT: Hughes Aircraft Company Ground Systems Group Fullerton, California PROJECT Architectural and structural designs, working drawings and DESCRIPTION: specifications for the relocation of a 1,000 square foot anechoic test chamber. PROJECT: Building �601• Anechoic Chamber Expansion xP Fullerton, California CLIENT: Hughes Aircraft Company g P Y Ground Systems Group Fullerton, California PROJECT Engineering, working drawings, specifications and cost DESCRIPTION: estimate for the construction of a 840 square foot expansion of an existing anechoic test chamber. ' FACIITY DESIGN SERVICES s ' Cash & Associates Engineers has provided ' consulting services for Facilities Design and Relocation/Tenant Improvement Services since 1966. Clients include: ` ' • McDonnell Douglas Corporation • Rockwell International Corporation • Hughes Aircraft Company • U.S. Borax & Chemical Corporation • City of Huntington Beach ` s • Bergen Brunswig Drug Company < � z; Building design project experience ranges from ' structural evaluations of existing roof support systems for placement of HVAC equipment, to planning, design and construction services for a 250,000 square foot warehouse and pharmaceutical distribution facility. ' Selected Cash & Associates Engineers facilities design expertise includes: ' • Seismic Structural Design • Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings CASH E ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS ' • Masonry & Tilt-up Construction • Building Environmental Systems Client: Various • Heavy Equipment Foundations ' • Tenant Facility Relocations Project: Facility Design & • Mezzanines Tenant Improvements • Material Handling Systems Location: Southern California • Materials and Parts Storage ' • SPECIALTY ROOMS arm ,JJJPJJlW1 .n m.. ' r K' 1 x, r Cash & Associates Engineers has provided design and 1 planning services for a variety of specialized rooms for many clients in the industrial and aerospace market. Y Technical knowledge includes _ t a thorough understanding of ' the specialized design requirements for these types ' of facilities. Areas of project expertise include: 1 • Computer/Data Processing Rooms • Electronics Testing Laboratories CASH E ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS ' Cleanrooms • Chemistry Laboratories • Anechoic Chambers Client: Various ' Kitchens & Lunch Rooms • Project: Specialty Rooms Maintenance Shops 1 Theaters Location: Southern California • SCIF & TEMPEST Rooms ' • INNOVATIS DESIGN CAPABILITY 146 IM 1 " r 4 f s ry mt ti- ' Cash & Associates Engineers _ often provides consulting ' services for projects requiring 1 � ` innovative design solutions. _ ' Antenna towers and support - structures fall into this category. The antenna tower pictured in the upper ' left hand corner features a circular track offering 360 degree range control. CASH E ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS ' Innovative designs have been provided to various clients including: Client: Various • Port of Los Angeles • Hughes Aircraft Company Project: Innovative Design • Sea-Land Service, Inc. Solutions ' • United States Navy Location: Southern California • Allied-Interstate Development Company 1 ! • 1 1 i 1 t „ F f or 5 + �.'•' uvn a f Cash & Associates Engineers civil engineering experience has included planning and design services ' for a variety of projects. Expertise includes: CASH E ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS ' Hydrology Studies & Storm Drainage Systems • Site Grading & Paving • Parking Lots Client: Various 1 Street and Roadway Improvements • Water & Gas Distribution Systems Project: Civil Engineering • Sewage Collection Systems Location: Southern California ' Slope Erosion Repair & Prevention • OPERATIONS & ANTENANCE FACILITY a. 4_ . i 1 The Sunline Transit Agency project conseisted of the relocation of the Operations and Maintenance Facility ' as well as the following major tasks: • Site Selection - Evaluation of 8 potential sites. CASH E ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS • 10 acre site development including: - Operations & Maintenance Building -Bus Wash & Fueling Station Client: Sunline Transit Agency ' -Administration Office Complex Project: Operations& Maintenance - Environmental Systems Facility Relocation - Underground Waste Containment ' - Bus Maintenance Equipment & Support Location: Palm Springs, California • Project Phasing & Move-in Planning a 5 4 « Z r� 114 ftll if;III v� t t _ s Since 1966, Cash & Associates Engineers has provided consulting engineering services for the design of new facilities for expansion of, and changes to, existing process plants. Consultation and design services have included maintenance and renovation of existing plant facilities and equipment. Selected project experience includes: • Design of Equipment Foundations • Analysis of Vibration Effects CASH E ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS • Analysis & Design of Sesimic Resistance • Inspections & Reports for Structural Integrity Client: U. S. Borax & • Concrete Repair Chemical Company ' • Wharf Inspection & Restoration Projects: Various • Shipping Facilities • Offices Location: Los Angeles, Wilmington • Paving & Drainage and Boron, California ASL Consulting Engineers ' PUMP STATION PROJECTS Moulton Niguel Water CONTACT: Carlo Habash, District District Engineer 27500 S. La Paz Road Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 PHONE: 714/643-2584 ASL is currently designing a 5, 200 GPM pump station in ' Rolling Hills to serve the new Aliso Viejo Development. The station is being designed to meet an initial demand of 3 , 000 GPM plus 3 , 500 GPM fire flow. When the Aliso Viejo Development is 60% completed, the station will pump into a new 5 M.G. reservoir during off peak hours. The station will consist of 4 electric driven, 2-stage centrifugal pumps and 1 natural gas/LPG driven, single ' stage centrifugal pump. ' City of Huntington Beach CONTACT: Jeff Renna, 200 Main Street Water Superintendent Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ' PHONE: 714/536-5431 ASL recently completed the design of the 10 , 000 GPM Reservoir Hill Booster Station in the city. Seven vertical turbine pumps are driven by five variable speed natural gas engines and two constant speed elec- tric motors . The pumping equipment is housed in a concrete block building having truck access and an overhead crane. City of Fullerton CONTACT: Larry Sears, 303 W. Commonwealth Avenue Water Superintendent Fullerton, CA 92632 PHONE: 714/738-6886 ' ASL completed the design, plans, specifications and estimate for the replacement of two ( 2 ) existing horizontal pumps with two (2) high-efficiency vertical turbine pumps and motors complete with new control ' valves and surge protection for the Kimberly Well . This project also included electrical modifications for the new motors. i OUAL16-B:06/89 Page 1/5 ASL Consulting Engineers Irvine Ranch Water District CONTACT: John Moros, 18802 Bardeen Avenue Director of Irvine CA 92716 Engineering PHONE: 714/833-1223 ' ASL is currently designing two (2) emergency booster stations and four (4) pressure reducing stations for the Tustin Ranch Development. The stations are all located adjacent to the proposed Jamboree Road . Stations will be used to provide dependable supplies of domestic and reclaimed water to 5 different pressure zones. Rowland Area County Water CONTACT: Ton Poly, Y► District General Manager 3021 S. Fullerton Road Rowland and Heights, CA 91745 PHONE: 213/697-1726 For this District, ASL has designed five booster pump stations including vertical turbine pumps with adjustable speed drive . The flow ranges of these stations varied from 1200 gpm to over 2000 gpm. Pumps are housed in concrete block buildings. City of E1 Segundo CONTACT: Donald Holquin, 350 Main Street Water Superintendent E1 Segundo, CA 90245 PHONE: 213/322-4670 ASL designed a 7000 gpm pump station with fixed speed electric motor and gas engine driven pumps to serve the City' s water system. We also designed a 100 cfs fully automatic pump station with 425 brake horse-power natural gas engines pumping storm water through more than a mile of 36-inch and 54-inch diameter pressure lines. Concrete block buildings house the pumps. Two ' additional storm water pumping stations and a pressure reducing station have also been designed by ASL. ' City of Monterey Park CONTACT: Robert Codiana, 320 West Newmark Water Superintendent Monterey Park, CA 91754 PHONE: 213/573-2111 ASL has designed, investigated, and rehabilitated many ' pump stations for the City of Monterey Park which have included close coupled, water lubricated, vertical turbine pumps, and vertical submersible pumps. QUAL16-B:06/89 Page 2/5 ASL Consulting Engineers City of South Pasadena CONTACT: Guy Miller, 1414 Mission Street Water Superintendent ' South Pasadena, CA 91030 PHONE: 213/799-9578 ' ASL designed an MWD connection and pump station including 1500 gpm electric and natural gas driven pumps. We also designed the Indiana Booster Station, having 800 gpm capacity plus a booster pump to serve 22 homes . Pumps are horizontal split-case centrifugal pumps. City of Blythe CONTACT: Sam Heflin, P.O. Box 725 Director of Public ' Blythe, CA 92225 Works PHONE: 714/922- 6161 ' A 2000 gpm pump station for domestic water supply plus a 2000 gpm sewage pump station were designed by ASL. Vertical, variable speed pumps and both electric motors and natural gas engines were utilized. Orchardale Water District CONTACT: Herb Grosdidier, 13819 E. Telegraph Road General Manager Whittier, CA 90604 PHONE: 213/941-0114 ' For the District, ASL designed three pump stations and a chlorination station for the water system using water lubricated, vertical turbine, variable speed pumps, and natural gas engines. city of Manhattan Beach CONTACT: Thomas M. Martinsen, 1400 Highland Avenue Director of Public Manhattan Beach, CA 92066 Works ' PHONE: 213/545-5621 ASL designed several booster pump stations for domestic ' water supply and storm systems. A booster station for a well included mitigation measures to avoid adverse aesthetic and noise impacts . An underground pump station for storm water (17, 000 gpm, draining 34 acres of single family developments) included brick facing on the access shaft and landscaping to blend into the surroundings . These designs have included water QUAL16-B:06/89 Page 3/5 ASL Consulting Engineers ' lubricated end suction pumps, variable and constant speed, and both electric motor and natural gas engine ' driven. ' City of E1 Monte CONTACT: Glenn F. Welch, 11333 E. Valley Boulevard Director of Public El Monte, CA 91731 Works ' PHONE: 213/575-2271 A 3000 gpm pump station for a well , using 318 horsepower natural gas engine wad designed for this City. Well head and pump were housed in a movable metal frame structure to provide access to pull pump and pump column. San Gabriel County Water CONTACT: Phillip J. Crocker, ' District General Manager 8366 E. Grand Avenue Rosemead, CA 91770 ' PHONE: 213/287-0341 ASL designed pumping facilities for a well , incorporating a 618 horsepower natural gas engine and pumping capacity of 2300 gpm. Included was a masonry building with acoustical treatment to mitigate noise impact on a nearby retirement home. ' ValleV Circle Estates CONTACT: Kenneth A. Zuckerman ' 2444 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 540 PHONE: 213/828-4545 Santa Monica, CA 90403 ' ASL designed the 4000 gpm Donick Pump Station to serve this development. A 10, 000 gallon hydropneumatic/surge tank was also required to prevent surging and excess ' cycling of the pumps. Four single stage end suction pumps are driven by electric motor, while one double stage end suction pump operates on diesel fuel for fire emergencies . The pump station building itself is ' cooled with water from the adjacent Donick Reservoir. t QUAL16-B:06/89 Page 4/5 ASL Consulting Engineers IKinneloa Irrigation District CONTACT: Gene W. Burt, 1999 Kinclair Drive General Manager ' Pasadena, CA 91107 PHONE: 213/797-6295 For this District, ASL recently designed two booster pump stations . At the Wilcox Reservoir, a 550 gpm vertical turbine pump is situated directly in the reservoir . The Glen Reservoir required a 400 gpm ' vertical turbine pump in a can, along with a chlorina- tion station. ' La Habra Heights County CONTACT: James E. Frei, Water District General Manager 1271 No. Hacienda Boulevard ' La Habra, CA 90631 PHONE: 213/697-6769 ASL was recently responsible for the rehabilitation of ' a 4450 gpm pump station and design of new 5100 gpm and 1600 gpm capacity pump stations . The largest pump station includes three motors, two 300 horsepower and one 350 horsepower, with close coupled vertical turbine pumps installed in cans. The capacity of this station is 5100 gpm at 620 feet total dynamic head. DUAL16-B:06/89 Page 5/5 � i • ASL Consulting Engineers PUMP STATION, WELLS, RESERVOIRS REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION ' RELATED EXPERIENCE City of Huntington Park CONTACT: Mohammad Rafique 6550 Miles Huntington Park, CA 90255 PHONE: 213/582-6161 ASL completed the design of the rehabilitation of two pump stations --the Miles/Slauson and the 1 Bear/Florence. In addition, ASL designed a replacement for the metal pump house building at the Bear/Florence location including a movable crane system. These pump stations were designed to house natural gas engines (plus a new electric motor at the Miles/Slauson location) , and to have a pumping capacity for each of 1200 gpm. Services provided for this project included civil and structural plans, specifications, and construction cost estimate. La Habra Heights County CONTACT: James Frei Water District 1271 North Hacienda Boulevard La Habra, CA 90631 PHONE: 213/697-6769 ASL was responsible for the rehabilitation of a 4450 gpm pump station and design of new 5100 gpm and 1600 gpm capacity pump stations. The largest pump station includes three motors, two 300 horsepower and one 350 horsepower, with close coupled vertical turbine pumps ' installed in cans . The capacity of this station is 5100 gpm at 620 feet total dynamic head. City of Monterey Park CONTACT: Robert Codiana ' 320 West Newmark Monterey Park, CA 91754 PHONE: 818/307-1321 ASL has designed, investigated, and rehabilitated many pump stations for the City of Monterey Park which have included close coupled, water lubricated, vertical turbine pumps, and vertical submersible pumps. ' City of Ontario CONTACT: Rudy Alcala 303 East ' B' Street Ontario, CA 91764 PHONE: 714/986-1151 ASL prepared the plans , specifications , and construction cost estimate for the pump replacement at John Galvin Booster Pump Station. The work included removal and salvage of four existing pumps, motors, QUAL16-C:11/88 Page 1/3 ASL Consulting Engineers pump control valves and piping, pump base, inlet and outlet piping, and replacement of concrete slab. The ' pumps are water-lubricated, vertical turbine pumps. City of Beverly Hills CONTACT: Gene Tanner 450 North Crescent Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 PHONE: 213/550-4695 ASL has prepared the plans , specifications , and construction cost estimates for the demolition of the existing steel building at Booster Station 4B and removing the existing motor control centers , the installation of piping, diesel fuel pumps, engines, 550 gallon fiberglass underground fuel storage tanks , electrical and telemetry systems , paving, fencing, retaining wall , valve pit , and catch basin I modifications for Booster Stations 4B, 5, and 6, and the installation of new motor and engine controls at Booster Station 7 . Also designed were new pump station buildings including ventilation equipment and acoustical louvers for Boosters 4B, 5, and 6. City of Laguna Beach CONTACT: Ross Cox 505 Forest Avenue Laguna Beach, CA 92651 PHONE. 714/497-3311 ASL designed the rehabilitation of the Bluebird Canyon Sewage Pump Station. Improvements included enlargement of existing wet well , replacement of the station discharge piping, and construction of approximately 500 lineal feet of force main. Cal American Water Company CONTACT: 2020 Huntington Drive San Marino, CA 91108 PHONE: 818/289-7821 For the Danford Pump Station , ASL is currently designing the rehabilitation of the existing horizontal split case pump, currently housed in a 15 foot deep concrete vault. The pump station will be rehabilitated into a submersible pump and the vault will be abandoned. Kinneloa Irrigation District CONTACT: Gene Burt 1999 Kinclair Drive Pasadena, CA 91107 PHONE: 818/797-6295 iASL prepared plans and specifications for the redevelopment of the K-3 well, which is approximately 700 feet and is in an underground vault. QUAL16-C:11/88 Page 2/3 ASL Consulting Engineers City of Burbank CONTACT: Ross Burke 164 Magnolia Boulevard Burbank, CA 91505 PHONE: 818/953-9647 ASL prepared the plans and specifications for restoration of Reservoir No. 1 , a 17 Million Gallon reservoir that had a portion of it damaged by fire . Design effort included a new roof as well as rehabilitation of the concrete slabs. iCity of Huntington Park CONTACT: Robert Storey 6550 Miles Huntington Park, CA 90255 PHONE: 213/582-6161 Repair of the Bear Street Reservoir using epoxy grout in cracks and joints that were leaking . Repair consisted of removal of old weathered dilapidated joint filler, cleaning out and widening cracks so that the epoxy filler could be injected. Work also included repair to damaged portions of wood roof, replacement of columns, installation of plywood shear walls to provide earthquake resistance, and installation of new bird and rodent screens.City of Beverly Hills CONTACT.. Gene Tanner 450 North Crescent Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 PHONE: 213/550-4695 ASL completed the rehabilitation of Reservoir 3-B for the City. The reservoir was a concrete reservoir with hopper walls , concrete columns and wood roof . The repairs included epoxy injecting leaks in the vertical concrete walls , replacing rotted or damaged wooden columns and beams, cleaning the floor and sloping side walls and installing a rubber liner. After completion of the repairs the leaks had been completely stopped. U.S. Marine Corps CONTACT: Camp Pendleton PHONE: Rehabilitation of a 1. 0 M.G. cut and cover reservoir. This reservoir is the standard Navy design with concrete floor and vertical parapet walls , gunited sloping side walls , concrete columns and wood roof. The gunite walls were cracked and leaking badly as well as the floor. The roof was badly deteriorated. ASL installed a rubber liner to fix the leaking floor and walls. The roof was completely removed and replaced with an aluminum roof with wood joints. The Navy was so pleased with the results that they reused the design to repair several other reservoirs that were also leaking. QUAL16-C:11/88 Page 3/3 ' SIMILAR PROJECT EXPERIENCE JOHN J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT: Standby Pumping Unit Slater Avenue and Graham Street ' Huntington Beach, California CLIENT: City of Huntington Beach Water Department ' Huntington Beach, California PROJECT The operation of the standby pumping unit was causing ' DESCRIPTION: annoyance to a adjacent residents. Noise measurements were were obtained and noise control recommendations made. Alternatives proposed included the use of noise barriers and ' rework of the pumping unit enclosure. ' PROJECT: Plant No. 2; City of Huntington Beach Pumping Equipment and Search for Low Frequency Noise Source CLIENT: Orange County Sanitation District Fountain Valley, California PROJECT OJ CT Plant No. 2 has over 100 pieces of equipment which produce ' DESCRIPTION: significant levels of noise. An adjacent resident had complained about a low frequency noise. Noise measurements, A-weighted and 1/3 octave band, were used to track down the source. Noise control recommendations considered three alternatives to muffle a large pumping unit. Alternatives included: a commercially available silencer; a custom designed silencer and a large silencer/enclosure design. ' PROJECT: Water Pumping Unit Huntington Beach, California ' CLIENT: Willden Associates Ci Huntington Beach / t of Huntig Anaheim, California PROJECT This project involved design of a new facility which was to DESCRIPTION: be constructed within 50 feet of an existing apartment building. ' Noise control recommendations were provided including a silencer room, absorption material in the building and sound rated doors. The completed unit could not be heard at the 1 apartments. RANDY H. MASON CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS ' Civil Engineer Project Manager EDUCATION: California State.University, Fullerton B.S. Civil Engineering, 1972 California State University, Long Beach ' Master's credits in Structural Engineering LICENSES: California, Civil Engineer, No. C030661, 1979 ' SPECIALTIES: Building Design Facilities Tenant Improvements ' Design & Construction Scheduling Construction Management Randy Mason is a principal of Cash & Associates Engineers with over sixteen years of experience in the areas of project management, civil/structural design and construction contract I administration. His project experience has included renovation and new design of office and operation/maintenance complexes in the commercial and industrial field. ' Mr. Mason has managed special projects in the areas of energy management and energy storage design. ' Prior to joining C&A, Mr. Mason was project manager on various types of building projects including the Operating and Maintenance Headquarters Complex for Tucson Electric Power Company, a Material Handling and Warehouse Facility for Western Airlines, and the Western Regional Headquarters Facility and Plant Renovation for Synthane Taylor Corporation. He managed other projects for Orange County Transit District, U.S. Department of the Interior, Rockwell International, and United States Air Force. ' Representative projects for which Mr. Mason has served as project manager and/or lead engineer: o Operations and maintenance complex for 200 bus fleet composed of a bus wash facility, a two-bay maintenance building with two hydraulic lifts and one pit, a fuel and vacuum facility and an administration complex, SunLine Transit Agency, Thousand Palms, CA. o Civil, structural, architectural, mechanical and electrical engineering services for control ' rooms and warehouses for methane gas recovery plants at six different locations across the country, with varying terrain and soil conditions affecting the foundations and utilities. ' o Responsible for composing performance specifications for the design/build contract for two (2) 200,000 sq. ft. tilt-up warehouses. Warehouses included hazardous storage areas requiring special retention basins, fire walls, fire protection systems, in-rack sprinkler systems, alarm systems and auxiliary storage tanks, as well as a fully automated product retrieval system for Bergen Brunswig, Valencia and Sacramento, CA. RANDY H. MASON Page 2 ' o Industrial engineering and design of vehicle maintenance warehouse including parts storage, truck wash, fuel station and underground oil storage tanks. Project included outdoor storage of bulk maintenance and truck parts, emergency power generation and paving of parking lots - City of Huntington Beach, California. o Building A2, tenant improvement project involving relocation of a radar repair facility, electronics standards calibration lab, EO production lab and lunch room for Hughes ' Aircraft Company, Support Systems, Long Beach, CA. This project required detailed move-in sequencing produced on a CPM Scheduling program. ' o Building Al, installation of 5,000 square foot TEMPEST room involving equipment layout and SCIF security measures for Hughes Aircraft Company, Support Systems, Long Beach, CA. ' o U.S. Borax and Chemical Corp., Wilmington, CA. Various structural projects including: roof beams, equipment foundations and switchgear building. o Design for the renovation of an electronics warfare facility including computer rooms, offices, auxiliary mobile offices and theaters, U.S. Naval Station, Fallon, NV. o Civil and structural design for six light rail passenger stations, including two parking lots, between Long Beach and Los Angeles, The Tanzmann Associates, Los Angeles, CA. ' o Civil and structural design for a Saltwater Pumping Station for Todd Shipyards, San Pedro, CA. o Civil, structural and architectural design for an Emergency Generator Building for Rockwell International - Rockwell Science Center in Thousand Oaks, CA. ' o Civil, structural, mechanical and electrical design and management for the Santa Fe Energy Company Central Shipping Terminal composed of oil storage tanks and metered 1 pumping stations near Bakersfield, CA. 0 0 ` CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS ' A. ROSS CASH Supervising Project Manager Civil Engineer ' Structural Engineer ' EDUCATION: University of Washington Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, 1949 University of California at Los Angeles Master of Engineering, 1959 ' SOCIETIES: Fellow American Society of Civil Engineers Member Structural Engineers Association of 1 Southern California Member National Society of Professional Engineers ' LICENSES: California Structural Engineer No. 1053, 1960 California Civil Engineer No. 8960, 1954 Arizona Civil Engineer No. 10884, 1976 Nevada Structural Engineer No.4332, 1976 Oregon Structural Engineer No. 9009, 1976 ' Texas Professional Engineer No. 58365, 1985 Washington Civil Engineer No. 16165, 1976 Illinois Structural Engineer No. 081-004487, 1983 New York Professional Engineer No. 61555, 1984 Idaho Professional Engineer No. 5967, 1988 Colorado Professional Engineer No. 25865, 1988 ' New Mexico Professional Engineer No. 10712, 1989 New Jersey Professional Engineer No. GE34181, 1989 Ross Cash, president of Cash & Associates Engineers, Long Beach has thirty-nine years of professional experience which includes a wide variety of structural and civil engineering projects. Mr. Cash has designed and/or been responsible for the design of wharves, bulkheads, piers, floating structures, towers, stacks, highway bridges, railway bridges, storm drains, commercial buildings, industrial buildings and oil handling facilities. Mr. Cash has managed projects utilizing computers for management information systems, structural analysis and design, civil and mechanical engineering calculations. These projects have included consultation, investigations, reports specifications, complete design and construction drawings, and construction cost estimates. Mr. Cash has developed course outlines, selected texts and has taught "Structural Analysis", "Steel Design", and "Timber Design" at California State University at Long Beach. Previous professional experience includes draftsman, designer, resident engineer, and chi ef structural engineer for Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, Long Beach, California. A. ROSS CASH Page 2 The following are representative projects for which Mr. Cash has been the principal-in-charge: o Below grade emergency water tank for back-up fire protection for TRW Information Services, Anaheim, California. o Naval Shipyard Long Beach Waterfront improvement project. Design New Fresh Water ' System, including a 500,000 gallon storage tank and booster pumps. o Oil-water separation plant process design Todd Pacific Shipyard Corp., San Pedro, California. o Oil dehydration, water treatment and steam generation facility, TOSCO Corp., Placerita, California. I o Packaged water treatment plant, Pol etrics Inc. Lon Beach California. g P ym g , o Hydraulic study, site grading, drainage, sanitary system, roadwork, and survey for various projects for Hughes Aircraft Company, Fullerton, California. o Storm runoff collection system, impounding reservoir and pump station for Stauffer Chemical Company. o Site grading, drainage, and sewer for an industrial center for Boatman Properties, Inc. o Wastewater sewer for Oil Operators, Inc. o Site grading and drainage at a water treatment plant for Santa Fe Energy Company. ' o Survey, pavement rehabilitation, and sewer lift station for Cerritos Bahia Marina, Long Beach, California. WILFRIDO B. SIMBOL CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS 1 Senior Civil Engineer EDUCATION: Mapua Institute of Technology, Manila, Philippines ' B.S. Civil Engineering, 1969 LICENSES: California, Civil Engineer, No. 29699, 1978 Philippines, Civil Engineer, No. 9965, 1969 SPECIALTIES: Project Engineering J f� g Civil Engineering and Design ' Project Specifications ' Willie Simbol is a principal and chief civil engineer at Cash & Associates Engineers. Mr. Simbol has over nineteen years of experience in civil and structural design, project specification writing, and cost estimates. Mr. Simbol has been lead civil engineer for numerous projects that include new design of various site developments, parking lots and storm drain projects as well as repair and alteration of existing sites. Areas of practice also include street and bridge design, hydrology studies and slope protection. Prior to joining Cash & Associates Engineers, Mr. Simbol was manager of the Construction Planning Branch for the Department of National Defense in the Philippines. His responsibi- lities included designing and providing specifications for construction of the ammunitions plant. Mr. Simbol also was the civilian construction manager for the Construction Division in which he supervised all construction. Below are representative projects that Mr. Simbol has managed: o Masonry block pump station for storm runoff for the City of Huntington Beach. o Hydrologic study, site grading, drainage, sanitary system, roadwork, and survey on various projects for Hughes Aircraft Company. o Storm runoff collection system, impounding reservoir and pump station for Stauffer Chemical Company. o Site grading, drainage, and sewer for an industrial center for Boatman Properties, Inc. o Wastewater sewer for Oil Operators, Inc. o Site grading and drainage for a water treatment plant for Santa Fe Energy Company. o Site grading and drainage for various projects for Getty Synthetic Fuels, Inc. ' o Gas main replacement, City of Long Beach, CA. ' o Signal Hill Substructure Atlases, City of Signal Hill, CA. o Santa Ana Flood Plains Study, Hughes Aircraft Company, Irvine, CA. 1 WILFRIDO B. SIMBOL ' Page 2 ' o Street and freeway improvements for the City of Long Beach. o Pre-stressed concrete bridge over Los Cerritos Channel for the City of Long Beach. o Fresh water storage tank, pump station, and water distribution system for the Long Beach Naval Shipyard. o Pre-stressed concrete railroad bridge over Cucamonga Creek for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. ' o Survey, pavement rehabilitation, and sewer lift station for Cerritos Bahia Marina. o Survey, pavement rehabilitation and coating of tennis courts for Long Beach Naval Shipyard. 1 N I i 1 1 • BLAKE R. ECKERLE CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS Senior Structural Engineer EDUCATION: Santa Ana Community College, Santa Ana, California, A.A., 1973 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, B.S. Architectural Engineering, 1976 LICENSES: California, Civil Engineer, No. C30379, 1979 SPECIALTIES: Structural Engineering Masonry, Timber, Steel and Concrete Construction Computer Analysis and Programming Mr. Eckerle has had over thirteen years design experience in wood, masonry, concrete and steel construction. As a Senior Engineer with Cash & Associates Engineers, he has provided project management, engineering design, calculations, specifications and cost estimating for a variety of diverse projects. He has a particular talent for finding creative solutions to difficult design problems. In addition, his thoroughness in checking calculations and ability to ' coordinate the drawings of various engineering disciplines, enable him to provide complete and correct detailed construction documents. Mr. Eckerle's experience in computer analysis and programming has increased the firms's capability to provide complete and faster design services. He is responsible for implementing engineering software and training others on in-house computer systems. He is also responsible for CAD systems management. The following is a partial list of representative projects for Mr. Eckerle: o Various tenant improvement projects for Rockwell International Corporation, Newport Beach and Newbury Park, CA. o Structural evaluation for upgrading an existing EASTMAN-PBI Market Equipment, Signal Hill, CA building to 1985 UBC seismic criteria. o Building 230, penthouse roof analysis to support conduit - Hughes Aircraft Company, Torrance, California. o Structural inspection of San Pedro Naval Housing for a repair project - U.S. Navy, Western Division, San Bruno, California. o Building 505, design of equipment canopy modifications - Hughes Aircraft Company, Fullerton, California. o Feasibility study to assess damage to Building 598 - U.S. Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, California. i ASL Consulting Engineers Douglas J. Reinhart Vice President Education: Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, B.S . , Civil Engineering, 1966 ' Registration: Registered Civil Engineer, California No. 22611 Registered Control Systems Engineer, ' California No. 1847 Member: American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association American Public Works Association Mr. Reinhart is experienced in a variety of civil engineer- ing functions, with emphasis on the planning, design and construction of water supply projects. Studies and projects completed under his direction include computerized water master plans, reservoirs, pipelines, pump stations and well design, instrumentation, telemetry and control systems. Mr. Reinhart is well versed in complete water system analysis using both manual and state-of-the-art computer analysis methods. He has directed several major water master plans which incorporate Fluid Analysis and Simulation Technique (FAAST) , assessed through in-house computer terminals. ' Recent water supply projects over 20 miles of pipeline ranging in size from 8-inch through 50-inch in various locations throughout Southern California. He has also directed the design of a 6. 3 M.G. concrete reservoir with a parking of facility on the roof and a 7 , 000 gpm pump station for the City of El Segundo, a 4 M.G. concrete reservoir for the City of Camarillo, two M.G. steel reser- voirs for the City of Thousand Oaks. Additionally, he has completed the design for drilling and equipping four water wells ranging in capacity from 1, 750 gpm to 3 , 250 gpm. Two of his most recent wells were projects for the City of Camarillo. These wells were each drilled to a depth of 900 feet using the reverse rotary process. A special gravel pack was utilized to hold back the extremely fine native formations and stainless steel perforated casing installed to resist the corrosive characteristics of the groundwater. Mr. Reinhart has 12 years of experience in automation, instrumentation, controls, chlorination stations and telemetry. His experience includes telemetry feasibility ' studies and the design and supervision of installation of telemetry projects for reservoirs, pump stations, metering structures, storm drain pumping stations and sewerage lift R-1K ASL Consulting Engineers stations. Projects for the Cities of El Segundo, Camarillo, and Oxnard, and for the United States Marine Corps Base at Camp Pendleton. Recently he was responsible for the design execution of a telemetry system for the City of Pasadena. This system included a remote control of 14 reservoirs, 14 1 wells, 18 booster stations and several metering structures with data logging accomplished by computer. Design included the provisions for an automatic backup system in the event of telemetry failure. Mr. Reinhart has also served as res- ident engineer for several instrumentation and telemetry installations. ' Water quality and treatment studies are also conducted under Mr. Reinhart's direction. Mr. Reinhart recently contributed to the investigation of PCE problems involved in Rurban Homes Mutual Water Company water wells. Aeration was the 1 recommended solution in this instance. For the U.S. Navy' s Port Hueneme facility, he was involved in the design of a water softening plant using synthetic zeolite for ion ' exchange. Aeration and chlorination was recommended for hydrogen sulfide treatment at 2 water wells in Camarillo. ' Mr. Reinhart has directed several sanitation projects in- cluding gravity and force mains, variable speed pump sta- tions with capacities of 4 , 500 gpm, and treatment facili- ties. He was the principal-in-charge of the Western Trunk/ 1 Ventura Road Trunk Sewer project for the City of Oxnard. This project included the design and installation of 14 , 000 feet of gravity mains ranging in size from 12 inches through ' 24 inches, 7, 050 feet of 20-inch ductile iron force main and a 4 , 500 gpm pump station. The 30-foot deep pump station is located below grade and includes a variable speed drive system, completely automated, with a backup diesel generator ' to operate the station during power outages. Mr. Reinhart is thoroughly experienced in contract administration and construction management and has served as resident engineer on numerous projects. He brings to each project a sensitivity to the clients ' needs, with a 1 commitment to quality and performance. Prior to joining ASL in 1971, Mr. Reinhart spent 1 year in construction supervision with a general contractor and 4 years in the Civil Engineer Corps of the United States Navy. R-1K � i • ASL Consulting Engineers Steve Tedesco ' Project Manager Education: Polytechnic Institute of New York ' B.S. , Civil Engineering, 1979 Registration: Registered Civil Engineer, ' California No. 39261 Oklahoma No. 13713 ' Member: American Water Works Association Orange County Water Association Mr. Tedesco is experienced in the planning, design, analysis and construction of water supply, water distribution and wastewater collection systems . He is experienced in the ' design and analysis of water and wastewater systems, pump stations, water supply reservoirs, water transmission and wastewater collection mains. ' Mr. Tedesco is familiar in computerized hydraulic techniques in distribution system design and surge control . He is also experienced in assessment engineering. His recent projects include: Pump stations ' Provided design, inspection and construction management for three booster pump station in the Aliso Viejo Planned Community for Moulton Niguel Water District. ° Project Manager for design of Hillcrest Booster Station in City of Fullerton. ° Project Engineer for Design of Morro Hills Booster Station in the City of Oceanside. ' Project Manager for Design and construction management of Weir Canyon Pump Station for Woodcrest Development Company. ' Project Manager for Design of Tustin Ranch emergency booster pump and PRV stations for Irvine Ranch Water District. T-21 ' . • ASL Consulting Engineers Reservoirs ' Project Manager for the 2 . 0 M . G . Steel Highlands Reservoir and 5 . 0 M.G. Steel Pacific Park Reservoirs, including direction of inspection services and ' construction management for the Moulton Niguel Water District. ' Project Manager for construction services for 2-2 . 5 M.G. Rolling Hills Reservoirs and 2 . 5 M.G. Sheep hills Reservoir in Moulton Niguel Water District. ' Prepared specifications for the recoating of three steel reservoirs in the City of Camarillo. ' Project Engineer for design of 5 . 0 M. G. Morro Hills Reservoir in the City of Oceanside. ° Project Engineer for design of three precast concrete reservoirs in Irvine Coast Development for the Irvine Ranch Water District. ° Project Engineer for design of 25 M . G . Bristol Reservoir Expansion in the City of Santa Ana. 1 Transmission Mains o Provided design and construction management for the Moulton Parkway Transmission main for Moulton Niguel Water District. ° Project Manager for 20 , 000 L. F . of Domestic and Reclaimed transmission mains in Aliso Viejo Planned Community. ° Project Engineer for design of 40, 000 L. F. of Domestic and Reclaimed water mains in Jamboree Road for the Irvine Ranch Water District. ' Project Engineer for 35, 000 L.F. of high pressure water transmission mains in the City of Oceanside as part of the Morro Hills Assessment District. ° Project Engineer for 17 , 000 L. F. of distribution main in the City of Oceanside as part of the Downtown Area 7 ' and 9 Replacement Project. T-21 ASL Consulting Engineers Terry L. Kerger ' Project Engineer Education: E1 Camino College, A.A. in Architecture California State University, Los Angeles B.S. , Civil Engineering Registration: Registered Civil Engineer, California No. 34896 ' Member: American Water Works Association Southern California Water Utilities Association Mr. Kerger has 18 years experience with ASL in layout and design ' of civil engineering projects. He currently serves as the design engineer for all of Rowland Water District ' s improvement projects . His responsibilities include the design of water storage reservoirs, pump stations, and all water transmissions and distribution mains, and roadway and grading plans required to serve new development within the District's services boundaries. He has designed several well installations for clients including drilling and equipping of Well No. 11 for the City of Huntington Park, drilling and equipping of Well No. 13 for the City of El Monte, two wells for the City of Industry, two wells for the City of Ontario, a well and pump station for the City of Manhattan Beach, a well for the San Gabriel County Water District, and the new well in the City of Pico Rivera. ' Mr. Kerger has extensive experience in concrete and steel reser- voir design. He has designed reservoirs for Orchard Dale Water ' District, Rowland Water District, City of Camarillo, and Coachel- la Valley Water District. These projects have involved site grading, landscaping, and construction inspection as well. He has designed three steel tank water storage reservoirs for Rowland Water District having capacities of 2 M.G. , and 2 M.G. capacity, respectively. For the City of Monterey Park he de- signed a 3 M.G. steel tank reservoir. These projects have in- volved site grading, landscaping, and construction inspection as well . ' Mr. Kerger was principal designer for ASL' s contribution to the award-winning Industry Hills Civic-Recreation-Conservation Area including two 2 . 5 million gallon water storage reservoirs, two 6500 gpm pumping stations and six miles of 36-inch reclaimed water transmission main. He was also responsible for the design AR/K-1D ASL Consulting Engineers of the telemetry and control system including central control and remote sites for three reservoirs and three pump stations. Mr. Kerger is currently directing the Pomona Walnut Rowland Joint Water Line project which involves the relocation and replacement of 2000 feet of 42-inch mortar-lined and coated steel water main. Over 6000 feet of 51-inch mortar-lined and coated steel water main will be installed in its place. As part of the County of Los Angeles Waterworks engineering projects which ASL has recently begun, Mr. Kerger directs all plan check efforts for the approval of water distribution systems in private developments within the County' s boundaries. Mr. Kerger recently completed the design of the standby pumping ' facilities 4B, 8 , and 6 along with the related telemetry and piping work for the City of Beverly Hills. Mr. Kerger is an experienced construction inspector, having served in the field on numerous projects. Construction projects he has inspected include pipelines, reservoirs, pump stations, and buildings for Rowland Water District; reservoirs for Monterey Park; well and pump station for Manhattan Beach; warehouse build- ing and well for San Gabriel County Water District; elevated tank painting and ground-level steel tank construction for Dominguez Water Corporation; pump station for South Pasadena. For the Industry Hills project he provided inspection consulting. Mr. Kerger was project engineer for the John Galvin Booster Pump Station project for the City of Ontario. His responsibilities included redesign of the pumps, on-call inspection during con- struction, review of shop drawing submittals, and contract admin- istration for the City. Other pump station projects include: IManhattan Beach, Larrson Street Booster. Replacement of existing fixed speed staged booster pump operation with variable frequency electrical converter to control pump speed and system pressure. ° 2nd Street Emergency Fire Protection Booster Pump. Natural gas engine driven fire pump for water system, including automatic engine start controls and telemetry system for reporting engine status and failure alarms. Engine start and stop signals supplied from discharge pressure switchgauges. AR/K-1D ASL Consulting Engineers o Coordination of Video Taping. Taping of interior of well casing, sewer lines, and water transmission pipe- lines for Oxnard sewer main construction; Rowland Water District mortar-lined water mains and water well cas- ing. ! Rowland Water District Booster Pump Stations. Design and construction of several booster pumping facilities with capacities from 100 gpm to 8000 gpm. Designs included water system analysis to determine pumping criteria , pump selection, piping layout, design of building enclosures, site grading and drainage, access road design, telemetry control design, construction cost estimates, specifications, construction observa- tion, equipment submittal review, and construction observation. AR/K-1D ASL Consulting Engineers Bruce R. Eisenbise Project Engineer Education: San Diego State University B.S. , Civil Engineering, 1975 Registration: Registered Civil Engineer, California, No. 29136 Member: American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association American Public Works Association Mr. Eisenbise has over 12 years of professional engineering experience with special emphasis in water resource related projects. His background includes 6 years as a Senior Civil Engineer with the City of Thousand Oaks Utilities Department, 4 years with consulting firms specializing in water resources engineering and 2 years as the office manager of an engineering firm performing land development itype projects. ■ Mr. Eisenbise' s knowledge in the civil engineering field covers a wide range of areas. His experience in water resources includes the design and construction of major water and wastewater system improvements. Project assignments have included a myriad of master plan studies and reports, transmission and interceptor pipelines, reservoir and pumping plant facilities. Project responsibilities have included developing and managing project budgets; preparing construction plans, ' specifications and bid documents; overseeing bidding procedures, evaluating bids; administering contracts; preparing pay estimates; supervising inspection activities; and approving projects for acceptance upon their completion. A partial list of water with which Mr. Eisenbise has been involved include: ° Cal City Feeder, Antelope Valley East Kern Water Agency; 43 , 000 LF of 18-inch water transmission main and appurtenances. ° 1. 5 MG Reclaimed Water Reservoir for Lake Sherwood ° Ranch, Ventura, County. 5. 0 MG Willow Lane Reservoir and Pump Station, City of Thousand Oaks, E-1B.c ASL Consulting Engineers Los Robles Golf Course Irrigation Well and Lake Improvement. 750 GPM well and 1300 GPM booster station, City of Thousand Oaks. ° Willow Lane Pipelines; 10, 000 LF of 12" and 14" water transmission main, City of Thousand Oaks. ° Grissom Reservoir No. 2 Construction ( . 25 MG) and Grissom Reservoir No. 1 Recoating, City of Thousand Oaks. ° Unit "A" Wastewater Interceptor Main Replacement - A major capital improvement project involving approximately 3000 feet of 18" and 20" diameter pipeline situated within an environmentally sensitive and extremely rugged canyon location. ° Unit "G" Interceptor Main Replacement - Significant capital project involving the relocation of approximately 2000 feet of 18" diameter pipeline for future development. ° Unit "B" Wastewater Main Repairs - Rehabilitation of an existing pipeline involving the lining of approximately 1250 feet of 15" diameter pipeline. The project involved the unique "instituform" process. E-1B.c IL 0 i FRANK Y. TSO FRANK Y. TSO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, INC. BACKGROUND ' Born on mainland China and moved to Taiwan in 1949. Came to the United States in 1963 and became United States citizen in 1969. PROFESSIONAL FIELD Electrical Engineering 1 Control Systems EDUCATION BS Degree, 1956, Electrical Engineering National Taiwan University MS Degree, 1966, Electrical Engineering University of Southern California REGISTRATION California, 1967 Nebraska, 1974 Arizona, 1980 SPECIALTIES Electrical Engineering Industrial Facilities Buildings EXPERIENCE Taiwan Telecommunication Administration, 1958-1963 Supervisor of VHF radio terminal station, operating, maintaining and researching VHF COMMUNICATION SYSTEM. Sampson, Randall & Press, Consulting Electrical Engineers, 1963-1973 Chief Electrical Engineer, supervising, designing and managing different types of projects. Frank Y. Tso Electrical Engineering Company Formed Frank Y. Tso Electrical Engineering Company, Inc. in March, 1979 for all types of electrical engineering services. FRANK Y. TSO Page 2 PROJECTS A. INDUSTRIAL PARKS: 1. Industrial Complex, Sacramento - Fourteen tilt-up type warehouse and office buildings. 2. Industrial Complex, Cerritos - Five tilt-up type warehouse and office buildings. 3. Industrial Complex, Simi Valley - Three tilt-up type warehouse and office buildings. 4. Industrial Complex, Brea - Thirteen tilt-up type warehouse and office buildings. B. INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS: 1. North Midway Steam Plant, Santa Fe Energy Company. ' 2. South Midway Steam Plant, Santa Fe Energy Company. 3. XTRA Energy Corporation drill sites electrical distribution systems. 4. THUMS Long Beach Company, Island Freeman 112 well addition. 5. Tosco FOR Corporation, Placerita Plant. C. COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: 1. Home Savings of America - Various branch buildings throughout the State of California. 2. California Federal Savings - Branch buildings. 3. Carol's Bath Towel, Westminster - Interior finish. 4. American One Hour Photo - Various locations in State of California. D. RESTAURANTS AND HOTELS: 1. Hilton Queensway Hotel, Long Beach, California - Five story building hotel adjacent to Queen Mary Ship. 2. Misono Restaurant, San Diego, California. 3. All American Burger Restaurants. E. OFFICE BUILDINGS: 1. Home Savings of America, Long Beach - A ten-story office building with Home Savings branch on ground floor and shells from second floor up prepared for office use. Also included is a four level parking structure. 2. Medical Office Building, Long Beach - Three-story fully developed medical doctors office building. FRANK Y. TSO Page 3 3. Consolidated Base Personnel Office, George AFB - Three-story office building at George Air Force Base. 4. Bauer Professional Building, Long Beach - Suite development for doctors iand educational uses. 5. Office Building, Buena Park - 80,000 square foot, two-story office building for Hughes Aircraft Company including fire alarm system, security system, and energy management system. 6. Business Park, Santa Clara - Six building complex including four office buildings and two retail stores and site for future restaurant and bank buildings. 7. Hughes Aircraft Company office and research buildings, Buena Park, CA. F. HOSPITAL: 1. San Pedro Peninsula Hospital - Five-story addition including Emergency Department, Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Psychiatric Ward and Outpatient Family Therapy Departments. Various department remodel. Design electrical lighting and power system, communication and alarm systems, and new emergency generation system including synchronous switchgear to parallel operation of two emergency generators. 2. Long Beach Community Hospital - Structural strengthening of original hospital building including new addition and various remodeling. New electrical service and distribution systems, new synchronous switchgear for existing generators. Redesign and upgrade existing emergency automatic transfer system. 3. Fairview State Hospital - Design new 5kV service to replace existing for added air conditioning system including 5kV emergency generation system and electrical system for the central plant. 4. Fairview State Hospital - Remodel existing patient wards to meet new life safety requirement. 5. Alhambra Community Hospital - Design a complete 102 bed five-story hospital including all auxiliary facilities. 6. V.A. Hospital, Sepulveda - 120 bed nursing unit addition with administra- tion and recreation facility. i FRANK Y. TSO Page 4 7. V.A. Hospital, Long Beach - Research and Education facility (did not ! construct). Three-story research building and one-story education building including auditorium. ! 8. St. Mary's Hospital, Long Beach - Various remodel project and new addition. Master plan electrical system for new expanded area. G. SCHOOLS: 1. Stone Creek Elementary School, Irvine. 2. Santiago Hill Elementary School, Irvine. 3. California University at Long Beach, Nursing Facility Addition. 4. Compton Community College, Nursing Facility. ! 5. Compton Community College, Child Development Center. 6. Compton Community College, Study Skill Center Remodel. 7. Compton Community College, Upgrading campus high voltage distribution system. 8. Compton Community College, Upgrading entire campus security and parking lighting system to most energy efficient system. ! 9. New Middle School, Ontario, CA. 10. Rowland and Nogales High Schools Gymnasium Addition and Sound System. H. RECREATIONAL BUILDINGS: 1. Garden Grove Community Center. 2. Chapman High School baseball field lighting, Garden Grove. 3. Garden Grove park lighting. 4. Los Alamitos Community Center. 5. Los Alamitos Teen Building. 6. Old Ranch Tennis Court Lighting, Los Alamitos. 7. El Toro Marine Air Station football field lighting. ! ! 1 J.J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ' JOHN J. VAN HOUTEN Acoustical Studies EDUCATION: California State University g Lon Beach B.S. - Applied Physics ' University of Southern California M.S. - Mechanical Engineering ' SOCIETIES: Acoustical Society of America American Society of Mechanical Engineers ' American Society for Testing and Materials California & National Society of Professional Engineers Institute of Noise Control Engineering National Council of Acoustical Consultants LICENSES: California Professional Engineer No. 16233 ' Arizona Professional Engineer No. 12108 Mr. Van Houten has over fifteen years of experience with major companies involving acoustical ' and vibration system analysis and experimentation. He has been the principal investigator on numerous projects concerned with the development of sound generation, measurement and microphone calibration procedures and equipment. He has performed extensive studies involving industrial noise control, community exposure to noise and transportation system noise assessment. ' Project responsibilities for Mr. Van Houten have included all phases of support and test equipment engineering, electro-mechanical product development, systems integration design of sonic environmental and calibration laboratories, and ground and flight test operations. Mr. Van Houten has authored over twenty publications covering various aspects of the acoustical sciences and related engineering applications, court appearances as an expert witness and presentations before numerous public bodies. Representative project responsibilities include: o Investigation of methods of evaluating the acoustical and dynamic properties of materials for use in turbo-fan engine noise suppression, a part of NASA's long range noise abatement program. o Development of industrial noise measurement and engineering control procedures including industrial hearing conservation programs. ' o Studies of airport/community noise exposure from flight operations, including development of procedures for analysis and field monitoring of optimal flight profiles ' for minimal community noise exposure. 1 tRESUME NAME: Robert F. Karlicek ' DATE OF BIRTH: October 28 , 1927 CITIZENSHIP: United States of America EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology, 1951 Master of Science in Electrical Engineering University of Pittsburgh , 1955 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer ( Illinois-1951 ) ' PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES: Member of IEEE Member of ASME ' Past Vice-Chairman - Nuclear Power Engineering Comm. Member - Hydroelectric Power Subcommittee of IEEE Member - Performance Test Code Committee of ASME ' EXPERIENCE SUMMARY: ' Thirty seven years of engineering experience in the following: o Project engineering and project management o Electric power system analysis and planning o Transmission line and substation design o Protective relay systems o Hydroelectric power plant selection and design o Hydraulic turbine and generator upgrading and performance evaluation o Hydraulic turbine field testing ' o Plant auxiliary system and equipment design o Steam plant performance monitoring and alarm system design including computer systems o Distribution apparatus application engineering o Design of real-time computer systems including large scale programs for plant design and compilers o Equipment and construction specifications ' o Development of American standards for equipment o Fire protection studies o Electrical power system studies including short- circuit, load and stability studies 1 � w i 1 RESUME: Robert F. Karlicek page-2 ' DETAILED EXPERIENCE: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY - January 1974 to April 1987 Senior Engineer responsible for: ' - Engineering expertise for major power plant equipment including the selection of equipment ratings , preparation of specific- ations , evaluation of bids and awards and installation of the following: Generators Transformers Turbines Motors 1 Valves and Gates Switchgear - Consulting engineering for hydroelectric plant design , selection of equipment and economic evaluation of alternatives associated with the development of resources - Project Engineer responsible for the development and implementation of Edison' s hydro plant upgrading program. This program was started in 1979 and has involved modernization of over 20 turbine/generators resulting in a increase of over 100 MW of capacity and efficiency improvements up to 8 percent. Duties included evaluation of the existing facilities, prepara- tion of specifications and procurement of equipment, and final field testing to verify actual performance. - Development of apparatus standards and specification for major 1 equipment- Prepared technical studies and major equipment specifications for a 36 MW Francis turbine/generator at Edison's Big Creek-3 1 hydro plant, and for the 200 MW Balsam Meadow pumped-storage plant. ' HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY - June 1966 to January 1974 Project Engineer responsible for the electrical design, tech- nical studies , equipment specifications and procurement, and construction drawings for the Bath County 2100 MW pumped- storage project in Virginia which is the largest pumped-storage ' plant in the United States. , RESUME: Robert F. Karlicek page-3 HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY (Cont'd ) ' - Project Manager for the development of a complete 400 kV electric transmission system in Iran consisting of over 800 km of EHV lines and 5 EHV substations, including numerous studies such as economic conductor selection, corona , and insulation coordination. L - Project engineer responsible for the design of a 20 MW impulse turbine and auxiliary systems for the Rio Lindo hydro plant in Honduras . ' - Project engineer responsible for the electrical design and start-up of three 35 MW impulse turbines and auxiliary systems at the Finchaa hydro plant in Ethiopia. ' - Lead engineer responsible for planning studies for the electric power system in West Pakistan, including optimizing studies for ' transmission systems, resource development, load and transient stability studies - Responsible for the development of large-scale computer programs for the design of electrical systems in power plants . RAISER ENGINEERS March 1965 to June 1966 - Senior electrical engineer responsible for planning studies for 1 industrial power systems , including short-circuit and voltage drop studies, load studies and overall design of power distri- bution systems. ' - Responsible for developing complete design standards for industrial power systems and equipment such as cables, motors and controls, switchgear, relays , and lighting . WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION February 1951 to March 1965 ' - Senior engineer in charge of computer applications for power plant monitoring, alarm and control systems, including 1 selection of sensors and development of computer programs. - Responsible for the development of a general purpose computer program with the capability of generating software for any ' any computer. RESUME: Robert F. Karlicek ' page-4 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION (Cont 'd ) ' - Senior engineer in the Switchgear Division responsible for the design and development of switchgear and for providing applic- ations engineering throughout the Country. - Liaison engineer responsible for coordination and application of protective relay systems between the East Pittsburg LDivisions and the Relay Division in Newark. - Consulting and Applications Engineer providing technical ' studies and analysis on power system applications involving : Generators Large motors and controls Transformers. Switchgear Relay systems Surge protection Distribution Apparatus PATENTS: Holder of 7 United States patents . ' PUBLICATIONS: ' o Ferro-resonance of Potential Transformers (co-author) o Application Guide for Low Voltage Circuit Breakers o Electrical and Hydraulic Characteristics of Pumped- Storage Plants (co-author) ' o Facility Upgrading: Capacity Gains at Minimal Cost o Testing of Hydraulic Turbines by the Thermodynamic Method i ALEXANDER I. KHAN PR ESIDENT 1 EDUCATION 1970 University of Toronto, Toronto; M.A.Sc. in Geotechnical Engineering 1 1976 University of Texas, Austin; Pile Design 1977 University of Missouri, Rolla; Construction Dewatering d State University, Boulder; Pile Dynamics 1978&1985 Colorado S y, EXPERIENCE 1 1983- GEOFON, Cypress, California present ' President. Responsible for the firm's overall direction, strategic planning, staffing, and quality control. Notable projects include Pier A and Pier J expansions in the Port of Long Beach, a Fire Boat ' Maintenance Facility in the Port of Los Angeles, several nearshore geophysical and bathymetric surveys for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, several waterfront geotechnical investigations for A-E firms itunder contract to the U.S. Navy, EIR input for coastal developments in Santa Barbara, a Homeporting Facility for the U.S. Coast Guard, and 1 the Bayside Marina for the Irvine Company. 1975- Ertec/Fugro, Long Beach, California 1983 Senior Engineer. Client-related responsibilities included liaison, project management and technical supervision. Company related responsibilities it required input to planning, organizing, staffing and business development. Selected activities are chronologically listed below: 1982 - Long Beach International Coal Project, Long Beach, California - Los Cerritos Channel Bridge Crossing, Long Beach, California 1 - Major offshore California project for. confidential client GEOFON, INC. 1 1981 - Hebe r Geothermal Plant, Heber, California - Atlantic Avenue Bridge Widening, Long Beach, California - Downtown Shoreline Marina, Long Beach, California 1980 - North Harbor Fill, The Port of Long Beach, California ' - Powerine Refinery, Santa Fe Springs, California - Large Scale Pile Load Test for Shell Oil Company, Long Beach, California ' 1979 - Hua Shan Hotel, Shanghai, China - 13th Street Bridge, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California - Cerritos Channel Crossing, Shell Oil, Long Beach, California f1978 - MX Missile Studies, Western United States 1977 - Sundesert Nuclear Power Project, Blythe, California - Arizona Nuclear Power Project, Arizona ' 1976 - Pipeline Trestle, Sohio Oil Terminal, Long Beach, California - Toxic Waste, Anaconda's Blue Water Mill, Grants, New Mexico 1975 - Rud-a-Karon Nuclear Power Plant, Iran 1975 Dames & Moore, Tehran, Iran Project Engineer for soil investigation and construction control for the Halileh Nuclear Power Plant. Project engineer for Arya Sheraton Hotel soil investigations and several small projects. 1974- Dames & Moore, Los Angeles, California 1975 Project Engineer for projects involving soil investigation and fill control for storage tanks, oil refineries, high-rise structures, and ' dams. Prepared construction specifications and drawings for cooling pond dikes in North Carolina. 1973- Dames & Moore, Cranford, New Jersey 1974 Project Engineer for analysis and field work on the Atlantic Generating Station Nuclear Plant (Floating Nuclear Power Plant). ' Worked with consultants - using state-of-the-art soil mechanics and instrumentation techniques. GEOFON, INC. t • 1970- Woodward Clyde Consultants, Clifton, New Jersey 1973 1 Activities included field, laboratory, and office work for preparation of foundation reports and onsite fill control. Involved in onshore and offshore investigations for Daily News and AT&T buildings, the ' Maryland LNG Terminal and several shopping centers for Arlen Shopping centers Inc. Helped in expansion of static and dynamic testing capabilities. PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES AND ACTIVITIES Chairman, ASCE Geotechnical Division, Los Angeles Chapter Member, Structural Engineers Association of Southern California ' Affiliate Member, American Institute of Architects Member, American Society of Civil Engineers Registered Engineer, State of California PUBLICATIONS AND PAPERS "Geology of Long Beach" Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists February, 1983 (Winner of AEG Publication Award for 1983) "Stress Conditions in Welland Clay," M.A.Sc Dissertation. "Alternate Concrete Reinforcement Materials", B.E. Thesis. ' GEOFON, INC. The Fee Breakdown is submitted as requested under separate cover. i ! INISSUE DATE(MM/DD/YY) 8/15/89 I PRODUCER I THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND. R. D. Crowell Insurance Agency EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite B3 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Costa Mesa, CA 92626 _ a COMPANY A LETTER COMPANY B INSURED LETTER Cash & Associates Engineers COMPANY P. O. BOX 38 LETTER C 2599 E. 28th Street COMPANY Long Beach CA 90801 LETTER D COMPANY E LETTER Design Professionals Ins. Co. • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LT ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS LT DATE(MMlDDM') DATE(MM/00/YY) GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $ CLAIMS MADE ❑OCCURRENCE PERSONAL&ADVERTISING INJURY $ OWNER'S&CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ FIRE DAMAGE(ANY ONE FIRE) $ MEDICAL EXPENSE(ANY ONE PERSON) $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO *For professional liabili y cover ge, the CSL $ ALL OWNED AUTaggregate limit is the tote insuran a avail— INDURY SCHEDULED AUWble for all covered claim present d within iPERPERSON) $ HIREDAUTOS the policy period. The limit will b reduced (IBODILLY NON-OWNEDAUUSJ payments of indemnity an expense ACCIDENT) $ GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM STATUTORY � al��, f li'. • ', �' + WORKERS'COMPENSATION $ (EACH ACCIDENT) AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY $ (DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT) $ (DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER FL441560 /88 i/01/ PROFESSIONAL $500, EACH CLAIM & LIABILITY AGGREGATE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS RECEIVED Job #93600. AUG 1 $ 1989 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO ATTN: LOUIS F. SANDOVAL MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE 2000 MAIN ST. LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR CITY BEACH, CA 92648 LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES �y> t or ISSUE DgEEr. L*SatATE E(/89� • PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, The Dougherty Company, I nc. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. P.O. Box 7277 Long Beach, California 90807 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE LETTERNY A Associated Indemnity Corporation COMPANY B LETTER INSURED American National Fire Insurance Compan Cash 6 Associates Engineers COMPANY C P.O. Box 38 Long Beach, California 90801 COMPANY p LETTER COMPANY E LETTER • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. CO POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS LTA TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE(MWDDNY) DATE(MMIDDNY) EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE GENERAL LIABILITY BODILY COMPREHENSIVE FORM INJURY $ $ PREMISES/OPERATIONS PROPERTY UNDERGROUND DAMAGE $ $ EXPLOSION&COLLAPSE HAZARD PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS A CONTRACTUAL PAC 2795814 11 /1/88 11/1 /89 COMBINED $ 1,000 $ 1,000 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY $ 1,000 Excludes Professional Liability AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BODILY INJURY $ ANY AUTO (PER PERSON) A ALL OWNED AUTOS(PRIV.PASS.) BA 8980011 11 /1/88 11 /1 /89 BODILY kURY ALL OWNED AUTOS OTHER THAN)1 (PER AMNT) $ PRIV. PASS. HIRED AUTOS PROPERTY NON-OWNED AUTOS DAMAGE $ GARAGE LIABILITY BI&PD COMBINED $ 1,000 1 EXCESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FORM BI d PD COMBINED $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM STATUTORY WORKERS' COMPENSATION $ ACH ACCIDENT) A AND WZP 80408020 7/1 /89 7/1 /90 $ ACH ACCIDENT) LIMIT) EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY $ ISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS RE: No. 93600 IW1611911 • City of Huntington Beach SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX• 2000 Main Street PIRATLQN DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL E 4 **1 Huntington Beach California 92648 MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE g LEFT,B(L[IWLI�EJCOS(XOCNI(OQICIC9EDUXlL0t06KlCJCA9Q(4>AiO�KIp]� 1[?fx Attn: Louis F. Sandoval �QFclrfia�Kx�6tx90xR Dt'bcKX#gEpC�)oR1i�'b» 6cOC90)VtkS. AUTHORIZED REPR ENTA ISSUE RATE7AME3ND, N-t1 5 / PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS IISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND S El NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDE?_THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. R. D. Crowell Insurance Agency 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite B3 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Costa Mesa, CA 92626 CCnePANY LE-ER AFiremans Fund -TnsuranCe Co. C^'MPANY B INSURED LE ER 1 COMPANY `. Williamson & Schmid , 'E-ER 17782 S k y p a r k Circle CCAJPANY Irvine CA 92714 IL !_ 'R COMPANY E _�-ER p e/siona Ins. Co. • - THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE' URSD NAMEO THE POLICY PflR100 INDiCA7ED, NOTWTTHSTANOING ANY REQUIz4EMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY C04TRACT OA ='ER C- UOAEM'WITH RE _ T TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN.T�;E INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICES DES D HIE. _'ti I SUBJECT TC L-HE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS.AND COIrL71- TiONS OF SJCH POLICIES. _ I C_ :;ti g=^ a AL IMTS IN THOUSANDS j GENERAL LABILITY X G8037204 5 6/CI /L ?% Qc, s 1 ' ' �x c:,.:,___ _ - p8029E55, /Q'_/ c 8� - Z J`_ l O rl IS AUTOMOBD_-- LIABIUTY 4=or pro- e551 ' i lia aggregatellim' t is -he to - 1 insurance av_11 "' 1 H C s� _cAL b1e fer1 ail covere lai r' presented uithi Q the policy r ' od. T e 1 imi will be reduced jl'P Fes`' ''`'-'-"J►*`t� payments o ir:derll ity n¢ expense. Iy I EXCESS LIABILITY acc�c=--= .I � I I WORKERS'COMPE:NS 60X1 AND a. EMP_OYERS'LIABILITY OTHER- L4320 9 , 5/01/88 7/01 /89 - t��-PRCFESSIONAL =1, OGO, EACH CLAIM j1-IADILITY ' AGGREGATE DESCRIPniON OF OPERA71ONS"LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/=ESTRJCTIONSlS?E`':AL ITEMS 'except if policy is cancelled for non-payment of premium, 10 days notice will be given. SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX- ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS POTION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO ATTN: WILLIAM E. BENNETT MAIL30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE 2540 REDH I LL AVE. , SUITE C LEFT. BUT FARAM TO MAR SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR SANTA ANA, CA 92705 UABKJTY OF ANY MD UPON THE COMPANY,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.. AUTHOR=REP4IESENTATTIE i� a ISSUE DATE(MM/DD/YY) 8/24/89 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, Ill D. Crowell Insurance Agency EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite B3 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE a COMPANY A LETTERFiremans Fund Insurance Co. COMPANY B INSURED LETTER Frank Y. Tso Electrical COMPANY Engineering Co. , Inc. LETTER C 16541 Gothard Street Suite 108 COMPANY Huntington Bch. CA 92647 LETTER D COMPANY E LETTER Lexington Insurance Company • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS LTR DATE(MMlDD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMPIOPS AGGREGATE $ 3 CLAIMS MADE FXOCCURRENCE PERSONAL 8 ADVERTISING INJURY $ 300 OWNER'S&CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ 300 FIRE DAMAGE(ANY ONE FIRE) $ 50 MEDICAL EXPENSE(ANY ONE PERSON) $ 1 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO CSL $ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (PER PERSON) $ HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY NON-OWNED AUTOS ACCIDENT) $ GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY WIAMAGE;'T".,EXCESS LIABILITY EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKERS'COMPENSATION $ (EACH ACCIDENT) AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY (DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT) $ (DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER ROFESSIONAL LIAB $250, EACH CLAIM & IN THE AGGREGATE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS • � s SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX. CASH & ASSOC. ENGINEERS PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO ATT, RANDY MASON MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE PO BOX 38 LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LONG BEACH, CA 90801-0038 LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. 1WTHcCI0gWTgSETA1"ra c A enc y LJ J CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK September 20, 1989 Cash &Associates P. 0. Box 38 Long Beach, CA 90801 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting held Monday, September 18, 1989 approved an agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Cash & Associates Engineers for engineering design services for the Reservoir Hills/Overmyer pump Station Complex, Project CC-534. Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records . Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:bt Enc. (Telephone:714-536-5227) n/P /- REQUEA FOR CITY COUNCILACTION /� Date September 19, 1989 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council p APPROVED BY CITY COUNCILQ Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator l��_ q_ 19.�! Prepared by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Worksw CITY CLE K Subject: RESERVOIR HILL/OVERMYER PUMP STATION COMPL - Consistent with Council Policy? [ KYes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Proposals were requested from qualified civil engineering firms for the preparation of preliminary engineering services (Phase 1); final design (Phase II); and construction support (Phase III) for the Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the selection of Cash and Associates Engineers to perform the preliminary engineering services, Phase I, for the project. 2. Establish a project budget of $42,000.00 (this includes consultant agreement and miscellaneous costs, if required). 3. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached consultant agreement with Cash and Associates for a fee not-to-exceed $39,928.00. ANALYSIS: The pump station complex will house the Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station, Overmyer Pump Station and emergency electrical generators for the Water Operation Facility. This project requires the expertise of an outside consultant to establish the design criteria from review of existing plans and specifications of these facilities. The final design report will include the feasibility of constructing a hydroelectric generator system for possible energy savings and a construction cost estimate for budget year 90/91 considerations. Phase II and Phase III will be negotiated with the design consultant after completion of Phase I and brought back for Council approval. Therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3.03 "Professional Services" of the Municipal Code, proposals were solicited for qualified engineering firms. Proposals were received on August 28, 1989. Staff has reviewed each of the three received and recommends the selection of Cash and Associates. NO 5/85 1 Request for Council Action Corrosion Engineering Survey September 18, 1989 Page 2 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny Approval ATTACHMENTS• 1. Consultant Agreement 2. Consultant's Proposal 3. Request for Proposal PEC:LFS:lw 2186g SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2-6- II Jiff MI FEET LL CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP PROJECT LOCATION GARFIELD AVE. ; J4 I 11 1.1 / I I I I't i ] t Y — T L N m �Anmm: c w „ CLAY OWEN AVE. I .AEeRerF-_._P�y 4�N NPOAVI ; WILLIAMS AVE� w0 r�_. FAW YORKTOWN __ AVE. Lt - If CF-C CF-E C-ITER) 5� AVE. ....i..... wHMO JAY VENICE 'AVE. ®� Ej Na Tl-- UTICA AVE. C F-R JI � TORONTO AVE. EJEJ LI[Il - p weanE a. SPRINGFIELD ® Hp ' KTAYM p1 ' Mg $• S.. �rC QrJ, w Z < ROF o ZZ AVE.rc Q J 1 2 • �� ®j® m ADAMS AVE.