HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeoRemediation, Inc. - 1993-04-05• (�Oo.30
'X),,s4-ntbdtb Ty L4
t YO AJg6VfW
�J. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1&eloe7
INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
TO: HON. MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: GAIL HUTTON, City Attorney
DATE: April 5, 1993
SUBJECT: Clean Up liability - Contaminated Property at
301-303 Main Street AGENDA ITEM F-3
Coucil/Agency Meeting 4/5/93
The tank in the public right of way was installed in the
1920's.' At that time, the City of Huntington Beach did not
exist, but the town of Pacifica did.
It is my understanding that this problem was first brought to
the city's attention by Peter Pueron, Hazardous Waste Specialist
for the Orange County Health Care Agency, and the county is
holding the city responsible for clean up.
The source of the contamination appears to be from•three fuel
r• tanks. One of the tanks was located in the city's right-of-way
and two were located on the adjacent property owned by James
Egller.
A site assessment work plan was prepared by Tom Pizzo of Economy
Environmental, Inc. The plan contains a history of the site.
This history contains several pieces of information which will
be very helpful in any action by the city to recover remediation
costs.
1. Mr. Newcomb was aware of the problem, as he had a site
evaluation done in 1991.
2. The tanks were removed sometime in 1979 when the
property was owned by the Crocker National Bank.
WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL RECOVERY OR CONTRIBUTION THEORIES FOR THE
COST OF CLEAN UP
There are several options in the law that cover recovery of
clean up costs for toxic spills. Underground saturation soils
is considered a spill from a legal standpoint.
V.
Page 2
Agenda Item F-3
Clean Up Liability
Federal Law: The federal law concerning this problem is called
Super Fund or CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act 42 USC 9601, et seq.).
State Laws: The state laws concerning this problem are
Hazardous Waste Control Act; Health and ,Safety Code Section
25000, et seq., and HealthandSafety Code Section
25189(d)-Negligent Disposal.
Under either the
who were owners
held responsible
state or federal
at the time of the
for the clean up
law, owners of real property
spill or subsequently can be
cost.
Possible Responsible Earties: It is undetermined at this time
whether the contamination in the street came from the street or
the two tanks on private property. This will have to be
discovered before responsibility can be determined.
On the tank found in Main Street, the following is the history
of ownership:
These lots were originally subdivided in 1903 as the
Vicker's Addition to Pacific City. The right to use the
streets and alleys is reserved by the West Coast Land and
Water Company.
The tract was re -subdivided and added to in 1904 and was
named Huntington Beach. The right to use the streets and
alleys is reserved to the Huntington Beach Company. It may
be that there is information in the City's 1909
incorporation records indicating ownership of the street
right-of-ways. Dan Brennan's research uncovered December 5,
1922 as the date Mr. J. W. Mitchell, using a contractor, the
Ridenour Brothers, acquired a building permit for a service
station on the site. The owner of record at that date was a
Mr. David O. Stewart.
As to private property lots the chain of title is as follows:
7/9/04
From S.
H. & Ida Finley
to
Katie
V. Mead
8/27/04
Katie V.
Mead
to
J. W.
Wood
3/24/05
J. W. &
Mary W. Wood
to
C. P.
& Mary Webster
6/27/05
Charles
P. & Mary Webster
to
J. S.
Norvell
7/1/05
J. S. &
Electra Novell
to
David
O. Stewart
r:
Page 3
Agenda Item F-3
Clean Up Liability
3/7/06
6/10/21
6/10/21
6/10/21
4/7/34
6/15/36
11/4/63
12/27/68
11/30/70
12/16/70
2/8/71
8/21/73
8/21/73
3/31/87
John H. & Anna E. Kemble
Jacob Beecroft
I.A. Ronkin
Sig and Ida Sherman
D.O. & Alice M. Stewart
Rena River/Rena Dellinger
Everett & Maud Clemons
Westgate -Cal. Realty
Elsinore Royalty
Westgate -Cal Products
British Columbia
San Luis Rey Downs
Title Ins. & Trust
Crocker National
3/31/87 Renate Guarano
to Jacob L. Beecroft
to I.A. Ronkin
to S. Sherman & S. Freedman
D.O. Stewart
and Samuel & Sarah Freedman
to Rena Dellinger
to Maud & Everett Clemons
to Westgate -Cal. Realty
to Elsinore Royalty Co.
to Westgate -Cal. Products
to British Columbia Invest
to SoCal Properties, Inc.
to Title Ins. & Trust Co.
.to Crocker National Bank
to James & Joan Koller %
int. & Lauro M. Guarano V4
int.
to Lauro M. Guarano
Until the city has a technical evaluation of the various
properties to determine the source of the contamination, we
cannot proceed with legal action. We will also have to have a
determination of the cost of clean up.
GAIL HUTTON,
City Attorney
/k
164:AJF
cc: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
Ray.Silver, Asst. City Administrator..
Sarbara'Kaiser, Director of Economic Development
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND GEOREMEDIATION, INC.
TO PERFORM SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIATION
OF CONTAMINATION AT 504 AND 506 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 5th day
of April , , 1993, by and between the REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a public body, corporate
and politic, hereinafter referred to as "AGENCY," and
GEOREMEDIATION, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WHEREAS, AGENCY requires subsurface investigation and
remediation of subsurface hydrocarbon contamination at a site
located at 504 and 506 Pacific Coast Highway in the City of
Huntington Beach, California; and
CONTRACTOR desires to perform said services,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by AGENCY and CONTRACTOR as
follows:
CONTRACTOR shall provide all services as described in the
Proposal dated January 18, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as
Exhibit "A"), which is attached hereto and incorporated into this
Agreement by this reference. Said services shall sometimes
hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT."
CONTRACTOR hereby designates QAg!AnL-hawho
shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all
502:SLk 1
consultations with AGENCY during the performance of this Agreement.
2. AGENCY STAFF ASSISTANCE
AGENCY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly
with CONTRACTOR in the performance of this Agreement.
Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services
of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after the
execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A"
shall be completed as soon as possible after the date of this
Agreement. This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if
mutually agreed by AGENCY and CONTRACTOR.
4. COMPENSATION
In consideration of the performance of the services
described in Section 1 above, AGENCY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a
fee not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00), plus all
expenses reflected in Exhibit "A."
In the event AGENCY requires additional services not
included in Exhibit "A," or changes in the scope of services
described in Exhibit "A," CONTRACTOR will undertake such work
after receiving written authorization from AGENCY. Additional
compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the
prior written approval of AGENCY is obtained.
A. Delivery of work product: A copy of every technical
memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to the
AGENCY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the
event AGENCY rejects or has comments on any such product, AGENCY
502:SLk 2
shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion.
Any such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected
by AGENCY within ten (10) days of receipt shall be deemed accepted.
B. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the AGENCY an invoice
for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall:
1) Reference this Agreement;
2) Describe the services performed;
3) Show the total amount of the payment due;
4) Include a certification by a principal member
of the CONTRACTOR'S firm that the work has been
performed in accordance with the provisions of
this Agreement; and
5) For all payments include an estimate of the
percentage of work completed.
Upon submission of any such invoice, if AGENCY is
satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward
completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, AGENCY
shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall
be made within forty-five (45) days' of receipt of the invoice by
AGENCY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the
AGENCY does not approve an invoice, AGENCY shall notify CONTRACTOR
in writing of the reasons for non -approval, within seven (7)
calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of
performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the
parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or has
been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is
terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof.
502:SLk 3
C. Any billings for extra work or additional services
authorized by the AGENCY shall be invoiced separately to the
AGENCY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information
required under paragraph 6C, and in addition shall list the hours
expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices
shall be approved by AGENCY if the work performed is in accordance
with the extra work or additional services requested, and if
AGENCY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs
incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of
such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the
ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement.
• r • r i )TW! 45-1-9
CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder
shall be turned over to AGENCY upon termination of this Agreement
or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. In the
event this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by
AGENCY in the completion of PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit.
Title to said materials Shall pass to the AGENCY upon payment of
fees determined to be earned by CONTRACTOR to the point of
termination or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is
applicable. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to retain copies of all
data prepared hereunder.
CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify and hold and save
harmless AGENCY, its officers and employees from any and all
liability, including any claim of liability and any and all losses
or costs arising out of the negligent performance of this
agreement by CONTRACTOR, its.officers or employees.
502:SLk 4
CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the
Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of
California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the
California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar
state or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify,
defend and hold harmless AGENCY from and against all claims,
demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of
every nature and description, including attorney's fees and costs
presented, brought or recovered against AGENCY, for or on account
of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by
reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this
Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish evidence to AGENCY of
maintenance of statutory workers' compensation insurance and
employers' liability in an amount of not less than $100,000 bodily
injury by accident, each occurrence, $100,000 bodily injury by
disease, each employee, and $250,000 bodily injury by disease,
policy limit.
10. INSURANCE
In addition to the workers' compensation insurance and
CONTRACTOR'S covenant to indemnify AGENCY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain
and furnish to AGENCY the following insurance policies covering
the PROJECT:
A. Generol Liability lngurangr,.
A policy of general public liability insurance, including
motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall indemnify CONTRACTOR,
its officers, agents and employees, while acting within the scope
502:SLk 5
of their duties, against any and all claims of arising out of or
in connection with the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not
less than the following amount: combined single limit bodily
injury and property damage, including products/completed
operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of
$1,000,000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form
which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate
limit must be no less than $1,000,000. Said policy shall name
AGENCY, its officers, and employees as Additional Insureds, and
shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which
may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage
and that CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall be primary.
CONTRACTOR shall acquire a professional liability
insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder.
Said policy shall provide coverage for CONTRACTOR'S professional
liability in an amount not less than $500,000 per claim. A claims
made policy shall be acceptable.
Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder,
CONTRACTOR shall furnish to AGENCY certificates of insurance
subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing
insurance coverages as required by Sections 9 and 10 herein; said
certificates shall provide the name and policy number of each
carrier and policy, and shall state that the policy is currently
in force and shall promise to provide that such policies will not
be cancelled or modified without thirty (30) days prior written
notice to AGENCY. CONTRACTOR shall maintain the foregoing
502: SLk 6
insurance coverages in force until the work under this Agreement
is fully completed and accepted by AGENCY.
The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance
coverages shall not derogate from the provisions for
indemnification of AGENCY BY CONTRACTOR under Section B of this
Agreement. AGENCY or its representative shall at all times have
the right to demand the original or a copy of all said policies of
insurance. CONTRACTOR shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner,
the premiums on all insurance hereinabove required.
A separate copy of the additional insured endorsement to
each of CONTRACTOR'S insurance policies, naming the AGENCY, its
officers and employees as Additional Insureds shall be provided to
the AGENCY Attorney for approval prior to any payment hereunder.
• _ l • 0 0 IRA •
CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the
performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor.
CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any
and all payments of all taxes, social security, state disability
insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other
payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents and
employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with
the services to be performed hereunder.
All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good
and workmanlike manner. AGENCY may terminate CONTRACTOR'S
services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether
or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this
Agreement by AGENCY shall be made in writing through the AGENCY
502:SLk 7
Engineer, notice of which shall be delivered to CONTRACTOR as
provided in Section 16 herein.
le"no a ail d19W107-14K#jL:
This Agreement is a personal service contract and the
supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to
any other person or entity without the consent of AGENCY.
CONTRACTOR shall not apply without attorney's consent for
a patent or copyright on any item or material produced as a result
of this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall employ no AGENCY official nor any
regular AGENCY employee in the work performed pursuant to this
Agreement. No officer or employee of AGENCY shall have any
financial interest in this Agreement in violation of California
Government Code Sections 1090 et seq.
17. NQTICEE
Any notices or special instructions required to be given
in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal
delivery to CONTRACTOR'S agent (as designated in Section 1
hereinabove) or to AGENCY'S Executive Director, as the situation
shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope,
postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States
Postal Services, addressed as follows:
TO AGENCY:
Michael Uberuaga,
Executive Director
Redevelopment Agency
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
TO CONTRACTOR:
GeoRemediation, Inc.
3002 Dow Avenue, Ste 414
Tustin, CA 92680
502:SLk 8
18. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED
CONTRACTOR and AGENCY agree that AGENCY is not liable for
payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and
that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of
services contemplated hereunder. CONTRACTOR understands that
pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter § 309, the City Attorney
is the exclusive legal counsel for AGENCY; and AGENCY shall not be
liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by
CONTRACTOR.
17. ENTIRETY
The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth
the entire Agreement between the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers
the day, month and year first above written.
GEOREMEDIATION, INC.
By:
Gary� arlin,Presi dent
By:
Edward Cieslak, Chief
Financial Officer
ATTEA"
Agency Clerkd/9/�
E cut
xecutiv Director
0
502:SLk
9
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
A public body, corporate
and politic
Chairman
Pro-Tem
APPROVED AS TO FOR
C�9i,:�.
—G Agency Atto eyov �'t!
INITIATED AND APPROVED:
Director of Economic'
Development
-To: STEVEN KOHIER From: GeoRemediation, Inc. 1-18-93 2:40po R. 2 of 4
G GeoRemediation Inc.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUU NG d MMV 170IN 3W2 Dnw, Awnu, Sadre 414. 7WIA. CA 92680
n14)573-N35
January 18, 1993
City of Huntington Beach Log: 93-008
Department of Economic.. Development
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Stephen Kohler
Subject: Proposed scope of work to perform a limited subsurface
investigation at property located at 504 and 506
Pacific Coast Highway in Huntington Beach, California.
Gentlemen:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to your request, GeoRemediation, Inc. (GRI) has
prepared this proposed scope of work and cost estimate to
conduct a limited subsurface investigation at property
located at 504 and 506 Pacific Coast Highway in Huntington
Beach, California.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The main objective of the activities described in this
proposed scope of work is to determine if subsurface
hydrocarbon contamination exists at the site, and to
characterize the nature and extent of any contamination
found at the site. Findings from this proposed
investigation will be provided to the City of Huntington
Beach in the form of a summary report. Evaluation of the
technical data presented in the summary report will provide
a technical basis for additional site characterization or
To: STREN KOHLER From: GeoRewediation, Inc. 1-18-93 I:41p■ p. 3 of S
January 18, 2993
Page 2
remedial action, if required.
3.0 SCOPE OF WORK
3.1 Hand -Auger Borings
GRI proposes.,to excavate six to eight hand-augered scil
borings, one in each corner of the property and two to
four at selected locations in the interior of the
property, to a maximum depth of 20 ft. below current
grade elevation. Soil boring cuttings will be
monitored using an organic vapor analyzer, and
observations will be recorded on boring logs.
3.2 Soil Sample Collection
GRI proposes to collect soil samples at 5 ft.
intervals, and to secure those samples at a State
Certified Laboratory for possible laboratory analysis. r.
3.3 SummaKX Re ort Pre aration
Upon completion of the limited subsurface
investigation, GRI will compile and evaluate the
available data, and a summary report will be prepared.
The summary report will be provided to the City of
Huntington Beach with recommendations for further work,
if required.
4.0 COST ESTIMATE
The estimated cost to perform the activities discussed in
this scope of work is $2,000.00.
STEIEN KOHLER From: GeoResedialion, Inc. 1-18-93 2:41p■ P. 4 of 4
January 18, 1993
Page 3
5.0 TIME ESTIMATE
2
Based on GRI's experience with similar'projects, the amount
of time required to complete the scope of worst described in
this document is one Week.
6.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS
This proposal was compiled using a degree of care and skill
ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by
reputable Soil Engineers, Geologists, and Environmental
Scientists practicing in this or similar localities. No
other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the
conclusions and professional advice included in this
document.
The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If there
are any questions, please contact David L. Lucero, Project
Scientist, at 714-573-0435.
Very Truly Yours
GeoRemediation, Inc.
(Y� ( . U-��
David L. Lucero
Project Scientist
R.E.A. 4294
9
lr
Edward T. Cieslak
sr. Environmental Chemist
R.E.A. 3404
Gary T. Carlin
Sr. Envronmental Geologist
R.E.A. 3403
4 a
4
f6
James J. Mi,
Senior Eng
R. C. E.
a
'4F ESS1 py�!
ip.MES ris
CHA''^
No. 41a%- ,
Epp. 3/;/ 4
CA
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND GEOREMEDIATION, INC.
TO PERFORM SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIATION
OF CONTAMINATION AT A SITE AT MAIN AND OLIVE STREETS
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 5th day
of April , 1993, by and between the REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a public body, corporate
and politic, hereinafter referred to as "AGENCY," and
GEOREMEDIATION, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WHEREAS, AGENCY requires subsurface investigation and
remediation of subsurface hydrocarbon contamination at a site
located at the northwest corner of Main Street and Olive Street in
the City of Huntington Beach, California in the City of Huntington
Beach; and
CONTRACTOR desires to perform said services,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by AGENCY and CONTRACTOR as
follows:
r • .. 09
CONTRACTOR shall provide all services as described in the
Proposal dated January 18, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as
Exhibit "A"), which is attached hereto and incorporated into this
Agreement by this reference. Said services shall sometimes
hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT."
CONTRACTOR hereby designates Cae�c 0,AgUt) _ who
shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all
consultations with AGENCY during the performance of this Agreement.
461:SLk 1
AGENCY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly
with CONTRACTOR in the performance of this Agreement.
Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services
of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after the
execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A"
shall be completed as soon as possible after the date of this
Agreement. This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if
mutually agreed by AGENCY and CONTRACTOR.
• 4#• _ •
In consideration of the performance of the services
described in Section 1 above, AGENCY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a
fee not to exceed Thirty -Nine Thousand One Hundred Fifty Dollars
($39,150.00), plus all expenses reflected in Exhibit "A."
5. EXTRA WORK
In the event AGENCY requires additional services not
included in Exhibit "A," or changes in the scope of services
described in Exhibit "A," CONTRACTOR will undertake such work
after receiving written authorization from AGENCY. Additional
compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the
prior written approval of AGENCY is obtained.
6. DELIVERY OF WORK PRODUCT-EXTHOD OF PAYMENT
A. Delivery of work product: A copy of every technical
memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to the
AGENCY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the
event AGENCY rejects or has comments on any such product, AGENCY
461:SLk 2
r
shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion.
Any such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected
by AGENCY within ten (10) days of receipt shall be deemed accepted.
B. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the AGENCY an invoice
for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall:
1) Reference this Agreement;
2) Describe the services performed;
3) Show the total amount of the payment due;
4) Include a certification by a principal member
of the CONTRACTOR'S firm that the work has been
performed in accordance with the provisions of
this Agreement; and
5) For all payments include an estimate of the
percentage of work completed.
Upon submission of any such invoice, if AGENCY is
satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward
completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, AGENCY
shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall
be made within forty-five (45) days of receipt of the invoice by
AGENCY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the
AGENCY does not approve an invoice, AGENCY shall notify CONTRACTOR
in writing of the reasons for non -approval, within seven (7)
calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of
performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the
parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or has
been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is
terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof.
461:SLk
3
C. Any billings for extra work or additional services
authorized by the AGENCY shall be invoiced separately to the
AGENCY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information
required under paragraph 6C, and in addition shall list the hours
expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices
shall be approved by AGENCY if the work performed is in accordance
with the extra work or additional services requested, and if
AGENCY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs
incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of
such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the
ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder
shall be turned over to AGENCY upon termination of this Agreement
or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. in the
event this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by
AGENCY in the completion of PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit.
Title to said materials shall pass to the AGENCY upon payment of
fees determined to be earned by CONTRACTOR to the point of
termination or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is
applicable. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to retain copies of all
data prepared hereunder.
�� • � • � R• • . R `tip
CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify and hold and save
harmless AGENCY, its officers and employees from any and all
liability, including any claim of liability and any and all losses
461:SLk 4
or costs arising out of the negligent performance of this
agreement by CONTRACTOR, its officers or employees.
9. WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the
Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of
California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the
California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar
state or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify,
defend and hold harmless AGENCY from and against all claims,
demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of
every nature and description, including attorney's fees and costs
presented, brought or recovered against AGENCY, for or on account
of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by
reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this
Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish evidence to AGENCY of
maintenance of statutory workers' compensation insurance and
employers' liability in an amount of not less than $100,000 bodily
injury by accident, each occurrence, $100,000 bodily injury by
disease, each employee, and $250,000 bodily injury by disease,
policy limit.
10. INSURANCE
In addition to the workers' compensation insurance and
CONTRACTOR'S covenant to indemnify AGENCY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain
and furnish to AGENCY the following insurance policies covering
the PROJECT:
461:SLk 5
A. General_-Ligbility_ Ins-urance.
A policy of general public liability insurance, including
motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall indemnify CONTRACTOR,
its officers, agents and employees, while acting within the scope
of their duties, against any and all claims of arising out of or
in Connection with the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not
less than the following amount: combined single limit bodily
injury and property damage, including products/completed
operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of
$1,000,000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form
which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate
limit must be no less than $1,000,000. Said policy shall name
AGENCY, its officers, and employees as Additional Insureds, and
shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which
may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage
and that CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall be primary.
CONTRACTOR shall acquire a professional liability
insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder.
Said policy shall provide coverage for CONTRACTOR'S professional
liability in an amount not less than $500,000 per claim. A claims
made policy shall be acceptable.
Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder,
CONTRACTOR shall furnish to AGENCY certificates of insurance
subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing
insurance coverages as required by Sections 9 and 10 herein; said
4 61: SLk 6
certificates shall provide the name and policy number of each
carrier and policy, and shall state that the policy is currently
in force and shall promise to provide that such policies will not
be cancelled or modified without thirty (30) days prior written
notice to AGENCY. CONTRACTOR shall maintain the foregoing
insurance coverages in force until the work under this Agreement
is fully completed and accepted by AGENCY.
The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance
coverages shall not derogate from the provisions for
indemnification of AGENCY BY CONTRACTOR under Section 8 of this
Agreement. AGENCY or its representative shall at all times have
the right to demand the original or a copy of all said policies of
insurance. CONTRACTOR shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner,
the premiums on all insurance hereinabove required.
A separate copy of the additional insured endorsement to
each of CONTRACTOR'S insurance policies, naming the AGENCY, its
officers and employees as Additional Insureds shall be provided to
the AGENCY Attorney for approval prior to any payment hereunder.
12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the
performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor.
CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any
and all payments of all taxes, social security, state disability
insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other
payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents and
employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with
the services to be performed hereunder.
461:SLk 7
_PiMINIR591 0 1 MIN 0 EGIM414MAtIA-91�_
All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good
and workmanlike manner. AGENCY may terminate CONTRACTOR'S
services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether
or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this
Agreement by AGENCY shall be made in writing through the AGENCY
Engineer, notice of which shall be delivered to CONTRACTOR as
provided in Section 17 herein.
ilwti_ s s R
This Agreement is a personal service contract and the
supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to
any other person or entity without the consent of AGENCY.
CONTRACTOR shall not apply without attorney's consent for
a patent or copyright on any item or material produced as a result
of this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall employ no AGENCY official nor any
regular AGENCY employee in the work performed pursuant to this
Agreement. No officer or employee of AGENCY shall have any
financial interest in this Agreement in violation of California
Government Code Sections 1090 et seq.
17. EOTICES
Any notices or special instructions required to be given
in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal
461:SLk 8
delivery to CONTRACTOR'S agent (as designated in Section 1
hereinabove) or to AGENCY'S Executive Director, as the situation
shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope,
postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States
Postal Services, addressed as follows:
TO AGENCY:
Michael Uberuaga,
Executive Director
Redevelopment Agency
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
TO CONTRACTOR:
GeoRemediation, Inc.
3002 Dow Avenue, Ste 414
Tustin, CA 92680
• • •••�
CONTRACTOR and AGENCY agree that AGENCY is not liable for
payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and
that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of
services contemplated hereunder. CONTRACTOR understands that
pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter § 309, the City Attorney
is the exclusive legal counsel for AGENCY; and AGENCY shall not be
liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by
CONTRACTOR.
461:SLk 9
17. ENTIRETY
The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth
the entire Agreement between the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers
the day, month and year first above written.
GEOREMEDIATION, INC.
f
Gar Car/fin, Pre ,i ent
L�-�
By:
Edward Cieslak, Chief
Financial Officer
ATTES
as�w"'4&10
Agency Clerk IV/ 9/913
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
A public body, corporate
and politic
i= V, F/I F-Ira- =--
Chairman
Pro-Tem
APPROVED AS TO FORM*
C-aPi G ' up7T7/1// j
g e n c y Attoey f
INITIA>TED AND APPROVED:
Director of Economic
Development
461:SLk 10
To: STEVtN WLEP. from: GeoRemediation, Inc. 1-1e-93 2:32pa P. 2 of 9
G R GeoRemediation Inc.
I LENWRONULVTAL CONSULTING & MMGA77ON 3002 Dow Ave=4 Suite 414. 7IWbk CA 92680
V
(714) 5734435
January 18, 1993
City of Huntington Beach Log: 93-006
Department of Economic Development
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Stephen Kohler
Subject: Proposed scope of work to perform a comprehensive
subsurface investigation at the northwest corner of Main
Street and Olive Street in Huntington Beach, California.
Gentlemen:
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to your request, GeoRemediation, Inc. (GRi) is
pleased to present this proposal and cost estimate for a
comprehensive subsurface investigation to be conducted at
the northwest corner of Main Street and Olive Street in
Huntington Beach, California.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The main objective of the investigative activities described
in this proposed scope of work is to delineate the
horizontal and vertical limits of subsurface petroleum
hydrocarbon contamination at the site. Findings from this
proposed investigation will be provided to the City of
Huntington Beach in a summary report. Evaluation of the
technical data presented in the summary report will provide
a technical basis for the preparation of a remedial action
plan (RAP) to mitigate subsurface contamination at the site.
'a: STEVEN KOHLER Ffom: GeoRe*ediation, Inc. 1-18-93 2:33p ■ P. 3 of 9
January 18, 1993
Page 2
3.0 SCOPE OF WORK
3.1 Work Plan Preparation and Submittal
GRI Will prepare and submit a Work Plan and a Site
Specific Health and Safety Plan (SSHSP), detailing the
proposed subsurface investigative activities to the
Orange county Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and to the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa
Ana Region (CRWQCB), for review and approval to
implement the plan.
. -.
3.2 Hand -auger Borings
Based on data collected during previous investigations
at the subject site, *seven to ten hand -angered borings
will be excavated, and observations recorded, in order
to approximate the limits of the subject contamination.
GRI will evaluate data collected during excavation ofthese borings borings to determine the proper locations for
soil vapor and ground water monitoring wells.
(Monitoring wells typically must be located and
constructed in accordance with government regulatory
agency standards.)
Select soil and ground water samples 'collected from
these hand-augered borings will be analyzed, using
standard analytical methods, to further characterize
and substantiate the limits of subsurface
contamination.
,To: STEVEN KOHLER From: GeoRemediation, Inc. 1-18-93 2:34pm p. 4 or 9
January 18, 1993
Page 3
Soil boring cuttings and decontamination rinsate water
will be contained on site in DOT 17H drums pending
laboratory analysis to determine proper disposal.
3.3 Installation of Ground Water Monitoring Wells
Five mechanically drilled borings will be excavated at
selected locations, based on data collected during the
hand -angered excavations. These borings will be
converted to 4-inch I.D. PVC ground Water wells.
select soil samples collected from these hand -auger
borings will be analyzed, using standard analytical
nethods, to further characterize and substantiate the
limits of subsurface soil contamination.
These wells will be surveyed, developed, sampled once,
at least 72-hours after well installation. The
collected water samples will be analyzed, using
standard analytical methods, to characterize the
severity and extent of ground water contamination, and
to determine the local ground water flow gradient.
Well development Water will be contained on site in DOT
17H drums pending analytical results to determine
proper disposal.
3.4 Disposal of Boring Cuttin s Decontamination
Water, and WellDevelopment a er
soil boring cuttings will be characterized analytically
'To: STVEN KOHLER
From: GeoRemediation, Inc. 1-18-93 2:35ps P. 5 of S
January 18, 1993
Page 4
and disposed appropriately. A licensed waste hauler
will be contracted to transport bulk volumes of soil to
an appropriate, licensed disposal or recycling
facility.
3.5 Summary Report for Subsurface Investigation
'Upon completion of the subsurface investigation, GRI
will compile and evaluate the available data, and a
si= ary report will be prepared. The summary report
will be provided to the City of Huntington Beach with
recommendations for the development of a Remedial
Action Plan to mitigate subsurface contamination at the
site.
4.0 COST ESTIMATE
The estinated costs associated with performing the tasks
discussed above are presented in the following table.
To: STEVER KULER from: GeoRe■ediation. Inc. 1-18-33 2:35Fm p. $ of 9
January 18, 1993
Page $
COST ESTIMATE
TASK
COST
Site Characterization Plan
Preparation/Submittal .........................
$ 1,000.00
Site Specific Health and
Safety Plan ...................................
$ 500.00
Excavation of Hand Auger Soil
Borings/Soil Sampling ...................
$ 2,000.00 - 3,000.00
Ground hater Well Installation .......... S
8,000.00 - 12,000.00
Ground Water Well Development,
Sampling, Surveying ...........................
$ 1,500.00
Soil Sa>rple Analyses .................... $
5,000.00 - 10,000.00
Ground Water Sample Analyses .......see ,.
$ 1,250.00 -- 1,500.00
Disposal of Boring Cuttings .,...'...,.....
$ 3,100.00 - 5,650.00
Disposal of Decon Water and Woll
Development Water ........................
$ 1,000.00 - 2,500.00
Su=ary Report for Subsurface
-
Investigation .................................
$ 1,500.00
TOTAL $
24,850.00 - 39,150.00
5.0 TIME ESTIMATE
Based on GRI's experience with similar projects, the amount
of time required to complete the scope of work described in
this document is approximately 13 weeks.
6.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS
These figures are estimates based on our experience with
similar projects in Orange County, California, and are
subject to variations due to factors beyond our control.
to: STEVEN KOHLER Froa: GeoReaediation. Inc. 1-18-93 2:35pm P. 7 of 9
January 18, 1993
Page 6
This proposal was compiled using a degree of care and skill
ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by
reputable Soil Engineers, Geologists, and Environmental
Scientists practicing in this or similar localities. No
other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the
conclusions and professional advice included in this
document.
The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If there
are any questions, please contact David L. Lucero, Project
Scientist, at 714-573-0435.
very Truly Yours
GeoRemediation, Inc.
D--:, L - C"-
David L. Lucerc
Project Scientist
R.E.A. 4294
z '
Edward Cieslak
Sr. Environmental Chemist
R.E.A. 3404
Gary T. Carlin
Sr. Environmental Geologist
R.E.A. 3403
4u4- C• `
J es J. M. Crahg
Senior Engineer RpfEssji
R.C.E. 41896 Q
Q
Jxws tic
h�, In �
L" ft. 41696
`p C10-
CAE1��a
'fo• STEVEN ROHLER From: GeoResediation, Inc. 1-18-93 2:37po V. 8 of 9
_G R GeoRemediation Inc.
1 EMRONMENTAL CONSCILMU & M177G 4rW 30M DowA Sulu 414. 'ru= . GA ZKW
SCHEDULE CF FEES
Senior Environmental Geologist
Senior certified Engineering Geologist
Senior Che=ist
StLff Scientist
iroj ect Manager
Senior Technician
Technician
Laborer/Technician
Drafting
Word Processing
Pick-ep and Delivery '
SPECIAL EQUIPF—NT
concrete Coring Machine
Photo Ionization Detector
Generator (if on -site power not available)
Organic Vapor Meter
vaper Sampling Kit (vacuum & Sampling Pumps)
pH, Conductivity & Temperature Meter
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
-- $ 85.00j"r.CCS
-- S 85.00/Foux
S 6 6.0 0/Eour
- 5 55.o0/waur
- S 53.00/Hcur
- S C0.00/Eoc:r
- S 3 5.0 0/Hour
S 25.00/11r.our
- s4 0.0 o%toc:r
- 5 26.00/Rou
- S 2 5.0 0/Hot:;
- 5
115.0 0/ Day
- $
80.00/Day
- S
66.00/Day
- $
55.o0jDay
- $
60.00/Day
- $
25.00/Day
outside servicesrformed by ethers and direct costs ezperdea on
the client's behalfppeeare charged at cost plus 20%. These txpenses
include rental equipment, laboratory services, permits,
reproduction costs, .etc.. Travel time required to provide
services will be charged at regular hourly rate.
To: STEVEN XMIUR From: GeoRemdiatior, Inc.
!-l9-93 2:39va a. 9 of 9
GEOMMAMONANG
MCA SCHMILE
511192
My!
GR[ MT ERICE; Eel
4X6` BRAS RINGS
S 2.70
' WIG D:D CAPS
S 40. L' '
W WELL SCREEN
S 3331:• �-t
GCS']8"%rKCASING
5 3.02t4%If.r
W WELL SCREMN
S 7.42 r;* f --t
'.CSBLAINNCASING
S 4.56 r•{ {.-f
' PVC CAFS
S a.8O
' PVC CAPS
S 9.60
' THREADED PVC CAP
S r? 00
'SOLID DRIVE POIST
S 16.773
' SUP COU?L.ING
5 7-4a
AND (100O) I CU. FrJSK
S 6.00
ErTONM OKT-LIWE L)
S 42.00
ONMETE (.5 WTV51K)
5 6.00
WELL B CX
S 90.00
' WU L BOX
5 $4,00
S GAL RECONIX DRUMS {7 CU FI EW.&D
S 41—CO
i4TER1L'rAS PASTE
S 12.00
ML TEDLJ R BAG
S 12.00
I LTR, TEDLAR BAG
$ 14.20
>INCRM C0RING MACHINE
S 111MDAY
&FMSMTElNO KIT
S 60.Ot'1DAY
D
S 80.00rDAY
Wev"'CQN'DUCCIvRY &M7ER
S 2:5.00DAY
E'ERATOR
S 66.00 DAY
BIND AUGER EQUIP
S I00.O01DAY
tSTECH
S 55.00IDAY
UT..FR
S 10-001DAY
3Eust 19. IM
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
April 12, 1993
GeoRem-ediation, Inc.
3002 Dow Avenue, Suite 414
Tustin, CA 92680
Attn: Gary Carlin, President
CALIFORNIA 92648
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular
meeting held Monday, April 5, 1993, approved.anreements between
the City of Huntington Beach and GeoRenediation, Inc., -to perform.
subsurface investigations and remediations of contanitatidn-at-a-
site located at Main and olive Street and also at a site located
at 504 and 506 Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Huntington
Beach.'
Enclosed are executed copies of the agreements for your records.
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
CB:bt
Enc.
ITelophone: 714.536 5227 i
REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
ED 93-09
Date: April 5, 1993
Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, Executive Offic /�
Prepared by: Barbara A. Kaiser, Deputy City Administrator/Economic Development`�
Subject: GEORF.AIEDIATION CONTRACTS FOR SITE ASSESSMENT AT
THIRD BLOCK WEST AND 504 AND 506 PACIFIC COAST
HIGHWAY APPROVED BY CITE' COUNNCIJ.
.- l4�3
Consistent with Council Policy? Dd Yes [ ] New Policy or Exceptiona
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding; Source, Alt rna ' -K
tG �l
�TATENiENT OF ISSUE:
In conjunction with the Agency approved project Third Block West and the pending Agency
acquisition at 504 and 506 Pacific Coast Highway the services of a hazardous materials consultant
are required.
RECONiNIENDED AgENCY_ACTIQN;
Approve and authorize the Agency Clerk to execute eitherlor both
1. The attached contract between the Redevelopment Agency and GeoRemediation for a
comprehensive site assessment of subsurface hydrocarbons at the corner of Main Street and
Olive Avenue (in the public right of way and on privately owned land within the Third Block
West project site.
2. The attached contract between the Redevelopment Agency and GeoRemediation for a "Phase
I" site investigation of suspected subsurface hydrocarbons at 504 and 506 Pacific Coast
Highway ("Wimpi's" site to be incorporated in Main -Pier Phase II).
ANALYSTS:
The Third Block West project was the subject of a Disposition and Development Agreement
(DDA) approved by the Agency in March 1991. The project is bounded by Main and 5th Streets,
Olive and Orange Avenues. Recently, in conjunction with construction of the Main Street
( /S
RAA ED 93-09
April 5, 1993
Page two
Improvements Phase I a subsurface tank containing a petroleum product was unearthed.
Immediate but limited steps toward remediation of the contamination from this leaking tank were
taken so that the construction of the Main Street improvements could continue. However, before
a comprehensive remediation plan for this subsurface contamination can be prepared, it is
necessary to fully assess the extent of the soil contamination and to determine the extend, if any,
of contamination of the water table. Because the source of the contaminates was discovered
through city actions, the County of Orange has found the city to be the "responsible party" for the
clean-up (the ultimate liability for the contamination and the cost of clean-up is the subject of
separate correspondence from the City Attorney in response to the City Council request at its
meeting of January 4, 1992).
Additionally, the Agency has approved resolutions of necessity and the City Attorney's office has
posted funds with the court for the acquisition of the site at 504 and 506 Pacific Coast Highway,
(commonly referred to as "Wimpi's"), in conjunction with the proposed Main -Pier Phase II
project. It is suspected that subsurface contamination exists on this previous gas station site, but
there has never been any professional testing to determine the nature and extent of contamination.
Pursuant to Administrative direction of April 1992, the following specific questions regarding
these proposed consultant services are addressed below.
♦ On both sites the consultant will sample subsurface soils by auguring holes and removing
samples at various depths below grade. These samples will be categorized and secured for
later analysis in a Iaboratory to determine the presence and nature of contamination. The
result of these tests and a technical analysis thereof will be compiled into a report which will
enable the citylagency to better determine future action required on each of these sites. City
staff does not perform this work currently and lacks the equipment, technical expertise and
laboratory facilities to perform it.
♦ As above, city staff can not perform the work without going outside the organization because
it lacks the equipment, technical expertise, and laboratory facility.
♦ These consultant services are not necessary as a result in a conflict of city priorities, but by
the lack of in-house expertise and equipment.
♦ Using a consultant for these services is cost effective because it avoids a substantial capital
outlay to equip city forces to perform this work, extensive and time consuming training of
city staff, and hiring of additional, qualified individuals.
♦ Staff can not recommend an alternative to using a consultant for these services. The
alternative is to not perform the work. The implication of not performing the work are
explained below.
RAA ED 93-09
April 5, 1993
Page three
♦ There are no legal conditions which preempted performance of geotechnical work by city
forces if the equipment and expertise were available within the organization.
GeoRemediation was selected as a result of a solicitation of proposals from three qualified firms.
Two firms submitted in response to the solicitation and these were reviewed by a committee of
city staff composed of representatives of the fire, public works and economic development
departments. GeoRemediation was selected for the superior nature of its proposal and more
economical fee.
GeoRemediation, Inc. has met all of the city's insurance requirements and the not exceed amount
of the contracts is: 1) $39,150, for the Third Block %Vest site and; 2) $2,000, for the Pacific
Coast Highway site. If approved, work could commence immediately and could be complete on
both sites within 12 weeks.
Regarding the Third Block West site, the result of this work will be used to formulate a
Remediation Plan to be submitted to the appropriate authorities for approval and that will specify
what precise actions will be required to eliminate the contamination. The consultant estimates
that the preparation of the Plan will cost approximately $3500. The actual remediation will likely
be a long term process requiring nine to eighteen months and while the cost can not be known in
advance the consultant estimates approximately $100,000, and the Disposition and Development
Agreement with Newcomb -Tillotson stipulates that should the cost exceed $250,000, the
developer has the right to either proceed, paying the excess cost, or to terminate the agreement.
Council has previously requested an opinion from the City Attorney on who bears the ultimate
liability for the Third Block West contamination. While the opinion is not yet complete, the
Attorney's staff recommended undertaking the work contained in these contracts to determine the
scope of the remediation.
Previously budgeted Redevelopment Agency project accounts which will not be needed this fiscal
yam -
ALTERNATIVES:
Do not approve the attached contracts.
Since the County of Orange has found the city to be the responsible party regarding the Third
Block West site, failure to pursue an assessment (and Iater remediation) of this site could result in
legal action.
RAA ED 93-09
April 5, 1993
Page four
Since the Agency is in the process of acquiring the site on Pacific Coast Highway, it serves the
Agency to know in advance of the conveyance of this site whether subsurface contamination
exists. The court which decides the pending eminent domain case can off -set the price paid by
the agency by the amount of the remediation.
ATTACHNIEWS:
1. Contract between the Agency and GeoRemediation for Third Block West site.
2. Contract between the Agency and GeoRemediation for 504 and 506 Pacific Coast Highway.
3. Map
MTU/BAK/SVK jar
247j
•PLANNIN3 ZONING
DM 12Z
SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP
II-6-lI
"E"°
At Ort EO MARCH T,few
C` Naa�M wrt
L•11Y CO,.IrC IL ORDINANCE MO 7"am
I�. a�1[O4.1lSNd.
CITY
or�����:����N..IWfLAAOM,
r i- 1,. a 3 n 1 L a r r a /.+..
--raworbN /nr/K rLM
L N-f. ,t• L•' • f ! w r ►a r r . N+.
0 Is $-1
rM-.ai
!\r.' aDLLfacL[ LaAC*
Iv
f-I-:• IN.Rn •rN 1.+.
IDS: Rwfo wr4a.rN PRrR
a ,-re tr toIDR.Tf'W1•-
}. Is. Iwr leN Par rs iL,•
L of ,.e r.•n ,aa t�, a•r r. [L•.
?I I LwsI W.W.
�i: rdN playa at>1ct.Tla wTLILY
l".1 ftv
_
I3U�TTI��GTOI�T 13E�,.GII
�
r.. y+ .r •.,,awr,1.. ..,N r.IT.�
1••r M 1Y I,N L {-h rr-D. !!r T• N N O •+`0
��: udrryrgrrPTrafEfr,aaalfrlftT
n., •..war, �LLlplr,S wrrn
rYNY« 4• �/.rs 1Tu!!! [+�N
-M -, H
rt GwrarrT R[;,TVf wC>ta,OYutMRLlt
i:� pA1M.Y,1 r[La, V1 aL,lrar•trArlw'r+:f
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
{'~ u tif/
��
witW, p"
t =IlP.-.��.,�L
� o Ii
ti• R!-0
ovIN ia ,
CF—E
Is 1.-wrE11 ■L:fDCtil �<
of
SIC
Tf-Rp• we►.
►-r .A[a ow
lwrrc. •rI
a �
r ;N
1
J
ADAMS
LI L__IL.J III_I t-.JL-
RI RI R❑I f = R•I R;
�/ RI . RIy Rs al •�
RI Rl
RI RI eA RI
qv
RI RI
CF—R
' R IYti.1
CF-R ,L[Yrrr K ,T
rL..,''4 T RI
Jcal - 2
R I �T
2 RI
ti 1
* ♦F R I
QF
> �+-r••+.f.�. ICI- m'ra---ft r—,
: i Li rs :r .�•� w.--. -•rn;+r+� (L. aFrw. 0. V.,
L'D.! -Wi 4 f .••rfa• b LOAD[Ki.0 E3 Lc1 ff[1 N[cal aar i A>N lT /LlLwlrr
CAq rDa SOD :� L, is
•[.11•• f-ry I1 �• w�+, j-Ill B""!a, E'4-QLN•aL ..rM I.IVYC.M
T-•-II •,A ,1 f l M AV
fle• )lrLAd L.4
C� 1>JalaaV p .,r .L •.pp,I[*,pr �, . ,
• mML n-•1 .• • i t w h • >rrc r •N• taa.as � Aa+. r }
if n n rvr rlfu rlom Iva 1.0. M a L[ ,Y xrrrLrfr n - � . a
AVE.
1 _ 1 } I fa Maafr a. a+ fL 1 L-
151PECIF
Cz C-0 . -LAM
V
1 O
o.0 E-0
RZ-P
-0
AA I -
_b oJOENO r.,
!� ;ata•.o-w . • � J�
-0• rLlyl'I ��1.; R2•Po-q
� E) �TRCCT 'PHO)..�
_ [I]
L a
f �=J-Fl Lp
1.•..,,ir. iTl R3 C•
DO 00100 Do'
n1 n
L N 1 IC I I�R3 !R3 ^310 a�
j -1
IJ�LJ Dl-
L R3 Ca
�—R3o0Elj-
/L
LJ ^~
t
t � C=0 ,
L -•J
,.
L 0
r. I..�
LDT WN W
•�- �'�, S DISTRI A � E
,Ye• a � p�
1
MH—FP2 f
1 z • tt r�A"r
C�0,a01�?./My,���
� -p'/r � Nr'Fa ,� � jsl rits•:1i� � �s
la �:l .. R2-V7CZ'
.[fit _-t �r
i 1la--Ca1MY-•..• Tf�
ATLA14TA
1KW1 m
NOTE
\ O Ka PYIrL./•L ALf r
fitt
LaY TLa[ WN,.ay MIT .MF 0. wT
TO
y rr[w[O N tar[rp N M 01ar14
W LVLr LNw, or
N
III
RTEF?CATE OF INS
*U•,1-XN `
r,035 1 6:.*= IOyAL
220 x-ONiGOAZY FJ;20
:AN i"<ISCO, CA 9.4:04
cis
rriari - -----
:SO Reaediatio:%, Inc.
:d ieslak
100 Dow Ave, St* 414
2680D CA
CSR SE 10
ooaanu ■o alart Qior 20 arxvICM aor.x". tau cs' aLy CM
oar wr AM=, v a as U-m tort awmam anoww aT in
1rA. Cns ate.
COf1pANUS "FORDING COVERAGE
caa.xr aarxm A trosdoa Ins Co Ltd
canaar Larsen D
eta m ummt Z
rtls =i 20 6r---Iy an muctar or amom om Wam mum aara =0 Zanlm 20 =1 t]1iii m =a aacna 1m Tat lwer
/XRmo :.-.su7tlf. m. Wrmrmnl:w7 wr U992a mr, WK Olt aOaDilTOlr er OT awrobwIft t�!!Q a0001d7! R= ati"racr ro
Mor •�rll I I - -CM Mf u Zaavaa Isar W 1XISM, 2N OWUN CK W70M n ar m IP=C=i asacsm aAN= to =7161r 20
All r.&W. zor1=101011 Uo em'.Trorr OP 8= PQ. ens. sa m was w ma" asm smoaa rr "IS CLAIfia.
Tm ar 10169"rei ------
Po= aaia.Pir
P=Cr 3"
PQICt tar"—
am
Shen
mrau. aoaaadimr
t.00a,oea.
GENERAL LIAR LLITY
A ea"mrau, ON uua=rr
FREOI29OR
08/12/92
8/12/93
Paoo- w/ca am.
s,oaso,00a.
[ 2 ci :w wx [ X) Coe.
PFd. a art. Is1',»a
-1,040,000.••
—�.00a,0ae.
[ Onao M'& i mrriu, •1
10� as urCs
Tin Di1e=
pawns-mm Ltaa
law on rum)
50,000.
CLAIM PUS KM
Mo. mffism
(aaT es tans )
A[TTONOB I LB L IA8
CWN. rs"au urar
1 �urT affm
AFPROVED AS
TO FC'FU:
aoor..T zs:m —
......
( 1 AU VWV AMA
CAIL HUTTON
City Attu
ey
era PtiriCir�
I1 sczm=i camsi
BY: Deputy
:i �:; t. '.o:.
3y
aooesx iss Y -
-......_
[ 1 PX-CWZI AM&
07"
(toy axlatsa
mitt
P
EXCESS LIABILITY
JAM ooQ.•sn.m
(1 Vow.. rm.r
„...NN»..»..._..
..._._.......
[ ) 0=1 !s•.s to! Eft ti PM
aoaxaa�a
-
IsTa2vion Sam"
WORKERS' COMP
W TACHED,
sra rociam
AND
0:5m a -Par.. snw:
Z"LOTERS ` LIM
c:a�un-a ct sQ.
ats�oar or 1m"x [Cats xm=ow MIN 1131 1-19cru trtr+
CERTIFICATE HOLDER IS NAMED AS AN ADDITIO13 IHBURSD WITH RESPECT TO WORK
PERFOR*ID BY TBE NAMED ISISUAED.
PROJECT 0ESCAIPTI0N;CITT O! HUNTrNGTON BEACH, wRTE3m? CORM or MAIN AND
OLIVE ST.,HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA. PROJECT DATZS310-1-92 TO END OF POLICY TERN
mr171073 aa.CU ..... aOCILL xor ---�--
aaat+ an w Isar ""ar sdaamom Parses" w emmwLq Iima m -
stamisa�" @a m Isawir, as uidaao>Md�r r rIsMA Qwatan 4111Is■st
+ MEW Is" 711 MEMO= ara<aaR acid• ad M sss. -
CITY OF H"iRTINGTON BEACH
KTPN:STEPHEN ROHLER
2000 MAIN STREET
HUNTING` 04 BEACH CA
9c �4.cm ��23-s (7/►0)
. a4'isonl L:o
� ►
r
Ib:f7,
.J . h4 s 11 F� RsFi P. 2 /2
STATE P.O. BOX42M7. SAN FAANCMW, CA IM142-1=7
Cor�■ir,isATltJw •
�wesu*taracei - = -
FUND CERYIFICATE OF WORKERS'.CO PEI SATION•INWRANCE
OCT03ift 30.- 1972 /Ouc UmSER 1222332 . 92
. CEITIPICGTE EXPIRI& 1O-•1r43
r :
CITY.OF'OUNTIWOK 8EACN
SUILDYNG DIYItIaH.- 3RD FLOOR ;
2000; MAIM STREET -
HUNTINITON 8EACIft to 99648 JOS: ALL OPERATIOKS
L '
This K w c.rt+fy that wa Awt hst,ed a vs!id Worker&• C0nV*M1;M Inwran" wicy in a form approved by d w calitorri■
Insuran•;e fornmwoner to the ePrjoytr named below for the. PoRy pwW RWatad-
TKs policy h not subject to uncallatwn by the Fu•id except upon t W advance wtitten notice to the molover.
We will jktm �►e vau T days'advanca nonce should this policy bat cana(k¢ prior to its normal expiration.
This eertifreste of•Insurar+ce u not an insurance policy sod dots &tot imand, axterxl rs altar tht CoveraW afforded by the
policies lilted twoi . Nmvithstsnding any re4uireater+t• M tmrn,*a Swwwan of env wtrwt or other documtwith
rmp.ct to which this CKtiiicate of ineu &xi mvi be i vik-or t%ay pertain• the imwume afforded by Vw potkW
destrf bud Herein is subject to all tha tOrrnt, end CORditI V fuCh PoAcles.
,• � va�6b[�JY• .
EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY LIMIT: 53i000,i!000•.P11t OCCURRENCE. • .
ENDOSEMENT42065 ENTITLEB CERTIFICATI KOLDERS' NOTICE I FFECTIV
10/30l'42 IS ATTACHCO TO ACID FORMS A ?ART`OF THIS POLICY.
(MPLOVIR
GEG REMEDIATIONt INC.
3002•DOU-AVEHUE.-•1110. 414
TItSTIH: CALI FCRNIA 926E0
9
L
To: STEVEN KOHLER � from: GeaRemediation Inc. 11-2-92 3:I7pm P. 2 of 2
w
ERTrF?CArE Of INSURANCE: CSR SR 10/23/92
sra C=J'I=4 u W= L a Xu=JL CW MQUA-ZION art MU
{� oI;S (NM�'WA T IONAL aOMU ab uaa� am Caaxt ICM tea:. Tau cs Ulan
Data M rumor EM ca at'a aar oo*daat Arran mr mm
Zips r:U��iGC�:c?Y #420 aaraetsa a�.
.4 UAACISCO, CA 9.410A __""---- COxpAMtz iiv0WiNa COiERAca
loons
........................... .....•-------
.
CEO Reaediation, Inc.
Ld CCiealak
3002 Dow Ave, St! 414
Tu
stin
CA
ro wm ur.m A Fxoadoa Ins Co Ltd ._._.
eao+urr LtI'tU
cmwaat tssss C
coararl•uw= D
t.aeatr tan m E -
r Cmxa �! �......-.._.�...........-....... - •-•+.�+.+....rya...
nit If Tr rrz^ry r.;.% XL=etam Of Iaa'.1fl= sZllf" 0 MW nR 2M UMM to on MUM XMM AUM 7M TU l=cr
.sr; r --km. ax•+.•�rraRraa us tagz aaw, =a as oore=w or uT mrmwta Alai ooakmR w= mna ro
VC: . tiM!71Z= n't U M'l= as MY PMMUZ, Slot IraUWUKZ M70maZ =_ M a0i'.2Cat M90aaw XOM = VAJ 2 m
1:' -V, =MUST 4. &M CM-MINS Cr 8 = a=CM- IMM FOOM PAT ai.m am 12 OM rI 1= C1AM.
INL'R
Ml Gr I1=_I_ _ ___.--79..ICr 07sa1t PoZza zry IMleff XIM LD[I:a»M•••••••
•? . _. �_.__w..-�_a_»-_a _..._-.. _.- � N____.-a�iY_�___ _M.-._M-.w...MNa.Y-aaaa
A
GENERAL LIABILITY
cnowr:AL W2 uuILM
{ l C.:ns rat I Xl oce.
[ l tyrLses-s s currAx-ru's
aCTTa::: va
0r4 v.rrtsl:oxuL ZIA$
I l cAtra nu= VIM
MX01290R
_...----.....-------------».... -.._-..»---»----------
RVi'G"}.78ILH LIAR -
[ 1 �•= affm uurw
[ i a=arzz:) Avr+S
[ l =-M au-ct
t f a-a-a.TO AM -.a
1 1 Gd� L:�ITrII'L
11
EXCESS LIABILITY
t 1 0--j" tux "Mu IM
----------------
WORKERS• Cc"
AND
IMFL07ERS` LIAR
APPROVED AS
GAIL HUTTON
By: Deputy
MTACHM
08/12/92
TO FORM:
City Attc
'ity
j- v,
Aawaa=a I t,0c0r6M.
08/12/93 jrxv-owiar wa. I t.ova,m.
n". a say. Is,Til['Y
1,000,00C.
rare aXXVAWCZ
1.000,000.��
rIa= tvvr►a=any
oa rumi
..
50,000.
aa.
Ia*t as rn�!
care. @us= UKM
-riey
(aaa :arsart
)y
--------------- -
---_..--»---
=o�tl.Y xa�s
tasa arCzn>::I
F �qz
rzvz= oauaa
�a:a:osutr tpara
aa+a aacslarz
n:aszal-aoc. txx
a:m�►u.eacs tsar. -
.........------.......».... __»..._.........r_--------�.......__� _w.._....»...... ----- -----
DUCRIs7139 or vrua�egiLoo=so.anrR>±�s.�ar=ri11 IsIIM
EiRTIFiGATL HOLDYR IS MAMED AS AN ADDITIONAL IMMMD WITH RESPI,CT TO WORX
PERM."MD BY THE MAMID INSURED.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CITT OP HU14TINGTON BEACH, NORTOMT CORM OT MAIN AND
OLIVE ST.,Rl=LNGTON EXACH,CA. PROJECT DATIS310-1-992 TO END OF POLICY 7%RX
awn we or M mint *Nano 30MM at � M a .
- "now ow a>w�r. M lam roars = c tnts D srsa au aa.a
mates 0 go �ZrIOlat swam wim !0 ME &A "t.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH •
ATTN:STiPHEN KOHLER
2000 MAIN STREET'
iEEAr_....__.._M..__...........«...._. .�. ..7»_..-..
92d'UNfICTON CH CA. u�xlsm �ta<a rxrtra i'
.. - ..
To: VEIL KOHLER From: GeoRemediation Inc. 10-30-92 12:35pm P. 3 of 3
.f
buiF-5H`IIR Fib P.1/2
PTA T. E PA. BOX 42M7. SAFRANCISpO, C11 P142-0807
CCrM ��NSATit7r+ r
1P4Is%JetANCa
FUND Cr-13TIFICATE OF WORXERS' COMPENsATION-INSURANC.I
OCTOStA 30j, 1972 Fou"Nums"t: 1222332.-. 92
. Cift7INCATE EXPIRIS: i 0-1-43
r
CITY . W HUNTS N6TON BEACW ; ' ; ,.
• BUILDING DIYItl0ke 3RD FLOOR
2000; FIRIN STREET
HUNTINSTON BEACH# to 9?849 Jae: ALL OPERATIONS
L. '
This is to certify that wa ly„a isaved a valid Workers' Compernaiwn inavraAw porky in a form:pproved by the Glitor_rda
Inti.rar►ct Cnmmiss:Or%er to the employer teamed below for the 00kv 9w1od Wicated
7h;s polity is nbt cabiret to ancaltatwn by the Fund excox upon' "
f�kri'sdvoAcir written natlteto the emplDVer.
Wt will auo 91ve you Today:' advance notwA sfia.Id this perky be Cantxlied pfiot to its nornyi expire oa.
Th'r. Certrf Cate ot'inswance is not an insurance policy and does w art'vW, extend or altar the covetapl aftok*d by the
policid lifted herein. Notwitt1atanding any teQdtrtn% kr4, tum.'et Condit+dn of any CO WWI or Other ftcu wet vAth
respect to which thil tMtir;eate of iltcuNACt may be; Mued'ar May pertiin, me imu•5noe aftarded by ttw polkJo
dawribCd herein is sub.4et to ali the Cairns, eKdus'rons and condiOorAof each poticiet.
• � PtiEbtt)[1�lT
EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY LIMIT: 53i000.,000.PER OCtURRfrIr=E.
ENCOSEXENT42065 ENTITLED CERTIFICATE NOLDERS' NOTICE FFIECTIYt '•
101301'92 IS ATTACH O TO AWD FORMS A P1 RT ° OF THIS POLICY.
• £s1PLAY[p .. .
GEC REMEDIATIONP INC.
3002- 00W- AVENUE.-• NO. 414
TUITIN; CALIFORNIA 926E0
!_
Q-1k 101:%o 4aay.
lILYa.II �VIILLII 11 V.1• VVY.14•.V Y.V •a V.. .11... .. ti -_ .. _.r- .r. - .. -
CSR S9 10/23/92
•.YA a...w. ►. ►rl.a. a. ..I.wY .. w J..•i.w w ►.l Y._... aa.. Y.. ► a.r
f.02-15 VI i c.1=10;1AL aoarssa ao mans a w us cmr:.anws uxasa. eau cp=tsn
aal wr L1 m, �ca.00 as saxot oD4oaos srrnsrsa sf so
210 r'IUi GG0XVY r420 wsetl. aslw.
:AN MANCISCO, CA 9.,:0,4 Ct? ]WI>Ra OitDINQ COVERI4GY .~.—...._
►sus
mum eoorw Barra A Treedom Ins Cc Ltd
CEO Remediation, Inc. emew U=aa
3002 Dorn Ave, Ste 414 cta.arr Iarsai. C
TustinCJt ..»...____ _..._....a.__. —....».—a«»_
9 2 6 8 0 eaor.r► Lsrssa D
meahr Issas E .._....»�»— _....�._........—......
COv211=[w.....�..........,...........�.. ................�........
![Is Is ?a tIIC'..7'l "" MUM w 21miVl"a Lum mjm aata Ism lma 310 us >sam= aster aav+s tart !la mutt
I>atTOP :.1.IGSsp. )►'L'r::llL'iNCI1Z �! pQ02R7ia3r► :'� � OC1!>lLIIOR a! � �'� � a00D1�T lam >� 1�D
WU= '-I Is MZ :PIZM FAT U IN M M 3QT FMA&M, 10 Iaatat M NP== aT Ut P=C=B MW=W* salea2 It ssrsM2 m
All rwal Dr.Ae:=. AM MMITlon or an ralacaa. &a m a Ma= am am umm sr um tsar!.
IG
IA
i
R
— Tlrs 0 IM06VAM � »
--- P=r PON=�»
PC&= my
/Ciro s+s»
•w Lmumis
.»..........
am
wQ
EliERAL +LIAR LLZTT
mrsass. aoaavaas
I,aoa,oaa.
cooax= an izasILM
PRE01290R
08/12/92
8/12/93
rsoaaarsror wo.
Loan,aaa.
[ ; C.U" wt IX) occ,
~I.000,Ooa.•,
—1.0001oaa.�
rots.. rat.:.solar
-
I a a.•a : atri7ta_ •s
saw OCCIMAMM
mrs"IDrat Ilal
'
rtaa tsar
tux ate rim)
50,000.
k "UPS ,u s nom
no. mvsna
i t an sr� k
UTOHOBILE LL748
Cao. shall Umn
I a� svm
I A" Cep �
APPROVED AS
GAIL HUTTc°r
TO FOFU*
c.t;� Atto
eY
malty
{.,�t,.�.�
s�r� sans
I alga W2oi
BY: Deputy'
... I
J
.»«.».....»«_.
Immix is m
_.._,....._..
PM -CUM) aoas
(M Aoaon'r)
I
� �
!
raosaxsr aw�nQa
Ahm oocn nxm
KCESS tiAEILiTY
I oast a ut at+a aria l�Osw
soolasalla
WORKERS' COMP
ATTACHED
sl,ar.
sia� Aoczam
AND
a:m.s-ra. LDa:I
EXPLOVERS' LIM
a:a>stn-sat aa►.
TBER -
-
ClItTIFICA.TZ ROLD� IR =I3�NAMD AS AN ADDITIOXLL INSURED WITH RUPXCT TO WORK
PERPOLMzrp BY THE NAXID INSURED.
PROJECT VESCRIPTION XITT OT HuNTImOZ` u 18EACH, NOR�g T CORNER OF MAIN AND
OLIVE ST.,HUMENGTON ZZMM,CA. PROJLCT DATSSi10—F SO ZMD OF POLICY TERX
al.li/ irr M M IMM a OMM s.aserrs AN a sms ag JOOsa !tQ art-
• Vona" a mmm, aaa arrm� r�wr ass an am tass�
. lm l a/ 7111 lmovmm sac m ws sa on
CITY OF M MTINGTON BEACH
JkTTN:STZFHE,N XOHLER
2000 MAIF STREET
HU
NT NGTOM BEACH CA
KC= 25-9 fil"I
sxraosum latl7.r.so*ssfm
j r�u- uu-nucuiation tnc. 1U-JU-1Z 12;35p2 P. 3 of 3
• P.1/2
STATE PA.130X4.2M7, SAM FRANCOM, CA "142-W37
I Ivy VrlANCK
FUND CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS' CO.MPENSAT1ON•1NSURANCE '
OCTOS�Jt 30. 1992 FOU"Ntlm"w- I222332. 92
• • ' C. MIFICATE 9XM Rfa:
CITY.OF'OUNTIFFSTON BEACH
' BUILDING OIVIODNe 310 FLOOR
2000; MAIN STREET ,
HUKTINSTON BEACH, 'CA 9264$ 402 ALL OPFRATZON$
L '
TKI rs to c#rtify that we hove InuW a valid WorWs'tolJ pamlion Inwro4oe ppl;Cy in a form approvstl by tN Uifornllt
I nwranu C0fimiss.0FW to the ernpsoy*r wled below tar the Doi'+cy pWlgd Wk49*d
This Folicy is oot tubject to cancellation by 1he Fund 4=7. upon 4Lyl' adrance written not ite to the 9M)OW.
we %V;:l awe -gore yqu T devs'ddvanea Rnt4c shWd this policy be Cenm4 ed pion to its nornuI exp;'86en.
This ctrtifjicatt of'Insarance is not an insuranu policy AM doff pot Mend, extend or alter tht covelow afforded by the
politits 1iged herein. Notwittntanding any requkertent, ternt,'or t0ftditan at MY Contract Or ewer docurnmt vAth
respect to which thk cwt;fiGate of irwram May be bsuid'or qw perUA tht Irnwwal effor&.4i by ft p000"
dmrltud htrrin is subject to all the tarmt, excks;o" and Corl$it O& Ot wtfl pCtlbles_
EAPLOYER'S LIABILITY LIMIT; S3,0004M.PSR 4CCURRME. • .
MdRSEMENT•412065 ENTITLED CERTIFYCATE �OLDIAS' KOTICE EFFECTIVE
10/50192 IS ATTACH9 TO AUP FORMS A PARTiOF THIS POLICY. .
CUPLOYER
GEO REKEDIATIONs IWC.
3002- DOLE. AVENUE e. NO, 414
TU.STIH: CALIFORNIA 92680 -.
L :
REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
�3
` Prr Coonc%'k A,�Z - l ' ED 92-62
�Uvnc. Date: January 4 1993
-%3 fl-S _/v rt`SponsIhAy p"41 A` c/Pe--
{ �� Gt717P�
Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members 701
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, Executive ,� l
Prepared by: Barbara A. Kaiser, Deputy City Administrator/Economi
Development
Subject: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND GEOREAIEDIATION
FOR IIAZARDOUS AIATERIAL TESTING
Consistent with Council Policy? M Yes i l New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments
STATENIFNT OF ISSUE:
In conjunction with the Agency approved project Third Block West and the Agency
pending acquisition within the Main -Pier Phase II site the services of a hazardous
material consultant are required.
RECO',%ni TENDED AGENCY ACTION:
Approve and authorize the Agency Clerk to execute the attached contract between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and GeoRemediation, Inc. to
perform subsurface investigation and remediation of contamination at sites within the
Main -Pier Redevelopment project area.
ANALYSIS.:
The Third Block West project was the subject of a Disposition and Development
Agreement (DDA) approved by the Agency in March, 1991. The project is bounded
by Main and Sth Streets, Olive and Orange. Recently, in conjunction with construction
of the Main Improvements Phase I a subsurface tank containing a petroleum product
was unearthed. Immediate but limited steps toward remediation of the contamination
RCA ED 92-62
` - January 4, 1993
Page two
from this leaking tank were taken so that the construction of the Main Street
improvements could continue. However, before a comprehensive remediation plan for
this subsurface contamination can be prepared, it is necessary to fully access the extent
of the soil contamination and to determine the extent, if any, of contamination of the
water table. The principal activities of the proposed GeoRemediation contract will
accomplish these tasks.
Additionally, the Agency has approved resolutions of necessity and the City Attorney's
office has posted funds with the court for the acquisition of the site at 504 and 506
Pacific Coast Highway, (commonly referred to as 'Wimpi's*), in conjunction with the
proposed Main -Pier Phase II project. It is suspected that subsurface contamination
exists on this previous gas station site, but there has never been any professional testing
to determine the nature and extent of contamination. The proposed GeoRedmediation
contract herewith will accomplish a Phase I investigation of this site.
GeoRemediation, Inc. has met all of the city's insurance requirements and the not to
exceed amount of the contract is $35,000. Work will be completed at both sites within
12 weeks of commencement.
ALTERNATIVES;
Do not approve the GeoRedmediation, Inc. contract. This will pre-empt preparation of
remediation plans for these two redevelopment sites.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Main -Pier professional services.
ATTACIihiENTS:
Contract between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and
GeoRemediation, Inc.
IhITUMAKISVK jar
222j
G R GeoRemediation Inc.
I &VnRONMEWAL CONSULTING c# MITIGATION 3002 Dow Avenue. Suife 414. TWdr, CA 92680
(714) 573.0433
November 20,11992 Log: 92-273
Mr. Keith Bohr
Assistant Project Manager
Redevelopment Agency
City of Huntington Beach
California
Subject: Proposal for a subsurface investigation at property
located at 5th Street and Pacific Coast Highway,
Huntington Beach, California.
Dear Mr. Bohr:
Pursuant to your request, GeoRemediation, Inc. (GRI) has prepared
this proposal to conduct a subsurface investigation at the
subject site. The purpose of this investigation is to determine
if there are any indications of subsurface contamination. If
significant volumes of contaminated soil/ground water are found,
subsequent investigative activities may be recommended. The
following outline details the proposed tasks and their respective
costs.
TASKS AND ESTIMATED COSTS
1) Excavate 6 to 8 hand auger borings,
one in each corner of the site and 2
to 4 at selected locations in the
interior, to a Maximum depth of 20
feet below current grade (bcg).
Collect soil samples at 5 foot
intervals beginning at 5 feet bcg for
possible laboratory analyses. Monitor
soil cutting vapors with an organic
Vapor Analyzer during the drilling...
....$ZOOo.00 to $2000.00
Frior to submitting any soil samples for laboratory analyses, you
will be advised of the findings of the hand auger borings based�10r.�
cn field observations. Recommendations for a laboratory anal ses
program, with estimated costs, 'will also be presented at 1o•'�"�
time. In addition, a scope of work for the juna ized written �88'0
S`40 report will be established at this time. An estimated start 0
�a a for this investigation is December 1, 1992.
The opportunity to be of service is appreciated.
questions, please call.
Very Truly Yours
GeoRemediation, Inc.
r
Gary T. Carlin
President
If you have any
g8D
$3,3fD
G R GeoRemediation Inc.
L EN"RONMENTAL CONSUL77NG do MITIGATION 3002 Dow Avenue, Suite 414, 7Lstin, CA 92680.
(714) S 73-0433
October 19, 1992
City of Huntington'Beach Log: 92-217
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Stephen Kohler, Project Manager
Subject: Response to questions regarding specific items in
subsurface investigation/remediation proposal.
Reference: Proposal to perform subsurface investigation and
remediation of subsurface hydrocarbon contamination
at a site located at the northwest corner of Main
Street and Olive Street in Huntington Beach,
California, published by GeoRemediation, Inc., dated
September 25, 1992.
Gentlemen:
1.6 INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to your request, GeoRemediation Inc. (bRI) is
pleased to provide an expanded description of the projected
costs associated with the characterization and disposal of
soil 'boring cuttings, decontamination water and well
development water, per the work plan referenced above.
2.0 DISPOSAL OF SOIL BORING CUTTINGS
The anticipated volume of soil generated by the proposed
soil borings is approximately 10 cubic yards, or 15.0 tons.
Two (2) roll -off waste containers suitable for transporting
hazardous materials will be delivered to the site by a
licensed hazardous waste hauler, and the drummed soil will
be transferred to the roll -off bins by GRI personnel in
:RECEIVED
OCT 2 = 1997
DEPARTR:
rrONOMic C'. ' . .
October 19, 1992
Page 2
order to facilitate chemical characterization of the subject
soil under the direction of the Orange County Integrated
Waste Management Department (IWMD).
The estimated cost for GRI personnel to transfer the subject
soil from drums to the roll -off bins is approximately
$680.00.
The estimated cost for disposal/reconditioning of used drums
is a maximum of $400.00.
2.1 Class III Disposal Facility
Based on our experience with similar projects conducted
in orange County, IWMD will require that, at the most,
four (4) samples are collected from soil stockpiled in
the roil -off bins. Furthermore, IWMD will direct a
laboratory program whereby each sample will be handled
under strict chain -of -custody protocol, and analyzed by
a State Certified laboratory using the following
methods:
o Cal DHS Method 8015 Modified (gasoline);
o EPA Method 8020;
o EPA Method 6010/7420.
The estimated cost to conduct these tests and to
coordinate the sampling and reporting activities is
approximately $800.00. Bin rental and pickup/delivery
costs are included in this dollar figure.
October 19, 1992
Page 3
If laboratory results indicate sub -threshold
concentration levels for the various chemical analytes,
and approval for transport and disposal is received
from IWMD, the subject sail will be transported under
non -hazardous manifest by a licensed waste hauler to a
Class III disposal facility in orange County designated
by the IWMD representative.
The estimated cost for hauling and disposal of the
subject soil to any of the Class III disposal
facilities in Orange County is approximately $1200.00.
Therefore, the total cost for soil transfer, chemical
characterization, hauling and disposal of the subject
soil is approximately $3100.00, based on this scenario.
2.2 Soil Recycling
If laboratory results indicate that specific soil
contaminants exceed threshold levels per IWMD, the
second "disposal" option to be considered will be soil
recycling at a facility in Adelanto, California. For
this alternative approach, the laboratory analyses
conducted during the characterization process described
in section 2.1 above will suffice.
The total estimated cost for soil transfer, drum
disposal/reconditioning, hauling and recycling of the
subject soil is approximately $3400.00.
.
.
October 19, 1992
Page 4
2.3 Class I Disposal Facilit�
In the event that the subject soil is characterized as
bearing lead concentrations exceeding threshold limits
per Title 22 of the California Administrative Code
(CAC), it may be necessary to dispose of soil boring
cuttings by hauling the material to a Class I disposal
facility. The material will have to be chemically
profiled by the landfill operator at a cost of
approximately $480.00. The cost to contract a licensed
hazardous waste hauler to take the material to the
Chemical Waste Management facility in Kettleman Hills,
California, would be approximately $2040.00. Disposal
fees would be approximately $2034.00.
The total estimated cost for soil transfer, drum
disposal/reconditioning, a chemical profile, hauling
and disposal at the Class I facility would be
approximately $5634.00.
3.0 DISPOSAL OF WELL DEVELOPMENT AND DECONTAMINATION WATER
Each time ground water wells are sampled, the wells must
also be developed to ensure that representative samples are
being collected. Approximately 55 gallons of well
development water will be generated each time a well is
developed. Decontamination water is generated during
drilling and soil sampling activities.
It
October 19, 1992
Page 5
We anticipate contracting a licensed hazardous waste hauler
to transport all of the liquids to the DiMenno Kerdoon
recycling facility in Compton, California, under the
appropriate State Manifest for an estimated cost of
approximately $2.00 per gallon.
4.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS
This cost estimate was compiled using a degree of care and
skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by
reputable Soil Engineers, Geologists, and Environmental
Scientists practicing in this or similar localities. No
other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the
conclusions and professional advice included in this
document.
The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you
have any questions, please contact David L. Lucero, Project
Scientist, at 714-573-0435.
Very Truly Yours
Geo Remediation, Inc.
a'4' �- L .
6'-�
David L. Lucero
Project Scientist
R.E.A. 4294
Gary T. Carlin
Sr. Environmental Geologist
R.E.A. 3403
Edward T. Cieslak
Sr. Environmental Chemist
R.E.A. 3404
amen
�ttlrl
J. M. Chang �OTIESS10
Senior Engineer a Nq�
R.C.E. 41895 4,4 f►
' M-AES
?� CHANGrn
�
co r'
14o. 4MIS
04
C tV11.
OF C ALOE
a .
G R GeoRemediation Inc.
EAWRONAIENTAL CONSULTING do UMGATION 3002 Dow Awnue, Sure 414, T aej; CA 92M0
(714) 573-0435
September 25, 1992
City of Huntington Beach Log: 92-2I7
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Stephen V. Kohler, Project Manager
Subject: Proposal to perform subsurface investigation and
remediation of subsurface hydrocarbon contamination at
a site located at the northwest corner of Main Street
and olive Street in Huntington Beach, California.
# Gentlemen:
I
-1.0 INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to your request, GeoRemediation, Inc. (GRI) is
pleased to present this proposal to perform a subsurface
investigation and remediation activities to . mitigate
subsurface hydrocarbon contamination at the subject site
located at the northwest corner of Main and olive Streets in
Huntington Beach, California (See Figure 1, Site Location
Map). GRI will perform site activities in phases. The first
phase will include the subsurface investigation activities
needed to define the limits of subsurface hydrocarbon
contamination. The second phase will be the preparation of a
Remedial Action Plan (RAP) for mitigation of the subsurface
hydrocarbon contamination, and the third phase will be the
implementation of the RAP.
The following sections of this document describe technical
details of this proposal by the three various phases.
• r�R
� J 11111JUL
•n
� •1 i� rlVll•,��_�
i•� +' j •'il l ••1
+ jG.fl`IY
r
_ C ., M,•w•w•r .r..r..r., ,....n. wi=•... ..,tl V I1}i 17�•a. r ...r••�1� �y����i r
• i'
. • r' I tf ! R • w r,•rAr4 •..wr,r •r w, • • 1 ;fL 1 is .`�;.<' ' ••
PT
1 of 1pj*]� w•¢aw? • E '�1 fJ►. •' , '• !NV 1 • .. ..'! '�y, ,, 0'•
'��f! it w \ ry y- �"1 wwJ'w. ' �,h• •"•� ,y I� �
,• )+fll rr+h lgfi�.y�'C" • • • • j• • :i..y i'• J / '}„N ti lu
F rlrt H �:��.• �"' wry r ��� �' `' `, Q ra
•r r • a •• • w •'r . • f
• 1 (ff
t��t• , 1"« 4. r ` '�,1`�''" 1 14~ :.•••f • s r , • rel ,I�.►r � r¢'
.w � M •so � ; •y /
is '• ♦ 1r� H Ili •.0 �'� r, it wyif' �w f «^?. .. '\,Jr �'� �1l�li'�• .1 J
l y • .Fn
1s it Il 11 'a1 M� �►' 1,fit�'w /.:.n it
~ y * tlI
L4
a `,
w '[� Co
10.
I•+� I k
40
Ir
(•/ .��. 1 r �• so
• •, rl' .• • tar
' •r / O
I.j a
• �• r I. "' • .ill'• J,
•
1 '
September 25, 1992
Page 2
A cost and time estimate for completion of the specific
phases of the project are also presented in subsequent
sections of this proposal. GRI's Statement of
F Qualifications, a list of references, and resumes of the
principal personnel involved with this project are attached
to this document as Appendix A. A copy of GRI's Schedule
of Fees is attached to this document as Appendix B.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
GRI's approach to mitigation of the subsurface contamination
is designed to incorporate existing geochemical data,
supplemented with data from an additional series of proposed
soil borings, to fully define the limits and magnitude of the
subsurface contamination. The existing data and the data
resulting from the proposed activities will be used to
determine an affective remediation concept for mitigation of
! the subsurface soil and ground water contamination at the
site. As stated above, the work will be conducted in phases.
These phases are discussed in detail in the following
sections.
2.1 Phase I: Subsurface investigation
In order to fully define the extent of the problem,
additional subsurface soil samples will be collected and
analyzed to determine the vertical and horizontal limits
of the subsurface contamination. GRI also proposes to
install five ground water wells for the purpose of
.
`September 25, 1992
Page 3
defining the limits of ground water contamination and
( determining ground water gradient:' The intention is to
insall a series of contaminated wells surrounded by a
series of uncontaminated monitoring wells. Individual
costs of well installation are relatively costly, thus to
provide some assurance that wells are located
appropriately, a series of 7 to 10 hand-augered borings
jwill be excavated. The observations made during hand -
auger drilling will be utilized to establish the precise
location of ground water wells. As discsussed below,
some of these hand -auger borings will be utilized for -the
installation of vapor extraction and monitoring wells.
GRI will prepare and submit a Work Plan to the Orange
County Health Care Agency (OCHCA), along with a Site
Specific Health and Safety Plan, detailing the proposed
subsurface investigation and installation activities.
After approval of the plan, GRI will excavate the hand -
auger borings and install the ground water wells. Vapor
wells will be installed in selected soil borings, again,
J based on field evaluation. These vapor wells will later
j be used as components of the soil remediation system
descriLed in a subsequent section of this proposal.
Technical details of the subsurface investigative
activities are presented in the following sections.
.
_J
`September 25, 1992
•� Page 4
2.1.1 Soil_Sample Borings
Eight (8) hand -auger borings will be excavated to a
depth of approximately 23 ft. below current grade
(bcg) at locations indicated on Figure 2, Proposed
i
Boring Location Map. Hand auger equipment will be
decontaminated prior to each boring to prevent the
possibility of cross contamination of the borings.
Decontamination will consist of washing the
equipment with a non -phosphate soap, followed by
a double rinse with tap water and a final rinse
with distilled water. Decontamination water will
be contained in labeled, 55 gallon drums pending
analyses for proper disposal. Soil boring cuttings
r:411 be contained on -site in labeled, 55 gallon
j drums pending laboratory analyses to determine
j proper disposal.
1 Field observations made during drilling will be
recorded on boring logs. Soil boring cuttings will
be monitored for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
j using a Gastech Model 1314 organic vapor analyzer
j (OVA). VOC readings will be also be recorded on
boring logs.
i Relatively undisturbed soil samples will be
collected at 5 foot intervals beginning at five
feet bcg utilizing a core sampler and drive hammer.
i
i
o a
0 0 .
O �i �; O
�uaEl�-tr,Zaut�D Tkti'��-
. \X\
�4
O DoR-i,iG CoCA7iIJrS
G R P'aarc sep Bo Li VC— LoLATlop AAA
i 1 • Na« a�►s[:5��,,,,ae�, +99►� '�auRi: 2
f
I
September 25, 1992
Page 5
All soil sampling equipment will be decontaminated
between sampling intervals to prevent the
possibility of cross contamination of the samples.
The decontamination procedure is the same as that
of the hand augering equipment. Soil samples will
be contained in decontaminated, . 2--inch by 6-inch
brass sleeves. The sample sleeves will be sealed
i
with teflon patches and plastic end caps, then
labeled, placed in an ice chest with "Blue Ice",
and transported to Del Mar Analytical ( Del Mar) in
Irvine, California. Strict chain -of -custody
f protocol will be followed at all times.
Based on field observations and VOC mpnitorin
g
data, selected soil samples will be analyzed for
concentrations of Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons, using
1 Cal DHS Method 8015M (gasoline), and for Volatile
1 Grganic Compounds, using EPA Method 8020.
i Analytical results will be evaluated to further
characterize the extent of subsurface soil
contamination, and to determine the adequacy of the
excavations for use as vapor extraction wells.
Based on the results of the laboratory analyses,
additional hand -auger borings/vapor wells may be
proposed.
September 25, 1992
..� Page 6
Pending evaluation of the field observations and
analytical data, the soil sample borings will
either be appropriately abandoned, by backfilling
the boring with a concrete bentonite mixture, or
be converted to vapor wells, as illustrated in
Figure 3, Vapor Well Schematic.
2.1.2 Ground Water Well Installation
Five (5) mechanically drilled borings will be
� excavated to a depth of approximately 50 feet bcg
for the purpose of installing four -inch I.D. PVC
ground water wells at locations indicated on Figure
4, Proposed Boring Location Map. Ground water well
construction details are shown on Figure 5, Ground
Water Well Schematic. All drill rig auger stems
and bits will be decontaminated prior to each
boring in order to prevent the possibility of cross
contamination. Auger stems and bits will be
decontaminated by pressure washing, and
decontamination rinse water will be contained in
labeled, 55 gallon drums pending laboratory
analyses to determine proper disposal. Soil boring
cuttings will be contained on -site in labeled, 55
gallon drums pending laboratory analyses to
determine proper disposal.
Field observations made during drilling will be
1
1
�ss 6�ior •
�` �0.r+T�K•T"� �Lus
N!•� I�OK�YL4�ir� �0.G�L.
10
' r
2S r •.
2r SLG•4� PYG btu e-LicEal
�� �•Tr... pVyi,
17
C R VA To f- 57 + ,u q -p 4
i Joe NO3 OJ►Ti: �IOttRi:
' Sc'p1-EJ�. a �. f � `i Z.• 3
13
eM4E� WAT-W3 C{
•rA v'L
0c►I vlr-- r*-ve Uvr,—
tT'
S�z.� • � � � 20 �
boR-WG LoCAT 16M S
P��rQs�p 6LIXrO6 LCCA-r:op "F
TAM f�ouRe:
05ErrCAA s3 _IT 11 R
TZ
10 Fr
I l-,
20 FT
WELL COVER
CONCRETE/BENTONTTE OR NEAT CEMENT
SAND
4 IN. SOLID PVC PIPE
2 FT. BENTONITE PLUG
SAND
4 W. WELL SC�.N
0
j
�R�" GI�o�Nn w.i-�r.R- �Y'r�Gr+•N fys��- sc�EtaAr�4
a Nos o�►T[:
`v p . 3rTEM31:rc. r49z
riaupea: 5
I",
' 1
September 25, 1992
Page 7
1
recorded on boring logs, and soil boring cuttings
will be monitored for the emission of VOCs using
the OVA. VOC readings will be also be recorded on
} boring logs.
A California modified split spoon sampler
containing three, 2--inch by 6-inch brass sample
sleeves, will be used to collect discrete soil
samples at 5 foot intervals beginning at 5 feet
bcg. sampling equipment and sample rings will be
decontaminated between each sample interval to
w prevent the possibility of cross contamination of
the samples. This will be accomplished by washing
the equipment with a non -phosphate soap, double
rinsing with tap water, and final rinsing with
distilled water. The middle sample sleeve will be
retained from each sampling interval for analyses
and the two remaining samples will be used for
field observations. The retained soil sample
sleeve will be sealed with teflon patches and
plastic end caps, labeled, placed in a cooler with
"Blue Ice", and transported to Del Mar under strict
chain--of-custody protocol for analyses.
Based on field observations and VOC monitoring
I
data, selected soil samples will be analyzed for
concentrations of Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons, using
1
September 25, 1992
Page 8
Cal DHS Method 8015M, and for Volatile Organic
Compounds, using EPA Method 8020.
A ninimum of 72 hours after ground water well
1 installation, the wells will be surveyed,
developed, and sampled. All well development water
I
will be contained on site in lableled, 55 gallon
drums pending analytical • results to determine
proper disposal. Ground water samples will be
analyzed for Volatile Halocarbons using EPA Method
601 and for Volatile Aromatics using EPA Method
602. Ground water analytical results will be
evaluated to further characterize the severity and
extent of ground water contamination. Based on the
review of laboratory data and field obse'vations,
additional ground water monitoring may be proposed.
2.1.3 Disposal of 'Soil Boring Cuttings, Decontamination
Water, and Welleve opmen ater
All soil boring cuttings will be characterized,
based on laboratory results and the California
Administrative Code, Title 22 regulations (Title
22), and disposed of accordingly. GRI anticipates
segregating contaminated soil boring cuttings from
otherwise clean cuttings. A licensed hazardous
I waste hauler will be contracted transport the bulk
volumes of material to an appropriate, licensed
receiving facility. Disposal at Orange County's
1�
1
A
September 25 1992
Page 9
Cla s III disposal facility, if applicable, will be
performed under the direction of the Orange County
Integrated Waste Management Department. If soil
boring cuttings are not accepted to orange County,
an alternative licensed facility will be utilized.
Decontamination water and well development water
will also be characterized, based on the laboratory
analytical results and by Title 22, to determine
proper disposal.
Storage of hazardous waste on site is limited to 90
days from start of accumulation. GRI will schedule
removal of all wastes generated on site within this
time period.
2.2 Phase II: Summary of Subsurface Investigation/
Remedial Action Plan
After concluding the subsurface investigation activities,
GRI will compile and evaluate the previously existing
data, along with the data collected during the subsurface
investigation. Based on this information, GRI will
prepare a Summary of Subsurface Investigation/Remedial
Action Plan for submittal to the appropriate agencies.
This report will contain GRI's conclusions and
recommendations for a proposed method of mitigating the
subsurface contamination at the site.
Based on our previous experiences at this particular
t September 25, 1992.
PI Page 10
site, the RAP will most likely involve insitu treatment
of contaminated subsurface soil by soil vapor
extraction/carbon adsorption. A series of vapor
extraction and monitoring wells, some of which will have
been already installed during subsurface investigation
activities, will need to be installed. Four to six vapor
extraction wells will most likely be required in the
contaminated soil zone and approximately an additional
four vapor monitoring wells required outside of the
contaminated soil zone. It is anticipated that some of
the vapor monitoring and vapor extraction wells will be
located offsite toward the south and east.
Based on GRI's present knowledge of the site conditions,
the most economicaly feasible method of remediating the
ground water contamination is to install a system of
ground water extraction and monitoring wells. The ground
water treatment system will most likely consist of one
or two centrally located ground water extraction wells
surrounded by four ground water monitoring wells. These
wells will be installed during the subsurface
investigation. As proposed, two of the monitoring wells
will • require offsite installations. As indicated
earlier, the five or six ground water wells should prove
to be sufficient.
It is anticipated that some
ground water and vapor
September 25, 1992
Page 11
monitoring installations can be combined. Ground water
monitoring wells can be installed in a manner such that
they can be used to monitor both water and vapor quality.
Laboratory analytical reports, soil boring and ground
water well installation legs, waste disposal manifests,
and technical information concerning the proposed
t remediation system will be included with the summary
1 report.
2.3 Phase III: Implementation of the Remedial Action Plan
After approval of the RAP by the appropriate agencies,
i
GRI will proceed with remediation activities. These
activities will include: final treatment system design
and permitting; treatment system construction and
installation; and monitoring, maintainence, and reporting
to the appropriate a encies.
g
3.0 Cost Estimate
The tasks with estimated costs associated with performing the
above discussed project phases are presented below. These ,
estimated costs are based on a time and material basis
assuming current material costs and GRI's schedule of fees
(Attached as Appendix B).
September 25, 1992
Page 12
PHASE I
TASK
COST
Site Characterization Plan
Preparation/Submittal........................ $ 1,o00.00
Site Specific Health and
Safety Plan..........i....................... $ 500.00
Soil Boring/Sampling and
Vapor Well Installation ................. $ 2,000.00 - $ 3,000.00
Ground Water Well Installation.....,.... $ 8,000.00 - $12,000.00
Ground Water Well Development,
Sampling, and Survey......................... $ 1,500.00
Soil Sample Analyses...............,.... $ 5,000.00 - $101000.00
Ground Water Sample Analyses............ $ 1,250.00 - $ 1,500.00
Soil Boring Cuttings Disposal........... $ (To Be Determined)
Decontamination Water/Well
Development Water Disposal .............. $ (To Be Determined)
* Actual laboratory program will be established following
drilling activities.
PHASE II
TASK COST
Summary of Investigation/Remedial
Action Plan Report
Preparation/Submittal
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System Design ................. $ 3,500.00
1 1 u+.: UGUi%C 'CJIc LlOri, lilt.
September 25, 1992
Page 13
PHASE III
TASK
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
SCA= Permitting ......................
soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
NPDES Permitting ........................
2Z-Zd-yZ IUAba•
COST
$ 3,000.00 - $ 4,000.00
$ 3,00.00 - $ 3,500.00
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
Construction ........................... $27,500.00 - $32,000.00
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
Installation
(Connective Conduit, Electric, Etc.)... $ 3,000.00 - $ 4,000.00
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
Initial Activated Carbon Beds.......... $ 6,000.00 - $ 7,000.00
Professional Labor
(Project Management) ................... $ 3,500.00 - $ 4,500.00
Monthly Costs
Monitoring and Maintainance............. $ 500.00 - $ 750.00
Free Product Disposal................... $ 250.00 - $ 350.00*
Activated Carbon Usage .................. $ 2,500.00 - $ 5,000.00**
*It is not known at this time the amount (if any) of free
floating product in the ground water or the actual
concentrations of soil contamination. These two factors are the
determining factors for estimating carbon usage and recovered
product disposal. A better estimate of these figures will be
made after laboratory data, collected during the subsurface
investigation, has been evaluated.
**This estimate has been prepared based on an assumption that
the volume of released product was relatively low and that
carbon filtration would be the most economical method of soil
and water treatarent. Thus, we anticipate that usage will be
near or below the low end of this cost ran -cm. If during
preliminary investigations, this assumption is found to be
wrong, other (non -carbon) alternatives will be considered and
P. 3 of 3
September 25, 1992
Page 24
proposed.
4.0 Time Estimate
Please find below GRI's estimated time schedule for
5
completing the above described phases. This time schedule is
based on GRI's experience with agency reponse times and
system component, installation schedules.
PHASE I
TASK
Site Characterization Plan
Preparation/Submittal...........................
Site Specific Health and
Safety Plan .....................................
Approval of Plan by Agency ......................
Soil Boring/Sampling and
Vapor Well Installation .........................
Ground Water Well Installation ..................
Ground Water Well Development,
Sampling, and Survey ............................
Soil Sample Analyses Results ....................
Ground Water Sample Analyses ....................
Soil Boring Cuttings Disposal ...................
Decontamination Water/Well
Development Water Disposal ......................
PHASE II
TASK
TIME SCHEDULE
WEEK:
1
WEEK
1
WEEK
4
WEEK
5
WEEK
6
WEEK 6
WEEK 8
WEEK 8
WEEK 12
WEEK 12
TIME SCHEDULE
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System Design..... .................... WEEK 8 -- WEEK 12
September 25, 1992
Page 25
Summary of Investigation/Remedial
Action Plan Report
Preparation/Submittal ........................... WEEK 13
Approval of RAP by Agency... .................... WEEK 17
PHASE III
TASK TIME SCHEDULE
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
SCAQMDPermitting ............................... WEEK 17
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
NPDESPermitting ................................ WEEK 17
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
Construction .................................... WEEK 18
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
installation
(Connective Conduit, Electric, Ect.)............ WEEK 22
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
Startup/Troubleshooting............... .... WEEK 24
Soil/Ground Water
Treatment System
Operation. ...................................... 12 - 24 MONTHS
Continued Ground Water Monitoring
(After Remediation is Concluded) ................ 12 MONTHS
5.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS
These figures are estimates based on our experience with
similar projects in Orange County, California, and are
subject to variations due to factors beyond our control. In
addition, the time for obtaining approval of remediation by
September 25, 3992
Page 16
all applicable government agencies may be lengthened by the
additional requirements of Health and Safety Code Section
33459, which apply to the remediation of hazardous
substances by redevelopment agencies.
5
This proposal was compiled using a degree of care and skill
ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by
reputable Soil Engineers, Geologists, and Environmental
Scientists practicing in this or similar localities. No
other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the
conclusions and professional advice included in this
document.
The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If there
are any questions, please contact David L. Lucero, Project
Scientist, at 714-573-0435.
Very Truly Yours
GeoRemediation, Inc.
David L. Lucero
Project Scientist
R.E.A. 4294
q.m s J. M
Senior Engin
R.C.E. 41896
Edward T. Cieslak
Sr. Environmental Chemist
R.E.A. 3404
.�I ` QSof ESS/10
JAM
y CHANG
gg�
Cc! 1I9E
a,
`ff CIV11.
,41� �F C At1k�a
G7GeoRemediation Inc.
1 I FNnWMMFNTAL CONSUiJVG do M177GA770N 3002 Dow A„enue, Suite tit, Ti,a4 C4 9M80
M4)577- &75
SCHEDULE OF FEES
Senior Environmental Geologist
- $
85.00`iioLr
Senior Certified Engineering Geologist
- $
85.00/4w-our
Senior Chemist
- S
66.00/9ou=
Staff Scientist
- $
55.00/four
Project Manager
- $
53.00/hour
Senior Technician
- $
40.00/%our
Technician
- $
35.00/Hour
Laborer/Technician
- $
25.00/Hour
f Drafting
- $
40.00/Hour
!� Word Processing
- $
26.00/tour
r Pick-up and Delivery
- $
25.00/Hour
SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
Concrete Coring Machine
- $
115.00/pay
Photo Ionization Detector -
- $
80.00/pay
Generator (if on -site power not available)
- 5
66.00/0ay
Organic vapor Meter
- $
55.00/Day
Vapor SamplinV Kit (vacuum & Sampling Pumps)
-- $
60.00/Day
PH, Conductivity & Temperature Meter
-- S
25.00/Day
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Outside services performed by others and direct costs expended on
the client's behalf are charged at cost plus 20%. These expenses
include rental equipment, laboratory services, permits,
reproduction costs, etc.. Travel time required to provide
services Will be charged at regular hourly rate.
F
GEORi1MEDIATIOK. INC
�
r
PRICE SCHMUL.E
1
y _
Ste.
ITEM
GRI UNIT PRICE. EA
"X6' BRASS PINGS
5 :!-M
2' RING e;D CAPS
5 0.13
i XS WELL. SCREF�Y
5 332 p•- ,�- t
)'X5'BLAv'KCASING
5 2.0+r•w.For
'I U WELL SCRs ,A
s 7.x- ra' �•-� -
":CS BLANK CASING
S 4.96 P.. f + • E
?' PVC CAPS
S 4.80
PVC CAPS
S 9.60
4. THREADED PVC CAP
5 12.00
' SOLID DRIVE POINT
S I6.73
24 SLIP COUPLING
S 2.40
hND (1009) I CU. FT.1SiC
S 6.00
derv' s�IM(BKT-11WE1.L..)
S 42.00
N CRL'TE (.5 CU.FTJS M
S 6.00
. WELL BOX
5 90.00
s
5 54.00
lWaLE)OX
GAL R1 COND. DRUMS (7 CU.FTJDRUID
5 42.00
NVATEF.IGAS PASTE
S 12.00
R. TEDLAR BAG
S 12.00
10 LTR. TEDLAR BAG
5 14.20
�NCRETE CORING MACMNE
S 115-WDAY
VAPOR SAWLING KIT
3 60.WDAY
" P
lvmCONDUCTIVITY
S 80:00fDAY
S 25.001DAY
I .'( NaTER
r .ANERATOR
S 66.001DAY
I WD AUGER EQUIP
5100.00VDAY
GAS•iECH
S 55.CMAY
I MER
S 10-MAY
August 19.1992
i
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
mxrtv+GTON •EACH
To From GAIL HUTTON
City Attorney
Subject Contract Signatures Date
RLS #
I have initialed the above referenced contract to show conditional
approval as to form, pending execution with the signatures binding
the contractor.
1. If the contractor is a corporation, two (2) officers of the
corporation must sign the contract. (Corp. Code § 313) One
officer from column A and one officer from column B must sign.
Chairman of the Board Secretary
President Any Assistant Secretary
Any,Vice President Chief Financial Officer
Any Assistant Treasurer
If the corporation cannot provide the above signatures, it may
have one officer sign only if an authorizing resolution from the
Hoard of Directors is also provided.
2. If the contractor is a general partnership, the signature of any
general partner -is suf icient to bind the corporation, unless the
city knows that a particular partner has no authority to act for
the partnership. (Corp. Code § 15009 and 5 15010)
3. If the contractor is a limited artnershi , the signature of the
general or managing partner is sufficient to bind the
partnership. (Cgrr. Coda § 15509)
4. If the contractor is a sole prorrietorship, the signature of the
owner is sufficient to bind the business.
5. If the contractor is a trust, the trustee must sign and a copy of
the trust document eviden inc g authority to sell must be attached.
Please be sure to have the appropriate name and title typed on the
contract in the designated area of the signature page before
returning the document to the City Attorney for signature.
GAIL HUTTON
City Attorney