HomeMy WebLinkAboutCMI Engineering - 1993-11-01 v., CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY -
CITY CLERK
October 5, 1994
CMI Engineering Consultants
2197 Calle Riscosco
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their meeting held October 3, 1994 approved
Amendment No. 2 to Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and CMI Engineering
Consultants for Project No. 1; Peck Reservoir Renovation. - •
Enclosed is a copy of the executed agreement for your records. If you have any questions
regarding this matter please call the Office of the City Clerk(714) 536-5227.
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
�v� u
Evelyn Schubert
Deputy City Clerk
cc: Debbie DeBow,Associate Civil Engineer
g:cc\cbmem\pdtech
/6/5-4 4 ,
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date October 3, 1994
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator �-- —
Prepared by: Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator',, P
Acting Director of Public Works ;Wit
Subject: PROJECT CC-696; PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION
ADDITIONAL INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVED b`' 1-11
CITY COUNCIL
/0/3 1997
Consistent with Council Policy? [XI Yes [ I New Policy or Excepti n_ Cr" c�fa'
Statement of Issue, Recommended Action, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: /
Statement of Issue:
On November 1, 1993 , Council awarded a professional services
contract to CMI Engineering Consultants (CMI) for an amount not-to-
exceed $98 , 670 to provide construction management, inspection and
quality control services for Cash Contract No. 696; Peck Reservoir
Renovation.
It has become necessary to increase the scope of services and
contract amount by an additional $62 , 400 for a total contract
amount of $161, 070 to encompass an extended construction contract
time period.
Recommended Actions:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to:
1. Execute Contract Amendment No. 1 with CMI Engineering
Consultants, for Project CC-696; Peck Reservoir
Renovation, and;
2 . Authorize the expenditure of an amount not-to-exceed
$62 , 400 for these additional construction management and
inspection services.
October 3, 1994
PROJECT CC-696; PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION
ADDITIONAL INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 2
Analysis:
Background
The Peck Reservoir Renovation project generally consists of the
renovation of the existing 16 million gallon reservoir structure,
and rebuilding of the existing pump station, including the
following:
(a) Reinforcing the reservoir structure and rebuilding the pump
station building to meet the requirements of the seismic
regulations of the current Uniform Building Code.
(b) Replacing deteriorated reservoir roof panels, decayed
structural members, and supporting roof hardware on the
reservoir.
(c) Replacing the reservoir lining to reduce leakage.
(d) Replacing one pump and adding one new pump to the existing
pump station.
(e) Adding a liquefied petroleum gas fuel system for secondary
power.
(f) Adding safety ladders and required access ways.
On November 1, 1993 , City Council awarded a construction contract
to Pro Contracting Corp. , in the amount of $2 ,793 , 027 for the
construction of the Peck Reservoir Renovation. Construction
activity began in March 1994, and the project is now approximately
50% complete. The anticipated completion date for the project is
February, 1995.
Also, on November 1, 1993 , City Council awarded a professional
services contract to CMI Engineering Consultants to provide
construction management, inspection and quality control services
for this project in an amount not-to-exceed $98 , 670. This not-to-
exceed fee was based upon an hourly rate of $65, for a construction
contract time period of 240 calendar days.
October 3, 1994
PROJECT CC-696; PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION
ADDITIONAL INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 3
Contract Time Extensions
The original construction contract time has since been extended by
a series of change orders as follows: 24 working days for
additional work resulting from plan check revisions; 22 working
days for additional roof framing; 6 working days due to weather;
27 working days for soil stabilization and underdrain liner; and
11 working days for delays caused by the concrete testing
laboratory, for which the City is seeking reimbursement from the
testing laboratory. This results in a total construction contract
time extension to date of 90 working days. A more detailed
description of these previously approved change orders may be found
in Exhibit B, attached.
All time extensions resulting from change orders have been
prudently negotiated with the contractor, - based upon
recommendations from both CMI and the Design Engineers (Montgomery
Watson) . Unless a particular delay directly impacted the "critical
path" schedule of the project (i.e. , completion date) , no time
extension was awarded to the Contractor. On average, the City
granted time extensions of approximately 50% that of the
contractor's request, (i.e. , if the contractor requested a 10 day
contract time extension; typically he would be awarded a 5 day
extension, after negotiations were complete) .
Additional Construction Management and Inspection Costs
As a result of the above, CMI is requesting additional funds to
provide services for the following time periods:
Contractor's Time Extension (approved) 90 working days
Contingency for future time extensions,
if necessary 30 working days
120 working days
At the same hourly rate of $65, this results in an additional fee
of $62, 400. This would be a not-to-exceed fee. The requested 30-
day contingency is in the event of potential future contractor
delay claims, weather delays, etc. , and may not be necessary. If
it is not necessary to utilize these contingency funds, the actual
total fee billed to the City would then be less than the $62 , 400
'not-to-exceed fee.
Staff considers this additional fee request to be reasonable and
recommends approval of Contract Amendment No. 1 to increase the
contract by an amount not-to-exceed $62,400.
October 3, 1994
PROJECT CC-696; PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION
ADDITIONAL INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 4
Funding Source:
Funds allocated for this project in the total amount of $4, 232, 330
are budgeted in the Water Division Capital Outlay Account E-EW-PW-
849-6-39-00. Of this total amount; $150, 000 has been approved in
the FY 94-95 Budget for anticipated construction change order
impacts necessary to complete the project.
Alternative Actions:
1. Deny request and utilize City staff to provide inspection
services. This type of inspection is very specialized; staff
does not have this expertise in (mechanical) pump station
facilities and reservoir renovation.
2 . Do not approve the contract amendment and direct staff on how
to proceed. Without continuous inspection, construction
activity would stop. This action would result in a delay
claim by the contractor, with a potential cost to the City of
several thousands of dollars per day.
3 . Stop construction. This project is critical to the operations
of the City water system. Stopping construction is not
recommended because of the impact on the water system, as well
as the financial settlement committed to the Contractor.
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Contract Amendment No. 1
Exhibit B: RCA dated August 1, 1994 , regarding Change Orders
for the Peck Reservoir Renovation; CC-696 .
RS:JRR:DMD:bb
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CMI ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
OF PECK RESERVOIR AND PUMPING STATION (CC-696)
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 is entered into this 5th day of OctohPr , 1994,
by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of
California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and CMI ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS., a
California general partnership, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR".
WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR, are parties to that certain agreement, dated
November 1;1993; and
Since the execution of the original agreement, CITY has requested additional work from
CONTRACTOR, and CONTRACTOR has agreed to perform such additional work;
CITY and CONTRACTOR wish to amend the original agreement to reflect the extra
work to be performed by CONTRACTOR and the additional compensation to be paid in
consideration thereof by CITY to CONTRACTOR,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows:
1. ADDITIONAL WORK
CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY such additional services as described in *
CONTRACTOR's letter datedSeptember 8, 1994, marked as Exhibit A and attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
In consideration of the additional services described in Section 1 above, CITY
agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a sum not to exceed Sixty Two Thousand Four Hundred Dollars
($62,400). This additional sum shall be added to the original sum of Ninety Eight Thousand
Six Hundred Seventy Dollars ($98,670), for a new total agreement amount of One Hundred
Sixty One Thousand, Seventy Dollars ($161,070).
1
6/k/cmil/9/13/94
3. REAFFIRMATION
Except as otherwise specifically modified herein, all other items and conditions
of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this amendment as of the
date first above written.
CM! ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, a CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, A
general partnership municipal corporation of the State of
California
By: frI
Hotch Bedrosian, General Partner
Mayor
ATT ST:
. 014:41644/;Ty) APPROVED AS TO F
City Clerk ( /)
9Iy At or �\—\ —
EW D APPROV •
INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City Administrator
Director df Public Works
2
6/k/cmil/9/13/94
C•Cf— --7`T 11"IU 41 1.111 C!'i l�liYCC1�I la GrJ7J�7A. f �G r ��
CONSTRUCTION MANAU MENT INSPECTION
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2197 Cale R,scoso it Thousand Oaks CA 91362 it(805)529-1736 X FAX( 0 )529-7146
September 8, 1994 DEPT OF�`OF p;,;:.;'1 !'v'«RF.
t'UNTINGTON BEACH, Ci-
Ms. Deborah DeBow, P.E.
Associate Civil Engineer, Water Operations
City of Huntington Beach
19001 Huntington Street, P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Project; Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station; CC-696
Subject: Request for Additional Funds for CMI Engineering to
Provide Construction Management and Inspection Services
for the Duration of the Project.
Dear Debbie:
This letter is in response to your letter of August 29, 1994, requesting a written request for
additional funding necessary for us to provide construction management and inspection services
for the duration of the project. .
The following is a breakdown of costs necessary to complete this project:
84 working days (Due to changes in conditions and the impact
of CCO's on the project) $43,680.00
6 rain days (Rain days were used to process and file correspondence;
review plans, drawings, RFI's, submittals) $3,120.00
30 working days (Contingency days, and/or future change orders,
if necessary) $15,600.00
Total of Additional Funds Needed (NOT TO EXCEED) $62,400.00
(The above fees are based on an 8-hour working day,at an hourly rate of$65.00.)
I feel this additional funding will be enough for CMI Engineering to provide construction
management and inspection services for the duration of construction (January 26, 1995) plus
future change orders.
Very Truly Yours,
CMI ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
Hotch Bedrosian
Principal
44.100tVmiortiv'CGVddi'4 do4
•
RE.CEIVEEJEQU EST , `-)R CITY COUNCIL , v TION
MT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
AUG 51994 Date August 1, 1994
WA ER DIVISION
Su Q N BEACH, CA Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator LJ�
Prepared by: 4;vtay Silver, Assistant City Administrator/� ,z
Acting Director of Public Works
Subject: PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION; CC-696 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
CHANGE ORDERS
CITY
onsistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommended Action, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments 9
/05/eo ;e., 9jL
Statement of Issue:
On November 1, 1993, City Council took formal action to establish
a budget of $3,982,330 for the Peck Reservoir Renovation, CC-696.
This budget includes $2,793,027 for construction; $279,303 for
construction change orders; $550,000 for City purchased equipment
and $360,000 for anticipated project supplemental expenses
(including project management and inspection costs, special
materials, testing, etc.) .
The funds previously approved for anticipated change orders
($279,303) will need to be increased. There were several major
unforseen field conditions encountered (including unstable soil
conditions and inadequate roof framing) that will expend the entire
previously approved change order budget. It is requested that the
project change order budget be increased by an additional $250,000.
Recommended Action:
Increase the construction change order budget for the Peck
Reservoir renovation from $279,303 to $529,303. This increase will
represent a change order budget that is approximately 19% of the
total construction contract amount.
Analysis:
Background
The Peck Reservoir Renovation project generally consists of the
renovation of the existing 16 million gallon reservoir structure,
/1
r f
0�
August 1, 1994
Peck Reservoir Renovation; CC-696
Change Orders
Page 2
and rebuilding of the existing pump station, including the
following:
(a) Reinforcing the reservoir structure and rebuilding the
pump station building to meet the requirements of the
seismic regulations of the current Uniform Building Code.
(b) Replacing deteriorated reservoir roof panels, decayed
structural members, and supporting roof hardware on the
reservoir.
•
(c) Replacing the reservoir lining to reduce leakage.
(d) Replacing one pump and adding one new pump to the
existing pump station.
(e) Adding a liquefied petroleum gas fuel system for
secondary power.
(f) Adding safety ladders and required access ways.
Construction activity began in mid-March and the project is now
approximately 35% complete. The anticipated completion date for
the project is February, 1995.
Change Orders
There are several currently approved and/or pending construction
change orders which are summarized as follows:
Item Estimated Cost
1. Soil Stabilization $ 60,000
2. Roof Framing Timbers $ 140,000
3. Plan Check Revisions $ 80,000
4. Misc. Change Orders $ 30,000
TOTAL $ 310,000
Staff is also currently considering certain design changes, for a
credit to the City, that may reduce the above figure by up to
$50,000.
Following is a more detailed explanation of the above change order
items:
August 1, 1994
Peck Reservoir Renovation; CC-696
Change Orders
Page 3
1. Soil Stabilization
The reservoir renovation includes an "underdrain" piping network
beneath the reservoir, for the purpose of disposing of water,
should the reservoir leak. Construction of this underdrain system
involved digging drain trenches beneath the reservoir floor at a
depth of 3-feet. During this construction activity, it became
apparent that the existing soils beneath the reservoir floor were
saturated with water. The source of this water may have been
perched groundwater, water from years of reservoir leakage, or
perhaps irrigation water migrating from the adjacent strawberry
fields. •
Concerned with the stability of these soils, City staff contracted
with a geotechnical consultant (Geofon, Inc. ) to investigate the
situation and formulate any necessary repair methods. Geofon
investigated the site conditions, identified those areas of
unsuitable soils, and recommended several repair options including
the following:
(a) Removal of existing saturated soils, to a point where
stable soil conditions are found.
(b) Lay a geotextile fabric over the existing soil to
increase the strength and bearing capacity of the soil.
(c) Replace the saturated soil with a more suitable soil
material.
Staff agreed with this recommendation and authorized the contractor
to proceed with this work (under the direction of Geofon) on a
time-and-materials basis. Because these conditions were unforseen,
and the contractor had no knowledge of them prior to bid, he is
entitled to extra compensation for this work. Attached is a
letter from the consulting design engineers (Montgomery Watson
Americas, Inc. ) explaining how the soil stabilization change order
could not have been anticipated at bid time.
The' total cost of these repairs on the reservoir slopes is
approximately $55,000. Staff is currently negotiating with the
contractor for him to assume a percentage of this cost, since staff
feels that the contractor's work method at certain locations
(specifically in leaving the underdrain trenches open overnight)
may have exacerbated the slope failures.
Unstable soil conditions were also encountered when the footings
for the pump station were excavated. Again Geofon was consulted to
investigate and formulate repair options. Staff heeded Geofon's
recommendations and authorized the contractor to proceed with the
repairs on a time-and-materials basis. These repairs included
August 1, 1994
Peck Reservoir Renovation; CC-696
Change Orders
Page 4
over-excavating the footing an additional 18-inches (minimum) and
replacing the saturated soil, at a cost of approximately $5, 000.
2. Roof Framing Timbers
The reservoir renovation includes construction of a new roof. The
project plans and specifications included the removal and
replacement of 15% of the roof framing timbers. This 15% was an
estimated figure, chosen by the design engineering consultant
(Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc.) to represent those timbers that
may require replacement. The contractor's bid included a unit cost
for these framing timbers, in the event that this percentage would
need to be increased (resulting in a change order to the City) or
decreased (resulting in a credit to the City) .
Until the existing roof was removed, it could not be determined
which members or what percentage of the existing roofing timbers
would require replacement. When the roof was removed by the
contractor, an independent timber inspection firm evaluated the
existing roof framing and determined that not 15%, but
approximately 40% of the existing framing would require
replacement. This results in a change order to the contractor of
approximately $140,000, and is based upon the contractor's unit
cost, per his original bid. The attached letter from the
consulting design engineers (Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. ) also
explains how the extent of roofing timbers requiring replacement
could not have been anticipated at bid time.
3. Plan Check Revisions
In an effort to expedite this project, so that the reservoir would
not be out of service for more than one peak summer demand period,
the job was bid, and the contract was awarded prior to the review
of plans and specifications being completed by the City Building
Department. This final plan check review necessitated certain
design changes which resulted in a change order to the contractor.
nese design changes included a gas leak detector system in the
pump station, additional roofing hangers, and other miscellaneous
items, at an additional change order cost to the city of
approximately $80,000. Since the contractor was not aware of these
(plan check) revisions when he bid the job, he is entitled to
change order compensation for this work.
4. Miscellaneous Change Orders
Several miscellaneous change orders are pending, including
additional roofing hardware (for additional roof framing) , and
minor design changes necessary to accommodate unforseen actual
field conditions. The total cost of these miscellaneous change
orders is less than $30,000.
August 1, 1994
Peck Reservoir Renovu.: .on; CC-696
Change Orders
Page 5
Future Change Orders
Because change orders are for unforseen conditions, it is virtually
impossible to estimate the funds that may be required for future
change orders, which may include further soil stabilization and/or
design changes. Typically, Council authorizes an initial change
order budget in the amount of 10% of the construction contract.
Because we are now very close to exceeding this initial amount,
staff is requesting that approximately another 10% of the
construction contract amount (i.e. $250,000) be approved for use on
future construction change orders.
These future change orders have not yet been identified; their
costs may actually be less than $250,000. However, staff feels
that increasing the change order budget by another $250,000 should
adequately serve the anticipated but not yet specifically
determined future change order requirements of the project, and
should avoid the need for subsequent requests to Council for
additional change order funding. The additional $250,000 is
effectively a reserve account, should the need for future change
orders arise. City Council approval at this time will allow staff
to authorize future construction change orders to the contractor
with minimal interruption to construction activity and delay
claims/costs by the contractor.
Funding Source:
Funds allocated for this project in the amount of $3,982,330 are
budgeted in the Water Division Capital Outlay Account E-EW-PW-849-
6-39-00. An additional $250,000 is requested from the Water
Division unappropriated Reserve Fund Balance per the attached
Fiscal Impact Statement.
Alternative Actions:
1. Deny request for additional change order funds at this time.
If change order funds are not approved at this time, it will
be necessary for staff to request City Council approval for
each individual future change order. Because legally the
contractor is not authorized to proceed with extra work until
he is issued an approved change order, this could cause undue
delays to the contractor, at a cost to the City of up to
thousands of dollars per day.
August 1, 1994
Peck Reservoir Renovation; CC-696
Change Orders
Page 6
2. Approve an additional change order budget of something less
than $250,000. A lesser number may be sufficient, however,
staff feels $250,000 is a reasonable figure.
Attachments:
1. Fiscal Impact Statement
2. Letter from design engineers, Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc.
RS:JRR:DMD:bb
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
- INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON.BEACH -
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUESTED FUNDING FOR ADDITIONAL CHARGES
• ASSOCIATED WITH THE PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION,
FIS 94-44
DATE: J U LY 19, 1994
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared
for the proposed appropriation of$250,000 to allow for the funding of additional
construction costs directly related to the Peck Reservoir Renovation Project.
Upon approval of the City Council, the balance of the unaudited, designated
Water Fund would be reduced to $4,706,000.
RO: - 114 • NZ
eputy Cit- Adminis ator
RJF:AR:skd
0004776.01 07/19/94 9:35 AM
SENT BY: U'i-1',!-94 04:S?PM 616' =A.Ui- .1-, ,,.�, 1QU i H
i
0 MONTGOMERY WATSON
1
July 19, 1994
City of Huntington Beach
Water Department
19001 Huntington Street
i
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
ATTENTION: Ms. Deborah DeBow
SUBJECT: Roof Timber and Reservoir
Soil Stabilization - Peck Reservoir
•
in response to your recent inquiries regarding the development of the construction
change orders for the soil stabilization and the timer quantities work at the Peck
Reservoir, we are pleased to offer the following background information:
° In 1989, Geofon under a subcontract to Montgomery Watson, conducted a
geotechnical investigation of the subsurface conditions at the Peck Reservoir
site. Geofon's geotechnical investigations were carried out on the exterior of
the reservoir and their findings were based on the limited number of borings.
Based on Geofon's findings at the time, there was no need or
recommendations for any soil stabilization. However, once the reservoir was
dewatered and the interior slope was exposed, a localized failure of the
slope was observed. Based on the localized failure of the slope,
recommendations were made to stabilize the slope.
•
•
° Complete evaluation of the timber replacement of the reservoir roof could not
be made during design because access to the timber roof was not available.
An estimate of 15% replacement was included in the contract documents
with a separate unit price bid item included to adjust for the differences in
quantities when full access to the roof was available during construction.
in summary as you can see, these conditions could not be anticipated to this
extent, and the change orders occurred as a result of the unforseen and changed
conditions.
301 North Lake Avenue Tel:818 7969141 Serving the World': Eavlronmontal Needs
Suite 808 Fax:R18 RR R1 f 1
Pasadena,California
n.....
•
if you have any questions regarding the timber replacement quantities or soil
stabilization, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
, '"4?:(i/P/t( ;#?‘"'Ne
Luanne Fairbanks
Senior Engineer
cc: A. Dhingra
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
November 8, 1993
CMI Engineering Consultants
2197 Calle Riscoso
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
Attn: Notch Bedrosian
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting
held Monday, November 1 , 1993 approved Professional Services Contract
between the City of Huntington Beach and CMI Engineering Consultants
for Construction Management of Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station
Renovation (CC-696).
Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records.
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
CB:bt
Enc.
(Telephone:714-536-5227)
(eb )
REQUEST-FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date November 1, 1993
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator'
Prepared by: 17' Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works-le-
Subject: PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION CC-696
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
199,3
Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Excepti • .
art LERK
Statement of Issue, Recommended Action, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
Statement of Issue:
Pursuant to City Council authorization on August 16, 1993 ,
construction bids were received for the renovation of Peck
Reservoir CC-696, and a contract is now ready to be awarded.
Additionally, proposals have been received from qualified
construction management and inspection firms to provide full-time
services for this project. These proposals have been evaluated and
the professional services contract is ready to be awarded.
Recommended Actions:
1. Authorize the Director of Finance to amend the current year
Water Division Capital Improvement Budget for the Peck
Reservoir Renovation; CC-696, by:
a. Appropriating an additional $982, 330. 00 for construction
costs.
b. Appropriating $360, 000. 00 for anticipated project
supplemental expenses (including $98, 670. 00 for
construction support and inspection services) .
c. Appropriating $279, 303. 00 for construction change orders.
2 . Establish a budget for CC-696 of $3 , 982, 330.00. This includes
the $2,793, 027 . 00 for construction; $360, 000. 00 for
anticipated project supplemental expenses; $279 , 303 .00 for
construction change orders; and $550, 000. 00 for equipment
purchases.
3. Accept the construction bid submitted by Pro Contracting
Corporation as the lowest responsive bid and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached construction
contract in the amount of $2,793, 027 . 00.
PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION CC-696
November 1, 1993
Page 2
4 . Approve the selection of CMI Engineering Consultants to
provide the construction management, inspection and quality
control for CC-696, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the attached professional services agreement with CMI
Engineering Consultants for a fee not-to-exceed $98, 670. 00.
($85,800. 00 + fifteen percent [15%] for anticipated change
orders) .
Analysis:
The analysis of this report is divided into three sections: The
Construction Contract; the Professional Services Contract for
Construction Management and Inspection, and the Environmental
Status.
Construction Contract
The Peck Reservoir project consists of two major construction
elements: (1) Renovation of the existing reservoir structure, and
(2) Rebuilding of the existing pumping station.
On August 16, 1993, the City Council authorized the Director of
Public Works to solicit new bids for this project. On October 12,
1993 , the following bids were received, opened, and read aloud:
Contractor Base Bid
1. Pro Contracting Corp. $ 2,793, 027. 00
2. Keiwitt Pacific $ 3, 058,200. 00
3. Pascal & Ludwig $ 3, 070,000.00
4. MERCO Construction $ 3, 111, 600. 00
5. BFI Contractors $ 3, 169,700. 00
6. C W Roen Construction $ 3, 204,222 . 00
7. E. R. Paul $ 3 ,597, 192 . 00
Engineer's Estimate $ 4,500, 000. 00
When this project was originally bid last Spring, the reservoir and
pump station were bid separately; when re-bid, they were packaged
together. Packaging the two projects together, (for award to one
contractor) , together with an economically favorable bidding
climate, has resulted in very competitive bids, significantly below
the engineer's estimate.
City Staff has reviewed and evaluated the bids and recommends the
acceptance of the bid submitted by Pro Contracting Corp. as the
lowest responsive bid.
PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION CC-696
. November 1, 1993
Page 3
•
Professional Services Contract
for Construction Management and Inspection
Professional consultant services • are necessary to provide
continuous inspection, quality control and construction management
throughout the duration of construction. City Water Division Staff
does not have the expertise nor the manpower available to devote to
the full-time inspection requirements of this project.
As an alternative, the City could hire additional full-time (City)
employee(s) to perform these services. Although the cost for these
services might be comparable to services contracted out, this newly
hired employee would then need to be terminated when the project
was completed, as their specialized services would no longer be
required. In addition, it would be very difficult to find one
individual able to provide all of the expertise required, whereas,
a consulting firm would have a staff of "experts" available for the
various different aspects of the job. It would not be practical
for the City to hire an employee to .provide these specialized
services.
Pursuant to Chapter 3. 03 of the Municipal Code, Professional
Services; on September 20, 1993, a Request for Proposals was mailed
to the following five qualified consulting firms:
CMI Engineering Consultants Thousand Oaks, CA
Holmes & Narver Orange, CA
Butier Engineering, Inc. Huntington Beach, CA
Harris & Associates Los Alamitos, CA
Track-It Los Angeles, CA
On October 7., 1993 , qualified proposals were received from the
following firms:
CMI Engineering Consultants Thousand Oaks, CA
Butier Engineering, Inc. Huntington Beach, CA
Harris & Associates Los Alamitos, CA
Track-It Los Angeles, CA
An evaluation of these proposals, based upon qualifications and not
fee (as Mandated by State of California Senate Bill 419) , in
addition to interviews with the top three firms, determined the
proposal submitted by CMI Engineering Consultants to be the most
responsive. A separate, sealed envelope was opened, revealing
their not-to-exceed fee of $85,800. 00.
Environmental Status
The Peck Reservoir Renovation; CC-696 has been determined to be
categorically exempt pursuant to Class I, Section_ 15301 B of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION CC-696
• November 1, 1993
Page 4
•
Funding Source:
Original funds allocated for this project in the amount of
$3, 000, 000. 00 are budgeted in the Water Division Capital Outlay
Account E-EW-PW-849-6-39-00. An additional $982, 330. 00 is
requested from the Water Division Unappropriated Reserve Fund
Balance (per the attached Fiscal Impact Statement) , as follows:
Construction Contract Amount0) $ 2 ,793 , 027 . 00
Construction Change Orders(2) $ 279, 303 . 00
Project Supplemental Expenses) $ 360, 000. 00
Equipment Purchaseso) $ 550, 000. 00
Total Project Budget $ 3,982, 330. 00
Less Amount Currently Budgeted $ 3, 000, 000. 00
Total Funds Required $ 982, 330. 00
(1) Lowest responsive bid submitted by Pro Contracting
Corporation.
(2) Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 4896, the Director of
Public Works is authorized to issue construction change orders
with a cumulative value not-to-exceed ten percent (10%) of the
contract amount, or $50, 000.00. Because of the value of this
construction contract (approximately $2 .8 million) , it is
requested that the Director of Public Works be authorized to
issue change orders in excess of $50, 000.00; not to exceed 10%
of the contract amount ($279,303 .00) , without prior City
Council approval .
(3) Includes proposed contract with CMI Engineering Consultants,
future Construction Support Services to be provided by the
project design engineer, special materials testing, etc.
(4) Includes major equipment • (pumps, engines, meters, an upgraded
reservoir control system for communication to all reservoirs,
etc.) purchased by the Water Division. The direct purchase of
this equipment by the Water Division eliminates the
contractor's mark-up, and should result in a net cost savings
to the City of at least $50,000.00 .
Revenues are budgeted for this project in the Water Division
Capital Outlay Account E-EW-PW-849-6-39-00.
PEER RESERVOIR RENOVATION CC-696
November 1, 1993
Page 5
•
Alternative Actions:
1. Reject all construction bids, and direct Staff on how to
proceed. This option would delay the project indefinitely,
and may jeopardize the surrounding area and water supply
system, should a seismic event of sufficient magnitude occur.
2. Deny award of professional services agreement for construction
management and inspection services, and utilize City Staff to
provide these services in-house. This type of work is very
specialized; City Staff does not have the in-house expertise
in (mechanical) pump station facilities and reservoir
renovation, nor the manpower to provide these services.
3. Deny award of professional services contract for construction
management and inspection services and authorize Staff to hire
the additional personnel and purchase the equipment necessary
to provide these services. It is neither cost effective nor
practical to hire additional City personnel for this project.
In addition, this alternative could delay the project for
approximately six months or longer.
Attachments:
1. Construction Contract with Pro Contracting Corporation
2. Professional Services Contract with CMI Engineering
Consultants
3 . Fiscal Impact Statement
LFS:JRR:DMD:bb
•
�� inCITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
4.) INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUESTED FUNDING FOR ADDITIONAL CHARGES
ASSOCIATED WITH THE PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION,
FIS 94-14
DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1993
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared
for the proposed appropriation of$982,330 to allow for the funding of additional
construction costs directly related to the Peck Reservoir Renovation Project.
Upon approval of the City Council, the retained earnings of the Water Fund
would be reduced to $2,923,632.
10/
deg,441171
R• :ERT :'. F' A Z
Deputy City Ad 'nistrator
RJF:AR:skd
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND
CMI ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS FOR
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF PECK RESERVOIR
AND PUMPING STATION RENOVATION (CC-696)
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
44k-14.7 ,- 19`%_� by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a
municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and CMI
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, an association, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a contractor for construction
management and inspection of the Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station renovation, in the City
of Huntington Beach; and
Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of HBMC
Chapter 3.03 relating to procurement of professional service contracts has been complied with;
and
CONTRACTOR has been selected to perform said services,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows:
1. WORK STATEMENT
CONTRACTOR shall provide all services as described in the Request for
Proposal, dated September 20, 1993 and CONTRACTOR's Proposal dated October 7, 1993,
(hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit "A"), which is attached hereto and incorporated
into this Agreement by this reference. Said service shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to
as "PROJECT."
CONTRACTOR hereby designates Notch Bedrosian, who shall represent it and be its
sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this
Agreement.
1
6/agree/CM I/10/29/93
2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE
CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONTRACTOR in the
performance of this Agreement.
3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of the CONTRACTOR
are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement and all tasks
specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than two hundred forty (250) days from the
date of this Agreement. These times may be extended with the written permission of the CITY.
The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A"are generally to be shown in the
Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This schedule may be amended to
benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed by the CITY and CONTRACTOR.
4. COMPENSATION
In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY
agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a fee not to exceed Ninety Eight Thousand, Six Hundred
Seventy Dollars ($98,670).
5. EXTRA WORK
In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A," or
changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit"A," CONTRACTOR will undertake such
work after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra
work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained.
6. METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to progress payments toward the fixed
fee set forth herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit
B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every technical memo and report
prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to the CITY to demonstrate progress toward
completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY
2
6/ag ree/CM I/10/19/93 •
shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any such product which has
not been formally accepted or rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted.
C. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY an invoice for each
progress payment due. Such invoice shall:
1) Reference this Agreement;
2) Describe the services performed;
3) Show the total amount of the payment due;
4) Include a certification by a principal member of the
CONTRACTOR's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the
provisions of this Agreement; and
5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work
completed.
Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that
CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with
this Agreement, CITY shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be
made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld. If the CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify
CONTRACTOR in writing of the reasons for non-approval, within seven (7) calendar days of
receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be
suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or has been
brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated as provided herein.
D. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by CITY shall
be invoiced separately to the CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required
above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time.
Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra
work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours
worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
3
6/ag ree/CM I/10/19/93
Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as
separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement.
7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS. ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder, including all
original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, maps and other
documents, shall be turned over to CITY upon termination of this Agreement or upon
PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. In the event this Agreement is terminated,
said materials may be used by CITY in the completion of PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit.
Title to said materials shall pass to the CITY upon payment of fees determined to be earned by
CONTRACTOR to the point of termination or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is
applicable. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder.
8. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold and save
harmless CITY, its officers and employees from any and all liability, including any claim of
liability and any and all losses or costs arising out of the negligent performance of this
Agreement by CONTRACTOR, its officers or employees.
9. WORKERS COMPENSATION
CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers
Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of
the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar state or federal acts or
laws applicable; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all
claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature and
description, including attorney fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against CITY,
for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any
work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish evidence to CITY of maintenance of
statutory workers compensation insurance and employers liability in an amount of not less than
4
6/ag ree/C M I/10/19/93
$100,000 bodily injury by accident, each occurrence, $100,000 bodily injury by disease, each
employee, and $250,000 bodily injury by disease, policy limit.
10. INSURANCE
In addition to the workers compensation insurance and CONTRACTOR's
covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish to CITY the following
insurance policies covering the PROJECT, a policy of general public liability insurance,
including motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall indemnify CONTRACTOR, its officers,
agents and employees, while acting within the scope of their duties, against any and all claims
of arising out of or in connection with the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not less
than the following amount: combined single limit bodily injury and property damage, including
products/completed operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of$1,000,000 per
occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated general
aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1,000,000. Said policy shall name
CITY, its officers, and employees as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any
other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess
coverage and that CONTRACTOR's insurance shall be primary.
11. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE; ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENTS
Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall
furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the
foregoing insurance coverages as required by this Agreement; said certificates shall provide
5
6/agree/CM I/10/20/93
the name and policy number of each carrier and policy, and shall state that the policy is
currently in force and shall promise to provide that such policies will not be canceled or
modified without thirty (30) days prior written notice of CITY. CONTRACTOR shall maintain
the foregoing insurance coverages in force until the work under this Agreement is fully
completed and accepted by CITY.
The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverages shall not
derogate from the provisions for indemnification of CITY by CONTRACTOR under the
Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original
or a copy of all said policies of insurance. CONTRACTOR shall pay, in a prompt and timely
manner, the premiums on all insurance hereinabove required.
A separate copy of the additional insured endorsement to each of
CONTRACTOR's insurance policies, naming the CITY, its officers and employees as
Additional Insureds shall be provided to the City Attorney for approval prior to any payment
hereunder.
12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this
Agreement as an independent contractor. CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be
responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance
compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR
and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the
services to be performed hereunder.
13. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike
manner. CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR's services hereunder at any time with or without
cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by
CITY shall be made in writing through the Department of Public Works notice of which shall be
delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided herein.
6
6/ag ree/CM I/10/19/93
,
14. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work
hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to any other person or entity without the
consent of CITY.
15. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS
CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material
produced as a result of this Agreement.
16. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS
CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in
the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have
any financial.interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California
Government Code.
17. NOTICES
Any notice or special instructions required to be given in writing under this
Agreement shall be given either by personal delivery to CONTRACTOR's agent (as designated
in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY's Director of Public Works as the situation shall warrant,
or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in
the United States Postal Service, addressed as follows:
TO CITY: TO CONTRACTOR:
Lou Sandoval CMI Engineering Consultants
Director of Public Works 2197 Calle Riscoso
City of Huntington Beach Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Notch Bedrosian
18. IMMIGRATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL be responsible for full compliance with the immigration
and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions
of the United States Code regarding employment verification.
7
6/agree/CMI/10/1 9/93
19. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED
CONTRACTOR and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any
subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside
the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONTRACTOR understands that pursuant to
Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for
CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by
CONTRACTOR.
20. ENTIRETY
The foregoing, and Exhibit "A": attached hereto, set forth the entire Agreement
between the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by and through their authorized offices the day, month and year first above written.
CMI ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, A
By: y��1 (1' -a-' ''z'`"� municipal corporation of the State of
f{�-rc i-4 P O/LO S rr�.n/ California
print name
ITS: (circle one)eriieirffleflOPreSitieRtALiee
Mayor
•
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ITS: (ci ne) Secretary/Chiie cial
er/Asst. Secretary-Treasurer
;�� r` 3City Attorney Q.< �0-1a -a's
ATTEST:
eirOPPee-i ZgAtile4a,i7 IN IATED AND�' .4V 1•:
City Clerk 111110
Director of
REVI WE D APPROVED:
City Administrator
8
6/ag ree/CMI/10/1 9/93
t�— ,a-t_::s• _ ._.K'9:X^i<»< u:NwAaw:w?.r.o a.'w<a:i;� i> .�wr i:e.x..•A-a�:A J < rR kk k:<:C: .kA
ufk1 t:wxxoa.R e > k <i �!�'":Rk
y,,,,,,<.i.x.,,:.,.-,_xe
'
...,J..,.
w�co4Y• .lSkN: t , : A7° A1 x � Ypu,u,ou: :f.xa:/<:;I•.f.:34:. x4:19i1t8S1UE GATE MMDD/YY)
Fu '.RRk4u; R:R,. n:.l .`M:1Rb.x+:ai � .--,4IaE : ,•o J 1. r .I: (>kY9tiR"t k:rF iMallfd .1:9r�� 05/ 3,�JCL:X.rf.sia.:f.way.a6 r;,k.4Xa:,Lutis w3iA4,ei 2 . tit uwat.,.kf •ki ,%9 't:ADf Rr 1.Y: Ak:x:.:wx: L:i;AkI : : : I
RODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUE° AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND
Colonial W�ste3,xt1 Agency, Inc. CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE
5145 N. 17oe ter Fir Road s DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE
gPOLICIES BELOW,
Calabasas, CA 91302
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
Tel (818) 591-3100 (� , I f COMPANY A Monticallo Insurance Company
Fax (818) 223-9pQg � i,LETTER
__._._._.._....__._..._...._._.._.__,_.-__a__. ._._._._........._.3 COMPANY B
IL
ISURED ILETTER
I 1COMPANY`` -
Construction Management Inspection 'LETTER
2197 Ca11e Ri.5coso I COMPANY p
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 !LETTER
!COMPANY E ._.._,_—.__._........._.__.__...._._._.__
1 LETTER
�, f ^:<w,,,:wx<:x:. ..X. .A ,a..11.•..l:l.w:'.::1'R:<:lix:i;,i:1:::Yk.l>:l.t a,:q,:.}<;,:..:ra;:o:>t..,a.:.:...,,.;.r..�.,..;...�,.c./� , A.Y.a:X,lgsx;x;:ink.R..;•.:lu,:l:t:.w,.e:l:.>.R.C.<.w,d.-C...rolA.:.elY:. iJ�:w.•...i s•xd.N,.f...d.f.J.1:1.A.i:iJ,.G<A.<h:��:o:1.R.C..,a.d�A.ta:K:t: sx:f::i::::1:R:k:I;:A::t:k:<?>;,:<;x.>:-:..:<.>:«a:.ox..w-:<..;•>.
%,q y..,p,IL4Y :.s ..Na:.ka>,«x.Ad-CJ:.R.:2:>`-f::<un! tt*+.:;iagta:<aa:<.k ta:M:....:1 Igig p:•E4.a..:t�. ..V R
....5...7,Zv1G"S'c�•i':taCt,a..^.1.•1'.3.. .. .. M.,1.,.......au.uanflaoa.:Aat:.,k.2<A:Y.tsii'Lt':t�.4:•g.Ai:.:1.i�:av;�'!Y!: �' �i'i��Y.'�,exx:l:.:<..tkr.�>l.k:j:t:A:isN&:k�x..3,,:•.<•R.k.C..:>:°<� a'a.f:•iaNi:'f obi lf�Kld b14J�:t:wi�wl>l�:kks
4 •h\M..\'dYe4r.•�nw>.2kf.;Lai:<••L'k:�::set,'£•_...,.,17:...�..:...:.: ...�....:i,.a.n•...<<;,ar.fvi`Va.�X<x•
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED To THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED.NOTWITHsTANOINO ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN 15 SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH PO JCIfS.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAiD CLAIMS.
0 TYPE OFINSURANCE 1 POLICY NUMBER iPOLICY EFFECTIVE IPOUCYEXPIRATION;TR I J J DATE(MhVDD/YY) 1 DATE(MMIDD/YY) LIMITS
I
A i GENERAL LIABILITY 1 1 ;GENERAL AGGREGATE 3
MCL 411277 O5/11/93 05/11/94 ++ 200000(
�{1• 'CLAIMS
GENERAL LIABILITY i ! I•.__._._._..__.__._.._.._._.._...._._._L_.__..�.__._._......
r 1 ,PRODUCTS-COMP/OPAGG. IS 1_00000(
CLAIMS MADE ^OCCUR i 1_.____.._._.__._.._.__.._...:
- _. 4_._1 I_X.1 J I 1PERSONAL6ADV.INJURY JI-._. 20000OC
I 104YNER'S R CONTRACTOR'S PROT. 1 .1 1 iEACH OCCURRENCE ry -li 100000(
I._..._i_..._ • i I I FIRE DAMAGE(Any one I1re) ji 1 OO p p QC
{1 MED.EXPENSE(Anyone person) :i 7 0Q000C
I AUTOMOBILE LIABIUTY i I COMBINED j
1AHYAUTO I I I i
I i I ?LIMIT j
1 ALL OWNED AUTOS J ! 1 �.-----...__._._._.........
i J _,�,:. rBOOILYINJURY 1.
1 :SCHEDULED AUTOS I APPitOT' :� :_S 1O r`v_i4i. 1(Perperson)
i .i City !Attorney
IHIREDAUTos , GAIL HU'iT02?.. , �_--_.:..._._._—....
- BODILY INJURY 1i
I ,NON-OWNED AUTOS J By: Dbputy dity Atitorney (Peracrlden°
;GARAGE LIABILITY I I 1._j 161/ ,_.__.._._._--._.
— ' Gi 30
;PROPERTY DAMAGE '_
E39 LIABILITY f D
t._._ EACH OCCURRENCE ,i
EXCESS j I
(UMBRELLA FORM j I 1•• ._.._.._.___....
!OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM 1 1 AGGREGATE -js ....
1
j 1 j .u.k.ks;<a..:4.<�;f:n»:�.:ok.is.:.;.y1r•,<:;.w;•f:Li;....Rdr:k :i)w>il:F> >:%
WORKER'S COMPENSATION 1 i i 1 J STATUTORY LIMITS itiiMa%•ii>•">x•'•�f'<:
Al
i AND j I I EACH ACCIDENT
__ -_.._......_.__._.... ......,..._..- ._._.,.
EIAPLOYEF1'BUABILiTY ATTACHED ( 1 DISEASE_POLICYIIMiT It
J---OTHERI )pISEASE•EACH EMPLOYEE :i
q 1 1
Certificate holder is named as additional insur4d with liabi .ity limited to claims
J arising out of in'uredrs operations ionly, with rho assumption! of liabilities to others.
1
1 1 1 I I
i i
ESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
Inspector: City public works projects . .
.a.....•..>.9A�: :w.<..a..1.k.isX:>:6:a::1.x.::..:t:k.<S::>.>.<',:,:..;'•;L�:....��,. `:L•/I.a...,.y:�.t:•.,a:.:a.,:.,.r:v:<.,':.:<.x..^i.S..�`(�/�'({� 1� .a.<k f..t>q.1:d,.. .a:::a:o:<ko:•e'.y..,9.e:<x�k.;,.,Sc„?:a;a;;..;: •.�,f::F:ok:>`:'�a:a:ka;aa:>v;o:is>k.::,.:1.R`7:c>...,:<x.>:,.:_;<a�•,...-..;::..:.�.,:a .>a.ive•*tti IV.R 01. . R'l::l:k:>ii::Y..>:o::< w.>..i:<;:>:>:.:l.k...>.... 'rw.a.. ..,.a.i.X.<:.�p,y/'�y., ��iF y�`:aiiijg.,ky.:1.R:i.�. ;..... .l.w...:i.>:f:^:.w.:t.x.<..:.:1../...k>...,,..x.>...:.>:i;.if.w.l,.<.t,i<k:..i..l.
.:�...,..<__........-.u._.1 � ....J.d:1'a'C.�'�n...1.J.w:i.:i.k..:.f:l.<;.<i<.>..:<.:<.:F.!;• k):.,k:k.._1.;.. ..) MkL'�lN1Y.:_x<..i.kn,..x.x )..�A.a>. w.<.,�..: . f <Xw:..,.:..%nk..:,,..:1.aS:i i
.Y....eL......_.._-._._�... :�..a_.a.....oL.G1W:Own0...1,..•,i3:d ...._:... Tw.............<....Jw.f:e:<.ar.<:<.:l.e<o{.J,w;ia:>:..:wa.x:c<•<.:o:+ <.:i:•.::>»'w:ok.r..;..w.a.�;a.� 4>:'
.,... ... ...._.._.»..:: ialCl�b';✓.:k.a./ ..kJ:a:w:<.Y::q::g:;.;J:F:os:<A�.a_Rwa .i:l�k-�:�
City of Huntington Beach xi
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
2000 Main St. ra>,.
P.O. Box 190 EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL SO DAYS
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fu
WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEF _
I`R:11
l::if
t4i AUTHORIZE°REPRESENTATiV
Ibk-RS
l Sorn Harn
'R
1 '�
k.k.
.>� ffk'asAnderson & isan,s. Inc.
L..F�SiA� ':'ta:.rvaaxh0..11�� a:<n >.:weR uh;eld>l.. ..<.f:i:.ii•x&:w;:::. 'B
��_MEIA L1 a 1,�. ::iti<:i<x.x.R:.+.<..a:,:.<i: NA:a. a•<, -:,4., •.':i:n:b:<.oc :R.a,yl:a: ...... .. ....s.a.i:aX.R..: cR.f.:a•:e.f:6 X.,:•:l.x.:�::l�<:> ,.<:i:e:w <.f..<;..r:GX;f,:is�k.f< ..Q:i..:l:e..;i.7i:.:.:>:f•.r.x v.aw :<.k.k..
�..,..�.; :,.,..a.: <..:.......w.a::;k:.:<.,. ..........,..:...,:.:,.....,, :a.f.K(:Fk.::¢<R:R�...P, .,:•..k.k:R:f 7:k,:.�,�
......... _.,..: mc1i[bcolvrvm7(*LI$$9
� f
•
$TAT P.O.BOX 420807.SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94142-0807
COMPENSATION
INast.iRANICE
FUND CERTIFICATE OF MAKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
JUNE 25 , 1993 POLICY NUMBER: 13 3454 1 -• 915,
CERTIFICATE EXPIRES: 3 1_9,4
1-
CITY OF HUNT INGTC)N BEACH
RISK MANAGEMFN1 [11V3E 1OIJ - A1114: GENNI'zi COLTER
2000 MAIN STREET / P 0 BOX 190
HUNT I NGTOI•: CA 92646 - _.
L
This is to certify that we have issued a valid Workers'Compensation insurance'poticy in a form approved by the California
Insurance Commissioner to the employer named below for the policy period indicated.
THIRTY
This policy is not subject to cancellation by the Fund except uponritt days'advance written notice to the employer.
THIRTY
We will also give you ZXX days'advance notice should this policy be cancelled prior to its normal expiration.
This certificate of insurance is not an insurance policy and does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the
policies listed' herein. Notwithstanding any requirement, tetm, or condition of any contract or other document with
respect to which this certificate of insurance may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the policies
described herein is subject to all the terms,exclusions and conditions of such policies. }a/A
Al:
PRESIDENT
AP BO;rI ll :
GAIL HUTTOil, City Attorney
Dy:. Deputy ity.Attornsz
-cp
D
EMPLOYER
r
KATHRYN i✓EOROSIAN AND HOICH t.EI►ROSIA'J
CMI CONS 1RUC TIOWt M.A.NAGEMEN1 I NSPCC T ON
2197 CALLE RISCOSO
THOUSAND OAVS (.A 91;;62 •
•L
5(�r J0262 tRCv. ]0 6c1 ' C4i'i rLir, ,�:�lr. J r It,F
This form Is ® The Exchange or Company designated on the reverse Side as number 4-
Issued by: El
A stock inswanoo company,Wain called the company. City and Stale
E-1136
MARK BMW THEN 1st Edition
Named Insured KATHLEEN BRA THEN
• 2319 CARINGA WAY #56 99 85 336 13377 06 14
CARLSBAD CA 92008 - Agent Policy Number'
Effective 11-06-92
PART I CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Nor
APPLICABLE � APPLICABLE ,•..
COVERAGE IS INDICATED BY AN"X" LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Bodily Injury Liability f$ 250 ,000 each person
X $ 500 ,000 each occurrence
Property Damage Liability 10 0 ,000 each occurrence
Bodily Injury&Property Damage Liability S ,000 each occurrence
Personal Injury Protection-Property Protection Insurance(See Endorsement)
X Comprehensive,Actual Cash Value Less $ 240 Deductible
X Collision or Upset,Actual Cash Value Less $ 500 Deductible
S retained limit
_ Umbrella Liability S each occurrence
POLICY NUMBER S aggregate
Description YEAR AND TRADE NAME IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
of LAST 3
Equipment 87 RANGER T 089 DIGITS
SHOWN
This certificate Is subject to all terms,conditions and limitations set forth in the policy(ies)and endorsements attached to it. it is furnished as a matter
of information only and does not change,modify or extend the policy In any way.It supersedes all previously Issued certificates.
PART II ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT ❑X APPLICABLE NOT
APPLICABLE
We provide the coverages Indicated below by an"x",with respect to the above described equipment,to the person or organization named below as
an additional insured. This coverage applies only(1)while the named Insured Is the owner,or has care,custody,or control of the above described
equipment,and(2)when liability arises out of the acts and omissions of the named insured,
This coverage does not apply(1)where liability arises out of the negligence of the additional insured,its agents,or employees,unless the agent or
employee is the named insured,or(2)to any defect of material,design or workmanship 1n any equipment of which the additional Insured is the owner,
lessor,manufacturer,mortgagee,or beneficiary.
Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability
Personal Injury Protection-Property Protection Insurance (See Endorsement)
Comprehensive (including Fire and Theft)
Collision or Upset •
If any court shall Interpret this endorsement to provide coverage other than what is stated above,then our limits of liability shall be the limits of bodily
injury liability and property damage liability specified by any motor vehicle financial responsibility law of the state, province, or territory where the
named insured resides,es applicable to the equipment described above. If there is no such law,our limit of liability shall be $5,000 on account or
bodily Injury sustained by one person in any one occurrence and subject to this provision respecting each person,$10,000 on account of bodily Injury
sustained by two or more persons In any one occurrence. Our total liiability for all damages because of all property damage sustained by one or more
persons or organizations as the result of any one occurrence shall not exceed$5,000,
The insurance afforded by the policy described above is subject to all terms of the policy and any endorsements attached to it. This endorsement
does not Increase the limits of the policy.
Upon cancellation or lamination of this
policy or policies from any cause
we will mail 3 0 _ days notice in
writing to the other interest shown below.
• CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,
• 2000 MAIN STREET, P.O. BOX 190
• HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
.FAIMUS
Countersigned Auth riled Reproaentatva O.B21B01 • ' }�
91.113e 1ST EDITION 7-88 Wr200 G1200
•
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
WATER OPERATIONS -
' 19001 HUNTINGTON STREET
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
PROPOSAL
FOR
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Peck Reservoir and
Pumping Station Renovation
CC-696
SUBMITTED TO:
MR. JEFFREY R. RENNA
Water Operations Manager
.1.4
SUBMITTED BY: 1
CMI ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
2197 Calle Riscoso
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 529-1736
r� �J
OCTOBER 7, 1993 �f
(CONSTRUCTION MANAuEMENT INSPECTION
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2197 Calle Riscoso4Thousand Oaks CA 913624(805)529-17360FAX(805)529-7146
October 7, 1993
ATTN: Deborah DeBow,P.E.
Associate Civil Engineer, Water Operations
City of Huntington Beach
19001 Huntington Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
ISubject: Proposal to Provide Construction Management and Inspection Services for the
"Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station Renovation—CC-696", in the City of
Huntington Beach, California.
Dear Ms. DeBow:
We are pleased to submit this proposal in response to your request of September 20, 1993 to provide
construction management and inspection services to the Water Division of the City of Huntington Beach
for the above referenced project.
Enclosed you will find the information requested including our experience in construction inspection, the
qualified and expert project team assigned to the project, examples of construction forms, and our ability
to perform the project on time and within budget constraints.
We attended the pre-bid walk through on September 29, 1993, carefully examined the contract
documents, specifications and the corresponding plans for the project and understand all tasks of the
work to be performed.
CMI Engineering is currently inspecting the Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex, CC-534 in
Huntington Beach. In the past we have inspected the 24" Water Line Relocation (Adams Avenue and
Santa Ana River), CC-804, Garfield Avenue Storm Drain & Water Main Construction, CC-734 and the
Water Warehouse, Phase II, CC-719 for the city.
Certificates of Insurance for Worker's Compensation and General Liability are on file in the city.
We appreciate this opportunity to submit this proposal to you and present the qualifications of CMI
Engineering Consultants to provide quality construction management and inspection services for this
project.
Very truly yours,
CMI ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
Hotch Bedrosian
Principal
,, enclosure
attachment (Fee Proposal)
: 1
c
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Introduction 1-1
Relevant Project Experience 2-2
Project Abstracts 2-3
Project Approach 3-6
Scope of Work 4-7
Project Team 5-10
Organizational Chart 5-11
Career Resumes 5-12
Appendix
Rate Schedule
List of References
Fee Proposal See Attached Envelope
INTRODUCTION
CMI Engineering is a project management and inspection firm with the capability to handle both the
technical and the administrative aspects for its projects.
During the past 20 years, CMI Engineering has grown steadily and developed a solid capability to
provide civil engineering services on both public works and water works projects. The firm has
consistently demonstrated its ability to resolve project-specific issues and achieve successful solutions for
its clients while sensitively responding to a variety of public interests.
Since CMI Engineering's clientele in the public sector have different and individualized needs, the
resources, services and capabilities of the firm are flexibly designed to resolve diverse and complex
problems of planning, design, operation and management of public works facilities in a realistic and
economic manner. Therefore, its staff is comprised of highly specialized engineers and technicians with
expertise and experience in civil and building engineering.
CMI Engineering's principals, engineers and qualified inspectors have an aggregate experience of over
150 years in structural and civil engineering, construction management and inspection services. During
this period, CMI Engineering has provided leadership, direction and professional expertise on a variety of
heavy construction and public works projects totaling hundreds of millions of dollars.
CMI Engineering offers an unique concept in inspection, engineering and consulting services. By
assembling project teams specifically tailored to individual projects, CMI Engineering is able to provide
high quality and experienced personnel at moderate cost. This is accomplished without the level of
overhead normally required to support the quality of personnel which we have available.
The Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station Renovation project will receive detailed attention from
experienced professionals, professionals who have managed similar projects in the past, who are familiar
with contracting law and practice, bidding procedures, project management, and assembly of contract
plans and specifications, and are familiar with UBC and Title 23 provisions governing building
construction.
Our personnel are experienced in municipal public works projects and familiar with working in urban
areas. Traffic control and safety measures are rigorously enforced during construction by our experienced
inspectors.
Design and project management costs are a minor fraction of any project budget, yet adequate design,
comprehensive specifications, and thorough inspection controls and anticipation of construction problems
can result in substantial savings and avoidance of construction claims.
On the administrative side, CMI Engineering is further capable of coordinating, monitoring and
scheduling construction activities, reporting on progress, preparing progress payment authority, and
maintaining all project documentation.
CMI Engineering will provide all inspection services necessary to the scope of the project construction.
Regardless of the scope of work provided by CMI Engineering, our concern with cost savings during
construction is reflected in the work performed. Anticipation of future problems as early as possible in the
project development is our forte.
1-1
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
CMI Engineering has extensive experience in the management of City projects. Services offered include
construction management, inspection, and post-construction needs, such as facility operation manuals,
operator training, and operations consultation.
Of special significance to the City of Huntington Beach is CMI Engineering's experience in providing
construction management and/or inspection of City Capital Improvement Projects.
Project experience relevant to the Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station Renovation include:
g> 7.8 million gallon Underground Concrete Reservoir and Pump Station in South Laguna for the
South Coast County Water District
5 million gallon concrete Water Supply Reservoir, HUD assisted Reservoir and Pump Station,
Water Treatment Plant and Pump Station (13mgpd), and gravel pack Rotary Wells (5) in the
City of Inglewood
g> Agua Hedionda Pump Station in the City of Carlsbad
g> 5 million gallon Steel Tank Reservoir in the City of Fountain Valley
Lining for two 5 million gallon Reservoirs for Leisure World in El Toro.
The projects that had water stop and lining were very critical, therefore received full-time quality control
inspection.
CMI Engineering is proud to state that no leakage problems have occurred on any of our reservoir
projects to date, due to our experience and efficiency in quality control inspection.
CMI Engineering effectively coordinates and controls projects during construction, thus enhancing the
overall engineering effort. Construction management considers the construction processes in the early
stages of planning and design to provide an integrated design and construction program. Interactions
among construction cost, environment impact, quality, and completion schedules are carefully examined
so a project of maximum value to the client is realized in the most economical time frame.
The responsibilities of members of this group typically include: contract administration/coordination;
construction management plan; financial planning; cost estimating; bid packaging and analysis; progress
control, including coordination of multiple construction contractors, verification of progress payments,
and evaluation of change orders; resident engineering and inspection; quality control; final inspection; and
warranty interpretation.
The following project abstracts demonstrate CMI Engineering's wide experience in providing
construction management and/or inspection services which range in scope, magnitude and engineering
discipline. More detailed information regarding the projects and services performed by CMI Engineering
can be provided upon request. None of these projects entered into litigation.
I
I
I
i 2-2
•
•
PROJECT ABSTRACTS
CLIENT NAME CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
NAME OF PROJECT Reservoir HilUOvermyer Pump Station—CC-534
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Deborah DeBow
& TELEPHONE NO. (714) 536-5528
ESTIMATED COST & TIME $2,482,412 (270 days)
ACTUAL COST& TIME Active
CLIENT NAME CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA
NAME OF PROJECT Various Public Works Construction Projects
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Mark Watkins, Senior Civil Engineer
& TELEPHONE NO. (805) 654-7889
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $5,000,000 (365 days)
ACTUAL COST& TIME Active
CLIENT NAME CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
NAME OF PROJECT 24" Water Line Relocation—CC-804
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Howard Johnson
& TELEPHONE NO. (714) 536-5503
ESTIMATED COST & TIME $352,590 (150 days)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $351,970 (178 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF INGLEWOOD
NAME OF PROJECT Mobil Oil Pipe Line—M70
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Richard A. Kennon, Associate Civil Engineer
& TELEPHONE NO. (310) 412-5333
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $250,000 (36 days)
ACTUAL COST& TIME $245,000 (42 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF WHITTIER
NAME OF PROJECT Improvement of Painter Ave. from Whittier Blvd.
to South City Limits
F.A.U. Project No. M-MG-L159[2]
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER David Mochizuki, Director of Public Works
& TELEPHONE NO. (310) 945-8200
ESTIMATED COST & TIME $1,500,000 (50 days)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $1,500,000 (65 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
NAME OF PROJECT Braewood Subdivision
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER James R. Van Winkle, Director of Public Works
& TELEPHONE NO. (818) 799-9101
ESTIMATED COST & TIME $2,000,000 (105 days)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $1,750,000 (115 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF WHITTIER
NAME OF PROJECT Beverly Hills Estates, Project No 48388
Urbatec
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Leon Yehuda
& TELEPHONE NO. (310) 945-8201
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $3,000,000 (180 days)
ACTUAL COST& TIME $3,000,000 (220 days)
{ 2-3
PROJECT ABSTRACTS
CLIENT NAME CITY OF CARLSBAD
NAME OF PROJECT Tamarack Avenue Widening
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
& TELEPHONE NO. (619) 438-1161
ESTIMATED COST & TIME $500,000 (180 days)
ACTUAL COST & TIME. $500,000 (180 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
NAME OF PROJECT Water Warehouse, Phase II—CC-719
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Howard Johnson
& TELEPHONE NO. (714) 536-5503
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $325,000 (220 days)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $320,000 (210 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF CARLSBAD
NAME OF PROJECT Ocean Street Sculpture Park
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
& TELEPHONE NO. (619) 438-1161
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $1,000,000 (260 days)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $1,000,000 (275 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF HESPERIA
NAME OF PROJECT Road Improvements throughout City
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Dave Blevins
& TELEPHONE NO. (619) 947-1417
ESTIMATED COST & TIME $1,575,000 (355 days)
ACTUAL COST &TIME $1,615,000 (410 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF HESPERIA
NAME OF PROJECT Repair of Lime St. Community Center Parking Lot
Project No. 121-15108
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Dave Blevins
& TELEPHONE NO. (619) 947-1100
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $750,000 (120 days)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $750,000 (140 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
NAME OF PROJECT Garfield Avenue Storm Drain&Water Main
Construction— CC-734
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works
& TELEPHONE NO. (714) 536-5442
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $450,000 (90 days)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $473,000 (93 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF CARLSBAD
NAME OF PROJECT Road Improvements throughout City
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
& TELEPHONE NO. (619) 438-1161
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $975,000 (330 days)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $978,000 (290 days)
2-4
•
PROJECT ABSTRACTS
CLIENT NAME CITY OF WHITTIER
NAME OF PROJECT Improvement of First Avenue(FAU-M-Q757[2])
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER David Mochizuki, Director of Public Works
& TELEPHONE NO. (213) 945-8200 ,
ESTIMATED COST & TIME $800,000 (6 months)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $800,000 (6 months)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF CERRITOS
NAME OF PROJECT Cerritos Towne Center, Community Arts Center
Parking Area, Auto Square Expansion Project, and
Wall at Windjammer Road
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Vince Brar, Director of Public Services
& TELEPHONE NO. (213) 860-0311
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $10,600,000 (11/2 years)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $10,600,000 (2 years)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
NAME OF PROJECT Hermosa Park and Street Improvements
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
& TELEPHONE NO. (714) 989-1862
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $1,750,000 (10 months)
ACTUAL COST& TIME $1,800,000 (1 year)
CLIENT NAME UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
NAME OF PROJECT Upland Police Facility
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Chief Garry Hart
& TELEPHONE NO. (714) 946-7624
ESTIMATED COST & TIME $4,500,000 (52 weeks)
ACTUAL COST& TIME $4,500,000 (78 weeks)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF UPLAND
NAME OF PROJECT DMV Building-R.D.A. 9816
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Fred Blanchard, City Engineer
& TELEPHONE NO. (714) 982-1352
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $500,000 (42 days)
ACTUAL COST& TIME $500,000 (78 days)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF SIMI VALLEY
NAME OF PROJECT T.D.C. Madera Road Extension and Industrial
Assessment District
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER John Garcia, Project Engineer
& TELEPHONE NO. (619)496-7992
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $3,500,000 (18 months)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $3,500,000 (18 months)
CLIENT NAME CITY OF CARLSBAD
NAME OF PROJECT Agua Hedionda Pump Station—#3303
CLIENT'S PROJECT MANAGER Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
& TELEPHONE NO. (619)438-1161
ESTIMATED COST& TIME $1,500,000 (6 months)
ACTUAL COST & TIME $1,550,000 (8 months)
2-5
PROJECT APPROACH
is
CMI Engineering's role in the construction of the Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station is to monitor and
inspect the work of the general contractor and sub-contractors to assure the completion of the project in
accordance with the Water Division's objectives of cost, time and quality. •
Our approach to the project will be as follows:
A. To fully acquaint ourselves with the project plans and specifications and to organize and
conduct pre-construction meetings in conjunction with the Water Division and the project
Design Engineer.
B. To establish an office at the construction site that will include all necessary, equipment such as
telephone, fax, copy machine and other necessary office supplies.
C. To conduct an initial meeting with the general contractor and sub-contractors in conjunction
with the Water Division and the project engineer to discuss all aspects of coordination and
scheduling of the main phases of the project.
D. To establish the records system, report forms and construction schedule that will be used
throughout the life of the project.
E. To conduct regularly scheduled weekly meetings with the general contractor to monitor
progress of work and to conduct other meetings as required to solve problems that may arise.
F. To maintain competent staff at the construction site office to coordinate and provide general
direction to the contractors throughout the course of the project.
G. To maintain permanent records of the progress of the work and at the completion of the
project, deliver these records to the Water Division.
H. To determine substantial completion of the project and issue a final punch list to the
contractor.
I. To check out and test all utilities, systems and equipment with the Water Division and the
contractors for readiness.
J. To determine final completion and turn over to the Water Division all guarantees, bonds, keys
manuals and other materials necessary for occupancy.
K. To issue a final report to the Water Division and recommend that the contractor be paid in full.
i
{
3-6
SCOPE OF WORK
To demonstrate CMI Engineering's understanding of construction management and/or inspection
activities, the following scope of work has been prepared. It is not intended that the tasks and/or
activities hereinafter identified are all inclusive, but rather set forth as typical duties of the Construction
Manager until such time as the full nature and scope of work are more thoroughly defined.
Task Description
PROJECT Monitor the work of the contractors and coordinate the work with the
CONTROL activities and responsibilities of the CITY to complete the project
according to the Water Division's objectives of cost, time and quality:
- Maintain a competent full-time staff at the project site field
office to coordinate and provide general direction of the work
and progress of the contractors on the project.
- Establish on-site organization and lines of authority to carry out
the overall plans of the construction team. Develop an
organizational chart.
— Establish procedures for coordination among the CITY,
Design Engineer, and Construction Manager regarding all
aspects of the project.
- Schedule and conduct progress meetings at which contractors,
CITY, and Construction Manager can discuss jointly such
matters as procedures, progress, problems and scheduling.
Write and distribute minutes of the meetings.
- Provide regular monitoring of the schedule as construction
progresses. Identify potential variances between scheduled and
probable completion dates. Review schedule for work not started
or incomplete and recommend to the CITY and contractors'
adjustments in the schedule to meet the probable completion
date. Provide summary reports that monitor and document all
changes in schedule.
- Determine the adequacy of the contractors' personnel and
equipment and the availability of materials and supplies to meet
the schedule. Recommend courses of action to the CITY when
requirements of a contract are not being met.
4-7
Task Description
COST Develop and monitor an effective system of project cost control. Revise
CONTROL and refine the initially approved project construction budget;
incorporate approved changes as they occur; and develop cash flow
reports and forecasts as needed. Identify variances between actual to
budgeted and estimated costs, and advise CITY whenever project costs
exceed budgets or estimates.
CHANGE Develop and implement a system for the preparation, review and
ORDERS processing of Change Orders. Recommend necessary or desirable
changes to the CITY and the Design Engineer; review requests for
changes; submit recommendations to the CITY and the Design
Engineer; and, assist in negotiating Change Orders.
PAYMENT TO Develop and implement a procedure for the review, processing and
CONTRACTORS payment of applications by contractors for progress and final payments.
CITY Coordinate professional services of testing laboratories and special
CONSULTANTS consultants.
INSPECTION Inspect the work of contractors for defects and deficiencies in the work
for compliance with the drawings and specifications.
DOCUMENT Refer questions for interpretation of the documents prepared by the
INTERPRETATION Engineer to the Engineer and/or CITY.
( CONSTRUCTION In collaboration with the contractors, coordinate all construction staking
STAKING services to ensure uninterrupted contract phasing.
SHOP DRAWINGS In collaboration with the Design Engineer, establish and implement
AND SAMPLES procedures for expediting the processing and approval of shop drawings
and samples. Set up and maintain a log of submittals.
REPORTS AND Record the progress of the project. Submit written progress reports to
PROJECT SITE the CITY, including information on the contractors' work and the
DOCUMENTS percentage of completion. Keep a daily log and provide for its
availability to the CITY. Maintain at the project site, on a current basis,
records of all necessary contracts, drawings, samples, purchases,
materials, equipment, operation and maintenance manuals, and other
construction-related documents, including all revisions. Obtain data
from contractors and maintain a current set of record drawings,
1, specifications and operating manuals. At the completion of the project,
J deliver all such records to the CITY.
C
i� 4-8
Task Description
SUBSTANTIAL Determine substantial completion of the work or designated portions
COMPLETION thereof, and prepare for the CITY a list of incomplete or unsatisfactory
items and a schedule for their completion. Establish close-out
procedures for contractors. Review project with inspectors. Ensure
contractors complete all lists and notify the Construction Manager, in
writing, that the contractor is ready for substantial completion
inspection. Establish a date of the inspection with all parties present.
Prepare a final punch list and issue a Certificate of Substantial
Completion showing all correction items.
START-UP With the City's personnel, check out utilities, operations systems, and
equipment for readiness. Assist in their initial start-up and testing by the
contractors.
FINAL Determine final completion and provide written notice to the CITY that
COMPLETION the work is ready for final inspection. Secure and transmit to the CITY
required guarantees, affidavits, releases, bonds, and waivers. Turnover
to the CITY all keys, manuals, record drawings and maintenance stocks.
FINAL PAYMENT Review all quantities, unit costs, retentions, claims and final change
TO CONTRACTOR orders to ensure all is in order. Recommend to the CITY that the
contractors be paid in full.
•
4-9
PROJECT TEAM
The Project Team has thoroughly reviewed the plans and specifications for the Peck Reservoir and
Pumping Station Renovation in the City of Huntington Beach. We understand the scope of work and
types of construction being proposed.
The Project Team will consist of the following people:
Hotch Bedrosian, will serve as Resident Construction Manager and Field Inspector for the project. Mr.
Bedrosian has over 40 years of public works construction management experience. He has worked on
many reservoir projects relevant to the Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station.
John Garcia, R.C.E., will attend meetings, review plans, specifications, submittals, and update all as-
builts, he will also do necessary correspondence. John has over 16 years of experience and has provided
design and construction for many water related projects. He was the Director of Public Works and City
Engineer for several cities.
Charles High will serve as Specialty Inspector/Administrator of the Project Team for the Peck Reservoir
and Pumping Station Renovation. He will inspect all mechanical and electrical work for this project.
Charlie has over 35 years experience in water works, public works management and city administration.
He has extensive experience in mechanical works of Pumping Stations and Water Reservoirs for the City
of Inglewood.
Mark Brawthen is designated as alternate Field Inspector and will have full knowledge of the project at
all times. Mark has been with CMI Engineering for over 9 years. He has been the Project Manager for 5
years in the City of Carlsbad representing CMI. He recently completed the Agua Hedionda Pump Station
there.
CMI Engineering will utilize all project team members on an as-needed basis for the Peck Reservoir and
Pumping Station Renovation. At no time will the City of Huntington Beach be charged for more than one
inspector's time, unless requested by the Project Manager. Even though Hotch Bedrosian will be the
designated Resident Field Inspector, there will only be one charge (See the attached FEE PROPOSAL
for the breakdown).
The Project Team and Resident Field Inspector will operate from offices located at the construction site
to be furnished by the contractor.
Following CMI's Organizational Chart are the career resumes of the Project Team.
L
I
I
I
5-10
•
ORuiNIZATIONAL C �AII�
PECK RESERVOIR AND PUMPING STATION RENOVATION
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
WATER DIVISION
e
PROJECT MANAGER
WATER OPERATIONS
Deborah DeBow,
P.E.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INSPECTION
Hotch Bedrosian John Garcia
RESIDENT FIELD R.C.E.
INSPECTOR
Mark Brawthen Charles High
ALTERNATE MECHANICAL,
FIELD ELECTRICAL& MISC.
INSPECTOR ITEMS
5-11
Notch Bedrosian
Construction Manager/Field Inspector
REGISTRATION: California State Board of Registered Engineering Inspectors, Division I—
#CI-001301; California State Contractor, License—#261707.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION: American Public Works Association (APWA); American Water
Works Association(AWWA).
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
The Principal of CMI Engineering Consultants with over 40 years construction management experience.
City of Huntington Beach, Reservoir Hill/Overmyer Pump Station Complex, CC-534.
City of Huntington Beach, 24" Water Line Relocation, Adams Avenue and Santa Ana River, CC-804.
City of San Buenaventura; Various Public Works Construction Projects throughout the City: curb and
gutters, catch basins, sidewalks, water lines, asphalt paving, and utilities.
Mobil Oil Pipe Line, Project M70: City of Inglewood;Principal Project Manager.
City of Whittier; Improvement of Painter Avenue from Whittier Boulevard to South City Limits, F.A.U.
Project No. M-MG-L159[2]: curb and gutters, catch basins, sidewalks, asphalt pavement, landscape
and irrigation, street lighting and traffic signal modification.
Principal Project Manager for all public works and building projects throughout city: City of Hesperia.
Garfield Avenue Storm Drain and Water Main Construction: City of Huntington Beach; storm drain,
sewer, curb and gutters, and catch basins.
Organizational Analysis of the Building and Safety Department and Construction Inspection Division of
the Public Works Department: City of Hesperia.
City Public Works and Capital Improvement Projects: City of Carlsbad; street improvements
throughout city and residential streets and sidewalks. Providing supervision and management for
various projects throughout the city.
Cerritos Auto Square Expansion. City of Cerritos; street and median improvements.
Cerritos Towne Center: City of Cerritos; interior street improvements.
Community Art Center Parking Area: City of Cerritos; street improvements, grading, and paving of
parking area.
Improvement of First Avenue from Whittier Blvd. to Leffingwell Road Project (FAU-M-Q757[2]):
City of Whittier; street improvements, grading, and paving.
Construction Inspection for Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital Storm Drain: City of Whittier; storm
drain, grading, paving, and appurtenances.
5-12
Notch Bec u.2 >ian, Construction Manager/Fiek.. ...spector
(Resume Page Two)
Land Development Project, Street and Storm Drain Improvements: City of Norco; streets, storm
drains, and excavation.
Landfill Gate House and Truck Scale and Improvement of First Avenue: City of Whittier; street
improvements, landfill excavation, grading, and paving.
Upland Police Facility: City of Upland; complete building facility for the Upland Police Department.
Baldwin Park Towne Center: City of Baldwin Park; storm drain, water line, sewer improvements, and
traffic signals intersections.
Baker Avenue and Arrow Route: City of Rancho Cucamonga; storm drain and street improvements.
DMV Remodel—R.D.A. 9816: City of Upland; complete remodel of building for the relocation of the
DMV.
Residential Street Rehabilitation, Phases I & II: City of Rancho Cucamonga; slurry seal, heater remix,
and overlay throughout City.
Three Traffic Signals: City of Rancho Cucamonga; signals and street improvements.
Hermosa Park/Hamilton Street: City of Rancho Cucamonga; street improvements, parking lot,
landscaping, and irrigation.
Highland Avenue: City of Rancho Cucamonga; street improvements and as-builts.
Five Traffic Signals: City of Rancho Cucamonga; signals and street improvements.
Archibald Avenue @ A.T.S.F. Railroad: City of Rancho Cucamonga; street improvements.
Haven Avenue and Church Street Bridge: City of Rancho Cucamonga; new bridge construction.
Madera Road Extension (TDC): City of Simi Valley; 2 million c.y. earthwork project, including major
drainage facilities and 2 miles of large diameter water pipeline.
Wood Ranch Assessment District: City of Simi Valley; street improvements, storm drain, reservoir
water, sewer, landscaping, and irrigation.
Offsite Inspection: City of El Segundo; sewer and storm drain improvements.
Victoria Planned Community: City of Rancho Cucamonga; street improvements, storm drains, 2.5
million c.y. grading, Multi (Armor)Plate double railroad overhead, landscape, and irrigation.
Industrial Assessment District: City of Rancho Cucamonga; street improvements and storm drain.
South Coast County Water District: South Laguna; 7.8 million gallon underground concrete reservoir.
Refuse Transfer Station: City of Huntington Beach; remodeling.
5-13
Hotch Bec:_Jian, Construction Manager/Fief spector
•
(Resume Page Three)
Culver and Barranca Street Bridges: City of Irvine; new bridge construction.
Prairie Avenue Residential Project: City of Inglewood; sewer storm drain.
VTN, Resident Engineer
HUD Assisted Water Supply Project(reservoir). City of Inglewood.
Gravel Packed Rotary Wells(5): City of Inglewood.
Water Transmission Main (12 miles): City of Inglewood.
Water Treatment Plant (13 mgpd): City of Inglewood.
City of Fountain Valley, Field Engineer
Steel tank reservoir of 5 million gallons with twin 75—hp pumping station, 6000 feet of distribution line,
25 miles of transmission line, water wells, storm drains, street improvements, P.C.C. structures, and
sewer lift station.
I '
1 ..
1
5-14
•
John M. Garcia, R.C.E.
EDUCATION: Master of Public Administration, California State University, Cal-Poly Pomona;
Bachelor of Science, Engineering, California State University at Los Angeles; Associate
of Arts, Engineering, East Los Angeles Junior College.
REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer, California R.C.E. #25570 and Colorado R.C.E. #16764.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers; American Public Works
Association; Institute of Transportation Engineers.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Over twenty years of experience in Public Works engineering and administration, including project
development, planning, budgeting, right-of-way acquisition, special improvement districts, establishment
of design and construction criteria and record systems, and management of construction projects.
JOHN M. GARCIA and ASSOCIATES, Upland, CA
Survey of Public Works and Capital Improvement Projects for various cities. Performs plan checking of
public improvements and subdivision maps, including review of grading, street improvements, storm drain
improvements, and sanitary sewer improvements.
CITY OF SIMI VALLEY, CA, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Planned, organized, directed, and coordinated the various engineering functions of the city; including
design and construction of streets, traffic signals, storm drains, sewers, and other projects. Conferred
with developers, maintenance contractors, contract engineers, public officials, public agencies, and
citizens on public works matters. Prepared City Council Reports and made presentations as were
required.
CITY OF PLACENTIA, CA, City Engineer
Planned, organized, directed, and coordinated the various engineering functions of the city. Secretary to
the City's Traffic Safety Commission. Prepared the annual budget for the Engineering Services
Department.
CITY OF LA HABRA, CA, Associate Civil Engineer
Supervised professional and sub-professional office and field engineering personnel in the daily operations
of the Engineering Department.
LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER, Assistant Civil Engineer
Attained a solid background with the various fields covering civil engineering. Three years with the
Structural Engineering Design Section, three years with the Construction Inspection Section and one year
with the Civil Engineering Design Section.
5-15
•
Charles High
• - Specialty Inspector
REGISTRATION: AWWA Grade 5 Water Treatment Certificate.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: AWWA, Water Systems Control Committee, Southern California
Water Utilities Association. Taught water treatment classes for
certification.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Mr.High has over 35 years experience in water works supervision and construction.
CMI ENGINEERING, Thousand Oaks, CA-Resident Water Works Inspector
City of Whittier: Water Transmission Mains; Urbatec and Beverly Hills Estates projects.
CITY OF INGLEWOOD, CA - Water Utilities and Sewer Superintendent - July 1, 1970 thru
May 29, 1987
In charge of$30,000,000 water system in the City of Inglewood.
CITY OF INGLEWOOD, CA-Water Projects Manager
HUD Assisted Water Supply Project (reservoir): City of Inglewood.
Gravel Packed Rotary Wells (5): City of Inglewood.
Water Transmission Main(12 miles): City of Inglewood. Installed automated telemetering systems.
Water Treatment Plant (13 mgpd): City of Inglewood. Pressure reducing station with MWD to mix with
well or treatment water.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES -Department of Water and Power
Maintenance of pumping stations, reservoirs and wells Installed automated telemetering systems.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES -Department of Water and Power
Maintenance of generators and sewer plants.
Hydroelectrical Plant-Boulder Dam.
5-16
•
Mark iv. Brawthen, Alternate Field Inspe - r
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Mark N. Brawthen has over fifteen (15) years in Civil Engineering, Architectural Design, Project
Planning, Construction Management, and Contract Administration of private as well as public projects.
1988 to Present—CMI Engineering Consultants, Consulting Services, Thousand Oaks, CA
As Project Manager, responsible for services that include: project management and contract
administration, construction organizational analysis, claims negotiation and mitigation preparation,
drawing and document review and constructibility review, capital improvement program management,
economic analysis and cost control.
1985 to 1988 - C.I.A. Engineering(CMI Engineering), Consulting Services, Thousand Oaks, CA
As Resident Engineering Inspector, responsible for services that include: enforcement of plans,
specifications, and contract documents, monitor construction activity, maintain full project file, resolve
design/construction problems and engineer solutions, prepare progress payments and exercise cost
controls.
1984 to 1985 - John M. Garcia& Associates, Upland, CA
As an Associate, responsible for services including: plan checking, preparation of civil engineering
drawings and documents, construction survey.
1979 to 1984 -Kaiser Design Engineering Corporation, Oakland, CA
As Construction Engineer, responsible for services including: project management and contract
administration, preparation of construction budget, prepare and authorize expenditures, control cost
centers, prepare written material to resolve claims concerning extra work and delay. Services were
provided for national and international turn key corporate projects. Projects ranging between $12 and
' $265 million.
1978 to 1979 -Kaiser Design Engineering Corporation, Oakland, CA
As Civil Designer, responsible for services including: analysis and design of concrete and steel structures,
' civil engineering, construction surveys, preparation of technical contract documents. Services were
provided for corporate projects within the continental United States and Hawaii.
1974 to 1978 -P. Timm Allred Developer/Contractor, Ukiah, CA
As Architectural Designer, responsible for services including: preparation of drawings for multiple family
and single family dwellings.
I
i .
5-17
Mark N. oiawthen, Alternate Field Inspects.
- - (Resume Page Two)
1972 to 1974 -Portola Valley Associates, Portola Valley, CA
As Architectural Designer and Assistant Construction Superintendent, responsible for services including:
modifying project architects typical drawings to meet desire of buyer on 200 custom home development
project. Maintained construction files and assisted the construction superintendents scheduling of sub-
contractors.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Public Works Association, Southern California Chapter;
American Water Works Association; American Society of Civil
Engineers; American Institute of Architects, Associated General
Contractors, Associated Building Contractors.
EDUCATION: Associate of Science, Architecture, Canada College; Bachelor of Science, Construction
Engineering and Management, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.
5-18
CMI Engineering Consultants
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
Effective June 1, 1993
PROFESSIONAL— ENGINEERING
Principal Engineer(R.C.E.) $110.00
Associate Engineer(R.C.E.) $80.00
Senior Engineer(R.C.E.) $78.00
Principal Project Manager $75.00
Project Engineer(R.C.E.) $70.00
SURVEY/TECHNICAL — DESIGN AND DRAFTING
Supervisor—Survey $78.00
2 Man Survey Party $135.00
3 Man Survey Party $160.00
Senior Designer/Plan Check Engineer $65.00
Plan Checker $55.00
Draftsman $45.00
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT— INSPECTION
Principal Construction Manager $75.00
Senior Resident Engineer $70.00
Resident Engineering Inspector $65.00
Resident Inspector $55.00
Assistant Resident Inspector $50.00
Inspector—Trainee $45.00
Senior Resident Building Inspector $60.00
Building Inspector $55.00
ADMINISTRATIVE — OFFICE
Office Engineer $50.00
Computer Programmer/Analyst/Technician $50.00
Clerical Work $35.00
SERVICES AND EXPENSES
In-house Reproduction Cost
Outside Services, Consultants, Survey, etc Cost+ 10%
Overtime rates for weekdays and Saturdays are 1.5 times those rates listed.
Rates negotiable—dependent on size and scope of proposed project.
r
- LIST OF REFERENCES
Mr. Lloyd Hubbs Mr. William Mahar
City Engineer Engineering Director
City of Carlsbad City of Inglewood
2075 Las Palmas Drive 1 Manchester Blvd., P.O. Box 6500
Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Inglewood, CA 90301
(619) 438-1161 ext. 4391 (310) 412-5333
Mr. David Mochizuki Mr. William J. Morris
Director of Public Works Director of Public Services
City of Whittier City of Costa Mesa
13230 E. Penn Street 77 Fair Drive, P.O. Box 1200
Whittier, CA 90602 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200
(310) 945-8200 (714) 754-5343
Mr. Howard Johnson Mr. Louis F. Sandoval
Water Division, Project Manager Director of Public Works
City of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach
19001 Huntington Street, P.O. Box 190 2000 Main Street, P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
(714) 536-5503 (714) 536-5442
Mr. Jeffrey R. Renna Mr. James R. Van Winkle
Water Operations Manager Director of Public Works
City of Huntington Beach City of South Pasadena
19001 Huntington Street, P.O. Box 190 1414 Mission Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 South Pasadena, CA 91030
(714) 536-5431 (818) 799-9101
Mr. Mark Watkins
Senior Civil Engineer
City of San Buenaventura
501 Poli Street, P.O. Box 99
San Buenaventura, CA 93002-0099
(805) 654-7889
p \
ONSTRUCTION MANAG [ENT INSPECTION
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2197CalleRiscoso®Thousand Oaks, CA 913620(805)529-17364FAX(805)529-7146
Proposal for Construction Inspection Services
Rehabilitation of Peck Reservoir—Contract No. 696
City of Huntington Beach
Jeffrey R. Renna, Water Operations Manager
October 7, 1993
FEE PROPOSAL
Compensation is proposed on a hourly basis. Included are all Project Team members as needed. The
estimated cost, assuming a project contract time of approximately 240 calendar days (165 working days)
is as follows:
Resident Engineering Inspector— 1,320 Hours @ $65.00 $85,800.00
(The inspection is 8 hours/day for any and all inspection)
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE (Not to Exceed): $85,800.00
This Fee Proposal is negotiable.
•
\� u .ONSTRUCTION MANAG ENT INSPECTION
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2197CalleRiscosooThonsand Oaks. CA 913620(805)529-1736,FAX(805)529-7146
•
Proposal for Construction Inspection Services
Rehabilitation of Peck Reservoir—Contract No. 696
City of Huntington Beach
Jeffrey R. Renna, Water Operations Manager
October 7, 1993
FEE PROPOSAL
Compensation is proposed on a hourly basis. Included are all Project Team members as needed. The
estimated cost, assuming a project contract time of approximately 240 calendar days (165 working days)
is as follows:
Resident Engineering Inspector— 1,320 Hours @ $65.00 $85,800.00
(The inspection is 8 hours/day for any and all.inspection)
Professional Liability Insurance $14,000.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE (Not to Exceed): $99,800.00
This Fee Proposal is negotiable.