Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATION - 1991-12-16 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN i THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. , TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER PROJECT THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 18th day of February , 1992, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. , a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR. " WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR are parties to that certain contract, dated May 21, 1990, entitled "Consulting Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Concept Marine Associates, Incorporated, to Perform Construction Management Services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier Project; and Since the execution of the original contract, CONTRACTOR has requested additional time to perform such work; and CITY and CONTRACTOR wish to amend the original contract to reflect the extra time for the work to be performed by CONTRACTOR and the additional compensation to be paid in consideration thereof by CITY to CONTRACTOR, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows: 1 x 1. ADDITIONAL WORK CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY such additional services as described in the letter from CONTRACTOR to CITY, dated January 14, 1992, with its attachment, herein collectively referred to as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION In consideration of the additional engineering services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR the additional sum of One Hundred Twelve Thousand, Two Hundred Thirty Two and no/100 Dollars ($112,232) This additional sum shall be added' to the original sum of Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Three Hundred Forth and no/100 Dollars ($417,340) and thi Agreement ' s First Amendment sum of Seventy-one Thousand Five Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($71,500) for a new total contract amount of Six Hundred and One Thousand, Three Hundred Forty and no/100 Dollars ($601,340) . 3 . REAFFIRMATION Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms REST OF PAGE NOT USED 2 and conditions of the original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this amendment as of the date first above written. CONTRACTOR: CITY: CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH a California corporation a California municipal corporation By / "‘.14 •'��T Z�irl!v Its : PRIE:7'S;' Mayor B — Y Its :_. S igaLELeePO ATTES ��A "' APPROVED AS TO FORM: ‘64.04e4lity City Clerk -2-çATOV 0REVIEWEDANDAPR : D: City Admi'ni rator Director of Public Works 3 AJF:k:345 Z CcnccotMarine Concept Marine Associates,Inc. 1 Spinnaker Way 13763 Fiji Way,Suite EU-2 Construction Management/Harbor Planning Berkeley CA 94710 Marina del Rey CA 90292 510/839-6700 310/301-0983 FAX:510/843-1360 FAX.310/301-2453 January 14, 1992 9005/191/1101-R Mr. Robert Eichblatt, City Engineer City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 RE: Huntington Beach Pier Construction Management Agreement Amendment Number Two Dear Mr. Eichblatt: Last week Riedel International presented a revised project schedule which indicates a completion date of mid-July 1992. The original contract completion date was January 10, 1992. The contractor has been granted time extensions only through February 5 and, therefore, will be subject to liquidated damages for the balance of the time. - iu There are sufficient funds remaining in the original agreement to carry our fees through the month of January. Accordingly, I am requesting an amendment to our contract to supplement our fees from February 1 through July 30, 1992, in the amount of$112,232 (see attached fee breakdown). This amounts to $17,872 per month, which is slightly less than our current monthly billing, plus an additional $5,000 contingency. This increase in cost to the City should be offset by the liquidated damages assessed against the contractor. Please advise me if you need any supporting documentation. Sinc rely, o . Fulton President GRF:keb Attachment cc: J. Miller 11111111111111111111111111 liii IIIII 11111 EXHIBIT A BEGINNING OUR SECOND DECADE J HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER RECONSTRUCTION Supplemental Costs for Construction Management Services 01/14/92 9005/191 * Rates Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Hours Total Project Sponsor $99 24 - 24 24, 24 24 24 144 14,256 Resident Engineer $75 176 176 176 176 176 176 1056 79,200 MIS $56 8 8 8 8 8 8 48 2,688 Clerical $33 56 56 56 56 56 56 336 11,088 ` Contingency 5,000 Total $112,232 - ,_* Note: Rates increased by 4.5% over original 1990 rates. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. , TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this X day of ____jlekidAR , 199r, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. , a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR. " WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR are parties to that certain contract, dated May 21, 1990, entitled "Consulting Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Concept Marine Associates, Incorporated, to Perform Construction Management Services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier Project; and Since the execution of the original contract, CITY has requested additional work from CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR has performed such work; and CITY and CONTRACTOR wish to amend the original contract to reflect the extra work to be performed by CONTRACTOR and the additional compensation to be paid in consideration thereof by CITY to CONTRACTOR, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows : 1. ADDITIONAL WORK CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY such additional services as described in the letters from CONTRACTOR to CITY, -1- r dated January 11, 1991; September 20, 1991; and September 23, 1991, herein collectively referred to as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. 2 . ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION In consideration of the additional engineering services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR the additional sum of Seventy-one Thousand Five Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($71, 500 . 00) . The additional sum shall be added to the original sum of Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Three Hundred Forth and no/100 Dollars ($417,340 . 00) for a new total contract amount of Four Hundred Eighty-eight Thousand Eight Hundred Forth and no/100 Dollars ($488, 840 . 00) . REST OF PAGE NOT USED -2- 3 . REAFFIRMATION Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this amendment as of the date first above written. CONTRACTOR: CITY: CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH a California corporation a California municipal corporation GV--SkZN-Q-Cb—' President Mayor Secretary ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk 72fC' ty A torney 0/74 1 REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ITIATED N9 APPROVED: rty Administrator Direct r of Public Works -3- CONSULTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS # TITLE PAGE(S) 1. WORK STATEMENT 1 2 . CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE 2 3 . TIME OF PERFORMANCE 2 4 . COMPENSATION 2 5 . EXTRA WORK 2 6 . METHOD OF PAYMENT 2 - 4 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS 4 8 . INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 4 & 5 9 . WORKERS' COMPENSATION 5 10 . INSURANCE 5 & 6 11. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE; ADDITIONAL INSURED 6 & 7 ENDORSEMENTS 12 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 7 13 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 7 14 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING 8 15 . COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS 8 16 . CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS 8 17. NOTICES 8 18 . IMMIGRATION 8 & 9 19 . ENTIRETY 9 CONSULTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this a/at day of rn , 1990, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. , a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR. " WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of an civil engineering firm to peform construction management services for the upcoming Huntington Beach Municipal Pier Project in the City of Huntington Beach; and Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of H.B.M.C. Chapter 3 . 03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts, has been complied with; and CONTRACTOR has been selected to perform said services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows : 1. WORK STATEMENT CONTRACTOR shall provide all services as described in the Request for Proposal, dated March 5, 1990, and CONTRACTOR' S proposal dated March 30, 1990, (hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit "A") , which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Said services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as "PROJECT. " CONTRACTOR hereby designates Gordon R. Fulton, who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. -1- 2 . CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONTRACTOR in the performance of this Agreement . 3 . TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than 15 months from the date of this Agreement. These times may be extended with the written permission of the CITY. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be as shown in the Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed by the CITY and CONTRACTOR. 4 . COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the engineering services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a fee of FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTEEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FORTY DOLLARS ($417,340 . 00) . 5 . EXTRA WORK In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A, " or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A, " CONTRACTOR will undertake such work after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6 . METHOD OF PAYMENT A. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to progress payments toward the fixed fee set forth in Section 4 herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit A" . -2- - I B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every technical memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to the CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks . In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted. C. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY an invoice for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall : 1) Reference this Agreement; 2) Describe the services performed; 3) Show the total amount of the payment due; 4) Include a certification by a principal member of the CONTRACTOR' S firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and 5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days ' of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of the reasons for non-approval, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this -3- Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof . D. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by the CITY shall be invoiced separately to the CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required under paragraph 6C, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder, including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notes, calculations, maps and other documents, shall be turned over to CITY upon termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. In the event this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY in the completion of PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit. Title to said materials shall pass to the CITY upon payment of fees determined to be earned by CONTRACTOR to the point of termination or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is applicable. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder. 8 . INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify and hold and save harmless CITY, its officers and employees from any and all liability, including any claim of liability and any and all losses or costs -4- arising out of the negligent performance of this agreement by CONTRACTOR, its officers or employees . 9 . WORKERS' COMPENSATION CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers ' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar state or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature and description, including attorney' s fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against CITY, for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish evidence to CITY of maintenance of statutory workers ' compensation insurance and employers ' liability in an amount of not less than $100,000 bodily injury by accident, each occurrence, $100, 000 bodily injury by disease, each employee, and $250, 000 bodily injury by disease, policy limit. 10 . INSURANCE In addition to the workers ' compensation insurance and CONTRACTOR' S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish to CITY the following insurance policies covering the PROJECT: A. General Liability Insurance. A policy of general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall indemnify CONTRACTOR, its officers, agents and employees, while acting within the scope of -5- their duties, against any and all claims of arising out of or in connection with the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not less than the following amount: combined single limit bodily injury and property damage, including products/completed operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of $1, 000, 000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1, 000, 000 . Said policy shall name CITY, its officers, and employees as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage and that CONTRACTOR' S insurance shall be primary. B. Professional Liability Insurance. CONTRACTOR shall acquire a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. Said policy shall provide coverage for CONTRACTOR'S professional liability in an amount not less than $500, 000 per claim. A claims made policy shall be acceptable. 11. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE; ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENTS Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverages as required by Sections 9 and 10 herein; said certificates shall provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy, and shall state that the policy is currently in force and shall promise to provide that such policies will not be cancelled or modified without thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY. CONTRACTOR shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverages in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and -6- accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverages shall not derogate from the provisions for indemnification of CITY BY CONTRACTOR under Section 8 of this Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of all said policies of insurance. CONTRACTOR shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on all insurance hereinabove required. A separate copy of the additional insured endorsement to each of CONTRACTOR' S insurance policies, naming the CITY, its officers and employees as Additional Insureds shall be provided to the City Attorney for approval prior to any payment hereunder. 12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor. CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any and all payments of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. 13 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR' S services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing through the City Engineer, notice of which shall be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16 herein. -7- 14 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to any other person or entity without the consent of CITY. 15 . COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CONTRACTOR shall not apply for a patent or copyright on any item or material produced as a result of this Agreement, as set forth in 41 CFR 1-9 . 1. 16 . CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of California Government Code Sections 1090 et seq. 17. NOTICES Any notices or special instructions required to be given in, writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal delivery to CONTRACTOR'S agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY'S Director of Public Works, as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Services, addressed as follows : TO CITY: TO CONTRACTOR: Mr. Louis Sandoval Mr. Gordon R. Fulton Director of Public Works President CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. 2000 Main Street 13763 Fiji Way, Suite EU-2 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6974 18 . IMMIGRATION CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for full compliance with the -8- immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall , in particular, comply with the provisions of 8 U. S.C. § 1324a regarding employment verification. 19 . ENTIRETY The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth the entire Agreement between the parties . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers the day, month and year first above written. CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California corporation A mu c61S1-02 ipal corporation • State of California *1%14.1! By; ) - .�. Mayor Its : Ren.1 6r-- By: Its : SG6c115c7}/ ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: dWItaitifa"CO 7/// City Clerk Cit Attorney t� e? {N REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ITIATED AND APPROVED: City Administrator Director of Public Works -9- ;, n CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Co' 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK February 24, 1992 Concept Marine Associates, Inc. 13763 Fiji Way, Suite EU-2 Marina del Ray, CA 90292-6974 Attn: Gordon R. Fulton The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting held Tuesday, February 18, 1992, approved Amendment No. 2 to Consulting Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Concept Marine Associates, Inc. , to perform construction management services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier Project. Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records. Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:bt Enc. (Telephone:714-536-5227) ConcotMarine Concept Manne Associates,Inc Construction Management/Harbor Planning 1 Spinnaker Way 13763 Fiji Way,Suite EU-2 Berkeley CA 94710-1612 Manna del Rey CA 90292-6974 415/839-6700 213/301-0983 FAX 415/843-1360 FAX.213/301-2453 March 30, 1990 5800/000/5834 Mr. Robert E. Eichblatt, PE City Engineer City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Eichblatt: RE: Huntington Beach Municipal Pier Construction Management Proposal The scope of work you have described in the Request for Proposa's involves precisely the services for which Concept Marine was founded nine years ago. We are a professional construction management firm specializing in marine and coastal projects. As you read this proposal, you will see that our staff, procedures, and work histo►y are ideally suited for your project. Concept Marine very much wants to he your construction managers on this project. Your project has local, regional, and even national stature, which we ,could be proud to be associated with. We have assembled a competent, experienced team for this job, consisting of Al Cantor, Warren Mills and Dianne Murphy, of Concept Marine, and a group of three sub- consultant specialists: Brian Constant and his staff at Moore and Tabor Geotechnical Engineers, Robert Nottingham, President of CHJ Construction Services with Ray Winders for pile manufacturing inspection, and Smith-Emery's Anaheim office for testing and special inspection. This is a team that I, as the Project Sponsor, am enthusiastic to lead. You will notice that we have worked on several projects with repeat client. It is hoped that the City of Huntington Beach will also find our firm worthy of consideration for further work, should the occasion arise. We appreciate the opportunity to present our proposal. Sincerely, ordon R. Fulton President GRF:mm EXPERIENCE OF YOUR FIRM la List and describe the projects for which your have provided construction management services which are similar in scope to the Municipal Pier. Is the team you propose to employ on the Huntington Beach Pier the same one used on identified past projects? Concept Marine specializes in providing agency construction management services to public and private clients on coastal and marine projects. As such, virtually all of our construction management experience is similar to the Huntington Beach Pier project. The following pages present Concept Marine's current projects and recent work history. Work experience of staff prior to joining Concept Marine is shown only in the individual biography sections. Two recent projects are identical to the Municipal Pier. The Newcomb Pier and the Municipal Pier, both for the City of Santa Monica, are pile supported, cast-in-place concrete, surf-zone structures, built by the contractor from a temporary steel trestle. The combined structures cost twelve million dollars, and took 24 months to complete. The work was performed under two separate construction contracts, but under one single contract with Concept Marine. The Concept Marine staff that worked on the larger of the two structures is identical to the staff proposed for the Huntington Beach Pier: Gordon Fulton as project sponsor, Al Cantor as the resident construction manager, Warren Mills as manager of quality control, and Dianne Murphy as the manager of information systems. Currently, the Fulton/Cantor/Mills/Murphy team is working on the first phase of the Vallejo Municipal Marina. This work involves dredging, concrete bulkhead construction, and a steel sheet pile breakwater. This phase of the project is scheduled for completion in June 1990. FI • 1116 • ry414 MARINA EXPANSION PHASE I Vallejo, California Concept Marine Associates is providing a full range of construction management services, resident engineering and inspection services for the first phase of the marina expansion. The work includes site preparation, dredging and building of a new breakwater. Total value of the project: $3 M Project Completion Date: Phase I-June 1990 i ,�''`_ „•tea �.fil►T . Y 40, 1 1'11, ,4 .ors r- ir �,, Ai4 w 171.{11.—' *IF ,.' - ''''''' '.-t. '41417":4;:;?.?Ij ' ' r �:"� tr y •Nit/ ,.. ..... / ..?„,. . • .., . .,. VENICE PIER Venice, California The City of Los Angeles has commissioned a study of the Venice Pier to determine if the existing structure can be refurbished. Demolition of this structure and reconstruction of a new pier is also being examined. Concept Marine Associates is a sub-consultant to Theodore E. Anvick, Structural Engineers, responsible for management on non-destructive testing, cost estimating, schedule and construction techniques. Total value of the project: Not known at this time Project Completion Date: Study- 1990 Construction - 1991 IIIIIIIIII ;i�� � � �. �, t��►_ .��.�, it 4, ... � dl:. Ail'r 1/ I 11 �-gin' - mac.= . —- - - ._ r� �_` 1 ..rii • � - 1111 MUNICIPAL PIER Santa Monica, California A full range of construction management services are being provided for the construction of a new pile supported, cast-in-place concrete, surf-zone public pier. Total value of the project: $6.2 M Project Completion Date: 1990 T .• • iumit • . . ,„,, , ji • i ..„).. _ _ ... • , _ tr ____ • ,_ __...... .,_ • ., ,..t. , 4...)„,i±, .. . 1 i• i , .._.___ , 4 , ,! .. T .... ..4 or., _.•,. , ,,.. ..h4 • ai '4 e t f SEAWALL REPAIR Marina del Rey, California Concept Marine is the Project Manager of this complex and highly visible project which involved the determination of the extent of deterioration of the 7.5 miles of seawall at Marina del Rey, assembling a team of experts in structural analyses and the issuance of a report on their findings and recommendations for repair. Elements of this effort involve state-of-the-art, non-destructive testing procedures, development of in-situ repair techniques, buttressing methods and possible replacement strategies. Total value of the project: $ 10 M Project Completion Date: 1991 w ' ., ...Ali""' .. ` ._ I i . . r $ to • j .r. , NEN 1 PI i h 11,--%-. .,„,'7, ` k * -. .- -•_. ',.. 41/ .iirt\ ,..: :...._. ------; • BEACH REFURBISHMENT — PHASES I THROUGH V Los Angeles County, California Concept Marine is providing complete project management services, including programming, design and construction management, and the development of a facilities management program, to Los Angeles County for refurbishment of facilities along the shoreline. The projects began in 1985 and will continue through 1993. To date, more than 16 buildings have been structurally refurbished, restored and brought up to Title 24 requirements. Total value of the project.' $ 16 M(est) Project Completion Date.' 1993 • • d 1 •' '-A ry + ` � r nil .urimC, 6.F..� s. c•CJ'.. ,tin IL �iRya„e'a` =�L+c'�' r.�k�.. .. ".�ems? .. ,. _ -�•�' 'tea.-�.;...:...� �- P • l l , ".u. 1 `.nu+1[•Y`SS�.i'-� +ta +"' J't'_'°'n$ ✓1 • 'f '.. f1P 1 t - •- 4 ,-. .,,,_„� �: i�;�Yy, %.ti'w l-6;••�"1 44 y�,� .sn• - �°":,l:�T,^r. `yayl ,.. x .�hx ,I, §- • ly,,i')'e Ji •.n 6.2I. p,..r" �f' ' L�:GoA �PI i���� r TNT { l „U ILA -.fir _Y 1'Zri � t A • Lt ►'.t x.. ^'+. . .i ��''+ ' '-.. t ,* h,D,Mt .<..-. J• trx 'M,an sS,. r1� ►, '�w fit; �rJ � J, x • It• .# y i a., f t`y 1 n sa .47 7 '03•7_.<6• f`i-M • �.• `�.` te- -, • NEWCOMB PIER Santa Monica, California This project involved the construction of a new pile supported, cast-in-place concrete, surf-zone public pier for the City of Santa Monica. Concept Marine's involvement was to provide resident engineering and construction management services. Total value of the project: $3.5 M Project Completion Date: 1988 CABO MARINA Cabo San Lucas, Mexico Concept Marine is providing total engineering review, inspection and complete technical advisory services for the 300+berth marina. These services are being provided as a Consultant to the Owner/Development group. Total value of the project: $3.5 M Project Completion Date: 1990 14^. 'i ;'' r *Li 4 •rt r ;� ",/• 040111.. ro . 4\4R r WHARF NUMBER TWO City of Monterey, California Concept Marine performed an extensive substructure inventory and development of a pier maintenance database program for an existing wood pier. These services were provided as a consultant to the Engineer. Total value of the project: To be determined Project Completion Date: 1989 •w ..�.. iiik 7`_ r 1 L, ''•••••••......---•• .. . • t• f r i.a•".taar .Tft.•.i.. i ANTIOCH MUNICIPAL MARINA Antioch, California A full range of construction management and resident engineering services were provided for a 300-berth marina with piling, breakwater, shoreline protection, covered moorage, commercial building, parking and landscaping. Total value of the project: $6.5 M Project Completion Date: 1989 f y� 1111 TIP t IN R runt'IF 1 a, $41 j - 88 G i. MILLER PARK MARINA Sacramento, California Resident engineering and inspection services were provided for the construction of a 300-berth marina which included the dredging of a one million cubic yard harbor, shoreline protection, floating docks, utilities, commercial buildings, parking and landscaping. Total value of the project: $ 7.5 M Project Completion Date: 1989 - . e WI •0`. .00..gailtr .-". I .V. . hPie ;. 4:64„.446411/, tiat--...F. _..411A.. ,,1. I - � .i'lle. ‘"' 1 Le:".i41>.1117.. . , . . 48: '110)..7's *** ii:111,41.. ._.. . . I . LL LiLoititeci,",.... A4.,h, ,,,, ' � �; " 1 N.'dt.'' 1 MARINA BAY YACHT CLUB Richmond, California Concept Marine was the Project Manager for this large marina and shoreline improvement project. CMA performed planning, design management, value engineering services and construction administration services on this project which involved shoreline protection, broad, landscaped, public esplanade, marina, and yacht club structure with parking. Total value of the project: $3.5 M Project Completion Date: 1985 r Partial List Of Clients - Public Sector * City of Antioch * City of Berkeley * Egyptian Ministry of Tourism * Los Angeles County * Mexican Department of Tourism * Navy, Department of the, WESTDIV * Oceanside Harbor District * Port of Los Angeles * City of Richmond * City of Sacramento * City of San Leandro * City of Santa Monica * City of Vallejo * University of California II V � Partial List of Clients - Private Sector * Alameda Yacht Harbor - Alameda, California * ALMAR, Ltd. - Cabo San Lucas, Mexico San Diego, California Ventura, California Alameda, California * Cabrillo Yacht Club - San Pedro, California * Diodati Development - Oyster Point, California * Encinal Marina - Alameda, California * False Creek Marina - Vancouver, B.C., Canada * Kappas-Pacific - Sausalito, California * Marina Bay Development Corp. - Richmond, Calif. * Marina City Club/Ritz Carlton Hotels - Marina del Rey, Calif. * Marina del Rey Yacht Club - Marina del Rey, California * Mauna Lani Resorts - Hawii, Hawaii * Port Royale Marina - Redondo Beach, California * Real Property Management, Inc. - Marina del Rey, California * Sunroad Enterprises - San Diego, California * Tahoe Keys Marina - Lake Tahoe, California * West Beach Marina - Oahu, Hawaii lb. Give a brief history of the firm, including the length of time in business. Include information on any sub-consultants which should be involved in the project Concept Marine was founded in 1981 by Gordon Fulton. Since that time, CMA has provided construction management services on over thirty coastal and waterfront projects throughout California, Mexico and Hawaii. -' In the nine intervening years, Concept Marine has grown from a one person operation to a staff of 10. Its growth has been steady and conservative. Most key employees have been on the staff for three years or more. The quality of our work does not suffer from hiring and firing on a project basis. Early on, the company deliberately determined to avoid either associating with, or competing with, design engineering firms or construction contractors. We understand the unfortunate dynamics which occur when the CM is too close to the designer or, conversely, competing with the designer in other arenas. Concept Marine has only one relationship which governs its activities and its loyalties, and that is the client. Please note the number of repeat clients in our work history section. CONSULTANTS We have elected to use the following three consultants on this project. Brochures are submitted under separate cover. Moore and Tabor will provide full-time pile driving geotechnical inspection. They were selected for two key reasons. First, we know them to be a very competent geotechnical firm with an excellent reputation. Secondly, we feel it is important to have the geotechnical engineer that provided the design criteria as a part of our team for the pile driving operation. The determination of whether anticipated conditions match actual conditions and, if not, the determination of which remedial course of action to take is absolutely essential in this project. lb. Continued. During the preparation of this proposal, Concept Marine and Moore and Tabor have had several phone conversations and a meeting of key senior personnel. We propose to ;_ collaborate in several specific areas, which they have not been asked to do on this project to-date. If the City concurs, we will prepare an indicator pile program, develop a bid strategy to minimize the consequences of the difficult pile driving that is expected, and prepare specification recommendations which will allow and encourage the contractors to use their ingenuity to lower costs while not sacrificing quality. - CHJ Construction Services will be the consultant responsible for inspecting the pile manufacturing operation. They are located in Colton, California, within 6 miles of two firms which manufacture the 24" octagonal piles specified for this project. It is highly likely that the piles will be made in this locale. CHJ provided full-time pile manufacturing quality assurance for the Santa Monica Newcomb Pier in 1987-88, for which Concept Marine was the construction manager. At that time, we became acquainted with the President, Mr. Robert Nottingham, and one of his senior deputy inspectors, Mr. Ray Winders. We have the highest regard for Mr. Winders, and have asked Mr. Nottingham to make Winders available for the Huntington Beach Pier project. Winders is an expert in pre-stressed pile manufacturing inspection. He is certified for this work by the ICBO and the ACI, and licensed to inspect as a deputy in Orange County and Los Angeles County. If the contractor elects to have the piles manufacturedout of the anticipated area,we will make other arrangements. Smith-Emery will provide all special inspection and testing services as required by the design engineer, the City and our experience, including concrete, aggregate, reinforcement, coatings, etc. Their services will be based from their Orange County office in Anaheim. Concept Marine and Smith-Emery have had a working relationship at the executive and operational levels for more than five years, including the Newcomb Pier in Santa Monica, and various projects for Los Angeles County. We have come to rely on their responsiveness, and their competence. i ', , I M O O R E & TAB E R GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS 1290 NORTH HANCOCK STREET • P.O. BOX 19079 • ANAHEIM, CA 92817 TELEPHONE (714) 779-2591 • FAX (714) 779-8377 ADDITIONAL OFFICES SAN DIEGO BAKERSFIELD March 29, 1990 , ' Proposal No. A90-097 r Concept Marine Associates, Inc. 13763 Fiji Way Suite EU-2 Marina Del Rey, California 90292 Attention: Mr. Gordon R. Fulton President ( PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PIER HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA to submit a proposal to As requested, Moore & Taber is pleasedp p provide geotechnical services during the construction of the Huntington Beach Pier. The scope of work as described herein has been based on preliminary discussions with Concept Marine. Due to the complexity of the project and the dependency of the schedule on the contractor, the actual requirements of the work may vary significantly. This submission should therefore be considered general in nature and subject to change. The provided costs estimate have been based on the specific allowances noted herein and are considered to be sufficient for preliminary budgetary allowances. SCOPE OF WORK The geotechnical services covered by this proposal include observation of pile driving operations and engineering consultation on related issues. Having had the opportunity to perform sufficient field observations and tests, we will render a professional opinion on the compliance of work with applicable portions of the project foundation plans and specifications in a written report that summarizes the results of our services. Concept Marine Associates, Inc. Page 2 Attention: Mr. Gordon R. Fulton - r ti The presence of our field representatives will be for the purpose of providing observation and field testing. Our work does not include supervision or direction of actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. The contractor for this project should be so advised. The contractor should also be informed that neither the presence of our field representatives nor the observation and testing by our firm shall excuse him in any way for defects discovered in his work. It is understood that our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Job and site safety will be the sole responsibility of the contractor. Major tasks that may be included within the scope of geotechnical services for construction include the following: 11 Task 1. Interact with Concept Marine on piling issues so that effective bid documents are prepared. Task 2. Observe pile extraction and trestle pile installation on an intermittent basis. Task 3. Participate in the development and execution of test piles which may be installed at the time of demolition. 7f 14 Task 4 . Provide full-time field observation of pile installation during construction. Task 5. Provide engineering evaluations for unusual or 1 inconsistent pile driving behavior. Task 6. Summarize all findings and data in written reports. Proposal No. A90-097 - March 29, 1990 Concept Marine Associates, Inc. Page 3 Attention: Mr. Gordon R. Fulton ESTIMATED COSTS Task No. Allowances *Estimated Cost 1 - Two engineering man-days $ 1,600.00 si 2 - Two engineering field days $ 1,400. 00 3 - Two engineering man-days for $ 1,800. 00 development of test pile procedures it - Two field days for execution $ 1,400. 00 - Two engineering man-days for $ 1,700. 00 evaluation and reporting 4 - Allow 720 hours for field $44,300.00 engineer (assuming 355 piles at about four per eight-hour day) - Five engineering man-days for $ 3,500. 00 engineering support and supervision during construction 5 - Five engineering man-days $ 3,700.00 6 - Five engineering man-days $ 4,500. 00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $63,900.00 * 1. The estimated costs include these for support staff (drafting and clerical) as well as vehicles and other incidental expenses. 2 . The costs have been based on the attached fee schedule, which is applicable through March, 1991. Proposal No. A90-097 - March 29, 1990 Concept Marine Associates, Inc. Page 4 Attention: Mr. Gordon R. Fulton CLOSURE If this proposal meets with your approval, please return a signed copy and it will constitute our contract for professional services. The terms on the back of the signature page are an integral part of the proposal. It is our policy that no reports be submitted until a signed agreement is on file. We appreciate the opportunity to be of services and look forward to working with you on this project. If you should have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact the undersigned. MOORS & T ER ji Brian D. Constant APPROVED AND ACCEPTED: Vice President BDC/lkr CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. Encs: Fee Schedule C By:, h :r Title: Date: Anaheim, California �F Proposal No. A90-097 - March 29, 1990 �� CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CC %ij �L . INCORPORATED P.O. Box 1820 • 1355 E. Cooley Dr., Suite C, Colton, CA 92324 1, Phone (714) 824-7224 • Fax(714) 824-7209 Ccncepti✓iaine MAR 2 1990 March 22, 1990 RECEIVED Concept Marine 13763 Fiji Way, Suite EU-2 Marina Del Rey, California 90292 Attention: Mr. Gordon Fulton, President Subject: Huntington Pier Project Dear Mr. Fulton: C.H.J. Construction Services, Inc. is looking forward to working with you once again as we did on the Santa Monica Pier project. Mr. Ray minders was our in-plant inspector during the fabrication of the pre cast piles for the Santa Monica project. As I stated to you, we will make him available for this project to perform the same high quality inspection. C.H.J. is looking forward to this project and continuing the team relationship we have had in the past. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully submitted, C.H.J. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. Rober L. No in President RLN:br MATERIALS TESTING AND EVALUATION • CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION SMITH-EMERY COMPANY The Full Service Independent Testing Laboratory, Established zgo4 78t East Washington Blvd. Los Angeles,California 90021 (213)749-34t Fax(2t3)7467228 �t C' March 23, 1990 Mr. Gordon R.Fulton President Concept Marine Associates,Inc. 13763 Fiji Way, Suite EU-2 Marina Del Rey,CA 90292 Dear Gordon: We are pleased to be on your team for the Huntington Beach Pier proposal. As you know,we will work with you to set up a full quality assurance program which will ensure that the project conforms with the plans and specifications. Based on our years of working together on the Los Angeles County projects and the Santa Monica Pier,I can give my personal assurances that we'll support you with top field personnel. Our Orange County offices and laboratory in Anaheim have the capability to provide complete materials testing of the components'which make up the Pier. We look forward to working with you again. Sincerely, c,4 Fred Partridge Vice President,Marketing Enclosures FP:sd If ,1 'u l i Anaheim San Francisco t- 5427 East La Palma Ave. Hunters Point Shipyard,Bldg. t 14 heim,California 928o7 P.O.Box 88o55o Ana na 693-to San Francisco,California 94188 (714Fax(714)693.1034 (413)822-888o Fax(4t3)822.3864 lc Identify all projects within the last five years that have entered into litigation Erplain the circumstances for each project listed Concept Marine's approach to claims and disputes is litigation avoidance. This means: * having more thorough documentation than the contractor * early identification and resolution of potential claims * being intimately familiar with the contractor's work * firm, fair, good faith bargaining Claims avoidance does not mean indiscriminate approval or denial of contractor claims. As a result, no project that we have managed has gone to litigation because of contractor claims. _- However, Gordon Fulton has had substantial experience working on claims as an expert witness or observing claims. Fulton was an expert consultant in quality assurance to the Port of Los Angeles on the $23M Cabrillo Beach Marina in 1986-7. There is a large ongoing construction claim, to which neither Fulton nor Concept Marine is a party. The Port continues to use our services on claim analysis and on other unrelated projects. In the nine years that Concept Marine has been in business, it has only been involved with one instance of litigation. An arbitration proceding was instigated by us for non-payment against a developer in Northern California. The panel of arbitrators awarded Concept Marine approximately 1.5 times its actual claim, instructed the developer to pay all of Concept Marine's arbitration costs, and denied the developer's counterclaims in their entirety. A copy of the two page arbitration award is available upon request. Concept Marine has become convinced that construction litigation is a "lose-lose" situation, However, we are fully prepared to deal with an accurate presentation of the actual conduct of the job, to support litigation should it become unavoidable. This includes maintaining a data-based document control system, a sample of which is attached, full recording of both formal and informal conversations, and a complete visual record of the construction through the use of video and 35mm photography. PROJECT TEAM 2a. Who will be in charge of the project;what staff will be assigned to the projec4 and what will be the temp structure and responsibilities? The following description of Concept Marine's key project staff is supplemented by resumes in the pages immediately following this section. Gordon Fulton, the President of Concept Marine, will be the Project Sponsor. He will have bottom line responsibility for the overall performance of Concept Marine. He will have the ability to make binding commitments for the company, and will be responsible to ensure that the project team has the resources and structure to perform with excellence. Fulton will remain in close contact with the project through frequent attendance at construction meetings and client meetings, as well as by regularly reviewing documentation. He will focus on project overview, schedule and potential claim resolution items. He will be available for, and will recommend, if necessary, meetings with City personnel at the appropriate levels. Alfred Cantor will be the full-time Construction Manager. He will be the primary, day-to- day manager of the project. As such, it is his responsibility to monitor the general performance of the contractor, conduct construction meetings, coordinate sub-consultants and independent inspection agencies. It has been our experience that it is a luable investment to have the full time on-site representative be an experienced construction manager with inspection support instead of the reverse situation which would have the inspector on the job with the construction manager back at the office. If and when pier projects, like any other heavy construction, have problems, they tend to escalate from small difficulties into major problems. Having a seasoned construction engineer of Cantor's caliber enables us to control the project on a much tighter basis. Cantor will reside within 10 miles of the construction site throughout the duration of the project. Warren Mills, himself a seasoned construction manager, will assist Cantor with quality assurance. His training in the Corps of Engineers and lengthy experience make him an expert in defining quality assurance scopes of work and performance, both in-house and ' 2a. Continued with consultants. Mills will work with Cantor, but report directly to the Project Sponsor. He will be personally present on-site for key meetings and at critical times, such as the start-up of pile driving, pre-pour inspections and concrete placement. Additionally, he will spot monitor our pile manufacture inspection sub-consultant and the testing firm. Dianne Murphy is Concept Marine's Manager of Information Systems. This very important function is crucial to the control and dissemination of information, in the broadest sense, to all members of the project team. She will set up a central filing database system for this specific job, which will issue regular reports to the City's project manager, as well as Concept Marine's project team. J _1' Additionally, she will be in charge of document control, tracking actual-versus-budget costs, maintaining trend logs and change order logs and preparing the Monthly Progress Report. A separate section containing samples of the reports and documents accompanies this proposal. HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER ' PROJECT ORGANIZATION PROJECT SPONSOR Gordon R. Fulton J I 'a M.I.S RESIDENT ENGINEER QUALITY ASSURANCE Dianne Murphy A. Cantor W. S. Mills . i Document Control Submittals, Etc. Geotechnical Testing& Pile Fabrication Cost&Schedule Support Special Inspect. Inspection Control Moore&Tabor Smith-Emery C H J Management Reports KEY: Reporting Support/Coordination GORDON R. FULTON. PRESIDENT Mr. Fulton's current responsibilities with Concept Marine consist of overall corporate management, resource allocation and quality control within the firm, and special studies. Fulton also remains active in project and construction management activities of the firm. Fulton is currently the corporate sponsor of the Santa Monica Municipal Pier. Fulton has been involved in construction since the late 1960s, and has managed a variety of projects on his own account and for others. He has specialized in small-craft harbor and coastal projects since 1974, first as Vice-President of Operations for Omnifloat, Inc., in Southern California; then as Vice-President and General Manager of Bellingham Marine Industries (Cal.). Both firms were marine contractors specializing in docks, piers, and general marine construction. During this period Mr. Fulton was in charge of the construction, pre-cast concrete manufacturing operations and overall general corporate management. In 1981 Mr. Fulton established Concept Marine Associates, to provide construction and project management services for owners and developers of coastal facilities. He has spoken to a variety of groups about construction management, including a graduate seminar at the University of California (Berkeley), and the States Organization for Boating Access (SOBA), California Marine Parks and Harbors, and the Port Captains and Harbor Masters Association. Mr. Fulton's formal educational backround consists of a B.A. from Lewis & Clark College in Portland, Oregon, and an M.A. from the University of Pennsylvania. He is regularly engaged in a program of continuing education. Organization Memberships California Marine Parks & Harbors Association, Past President Construction Management Association of Ameria California Marine Affairs and Navigation Conference, Director American Arbitration Association, Panelist Shore and Beach Preservation Society California Association of Port Captains and Harbor Masters Alfred Cantor. Construction Manager Mr. Cantor began working for Concept Marine in 1988. Among his first tasks was to develop a replacement cost for the infrastructure at Marina del Rey, which now serves as the basis for budgeting replacement funds for Los Angeles County. Cantor was the construction manager for the Santa Monica Municipal Pier from December 1988 to January 1990 ($6.9M). Since that time he has been the construction manager for Phase I of the Vallejo Marina, which consists of dredging, shoreline protection including walls and rip-rap, and construction of a detached breakwater. From 1986 to 1988 he was Construction Manager responsible for building cofferdams and pipelines, pipe foundation piling for structure and pipe saddles for two high-rise office buildings in San Francisco, the Chevron Refinery in Richmond, CA, and a pump station cofferdam for the City of San Mateo. During 1985 he was Resident Engineer responsible for testing and inspection of the Spud i Point Marina at Bodega Bay, CA. As a Construction Consultant from 1981 to 1984, he - was involved with many marine-type projects such as marina piers, fishing piers, concrete sheet pile walls, marinas, dredging, sheet pile retaining walls, channel pipeline crossings as well as cofferdams, and building foundations. He was Project Manager for the Pier 41 facility at the Port of San Francisco, which consisted of a concrete deck structure on concrete piling, and rehabilitated a pier at a ship repair yard. During the 1970's, he was Project Manager for construction of Pier 94 at the Port of San Francisco which consisted of extensive deep water dredging, sand backfill, rock slope protection and construction of a concrete wharf for container ships. He has participated in dredging projects for the Ports of Oakland and Richmond, and the Bethlehem Ship Yard. At the Kaiser facility in Vallejo, CA, he worked on construction of sheet pile structure, sand backfill and dredging and, at the Oakland Shipyard, he was involved with the construction of a launching pier for an offshore drilling platform. He also participated in the construction of a concrete pier, small boat marina, shoreline protection, dredging and paving in Sausalito, CA. In the early 1970's he worked on the West Mission Bay Drive Bridge for the City of San Diego and was Project Manager for construction of a fishing pier for the City of Pacifica. From 1966 to 1969, Cantor was Marine Superintendent for the construction of the underwater crossing for Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) between San Francisco and Oakland, CA. Alfred Cantor, Continued Prior to this, he worked on projects for the Cities of San Diego, Vallejo, Sacramento and Oakland, and for such clients as the U.S. Navy at Hunter's Point Naval Shipyard, North Island Naval Shipyard, San Diego, Port Hueneme Naval Base, Long Beach Naval Base, Fort Mason,as well as the Corps of Engineers, P G & E in Pittsburg, California State Water Resources at Feather River, Todd Shipyards in Alameda, and Standard Oil. This early experience encompassed a wide variety of jobs from pipelines, sewers, cofferdams, pile foundations, wharfs, bridges, and dredging, which has given Cantor the basics for his area of expertise. Mr. Cantor graduated from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts with a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering. WARREN S. MILLS. Construction Manager Warren Mills joined Concept Marine in early 1987. His current responsibilities consist of directing construction management and quality assurance activities for our projects with the City of Vallejo, Cabo San Lucas Marina, and Los Angeles County. From 1986 to 1989 he was the construction manager for Concept Marine on the Antioch Marina $6.5M), the Sacramento Municipal Marina ($7.5M), and the Oceanside Marina ($3.8M), as well as a variety of smaller projects. During his previous employment with a concrete precast manufacturer, from 1980 to 1986, he wrote product specifications to meet structural and performance requirements and designed a quality control program. He was also responsible for the management of the in-house engineering department for three production facilities, supervising seven engineering technicians. While working for the Corps of Engineers during the period of 1974 to 1979, Mr. Mills inspected and coordinated all phases of construction, including mechanical, electrical, civil, structural (including complete office and commercial building projects), and asphalt and concrete pavement. He reviewed plans, coordinated shop drawings, initiated modifications and assisted in cost estimates as required. He worked with contractors and enforced compliance with the plans and specifications, as well as directed and administered all required tests. Certificates for Special Inspection were earned through the Corps of Engineers' inspection education program in the following fields: Power Generation, Architectural Hardware, Diesel Generation Testing, Paint Inspection, Concrete Inspection and Testing, Asphalt Inspection, Electrical Inspection, and Construction Safety. Mr. Mills completed college engineineering courses towards a degree in mechanical engineering prior to entering the armed services in 1970. He is currently engaged in a program of continuing education in construction law and technology. DIANNE MURPHY. Manager of Information Systems Mrs. Murphy has been responsible for overseeing Concept Marine's Project Control System, including document control and cost reporting since 1988. Her background consists of twenty years in an engineering and construction environment with Kaiser Engineers, an international engineering organization. Her responsibilities during this period have covered all aspects of project administration and controls for a variety of projects, both large and small, and have covered an assortment of industries. She has developed systems for the control of all aspects of project controls from documentation through costs and schedules for a wide variety of projects, both for the government and private sectors, domestically and overseas. Based on her experience and expertise, she has recently developed and implemented the project controls systems for Concept Marine in order to monitor not only the day-to-day 1 correspondence and contractual documents, but also the costs for all projects currently being executed. As Membership Chairman of the Northern California Chapter of the Project Management L ! Institute, she has developed other computer systems for tracking personnel data and, as Treasurer for the Church she attends, has developed a complete Computer Controls System for their benefit. r ,1 > ii) BRIAN D. CONSTANT �. Vice President and Principal Engineer POSITION Mr. Constant is a Vice President and Manager of the - Studebaker Road Extension,Long Beach ' Geotechnical Engineering Division of Moore&Taber. In this capacity, he is responsible for the supervision and - Burning Tree Road Bridge,Fullerton - review of all geotechnical investigations and he coordinates work with other divisions and offices within - Industrial/Commercial Developments in Moore & Taber. Fullerton, Anaheim, City of Industry and Mira - Loma Mr. Constant also is a Principal Engineer and serves as Project Manager on more complex and demanding - Santa Margarita Parkway Bridge Widening,Oso assignments. and Antonio Parkway Bridges,Orange County - Orange County Register Satellite Production EDUCATION Facility,Rancho Santa Margarita University of London,England - Community Arts Center,Cerritos ' M.S. in Soil Mechanics, 1971 Imperial College of Science and - Office Tower Development,Santa Ana Technology,London,England D.I.C.in Soil Mechanics, 1971 - Citrus Community College Expansion,Glendora University of Alberta, Canada B.S. in Civil Engineering, 1970 PRIOR EXPERIENCE From 1971 to 1987 Mr. Constant served in a variety of REGISTRATION capacities for Hardy BBT Limited and its predecessor firms. Hardy BBT is a major multi-office geotechnical and California Registered Civil Engineer materials engineering firm practicing primarily in Western No. 44506 Canada and the Arctic. During his time with Hardy BBT, Registered Professional Engineer Mr. Constant held Senior Technical/Administrative Alberta, CE11747, 1972 positions that included Chief Engineer and Manager BBT Registered Professional Engineer Geotechnical Consultants Ltd.,Edmonton;Vice President Saskatchewan, CE 5603, 1985 of Engineering BBT, Saskatoon; and Chief Engineer - Saskatchewan Operations,Hardy BBT,Saskatoon. Major projects carried out by Mr. Constant or under his direct ._ ORGANIZATIONS supervision included: American Society of Civil Engineers - 50 rail and highway bridges in Western Canada 1 Consulting Engineers Association of California Deep Foundations Institute - Fibre optics crossings of the South Saskatchewan and Canadian Geotechnical Society Battle Rivers, Canada British Geotechnical Society Transportation Research Board - Highway design for in excess of 300 miles of alignment in Western Canada i EXPERIENCE - Major structures with unique foundation systems including reinforced earth auxiliary production Since joining Moore & Taber in 1987, Mr. Constant has systems,Syncrude Minesite,Fort McMurray,Alberta participated in and served as principal reviewer for a and 40,000 ton ammonia tanks in Alberta and variety of foundation studies. In addition to serving as a Saskatchewan specialist internal consultant on dam and major grading projects,Mr.Constant has been directly responsible for the - Foundation design for large developments including following assignments: the Strathcona Imperial Oil Refinery Expansion, Edmonton; major components of the Dow Chemical - Los Angeles Mission Plant,Fort Saskatchewan;and for the BP Wolf Lake Heavy Oil Project, all in Alberta - Fisherman's Channel Bridge,San Diego (second party geotechnical review) - Slope failures and remedial work for the Imperial Oil Refinery and Texaco Lone Rock Steam Flood Project - Monarch Beach Resort,Laguna Niguel in Alberta; Leacross Railway Bridge site, Saskatchewan; and Territorial Drive Slope in - Juvenile Justice Facilities, City of Orange Saskatchewan 01/90 MOORE & TABER DOUGLAS R. BELL (�• Senior Project Engineer POSITION Mr. Bell is a Senior Project Engineer for Moore&Taber. -Brea Neuropsychiatric Hospital-Brea. In this position he is responsible for project cost estimates -ADP Tax Center-Diamond Bar: 150,000 square foot and proposals, supervision of subsurface exploration and structure field testing, engineering analyses, report writing and -Executive Office Park-Santa Ana: Seven to Ten story project review. office and parking structures -Rancho Santiago College Expansion- Orange -Pasadena Police Building - Pasadena: Three story EDUCATION building McGill University,Montreal, Canada Hydraulic Structures and Impoundments Bachelor of Civil Engineering, 1980 Vanier College,Montreal, Canada - Jeffrey Road Trunk Sewer - Irvine SAWPA Magnolia Pure and Applied Science, 1977 Avenue Water Line and Desalter Facility- Riverside -Lower Deer Creek Drainage System- Ontario -San Sevaine Detention Basin 5-Rancho Cucamonga REGISTRATION -Day Creek Improvements - Ontario -Irvine Center Drive Reclaimed Water Line - Irvine California Registered Civil -Etiwanda Debris Basin -Rancho Cucamonga Engineer No.40516 In addition to the above,Mr. Bell has served as Project Engineer for the following major geotechnical EXPERIENCE investigations: Since joining the staff of Moore&Taber in 1984,Mr. Bell -California Commerce Center East,Phase II Ontario: 380 has conducted many important geotechnical investigations acre commercial/industrial subdivision. for bridges,mid-rise buildings,heavy industrial facilities, surface hydraulic structures, subsurface conduits, and -Monarch Beach Resort -Laguna Niguel storage tanks. His experience includes the following: -All-American Pipeline Facilities- Kern County and San BridgesBernardino County. Heater and pumping stations and large diameter oil storage tank sites. -Pacific Coast Highway Crossing Over Santa Ana River- Newport Beach -Mission de Camarillo- 250 acre hillside commercial and -Borchard Road Bridge Over Ventura Freeway-Thousand residential subdivision - Camarillo Oaks -John Wayne Airport and Route 55 Access Ramps and Bridges -Irvine PRIOR EXPERIENCE -South E Street Bridge over Santa Ana River, San Bernardino Before joining Moore&Taber,Mr.Bell worked as a Staff -Gypsum Canyon Road Bridge Over Santa Ana River, and Project Engineer for BBT Geotechnical Consultants, Yorba Linda. Ltd.in Calgary, Canada from 1981 to 1984. Some of the -Fullerton Road Bridge Over San Jose Creek, projects he was involved with include: City of Industry. -Lincoln Avenue Bridge Over Temescal Creek, -Light Rail Transit System- City of Calgary, including a Corona nine span bridge over the Bow River and seven station -Southern Pacific Railway Bridges Over facilities. Dominguez Channel- Carson. -Highway 66-Bragg Creek to Ford Creek-Geotechnical -Storke Road Bridge Over Southern Pacific services for 18 miles of mountain highway in southern Railway- Goleta. Alberta. -Solomon Road Bridge over Orcutt Creek- Orcutt -Off-Shore Drilling Facility - Geotechnical field -Las Palmas Drive Bridge Over Union Pacific exploration for Pan Canadian Petroleum in Lake Newell, Railway -Fullerton. Alberta. Buildings -Fieldstone Plaza- San Diego: 27,500 square foot commercial building. -Bachelor Enlisted Quarters-MCAS,Tustin: Four-story concrete structure. -McCrory Stores Warehouse- Rialto: 700,000 square foot warehouse and distribution center. 01/90 MOORE & TABER SCOTT T. KERWIN (4trii) Senior Engineering Geologist POSITION EXPERIENCE Mr. Kerwin serves as a Senior Engineering Geologist for Mr. Kerwin originally joined Moore& Taber in 1975 and Moore & Taber. In this position, he performs and participated in a number of geotechnical projects including supervises a variety of geotechnical tasks including: subsurface site stabilization by compaction grouting at the geologic mapping, subsurface exploration, aerial photo Los Angeles County Juvenile Hall Facility in Sylmar,which interpretation, and other reference research. He has was heavily damaged during the 1971 San Fernando participated in the identification, instrumentation and earthquake. During a 2-1/2 year hiatus in Australia evaluation of geologic hazards in planned, as well as (1977-79), he gained valuable construction experience in existing developments. He has also prepared,planned,and the installation of deep foundations with the Main Roads implemented workscopes,proposals,and/or cost estimates D tpartment of Queensland and a major construction firm. for a wide variety geotechnical studies and projects. Since returning to Moore& Taber in 1979,he has EDUCATION performed and supervised a wide range of important geotechnical projects including: University of California at Los Angeles B.S.in Geology, 1971 Geologic studies of the Klondike Canyon Landslide and the The Geological Engineering Foundation, Flying Triangle Landslide situated along the partially Berkely, California developed eastern margin of the ancient Portuguese Bend Short Course in Geological Landslide Complex. These studies were undertaken for a Engineering,June, 1984 number of clients over an area of several hundred acres between 1980 and the present. The primary purpose of REGISTRATIONS this investigation was to delineate stable ground which is not impacted by these extensive,slowly creeping landslides. California Registered Geologist,No.3980 California Certified Engineering Geologist,No. 1267 Geotechnical investigation of the Cove Road Landslide at the western end of Dana Point Harbor. Engineering ORGANIZATIONS geologic tasks for the Cove Road Slope Restoration Project included development of a remedial design scheme, and Association of Engineering Geologists intensive geotechnical observation and review during construction. A restraining structure supported by a PUBLICATIONS relatively complex system of long rock anchors,and a crib wall with an exposed height up to 45 feet, are the main "Land Stability in the Klondike Canyon Area". elements of the slope restoration/stabilization design. Landslides and Landslide Abatement, Palos Verdes Peninsula,Southern California;Volume and Guidebook for Geologic and geotechnical investigation for reconstruction the 78th Annual Meeting Geologic Society of America, of the Huntington Beach Pier. This landmark structure, Cordilleran Section;April, 1982. which was constructed in 1914,is scheduled for demolition and replacement in 1990- 1991. "Restoration of the Cove Road Landslide, Dana Point, California", Ground Failure, National Research Preparation of a comprehensive Hydrogeological Council-Committee on Ground Failure Hazards, No. 1, Assessment Report for solar evaporation ponds with a Winter 1984-85 (pp. 11-12). combined wet surface area of about 500 acres at the U.S. Borax do Chemical Corporation's facility at Boron, - "Sea Cliff Stabilization Using Long Rock Anchors - A California. A similar Solid Waste Assessment Test Case History",Rock Mechanics: Proceedings of the 28th 'SWAT)Report was also prepared for solid waste disposal U.S.Symposium,University of Arizona,Tucson,1987(pp. units at the facility. 305- 315). Fault studies and geologic seismic reports for several HONORS projects sited within Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones. Also, a diverse range of distress investigations including The Cove Road Slope Restoration Project was the residential and commercial structures and other recipient of a number of engineering awards: improvements such as pavements,storm drains,sea walls and slope revetments. - Project of the Year 1987;ASCE Los Angeles Section, Orange County Branch. Previous construction experience was an important - Outstanding Project Award 1987;California advantage on these and other projects, including: Geotechnical Engineers Association. geotechnical observation and review of the Santiago - Engineering Project of the Year 1988; Orange County Aqueduct Parallel in Orange County and also during Engineering Council, Orange County,California installation of an extensive system of large diameter, - National Nominee: Outstanding Civil engineering east-in- place piles for the LAX Second Level Roadway Achievement Award 1988; and Martin S.Kapp Project Foundation Engineering Award 1989;ASCE Los Angeles Section. 01/90 MOORE & TABER TED M. PRIMAS Staff Geologist POSITION Mr.Primas currently serves as a Staff Geologist for Moore Geotechnical investigations for Whelan Ranch Property. &Taber. He performs a variety of geologic tasks including This project includes the conversion of approximately 400 field explorations, geologic hazard evaluations, report acres of hillside and flatland terrain into a master planned writing,field services during construction and laboratory residential community. testing. He has logged and sampled borings and trenches, conducted geophysical surveys, and performed geologic Roadway Landslide Investigations for Santa Barbara mapping. He also participates in structural distress County. This project involved the investigation of four investigations. He has performed field services during landslides involving major county roadways and included construction, including grading observations,compaction the development of remedial measures. testing and the observation and approval of drilled cast-in-place and driven piles. - Mr. Primas served as a construction inspector on the east-in-place pile installation for the City of Los Angeles, Department of Airports, LAX Second Level Roadway EDUCATION Project. This three mile viaduct was constructed above the local traffic lanes within the terminal complex. Pilings Chapman College - B.A.in Geology, 1979 to six feet in diameter typically were designed to support California State University at Long Beach loads to 2000 kips. Approximately 130 drilled, Graduate Study in Geology, 1980 cast-in-place piles were installed. Mr.Primas was the Pile Driving Inspector for Brinderson REGISTRATION Towers, Tower Number One, Newport Beach, which consisted of a 12-story building supported on 528 precast, Registered Pile Driving Inspector, prestressed concrete piles. City of San Diego,PD-263 City of Irvine, No.390 As a Soils Technician, Mr. Primas has performed and Certificate on Radiation Safety and Use supervised grading operations,compaction tests,and field of Nuclear Soil Gauges explorations for a number of projects including: Development of the above described Lusk Industrial Park ORGANIZATIONS which involved excavation and compaction of over 10 million cubic yards of earth. South Coast Geologic Society Development of the Kaiser Cement and Gypsum CERTIFICATES Corporation, Cushenbury Plant Modernization which involved excavation and/or compaction of limestone,rock Radiation Safety and Use of Nuclear Soil Gauges and sand in preparation for construction of major Hazardous Waste Training Certificate structures,including a 28-story pre-heater tower,kiln,raw and finish mills, storage domes and clinker silos. EXPERIENCE Since joining Moore & Taber in 1979, Mr. Primas has participated in conducting a wide range of geotechnical projects in Southern California. He has served as a Staff Geologist on the following projects: Preliminary geologic investigation for hillside industrial and residential development in Orange,Los Angeles, San Diego, Santa Barbara and San Bernardino Counties. Geotechnical investigations for Lusk Industrial Park. This project included the conversion of approximately 400 acres of hillside terrain into a master planned commercial - industrial complex. In 1981,an additional investigation for a 600-acre development was conducted for the Lusk Company in the same area. This more recent project will also involve mass grading and will ultimately be developed as a mixed commercial/industrial/residential complex. 01/90 MOORE & TABER JOHN B. STRAUSS Staff Engineer POSITION Panorama Heights Waterline-Site investigation for a Mr.Strauss is a Staff Engineer for Moore&Taber. In this 3,700 foot waterline utilizing surface seismic equipment position he is responsible for cost estimates and proposals, Orange County. subsurface exploration,field testing,engineering analyses, Flower Street Storm Drain-3000 foot storm drain report writing and field inspection of deep foundations. project- Santa Ana Mr. Strauss also works in our field services department Arlington Basin Desalter project - 6400 foot pipeline which observes and tests engineered fill. connecting several water wells-Riverside Euclid Interceptor Sewer- 12,000 foot sewer project - EDUCATION Anaheim Brea Creek Channel-Box culvert inlet structure- California State University,Long Beach Buena Park B.S. Civil Engineering, Geotechnical Emphasis, 1987 Pile Inspections Additional studies at Orange Coast College Gypsum Canyon Bridge-Seven pier bridge over the - Building Construction Emphasis Santa Ana River,driven steel piles and well monitoring Yorba Linda. EXPERIENCE South Melrose Bridge-Two pier bridge,driven steel pile and footing inspection-Vista. Since joining the staff of Moore & Taber in 1987, Mr. Jahnke Seawall-Drilled cast in-place steel pile seawall Strauss has conducted a variety of geotechnical Capistrano Beach. investigations. His experience includes: Royal Palms Retirement Center-Driven concrete piles and footing inspection- San Pedro. Buildings: Irvine Civic Center-Driven concrete piles-Irvine Fullerton Home Distress-CIDH Pile and footing Orange County Register-410,000 square foot printing inspection. and distribution plant -Rancho Santa Margarita. Anaheim Police Department-CIDH pile inspection for new'facilities -Anaheim Albertson, Stores -A 450,000 square foot warehouse Barranca Parkway Interchange-CIDH pile inspection at expansion - Brea. the S.R. 133 Freeway-Irvine HUD Senior Housing-Driven concrete piles for four- Santa Fe Pacific Realty- 26 acre commercial and office story building- Gardena development -Anaheim Distress Investigations: Ingram Paper-296,000 square foot production and office facility - City of Industry Mr.Strauss has participated in studies to determine causes of distress to homes and larger structures. Projects Jay S. Crawford -8 unit residential development - include: City of Commerce Towers Condominiums-Pool and seawall distress Whittier Senior Apartments -Four-story apartment investigation-Newport Beach. complex- Whittier Manuel Home-Driveway distress investigation -Norco Branson Residence-Floor level survey on reconstructed FHP Hospitals - 500 square foot building addition- floor slab- Orange. Hawaiian Gardens THUMS -Subterranean oil pump station,-Long Beach Toys R'Us - 5000 square foot warehouse addition- Cerritos Brid es Fluid Structures: Wilson Street Bridge-Single span bridge over Etiwanda Channel-Rancho Cucamonga Chapman Avenue Storm Drain - Site investigation for a 7,000 foot storm drain - Garden Grove. Orange County Sanitation District Sewer- 26,000 foot sewer project - Garden Grove, Santa Ana,Anaheim. Irvine Center Drive Water Main- 23,000 foot reclaimed water line-Irvine. Texas/Dearborn Water Main - 18,000 foot reservoir to reservoir. 01/90 MOORE & TABER S r FILE IN CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERV I DUPLICATE OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHIT BUILDI VG INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION RECORD SSS 5(R 11/85) File Application PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE 2. County 1. NAME Winders, Ray Allen Last First Middle 3. School District or Owner ADDRESS 25149 Kerilyn Lane Number Street 4. Project Name HPmPt, Riverside. CA 92344 City County State ZIP Code 5. Estimated Cost PHONE 55714 ) 824-7210 HOME E ( 714 ) 929-8939 Area Code Area Code § ' _ ' 6. Date of Birth 7. Have you any minor or major physical defects or have you 8. Are you In employ of contractor for above building? Month Day Year ever been affected with any ailment which may impair your working efficiency? 0 YES NO 10 08 32 ❑ YES [] NO If yes,describe fully on the back of this form. i 9. Are you registered In California as a Construction Inspector? ❑ YES ❑ NO If yes,indicate your California Registered Construction Inspector Registration Number,and Divisions and Speclaltles In which you are registered. California Registration Number Divisions) If registered In Division ill Indicate specialties: ❑ 1. Mechanical ❑ 5. Comb.Bldg.Code ❑ 9. H.V.A.C. 0 13. Roofing ❑ 2. Electrical ❑ 6. Earthwork 0 10.Struct.Metals ❑ 14.Struct.Cod/ El 3. Concrete 0 7. Paving ❑ 11. Welding ❑ 4. Masonry ❑ 8. Plumbing ❑ 12. Pipeline -- 10. List all education related to building inspection work Graduate? Year YES NO Completed Education—Names and locations of schools attended List Courses Studied Fast High Srhool , Des Moines, Iowa English, Mechanical Draw X 1951 Junior College I College or University Degrees Drake University - Des Moines, Iowa Liberal Arts - 1 year - No Correspondence,Business or other schools International Correspondence Schools General Contracting Yes 1970 International Correspondence Schools Architectural Drafting No , 11. Complete Employment Record for the past ten years.Carefully note all qualifying experience.If more space Is needed,attach a separate page.(You may refer to previous project qualification record on which you listed your complete employment record.If so,state the project and application number.) From Occupations and Descriptions of Duties Performed Salaries Employers Reasons for Leaving Mo.-Yr I To Mo.-Yr. Received Names and Addresses 8/86 Pres Special (deputy) inspector in reinf. per C H J Incorporated concrete, masonry & prestressed conc. ratenlChTfon: Egq9 2Rrive Current 4/78 10/82 Manager Ames Conc. Block Co. Ames, IA 1800/ Iowa Concrete Block Plant Closed mo + WesL Deb production-sales-general management [linnet, 1477 Fuller Rd Moies. IA 10/66 10/7f Superintendent - Commercial Constr. 420/ Vawter & Walter Co. Lack of Work Layout Bldqs. , Supervise Trades - benef, 10550 New York Avenue Organize Work Des Moines, Iowa , Complete Application on Other Side of Sheet Architects,Structural or other applicable Professional Engineers shall forward this record as follows: — In Northern California,To: In Southern California,To: Office of The State Architect Office of The State Architect Office of the State Architect 5.0. Box 1073 1 Hawthorne Street,4th Floor 107 S. Broadway, Room 3029 iacramento, Ca 95FO5 San Francisco, CA 94105 Los Angeles,CA 90012 ' e ' 4 a C. ', at-41777:- 12. Is part time employment contemplated for i reject?If yes,give details below. YES NO fx) (x) X , 13. School work-do you have duties as Inspector on other school projects which require a portion of your time?If yes,list below by application numbers citing also the name and location of each school. 14. Other work-are you engaged In other projects or In a business or other employment which required a portion of your time?If yes, describe below and state the number of hours 01 your time daily or weekly which will be occupied by these activities. USE THIS SPACE FOR ADDITIONAL REMARKS I am employed by C H J Incorporated as a special (deputy) inspector. My duty as inspector on the school project shall be assigned and dispatched by C H J IncorporatE on a daily basis. I am working under the supervision of a California registered Civil Engineer within C H J Incorporated. NOTE— THE CERTIFICATE OF EMPLOYMENT SHALL BE EXECUTED BY AN AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE RESPONSIBLE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER WHO ARE TO SUPERVISE THE CONSTRUCTION BEFORE THIS QUALIFICATION IS SUB MITTED TO THE OFFICE.OF THE STATE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE MAINTAINED IN A PUBLIC RECORD FILE AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION. 15. CERTIFICATE OF APPLICANT.Read carefully before signing i Hereby Certify, Thar all answers to the questions on this form are true,and I agree and understand that any misstatement of material fact contained in this application will be sufficient cause for my immediate dismissal. If I undertake additional work, other than stated herein, I will secure prior approval from the School District/Owner, the Architect and/or Engineer,and the Office of the State Architect. If appointed, 1 will accept the responsibilities of inspector on the above;project and will discharge the duties imposed upon me by Sections 39140/81130 through 39156/81146 of the Education Code,or Sections 16000 througt 16023 of the Health and Safety Code. / will accept no remuneration or payment for my services from anyone but the School D;strict/Owner,or duly authorizec agen tither than the buil ing contractor). 5754,,.. / Date/ ie. CERTIFICATE OF EMPLOYMENT l�' APPROVAL OF INSPECTOR BY ARCHITECT, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER,OR OTHER Ray A. Winders is being employed by the APPLICABLE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER School District/Owner, or its duly authorized agent subject to the approval of the Architect, Structural Engineer, or other applicable professional engineer and the Office of the State Architect to provide competent, adequate and continuous Inspection during construction of this project. The Inspector shall Winders,I ,�, act under the direction of the Architect. Structural Engineer or other appli- Ray A. Winders is known to cable professional engineer as the Owner may direct, and be responsible to me, Is found qualified,and Is satisfactory to me t0 be the Inspector on this the Owner, project. Jfflclai/Owner Date Architect Date Title Structural Engineer Date address APPROVED: OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT oY (Supervising Structural tng,neer) Type or approval ate . -' t I International . City of Riverside No. 2012 j t ._._` I Conference of Building Officials , THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I RAY ALLEN WINDERS RAY WINDERS i CERTIFIED SPECIAL INSPECTOR - IS A LICENSED Reinforced Concrete FOR; STRUCTURAL MASONRY INSPECTION I The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED as a Special Inspector in the classification shown,having been so certified pursuant to and Masonry INSPECTOR j successful completion of the prescribed written 8ramir�tjq /42 IN THE CITY OF RIV RSIDE 1 i This card is issued(or a period of 3 years endi on:Si 1 ! 32134 Xlcy �' Ai/L.v 07/01/90 No. WWI valid unlesssigned by EXPIRES INALD W MEIGS BUILDING OFFICIAL 1 < t certificate holder. s .— -- ORANGE COUNTY '{ .� 1 t ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEME AGENCY I r _l U REGULATION NT ATION I International I ?7Y21 TRITON way.LAG1A4A onus,G$e6T 586 Conference of Building Officials f�;, PHONE:(714)472-7979 No. . • This Certifies 1i1r Ray A. Winders RAY ALLEN WINDERS as having qualified as a Special Inspector to knish ragweed oonanuoua CERTIFIED SPECIAL INSPECTOR irspectmom re"(of rnnr, prastr- cone, masonry FOR: REINFORCED CONCRETE INSPECTION eons:nrtton in ioxedaroo with Sieben 30a(a)of the Unbar Bu. ng Cod. The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED as a Special Inspector ( That nc Cemcatron does not autnonza nor wane approval of mewed Pewee- , in the classification shown,having been so certified pursuant to bon by the Bu.kR g Official 1 successful completion of the prescribed written examination. - I This card is issued for a period of 3 years ending on: 2,/f147 ( Valid from July 1,1959 to June 30,10:: n. I / / I�g94� Ha 17013 ' /I, 'a - t , --la - Cemfasd try ` MGR suuoreG FGPECTIDN DIVISION Got valid unless signed by F0250-191 4(R4/86) ` certificate holder. - CERTIRCATE OF REGISTRATION' COUNTY OF ANGELES 1p N VALIDATED.GOOD UNTIL 7 7 ` ' .50 TYPE WORK C International N SILO NO. Conference of Building Officials '/� 1 4ItiDERSa RAY A M 'V • RAY Al LFN WIA[DFRS 2514 9 KERILYN LANE CERTIFIED SPECIAL INSPECTOR HE MET, CA 92344 FOR- PRFSTRFSCFD CONCRETE The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED as a Special Inspector 714-929- 9 . - in the classification shown,having been so certified pursuant to Signature of .sij� successful completion of the prescribed written examination. \ Rpwtram /�`� ' This card is issued for a period of 3 sears nding op: 1-30-91 i//J 25462 t 4. fj�{// Not valid unless signed by k. -. .- certificate holder ., american concrete institute .t4 ' CALIFOflN1Az b EXPIRES ON BIRTHDAY br.n[N Llrl.ic Ray6169 A. hinders 484-28-4790-_._ C359 •ile I. jZay :sites .ir.Jers ...,....,..-.�..,.�.,.�. `T 1557 Locust St ,San Diego, CA 3[10o ,.0,.nn .u,...WW.y ���'�,,��J,�rn C dru ilzl -19 9cx 90-0a-32 ,,,. 4-12-86 ,. ..., . . ,. r. ` .�. . c.r Coo. lr A t1 1991 `11V., Xl. 4.a..,!..rrLeit-✓ Pr ,f1 / r 2b. How long has the person in charge been with your firm? Fulton, the Project Sponsor, started the company in 1981. Al Cantor and Dianne Murphy began work for Concept Marine in 1988. Warren Mills joined the firm in 1986. 2c List specific projects that this team has worked on together, as well as individually. Gordon Fulton is the President of this organization, and is typically involved to some degree in all projects at the management level. Likewise, Murphy would normally be involved at some level with all of Concept Marine's projects, since her role is that of systems and documentation controls. Mills' and Cantor's responsibilities are typically defined on a project basis. The three major key team members who would be assigned to this project, Cantor, Mills and Murphy, were involved together on the successful Santa Monica Municipal Pier project and are currently working as a team on the Vallejo Marina Expansion Phase I project. Prior to the Santa Monica Pier project, Cantor and Murphy worked together on a facility study for he County of Los Angeles. Mills and Murphy are working currently on other projects in Mexico and in the Los Angeles vicinity. The Team Formation Chart on the following page outlines how each of the recent project teams was constituted. Only the key team members assigned to the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier have been dealt with at length in this proposal. However the chart includes other members of Concept Marine's staff, who would be available to offer support, advice and/or assistance if needed. They are specialists in their fields, they have been involved in construction for some combined sixty years and are a wealth of information. Project Name and Location Fulton Cantor Mills Murphy O'Neill Matson Kramer 1 Condition Survey on ramp/ dock facilities at UCLA X X X Aquatic Center 2 Venice Pier Condition Survey X X X Venice, CA 3 Vallejo Municipal Marina Expansion, Vallejo, CA X X X X 4 Beach Refurbishments Phases I, II, III, IV&V X X X X X X Los Angeles, CA 5 Santa Monica Municipal Pier Santa Monica, CA X X X X 6 Marina del Rey Seawall Condition Survey&Repair X X Marina del Rey, CA 7 Redondo Beach Pier Redondo, CA X X 8 Marina Cabo San Lucas Cabo San Lucas, Mexico X X X 9 Wharf Number 2 Monterey, CA X X X 10 Antioch Municipal Marina Antioch, CA X X X X 11 Miller Park Marina Sacramento, CA X X 12 Newcomb Pier Santa Monica, CA X X 13 ACO Funding Study Los Angeles, CA X X X 14 Encinal Marina Alameda, CA X X 15 Cabrillo Isle Marina San Diego, CA X X 16 Sunroad Marina San Diego, CA X X 17 Cabrillo Marina Cabrillo Beach, CA X X This diagram is not intended to reflect all of Concept Marine's projects; rather it is designed to show relevant team configuration on jobs. 2d What percentage of each individuals'time will be devoted to this project? The schedule of fees in Section 3.b describes in detail the number of hours per month that we anticipated for each team member, based on our understanding of the project. During construction, however, Fulton will generally average from 6 to 8 hours per week on the project. Roughly half of that time will be spent at the site in construction meetings and walking over the project. Fulton intends to be actively engaged in the preconstruction activities, specifically in the review of the front end specifications and the bidding strategy. Al Cantor will be at the job-site on a full-time basis. During the preconstruction phase, he will focus on the constructibility aspects of the job. Warren Mills will be involved on an intermittent basis. His time will average 8 to 10 hours per week, with the majority of it spent on site during concrete operations. During the preconstruction phase, Mills will focus on the quality assurance aspects of the project, as well as evaluating the continuity between the plans, specifications and referenced standards. Dianne Murphy will average 4 to 6 hours per week on the project. During the initial preconstruction portions of the work, she will set up the various job-specific files and the necessary software that are required, and prepare project specific forms and reports. Clerical support will be made available to Cantor on site on an as-needed basis, which we anticipate to be about 6 to 10 hours per week. 2e. From what location will this office operate? It is assumed that the contract documents will require the contractor to provide an appropriately sized job-site trailer with furniture and phone lines. This local project office will be the principal center for our operations. Our Los Angeles office, the Northern California office and field offices are tied together via modem, fax, telephone and, of course, overnight delivery services. This gives us a corporate continuity and integration that would not have been thought possible three or four years ago. At the center of Concept Marine's communications system is a 286-base local area network (LAN) computer system with six terminals, expandable to twelve. Software programs include DBase III+, RBase (Rev. 3.0), the latest versions of multi-user Lotus and Wordstar programs, PMS schedule program (Dept. of Defense approved), and desktop publishing. This cost effective approach of setting up an on-site project office which is linked electronically to a central office with supporting staff, has been used successfully on most of our projects. Concept Marine's local Huntington Beach project office would have a business license, and pay City taxes on income earned from local operations. 1 2f Describe how the team will interact and interface with the architects, agency, contractor, etc The key concept here, as in all our jobs is: project control through coordination and information distribution. The central device used by Concept Marine for recording the activities, progress and problems at a job site is the weekly construction meeting. This involves the contractor's project manager, superintendent and/or project engineer, and our staff. During the first phases of the project, the design engineer is frequently invited to attend, to answer questions, speed up processing of submittals, and to generally observe the work. During pile driving, the geotechnical engineer is asked to attend if there are any difficulties in pile installation. Frequently, a representative of the City Engineer's office and the client Department, i.e., Parks Department, attend. The meeting is conducted by our construction manager, Al Cantor on a formal basis, with minutes distributed to all attendees and any other designated parties. At each meeting the minutes of the previous meeting are reviewed, and if necessary, they are amended. They then become a permanant part of the project record. Action items are highlighted by identifying the responsible party in the right hand colmn. A sample of these minutes is attached. All job-related correspondence, such as Requests for Information, Change Order Requests, submittals, memos and other communication between the City, the Engineer and the Contractor, must be transmitted through Concept Marine in the interest of control. We will monitor all paper documentation and issue regular reports via our data- base management system. Response time to questions, reviews and other required actions will be noted. Copies will be distributed to all appropriate parties, and a clear project audit trail of will be maintained. At the beginning of the project, specific communication matrixes are prepared by Murphy to identify distribution of all documentation, whether in its preliminary or final stage, to ensure that communication channels are defined and to avoid conflicts. Copies of the document control reports, sample key forms, and a sample of construction meeting minutes are included in Attachment A. 4 ABILITY TO PERFORM THE PROJECT 3a Show evidence of financial qualifications and fiscal stability. Concept Marine is financially sound. It has experienced continuous conservative growth since its inception in 1981. Its gross volume in the last two years has been in the $750,000 to $1,000,000 range. Attached you will find a letter from our bank attesting to our financial stability. A financial statement is available on a confidential basis,upon request. THE Financial Center BANK N.A. March 30, 1990 To Whom It May Concern: Re: Concept Marine Associates One Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710 Mr. Gordon Fulton, President of Concept Marine Associates has asked that I give you the benefit of our experience with his firm. The company has banked with us since December of 1987 and main- tains a depository relationship in excess of six figures. We have extended credit to Concept Marine Associates also to a six figure range, which they handle as agreed. As a condition of their credit relationship with us, we review the company' s financial statements on a monthly basis. The company has done a good job of complying with all financial covenants and is, in our opinion, a healthy, well run firm. We continue to be p1 ased with the company's progress and consider their relation- sh 'p valuable. Please feel free to phone me at (415) 836-2887 if yo have any additional questions or concerns. Si c rely, De . Fournier Vi President Oakland Regional Office • 1999 Harrison Street,Suite 2000 • Oakland,CA 94612 • (415)836-2887 • FAX(415)987-7732 SAN FRANCISCO • OAKLAND • SAN MATEO • WALNUT CREEK 1 1 3b. Describe the fee range you anticipate to perform these services (may be estimated as a percentage of the contract amount or as a monthly fee if desired). We have found that the most accurate'way of estimating our fees is to prepare an activity- based project schedule, based on our knowledge of the project, and to estimate the number of hours that each team member will spend for each activity on a monthly basis. The form of consultant fee, whether hourly with a not-to-exceed maximum, lump sum, or other approach, is open for discussion with the City. Accordingly,please find attached a tentative project schedule with associated fees. Consultants are shown on a cost basis. This is based on the assumption that some arrangement for direct payment from the City can be arranged. Any other sub-contracted work needed for the job, ie. surveying, can be added on the same unmarked-up basis. If this cannot be arranged, a fee of 15% for general and administrative expense and insurance costs, must be added. The hourly rates shown for Concept Marine include reasonable operating expenses as reproduction, telephone, photographs and video, postage, and local travel. Not included is travel outside the general project area, or reproduction of plans and specifications. I , . 1 , 7 ' MIN HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER - SCHEDULE & COSTS PRE-AWARD MONTHS Item 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Design Review Bid .: •:• ::: • Pre-Bid Meeting L Bid Analysis Award r . Mobilization Construct trestle ::.:.:.:,,,,,,..,,,,,,,x7 . . Demolition vivii,iiiiii:. Fabricate Piles . .. ::::.. .i• .,.::: . Drive Piles . ...........----....••••••••••••••••- Install Deck Finish&Demob •:• •:::, ---......._,„ Closeout ! Eg!............. HOURS & LABOR COSTS Labor Rate Total Project Sponsor $95 12 12 12 12 36 36 36 36 36 24 24 24 36 36 24 36 24 40 40 :S$0.:;02Q: Resident Engr $72 24 24 24 12 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 Quality Assurance $68 16 8, 24 24 8 9 40 88 88. 88 88 24 ..:S$4.04.0 MIS $54 16 32 24 24 24 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 ao tiii* • ..... ......... Clerical $32 6 4 8 4 12 16 16 16 16 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 40 SA0532:. Total CMA Manhours 58 48 , 44 44 280 252 252 252 270 258 259 290 350 350 338 350 250 290 296 4,531 CMA costs i:.4148 ii540 11.--;:-J124.: :..: l:299.....0.....;19 81 61:11,7....900',114904i!:Ill:960. i 1,9168::::I7.492 41566::::::.:49.:60„..i.i46.72. r.ii0t..........!i:!i:29..'1.......iiat...... Ji.948... ...., ii....I66..1.:..194..Ii.:-.!."11.,'.4:..80.::::1 Total Phase Costs 13808 __ 299572 .:$ 0.•; .. 0.0: !A 3b. Continued SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED FEES 1. Concept Marine Pre-construction activities $ 13,808 Construction activities 299,572 -_I $ 313,380 2. Moore and Tabor Design Review $ 3,400 Construction 44,300 Engineering and contingency 16,200 $ 63,900 3. CHJ Continuous pile mfg. inspection 35 days @ $50/hour $ 14,000 Laboratory allowance 2,500 $ 16,500 4. Smith-Emery Materials testing allowance $ 10,000 3c. Describe the organizational structure of your firm and how support is provided to the team. Understanding Concept Marine's size is important to understanding its organization. It is a relatively small, niche market firm. One of it's main strengths comes from being large enough to have the depth offer a variety of in-house disciplines, ie. estimating, scheduling, both project and construction management, and a dedicated management information system (MIS) program. However, it is small enough that, coupled with the day to day involvement of the president of the firm, allow it to react quickly to unforeseen occurances. It can make commitments i without red tape, consultation with layers vice-presidents, legal staff and risk managers. The company is organized along functional, relatively non-hierarchical lines which allow each employee to perform to the best of his or her ability, based on their experience and skill. The following diagram shows how Concept Marine is organized on a non-project basis. CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES ORGANIZATION PRESIDENT Gordon R. Fulton PROJECT SUPPORT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES MANAGEMENT L ADMIN DESIGN ESTIMATING QUALITY RESIDENT Consultants S. O'Neill S. Mattson R. Kramer ASSURANCE ENGINEERING W. Mills A. Cantor M.I.S. D. Murphy INSPECTORS CLERICAL 3d Outline your approach for providing the requested services Our general approach to this project is that we serve as expert extensions to your staff. Our team make up, individual functions, and general approach to the project have been discussed above. It is appropriate therefore for a specific breakdown of the tasks outlined on the first two pages of the Request For Proposals. The following program is designed to give Concept Marine full responsibility for administering the construction process, while keeping appropriate City staff fully informed of progress and events. The City would be relied upon principally to approve changes in the project cost, the completion schedule, or the scope of work. I. DESIGN PHASE A. Contracting Plan. Concept Marine Associates (CMA) will meet with City staff and the Engineer, to assess the construction to be performed and the project goals. We will then evaluate the bid documents, and make specific recommendations for an effective bid and construction strategy. B. Design Review. We will review the plans and specifications for constructibility, clarity and for continuity between the various components. We will suggest value engineering ideas for your consideration which will reduce cost and/or increase serviceability. Following the review, CMA will prepare a Design Review Report which includes the above analysis, with recommendations and a review of the Engineer's cost estimate. C. The "Front End" Specifications. We will provide a review of the Requirements and Conditions sections of the specifications (Part 1 and Part la), to ensure that the appropriate management and contract administration tools are in place. We will also prepare a recommended bid sheet. DELIVERABLE: Contracting Plan Design Document Review Report Contract Document Review Report 3d. Continued II. BID MANAGEMENT The bid process is the last opportunity to make a major impact on the cost of the project without having to limit or alter the scope of work. We will make every effort to assist the City and the Design Engineer to manage the bid process. A. Pre-Bid Activities 1. Refine the Bid Strategy. a. Refine the bid sheets and make recommendations for maximum control and flexibility, including unit prices, additive alternates, final pay quantities, etc. b. Conduct a telephone campaign to ensure maximum contractor participation in the bid process. 2. Inquiries. Support the City and the design engineer in screen and acting upon contractor inquiries. 3. Conduct Pre-Bid Meeting. a. Prepare an agenda and conduct an on-site pre-bid meeting, in conjunction with the Engineer and City personnel. The contract documents will be clarified and bidder inquiries will be addressed, as necessary. b. Describe and discuss the work with all qualified bidders. 4. Addenda Issuance. Assist the City and the design Engineer with the issuance of addenda as required. 3d Continued B. Post-Bid Activities. 1. Bid Analysis. a. Analyze all bids with regard to completeness, irregularities, bid item loading, subcontractor listings, compliance with affirmative action programs and small business set aside programs (if applicable). b. Review possible combinations of additive alternates and unit i cost extensions. 2. Pre-Award Conference. Meet with the apparent low bidder to perform a final review of the documents and job conditions. This is the last opportunity to clarify and resolve misunderstandings which could later result in claims. 3. Bidder Evaluation. a. Substantiate the contractor's qualifications, and review the background of prime contractor, major sub-contractors and suppliers. b. Make recommendations to the City and Design Engineer for determination of lowest responsible bidder and award. DELIVERABLE: Pre-bid Meeting Minutes Bid Opening Report Low Bidder Evaluation Report 3d Continued III. CONSTRUCTION PHASE A. Preconstruction Conference. We will prepare the agenda and conduct the preconstruction meeting, with the support the Owner and the Design Engineer. Among the topics which will be addressed are: 1. Introduction of key personnel. 2. Responsibilities of the Owner, the Engineer,jurisdictional agencies and the Contractor. 3. Formal lines of communication. 4. The conditions of the contract. 5. The Contractor's schedule. 6. Sub-contracts. 7. Change order procedures. 8. Progress payment procedures. 9. Payroll reporting procedures. 10. Limits of work. 11. Inspections and testing. 12. Labor and affirmative action requirements. 13. Contract closeout procedures. 14. Rights of way, easements and special access considerations. 15. Public Safety 16. Placement of signs and posters. 17. Handling of disputes. The Contractor will be asked to submit the following items for review and discussion: 1. Schedule (CPM) 2. Schedule of Values 3. Cash Flow and Manpower Projections 4. Schedule of Submittals 5. Safety Program 6. Affirmative Action Program(if applicable) Concept Marine will take and distribute notes. DELIVERABLE: Preconstruction Agenda Preconstruction Notes 3d Continued B. Construction Meetings. During the course of the work we will conduct weekly construction meetings to discuss, at a minimum, the following items: 1. Review of the previous weeks minutes. 2. Review of the previous weeks progress. 3. Review of outstanding submittals. 4. Projection of the next weeks progress. 5. Actual and potential changes in the work. 6. Safety. Representatives of the City and/or of the Design Engineer are frequently asked to attend. CMA will prepare and distribute meeting minutes to designated City personnel, the Engineer and the Contractor. DELIVERABLE: Meeting Minutes C. Schedule Management. One of the primary tasks to be accomplished at the construction meetings will be to review the schedule. During our review of the General Requirements, we will have recommended a variety of schedule management tools such as the requirement for computer generated CPM schedules, frequent contractor updates linked to progress billings, recovery schedules, superintendent overtime, etc. Slippage will be analyzed and strategies will be discussed to make up lost time without causing Contractor claims. Updated schedules will be required from the Contractor as a part of the progress payment request. If the revised schedules show a change in the overall completion date, the causes and impacts will be evaluated. DELIVERABLE: Updated Contractor Schedules D. Cost Control. A cost control system, based on the Contractor's schedule of values, approved change orders and the contract amount, will be administered to monitor progress costs. Monthly cost reports will be submitted to the City as a component of the Monthly Progress Report. DELIVERABLE: Monthly Cost Reports 3d Continued E. Change Orders. We will prepare all documentation relating to changes in the work, including Proposal requests, confirming estimates, and the actual change order form, for signature by the City and the design engineer. Upon approval by the City, we will prepare, log, and distribute change orders and administer their implementation. DELIVERABLE: Change Order (signed by Contractor) F. Progress Payment Requests. We will conduct monthly meetings with the Contractor, one week prior to his submittal of Progress Payment Requests, to discuss percentages of completion. Our experience has shown us that these meetings help to avoid Payment Request rejection, delayed payment and misunderstandings that lead to claims. We will verify quantities and ensure that values claimed are consistent with the project cost control documentation. We will then log and review Contractor requests for payment and transmit them to the Owner for approval. DELIVERABLE: Reviewed Contractor Progress Payment Requests G. Safety. While recognizing that the contractor retains full responsibility for safety, we will review the Contractor's safety program from the perspective of public safety and worker safety. We will verify that the Contractor holds regular safety meetings. If the City or the Design Engineer have special safety requirements,we will see that they are adhered to. H. Quality Assurance. We will have two primary functions to perform on this project: 1. Observation. Our on-site construction manager will provide continuous monitoring of the work to ensure that it conforms with the contract documents. At key points, our staff, along with the Design Engineer, will perform detailed inspections. resident on-site representative will provide continuous monitoring of the Contractor's work. 3d Continued 2. Inspection Coordination. We will coordinate all parties that have inspection responsibilities on this project including the Design Engineer, the geotechnical engineer, the pile manufacturing inspector, City forces (for code compliance), testing agencies and special inspectors as required by the contract documents. 3. We will monitor and verify all quality assurance programs required by the specifications. We may recommend special testing to ensure that the programs are being adhered to. Clarifications of Plans and Specifications. We will evaluate the Contractor's requests for clarification and attempt to screen questions which can be answered by a careful examination of the contract documents. If, in our opinion, the contract documents are unclear, we will meet with the Designer to determine his intent and advise the City of our opinion regarding the adequacy of the documents and the Designer's response. DELIVERABLE: Contractor's Request for Clarification Log Engineer's Structural Clarification File J. Submittals. Concept Marine will maintain a computer database to track submittals on this project. We will receive all contractor submittals and review them for general conformance with the contract documents and completeness. We will then log and route all shop drawings, samples and other submittals from the Contractor to the City and the Design Engineer. Responses will be logged and transmitted to the Contractor. Submittals will be tracked throughout the project to ensure timely response to avoid Contractor claims for delay. DELIVERABLE: Contractor Submittal Log K. Continuous Project Documentation. We will document the general progress of the job by means of the following: 1. Daily Work Reports. These reports detail the manpower and equipment utilization, job conditions, progress and any special or unusual occurrences. I I 3d Continued. li 2. Job Log. This handwritten log is maintained by the on-site construction manager and consists of an informal narrative of events and conversations of significance. 3. Video Tapes. Concept Marine uses video tapes on at least a weekly basis for general documentation purposes, and as needed to show significant processes or work where method or time duration is important. Our video cameras are equipped with date and time imprint capabilities. 4. Photographs. Photographs are taken on a regular basis to show general progress and to show specific details. Like our video cameras, our 35mm job cameras are equipped with date and time imprint capabilities. Job photos are labeled and arranged chronologically in a photo album at the job site. DELIVERABLE: Daily Work Reports Project Photo Album Job Log L. Monthly Progress Reports. In addition to receiving copies of key correspondence and meeting minutes, you will be kept up-to-date with monthly progress reports consisting of the following: 1. A narrative description of the status and progress of the job. 2. A Master Trend Log which details potential and approved changes. 3. A Job Cost Report with graphic support. 4. Relevant job photographs. - DELIVERABLE: Monthly Progress Report M. Project Files. Complete and current project files will be kept at the jobsite, or at a location agreeable to the City, and shall be available to the City at all times. These files will consist of the contract, correspondence relating to or modifying the contract, proposal requests, clarifications, permits, logs, reports, etc. 3d Continued N. Closeout Activities. We will oversee and coordinate the closeout of the contract as follows: 1. Punch-List. We will assist the City to prepare a list of incomplete or defective work (punch-list) when the Contractor has reached substantial completion. We will then provide reasonable inspection, to ensure that the incomplete work or defective work has been remedied, and coordinate the final inspection with the City and the Design Engineer. If there are any remaining punch-list items to be corrected, we will expedite their completion before recommending acceptance to the City. Additionally, we will oversee the Contractor's delivery of all keys, manuals, record drawings and maintenance stocks. 2. Record Drawings. During the progress of the work contract, we will ensure that the Contractor makes continuous notation of changes and actual locations of items of work is made by the Contractor. During the closeout phase of the contracts we will, at the City's option, transmit the as-built drawings to the Engineer for preparation of the final record drawings. DELIVERABLE: Reviewed As-Built Drawings 3e. Outline the items that will be ind idod in periodic project status reports. Concept Marine routinely issues a Project Progress Report on a monthly basis. Normally, this report is issued within the first ten days of the following month. This report usually consists of a summarized narrative discussing the month's activities, a Cost & Comparison to Budget Report, a Trend Report indicating all potential increases in costs or time extension, graphic illustrations of progress and photographs. Other special items can be included if the client so desires, however, the primary function of this report is to supply succinct management information to those not intimately involved with the project, but with a need to be kept abreast of general progress and activities. A copy of a Progress Report is included in Attachment A. At the end of the project, since all documentation is the property of the Owner, a project manual will be issued. This manual will comprise all pertinent documents relating to the project and the final progress report. Unless specifically requested, individual monthly reports will be excluded from the final project manual. The project closeout manual may be reproduced on in either paper or microfiche. 3f Describe any unique problems perceived concerning this project and what solutions you would propose. Our experience on piers, heavily used beach construction projects, and our visits to the Huntington Beach Pier site, have prepared us to deal with the following areas of concern. PRECONSTRUCTION Few construction bids. There are only five, six or seven construction firms with the adequate equipment and personnel to perform the work. One of them owns an existing trestle system. If the other contractors perceive this contractor to have a substantial advantage, and if there is other work to bid, the response to this project will not be favorable. Concept Marine knows, and has worked with, most of these contractors. We will conduct a bid campaign to maximize contractor participation. The low bid exceeds available funds. Cost estimating for this type of work is extremely difficult. Even if the Engineer's estimate matched the available funds, it would be prudent for the City, the Design Engineer, and Concept Marine to develop contingency plans in the event that bids exceed funds. Among the available strategies are phasing, additive alternates, design/build negotiations, or delaying the project. This should be worked out prior to bidding so that the specifications allow the City maximum flexibility. THE COMMUNITY Safety of the public. Once construction begins, public safety becomes a major concern. Huntington Beach is an active, crowded and dynamic public area. We have learned that no amount of signage or warning tape will keep people from jogging under the construction, seeking shade from the structure (even picnicking), or wandering through the fenced-off construction yard. Two of several possible approaches to dealing with the problem are solid fence barriers, with one or more protected passages under the construction, or the maintaining of a suspended tight mesh safety net throughout demolition and construction. Disruption of local businesses, roads and beach activities. Disruption is an inevitable consequence of the construction process. Concept Marine's approach would be to plan and organize to minimize the disruption and to defuse the community resentment which results from the process. 4 r 3f Continued. Two possible approaches to solving the problem can be performed by either the City or by Concept Marine. One would be to meet regularly with representatives of local, impacted organizations such businesses, i.e., Maxwell's, the snack bars, the local volley ball organization, and possibly the local surfer organization. An alternate or supplemental approach might be to have a bulletin board that informs and updates the community on what is happening, what construction techniques are being employed and, roughly,when the project will be completed. CONSTRUCTION The contractor's staging yard. The yard location needs to be thought out carefully, in terms of size, location, access to the road for 120' long pile delivery trucks, and access to the trestle staging zone. Employee safety. These days, it is not enough to leave the full safety program up to the Contractor. If there is an industrial accident, the City, Concept Marine, and even the Engineer will be implicated, even though not directly involved in the = " incident. The specifications should be very thorough about the requirements for a safety program, its implementation, and safety meetings. Concept Marine will review the Contractor's safety program, audit its implementation and call any potential safety problems it sees to the Contractor's attention. Pile driving. The pile driving operation will probably encounter some difficulty during its execution, whether from geotechnical causes or debris obstructions. How this is handled will be a major subject of discussion between the City, the Design Engineer, our geotechnical consultant and ourselves. This is a subject more appropriately addressed in the specification review portion of the work. Pollution control. Most large contractors are familiar with pollution control procedures relating to their pile driving hammer, vibratory hammer and other equipment with fluids and fuels. However, given the newly sensitized community awareness of pollution, it would be prudent to engage in preventative steps and not just rely on thorough clean-up procedures. Non-polluting operations, which may have only the appearance of polluting, should be addressed. 3f Continued Quality control. Quality control problems are present on most projects, to some extent. The City, by recognizing the need for full time inspection, has reduced the risk of major quality control problems on this project. However, Concept Marine will perform a full review of quality assurance procedures, and prepare a Project Quality Assurance Manual, based on requirements of the specifications, our experience and previously prepared in-house QA manuals, for review by all of the team members, and for use by the construction management team. CONTRACTOR PLANNING Even the biggest and best contractors make false assumptions and do not properly plan out certain activities. It is Concept Marine's practice to meet with the Contractor, not as a part of the preconstruction meeting, to discuss, in a pro-active supportive manner, the Contractor's approach, equipment and procedures for the whole job. It is easier to deal with contractor planning problems before construction starts than it is in the full swing of construction activities, when the tendency might be to look for blame and claims. 3g. Describe what motivational programs you have used to maintain performance on projects. "CORPORATE CULTURE" As a small firm, there is a degree of non-hierarchical freedom that cannot be recreated within larger firms. Each of the team members knows that they are not impeded by red- tape and a bureaucratic attitude. The policy of Concept Marine is to hire top-notch, senior people, give them a very competitive compensation package, integrate them into a team, and give them the freedom and responsibility to do their best. TEAM INTEGRATION Concept Marine's team approach, which is based on trust and reliance between the team members, is a crucial element in maintaining an esprit de corps. Cantor, who will be the only full-time team member on site, will be in constant contact with the other supporting members of the team. INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCE All the members of Concept Marine's team are professional, senior, seasoned construction administration people. Construction management is often a stressful occupation, especially for the full-time on-site person. In Al Cantor, the project will have a very senior engineer with substantial experience administering projects from the field. TEAM EXPERIENCE The team of Fulton/Cantor/Mills/Murphy has worked together on several projects, and there is a high degree of confidence in each others skills and abilities. PROJECT SPONSOR Fulton, as the president of Concept Marine and the Project Sponsor, has as one of his key responsibilities the job of monitoring morale, to keep the team and the individuals on it from being stymied or feeling forgotten. Furthermore, his regular involvement on the team makes him accessible whenever the need arises. 3h. Provide a list of references showing project name, address, telephone number and contact person: 1. Marina del Rey Seawall Project, and L.A. Beach Refurbishment Programs Phases IV and V Mr. Eric Bourdon, Assistant Director Department of Beaches and Harbors County of Los Angeles 13837 Fiji Way Marina del Rey, CA 90292 (213) 305-9524 2. Newcomb Pier Reconstruction Municipal Pier Reconstruction Mr. Stan Scholl, Director of General Services City of Santa.Monica 1685 Main Street Santa Monica, CA 90401 (213) 458-8221 3. General Consultation Mr. Bruce Seaton Port of Los Angeles Construction Management Division 425 South Palos Verdes Street San Pedro, CA 90731 (213) 519-3527 4. Marina Cabo San Lucas Cabrillo Isle Marina, San Diego Mr. Harry Nelson Almar Ltd. Almar Plaza 28441 Highridge, Suite 110 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 (213) 541-3830 3i Furnish proof of the following minimum insurance requirements with proposals: General Liability- coverage$1,000,000 CSL per occurrence (Note: If provided coverage is under a form which includes a designated general aggregate the limit must be no less than$1,000,000.) Professional Liability coverage - $500,000 per occurrence (Note: A claims made policy is acceptable). Workers' Compensation coverage in the amount of not less than $100,000 bodily injury by accident, each accident, $100,000 bodily injury by disease, each employee, $250,000 bodily injury by disease,policy limit. Concept Marine's general liability policy conforms to the City's requirements. A copy of the binder is attached. Our professional liability policy is based on a limit of $250,000. However, as indicated by the attached letter from our broker, we have the capability to augment the policy to the required $500,000 if the City awards the CM contract to Concept Marine. Our workers' compensation policy limits are substantially higher than required ($1,000,000). Please note that many of the construction management activities take place over the water. Accordingly, Federal Longshoreman and Harbor Workers Compensation is required. This is included in our policy. ACORIL INSURANCE'DINDER .- -""x .. - ISSUE DATE(MM/DD/YY) 3/6/90 mt THIS BINDER IS A TEMPORARY INSURANCE CONTRACT, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM !PRODUCER COMPANY BINDER NO. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS M90X303 DURHAM AND BATES AGENCIES, INC. EFFECTIVE TIME DATE EXPIRATION DATE TIME '- -I330 S. W. 6TH AVENUE X AM 12:01AM PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 3/4/90 12:01 PM NOON THIS BINDER IS ISSUED TO EXTEND COVERAGE IN THE ABOVE NAMED COMPANY PER EXPIRING POLICY NO: I CODE SUB-CODE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSNEHICLES/PROPERTY(Including Location) INSURED I CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 SPINNAKER WAY BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94710 1 COVERAGES ALL LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS TYPE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE/FORMS AMOUNT DEDUCTIBLE COINSUR. PROPERTY CAUSES OF LOSS BASIC BROAD SPEC. -I GENERAL LIABILITY •GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 1 ,000 I X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PROD.—COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $ .1.,0 0 0 X CLAIMS MADE }{OCCUR PERSONAL&ADVTSNG.INJURY $ 1 ,0 0 O OaltediteitiaCTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,,0 0 0 FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $ 50 RETRO DATE FOR CLAIMS MADE: MED.EXPENSE(Any one person) $ 1 AUTOMOBILE - ALL VEHICLES SCHEDULED VEHICLES CSL $ LIABILITY BI PERS/ACCID $ I NON/OWNED PD $ HIRED MED.PAY $ GARAGE PIP $ UM $ IAUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE ALL VEHICLES SCHEDULED VEHICLES ACV ' COLLISION DED. STATED AMOUNT $ OTC DED: OTHER 'EXCESS LIABILITY EACH AGGREGATE SELF-INSURED OCCURRENCE RETENTION UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM RETRO DATE FOR CLAIMS MADE: STATUTORY WORKER'S COMPENSATION $ (EACH ACCIDENT) AND EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY $ (DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT) $ (DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE) SPECIAL CONDITIONS/RESTRICTIONS/OTHER COVERAGES NAME&ADDRESS MORTGAGEE ADDITIONAL INSURED LOSS PAYEE LOAN N AUT ORIZED REPRZESSENTAATIVE ACORD 75-S(2/88) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 fTitra\i,,.-� . D RHAM AND BATES AGENCIES,INC. _ -- INSURANCE BROKERS S AGENTS I March 22, 1990 Mr. Gordon Fulton, President Concept Marine Associates, Inc. 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, California 94710 RE: PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY Dear Mr. Fulton: As per our phone conversation today, enclosed you will find Confirmation of Insurance effective March 14, 1990. We will forward the original policy as soon as it is issued by underwriters. In the meantime, should you have any further questions, do not hesitate to call. Underwriters have agreed to increase your limit from $250,000 to $500,000 if necessary, and have quoted an additional premium of $6, 880 plus California state taxes and fees. (This is with the same deductible at $25,000) We will await to hear from you should you require this increase for the Huntington Beach project. Sincerely, DURHAM AND BATES AGENCIES, INC. Marie J. Te esco Account Administrator MJT:hs RECEIVED Enclosures MAR 2 61990 ConceptM nine ... ... .. en., .... nor r_n. o-. nw rent r niiouwu cTI TC1 CY Il1SA 71-14a- 084 PHONE 15031224-517: FAX 15031 221-0540 N° 16753 CONFIRMATION OF INSURANCE TO: Concept Marine Associates, Inc. 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, California 94710 DATE: March 21 , 1990 We confirm that acting upor. your instructions and for your account we have procured insurance. subject to all cl' the terms and conditions hereinafter staid?. from the Insurer(s) listed below.a. follows: 1) NAMED INSURED: CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. 2) MAILING ADDRESS: 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA. 94710 3) POLICY PERIOD: March 14, 1990 — March 14 1991 4) COVERAGE: Design/Build Professional Liability 5) SUBJECT TO: 1. RETRO DATE: INCEPTION. 2. Design/Build Limitation Endorsement_ 3. 25% Minimum & fully earned premium. - 4. Proof of CGL Coverage. 6) LIMIT OR AMOUNT. $250,000 Per Claim & Annual Aggregate (Defense Expense Within Limit) 7) U/L LIMITS/RETENTION/DEDUCTIBLE:DEDUCTIBLE , T25,000 Per Claim G) PREMIUM $22,932.00 + State Tax $697.96 See #12 Below 9) RATE: N/A 10) INSURER(S): London Companies as managed by H. S. Weavers 11) POLICY #: 135400021 12) + Stamping Fee $22.93 + Broker Fee $575.00 IN THE EVENT OF CANCELLATION. PRODUCER HEREBY AGREES TO PAY ANY EARNED PREMIUM. NO FLAT CANCELLATION ALLOWED. 30 Days Premium due on or before from rn maptiun This Trts:;ranee is subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Cover Note. Certificate of Insurance and/or Policy which may be issued, The Undersigned are not the Insurers. however Insurance has been effected by Dimock & Associates Inc. Insurance Brokers. t �.19' R11) .UI i VI{ ATES k. , `..:v, I<t ��. :A�..+ L'.� t,.:;.'.. .�;t.a ,�.at:t� tf"� f�.•i t'• t,. ',,%- " iGE-ii C,f•1i$Ai , Ii l' n :,4 -Y i: :{ .fi �fPitR�#110E BROFERS, 0--.).S, ;vi I 3 2 a�'-t'' BY t !� ;? ��� rk. �r DIMOCK & ASSOCIATES INC.. INSURANCE BROKERS `, .. one�24-"51T0 t ; ,k,. C++• �n. 56 't'i L u r lip. ,. .F. 4•.,,,•,36 :M i3C7i �l�VEII17E 1i s.� ' • �t'� Policy Number Previous Policy Number COVERAGE IS PROVIDED BY 8 09 WP 80404114 8 09 WP 02950024 NATIONAL SURETY - CORPORATION CHICAGO, IL c td) A STOCK INSURANCE CO. (07) '-' NCCI Carrier Code 12866 FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANIES Producer Name and Address MAILA�.�9ESS NO\4'O CALIFC;NIA DEALEY, RENTON - ARCH. & ENG. P.O. BOX 12675 OAKLAND CA 94604 WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY INSURANCE INFORMATION PAGE 1 . The Insured and Mailing Address CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. I SPINNAKER WAY BERKELEY CA 94710- The Insured is a CORPORATION Other workplaces not shown above: 13763 FIJI WAY, SUITE EU-2 MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 2. The Policy Period is from 07-01-89 to 07-01-92 12:01 A.M. Standard Time at the Insured's Mailing Address 3. A. Workers' Compensation Insurance: Part one of the policy applies to the Workers' Compensation laws of the states listed here: CALIFORNIA B. Employers' Liability Insurance: Part two of the policy applies to work in each state listed in item 3.A. The Limits of our Liability under part two are: BODILY INJURY BY ACCIDENT $1 ,000,000 EACH ACCIDENT BODILY INJURY BY DISEASE $1 ,000,000 POLICY LIMIT BODILY INJURY BY DISEASE $1 ,000,000 EACH EMPLOYEE C. Other States Insurance: Part three of the policy applies to all states except NEVADA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, WASHINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA, WYOMING, states designated in item 3.A of the Information Page and: NO OTHER D. This policy includes these endorsements and schedules SEE EXTENSION OF INFORMATION PAGE This Information Page WC 00 00 01 A is issued in conjunction with and forms part of policy Form WC 00 00 00 WC - 1 f Policy Number 8 09 WP 80404114 Named Insured 1 CONCEPT MARINE ASSOC INC 4� FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE INFORMATION PAGE WC 00 00 01 A (CONTINUED) COMPANIES MAIL ADDRESS NOVATO CALIFORNIA 4. The Premium for this policy will be determined by our manuals of rules, classifications, rates and rating plans. All information required in the 111 schedules attached to and made part of this Information Page is subject to verification and change by audit . ) CLASSIFICATION OF OPERATIONS: SEE EXTENSION OF INFORMATION PAGE Total Estimated ANNUAL Premium $ 4,416 . Includes California Surcharge of $ 43 Minimum Premium $1 ,000 Deposit Premium $ 4,416 Interim adjustments of premium shall be made A , UALLY All is ,•y., ;', ENT TES Countersignature of Autho ' e Agent: lot ..— Countersignature Date: Z Date of Issue 06-08-89 Issuing Branch EAS BAY Copyright 1987 National Council on Compensation Insurance I. I WC - 2 Policy Number 8 09 WP 80404114 Named Insured CONCEPT MARINE ASSOC INC `(� FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE ITEM 4. EXTENSION OF INFORMATION PAGE WC 00 00 01 A COMPANIES MAIL A:CAESS NO.A'O CALICO='.IA WORKERS' COMPENSATION SCHEDULE STATE CALIFORNIA Rating Period 07-01-89 TO 07-01-90 Company 07 Premium BasislRates I Estimated Iper S1O01Estimated Total Annual lof Remu-lAnnual Code No. Classifications Remuneration Ineration1Premiums 8601 1 ENGINEERS-CONSULTING-MECHANICAL, 139,300 1 .54 2, 145 CIVIL, ELECTRICAL AND MINING ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS, NOT ENGAGED IN ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION-N.P.D. •8810 1 CLERICAL OFFICE EMPLOYEES - N.O.C. 93,300 .83 774 8742 1 SALESPERSONS - OUTSIDE 104,000 1 .35 1 ,404 TOTAL CLASSIFICATION PREMIUM FOR THE STATE 4,323 TOTAL ESTIMATED STANDARD PREMIUM 4,323 California US L&H Endorsement Charge 50 California Surcharge 43 TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL PREMIUM 4,416 WC - 3 Policy Number 8 09 WP 80404114 Named Insured CONCEPT MARINE ASSOC INC FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE ITEM 3.D. EXTENSION OF INFORMATION PAGE WC 00 00 01 A COMPANIES MAIL ADDRESS NOVATO CALIFORNIA ENDORSEMENTS - WORKERS' COMPENSATION The following Named Endorsement(s) apply: MARITIME EXCLUSION ENDORSEMENT (WC 00 02 02) The following Named Endorsement(s) apply to the States shown: STATE CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION ENDORSEMENTS (WC 99 03 01 01 86) LONGSHOREMEN'S AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT COVERAGE ENDORSEMENT - CALIFORNIA (WC 04 01 01 ) CALIFORNIA - GROUP POLICY ENDORSEMENT (WC 99 03 02) and it is completed as follows: Group Name: CALIFORNIA ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS AND SAFETY ASSOCIATION EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY COVERAGE AMENDATORY ENDORSEMENT - CALIFORNIA (WC 04 03 60) WC - 4 ATTACHMENT A SAMPLE REPORTS AND DOCUMENTATION This section is attached to show the range of reports referred to in the body of the proposal, and by highlighting certain entries, to demonstrate how the entire process inter- relates within our project management data base. 1. Progress Report 2. Documentation Control This data can be supplied in a wide range of reports. The report attached, entitled "List of Incoming/Outgoing Correspondence", indicates by numerical sequence the documents sent or received, where the documents can be located and the subject matter. Correspondingly, the report entitled "List of Incoming/Outgoing Correspondence Sorted by File" gives a more detailed breakdown of all documentation pertaining to specific subjects. 3. Transmittal- Submittal Form This form can be used for a variety of transmittals, such as actual Submittals, Change Orders, Progress Payments and miscellaneous items where a specific letter is not required. It shows the document's unique identification and designates or requests specific actions. 4. Submittal Log From the sample of the Submittal Form in the previous attachment, you will note that data is included in the submittal log for status reporting on each submittal. This can also be cross referenced with the correspondence reports discussed in Item 2 above. 5. Master Trend List This depicts all identified changes, additions, clarifications or deviations to the original scope, together with the actual contractual changes. Data for this report usually emanates from correspondence between the Contractor and Construction Manager in the form of letters or field memos. To document the activity formally, a Change Order Request is prepared requesting all pertinent data relating to the specific changes and/or additions. This Change Order Request also becomes a specific item in the Submittal Log and can be tracked as to status within that report. 6. Change Order Request Form This document is discussed in the item above; however, you will note the inter- ; relationship of the document identifier number in the correspondence tracking system described in Item 2 above. 7. Construction Meeting Minutes This document is created on a stand-alone basis because it contains multiple topics, is integrated into the data base by its document number. Note the order of topics discussed and the calling of attention to action responsibilities. ConcoptMarine City of Santa Monica Municipal Pier Reconstruction PROGRESS REPORT November 1989 City of Santa Monica Municipal Pier Reconstruction CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS November 1989 Forming for Pour No. 10, the last pour, continued until November 8. The final pour was made the same day and consisted of 233 cubic yards of concrete. During the month, deck sills were placed and this operation was completed by the end of November. The 4" by 16" fascia timber was being placed and installation was nearly complete at month's end. Decking placement resumed on November 13. By the end of November, 80 percent of the handrailing had been installed and posts grouted. The stairway to the west fishing deck was completed and about 75 percent of the ramp was in. Amelco placed sewer and water lines under the deck and EDI installed electrical conduit, also below the deck. Some catwalk was installed under the new pier. Concept Marine SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL PIER Construction Contractors Costs AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1989 Projected final iCuMulatiVe - Period Material Equipment Labor Additives Subtotal Fee Target Cost Total 1 Jan 4 - 26, 1989 $37,564.00 $194,306.00 $26,495.00 $15,275.00 $273,640.00 $48,416.67 $322,056.67 $322,056.67 2 Jan 27- Feb 23, 1989 $237,839.00 $47,325.00 $54,194.00 $31,199.00 $370,557.00 $48,416.67 $418,973.67 $741:;03034 3 Feb 24 - Mar 23, 1989 $362,107.00 $56,776.00 $74,461.00 $45,686.00 $539,030.00 $48,416.67 $587,446.67 $1,328,477.01 4 Mar 30-Apr 27, 1989 $363,647.00 $76,494.00 $94,374.00 $59,147.00 $593,662:00 ' $48,416.67 $642,078.67 $1',97.0;555.68 5 Apr 28- May 25, 1989 $361,731.00 $63,861.00 $68,828.00 $45,268.00 $539,688.00 $48,416.67 $588,104.67 $2,558,660.35 6 May 26-Jun 22, 1989 $75,273.00 $142,444.00 $71,741.00 $44,981.00 $334,439:00' $48,416.67 $382,855.67 : $2,941;516 7 Jun 23-Jul 23, 1989 $144,632.00 $67,432.00 $107,465.00 $71,124.00 $390,653.00 $48,416.67 • $439,069.67 $3,380,585.69 8 Jul 23-Aug 24, 1989 $265,735.00 $65,787.00 $107,080.00 $72,132.00 $510,734.00 $48,416.67 $559,150.67 '$3,939,736:36 9 Aug 25-Sep 28, 1989 $636,158.00 $79,058.00 $125,382.00 $84,133.00 $924,731.00 $48,416.67 $973,147.67 . $4,912,884.03 10 Sep 29- Oct 26, 1989 $124,400.00 $44,154.00 $106,641.00 $71,634.00 $346,829:00 $48,416.67 $395,245.67 :$5;308,1.29.70 11 Oct 27- Nov 16, 89** $268,620.00 $30,304.00 $84,626.00 $60,983.00 $449,504.63. $48,416.67 $497,921.30 45,8060.1.;.00: 12 Billed to date $2,877,706.00 $867,941.00 $921,287.00 $601,562.00 $5,273,467.63 $532,583.37 $5,806,051.00 Balance to go $505,694.37 $48,416.63 $554,111.00 Revised Contract Value $5,779,162.00 $581,000.00 $6,360,162.00 Pending Changes $542,204.00 : $20,303.00 $562,507.00 Projected Final Costs $6,321,366.00' $601,303.00 $6,922,669.00 ** - Includes adjustments by Kiewit in Subtotal of$4971.63 Construction Contract Value 1 ..Cumulative Description Subtotal Fee Total Total . . , Original Contract $5;772 00000. $581,000.00 $6,353,000.00 $4,353;000 00 Change Order No. 1 $7;162;00 $0.00 $7,162.00 $6;3600:62;00 Change Order No. 2 .$6;360;162.00: Change Order No. 3 : 46,360.,18.2,00 TOTAL $5;779,162.00 . $581,000.00 $6,360,162.00 Concept Marine SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL PIER Construction Contract AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1989 7 Projected Final Target Cost including fee $6,922,669 6 — Completion date January 19, 1994 5 — Cumulative actual cost Original Target Cost 0 4 — to date including fee including fee o $5,806,051 $6,353,000 o Completion date 3 _ January 16, 1990 2 — 1 — 0 i ► i i i i i r i i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 o — Monthly billings + — Cumulative billings 21-Dec-89 MASTER TREND LIST SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL PIER AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1989 WOO" - :qopp-Ar CO .. . Targetpzia Pending Approved Schedule MR:-.7010.04 :.!QM,..,;:tick,.:,...„:,.... :.:9.00:0100:t.t,,,....„. :..., ::Ctiii..0.0Nittileii, .,.,...ighaptiA:„,„ ,,,potgrigrigioiL.,_ q•400:goi;, :i:L__„:i19001.4(Nt: . ., _, 1 - Supply electrical light poles $40,000.00 $40,000.00 per original design&spec 2 2 Move Contractor's storage yard for circus $5,995.00 $5,995.00 3 1 Change concrete pile mix $0.00 $0.00 design 4 1 Delete chain link protection ($9,100.00) ($9,100.00) for high-voltage conduit 5 1 Add 3 days to schedule $0.00 $0.00 3 days due to inclement weather 6 1 Revise misc. metals cost ($13,583.00) ($13,583.00) 7 1 Revise treated timber cost ($2,814.00) ($2,814.00) 8 1 Revise rebar cost $32,659.00 $32,659.00 9 3 Modify pile installation procedure $454,870.00 $454,870.00 9A 3 Time extension for pile $0.00 $0.00 69 days driving 6/21 -9/29=69 days 10 3 Move office trailer $2,809.00 $2,809.00 11 - Purchase &install additional J bolts $2,819.00 $2,819.00 12 - Furnish &install additional Waffle Slab resteel TBD TBD 13 2 8" waterline offset/bikepath $1,184.70 $1,184.00 14 2 Additional 4" butterfly valves $1,082.50 $1,082.00 15 2 6" expansion joint restraining rods at fire hydrants $920.70 $920.00 16 2 New thrust anchor detail $12,328.00 $12,328.00 3 days 17 - Relocate lumber yard $9,266.00 $9,266.00 18 2 Time entension -mechanical No impact to overall work on existing pier $0.00 $0.00 schedule (47 days) 19 2 Final concrete pile footage adjustment ($24,012.02) ($24,012.00) 20 - Filling countersunk sill holes $646.00 $646.00 21 - Delete bollard lighting CREDIT TBD CREDIT TBD 21-Dec-89 MASTER TREND LIST SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL PIER AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1989 g • •• • • . .. . . .. . .. ..................,.::::....................,....,.........,...._...........,..........,.....: j.t. mi i0.0mr.tr. COi. Togoti'ocig. .;. •••••••• !Pending Approved Target...... . .,.. . ... ... ............................................................................................................................................;:c.t.i400.:Y#140:.,......„.....................:QM090h.J...........todC.041)....................... _,_ _ ) ii-Otititk* „.„... ...... 22 - Delete stancions at transformer pad CREDIT TBD CREDIT TBD 23 - Rebar clearance tolerance TBD TBD 24 - Stain beams&columns 475 475 25 3 Extra lumber $22,106.00 $22,106.00 26 - Facia change $11,716.00 $11,716.00 27 - Amelco Firehose valves& additional hydrant TBD TBD 28 - Time delay due to concrete delivery problems TBD TBD 29 - Extra rebar at C52 1/2 TBD TBD 30 - Extra handrail tab at C52 1/2 TBD TBD Current completion date thru Total Changes $549,367.88 $542,204.00 $7,162.00 Change Order 1 -Jan 19, 1990 - Mod. pile installation fee $20,303.00 $20,303.00 Concept Marine • 'alI1 +3' 4.i_' .,, ^ • �w - < Waffle deck completed with 3 x 6 Hailers in place. t t_ _ter•=�. — � .. C z .s ��• • i .row ..:tap.. ..... `4., . tfr" .. 1,1/ ii N t. Handrail installation. > „•ii Note trestle demolition __ • - r_{ n • _y` '1_y � 11• qI i �fl 1. -�—r_a 'ter.. Rini --sr��il�a tir �' ■ -- i l « -t ��Or'1.y``� .-�...-- !ice ---110011 -- - - . ,---- . ' "'lir",-- . - ___,.. „•• •*/ Liair' . fi'_ NOVEMBER 1989 _ Concept_ —___'_-____ Con.rpt Marine et _ , - .. _eillifir • ,., dew s> 1' , • i MI t1 .. , lif f i . 1 ' 1 frk_ry ,. . 1 ,. .. ._ Ill a ___„,... .. , .,..,,7 : li, .....„iiii,„.„..,:..1.....:...........,;; _ , , 4,1,1 1.7.r....... . .•,., . • i Waffle deck under pier pii int... . ..: .. . ...., i- 1 id loi ...6.6., i .. , . . .. i4 ' ; i 11 iimilli . , —-. - 1 ' p:ii Handrail installation and waffle decking taken from fish deck 1 1 DECEMBER 1989 I i Responsibility: SBO/WSM LIST OF INCOMING / OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 1 DATE DATE IN/OUT COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED LOG FILE Doc type FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT REMARKS JOB NO: 9001 LA Phase IV - Chautauqua Jan-26-90 0 100 3600 F WSM Boykin Copy of submittal log for reference Feb-05-90 0 101 3601 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 1 - Plumbing fixtures for review Feb-05-90 0 102 3602 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 2 - Concrete Mix Design for review Feb-05-90 0 103 3603 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 3 - Electrical Fixtures & Lighting for review Feb-05-90 0 104 3604 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 4 - Roof Tile for review Feb-05-90 0 105 3606 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal NO. 6 - Wire Mesh Screen & Entry doors for review Feb-05790 0 106 3608 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 8 - Toilet Room Acccessories For review Feb-05-90 0 107 3609 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 9 - Hardware for doors for review Feb-05-90 0 108 3610 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 8 - Roll Up Doors for review Feb-07-90 0 109 3613 LOT WSM Yee Original Certificates of Insurance Submittal No. 13 Feb-07-90 0 110 3605 LOT WSM Yee List of Subcontractors - Submittal 5 - for information Feb-07-90 0 110 3611 L WSM Yee Construction Schedule Submittal 11 for information Feb-09-90 0 111 3101 F WSM Johnson Chaut.specs Feb-12-90 0 112 1302 ROT SBO Distribution Conversation with Brad Bolger re permits Preconstruct. meet & Notice to Proceed Feb-15-90 0 113 3602 LOT WSM Boykin Concrete Mix - 4000 psi NET - Other REJ Feb-15-90 0 114 3604 LOT WSM Boykin Roof Tile - NET Feb-15-90 0 115 3610 LOT WSM Boykin Roll-pUp doors - NET Feb-15-90 0 116 3606 LOT WSM Boykin Wire Mess Creens & Entry Doors - RR Feb-15-90 0 117 3609 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 9 - Hardware RR/MCN/NET Feb-15-90 0 118 3603 LOT WSM Boykin Electrical Equip & Lights - Model number required - RR Feb-15-90 0 119 3608 LOT WSM Boykin Toilet Room Accessories - NET Feb-16-90 0 120 3303 MIN WSM Distribution Meeting with Boykin & Suggs Electric on Feb 13, 1990 at job site Feb-16-90 0 121 3600 LOT - WSM Boykin Certificate of Compliance returned as issued prematurely Feb-22-90 0 122 3302 L WSM Boykin Project clarifications Feb-20-90 0 123 3618 LOT WSM Yee Copy of Schedule of Values for info Responsibility: SBO/WSM LIST OF INCOMING / OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 2 DATE DATE IN/OUT COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED LOG FILE Doc type FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT REMARKS Feb-20-90 0 124 3614 LOT WSM Creegan + d'Angelo Handrail submittal for review Feb-20-90 0 125 3615 LOT WSM Creegan + d'Angelo Plumbing-piping submittal for review Feb-20-90 0 126 3616 LOT WSM Creegan + d'Angelo Paint Product Data submittal Feb-20-90 0 127 3617 LOT WSM Creegan + d'Angelo Hellow Metal Doors/Frames for review Feb-20-90 0 128 3601 LOT .WSM Boykin Return of submittal with comments Feb-22-90 0 129 3303 MIN WSM Distribution Meeting County Permit Office 2/21/90 Feb-22-90 0 130 3303 MIN WSM Distribution Meeting February 21 at Boykin office Feb-22-90 0 131 1302 RTC WSM Distribution Conversation with Bolger on Feb 22 regarding permits Feb-22-90 0 132 3603 LOT WSM Creegan + d'Angelo Submittal 3A for review Feb-28-90 0 133 3603 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 3A - NET/MCN Mar-01-90 0 134 3615 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 15- Plumbing - Piping MCN Mar-01-90 0 135 3616 LOT WSM Boykin Paid Product Data - NET Mar-01-90 0 136 3617 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 17 NET/MCN Mar-07-90 0 137 3302 LOT WSM Distribution Items requiring clarification Mar-07-90 0 138 3303 MIN WSM Distribution Site Meeting No. 1 - March 6 Mar-19-90 0 139 3102 COR WSM Boykin COR 1 Mar-19-90 0 140 3102 COR WSM Boykin COR 2 Mar-19-90 0 141 3102 COR WSM Boykin COR 3 Mar-19-90 0 142 3201 LOT WSM Boykin Change Order Requests 1, 2 & 3 for signa ture Mar-19-90 0 143 3303 MIN WSM Distribution Site Meeting No. 2 - March 13 Mar-21-90 0 144 3609 LOT WSM Creegan Transmit Submittal 9A for review Mar-21-90 0 145 3303 MIN SBO Distribution Conference Notes - Meeting March 16 Mar-21-90 0 146 3102 L SBO Charness Recommendation that a Change Order be is sued Mar-21-90 0 147 3102 L SBO Charness Recommendation that a Change Order be is sued Mar-21-90 0 148 3602 LOT WSM Creegan Transmit Submittal 2A for review Mar-21-90 0 149 3617 LOT WSM Creegan Transmit Submittal 17A for review Responsibility: SBO/WSM LIST OF INCOMING / OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 3 DATE DATE IN/OUT COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED LOG FILE Doc type FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT REMARKS Mar-21-90 0 150 3619 LOT WSM Creegan Transmit Submittal 19 for review Mar-21-90 0 151 3614 LOT WSM Boykin Return submittal - MCN Mar-22-90 0 152 3608 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 8A shop drawing layout for res troom partitions Mar-22-90 0 154 3303 MIN WSM Distribution Meeting No. 3 Minutes - March 20 Mar-23-90 0 155 1302 RET SBO Distribution Telephone conversation March 22 Mar-23-90 0 156 3102 COR WSM Boykin Change Order Request No. 4 Mar-23-90 0 157 3201 LOT WSM Boyking COR No. 4 Mar-26-90 0 158 3602 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 2A rejected Mar-26-90 0 159 3609 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 9A revise & resubmit Mar-26-90 0 160 3608 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 8A - MCN Mar-26-90 0 161 3619 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 19 - NET Responsibility; SBO/WSM LIST OF INCOMING / OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 1 DATE DATE IN/OUT COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED LOG FILE Doc type FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT REMARKS JOB NO: 9001 LA Phase IV - Chautauqua Jan-19-90 Jan-26-90 9 100 3101 L Ludvik Pacific States SBO/WSM Notice to Proceed for Chautauqua Jan-29-90 Jan-31-90 9 101 2101 L Johnson SBO Chautauqua restroom additional budget for submittal review for new contractor Feb-01,90 Feb-05-90 9 102 3601 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal No. 1 - Plumbing equipment Feb-01-90 May-01-90 9 103 3602 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 2 - Concrete Mix Designs 2000, 2500, 3250 8 4000 PSI Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 104 3603 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 3 - Electrical Equipment Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 105 3604 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal No. 4 - Roof Tile Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 106 3605 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 5 - Subcontractor Listing Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 107 3606 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 6 - Wire Mesh Screen 8 Entry Doors Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 108 3607 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 7 - Site Preparation Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 109 3608 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 8 - Toilet room accessories Feb-01-90 May-01-90 9 110 3609 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 9 - Hardware for doors Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 111 3610 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 8 - Roll Up Doors Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 112 3611 LOT Boykin ' WSM Submittal 11 - Construction Schedule Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 113 3612 LOT Boykin WSM Demolition Schedule - Submittal 12 Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 114 3613 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 13 - Insurance Certificates Feb-02-90 Feb-05-90 9 115 3600 L Boykin WSM Transmittal of submittal procedures Feb-12-90 Feb-12-90 9 116 3608 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 8 approved Feb-12-90 Feb-12-90 9 117 3601 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 1 with comments Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 118 3603 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 3 Revise 8 Resubmit with model numbers Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 119 3609 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 9 with comments Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 120 3606 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 6 with comments Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 121 3610 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 10 accepted with comments Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 122 3604 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 4 approved Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 123 3602 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 2 - with comments Feb-16-90 Feb-16-90 9 124 2302 F Wilcoxson WSM Clarification of Spec Section 15410 Plumbing piping -' , -t I � 1 Responsibility: SBO/WSM LIST OF INCOMING / OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 2 DATE DATE IN/OUT COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED LOG FILE Doc type FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT REMARKS Feb-19-90 Feb-20-90 9 125 3301 F Boykin WSM Details to get to their office Jan-19-90 Feb-20-90 9 126 3618 LOT Boykin WSM Schedule of Values Submittal Feb-15-90 Feb-20-90 9 127 3614 LOT Boykin WSM Handrail Submittal Feb-01-90 Feb-20-90 9 128 3615 LOT Boykin WSM Plumbing - piping submittal Feb-01-90 Feb-20-90 9 129 3616 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal for paint Feb-01-90 Feb-20-90 9 130 3617 LOT Boykin WSM Hollow Metal Doors/Frames Submittal Feb-14-90 Feb-21-90 9 131 2201 INV Creegan + d'Angelo SBO Invoice thru 1/31/90 Feb-01-90 Feb-21-90 9 132 3603 LOT Boykin WSM Resubmittal - 3A with models identified Feb-21-90 Feb-21-90 9 133 3401 L LA County WSM/Boykin Building, Plumbing, Electrical Permits & Inspection Record given to Boykin 2/21 Feb-16-90 Feb-23-90 9 134 2201 L Creegan + d'Angelo SBO KS Statement of account Feb-26-90 Feb-26-90 9 135 3101 F Bolger SBO Notice to Proceed Feb-27-90 Feb-27-90 9 136 3603 LOT Creegan + d'Angelo WSM Submittal 3A returned - NET & MCN Feb-28-90 Feb-28-90 9 137 3615 LOT Creegan + d'Angelo WSM Reviewed Submittal 15 - MCN Feb-28-90 Feb-28-90 9 138 3616 LOT Creegan + d'Angelo WSM Reviewed Submittal 16 Feb-28-90 Feb-28-90 9 139 3617 LOT Creegan + d'Angelo WSM Return reviewed Submittal 17 Mar-15-90 Mar-15-90 9 140 2302 F Johnson WSM Clarification Mar-20-90 Mar-20-90 9 141 2302 L Johnson WSM Design clarifications - Chautauqua Mar-20-90 Mar-20-90 9 142 3614 LOT Johnson WSM Return Submittal - MCN Mar-05-90 Mar-20-90 9 143 3617 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 17A - UL Listing Hollow Metal doors/frames Feb-01-90 Mar-20-90 9 144 3602 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 2A - 3000 PSI Concrete Mix Feb-01-90 Mar-20-90 9 145 3609 LOT Boykin WSM Dubmittal 9A - Additional hardware Feb-01-90 Mar-20-90 9 146 3619 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 19 - Epoxy coating Mar-19-90 Mar-21-90 9 147 3102 L Pacific States SBO WSM Extension of time on Chautauqua request Mar-16-90 Mar-21-90 9 148 2201 INV Creegan SBO KS Statement Mar-05-90 Mar-21-90 9 149 3608 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 8A - Shop drawing layouts for restroom partitions Mar-21-90 Mar-21-90 9 150 3102 L Charness SBO Executed Change Request No. 1 Responsibility: SBO/WSM LIST OF INCOMING / OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 3 DATE DATE IN/OUT COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED LOG FILE Doc type FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT REMARKS Mar-21-90 Mar-21-90 9 151 3102 L Charness SBO Executed Recommendation that a Change Or der be issued Mar-23-90 Mar-23-90 9 152 2302 F Creegan WSM Clarification on Drinking fountain Mar-23-90 Mar-23-90 9 153 3602 LOT Creegan WSM Return Submittal 2A rejected Mar-23-90 Mar-23-90 9 154 3609 LOT Creegan WSM Submittal 9A -revise & resubmit Mar-23-90 Mar-23-90 9 155 3608 LOT Creegan WSM Submittal 8A - MCN Mar-23-90 Mar-23-90 9 156 3619 LOT Creegan WSM Submittal 19 NET JOB NO: 9001 LA Phase IV - Chautauqua Responsibility: SBO/W LIST OF INCOMING/OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 1 SORTED BY FILE DATE DATE 0UT(0) TYPE OF MAILING COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED IN(9) LOG CORRES. METHOD FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT File No: 3101 CONSTRUCTORS CONTRACT, SCOPE, BID DOCS, SPECS ETC Jan-19-90 Jan-26-90 9 100 L Ludvik Pacific States SBO/WSM Notice to Proceed for Chautauqua Feb-09-90 0 111 F WSM Johnson Chaut.specs Feb-26-90 Feb-26-90 9 135 F Bolger SBO Notice to Proceed File No: 3102 CONSTRUCTORS CONTRACTS CHANGE ORDERS Mar-19-90 0 139 COR WSM Boykin COR 1 Mar-19-90 0 140 COR WSM Boykin COR 2 Mar-19-90 0 141 COR WSM Boykin COR 3 Mar-19-90 0 142 LOT WSM Boykin Change Order Requests 1, 2 & 3 for signature Mar-19-90 Mar-21-90 9 147 L Pacific States SBO WSM Extension of time on Chautauqua request Mar-21-90 0 146 L SBO Charness Recommendation that a Change Order be issued Mar-21-90 0 147 L SBO Charness Recommendation that a Change Order be issued Mar-21-90 Mar-21-90 9 150 L Charness SBO Executed Change Request No. 1 Mar-21-90 Mar-21-90 9 151 L Charness SBO Executed Recommendation that a Change Order be issued Mar-23-90 0 156 COR WSM Boykin Change Order Request No. 4 Mar-23-90 0 157 LOT WSM Boyking COR No. 4 File No: 3301 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - GEN CORRESP. NON TECHNICAL Feb-19-90 Feb-20-90 9 125 F Boykin WSM Details to get to their office File No: 3302 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - GEN CORRESP. TECHNICAL Feb-22-90 0 122 L WSM Boykin Project clarifications Mar-07-90 0 137 LOT WSM Distribution Items requiring clarification JOB NO: 9001 LA Phase IV - Chautauqua Responsibility: SBO/W LIST OF INCOMING/OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 2 SORTED BY FILE DATE DATE OUT(0) TYPE OF MAILING COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED IN(9) LOG CORRES. METHOD FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT File No: 3303 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - MINUTES OF MEETINGS Feb-16-90 0 120 MIN WSM Distribution Meeting with Boykin & Suggs Electric onFeb 13, 1990 at job site Feb-22-90 0 129 MIN WSM Distribution Meeting County Permit Office 2/21/90 Feb-22-90 0 130 MIN WSM Distribution Meeting February 21 at Boykin office Mar-07-90 0 138 MIN WSM Distribution Site Meeting No. 1 - March 6 Mar-19-90 0 143 MIN WSM Distribution Site Meeting No. 2 - March 13 Mar-21-90 0 145 MIN SBO Distribution Conference Notes - Meeting March 16 Mar-22-90 0 154 MIN WSM Distribution Meeting No. 3 Minutes - March 20 File No: 3401 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Feb-21-90 Feb-21-90 9 133 L LA County WSM/Boykin Building, Plumbing, Electrical Permits& Inspection Record given to File No: 3600 SUBMITTALS - GENERAL Jan-26-90 0 100 F WSM Boykin Copy of submittal log for reference Feb-02-90 Feb-05-90 9 115 L Boykin WSM Transmittal of submittal procedures Feb-16-90 0 121 LOT WSM Boykin Certificate of Compliance returned asissued prematurely File No: 3601 SUBMITTAL No. 1 Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 102 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal No. 1 - Plumbing equipment Feb-05-90 0 101 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 1 - Plumbing fixtures forreview Feb-12-90 Feb-12-90 9 117 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 1 with comments Feb-20-90 0 128 LOT WSM Boykin Return of submittal with comments File No: 3602 SUBMITTAL No. 2 Feb-01-90 May-01-90 9 103 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 2 - Concrete Mix Designs2000, 2500, 3250 & 4000 PSI JOB NO: 9001 LA Phase IV - Chautauqua Responsibility: SBO/W LIST OF INCOMING/OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 3 SORTED BY FILE DATE DATE OUT(0) TYPE OF MAILING COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED IN(9) LOG CORRES. METHOD FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT Feb-01-90 Mar-20-90 9 144 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 2A - 3000 PSI Concrete Mix Feb-05-90 0 102 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 2 - Concrete Mix Design forreview Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 123 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 2 - with comments Feb-15-90 0 113 LOT WSM Boykin Concrete Mix - 4000 psi NET - Other REJ Mar-21-90 0 148 LOT WSM Creegan Transmit Submittal 2A for review Mar-23-90 Mar-23-90 9 153 LOT Creegan WSM Return Submittal 2A rejected Mar-26-90 0 158 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 2A rejected File No: 3603 SUBMITTAL No. 3 Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 104 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 3 - Electrical Equipment Feb-01-90 Feb-21-90 9 132 LOT Boykin WSM Resubmittal - 3A with models identified Feb-05-90 0 103 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 3 - Electrical Fixtures &Lighting for review Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 118 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 3 Revise & Resubmit withmodel numbers Feb-15-90 0 118 LOT WSM Boykin Electrical Equip & Lights - Model numberrequired - RR Feb-22-90 0 132 LOT WSM Creegan + d'Angelo Submittal 3A for review Feb-27-90 Feb-27-90 9 136 LOT Creegan + d'Angelo WSM Submittal 3A returned - NET & MCN Feb-28-90 0 133 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 3A - NET/MCN File No: 3604 SUBMITTAL No. 4 Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 105 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal No. 4 - Roof Tile Feb-05-90 0 104 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 4 - Roof Tile for review Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 122 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 4 approved Feb-15-90 0 114 LOT WSM Boykin Roof Tile - NET File No: 3605 SUBMITTAL No. 5 JOB NO: 9001 LA Phase IV - Chautauqua Responsibility: SBO/W LIST OF INCOMING/OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 4 SORTED BY FILE DATE DATE OUT(0) TYPE OF MAILING COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED IN(9) LOG CORRES. METHOD FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 106 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 5 - Subcontractor Listing Feb-07-90 0 110 LOT WSM Yee List of Subcontractors - Submittal 5 -for information File No: 3606 SUBMITTAL No. 6 Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 107 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 6 - Wire Mesh Screen & EntryDoors Feb-05-90 0 105 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal NO. 6 - Wire Mesh Screen &Entry doors for review Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 120 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 6 with comments Feb-15-90 0 116 LOT WSM Boykin Wire Mess Creens & Entry Doors - RR File No: 3607 Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 108 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 7 - Site Preparation File No: 3608 Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 109 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 8 - Toilet room accessories Feb-05-90 0 106 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 8 - Toilet Room AcccessoriesFor review Feb-12-90 Feb-12-90 9 116 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 8 approved Feb-15-90 0 119 LOT WSM Boykin Toilet Room Accessories - NET Mar-05-90 Mar-21-90 9 149 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 8A - Shop drawing layouts forrestroom partitions Mar-22-90 0 152 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 8A shop drawing layout for restroom partitions Mar-23-90 Mar-23-90 9 155 LOT Creegan WSM Submittal 8A - MCN Mar-26-90 0 160 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 8A - MCN File No: 3609 Feb-01-90 May-01-90 9 110 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 9 - Hardware for doors Feb-01-90 Mar-20-90 9 145 LOT Boykin WSM Dubmittal 9A - Additional hardware JOB NO: 9001 LA Phase IV - Chautauqua Responsibility: SBO/W LIST OF INCOMING/OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 5 SORTED BY FILE DATE DATE OUT(0) TYPE OF MAILING COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED IN(9) LOG CORRES. METHOD FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT Feb-05-90 0 107 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 9 - Hardware for doors forreview Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 119 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 9 with comments Feb-15-90 0 117 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 9 - Hardware RR/MCN/NET Mar-21-90 0 144 LOT WSM Creegan Transmit Submittal 9A for review Mar-23-90 Mar-23-90 9 154 LOT Creegan WSM Submittal 9A -revise & resubmit Mar-26-90 0 159 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 9A revise & resubmit File No: 3610 Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 111 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 8 - Roll Up Doors Feb-05-90 0 108 LOT WSM CONNMASS Submittal 8 - Roll Up Doors for review Feb-13-90 Feb-13-90 9 121 LOT Johnson WSM Submittal 10 accepted with comments Feb-15-90 0 115 LOT WSM Boykin Roll-pUp doors - NET File No: 3611 Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 112 LOT Boykin - WSM Submittal 11 - Construction Schedule Feb-07-90 0 110 L WSM Yee Construction Schedule Submittal 11 forinformation File No: 3612 , Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 113 LOT Boykin WSM Demolition Schedule - Submittal 12 File No: 3613 Feb-01-90 Feb-05-90 9 114 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 13 - Insurance Certificates Feb-07-90 0 109 LOT WSM Yee Original Certificates of InsuranceSubmittal No. 13 File No: 3614 JOB NO: 9001 LA Phase IV - Chautauqua Responsibility: SBO/W LIST OF INCOMING/OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 6 SORTED BY FILE DATE DATE OUT(0) TYPE OF MAILING COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED IN(9) LOG CORRES. METHOD FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT Feb-15-90 Feb-20-90 9 127 LOT Boykin WSM Handrail Submittal Feb-20-90 0 124 LOT WSM Creegan + d'Angelo Handrail submittal for review Mar-20-90 Mar-20-90 9 142 LOT Johnson WSM Return Submittal - MCN Mar-21-90 0 151 LOT WSM Boykin Return submittal - MCN File No: 3615 Feb-01-90 Feb-20-90 9 128 LOT Boykin WSM Plumbing - piping submittal Feb-20-90 0 125 LOT WSM Creegan + d'Angelo Plumbing-piping submittal for review Feb-28-90 Feb-28-90 9 137 LOT Creegan + d'Angelo WSM Reviewed Submittal 15 - MCN Mar-01-90 0 134 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 15- Plumbing - Piping MCN File No: 3616 Feb-01-90 Feb-20-90 9 129 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal for paint Feb-20-90 0 126 LOT WSM Creegan + d'Angelo Paint Product Data submittal Feb-28-90 Feb-28-90 9 138 LOT Creegan + d'Angelo WSM Reviewed Submittal 16 Mar-01-90 0 135 LOT WSM Boykin Paid Product Data - NET File No: 3617 Feb-01-90 Feb-20-90 9 130 LOT Boykin WSM Hollow Metal Doors/Frames Submittal Feb-20-90 0 127 LOT WSM Creegan + d'Angelo Hellow Metal Doors/Frames for review Feb-28-90 Feb-28-90 9 139 LOT Creegan + d'Angelo WSM Return reviewed Submittal 17 Mar-01-90 0 136 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 17 NET/MCN Mar-05-90 Mar-20-90 9 143 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 17A - UL Listing Hollow Metaldoors/frames Mar-21-90 0 149 LOT WSM Creegan Transmit Submittal 17A for review ' 1 �_ — 1. JOB NO: 9001 LA Phase IV - Chautauqua Responsibility: SBO/W LIST OF INCOMING/OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE AS OF Mar-30-90 Page No: 7 SORTED BY FILE DATE DATE OUT(0) TYPE OF MAILING COPY OR WRITTEN RECEIVED IN(9) LOG CORRES. METHOD FROM TO ACTION SUBJECT File No: 3618 Jan-19-90 Feb-20-90 9 126 LOT Boykin WSM Schedule of Values Submittal Feb-20-90 0 123 LOT WSM Yee Copy of Schedule of Values for info File No: 3619 Feb-01-90 Mar-20-90 9 146 LOT Boykin WSM Submittal 19 - Epoxy coating Mar-21-90 0 150 LOT WSM Creegan Transmit Submittal 19 for review Mar-23-90 Mar-23-90 9 156 LOT Creegan WSM Submittal 19 NET Mar-26-90 0 161 LOT WSM Boykin Submittal 19 - NET ConccptMVlarine SUBMITTAL — TRANSMITTAL Concept Marne As4rtates Inc CHAUTAUQUA RESTROOM Cons:ruction Management Harlx:P:c-trun_ Specification 4740 C.P.No 76018 I Spuniaker Way 13763 Fill Way Saute EU-2 Submittal No: Berkeley CA 947:0.1612 Mmanc ae1 Rey CA 90292-69'4 415 839-6700 213;30:-0983 Date: March 23, 1990 FAX 415/843-1360 FAX 213 301-2453 File: 9001/0157/3201 To: Mr. Ray Boykin From: Mr. W. S. Mills 9/(R. D. Boykin Company Berkeley 4021 Rosewood Avenue,Ste 103 Los Angeles, CA 90004 We are sending you the following: X Attached Under separate cover Shop drawings Plans X Change Order Correspondence (Specifications Samples Progress Payment Other These documents are transmitted as noted below: For review & approval For information/file X For action: APPROVED NOT APPROVED NET No exceptions taken RR Revise & resubmit MCN Make changes noted REJ Rejected - Resubmit Number of Copies Date Description Action 2 each 23-Mar-90 Change Order Request No. 4 Remarks: Please complete the attached Change Order Requests and return the signed original to this office, together with the applicable estimates and backup, for further processing. Quantity of copies transmitted to: Trans Att Trans Art CONNMASS 1 2 R. D. Boykin Company 1 1 S. B. O'Neill 1 1 Central File - Berekely 1 1 Central File - ML Page # 1 of_ 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII\ \ \ I\IIIIIIII\\U\ Report run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG Report run time: 11:14:03 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page No: 1 CMA Job No: 9001 Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan + d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date cd Date S No. of Date S Date Sub Description Ref Spec FromForwarded/ Copies Received &/ REJECTED SIaREVISE &Returned IAPPRV to Contractor APPRV CopieslResu Duem�t /I Remarks No. Section Contractr to A/E A In:Out from A/E A RESUBMIT MCN NEC In:Out Date A 01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 13 Certificates of Insurance GC 10-13 05-Feb-90 6: I O7-Feb-90 :1 Originals sent to Henry Yee 0 Certificates of Compliance GC 19 •• 0 Mechanical Permit GC 20 21-Feb-90' 1: 21-Feb-90 Contractor received 0 Electrical Permit GC 20 21-Feb-90 1: 21-Feb-90 Contractor received 11 Progress Schedule GC 32 05-Feb-90 6: 12-Feb-90 :1 Copy sent to Henry Yee. CMA reviewed 0 Procurement Schedule Outstanding 5 List of Subcontractors 00430 05-Feb-90 6: 12-Feb-90 :1 Copy sent to Henry Yee. CMA reviewed 0 "Equals" Listing 00440 None submitted 0 Record Drawings 00800-4 21-Feb-90 1: 21-Feb-90 Contractor received. 18 Schedule of Values 01370-1 20-Feb-90 6: :1 Copy sent to Henry Yee 7 Temporary Facility Layout 01500-1 05-Feb-90 6: 12-Feb-90 CMA reviewed i teport run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG teport run time: 11:14:15 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page No: 2 CMA Job No: 9001 Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan + d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date Recd Date S No. of Date S Date & Status Returned to Contractor No. of Resubmit S Sub Description Ref ISectiiionclContractr torA/Ed�A In:Out from/ Copies iA/E A REJECTED I REVISE &RESUBMIT I APPRVMCN I APPRVNEC Copies Due /In:Out Date Date A Remarks 02 SITE PREPARATION 12 Special Demolition Schedule 02050-1 05-Feb-90 6: I 12-Feb-90 CMA reviewed 0 Aggregate Test Report 02519-1 I - I - - -- _ Report run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG Report run time: 11:14:19 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page No: 3 CMA Job No: 9001 Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan + d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date ec DrA S f ev e s eE oC Subl Description IReftSpeclConFro tFoo Forwarded! (Copies Receea ived / REJECTED & SIaREVISEI& IedAPPRV nI APPRCr V IIopieslReDuemit S Remarks 03 CONCRETE 2 Concrete Mix 03300-3 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 13-Feb-90 15-Feb-90 15-Feb-90 4 :2 Only 4000 PSI acceptable. Design-2000,2500,3250,4000 Others n/a. 2A Concrete Mix Design - 3000 03300-3 20-Mar-90 21-Mar-90 6:5 23-Mar-90 26-Mar-90 4 :4 PSI 0 Concrete Test Results 03300-12 .• 0 Curing Compounds 03300-14 .• 0 Hardener 03300-14 . 19 Reinforcement Coating 20-Mar-90 21-Mar-90 6:5 23-Mar-90 26-Mar-90 4 :2 - -.. , — Report run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG Report run time: 11:14:26 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page No: 4 CMA Job No: 9001 Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan + d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date Date S No. of Date S Date Sub Description Ref Spec From cdForwarded/ Copies Received / REJECTED & Status a tr IREVISE & Ied PPon APPRV APPRV Copies ctor No. of Due / Remarks No. Section Contractr to A/E A In:Out from A/E A RESUBMIT MCN NEC In:Out Date A 05 METALS 0 Misc. Metals-Shop drawings 05500-1 I . 0 Steel-Certificate of 05500-2 I : Compliance 0 Galvanized Steel Cert of 05500-2 I .• Compliance 0 Bolts Certificate of 05500-2 I . Compliance • 14 Handrail - Shop drawings 05500-6 20-Feb-90 20-Feb-90 6:5 20-Mar-90 21-Mar-90 4 :2 _ Report run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG Report run time: 11:14:32 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page No: 5 CMA Job No: 9001 Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan + d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date Recd Date S No. of Date S Date tus to Sub Description IRRef eftSpe Con From to warded/ IIopies Received /A REJECTED & SIeREV REVISE SEI&T IedAPPRVContractorPPRVMCN NEC CIopieslReDDuuemit te AI Remarks 07 MOISTURE/THERMAL CONTROL 4 Roof material sample 07321-1 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 13-Feb-90 I 15-Feb-90 4 :2 0 Roof Installation Sample 07321-1 I III 0 Roof Warranty 07321-1 • 0 Architectural Sheet 07620-2 • Metal-Shop Drawings 0 Joint Sealers 07900-1 • Report run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG Report run time: 11:14:39 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page No: 6 CMA Job No: 9001 - Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan + d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date Sub Description RSeecf ConFromtrFo rAaw/atEer Copies tiAve / REJECTED & aRRtuEEVSs AMPtPoC nIaAPtNPoERCr V (Copies ReDuee't / Remarks 08 DOORS, WINDOWS & GLASS 17 Hollow Metal 08110-1 20-Feb-90 20-Feb-90 6:5 28-Feb-90 01-Mar-90 01-Mar-90 4 :2 - Doors/Frames-Shop Drawings 17 Hollow Metal Doors/Frames-UL 08110-1 20-Mar-90 21-Mar-90 6:5 : • A Listing 6 Main Entry Doors-Shop 08111-1 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 13-Feb-90 15-Feb-90 4 :2 Drawings 1 Access Doors-Shop Drawings 08305-1 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 12-Feb-90 20-Feb-90 4 :2 In Submittal No. 1 - Plumbing 9 Hardware-Shop Drawings 08700-2 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 13-Feb-90 15-Feb-90 15-Feb-90 4 :2 RR-Plates & Bumpers: MCN-B/Locks & hinge 9A Hardware-Shop Drawings 08700-2 20-Mar-90 21-Mar-90 6:5 23-Mar-90 26-Mar-90 4 :4 10 Roll-Up Doors - Shop 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 13-Feb-90 15-Feb-90 4 :2 Drawings • Report run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG Report run time: 11:14:50 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page Noe 7 CMA Job No: 9001 Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date Date S No. of Date S Date & tus to Sub Description IRef ReftSpe IConFro trlFo war Forwarded// Iopies (Received /A REJECTED SIaREV REVISE SEI&rIedAPPRVT MCN ContractorPPRVNEC ICIopieslReDDuuemit te A Remarks 09 FINISHES 0 Plaster-Material 09150-2 . Certifications 0 Manufacturing Mixing 09150-2 : . Requirements 0 On-site sample 09150-2 : .• 0 Qualifications of 09150-2 .• subcontractor-plaster 16 Paint - Product data 09900-2 20-Feb-90 20-Feb-90 6:5 28-Feb-90 01-Mar-90 4 :2 i 0 Paint - Office samples 09900-2 -• 0 Qualifications of 09900-2 : subcontractor-paint Report run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG Report run time: 11:14:59 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page No: 8 CMA Job No: 9001 Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan + d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date Recd Date S No. of Date S Date & Status Returned to Contractor No. of Resubmit S SuNob Description Ref Section Contractr torA/Ed�A In:Out from/ Copies iAA/E A REJECTED I REVISE RESUBMIT I APPRVMCN I APPRVNEC Copies Due /In:Out Date A Remarks 10 SPECIALITIES 8A Toilet partitions -Shop 10160-1 21-Mar-90 22-Mar-90 6:5 23-Mar-90 26-Mar-90 4 :2 drawings 8 Toilet Partition 10160-1 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 12-Feb-90 I 15-Feb-90 4 :2 Manufacturing Data i 0 Toilet Partition Samples 10160-1 I 8 Toilet accessories - Shop 10800-1 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 12-Feb-90 I 15-Feb-90 4 :2 drawings 8 Toilet Accessories Product 10800-1 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 12-Feb-90 I 15-Feb-90 4 :2 Data Report run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG - Report run time: 11:15:07 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page No: 9 CMA Job No: 9001 Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan + d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date Recd Date S No. of Date S Date tus to ctor No. of Sub Description SectionRef S IConFrom to war Forwarded// (Copies Received /A REJECTED & SIeREV REVISE SEI& IedAPPRVonIraAPPRVMCN NEC ICIopieslReDDuuemit te AI Remarks 15 MECHANICAL 0 Plumbing materials 15010-2 : 0 Operations & Maintenance 15010-2 : Manuals 15 Plumbing piping 15410-2 20-Feb-90 20-Feb-90 6:5 28-Feb-90 01-Mar-90 4 :2 1 Plumbing fixtures 15440-1 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 12-Feb-90 20-Feb-90 4 :2 0 Sterilization test 15410-4 : 0 Hydrostatic test 15410-4 : teport run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG teport run time: 11:15:14 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page No: 10 CMA Job No: 9001 Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan + d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date Sub Description Ref ReftSpecConFroctdrFo Forwarded// Iopies (Received / REJECTED & SIaREV REVISE SEI& IedAPPRV ContractorPPRV IopieslReDDuuemit / Remarks 16 ELECTRICAL 3 Electrical material 16000-4 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 13-Feb-90 15-Feb-90 4 :2 Model numbers not identified 3 Lighting fixtures 16000-4 05-Feb-90 05-Feb-90 6:5 13-Feb-90 15-Feb-90 4 :2 Model numbers not identified 3A Electrical material 16000-4 21-Feb-90 22-Feb-90 4:4 27-Feb-90 28-Feb-90 28-Feb-90 3 :2 3A Lighting fixtures 16000-4 21-Feb-90 22-Feb-90 4:4 27-Feb-90 ' • 28-Feb-90 28-Feb-90 3 :2 0 Electrical - Shop drawings 16000-4 0 System Test 16000-5 0 Final Inspection/Acceptance 16000-6 Report run date: 26-Mar-90 SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL LOG Report run time: 13:57:03 Project: Los Angeles Beach Refurbishment Phase IV - Chautauqua Page No: 1 CMA Job No: 9001 Client: County of Los Angeles Constructor: R. D. Boykin Architect/Engineer: CONNMASS/Creegan + d'Angelo Client Ref: Spec. 4740, CP 76018 Constructor Ref: A/E Ref: C-1197/388105 Date Recd Date S No. of Date S Date & Status Returned to Contractor No. of Resubmit S SuNob Description Ref ISectioc Frm lContractr torA/Ed�A In:Out from/ Copies ived A/E A REJECTED I REVISE &RESUBMIT I APPRVMCN I- APPRVNEC Copies Due /In:Out Date A Remarks 99 CHANGE ORDERS Cl Change Order 1 - Hidden Aprvd by Charness - Conditions 3/21/90 C2 Change Order 2 - Concession Aprvd by Charness - area 3/21/90 C3 Change Order 3 - Elect. & : I • Handicap Chngs C4 Change Order 4 - Exterior I • Page 1 26-Mar-90 A - Added LOS ANGELES BEACH REFURBISHMENT - PHASE IV C - Change to existing MASTER TREND LIST COR Item Recommend CO Typ No To Cant From No. Description Date Na. COST ', SCHD. ;,�--- REMARKS•- ... .. .. . ....----- _ -• - . .--- --CHAUTAUQUA RESTROOM Specification No. 4740 CP 76018 CONTRACTOR- R. D. BOYKIN COMPANY 1 3-19-90 Hidden conditions: A 1 Women's restroom wall frame 21-Mar-90 2 $1,432 A 2 Men's room concrete floor/tile 21-Mar-90 1 $4,879 19 days A 3 Women's restroom window 21-Mar-90 2 $100 A 4 Men's room landing handrail 21-Mar-90 2 $964 A 5 Simpson Wall Bracing A 6 Women's room - new wall 21-Mar-90 2 $1,362 2 3-19-90 Concession area C 1 Roof support beam A 2 Frame in vents (3) 21-Mar-90 2 $100 A 3 Remove exhaust fan A 4 Remove window 21-Mar-90 2 $100 3 3-19-90 Electrical & Handicap changes A 1 Add second electrical meter C 2 Reconfigure handicap area 3 Install chase access door 4 3-23-90 Exterior 1 Clarify Floor replacement A 2 Handicap drinking fountain C 3 Texture coat entire building 21-Mar-90 2 $2,786 C 4 Window trim - 5 Reverse steel gate swing Sub-total $11,723 26-Apr-90 Original completion date Total Changes (including overhead & profit) $14,894 15-May-90 Current completion date ConceotMVlarine CHANGE ORDER REQUEST Concept Mar e Assmcrtes.Inc CHAUTAUQUA RESTROOM Constructor.Ma.laaerent Harbor P:annrng Specification 4740 C.P.No 76018 1 Spinnaker."ray 13763 Fr;i Way Suite EU-2 Change Request No: 4 Berkeley CA ;4710•:612 Manna del Rey CA 90292-6974 415 839.6702 213'301-0983 Date: March 23, 1990 FAX 415 842 :360 FAX 2:3 301.2453 File: 9001/0156/3102 To: Mr. Ray Boykin R. D. Boykin Company 4021 Rosewood Avenue, Suite 103 Los Angeles, CA 90004 Description of change: Provide concrete pad for handicap drinking fountain. Provide trim framing, windows in Men's restroom. Provide stucco texture to entire facility exterior. See attached detailed outline and sketches. Section of specification of drawing affected: Drawings Nos 4/13 and 7/13, and all applicable sections of Project Manual 4740 • Reason for change: No existing handicap drinking fountain. Framing detail for moisture protection. Exterior texture coat for moisture-proof and consistent finish. Estimated cost: Estimated time: Requested by: W. S. Mills Contractor: Title: Construction Manager Prime Contractor: R. D. Boykin Company Date: March 23, 1990 By: Title: Subcontractor: By: Title: 1. Return signed original together with applicable backup. 2. Use this form for changes that affect contract price and/or time. 111111111111111111IIIIIIII March 23, 1990 9001/0156/3102 ATTACHMENT TO CHANGE ORDER REQUEST NO. 4 1. Provide new floor construction as detailed in the attached drawing No. 1, Men's room and plumbing chase. Drawing is supplied as additional clarification to item No. 2 in Change Order Request No. 1. 2. Provide concrete slab with protection walls per attached Drawing No. 2, for handicap drinking fountain. Install drinking fountain per specification. Layout of handicap restroom configuration is provided as additional clarification to Item No. 2 in Change Order Request No. 3. 3 Provide texture surface coat on entire exterior stucco surfaces, new and replaced, for a consistent finish. Submit catalog information on material and recommended installation. 4. Provide window trim as shown in attached Drawing No. 3, Men's restroom. Extension section used only where toilet partitions encroach window area. Header section used in all other locations. 5. Reverse steel gate swing at entrance gate of Men's handicap restroom, per attached Drawing No.2. • ConceotMVlarine Concept Mc:ine max:...= Inc Construction Mcncge;re-• Hartz!P:cnning 1 Spinnaker Way 13763 :Nay Scrte EU-2 Berkeley CA 94710 h:c:rra cle:Rey CA 90292 415/839-6700 213 301-0;83 FAX.415'843.1360 FAX 213 301-2453 Date: October 23, 1989 Document No. 8901/4.2/1111 City of Santa Monica Reconstruction of Municipal Pier Specification No. 1140 Weekly Site Meeting No. 37 MEETING MINUTES Date: October 26, 1989 Time: 9:30 a.m. .(9:44) Location: Kiewit Site Office Present: Al Wun Kiewit Pacific Company Rich Weitzel Kiewit Pacific Company Harry Lincoln Kiewit Pacific Company Gordon Fulton Concept Marine Associates Al Cantor Concept Marine Associates Dave Pann City of Santa Monica Judith Meister City of Santa Monica Jack Bayer City of Santa Monica Ted Anvickk Theodore E. Anvick DISCUSSION ACTION 37.1 REVIEW OF MINUTES The minutes of Weekly Site Meeting No. 36 were reviewed and accepted with no changes. 37.2 SUBMITTAL STATUS A. Submittal No. 43C: Detailed AMT Drawings -- Received two Anvick sets of Anvick's stamped drawings. B. Submittal No. 62: Progress Payment #9 -- Check is ready. C. Submittal No. 63: Edge of Deck As Built -- Approved by Anvick. • RECEIVED NOV - 11989 Conoept/VIarine , . iee/Cc �`l DISCUSSION ACTION 37.3 STATUS OF CHANGES A. Pending Changes: 1. Railing Base -- Anvick's sketch for old-to-new - transition approved. 2. Water lines changes to be reflected in Anvick drawings: a. Rerouting completed. b. Fish sinks to stay as drawn. B. Target Cost Change Log 1. Change Order #2 -- a. Corrected to remove J-bolt item. b. Corrected to remove lumber item. c. Total pilecot avin9corrected from 24,027 to 24,012. d. Completion date extended by 47 days. j 37.4 CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS A. Concrete Pours 1. Deck pour (#7) made Thursday, 10/19 using Cal-Mat Ready Mix. a. Anvick approved 9-day stripping for 10' spans; b. Anvick approved 14 days for 20' spans. 2. Pour #8 completed on 10/24. 3. Pour #9 scheduled for 10/27. 4. Pour #10 rescheduled for 11/8 due to Cal -Mat plant shut-down until 11/5. Wun prefers to wait a few days until they "get the bugs out"; hence 11/8 pour date. . C. Wood Decking and Ramps in progress. 4x16 being installed. • D. Hand Rail installation will begin in earnest after 11/8 pour. E. Substation threshold -- KPC to install now. KPC 8901/4.2/1111 page 2 r l ` 1/ DISCUSSION ACTION 37.5 SCHEDULES A. Monthly updated schedule to be provided by KPC. KPC B. Bi-weekly schedule in CMA office. 37.6 OLD BUSINESS A. Benches -- CSM approved 50% downpayment for custom benches. Approved drawings and delivery still to be discussed. B. Light Poles -- Bayer indicated that these should not effect completion. C. Relocation of edge inboard two feet on south side and its effect on handrail to be shown on Afvick corrected drawings. Moving pile #C52-1/2 2' east resulted in 32 rebar extensions. D. KPC correcting and repairing shrinkage cracks caused by Santa Ana winds. 37.7 NEW BUSINESS A. Change Order No. 3 to include the following: 1. Coast Guard's required clearance lights -- to be cleared by Meister. CSM 2. Hydrant -- Amelco to provide dollar amount. Amelco 3. Additional fire valves -- Amelco to provide Amelco dollar amount. B. Fishing at end of pier to be limited to KPC personnel . 37.8 NEXT MEETING A. The next meeting is scheduled to be held on Thursday, November 2, at 9:30 a.m. B. The meeting was adjourned at 10:43 a.m. Distribution: Attendees 8901/4.2/1111 page 3 • ;, in CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK December 20, 1991 Concept Marine Associates, Inc. 13763 Fiji Way, Suite EU-2 Marina del' Rey, CA 90292-6974 Attn: Gordon R. Fulton The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting held on Monday, December 16, 1991, approved Consulting Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Concept Marine Associates, Inc. to perform Construction Management Services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier Project. Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records. Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:kw Enc. (Telephone:714-536-5227) -9 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION February 18, 1992 Date 1Q- ke/I tarry Y couNcius. Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council A - 1? 19.E Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator/1. '.ffi` Prepared by: °' Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works - - , TY pl. Subject: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER; CC-735 Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception X Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:0,S STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Pier construction contract will extend beyond the original completion date requiring additional services from the City's construction management firm, Concept Marine Associates. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Amendment No. 2 to the contract with Concept Marine Associates for continued construction management services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier in the amount of $112,500. ANALYSIS: Concept Marine Associates were retained by the City to perform construction management services for the Pier construction contract. These services include a constructability review, geotechnical services, materials testing, pile fabrication inspection, full time on-site inspection, contract administration for payments, material submittals, change of work, and monitoring construction schedules. The amount of the original contract is $417,340. Amendment No. 1 to the contract for an additional $71,500 was approved to provide additional inspection at the casting yard when the contractor chose to pre-cast inspection at the casting yard when the contractor chose to pre-cast the pier deck units off site. This amount also provided $6,400 for additional services and $10,000 for reimbursable overtime inspection. The revised construction schedule for the project indicates completion of the pier by the end of June, 1992, and removal of the construction yard and equipment and the restoration of the beach in July. The contractor will be assessed liquidated damages, as specified in the contract, for each day the contract runs beyond the original contract completion date and the additional time granted for weather or additional work. The contract completion date is February 10, 1992. These monies will be used to offset our additional expenses due to the extended construction period. / Const. Mgt. Ser. - H.B. Pier; CC-735 February 18, 1992 Page 2 At the time we executed the agreement with Concept Marine, the fee was based upon pre-award services and on construction services for only a fifteen month construction period, as specified. The fee for the additional six months of service is estimated at $112,500, to be paid on a time and expense basis and is consistent with the original contract monthly charges. FUNDING SOURCE: The Pier Fund, Account Number E-PG-AS-154-6-37-00. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Provide alternate direction. ATTACHMENTS: Contract Amendment Number 2. MTU:LFS:JM:dw 3170g/1&2 / REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION.... December 16, 1991 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator /•Z ,per Prepared by: v"Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works CZ Y CLE Subject: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE MUNICIPAL PIER; CC-735 Consistent with Council Policy? I] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Construction management services for the Pier, provided by Concept Marine Associates, will exceed the amount allocated in their present contract. An amendment to the contract is needed to continue their services to the completion of construction. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the amendment to the contract with Concept Marine Associates for construction management services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier in the amount of $71,500. ANALYSIS: Concept Marine Associates were retained by the City to perform construction management services for the Pier construction contract. These services include a constructability review, geotechnical and materials testing, pile fabrication inspection, full time on-site inspection, contract administration for payments, materials submittals, change in work, and monitoring construction schedules. The amount of the original contract is $417,340. The time and effort required by Concept Marine Associates for the Pier project services have been greater than originally estimated and budgeted. Riedel International, the general contractor for the Pier, elected to cast both the piling and the deck units off-site at a casting yard in Upland, California. This method of construction appears to have been a factor that allowed the Riedel bid to be approximately $3 million lower than the next bid and the engineer's estimate. Full time inspection is required at the casting plant during the manufacturing of each of these units. Casting of the piles has taken longer than estimated ,and as the pre-casting of the deck units off-site was not anticipated, the additional cost for inspection has run $65,000. Extra specialized construction services in the amount of $6,500 for a building code review and a contract issue legal opinion were also accomplished. Concept Marine has also performed overtime inspections due to the extended work hours of the Contractor. These costs will be reimbursed by the Contractor. Off-site inspection is no longer needed, as all piles and deck units are now cast. The remainder of the services provided by Concept Marine will be paid on a time and material basis as before. A request to consider extending the contract with this firm for construction management services for the Pier building construction may be made in the future. 1. Construction Management Services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier; CC-735 November 18, 1991 Page two FUNDING SOURCE: The Pier Fund, Account No. E-PG-AS-154-6-37-00 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: • Deny alternate direction ATTACHMENT: Contract Amendment No. 1 MTU:LFS:JM:gd 2970g/1&2 s .3. .„ . , 13::0.;1:::..pit....*m:::;<*:w.:::-Km..-{;:,-;,•:,w0=--iv: w..--:::-,1 CERTIFICATE OF INSLTRAN - mi•&,m,g,s,g-kzi;o:W,mmmr:Wg§:As.w.,:r.>,. - ,a,,,Eim 3/15/1991 .. .,. ...--,...7 ,.:,. PRODUCER - ..i-exowz% A •VA . VA0Wal COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE 61COMPANY A: LLOYDS & COMPANIES Durham and Bates Agencies Inc. Policy # : L6259/91 330 S.W. Sixth Avenue Eff. Date: 03/04/91 Exp. Date: Portland, OR 97204 9COMPANY (503) 224-5170 Policy # : Eff. Date: / / Exp. Date: /. / INSURED NICOMPANY C: Ii:iMA;a0=iM Policy It : CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC Eff. Date: / / Exp. Date: ,....4„/ ”..... !,. 1 SPINNAKER WAY W I COMPANY D: I 0a-42:410.N. BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94710 Policy #: Eff. Date: / / Exp. Date: / / THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE ,gg. ..T.,..,x.Q.m.:;,,g. .,. ....;z....w. ..§.,.,15s.)2ANAND, EXTEND OR.,.4.w.g.4,.. ,c,pv,m.pg„lily,...pp,14;q.Tg.s. .4Eig.X.N• woolgegookaohogeme I COVERAGES I WaggirktftedahateN.M.MNIKON This'(e to certify.*that-policies 'O-i' insuranceVeted-,below have been issued to the insured named above for the polio) period indicated, notwithstanding any requirement, term or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued or may pertain, the insurstre afforded by the policies described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such policies. A • -. Co TYPE OF INSURANCE . ' All limits in THOUSANDS ! . r.„ ...,. GENERAL LIABILITY . $ 1,000 Combined single limit A [X] COI=• General Liability ' - - , Bodily Injury and Property (X] occurrence [ ] Claims Made Damage [ ] Owners/Contractor Protective-. $ - ., Bodily;; Injury (per person) [ 1 --'-.:.: $ . ,,. ,- , - -BodilyT Injury (per accident) Property Damage 7' ,1% •...• . ' • AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY t7::'. ... ." 1 - -; ...._. , . '.:.:'.[ I Any, Auto- •„:::: .,i',. ' •:':, :.'g?139vE.134g19 1!*:'- ::- :'- -;,,i--,..:Combined single, limit [ ] . All Owned Autos-:,.. :::q..6_,Ifi-E0T0';':_.City .4ttOi.rijOi..,,,:BOdilSrf,:rInjUry and Property [ 1 Scheduled- kItcs.:,.:,'-'i'-':.:- .J:.,:ii..,:.-D ' ii:i6 -Ci:Ei:A.# i'ileyl'A';,;1.::-,:,,D,41,11,ag.:P.1::,:.:,7;-',',.,. - ' [ j Hired Autos ,.'•:...:'.'t-1.,.,:1- -,::.',:;: z,1--r/e•-•- • . .• • . •.., .:., .-..„.._.... __ : g C 3 Non-owned Autos ,/ . 47-- ''' .'':'Sii.'f-',, Bodily In)ury,:' (per person) , [ ] Garage L.itabilitY:::,;;, 11.::::::ii,,.•.-.-,, , ( /t4". -..: ,z.;;;.' 84d.i.ly.,.*/Inj ury. _(per accident) [ ] . -;-.- ':-. :;7.1',;;';', .',5:''ri-,;:= 1' -' $ - - " - --, Property-Damage .....„,.744,,. .,,,,, , ;. --- , ;N-,,-0 _ ....,. _ .:2:,,,,,. EXCESS LIABILITY ,,?,,.' - .% - .-- $ -- EachiOcurrence [ LUmbrella Form !,-:5-.,....-',.,''L :,-'' . --I.!-. :;--.:_ •.. •' , - ' $ - , . Aggrelate , [ YOther than Umbrella - - $ Self- insured retention WORKERS COMPENSATION $ Each Accident AND __ $ Disease Policy Limit EMPLOYERS LIABILITY $ Disease Each Employee --- . • . $ $ $ , . Description of operations/locations/vehicles/other CITY OP HUNTINGTON PEACH IS ADDITIONAL INSURED AS. RESPECTS LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF THE NAMED INSURED'S WORK FOR THAT INSURED. 1 CERTIFICATE HOLDER 1 H CANCELLATION 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH If cancelled prior to expiration date, 2000 MAIN STREET issuing company will kX6NIAMbk to send HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 30 days written notice to cert. holder . !Authorized Representativel . - . • - _._•- _ - •:,-• _ -,2--_-. .,-2.-:-_-;:,: , _ 03_7-'7-91 09. 4AM P01 • c:1_ -,- .-.L.1.--...-:=„7.-,..., ,. - -:. - __. j _ _ , -.::-= '.-F,-:- •: . ACID CERTIFICATE JF INSURANCE ISSUE DATE(MM/DD/YY) I 10-08-91 I PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS DSI INSURANCE SERVICES . NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,I ONE CALIFORNIA STREET EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW SUITE 2700 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 COMPANY LETTER A SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY _ COMPANY B INSURED LETTER CONCEPT MARINE, INC. , DBA: , COMPANY CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES LETTER C 1 SPINNAKER WAY ' COMPANY BERKELEY, CA 94710 , LETTER D COMPANY E LETTER COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITIONS OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH.POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO i T POLICY EFFECTIVE ;POLICY EXPIRATION LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE i POLICY NUMBER DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS GENERAL LIABILITY i ;GENERAL AGGREGATE j$ COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABIUTY ' 'PRODUCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE ;$ ;CLAIMS MADE 1 'OCCUR ,PERSONAL&ADVERTISING INJURY $ OWNERS&CONTRACTORS PROT. 'EACH OCCURRENCE ,$ ---- I (Any on fire) $ FIRE DAMAGE e lj ;MEDICAL EXPENSE(Any one person) L$ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 1 COMBINED !SINGA ANY AUTO { BA 8326079 10/14/91 10/14/92 IuMT� $1,000, - ALL OWNED AUTOS I DIILYY —�$ --' X I SCHEDULED AUTOS '(Per person) X i HIRED AUTOS ;BODILY 1 X X .NON-OWNED AUTOS I (Per ac ident)j$ I 1 GARAGE UABIUTY s . _ ;PROPERTY ,$ !!{ DAMAGE EXCESS LIABILITY i j EACH - AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE $ i$ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM ' WORKER'S COMPENSATION STATUTORY j '$ (EACH ACCIDENT) AND • $ (DISEASE—POLICY UMIT) EMPLOYERS'UABIUTY j $ (DISEASE—EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER ' I i 1 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRA- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL 151D52.822 -;M'A(L 30 DAYS 2000 MAIN STREET WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,-841-FFAJW4E-TO-MA(L HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 5Im Trn-FMER—n EQE=(T17B mB= ISEEI(ZIpCTE=0:E 92648 CIZIZIPAITCC B=co3HEPgES> CYEz__ AUTHORIZED REPRES 7ATIVE j ACORD 25-S(11/89) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1989 j i n a,' ycr , dL hr .sMk 4 _) ra•4." 7:1- c t.17. .-�i Aw.kro„7,---r 1.:Y4 ., �" • yi: AE�®OPED `.4-C RT�F�AT®i. a S: , C, _ : 4" +.f rtF; kx i9.' ISSUE DATE(MMIDD,YY) :. eo C • • ( , � 'y» ..L..si a �-�•r. .3,rs'a.-r.:,it�C.;.-.�: F.+w1L!tiad'Ya,{iJ' , t.0 di hti��'rt�'_+Ti � -�,n'$:. � a A, 7 16 91 is MT .. ... .,,...cSw�S'7.�Stu�y-,: ��t rTi..r� .�A �. /'a.�� � _� 1,t' .., 4" K',.f' PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND DURHAM AND BATES AGENCIES INC• CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE 330 S.W. 6TH AVENUE POLICIES BELOW. PORTLAND OREGON 97204 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY AMEMBERS OF THE INSTITUTE OF ,LETTER T,ONDOILUNDERWR ITERS COMPANY B INSURED LETTER CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. COMPANY LETTER C' 1 SPINNAKER WAY BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 93710 COMPANY LETTER D COMPANY E LETTER a.. .fit. .. ., a t•. .` e r.� .�,t +4 RI '. -:; r -Ax H Y i � + .... Ii". '.lFi0.` .Af',a,4 r}r� + ,N.+err'., .':—.< t''il7.`1' - w.. q'A.. �'."•f ,,I ,'Y..•y'•'4,,,,:^t F.w .ei..•. ,• , #O�IERA�ESF:.'��;;�r�`� �� ��' � �- � 4�,�� z • .,r �. ».,_ ,.�.,. ;:., � .{ a - * .'- _.Y • ;� �'.0 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN.IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS LTR DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) GENERAL LIABILITY BODILY INJURY OCC. 5 COMPREHENSIVE FORM BODILY INJURY AGG. $ PREMISES/OPERATIONS PROPERTY DAMAGE OCC. $ UNDERGROUND PROPERTY DAMAGE AGG. $ EXPLOSION&COLLAPSE HAZARD PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERA y���IIM��"'"' ��1 BI&PD COMBINED OCC. $ - CONTRACTUAL !V1'I_f BI&PD COMBINED AGG. $ INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS PERSONAL INJURY AGG. $ BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE •'%.- 'r-ti:,'„ m PERSONAL INJURY .''n:,' `a '':." . a.,...,_. ... AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BODILY INJURY ANY AUTO (Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS(Priv Pass. ) APPROVED AS TO FORM: BODILY INJURY $ ALL OWNED AUTOS(Other Than) (Per accident) Priv.Pass. GAIL HUTTON, City Attorney HIRED AUTOS By: PROPERTY DAMAGE $ NON-OWNED AUTOS De ty City Attorney GARAGE LIABILITY - BODILY INJURY& PROPERTY DAMAGE $ COMBINED EXCESS LIABILITY l r / EACH OCCURRENCE $ UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM STATUTORY LIMITS - WORKER'S COMPENSATION EACH ACCIDENT $ AND DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE $ OTHER $1,000,000 LIMIT PER CLAIM A PROFESSIONAL LIAB. 136460012 7/1/91 7/1/92 hNNTTAT. ATE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS x '� I V uI.a i1 sAftE r-�•"�+.1�v ---- 'COAT eftP 14=----.k gr 44 aE - --'.-5 ? AMfv°`!:0 1.} CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH tl SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE 2000 MAIN STREET 4EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL XnXX' IXXIX) HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 MAIL_30.DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE 4- LEFT,XX�vXXXIXiXXXIXXK�XX�XiXX X� S6CXIXbD3C�X�X�XXSuX4CiXfXXXIXXXX4X ATTN• JULIE +- .• + l , , - - I + � . • AUTHORIZE HE F TA 3 _ ss,, xr ;5 '. -, `- z1;;--A "+ i„ •''Vt-' Y`a s', ' 4''a" AcaT l PORATIO� F449 :3 a\a��.�+t�.�l�.c �_ �«' r .^i:�+F^ ���..:3:7:C�tva s4.:���T'..+sus+-',+:7.`.��r _�h�S`�...n- �"s%r•�3!�.'b.i,: -b,uJ._�e1 ._.1 sc-.v3r'is:_ _,�.. .4. , S y$:. .; .:.`: !;liW'': >>L.{.,:;; ;.<:.'^'y'{`5:: ISSCUE DATE(MM/DO/YY) :L: f •� . n 6l25l91 w ... F.•}`�'` .:..... ....... ..? ... ... ... :.if.::.is ..{.....::}�{4. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS DEALEY,RENTON do ASSOC. NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICES BELOW P.O. Box 12675 100 Oak Street COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Oakland, CA 94604-2675 415-465-3090 COMPANY 000E sue-CODE LETTER A National Surety Corp. C L COMPANY INSURED LETTER B Concept Marine Associates COM'AM' LETTER C 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710 I+�'TERD CO►PANY LETTER E c:<::.:::w;{.,{:su<;,cw:a:<•.,.......,.;..:,,...,{:c.....:a.o-•>•{;:w;:M;,,.,,M..M,w....u......�„.,,:,w................. : c ,,..,,..,.w.wx.cu,.,;<w•.:.::........«•:�cx...��.a:x.,�: G�:�':ixi•{'•:<xbcaixi':::.:;;i:<:::,..::a;sy.::>.,i:itux••_ es`+f THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCLMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAO CLAMS. GO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICYE'FFECTIVE POLICY EXPIiATIOF /ILL LIMITS NTHOUSANDS LTD DATE(MM/CO/YY) DATE(MM/DO/YY) BEIERALLIABLITY GENERAL AOOREOATE _ COMIERCIAL OEIERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-CO1P/CPS AOOREOATE 8 iiiiiiil CLAIMS MADE OCCUR. PERSONAL I ADVERTISINDINJLRY $ OWNER'S I. CONTRACTOR'S PROT. EACH OCCUIRD CE s FIRE DAMAGE (Any one lire) $ MEDICAL EXPENSE(Any one person) _ AUTOMOBLE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE $ APPROVED AS TO FORM:- - - - LIMIT -_ _. ALL OWE AUTOS GAIL HUTTON, City Attorney BCOILY INJURY $ SCI—EC QED AUTOS By: Deputy C Lty Attorney (pef P&SOf) HIRED.AUTOS INJLRY s NON-0WNED AUTOS �/�.�Z_ (PeraocideM) GARAGE LIABILITY Z PROPERTY���Zl DAMAGE _ EXOESSLIABLRY PRIVATE PROPERTY WORK ONLY : s $ ONCE —I OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM ,,,•, WORKER'S ooMPENSATION STATUTORY p ... ....... EEii;:;E;c'isisi:i�i� EiE'si:,EiiEiE iii $ 1000 (EACH ACCIDENT) NO SFA POLICYLIMIT A EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY WP80404114 7/01/91 7/01/92 _ = 1000 ) = 1000 (DISF&-SF-EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER DESORPTION OF OPERATIONSSLOCATIONSIVEHIOLESIRESTRICTIONSZSPEOIAL ITEMS SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILLXQX/I/XIKXR MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE City of Huntington Beach i:i. LEFT MOVXMRA TR IRRLPI/9 AEXcitiStL 219 -56 BkIR57P1 ft 2000 Main Street :, -IfXRR X A 1fhP{')&)nM t k Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ::FOR®REPRESEWTATWE f MAL i, lE IU1 fz ASS S Attn: Robert E. Eichblatt ., 57000 C i t Enka nee r ,• t V•i84a� 1 i .. ConceotMVlarine Concept Marine Associates.Inc. Construction Management/Harbor Planning I Spinnaker Way 13763 Fiji Way,Suite EU-2 Berkeley CA 94710-1612 Marina del Rey CA 90292-6974 415/839-6700 213/301-0983 FAX:415/843-1360 FAX.213/301-2453 • January 11, 1991 • 9005/156/1102 Mr. Robert Eichblatt City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: City of Huntington,Beach Reconstruction of Municipal Pier Precast Concrete Inspection Dear Bob: t Early expectations were that manufacture of the concrete pre-stressed pile would take place at the Utility Vault Co. in Fontana, California. We selected CHJ Inspection Services of Colton, California to be our inspectors because of their close proximity. These expectations proved to be correct, and CHJ was the ideal local inspection agency. However,the costs associated with inspection are undergoing significant changes. • A. PILE MANUFACTURING PRODUCTION RATE The rate of pile manufacturing is substantially slower than we had projected. In our proposal, we estimated that pile production would be approximately 9 piles per day, based on our experience. At this rate the job total of 312 piles would have been complete in 35 working days,the number of days stated in our proposal. The actual rate of production is about 2 piles per day. If present production rates continue, pile manufacturing will take 7.5 months. While we expect the rate of pile • production to improve,we cannot accurately project a completion date. I recommend that, for the present, our contract be adjusted to match the Contractor's baseline construction schedule. This schedule shows pile manufacturing completion in 120 calendar days, 85 more days of inspection than was anticipated by the Agreement (please see the Table 1, attached). Unlike the overtime inspection costs discussed below,I do not believe this additional expense is recoverable from the Contractor. liii]i Mi L Mr. Robert Eichblatt January 11, 1991 9005/156/1102 Page 2 B. OVERTIME INSPECTION • As of the end of December, CHJ had logged in 37 hours of overtime. It is our recommendation that this cost be charged to the Contractor under Section 2-10.1, Authority of Board and Inspection (copy attached). At present, the Contractor is considenng routinely manufacturing piles in 10 hour shifts and on Saturdays. Of the various options available, it is assumed that the least desirable would be that the Contractor make direct payment to Concept Marine. Accordingly, we will need to meet .i • • • set up accounting procedures for the recovery of compensation . es e Contractor. We recommend setting up an overtime contingency fund of $10,000 to pro '• compensation for CHJ's overtime work, pending reimbursement from the • actor. C. PRECAST CONCRETE DECK SECTIONS The contractor has opted to precast the deck sections in the same plant the piles are being manufactured. This remote location does not allow our on-site construction manager to inspect the reinforcing and concrete. However, we feel that our pile • casting inspector can inspect the deck sections at no extra cost, as long as the two activities are concurrent. It is difficult to anticipate inspection requirements and costs associated with the deck sections after pile manufacturing is completed in late April. Accordingly, we recommend waiting until mid-March to discuss this matter further. One other matter that relates to inspection: CHJ has offered us a 5% discount for prompt payment. The City has been generally prompt in paying Concept Marine, so we would like to pass the savings on to the City,which is reflected in Table 1. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. • Sin ely, Gordon R. Fulton President GRF:keb Attachments cc: A. Cantor ConceotMVlarine Concept Marine Associates.Inc. Construction Management/Harbor Planning 1 Spinnaker Way 13763 Fiji Way.Suite EU-2 Berkeley CA 94710-1612 Manna del Rey CA 90292-6974 415/839-6700 213/301-0983 FAX:415/843-1360 FAX:213/301-2453 INCREASED COSTS FOR PILE PRODUCTION Pile Production Current estimate for pile inspection- 120 days 960 hours (based on CPM schedule for pile fabrication) CMA agreement allowance for 35 days of pile 280 hours inspection • Therefore, Increased inspection of 85 days= 680 hours Estimated additional cost required to complete inspection based on current CPM schedule 680 hours @$50/HR $34,000 Less 5% CHJ prompt payment allowance ($1,700) Less prompt payment allowance ($700) against original agreement • $31,600 • Plus Concept Marine 15% mark-up $4,740 • $36,340 Contingency Inspection Allowance Overtime Say $10,000 TOTAL RECOMMENDED CHANGE AMOUNT $46,340 January 10, 1991 �iocc- V,'7L4?'fir ConccptMVlarine Concept Marine Associates,Inc 1 Spinnaker Way 13763 Fiji Way,Suite EU-2 Construction Management/Harbor Planning Berkeley CA 94710-1612 Marina del Rey CA 90292-6974 415/839-6700 213,'301-0983 FAX 415/843-1360 FAX.213/301-2453 September 20, 1991 9005/179/1301 Mr. Robert Eichblatt City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Huntington Beach Pier Pre-cast Concrete Inspection Dear Bob: Now that the manufacturing of concrete pre-stressed piling and precast deck sections is complete, it is appropriate for me to follow-up on my letter to you of January 11, 1991, which predicted cost overruns for inspection, and to present an accounting of the costs. Our original contract had $18,975 allocated for pile casting inspection. As my January letter noted, pile manufacturing was much slower than anticipated, plus Riedel International elected to precast the deck sections at the pile casting yard. CHJ, o • •ection sub-contractor, has had billings through completion of $64,714.00, comes o a total of $74,421 with mark-up. This leaves an unfunded balance of 55,446 w P' we request the City to add to our contract. - ached you will find a tabular summary of CHJ's costs, along with copies of invoices. We are evaluating whether any of this cost increase can be allocated to Riedel International. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Gordon R. Fulton President GRF:keb Attachments I 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101 HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER RECONSTRUCTION CHJ Billing Summary Invoice Date Amount Mark Up Total 2930 11/30/90 3,876.00 581.40 4,457.40 3000 12/31/90 7,159.20 1,073.88 8,233.08 3036 01/31/91 7,398.60 1,109.79 8,508.39 3124 02/28/91 5,458.70 818.81 6,277.51 3182 03/31/91 4,086.90 613.04 4,699.94 3303 04/30/91 7,233.30 1,085.00 8,318.30 3386 05/31/91 7,573.40 1,136.01 8,709.41 3407 06/30/91 7,166.80 1,075.02 8,241.82 3556 07/31/91 6,971.10 1,045.67 8,016.77 3628 08/31/91 6,555.00 983.25 7,538.25 09/06/91 1,235.00 185.25 1,420.25 $64,714.00 $9,707.10 $74,421.10 09/23/91 9005CHJbill s 1 CbRtcEPT'MA-INE ASSOC. , r / ; I// �— CONSTRUCTIOr: --RVICES THIS CHECK MOAN FOR PAYYERT \1 I • Cv�J INCORPOL O■ THE F ACCOYRTf DATE — S/- : O. Box 1820 •• 1355 E. Cooley Dr., Suite C, Colton,CA 92324 •• Phone(714) 824-7224 INVOICE No 2930 minnuip) PROJECT To: Concept Marine City of Huntington Beach 13763 Fiji Way Reconstruction of Municipal Pie Suite EU-2 Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6974 DATE JOB NO CUSTOMER'S P O NO 11/30/90 90205-5 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 68 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection $ 50.00 $ 3,400.00 10 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (0.T.) 68.00 680.00 Less 5% Discount ( 204.00) AMOUNT DUE: $ 3,876.00 RECEIVED DEC lu 1990 COnceptJVlarine . i r'! C,VN5111UC.IiVN Ott<V!C:ES - 1 , 'L C�J J INCORFOR.``-;D . • PO. Bolt 1820 • 1355 E. Cooiay Dr, S0:e C.Cotton,CA 92324 • Phcr,d t714)824.7224 INVOICE No 3000 - PROJECT To Concept Marine City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 677 . Reconstruction of Municipal Pier Beach Center Station Huntington Beach, CA 92648 • Attn: Mr. Al Cantor , DATE J08 NO CJSTOV ER S P C NO 12/11/90 . 4420f-5 I - OUANTITv _ DESCRaPTION I UN.t PRICE A.'OuhT 114 • Field Hours - Concrete Inspection $ 50.00 $ 5,700.00 19 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (0.T.) 63.00 1 1,292.00 8 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (O.T. Sat) 68.00 544.00 � I Less 5% Discount ( 376.80) Amount Due S 7,159.20 CPNC PT MA'INE ASSOC. Aft .>f► •'��1 . CONSTRUCTION RVICES T XIS OR CHECK IS-pEt 1FOUOR RTS►AY MERT / INCORPO D THE FOIIOKVER C DATE '0 ANU : O. Box 1820 • 1355 E Cooley Dr., Suite C,Colton,CA 92324 • Phone(714) 824-7224 INVOICE N° 3036 === PROJECT To: Concept Marine City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 677 Reconstruction of Municipal PiE Beach Center Station Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: Al Cantor DATE JOB NO CUSTOMER'S P O NO 1/31/91 90205-5 I' QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE ' AMOUNT '/ 130 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection $ 50.00 $ 6,500.00 12 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (0.T.) 68.00 816.00 4 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (0.T. Sat) 68.00 272.00 4 Field Hours - Prestressed Pilings Inspection 50.00 200.00 Less 5% Discount ( 389.40) Amount Due $ 7,398.60) ConceptMarine FEB11 1991 CoN•c�T M R7E7.J oa. ' n CONST RUCT IORV ICES THIS CHECK l t ACOYRTAERT (/1 INCORPO•D oN THE F - 1. Box 1820 • 1355 E. Cooley Dr.,Suite C,Colton,CA 92324 • Phone(714)824-7224 INVOICE W-2 . 1111111111 N o 3124 r—W r& PROJECT M111=1111111111111111•1=1111M1 To: Concept Marine m City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 677 Reconstruction of Municipal Beach Center Station Pier Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: Mr Al Cantor DATE JOB NO CUSTOMER'S P O NO 02/28/91 90205-5 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT -r 3 = r',.e,,3'772 ' 104 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection $ 50.00 $ 5,100.00 9 1/2 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (0.T.) 68.00 646.00 Less 5% Discount (287.30) AMOUNT DUE: $ 5,458.70 9tx7s/P/-76/142.01 Concepti1arine MAR 12 1991 RECEIVED CONCEPT MARINE ASSOC. - CONSTRUCTIO RVICES �p WWII? 71 O �C'1 °�i� • Cam`=�` INCORPOFfED TNI EICI HT E FO'ILOMI ACCOYNTS YYEIIT DATE -� r-- : O. Box 1820 • 1355 E. Cooley Dr., Suite C,Colton,CA 92324 • Phone(714) 824 7224 INVOICE VW/1114'�- N o 3182 PL 1 P7 PROJE.CT MEMMEMMINEMMOMMII To: Concept Marine City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 677 Reconstruction of Municipal Beach Center Station Pier Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: Mr. Al Cantor DATE JOB NO CUSTOMER'S P 0 NO 3/31/91 90205-5 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT / 84 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection $ 50.00 $ 4,200.00 / 1 1/2 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (O.T.) 68.00 102.00 Less 5% Discount ( 215.10) Amount Due $ 4,086.90 /005/9z0/5zoi ConceptMarine APR 08 1991 RECEIVED CONCEPT MA- NE ASSOC. : 2? n CONSTRUCTIONORVICES -0W THIS CHECK IbiViRLO FOR PAYMENT � '• �J INCORPOR/""�I ED OH THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS DATE mommom0 P ,L 1 ). Box 1820 • 1355 E Cooley Dr.,Suite C, Colton, CA 92324 • Phone(714)824-7224 INVOICE reffiffilr lWASM.'Ill N ° 3303 ===�� PROJECT To: Concept Marine e City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 677 Reconstruction of Municipal Pier Beach Center Station "Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: Mr. Al Cantor DATE JOB NO CUSTOMER'S P O NO 4-30-91 90205-5 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT / 138 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection 50.00 $ 6,900.00 I 4 1/2 ' Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (0.T.) 68.00 306.00 r 6 #7 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (0.T.-Sat.) 68.00 408.00 ( Less 5% Discount. ( 380.70) Amount Due: $ 7,233.30 o • 4a5Ipmi/SZ°'• Concept arine MAY 08 1991 RECEIVED , CONCEP T ' E ASSOC. r • iJ.. LVIVOI(<Vc...1KAN OCICVI�CJ . ' jr THIS CHECK 1S DELIVERED FOR PAYMENT . .• .. ; INCORPOCD • - OM THE FOLLtWIRu ACCOUNTS P.Q'8o><1820 •• 1355 E�� rC,goley Or,Suite C.Corta.GA 82324 .,Pnotle(714) 824.7224 I vrnt ,,�.� I1 N 3386 -`/ eri . PROJECT 'WWI e City•of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 677 a Reconstruction of Municipal • elea � Center .Station • Pier Huntington •Beach, CA 92648• Attn: Mr. Al Cantor ; ! I f 1DATE • J09 NO . • • • CUSTOMER'S P.O NO ' 90205-5 .TO ANTITY : DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT I . 154 • Field Hours - Concrete Inspection • 50.00 , 5 7,700.00 ✓ 4. Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (Overtime) 68.00 272.00 I . Less 5% Discount I • Amount Due: $ 7,573.4D ! r.. I , - 0/ 4-r_ . • Y • . ,ar,�..,, ,w,.rIr ...•t-+r---r I I • i I J • • I • gaoS/Q 359`Szo1 • , • ConceptMMarine JUN 07 1991 I IF • RECEIVED 1 PT• _ . . THIS CHECK IS DELIVERED FOR PAYMENT J CONSTRUCTION I VICES' ON THE F4CL�RTRRS�CCOUNT S 4� . C_ ' Ir� 'mom 11. INCO\RPORAItD INNE�- ). Box 1820 • 1355 E. Cooley Dr., Suite C, Colton,CA 92324 • Phone (714) 824-7224 INVOICE IN N 3407 PROJECT • To: Concept Marine a City of Huntington Beach Attn: Mr. Al Cantor Reconstruction of Municipal Beach Center Station Pier P.O. Box 677 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 DATE': JOB NO CUSTOMER'S P 0 NO 6/30/91 90205-5 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT / 140 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection $ 50.00 $ 7,000.00 2 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (0.T.) 68.00 136.00 / 6 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (0.T. Sat) 68.00 408.00 Less 5% Discount ( 377.20) Amount Due $ 7,166.80 t ,ocf 39 3/%01 ConceptMarine .JUL 08 1991 RECEIVED - I (� • CON r INCOR ORS ^�ICES PO. Box 1820 • 1355 E. Cooley Dr., Suite C, Colton,CA 92324 • Phone (714) 824-7224 INVOICE N1° 3556 PROJECT To: Concept Marine m City of Huntington Beach Attn: Mr. Al Cantor Reconstruction of Municipal Pie P.O. Box 677 Beach Center Station Huntington Beach, CA 92648 DATE JOB NO I CUSTOM=P'S P O NO 7/31/91 90205-5 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUN r 142 Field HoL'rs - Concrete Inspection $ 50.00 $ 7,100.00 3 1/2 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection (0.T.) 68.00 238.00 Less 5% Discount ( 366.90) Amount Due $ 6,971.10 e9/C> °1oo*YZ-7/6(05 ConceptMarine \\ A U G 06 1991 RECEIVED n CONSTRUCTION VICES C • /� ' `vJ INCORPORA D P.O: Box 1820 • 1355 E. Cooley Dr., Suite C, Colton, CA 92324 • Phone (714) 824-7224 INVOICE N° 3628 PROJECT To: Concept Marine City of Huntington Beach Attn: Mr. Al Cantor Reconstruction of Municipal Pier P.O. Box 677 Beach Center Station Huntington Beach, CA 92648 DATE JOB NO i CUSTOMER'S P O NO 8/31/91 90205-5 I _ QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 138 /Fieid Hours - Concrete Inspection $ 50.00 $ 6,900.00 Less 5% Discount ( 345.00) Amount Due $ 6,555.00 ConceptMarine S E P 10 1991 RECEIVED nn CONSTRUCTION "-iRVICES - .I� • C�1 INCORPOF, ., D P.O. Box 1820 • 1355 E.Cooley Dr.,Suite C, Colton, CA 92324 • Phone (714)824-7224 • INVOICE 3083 PROJECT To4001pt Marine City of Huntington Reach AWW: Mr. Al Cantor Reconstruction of Municipal Pier p..Q Box 677 Bi 4i(Center Station iiur ; iaton Beach. CA 92648 DATE JOB NO. CUSTOMER'S P O NO 9/1B/91'` 90205-5 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION — UNIT PRICE ) AMOUNT . Septep►bar) - Septembgr .6,, 1991 26 Field Hours - Concrete Inspection . { $ 50.00 $ 1.300.00 Less 5% Discount ( 65.00) Amount Due $ 1,235.00• • • Jcit c ConcotMVlarine Concept Marine Associates,Inc 1 Spinnaker Way 13763 Fiji Way,Suite EU-2 Construction Management/Harbor Planning Berkeley CA 94710-1612 Marina del Rey CA 90292-6974 415/839-6700 213/301-0983 FAX 415/843-1360 FAX 213/301-2453 September 23, 1991 9005/180/1301 Mr. Robert Eichblatt City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Huntington Beach Pier Geotechnical Inspection and Testing Dear Bob: In the course of preparing my letter to you dated September 20, regarding precast concrete inspection,we had the occasion to update the contract status of our other subcontractors. I thought that you might be interested. Geotechnical Subcontractor (Moore and Taber): To date, Riedel has driven 208 piles of the 312, which means that they are 66% complete. Moore and Taber billings to date total $50,423.27, including Concept Marine's mark-up. Moore and Taber's contract amount is $73,485, which means that they are 68.6% complete. Considering that Moore and Taber's work included preconstruction activities, it appears that we will stay within budget. Testing (Twining Laboratories): Twining's cost to date is $3,933, including our mark-up. This is 34.2% of the total budget amount of $11,500. With approximately 13 on-site concrete pours remaining, we expect to underrun our . a • ti . Extra Services: To date, we have e • s ed $6,389 on I ding inspection by City Consulting Corp. (Ray Schuller), and :al services by a •_.n, Lewis and Bockius (Karen S. Fishman). Sincerely, Gordon R. Fulton President GRF:keb Attachments ������Mil IIIII III1111111 liii liii HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER RECONSTRUCTION Moore & Taber Billing Summary Invoice Date Amount Mark Up Total May/June 3,400.00 510.00 3,910.00 3678 12/20/90 5,446.33 816.95 6,263.28 4236 03/29/91 17,755.85 2,663.38 20,419.23 4726 06/27/91 11,903.76 1,785.56 13,689.32 5029 08/28/91 5,340.38 • 801.06 6,141.44 $43,846.32 $6,576.95 $50,423.27 Twining Laboratories Billing Summary Invoice Date Amount Mark Up Total 603638 04/30/91 320.00 48.00 368.00 24376 05/22/91 (160.00) (24.00) (184.00) 603721 05/31/91 1,190.00 178.50 1,368.50 603845 06/30/91 380.00 57.00 437.00 603947 07/31/91 1,060.00 159.00 1,219.00 604070 08/31/91 630.00 94.50 724.50 a $3,420.00 $513.00 $3,933.00 09/23/91 9005M&Tbill 1 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION December 16, 1991 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator 9w0 y Prepared by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works C CIVvCI / Subject: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE HUNTINGTON Z/G�y/ MUNICIPAL PIER; CC-735 Consistent with Council Policy? (] Yes [ ) New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: i20 STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Construction management services for the Pier, provided by Concept Marine Associates, will exceed the amount allocated in their present contract. An amendment to the contract is needed to continue their services to the completion of construction. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the amendment to the contract with Concept Marine Associates for construction management services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier in the amount of $71,500. ANALYSIS: Concept Marine Associates were retained by the City to perform construction management services for the Pier construction contract. These services include a constructability review, geotechnical and materials testing, pile fabrication inspection, full time on-site inspection, contract administration for payments, materials submittals, change in work, and monitoring construction schedules. The amount of the original contract is $417,340. The time and effort required by Concept Marine Associates for the Pier project services have been greater than originally estimated and budgeted. Riedel International, the general contractor for the Pier, elected to cast both the piling and the deck units off-site at a casting yard in Upland, California. This method of construction appears to have been a factor that allowed the Riedel bid to be approximately $3 million lower than the next bid and the engineer's estimate. Full time inspection is required at the casting plant during the manufacturing of each of these units. Casting of the piles has taken longer than estimated ,and as the pre-casting of the deck units off-site was not anticipated, the additional cost for inspection has run $65,000. Extra specialized construction services in the amount of $6,500 for a building code review and a contract issue legal opinion were also accomplished. Concept Marine has also performed overtime inspections due to the extended work hours of the Contractor. These costs will be reimbursed by the Contractor. Off-site inspection is no longer needed, as all piles and deck units are now cast. The remainder of the services provided by Concept Marine will be paid on a time and material basis as before. A request to consider extending the contract with this firm for construction management services for the Pier building construction may be made in the future. 9s Construction Management Services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier; CC-735 November 18, 1991 Page two FUNDING SOURCE: The Pier Fund, Account No. E-PG-AS-154-6-37-00 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny alternate direction ATTACHMENT: Contract Amendment No. 1 MTU:LFS:JM:gd 2970g/1&2 4� , x ri RCA - ROUTING SHEET/CHECKLIST WHITE - REMAINS WITH RCA GREEN - ADMINISTRATION COPY CANARY - CITY ATTORNEY'S COPY PINK - CITY CLERK'S COPY GOLD - DEPARTMENT COPY INITIATING DEPARTMENT 611)16; J DATE /c2. — — / SUBJECT •Z35 MEETING DATE h2 -/‘ 9/ AGENDA DEADLINE /a- 1- '/ (TO ADMINISTRATION) YES NO PUBLIC NOTICE [ ] [V PUBLICATION DATE LEGAL DEPARTMENT(with Exhibits) Date In Date Out INITIATING DEPARTMENT REVIEW/CHECKLIST: YES NO N/A [ ] [ ] [i./r-Ordinance [ ] Exhibit 1 [ ] [ ] [Resolution [ ] Exhibit 2 [ ] [ ] [Signed Contract [ ] Exhibit 3 [ ] [ ] Signed Agreement [ ] Exhibit 4 [ ] [ ] [rr Neg. Dec/EIR [ ] [ ] [//Insurance Required Additional [ ] Exhibits Nbr. [ ] [ ] [I/(Bonds Required [ ] [ ] [L-r-Financial Impact Statement (Unbudgeted Items over $1,000) [ V]-' [ ] [ ] RCA - City Council [ ] [ ] [/RCA - Redevelop ent Agency • INITIATING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL BY: [ ] ADMINISTRATION REVIEW [ ] CITY CLERK FOR AGENDA COMMENTS: • •,, en CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK May 25, 1990 Concept Marine Associates, Inc. 13763 Fiji Way, Suite EU-2 Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6974 Attn: Gordon R. Fulton The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting held Monday, May 21 , 1990, approved Consulting Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Concept Marine Associates, Inc. to perform Construction Management Services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier Project. Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records. Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:bt Enc. (Telephone: 714-536-5227) I - REQUES I FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION (n°' �O Date May 21, 1990 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator�t-i} �C� s- '�/ 19 Prepared by: geigi2Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works CI Y CL K Subject: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FOR MUNICIPAL PIER PROJECT: CC-735 Consistent with Council Policy? [d Yes [ I New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Pier construction management contract has been prepared and is presented for approval, as directed by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the construction management contract with Concept Marine Associates, Incorporated in the amount of $417,340. ANALYSIS: The City Council, at their May 7, 1990 meeting, authorized the preparation of a contract to retain Concept Marine Associates to perform the construction management services for the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier project, for approval at this council meeting. The contract amount is a fixed fee of $417,340, based upon a fifteen month construction period. FUNDING SOURCE: Funding for this task will come from the Pier Fund. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reconsider the Council action of May 7, 1990 and direct staff as to alternate measures. ATTACHMENTS: Construction management contract LFS:JFM:lw 2432g/7 `JI r`,a Z75 U `1! t, l '31173'143" n1HnH 30 Al;3 / JitV3"i3 ,i113 03Ai333ii Pin cffic ' 90 05 15 16: 37 Z .5G1= 221 0540 DLIF.:HAI'1 & BATE_ 1_1 r r ' s, T TAB,070Pe AT AHIR W- r Or . ....'CERI`IFIC E OF INSURANCE i Isar 0IL• (MMNUfYY) 5/3 5/90 MD/cqi PRODUCER ime CERTIFICATE IB ISSUED AS A MATTER OP INFORMATI• ON Y A C.CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFI ATE D ES 1C- .t'; to 1 i„iiil itt.d ht+ t; A1gerica n a ', , I nC . i EXTFND OR Al."DER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE Pi ICIES BE Lb J0 S.W. sixth Avenue " T .,,-•a-1 in'1 , �r,�n-,n 07204 I CrWIDANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE ^COMPANY ters at Lloyd0 and II TLETT'ER A Var.ious�Ifl titute Comp4nja LETTER ANY Eh g "-ambers of the Insti ` ‘ Io INSURED .. '..,li<�g _T,ifi erw t r� I r COMPANY �� Concept Marine f.,s-oc ate 3 , Inc. I LETTER r+ Replaces Corti fic.at.e issued 5/11/90 1 S t.1 i 11 n;1:•.-'1 YJ ty 1.- . _._ ...__. — — I COMPANY D .Berkeloy, California 94710 it-itt-H �CC)MPANY it , _ ..... .. — — !FITEF COVE. -0 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIEC OF INCURANCE LICTED DELOW HAVE BEEN ICCUCD TO THE INCURRED NAMED ABOVE ron Ti It PO!-IOY P AI'+INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS ER IFICATE MAV - 1 DE I55i/EG OR MAY PER I AIIr, THE INbURANLG Al-F IJHUiU RI I tit►LILIL•ILb Uth,.HIRJtU HtHLIN IS SU9JL.1 11.1 ALL I HE TERMS,rXG s USIIONSr AND CONDI- TIONQ ' SUCH POL ICIES. _ I _- -- -- _- PLIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS , CO — -- „ — — F4M;t!-Y FhrFL11Vt POLICY FYpINAlntry r LIR !PE CW Ir 1URANCE '..11,.Y 'd1.IM-iFI� I L t IMM,LOYt) DATE,MMW11 t 'Yl - CA�,H I tI (..019'tENCI- AGGREGATE BOUILY AI. �ni nlgv i -Al JNt nn^^ y 3/4/90 PROPERTY It „Q�Vr ' F}_�':.,.'. .. .,,.LI.Ar- I;AZARD L'19 J3 .}i f`�f 1 U4F.1AC1E ' _ I'RODUL I,,,:U') ififL'JPERATION� CONTRACTUAL ei a P' 0000 1000 commit!! 1 NUEPENr,FNi L-' l+AL 1JR� j J. +-_.I - BROAD FORM -'RGPLR"Y DAMAGL YLHSLtNAL NJIJR I ,.r'«1^,' F.J11RY: $ Inc1. • AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO I r tr,.. I All OWNED AUI`s i1P11 an,s I fa:, - .,ER Di- ; ,Ive, ALL OWNED A,,. Y1tV Ph55 ." t �,. HIAEfI AUTOS r NON-OWNED Atli-iS Irt *' tD 0 ;AM,,,ep &'( GARAGE LIAG',-° �S¶O ��. EXCESS LI M I.Y UMEIREL A G�II' 1 c4ilty B A 'C, 0 IA, „fk4' ,s., Rio*VLGM6,.L3I WI Of 1 OTHER'Irt.tih wipip . /?y � (- ------ 1 WORKERS ' ,. .. ,T,.,•; !�C a ta„,/,. . / / l ( 1 „rr-t I w fAC ACCIOENI) I $ DISE SF-POLICY LIMIT) EMPLOYE' �"""'• Dn -"""'( t DI�f+ r EACH EM 1 OTHER s5ou t.000 ., mit per B professional' • a !u'a /.1 ", '1,.- 11- , nt Annual Liability i ` ~ j gg DESCRIPTION r, , „EgATIr.yc,�or„„, „'F•t^,.F,- I-" , •_�,i — n TN F I is!I nl: 2pl.'{,TTMTG'II CERTIFICATE HOLDER •*-;,, -- CANCELLATION , SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CA CELL-D - FORE THE EX- City of Hunt ington Beach PIRATIQ I DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COWAN WIL - -• 01 k 2000 Main e e t MAIL 3 0 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLb R AMED TO THE - �y �Huntington ,each, California 926 7070�' Ir•S1 •is 7* . .4irVf iv. rv. , • • t • •.tytit n._i. SISM %, ' AUTHOR ZEC,REPRESE TIVE ATTN: Robert zichblatt. ..' ACORD 25(8/84) , A i�:. IIR/ACORD CORPORATION 1004 r POLICY 1 UMBER: IMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS (FORM B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART. SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (if no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of "your work" for that insured by or for you. CG 20 10 11 85 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1984 ❑ 1 74P �"4 i iws;p r . .5 2«I 0540 OvAHAM & BATES - - I: 01 . •„., Of. s>nIr« (nns,,,ur`'rfvl Ore� : GE IF1O OF INSURANCEs i z/Ma Tilt PRODUCER TH1d CERTIFICATE 1S ISSUED AS A MATTEA OF INFORMATIO ONi. APO CQHFtRS P NO NIGHTS UPON Ts'CEATIFICATIHOLDER.TKIS CFATIFIC It E$NOT AMINO. ExTrso Oft ALTER THE COVERAGE AFTOROED sY THE PO E$ Low. Df]Rf>'AM AND c t ., . ax.Ivrr1c',S, Itk . f1f1 � 330 S.- W. ii ' AV :NIJE COMPANIES AFFORDING COY1RA?E t'ORT?ANn, = ,v:i;V 97204 COMPANY A QNDERWRXTERS AT LLOYDS AN##N LETTER VAR .0 S N •„ •: 1 _-_a- .-_._. �.._ �. - -- «�r"sr A Y VARIOUS LONDON COMPAN ZES IN51URlD III CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTER Y C I 1 SPINNAKER WAY "— CQMPANY it BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 97410 I t.r"-17EH . . LEER COMPANY a CO -Ate. •. , _ Ts+at IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED&LOW HAYS SEEN ISSUEDtO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE P a LICY •ERIOD IHDICATEa NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT.TERM OR CONOITIOt1 OF ANY CONTRACT OA OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHACH TMtg`CERTIFICATE MAY SE ISSUE°QR MAY PERTAIN,TttS INSURANCE AiiFOAO[D SY me POLICIES DESCAIsED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO AiL THE TERMS. :EMU IONS,AND WW1- . 'DONS DP SUCH POLICIES. CO POI.et crFFcTnrc 1,0 4y earmito LTA& ITS INr15 ANDS TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMfiER POI. t of +�! 0lITF f✓ r LT : '` IQHEGATE GENERAL UAIILITY --- - - — - -. -- tiOtY COMPREHENSIVE cOPM _. .. M9 0 X 3 0 3 ___ 3/4/9 0 3/4/91 f ''`'R" h al P1NPROSESIOPERAION5 POOPOTTYEAGAOtf EXPLOSION d �ND :APSE 1tAUf4O I $ .----- "C PAOQtaCTSiCC>MP,710 OPESATtONS ` 1 ^ CONTAAGTUAa COMw Pa ; $I i a 0 Q ,0 00 A BROOD r ed OitIttiTY 7A6•S4:+E 1 - , ai PER9otu,: t4Js PER$L L ltILAJAY $ Incl . - - -.R--•-.. .m- - trt— -C t , 1- -r AUTOUOSiLET I(AS1UTY N 't / ?";T r " 1111 ANY AUTO ,eA tf�_ p 4 � ¢ 1� �''; _ $ i{' t k� t f' t }�- a1 .i e�4 Z,f• 4 • N.t.OWNED AUTOS Ow,PASS) 9WItr 11 :'' . '''';i -. • AI.L OWNED AUTOS t DRN le) t1 v}N+ N �' ;?i% s i HIRED AVMs 7?+ Egt4 I '4�?' .'�' t i nON,OYiNEO At11t?5 r GE 1 $ 1 k, `. t , t''�'"�' ,t "s' r ciARAGE LlAbiLIry' • _ ' r +' F• •7 T' y„---- - -... --- - --.... . -- ........ EXCAsS LIAINUTY i 1 UM81It A FCRM _�_ _ CC 4 U4 i °D R t1+AN,UMtIRELLA ICI M I. sYeki AY i 171411110110411 WAXERS'COMPENSATION I (tACtl ACCIDENT) AND <;;;,�. < tclIPLQXER>TG'LIAN1ILiTV ., . (DISEASE-POLICY L . ,.. (OISEASE•EACHEMn s:NEI $50P,000 Limit pox B [otrit* PRi r:SSIONAL 1 Cla' m and annual LIABILITY 13540QG21 ;,.it!�._4/9Q 3 A�f"S Ar�fa.1..w .., OC CR1P7'Cki 'r 1PFRATtONS LCICATIO SNF►ItCLEiISPt r L ITEMS '~ f . CERTIFICATE HOLINR ;;i, •- CELLATIQN. #4 1f (�4.r- slOULO ANT OF THE ADOYE OfElCIU ED POLICIES 0 CAN f D MEFORE .THE EX- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COM� MAD WILL ENDEAVOR TO 2000 MAIN STREET MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE OER NAMED TO THE LEFT.St1T FAILURE TO MAst.St,ICS NOTICE SHALL.I NO $L OATION OR u.4,MJTY HONTING'2ON BEACH, CA. 92648 .,OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMP ITS AGENTS OR EPRE ENTATIVf_S, AV 0 PEA SEN!�}FtvE ! i+ I Attn: Robert EiChblatt - GZ-�'C/J , . ACORD41441 -. .. - - .. r !IP!ACCRO CORPO . aril 1$7. ... POLICY NUMBER: 1MMERCIAI. GENERAL L1ARit ITY • THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFu1LLY. � _ ��T�� NAL 1NS� RE� -_. OWNERS LESSEES O CONTRACTORS (FORM B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under-the foItowirtg. COMMERC1Af- nfNERAL LIABILITY COVF_'RAGE PART SCHEDULE to.,,- 7R Peritne tar Argsnlratfon: CITY or-HUNTINGTON BEACH _. _ (If no entry appears above.information required to complete this endorsement wilt . Dgclarations as applicable to this:ndorsement.) WHO IS AN 'NS REf ( ecthoh II)is amended to include as art insured the person or cigar 7 ,n the- . Schedule. but onry with respect to liability arising out of-your work"for that insured b' • - { • CG 2010 11 85 Copyright, Insurance Serv1c.es Office. Inc„ 1984 L7 • • • • rA44ltI.. OE> 4 5L14/.9.0-____ t+elFTAlacrr THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS DE AL EY,RENT ON & ASSOC. NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW P-0. Box 12075 100 Oak Street COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Oak I and, CA 94604-2875 .-__ _ - 415-46 5-30 9 0 cOAPANY coop sue-oo0e LETTER A - TMftlsnrr( SWrl2V CQTA. _ CoiCANY --- - LETTER B Concept Marine Associates CONPAIn' LETTER C 1 Spinnaker Way ------- --- -_ - ___. Berkeley , CA 94710 CORNY a COMPANY LETTER E STHIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS.EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES_ LMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAMS ��—� LTA TYPE,'"NJa1IRAsee men widen cyemotive POLIOYCXPIIATIOA) ALL LIMIT$INTNOUSANDI DATt(MMlDOM) OATE(MM/DO/YY) ^''"Waal&Ll7;BTtine--- "-- —� �V QEIERAL AQOREGAIE $ COMMERCIAL CEPERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COAT'/CPS AQCIREQATE CLAIMS MADE i 1 OCCUR PERSONAL & ADVERTISIN41NJUaY $ OwNER'S IT CONTRACTOR'S PROT, EACH OCCt1IRENGE I FIRE()AMAOE (Any one fire) $ MEDICAL EXPENSE TA , no.,vomn) 1 _ A{frOArb6a a LIABILITY COAHIi�t1_. SIN[3LE _ ANY AUTO LIMIt ALL OWNED AUTOS ITLANLAr INJLIv $ SC►tOLLED AUTOS (Per person) _� HIRED AUTOS EMILY' NON OWNED AUTOS (Per aaoident' -4_ (1ARACT- LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE $ --- mess _.--_w •—, - C1C �URARENCE ._ _ 1 $ Olr€R THAN UMBRELLA FORM J WORK1 ri COM/CNIATION STATUTORY. � 1 s �QO� (EACH ACCIOENT) A AND WP80404114 //01/89 7/01/90 t 1001 (DISEASE•PDLICYLtieT) , eratoveNt'LABILITY t 10 $EASE,EACH_ENPLOvEE) oTtI R _____ IVRPT10N T)ON OF oPIPA =I1.00ATION$W 1 l9IO1 retest 0TIONI1Sreenat new * 7.7411 OP Eby ! .. 'et:;Y"i. 4... x �a x k� :Ay 7;0�y'-" e5 �:�Rif� ��`i���':i7v1w�6R� ''' ���:� -.": � � .r:., .. �,! "A"� �a�"tga�.WY.r� Y� w�SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE u; EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL-E . x 30 k` City of Huntington Beach MAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE YY< 2000 Mein Street >''LEFT. Huntington Beech, CA 92640 : LN • Attn: Robert E. E i c h b l e t t `""A1ame=MereeserraTIve " C I ty Engineer DCAI R N7,`.' CIATtg9567000 3 tO# P r x.x x:5; ar w y , k:gx .�x•k; r: �f.'te• AOI �34.06000091ita MP',' 14 '90 10:27 DSI IN,IIPAPIrE SVC 41F 77? 7099 P.2/2 i ! 'ultimo. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE „r, ISSUE DATE(MM/DDIYY) 5- 14—A4 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS 3 r)s 1 ' _ ::KVTCES NO R''GHTS UPON I:; . CEJ T.PICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, ONE CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2700 EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94 I 1 1 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY A LETTER 09, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY UMPAN i p ics:wsL� LETTER G CONCEPT MARINE, INC. , dba: COMPANY LETTER G ''')NCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES i 'PINNAKER WAY COMPANY TTER D ,". CA 9'. . i 0 GCMPAN r c LETTER , �1COVERAGES „ ' 'r ."°^ , THIS IS TO INDICATED,CERTIFY TIF NOTWITHSTANDING'THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS ANr,'''^^I^'T'^LIs ne SUCH PC]!ICIFS I.WITS SHOWN N1AY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID r.-:=,!MS {CO TYPE OP INSUF7•. •: POLICY NUMUER 'POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION Al I_ l.IM)T$IN TN ��D g hULO yyi DATE iMMrODi i r; uCNcKA.. GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PROD lrTg,COMP'OPS A19rRFOATF $ ;'E:40,r1• . ,.,Vr-Wl IS,N(,,t,,.x,,,,,' i, EF. . i;PE.,;k ti'LG .. I?.PEhS.E .r•v Eor;on) 5 ,. r)MOBILE t_1A91,.ITY r,.',•.,6,I,L L' ,^,�' P IG BA B3�26Lrt"i ;U- 14 - 89 10- 14-90 ;;,r..L ' , r 000. C W.EC ouTC)a bGrIEDL.,tFD ,, `S y 4.)rJ) /NFL n ,I. .. ArIAL I.,.a1LITY LAC SS LIABILITY ACitIRLGA rE 3 OTIifFI 1-6-tiv, Iih, f,,..: t,.. i ,T,,,IWV WORKER'S GOMPENSA710N AND Acc' $ 'DISEASE.- . EPAPLOYFH Ad1LITY 1 ;CISEAuE-L , OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OFERATIONS,LOCATIONSJVLHICi-ba "CIAL ITEMS CERTIFICATE HOLDER _.�....� CANCELLATION . . .--- SHOULD .ANY 0= :,1, ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED sEi.)PE THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE I6SUING 2000 MAIN STREET �XWIRM X2RXIC. MAIL__3 DAY'' RITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE MOLDER NAMED TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 LEFT,Ag-thkkn.x9.�Xzkxmsnxitx ixx �� x ATTN: ROBERT EICHBLATT �X XXX �X14N €R IOX� i AUTHORIZED REPRESFNTA0.r. X TIV 4 ' ; T � — I ACORD 25-S (11/89) �__ C©ACQRD CORPORATION 1989 CZ= g ,f u P.O.box 2830 �+ �; :.;1>< � ��Y 43 Sacramento,CA 95812 ^� ^ Y`^ Phone 916 .u5.2O20 1"' C1 '� �lCCCCtFICL31719fIIte ( ) STATEMENT BY DOMESTIC STOCK CORPORATION `- _ —r. .l ostr 5btc aS Ca ioI:::4 (THIS STATEMENT MUST BE FILED WITH CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE(SEC.1502,CORPORATIONS CODE) A $S FILING FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS STATEMENT. • . - • NOV I. 0; 1987 COMPLETINGWHEN ••M, PLEASE USE BLACK TYPEWRITER RIBBON w• BLACK INK MARCH FANG EU, 5ecreta7 of l;iaiE IMPORTANT—Please Read Instructions On Back Of Form . . 1. DUE DATE: NOVEMBER 3 1987 1592453 CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. • Oa NOT ALTER PREPRINTED NAME IF REM NO. 1 13 BLANK.PLEASE ENTER CORPORATE NAME DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE - THE CALIFORNIA CORPORATION NAMED HEREIN; MAKES THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT 1 2. 3T1IECT ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL, EXECUTIVE OFFICE ROOM NO. 2A. ,CITY a STATE 2E3. 21P COOS 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710 3. STREET AOORess OP PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OFFICE IN GAUFORNIA ROOM NO. 3A_ CITY 39. ZIP CODE (IF ANY) CA , 4. MAILING ADORE-13 ROOM NO. 4A. CITY O SrATe 4E3. TIP CODE 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710 THE_,NAMES.OF THE:FOLLOWING-OFF.ICERS. ARE•. . _ .. . ._-._. .._ 5. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 5A. 6USINESS OR RESIDENCE AOGRESs 58_ CITY& STATE SC. MR coo Gordon Fulton 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710 B. SECRETARY 6A. BUSINESS OR RESIDENCE ADDRESS 6B. CITY &STATE 6G. a.IP CODE ' Gordon Fulton 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710 7. CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 7A, BUEINE55 OR RESIDENCE ADDRESS 7H. CRY&STATE 7C. 2P COGS Gordon Fulton 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710 INCUMBENT DIRECTORS, INCLUDING DIRECTORS WHO ARE ALSO OFFICERS (Attach supplemental list If necessary) • 8. NAME BA. BUSINESS OR RESIDENCE ADORES-3 85. CITY a STATE 8G. YIP COOS Gordon Fulton 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 194710 9. NAM4 A. BUSINESS OR RET.IDEr,CS AVM...SS I se. c r- a STATE ._---- 1 9C. :Ai. CO. Elizabeth Fulton 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 194710 1 O. NAME 1 OA. BUSINESS OR Re$IDENCe ADDRESS I OB. CITY e,STATE 1 OC_LP cocE 11. THE NUMBER OF VACANCIES ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, IF ANY: DESIGNATED AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS (Only one agent may be named) _ 12. NAME r--)rnn F\11 ton; .1--Sn;nfaker .4;; like.Lgiley, C A 94 710 •— 13. CAUFORNIA BUSINESS OR RESIDENCE ADDRESS IF AGENT IS AN INDIVIDUAL (DO NOT USE P.O. BOX) DO MOT INCLUDE ADDRESS IF AGENT LS A CORPORATION. 14. DESCRIBE TYPE OP BUSINESS OF THE CORPORATION. Marine Construction Manager and Consultant is. I DECLARE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS STATEMENT AND TO The BEST OF MY XpC,TriVEDG4 ANO 55 IEF, IT IS TRUE,CORRECT ANO COMPLETE. R. Gordon .Baker., Jr.,Attorney at Law / , /z--- ✓ _ /� / - TIFE O, PRINT NAME OF SIGNING OFFICER OR AGENT ( ( _9 SIGNATURE OATe _ r_ll_.. �. d _ ♦ 16. I DECLARE THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION .CONYAINED IN THE LAST STATEMENY OF THE CORPORATION WHICH IS ON MILE IN YHE SECRETARY OF srATe'9 OFFICE. DOS NOT APPLY-9N 1HI•DAL£!LINE. (READ INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING THIS ITEM) • ICHECK HI[RO TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF SIGNING OFFICER OR AGENT SIGNATURE - DATE .. U I ,,, , • moo- . . .. . .�+ .+n , - eAtb- ..:, . , §-tote of (gati i*'uit - i. - . fi#arCI Yung En PAD.!lox 2850 SaCromant0,CA 95812 1..:. Itil D 0 n w fierretzx&j of &tuft Phanc:(915)445.2020 .. 2 , I.- l STATEMENT BY DOMESTIC TOCK CORPORATION :,:;2Q.tSc5Zaco Calif o :.:. •q (HIS STATEMENT MUSI BE FILED WITH CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE(SEC_1502,CORPORATIONS CODE) ' • A SS FILING FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS STATEMENT. .- .... ;.-... . : • NOV i0 98 WHEN COMPLETING FORM, PLEASE USE BLACK "TYPEWRITER RIBBON OR BLACK INK J A►'Cil FONG EU, Secretary ai si3iE IMPORTANT—Please Read Instructions On Back Of Farm - .. ... .w.••.-.....«. . • 1. DUE DATE; NOVEMBER 3 1987 1592453 CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. 00 NOT ALTER RREPRINTED NAME IF ITEM NO. I l3 BLANK,PLUS[ENTER CORPORATE NAME DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE THE CALIFORNIA CORPORATION•NAMED HEREIN, MAKES THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT' 2. ETREET ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE ROOM NO- 2A. C)TY CI sr,re 2U. YIP CODE 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710._ . 3, STREET ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ORRICE IN CALIFORNIA ROOM NO. 3A, CITY 3B. MP CODE, 1 (lI ANY) CA 4. MAILING ADDRESS ROOM NO, 4A. CITY 4 STATE 4s. ZIP CODE 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710 . THE_,NAMES,OF THEN FOLLOWING'OFFICERS.ARE= , .. ; ,... -• - ,:, ., - 5. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER _.'•�.,� SA. eusiNess OR RESIDENCE AOORE-55 se_ CITY A STATE SG. ZIP CODE Gordon Fulton. 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710 • 6. SECRETARY 6A. BUSINESS OR RESIDENCE ADDRESS I B. CRY A STATE 6C, ZIP G44E ' Gordon Fulton 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA 94710 7. CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 7A. BUSINESS OR lissiceNGs Aar/E-s 7H• CITY e:STATE, 7C. .•rP coos Gordon Fulton I Spinnaker Way P rkeley, CA 94710 • INCUMBENT DIRECTORS, INCLUDING DIRECTORS WHO ARE-ALSO OFFICERS(Attach supplemental list If necessary) • • 8. NAME BA. BUSINESS OR RE IDENCL' AGGRESS 88. CM-a 3rATE 8C. sip CODE Gordon Fulton 1 Spinnaker Way Berkeley, CA , 94710 9. NAME BA. BUSINESS Ora RES:D_NC;: :.ODA;.83 se. CT a STATE BC. SIF COOS • Elizabeth Fulton 1 Spinnaker Way __ Berkeley, CA _ . 94710 10. NAME 1 OA. BUSINESS OR RES10ENCe ADO,YESS 1 OB. CITY w STATE I Oc.ZIP CO=E' 1 11. THE NUMBER OF VACANCIES ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, IF ANY: DESIGNATED AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS (Only one agent may be named) • '\/--IT-• . , 12. NAME PeIrricm. PvTlton• ) c i nnPkPr_ ; R9-1celey, CA 94714 --.. - 13. CALIFORNIA BUSINESS OR RESIDENCE ADDRESS IP AGENT IS AN INDIVIDUAL(DO NOT IJ9p,P.Q.sox)DO NQT INCLUDE ADDRESS IF AGENT IS A CORPORATION. -.. 14. DEOCRINE TYPE OR BUSINESS OF THE CORPORATION. Marine Construction Manager and Consultant 15. I DECLARE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS STATEMENT AND TO THE BEST OP NY K �ANO SS IEF, rr IS TRUE,CORRECT AND COMPLETE R. Gordon Baker, Jr„Attorney at Law r ..�,�,t-- // / .- TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF SIGNING OFFICER OR AGENT ,,,1 SIGNATURE DATE 1 S. 1 DECLARE THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE LAST STATEMENT OF THE CORPORATION WHICH IS ON RILE )N THE SECRETARY OP$TATE'S OFFICE. 1O4e$NOT APPLY 9N INITIAL FIU . (READ INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING THIS ITEM) _ _ . TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF SIGNING OFFICER OR AGENT SIGNATURE DATE __ I - immigration ari4 naturalitaticn laws of the .United States and sha1.I, in 2art cular, comply with the provi .1Ons of 8 U.S.C. S 1324a regarding t-mployment verific.aticn . 19 ENTI J<ET The foregoing . and Exhibit- "A" attached hereto, set forth the entire Agreement between the partes . IN WITNESS WHFREOF, the parties hereto have ^aused this Agreement to be executed by end throuqh their a,,+•h,•,rized officers the day, month and year first above written. CONCEPT MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a Calif nia corporation A m. nicipal corporation of the State of California li.,-(2-- , Mayor Its President 12 By: - _ çç9Q .. _„/52-44--Its: Seeretary ATTEST: P'`"P1VF" "^ 'rO FORM: - _ City Clerk Cit Atto'• y cis-" Ar lI_ �� � REVIEWED AND APPROVED: Ni'! �1 73:::::-"..eL QtC i City Administrator Director • f Public W" -" -9- r I_