Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - 1976-03-22
I (41N�' i "'�' ;'�• - r �'�k4P .:JCF'�4.y„i,.r, Y; . , • .,..;, � JEr +r. i" w 4 i� � �'�:RL !'r*.•q0�:. . w.{. �( •'' �' �4, r '''."r •.4»w.•if'r.M 1J M�.hY1LL'�1:+.'.r�.��. .. .. ....t"' ... ... J!'�.. .. .. .. .._.. ... ...J... . �•�? fir•: : rS ir•,�•=;�A Mr• 0 t� C�l ;Tr �• t+ A i��:,'fyj'• � �.a,rll!�.' ..r,, .. • ..., is iJ��1Y r11 r6 ", F'i ; •AS (r,ity of Huntington Beach P.O. to:,( ISO CALIFORNIA OiM :ENGINEERING DVARATMENT May 10, 1977 Honorable Mayor4�� and City Council;'; City of Huntington Beach ��-�.� �• Attention: Floyd 1. Belsito City Administrator Subject: Center Drive Extension and San Diego Freeway Offramp Modi.f..ications, CC.--367 Dear Council Members: Reference 3s made to my letter of January 11, 1977, a copy of which is attached. The purpoze of this letter is to: 1. provide an update of the ti-ing of the project. 2. Provides an update of the cost of the project.. 3. Cbtain approval -,)f the City Council to acquire right of *.Gay. Timing Due to compli.ations in obtaining the rights of way from Huntington Center and from tht: Edison Company, the project will probably be doluyad by five (5) months from the last schedule. ''hat would mean work would W commence in Oct')be, 1977, and be in progress through the Christmas season. , �;')R'^� This timing could interfere with the traffic at Huntington. Center. However, ;w�, �r' • 1 as a result of a meeting today with Cal Trans personnel and representatives of the affected property owners and major department stores, a satisfactory timetable was established. Transmitted herewith is a copy of a letter from w''�•:" Cal Trans outlininga tentative :'schedule. Total construction time, consider- � r':: . a, •; .ram• ills rain delays, would be abont sir_ (5) months. �' A;, Cast ._ A cost estimate was summarized in the letter of .7anuary 11, 1977, , and is updated below. The significant change is an increase in the cosy: of right of way acquisition. The partnership which owns Huntirgton Center was not in agreement with our offer of purchase. Their principal concern I is that they should be reimbursed f:r the cost of restoring the parking lot which ins being severed. As a result of the lick of agreement we obtained an appraisal. Our revised offer of $159,70() is a compromice approximately in the middle of our original offer and the appraisal. The appraisal is in my office if you or members of the City Council wish � � ''.' •• to review it. -' •'ate.'', i •• A. Trr N C 1n `' . • ',,' ';;'( aJr' r,, t.' � r / r R., ,if . .(e'1; i :°r cif•• Y I '�1' r ' ' •'y( 4 f ��''}}aa% war• ^� r•�,'• � `n � •�, ��• +it �,•,',' ' • �,.•' �`.'�' � � , �, ,?I, fir'+•'•, •71.. r :� !r; • �'• , .5,°1'14':T Y•+." �'• "�..`9]P1^`.•..,4 w�.. ww+--...,.....r1'YrY.A�rI..W.IY,.."l:. M'I i.;�l. '.vLYa�ttiM'-Mi:l-'. �:'X: �..•4'. :.I l�'wr.1.r_/•SiStl'Y7tlIR`!7R�!' %iiF+t'1.;Ml.f ..dYM"+f:. �'•I �'r' :i ti f �+ A ,• ) ��,az'1Y,r y r. i 11: J �1 \1,r + 'V''A"y r'•� � �•� d x `',;I'I '•1•r4o ''�','' Honorable Mayor .And City council May 10, 1977 ;.•, t.:?+v;�• ' �.�''.:f:'ti^�'r� d� .'J,:r{, Yoh',' k,�;,�,• Page 2 ., . . C :.0kk awl �,ii, "CYi(f 4 J `Id - Also, as indicated in my previous letter, the cost of obtaii.ing the right to cross the Edison right of way would likely increase above the histor.io9l license cost of $300.00. Edison Company personnel appraised the street right of way value at $19,520.00. Our appraisor placed a right of way value at $7,500.00. At the time of the writing of this letter we have not reached agreement as t:o the cost of acquisition. How- ever, it appears a compromise is possible and would be in order to prevent delay of the project. County and Total City Hunt. Cntr. Jerwel. Consultants Agreement No. 1 $ 6,000 (50%) 3,000 (25%) 1,500 (25%) 1,500 Consultants Agreement: No. 2 2,077 t1 1,039 11 519 to 519 Economic Benefit Study 51000 11 2,500 t1 1,250 11 1.1250 Engineering -Cost - Approx. 90,000 (80%)72,000 (14%)12,600 (6%) 5,400 Construction Cost -- Approx. 550,000 11 440,000 11 77,000 11 33,000 Contract Adm. - Approx. 136,000 " 1081801) 11 19,040 11 • 8,160 R/W - Huntington Center 159,700 2 1 .127,760 11 22,358 it 9,582 Easement - Edison Co. 13,510* j1 10,808* 11 1�891* i1 811* $ 62,287* 765,.907* 136,159* 6 ,222* *Assumit,g a compromise at halfway between the two r_pprai.sals. The County of Orange will provide 1*340,000 of Gas Tax funds thrrjugh the Arterial Highway Financing Program. This is as outlined in an agree- ment wit', the County, approved by the City Council on May 2, 1977. The City': cost wil? be approxima'Lely $425,907 and will be financed from City G funds. A construction agreement with the State was abprcved by the .. Council on January 17, 1977. Recommendation Authorize staff to proceed with the acqu -.tion of right of way from Huntington Center and a license and/:•r easement from the Edison Company. Very truly yours, Director of Public Works HEFI : ae .1 pn �•, t�l .it . a• � •i.': ,µ[a�2 :^I'.�'i"� ... �+ten ". /• II r ' .•_. .. '..1['.l�lC:ai.et'•XJ i'IILR..�.TA.Z�d[.ir'rA:'Llile•.ira. iFll��af' '� f'A.. P' G 90111 l •.� YqL' 7 f1T'. .JA e,et. i 1�P,ill'J:11/PYbAlILa:rr.'fCtl.kV'10 "/L'lah ,1 _'+N1�11/J'.iY f.; f'••':J^.'..'{'��:'!:�'�Y,:'�',J"L�lll'4CE�'!� J City of �runfington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 9a6&a ENCINEERING DEPARTMENT Janfiary 1.1, 1977 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Subject: Center Drive Extension and San Diego Freeway offramp Modifications, CC-367 De.Ar.Council Members 1 80 The above project has been in the making for several years. Some of the most recent hastory is as follows: 1. City Council approved Consultants Agreement No. 1 an May ?0, 1975, with Donald Frischer & Associates for Engineering Feasib:.lity SL•udy. Cost $6,000 (City - t 3, 000; Huntington Bea,--h Co. - $1, 500; Jerwel -- $1,500). 2. City Council approved Consultants Agreement No. 2 on September 15, 1975 with Donald Fzisci.er F Associates For Engineering Feasibility Study. Cost $2,077 (City -- $1,039; iiuntinaton Beach Co. - $519.03; Jerwel - $519 00). 3. City Council ac+ -horiz& on November 10, 1975, Economic Benefit Study with *rrban Project,,, Inc. Cost $5,000 (Cite -- $2,500; Huntingtr.. Beach Co. -- $1,250; Jerwel S1,250) . 4. City Council on februar1* 2, 1976, received the report prepared by Urban Projects, Inc. which indicated net benefits as follows: a. Iiuntingcon Cent-:zr $13.96'0 I- . Jerwel Enterprises 5.92" `- 1 I r.. City of Hun t-ington Beac i L The City Council authorized the staff to negotiate a cost sharing i agreement with the: two entities. 5. City Council, on February 2, 1976, approved an engineering services j agreement with Cal Trans for des an of the project 1 4• r�, Yr IV R"D"'YLL.�L.[t..:.wwr+rrr.+. r+--.-.+rr4/....w'i.n+nJ.lMM.•tA+...r.....Y.T'.wA.. ll".aal..,...,•,.., .,\�.•M,rV 1.:•Itf�)iL+lYY.iM.ItYD4'YV.•fiRyfi7�etl.i! y� " p"., �. Honorable Mayo:: and City Council January 11, 1977 x.kyy4�`yy'LL 11age 2 �{ L 1 The plans and spacificati.ons have been completed by Cal Tt:ar,s and the next step is to enter into a construction agreement with Cal Trans whereby they will let and administer the contract. ; The total cost of the protect cost- sharing will be approximately as fellows: County and Total City Bunt. Cntr Jerwc:l Consultants Agreement:. No. 1 $ 6,000 (50%) 3,000 (25%)1,500 (25%)1,500 Consultants Agreement No. 2 2,077 1,039 519 it 519 Economic Benefit Study 5,000 It2,500 111,250 It1,250 Engineering Cost - Approx. rsr',000 (80%)48,000 (140)8•400 (6%)3,0-00 Construction Cost - Approx. 605,000 " 464,000 84,700 36,300 Contract Adm. "- Appro•.. 115,000 92,000 16,100 6,900 ►..., R/W -- Hunt*Lngton Center 115,000 92,000 lb,100 6,900 Easenler_t - Edison Co. 300 240 42 18 908,377 722.779 T:-9,611 56,987 0 4 Historically the cost of obtaining a iicensp from the LAison Company tc cross thf.i.r powarline right of way for st:: -:!t purposes hap been $300.00. However, this figure is subject to change based on recent discussions with a representative of the Edison Company. Any additional cost will be pro- t. F portionally shared in the same manner as outlined above. The right of *,ray from Huntington Center is a portion of the parking lot behinr? Barker Bros. �. and consists of 0.88 acres. The fair market value as obtained from, a member of the Realty Board �ould be $3.00 per 5cuare too'.: or $115,000.00. f; ; The County ci grangc will provide approximately ` 340, 000 of Gas Tzx '. ' '` "•'., `•�' r r funds through the A.H.F.Y,. The City's net cost w?.l.l be approximately $382,779 and will be financed from Gas Tax funds. upon approval by the City Council of the construction agreement, the: pr •cessing by the State will entail an additional 90 days. Advertising and ay.rard of contract wit 1 �� •� consume 60 more days, which means work can commence in June with a completioI, �;.�� �"��<'.•'. ;; date of Novembcr 1977. `' Rec >mmendat on 1. Approve the agrcer,ent with Cal Trails and authorize th'-, Mayor an-1 Clerk to execute same. 2. Approve the sharinq of cost as outlined abovo. ::.. 3. Authorize stuff to proceed with the acquisition of riahc of way from Huntington Center and a 1_.cense and/or an �a.scxnent from th`,, Erdi.scn Ccmpcllv;' `fiery Lrul, yours, w 'y E. !IEii: ae Director of Public Works . .. ., w t +•,+^:T/'..' jT!17SiVQia '.A, . ;t,i . L' '�`1 . •, `�� ',ram ' �• r . � e N 1 + K • It MEMPMEEMW Ll .w, '• f ';. r,•, �4fr1 r ` + r ! r f.*'r, 1 . l �., �J / ��'�h �i�'i"it .�i11i. 1tlrrF�'' 11'• rd I F ���) I% Se � �[�(7�',�. ,�f +'+.'�' )vy . "<r +yrJl1 J�« r4/ :�C•R ��� 1 q_: � - , r,•f � •r • T � •j,.� � ? M`.i '1�f !« � 0.:' 7•rT ��■ .1,�} t ti � h.+ 1 xh : �ti # i r �. �,5`+,X *f . }F� d � ' r•'� �5 �.�5'�r � } -�,,r �' + ,t -. • • : � ° � � �' �i .��' r K .:gip J •. f • ,' '. ?:air" A r * � � + �, •• y pw R�, rl�■ IL " :' ; ,r: i+ r '" r }vr.• +;Iw.,,�1' c sir ,. r ,, t I'S+J rFWi''tti'„� "t 1. •( x v f �yy,l. vy •.v ` •� r � ,��[�,y�` r.�. �:r' � ' � IW` r" �£� ,�t��•(��`[L���l1 � T. yf� ,. � _r', �st+`�idc�,� l'ri:' •+W y �7 ; j�s t� •]j } 'f �� �' •. yr. �♦ ,. • + !�. h '}'� 1 . � �•y fir. 71'�a, '.r.� .rwf �,.� . R 1 � , �a . •i►•Y r1 Y t': i �r. •'"1f - a . " 7.� � I �„ h II r [ . • fa'i4 5-� w µ 1 4 � f�r r � Ow a r " in , �' .ice �..- .a!'�+'• .,�; � - :_` :• 71 y y � 1 • r{ •'s. � rr a.,"�►,�;'�.''�K tF�i,+rlha., �•J }r r k;'�-.� u�' •' _ ■ t _ r r• , i h �`r ra • r. _} �w . +� a •. t �ljr µ _ _ ��, * y y . 1 -ti iy:. _ �'�`}.,+�+w: �I• /T ,s' Q i •? .ice., '�,r iltr:. •T ry ,'1 �•f h • �•�� I itE '�..1, . �W� ii;'.•;'� ifi ar-�•�f -*4t • ''.'} " r , yr- } * "� .� >i iKw, + h, a": QT. w 4 ' �f� }f .� •+ i.''y M `_�! IcyY !.} �+�. ' r }a �'r.i �. 4 �.•+''� '•III' •� .�'.'.�'•1 '.i, ,,r _-$ J,• �,'' 4�.:'� .'i,,� �- N•r.,JJ�4. ...4'k 'i' K.:'�j•' r }• .. _ r ,}.;r .. i +? �:s; .r tS•,."� J ''TwJ i t i'•' r. i,�/t', 4r•, r' ry■' u y■ I f.��1� '.1141•h �� �.•/.ry r 4—`i.��.`_.�.- .i:♦.. 1 �: rr�,�y�Y +�}y ,,,,.�..� � ! }�4+'_�r-��'•.-.r_4r`.4�y _ f��' a � •�ti'.. _ - + - f: *., �• � y~� . •�'ti r • i � � . •,y• . �, r�,+ • {,.#Ir 7 '�f �' �•,ti � •, •+' �• r . .�+ . • ' , .A �1 ' *•, , ar r ,.I �' * � t .. i � •i.,, j + - '.• �. y' ,1 r _' .A '. rp•. ; r► + .-. .. �. •,•_ � �,4 • • • o •'{8 Y'. •`' 1. �. ¢�, ' v ' }'d"''rl} � • +. •�� � +'^tr ' 1�'! :`,.ram • � , -■ r ' '. • . +. r -•7... • . 4•` r r �-� +• � '.. ' '� '� M '-'ri_'' '# ` } �i1'`�;.,� w# � •.�'Y.• + �+,ri �':. 4ti� . r+,..t'' J..' �-. .'y ,...��•.+'�,'_wI i.,:{�' .. , ... r,.* '''y*.. �•r -*.•� ti + •�'� !k + a y yr' ,•� r"� � � ,`� � � - * ' {; 'r:� ice. ••': "r .. r , `. 4 - , +' � ■ � =may �, . , 41 10. lip 1 y -/ a•.H.� ! �•. •: •'+ '. ,y 'r).r � i y �, �. R I' �y�, - �,.� .L� . � .+. 4y +} •4•. ti'�r "yti '� t'rti �a r''-4,:'�{ ';r! - *_ rt : ,•••��r• + �.� r. ..5 ,,. ., •��*�•J1. * 'i `.: � _ � • +y r + ..r �- y "ry! J a. l , •4 fr�'h. .1 �., '. +..` � - ,�,r.� r 5��* .ti� • • 'v, _t._ ■ may, � � w a xv 'P hRY 4 IH4.A 4' ,�.`T'�'y 7`' r�r'Li' h. f: i •'�' '�i `r ��-y ya + ,� r Y• t l• _ 11�'~ :l �r. •�`+, w . , 4' ', 1 •r ` w� .'fr^,A !C^ i y1 + ;v� ♦f rr-'fir Fry.A >*qr �''' 9 * 'ii ., . ¢ b \ # • r ' * • ' • w . _ r _ • �4t 1 .'�iP City of Huntington Beach P.O. pox t90 CALIFORNIA S2G4 ENT(3INEEJJJJ9(3 DEPARTMENT February 14, 1977 I) Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. BelSitO t'ity Administratcr Subject: 405 Freeway Agreement Revisions, CC-367 Dear Council Me^wers : The original Freeway Agreement between rite► of Hunti.rigton Beach and State Department of Transportation was adopted by Resolution No. 2351 on February 1, 1960, and setforth the con- figuration of the 405 Freeway. Transmitted he:owith is a resolution to revise this agreement by changing the ::anfiguratior of the 405 Freeway at Beach Boulevard. This revision is necesEary to conform with the proPosei Center Drive/405 Freeway construction project which is now ::n the final stages of design by the St14e Departme"t of Transpo.:ta- then It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolu- tion and authorize the mayor and City Clerk to execute. Very truly yours, _uI • .:. • Oart e it Director Of public Workd, PiEH :'JEH: ae Trans. t 1 a i t, it 1 • T _ _ Y . t 1 `rsp ice • . 5' :. —v . y1+ �r h � d•L3 1x,1K, r;, :her :�i�vj'• .. � ' ''l :ifP•i y; rub ,ry 0 l - • it } _ 4� ■ F ' p �� i•,� �. �+ apt • ti,� �J r►' .y, + } , . a r . 4 • f`..Y • � r �r `-4� ?F f r�. �.� 'w f+L,t'�r y�,"/•� - 'f } * -�* h.' r... h �•y, 1�'], ,% l.. • L ,4 }),l,yr�,,,,ti y �r � W � , � 1 � \ t - �■.Y ■ gy■pq, y \�" r'�_ ,5r �c r, t 1 1 t +' yr ,.:,•.i lyy'f:: ,'f'"7 5 ,� 1..• :..'I '.� ■. rQ * r` •r 1 i'' � .� ,4R Y�,:A a ,j� f I ';�rk •� - . • �; 1 T ti - r �, .� I� • •• I�y,w '. ': / • �' , �aa• ■ yr, a Y F L y • J3 h T' 7 t' 1R' u 16 S'� 'f� � .,.' , v, fir,; � '.. ',' � •. # fi ar.• f r; �S-t■ r fi .I r �j L r 1 T F t +�! it �.. r , ■ -• � 'C ti •. rr a R;p' 1} J+.,r+ �� L• �ti�• M.r •- � • } ,. _y y�,' , Y �, ' � . i Yam• �{�Y •' '•1 ''• 1 �� h.� i"K*y y/}";�4.f' -. .. titi _. r l �.r - - yr ° ;;.:, r 5� ,:� + { � � ly'Ir'� r �'.•�-�! # '. 1, } -5i y ctg� � } ��Y, � ' * �i � •\' r / •..ICY., It d F s`+•�'bjiti rft _ ,,.,yyY��'� yy4 r{,• S ,ti r "r7fy1.. LLi:� .. '� { • 4F� .. • f i �' 1� r •1.- • y '�P '. u r+. • -■. ��:.' :.y,� + r,. r4•.. _ - ,/ a *` .II•■ ! .��}I' r •k :• f' _.4 r _ •Y• k'.. • - r- , M ♦.-{ ♦ I • �I'�•1. y'•+ !4-. "'• ! r �• a l •,i:� . � .. ,�`' „CIF: „r .r ,* •„' :•c{`�1, .. �/�',. ,•�; 7 : .r •Y^� = - ■■' �� •� - 1 • _ �,•,-• 1 1-�•+. •� 1.VV _ 4• �• / ' ' �. - Y lit .." 'S■ •t w,. a• • }� y .4 �y„y..� , y '• rr. r.4.: r }Jf'. •?'L�� L ,R� r r ; br••.+ • !, Ar 1°"x,' I , 7 ,iG+ •Tiys%� i : k+ , i L ■ }• 1 � • �y - ..K �' �� ' r.� •. ■'• - / ' + .:M�, '"ti.Y-. , � y'y-Y � i`+" 1. ; y� .p. ,. ,.• . i �+iP• 'l. '�'. � 1�'�,t ..., µ . �f, 16 -•+ ,•' �„ +: r�•'� tt ,iw� ''t" r. r t'� �.y,C ,. � ,•�F ,}�r1•y•'�. '� w •#�C 1r. ,�,•. ,■_ -� �. t r;.it '1 �1t, 4+. r .h', "+° 1 -•� . rlr. i_ 1 1 ... i}}iN # , ti+�h• y s 4� . ' _S 1 ' S_ t j I 1h r-f y 7 .l ■ = #y rr.r,f„�i, �y�t+„a�y. +. rfR ;'M1 - It *+ _.=r1 i� } i �i��� :y�..w vt* r "'ti,. -K ,'. rr•r .` stir w A K k•� i`"i'►_4` �L y irI■^ L `LL`�•` # '� •.,,, -. r: "r t• ='M,.hf` . 'i 1 - ' 'r•�,, !,.• ' f } r,. 5I r ^, '+�+ dry' '�''•' y t• 1 .'.:. ,L . �-` I - . ,'• r t. ..Z. rCt •f' , i •: r+} S YZ �•y, - 1'� I 1t ' �'t Yr" 11-•� y Rr'„% ' Yi h. 1 f , .� '�z i�' �. *� :�� r+ "�' ,•:� k��, k+ - y •,4_,•j1r «k;k; y•I,Y ,' '-� � ;+,►t ti�ri'..- ,',�I 11 +�• �,1�,.. :*:- � -nr •yh• �-,! - '' '.• r } } '■• - , ■�, � r '.� 4 I M � }.�.. ,�. _ ♦7� '.Y •7 •, ,r- - i+i•, r, k 4 1 ram• T.. �Mw .h •+i. 'fk } ,i. ti GF: j ■.,. 'k f'r r { • 4 ... _ - r s; t. f +t. !. r ,ram " r . F' f s • ... ■ -'� ��!r:. /+ 7.•�.� � •',Rf •#f.. �• �•,�/ y� M.:' �•ati r. `',��.ti � '"�:'Y % -. y� +x!.r r■�, �j �:.` � l hT � ��- -.• .,. .1. �F. �,. 1`!Y:•" r •"}•,h i.Y f 7{'M7rl� r, f- ,• 1,•?t4 ,4 �`. `e. . #'� �, �s * "lt;.■t ti rx i �� a ,►. i r.r•: '.�r rk7• ,. ■ •1 IM 1 _ ■Y _ * • .f•..Y o'S i , .� gr`{.�1.' 1: �.,1., ' # ,sue. u1•;r• f,l\.''� * r• 4 f i y t : + .+ .� - k� Yy i .• �■-0'y' �} 1 i. _I .q. w�Y M... .r +a;. ',Y •. rl••' �, .,,#,: i■r.•° r' .1 4, t �� + �i�h.._ 1 ti'a �''r � �1 '�.' �► •x Tr�� r+ �S ''1 i rL. i' ■ M•)..���:n -'� •F' yy1�•�",�4t• r• +• * -- ,'� •t •,; rw.'.t ..� �'7 ' ' 4 ' :++ t .. r- y, '`1'�,jrf y _ "Y t 1 .. �1 , ;k-.1•w - "1`'�.1:.1 •ti X.T , 4 • ~ #'• + 1 4 y+ i 1 `� tn, +•■yT .� R r _ y �7 r , r ?, „K r r• ■ h. - 1�. �y��[1 •' 17 P. ' , }r •'y' 'r + - .r- •' ^4 " . � * .. . 6..' y t y �.c r. i i�T y•1 •� 4 ` -_J ,`. a=-1 ' �. ,+. A. � �k T^ ♦?_*:• �,■ ..�-. Y .Yx `r L * �� r..�'1 r.*.. .}5+ � ,b �3,=`'.r y!� •:■�+4 [-}... F Ivr :,,ql,. : �.. rf' . '. _1Q�rr i.'"y.; r"i '7< * yp�, .� .� '4.. YI •. MA • •T'i + ' ,,�• 1 , ,. � .ate'"' �• � r � , } r + h j I Fr •� f • r� .. •� {' „� '?=� wr���+'Ate � .,{ t loop P. ' T,r} ',7'Ir � t v� r 'r♦r t f •f •[r t "+'r;• q1 r r +C. +i iaJ .nS �::l RM1F,',', db y 77 It •i :.� •. �i ,fB., +f41 ;ph,I�yl Y�„4, -��,�' i^ J* `��. •! T 1 � I +'� r . . Lr6 ±�i�r�LF� t • �{ a►dF' � Sv i `. .W a..�f i•. I 1 ' I�� i� M1 � r SYrr tI �' ' F � y1}� tb7 1' �: •T � +� i' nd4 y'}�t��+R � Ik. 111���',� �R'jyRr,�]r r. J,• yr, Y•F + 't +.� • rZ " +r•. i ;r`. � r7r ,i r "yJ!• 4 /4r •�1 r ,H:. s +« x�.'•�" YF. fir,t. �#•o'4!Y6� . 7 �14�i � �fn }.,-f� r t +{F � : r + •. 16 � +�( c"". , •�MfR^ ^ii 1. • i • 4 ! • r 4 �` t }J 'Ly T. ,r 04 ,+ h - ♦.•�, '. •�.' }` `�, .•IrA fi t r. i r .. I . I + � �,. i ri': +` t -b r i�'�'•+r� 4Y^Gel � ',+��. i y ,� _. a,� 1. � .1,n.: .- ti ^mow.• +. ••' �- � v � � •• � . " ►t y`_ S 'fit .� '�" .t f 1� # - r ,r 1. r•r� 1�ti-'� � � �. *. 41 4. w 44+;� a � AL q. +Y .+',.•�' 1'r. ,. Jk •ti Y� '•�::.,. :r l'�` r _ �r'+r E;a. �y� .• _ .r' 1., r ,�?;"�I:L j}. �,.. _ y .r: r1 ►� .:r� ;E ti.,�..' '.♦ ♦ � _��` � R` �.• t r' rr + •IFS" a-.+, �,rw ti . ■ �� , .1r;X .c•-S`''• ..,Y'+ '� `. '� •', #r Is�. l..>� - ° :� �,i ti �:� •• �,:�. • i ^� • : 4i. ; - �,�,'{'ti.. .■ _ .w i 4.' ur , y �, ti F:-, !i'. *' ..r r;v ., �... , S. `� 'r�..+,-#.. „ r•ir ,.�r ,y}+f• rL -4 �y' {, ~}+V'�.;t„'r V -�i•fir y.•r. �..,' -e4n•• r`f.. #1�#.• 1. ,4.`. y_,t j• f „ rF • ti s.•r ; . +f •' i .,yw ;.w :-a i+i' •r.+'r . T ". M. : +Y' - .. .� ,�. . i q. _ ' • J• r' Y •■ • i�. "Y F y5•.•'. • Cf''�F• �}f'11-y z_ `r / •� if±. .�rM i i " � +• \. r/, � ., • � �, � • _� _ joi } •�A. .�#ti ,}♦ ,l~ +. �;„ 'i r � + `` �.` r ,. ri .. #.# `.r, S •tip �. � -,F ; _ T srµ. �. .r `t -' _.`-r: r ? � .� .�' '+Iy•_ �• •' '�; �' " -4 ,r .r. , I- '+• l if. . �- �. r $ elf, 4 • _ 4 •ti •+ r Y K.i 1 tw `. i �.+ . 'I # • iL':�r - ! ''I� +,�- ' ,,,.'I r'• ,�: + �r / .. t � ., •j, k ' ••..+ � ', �• , .` • r r`` l� ��t• ••� i- , ' •r ■ , �'' •.' * _ �� �` - � / �.� �, k t • .i � . „"� •' i r ~ � ; •r - • ifti. fi • � i " r. •�` : jr, t _ 7. ,•y ♦ •. 'si .; 4 ..�"•■ '' 4•' j : .'T " y'..i -. i .•* ��. ..4! i,�:' 4{ .' ' f, -{� '�• 7,. + - ' r-. - Y i s- ; - � y. y i. `•+!. •4r�� 7 R � r0 y1'•7, ; -'ry ;� -.� ' i r • r • f � r • r r � � / ' + r 1I • � � r - f +y .% + • I'll . -. _ . v -!�� r •!y / �.�' y � +Fi1k� �j rl�k'S'r rW y ir• � C • ! R+ yjirir Yf�'�!': ^i" � ��`5�`�"� X. 4 'Al r'7W •' +. r 1.,��;r'y,`.`wG•� `f.. ";�*_rry. '.7. r-p4.,��,.!_y�'! 1� .Y. ir•� '4V' ,ik{^' . C f� 1 i l,r+rf � � 1�f1 �� 1 `J /Y } r • •' ! ,- 1p.IL WILAZ all 1A, R S'- q.11,,(' d ,� I b ili7• f.. r 1 ' I • w- r . � Y", 1���}'�. /��..�� pt�c: • • • • _ • aka �ryl.f4.+,���rl� r - r ` 'F � � �•._f _fir � ,i ay r �. ,tv ,r ,.r, l,+ M3.r w.rr �,+�jr• ���f� • r• ■ I fir., �,..H ,/ ' �, r- Y l - r �� S� tom.{i�� fr��.�'". tl� - • • i • • r � • f � • • . t + i:,4 � - • 'I�._: • y« - Y.Y 01. 14 oil T 46 Y i� '• �. w ta}' � i 1 ' i • / -�' s ��� y' Y4' �.i y • V 1 L f I r1 _ • • I • •4 + +�,i � f ' *7 -� ' r ' . , - '� �. , _ t, ' � mow„ .•. f ' ay,Ile �. ,•. .� f.dj Ap ' �� •�� ry��+w ,Y� � • "�r r.' .,- fir-*. • 4 � r�� 44 � ' i � >N. � 4 T ��� 'Y• � h1 '•ice••" r 'W • p. I ; iF �. •fir. , �.. y � ? ;. j �_ 4 • # Y Y + -t♦ :• w 1F .� .a-.3-. - > ':' '� # r ,♦;riy_ •;•;• ..tr'v?ar , .;.. �. * ';• r' :r?y,.�j r # • ,r,,.. '" .r, t . - '�, `,� + a _ ;v .. .yam ,.�, --; �f;+r •. � .'•fi fir' �,,, . � .1 :� ti.�. :; '•tx;:1� .• W 4� 4, 5 �*. _.} r r _ ,.; �. Ll�`*.� 'r' ty_ � r.' '.�..�'+, .f-�Y �. rM1•S'� .S'Y �,y'ti4 ` � ,;r;J .� •71 -r ,, 49� '''h 1. y1M]iy;1A� 7•:t.-.t t, '•. -.; ` _ • rW �r i r 4 Y ��•'.5. .S T` ! ■ _ _ � �.Y • . « * ' +M .Yry � •#," • ■ 7 �'-♦� •1+ '_ 1 y.'Z �!• " � # -"/ f 4 I{ + r NY,� Y • r - •�Iy � �l.-A• ,. .. - S t . ,y � ,tf' �'rt •',F �i r '>. } . ; r ''ti-+ y[•I,, '' �� •+{ .7 �P.�(. ` ''�o � I? •+±' ;r'' •,•� - - .'•, r -y • r.. s • _ r. �,S 77 • Y' S t .7y.T. • i,`•w L y�t+�S M1"}f '.•-! Mr a' !, .fi•\■ r' "+\ /' ��-. `f� :�' *� !- +• �, •i' -►. • :{ 7 •~S� •�•yr• ,•Y i�r3*.:w}a,.� ,t r 14 u ,#' •�• .r. �++' M; .'r .S • + •« .`.� ?ti- _ `.� •- .tip- `},�* :.j'rr a. •.�.�� .r��., ti l Y •� �, 'r�'•y��j.�r� p; {� •- :.. Al � r. ,- '•�y.1.J .. a ... •r � � _ 't Jlrt'�... 'r•.� _ y��� �i. '_ A+. '- �1i 1'L .1. �� ��iYf�.•,•. ' u y' • , %! 1,� ��,� I'. r h^I;,a; µy't �y�.4 •�("�4 +��1��'�•��f4' �}+♦ µ ` +` M., 70 r �+���.. y� K r1 *T •',� f'^U�'1.+T-C�rr; ... ( F�j4��r1•+"�'�.� -,� ♦ it '' e,- �• } t a i p'j .N1 i �;�r.�� •�;7" .h 4� 4M + ��.yN�� �r�'^i �, �r •• -' ,�� . 4 rt • i4iFyyj4� o: +�,, w �, + •. 'Y ' ` i ,'r1 , .r gg fo p 'F t,, M , �� • ' h r•I � - 4 g • r'' r'"N . ��:-. 43.E �.. k'i o, +}�. • : a � rt' yy�,'h ♦ 'vp : !,* `fry ` '� a *.': Is �I ►.�$ ' 1 � � .�Ti.{, {itrx * •' �'Lr'f�liwr�,��e,r� � '� 1 1 1 ♦ • e t ♦ • • _ • • - , . i _ ,t Yvv t 'v' RSr. yHilr ;"5'�'•v • - • / l ■ • • ■ 'vF r� yr 'ti' a� t p IT lb ri °/ M rw t . _�• ,�ayy, P` ►d_y��y•tp�'`,4 r,, ,,'� fir• i + • � . y , 2.1 . r .' '• 4 ,..-• ddddd -•_'{ I - '.a 'h. r. y +h . .f 4 y?. +. #„F •i.,t •'M.!f.' '{� M :q:'ti-' 'Rv � �* a 4.�r ` :� }+., atw ,4,•,1.'''� -- +�- � 'T..tic*. i� � ,1M - .ii M1 ■,�. . r--. .. ,'�' t, �. r i -� ,�'- f� r, `er fi ,, _ �. 1h �.. � •• � � r.. � ., py' 1 tir '''~ �� � , � ��..• •♦ f - 1•. L ,'' i'r. � , .�,.,•�` •�, t' �4 1�.. >r !.1 'A•TS'-..�1.- .S''.. ��••I •-�� 'stir •l.' ��- F-. ml Y. I ,4 . � •'�� ji; { �y .+,. L 4 � �, + �,r i'-!•� ,•"�•t W j y',�S',. r : ti• ��v i .� J +r,•t �rt g'%n `w r1- :'' r 3'I'M. •. - �;•r'R•.,�' +4 �. '.:h r fi.'�` ML 'y� r�: J, 4 *�. [,t# t _ 1�•ay_"•i'.�F�'"4 � �1�,��, y" .ice; ivr�l:d►� :r•- i• . r, fi • � Fi ' • �' � t.r •� ... �� .1_ y, � {� �� ryy, � " /. h � � w� r � � a +. a'•, � r - .a . r , _` y+ -�,�. � •� - �'.�.� �` lr ;t, ,* ,r.r fit. • ■ x �y�, r .: h1 f �,{. : � r . y y - •' L,. . 4.` • : t •:Y 4r r +•e+r r.•.t ',z • n�.. µ;.. - i ►"• ` ,. •v.. Y AI.rrti TAI *•,', + -" �;.4 1 -r,�• 7•r - Y y; +.. AJF Y.'•4 ■, -i- r ••5 ��'-' • .+ •� � *4• � #r � •► ;tea w .7 - k l .�. -'T .� r/�ti J * .' ■., P • v it ¢:' Y - ' •t, v4 V y5y t•�1 , ��u• !µ '�i i rS 'y ,� _ , ;✓• L. • 4 _ ` �'. +• �' • -.y' • jr , ' • `I, ' �+i '.'�.: C * s ..',.Y: LL�''t. i; i l ..4 v' + 'F L_" +. ♦.. r • . � �' ` � .1 .� � •� 1' /v ,% �t A �• � t � '1 - vi4 �Cd.S � }'_ir� ~.-'•~r �`� . i1��+'t4..�'N-. � - _ .. t.:■�„tY: ' .. r ■ �r"..".'�.J 't'$. �'tT';F:`4 � � ?r � . C. M �i- r w, 'a _ rsF,.: ,. i. I t• I i' '�� ;fir ;k:�?,,•i!'{ � � I ''.d ,��, d;tr.I fS }�" .'j.{ °1 •' { ! ..i}Wr + ::�,}Sir. I , J car" e,. SI''f:•:l'' } r + .lww...w�4lft'ai.9V69"lalilt:.a.....r:r,.�e'siN.Ce:4.'k'-•aer.Mr-a aar5wcr.+4...a�..u..rr,':.ww...,.,..,....,�...««WWI•iYr+...+riiiww,:: ...rll f' S receipt of a detailed statement and biI].3ng there:f'or, to reimburse ' M Y STATE promptly, any amount over and above funds deposited by LOCAL �+ AGENCY as defined hereinbefo e,. required to complete LOCAL AMOY'S cost pursuant to this Agreement. Actual coat to LOCAL AUNCT frr work parfor► ed by STAVE on behalf of 14 KAL AUNCY as defined her*in, SECTION ?II, will bi determined upon cowple►tiem of 0.1 ouch work , and final ac:ount!"ng of all relatrd charges' and shall be a sun of the construction &rW engine*ring services posts, inoluding all direct and indirect coats (fu notional 3MInistrat1ver ovesJrre ►ad , assecament attributable to Luch Mork, applied in acaordame with STATLI' S standard accounting procedures). � Y{ 6. Upon completion and acceptance: of contract for PROJECT- to accept control at'%d minters "neee of those portiona of PROJECT lying outside of STA771S right -of -May at no cost to STATE. SECTION 117 IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD A11D AGFd?ED: �. 1. That the actual final cost to LOCAL AGENCY for PROJECT �• 'tip i�`�'' j ,• �t will be computed on ''ze basis of unJt• bid prices received for the ' ��'• ' accepted STATE'S contract for PROJECT, to whicn brill be added the actual cost of contingency items invol•1cd, to which vill be added the actual cost for right-of-way engineering and construction_ en-- +• ginecring, :;o which wi.11 be added e11 direct and indirect costs j (functional and adrainistra-"ive: overhead aese:ssment) attribul-able �o suer. work., applied in accordance with STATES Standard Accounting4�4' ;.d••, ! Proceduzes . •p•, •.Y,�I, +, 'r�4. 'h' ..1w., A. Construction ^ont---The= .final cost to LGCa?L AGENCY for construe :ion of said PRC, Eul (except for supplemental work and ',;: • any additional or Extra vork) shall be based upon the accepted lox K +,:}Y •�� _ _yam ...r�,�l•Sy�p+-•�M�.v R•-�.�•.w-..mow. t .. • • -... .. • .-. .. ..- Y Ld ` �': +iipr,n.''*•A M ' 'a•tR'�. r•'� -'Y Y,ry} '� J Y �:;, � tip..'• 1 _�, :�•+a r: �: 11 � df per•, •d r' l � 1 ! � '+:yr���.�.�Ai.ei.riJPY.'lri.ill.wa'IRw1Mllf�fl�l'i'�1�'�YiTM�f�r�..�aeAwn.�r.Y u�lL�fiAk'!N'+..11�.'+11r•iS4MK•d141.1.4a1#I Iv.;.1Cr/MC•tY• ..We+�vay..,.. .....mar Howe. kw.+�Y Zhu •,1 1 'i.t.• i .. .'°. Ar . b{d for rAUJFGT. .aid oonstrcction coats wii+ be dErarmined by multiplying the final pay quantities required for aforesaid PROJECT by contzaot unit prices in STA`fE'S construction contract. Coat of :item® which vary in quantity by more or less than twenty-five percrnt (25%) of quantities ahown in the; Engineer's F`stimate will )e deter- mined in accordance with thy► appl loable sectione of 'the ' ..'ali.fornia Standard Specifications, dated Jar:uary 1975. Work not c,ivere:d by a. c:ontvact item will bo paid for by force acoount as provided In .Section 9-1.03 of said Standard Speaifloations. Cott to the LOCAL AGENCY will be determined as stated above using final pay 4ltiantities and Daily Extra Work Reports covering the force aeco.u,t cork, plus any additional vontingt my items. B. Contingency Items --Contingency Stems shall include, but not be linIted tu, construction sign depreciation, moving, erecting a:_' repairing signs, and services performed fc.r the Resident Engineer and upon ilia quarters, &A work done under extra work ord3rs pertinent to the construction of PROJECT. C. Supplemental Construction Costs --LOCAL AGF:?JCX'S costa will be the actua?cc-Mt of all auptlemental work and/or JA J MVATE-furnished material n,?d service directly attributable to work Fn involved i., the construction of aforesaid FROJECT. Supplemental WWI— shall include, Lut no; be limited to, =int :;ping 4ra.'fie and signs, depreui..ticn, moving, erecting and i�epalring sign r water for dust control and other incidentals. F'aym:nt for work referred +:4 •y to herein shall be determined In accordance with applicable sections :' • ` ` -� i of the California Standard Spec.LfIcations or i.-odif icati ons t-hereto which nay appear in the Sp,_-ci21 Provisions relative to k.)rk to be :; ;... performed under aforesaid contract. r 1 1 n1ro •�,"A ' N t . A. .�Rarn41�'r'wwr��ar+�MF4r w,�r�....,n-++1.r'iF htiro re �^•+r..f.T'�r+. �-,r.r • •�.. w_._ -r �. •... •.�..__. �..�.•i•..r .rwr•rw r_v• r ��._ 41 r r r � .f•' ., T ^74 . �AM"•••m'iry. Gt .I ri4 , r .� • •. •T•. Y � ', ML •�AI.� 0 ;ar n r r ,� r f ► r o- ;711, - v A 4.5 ..f'/ t� for construction of the PROJECT doea not exceed the Engineer's Entrlmate of Cost as stated in SECTION I, Ai ttalr., 41, by more than fifteen percent (15%), the contract may by awarded by the STATE. If, however, upon receipt of bide the Engineertu Estimate is exceeded by more t1aui fifteen percent (15x), the LO(VAL AGENCY'S written coneurrance will be required to order to obligate LOCAL AGENCY for all coast over s.nd above the Engine W s Estimate of Cost. 3. If upon 4003ptanoe of bills, it in found the amours; deposited by LOCAL AGENCY Is in exossor of thf. t.ot&il cant of the work h3areinbafore described, the balance rema,i_nIng shall be promptly refunded by STATP, to LOCAL AGENCY. If, however, the said cast of the work is more than the amuunt deposited by L0Cj1L AOEIICY, LOCAL AGENCY will promptly, upon receipt of czar therefor, pay the additional amount to STA'Is. I_f eaid exceia or deficit is less than rive: Hundred Dollars ($500), a refund ur additional deposit will be waived until final accounting. 4. In the event that LOCAL AGENCY decires any addi,-.Io al or extra work ove. and above that spoci.fi call.y provided for hra-:in, such work will be financed by LOCAL AGENCY at LOCAL AGENCY S sole expense and accomplished by means of an executed change order, approved by LOCAL AGENCY t►::d STATE in writing, The zo t of an approved change, if- within 'Uhe amount provided rot, contl.ngency item; , may be tak;?n from thc' fund provided W;ref or, If 'lie cant of an approved change exoeeds the amount prcvlded for ir, ccritin-- aenc:y i tern n, LOCAL AGENCY will, upon receipt of billing 'therefor, deposit with STATE tho as Imated oast of auch approved change, plus file percent (5%) for contingenties, and nineteen percent (!9") for construction engineering, administration and overhead cost. ?.iY/i.r•h•.f�. tw ,.�IIR��.iwifAhti.-.Y.. may ..-nr.r�.a ... .. ._.. ..•_.,.-.. .• ..-.. .�.-_.. .... �_..�_ r .wir.�._��w..�.-_._.. _.. __� ..... _• • +� w }} 1 ' :n . -14 • '+i'i:l'c'Y. ' F".�'' ".�rtk• i =i Y r V p y- .. a r 41, {f a !},� ,+;..• ,a.,+� :n��� '�"uill �., i'� ,1•. ret+t .::lw..•..a•..rfe7:. uls v.: �•... F._,...'.i.Y �.i S. t.r••t...... u.r ...,., ....e,:.'r' ::... - .. .. is � �.1 : 4%:•f i :1': �. ;'' Within ninety (90) dayn after completion of the Work 1. 'sg1r;l r audlor a.cceptanea of the PROJECT, the STATE. shall notify the LOCAL1. 1 7...d';. f, ''� .. .1 1 Jr •, m'*'+#`•` AGENCY in writing the dates �:hcreof and -he probable or estimated 1 a'p}y';;� ! date thefinal dita;Lled statement of ao3t Yor the LOCAL AGENCY 1• '''r'Sia will be uubrni.tthd. if outatanding chargeas such as contractor's clailri,a �.iens, etc.,, delay the i'int��. counting , the, STATE r�hall •� so advise the LOCAL AGEIICY, but In any event a final accounting, � i,' chrt.r e-3 are ct:ill. uuratanding, tahull o_„ :,eni." f"`nral accountings 1 i r be pl,,!3ented t'rtthizj one --hundred eighty (180) days from the data of cntnp'_cta o;•i of work. G. That r,Qithcar. STAT-E nor any officer or employe-- thereof ahall be z-esponzlible for any daim aga or- 11abillt;y ocourrInil % • rr of %•nythinv done or rarriitted to be done by LOC.A1 MENCY Ie.W,;: tl.U3� or i�1 connection latch any tlnr?c, authority rr jurIndictiola delega�.l�d to LOCAL AGENCY tinder thii ALi;j,e►.r,Ent. it i.s jalsrr ur.3ex,- t ,'':,.. .a .•want ho (Icvr.r�zment q�i stood �:nrl agreed that, pui ,� 'ode:' Section ©. .II •M' • '•:• `' y',•. i, i, li,'��?�',,'Y}fr'.4 is r ' ••1 '' " 4 tl.ie'rn 11ri hold STATE ha�rmlenii from 1.d)Ct,il Auif?CY 3rrail folly � I'Y ' '; Ir„ 14 i r•�,, `j'"''• .- '1 derin-cl b Government Code any liability Amposed for in uz,l ( y Sectiorz 81o.0) occurring by x,r_,i.j3on of a.nythin;r; clone or o-:itte d to LOCAL G IIM e r_ - o�. i.r connection t'rit'h an., work, LrY done by I.( ,A �� i~ t,xtd x authority or jurisdiction dcler;ctted to LOCAT, AGMICY under thin J �'t•+• Ali+r%'^iNY'(l{�'ri]I1/•Ip��' w #, AinvL 7. That, ne t,h.her LOCAL AGENCY nor an-, Lfficer or employee t •'` ���;;g ;'' ;" ll [[1 ( is ;-e!3pan;5ible i'or any -, ,fige or liability occurring by L.�,4�?,,�4 re, son of LFrythinr done oz' ot� itt:.•d to be done h'r STATE 11 ider or 1;1 �' ' '•1,r� , I`4i1Il�l;i:1.CT1 1!_+_t;h any t:U�`I;; t%UthajJ,j.ty ;".`r j ur_isdictioi not (�Pl('Cc'btCd to LOCAL A(i::'I(',' iu,r.ir .• this, I'rrOc-mezlr. it is alno undr.l'r.tood rend ''`• ; ' E ed t:2litit pU:'ti'.laIlt i n GoVFrf:?lc, t.ode + tl.on Hna. 1:, STATE 'd.'ti ,• •.)'.,...,; S 1, E 40 . '+ r', ", F.' • :'+,;,'.' ;�+i. , 1$.+i'" '. •' ..� � ,'4 '�11. '<."a 'r � „'� � '!+h'r .!A Tl'�,�`, "'��{VA . ,. ,; rYP .1, . .. , .. � � : e'r(�4 i'i• '',�' A' li�'•r.a �,�' i 4n'S ." ';i' , ,'n•,. ��y1//% ,i', � i, . 4•�.y �• :�•/ y,�,r'; '•�''�', �,.r^ � fi}}4��. r rjf ;'�Y:r S ».. ': '{' k �'y�, �+�' r„��A, I!• i.l.�' rA'p,;!�i;' y.C.:'�I'.�!'' �' •w. �� ���.'r4" ar . h,. ; 1 „i 11�6rb � 'r.'.f '• 'e' �I '{ w..;��I ^�9.T�,r''.I k,�, f.+ei .; rr, ;': q ';7, ,:,. �iA '.' r'}t•{',.�•y,,' �' •}Rp';�'• ..,. R •.C' ik. �/ •F�'. '�Y•' , i....'' ..•µ, 1 �., !r•° �}1• r .'�j Y•' h'i r'y�F 11•.�a ;o' ( Fi w '�'•iv '•�:' r�7+' ir� e . 1 1 '+ ,,. F: 1 • j�ay}tj:�; .,,�."'•',.:;ti.,:•vp a.. ,f.,•� r; .�xi,v,,. :•'S` .r,&. ! , ..1 ' ..fir • ....i'R. � .j., b '1: � "°.t'. U,;: • i' ".r �„ v:i.. y r e ..• y: , .wi:,i. 'r. 'Y' :.. •i}5 , 1 yoq!,., 1k{� , •,i y, l,.i',. •9 ti .;...,�.'�i 11 1 1 I r 1p i L '�'+''• I A .0 ` ;; , , yP'• rip .fQ•i y' . IN „�. • y�gyp, ll` lPf ? f."1l:,' .�{� Yf �'1 ��'',.. af.Yi ,` ^,K` J �r •!�' Y �5, r:. i,,,Iv,;' �y y�• ''��' fop ,,,,a, ,, �.. urns yw'9`t/•. '+. •+v.,.u,.a.., r.w!ih �i:•.ar'•w 41 f.!'1:•C.AM M.'�iti., _,r:.: . ! JI' ;1', .: I AAWitr'wa.u...—�.trw�,r.uiai. airNIW.�Fbnw.ia..,/l err Y'T fu kl�i .liir '1 ly 1' s"r•: •I t I y r i . ,, shall fully indemnity erd hold LOCAL AGENCY harmless fron any liability lmponed for injury (as Winud by Government Code Section 810.8; occurring by reamon of anything done o: omitted to be clone by STATE under or in aonneotion with any work, authority or ,jurisdiotion not delegated to LOCAL AGFNCT tuider thiec Agreement. 8. That, in the const;ructil)n of PROJECT, STATE will furnish a representative to psrform tho usual functions of a Resident: Engineer) and LOCAL AGENCY; at no oost to STATE, may furni.uh E. Resident: Eng'inoar if it ao deal.,ss, and that said ropresontativo and Resident Engineer will cooperate and conoult rri th cach other, but the ordors of r•he STATE Engineer shall be f1naI 9. LOCAL AGENCY'S coat may be provided from fundn F}vailable to it, including, but not VL:z ted to: A. Punds aj oxstionsd under St:reettr: and Hithwayn Cods. Sc-ottor: 2107 and 2107.5. B. Funds apportioned under. Ntreets and lilehway s Code .,, rv'.Ion 2106. C. Contributions by aubdIvidert or other private partic';i in the form o.i r lghts-of-way or cor.struction. 10. Upon completion and acceptance of tl,e contract by STATE fo:7 FRO.7I;CT . maintenanne will]. be accomplished ae follows: A. LOCAL AGENCY will accept control and maintenance i responsibility for that portion of work within LOCAL AGENCY highway rj ghts-of--wa . ''':.' .' r B. STATE will aooe t control an(' maintenrynco rc-a-Al I` Pons 1bility for that per. �.,n of wort: rritrhiry STATE rightn-of-iiF�r. • 1 •Y i w •. a y 1 r, " i e r ; I 1 \ I �• ��'i 'r 1}i,l �' i. . I i r flyMlfy ,. 3 I ',',�^i�i' ,�.. I �+ -r•qr, ..:,.y,:�R'!a :jas�• .. y r p-,r1;'M`(ukw, ff '(� •�D t-� ..!: �Yti.A'�;��1 hl.,,�'�'i{,,,'li}I'�f...l(.I�i, io,'I}.1"•�.i +at �}',i',}/, i} 4 � �?, T4fy�, •'�'}...'s..} �, i. �,, :i &:, � .,•. V .l :" i � y�... ' { f�ti •'y air S. .�:'7,� I , :�!¢ 4..f ? :��'' .. 5. 1' 1 , , r . „ is • . I arr, t I'1 . , C_- C?'Ti' OV HUNTINGTOIJ DETACH r_ +•� is c' 1� or yy Alicia A, Wentwor-L, e � 1 'e,� Crcr•F, xjeaj • City C�Iir9rl�Cirr�w.•i��l.�dr_,+c:'"'' 'A e r=k APPROVED A i TO FORM I A?11? AND PROCEDURE`at �' d : •' ''�'}it` . �.i,y"* ' I 1 • �.....rr"'�'• 1•, yr,s,,.d ,;i,F�,•ry4e' iN,y,�'.�r::'aR,;i,,�J: • I � � RllrIEV12D P a AND A I)r F. VEll : 41 �, •r.1'i J ":,'� � � ` �' 4-As t r a L � _ �� •" t y'��' MID APPROVED AS TC COI MINT: APPROVED AS TO f.' �;"'�•' 11 � sal F '➢f ,�,' •�' .r^, :i�!"I �' i 'r, � � . j � .. .. sil'±,,`..J, ,.{..+,. y a 4 y, a ,y'.!; k< : .. , ` ; ,. _ ti.. iFSS ai a iw.p►.. y►+{ „ ,..'�3a',�,A�y;,,J'r!�i;�, ^F ,'' •\'r •�%., ''i'' Y s 1, � �ls•; �•, . } y,15� I�, ^ '.t 'I A', •,' it �i ' 0.. „lye%`J ' ,i,t ,rt,' `'• of' 1 YlA ,:k Art;aA I e''t .Ai •.i r r, 11v1,WTry,C, r ,'1 - ' ! a' ter,. • . I\ iijF;'.' rI•�y, �,., • r '�✓�1iwi'F1wW1�'JFid.i.AsY'R.AA:�7�YY�i�'.yfl'',��I�IYr...uv•+n.:.l�.��•L�!:��iA'Di'NF,.wwrtr+yv Jw.,4.M1�3YH.f+.l CM 12'K'^'9\k4MaIR:+rn.....r1,wa.au��:1,.�....(r�.,„,'.l.L.awl'wkr:nuu,.'..�t'ipkt..l� 1 . ♦1 ' r• � r Sl' r; 11. That this AEre+.enert; and proviaions con",%ined herein MY ba altered, chartf ed., or amended by iru!•:jal oome3nt of the parties hereto. 12. That LOCAL AGENCi may, at any tide prior to award Of contract:, for any reasot:, terimInate STATE'S Servicez Arinediately and shall notify STLTE in writing of such te3rmina tiaei, and w1.1:t reimburse: STATE the actual coats for that: portion of rpntrriC f;ed zEmrices rendered prior to the date of trrminatiorl. 13. That should uny port -ton of the PROJECT br: financed 0t,h Federal. Furida or Gays Tate Funds, all app; j.cable Procedures are? Policies relatirg to t:lre use of such funds aht.11 apply, notrrri!:h .• standing Other provisions of. this Agreement. IN 1,11TUESS j1iERE0pj the parties hereto have caused this; A,llyree:ment to be e:xe nute:d by their respective officers,, duly esutho-• c'lzed, th! provia::ons of which Atx:•eement are effective as of the day, nontty, ardea�. fi;•uv ;iexcinabave: 4.�f:cn. STATE OF GALIFOROIA nusiness and Transportation ADency DePartirvmii of Transportation ALIPTANA 011ANTURCO Director of Transportation � Y 1Dlveotor ofAitiblic 'larl:13 t o � Pinance Dir :� '•t,.i. ate,:;„ . e. c '� r• '�'' .y, 1, '.. pt4,�f4f'r, �� t '� �%•''•. •.`4 �i-A¢:v'J�, 'r',' ZR li. y�F i '.. 1��/ (� •!.'.Y'nt . rf.tyt •, � •� � .'F�' rry-Ji 1 y ph •,Vy} yF+� V: � ., x, ;V) r 1y }. , � '� `'�: �' ,,, 7k. . j � • �'�,�'yy, t: ,"F� r�'., �Y f � . � ut' vii� '� `•.�� ,', �v. " �'' �.:f 'T'�i ^�'%`�. . .Y�,' .. ` `r, , � ,,`��"' :1 a:, ''� . t' ti. o-� � �•11'. :JrF• i$ I F.w' F :N11{�7:1'$i'a•, +�.�,. .R',t.,� ,� •*'; .:,�'`'t ,�' ..,.�' ��,}ylio t,, , �.,ti '• , �.• , �" � .t �fJt' ',i1 .. 41'S':Yi:'4 '4, ,'1.', •,A' J. nryj � ., w...a. ..tk}Y � 2.,• '✓.r ,'k .. . �1,. ; ."R•, ., 7...:1� , .t. ,''71`',u� . 'f+ r � • tr 'r. J �'"7'�rw•jy" �i� w`p" �•: ' ;�%4' :' Lair �'' i' Y1. • ,��•i N 491 'finFit. 71 , V, N-1 yi 0Pfw4N0 DATE STATE u6L1F9F,'AA PRELIMIP4ARY LSTIMAIC OF' COST E X r-f IV'.) 11110 F AlffifnP T ZA T I ON 1 N HUNT INGTON BEACH AT 6EACH OLVD-a 1A cc"" U4 RELOCATE SOUTHDOW) (IN AND OFF FEDERAL AID N!JHRFR P.Mps NONE A HX13HWAT BLUE SHEET ITEM DESCRIPTEON UNIT qUANTM NO C*[Ic (ALT) 15030F, OOLITERATE 511kFAC!NG SOW 1*100 2 !Sn6O8 REMOVE 0AIN LINK FENCE LF 435 3 1506'39 QZN;DVE GUAIW RAII_ INN LF 19375 tt 4 1506�.#5 REMovE FACILITY t.s. LUKP SUN 150711 RENOV4 PA114TC-0 TRAFFIC STRIPE LF 9.30 6 1507IiA 11EMnVE 7`4ERMOPLASTIC TRAF�'dC STRIPE SOFT 250 AND PAVEMENT HJRKT(JG 7 1506Q8 REMOVE OR A13ANDOPI STORN DRAIN SYSTEM Ls LUMP SUM 6 152615 RFLAY CONCHt"E IrLAREO Z140 ISECTIw4 EA I 9 151- 3 2 (1 PESFY "WSIDE 510W EA 5 10 152432 ADJUST MANHOLE 2 11 11-93210 NEHOVE CONCRETE Cr 45 12 160101 CLEARING AND GRL11WING LS Lump SUM 13 li%0101 ROADWAY EXCAVAT!0N Cy C.00000 14 19"01 STRUCTURE 9-XC4YAt10N cy IOU, IS 19-InOl STPUCTURE HACK ILL cy Tti A dU0GET ALLOCATIOX SOURCE OF FUN3% TV SPECIAL FIAWS Xi ph, 1, C L AMOUNT 141 Ap. 000i) 03 ft 0 01-1�4 . A..jA I 2000 IS. 14, 11971240"00 1 0 0 75 0 109000000 0 0 0 ill 4:•'111 0 'A N sA 4 4't' %o ':JA 1' '7' t.. 05 Ir V E 9 Pt ARE k-UNORIZATION %-.;V ILI L INELIMINAW; hMATE OF C; )ATc, SATE 12 A? 76 HIGHWAY BLUE SHEET I TF'm 17EM ITEM DESCRIPTION U-41 t QUANTITY NO COVE A"WIT (ALT) 16 I'4C650 EMOWWMENT CY 219000 'Q04W so EA 20.3 %,or .3 151, a 0 1? 200110 rREPARE HOLE ZOO!20 CULTIVATE bGY0 0150 19 2 4 2 a (13 IRON SULFATE L FJ 400 to 15 a 4 a 26 29?006 SOIL AKi-.N4K4'.' CY 40 ZI PW? 0 CohNERGIAL FERTILYC'MR Tom AJ fk 23 Z04006 PLANT KROUP F) ILifly fripRou'"A X A 25 204620 FLAW' WROUP U) EA Z6 204099 PLANT ESTAHLISHMENT WORK LS ILUMP SUM z 0 o-jo io (s) jj Z! T ?06'5160 CONTR(.-L ANU NEUTPa. cotonrons LS L V K;-' S V 11f ELECTOIC lip P10TC CouTAOL VALVE EA 7 7?c,,o* (s) It TRIREY". X"Ok T" v ' 4, 1 Y 44, 17 W., ? Yr nhkei6wai CAPEND, Al AUTHOPIZATIUN )REL1141HARY JIMATE Or Ci UIST-CO-RTI-PH HIOMWAY BLUE 5"ECT I TE14 ;TFM MIA DESCAT"ITION UNIT NO CuDE (ALT) L 09 206603 1 11111 ELECTRIC NENOTL CONTROL 11.&-LVE EA •S, 'A I 30 Z06504 1 1/2" ELECTRIC REAOVE CONTROL VALVE EA 31 Z06699 ELLMIC SEK:ICE INSTALLATION L!5 r. 3Z 206305 12 STATION LLECTRIC AUY014ATIC CONTROLLCR E -A IPEOESTAL. "OUNTEO) 33 2e4262 3/4" PLASTIC PIPE (PA 200) MPFLY LINE) LF 34 Z 0 A 1 fs 3 1" PLASTIC PIFE JV, It30) iSUPPLY LINE) LF IS) 3S *04264 1 1/4" PLASTIC ,FIVE WR 2001 (st ISUPPLY LINE) 16 Zfib2t$ 1 111" PLAVIC J"PE W4 t?00) LF MIPPO LTNt) 37 Z: 0 F2 C- 6 Erf PLASTIC PIPE WA 2001 !SWPLV LINE) LF 16 ZOQ67 V 112" PLASTIC PIPE WR 200) LF (51 iSUPPLN' LINE) 39 Pa!M I SPRTNKLER MPE A) EA (31 40 100505 SPRINKLER (TYPE EA PAG;F. 3 DATE U 21 ?b QUANTITY PRICE A140WO 12 libliab 4 120*04 itac.-lac LUMP SUN 995609co 14 9 �t L, 102000-;Q 2000A0 4 loot, 40090,01 z0ve Itas i1*0594t I 140 a s WIQ 09 i. W b •Mjpy9ratitl' . F �A !71 -7 T ;�• J. ,yam,+'+ • •r,y ' � . 1 •' •f 'f' • � i Q , y,� ti1� 'J '� � i la 1 ;S 4. ..'M1Y[i•�^,'►I��"�rr�i •' r r• , .f 1, •�! ' 'ICE.. �' J�r� fti �`���r y y.. •r IrW"'h(��� i ,r. IilrM L �i0/� ..• �. ,I. I. 1, .. •� ',. 1 ....w�...w.�L.rr.�•..r��•...,,w�.u.r�r�M?rwUAt.iMw Wy/l�wNdl�Wprl�IMww/wrl.�VSA(M + WW '--�• _•YA,I+YawlMww.r�r�I'�vr,..rw.YWw�..rr..wr.1w•�'r�w�.f a+�r ExPhIs�4 �Ft AuTM�O�rIYA tIpM iRELIMIH.%Hf' '�IRATIE OF &t ~' ! QY-207A394901 DIST-00-ATfE-PM9 M+ItiliWi BLUC SHEET 17em 17EN ITEM OESCRIP`CION UNIT ��At�1itY NO COIX tALT) ? 41 208511 SPFilNFLE.R ( T YKE R- ) EA Vt� is) A;R 20elrGI SPHINKL,ER (TYPE C•-;J) EA, 173 i IS) 4A 2@eald1 Z 3/2N GATE VALVE EA i (t, l d�� 44 206605 1 I /P-t% CON IVOL VALVE EN S tS3 0,5 Z06644 QUICK COUPLING VALVE C a w 1 ���,� a� �ST'E •' 1011 ce"naiT Ii,..F 22b :'•, V :.V e7 U10201 CLASS a 0014EOATE a4,SE Cy I MS 40 3T5003 SCRE.E00135 (ROCK SEAL) r 64 3YO301 4011 i,EGATE ( TYPE 6 ASPHALT COUCHE10 TO" C.5100 5t 3VIO01 PAVING ASPHALT tsSPHALT VOUCRCTE) it 39AP6? PLACE ASPHALT CW4CRETE cHISCELLANEOUS s11y14) AREA) 52 :1--'-,011 PLACE ASPHALT C01-WAM 016E LF 525 (Om501 w T'I t A) !iw( �lt1 t�?! FlIPiv^fl CCtrCRkTE (141GOR STRUCTURE) CI _ 51b1'< ' ,1GN STRUCTURE ct.IGe1TWEs!;HY) Lb TgG00 , lb rr10'1 fJ.�fr, i r? +h . r• VJ ' , • ,il�'�wlr r! � �r'Ji4 . � y' .wSYh� 1 v • t' ; r' .,r„fJ J,h •,+Jl SYaF.I �'r' ,},•:•, .:'F;:I��'{�r''�,i" F h � '�.d •r ' n � , a i • J CATS 12 r1W 76 PRICE AMOUNT ; tsp00 or:�o00 R :v !• r lee s e$ U 0141 f, ••�"� r' i ,4 2*61) 1299320't0 i 16 0 3t,110 cln i!o 0 fl f• , 4001,00 1otj00000 1 loS9 1%JE'JOo0Q I f ! y'';e• ,•r .::�!•tr �••r r1'y: !'' et1A'.::, A, .V •, i • y,, ,• �'•�' 1. ,, y •''4 1' 4 1 4ri, •'f,��',. A,� 10 4 A M •i� .;ly,r}^', J•.1'''�n ',a •'i'�!"�'Ct ,'1 �. ',� r,�T'r^ - x'4����{{•jjIS ,. � '�Iyr �,�';•.9 + ,1u1.� .H 4 fit•*4 ., r 73T��ri�► h yKy+ 11 � . , `, � • f .. '� .r ,1 • ! wi7'4y�•4k;i .,r. r�. 1 Ar �; �' ' • prrr _ . ��' ,4ir ar 5r'' � � .'! :'rl •'4 ,: �' � p �.k•� f�k �' �, y � i,� • ; � , . ; r • +ire+' � �` . .i1''t`�ylj,� ,r: i l,'�'1' .. � ��' 'Y ''..'d•'•r.f'r ! 'tf+,�X�So YIY,'.,�.� �+�YA� .., � r.•" £,�'%i .' (,'1 ' �y + i ��J �4h i 1je I %1"' ^iKar �Ar •�r''�i M'.1�;�', •r� �,. ..1`,;-�� .,'{s• '•Y�,f.."'.31 •.l0rl�r4'rhf ' h,�r:�Ayw,�.,''r• ; ti ��''d;1 t T i ! :.r! , t' •�'` '�i`,�,;:,::';.. ,':r'•i ,'�I.!•..ly�'1,�,: .a.. ..�y.; .:r. ;� ,n' y ri�: ��,�I'�'rr.�J�'iy „y r '� YI� r;,�l,ir#•' ' i'' } . ! r! ' _.. :I; �� L•' � f, '"f'�!'}• i �'i� t �; ".`sir •: 5.! +: 'Sr.4:.. iii>�G�`.,+�'.�.; Pvch1/4 ' /.,i W,lii/.L..W'_"'-3:�>Ne.ur.oaMnbinh,wwb.11warM�Yii�'11A h4tA�l+l6M1'NRI�ii,Bi�Mi/IIiiX.Y�RfIRiWm�JMIi1�lf1'�'NMNiRi:MYi'YtiY'�I['M tf�AVJ i�.buw wru �w/w.r,+w.Wtlwro+MUM[sw,Wrwr�I M+6x.,/�inY� 1 ! -XpCN0,, jRE AUVni llIZATION R F. L.IMINokRYrIMATE OF CL PAGE 5 079207-394901 rvATIE 12 2q 76 DIST•CO-RIE-PA HIGHWAY BLUE SHEET ITEM ITEM ITEM OESCRIPTIGN ullI:' QUANTITY PRICE AMOIJHT o. I ho 'CUOt: (ALT) , 55 S61004 301: CASTmIN"GRILLE -HOLE CONCRETE PILE LF 26 1001,00 2v69q:U�D � TO, !SIGN FOUNUATION) r�r th 566001 WOOD (ROADSLOF; SIGN) MFHM 105 klbooano �}piSC,QR 57 5*. tdg0t INSTALL. Slit'4 (FITRAF ANU SAIMLE bR,%CKET EA 4 b9o00 ME T"00) SB t502,16 21," REINFORI;LO M4CAETE PIPE iCLASS 11) Lr 250 ,;5,ZO S9 70?4�61 3611 REINFORCLO CONCHL:TE PIPE RISER f U 91 0Q '�i�tiolifi 60 73M0 CLASS 8 CONCRETE (MISCELLANE'OUS any 125.ibt1 +bl tZbo,b4 rr nNSTAUCY ION1 • ' 61 750401 NISCELLAWMJS IRON AND STEEL. I.Fd 436 loug ray- IF) 6? 900360 CHAIN LI141k FEUCE !TYPE CL.a6) LF IoCQIi 3,50 Sr50it,3)i !: 63 029102 UUME MARKER EA 20 300,00 s b4 )iVOC-3 METAL, bpA,4 rjUARD RAILING IWOOD POST) LF &5 ('39531 GAME A14CHON ASsSENfILY EA 1 3bFdo00 70500411, i. ' (HRE.hKAHAYe TYPE A) f,b S1 P`453Z C1~i3LE ANCH014 ASSE14BLY EA I 00000!) WR AKAWAYi TCPc' it) r ' 67 650103 TYPE A F f.VLMENT t{AAb%CR KLASS lI OP. III) EA 76 2*00 60 840145 iYVE ti PhVEmENT HARI(ER EA 86 5000 4.10 0Q C9 dt"•0201 SIB►?AL ANU LIGnTI► r Ls L�i{P .eUiS '' • r,El�liAlleQ� I'HeO�U�Q�i IF •. TO 060^41 !.'1 LS QL{19 SUM 1094 0*00CIL 1C�i�1}�sQQ I I' I `I 1 ' wa,syn ,..,. .INN -R t ��,e�•��+ .l '' '• " � r .f . :. ,r.y, , '. v 4` .. i I:.d • � �': ".Ar i 'I i ' . r� '� :{ � f �v y l ' }e' �,j 1111111,�( hn 4 < ki • '{, • .. ; . .1�1h .,;;�, , I L:�-A . V. le, Aj W, 4A 4r 4� V, OX� 41. .:.v a '! 7" 4ej '' #. . / . ., .., It V .7, ............ 9:1 Kk Al V(PEN0z .#RE AWHORIZAT101i Wrl Tki pi n I M A I L Ur %;k PAGE 6 DATE IR 27 DIST-CO-RTE-PM 0?-ORA1,409-16oS HIGUWAY BLUE SHEET SUPPLEMENTAL WORK DESMPTION "AINTAINING TRAFFIC NAXHTAIN EXISTIwa PLANTS MODIFY' IRRiQATION nYSTCH NAULINS SALVAUED ELECTRICAL IMMIENT MAINTAIN EXISTING ELECTRECAL SYSTEm L 6 LS LS LS LS SUMTOTAL SNTOTAL STATE rok"ismeo MATERIALS AND EXPENSi-ES DESCRIPTION LS TYPE 200 CONTROLLER ASSENaLIES LS SIGN PANEL59HAR0WARCq(CLCSURE INSERTS* LS COMPUTER 5VTWARE LS TRAFFIC SICNLkIPS LS MdNEVION FEE ELECTRICAL LS I !NCM NFTEn LS AgA& AltOUNT 10-000400 10500000 k$000900 3426;;o XV000800 ANUUMT IqNoqss� 540,600 33rMwOg 4vlaoftoo rocao'no 100000 100000 300o0o rwl % L141 TARl ;TY �N ; t -TA,v�Ii, r 5090323450 ?R0 dp 'Mir; 71. 4 1? 777 F.7 N1. ; tv- 1j, tt.." It. ...... . . . . . . . . AQI� CAPE AUTHWWX IO ... DAM IF 2? Tt 7 O'A . p 1 4 1 Ajr tm A 0# to 5 - 16. s HIeNWAY D�.UE SKEET STRIPING LS j sleN MENTAL LZ SUBTOTAL Ir 41 v ly 1JECT TOTAL ti-et. 67 LAST PAPE or 7 CAL, 2 CONSI'HUCTIOU UNGINCERV-10 $ YNTAL, 9 v a 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 go 0 IRAU, I 4r TOTAL410064964fie-aam $721 09 —A MILL, 1'72,q 000.00 IG A' 16.,�� JE pl, T, rr nr O\rGo �31 N ell APPENDIX L9: At. *7yll I I I , ".. J l�' -1,7 , 04i Co I - ', ; uA •y f + + f14N1 t• `r' 'f } a y '*� ,' p.•54f .r5 { TA ,yam :x • .r.1' � 1 rlk r • f. w t 'll 1,J �1A i1.�'.', •,r �� , ' � t r• 1 •-r J� '� r r� t t fir.. r J -�': •; +.. ++ 'P rt 5 h 7 C S + i tti t r ;Y + i '•� l9F 'Y h ti t- �i A •� �t Jl '-�} r }r t };,IIZ , Y. ,+...�v.�';.. riM '.,�r,l v ' .'.,:' '��. ,.I,r.d1, Y'.7} +. Y��A.r �. �1 5 :. l:. r'r 1.r i'�•. yY'�: y �V��. ,f',.. 1r � r�'' 1 I {,,', .,'�'..�'.' �., T•.aY, a..+Y':•�1,�`rs _.'w�[ '^ ,t � w ti� r'' '�'�"4 .�i��+.i Y: .�M.. ..: of+4 '• f 4 +, r• +'1 i`. 3t''.,i. y,��'.�.. ''.X•.;. � ,� 'r 'X:. �'' 1,. 1 ,�,u•� .r-., .� ..1� "r�r� } .fin .a. �r.,��. r,(� �d':p•��•d l..Xa��1 k ��'• 7 !, ,ff , } . �', !,', -: d!„� �..: � ti �,,., �,.� `,�;�y r ',�.`W`�M+�y;.y �, `Yi. {� � �`,,,ry� ,:k,.� ,ti {.c' 1 �', r _'( �,.�• r• a. °yr + ,{. .}"ti'1.� „�+`' + q'.' , { �i:' ( i �µ.. 1� fL, �' r y'1 . .Yl1}�'�Yr� � i•, '' S: },� ..R.. 'MF.r. d.., �,�� } i::��?•Rr�•'�'.,,T,: f f.wf.. y� Ni .' 1k, r Y.,` ry,,�. �+d(� .i ' G J �I'' ��'.. 'f;?i ,.:"t. .:�'a r ,,� 4� n': •'�,,. �`. ,n7 ik. _ -�u.�„ +{ 51�.:: a' +�la .lw"' i. +,5 : ;�.:I .� -1 +: ri* �r:.+f'"" f 4 �•' r, ' i' .,{ t.. ,+' �, r,.F. :i 5y�'y' .7r 41t,: '.6 y '/- „r 5M � k r + �A`'' Y1 f t' �r��/� ii�l'. , .�. � .� r i� ,4;,: ��; ,, 'y�{ -4 4� ,r' .+ .�,t �r �4'} �'• '+k�� +' (. .c,.V,r 4y�' , �r!.� ft , Y'', , r .."' '. �,... � ., 5A h' '4': j; `..1,'' 'I •li�ei . -v F a��'� -!. Y' •P �, �k7 1 �hA M'. �. 4.. .1 l� :.�P' IfY. , +.J� ~:V' 4 >rii�*` �r 1 -•�� r' %, � 'W, r'k'..ti',f; 1p'r l': •� i :,»,' ';�; .aa•',,, # /:�..�, } � +;.� ��' I'a. A 'rJ 4� ..�r.'"�+� 'f +94H',r.. ., t rr�' ' '/7 G 'yT. "� 4,. ,/ �;�y 19 `yFy. �t'. Y � p � rf.. ,�(�1�� i'( Iy`�,,�,µ{�y, � ;./P. �' 4. •�y . �y'" '�'1� 1y '�,2''.rM T '�,6'11.� �1 ��'.•i'�•��,�. �J}7f] ia� �. +��y��','�v` .•� .i; i i t�.�. (r l.,�i,.. •.4�,�Ji.,'rM _4.f•i 1r�.t ...�HI�j'1�J ����. rw'i1.'_"��u fLT. .'�..yW�i `�Llfs11�'197N1., „��.._l.�.1�Yfk��R}�y. ...T�t'.�t�t�.K A:. ,L.. :1-.�CJ: LT.+,. /....nil..:iL �=�,1'1�-YYI1�..�1�.�.Yf�i.;�1..R.w".4t s.�.{.-1it 11 .�,4'Mi��:�rh S+..f�� I a I WI-1 411. , Fp ji AAr� 01 In ut MAN — low S Jr'04'tf'C 11 411, 6VO. 00: :AF. 30 -, Mp rr At Y jCAL jj is lye. M , i7A, T, 7, I At Y jCAL jj is lye. M , i7A, T, 7, I R I t ;:x f VY J or Ind! Asz1a.- —ar M, CITY Catoo.11 ..... . . . . . wo Council Chambir, City jixil 11unt1nytun LWarliv valifor ijin X. A. —.tlayar Rieder callCd Via regular r "Ut.111Y of ulle CJL,,' coulikJ4 of the City Of 11wItIngton Retch tO (1--dar at 7lio P.M. Present, Mull lialtart Akaentt Na" jr autib as*** dtalkplbs *a 13 a sellat'llc a f, one oft*ks &A —Vr ExTrx5ya, i RlS1 Dips rss�, PEMMM)L'ITMMCNT The Clerk preirent6d a czepwLtir,7�tion fj:cn tilk DjLrecto Alt.: of Public V��rkg, tranmitLing I,,, A91102413t bel.100"A the City " CAI Trans raiativ.,, to Cantor Lriv& Zxtanwl�in er.2 un YodLtic—jo-la, Project M-340. On action by Coon, Seca-14 P&ttjArr4jl# Cuuftcil &rp.-ev*d tlw agra*n-at bettftsn thn. City 4-.rxl C41 Tranu relative to the Cant&K Driva rxUnrlo.% and agn Diego preomy ofg.: i X, vjl.c_ &U40n2l Aqthorized axocutLon by ths Mayor sax] Claiko approved shp-rIng of cogjt:o, an L-jt.Ijf.4L.j In the Director of Pubile ilzrka cos;s=jOjtjOr.,- arA authorlytA staff to procw,., jjjtj% =qdultion of right of way from Ifuntingttn Canter and a licanat And.,01 edsl.:-ellt fra, !IV 4 Malin (�o. fir'tion czirz-Lod urA:jiw%jjtv. oi. xction Urtlett, stco 4t! nd Ll-tt -GC:v;h& resfular tweLLng of the City Council of t�-�c City ot Huntingto to ticrt�� Zan-.; Huntington Cr B "ch adja,trned �—t 31,177at o r. 11. ill tile �r�ova D-9 '�ftl4SK—MUC= Wntion c&lFr xd"— AM1*3 2 1.!/ City Civrk and er-officio Cjark `,F,.V- I - . , . AWS-ST s Of the City Cctlncj? Of th, City "i, 4L 2auch, C&J1,!,)rn!,L 14 A. n. Wentworth City Clerk r4puty lzry M., County of Oranga 551Ktjmr tY city Of Huntington Boach) I. ALICIA M. 1a1:77'ijUjZnj, the dtIly 014cted AM quzl,fod City Cldr): of c-f N=t"guln "&cbl Callfc!-Min, do LuM017 cnrUfy chat Lhe th-i 1�ity ve AVY and foru5ning is p WIT &:d correct GtAUM"t 91f Action of tho :1,ty C%mnril of asid at .---=rut1n7 MIA on t-.hp 17%:1- day of -�,A n 11 Ary Tat their 7 —11,ular -y hand ane Xe411 Of Or 22id Cj jZL_19 77 l- Y 11"Int"Otm Nr-ch tlAir. tile IS% ily �:f _, .ILciA H. tieriiavlth rrE 117 1. Cal. Cy"Zi =,.rz Of the City Ctntn,ll of ths of liw.Lin-tor3 37 V v7u tI . T V I F.- f Jv 4 r I '4r•. 'w'''r• -,�, ' 1.1.E ', ,, ', ;�' • ,°i � Ili ' ''' • ✓" ,., , '�; .'''. .\: J.' .....f., ...rr+�.... ,.,. ... ,... �........ ....... _.. _.. . ...:r:r,:r.:�.:...:.t.'_'::!,::i:S'....,.i['h�:rr//.:+t.ij •/. ' . 11:1. !.i 1.,...... .L• . .l ,YI.C{.. i • ''1F,r , ,', F I 7(( y' MNGO�1 y17 EIli, M Ey.{ M PANY 2110 STAIN E311ItrMoT- 1111ONn i714> SGS-113C131 i`i:, `•! 11UNTINC3TON BEACH, CA'LIFORNIA 024146 v ! January 13, 1977 .. (�•��R .`''IF AJ.11 !,A•A. ''r'r' �'J r •+q• "�, TPi,' r1'Lqi; 4,i•5 t'y:' '�!P•" I',r,TM, /7, T' t aY R•Ir 1• .x .r � '''`''�Yf;�'''•' "' ' � CENTER DRIVE EXT. AND 5APJ DIEr�O y1 +t,',:�•'' FRWY . OFFitxMP MODS CC- 35 7 4 9 .I' F•If: A . ,• �'1�."r;�,,� .�`�, ,fir.,', �' ,� °�;; R" ;''•;}�"' .lr. H. E. FIartge D-irector of Public hark Y +:,a•. v'�''<' City of Huntington Beach 'r,� 'y,a�•," �: P.C. Batt 190 F:u+.�t.:ington Bc-acli, C, 92646 5 \ i('; L.' +'',✓,r y 4 .+.• Dear Bill ��' `*"' .!'r "•}'�( f Your Netter to the City Council dated January 11, 1977, has beenI'{'' reviewed with ?ir. . Charles rierr�ti: of The MacDonald Group, Ltd. .:Y ?.:,',';✓r' ;. •, ' ' our partner in 'the Huntington Center. Although no official � been taken by either company owner, we agree: in pi•"cipal with the percentage of net. benefit as set forth in the Economic Benefit � ,L-�f�,;ti• �xx Study prepared by Urban Projects, Inc. and exp Yct to pay our fair .. '. J: share of the costs as set forth in your letter. However, since 11V these were est;matec7 Cost.quotes, we niliat re:�erur: t:!e ricii,t, of � F' ? I 'yf l i � r. 1 , VY •AAA. .. , .'.' „ 1 , , , A fl4 • ' ,1T .' rrl�w i. Y review of final COIL;--ruc tion bid costs. r Very truly ycurs , 2 J . D . Vice :'1C.f7ijtant tothe Presid.--, nt ' 1 I #rr I , �l IllvV� •i _. r:ti. 3 IJ A► , I � n. � :;�'r'•' �, . J"'{ •I } � ; ; 4 ",,..f,Y� '' • rr��, '� . r Yr Y I F' x $y�4.,, .:'h:,} $"aV���,.�•�%, i, 1 'L y+,�t, �4'y 'Y'•. '„ } ^1� r'.r � ,I .,�• �4. I, r ,,. 1'?r"f' •rh ':1•'hl}� s j M,4 .+' 1" 1 1 , i ,'4.J ,1�'r �Ii'r., bF {'..l ••� P 7 5 ,i�, �d','"d' • r4":''' .Y• ;y•'Y. :5 yy V•.�d, v �' L, r ..5' P�. .d''rl,' �. rr a. t�.,�' ,IS y�•,1 .cs+ :r � .,°.. {,, ,4.I ;l 1 , t .�{r 4 +a�s`1�•C .� .��a; 7 ! .. ,apt. a+ 'f ?� R•�+fi� KY���3 � �,�' 1. 1 .}. 'R., ;,,l, {r.l"?^'F,+ rah•", ry l.e �� '�V'r!- .'•A'' ' � Y .. ', r r,y,". r. _. n.,/ +'�',•'•''�'.,'"�','�r�'',' ' r � , � /�' � �/ Ir,'� Wry~ Ml?ai-..diJ::•Y'L/7Mbi.:�i.'i.: u✓/s n..x .._..� ... ...+..a....i (',: a+. ... ..a♦ Io :.s:..e,a.......•. w... �._...- w. ..._.ate..........,_.._ e`. ,r...• ,._ - aa.. �_. ... _ .. � Y Ar '/+T •,° . ' ;+ry �,i'`n. ,�r,"y 1t ,, %•, .�FR. ;, a. r. _.t.r.,.. !• ., , •r �'�",`R tR d ,1 �• � � .� � / _1....-..a:l , yLJ. ,.c..,.:7.•-.. ..,Ir.� �t J / ' ' i`. '�I' .!' r r''" •'I �' r y+k',".,.5. y'{ i 1' 1 r.,�• -! i � a L�4•I,1 � f , . f, r : �, r l . � , . I ,:•• ;.�(f'f,.iri. 111 ,��Y - r +` '�,, ,,: r Y�IY. ,,,gip' 1`,�'• .,�. S � � / t •, , ` , IF If • ,J�rl�r'.� IrN�r;'{�,l�i', '.: (I ��� � I; • # , , . ',,. • ,+ I r �I• • ' ENTCi<Piilf3f 3 / �17.•+''' }' �I �' "';r'••' j 111 EAST THIRD STRELT -O+ N.O. BOY, 176, SAN DIMAa, CALIFORNIA 91773 w% (714) 509.1256 �ls� %en w3+ ate+ r" "•%' '';' ✓'''i" 4r i y .',..a. J6f]utir l3, la7 iAojr(no.;hip o/ ?t,f, e,',('+1' ,'.!A• ,1 G.SRALIJJ. KLEIN—EARL WFLK .. '/ y'':'• t ��X �'''.lr+•tp�4'�/.r�.f�) ,.NAP ■ y,z .%.',, �I.F }�,'..'�„�r� " ,, a:. 7 s ;. ,, •,/ , e,rj.�j" r*y�t 1t r wJ-t;3t6., Director of Public: Works Re: Center Dr. E.. '.-nd San a` ` ,r ,'�'N•''Y''; City of iiuntin ton Beach Diego Frr •I, x'•r;�ry ;��,. .�' � B +y OiTrt>,p tderla., 0 Box 190 CC _367 Hunt:ing,,on Heuer,, Ccli f . dy �, 1 4 I� V W y ;g Deer Bill: We have r oviewed your letter to the: City Coutail. dated January 11, 1.977 p with subject as above referrenced. We are disappointed that the construc.Aon »chedule has been act back by severest months, holrever our position and comittu:nts have not changed. We agree with the percentage 4f net benefit as cot forth :in the Eccno::ie Benefit Stvdy prelfLred by Urban Projects Ina. � and agree to par our fair rhare of the costs as cat: forth in yprur L:t,ter Sineereot parsone.l regards, ` •,�' a,rF?I';"rm k:ImiproI �A' ; '•.�, s .?fir 'r,;r� `�d., ,':�..f �•`�•�r{} �;1�D [llT (7/ r +LT:iZ1ire�(�y14' 4� -,': ,.I'•,�"'^,t +'r +,yg•'' 4- f GJK Far to rIA � ..; ; �,•;,.�, ` ` I/ ' `,�1" 4�' 1;K F'1'ir'''` Y t •'' t YK�1t,•J � /W ^' r •-,• , ..... _. ...... _. _.__...__._..__.._... _.... ,.. ._._..-.,. 4 gyp '• � ;�� •4- , , r 1, • '',�+7, .,• }yi .. ,;t.f'('ti�'i �h: f�+�:� Y rr e.,,� ",(''<?' , .. :'; 5�'rr'.ly"yl'�,•5i �. M'''k� ''i V'rr,I �r' � p`.�'+. '�'��''n', WI AA'4� •7 Fir" '�. rt� � �� . , ,,.. ,, :::Cyr':' ::aX'�`,'�a�T�,y��,'�{' •k+' ' ' •'l 1tr ;. � I'lAp1 .� 91G�L'c r,4�„ r@7'Y"��' 1_.,L`e"i.JtU'EC,Y`'11�41bi�i•';d17P;s'se.M.4amtlrnrl^�oexwo�xaarte�r...�.r.. � ._.,w.-.. _ -'--- - ..h,..... r :.1•. �'�'��,;��,. gip,, �,, ',•', Y < ! r1 it / + �• /, .� 3�'•f...! r r ,,,t f�'d�y„� l�,!I I. ' ,; / '.m1k;,,J�.!'ritf.•''.r�! 11.. :1:5.-i. .. .. cr �'. .: .�1.���.,f .r. ... .. .r �,. .'., �.r' .r..: 4r. ... _....,....- _...... J.. _..»........, ... r.. ........«....,.............. ...-_..... �_�..r _..• _ ..�.. -_,� ,O� T I' r ,4 I �` �. ��r q��{�-• n n r r �qp (�' , `_ ,! p l/'/—j`,�`�'} ll•J _ �J T - ` ' ;f, . ,1 .1, { .� / , x' r �iii Q 4 llY S�J+iJ— Ki`II Y s �� (i r(��i 7tC� 1 ,�i`.� n,�.. hJllr�,rr (t i� `✓ j Cl1L'�t /`�YQ'f ' { , ►i j!j iw�+�:f� ''�?; INTER•DEPARTIMENT COMMUMCATION WW1Y;10N MACH t To ri. )a. F'�rf , .ge James Geoz ges ' Public Works Director , }. . ,,,'°•, .',.. .. ' I' j. ar r Deputy City Attorney +;' r u e Freeway Offramp in::o Gate January 12, 1917 r +" Huntington Center, Agreement �•' '.,'' y; with CalTran: CC--6. .`Ij'•,•'' {, ,..',•,,,; ,;r, r, �,;. This office has reviewed the preliminary coat act prepared ;'• .,;�'��•"..•�:t5' , A�;'f % rt'•'';'' -' j§;?`': . ' �' by the Caaifornia Department of Transportation and I had .' ! : t,,,• '•rf, if.,` �`.01, ,•', r r1,,r made my comments to you regarding the prel j.atinary cont;�act {I"y .'•'�ul', !t"t �,,'g• •r';/,.��r.r (r.� ,`Y''I•, �Yu%,�It•+'�'17, oh C ' I �'`H ,•fit � t. In a memorandum dated November 30, 19•,'6. �s;�•:��.��.'1':',, `';���,'.1 r ''- I also have written to you a memorandum on this name " subject dated December 8, 1976 restating my objections to the preliminary contract but concluding that the City can legally eater into such contract with the State. Since then it has come to my attention that -there is a provision r in the City Chartf r which would prevent; a city from entering into such contract for the following reason: �• The final draft oi' the contract on page four, para6raph Y ' • three states • i.'s'f :,' �',.� "d• n$• (�+. ' ;,.��r{: , • „'�i, ` Joy_ !.. ,1/�•,, 3. The cost of utility adjuotmPnuS to be paid for - by LOCAL AGENCY shall. consist of the amount; paid by i` t STATE for relocations or riUdi+lcations o_ ul.iIiti..s .:'1y1 '1'! r 1'.'•y 14t ? i 1,5'"'� 1:. •. i' ,,,},,�,,., ;:,•.W.�,, ,• necessitated by STATE'S construction of PROJECT requirir.r, the change plus the amount to cover STATE'S engin:^wring and overhead costs City Charter, Section 1.1105 (d) states that the utility companies shall.. "(d) Remove and relocate without expense to the City any facilities installed, used and maintained une:er i the franchise if and when made ne.-cessary by any law- � '`• ' i ful change of grade, alignment or width of any public '' street, Fray, alle;r or place, ineluding the construe-- ;' `� �•1' tion of any subway or elevated tranc:it facilities. or by the construction or improvement of any public property or facility, or if the public health, come or t, welfare, convenience, or safety so demands.". �,':�rf[•';'•, (, it i� apparent that the above City Chaz•rter This office 'eels s sort I on would, in effect, prohibit the City to en+:er into an � :'.:;`'','•,,:r� ,yf: fit,=.,• �•.i r 1};1.s�� t , 'I •fir '+� �' Ir, w � y' - .. r.. � � I 'a * - �� f � �. .+•: s { n' :r � W ,,',1 ' :'•`f+ ,r,:',j., ,., ,�,t. � .'• ,' ,,'!. i F: f k 4 . ,1•I,y�+: �i, � rL ww......�...-+•I.II•f..a.•..L.LUI...�..u�._�..,�.. ,��._.. ...� .-. .�.+.r s,,.ta'u .....r..w ,....�._..._�-..._......_ .., u ... .. ..... _� •. ,�' ;P}` [ agreement with the State: whereby the City �',culd have ':c Fay for the cost of removal and relocation of utility ,' y,:;nA.r�::.l'.y'fl%� .��A ���i .,'7 .• Sf. .r � 1: !.'',y%'.`•'.r' 1 ,77 ,. ;; e •. 1'.t_es . I'hprefdre, this of ice cannot approve as to formX. rt' any contract �rtl.t(;)i appears to be in violation of the r „r;.�, Cl y Charter. ;•. • Ip � i , � F .. .' , .r',r I. ' �y�„IAnr„�/"� � /�• "�`�—^�^ yjf �I x.r�,, k � ife I , i. AriL' S GECFtGES � r �•.��' "�?�' ';' ,'' � t APPROVED., yh ,':..,. Deputy City Attorney Y: wel J G : c s Enclosures City ntt 'r l'y �►yr•.. t y+i : i k yy...Y.i � ' J l Y�I p' Ito � r � Y ]T■ t.yy. r d •4, ..�t .. , ., r r, _ , i. , _ ,,. ,.• ,.,�.• :, 4,- ti', '�• 'i j'• Y:.. �'.. ,I7t; �1r'yrr.r;•.y7' }' <:t7■�. f' ., �. , `4.',:tr h... .,A.,, r. iM }• �' f .y" 1 ,lr 7"`r I 1v :> !:• ., :�'!: '} ,, `1- .'ry r.^�'+' iy lrrf{' i' L.r: •Y:...-4 1 i' ,` *y1•.,r10 ,zF •ff r, i' 1. -( •a. ii Y .t :''. .,Y- N 1y�( .� r.:!'• Fr :.''`•I,.�'' ':� •,A •r,l.'. .1 yyy t y w�:.1... i',��1"4S', .R' :I• ''1 .A r(1. 1!y •` I.+P'.:.f-.F.' 1 1 �„ '1 '•�.. � ,ry'1' i i'* �„ ., .� .� ��• '� '�"45 ,'wy - >♦ ._�r �{- 1 : t.. lr.. �.r�' i,.+ r'Ci41,• ,, •+ 1, _ i ,, �. ,�. . y i 1�• a 5 %{ '•1 ,,.l ••'f' 7 r3� r�''i{: ) ��, k• .i. . Y 't 5. } ♦. A 'T r,' .F: 1` IF S it: �f• M .'d: �.r ?, .:'�, ,,+ ;r' •W ti. .t r;'- tir.,,.� .:' - �,,;•�"�, { ,Ya:?: , r.,tcvyt:`t-I` r-',-+:'r'�' - f. r ,>•-� �, .�,. .h , .,,r. ra,. ;:• ..;,r , �r C+: I rS :t � f�' h,.'l: r • '� �i' .'��' y y c� i�r 7�r}'.�. $.''..td'tE-srr. .:: �"�����-,i.�'_: i:. �•'!�•s .a.t'"�-,i:'_' ri*a5i?4+i �lr'a+,f. �............ '1Y.;,'!�•.,,.�i;,.r'...'ti_:1�1+�.w �51'��;'..-t+�,t d1y' '•+: 6.r". t. ..y;��:S��'K><.''4r.w._',� �._y''.'. •,�1.' .��r :,��,�{i�t� a.. .._ .� :'r .'�`t-:;.A...Iii_.�"F_ •1r �'.,Z'�4•'�1tv�'?'. , � + f .. •.. -r . .. ......... .... ......-. ..Ii. ...�._.......... ....-., r_..�t:._. .. .._... .....-..-.. '.i � ...-..,'. 1. �r t. ' r. , 1 r +" ;lt.1„ - , .aa l.i .. ...�... «,.I. 'l:•s,:.. +.. '.f .,: .... :t.. _.. .. .•1 .. .•. •.. ......... .... t.. .r. . 4,........_.a.... ....._.�_�.. ... ,.-.-. ..... .., + .+� ., '1,' . 41 1 City of Huntington Bead P.O. 110Y IM CAL,I>^'OR141A G2640 ENGINEERING DEP_'1 nT ENT January 11, 1977 r•--',�,c� . /�- `� ,,.;. •,r�•.; fir, ^s�• Y �•, Honorable Mayor !!,� . un3 City Council : lC.� City or. Huntington Beach �-� "1 �.. i ,. �, �y, ,' �.,w��, Attention: Floyd C. Belsita �..�'�'t; .s:,',1: r, r•.' City Administrator •.I�,Rr'.4. if, �eM �l.i'r•y '. , ti; ';r�"'� � �'J Subject: Center Drive Extension and San W-vCo Freeitay 4• , Offra.'np Modifications, CC-36 7'`' ' Dear Council Members. � F �•::,� . • c W . �;, 1f1 3,,t . The above project has been in the making for several years. Some "';.,• '�'' of the moE. recent �listory is as follows: + g May 20, 1975, 1 ' i.; .. 1 on ri• 1 . City Council approved Consultants Agreement No. �',:; with Donald Friscl�er & Associates for EngineQr. 3 i�g r^easi.5ility Study. ( Cost $6, 000 (City -- $3, 000; Huntington Beach Co. - $1, 500; Jer<ael 1. City Council approved Consultants Agreement No. 2 on September 15, � ' •r r '. �'.:'.{,'' •' • �J'/' 1975 with Donald Frischer C. Assor..i-ater, for Engineering Feasibility !, . rrR''4'••fiSf ' I Study. Coat $2,077 (City•- 1 039 Huntington Leach Co. - 519.004- • �, ' j JercYel -- 519. GG)., , ;.• 3. Citv Council authors Zed on November 10, 1975, Economic Benefit Study c'rith {Jrbnn Projects Inc Cost 95 000(City - $7 500• 11untin ton A 1 ' Beach Co. - $1, 250: •Jerviel $1, 250) . 4. C:;:y Council on February 2, 1976, received the report prepared by iirb-ln Projects, Inc. which inaicatee; net benefit,; as fio'Llrn'Is: a. Huntington Center $13.96% b. Jerwe►l Enterprises 5.92% C. City of liuntingtc;n Beach_ 80.12 4 The: City Council authorized the staff to negotiate a cost sharing agreement_ with the two entities. 5. City Co::ncil, on February 2, 1976, approved an engineering services agreement: with Cal Trans for design of the project. C tlr. 11 . •, r ' M ,1 V' I 4ayor Honorable and City Council January 11, 1977 Page 2 The plans and specifications have been completed by Cal Trans and the next step is to enter into a construction agreement with Cal Trans whereby they will. let and administer the contract. �.4 The total cost of the pro4.---ct cost sharing will he approximately v" as follows: County and 4. Total City Hunt. Cntr Jerwel Congultants Agreement No. 1 6,000 (50%) 3,000 (25%)1,500 (25%)1,500 Consultants Agreement N2 2o. 077 1 039 519 519 Economic Benefit Study 5,000 2,500 1,250 1e250 Fngineerxng Cost - Approx. 60,000 (00%)48,000 (14%)8,400 (6%)3,600 Construction Cost - Approx. G05,000 If 404,000 " 84,700 36,300 Contract Adm. - Approx. 115,000 92,000 " 16,100 6,9t'.0 R/1AI - Huntington Center 115,000 92,000 16,100 6,900 asement Edison Co. 300 240 42 18 908 377 722,779 128,611 56,987 Historically the cost of obtaining a license from the Edison Company to cross their powerline right of way for street purposes has b?en $300.00. flowavc-r, this figure is subject to change based on recent discuosions with a representative of the Edison Company. Any additional cost will be pLo- portionally shared in the same manner as outlined above. The right of way from Huntington Center is a portion of the parking lot behind Barker Bros. and consists of 0.88 acres. The fair market value as obtained from a member of the Realty Board would be $3.00 per square foot or $115,000.00. .4, The County of Orange will provide approximately tv340,000 of Gas Tax funds through the A.H.F.P. The City's net cost will be approxiinatoly 3.1 $302,779 and will Ve financed from Gas Tax funds. Upon approval by the 11W !i.- City Council of the construction agreement, the processing by the State will entail an additional 90 days. Advertising and award of contract will consurne 60 more days, which means work can commence in June with a completion fir date of November 1977. Recormlend;--Otion 1. Approve the agreement: with Cal Trans and authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute same. 2. Approve the sharing of cost as outlined above. 3. kuthorize staff to proceed with the acquisition of right of way from. Huntington Center and a license and/or an easement from the Edison Company. Very truly yours, yy OZ "V 0 E. �far. HEM c no Director of Public Works 'A W. 4— .4941. to F 4V ? 7 4 01 4f Imp. `r 'fr,7f%,rij,f,rr�u al., r' 't . , rgryy�•`•%:r. i�r,�, F'�' ..1 rt ..... r.....-. .. .•., ,r •... .. ,. ,'r :,..,nr, .. Y \.. .,r .., .. .. .l+•_._ .f. _.. ..... ",.. ,a,. ._..... _.. __. ._.—..�.u.r.. .. a.v"..rlS/'u1:.!.Si t i. , � } r .. 1st �i L�..✓�,�f•��/ I r�r Cit of Hunfinggton Beach P.V. LION 190 CALIFORNIA 62040 `` ! •'ti`4 ENGINEEi?ING DEPARTMENT {, November 17, 1976 S it ''r,,r' � •�w � .� '�AZI.�+�, i`:' �.� `.ri',�;' ' i ' " �v/�rp■p ��Rq � i.rh• •r . �Y.,•1�,�7yyYt'',,7!'yy4 a �{ t f'; 'fir • r' •rf e rV � ',1.1'r`,J17.°P:;l, �"f,�.t;�� °g,y, . Mayor Honorable Ma ii and City Council .,,,? �t; • „'. City of Huntington Beach •,rey�I/�+kT:f`3?r't; ..,. �1,r��, 'i"., , Attention: Floyd G. Belsito eon `p� . �'{ ,�.'i •'r• , f, City Administrator / = +'' `• `'r,,'. Sub Negative Declaration No. 75-76 Center Drive Offramp, CC-367 AHFP *030 s Dear Council Members:';,'�Mi,y�f' On December 23, 1975, the City's Environmental Review, Board granters app;:oval on Negative Declaration No. 75•-76 for the proposed Center Drive/405 Freeway offramp project. A copy of the Board's notice it attached. �,�. ' ',,� •x• r This fiscal year 1976--77 AHFP project consists of the modification of the existing 405 Freeway offramp at Beach i Boulevard and extension of enter ^rive in order to improve the traffic flow ,, nto the Huntington Center. Please refer r to the attached map wiii-ch indicates the limits of this project. ! x, It is recommended that the City Council approve the find-- ingc: of the Environmental Revite7 Board and instruct '.he Vity Clerk to file a Noti.ce of Determination with the County Perorder. Very truly yours,oe ; �! y, ,' ��.a;...�,.t�l�"�,/' �.r I ''tr ;r�' ;%•' II E. Hartge r y Director of Public Works His 11: WE H : r` i •,fits.' �t�r ���-� 'r•: x. r' Y p •,,. a ,. jyy}•d L' • ,, ���, `'j •SrtJy7 • A,, ', • 4. �1..1 1' ,Y t { 'S + F� fffGGGwww '. 1 ' 1 1 ;All 'RO'� {�t=.77•"W • �. 4'•. �' •Y. '•�e'�LiC.,17J1:�t'iii�'d�i!''i1.YQrT.1L'.�' ^lY�,�' y«t V. • t''41 r J $Si �•R Tl��r�: t N(• �. x ( }4f }y. �.•'k �i.: • '' ,f '�h�; III r f' 0 • .'.art. .. •r,r', a;' ' PI �� ♦�r 7EnYu"'ZC)"d MEnTPL icc-vic it ' 'J s A.4 ? CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH-CALIFORNIA ' t r P.o. BOX 190. 9264B r ,''•rr i a r�.11 ,,'jr TO: William .'irtge, Director { ;''r• Department of Public Works !• •., .,,'�>; r-' ,; '' .� f 'w 4't,� rip• FROM: Lnvironmental Review Board ''•'r;r,�+;.:'ry;' DATE: December 23, 1975 SUBJECT: Negative Declaration No. 75-76 APPLICANT: Department of Public Work:, Huntington Beach PROJECT: b.odification of Freeway Offramp LOCATIO14: Subject project is the Beach Boulevard/San Diego Freeway cfframp, Iluntington }3each, California The Environmental Review Uoard, at its meeting of December 23, 1975, 2l: tedi the abo•►e negative declaration request, having fuul:d that ^' the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect i���n •'.3'�"�': the -physical environrnPant. _ No environmental impact report has br.en prepared for t'hi:. project. f1' Findings are has,:d upon information contained in the negative ! ` � ' ' •t''' dcclarah-ion request form, tl'.c I7L'b1.1C r('Va.eY' process, and (lisr.ussien ,'•'`,'� '�i�, by this Board. I. ; ;•,... Melvin A. Tooker, Acting Srcretf.ti'% Environmental Review I"hard :di r 'i +'. r i "A7 1 17 1W 3.*,Y Pip tj Ar 'ue��lir4 %�SIF� I ~ i t 9} `,1 par 83-LN30 WIWI NAIA H18ON f 7 C D . .L'f,iY ,� 9 %t�f'' :1,=M1^• /,�f(��1�'P111�'' f I� �•.. �1 /V ~�--.--�....�J ,I.�.� i�-r-...� \l��J, ,- .. II9 � ,� ' 4,� , ------------ - i r ;3sv3 3?)OZ AG Q3cN3)W v I K if 0 ..11 1 v D '1' N' f 10 D -a f) m v I 10 all lit 914, r�1.1 a064 DV 647s6 a161.1PR CoID) ) il 04 33410'aft113.rO5 A10 co6l';l 141, all, "It JO At-Uld 1 3 top., �—f7 dVV� 13 i N JS I (1 -1 V'N 0 1 DMUM V l I 07-OPLA-405 1.6.5 1 ! Rte 40:i n- .y at Beach Blvd Roloc atc and Hadify, raft` ramp �S . 07207 -• W.A. ;Andlag) ' DiAlt-rlat A reerr&:^t No, 3221 I 11 113-S AGR7,l^ VE"NT, MADE Frf117 r- INTEMED TNTO 0!4 Tills • ! h' , DAY OF ? �-t ,c.0 -�; . 19 "1 � IR f , BY AND BETMEN CITY OF HUAT'5:FXGTM r, body politic and a ccun'' cipal corporation of the State of C aliaforniao, berain-- '�' f.r;k�,`•,, aftar rR�l:`orred to es "3�Ck•'AL "' ' I Aammcolo -D CTAT2, Or CAUL A 0RNIA acting by and thro;.,.gh it Fiq3?�c:�a c3 Tran:avovt•tl,�. vt', j j Ags�.tory, Lck nr�►rti�rt. oi` I ,,: . • zei Tr��si�gart:at,inn, h�so�i.iaa �i.r:r. •, , t d to rt 1 ' l , S{;I'CI'1iiSSF1'1{ : i SM'FRw'AZ)j LOCAL AGENCY 1:3,lif} cz tton Of t hr_. (:;•:. �::t 11g sclutc:loic !id aff razi,) fvcm 1:im Route 405 Vr(:v,-, l y to 39 (nonch rm!,,2cavard) : no an Lo t.a:ai fc to and fron � I i Crintt%, 0t1c�+t. :'ha r :•ojr:ct iU 1GCatPd .i% i:•urttL1gV.0r1 PANEAMz, ill CiVvngn Cour,i I.tc re.`Mrrcd to :m "PROJECT'" g and ' Pa'FE1+1�iiFi LCICIAL AGENC7 has ruquia ntnc and is W-4-1:,•irar; i to ftumich ens; n,%,e ing sorvicer, for unid PROJECT pry' vidcd a'C ! ! r ,inc-urrn' d of STATE on brzha.lf al., LOCAL AG; N10Y are bornr. at i I ' tPe Ijcle ej:Nnr.c, of LOCAL, .A MNC Y1 and ! ; ( t MEI EAS,. flirt LOCAL r. ENC: IS need for engineering sorvic%.a la tomporary arced necoun :iy to fulfill an impor_t6n.t: pu:•,lic pizrP3013, ' ` and ' WHEREASp Din STATE, can mvJ3 a .readily availyd)la the naces- qztrV expertise, utAff, equIpm nt. and office space; and WHEREA6, performing the EtL-Actwill not. c'raure deeAsvta , or reduon d',eaptrtmental effectiveness in thei perfox-vance o f the "�'•, ' rai!ATE's nernal. responsibilities and .`,, r MI1 PMALS, LC+CAL ACL.NCY and STAT2 desire to specify herein this c<jndi'tions tinder which STATE servicas ar.;n to Lie T pro ,ridad for �,�,,�),.. f• , �nH�f vA�• and final -Ace . NOW TIMItEFORE in consideration of the eo,,emmnta and cinditione heroin contained, the partiac hereto agron ns fol,laffo, z • � i1 '' Srr'T101:1 i8"IAIVE : AGREES 3 1. To porform, on( ineering service,; including, but rot + f � limited tor. the follaviriur i A. Per:fozr.i field njanreya an tirauesaary to euppXc;•• i' „ mont viLo data info=riatlan furnished by LOCAL B. Prepare detailed contract nlirar., speci.fical.-Iona mid ontirtate of constrvct=on cast for the PRCIJEC'P C. Obtain i'ederal 111 ghway ��cImi nic tza; Iran ana R •. other npp. t(Ai t annecenunry LU (`onstrtict C�iF the '?2,CT. 1 n I , h r -. •..... .... ....'... ... .... s.... ,....�. _ .. ... 1, / t 1 • t r' '(�r�i yA+,(: t r ��a•�,ir'i�ir,ky'�>i.^.zl�ia.!'',f.$t�Hr•l,�f•�, • I • Jr I ' , D. Advertisci f award toad admsnist cir -Wits construction Contract, pr vi&ed PPOJECT rz,neive!A necetandz-y approvals Ll. Provide construction engincer,i.ng sarvires, j.nckt:ding the furnishing, of materiala testing uervicau, as will. be 4?nner i}aed by a separate Momorendim of' Undorstanding upon eg!ren- .mnt between LOCAL AG?NCY .Lnd STATE. 2. Prior to comnencemerat of enUinoelring work by STPTIR i area:.nne)., to eatnbliah a opecial. 926xrx account to accumulate all ,related expenses and charges for all work ptrformed on heha lf" of LOCAL AGENCY p�lrsut nt to this Agreenonte 39 . - ediately following execution of this Agr,eemcntr to nubmit• to LOCAL AGENCY# billing :in tho amount. of $350,000a, which f icjuza roprosentca 25t of the $140, 000 total uestimated coast of caigim,ezing servicas to hay p•eraronned by STATE on bohal:q of LOCILL AGE11CY pursuaiit: to this Agreamunt. rOdi.tiu..inl progvean bIlli.ng by STP. TF, %,Al . bo submitted to LOCAL I*,rE. '_*''Y in rrt?mantra of $35, t](•0 r,L nuch tunas nn work r.crformad by STATr on behalf of lk.,ICU W&L.31 vzhaunt naiu° prior denauited fundn,. _ STATE will not hill k�ayuurl 13.54 of tot; + , �.3 r_imVtczci can; t of 1,140,000 *ait};cuf Cam a(y Ge-,tent: of hotli p,a tiou. I 4. Pur.trcj the dosign phuso of the PrOJECII, to ravicw plane and apocif ant3.cm a wit'n LOCAL ACE CY f:Or tonourrencc* au milo!3tioro points of plan pr•opsration, 5, -Upon mnplet:ion of t n PROJECT 'to furnish 'LOCAL AGENCY with ,% final datailed statement of the?3 acomm il.r-ated c:cai.n. ). fs 'I 3 I • r' I � 1 f t s r r' 1i� y f' +fis tIk 3 r71 , r, 1+ 'y y � � 4�•� 17wc '1 , ,r,, ,x'�l .r y, *- i 4 _��' , '�� ' ■ •l �: �'. ti.v.� ,1i, t 1 t/ D i.. `' ,.r. �1 �`i � ,. ��it f� 1' * �Yt :'+F � •r ��' sx .M1t � , �� '�tj h,- t -� .� .7'+ :" i ,.� t�f ,'; ��. /,1, .+'�,' �.1 � ;T 1 .19 1.�'.. It A" �}'.1'�' '�I 5 'i f_. H �.. { � 1!'� i � •�i 4 p •,t.•e.,.' .t ? ' :�'' �'� iY' i w...y..'trrMtix.. � �,; •.1' 7". •h'�,'�+. ')r'' . r e` /y: � .�, �,`' S "S y• ,t.,+,��4;,.nw', :,, .f' .�. L �?.�r, • w. -'�, �y 2 r -l. f...ir ,. ri! +�� _Y: :7•j'•. v,.`rf,+ �: '+ , . , '1!"���*{�. Yj.; � '.Xu, x+t •s, '1�'I�;v � ,�}� .}: .+� . ,� �h • ., i�?�' � 1 j' �t{,�t' e, � �, T1 7tiJ�( 't,, �iL Ply r:,ay}y f '�v�tl i=' '1�;:• � : � d^ . �- �1' 4 ... � .S '4 r fd�. K.IS+;t y, �, { . .+�/.:k t• 4��' {�'� ;t go-.. /� .J ' ',, , ;•y S: a. ,�� .yy � �-t:, ! , '.,j,�� � •! 7'� t .�• At"a j�J. ,�.�j a' -�.t� .} � . f l� if:� }T'y,• ,,,. - �'w?F��, -Yt'}�jt � ��',�4�i�.�i'j�d;+'�♦;Y {. �4^r'..'� �•V`+�'.` ,#�Y9'.'� i�. (�'.'.'" ,,r, 5 ?! '�'1 1Y�' I rr f 9 �r%��.F. lj�, ! ;wi.l','�1 ,'P• �, k! t}' �� .i ' •5`�'� rr � , �:fJ't !� '"}%y .yn•+ {.. `y!S{4F{' 1���, , •4 1 1f,�'t'^ �; '�1 1 L I,{y�\..t.i d�. •-•{ i diu fWa 1'' "�,. f q. fti { +/t � f.� 9 +',. {� t'i r.� r1M ! den tiiying actual hours workad and related oxpanni)5 An coxincation with the servicen prr;v1dcd purnumit to this Agrnemont., G. Mia plans, ripecificationa and ast-:1.Mate will ))it Plalteei within 120 c!z1nndar day!i aft-ar the executian ot thin Agree- mentp or as noon as practic3l after that datel., SECTION 11 mm Amucy Arnnst 1. To provide STATE with such p, eri.irninary zite data anti map& ar are available for WIG PROJECT, 2, To advertise and conduct all requirad public haftrings and to rprovida STATE with an official trmnscript cof any ouch hear3n-.1. 3. To do all work nocizaaary for t-io nuccastsful cariple- tion of tho PROXXT 2:r.capt for that worl. which STATI1, tille to parforn in ,3e--- U-on I of thlo Agraamazit or by noparntr, aDrenn,,ant, 4 a To dep, .xiciit witli in advanct) !inrj irithin 14 dayn. of revoipt- of billlnq thernford the amutint of $3%0000 which fAqo!.'a' zoprenants 25-1 of tJic total coni: of anfjincrjt.Jng varvicalT (tte ontiiia.tad Wta), cont ol! angircering nevrkou iij bra by STATE on of LOChL AGENCY pttrauf.irlt •-.rj -Wii.n, Agree.-i,sat ajid mako progroan payment o to STATE withli 14 days of: LOCAL reezipt of, billing therefor, in arLowints of 135"D03. ft*ld billing will be submitted by STATE to WC2NL AGENCY atn daftne-,l hureinbafore in Section 1. Artic?.c (3). I. M.r I M .. jI z r F 1'• F rrJ �. r � F+ rr`. ,!, ��' 't f�- �r�.'� " I �tl,:� �'�� rf'.a'�.�, ."1r i 1 t , fir.'• ,�± , ' �v u '•J � ,, rcf , ,r 1(u+ '} �7AV '4i !• y ' 1'r'' k i' .1, i�°r' ,4•y''rr i ,f •�C•i �. .�j'+ .W �'' ,+ ��5 i I-•�� A'. ► i i`.r _ itt!' rl. _NCr. .. 4 Y t s �% 4 • 5. Upon complot'on by STATE of n.1.1 onji mm ing scs. vice r. pzl fi -xmad on beliali of LOCA', hGF UCY and upon re+r alpt of n detailed F,tutnriar.t and bill ng t1ter:efor, to ` promptly, any amou* nt over and above funds dnrositr. by LOGA7. AGBTIM' ac► dofiivd hurl?I before, requirod to corlpfetta LOCAL AmrIrT :Y'a mat pursuant to this+ Ac)ror<*rrFmt_. Actual, u0at to LOCAL 1 1 AGI?tICY for smz•?c performed by STATE on behalf of LOCAL A%7.r-, ICY 145 deAined heroinbe.forr:e in Section I, Article (a) will be determined upon completlakt of all ouch work and flual ><accouating of all ralatud cl-4&rges, and rhal:t be a► aim of ghee followings ' r 1 A F t11'a r 1 a., wizl.ary cowtz CoMputed In accor dasice •AriLh utan,dard uccormt- .ng procedures. b. Travai and per fliers o:zpennez i.nc]. ej1.,-Iq cri argc:G for t o use by nurti cnmployen of STATE volAclon, a f relcuirrd, in accort"tTmca with rates s,:•t up by tho Si Cato T3r3ax,l o: Control. unrlor 5action 706. cir i"u'ictiorin! indirQ tG aTrc admini stre.tivrs ovar- .vi!ad conto :;.rimput ed in LIc=.w do*.:CO with STAri B I n . ar:L'amit:ing P:'rll.uil Cilnptn ).Z, '':aizln C--2. G Conduct the vtgi.tirvDd anvirorimont ial sturliets 1. nLI pr:''*parca :•,nd circulate: if n cessr.><y, the rrqu:lt'ecl 5 F t.` , .TF. •5 I 16 ,1 r ,• .! `r k r a' w -+' a• •fin +r,) T'i. a' - sr•{aq - ^ ., . a w .;: �. ... i .r' .A f: +7. �+ I , •+ '�' r, ' a ' M�' Y rV. i�•7r +rr� aA ry d }n r ++{l ?h e r ''j�N, ollr efi'sy', ?'f�,!'�r.•�y� i.� •r1r i�s;w+, r. fq'+. +' , y`a •• �, Y r A' , },. '1 •'tZ ,4 .^f ' ' ,7 ,' i fir`' +„�. ,� J, ',yS"`t• .'V'':•� ,'r ....�'t . y�. ,, :��5 Y, t: 1'.''i :� •';v. ,� .� ,i'A•' r�ty •�.1.}}•�1.': • <,� +C R Y •" 'i y� l�',.r, ' +. .�•. , � . K•, .,'�'• '.=�y' 1. F'1. p . A• I,•ryn ; L r M1'ai y. t �• ,'4,y� E�}'( � ,1+ SJ ,�,4 '�;.. .` �+,k,�,' a{, V�,4 �1, .. 4.,. 1 J �..x t•�++ �. ti :''. i F 4 !• �: f�ti t �.,t 4 r 5i �� .. .. .! '}A } ' .q a , • f • i 4r; ', ! , . .Ire .. . �., �r'.rd .r 1� ti'K _ r�• i„q�y. a:+ ! `'p,,r '•�' '� f sa,:µ� f ,` �. '���. *.. • 4 .',.• A . ' f$r mii, t{�:G', �•P „(l,'+�+, hm'�'. ,�'i, �r�.� �J{�Y. .•,-r.! I��j';.+ •y'�,�•1� 'li�l Y 54., P'.t i ' 9```r', r ,r r' M''' yX r y r• '•�dj^.' y.+'+,TY+:•'�.' .#Ial'.�."+', .�r t N�"s �"�,�'�T••i�•,�,�E� i�• ia��jP''r.. l.i ''f.', •r''+�,+�..:1• J.1' �,,cpf!' 4.'+in�,j'...j'j (j'y w�•';l r �. � •�': . (; , � 1, f�„ i Cri:TMbt, T_II I`1' 7.C, 2IU'i't1117.:LY TRJD•!':r:FTCiOD : TT!) AGREED* 1. That, LOCAL ACENC'Y MaY, at ar1Y time, for any r,,,::;orlr �.er:ti:;:tt':> �iTi1P2:` 3-c'.r•�7:icc,,a inir,,nniatoly and rihtlll watrify 'ii`,Sr, 3.11 1/a �i'�i�:1C! of Etucll ermirl ',:ion, rand w ll roimburcrt, STATE ac.ual co:stti- for that portion of contracted iser'vice:! rott.derad t--o the date of teminettion. 2. That: LOCAL AGP11CY will ieomnify and vttLV(j STrLTL , agontaa anc1 oniplayeC:I rMrmlaM, frr. m any and all liability for in juries, to r.':•r ."On , 03. tla mag .: to proporty z ausc-.1 cz raoult:in^y in any r:izinitc,r groin {:ltc? pr-:0-'ori'ance of illy %14 y"Vit,-c-3 bV ST.' T17 peroannel withi.r: the csCC-1l1c 01'. JUTAB r,c73:��Cit'.Clltll 3. That d;'sir)tt? d -1117 portion of the project cct 711�! Lina„=-.e, tfit_,i r.eclr.rai run6S or Gus Tm. r~t�J11. v, all. rip- �_ic-1"Ac r'�L C�.: �l�.- rl and palici r-, =! ruli-t- nq to t';; . ttr3e -1f c=me.-Ii c,11::3.' LQ)P1Y: nat.tri.th -i wading otter provisions of t1l.' t'.g-r(!, It', !�t. IN 7'i•.,. r lE.i.s S ti;,!r.rtC?T', tl:.. n ;rt.i.<, ht�-et[) h, Vc� cau?' t � to b,? n]necutC'd by U1C ir of'ficr.-; .'£'ip flay ::.ticr�nr{'wrl:l, thu proviniun 3 of •iihich Itctr.c:,,r,-',tt �1:_t! C'ffOCt vO �1r c)t' t:kjo day, montki and your firs STATE OF CALIFORNIA Dunine:yc. and Tran_.nor. tilt; art e`. vC my i.']13t:rt:,R.�Ilt of Tratt:,r:o?:tation r 7r2TMIA GIANTURCO cif '^rantmn_•Z:-.f:ic)n ('.Trllri i��' I2CT:iZ'X2•lGTt:;I r3r:i;.:ji YJ- r'1'? IT :ST : i i . i i I I i i i t i A r r ,^ta:. ,. Siµ• r `. ; ' a APPROVED AS TO FOIL : CONT}'^ / ! City 7aininITTrator APPRGVEI) P,'1 IIJI^_'IATIDIG D�'nART!'lEr1';': ( • " ' Director of Pub)-,:fc Works APPFcOVED AS TO FUNDS: r i r , w\ I { 1 5` 1r r V', Ihrr,,ljl f.'til�y,''i i r 1 t i .y I r ' r , .r 'r l•r ` 1 �1 r � 1 � r i r � r t alb ir City of Huntington Beath }r P.O. Box 11.0 CALIFORNIA 92640 '�trrr ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT March 10, 1976 UP i r honorable Mayor d� R and City Council � City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City Adninistrator I Subject: Center Thrive Extension and San Diego Freeway Off Ramp Modification Dear Council Members: The engineering services agreement with California Department of Transportation was approved by the City Council on February 9, 1976. The agreement c<-1.1s for the preparation of plans and specifications f,)i Ce—t:e. Drive extension and the: moaiftications for an off- ramp at the Sari Diego Freeway. Due to a drastic lay off in Cal Trans, personnel who have been worki,tg on the project have either been transferred or are gone. There: is now concern as to whether or not th-:y can live up to the 120 day commitment for completion of the plans, apcci-- fi.cations and estimate. Therefore, they have re:quest,�d the addition of the following underlined words to Paragraph G on Page It of the agreement. 6. The plans, specifications and estimate will be completed within 120 calendiar days after the executica of this Agrecmen4, or as practical after that dzitd. it is recommended that the City Council approve the modifi- cation to the agreement. The City Clerk should be instructed to insert new Page t, in place of the original one. It is now planned to go to bid on the prof^_ct by early fall with complet ;ern by about I'iarch 1977. Very truly yours, I�,1 li If. E. Iartge Director of Public Works 11PH:ae rl + r r •it'd°'• "i • "; `, � A.� � I r•r y r , r 1 1 I( RYA iiM'Crt.� 1'�. :�'�' ,�'i�5r��1�: YY�r�1�{� }'! .'�. �:..i,�"�'i•.L'�i13531i1 , Wlii- r YLt�1ANVtra�r+'.i.ecu-�.estl.ra..�.",_ yyY 1 R 1 Transmitted herewith are copies of the report "Estimated Economic Benefits of Proposed Improvements to Center Drive and San Diego F.reuway Off•-Rantp" prepared b,,► Urban Projects, Inc, The: Economic ?advisory Committee reviewed the report and at their meeting of January 21, 1976, voted that, "t.he results obtained appeared .reasonable an-1 objective,." No recommendation to the City Council, as to a cost sharing formula, war made. Table 4 entiticd "Summary of I1et rconoinic Denefi t:. Resulting from Center Drive/Freeway Off -Ramp Mod:�ficatiori" and Page 7 summarized ths. zesvIts of the study. After -'tax benefits, which the. author states 4 r. e considered more reflective than before -tax benefits. total $2, 204 , 000. fill. The percent distribution is: A. Huntington Center Huntinc- t-on Center Partnership . . . 2.77 Department Store Tenants . . . . . . 11.19 7.3.96f, B. Jer,•rel Enterprises . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.92% C. City of Huntington bc.'ach Direct (fiscal) Benefits 30.66 Inuirect (dz ving public) Benefits 49.46 8 0.12 t 100.00% The purpose of the report was to quantify the major econe-mic benefit produced by the proposed modification and to arrive F.t a relative (Iistribu- tion of these benefits to a1.cl us in our nrgotiati_orr:> with the tnajc.,_' part -Les, 1. 4 S f)1 f . r i.c.. Huntington Center Partnership, Broadway, Montgomery Hard and Jerwel. Entc:rprisc'S . ! 1 ` l4 t •1 'I. r t r•'►;r Y K4 dti *1 i ,- , ... , , r t �/, •,�'•+.yi, 4•ti. °�'• � ..�. "ry" r. ,+r,,rry�,i,i•, y � �. T`� � .r { 1'/•J 'f"•• y• 1 rk Y i F,1 ;ayiy9,l, ��''• ;r�'' ,e '�•'�,.f ��,�� ....... q.... 'lr�•yF .:�,;• K � ,b 'w.. .. xr ". r•.7"tR '�'i'� R �• � ^.dr,, ',R', .?' Y, A'� y �i :�( •:'S' � J � � ,�. .. ,. '�; nr . .'w�' �4' '�''r i �m. � : �f' a • �k'.•, M'�y ^ •;';:'wY"f r' r�.:..7.,,: ' h'X / �tir' ��. ? +E� gyp• r 'M �.,?• ;y�,,1• � 1V"', N,"�yd��'�p'A'' ° r ' r � / y� , •^S� e'IY '�. A�, ! ''S7._.. _ { ,•'.' i; _r.'Ir`. �.�� R^ .7�^••••••`••••"�,. ...••:•y r.,,..•n.w:'+rirvY.n.srcwwrfawrll[ w.a�NtS�. e'Iatws'A!�*'�.�riL:9LC�f�i'i+F.S'.Y1i11�'s�.�.b'3Tif��1�'.�i�'�1�+:. r �:1?:�. .o .]' ... .:: i.. ......... .-..-•. a.1 .. l.a •..., J.Y. .. • I'.�t. ,� .. .. ..... .. .. ... A i Y :-Iunc%rable Mayor and City Council January 26, 1976 Fagg 2 The City Council, as a policy decision, should Ala --ermine the degree of City contribution towards the project. At least the flour following alttirnatives may be considered as being within a reasonabl.a' split. o;: cost: A. The formula, aj outlined in the UPI report, re%,)gnizing that not all beneficiaries are identified, but that most probably are; B. A finding that the public banef •tr, .are cuffic.ient to warrant the City paying for the entire project from Gas Tax funds; C. A compromise of A and B; U. The City pay for the entire cost oi' the engineering and select a formula for the sharing of the coat of ^onstruction. The cost of construction cannot be estimated with much certainty until the engineering i�, performed, but it is stated by Cal Trans engineers that it will hr about $400, 000. 00. The engineering services, as outlined in the l encosed proposed agreement with Cal Trans, will cost about.$140,000.00. It is painted out that the project can continue to prcceezC+, upon execution or" the engineering agre ment. Recommenda11--ion If a total cost s- Li.L Ls attempted at this time it may result in delay in the project due to the fact the Council may not wish to erttcz: iiitr,, the engineering a.greetnent until the total cost sharing is :l2termine'.i arld agreed t:'o by all paLt•ieu. It is, therefore, recommended that. 1. The City acrree to blur the entire: cost of the engineer_ng sr-rvices undar either one of the following conditions: a, The City assum:� z- responsibility for total cost of the orcjeleet:; b. The final coot; split will apply to constructior cost:. 2. Approve the engineering services agrt.cman't wich Cal. Tran,%-. in view of the fact the: City particiFation will be from trust funds derived fraia Gas Ta,,:, the subject need not: be referred to the Economic Advisory Committee. Very truly yours, ' r Director of Public: Works r , , • . r.t' r . WU W. ff '• t ' '�! •���, Tw'/F ' �p�e IM 41 r'�:,f'ht'�yr•� }��y,y �„+�y�!'i�'',y.�".; Imo,, � :T y 1 � '+3� '1 �'/: ,�•L.. (a li :� ,rH,r „.r. y'. .4Q "'Al ; Wim 7'", fY }5 : i. � i { LPL' • ' ' ��•�4 {.� Cy 'I i,lY�iA 'it r��!'..• J,�k. F�`at 'f +, ,}r' ',�: tf,''y " 'N'� 7' s,"•F`� , i ,� +��'' 4 4 ti A. MEMMANDUM REPORT ESTIMATED ECON0,11C KNEFITS Or PROPOSED 7 IMPROVEMENTS TO UNIER DRIVE ?, DIE60 FRE'rulAY -OFF-RAMP IP Prepared For: City of Huntington' Beach Jervic-1. Ent_rprises Huntington C,2ntv!' Partnership Prepared Dy: Urban Projects, Inc. 10850 W 1'shire Boulevai'd quite 1050 Lo.i Angeles, CnliPorn `a 90V`2_4 4,0 (21V 473-9651 MO. January 5, l':)75 `4 Till i m,; -I i• j t. r, 4? , du� 11 AA � �r 'v; A. MEMMANDUM REPORT ESTIMATED ECON0,11C KNEFITS Or PROPOSED 7 IMPROVEMENTS TO UNIER DRIVE ?, DIE60 FRE'rulAY -OFF-RAMP IP Prepared For: City of Huntington' Beach Jervic-1. Ent_rprises Huntington C,2ntv!' Partnership Prepared Dy: Urban Projects, Inc. 10850 W 1'shire Boulevai'd quite 1050 Lo.i Angeles, CnliPorn `a 90V`2_4 4,0 (21V 473-9651 MO. January 5, l':)75 `4 Till i m,; -I i• j t. r, 4? , du� 11 AA � �r 'v; r 5 _YL•Y.a Ott',,(' '��6 '; '.,fir' - ;� r � _. ,+'th.l' �'•.�• �,,.'' .r;vl,{ .'�47ArF,: `'f;. I• {' r• rl,,',1rfi'f . r �k ,JAI Y„�ir. a+... •• : i , 1„1��}p:l: , ��y) A1�V. �., .•i yu y1, 1. .1 .. 1.; A 15 - rtm, + i' 1 :. `Ii '•f:•I� r',`• , • k a �;'. ,'s�f l�• r a"• `L:p •t I• f, ., t :•. �';'r 2` ........ .. ,......._, .. __.._._,.._.._...._........ _.._.,,_. _....�._...».._._...............�._.....�..,,.........._-.......,.,......_..._... �.. � .. .r .' �lr•.ri'r{ yii .,y'., '' ,1 `,,, r ��,jd '; � .._..._. _-..... _..._-�—, ...........__..__.._ r`..,,.._..�,......i.�'.:,.:..L�L�...'�SsY:.:ii.sl..Ji:.•I.u:.+L..ww.u"....,..�a.a.:•i I.'I ., 1 ' •+'ri p(r�:�r,�'; i�.r, 5,,.,, � .�- � ' •..� •r�. LIt F.N::! •n l:,rr,,,^. �� ;.f. �1ff'!%. %�,'�;p:" '� t':.rr•r: :LZ L^.:.i!S ln•:;.T:�7J'w'.. .. .a a '.� n�•..: � :S ,1¢�}•� •: t• ,1 A �f r _ r ' ..�x�•'pii'b'' � `` � ,5�� \•� t�#�' N01 74 SCAL4 r P� rr•yh .t :.T.� 5 J• p� V:,'"i' L ''J;-S Oi •I.1 � t•,(3Ln F.f� Sri -j. C,tr.R•r Drrw \• .". p :� � r �r,�;,�Y':�,i, ''r'r ( ,r.i 9•t �,j,� •!Y.. , ' :Tx r,�-'='�:'-r-a,;••: �•...«.. _ '• i1i _ r a4}n'; '{:' �i' •�` ;( 1 •'' 7 •;?'y 'i� �(:;,•,,.'jth`a � . __.......-1•r." :r-r: .z<.ts:-rrx-::r::::.__, c;,,,, � th 41 � fol Is M��n �A 1 '� r `,l � h'r''• ` 5 r �_+j I t{ U . `� . ti� ° rh t•.j .r"'.,'a,, r 1 `y`i11'�•+; HUNTI.V3T0fJ :ENTER lY ' .5,e } _ �• �• 1 `•. aY ( 1••Tr'R l �X`'�C '�t'rl }�Yi14 Cl - v^rY, '�M pi•t°I S�' .'S, }' +� �.� `""A• �l.t�. '•� - 1 •,!)��r'J ��. f.�rf,: r, bi ��d ". .fk � !-.. ,(r.,. ,� .-•.-.•4.•.-.��.t�-t•-..r._..-,..•.-t,•........,..,.�r�l...v• ._._,7.,��..-.._...,... ... ^a.. I. :+.,5 s k: •;d ,� 5*� .. .... ., e':... t:. ..... ":...•..�.,.-....'JL 4rA1LhrLx.L..,Y-as .,.t tr.r,. •:...W ••J". w.t::-1 ).w•:.w�Y-.4.. .. +".. .«.•....ar: .'.:..i_r. •....a..r ..-.•.l... ,_,J .u..,4....�......-..,,... .�.t--..:...:n ; ,�Y " ,x,� �{ , 11tUI4,�FIGUREr SPoer44r�r (,�(r,tr,�•Jr:�rt+r.���t PROPOSED HIGHWAY (MODIFICATIONS ' K 'F' (, yM r FSRrt r,«.h f y: 4 yy j. .4 ii••� i'• .PA, l qt e, ,.r,' 7 t, +tit r• ` pnlF'r},r ;rs ,'j ,1 1 f'1° JJ.�°5y .; ,.;,���'• try 'E .T f� aA' '}' A •d �r,Y I�r' ,t .� 'fie Y , 4' 7" ii) ;1,a., '1j6,,:• ','�, t ' n', yy,,�� { ,l .i 'AY � �. •M' ;S. •''i.a �+ 5" f r1y;+ „Sl:'x,r 'yS I.k pn R'r Y•1 1 y t Y: fi'�cCa - ," T - � wn.l. :�lqA:• 1 yFli�, ,yr,�, � �q ti� �. .�.. v �"':.� rW�� 'x: V�' Pllyr, 1,' l .� ,! }'!'r fir' + Y ys• 'M a';,� , '1rx.Y a :t' 1 # r .� 'dG7 }4 ,art'. - � . � � � y.. r . JY , ,y�+ ' �,, ' 4 ,y a•. hi Mt �'•.r ' �,, :��1 �^ � .,., c:.�I , r�ll � •y}'';"` :'h" �ti ' ?� `•��� '� a +, R , ;,}. 'ti,. � �'.. . r{,•...��� .� •�`'t �,��°j�j I • .rr'}.��.,�e�, .'"'�+MrYa�r y' .A• ' •p•, ! ^"Y�' ..'i 1. " i f, i'..4`:'j. ' I� s'�•y �Ly rwj� •{a", 'r , , ;.h: 4.T. `Z + �4�r°'uM�,F'i I"` Y ',,y.� 5,- M 1. -'.tif. ::9�-:Y;S'r••,•r"'A' �YI ¢��.Al•Y'\��1IyJr�,I„'�'''•t I ,r3Y .b.:+:,i"1 �w Yi .�6,.1'',:fl'� •ta • �k" w n„ t h i',+L::i`''�+:tiaYi,".'"I'_'2.•�.Sx.'s.. ' .. , . .. .. - - ---'--•.-...r,....,r.,.l...ov�w, s•'r�ist►iF;. ; NI,SF+ :E: • � r • '+, .+do-' . I'.', A; . r .f N4,1•+ r ' 1, '� ) '• '.. •R f ,( � ... :YJ.. ,.—... . ... ... ...._ ".. .. _. .., ..,.,. .,.,. fv•.r r .a •Yra'.. .... e+,..r. r .... I'r •.. ,..:1...,...._.»..,..........»,.�u...r.....«+. ...».... .. I . 'r r 1 tS.l ,• t t4rz`�ORANCU{'E REPORT ESTIFIATErn ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PROPOSED 711PROVEl1EI.TS TO CINTEk OR VE M{D SIN MEGO FREEWA OFF-RAi"l' f r ' I t Introduction f� a jThe purpo�iP of this'analys',s it to evaluate the probable fiscal costs and r "' A benefits which will accrue to the City of Huntington Beach and several private = *' land owners and business tanants as a result of the proposed extension of (,enter Drive and modification of the existing southbouno off -ramp of the Sari !. " + Ulego Froeway at Beach f3orjle'iard. The private land owners include the lluntingtrcln Center Partnership, orrner of the Huntington Center*, and Jerwtrl •'�' �, • � Enterpris...Y, o►mer of an adjoining undeveloped 30 acre parcel, who together (��,,;� . .�� • s , with the City participated in the preparation and casts of this study to •:ti,.:V identify the likely distribution of economic benefits to each of the affected { r+rS arties. it is hoped that the results of this analysis can serve as a basis of negotietio;I upon which the costs of this street improve -meat project might be shared. �. t : ;, rr.• �I G,ti t' background '..•I '1t7` i'i i' ' �' ' 1 + s C , 1 i ' ; i'11Fi3✓9'.! '# ' F':'i Cur rent congested traffic conditions exist at the San Diego Freetitiay inter + change at 6eae`r E3aulevard and the adjoinir:3 intersection of (each and Edinger, and during the past several years the City has requested the State of Cal i forn+ r .1" Department of Transportation to consider the possibility of modifying thek'"':r,fj f P; �'`��:•. '{:': southbound freeway off -ramp to divert a portion of the current traffic to l Center Drive, thereby alleviating congestion in thn in'Ynediate a; ea. Recently i n August 9 + d •! d Fri sc',er and � ,ugu_t, of 1 75, a City -sponsored stu y was prepared by C�on�. ,+ .• Associates, traffic consultants, which identified the feasibility of rerouting I + the existing southbouni freeway off -ramp to Center Drive, installing an Adi- � ;;' . •,� ' ' tior?al on-rzr;lj at this location, and extending Center Driveto Beach, Souleva,•d �s to improve traffic conditicns. *Funding of the capital costs of the project ',:rr`F :6x;'•' by the Ch]ifornia O'?partmer+t of Transportation does not appear tc be available lac;reve'•, and instead it will likely need to be )rovided at the local level. ! �•'+ ,' ;M• �' I light of this veer+ and recognizing that several local entities, will be;,eTit I,'''f• �N;�;r, � i ;rom the project, Urban Projects, Inc. was juin,:ly requested to undertake this +."•� study of the probable Economic benefits to each of the various p?rtif_s. General Bene r i ts_ to City and Land Otmers The pro��sed rrodificafiiciiis are iliustratel in the facing fioure. Center NrivF; �•. ." +�¢ a;hich foams the approximate co.=,on boundary between Huntington Center and th,! Jert'rel Propert presently terminates at a point west of the freeuay. The Y' C IY *The Nuntin tan Beach Company is a joint venture partner in this entity with the MacDonald Group, Lt,1. **Modificatior, Stud}•_ef th�� C aclr Enulevard Interchange, Pcnald Frischer i } t ns;o zest ates, 11u,�ust j� ,� I' ». .__._.... _. .... .. ' rI,,,l (' ;'� ,r-. .. .r ... r , ... ... ... .-.... .. ._.... ............. ,..... _.. .. .._ ....._. _._ ......., a.+.-x+w,drit � ,,. r ''• r• '. ti+n i r• '"•.ids . l / n V +'I �'+ 1 •+ h 411,E .r ._- _-_-.____T—_._.__�_._�_�_.___�-.�.�—..�..--.....,,.�.....w.wvaR.urwa,nr.r+we�a.i w�r.w -r.+�•'1'Y�:pRi:lt,rifJ4.1� l Drive to Beach Boulevard s' d' modifications proposed would extend Center,reroute f the southbouir� freeway oft -ramp to intersect with Center Drive and add an t additional soutnbc,!nd on -ramp beginning from this interesection.: Installs- ••ion cif the improvements would improve access to both the Huntington Center ' r' ' ,+ av , ; " . t and the Je; eiel property. Econc,nic benefits viould accrue co Via Huntington ;> Center through increased sales of indi,idual center' store t�^rlants and rents received by the owners, the Huntington Center Partnership, and to tie Jenrf:l � s,�y •, property oviners through additional reveiopmEnt Miicli id be made feasible. `�•�f�i �.,t •� The City of Huntington Eeachl would also receive sigrriiicant economic benefits through increased sales tax revenues, property taxes, etc.. Also, benefit'; will flow to the gerierFl motori;ig public through reduced travel time and associated costs, thereby accruing indirectly to the City. In additio,i, � .;xa� + economic and other benefits will fl,:w to other adjoining property owners•i f `'; through improve: access and enhanced economic •value of their• pr'operties., in- eluding Golden West College, and other commercial Y.enants and residents in the area served by the interchange. Huwever, the analysis which foilov,s 3 considers only the bene its to the City, (including those to the general ` { •icotoring. puhl ic) Huntington Centt�r Partnership, and Jen.iel Enterprises, arc+ thus overstates soi-ovwhat their logical shares in be,efits (and casts) from4. fy1;:."4S�S'i• y 4 ,.'y�,.�11�Y•' r, g �..} i the project. E' ' .. Q ..,A �, cA tCnnGm'IC i3anefi t5 to Huttti n�ton i,( peertler i iilld Tenantssi • ' f A� ?' i., The critical question affecting this portion of the anal sis is the degree to;#}w,,`;l4,i4� c'rhic,t existing sales levels (and income therefrr;m' at the Huntington Center :;' , ,f. •,,, t will be affected ty ahP. pr'opo.ied extension of Center Drib£ and mod ' ic.atian a•.•1 r r :rt�•:!� of the existing southbound fr'i2way off -ramp. Due to the existing congestion,.;;,,, at Edinger and Beach, the relatively easier access to be affotd(A Huntingtor, ' Center patrons can he expected to have some- positive impact on existing sales. The approach utilized by UPI has been to relate the increase in s0 es to 1 1`'" reductions in travel time of shopping u:nter• patrons 4s a ►•esYilt of the Yro- posed street improvements. The penetrative ability or a;:tractivenes; of a A P..'' regional Sh0 ;ng :.elites relative r0 its CG?il petition and it; corresponding _ pp P share of sales within its trade area can be shown to be directly related to its;S12e, merchandising and quality, and inverSc.y related to driving time frc'm potential patrons residences. Other factors t;eifcg aqua he t ? ` " ;.. N;:;'•,:i ', '...•1 of a shopper choosing a particular center over o*:ier competing centers t'111 �.',Y',•''; 1' bt positively influencel by a reduction in the travel time Experienced. Ti'r s•;''' exact. behaviour of shopping center patrons c. kn, of course, onl'•' be aoproxi- >;';'„:•, :Hatem in this fashion, but previous studi;s have established the r',,iocivN x ' yra 1 values of tha parameters invo•fur:d. h' �{ '• NOOK Using the rt:_uli:s of a survey conducted in late June 1975 of the origins G .. �r��,.,r;.u,$�;�'{,� 7y�� off txy st` shoppers at the J. C. Penney department s*ores, and additional in -formation i��i� obtaine-"i from Nin Fr•ische:• and Asscciatos the traffic: consultants esti,rates mere prepared of M the share of center patrons to be afre:.tced by the pro- - posed street improve?rtents, and (2) the pobable reduction in driving time of t•i;..,,,e },, these p3trr;nc:. First, based upon the J, C. Penney survey, v;hich is believed;`"''"t•�"i representative of all center patrons a ,rrximatel ' 35: of all shoppers are pew; nstirrated to arrive at they center via tree scuthbou-,d f:-eeua,y off -ramp Cr. k•Y Ka;:•-,;, t.; •,� " h ..—_.__.___�.._...,.�,�.-_,.�.....,�.......�nr...�.a+,rirar+r.rev.rrass�.n�fe'Y.IVf•.+..wfiM�w,f01�fu71r1Iuil87�tk�'1C'lfYaElil6�Rl'I'aY'Q�l/�.L%1�}�r Lti�'� ., ,�•. • �''. �� • , rr .. •� iYrrx;.i�a3(T: ,•, r .: ':�kr.� 4} 4' i'' a .'r„ �i1. r ,+} : ti r'• '. Y , ..+fy�•1 y; , S i •.fir. o(ff ' •1 ��/ :'.{�4 �••I1�+ �d`� 7.Fti�. ,, "ems ire , . +.,. •. .. ...._.__. _ --._._nr _...._....a, r....,._.rrwr�eri, .� .�._.. �. ..��+._....�_..�.._.�._.�__. >',�1.,N ....n}•R F, } 1• v .. �{ ,.�f ___._...» .-._._.._.w.�._....,,._.__......._....................,...r_.....�1.,'r...t��.�s.a....x.,',.1»t�Lr�:i::,i.'.,:.*�.:'i:}�'+;' � `�',4':�•`',, 1,��, �, MIA 9; �may, ., ;w';� •r I ; 1,''� p `� •,'d;s •• (a+i,y ,(.�; ''' /fir, Ar Of TA3LE yia. DISTRIBUTION OF JNCREASED SALES RESULTING FROM I'RgP-JMED CENTER DRIVE F7EE AY MODIFICATIONS: � ,` �,:`,�=;',,�•••` fiUNTINGUM CEdiTEI'. . ;}r,,' "y';:�: i; Estimated Inxrease 1ata1 S, les Increases Average Ir:cri:ase ' • ,;,;;'�.�'�'':•. ` .•,. Sales in tJerr Percent of Tenants Percentage Rent In Percentage Iry-; i:•'.''' �'' +'f�f'Fa�++,�J ,`'t;/•� I in 1774 Sal es,I Salts Distri U _ Pa inq RentsLease Tem Rent ► '',, ;$,��'"�'.tiA�i'"«'r q,. UDU a , . 110'1 f', hr. �,;' �,..,,•:' HVNTiNI TU t' PARTNERSHIP PPO r, _. � _ �� _.EI2TElZ PAitTr4E c. PE(t' „ , �• �'� A. J. C. Penney 16,700(est) $ 320 M,317 G9.�+fi 32q >3Gb A,)parc7 S Access. 8 1201 164 a 365- 2S.3 141 5.16 7.23GC. Fiirnitra- e '11,9003c5.$ 0 I1030D. Special ties 4,556 51 4,647 �48 60 2'21rJE. Services 291 i297 0.9 'q.O10 4. :,;r�+;;�' ;'• �''>;,. ..,li'. F, Foo y .'i I.: cti;or. 360 7 367 1.1 h t'w q r1 11065 q r R� ',�;,'�. , . a'.1•.,:� ,� }'' c 1 1, 036 i . 3 l q 6, � � + 4, ty •�'s� Sub -Total S r.,373 � S32,017 100.O5 � �k ,� J6_ S12,220 r: CENTL 9.1 T7NANTS y a.,'• i,. R. U1r;ER HUt1TTt�GT(!,. r � 'ki`�•�'`' 'g +� 6 A. ,•I�adtt'y 3 267 �r1 r,3gq(tSt� 513 � , Jul tl :Itgo.mery Ware 23 1?_ G36 �� ka ,r• �r+l '� i•''r ` Sub-Tota � ^�5,100 S 5i ,''•„r'9 '•1 ���,'N� `SP��. s:03 S25,603 Pd q Y M., TOTAL NUN7INCTON I CENTER ; 5; ,473 51,150 $58,620 O Ar;su„Ics � �rcrpasc in all i.enant :atr_yvries. s "Y ' � ... 'jiT:'f,7.•^+RRCri"1• .'^.N '. '..vdt'{. •'i!'�] _+ � � '1 �� _ �•+ � "q' � iZ , 'I i I. , r • .� '.Y s'''• ;d. .i. . LA''. ,1i .' ` • '.i� ► i �,,' �'14" '•'y •i'✓ ."M r:-;� yy *• `�y'�,1 L �. �'+, •.{ I'' S?C}J.• ' •7 f+". V, F' fM '1..4Y rik' ; .Y 1' *k , l �f+g�..d•' .h A � � M4J' .l i � '#'k !.. i :t fi i,,. � "�.t^`., ' i„arFf:. , ..N'FTMr.k'�.�.�'' h 'r r ' `yt�' • !as '�. .. � �' f �q..{, 7 '{� � 4' �'� F ' �� �• ,��xy1� ''4�'' a 1fh f yJ�; .�5 . •�,Y'-' •'� Y a • • a I� " �I •. �1 • N,.4�' �'• Y .:i ' 1� et '.Y 9 �v,.aa'i y �' y...�iIK• . e : w .. raj F 1'r_. r Y 1S • 3 , • I '!. 1' ,\ 1.1 _ .. ...-,. ., ,.. _ .1. .. ... .. .. (• •.. ... r... t,Y. _... .•. r.l rl.. .1 . ... ...,....... r w ' southbound Beach Boulevard. Of the estimated total 12,000 vehicles arriving + " f at the center on an average week, -day, Donald Frischer & Associates estimate t that approximately 2,200 or 18.3f.1 would elect to use the: modified Center Drive/freeway off -rams facilities, thereby saving an average of 0.54 mir:utes during their in -bound trip. This time saving would likely be greater during ' } weekends ar:d other more congested periods -,uch as the Christmas shopping season. b, Basad upon the survey data for J. C. Penney, the average shopping trip for f r t i a typical Huntington Center patron -is estimated to be 3.6 miles or 8.6 1 r. minutes iri driving time in each direction, with other delays raising the ; ! tota•i one-way trip P time to approximately 12.0 minutes on average. The t average trip time reduction for these affected patrons is estimated at 4.2%, and the probable increaental imparat on sales made by these patrons is esti- mated at approximately +6.5`�.* The sales penetration among the remainder y f ' ,rkY14 116.7,, of patrons normally arriving via the southbound freeway off -ram or 1" • 'r.r! .r,.;. .. I . ) P� Y 9 Y P southbound Beach 6ou'levar•d, who elect to continue using the Edinger and. Beach intersection, iS estimated to a1;0 increase due to reduced travel time 44,`' �', i through the intersection, but by a lesser amount equal to +3.0'. The re- mining patrons arriving from other points of origin (65;1), are not expected f�'I,Y•r4'1;3;;¢ t. 6.0 to be sigoificantla impacted, and using a weighted average for each of the " •Ar �_ three components, the combined impact on total center sales as a result of YAK' v�p,71 ., p f P c, ti( 'AijY"�y',:,•;'� Y"r r 4!' •; r' M the proposed street improvements is estimated at +1 .7,4'. Since this represents average weekday conditions and excludes the more congested weekend and `qE'';;ft ;;h°'R +' Ch •isfaras shopping periods', the net impact on total annur,l sales at Ilurrting,.on :rr ; 1''' , .,•', CE.tlter has been estimated at +i:_, and this 1�las 54hSeq'Ic"ntly Uc1eG or estimates ,�:�l! 4yi+, •li` of increased sales and rental income at the ce:lter•. r ' ';` `��;;,r•": f,'i Economic benefits to the Huntington Center owners will result fray, increased rental in;;.c-a which, through existing leas:: provisions, is a function of certain individual tenant sales. These increased rents are known as percen- ) C 9 1 '1. :..!'1; •: 14r R1 .;; Cage rents. ThL tenants therm,elvas will receive benefits through additent1 ;Y.'y1'r�'4 g ?�iSi � profits on expanded sales. Rased 'a on a review of recent 1974 and probable 1975° sales among various tenants at Huntington Center, the: 2 incremental increase 1n sales and �'' r',;��;`l.,'• X;,;`,r`,7�a x resulting increase 1*11 percentage rents has been estimated as shorn in Table N 1 w:rich is found on the facing page. As can be noted, a total increase in 1 ^ annual sales of S647 ,000 is projected, of which S562,000 or 56.9"i will be distributed a~I.cnc tenants currently a 1n ercen a e (i.e. overage rents. The i n-rementa l increase in perconLage rents has been es ti r;la ked based on current lease provisions, and the increase in total operating income to center owners is estimated at n an annual basis. ' a r „r•}: 512,2_f n The m,.jor share of ,}��•: l'x S,, L'Fr Are � operation expenses of the centcti• are passed directly cn to tt:lants via the- ' r•�',, s; ,;;;.; e>:lsting tenant lease provisian.,, therefore the increase in landlord exposure , ;, .,;;, .�,,.,r✓; to operating expenses due to the limited 2`: incrcase ;n sales activity is ti+ �':' ;.r,•':c: assumed to be negligible. Capitalizing this increase at 10": the net ec:oncmic benefit tc the y.intington Center owners is estimated at S122,000. J•,��',l,�IiL. .•{r'V+� • • YIOL. A,.}'tr �' *Sales penetration is estimated to vary exponentially with jriving tie.'? rather than linearly. r —3— iel'.alxn.i , sFr TABLE 2 SUt-MARY OF 1OTA! PROJECT VALUE UNDER ALTERNATIVE nEVELONMENT ASSU"IPT'40115 JERWEL 30 ACRE PARCEL i r 1975 Dot tars 0 L.nd Area No. of Gross Boilding' Project a Acres Land Uwe (Acres) Units Arec�Ft. )_ Value I. ASSJdPTIOI A: CErTER JRIlE/FREE.•AY OFF -RAMP N MOpIFIED a A. Adult Apartment Complex 20.76 7.25 NA $13,182,000 B. Old World Specialty �.. Complex 4.25 -- -- 2,535,830 1. Condo/REtail Units 3.50 42 $ 39,000(1) 2,100,000 2. Motel 0.'25 12 NA 115,000 � 3. Restaurant 0.50 1 5,000 320,83G t ?, C. Office: Project 1.72 -- 45,000 1,686,800 .4 D. Hotel E. Convenience Center 1.47 NA 20,000 903,100 1r F. Restaurant Sites 0.80 1 51500 401,000 G. Multiplex Theatre 1.00 4 NA 600,000 Total Parcel 30--00 -- — 19 308 730 5 II. ASSUMPTIOil B: CENTER DRIVE/FREEWAY OFF -RAMP IS MODIFIED A. Adult Apartment Complex. 8.70 2.85 NA 5,182,000 ::. B . 0ld World Specialty Complex 4.25 -- -- 2,602,550 1. Condo/ RetaiI Units 3.50 42 $ 39,O00(1) 5 2,T00,00 0 2. Motel 0.25 12 137,970 3. Restaurant 0.50 1 5,000 ?64,580 C. Office Project 1.27 -- 100,000 4,426,800 D. Hotel 11.93 300 tlr, 6,387,500 rooms F. Convenience Canter 1.47 NA 9G3 OOC ,100 20, ;•`"::�. {•'.{`,'?; , F. Restaurant Sites 1.88 2 13,000 94,7,917 I '' '''"' �,''`'r''• G. r•iul ti pl ex Theatre 1.00 4 NA 600,000 Total Parcel 30.00 S21,049,f%,7 Increase in total project value resulting from Center Drive/Free+ray Off -Ramp improvEments. $ 1,741, i2: increase per square foot of land $ 1 .3;/S ri" W,'. Indicated ir,crease in develoger's profit at 15" of total ptoject value 5 261,200 1. I:''; I 'f f"C :1... ........ .. ....I .t'.:. . ... .: f.L•. s' r. u , .. •a.... .. )I.T •. .._,. _ !1 '/'r - i .i . r.. .. ... .... ......rr ...... ... ..... .. , .. ....., .. r. .• ..a._ 7j The Broadway and Montgomery Ward department store facilities and underlying land are not leased but instead are owned by their respective parent chains i and thus "Increases in sales at these units will not directly benefit 'he Huntington Canter owners. However these -stores cod the other stores Covered ` by leases at t;re center, including J. C. Penney, will benefit individually from profits on their increased Sales. The economic benefit to the retailers has beer, estimated based upon the �K.+ expected profit margin before taxes that will be realized on the increased s" sales. The major retailers conprized of the three department stores, Broadway, Penney and 14ontgomPry Ward are estimated to realize a combined increase in sales of $823,000 on an annual basis. Store wide before tax profit margins for these retail chai::s currently average approximately VJ*, which when applied against the above increase, yields an increase in annual income of $49,400, Capitalizing phis annual increase at W% results in an indicated combined economic benefit of approximately $493,400 on a before -tax -basis for these three major department stores at Huntington Center. The other smaller mail tenant shops will also realize economic benefits through profits on their increased sales. However these benefits have rot been included based pri- marily upon pragmatic considerations which recognize the difficult; in successfully obtaining financial participation from these smaller tenants. Economic 3enefit to Jerwel En:erurisis Pr�ert� Tire development potential of the presently undeveloped 30 acre parcel owned by Jerr'rel Enterprises which lies ir.mediately to the north of the Huntington Center will also be positively enhanced by installation of the proposed street improvements. A development concept has previously been prepared for the parcel assuming -installation of the improvements, which galls for several integrated land uses including an adult apartment complex, Old World Specialty Retail Center with condominium home/retail units, mutel and restaurant, high- rise office project, major 300 room hotel, restaurant sites, etc. Several of the proposed uses are dependent upon the availability of good freeway access to the site. Estimates of the probable economic impact upon the Jerwel property as a result of the proposed Center Drive/freeway off -ramp modifica- tions have boon made based upon the amount and type of development that !'could be feasible with and without the proposed street improvements. These results ar•e sunrrarized in Table 2 which is shorn faring. The land uses and project values achievable assuming installation of the improvements reflect those presented in the fiscal impact analysis prepares; 1r September of this year for s+rbmitt�l to the City.** As can be noted, th° combined value of the various projects, which with the exception of tr.: retail;condo- ninium units are based upon capitalized not oporating inccire, total S21,049,S67 a5sirming ir•'stallation cf the street improvements. *Based on previous years 1971.1973. "Estimated Fiscal Impact of 30 - Acre Parcel: City of Hlrntingt^n Beach, S. StuF;in & rlssocia—tes, Septr.,mber -4- , •t ' 1' �'i•4R ,`•`ii , J ' 7lV+• I �� 7f. Its 'h ¢ F w, ' ,y Etl,•Ri 4�'4�'y. . . r .I ,h,r II i ,, •� , : r,y,3� t 9. rr •1 1S 1' ud•'•�t 'M F Ai It If the proposed improvements are not installed, cerLa projects are not believed to be feasible tx,would need to be reduced itl scale due to the reducel freeway access to the site. Primary among these are the planned 300 room hotel, , the 100,000 square meet high-rise of f i I:e bu 11 1 d -1 ng , and two major restaurants. Due co requirements imposed by major hotel operators and the -educed competitive ability of the site, it is highly doubtful that a major t hotel would be feasib currently hal Ae with free -way access restricted to that curi aFforded by Gothard Street and either Edinger or McFadden Avenues. Similarly, - the oppc,'vinity to attract two major dinner' huiise restaurants would be very lovi without direct frceway access, and in all probability, only a single smeller -offee stop operation could bp attracted in this eventuality. P. In Tha ability to undertake the major high-rise office project will alsu be reduced from the 109,000 sq. ft. of gross building area currently planned if the proposed modifici-tions, iire not installed, due to the reduced mavketa- bility for office space to regionally oriented tenants desiring better access. The type of project which likely could be supported would be a smaller low- rise development of Lpproximately 'b,000 sq. ft. oriented more toward local tenant5.. The remaining projects such as the Old Norld Specialty C.intev and Convenience' Center ijotl!d be feasi'We ►,.,ith or withOLIt the proposel, 'inprovements, though some impact ua achievable ales levels mould likely occur. This has been reflected in the analysis. Finally, removal or modification of the previously described projects would Make Finally, land area available arid it has beer assumed that the amount b of site area currently planped for high donsity residential Llflil:a, 8.2 aCre,t could logically be expanded to provide fo-,- additional residential development. Recognizing the fact that the City might react unfavorably to additional residential develop-m-ant, UPI nevertheless is of the npinion that such develop- ment would represent the highest and best use of the balance of the property jt assuming no modification of the off-rz,isp. If the balance of the property dere not developed residentially it couid conceivably be used for- similarly valued comumerC.ial land uses such as an office part; and miscellaneous retail uses. For analytical purposes have as'suriied that the additional land will to developed for, residential use, bringing the total land utilized for this to 20.74 The use arres. corresponding number cf developable units would be raised to a total of 767 units, including tile proposed 42 condominium home/ " retail units. 'j The land uses and associated projects which i-,,ould be feasible assuming no improvemer ' or modification of Center Drive and the existirg southttoundi freeivay off -ramp are estimated to have a combined value of S19,308,7310. IM represents a reduction of $1 7141 137 from the " total developable value possf,._ with the improvements. Assuming a normal developer's profit of 15`� on tolal project value, the net pre-tax economic benefit. to Jerwel ',-.riterprise� as a result of the proposed Center Drive/freeway off -ramp improvements is estimated at -,261,000. City of fluntinoton beach The not economic benefit to the City of Huntington Beach has been derived, based upon the probable City revenues and e>.perlditures which will result. from J 4, 4. A Elf A WWI r P ry ti 4, A If e_ J1. W_ J V r f tsar ,1 '<',,Ir'If•, •I ....r'c1Wli-....�L.::1.ua...a+.u_...,....�....._. �...--..,•...... ... ...._ .,.I.r .r'.,1.. a, F''y• TABLE 3 IN i SUMMARY OF ItlCftEt1ENTI1L ANNUAL REVENUES Atlp EXPENDITURES AS THEY APPLY TO CITY OF HIINTINOTON BEACH* � ��{✓ � CENTER DRIVE/OFF-RAMP NOT MODIFIED CENTER DRIVE/OFF-RAMP IS MODIFIED - 1 m ned Jerre Huntin :on om irye ';' •,f `.'",.-•° 3 �` ` s 3erwe Huntington o 9 pe Proprt Center Properties Prorty Center Pror"erties I. REVENUES •I" ; 8f 120 $ 86,120 5 96,370 S 2,640 $ 99 O10 A. iroperty Taxes , 4 I ) B. Sales Taxes 71,242 71,242 117,190 10,380 1275570 :'. Y �h'' 4 f. C. Per Cap. Rev. 33,740 33,740 14,900 -- 1d 900 !; ':, r '•r' 6 980 6,980 4 830 ** 4,830 , f D. License Fees E. Utility Taxes 31,140 31,140 16,840 ** 16 840 s ,u t F. Recreation & Parks 5,880• 5,880 2,500 -- 29500 30 110 30 110 18 460 ** 18 460 " G. Utility Revenue , H. Civic Impr. Fund 23,710 23,710 10,110 -- 10,110 Total Revenue, $ 288,922 $ 288,922 ; 281,200 $13,020 5 294,220 " II . EXPENDITURES� ;.✓.' ';'n �t �f:' A. Po ice S 28,820 $ 28,820 5 30,550 S ** $ 30,550 34 20G i r B. ? 2 ** 21 230 I Fire 4, 00 �1,2�0 7 ':,'�:�, C. Public i:o: r;s 12,400` 12,400 9,290 �''* 9,290 :'•?,r k t- -Supp. Serv. 25 550 2.5,550 18,8V *� 18,880 D. C1 pp . F. CtkliJ^pr. Fund 8;Fi1O 33610 3,670 -- 3,670 c f . R;-croatir•n & Par"s 6,930 5,930 2,950 2,950 �`•r.a'•'t"�:''' r O. Gas .a%. Adm. Co�,`s 840 840 620 '`' 020 t ' H. dater Ut i I i r v Costs 29,650 29,650 _ _ 17,800 � *� _ 17,800 Total Expenditures S 147,09i) S 147,000 S 104,990 S $ 104,990 ;,,,,,'�,',N Net 5;irnl us c 141,922 a 141,922 S 176,210 $13,020 S 189,230 Increase in Net Surplus Due to Street Improve-nents s 47, ,98 Capitalized at 7`j -wee peen i� a-1)1 e A-4 for detailed sun-mary. ' " :• 1 1 n I• fin.. 1 C salesactivity S.:Y�1 i fr'. 1•..v. . AssLime., negligible increase due to 'c.. increase in renter sales alone. t • i r r 1 • ' ...++uw,eaw sa•.aswnw.w .yrr..r �+wraw�o,nxr.a.a�ufxfi'slet 1[!L'*�T �:Tlffir'Rf' �'"'�i ' -avow F`7 �riMl'F.r ,, �i,'•�'; ,,7V�V'►lfr, n - I• '.. TI!'1!"�rrt `. �.�Kh{r/ pMp{{! ,.{:'Ai ' 1'' FMh?y • to l,.•. •..,.�:,"://Lr.ail—.r—w.....r...r.......w.....+.r......,..rs.v. i.l •.. .. ..... .... rn .... r,r ...., .... ... .... .. , ,......,, ... v... .... r.......—_... .... -. •. �.r rn............... 4"' f' increased sales and more intensive develo ment made possible throe h instaila- lion of the proposed street improvements. These are surrrarized in Table 3 44, s, /.Y'/I;•"' ' shown facingwhich lists the incremental revenues and expenditures undE" "`i''' '' rt each { , ?,,. 17,,' ( a h assumption. ..,,, , " which will flow to the City assumIn , a ,f, .1., Incremental revenues and expendituresY 9 i 'w..�` 4'• no street modification will combine to produce a net positive annual surplus of $141,922. If the modifications are installed, this .surplus will by in i ;fs�°{,�,.,>,,'' ; 4 a!'rb creased to $189,230, reflecting higher City revenues from increased sales taxes at the Huntington Center, increased revenues from additional commercial development onLhe Jerwel property, and reduced City costs due to fewer resi- dential units.} The economic benefit then to the City of Huntington Beach / ;,' • sr can be equated to the increase in cash surplus which equals $47,308. The `i'1gg;'.;t'''i ;' capitalized value -of this increase to the City has been estimated at appror.i- irately $675,800 assuming current estimated municipal borroti'ring costs of 7,4. In addition to this direct fiscal surplus which would be experienced by the City of Huntington Beach, economic benefits will accrue to the general driving •�' public as a result of the proposed street modifications. These have been " Y identified' in the traffic consultant's report*,' and are projected at 118,300 vehicle miles and 878,800 vehicle minutes on an annual basis, reflecting C'.. N. curnrulative drivingdistance and time saved b users of the modified s stesr. y y • The equivalent economic value of these driving benefits were also estimated ' !f'4r in tare traffic consultant's report to equal $76,500 annually. ,rr, "T,• ''rr ,r I • r, � YI�y r l • i r Since the above benefit will accrue to the general public, it has beer. treated as all indirect benefit to the City of Huntington Beach. This viewpoint reflects the assumptiun that more diverse benefits of this type which flow to the coxmunity's residents as a whole rather than to specific landowners, and which are custcmarily protr.'ed for by the City, can be logically allocated as a benefit received by the City of Huntington Beach. This approach %'ras pre- viously agreed to by the three parties who participated in this study**';. The capitalized value of this annual economic benefit of $76,500 is estimated at approximately $1,090,090, based upon a capitalization factor equal to the City's rurren,_ estimated borrowing costs of 7N. The addition of this benefit to the capitalized net. fiscal benefit of $675,800 identified earlier brings the City's combined benefits to $1,765,600. Summary of ilet. Economic Benefits Estimated net economic benefits to the respective parties as a result of the proposed Center Drive/freeway off --ramp modification, are Suir,:narized in Table -'Ratios utilized to derive these estimates reflect those developed as part of the fiscal impact study of the Jerwel property prepared in September, 1975. See Appendix Table A-4 for additional detail. "Modification Stugy of the Seach Boulevard .Interchanne, Donald Frischer &.Associates, august 15, 1915, page 26. represe.!tatives of City of Huntington Brach, Jer7'rel Ents,rprises & Center Par}nr_rship. IM �. r 1„ !r•:1ij 'l �rv�Fid�:r"'�1 Y. ' 1 I r , 1 ' r ' ''.y'!''fF'Y:'QiJ'e�'(G��i'�,i•�S�QfL'�rF.`'.0 ..'�'!^'1'�.i.i 53��.Rdr � �.�r j���y�� $r �j �'; y LJ ,,... ;�, . �z (• �trn � ��{U4 li S' r,% ..,.'%,t'_�'' .... <�+,..,fi. �'!LI�1� 1 .�. '.+- I4 Y .... .„ ��w'.. - *SKr u_. Iy�, t^.1Kh r . , TR { ' }.• ' 1 ,i•; 1'.� ',yi.�.c fly ,'.,; r i � • i ��•49 �rU� I 11 ��.:1i,{ '�yrY{rid. r"•�1 , ' I 4„ 'SVI.r•r (TT3. T H`enney; Brnad'�i�y ?t tiontgc,rery h',�rd cnllC:ctively. 2 Increase in percentage r_nts capi t a i i ed 0 10 Incre&sed co.nbine,i sales of S523,000 , 6'.; profit margin cao:talized 0- 10 . 4 Reflects anrvjal driving mileage end time savings equal to $76,. t0 arnu.ill, and capi tal i:!ed 0 7 source. traf fit: consultants report. a (5) As'..mile5 ��. tox brac;,.ot for priva'Le land owners and tr-n2nt.s. r It 1 i ? e TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF N"cT ECONOMIC BENEFITS RESULTING FRJM CENTER DRIVE/FREEWAY OFF -RAMP MODIFICATION Net Economic Percent Benefit Distribution 1. DISTRIBUTION OF BEFORE -TAX BENEFITS A. Huntington CenTnr 1. Huntington ',enter Partnership 615,400 122-,000(2) 2. Derartment Store Tenants (1) 4939400(3) B. Jerwel Enterprises $ 261,000 C. City of Huntington Beach $1,765,800 1. Direct Fiscal Benefits ---67 —5,$00 2. Indirect Driving Public Benefits 1,090,000(4) Total $2,642,200 III, DISTRIBUTION OF AFTER-TAX BENEFITS (5) A. Huntington Center 307,700 1. Huntington Center Partnership _$_ 61,000 2. Department Store Tenants V 6,700 B. Jerwel Enterprises $ 130,500 C. City of Huntington Beach $1,765,800 1. Direct Fiscal Benefits 675,800 2. Indirect Drwing Public Benefits 11090,000 Total $2,204,001 23.2Vt. T-6-2 18.67 9.88% 66.83%, 2G.58 41.25 100.00" 13.96. 2.'7.7 11.19 5.92`.. 80.12`,' 30.66 49.46 100.00`, ;•y �3i..- �.•'LID>sfl7StaJ i'(.t'.l �,+1'!. _'.'.� �I.�f ,�. .•.) ! f r 4 r'4* - ,. .�"I .;1 ....�. .. �.J ,� _11..�.. ..�����L ., _t�' �' �'�':•....., rt.L�.��'�.1.'".. �'... r ' .. .'Am,MR t 4' rr ' �. a shown facing. They are sho►'rn on a before -tax and after-tax basis, reflecting an assumed 50ro tax bracket -for each of the private parties. As ra►i be noted, ' combined before -tar, benefits total $2,642,200, with 1�enefits to the City � '., equaling 66.81' or tyro -thirds of this total., w After-tax benefits rahich are considered more reflective of actual economic I,ar+, benefits to the individual private parties, total $2,204,000, including the ".' ;.�{ City's share a.` this to'cal, the Huntington Center Partnership, owners of the r .d4 ` ';', :,•:.{'',:'p,�. ';� f shopping center, are estimated to receive $61 ,000 or 2.77101 of the total, v;hi le f'• ,W�t '' the three department stores will receive benefits equal to an estimated $246,700 or 11.19" of the total. Jerwt?1 Enterprises, o','mar of the undeveloped 30 acre arcel will receive after-tax benefit. � a•.. ,. •,,,,r ,,,. p .. equal to approximately $130,:i00 or 5.921'j. The Cit,' of Hiritington Beach, itself will benefit to a significantly t greater degree thin any of the private interests. Direct fiscal (i.e. cash) bene,its gill equal approximately $675,800, representing 30.66,.1 of all economic t ;;• '' benefits produced by the project. These reflect primarily the additional "•;;� saies tax and property tax revenues flowing from the project. Substantial �c �','f:'•.'i' benefits to the driving public, valued at S1,090,000, bring the City's ke, rcombined share to over 80/Z o the project's after -tar. benefi:s."The preceding analysis has attempted to quantify the major direct economic. benefits produced by the proposed modification of Center Drive and the ad -joining San Diego freeway interchange at Beach Boulevar d, together with the ? '�''�*.• `'. "'' relative distribution of these benefits among the various private and public T14, entities involved. It is hoped that these results will provide a meaningful !'`'' '" •k• r basis for future nzgotiations between the major parties concerning equitable � r; �•*r,,� rig F' r,'• participations in the casts of this desirable project. �; ,' f 1 . � • i+ i I , 0 I 1 l ,r x ,� t. fv '.r •rr y 'h, r ,', :Yrf . �:, '�+ 1., J�'f �.' r� _,f, 3,,4 y' j., h i :r '{ rj '' a J , 1 r • • ..,. _� • a• -. {� :r.. 1. a, I� .:3'• '•,, 'y ,'y �' i �y::;:, ;Y v .,J '� ,.� k r.r * 4` o f}. ,rg 1:: •r �' r y *'' . , a . M:: k . y, M, .d- * ;�' f 'r ly'B• t•_i, •�. 7 ��r ;r, x � f. .� �,#. ;,J i i ,} - "�•.�• ':�' '�rY .l. •�'�'i` I '1Y ':� 4 ,k -�', 1:• '•' �!. ,.,.. qf'+'' ,1n �'•'! rY lr'r"� r. 1 •`J.' li- —.�.. fi. r�' •��L. .. '�.k. :;fir +f r '+ ti r.+F�' fv '� '�'v,~ ,'� , } , �• '.i.��. *�.. ;.. •. .! IgMY'� �' },. r M .r ''1 / A ,`�� ! , . { ti,. % !' r "Y '+' -{ r{ ��},1+�'f-�".4,.��r� M•ft .�.. .-i.! _ � r1.. .7 ����• ry�� � + yH ,!• ^• 11.y 1 � j'If Y:a�., } f r. .S� h .77 S` 110 r1{ � }C ' r Y f; w L d ,71fI�, tt '•y�y�. -I •A #� 61,N�6 Yi" 'A��'V� � �i1 1 r {i .7r',YJ..f .,e..:: �.:{' /'af .1!.',-.r. ..�.5.',Y,1'�'_. ,.� s ..:.la•IF'L......r, �d .i..itas L:.' .Sl.l•.,. ,.'1; '.!1% .{_ .il a;� .—.�L Y11. !�.. .. .•P, ,f� �......f .. r S.• , , �11 Fie.. 'i .rA r .. f +' ` ' rf'il ','�".• ,'•�Iy'y:r4'/�r lT�r'4t, ;, � 4''f'l. y'i, � �' 4 , � .''� rl: �, rrr+�f �, �,}}jrrf �_ r �YyyS(i4 , �; r r yv„r ,f; l::}2�,y rI' 1:.,. f, , ' � .. �,' ..•,1 'i'•v�' f "Sr✓' ,r ,�j, ' : ' K �,. Fe `�}' 4''2'fFinl?!�f_r'. .,., •`.4 , ., t x i L•i,',.`r�',,. % ,, lv •i � tl}'t• " •f. • i'•'.t�x :j }•^?iT�11l. A; � 11 '� ' � :'f • 4P. '%} A"�` � 76',r ' .. .. • q..it ti � ,1 sr:,�.,, ,,r : P,,v}j �. r1'd rr t i.r��. �I�JI � �f ��I �J'jj. ''r ��i f{l: r+,'�, Yr rl+�i:'� f+ i , 1'i .' � !y.'M��,�+'r•': 1.. �`a. ; �;, !,; i•..,; r , t� fl� trt�l��S1�!-" "s',; f tl?"r 's� i,.:.¢;irl�;rJ'�� lyd�w' �'r, '' ':e ' r•�, ^4 �,l {�ni`r! i ? .. � ''+'r ^, �'�''� #k'' , .. .c*!,, +.l�r f��! 1 r'f'':ti�y'�pi��'��'`ti.F`r'• ,4 f 1.4y .0 il. .i, �!)Fi Q`�'•pl•Y}l�'!•r'y,. A,V .� �,� ,,, �I+ '`�1!rj ,+' °� �f r'+�.r:,,•, ;�, r7�.r*f'jr.7�':.?'Tyl,r''' •'J, i�i',1. � "P�i' �fi r'.i * i•• ,. �M-lI y ',1,�<r.f� '4" . r .. ; , �M .'4 ✓u'°'� Y'fwiA•'','} ! I' ,•'!,}'r•�1,���f .r ,,' ,. r, f •,�, r. •�r � !d; ''�'T�"kl'''1 s',fj.'`r�,,'':�J�'f,'r'r,yyfi! `r •fir y�4; ,�� _�..�.._._._._��_..,—_.. _ ___._.....__ r. c TABLE A-1 Ei SUMMARY D.STRIBUTI0:1 OF SALES 1,1 '1974 �, ' • p HUNTINGTON CENTEP, Total Sales Sales Only Of Y Rent Sales In 1974 Of Percent Tenants Paying As `hare Of Average Percent , All Tenants Distrinut;on Rents _ Tut':l Sales _Rent Term z) _ 1 �a A. 41. C. Perim.-,L, S16,000(est) 49.4%j 516,000 100.0,; E. 11ppr•ei u. Accwssories n,201 25.313 S 71OG9 86.2`3' :;, iG"• ' C. Furni turd S 1 ,900(est) 5.S'i S 1 ,80r 94.7:r CI. Specialti�==� > 4,556 14.l;� 2,39G a?.G:. 4.G0�' E. C'ertflcr?S 5 '?I 0.9i: 130 44.7`, 10.0111 V. Fond .. Liquor r 31,Q 1.1 : 1SJ— G. rlth:ll 1_,Of, 3 i`> 3''5 - 48.1 Total32 373 i Z;.0` ;27,900 'J1I?'Cn; H1.111til'C'.,,il �:LCiCh j11nj' Pre ,11C;,'ty(1•%\'ii' 4'. Of E'I, t5 Clll'+'.:Ilt,'l1r )".i, U b:. On their 1'(!1..t1, f 1om, f5� 1('il i;{�T•'I IMf. 1>cr �." I'.il:.5 i(1. ^tlt1—:, Sale- ills' trim-e lt: -,es };if' Ij{•f;l�lliti('.I cales f {x � :�,".,' ��.. ,y{ .� :' "' �, .. M�•a ,�. { ,•. ,. r-;x , f 1' z;; ., 'i "''; j, �-'J ,... :'i' ,'`'. d. 777 '1% Jr r�. f ( Y11. .. , '�!: �A r ,'•� �'�,. ' k''r•y r,° r4 •, �W :! '.i' J .(r r ;1 ! ,a;y , ut ,,r +. i' ;w ;�'. 7; ''q"ii' �' } 'I.. TABLE A-2 - Y :UMMARY OF INCREMENTAL CITY ANM iAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES: t' ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS DrI've!r-reei.ay Off -Ramp 'Not tI^dified Center Drive/Freeway Off -Ramp Is Modified Prcner•t�j_;� nt Vaiue Pruperty Market Value _ s: Land FiVr. Tax Ldnd & Fixt. & Tax _ -ind Uso impr. t Iclrs. Prop_ Inventary '6tEI Revenue" I rrip r.* Pers.Prop. Inventory Total Revenue" 11,,.��i :';^t. C.CTpiEA ;? 3.1'.:'.,0i�� t** $ ,y ;?3,]82,000 $53;390 $5,1r1"c,OQO > �u* $ *** $5,182,000 $20,990 6. vId ':i i jrr ?'Ity . I• 07,,nt2,535,E=700,0000) 3,47!..S30 1r1,090 2,602 550 440,000 590,000(3) 3,632,550 14,710 C. P; 03�'C% i ,o6,8L 0 _,000(4) -0- 12.136,800 8,650 4,426,800 110001000(5) -0- 5,426,800 211,980 _�; -- -- -- -- -0- NA NA NA 6,387,500 25,870 2. n1enc:e _11ter ,;t)0 200,000(5) 75,000(7) 1,178,100 4,770 903,100 200,000(6) 75,000(7)-1,178,100 4,770 E;Qstaurant Sites 401'000 110,060(8) 511,000 7,070 947,917 260,000(9) *+* 1,207,917 4,890 %. ''.:ltiplex Theatre 600,000 180,000(10)_ -0- 780,000 3,160 600,000 -:80,000(i0)_ -0- 780,000 3,160 Serb-tr:ta1 ai ,308,7::3 $1,380,300 S575,000 S21,263,730 86,120 ;I4,662,367 $2,080,000 $665,000 $23,794,867 10'96,370 ? I . !-!ur,ti nn ton Cent ar 0_-ntington enter (15) (12) . :�operty 90,00J $ 371,000 $ 1,5u"0 3. Other Tenants -- -- -- -- -0- _ 222,000 -- 59,003 281,000 1,140 (15} (13)r 6 -0- $ 122,000 $ -- 29,000 S 151,000 5 610 (15) (14) I 2. I'ontgomery Lard 3 -- -- ,� -- $ -_ $ •-ft- $ 1001000 $ -- S_30,000_ S 130,000 $ 530 Jub -to 'La l -- -- -- --0- - $ 503,000 $ -- S149,000 $ 652,000 $ 2.640 . ' E15,165 $2,080,003 46,867 367 ,000 $814t24,4$99,010 . �c�al Combined r�ropLr�t�,_ 586,12.,0 W , --- - _-- �- _ tj 4.;r:. aiue r. en develop):- • see Tablr, ? -Within tent. ;-et Value 25:, $1 .--1SI00 A.". ;I0/= ;4,t10Q c= (2) .>H5 sa1_s/SF « �I.O turn;rer x .6(1. (3; 100 salsas/SF. tP 4.0 turnover x .60. (4) @ $10/SF x 45,GUO SF. (5) @ $10/SF x 100,000 SF.• Si C::,OQ SF. (�' }ci0 sa? _s/SF If1.G `urno:+er r.�r;. (3) 2�;JzF x 5,500 SF, ;9) C $2G/SF x i3,OG0 St=. (1O) @ $15/SF x 12,000 SF. (il) $12,220 10�_:. (12) 461",500 SF ? Sfi /SF C1 4.0, ,t:s-mw-_-lr x .60 x 2". 03) 156,.000 SF x @ 5.5 turnover x 0.60 x 2'A"'. (14) 197,000 SF @ $60/SF :s turn. r_r x 0."70 n 2'. ,75) 2: 1-17 -75 issessed va.c_;�. '�.' �F. 7. _ _ ._. _ _ _ •too MR qrw TPiSLE OF til- CITY DIL RETAIL SALES TAX REVENUES 1`11_TEEN;�_71VE DE'. ASSUMPTIUNS Center I..-ive/Ft-ee-.aay Of-F-:..amn Not Nodified Center Drive/Freeway -Rapp Is Modified Jtnnual Sales Ta x :I b .2 - fi-f .abl u Tar, Revenue Annual Sales Taxable _Off T axa b I e Tax Revenue Volume I C-�_:,ales a City VGlume Sales Sales To City A. Residential Uses partm.,!nt Cnir.lpie, rLI,970(l) 3,528(1) 2. Condccflniuii Units 102(2) 7 02 ( 2- C c7m:n L, r c a I Uses i"ite, ttorld Specialty cr. Component 3, 149.250 $29,920 5_,900.000 9 5.' $3,705,000 S 35,200 taurant/Beer Garden n ico 1;51), GOO t, L_ 6 0 0 C, 5,230 iOG 625,000 5,940 100 5,1390 4,10 55,19-3 ]00 55j90 520 2. Hotel -0- -0- -0- J,832,500 no 3,832,500 36,410 Ccnvenience Center i'200,000 95 1,140,000 10,830 112001000 95 i,140,000 10.830 Restaurant Si Les r.8? 1500 100 687,600 6,530 1,625,000 100 1,625,000 15,440 S "ultiplex Theatre 907,200 1 GO � -1 907,('_,U� 8,620 907,200 100 907,200 8,620 Sub -total Jerwel PropertV 0 S6.479,940 $71,242 $12;,44,890 1511 889 890 $117 190 ..U_1'_1tit)qton Center Center Por,_ner- ship Property $ -0-$ 647,000 9% 5 E/va S 614,630 $ 5,840 3 r t ts -.,,her Ter 0- -0- 503,000 95 477,850 4,540 b-total Huntington Center S -,j- -0- 11150,000 $ 019 2 55 C 0 10,380 7,ot2l AI! Proi;Crti es '6,70�-1690 S6.479,91G 71.242 $113120,890 tl 2,982,390 $127,570 r-1re e: —imaged Fiscal-Impa-c' of 30-Acre Parze.1 C --.v of Huntington ?each, P. S. 5tuklin & Associates. Sr,pteiiter 't.7, --- 751 Fi—f _7 1 5 U n iL s ; 16.71 hin; t x 2 units; s -e,� ref,_--rencc alhovc. . . ........ . ... az 0 i� te - - - - - .. - - _ - :•dui- ', �'. . .. - - - --._ ..� - _._._- - �...- - - �.... i.-. _-,..ram - - •.....-.�,i�.:��. __- _�.e..- -- - �,� .� _ TABLE A-4 DETAILED OF INCREMENTAL 'NIIUAL REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ;S THEY APPLY TO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Center Drive/Freeway Off -Rama Not t'oditied -� _ _ Center Drive/Freeway Off -Ramp Is Modified jerwe? Property Jerwel Property _ 76, Resid. _- Huntingtc:! Co::ibined 327 Resid 18.3 Huntington Combined Jnits Ac.Cc:n:. Total Center Properties Units AC.Gamm. iotai Center Properties : r. ?jEs . Pronerty Taxes 53,390 t 321,730 $ 86.12u 86,120 $20,990 $ 75,380 $ 96,370 $ 2,640 5 99,010 -1; T:'es 9,672 61,570 %i .._;2 -0- 71,242 4.230 112,960 117,190 10,380 127,570 Cur. Revent;es W 33,740 -0- i3,t�+Q -0- 33;740 14,900 -- '4,900 -- 14,900 Lic. Fees (2) 5,1�,✓? 1,B40 6,980 -0- 6,980 2,190 2,640 4,830 * 4,1330 _. Uti : i t•v Tav (3) 27,610 3,530 31,140 -O- 31,140 11,770 5,070 16,840 * 16,810 i:.ccr_'Lion .. r,r�:s .j 5,880 -0- 5,880 21500 -- 2,500 -- 2,500 24, 540. :i,570 30,110 -0- 30,110 10,460 81000 18,460 * 18,460 Civic 1mr)rv. Fund (6) _^ 23,710 -`_ ?3,i10 -O- _ 23,717 l0,1i0 -- _ 101110• - _ 10,110 Total Revenues t83,E82 105,240 288,922 -0- 5 988,922 $77,150 $204,050 $281,200 $13,020 5294,220 i t . Chi' NOITURES - 10,74O `, 1 ,0�I,0 0,820 -0- c 28,820 $ 4;580 $ 25,970 $ 20,550 = x ; 30,550 5. 7ire (Ct �7,610 6,590 ;YyG'c10 -0- 34,200 11,770 9,460 �1,230 21,%?O L. r :: is ::^r6;s (9; r 3,960 12,400 -0- 12,400 3,600 5,690 9,290 * 9,290 '. :;ter Support S?r.(10) 17;5'; 7,910 25,550 -0-- 25,550 7,520 11,360 'F,880 * 181830 c Imprv. Fund (11) 8,616 -- °,6i0 --0- 8,610 3,670 -- -t,670 -- 3,670 F. Recreation & Fars:; (12) 6,930 -- 6,930 -0- 6,930 2,950 -- 2,950 -- 2,950 C. Gas Tax A,!m. Costs (13) 5 340 -0- 840 250 370 620 * 620 I;tility Cosr.s (14) 24,54 5,110 29,650 -0-• 29,550 10,460 7,340 ,7,800 * 17,800 otal txp-2ndituros S' 195. q• .:1.91`0 � i47,000 -G- 5 147,000 $,44,80�7 5 5�0,190 {104,990 5 -0- S 104.990 Curniu; 78.S92 63,330 r 14i,922 -0- 141,922 $32,350 $143,860 $i76,210 $13,020 5 189,230 p 4 ita �� t.r c _L1. �,ss::azn� 0 ,-te 'l_.L c., 1 per ap rrnipnt iLrs r.• a a,l, F= 3.0 ,r_ilers e. end d a per condominium. (2) $6.70 per residential i $ e., nt al unit n a144.�+5 per m �, co..m. r 3 acre. (3) 5..6 - p_r resida_nti31 unit .:2-17.07 der Year per cciTm. acre. (4) 1-7.66 per residential uni%. (5) 532 Fer residential unit & $437 per comm.acre. ;6) ; r_, resi lenti_1 unit. "I - r�•r resideniiai unit S1 .419.00 per, cc.,rz. acre. (8) $36 per residential unit & S5"t7 per coM. acre. (9)$11 per resi- :tiaj unit 5311 per cc ;. :ore. ;':':l Incl:des all operating debts except police, F ,•e and Public Works; $23 per residential unit and >521 per carom. 511.23 ;per residential Ls,it. (12) per residential unit. (13 $0.75 per residential unit $20.49 per comm. acre. (14) �32 per residential 1-1,131 Per comr.. acre. 11_711rible ncreasc. Ft:r Yam^ Increase in center sales ac"LAIVity i lon'2. ti Yr le I• HUNTINGTON CEN"T'EP : SAN DIEGO FREEWAY AND LJEACII nLVD. HUNTiNOTON DEACH, CALIF0111,1IA THE t.1ACDONAL.D GROUP. l_TU. HUNTINGTON DEACH COMPANY 10100 GANTA MONICA VLVD., SUITE IOGO $I10 MAIN GYREET LO73 l,NGKL.EG. CALIFOtiNIA C0007 HUNTINGTON REACH. CALfronnIA CY046 1. TELEPHONE IS36-O OI TELEPHONE 050 0015 Jantra.:y 29, 1976 :�4?• ;• MODIFICATION OF SAN DIEGO i. FREEWAY OFFRAMP .'. r Cit y Council 11 Cou ci City of Huntington Beach i �r.• �• '�,rye' '.• F\ .<'}iYL'+}'r; it ��; ',! '• 1' 2000 llttin Street ' Huntington .Beach, California 92648 I. Honorable Mayor and City Council: We have reviewed the Memorandum He o._t prepared by U.P.I on the economic benefito from the subject project, and generally concur with its methodology and conclusions. This report is not •- and waB never intended to be - a precise rnalysis of all the benefits and their recipients; because the scope of scch tin analysis i is so large that its coat might exceed the cost of the project: itself. Rather, it is intended to deterndne :.tic order of magnitude of 'public aril � ' Y'• ' private be.nefitn derived from the project - Whether the public reneiNec e ► ' minority of th • beerefitu, Ital ! of t:ho benefits, or an aubstantiul c:ajority of the bencf-+ts. We believe that this analysis does indicatQ clearly that a substantial i r•,':3'.. •.� `, preponderance of the bens fits do accrue. to the public. Thin ratio of public bertef.itc would have been even h!£,Irer, if public agencier, other than the city had been included In the analysis. Our calculations indicate that if only � I t}te benefits of halgher asteBoed valuer, had been quan•.:ified fer other public + r. a ncreceivingetc.), g' {_es 6 property tax revenue (school diatrictn, county, ,}';��"�!r�r:�;•.R•,.+:. tPe percentage of public benefite would hr in the range of tW'., to 871. ;Irk r ' , 4 ' �JI'.•1�,'i,'• Z£, in addition, the reduced cost to the school dirltrict o£ the tale ad.ternativt_ I envelopment por-iJbi.lities of the Jerwel properties had been evaluaed, the percent�!Se of publi^ benefits would undoubtedly have. exceeded 90',. PRE amh� AW l , Y' , � Yrr 1. I 1 , • ,r' ; .,4 f . •t "J, J r I I r i f I'. f 0 i V .... ...... ./fin ... a ... .. ..._ .......... _. - ... -_�.I 1 ' i 1 Because,of necessity, all of the beneficiaries have not been identified, t� 4 not: their benefits precisely defined, the City Council should not give too much authority to the precise distribution of benefits derived in the sport. The consultants computed all of the shares to, two decimal places, i.e., to ore -one hundredth of a per cent, but this is clearly a cage of over -precision. We do not believe that the consultants intended to convey that Huntington Center, for example, receives exactly 2.77% of the total benefits of the project. A better form of expression proba;:iy would have been to conclude that the owners of Huntington Center i•muld almost certainly receive some economic benefit from the proposed project, and that their percentage of total benefits would be very small, perhaps in the range of 1% to 4%. The acme type of imprecise statement might also, of course, be applied to each of the other parties. Therefore, the City Council should not consider this report as an automatic decision maker, to be applied with total equity merely by arithmetic. The conclusions reached are much too imprecise for that type of approach. All 1 that this report really says is thr.t most of the benefits of the project: will accrue to the p•iblic sector, and that if they could be precisely quantified, that would probably fall into the range of SO/ to 907 of the total benefits. Based on that coi:clurdon, and the many policy statement$ of the City Council on the importance of strcngthenJ,1g our City's economic bane, it would appear most appropriate for your body to designate this construction to be a top priority project to be implemented at the earliest possible date; rind that it: should be totally funded frcn gas ta}: revenues which have been collected by the State. ann 'I2t.`L1tr-ed to the city for such rurpose;,. To take any other cost -sharing approach would involve not only policy difficulties, but practical probleras that could only reeult in hnF.thy delays ci this irportant project. Zlie type of policy difficulties that mi-tit arise from a co:,t:-shoring plan are questions such as:: ... Since the Counc.il's declared policy is Le strengthen our ci.ty's bic,ines:., rind industry, how can this be accomplished by chirging businesr; the full cont of any bent�iits they miflit receive fron public projects? ...Since ever public e:,penditvrc - ann paTticuarly tran portation, e:.penditujces - result in some rncillary private benefits, should n11 such projects be analyzed and contributicns from. the private :sector be sought in proportion to thL, bcnofi.t? •Y•, 1 ,,�.IS7j j,U'f r' `; 'r 1 .fIFVA ,.', , . dr'4U• � I lfiy�a . rF''n' , i A • based on there consideracions, we urge the Cotmeil to proceed ;with at leant .:he dealgn phase of this important project, without attaching n pre--condi;.ion cf private participation in any arbitrary amount. If necesuary, the project could a-ain be revieued ,after itu scopo and cost are better defined, Very truly your,, IIUhT?.NG1'ON BEACH COMPAN`.' BY-- W. E. P etr_r Vice Pra:sident. r•c: City Adm.ini.stratr.r Director of: Public. Wor.l:., I r , lip RMA l ' 41 'lY '.,,`+ •' *'!,{Yr 1 r I I Y'� ,••�., {''11t J `' ,I LAr�:''*n `•.:,�1,'i7,l Y.r/a 5R�}',1�{J f ':'J'�,wt77'+��: '.l, r!�ry �' / ,•-•�. /^"\ I ,, 1 y,l.i {�,',�I�r �P r� �''• ff"4, "�'I 1'' `f•' +' �` % �, :. 1 •f11�1'� �' ''.�r�•��''" ,� �Ar �•Y.a,• ENT ERR011aICS T' ' '' i • ' �1 d, • t• , 1 10 EAST THIRD SHEET i-O P.O.Po!;l k 75, SAN LIMAS, CAVIFORN1A 91771 ad'+ (71a1 s9e 1s5e 'A w+ti• a+� up+ r, ,, • ,; ,���' 1 ,.;' r l • ''t'�. • 41, yrf A partnonh 0 of GfRALOJ.KLEIN-'EVUWFLK yt t r, Jarlunry 30, 1976 p •r•i�i'1 a�'.��i(,Nf•'k, �! R���"' '/ .r•;+ •� } I .%1 ", .: ,j},.,TIS��t�,1 �;',';: r � �'+'. �''' js Nr :J�''. � y, r •r. R'.. fir, ' ,�'' , 1�'�•11 • i � I ,p� ,f"'• 1 Mr.; aria I3owlandr, Jl1N 3 0 1976 r•,f:;�'''" '�'� •�' City Adminintrator ! y x err ON BEACH ' City of Ihtutington Beach CITY (iFlSNTII GT Llox 190 )MINISTRATIV OFFICE h. • lye' Atwtineton Boaah Calitox-ai s 92048 At ` . , ,j'','• !, Re: Propoomd Center Dr. extension and Frealray R=p Modification r L'c Mr. Rowlands: ,,{far•";� 1 , 1PJy�.1"• �'•�JG�� t y''l1 �• f •�y 4: 1 }, • I 0 1 , .t 1 �o eonpluiou our r«�ati• of Urban Irojoct,n incla. report ai' the 41 Lotil:nt criomio Bcne.l'i tG of I'ropoeod Ts�rrovacrnt-, to Crutor nrivu t,nd f,., "' !�•' ,°' r r !� .gar. Bief, my of±-r:. �!. r, r i. The pri;_. '.rpoao of tho ropert war. to octnbl.irh the drirroo of bsnuxit to varlc. 7ofitting pe.rtivn. K9thin roa©cn, thct, has brion acco.•ipli vhvd. At :sting on Vorembar 4, IM wo agreed to be boor %' by the fsrldinbto of vi.L --t and an you'll recall, we ad PiucYd that 113 ( V',r•;';'•'t..�"r - .; r',st�:,; could not al:eak for any other benufitting puvtion. Vor trio m8t ''i'•• pert these people are lai•L :al vorporatinne. 0btc%in17:g bca.•d eppic- " ,• A �; vala and nub^(,quaut pFrticL. reT:)ento, would undolzbt ,dly ve a oi:a n con.--,, n.tng llacnrtc:I:irg. I{{{' f4 ��:", �::'••,rti,l`{' 'rho raf,ortr entablinho:l the City c. ' n 7ter. Penal na boirT the unjor bens-jficierry to the extont of aligi_,, tthall 80", it el';Itild qvp le.T to us that e rnipificaut delay in roaliaing •Mont -VUld. LtMV the '' r City not•n in tn., benefits than would ba raa],+:. j t21• i11 1. 4 .z . _, 1 •�, ±n1-nf, { 20'bo c+bir:-innd fron thq tiar1mv) poto4.tial pertic- i j �•' 'y4.':;; ,4;;' 1,1 •,. ,•,V plc I.arjo-. `, al.no noted thAt' tho tyj:o and quality �1 l..... .lo t1t ♦ Wr7111. i•rLr:t.rl 1 ,,r ,rr .ICJ I ,.�; 1�.,3 roa~l.izml oil ow, property if] dcpoiduut upon tht.3 ot•root project boev:!_4 r, " , ;.,, l,' �'• ; (1 rnalt.ty. Uo tiro' vurrant;v norotiat•ing with rimaral •�Ll�_ity tClnlll'Sltn .fox i th. i cnst.rly half of cur dovelop,mvnt. Theve potontinl tonnantu hfvre deft- yyr '. ,•;91•, nitely a, - roved the oito f cr now locations (inuln'yi�:g thr ho ol) lnit all 1 F,'�.1,''t',,' ,1.`;,4'•' . „'°{ �►tolltial t:1 have a,,1tievd that the will locate on over aito only if Cantor Pr. it; and tho frool njr rr.=vn 'ta4, I 2 It [ippeara to ua ti,; •` ould the City nand 100% Cif thin project, 'the 1Q I , r 4' i.nruatronit wol:ld 1;3 rr1._.id lu � ••.�r;: short period of tire. The tlut.►.if,rluen.I i rJ' y�±J•'� �r �;,,,,. ;''+,.•t,�',+4,,'„ ; uconoriin benofita to the tax payors of i'untington 11-anch as a d.irent A•om,.1t • of t}1!r illvnntnmt would bv substantial. 1'''ew•:'.Yl 1'1:f:'.' ;" , ;,.; ,..: .,,�•''• 1 A PL , i I } , I '1 , � 1 1 i , 1 1 1 x Oe die must re-emphanizo that time a our cnezy in this matter. -h o t notdo climate in correct wo the quality of our potentig.1 tonn=t jL tI2 cal2ent. A delay would not, oa3,7 incroaxin the cost, of the project, k ditionn might change to ths point where our development voLO.d 'ho dei-% ror years. If that happened, thcso tar dollary that would be paying this Jzjprovn=ent would be lact forever. We urge tho City to cone4dar thin matter at t10 aarli3fnt pne Iblo marmnt acid carnantly roco.,nzand 116t Cil -- Trans ba authoriz-od tc procoeJ Vith the dooign. Even though wri do not resist participating to the emtunt of our ontabliphed benefit, ve bullevo the ave rwhalniug banetita to thi--- Oity wti other taxing agencies is stich that the rfxaining participation j1r,.r; xi a Aliniz&l iLpuct on the bonefita darired from the atr(iet project And prf- 5 v ato !zprovemint in trio entire area. v, We would be most, happy to discuss Lhis fitrther, and ingreatar dotaAl V" 24 70U vo dualre. Sincereat person!?2 rep�vxeq. OTEMITIT, ?TTERPUSES GERALD J. yliilf Partner Bill Foster 131.11 Ka.vtgo It IT 0 'A Ii J If VV, it 4'� ti I IWO I.P I wh 1.V $-A, R Ii�?c'� !'' . ''4,P'�� •rum". ..«.....".wY.r..........: �,,,,,, �.,..F.P,•...........—.- ..�._..�.._.. _- �r.n..'.J._._�.r :(.:• •, 1 w•; +; d r.. Ci HUNTiNGTON CENTER RAN DIT•00 FRLItWAY AND 1111AGH &LVO HUNTINOTON AILAtNP CALIFOi1711A k` THE MACUONAL.R GROUP. L-TD. HUNTINGTON 8FACS COMPANY toloo SANTA MONICA OLVD.. RUITi 1600 iltO MA61H RT11[ET Les A14041,96. GALironNIA 00047 MUNTINGTO14 B&ACN. CALIFORNIA 01646 1Ei1s Tt4LFNONR W-sell TtL&PHO IL SAE t"I , 'I, J X "• ' "JAB' ; F . I � I.ti•, ' N.ti,.i..l 1 wLIA * Y: ti 4 7. •, •'t'�,•• k d','i January 29, 1976 MODIFICATION OF SAN BIECO FREEWAY O.."RAMP City Council City of Huntington Beech 2000 !Lain Street Huntington Belrch, California 92648 Houora+ble KayoT and City Council: We have reviewed the Memorandum Report prepe.red by ttY:'. T. on the econumic benefits from the subject project, and Generally concur with its methodology and conclusions. This report is not - and was never intended to be - a precise analysis of all the benafite and their recipients; because the scope of such an analysis is so large that its evat might exceed the cost of the project itself. Bather, it is intended to determine the order of magnitude of public and private benefits derived from the pro,',•ect - whether the public. receives a minority of the benefits, half of the benefits, or a substantial majorit) of the benefits. We beliave that this analysis does inlit care clearly that a Substantial preponderance of the benefits do accrue to the public. This ratio of public benefits would have been even higher, if public agencies other than the city had been included in the analysis. Our calculations indicate that if only the benefits of higher assessed values had beer. quanrified for other public agencies receiving property tax revinue (school districts, country, etc.), thr percentage of public Lenefits would be in the grange of 85% to 87%. if, in addition, the reduced cost to the school di-tticc of the two alternative development,. pcssibi:ities of the Jerwel. properties had been evaluated, the percentage of public be'2fits would undoubtedly have exceeded 90%. r s- 14 r r r1 j #r } .. r1✓ Because,of necessity, all of the bansficiariee have not been identified, not their benefits preci.stly defined, tre City Councii should nc.t give too such authority to the precise distribution of benefits derived in the report. The consultants computed all, of the shares to two decimal places, i.e., to one -one hundredth of a per cent, but this is clearly a camp of ovar-precision. We do not believe that the consultants intended to convey that Huntington Center, for e-x=ple, receives exactly 2.77x of the total benefits of the project. A better form of expreasion probably would have bean to conclude that the ownera of Huntington Center would almost certainly receive some scouamic benefit from the proposed project, and that their percentage of total benefits would be very small, perhaps in the range of 1% to 4%. The same type of imprecise atatewent might also, of course, be applied to each of the other parties. a T.terefore, the City Council should not consider this report as an automatic decision maker, to be applied With total equity merely by arithmetic. The conclusions reached are much too imprecise for that type of approach. All that this report really says in that most of the benefits of the project will accrue to the public sector, and that if they could be precisely quantified, that would probably fall into the range of 80% to 90% of the total benefits. Based on that conch+lion anJ the mAny policystatements of the City Counr_il +• �', r an the i:apg=tancr_ of etirengrhening our City's economic ba.ie, ;t would appear F.., r.;... mist approprinte for your body to designate t*als curst fiction to be a tcp priority project to be implemented at the earliest 'cry-'- date; and x•,. , that it should be totally funded from gas tax revenI WI, •e been collected by the State and remitted to the city for such :vo take any other cost -sharing approach would involve not nnly policy iifEiculties, but practical problems that could only result it lengthy + , delays of this important prcjcct. "a'• '.. •: T:ie type of policy difficulties that might arise from a cast -sharing plan. are questions such as: .Since the rouncil's declared policy is to strengthen our cit 's business a;-d ineustry, how .:an this be accomplished by charging business the full cost of any benefits they might receive from public projects? ...Since every public expenditure - and particuarly transportuti expenditures - result in same anci.tlary private benefits, sh 0.1 such projects be analyzed and contributions irox ►he orivate star be sought in praporticn to the benefit? 1 f H 04 L 1 ♦ • T• 14 •k E 0 i4 h�a? .. •• IE. w � .jph J .? a r x 4 h Ty �h` •.Ih 1i' � �Y i x f,r a � .F 1'•fA�. F. * Y dui h�:.'. Z. p r�dti - 41 :T 4 1 r irq�;.4'•r � r4 ...Would it even be legal to assess a portion of the coats of a public project to only soere if the henefictarlem? Wouldn't all beneficiariao hAve to be identified and assessed thei7 share? oo01e of the practical difficulties that arise from a cost --sharing approain aria i ...The cost of the project is not known to ,ny degree of certainty of this time, ar.,d comnot be known until the total scope ire defined and engineering estisiatre prepared. Figures at low as $300,000 and as high as $800.000 have beer~ rrslntioned. ...1he scope of the project has not been totally defined, and during engineering design, other work such as signalization, a rodifi_atio;,;; to nearby streets, etc. may be found to be necessery. How can any private entity agree to chart a definite percentage of a project of unknown cost, +mid whose scope he cannot control? ...Because the three department starers are nationwide chairs whose financial decisions are not wade locally, more preciet data and a lengthy delay would undcubtedly be needed to secure a guarantee of their participation in coots. ...What we+rld happen if one of the five private parties involved declined to share coats? Would the project be Jropped, car vould the city pay his tAsare? Based on these considerations, we urge the Council to proceed with at '.east the design phase_ of this ivrortant project, without attaching a pre -condition of privatc participation in sn) arbitrary amount. If necessary, the project could again be reviewed after ite scope and cost are better cefirred. VEry truly yours, FUNTINGrON HEACii COMPANY Y� _4�7 DI W. E. Ma Vice Free:ient W'�, y, .,• cc: Cl.ty Administrator 'u D.irector of Public Workz v FA