HomeMy WebLinkAboutHALL & FOREMAN, INC - - 1991-08-19 (2) AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AND HALL & FOREMAN FOR BEACH PARKING LOT BETWEEN
11TH STREET AND GOLDEN WEST STREET
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 19th day
of August , 199L, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a
municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and
HALL & FOREMAN, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR".
WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR are parties to that certain contract, dated June
17, 1991, entitled "Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Hall & Foreman
for Engineering Design Services for "Beach Parking Lot Between 11th Street and Golden
West Street" and
Since the execution of the original contract, CITY has requested additional work from
CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR has agreed to perform such work; and
CITY and CONTRACTOR wish to amend the original contract to reflect the extra
work to be performed by CONTRACTOR and the additional compensation to be paid in
consideration thereof by CITY to CONTRACTOR,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows:
1. ADDITIONAL WORK
CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY such additional services as described in the
letter from CONTRACTOR to CITY, dated August 2, 1991 1991, hereinafter referred to as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
In consideration of the additional engineering design services described in Section 1
above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR the additional sum of Fifteen Thousand,
Six Hundred Dollars ($15,600.00). The additional sum shall be added to the original
sum of Fifty—Nine Thousand, Two Hundred and Twenty—Five Dollars ($59,225.00) for a
new total contract amount of Seventy—Four Thousand, Eight Hundred, Twenty—Five
Dollar ($74,825.00).
3. ADDITIONAL TIME FOR COMPLETION OF TASKS
All services as described in the original contract and herein shall be completed on or
before October 4, 1991
4. REAFFIRMATION
Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the original
contract shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this amendment as to the
date first above written.
CONTRACTOR: CITY:
HALL & FOREMAN, INC. , CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
a California corporation 'a municipal
rporatio
‘/ ii, / , )i-IA-1--------___
-or Shambecki re dent ayor
4 4.
CKYA .. k '
Richard R. D',olittle :ec.'/Tre .
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
eoma•td azochaer,
C,P\+— k-kvYroU h,V
City Clerk c . `'- ity Attorney u'v=C c1
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INIT TED AND ROVED:
Sr
City A ministrator Directo of Public Works
3008g/24
/
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AND HALL & FOREMAN, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A
BEACH PARKING LOT BETWEEN 11TH STREET AND
GOLDENWEST STREET IN THE CITY OF HUNTINTON BEACH
' 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1. WORK STATEMENT 1
2 . CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE 2
3 . TIME OF PERFORMANCE 2
4 . COMPENSATION 2
5 . EXTRA WORK 2
6 . METHOD OF PAYMENT 3
7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS 4
8 . INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 5
9 . WORKERS' COMPENSATION 5
10 . INSURANCE 6
11. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE; ADDITIONAL INSURED
ENDORSEMENTS 7
12 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 8
13 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 8
14 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING 8
15 . COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS 8
16 . CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS 9
17 . NOTICES 9
18 . IMMIGRATION 9
19 . ENTIRETY 10
.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AND HALL & FOREMAN, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A
BEACH PARKING LOT BETWEEN 11TH STREET AND
GOLDENWEST STREET IN THE CITY OF HUNTINTON BEACH
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this / 1414C day
of 4 , 1991, by and between the CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of
California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and HALL & FOREMAN,
INC. , a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"CONTRACTOR. "
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of an engineering
design contractor to prepare plans and specifications for
construction of a Beach Parking Lot below the bluffs between llth
Street and Golden West Street in the City of Huntington Beach; and
Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City
Clerk, the provisions of HBMC Chapter 3 . 03 , relating to
procurement of professional service contracts, has been complied
with; and
CONTRACTOR has been selected to perform said services,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows:
1. WORK STATEMENT
CONTRACTOR shall provide all services as described in the
Request for Proposal, dated February 18, 1991, and CONTRACTOR' S
proposal dated March 29, 1991, (hereinafter collectively referred
to as Exhibit "A") , which is attached hereto and incorporated into
this ,Agreement by this reference. Said services shall sometimes
hereinafter be referred to as "PROJECT. "
1
CONTRACTOR hereby designates Richard R. Doolittle, who
shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all
consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement .
2 . CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE
CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly
with CONTRACTOR in the performance of this Agreement.
3 . TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence of this Agreement . The services
of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after the
execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A"
shall be completed no later than six months from the date of this
Agreement. These times may be extended with the written
permission of the CITY. The time for performance of the tasks
identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be as shown in the
Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This
schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed
by the CITY and CONTRACTOR.
4 . COMPENSATION
In consideration of the performance of the engineering
services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay
CONTRACTOR a fee of Fifty-Nine Thousand, Two Hundred Twenty-Five
Dollars ($59 , 225 . 00) .
5 . EXTRA WORK
In the event CITY requires additional services not
included in Exhibit "A, " or changes in the scope of services
described in Exhibit "A, " CONTRACTOR will undertake such work
after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional
compensat'in for such extra work shall be allowed only if the
2
e r
prior written approval of CITY is obtained. The Director of
Public Works may authorize such additional compensation in a total
amount not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount described in
Section 4 herein.
6 . METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to progress payments
toward the fixed fee set forth in Section 4 herein in accordance
with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit A" .
B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every technical
memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to the
CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks . In the
event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall
identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any
such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by
CITY shall be deemed accepted.
C. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY an invoice
for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall:
1) Reference this Agreement;
2) Describe the services performed;
3) Show the total amount of the payment due;
4) Include a certification by a principal member
of the CONTRACTOR' S firm that the work has been
performed in accordance with the provisions of
this Agreement; and
5) For all payments include an estimate of the
percentage of work completed.
Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is
satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward
3
completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall
promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made
within thirty (30) days ' of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such
approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the CITY does not
approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of the
reasons for non-approval, within seven (7) calendar days of
receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth
in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that
past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or has been brought into
compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to
Section 12 hereof .
D. Any billings for extra work or additional services
authorized by the CITY shall be invoiced separately to the CITY.
Such invoice shall contain all of the information required under
paragraph 6C, and in addition shall list the hours expended and
hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be
approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the
extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is
satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is
accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any
dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice
shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing
performance of the remainder of this Agreement.
7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder,
including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and
office notes, calculations, maps and other documents, shall be
turned over to CITY upon termination of this Agreement or upon
4
PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. In the event
this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY
in the completion of PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit. Title
to said materials shall pass to the CITY upon payment of fees
determined to be earned by CONTRACTOR to the point of termination
or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is applicable. CONTRACTOR
shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder.
8 . INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold
and save harmless CITY, its officers and employees from any and
•all liability, including any claim of liability and any and all
losses or costs arising out of the negligent performance of this
agreement by CONTRACTOR, its officers or employees .
9 . WORKERS ' COMPENSATION
CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the
Workers ' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of
California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the
California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar
state or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify,
defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all claims,
demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of
every nature and description, including attorney' s fees and costs
presented, brought or recovered against CITY, for or on account of
any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by
reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this
Agreement .
CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish evidence to CITY of
maintenance of statutory workers ' compensation insurance and
5
employers ' liability in an amount of not less than $100, 000 bodily
injury by accident, each occurrence, $100, 000 bodily injury by
disease, each employee, and $250, 000 bodily injury by disease,
policy limit.
10 . INSURANCE
In addition to the workers ' compensation insurance and
CONTRACTOR' S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain
and furnish to CITY the following insurance policies covering the
PROJECT:
A. General Liability Insurance.
A policy of general public liability insurance, including
motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall indemnify CONTRACTOR,
its officers, agents and employees, while acting within the scope
of their duties, against any and all claims of arising out of or
in connection with the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not
less than the following amount: combined single limit bodily
injury and property damage, including products/completed
operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of
$1,000, 000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form
which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate
limit must be no less than $1, 000, 000 . Said policy shall name
CITY, its officers, and employees as Additional Insureds, and
shall specifically provide that any other insurance
coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed
excess coverage and that CONTRACTOR' S insurance shall be primary.
B. Professional Liability Insurance.
CONTRACTOR shall acquire a professional liability
insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder.
6
Said policy shall provide coverage for CONTRACTOR'S professional
liability in an amount not less than $500, 000 per claim. A claims
made policy shall be acceptable.
11. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE; ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENTS
Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder,
CONTRACTOR shall furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject
to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing
insurance coverages as required by Sections 9 and 10 herein; said
certificates shall provide the name and policy number of each
carrier and policy, and shall state that the policy is currently
in force and shall promise to provide that such policies will not
be cancelled or modified without thirty (30) days prior written
notice to CITY. CONTRACTOR shall maintain the foregoing insurance
coverages in force until the work under this Agreement is fully
completed and accepted by CITY.
The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance
coverages shall not derogate from the provisions for
indemnification of CITY BY CONTRACTOR under Section 8 of this
Agreement . CITY or its representative shall at all times have the
right to demand the original or a copy of all said policies of
insurance. CONTRACTOR shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner,
the premiums on all insurance hereinabove required.
A separate copy of the additional insured endorsement to
each of CONTRACTOR' S insurance policies, naming the CITY, its
officers and employees as Additional Insureds shall be provided to
the City Attorney for approval prior to any payment hereunder .
12 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the
7
•
performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor.
CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any
and all payments of all taxes, social security, state disability
insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other
payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents and
employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with
the services to be performed hereunder.
13 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good
and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR' S services
hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not
PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by
CITY shall be made in writing through the City Engineer, notice of
which shall be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16
herein.
14 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement is a personal service contract and the
supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to
any other person or entity without the consent of CITY.
15 . COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS
CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on
any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement.
16 . CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS
CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any regular
CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement.
No officer or employee- of CITY shall have any financial interest
in this Agreement in violation of California Government Code
Sections 1090 et seq.
8
17. NOTICES
Any notices or special instructions required to be given
in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal
delivery to CONTRACTOR' S agent (as designated in Section 1
hereinabove) or to CITY'S Director of Public Works, as the
situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed
envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United
States Postal Services, addressed as follows:
TO CITY: TO CONTRACTOR:
Mr. Louis Sandoval Mr. Richard R. Doolittle
Director of Public Works Hall & Foreman, Inc.
City of Huntington Beach 3170 Redhill Avenue
2000 Main Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
18 . IMMIGRATION
CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for full compliance with
the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and
shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of 8 U.S.C. §
1324a regarding employment verification.
REST OF PAGE NOT USED
•
19 . ENTIRETY
The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth
the entire Agreement between the parties .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers
the day, month and year first above written.
HALL & FOREMAN, INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,
munic' pal corporation
f t e ate of alifornia
B iG
ci -04gyor
Its �—
B
Its
ATT APPROVED AS TO FORM:
45.)441C4e4alil
City Clerk 6,`)"6' City Attorneys 7 -:=11
REVIEWED AND APP V INITIATED D APP OVED:
City Administrator Director of Public Works
Co, — 10 — G1
10
REQU ;o ,Es ' ' . U f-s NCIL ACTION
" 19 D to August 19, 1991
Submitted to: illarg0I-C21( c Y CL ,RK
Honorable
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrate -70
-
'
Prepared by: t-Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works -.<c)
Subject: Ron Hagan, Director of Community Services t
BEACH PARKING LOT — 11TH STREET TO GOLDEN WEST; CC-819 �' p
Consistent with Council Policy? [ J Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception _
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
The Consultant Agreement with Hall and Foreman needs to be modified to include
additional work.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Amendment Number One in the amount of $15,600 to the Civil Engineering
Services Agreement between the City and Hall & Foreman.
ANALYSIS:
On June 17, 1991, City Council approved the selection of Hall & Foreman to prepare the
plans and specifications for the construction of a Beach Parking Lot below the bluffs,
adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway, between Eleventh and Golden West Streets.
Subsequent to this action, the Director of Community Services is recommending that the
scope of services be expanded to include conceptual drawings and cost estimates for
future improvements to this parking lot. These improvements include:
1. Signage Prepare a signage program for the area within the project limits to
differentiate the uses of the various facilities associated with the beach parking, bike
path and pedestrian walks.
2. Furniture Prepare details of public facility furniture to be provided within the
project limits.
3. Utilities for Concession & Restrooms Prepare a brief conceptual study outlining the
scope and cost of sewer, water and utilities for the concession and restroom
facilities. The study will be based on the concession/restroom facilities being located
at the Golden West entry to the Beach Parking Facility. This study does not include
design of the building, layout or grading.
4. Bike Trail/Pedestrian Lighting Prepare conceptual plans for lighting of the bike trail
and pedestrian path.
5. Anti-Graffiti Measures Prepare a brief study and recommendations for anti-graffiti
measures and prepare recommendations for repairs to the existing crib walls.
6. Separate Pedestrian and Bike Trails Prepare a study and recommendations for
separating the pedestrian and bike trails.
/Y/
/
V
PIO 5/85
c'^ • •)
RCA — Beach Parking Lot; CC-819
August 19, 1991
Page 2
The completion of these additional services, now, will enable staff to properly plan for the
development and funding of these improvements. Furthermore, it will enable Hall &
Foreman to identify any portion of these improvements that should be included in the
construction of the parking lot now to avoid the unnecessary expenditure of funds later
(i.e. sleeving for future future electrical, sewer, water and irrigation lines would preclude
having to dig up a new parking lot at a later date). Therefore, the Director of Community
Services and Public Works recommend approval Amendment Number One to the Hall &
Foreman Contract.
Based on the approval of this amendment, the civil engineering fees for the preparation of
plans, specifications and a detailed cost estimate for the construction of parking lot below
the bluffs will cost:
Original Contract Amount: $59,225
Amendment Number One: 15.600
TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS: $74,825
FUNDING SOURCE:
An unincumbered funds balance of $414,200 is available in fiscal account number
E CP AS 157 639 00 (Beach Parking Lot) to cover the cost of this amendment.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Deny approval of this amendment; thereby foregoing these additional engineering services.
ATTACHMENTS:
Amendment Number One
MTU:LFS:DRN:dw
3008g/21-22
h-s-t`-. r
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date June 17, 1991
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrat _
Prepared by: -'' _
ouis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works 4# APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
Subject: BEACH PARKING LOT 6
Arte. ,40.
Consistent with Council Policy? [X or p
] Yes [ ] New PolicyExce ti. • CITY CLERK
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: 0x2.
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
The on-street parallel parking along Pacific Coast Highway between Golden West Street and
Beach Boulevard, must be removed to accommodate the addition of a third traffic lane in each
direction. Although this can be easily done, the California Coastal Commission has precluded
this action until the loss of this parking mitigated.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve the selection of Hall & Foreman, Incorporated to prepare the plans and
specifications for the construction of a Beach Parking Lot below the bluffs, adjacent to
Pacific Coast Highway, between Eleventh and Golden West Streets and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute the attached consultant agreement for a fee of $59,225.
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to expend a maximum of $70,000 to cover the
contract cost of $59,225, anticipated change orders of $5,925 and soil testing of $4,850.
ANALYSIS:
On August 6, 1990, the City Council awarded a construction contract to widen Pacific Coast
Highway between Golden West Street and Beach Boulevard. The widening of this portion of
highway is unique in that additional street right-of-way is not available; therefore, in addition
to narrowing the median island, on-street parallel parking must be removed to accommodate the
addition of a third traffic lane in each direction. Although this can be easily done, the
California Coastal Commission has precluded this action until the loss of this parking is
mitigated. A new parking lot on an existing terrace below the beach bluffs, adjacent to Pacific
Coast Highway, between Eleventh and Golden West Streets, could accommodate most if not all
of the parking spaces needed.
Therefore and in accordance with Council approval on February 4, 1991, a request for proposals
for the preparation of plans and specifications to construct such a parking lot. The request
included a review of existing field conditions including soils testing and aerial surveying, the
preparation of preliminary plans and a project cost estimate, and the preparation of final
construction documents including utilities, drainage, parking lot lighting, signing, striping,
parking meters installation and landspacing.
On March 5, 1991, requests for proposals were mailed to six qualified civil engineering
consultants. Each firm was asked to submit a written response by March 15, 1991. Staff
received proposals from the following five firms:
PIO 5/85
Request for Council Action
Beach Parking Lot
June 17, 1991
Page 2
Firm Location
David Evans & Associates, Inc. Irvine, CA
Hall & Foreman, Incorporated Costa Mesa, CA
HDR Engineering, Incorporated Irvine, CA
Penco Engineering, Incorporated Irvine, CA
Walden & Associates Irvine, CA
On April 19, 1991, a three member committee met and prepared a written evaluation of
each proposal on the basis of qualifications and experience of key individuals, staff
availability, references, approach to design of project, successful completion of similar
projects, and quality/clarity of proposal. Hall & Foreman was the unanimous choice of the
committee. Their proposed fee of $59,225 appears to be in order, considering the tasks
required.
FUNDING SOURCE:
On February 4, 1991, Council authorized the Deputy City Administrator for
Administrative.Services to transfer $415,000 from the City's Park Acquisition
Development Funds and the City's Capital Improvement Fund, into a new fiscal account
for this project.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Deny approval of the Hall & Foreman, Incorporated contract and select one of the other
four consultants or forego the design and subsequent construction of the parking lot.
ATTACHMENTS:
Hall & Foreman, Inc. contract
2973g/11 & 12
e5 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
August 20, 1991
Hall & Foreman
3170 Redhill Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting
held Monday, August 19, 1991 approved Amendment No. 1 to Engineering
Design Services Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and
Hall and Foremen for Beach Parking Lot between 11th Street and Golden
West Street.
Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records.
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
CB:bt
Enc.
(Telephone: 714-536-5227)
in CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CRY CLERK
June 18, 1991
Mr. Richard R. Doolittle
Hall & Foreman, Inc.
3170 Redhill Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Enclosed is an executed copy of the Agreement between the City and Hall
& Foreman, Inc. , for construction of a beach parking lot between llth
Street and Goldenwest Street which was approved by the City Council on
June 17, 1991 .
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
CB:bt
Enc. •
(Telephone:714-536-5227)
�, 06/10/91 11i:05 $711 553 3353 THE CROWELL INS Ijjnni
'AO410'tIL CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ISSUE DATE(MWDOIYY)
6/10/91
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
Th6) Ci owr d i Insurance Agency NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER,THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
. 1 .� v l EX-TOM OP Al TFP THE C;O»h.1"i AlFE)F.r). En'TI'F POLICIES BROW
43 C... ‘, r to Park , Suites 2t)t;, COMPANiF, AFFORDING COVERAGE
II ,.. i :;.: , i,•. 9 71-3-`' 5Oi
CUM e'AN 1 A
LEIIER
°:OMi'ANY i'
r.*NIPAN e.
f .31 l a G= , 1—rrFI to
0, C'?aid T[ , a cit.:: .
1/0 1'.edI'i ! 1 ,%vr",it
C'''-„.(- I 1,1e,:z ? :621-' LCrrEn
r11v+PB.P!'' E
Lr�sr
Gera )r _
I COVI:L.AQES _.
` .t CO CERTIFY THAT P C POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BE'._OW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO PIE.:INS.$REL)NAMEU AbOVE FOH THE POLICY PERIOD
IN Dfs_A3==D NO;"JV rt1$TANCINO ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY'ONTRA,c".T OR OTHF 7 DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CPR' Ii.4TE MAY BE I„'-;IIED OR MAY PER-AIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POL=CA E.3 OE$C ,D HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
I E1'., SI'N":ANn CONRmCN$0&si,cm POLICIES. L!IVI7S SHCW"l MAY 1;A11'r /U d w"i . .r f;y qr
le,- POLICY EFytZ' IVP ON;r'"F!XC w},f. . • r-i�.LIMtTS IN 7H4.V£4NDS
9, r iY1lf.117A#EOE POLICY idU�JI#!£`, r
^=•tFr:rr ',ADSR'TY AEso004o8 / ,T, 1 JC.IVCMH.LAGGAEGAEE $ 1000
,
'C '' ` r ^'A t "'I' F f y HL.i`It:Ln in BG I1 i.� I d -t ;;O P'OP$A fi AT .
r ,:a `Ili J. ;
-. `'� TJC'� zi:., ti i.;11'�.:: :�. ,, � r.1 GQ E'A7E 3 1000
'�'''`''°r ,', M.i.t i 0 ri a- 1 L.•1l, G T C d On ;:; I I i S. 1 L.I ' •i.1: 1 / Z.W�NA,G ADvfrii iSING,N.,I 1000
`:•' -'1-...h'ii,N .k. .$.... .1000
QV..}dt ti:;,. -.:`•1:1 -i;`.t •i1:•t SOW: : �. ,t�
e' OE( 1 one firm $ 50
EXPEN'E a.�y onr person) $
.'. t
� ~' ' ` V — i'r{;o f•'.r-f eYr� �-•riJ i. .. ), ,.�'w i.i i_/ ...,:"V:y r•-a.j. t.!t. :1
,Y; .va I .i o fc.r all cc'-.,it:-:`.A 1. l,'". tiE :; P ,..- ,.. "-')0
"-"05 ti i i.. ; the .j.p 1 i.cY period . Ike l ii .. . . y,rpor.m,
' , .-ti uv -q?a-/ i`'1^j" paYrne t.. /- I Tnc:1(:0'1- 1. . ;u Y
`riF.tlI Tl
AGF
APPROVED AS TO FORM:I
.C... ,,,A ILITY GAIL EAC' %6GREGATF,
CIT, A N 1'
. r'::U•,EIHELLit 6•OHM
By.
Jr-'Hrtr.P'S C6MPEN�ATu1r, ,�,TuiUNY
Deputy City Attorney (EACH ACCIDENT)
AND
ilvtPLpv6R °LIkGiLIfY i,DiSEASE-POLICY LIMIT)
(pl$EA$E-EACH EMPLOYEE
,,. .?rfiL''H PL442835cl 12/ 1bi J•f .1.2. 1L.,
r' r I
11 ,000 , in t}lu
----- aggregate
C1 :3CRIPTuOR Or OPPRATI':1t1S!LOCATION311/E:K'±CLE;i°SPECIAL ITEM'_d,
*EXCEPT IF CANCELLED FOR NON-PAYMENT , THEN 10 DAYS NOTICE GIVEN .
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATIONyy DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL �yR
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAIL 3n DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO TriL
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LEFT,
1 P .0 . BOX 190
HUNT INGTON BEACH , CA 92648
AUTHORIZED REPRE$ENTATI TZ
ATTN: DON NOBLEli/0n i
•AdORD 2S-S (11/$9) _ ___ JACOR OgpOCiATION 1989°
4- �o LISA rE NEDY
I_
!C.L. IYU.V�4-rl...).1)-U'n(.l •14•OUI) r'k)
•
MNIit,. CERTIFICATE OF IN RAN E ISSUE DATE SAIAIDDJYY)
6/10/91
PROOUC.R THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AE!A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND
CONPE11S NO RIGHT'S UPON THE CERTIIFICATE HOLDER. MIS CERTIFICATE
rx S NOT AIMEMA, I":g1'E! D of% ALTER THE COVERAGE AI'PORDED BY The
ASSOCIATION ADMINISTRATORS POLICIES BELOW. _
& CONSULTANTS INC COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
P 0 BOX 19570
I R"V I N E CA 92713 coupANV A �--
LETTER Ps
COMPANY tErren 9
COMPANY is
HALL & FOREMAN INC LETTER __ ..__.___ ___W__ ___ —
SUITE C-320 rMEA Y_p._.—..
3602 INLAND EMPIRE BL I HARTFORD INS GROUP
ONTARIO CA 91764 OOMPANY E
LETTER
CQYFiIAill :
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LJBTED BELOW NAVE BEEN ISSU
•• • • ET)TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY at ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCU)SKJN8 AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POI.ICiFS-
POUCT eprtylvare POLICY ELATION
'� rrrE OI'nl1YUlI/1110E I Mier'AROMA ! Link*
Lull DArc p.imADO.V1 CATIr. ,MYI I
r- .___ _..r__.._ _1,-... -._,.,M.,.._.,...
�GENEAAL IJAIIur �- _ ___ fi..EOM r P4JURY OM. $
CCMPAL l NSi'it P;qIw4 1 ROCKY INJURY AGO. $
i- PnIDA{OE1++UP7!RAn sria APPROVED AS TO FORM:i rImPearY DAMAGE WO $
I ialarfGC01.1.APSE NAZA IL1 GAIL HUTTON PPIOPEITIY DAMAGE AGO
P'ROeuCrs/COMP1J:TCD aPER, C Y AT T ORNE el a''D COMBr=OM $
II CONTRACTUALDI t P0 COMPELS) I .
.. —
I415/1PaorNT CONTRACTORS By:
BROAD PORN PROPERTY DAMAGE Deputy ty AttorneyRY AGO,
lirF
PERsoNA1. INJURY ! i
AUTOMO1uu LMII.r v i SOINLY INJURY `
ANY AUTO 1 mor 0^)
Ali.OWNED AUTOS(Prior,pow-) (BODILY RY $
ALL OWNED AUTOS ( P ) (
HIRED AUTbENON-
..__. ..u.�------ -IN THE THE EVENT OF CANCELLATION FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE $
NON-OWNED AUTOS PAYMENT, A 10 DAY NOTICE WILL BE GIVEN
oARAOE IJABILITY BODILY INJURY t
.- MIS DAMAGE II
COMBf.... .�.s.,...._ ---- wW.........._.. ..-_.._..._..._.._.._.__-----�._.,..�......._,.._..... ........,......�....-,.
EXCESS umb ury EACH OCCURRENCE 1
UMBRELLA PORN AGGREGATE O
OTHER TI1AN UMBRELLA PORN •
wORt1ERII COMPENSATION 7 2 WJ CL3 715W 9/01/9 0 9/01/91 N. I E1ATl rORY LOOrrE .
EALDH AOCIERM7 *2,00 0,0 0 0
Mb
pr1iF4SiYOls"LwaaY DISEASE-POLICY Wry 45, 000,000
a ..0 C CNPLOYEE $2 000 000
OM ER I
DI eropa'nOMI op oPERATIONsA.OcaTiONeeyelsOLEILOPECIAL flT.MS
C'E 1F1 1At $oLDlrfi . CANCELUI'61C!!t
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ililliGAMMI640.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT/DON NOBLE MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO fill: CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
P.O. BOX 190 LEFT, - • - • - _ _ . - ..
HUNTINGTON BEACCA 92648 . - - _ , __- _ _ _. -
,. . A71Ylt
S
,. -1/ . .I • $,.,' OR T
T� ___ . ._
IIGQRQ. ("I111) • • •• ItbA1
v---- -•
•
k e.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
BEACH PARKING LOT
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
February 18, 1991
I I. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE
On August 6, 1990, the City Council awarded a construction contract to widen
Pacific Coast Highway between Golden West Street and Beach Boulevard (see
attached Location Map). The widening of this portion of highway is unique in that
additional street right—of—way is not available; therefore, the on—street parallel
parking must be removed to accommodate the addition of a third traffic lane in
each direction. Although this can be easily done, the California Coastal
Commission has precluded this action until the loss of this parking is mitigated. It
is estimated that a parking lot below the beach bluffs, between Golden West and
Eleventh Streets could accommodate 300 of the 521 parking spaces needed.
Therefore, the City is requesting proposals from qualified Civil Engineering firms
to prepare plans, specifications and a cost estimate for the construction of a
Beach Parking Lot below the bluffs between Eleventh and Golden West Streets.
II. INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM THE CITY
The City will provide copies of plans used to construct the bluff face crib walling,
beach access stairways, and oil pipe chase between Eleventh and Golden West
Street.
III. CONSULTANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
The consultant will assign a responsible representative and an alternate, who both
shall be identified in the proposal. The consultant's representative will remain in
responsible charge of the consultants duties from contract negotiations through
project completion. If the consultants primary representative should be unable to
continue with the project, then the consultants alternate representative will
become the primary representative. Any other changes in responsible
representative must be accepted by the City. The City will have the right to
reject other proposed changes in personnel, and may consider any other changes in
responsible personnel as a breach of the contract.
IV. CITY'S REPRESENTATIVE
The City will assign a responsible representative to administer the contract, and
to assist the consultant in obtaining information.
V. MEETING ATTENDANCE
The consultant's fee shall include a maximum of twelve meetings. City staff will
arrange and coordinate all meetings.
3
City of Huntington Beach February 18, 1991
Beach Parking Lot Page 2 of 5
Request for Proposal
VI. EXPENSES
The consultant's expenses for travel, in house reproduction, other reproduction
used in the design process, or any other expenses will be considered as non
reimbursable, overhead expense.
VII. SCHEDULE
The proposal should include a schedule of work showing a completion date for
conceptual plan, preliminary plans and final plans and specifications. The schedule
should include a two week block for City review of each major plan submitted.
The consultant will not be held responsible for delays on the part of the City.
VIII. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The consultant shall maintain the following minimum insurance during the duration
of the project:
a. General Liability Coverage - $1,000,000 CLS per occurrence (note: If
provided coverage is under a form which includes a designated general
aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1,000,000).
b. Professional Liability Coverage - $500,000 per occurrence (Note: A
"claims made" policy is acceptable).
c. Worker's Compensation Coverage - $100,000 bodily injury by accident,
each accident; $100,000 bodily injury by disease, each employee;
$250,000 bodily injury by disease, policy limit.
IX. FORM OF AGREEMENT
The consultant will enter into an agreement with the City based on the contents of
this RFP, the consultant's proposal, and a standard form of agreement (see
attached Sample Agreement). The consultant should describe any exceptions to
the standard form of agreement in the proposal. Any such exceptions will be
considered advisory, and will not be considered in the the selection process.
X. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
Proposals must be delivered to the City of Huntington Beach, Department of
Public Works, first floor, City Hall, no later than Friday. March 15. 1991. 4:00
P.M. Five copies of the proposal should be submitted in a sealed envelope. Five
copies of the fee proposal should be submitted in a separate, sealed envelope,
marked "Fee Proposal".
City of Huntington Beach February 18, 1991
Beach Parking Lot Page 3 of 5
Request for Proposal
Proposals should contain no more than approximately 20 pages, including exhibits.
Fee proposals should contain only enough pages to clearly indicate the breakdown
of proposed fees. It is not necessary to include a breakdown of labor hours.
The following features should be included or incorporated in the proposal:
a. Page numbering
b. Index
c. Team organization chart with names
d. Graphic Schedule
e. Approach to project
f. Descriptions of similar projects
g. Brief resumes of key staff
h. Hourly rate schedule (fee proposal only)
XI. INTERVIEWS
Four firms will be selected for interviews to be held on April 5, 1991. All firms
will be notified of the selection on March 29, 1991.
The interview will allow selected firms to demonstrate their ability to produce the
required product. Any form of presentation may be used; however, the most
effective presentation material will be demonstrated experience, and the ability
of key personnel.
Interviews will be limited to one hour. The interview will begin with the firm's
presentation, and will be followed by questions from City Staff.
XII. SCOPE OF WORK AND FEE
A. Review Existing Conditions
1. Gather and review all construction plans for adjacent improvements to
determine existing conditions of general site.
2. Conduct field review and provide surveying necessary to determine
that the plans accurately represent existing conditions.
B. Preliminary Plans and Estimates
Prepare conceptual plans of the parking lot and preliminary cost estimates
for the work. The preliminary cost estimates shall be used to establish the
project budget. The conceptual design shall focus on public ingress and
egress to the parking lot with specific emphasis on a Golden West entrance
and an Eleventh Street exit. Consultant shall obtain conceptual input from
the City Engineer an the City's Traffic Engineer.
•
City of Huntington Beach December 19, 1990
Master Plan of Drainage Page 4 of 5
Request for Proposal
C. Surveying
Provide design surveying services to gather all necessary data to complete
the improvement plans.
D. Utilities
1. Contact all utility companies, including oil companies, to verify
location of substructures and overheads, determine possible conflicts
and relocations and removals.
2. Determine conflicts of existing structures, include retaining walls, pipe
chase, seawalls, and stairways.
3. Show all existing lines, depths, and structures on a layout plan (Scale:
1" = 40').
Determine all needed relocations and assist the city in preparation of
relocation notices and relocation scheduling.
E. Drainage
Determine if and what kind of a parking lot drainage system is required.
F. Parking Lot Lighting
Parking lot lighting shall be a part of this project. This shall be a Southern
California Edison Company system. The consultant shall coordinate with the
Edison Company and provide construction plans for the services, conduits
structures and all appurtenances that will be required to be installed by the
City's construction contract for the parking lot lighting.
G. Signing, Striping
Prepare signing and striping plans for the proposed improvements.
H. Landscaping
Prepare a landscaping and irrigation plan for required landscape
improvements.
I. Final Construction Drawings
Final construction drawings shall be provided for all work required to
complete the project, including but not limited to the following:
1. Improvement plans for the parking lot and ingress/egress roadways at
Golden West Street and Eleventh Street.
City of Huntington Beach February 18, 1991
Beach Parking Lot Page 5 of 5
Request for Proposal
2. Structure plans for seawalls and drainage facilities. (Note: Seawall at
Golden West Street ingress roadway will have to be relocated.)
3. Landscape and irrigation plans.
4. Parking lot signing and striping plans.
J. Finalized Construction Specifications
Prepare construction specifications to conform with the City's
requirements/standards.
K. Construction Cost Estimates
Prepare a detailed construction cost estimate for the project.
L. Bid Documents
Prepare and provide 40 sets of plans and specifications for bidding.
XV. EVALUATION CRITERIA
The criteria below will be used in evaluating proposals. (Note: Fee proposals, to
be submitted in a separate envelope, will not be part of the evaluation process.
However, if the fee of our first choice far exceeds that of other the consultants,
then staff may reevaluate their choice of a consultant.)
1. (30%) Qualifications and experience of key individuals.
2. (30%) Ability to devote the necessary resources to complete the
project.
3. (10%) References.
4. (20%) Successful completion of similar projects, by key individuals.
5. (10%) Quality and clarity of proposals.
0454G
he.
hie g
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • LAND SURVEYING
PO
•
1MS° X.1';(1**141 !
FEE
PROPOSAL
3170 REDHILL AVENUE • COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-3428 • (714) 641-8777 • FAX (714) 641-0170
COSTA MESA • ONTARIO • PLACENTIA
emaaec.
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • LAND SURVEYING
March 27 , 1991 P191-067
City of Huntington Beach
Department of Public Works
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Attention: Robert Eichblatt, P.E.
City Engineer
Regarding: Beach Parking Lot - Fee Proposal
Coincident with the submittal of our Proposal, which outlines
the Scope of Services, please consider the following Fee
Proposal .
Based on conversations with Staff, there seems to be a few
design aspects that remain "outstanding" and will need to be
resolved and "locked down" during final design. These include
such items as decel/accel lanes; one-way or two-way traffic;
disposition of a portion of the sea wall ; mid-lot turn around;
extent and configuration of landscaping; and the breadth and
detail of soils and geotechnical testing. These type of issues
- to expand or exclude - have a bearing on the Scope of Services
and its corresponding fee.
We have analyzed the project requirements in two ways - from a
straightforward/no issue type of design. . . to a more involved,
design-intensive program. Accordingly, a fee range is provided
herein, which we believe will set the stage for contract
negotiations relative to both design parameters and project
limits, from which fair and reasonable compensation can result.
Please consider the following, including the attached Rate
Schedules:
Hall & Foreman, Inc.
Design Survey 8, 000 - 10, 000
Design Development/Meetings 8, 000 - 10, 000
Plans and Specifications 24 , 000 - 30, 000
Subtotal $40, 000 $50, 000
3170 REDHILL AVENUE • COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-3428 • (714) 641-8777 • FAX (714) 641-0170
COSTA MESA • ONTARIO • PLACENTIA
City of Huntington Beach -2- March 27, 1991
Dike/Runa, Inc. 10, 000 - 11, 000
Kleinfelder 4 , 000 - 5, 000
Total $54, 000 - $66, 000
We look forward to meeting with you during the "short list"
interviews, and finally the contract negotiation stage. Thank
your again for your consideration.
L F MAN, I C.
Richard oolittle, P.E.
Executive. ice President
RRD/kd
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
August 1, 1990 through July 31, 1991
OFFICE:
Principal/General Manager $135. 00 per hour
Project Director/Senior Project Manager $110. 00 per hour
Project Manager $ 95. 00 per hour
Project Engineer/Project Planner/
Project Surveyor $ 85. 00 per hour
CADD-Designer $115. 00 per hour
Designer $ 75. 00 per hour
CADD-Drafter $ 80. 00 per hour
Drafter $ 50. 00 per hour
Engineering Aide $ 40. 00 per hour
SURVEY:
Survey Manager $ 95. 00 per hour
3-Man Survey Party $195. 00 per hour
2-Man Survey Party $155. 00 per hour
NOTE 1: Client agrees and understands that if an invoice is
unpaid sixty days after invoice date, Hall & Foreman, Inc.
will stop work on this project on the sixty-first day. Should
the invoice remain unpaid ninety days after invoice date, Hall
& Foreman, Inc. will initiate lien procedures.
NOTE 2 : Client shall pay the costs, plus 15%, for any
applicable governmental fees, title company charges, well
monuments, outside vendor reproduction costs, in-house
reproduction costs, and delivery or messenger services
incurred on Client's behalf.
NOTE 3 : Miscellaneous fees shall be billed monthly as they
are incurred. Invoices shall be considered due and payable
upon presentation.
NOTE 4 : In the event this Agreement is breached, terminated,
or cancelled, or if Client-Optional Additional Services are
required, then Client shall pay Hall & Foreman, Inc. per the
foregoing.
NOTE 5: The above Schedule is for straight time only. In the
case of overtime, the rate charged will be 1-1/2 times the
hourly rate shown, and for Sundays and holidays, 3 times the
hourly rate shown.
NOTE 6: The above Schedule shall be adjusted in accordance
with Paragraph 25 of the Standard Provisions of this Agreement.
•
March 27, 1991
Mr. Richard Doolittle
Hall & Foreman
3170 Redhill Ave.
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Subject: Proposal for Professional Landscape Architectural Services for PCH Beach
Parking, Huntington Beach, California
Dear Richard:
Wearepleased to submit to you this proposal for Professional Landscape
- Architectural Services in connection with the above referenced project. Attached
you'will find a Services and Compensation Schedule indicating the Elements `of
Services and the Basic Fee.
The following assumptions were utilized to develop the fee:
1. The project shall be documented for single phase construction and will not
require segmented bid packages.
2. Landscape improvements square footage shall be approximately +/-
21,000 S.F.
Also included for your review is a summary of the Terms and Conditions upon which
the fee is based. If this Fee Proposal meets with your approval, we will then prepare
a Letter Agreement for your signature.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal.
Sincerely,
THE IKE PARTNERSHIP
P. Woodward Dike
Principal
PWD:ckn
Enclosures
The Dike Partnership Landscape Architecture Urban Design Site Planning Irvine / San Diego
One Venture, Suite 100 Irvine, California 92718 714 753 1779 Fax 714 753 1479
March 27, 1991
PCH Beach Parking, Huntington Beach, California
Page 2
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SERVICES AND COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
BASIC SERVICES: BASIC FEE:
ANALYSIS AND PROGRAMMING PHASE NOT A PART
Site Visit
Existing Data Review
Client/User Needs and Objectives ID (or Design Criteria)
Site Potentials and Constraints Analysis
Program Development/Report
Coordination
Client/Consultant Meetings
MASTER PLANNING PHASE NOT A PART
Concept Development
Master Plan Illustrative
Technical Plan
Cross Sections/Elevations/Sketches
Special Drawings
Statement of Probable Construction Cost
Statement of Probable Maintenance Cost
Water Demand Analysis
Master Plan Summary (Report)
Design Guidelines
Coordination
Client/Consultant Meetings
SITE PLANNING PHASE NOT A PART
Master Plan Summary Review
Site Plan Alternatives
'Technical Plan
Landscape Framework Plan
Cross Sections/Elevations/Sketches
Special Drawings
Statement of Probable Construction Cost
Statement of Probable Maintenance Cost
Coordination
Client/Consultant Meetings
SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE (@ 40 SCALE) $2,500
Review/Analysis/Program Development
Design Alternatives (2) XX
Conceptual Plan (City Submittal Plan) XX
Technical Plan
Cross Sections (2) XX
-Special Drawings
Statement of Probable Construction Cost XX
Coordination XX
Client/Consultant Meetings (2) XX
i 1
March 27, 1991
PCH Beach Parking, Huntington Beach, California
Page 3
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SERVICES AND COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
BASIC SERVICES: BASIC FEE:
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE NOT A PART
Preliminary Base Development
Preliminary Plan
Cross Sections/Elevations/Sketches
Special Drawings
Rough Grading Concept
Lighting Concept
Plant/Construction Material Identification
Statement of Probable Construction Cost
Coordination
Client/Consultant Meetings
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE (Q 20 SCALE) $6,585
Base Plan Refinement (On clean mylar site plan provided by Civil Eng.) XX
Landscape Demolition Plan
Finish Grading Plan
Landscape Construction Plan
Planting Plan XX
Irrigation Plan XX
Landscape Lighting Plan (Fixture selection/location only)
Details XX
Special Drawings
Specifications XX
Statement of Probable Construction Cost
Plan Check Revisions XX
Coordination XX
Client/Consultant Meetings (2) ' XX
BIDDING PHASE $560
Assist with List of Bidders
Prepare Bid Forms
Assist with Reviewing Bids XX
Coordination XX
Client/Consultant Meetings (1) XX
CONSTRUCTION PHASE $1,180
Interpret Contract Documents XX
Review Shop Drawings
Review Samples and Colors XX
Perform Field Materials Selection XX
Conduct Scheduled Site Meetings (2) max. XX
Conduct Periodic Site Visits
Coordination XX
Conduct Completion Review XX
TOTAL $10,825
•
March 27, 1991
PCH Beach Parking, Huntington Beach, California
Page 4
THE PROFESSIONAL FEE, AS OUTLINED IN THE ATTACHED SERVICES AND
COMPENSATION SCHEDULE, IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND
CONDITIONS.
EXCLUSIONS TO BASIC SERVICES
Specifically excluded from the Basic Services are the following items,which are to
be provided by others:
A. Base data and information necessary for the execution of the Basic Services
including, but not limited to:
1. Project Requirements
2. Boundary and Topographic Survey
3. Utility Locations
4. Clean site plan on mylar, accurate as to scale and depicting all site
information including, but not limited to, streets, sidewalks, curbs,
driveways, parking lots, buildings (including door and window
locations), and site walls (retaining and free standing).
B. Geotechnical Engineering
C. Agronomic Soils Analysis •
D. Civil, Structural, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (including all
engineering for any proposed water feature).
E. Provision of waterproofing systems, detailing or specifications of the
_ following:
1. Structural deck
2. Connections of architecture to structural deck
3. Penetrations of structural deck including mechanical, electrical,
drainage, or irrigation systems.
F. All Governmental and Private Agency Presentations, Processing and
Coordination.
II. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The Consultant may incur expenses and costs which are not included in the Basic
Fee for Service's. If authorized bythe Client, through written change order
g jobg
confirmation, the Consultant will perform said Additional Services on a time and
material basis, according to the following schedule:
I
March 27, 1991
PCH Beach Parking, Huntington Beach, California
Page 5
Principal at $90 per hour
Senior Landscape Architect at $80 per hour
Project Landscape Architect at $70 per hour
Job Captain at $50 per hour
Professional Staff at $35 per hour
A. Additional Services include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Changes to the Elements of Services as indicated on the attached
Services and Compensation Schedule.
2. Revisions to drawings,specifications,or other documents,which are
inconsistent with previously given written approvals or instructions.
3. Revisions to drawings, specifications, or other documents, required
by the enactment or revision of codes, laws or regulations,
subsequent to the preparation of such documents.
B. If the duration of the Project continues past one year from the date of
signing this Agreement,the Consultant reserves the right to renegotiate the
hourly rates for additional Services.
III. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the Basic Fee for Basic Services and to
the compensation for Additional Services. Reimbursable Expenses shall include the
following items:
A. Expense of reproductions, including printing, xerox copying, photo
reproductions, postage and handling of drawings and specifications.
B. Special rendered exhibits, printed reports, photographs approved in
advance by the client.
C. Travel and lodging outside of Orange County to be reimbursed at cost.
D. Long distance telephone calls,facsimile transmissions,telex and telegrams.
E. Fees paid for securing approval of agencies having jurisdiction over the
project. (Plan check fees, variance applications, etc.),
F. Outside Consultant Services,when authorized by the Client,at cost plus ten
percent (1.1 times direct).
KLEINFELDER
March 27, 1991
Proposal No. 57-YP0130
Hall & Foreman, Inc.
3170 Redhill Avenue
Costa Mesa, California
Attention: Mr. Rick Doolittle
Subject: Fee Estimate for Preliminary Geotechnical Study
Proposed Beach Parking Lot
Huntington Beach, Orange County, California
Dear Mr. Doolittle:
The following fee estimate is in reference to the scope of work presented in our technical
proposal dated March 27, 1991 for the subject project included in a separate envelope.
FEE
We propose that our services be compensated on a lump sum basis for a fee of$4,400. Cost
incurred for any services provided that are outside the scope of this proposal will be
invoiced on a time and expense basis in accordance with the attached Fee Schedule after
receiving proper authorization to proceed. This proposal is valid for a period of 90 days
from the date of the proposal. We reserve the right to review our scope and costs if an
agreement to provide our services has not been reached within the 90-day period. We have
assumed that any permitting costs shall be paid for by the City.
Our preliminary site reconnaissance indicates that the site should be accessible to a typical
hollow-stem auger drill rig. If weather, access or site conditions restrict our field operations,
Copyright 1991 Kleinfelder, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
KLEINFELDER 15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite J-101, Irvine, CA 92718 (714) 727-4466
Fee Proposal For Beach Parking Lot Page 2
Proposal No. 57-YP0130
March 27, 1991
we may need to revise our fee estimate. However, we would contact you for authorization.
The scope of work as defined in our technical proposal will be performed, and findings,
conclusions and recommendations rendered, in substantial conformance with the
geotechnical engineering practice that exists within the area at the time of our study. Our
fees are due within 30 days of your receipt of our invoice.
If contents of the proposal are acceptable, please sign the attached Standard Form of
Agreement (Agreement) and return the original to us. Upon receipt, we will fully execute
the Agreement, which will serve as a formal written authorization, and return a copy to you
for your files. Please note that Provision No. 23 on the Agreement limits our professional
liability. The fee estimate presented is based on acceptance of the standard provisions of
the Agreement without modifications. Revisions to the standard provisions may require
modifications to the fee estimate.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you
on this project. Please call the undersigned if you have any questions or comments or if the
scope of work we have developed differs from that you intended.
Respectfully submitted,
KLEINFELDER, INC.
B. Ichael Yacy hyn
Branch Manager
BMY/mlh
Attachments: 1991 Standard Fee Schedule
Standard Form of Agreement
PROPOSAL II/YP0130.FEE
Copyright 1991 Kleinfelder, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
KLEINFELDER 15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite J-101, Irvine, CA 92718 (714) 727-4466
111 KLEINFELDER
1991 FEE SCHEDULE FOR GEOTECHNICAL/MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL STAFF RATES
Assistant Engineer or Geologist $ 71/hour
Staff Engineer or Geologist $ 86/hour
Project Engineer or Geologist $ 95/hour
Senior Engineer or Geologist $105/hour
Rates for Associate, Senior Associate, Principal, Senior Principal,
Court Testimony, and Special Consultants On Request
TECHNICAL STAFF RATES
Technician $ 50/hour
Associate Technician $ 55/hour
Senior Technician $ 60/hour
Senior Technician
(OSA or OSHPD Registered, ICBO or Specialty Certification) $ 66/hour
Supervisory Technician $ 76/hour
Operations Manager $ 80/hour
Drafting $ 46/hour
Technical Typist $ 40/hour
Technical Typist with Word Processing $ 45/hour
Administrative Assistant $ 45/hour
Minimum Charges For Office Time Per Day One Hour at
Applicable Rate
•
• KLEINFELDER
EQUIPMENT CHARGES
GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORATION EQUIPMENT
Seismograph,Single Channel Bison Model 1570C or Nimbus Model ES-125 $170/day
Seismograph,Twelve Channel Nimbus Model ES-1210F $440/day
Resistivity Meter, Bison Model#2390 $150/day
Soil Test Model R-40C $110/day
Megger Earth Tester $ 90/day
Magnetometer, Portable Proton-Geometrics Model 6816 $175/day
Terrain Conductivity Meter
Geonics Model EM 31 $180/day
Downhole Shear Wave Velocity Measurement On Request
Blast and Vibration Monitor,VM-100(Normal set up and takedown) $360/day
Slope Indicator(4-hour minimum) $ 40/hour
Pneumatic Piezometer Indicator
Sinco Model 51411-A $160/day
Sealed Double Ring Infiltrometer
Test Equipment On Request
VEHICLES AND MATERIALS TESTING EQUIPMENT
Vehicle,2 Wheel Drive $ 7.00/hour
Vehicle,4 Wheel Drive $ 10.00/hour
Mileage,2 Wheel Drive $ 0.50/mile
Mileage,4 Wheel Drive $ 0.60/mile
Vehicle Equipped with Standard Field Testing Equipment $ 10.00/hour
Vehicle Equipped with Nuclear Density Testing Equipment $ 18.00/hour
Vehicle Equipped-with Ultrasonic, Magnetic Particle,
and Dye Penetrant Testing Equipment $ 18.00/hour
Skidmore Wilhelm Bolt Tension Calibrator $ 37.00/day
Torque Wrench $ 37.00/day
Schmidt Hammer $ 60.00/day
R Meter(Pachometer) $ 60.00/day
Windsor Probe $ 15.00/shot
Anchor Bolt Testing Device $120.00/day
Concrete Vapor Transmission Test-Floors&Slabs-RMA $ 50.00/test
Thin Lift Nuclear Asphalt Gauge $ 65.00/day
Nuclear Asphalt Content Gauge $ 65.00/day
Coring Machine with Generator $130.00/day
Diamond Bit Core Barrel Charge Asphalt Concrete or Masonry
2"Diameter $ 5.50/inch $ 4.00/inch
3"Diameter $ 6.50/inch $ 5.50/inch
4"Diameter $ 8.50/inch $ 7.50/inch
6"Diameter $11.00/inch $10.00/inch
8"Diameter $12.00/inch $11.00/inch
Minimum bit charge-6"per core
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
Microcomputer $ 17.00/hour
Mainframe Computer Time-Sharing $ 7.00/minute
Reproduction $ 0.25/page
Facsimile copies $ 1.50/page
Report Surcharge $ 30.00 each
Video Camera $ 55.00/day
G/M91 3
SOIL AND AGGREGATE TESTS
COMPACTION CURVES
Standard 4"Mold D-698 Method A $135 each
Standard 6"Mold D-698 Method B,C, D $145 each
Modified,4"Mold D-1557 Method A $145 each
Modified,6"Mold D-1557 Method B, C, D $160 each -
California Impact CAL-216 $160 each
Check Point $ 80 each
UBC UBC 70-1 $140 each
Relative Density(Maximum and Minimum) D-4253&4254 $230 each
SOIL AND AGGREGATE STABILITY
R-Value, Untreated Material or Field Sample CAL-301 $185 each
R-Value, Cement,Lime or other Additives, Laboratory Mixed or
Reproportioned Samples CAL-301 $220 each
Correction for oversized material in sample CAL-301 $ 55 each
C.B.R. 100%Compaction D-1883,T-180 $440 each
C.B.R.Other Compaction Effort D-1883 $580 each
Soil Cement, C.T.B., Mix Design On Request
C.T.B.Compression Test,(Includes Preparation) D-1633,CAL-312 $685 each
Lime-Treated Compression Test(Includes Preparation) CAL-373 $685 each
Check Point CAL-373 $185 each
Cement-Treated Compression Test PCA EB052.06S $450 each
BASIC SOIL AND AGGREGATE PROPERTIES
Sieve Analysis, Coarse and Fine Including Wash C-136 $ 95 each
Sieve Analysis,Coarse(Retained on No.4 Sieve) C-136 $ 57 each
Sieve Analysis,Fine Including Wash(Passing No.4 Sieve) C-136 $ 85 each
Sieve Analysis,Wash(%Finer than No.200 Sieve) C-117 $ 55 each
Hydrometer(Without Sieve Analysis) D-422 $110 each
Hydrometer(Including Sieve Analysis) $165 each
Specific Gravity C-127,C-128,D-854 $ 65 each
Sand Equivalent,Average of 3 CAL-217 $ 75 each
Sand Equivalent,One Point Method $ 60 each
Plasticity Index D-4318 $110 each
Liquid Limit D-4318 $ 75 each
Expansion Index Test(Without Specific Gravity) D-4829, UBC 29-2 $120 each
Swell Test FHA Specification $125 each
Swell Pressure, Per Point $ 70 each
Chemical Expansion Test $ 75 each
Moisture Determination and Unit Weight D-2216,D-4643 $ 28 each
Moisture Determination Only $ 18 each
Resistivity of Soil(Laboratory Measurement) CAL-532 or 643 $ 95 each
pH Test(Laboratory Measurement) $ 40 each
pH Test, Lime Treated Soils C-977 $ 75 each
Organic Content—Soils D-2974 $ 70 each
Pinhole Test for Dispersive Soils D-4647 $150 each
Double Hydrometer Test for Dispersive Soils D-4221 $125 each
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
Flexible Wall, Constant Head $370 each
Flexible Wall, Falling Head EM 1110-2-1906 $370 each
Rigid Wall Permeability of Undisturbed Sample $240 each
SAMPLE PREPARATION
Trimming $ 40 each
Remolding $ 50 each
Splitting $ 45 each
Mixing and Processing $ 60/hour
4 G/M91
•
KLEINFELDER
SHEAR STRENGTH AND CONSOLIDATION TESTS
Unconfined Compression, Including Moisture Content
and Unit Weight D-2166 $ 78 each
Triaxial Compression Test
Quick Per Point D-2850 $100/point
UU Saturated $170/point
CD Saturated $260/point
CU Saturated $205/point
CU Saturated with Pore Water Pressure $290/point
Direct Shear(Quick) Per Point D-3080 $ 85 each
Direct Shear(3 point staged test) $250 each
Direct Shear(Residual)Per Point $130/point
Consolidation, With Two Time Rates $370 each
Constant Rate of Strain Consolidation,WithTime Rate D-4186 $450/test
Consolidation,Without Time Rate,Six Load Increments D-2435 $260/test
Collapse Potential $ 80 each
Note: Special testing procedures that deviate from standard will be charged on a time and
expense basis.
AGGREGATE QUALITY
Injurious Organic Matter C-40 $ 42 each
Absorption,Gravel C-127 $ 42 each
Absorption,Sand C-128 $ 42 each
Unit Weight C-29 $ 47 each
Unit Weight(Average of 3) C-29 $ 75/set
Los Angeles Rattler Test-500 Revolutions CAL-211,C-131 $120 each
Los Angeles RattlerTest-1,000 Revolutions CAL-211,C-535 $155 each
Sulfate Soundness(5 Cycles)Per Sieve Size C-88 $ 75 each
Mortar Making Properties of Sand (2 ages) C-87 $300 each
Potential Reactivity Test C-289 On Request
Cleanness Test(Referee Test) CAL-227 $145 each
Crushed Particles on Sieved Sample CAL-205 $100 each
Flat and Elongated Particles on Sieved Sample CE-119,CE-120 $100 each
Clay Lumps and Friable Particles C-142 $ 80 each
Lightweight Pieces in Aggregate C-123 $110 each
Durability Index—Coarse or Fine CAL-229 $140 each
CONCRETE
Concrete Mix Design Review $150 each
Laboratory Trial Batch, Including Compression Testing of Six Specimens $380 each
Concrete Cylinder Cured and/or Compression Tested C-39 $ 18 each
Compression Test, Lightweight Insulating Concrete C-495 $ 32 each
Unit Weight of Concrete Cylinders C-138 $ 37 each
Flexural Strength,Concrete Beam C-78,C-293 $ 74 each
Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete C-231 $ 20 each
Compression Test,Gunite $ 37 each
Compression Test on Cored Specimens(Includes End Preparation) C-42 $ 70 each
Cylinder Molds $ 2 each
Drying Shrinkage Test,set of 3 C-157,CAL-530 $360 each
Modulus of Elasticity of 6"x 12"Concrete Cylinder C-469 $180 each
Splitting Tensile Strength C-496 $ 57 each
Cement Content of Hardened Concrete C-85 On Request
Moisture Vapor Transmission Test $ 48 each
Density of Spray Applied Fireproofing E-605 $ 52 each
Unit Weight of Lightweight Concrete C-567 $ 50 each
Laboratory Trial Batch,Grout or Mortar, Including Compression
Testing of Nine Specimens $500
G/M91 5
•
FLY ASH, POZZOLAN & CEMENT
Chemical Analysis C-618 On Request
Fineness(-325 Size) C-430 $ 62 each
Pozzolan Activity with Cement,Set of 3 C-311 $160/set
Pozzolan Activity with Lime,Set of 3 C-311 $160/set
Soundness by Autoclave,Set of 3 C-311 $295/set
Specific Gravity C-188 $ 60 each
Fineness by Air Permeability(Blaine) C-204 $ 60 each
MASONRY
Grout or Mortar Specimen
Cured and/or Compression Tested C-579, C-1019,C-780,C-942, C-109 $ 29 each
Compression Test, Masonry Units C-140 $ 59 each
Compression Test, 8 x 8 x 16 Prisms or smaller UBC 24-26, E 447 $ 70 each
Compression Test, 10 x 8 x 16 Prisms or smaller UBC 24-26, E 447 $ 80 each
Compression Test, 12 x 8 x 16 Prisms or smaller UBC 24-26, E 447 $ 90 each
Absorption and Received Moisture,Masonry Units C-140 $ 60 each
Lineal Shrinkage, Masonry Units C-426,or Title 21 $110 each
Compression Strength,Brick C-67 $ 42 each
Modulus of Rupture, Brick C-67 $ 47 each
Absorption Test, Brick,5-Hour with Coefficient C-67 $ 67 each
Shear Test on Masonry or Brick Cores CAL-644 $ 72 each
Grout or Mortar Mold $ 2 each
Breaking Load, Roof Tile UBC 32-12 $ 30 each
Absorption, Roof Tile UBC 32-12 $ 50 each
ASPHALT
Specification Tests—AR Grades On Request
—Liquid Asphalt Grades On Request
—Emulsions On Request
Other Asphalt Tests On Request
Centrifuge Kerosene Equivalent CAL-303 $170 each
Extraction,%Bitumen D-1856, D-2172,or CAL-310 $105 each
Film Stripping CAL-302 $ 85 each
Stabilometer Test and Mixing of Sample CAL-366 $155 each
Stabilometer Test on Premixed Sample CAL-366 $ 92 each
Swell CAL-305 $ 88 each
Moisture Vapor Susceptibility,in Addition to Stabilometer CAL-307 $178 each
Complete Design of Wearing Surface for a Given Asphalt
and Aggregate,Hveem or Marshall Method On Request
Marshall Stability and Flow—Set of 3(Without Mixing) D-1559 $247/set
Marshall Stability and Flow—Set of 3(Lab Mixed) D-1559 $320/set
Unit Weight of Asphalt Core or Compacted Sample D-2726 $ 42 each
Moisture Content(Xylene Reflux Method) D-1461 $165 each
Maximum Density of Mix by Marshall Method,Set of 3(Without Mixing) $147/set
Maximum Theoretical Specific Gravity(Rice Method) D-2041 $ 85 each
Index of Retained Strength D-1074,D-1075 $735 each
Index of Retained Strength US Army Corps Method $500 each
Coring Charges See Page 4
EPDXY
Bond Strength C-882 $ 98 each
Shear Strength,Metal-To-Metal D-1002 $ 49 each
Gel Time MHTD T-42 $ 41 each
Shear Strength,Diagonal,Set of 2 • MHTD T-44 $345/set
Flexural Strength,Hardened Concrete to Hardened Concrete,Set of 2 MHTD T-43 $270+ cost
of cutting
Flexural Strength,Plastic Concrete to Hardened Concrete,Set of 2 MHTD T-43 $345+ cost
of cutting
6 GM91
KLEINFELDER
METALS
Tensile, Up to 0.5 sq. in.Cross Sectional Area $ 50 each*
0.5 sq. in.to 1.8 sq. in $ 60 each*
Greater than 1.8 sq. in On Request
Bend Only $ 27 each
Tensile and Bend, Up to 0.5 sq.in. Cross Sectional Area $ 60 each
Tensile and Bend, 0.5 sq. in.to 1.8 sq.in $ 70 each
Tensile and Bend,Greater than 1.8 sq. in On Request
Pre-Stress Strands,Tensile and Elongation A-416 On Request
Pre-Stress Wire,Tensile and Elongation A-421 On Request
Machining Costs At Cost+20%
Weight of Coating(Set of 3) A-90 $ 95/set
Bolts, Nuts&Washers, Hardness, & Load Tests On Request
* Does not include machining costs,if required.
WELDING QUALIFICATIONS-STRUCTURAL STEEL
(PHYSICAL TEST METHOD—ASME, AWS, API,TITLE 21)
Operator Performance and Procedure Tests On Request
Machining and Material Costs On Request
Laboratory Testing: Guided Bend Test,face or root $ 32 each
Side Bend Test $ 32 each
Free Bend Test $ 32 each
Tensile Test (reduced section) $ 60 each
Macroetch Test $ 47 each
Fracture Test $ 37 each
T Bend Test $ 52 each
Notch Test $ 42 each
Fusion Qualification Test on High Pressure Polyethylene Pipe On Request
Qualification tests also available by X-ray procedures On Request
ROOFING TESTS
Standard Quantitative Analysis $120 each
Weight of Bitumen, Ply Structure Diagram
Standard Quantitative Analysis With Gravel $125 each
Includes Weight of Gravel
Quantitative Analysis D-2829 $185 each
Quantitative Analysis(New Roofs) D-3617 $120 each
Unit Weight of Surfacing $ 60 each
Unit Weight of Sample $ 60 each
Diagram of Sample $ 60 each
Void Analysis $ 60 each
Ply Type Identification $ 42 each
Mat Type Identification $ 42 each
Bitumen Sample Recovery $ 42 each
Bitumen Type Identification(Softening Point) $110 each
Compliance Report On Request
Technical Photograph On Request
Roof Moisture Survey On Request
G/M91 7
•
TIMBER
Moisture Content Measurements $18 each, plus
technician's
hourly rate
Strip Tension Test $78 each, plus
machining cost
Truss Load Test On Request
Shear Test On Request
Qualification Test For Adhesives On Request
Face Joint Bonding Test On Request
End Joint Bonding Test On Request
Timber Tests D-143 On Request
8 G/M91
•
KLEINFELDER
1991 FEE SCHEDULE FOR GEOTECHNICAL/MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Kleinfelder is a consulting firm which provides services in geotechnical engineering,materials engineering and testing,engineering
geology,hydrogeology,environmental engineering,geochemistry,industrial health and safety,mining engineering,water resources,
and agricultural engineering. Since 1961,the firm has provided consulting services to industries,governmental agencies,commercial
firms, developers, and other design professionals.
OFFICES AND TESTING LABORATORIES
ARIZONA 4369 Caterpillar Road NEVADA
4920 E. McDowell, Suite 101 Redding,CA 96003 6850 South Paradise Road
Phoenix,AZ 85008 (916)244-7203 Las Vegas, NV 89119
(602)231-0992 (702)736-2936 ,e
11731 Sterling Avenue,Suite E
Riverside, CA 92503 3189 Mill Street
CALIFORNIA (714)688-2513 Reno, NV 89502
17100 Pioneer Blvd, Suite 350 (702)323-7182
Artesia, CA 90701 9795 Business Park Drive
(213) 860-5559 Sacramento,CA 95827
(916)366-1701 UTAH
1370 Valley Vista Drive, Suite 150 2605 East 3300 South
Diamond Bar, CA 91765 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84109
(714)396-0335 San Diego, CA 92123 (801)466-6769
(619)541-1145
1975 E Street 212 North 1000 East
Fresno, CA 93706 2160 Oakland Road,Suite B St.George, UT 84770
(209)486-0750 San Jose,CA 95131 (801)628-5231
(408)432-8952
15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite J-101 2240 Northpoint Parkway WASHINGTON
Irvine, CA 92718 Santa Rosa,CA 95407 1200 112th Avenue NE, Suite C-226
(714) 727-4466 (707)571-1883
Bellevue,WA 98004
123 Commerce Drive (206)451-2877
Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 2825 East Myrtle Street
(619) 934-6829 Stockton,CA 95205
(Seasonal) (209)948-1345
1575 West Main Street 110 Railroad Avenue, Suite E
Merced, CA 95340 Suisun, CA 94585
(209)384-7552 (707)429-4070
981 Garcia Avenue, Suite A 2121 N. California Blvd,Suite 570
Pittsburg, CA 94565 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
(415)427-6477 (415)938-5610
6880 Koll Center Parkway,Suite 200
Pleasanton,CA 94566
(415)484-1700
r!
BASIS OF CHARGES
1. Listed herein are typical prices for services most frequently performed by Kleinfelder. Prices for other services
not listed will be given upon request, as well as special quotations for programs involving volume work.
2. All sampling and testing are conducted in accordance with the latest applicable or designated specifications of
the American Society for Testing Materials, American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officiais, or other pertinent agencies. For convenience, A.S.T.M. specification numbers are quoted in the
schedule, unless noted otherwise.
3. The client agrees to limit the consultant's liability to the client and to all contractors and subcontractors on the
project,due to professional negligent acts,errors or omissions of the consultant,to the sum of$50,000 or the
consultant's fee,whichever is greater.
4. Invoices will be issued on a periodic basis,or upon completion of a project,whichever is sooner. The net cash
amount of this invoice is payable on presentation of the invoice. If not paid within 30 days after the date of the
invoice,the unpaid balance shall be subject to a FINANCE CHARGE of 1.5%per month,which is an ANNUAL
PERCENTAGE RATE of 18%.
5. A two-hour minimum charge will be made for all field services. A four-hour minimum charge will be made for
any field services in excess of two hours.An eight-hour minimum charge will be made forfield services in excess
of four hours per day. A one-hour minimum charge per day will be made for any office services.
6. Time worked in excess of 8 hours per day and weekend work will be charged at 1.5 times the hourly rate. Rush
laboratory testing assignments requiring unscheduled overtime are subject to a 50%surcharge.
7. Per diem will be charged at a rate of$78 per day per person or expenses plus 20%,whichever is greater. Per
diem will be charged for all projects in excess of 50 miles from the nearest Kleinfelder office.
8. Outside services will include a 20%markup unless otherwise noted.
9. Prices shown for laboratory work include reporting of routine results not calling for comment,recommendations,
or conclusions. Sampling,specification review,discussion,and report preparation for field testing are charged
at hourly rates.
10. We are protected by Worker's Compensation Insurance(and/or Employer's Liability Insurance),and by Public
Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage,and will furnish certificates thereof upon request. We
assume the risk of damage to our own supplies and equipment. If yourcontract or purchase order places greater
responsibilities upon us or requires further insurance;coverage,we,if specifically directed by you,will take out
additional insurance(if procurable)to protect us at your expense,but we shall not be responsible for property
damage from any cause, including fire and explosion, beyond the amounts of coverage of our insurance.
11. All soil or rock samples will be discarded 30 days after submission of final report unless prior arrangements are
made.
12. Kleinfelder does not provide laboratory testing of materials containing hazardous or toxic substances. All
contaminated samples will be returned to the client for proper disposal. Costs associated with the return of the
samples will be billed to the client.
2` G/M91
trr,,"---L., f -:ki) c:
BEACH PARKING LOT PROPOSAL
Prepared For:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
March 29, 1991
Prepared By:
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
3170 Redhill Avenue
Costa Mesa, California 92626
(714) 641 -8777
matJ .
411111111 CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • LAND SURVEYING
March 26, 1991 P191-067
City of Huntington Beach
Department of Public Works
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Attention: Robert Eichblatt, P.E.
City Engineer
Regarding: Beach Parking Lot - Proposal
Your March 5, 1991 RFP for consulting services was well-received
and we very much appreciate the opportunity to respond and be
considered.
Your beach-front project presents the City/Consultant design
team with some interesting and rather unique issues to deal
with. While not a complex, complicated works, it does hold by
its location, nature, and physical constraints some challenges
to be analyzed and resolved.
We have assembled design team members which we believe possess
the insight and experience to serve the needs of the project and
the City. Our combined local know-how and effective consulting
capabilities will provide independent thinking set within the
framework of City guidance and overall direction. The following
team member firms look forward to working in a hands-on,
shoulder-to-shoulder context with City staff:
Hall & Foreman, Inc. - Design Civils
Dike/Runa, Inc. - Landscape Architects
Kleinfelder - Geotechnical
Our proposal is respectfully submitted herewith for your
evaluation and kind consideration. We look forward to combining
with the City the collective talents to initiate the design
process as soon as possible, leading to the construction of the
finished works. Thank you.
HAiuit& A
& FORE • I�, . /
Richard R. '•ol. ttle, P.E.
Executive Vi - - President
RRD/kd
3170 REDHILL AVENUE • COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-3428 • (714) 641-8777 • FAX (714) 641-0170
COSTA MESA • ONTARIO • PLACENTIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Letter of Interest i
Table of Contents ii
Project Issues and Opportunities 1-4
Project Methodology/Approach 5-6
Scope of Services 7
Project Schedule 8
Team Organization Chart 9
Hall & Foreman, Inc. - Creating Success 10
Similar Projects 11-12
Personnel - Bios 13-14
Dike/Runa, Inc. - Bio/Experience 15-16
Kleinfelder - Bio/Experience 17-19
ii
PROJECT ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Preamble
The Commission's directive to mitigate the parking issue
presents both a unique situation and, given the City's proposed
use of the adjacent strand of beach frontage, a great
opportunity. While there are design challenges to overcome and
issues to resolve, the project in itself is composed of
manageable elements, to be dealt with using straightforward
approaches and logical solutions.
Access
Vehicular ingress and egress via PCH will need special
attention. At Golden West St. , consideration should be given to
a S.B./R.T. deceleration lane; N.B./L.T lengthened pocket for
stacking; W.B. Golden West St. restriping; along with the City's
anticipated signal modifications. Internal parking lot
circulation will dictate whether the Golden West St. interface
will be an entrance only or designed for entry/exit traffic.
With 90° parking stalls, the travel lane can easily house
two-way traffic, should that be the final decision. A mid-lot
turn-around area (perhaps at 17th Street) may then be a
consideration.
1611/1
he gradient geometry and striping of the access "ramp" into
y the lot itself will require close evaluation of the existing
�\la7' bike/pedestrian trail, general maneuverability, stacking and the
constraints of the retaining walls.
Yib The access "ramp" at llth Street will need to be analyzed as to
exit only or two-way traffic. Again, coordination and
)k
compatibility with the bike/pedestrian trail will be a priority.
Signalization of PCH/llth Street may not be critical now, yet
may be considered at a later date. An enlarged right turn
return and perhaps an abbreviated acceleration lane may be of
importance.
It is assumed that the parking system will be meter monitored,
rather than an attendant or coin operated keyosk/arm. The
latter requires generous turn-arounds, loading/unloading zones,
stacking area and abruptly changes the entire character of the
entrance.
-1-
As to bike, pedestrian and handicapped access, again treatment
at Golden West St. and llth St. will be a consideration. Will
the bike route be re-routed down along the sea wall; will the
entry/exit "ramps" be designed for wheelchair gradients; will
additional stairs be installed up to PCH and/or down to the
sandy beach; is an anodized hand rail atop the sea wall needed;
and the need to reserve areas for maintenance or lifeguard
equipment - these and other questions will need to be resolved.
Parking Configuration
It appears that sufficient width is available to provide for 90°
stalls and two-way lane traffic. Accordingly, angled parking
may not be a viable consideration. The combination of vertical
gravity retaining walls and crib walls present a unique and
varied back drop to the parking area. Landscape islands could
be planned to "tie into" the crib wall planting and located to
enhance the stairways. Opportunities may exist to include
additional landscape pockets to "break up" the linear aspect of
the travel way, to help control speed.
As noted above, with two-way traffic movement, it might be an
opportunity to provide a turn-around area midway along this
linear parking system. This could serve as a landscaped focal
point as well, which could be tied to the observation point at
17th Street or the stairs and platform at 20th Street.
Drainage
Generally speaking, runoff from PCH and the linear park drain
into curb opening catch basins. These drain in an underground
system, which ultimately discharges through the sea wall and
onto the beach.
Runoff from the bluff landscape area, crib wall face and
proposed parking area can be handled in one of two ways.
The parking lot should be designed to surface drain toward the
sea wall at perhaps 2%. A simplified approach would be to
routinely "notch" the exposed portion of the sea to allow
accumulated water to "bleed off" through the notches onto the
beach below.
A second approach involves a more costly, yet perhaps more
environmentally acceptable solution. Direct runoff along the sea
wall via a gutter to specified inlets. These "catch basins"
would be equipped with the Huntington Harbour style "baffle"
design, so as to "clean up" the water prior to beach discharge
through the sea wall.
Other solutions - simple and complex - could also be studied and
considered as well.
-2-
Grading/Paving
Close coordination with Chevron, Shell, and Signal Oil companies
will be a must to assure design and construction compatibility
with the various underground lines. Our involvement with the
13th Street Storm Drain project proved out that with few
exceptions, the records of these companies along with the City's
Fire Department (HazMat) were fairly accurate as to depth and
location.
The integrity of the various concrete retaining and crib walls
will need to be reviewed. Compatibility with not only the final
product but also with construction equipment should likewise be
checked.
The need for soils testing and pavement recommendations may be a
benefit. Further, by Commission directive or per some
mitigation measure, soil testing as to toxins may be a
consideration.
The actual design of the surface features - pavement, curbing at
planters, striping, and any enhanced paving - represent
straightforward design considerations.
Sanitary Sewer
The building of a manned keyosk, permanent rest rooms, lifeguard
facilities, and/or future concessions was not considered.
Accordingly, a sewer facility was not contemplated, however the
question should be addressed for clarity, perhaps as a further
need, relationship to a larger project, etc.
Water
A domestic or fire flow line within the parking area was not
considered. It is contemplated that sufficient volume and
pressure exist in the irrigation system atop the bluff area to
easily "tap into" to serve the minimal landscape needs in the
proposed section.
Consideration may be given for a small line hot tap to provide a
source for perhaps a drinking fountain and/or a shower stand.
As to fire protection, the need for on-lot fire hydrants (at
300' or 500' o/c) should be discussed with the City's Fire
Department. Without any structures, there most likely will not
be a need, since car fires would be equipment fought.
-3-
Lighting/Landscaping
The need for parking lot lighting should be considered, since
visitor safety and better traffic visibility are enhanced.
Type, pattern/spacing and pole height are items to be analyzed.
Power source, underground cables, photocell and non-glare
shields will be specified. The use of "standard" or theme heads
will be City directed.
Landscaping is needed to visually "break up" and soften the
expanse of linear asphalt and a line-up of cars. An opportunity
exists to blend landscape pockets with the bluff top linear park
theme, as well as with various species of ground cover at the
bluff's edge and down the crib walls.
Soil investigation will advise the need for soil/planting
additives, while drought tolerant, salt water resistant species
will be specified.
General
The City has the opportunity (and mandate) to eliminate parallel
parking from along PCH. There exists a well suited site to
provide direct beach access parking in a more controlled and
safe configuration, with opportunity to create a well-planned
facility enhanced by landscaping, stair systems and bike access.
Hall & Foreman, Inc. , working both with and for Staff, has the
team spirit, experience and know-how to help the City realize
this important project.
-4-
PROJECT METHODOLOGY/APPROACH
General
In general terms, Hall & Foreman, Inc's approach to project
development embodies. . . research, due-diligence and team
involvement. . . design development with the Client. . . plan
production. . . processing/permitting. . . and bid/construction
involvement.
Research/Due-diligence
This initial phase has a two-fold purpose. From a technical
standpoint, a comprehensive "base map" is essential. This takes
the form of a survey map, with topographic data, exiting utility
and oil facility information and construction control. In other
words, an accurate representation of the existing site. . .
indicating a clear picture of what we collectively get to work
with.
Equally important is establishing a clear direction as to the
City's objective(s) , wants, do's and don'ts, etc. A crucial
element in this project is the City-Consultant link. Staff
provides overall intent, allowing Hall & Foreman, Inc. the
flexibility to analyze site opportunities and City requirements
to propose a workable, buildable and cost effective solution.
Design Development
Following office and job site meetings with City Staff, armed
with City needs, answered questions, and the all-important base
map, Hall & Foreman, Inc's subsequent step is the generation of
a "concept" plan or plans. Design parameters - such as
retaining wall treatment, Golden West St. entrance geometry, and
the like - will be noted. Parking bay/travel way configuration
will be depicted, to give a clearer final stall count. The
relationship to PCH, the bike trail, bluff stairways, beach
access points, landscape areas and lighting elements will be
shown.
Of course a key ingredient of this phase is City review and
comment. A "brain storming" meeting would be ideal in
identifying remaining issues, ratifying acceptable portions of
the plan and amending areas requiring additional work. This
establishes the essence of the "final design" .
-5-
Final Design
Based on a collaborative effort, the preparation of the final
plans, specifications and bid documents can now begin. Using
the comprehensive base map, the geometry and design elements of
the access "ramps", parking lot, travel lane, and landscape
planters will be completed.
The Striping/Signage Plan will follow, in concert with the
Lighting Plan coordinated between SCE and the City. In tandum,
Dike/Runa, Inc. will work closely with Staff to implement the
landscape and irrigation elements so important to the visual
integrity of the project.
Plans, together with comprehensive Standard Specifications and
Special Provisions will be processed with Staff. Again,
submittal and "pick up" meetings will be important to clarify
input and use time effectively.
Processing/Permitting/Bidding
Through proper plan check processing and by maintaining a high
level of communication and team spirit, a timely and productive
process is envisioned. With plan approval and preparation of
bid sets, Hall Foreman, Inc. will remain "on-call" during the
bid period. Further, Hall & Foreman, Inc. can provide project
continuity during the actual construction phase by providing
project management and construction surveying services if so
retained.
-6-
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The items enumerated A through L in the City's February 18, 1991
RFP have been included and accounted for in their entirety. An
abbreviated line item for each task is outlined herein, arranged
in the order of occurrence. Please consider the following:
Scope of Services
Pre-Design Services
1. Research, obtain and analyze available record data from
City, CalTrans, various oil and utility companies, and
others as deemed necessary.
2 . Arrange, attend and participate in City/Consultant
pre-design Meetings both at City Hall and the job site.
3 . Establish and set Aerial Control.
4 . Provide Aerial Topographic Survey Map.
5. Perform Field Topographic Survey to supplement (spot
elevations) #4 above.
6. Prepare Composite Topo/Utility Plan as an existing condition
base map.
7. Perform preliminary soils/geotechnical testing and prepare
Preliminary Soils report, with recommendations.
8. Prepare Conceptual Parking Lot Plan based on collaborative
input, for City review, amending and ratification.
9 . Prepare Preliminary Quantity Estimate based on #8 above.
10. Prepare Preliminary Cost Estimate for budgeting purposes.
Design Services
11. Prepare Grading/Drainage/Paving Plan for parking lot,
access "ramps" and turn-around.
12 . Prepare Parking Lot Striping/Signage Plan.
13 . Prepare Parking Lot Lighting Plan.
14 . Prepare Parking Lot Landscape/Irrigation Plan.
15. Prepare Project Specifications.
16. Prepare Final Quantity Estimate.
17. Prepare Final Cost Estimate.
18. Provide Plans and Specifications (40 sets) for inclusion in
City's bid package.
19 . Attend and participate in City/Consultant Meetings.
-7-
PROJECT SCHEDULE: BEACH PARKING LOT
91 9
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J
Task Name 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
PLANNING/ENTITLEMENT
Selection Process moms
Kickoff Meetings •
Research/Due Diligence . • -
Design Survey I •-
Concept Planning I u
City Review
ENGINEERING/PROCESSING I • •
Final Design
City Review I • • •
Plan Amendments •�
CITY APPROVAL
PRE CONSTRUCTION I • •
Bid Process • • • • •
Selection/Award I • •
Mobilization I �
CONSTRUCTION
8
TEAM ORGANIZATION CHART
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RICK DOOLITTLE
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
GEORGE PAULSEN
PROJECT DIRECTOR
DIKE/RUNA, INC. KLEINFELDER
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT GEOTECHNICAL
ADAM WRIGHT HAROLD GARCELON JON SOLLIE
CIVIL DESIGN TRAFFIC/LIGHTING DESIGN SURVEY
9
CREATING SUCCESS FOR OUR CLIENTS
Hall & Foreman, Inc. is committed to the success of the City's
project. This year celebrating our 30th anniversary, we are
proud of our industry involvement. Since 1961, consistently
productive results in civil engineering and surveying have
propelled Hall & Foreman, Inc. to a leading position in the
public works and development industries throughout Southern
California.
Under the direction of principals George Shambeck and Richard
Doolittle, 3 offices of Hall & Foreman, Inc. provide
individualized service to the special needs of each Client. We
are a dedicated team of professional engineers, planners and
surveyors combining experience and emerging technology with
analytical practicality to ensure the integrity of every project
from start to finish. The results are cost-effective, innovated
solutions to increasingly complex issues.
A partnership of trust is built with each Client through our
written Performance Commitment, assuring responsive,
comprehensive and timely service. The professionals of Hall &
Foreman, Inc. participate as an integral element in the Client's
project team from site evaluation, surveying, planning,
processing, engineering and construction on a variety of project
types and sizes. Additionally, we are a leader in the
application of computer technology and engineering design and
drafting, and in survey technology.
Hall & Foreman is a team of dedicated, involved people blending
over 30 years of experience with progressive thinking and
technology to create success for our clients. . . like the City of
Huntington Beach.
-10-
SIMILAR PROJECTS
Main Street Parking Lot - Garden Grove
Project Manager Adam Wright prepared grading, drainage, and
paving plans for the City's 8-acre municipal parking lot within
their Redevelopment District.
Ocean Boulevard - Long Beach
Project Director George Paulsen served as Design Manager for
this 2-mile road/parking area improvement project between
Alamitos and Belmont Avenues. Design elements included pavement
redesign to retrofit adjacent facilities, selective removal of
paved areas, coordination with utility companies and curb
reconstruction.
Rail Transit Authority - Long Beach
George Paulsen managed the design team on this 0.75 mile access
road and adjacent parking area. Coordination with such
underground facilities as sewer, water, communications, power,
and related on-sites were a major part of the effort.
Beach Parking Lot - Huntington Beach
Rick Doolittle, the company's Principle-in-Charge, while
Assistant Engineer in the City's Public Works Department, was
involved in the design and survey of the parking facility south
of (the pier) Main Street. Elements included PCH
ingress/egress, grading, paving, drainage and landscape islands.
OCTD Bus Depot - Irvine
Adam Wright performed as Project Engineer for the County for the
design development of their maintenance, parking and fueling
facility located in Irvine. Plans included grading, paving and
drainage considerations.
Dale's RV Storage/Parking Lot - Irvine
Design of the 300-vehicle facility included flood plain
mitigation, SCE coordination and Harvard Parkway access
considerations. Our involvement spanned entitlement, design
survey, design, processing and construction staking aspects.
-11-
Willow Highlands - Placentia
This 130-unit townhome project for Sand Dollar Development is
currently under design. Site Development includes linear
parking bays and a storage/staging area for R.V. parking.
Design is being coordinated with Black Hawke Oil Company to
"fit" the design around existing oil wells, provide for rig
access, and to accommodate underground pipeline facilities.
13th Street Storm Drain - Huntington Beach
This drainage facility which is located within the subject
project site, serves a major part of the "old town" residential
neighborhood. Consulting services included Caltrans permitting
for PCH jacking, close coordination with various oil companies
as well as the City's Fire Department (Oil Operations) , and the
Coastal Commission for the beach outfall. Design elements
involved bike trail re-routing, retaining wall undercut, service
road detouring and a discharge opening in the the major sea
wall.
Huntington Beach Art Center - Huntington Beach
Dike/Runa, Inc. , our landscape architect team member is
currently providing creative design plans and construction
documents for the improvement of the Art Center.
-12-
PERSONNEL - BIOS
Richard R. Doolittle, P.E./Principal-in-Charge
Mr. Doolittle directs the firm's office engineering and
supervision, as well as oversees the marketing effort. A
Registered Civil Engineer in both California and Arizona, he
earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics and a
Master's degree in Civil Engineering from California State
University, Long Beach. Prior to joining Hall & Foreman, Inc.
in 1975, Doolittle was both a surveyor and civil engineer with
the City of Huntington Beach where he gained valuable hands-on
experience. Subsequently, he specialized in Transportation
Planning and Environmental Engineering. Doolittle is a member
of the ASCE and several building groups, and has participated on
many advisory/technical committees.
George Paulsen, P.E./Project Director
Mr. Paulsen has extensive involvement in public works and land
development engineering. His career spans 22 years of
experience in civil engineering design and project management.
This includes conceptual/feasibility studies, planning and
design, and construction management. He has served as Manager
on many projects relating to the design of site developments,
drainage, water and sewer systems, street widenings and utility
installations. Mr. Paulsen graduated from Colorado State
University with a B.S. in Civil Engineering and is a Registered
Civil Engineer in California. He is also a member of the
American Society of Civil Engineers.
Adam P. Wright, P.E./Project Manager - Civil
Mr. Wright is a Registered Civil Engineer in California with 16
years of experience in a variety of civil engineering projects.
He holds both a B.S. in Civil Engineering, as well as an M.B.A.
Mr. Wright has broad experience in the design, engineering, plan
checking and project management of roads, highways, storm drains
and utilities. He provides technical leadership and plan
checking for our engineering projects. This involves overseeing
and development of engineering personnel for the firm, and
assuring quality in all of our projects.
-13-
Harold Garcelon, P.E./Project Manager - Traffic
Mr. Garcelon is a Registered Civil Engineer with 24 years of
experience in Southern California. His background includes the
design of extensive public and private sector projects. He has
been responsible for the engineering of numerous major roadway
and storm drain projects. Prior to joining Hall & Foreman, Inc. ,
he worked for the City of Whittier for 15 years, where his
duties included grading, highway design, traffic and lighting
engineering, plan checking and construction supervision. Many
projects have been investigated, designed and constructed under
his supervision. Harold has designed traffic signals and signal
inter-connections. Related duties include investigation and
recommending signal modifications.
Jon E. Sollie, P.L.S./Project Manager - Survey
Mr. Sollie attended LBCC and has spend over 20 years of field
time for both CalTrans and local/private entities. As a
Licensed Land Surveyor, he has extensive, "hands-on" experience
with large and small projects, horizontal networks for freeway
rights-of-way, reconstruction of state highways, ramps, parking
facilities and utilities. Jon is responsible for managing and
coordinating the surveying, computing and mapping departments at
Hall & Foreman, Inc.
-14-
li
The Dike Partnership, Inc.
The Dike Partnership, Inc. is a landscape architectural firm founded in 1987 through the
merger of Woodward Dike, Inc. and the Runa Group, Inc., both established in 1979. The
Dike Partnership, Inc. is currently a 26-person firm specializing in a full range of landscape _
architectural services. Headquartered in Irvine, California, with a branch office in San
Diego, The Dike Partnership, Inc. practices with the belief that landscape architecture
unifies art, culture and the land. Over the years, streetscape planning, design and
construction documents have been developed for both large-scale private
developments and for cities throughout Southern California.
KEY PERSONNEL
Woodward Dike, Principal will serve as Principal-in-Charge of the Streetscape
Improvements. Woody brings over 25 years of landscape architectural and planning
experience,with significant focus on streetscapes, parks and open space plans. Woody
has directed the design and planning efforts of the I-10 Corridor Landscape Master Plan
for the Corridor Beautification Authority of San Bernardino County, the Foothill Ranch
Master Plan of Streets for the Foothill Ranch Company, and the Empire Center
Streetscapes for the Haagen Company in Fontana.
' Jim Ridge,Senior Associate will serve as Project Landscape Architect for the project. Jim
has over 10 years experience as a landscape architect and is currently involved with the
design and planning efforts on the Aviara Four Seasons Resort in Carlsbad,California,the
1-10 Transportation Corridor for the San Bernardino County Associated Governments,and
is the project landscape architect for Empire Center in Fontana, California.
Karen Eames, Project Landscape Architect, will provide project coordination for the
design team, and will provide the liaison between the design team and the City staff.
Karen is currently Project Landscape Architect for the I-10 Corridor Landscape Master
Plan for the Corridor Beautification Authority of San Bernardino County, and for the
Foothill Boulevard Streetscape Plan for the City of Upland. Karen has a strong
background in planning, and has over ten years experience as a landscape architect.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
The Dike Partnership, Inc.
1-10 Corridor Landscape Master Plan and Design Guidelines - Under the auspices of the
Corridor Beautification Authority,The Dike Partnership,Inc. is preparing a comprehensive
landscape master plan for the forty miles of I-10 within San Bernardino County. The
landscape concept is based upon the historical landscape heritage of the Inland Empire,
and an expression of this heritage within the freeway corridor. The master plan includes-
specific design plans for the entire freeway right-of-way,and design guidelines for the off-
site properties within the corridor. The plan also identifies community entries along the
interstate for each of the cities involved with the project.' Riverside Avenue has been
developed as the community entry interchange for the City of Rialto.
-15-
Empire Center Master Plan, Specific Plan, Design and Construction Documents -Working
together with the Alexander Haagen Company, architects, civil engineers, and the City
of Fontana, The Dike Partnership, Inc. has been Involved with all phases of this project.
The first phase of the center is currently under construction. The Dike Partnership, Inc. has
provided full landscape architectural services for the 90 acre promotional center and 5.5
miles of streetscape. Plant materials and irrigation systems have been designed which are
particularly suited for the soils, wind conditions, and extreme range of temperature
variation. Careful attention was given to reflect the historical/agricultural character of
Fontana,and to transform Sierra Boulevard into an attractive,distinctive gateway for the
City of Fontana.
Downtown Escondido Redevelopment - Our role working with the City of Escondido, the
architect and civil engineers has been to provide a design solution which is specific to
Escondido and recognizes the emerging character and identity of Escondido. Grand
Avenue is promoted to be a vital retail shopping street which is urban yet comfortable
for its pedestrian orientation. In addition to our urban design and master planning efforts,
The Dike Partnership produced construction documents and specifications for 6 blocks
of downtown redevelopment. These projects have been constructed and are complete.
Foothill Ranch Master Plan - The Dike Partnership, Inc. has provided the Foothill Ranch
Planned Community with a master plan of the urban core; a development plan for the
central park and community parks; preparation of a resource management plan;
development plan of the arterial streetscapes; and development of residential and
business park design guidelines. To date, over six miles of streetscapes have been
installed including the first five major art pieces of the master planned community arts
program.
Burbank Gateway - Under direction of the Alexander Haagen Company, The Dike
Partnership, Inc., has been involved with completing a 41-acre redevelopment project
-
which promises to establish a bold design image for downtown Burbank. The design
• concept focuses on the romantic architecture of the 1920s and 1930s, the civic
architectural style of Bertram Goodhue, and the "California Classic" landscape with lush,
textural, sub-tropical materials and forms. The hierarchy of streets and open spaces is
reflected in the hardscape design and the planting design, establishing a strong
pedestrian environment with the urban cores. An "International Street" accommodates
both auto and pedestrian traffic in a rich, inviting environment that brings the street to
life. The landscape design also included the interior landscape of a 3-level, 700,000
square foot retail mall.
-16-
KLEINFELDER
March 27, 1991
Proposal No. 57-YP0130
Mr. Rick Doolittle
Hall & Foreman, Inc.
3170 Redhill Avenue
Costa Mesa, California
Subject: Proposal for Geotechnical Study
Proposed Beach Parking Lot
Huntington Beach, Orange County, California
Dear Mr. Doolittle:
Kleinfelder, Inc. (Kleinfelder), is pleased to present this proposal to perform a geotechnical study for
the proposed Beach Parking Lot project. The following paragraphs present our understanding of the
project, our proposed scope of work and estimated schedule for completing the study. Our fee
proposal is presented in a separate envelope in accordance with California Legislation requiring the
procurement of engineering services on a qualification basis.
BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
We understand the City of Huntington Beach (City),has awarded a contract for the widening of Pacific
Coast Highway (PCH) between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard. The California Coastal
Commission is requiring the City to provide additional parking to replace the parallel parking which
will be lost in the widening project. This parking can be provided by the improvement of a strip of
land below the beach bluffs between PCH and the beach. Based on a review of the RFP dated March
5, 1991, a site reconnaissance and conversations with Mr. Jack Miller of the City, we understand that
additional parking is required. Conceptual design indicated that engress to the parking area would be
from Goldenwest Street while egress would occur from 11th Street. The project will entail demolition
of an existing retaining wall near the PCH/Goldenwest intersection, minor grading to create
appropriate subgrade elevations for drainage and pavement construction.
PROPOSED SCOPE
Based on our understanding of the proposed project, a site reconnaissance and our general knowledge
of the soil conditions in the area, we have developed a proposed scope of work for this geotechnical
study.
Task 1 - Utility Clearance. Each of our proposed field exploration locations will be located and
cleared with known existing utility lines and the property utility companies through Underground
Service Alert (USA) and the City. We request that all available information identifying the type and
location of utility lines and other manmade objects below the site surface be provided to us to aid this
-17—
Copyright 1991 Kleinfelder, Inc.
AU Rights Reserved
KLEINFELDER 15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite J-101, Irvine, CA 92718 (714) 727-4466
Proposal for Proposed Beach Parking Lot Page 2
Proposal No. 57-YP0130
March 27, 1991
effort. We have assumed that all encroachment permits will be provided by the City at no cost to
Kleinfelder.
Task 2 - Field Exploration. We intend to advance four (4) hollow-stem auger borings within the
proposed project. The borings will be advanced to depths believed to be sufficient enough to evaluate
the subsurface soils affected by the proposed parking area. We will drill three (3) borings to a depth
of about 5 feet in the parking areas and one boring to a depth of 15 feet in the area of the proposed
retaining wall near Goldenwest.
An engineer/geologist will supervise the field operations and will log the borings. Selected bulk,
disturbed and intact samples will be retrieved, sealed and transported to our laboratory for further
evaluation. Our typical sampling interval is 5 feet. The number of blows necessary to drive both a
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler and a California-type Sampler will be recorded. Shelby tube
samples may be retrieved, if soft fine-grained soils are encountered. The depth to groundwater will
be recorded, if encountered.
Task 3 - Laboratory Testing. Laboratory testing will be performed on representative bulk, intact and
remolded samples to substantiate visual field classifications and to provide engineering parameters
necessary for geotechnical design. Testing may consist of moisture density, grain size,Atterberg limits,
R-value, expansion index and chemical analyses.
Task 4 - Geotechnical Analysis And Report Preparation. Geotechnical analyses will be performed to
evaluate potential pavement sections, lateral earth pressures for retaining structures and the potential
for soil expansiveness and corrosivity.
Following the geotechnical analyses, we will provide a report presenting the findings, conclusions and
recommendations for design and construction. We will present recommendations for retaining wall,
allowable bearing pressure, estimated settlement, passive resistance, lateral earth pressures for
retaining structures, soil expansiveness and corrosivity and pavement design. The report will contain
a site plan, logs of the borings and laboratory test results. Three (3) copies of the final report will be
provided. We do not intend to evaluate the stability of the existing sea wall or the existing crib wall.
SCHEDULING
We anticipate that the coordination with USA can begin immediately after receiving verbal
authorization to proceed. We estimate that the field work can be started approximately one week after
receipt of written authorization, depending on drill rig availability. Our final report can be issued three
weeks after completion of the field exploration. If necessary,we can issue preliminary results in letter
and verbal form about one week after the field work has been completed to expedite civil and
structural design. Our proposed schedule of design does not include factors beyond Kleinfelder's
control such as availability of appropriate field exploration, inclement weather, limited site access, etc.
-18-
Copyright 1991 Kleinfelder,Inc.
All Rights Reserved
KLEINFELDER 15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite J-101, Irvine, CA 92718 (714) 727-4466
Proposal for Proposed Beach Parking Lot Page 3
Proposal No. 57-YP0130
March 27, 1991
CLOSURE
We request that survey data be provided including accurate locations of known underground utilities
and services. Descriptions of utilities not adequately located will be the responsibility of the client.
The proposed study specifically excludes any environmental site assessment for the presence or absence
of hazardous/toxic materials in the soil, surface water, ground water or atmosphere, or the presence
of wetlands. A separate or concurrent environmental assessment may be appropriate prior to
development. Kleinfelder would be pleased to outline a scope of services for such an assessment in
a separate proposal.
In the event that obviously suspicious subsurface materials are encountered visually or by odor during
our field exploration, we will stop our work and notify your office. Any additional fees incurred due
to encountering such materials are outside the scope of this proposal and would be invoiced on a time
and expense basis after discussing the situation with you.
Our work will be performed and findings, conclusions and recommendations rendered in substantial
conformance with the general geotechnical engineering practices that exist within the area at the time
of the study. No warranty, either expressed or implied, is intended or made.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you on this
project. Please call the undersigned if you have any questions, comments or if the scope of work we
have developed differs from that which you intended.
Respectfully submitted,
KLEINFELDER, INC.
1\\*
B. Michael Yacyshyn
Branch Manager
BMY/mlh
PROPOSAL 1 1YP0130-2.PRO
Copyright 1991 Kleinfelder,Inc.
All Rights Reserved
-19-
KLEINFELDER 15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite J-101, Irvine, CA 92718 (714) 727-4466
0
[t; CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
8 2000 MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department
Director (714) 536-5431
March 11, 1992
Edick Shahnazarian
Park Rose Construction, Inc.
5658 Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 213
Van Nuys, CA 91411
Subject: Beach Parking Lot Below the Bluffs;
CC-819
Dear Mr. Shahmazarian:
After review and audit of your bid proposal package for the above referenced project, the
Public Works Department is recommending that the City Council reject your low bid. The
following items have necessitated this action:
1. Your bid proposal was incomplete. General Contractors are required to list
subcontractors doing more than 1/2 of 1% of the project work.
2. Your references did not reflect a sufficient amount of prior experience. Specifically,
according to our information, you have been in business less than one year and have
not completed a project of this size.
If you have any question, please call Mr. Randy Huttenberger at (714)536-5242.
Very truly yours,
Robert E. Eichblatt
City Engineer
REE:RH:gd
cc: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works
Gail Hutton, City Attorney
Jack Miller, Construction Manager
pon Noble, Contract Administrator
Connie Brockway, City Clerk
Randy Huttenberger, Engineering Technician
File CC-819 "Misc. Correspondence"
3191g/1