Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
HARRISON/LORENZINI ARCHITECTS - 1981-08-17
THE AMERICA! DESTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS r� AIA Document B141 H Standard F�' - n of A reemen � Betwee � x Owner and ArcLiftect t. t 1 1U7 EDITION ,A. (• THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY 15 ENCOURAGED WIr H RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION! OR MODIFICATION r+,�t re;s� ENT f��s:iilrLl sL • made aG of the :3rd day of August in the year of Nineteen Hundred and Eighty-one. r �ETWEE{'d the Owner;. The City of Huntington ;;Each as approved by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California. and the architect: HARRI5ON/LORENZINT ,ARCHITECTS 3420 Irvine Avenue, Suite 101 Newt or t. Hea,h, CA 92660 For the fallowing Project: llncltrde detat ed de-seription of Project location and scope.] Construction of one classroom addition C9ntaining approximr tely 7200 Sq.ft. aajecett4 to the existing Da;.' Care Center located on leaseWd property at the Oakview Elementary School site, Huntington Beach, California. The Owner and the Architect agree av, set forth befow. Copyright 1977, 192klM, 1091, 1953, '1958, 1961, 1%3, 1W,, 1%7,197ti,1174, CD 1977 by " .te A!:arkan Institute of Arr�SltrGtY, 1735 New Yosk Avenue, h R Wizh?ngto% Q.C. 2M. Roproduction of the masori I hereon or • Sui,St1041 TO1 AHQR of its pnMelohs withtmt `�afhii31OXI of tht C'JA violffiei the cos,.Aoit laws Of rlr8 United States and w It ixe soibjev to 1034 pN` "01ion, AiM DtYCfIft�MrIR1r1 o1h9 ER -AC I S,Fhs;,t kFk�FE#T • ThIR''12�NTH W TION < JULY 1W a ANO e 0, 1977 731E ,AMt*CAN 14$TrtV1-4 Of ARCMT�aS, 3nl %V YOKK AV NNE, H Y, WASNINGTOtr, D.t» 2". 9,141-1977 1 C, TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT AR11CLE `t ments to previous Statements of Probable Construction ARCHf3'ECTrS SERVICES AND RE,SPOt-' 'MILITIES Cost indicated b changes in re �.1ts general y g qCurer, or m.trket conditions,AIR ' BASIC SERVICES 1.3,4 The Architect s.aall assist the Owner in connection The Architect's Basic Services consist of the five with the Owner's responsibiliti for filing document- re- R nhases described in Paragraphs 1.1 through 1.5 and quired for the approval of governmental authorities hav- }, include normal structural, mechanical and electrical ing jurisdiction over the Project,'" engineering services ane any other services inciu ,iec! f 1.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATION PHASE y in Article 15 at part of Ba::,-,c Se. -s. t 1.4.1 The Architect, following the Owner's approval of 4 1,1 SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE tt-e Construction Documents and of the latest Statement t 1,1.1 The Architect shall review the program furni., --d a. Probable Construction Cost, shall assist the Owner in ., by the Owner to aseertam the requirements of the Protect oh:aining bids or negotiated proposals, and assist in and shall review the understanding of such requirements awarding and preparing contracts for construction. With the Owner. 1,5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE--ADMiNISTRATiON Y 11.2 The Architect shall provide a preltmir)z:y evalua- OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT fir. lion of the rarogralr, and the Project budget requirements, 1.5.1 The Construction Phase will commerce with :;ia r each in terns of the other, subject to the limitations set forth in Subparagraph 3.2,1, award of the Contract for Construction and togetherwith the Architect's obligation to provide Basic Services under 1 ' o 1.13 The Architect shall review with the Owner alterna- this Agreement, will terminate when final payment to the tive approaches to design and construction of the Project, Contractor is due, or in the absence of a final Certificate 1.1.4 Based on the mutually agreed upon program and for Payment or of such due date, sixty days after the Date Project budget requirements, the Architect shall prepare, of Substantial Completion of the Work, whichever occurs for approval by the Owt,er, Schematic Design Documents first, J' consisting of drawings and other Documents illustrating 1.5.2 Unless otherwise pmvided in this Agreement and J the scale and relationship of r'roject components. incorporated in the Contract Documents, the Architect JJ 1.1.5 'The Architect shall submit to ..e Owner a State- shall provide administration of the Contract for Construc- meat of Probable Construction Cost based on current tion as set forth below and in the edition of A!A Docu- area, volume or other brit costs. ment A261, General Conditions of the Chntrart for Con- struction, current as of the date of this Agreement, 1.2 tiEStGN Ei Vkt42PMEfi1T PHASt 1.5.3 The Architect shall be a representative of the 1.2.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Docu- O wier routing the Construction Phase, and shalf advise ments and any adjustments autho aed by the Owner .in and ccnstlt with the Owner. insumctions to the Contrac- the program or Project budget, the Architect shall pre- for shall be forwarded hrough the Architect, The Archi- pare, for approval by the Owner, Design Development ,zt shall havc• .anti t .ry to act on behalf of the Owner Documents consisting of drawings and other iocuntents crtiy to the ttent provided in the Contract Documents to fix :and describe the size and character of the entire u,a;ess otherwise modified by written instrument in ac- Project as to architectur t,struc'rural, mechanical and elec» cordance with Subparagraph 1.5.16. trical systems, mate ials.and such tither elements as ma) be appropriate, 1.54 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals ap- 1.22 The Architect shall submit to the Owner a further propriate to tile stage of construction or as 0iht rwise agreed by the Architect in writing to become generally Statement of Probable Construct�4n COAy familiar with the progress and quality of the Work and to 1.3 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE determine in geheial if tile Work is proceeding in aecord- 131 Phsert or, 3e, `roved Desi n Develo ment t�oc- anc- with the contract Documents. Ho -ever, the Arch!- p� B P sect saalr not be Mquired to make exhaustive or con- uments and w.ly . ster adjustments in the scope or quay- tinuous on -sits; inspections to check the quality or quan- ity of the Project or in the Project budget authori sed by tity of the Work. On the basis of such on -site observa- the Owner: the Archltt ct shall prepare; for approvar by tions as an 4rchitect, the Architect shall keep the Owner the Owner, Carlstructiotr Documents consisting of Dt tw- .informed of the progress ant quality of the Work, and ings and Specifications setting forth in detail the requirp- sha,'l endeavor to ,guard the fawner against defects and rheas for the construction of the Project. "deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor, 1.3.2 The Archt ga shall assist the Owner in the Isrepara� + ;.zs The Architect shall not have control or charge of lion of the neewixty biddipg ,rtfortrivon, bidding forms, and shall not be responsible for construction means', the Conditions of t e Contract, find It �,, form of Agree- methods, whniques, sequences or pmcedutes, or for lssentbetween the Owner and the Contractor, safety precautions and programs in connection with the 1.13 The Architect sha3l advise the Owner of any adjust- Work, nor fke acts or omissions of the Contractor, 5ub- AIh 00tV?,0HT M41 CiLyMt R 1,ACii3tCCr } GRCt 3Cttr a THlRI! CNaii ECrtTtpN • )ttLY 797i • AIM;- 01977 THC AWRIC,S# tNSCrttd C Of ARCUMCTv, 113S Nv W YORK AVENUE, N.Y., WA$'iINGTOY, 04. 2PgOb 3- contractors It any other persons perfo,ming any of the necessary or advisable for the implemeniation of the intent 4 Work, or for the failure of any of then, to carry out the of the Contract Documents, the Architect will have author- =s Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. i4, to require special inspertion or testing of the Work in r 1.5.6 The Architect shall at all times have access to the accordance with the provisions of the Contract Docu• ments, whether o, nc2 such Work be than fabricated, in - t, Work wherever it is in preparation or progress, stalled or completed, = /` i.5.7 The Architect shall determine the amounts owing to the Contractor based on observations at the site and on 7.5.13 Thn Architect shalt review take , - evaluations of the Contractor's Applications for Payment, other appropriate action upon thn Contractor's submit a'5 such 3s Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples, hO F � and shall issue Certificates for Payment in such amounts, as provided it: the Contrac' Documents, p only for conformance with the design concept of the r Wurk and with the information given in the Contract �r*' 1.5.8 The iss,, once of a Certificate for Payment shall constitute a representation by the Architect t-. the Owner, Documents. Such action shall be taken with reasonable promptness so as to cause no delay. The Architects AW revieW based on the Architect's obsery Lions at the >:te as pro- p4o4,4 of a specific item shall not incilcate approval of a:r vided in Subparagraph 1,SA and on the data comorising assembly of which the Lem is a component. >� � he Contractor's Application for Pa ment, uh;,t the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that, to the best of 1'•1`t The Architect shall prepare change Orders for C the Architect's knowledge information and belief, the qual- the Owners ocum.;l and execution e :accordance with the Contract Documents, anrr shall have authority to order rt .f it± of the Work is in accordance �r itit the Coatr.-t uocu- ments (subject to an revaluation of the Work for con- minur changes in the Work not involving an adjustment formance �:,n the Contract D^currents upon Substantial in the Contract Sum or an exten*ion of the Contract Time which are not inconsistent with he intent of the Contact r ` Compt< Lion, to the results of any subsequent tests ter Documents. quin.. by or performed under the Contract Documents, to minor devies ons from the Contract Documents cor- 1,5.15 The Architect shall conduct inspectior,3 to deter- rectable prior to completion, and to any specific qualifica- mine the Dates of Substantiai Completion and final corn- tions stated in the Certificate for Payment); and that the pletion, hall receive and ;anvard to the Owner for the Contractor entitled to payment in the amount certified. Owner's re-iowwritten warranties and related documents However, the issuance of a Certificate for payment shall required by the Contract Documents and assembled by riot be a representation that the Architect has made any the Contractor, and shall issue a final Certificate for Pay - examination to ascertain how and to, what purpose the ment. Contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the 1,5.16 The extent of f , duoes, responsibilities and lim- ContractSutn. itations of authority of the -bite t as the Owner's rep- •1.5.9 The An:hit—J shall be the interpreter of the re- resentative during constru _i sh. ' not be modified or qu rwments of the Contras: Documents and the judge ,j.' extended without written consent of thu Owner, the Con-- � the performance tl;ereander by both the Owne,• and tractor and the Architect, j Contracto The Architect shall render interpretations nec- 6 PRO) MT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BASIC SERVICES j essary for the paper cxecu!ion or progress of the Work ! with reasonable protrip'ness on w,ittert request" of either 1.6.1 if the Owner and Architect agree that more ex - the Owner or t4- Contractor, and shall tender written de- tensive tepresentation at the site than is described in cisions, within a reasonable time on all clair)s, disputes Paragraph 1.5 shall be provides:, the Architect shall pro. and other matter, itt question between the owner and the viJ: one or more Proje.( Representatives to assist the Contractor relation to the execution or progress of the Architect in carrying n tt such responsibilities at the site. j i Work or the interpretation of the Contract Documents. 1.6.2 Such Project Representatives shalt be selected, em- 1.5.10 interpretations and decisiors of the Architect shall pluyed and dhected by the Architect, and the Ar&.Itect be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable shall be .�mpensated they{ -for as mutually agreed be- from the Contract Documents and shall be in written or tween the Owner and the ,Architect as sat forth in an ex - ex- graphic form, In the Capacity of interpreter and judge, hibit appended to this Agreement, wht.:h shall describe the Architect shall imcleavor to secure faiinFul perform- the duties, responsibilities and limitations of anthorii• of 1 anr:e by both the Owner and the Contractor, shall not surly Project Representatives. E show partiellty to either, and sh?ll not be liable for the 't.6.3 Through the observations by such Project Repre- I result of any interpretation or decision rer>dered in goad sentatives, the Architect shall endeavor to `' e further faith in such capaclty. pro, protection for the Owner against defects and u ,c'sencles 1.5,11 The Architect's dec),dons in matters relating to in the Work, but the furnishing of such project rpnresenta- zrtistic effect shall be final if ctNnSister•t with, the inherit of lion shall not modify the _rights, responsibilities or obliga- the Contract DocumertT.s. tion4 of the Architect as described in Paragraph 1.5. 1.7 ADD'TIONALSERViCES The following Servir > are not included in [task Services unless so id. stifiedIn Article 15, They sha;l be provided if authorized or confirmed in writing by f.5a� 'The .Architect slt;01 have authority to reject Work the Owner, and they shall he Maid for by the Owner which sloes riot conform 'to the'Contract Documents, as provided In this Agreement,, In aadition to the Whenever, in the Architect's tomo,)We opinion, it compensation !,or Basic Services. MA, bl:WMENT 8141 4 CS1"E3t4KCN) M A7r{1:FMENT - THIME;t' If CDITION y iULY 1977 - AtAxI • 01977 4 014 -l971 1% AmfxitM lNsnTuTE 017 ARCH TEG`t`s, IVt', NEW YORK AWNtic, r,tV., wASHiM;TCN, Dlc. SMA _r y, k - i 1.7.' Providing analyses of the Owner's needs. and pro- struction, and furnishing services as may be required in gramming the requiremeris of the Project. connection with the replacement of such Work. 1.7.2 Providing financial feasibility or other special 1.7.16 ?rovi,;Iog services made necessary by the default studies. of the Contractor, or by major defects or deficiencies in 1.7.3' Providing planningsurveys, site evaluations env - the Work of the Contractor, or by failure of performance of either the Owner r ontractor under the Contract for r ; _ronmental studieor comparative studies of prospective sbmis- Construction. t sites and preparing special surveys, studies and sign; required for approvals of governmental authorities 1,T.17 Preparing a set of reproducible record drawings t R or others having jurisdiction over the Project. showing significant changes in the Work made during t f w construction based on marked -up prints, drawings and t _ a 1.74 Providing services relative to future facilities, sys- other data furnished by ti-.e Contractor to the Architect,. tems ar,d equipment which are not interded to be cc,i- structt.d during the Construction Phase, 1.7.18 Providing extensive assistance in the utilization of u° tiny equipment or system such as initial start-up or testing, 1.74 Providing services to investigate existing conuitions adjusting and balancing, preparation of operation and or facilities Qr to make measured drawings thereofor to maintenance manuals, training personnel fir % eration verify the accuracy of drawings or other information fur- and maintenance, and consultation during operation. Wished by the Owner, 1.7.19 Providing services after issuance to the Owner of 1,7.6 Preparing documents of alternate, separate or the final Certificate for Payment, or in the absence of a s: quential bids or providing extra servict, in connection final Certificate for Payment, more than sixty days after with biddi;tg, negotiation or construction prior to the the Date of Substantial Completion of the Work. completion of the Construction Documents Phase, when requested by the Owner. 1.7.28 Preparing to serve e• serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration pro- 1 7.7 Providing coordination of Work performed by ceeding or Iegaf proceeding. separate contractors or by the Owner's own forces. 1.7.21 Providing services of consultants for other than 1.7.8 Providing services In connection with the work of the normal a;chitectural, structural, mechanical and elec- a construction manager or separate con, iltants retained tricat engineering services for the Project, by the Owner, 1.7.22 Providing any other services not otherwise in- 1" 1.7.9 Providing Detailed Estimates of Construction Cost, cluded in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in analyses of owning and operating costs, or detailed quan- accordance with generally accepted architectural pactice. tity surveys or inventories of m,iteral, equipment and 1 g Ttht labor. 1.8.1 ' he Architect shall perform Basic and Adotirnal 1.7.14 !providing interior design and other similar set- Services as expeditiously as is consist,2nt with professional vices reouired for or in connection with the selection, skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work. Upon proc:.sament or installation of =urriiture, ftire7ishings and request of the Owner, the Architect shall submit for the reiaiixu zrtu=pinent. Ov ner's apprGral, a schedule for the performance of the 1.7.11 Providing services for planning tenant or rental architect's services which shall be 3diusted as required as spaces. th. Project proceeds, wid shall in rude allowances for peri. 1.7,12 making revisions in Llrawittg4, SpPcificatioiis or Olds of time requited for the Owner's review and approval of suh+nissioras and for apprz-vats of authorities having other ecum q such revisions are incorsirtent al ., urisdictionovertheProerr. r ad, o when a roved 1 his with written or insirncti>nC previously' given,l are required l the ena*anent or revision (,f codes, laws 9 y � for shall not �t for teasan. t le cau e, be by the d by the et.ceeded by the >lrchitect, or regulations subsequent to the preparation of such doc- uments or arc due to other causes not sOnly within the control of the Architect: ART WILE 2 ?.7.13 Preparing Drawings, Specifications and ;,.:aporting THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBUIFIES data and providing other services in sonrection with Change orders to the extent that the adjuatnient in the 2.1 The Owner shall provide full information regarding iiasic Oompen:Waon resulting from 6e adjusted Con- requirements for tfi'e Project including a program, which struction Cost is not commensurate with the services re- shall set forth the owner's design objectives, constraints quired of the itirchitect, provided such Change Orders are and criteria, including space requirements and relation - required by causes not solely within the control of the ships, flexibility and expandability, special equipment and A chitect, systems anti si..i requirer;ents. 1.7.14 Making fnvesti,l aeons, survey,, vatoations, inven- 2.2 if (tie Owner provides a budget fir the Project it shalt include caritingen,:ies for bidding, changes ,ra the torit-s or detailed appraisals of existing facilities, and sere- Peer required ;tt connectionconnectionwith construction pesfgrned Work during construction and ether costs which are the by t#t! owner. responsibility of the owner, including those descrrbatt ' in tlis A,-ti62 and in Subparag.aph 3.1.2, The Owner shall, f.7�1 PrSrivltlir+ fitt.suitatiort t tri cernirag reefs: t met if at the request ,.f the A;s hitest, provide a Statement of .any work damaged by fire or tither cause during funds available for the Proi .sct, and their source. MA 0ocirh4c+Vi'trttt A OWNMARCK011E t ZAIWENT "� i111r�fCl7�rN Ur7lCJ� i r1ti� * f�39if ��� JHE AMERJCiN IM,4Tt' UIT M AFtsrJOUCts, IM NtW YOU A'fENUf, N.%. is'AUPNOMN, G.C. X" B141-1977 S �nm.,.'w'gra+s�.`4u41 u,._... :,..,..... , ,. .._ _.. ....,, .•.uu..ax,_, .. ,::. .. ... ,.,:..,, . .._ I 23 The Owner shall designate, when necessary, a rep- signed, specified, selected or specially provided for by t resentative authorized ts, act in the Owner's behalf with the Archited. respect to the Project. The Owner or such authorized 3.1.3 Construction Cost does not inclined he compen- representative shall examine the documents submitted by the Architect and shall render decisions pertaining (hereto sation of the Architect and the Architect's comultants, promptly, to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the cost o; the land, rights -of -way, or other costs which are the responsibility of the Owner as provided in Anti- the architect's services, de-', tt Al 2.4 The Owner shall furnish i legal description and a " certified land survey of the vita, giving, as applicable, 3.2 RESPONSIBILITY FCtR CONSTRUCTION COST z + grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoins- 3.2.1 Evaluations of the Owner's Project budget, State- ing property; rights-oi--way, restrictions, easements, en- ments of Probable Construction Cost and Detailed t �" croachmznts, zo;ting, deed restrictions, boundaries and Estimates of Construction Cost, if any, prepared by the t ;" contours of the site; locations, dimensions and complete dav Architect, represent the Architect's best judgment as a t t { pertaining to existing buildings, other improvements design professional familiar with the construction Indus- r and trees; and full irtf^'.. a ion conct ming available serv- try. It is recognized, however, that neither the Architect t ; ice and utility lines both public and private, above and not the Owner has control over the cost of labor, mate - below grade, including inverts and depths. Eats or equipment, over the Contractor's method& of de- 2.5 The Oivii3r a;Mali furnish the services of soil engi- termining bid prices, or over competitive biddin' 7arket x veers or other consultants when such services are deemed or negotiating conditions. Accordingly; thr chitect ' necessary by the Architect. Such services shall include test cannot and does not warrant or represent bid- or borings, test pits, soil bearing values, percolation tests, air negotiated prices will not vary from the Pre budget � `R and water pnllu`�on tests, ground corrosion and resistivity proposed, established or approved by the Ot� ; if any, tes"is, iriciva,ng necessary operations for determining sub- or from any Statement of Probable Construction Cost or soil, air and water conditions, with reports at„ 1 appoopd- other cast estimate or evaluation prepared by the Archi- ate professional recommendations, tect. ;.6 The Owner shall furnish strtcctu>al, mechanical, 3.2.2 No fixed limit of Construction Lost shall be estab- chemical and other laboratory tests, inspections and re- lished as a condition of this Agreement by the furnishing, ports as required by law or the Contract Documents, proposal or establishment, of a Project budget under Sul?- 2.7 The Owner shall furnish all legal, accotrnting and in paragraph 1.1.2 or Paragraph 2.2 or otherwvise, unless such fixed limit has been agreed upon in writing and signed by surance counseling services as may be necessary at any the parties hereto. if such a fixed limit has been estab- Zime for the Project, including such auditing services as the Owner may require to verify the Contractor's Appfic, - lished, the Architect shall be permitted to include con - tions for Payment or to ascertain how or for what pur- tingencies for design, bidding and price escalation, to de- +,ermine '.what materials equipment, com onent systems y poses the Contractor uses the moneys paid by or on be.p half c;f the Owner.. and types of construction are to be included in :the Con- Con - tract Documents, to snake reasonable adjustments in the j 2.8 The Services, information, surveys and reports w- scope of the Project and to include in the Contract Docu- t quired by Paragraphs 2.4 through Z.7 inclusive shall be merits alternate bids to adjust the Construction Cost to the furnished at the Owner's experce, and the Architect shall fixed bruit, Anv such fixed limit shall -e inrreas<eo` in the be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness amount ni any increase in the Contract Sum occurring ehereof. after execution of the Contract ior Construction. 2.9 I. the owner observes or otherwise becomes aware 3.2.3 if the Bidding or Negoti,rtiort Phase has not com- of any ;cult of defect in the project or nonconformance menr~ed within three months alter the Architect submits 'with the Contract Documents, prompt written notice the Constructirn Docurnenis to the Owner, any Projea thereof shall be given by the Owner to the Architect, budget or fixetf .imit of Construction Cost shall be ad- 2.10 7',te Owner shall furnis t required informa ion and justed to reflect any change in 'the general level of prices svoces and shall render approvais and decisions as ex- in the construction industry between the date of subrnis- * . pedttiously as new -wary for the ordegy progress of the sion of the Constructior Documents to the Owner and Architect's services and of the Work, the date on which proposais are sought. b 3,2.4 if a Project budget or fixed limit of Construction ARTICLE 3 Cost t,adjusted as provided in Subparagraph 3.2:3) is ex- ceeded by th>� lowest bona fide bid or negotiated pro- sGC`NSTRI,iMON COS?' , posal, the Owner shall (1) give written approval of an 3.1 "DEFINITION increase in such fixed limit, (2) aut? prize rebidding or te- 3 A The Construclion Cost shall be the total cost or negotiating of the Project within c reasonable time, f3) it the Pro)act is abandoned, terminate in accordance with estimated sos; to the Owvner of all elements of the Project Paragraph 1022, or (4) cooperate in revising the project designed or specified by the Architect. scope and quality .�s regWred to reduce the Construction 3 1.2 The "COASIruc004 Cos', shalt include at current C,)st, to the case of (4), provided a fhted limit of Construe- mArket rats, including a reasonable allow4nce for over- tion Cost has been established as a condition of this Agree: hea6 and profit, tl ' cost of tabor and materials fumished Mont, the Architect, without ad.- ttio*ai charge, shall mod' - by the Owner and any equipment which has been ale- ify the Drat -wings and Specifications as necessary to comply AIA vocur4lt: a a4t - 40tMET.A9CH(TECr ACftt S 4Ettr'• 1114IRTF ECG H Et3tT ON t J1.0 ig7 r • A'A* 1y7,7 THC AMERICAN ISStr UTE Of i#KCHItECrS, 7735 NEW YORK AVENUE, AMU., WWWINO,TOM, D.C. 7DQ(Ki IN .with the fixed limit, The providing of such service shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility arising from the establishment of such fixed limit, and having done so, the Architect shall be entitled to compensation for all services performed, in accordance with this Agreement, whether or not the Constructiun Phase is commenced ARTICLE 4 DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE 4.1 Direct Personnel Expense is defined a, the direct sal- aries of all the Architect's personnel engaged on the Proj- ect, and the portion of the cost of their mandatory and customary contributions and benefits related thereto, such as emplayment taxes and other s.:atutory emptovee bene- fits, insurance, sick leave, holidays, vacations, pensions andsimilar contributions and benefits, ARTICLE 5 KIMBURSABLE EXPENSES %5.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the Com- pensation for Basic and Additional Services and include actual expenditures made by the Architect and the Archi- teces employees and consultants in the interest of the Project for the expenses 'listed in the following Sub- paragraphs: 5.1.1 Expense of transportation in corhs�.:tion with the. Project, living expenses in connection with out-of-town travel; long distance communications, and fees paid for securing approval of authorities staving lurisdiction over the Project, .5.1.2 Expense of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings. Specifications and other documents, e:ccluding reproductions for the office use of the Architect and the . Architect'3 consultants. 5.13 Expense of data processing; and photographic pro- ductionused in connection cuith Addi- t;onal'S rvfces. -V�1:. or extended through no fault of the Architect, compertsa- tion for any Basic Services regLired for such extended neriod of Administration of the Construction Contract shall be computed as set forth in Paragraph 14A for Addi- tional Services. 6.1.4 When compensation is based on a percentage of Construction Cost, and any portions of the Project are deleted or otherwise not constructed, compensation for such portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are performed on such portions, i . accordance with the schedule set forth it subparagraph 14.2.2. based on (1) the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal or, 121 if no such bid o; proposal is received, the most recent Statement of Probable Construction Cost or Ctataile.f Estj mate of Construction Cost for such portions or the Project. 6.2 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES 6.2,1 Payments on account of the Architect's Additional Services as defined in .Paragraph 1.7 and for Reimbursable Expenses as defined in Article 5 shall be made monthly upon presentation of the Architects statement of services rendered or expenses incurred. 6.3 t'AYMENTS WITHHELD 6.3.1 No deductions shall be matte from the Architect's compensation on account of penalty, liquidated damaftes or tither sums withheld from payments to contractors, or on account of the cost of changes in the Work other than those for which the Architect is herd legally liable. 6.4 PROJECT SUSHNSION OR TERMINATION 6.4.1 if the Project is suspended or abandoned in whole or in part for more than three months, the Architer+ 0- be rimpensated for all services performed prior it of written notice from the Owner of such susr. abandonment, together wfbi Reimbursable Expec . . due and ill Termination Expenses as defined in Pi! 10.4. If the Project is resumed after being suspend,,. more than three months, the Architect`s comper shall be equitably adjusted. 5.1.4 If authorized in advance by the Owner, exaense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates. ARTICLE 7 5.14 Expense of renderings, models and muck -ups re- ARCHA'ECT'S ACCOUNTING P..EC(P quested by the Owner, 5.1.6 Expense car any additional insurance coverage or � 7.1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses and e. raining to Additional Services an i services pi.. :Y limits, inciu ling professional liability insurance, requested by the Ow izr in +excess of that normaily carried by the t he basis a of Personnel ! Sacco sting: Architect and the Architect's consultants. n e basis be kept an the basis (,if generally arci;pted accounting generally principles and shall be available to the Owner or the ARTICLE 6 Owner's auth,=r,zed representative at mutually convenient times. PAY&IENTS TO THE ARCHITECT ARTICLE 8 ,6 a PAYMENTS ON ACCO NT-OF BASIC SVIVICES OWNERSHIP AND list OF DOCUMENTS 6.1.3 An, initial pa;rtnent as set forth in Paragraph '14.1 is the minimum payment under this Agreement, 8.1 Drawings and Specifications as instruments of sew - 6.1.2 Subsequent payments for Basic Service. shall L ice are and shall remain the property of the Architect whether the Projec" for mhich they are made is executed made monthly anti shal f be in proportion to services per- or not. 'she Owner shall he permitted to retain copies, in- formed. within each Phase of services, on the basis set cluding repmzlucible copies, of, Drawings and Specifica- forth in Article 14. tioils for information and referraice in connection with the 6.1.E !f a,hd tss;fie 6xtend,i;at theCon2tactl#me in'rtistly Owner's use and occupancy of the Project. The Drawings %tablished in xf,_ Contract for C 0struction Pr -exceeded and Specifications shall not be used by °he Owner on rich DOCt1AtCRT arts 4 01ANf3C�ACHtTEct I+GREFWW r 7rdiRTFLUM tDiTaOtr • JULY 19" - AJAV . 01977 ME ts6ta;Rt41.45TIYUtE Qf hit04[TTrnv 174S NEW IVRK AVENUE, N',W,. WMMAGTON, Vic. Tuts 81414977 7 other projects, for additions to this Project, or for comple- tion of this Project by others provided the Architect is not in default under this Agreement, except by agreement in writing and with apprcpriate compensation to the Archi- tect. 8.2 Submiccion or dsstribution to meet official regulatory requirements or for other purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the Architect's rights. ARTICLE 9 b ween the parties to this Agreement, ansm;. r<.a} ing to this Agreement or the breach thereo:. shall be d <6 d by arbitration in accordance with the Constru�- tion to stir Arbitration Mules of the American Arbitra- tion As iation then obtaining unless the parties mutu- ally agree therwise. No arbitration, arising out of or re- lating to thi Agreement, shall include, by consolidation, joinder or in a other manner, any additional person not party to this reement except by written consent con - taming a specific ference to this Agreement and signed by the Architect, th Gv, nor, and any other pi -.son sought Yo be joined. Any co - to arbitration involving an ad- ditional person or pers s shall not constitute consent to arbitration of any disput not described therein or with any person not named or escribed therein. This Agree - monk to arbitrate and any ag\1a arbitrate with an additional person or personnsetued to by t'le parties to this Agmenent shaifically enforceable and - the prevailing arbitrati9 Notice of thedemaod fon shad be filed in writing with the other party'cement and with the Arrlencan ArbitrationAsdemand shall be made within a reasonable time after tha\,c1aimdisfputveispute or other matter 1i quesrkm has, arise,`... In shallthe demand for arbitration be made afterwheninstitutior` �f legal cr equitable proceedd onsuch claim•,, .dispute or other matter in queId bebarred by the applicable statute of limitati9.3 The aware? rendered by the arbitratorfi 1,and judgmer+t may be entered upon it in aYA 10.44 Termination Expenses include expenses directly at- tributable to termination for which the Architect is not otherwir, compensated, plus an amount computed as a percentage of the total Basic and Additional Compensa- tion earned to the time of termination, as follows: ,1 20 percept if termination occurs during the Sche- matic Dcsign Phase; or 10 percent if termination occurs during the Design Development Phase; or .3 S percent if terminatiol occurs during any subse- quent phase. ARTICLE 11 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ica&l,-tl�ia.,agc�rasaeat-nil et.�asa:t-5k�i�kzaue-tlae-saeasa- z, 11.3 As between the parties to this Agreement; as to all acts or failures to act by either parry to this Agreement, any applicable statute of limitations shalt commence to run and any alleged cause o, >ction shall be deemed to have accrued in any and all evt.a3 not later than the rele- vant Date of Substantial Completion of the Work, and as to any acts or failures to act occurring after the relevant Cate of Substantial Completion, not later than ti,e date of issuance or the final Certificate for i'Aymenf, fir-- he-- GwF,er i -t agaiwci-aaslr-rathe Z,-t pats,-aget��s�f c�pla.;+ees•�f-tl�e-e3?itec¢erds�rregesntov�- .ariag�c�sszu�tivai �s-cgt fsfq.:1 , Ei4 er�t,p. A wasrat cf t�wa lilt-rac}uica-a�eta:iaxw Fi�.�:r _ . _`->•tr,�ter�-tfltaa�tt3--s+� age". Ad3ML E 12 SUCCESS: qS AND ASSIGNS 12.1 The Owner and the Architect, respectively, bind themselves their artners successors ass 'ors and le 1 representatives to the other. party to this Agre-ement and If ARTICLE 10 ro the partners, successors, assigns and legal eepresenta- k Tt`RM{NAT3ON OF AGREEMENTtives of such other party with respect to all covenanis of I this Agreement, Ni ,ther the Owner nor the Architect shall 10.1 This Agreement may l.e terminated by either party assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement upon seven days' written notice should the other party withou! the written consent of tE r2 other, fail subslantbily to perform in rrvordance with its terms ,., through no fault of tt,,e party in; rating the termination, : 10.2 This Ago tt`ment may be t �rrnmated by the Owrie1 ART{GLE 7i3 upon at least: saver; ;days' written notice to the Architect EXTENT OF AGREEMENT in the event that thL Project is ,permanently abandoned. 13.1 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated ' 10+.3 In the event of +ermina#ion not the fault of the Ar- agreement between the Ortrner and the Architect and chltect, the Architect shall be compensated for all serttces sepe» series all priior negotiations, representations or agre{.- performed t termination dale, together with $W,aburs- n;,tts, ether written a 90L This Agreement may be able Expenses then duo aaJ afi Termination Expenses as rrrnended only by written instrument signed by both defined In Paragraph 10.4, {loner and Architect. ArA DOCUMkNr 8t<i GtYt+9ARCt#ITCr tf89 Rirk2 TktIRI:EvTGt Et}tStr3N ItbCY 1^ • AI�W 1 ti ' a 9141-197,7 ME Awlticks INS`rM ft OF ARCIC Mx:rT , 1735 NO'S Y©8K AVENUE, rt w, ) c ,myi r ) ARTICLE 14 Y BAM- OF COMPENSATION The Owner shall compensate t'te Architect for the Scope of Services provided, in accordance with Article 6, Payments to the Architect, and the other Terms and Conditions of this Agreement, as follows: 14w1 AN INITIAL PAYMENT of no dollars (S ,0. a shay be made upon execution of this Agreement and credited to the Owner's account as follows: 142 BASIC COMPENSATION 14.2,1 FOR BASIC SERVICES, ar described in Paragraphs 1.1 through 1.5, and any other services included in Article 15,;' as part of Basic .Services, Basic Compensation shall be computed as follows: t' Mere insert buis of compensation, inc)pding fixed amounts, ,multiples or percentages, and identify Phases to which pxrG. itar methods 0 compehsa• tto r appfy, it necessair) r x; ; Eight percent (80.) or the Construrtir.,n Cost, not to excead $7,000_.00 f: rt, 14,12 Where cervIpion iS based on a Stipulated Sum or Percentage of Crmstruction Co.,, payments foa Setvices shall be made as provided in Subparagraph 6.1.2, so `,`tat Basic Compensation for each ;'hase l equal the following p"cpntages,of the total Basic Compensation payable: #lrklu at any addit(ond Pluses as appxpriaie,i t Schematic OeQgn Phase. Twenty percent ( 20 %) Design Dovelopmi e�i t Phase. Fifteen percent (15 0/6) Construti ion iaocumaiI Phase. Forty percent (40 %) liddingorNegotiation l':1ase: Five ,7:wxent.( 5 fin) Construction Phase; Twenty ;4ercent FOR PROJECT AEOWENTATION BEY -OND BASIC SERVICI~C, as described in Paragraph 1.6, Compensation shall be eowout sepXrateiy In accordance With Subparagraph 1.6.2. A4 00'VMENT M 1, w MYN 32 AR01RTECT AGif.EWENT - TFifOUNTH W.TION r JULY U? • AJAa * {1c T+7F 09 J.,W04CAN 12ttrI Of MC'HtUcTS,. 1715 i+iClli' VOAK AVtttX �Mw:, %Y,i INGTON, Ox 2txi0Q: Bi+{1k13`r""F 9 o 14.4COMPENSATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES G{ P 14.4.1 FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF THE ARCHITECT, as described in Paragraph 1.7, and any other services in- cluded in Article 15 as par: of Additional Services, but excluding Additional Services of ronsuivAnts, Compen- sar;on shall be computed as follows: P si•" rtiere insert basis of compensation, including rates and'or multiples of Oirect personnel Expense for Principals and employees, and identify Principals ' znd classify empioyees, if required. ldentify specific services to which particular r hods of compensation apply, if necessary.l x Two and eight -tenths (2.8) times Direct Personnel Expense of all employees except clerical staff and $65.00 per hour for Principal`s time. Thy Principals are: Ian J.N. Harrison and David I_orenzini, fix. R { 14A.z FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANTS, including additional structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services and those provided under Subparagraph 1.7 21 or identified in Article 15 as part of Add9- bona! ',rv;ces, a multiple of one and one tenth a l . I ) time: the amounts milled to the Architect for such services. lla'cn:`fy {otcilfc tlpes of consv'tants frr «4rticfe ts`, it rtrinirtd ? 14S FOR REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES, asdescribedin Article 5, and any other items included in ,article 15 as Reim burnable Expenses, a multiple of tape and one tenth 1 1.1 ) tf=s the amounts ex- pended by the Architeci, The Architect's employees and consultants in the int= est of the Project. 14.4E Payments due the Architect and unpaid under this Agreement shall bear interest from the date I. ' tmeot is due at the rate entered below, of in the absence thereof, at the legal rate prevailing at the principal place of ` business of the Architect. lHeresnsert ft rat of nerest tr due -s.) fight -tenths of one percent per rgonth on the unpaid bdlaitce over 30 d Sys from date of bill ncl. �tlsury Paws and rtquiremenu under,t c Fcrleraf Truth in ;^riding Au, sr-nrlar slate and `rrrar consumer cmda taivs and tithe, regulations at the f7wtrvt s ancf ArcGitet:6 prim' I daces of business, the location of the Proton and obewfie, may affect the validity nl :his provtslnrr. $pecitic lee" -140te, should obuine± va respect to Motion, modification, t.r other requrrernents such ar wriflon disclosures or syefvers.l 14.7` The Owrier and the Architect agret; in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement that: 14.7,Y If `Thin SCOPE of the Pl-eject or of this Architect's Services is changed materially, the amo;ants of compensation sfiall be e4u,tablyadjustbd, 14.7�` : IF THE SERVICES covered by this Agmcment have riot been completed within eight y<, t 8) months of the date hereof, through no fault of, !,So Architect, the amounts of Compensation, rate, and multiples set forth herein stall be equitably adjusted, 'ZIA450MMEN'r t040, • QWNE%-ARcHITTCT AGREEMENT • TIitRTEit4 61'rKiN t iULY 1977 • AtA* • t4,k IM 11% AM59fONN lh$tjTjjTE 0ARCHITECTS, IM NEW VC)" AVENUE, N.W,, WA'HINt)Tr.2N, OXs Ss ARTICLE 15 OTHER CONDITIONS OR SERVICES 15.1 Arrhitect agrees to perform this Agreement in accordanc3 with Title 17 of the City Ordinances for this work and the architect's proposal, which are on file with the city and incorporated by reference herein. Additional Articles 16 thy-ough 21, inclusive, are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. r4 AAA`: Y ARTICLE 16. DISPOSITION OF TNSPLC;'t'ION F INOINGS, RETORT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS }tRQUITECT agrees that Ali r ports, bo,' )t fit7.d and offier,2 notes, calclulat-ions, and other dot:umei.ts, chill be turned over to € . OWNER capon completioii of PROJECT. GWNLR hereby agrees to indemnify, hoW harmless, and defend ARCHITECT for aAid against any and all claims res;41ting from or �* arising out of the use of the reports prepared by ARCHITECT for r ARTICLE 17. DISCRMINATION: t-1 f Y ARCHITECT agrees that -n the- performance of the terms of his qn-4± menL. it will not engage in, nor parmit it,- a(lentrs to engage in, discrimination 3:n employment of pecsons because of race, :religio.,s creed, color, natimial origin, ancestry, physi- cal handicap, medical condition, marital status, or sex of such perscans except as providod in Section 1420 of the California Labor Cade, Violation of this provision may result in the imposi- tion of penalties ref irred to in Division: 2, Part- 1, Chapter 1 of the California Labor ','ode. ARTICLE 18, ItIDE 4NI ICt'XION, DEFEWSR, HOLD IIARt` U5S ARCHITP.Cl" shall defend. indent nify and ?;ojd harmless CiMMI, its officers, agents and enrj,a,oyees, from „ nd against any and all l,iabil,iL)y,, jUdgjrej3'L$, e::okmayes, coats' i.e3.isos' claims, includ- ingljor >�-r$' Cottpensa i:jon claims, and L•:Cjae2T7: vn ,i'L''`>ultiC1q,jrom or CC3P�X3'GEe'�i a�it1� AfiIGt�T7`t '1` rlL3t � ! f =e.' i t' ikt �ie•1 .�lt i tCi6]S C"f511d':w( in the pot ormanee of Aq e„nlncr*L x ARTICLC M 1101MRS' c;c MPz:NSATION. a Ittti'HITECT shall. c0ESRi)1y *Ith all of tho i i:ovisic�ns of t.hf> .n Workerzz Compensation Insurance and Safety Avt.s of tile Stlttt: of Califorrix, the applicable provi-,ions of Division 4 an6 5 of the C'aAifor~ni.a Lobo:: Code and all amandviontf, thereto, and all similar State or Fed=eral acts or :taws applicable. ARCHITECT >> shall furnish to OWNER a certificate c" Workers' Compensation insurance. The insurer shall not cancel or modify the policy iG v': J, without thirty (30) day: prior written notice to the OWNER. In the alternative, the ARCiIITECT may show proof of a cent ficilt:e �i..,. of consent: to self-insux(3 issued by the Director of Indus'tri.il Relations according to California Labor Code Section 3800. ARTICLE 203 INSURANCE. ARCHITECT` shall obtain a policy of comprehensive bodily injury and property damage liability insurance, and maintain such pol '°.r in effect. for Lhe period coverod by this agreement, providingcoverage for: bodily injury and property damage iT, the min.imuM amount of �250,000 combined single limit per occurrence. The policy shall name., as additional assurers,- OWNrR ind .its officers and ampl.oyec-sr whil.i�, acting _wit kin the scope of their ,duties, against all claims, suits, or other actions of any nature brought for or on account of any in juries, damage or osa, including any {deaths arJ.,;,Wq out of or connected with tite work of ARCiiiMT urider this contract. ARCHITECT shall Fug: ()w11q)?1 ; Z� ee'rtif .cx-ato of insurance Ct`on. the instrot ev;idvracr inq comp;liaoce with this pa raglra h urd Jlrvt�iditt,; thAt Chn I w baaII taut, c,alleeI or 1)qo f:i f v t1w poI iry wit, 1st'ttt f iti x [ prior written notice to t)t•< UR' Ar<cit 1'i'f:<."1' s}s;i i i cs Svc- t}stYt)'ER P-romPt and timely not.ive of any cl ai'm m)dr— or =;ui.t institute<i. x in addition, ARCOITIXT 8ball furnis1a U.) t.7WNIm i c"c=x,t.if icat v of in u>r'anze evidencing an error: and owls.;ion;; int;urance policy in an a►ssounL, not Les.: Ulan tine cal tr�srt Iarivo of this agreement � v ARTICLE 21. 114DLVENDENT CONTRAC`IORT t It: is further utiderstooci and agro(�d Lfa.at, A1z(;11i'i'C.'C"t is, <aXaci �N shall be, acting at al L t:issses as an its,loposa font: roots}aQto bovo n Yarstl not css an omploycn of OWNER. APC2tiTEC T m 1 ) secasrLy 1:, it!-, expense, and be resisrn,azble for any and all payment: of j nc-,t tw taxi social zecurit {� ' '�� :S�x'aL.Csr ii%5za17zls.t.y ctasaalst'SaSc'st.Cari, Oneinpl ozmexat eompensaLion and other payroll for AttCtii- TECT and its G$f1."`,it..,ers, agents and ompjt)yoc'f;, :"anL1 gill �LtSAXit' e.`i it-- ;lizes, if atty, in contacctican with t.1io services to be taL'T'i`ot"mod I4C'•T'�arltlC�rK' 'I IN WITNESS WMFREOFS the parties hereto have executed this agreement on tY the days month and year first above written. >,h' AT''£STz CITY' F HUNTINGTON 8E City Clerk ��Mayor REVIEWED AND APPROVED, APPROVED AS To FORM: City Ad nistrat' City Attorney r. INITIATED AND APPROVED: r 4-:61 M • -� fig,, t CITY OF HUETINGTON BEACH r HOUSING AND COWUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM REQUEST FOR i'ROPOSALS FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES BACKGROUND:' The City of Huntington Beach participates in the Housing and Community De- velopment Block Grant Program administered througfr the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The City has been an entitlement jurisdiction r °' " in this program since its inception in 1975, and currently receives approxi- mately $1.5 million each year to provide public tacilities, infrastructure z: improvem ots, and to improve housing conditions and economic opportunities ;o low and moderate income households. One of the projects'undertaken by 'Ne City with its Block Grant funds has been the provision of a Day Care i..ater in the Oakview neighborhood, PROJECT: The City of Huntington Beach has leased a portion of the Oakview Elementary School site upon which to provide the Oakview Day Care, Center. The existing Center contains 3,000 square feet, including three t;a;sroows, office space, kitchen, restrooms, and other appurtenant facilities, The existing racility was designed by the architectural firm of the Blurock Partners of Newport Beach. Construction of this facility was complete in September, 1980, at a, cost of $164,430. The facility is operated under contract to the City by the Orange County Department of Education. As part of the City's Community Development Program for Fiscal Year 1981-82, the City Council has appropriated additional funds for, the expansion of this fat, l i ty. 4 THE EXPANSION Pi3l`�GiIAM Available as pdrt of the wiscal Year 1981-82 Housing anu Community Development Program will be $50,000. These funds will be used in conjunction with residual' funds ;rot required 'ror the construction of the original facility in the amount of approximately $35,000; therefor,, the total budget for the expansion of the facility is85,g00. The Board of Edu>ation wiahes to use these trnrcis to p, ovide one additional class- roranS to house its extended Da Care Cro ram, This room shoo d acconuixdate 28 chlt 'tirgn an y s a e regu a ton, mus have a minimum of 980 square fe of unencumbered area: The room .must also provide for two restrooms, a sink with two faucets lacated in, the clasuroom with sufficient counter and cabinet space, a drinking fountain, and sufficient additional' square rootage to accoim odate a teacher's desk:The total square footage required is expected to be between 1,100 and I,370I1 square feet. ■ .i K 3 x € Request for Proposals f + Oakview Day Care Center Expansion Page rwo f. It envisioned that this new facility will be built as a separate free- standing structure adjacent to the existing structure on the leaseholn:-.- 'a property, and that it wound be connected to the existing structure by cove•ed walkway. The facility should, of course, provide for sufficient s{- light and cross v�otila ion, acress to the surrounding play area, and a , line to the e,,iStinq lac 116t;y's fire alarm System. 1. •',x: f t a„ a 1 Harrison/ Lorenzini ar c hi t e c: t. s, ian am harrisoi? aia david e. lorenzinl csi June 18, 1981 h:r. Stephen Kohler) City of Hunting#on Beach P. Q. Box 190' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: RFP - Oakview Day Care Center Expansion „{ z, Dear Mr Kohler Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal for the Oak - view Day C,re Center Expansion. Since our last proposal to you for the Bushe-'Gl Neig►,iborhood Gym, our firm has expanded with the addition of several key technical personnel. We have also completed several related projects which we would like to bring to your attention. F. Our firm now has a technical staff of twelve, eight of whom are Seven firm have had licensed or near -licensed. members of our ex- tensive experience with schools and public works construction;. Five of them worked previously for William Biurock & Partners, two as associates. The individuals in our film make up a team whose specialties cover every r, `ponsibility of arenitectural practice. The specialties include Design and planning, cost es*-imating and project scheduling, r. site engineering, production drawings and coordination, specifica- tions and contract administration, interior design and color coor- dination. Our individual experiance includes the design of several day and pre-schools ire the Costa Mesa area.. We have ,just recently completed a multi -purpose building for St Vincent de Paul Parish _ory Talbert StNet in Huntington Meech lfor the Diocese of Orange which w►`t built' a" time and within the budget~ More information on these projects � is included on .tire folloyOng sheets. 3420 irvitle aven-w '�nej}w�p, ort cali{forr�r+�a�q 92660 714/nl-3853 l ppbeach. yy G! Mr. Stephen Xohler } } City of 'Huntington Beach June 18, 1981 Page Tiro.;. 4 We feel uniquely capable to provide the services you are seeking because of our principals' active involvemaunt with every project.k, We deal directly with th? client's staff and supervise the ;)repay&- ..' ti on of construction do Cuments, In addition, our firm can assign higher level personnel to carry �.. out the, necessary services than larger firms which have very large, �. scare projects underway. Since both of out principals and three other staff „iembers also worked together at the Blurock Partnership at one time, we are familiar with their design philosophies and production systems. We also feel our team is more organized in the creation of an efficient operation which allows us to keep au fees as reasonable as passible without sacrificing the quality of our service. Finally, we utilize the same consultants for this tyF* of work that the BlurockPartnership uses. Our c,3ncern for coordinating their activities has won us their loyalty over the years. This last point is crucial for any firm wishing to tackle the extension of mechaoi- cal and electrical services on this project. our fee for the requested architectural services will be 8% of the const.ruction cost or a not -to -exceed fee of $7,000. We assume contract conditions equal or similar to the ,tandard AIP Contract for small construction ,projects. The proposed schedule for completion of our services will be approxi- matey as follows; Preliminary Design & Staff Review 2 weeks Design Developmeot & Staf r Review 2 Contract Documents Z tanks Submission td'Building Department Staff Review 4 weeks '. Finalization & Bidding 4 weeks Contract Administration 16 weeks Total 30 weeks = 7 months w Mr. Stephen Kohler {` City of Huntington Beach June 18, 1981< ; LL Page Three IF We hope the enclosed material is sufficient for you to Aluate the � qualifications of our firm. if you needany additional information,`" we Would.be pleased to have you visit our office for a personal tour and close-up look at our operation. We loops forward to working a with you on this project, Sincerely ;yours, s s r David E. Lorenz nri" G'.S. i OU:pl Enclosures 14 TAP . . . . . . . AR xc" ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY 0"A Aaturn orionai 4ndtllrsa coMor of i}lxtrihutfan. c ,sated cersitrcute tG: YOalOriginating Dept ClR7IFICATE OF JNSWIANCF After Apptovat in�- Riskbe City of N4ntinaton Seach TO t9y City ltttor�neY Pink - Oty Clerk 0alit Gold - City Attorney CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH. CALIFORNIA P. b sox -1 ! I 14""'Jit va13aach.Califmnfa'MxCvltb A MUNICiPAL ;OJ1PORATION l This is to *drt:{y that the mWicies of insurance as des .ibed below have been issued to the insured by thr uncle,,- ° �!_, signed acid are in force at this tirRe• If these poticies are cancelled or changed in such a manner that will f,ffect this cortiftcate, the insurance campany ngreas to give30 days "tior writtor, notice, by cons;, to City of Hontin,ton Beach, P.O. Boni 190. Huntington Beach, California 9,2648. a NAmeoflnsured.oar-r!son/ Lorenaill7' Architects OW Newport Collaborative, Inc, Addrassof Insured, WO Irvine Avenge Suite 10 i Newport Bezich, EGA 92660 Location of Insured Operations Oaky!ew ETei entaL 5,chooI s i;te Huntington Beach. CA Descriptiop of operations oaky ew Day Care rei1ter Project- # 249.01 PCiI ICIER IN FOlRCE POLICY NUM SEiR LIMITS OF LIASILISy EFs-EC'ftV XPIRA ►04 A Workers Compenk lion <, 42- Statutory emptoyere Liability , B.. Public Liability. « S300,000 combined single limit pev Occurrence. Bodily Injury Moufa^turers and Contracts: S M Each Person Comprehensive General � R00.303A --_- 2783 2782 �, S xach Accident Ur,,,Tudins products completed Dperations7 Property Damage Each Accident C. Autom.oblle Liability: _ Bodily Jnjury^ S « Each Pt-rson Accident Property Dumagx S _ Each Accident Bons policy corer: (Please check at last ott,h) All .owned autoombiles I } Yes (X )NO Non -owned automobiles ( 1 yes (X )tea Hired,au!omobiles f } Yes (X ) No D> Additional Insured El dorsoment. The, insurer sgrott that the City of rlurttington Beach and its City Council, and/or all City Conic;# apl committees, comml:sions, boards and any other City Council aplv>inted body, and/or elective r�"appr sen+ants or employees of the City of Huntington Beach, when acting A . tufts are additional ins her acts 471the insured, and such insurance Shall,rae.primery tOr any ins',Xanco sf. the City'of Huntington' E, Hold Harmless rear la y t� ns"f�d< - - (Si9ritiurol Mir the VO— __r The insured agrees to protoct, defend, indt tent y r� � ess'the City r f Huntington Beach against loss, damage at expense by reason of any suits, clai ut<stp�dgmartts and Wirer �ct!oh caused by lnsored, his employees, agents or a"ty Wbcorltractot or part" arising nut of or in consequence o rmance of all or any operations " 4YtVCred b rti+ cate of Insurance. F� APPROVED AS TO FO GAIT, HUi7 N ---- City Attrtrno !i *UTJ4OFI zE ' keptiEsgOtAT1W OF 1, tJJ AN! JN$0,9ANCP_ COMPANY Afxtslaf t?:a � fl fit;. COfI>#i Jiy a�'attt s of J£uthori2ed Sispr .0,(SroweTI Swam A: A e lftoia Street Adoteus 37130 Cam Its Sint 101 tr fah Tara is A a l Newport each, 560 y t, 1 - Submitted to: Submitted by Prepay hy- Subject: REQUEST FOR CITY C(YJNCIL ACTION lk Date Auqust 9, 1981 >- Honc;�able Mayor and City .Council APPROVBD BY CITY COUNCLIL'. 0arFes W. Thompson City�''' Administrator ___ t �- -E Department of Qeve a ices, HCD Qi ss�r— � CITY ctisRK CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES WITH THE FIRM OF � HARRISON/LORENZINI FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE OAKVIEW DAY CARE CENTER fr, Backup Material A ched: [Xl Yes [ ]No Statement of tissue, Recommendation, ,analysis, Funding Source, Alternative :actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Pursuant to the recommendation of the architectural selection committee on Jvly x 20, 1981, the City Council selected the Harrison/Lorenzini firm to provide archi- tectural services for the expansion of the Oakview Day Care Center. Subsequent to this Council authorization, staff has negotiated a contract with this archi- tectural firm and that contract is attached for the Council's consideration. RECONAENDATION:' Approve and order the Clerk to execute the attached agreement foi architectural services between the City of Huntington Beach and the firm of Harrison/LorenzImi, AIA, for the expansion of the Oakview Day Carte Ce ter, in an amount not to exceed $7,000, f ANALYSIS: I Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.03, "Professional Services", of the Municipal Code, three proposals were submitted for architectural services to accomplish the expansion of the Oakview Day Care Center. The architectural selection committee forwarded its recommendation of the Harrison/Lorenzini firm to the. City Council for its consideration on July 20, 1981. At tha+ tine, the Council approved the selection of this architectural firm and autt- led staff to negotiate a contract with the firm. The attached contract has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's office and contains the City Attorney''s usual- additional articles 16 through 21 regarding insurance, indemnification, and workers compensation. FUNDING SOURCE: U.S, Gepar'mant of Housing and Urban Development Housing and Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program,` r Page Two .ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The expansion of the Oakview Day Care Center is planned to include 1,200 � square feet in a separate stricture adjacent to the existing day care center, and will provide one additional classroom for extended day care. Without execution of an architecturM services contract, this project ,cannot move } fo ard, CWT. VK;jb� . a,is 1 1 S41;4 z a.. r I * REQUEST FOR CITY COU r..... ACTION Date '' July 10, 1981 ' Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato Prepared by; Department of Development Services, HCD Division k� $,, :Subject: SELECTION OF ARCHITECTURAL Flit FOR DAY CARE CENTER 19fV �n. 4 Backup Material Attached: I X1 `Ies j ]No � C1 -*19 r Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions STATEMENT OF ISSUE: As part of the City's Seventh Year Housing and Community Development Block Grant Program, the City Council authorized and HUD approved a new allocation of $50,000 for the expansion of the Oakvew Day Care Center, In addition, there remains approximately $30,000 unexpended from the construction of the originalfacility. To accomplish the expansion of this facility, it is necessary to garner the services of an architectural firm, and the HCD staff solicited proposals in conformance with Chapter 3.03 of the Muncipal Code, RECOMMENDATION Accept the recommendation of the architectural selection committee to designate the architectural firm of Harrison/Loren-:ni of Newport Beach as the architect for the expansion of the Oakview Day Care Center, and authorize staff to negotiate { a contract for seryicos With This firm. f ANALYSIS: In accordance with Chapter 3.03 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, staff solicited proposals for architectural services from three firms listed in the C ty's professional roster. In addition, this Request for Proposals was adver- tised in a newspaper of general circulation. Proposals were due June 18, 1981, and proposals were received from the firms of the Blurock Partnership, Anthony and Langford, and Harrison/Lorenzini, An architectural review committee composed of representatives from the Fire, Public Works and Development Services Departments met to review the proposals. As a result of this review and a routine check of the references for and experience of the three firms submitting {proposals, ',Ahe committee recommended the selection Of the Harrison/torenzini firm. Also, as reg0 red by the Municipal Code, the selection was based on the professional qualifications, ability for timely per- fomance and fair contract price submitted by the Harrison/Lorenzini firm, Page Two F x With the Council's selection, of the Harrizon/Lcrenzini firm, staff will � prepare an architectural services contract with a "Not To Exceed amount #' of $7,000 as contained in the darrizon/Lorenzini proposal. FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, }sousing and Community }s' Development Block Grant Program. .ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Council may reject all architectural services proposals and direct As r staff to readvertise. J 2. Council may reprogram funds to another activity. r C .SVK: jo att h t $ , s` WWI 11 v { r- vwilliarn blurock & partners architects planners 38, June 1.983 N ; Mr, Stephen V. Yohl>?r�',. Senior Community Development Specialist :# Department of Development Services Huntington Beach, California. 92648 Re: Pakview Day Care Center Phase 2 Dear Mr. Kohler; The Blurock Partnership is pleased to respond to your invita- tion for Architectural services for the proposed Dakview Day f" Care Center Phase 2. It is an horror to be considered for another project in and for the City of Huntington Beach. Although many of your City administrators are familiar with our firm we believe that a review of our staff orgairization z and personnel is necessary to understand our capabilities. The Blurock Partnership has been established in Orange County for more than twenty-five years, providing professional archi- tectural and planing services in categories such as public buildings, education facilities, commercial developments, reseat,ch facilities, and hotels and restaurants.. Of specific interest to you ;could be the community buildings that relate to your program. We have approximately sixty members on our staff, all devoted to architecture and planning. Of the professional staff, almost half are licet:sed architects, an unusually 'high number. The relatively large staff enables us to assemble an appro- priate team for projects like yours.. A principal partner of ytur choice 'will be atsigned. to the project and will be the pr1mary contact between the City and The Blureck Partnership � from, the schematic design phase through the bidding phase and during coostructiony � n - Yioin- project is very 'exciting and aligns with related facili ° ties that dominate out project load, Approximately sixty per- centof our 'wark is educational and community centered buildings. m n D s m f 4 _ Oak vi ew Day Care Center Phase 2 ���------`� Mr. Stephen Kohler June 18, 19`81; ' Page Two witliam bturock E,� partners architects planners r � The requirements to meet state earthquake, fire and panic . safety standards and barrier free architecture are very,'_ familiar to us. The undersigned has served for years on fi the Governor's Advisory Board to the Office of the State Architect for Field Act (earthquake safety) matters. Having visited the site and having designed the first phase, we are very familiar with the location for the facility as described in the RPP. The Oakview Day Gym is visualized to be 1,300 sq. ft. based on a $78,000 construction budget, including buildings and ' site development. Site development as we understand it is limited. to grading, and connecting Uncovered walks and does not iii Jude landscaping. We expect to design the buildings using techniques of con- struction that w111 prove the most economical, with low maintenance material's selected for their aesthetic natality and durability. Your facility will be designed with quality and longevity in 'mind, To respond to the request for fee proposal, we would like to say that selection should be based on the capability of the firm to respond to the design heeds of the project: Another impoirtarit consideration should be the cost of pro- fessional services which normally becomes a matter of negotia- tion after the firm is selected. Our fee schedule is compe- titive with other reputable firms. A normal fee for a project of this nature is ten percent ofthe construction cost,, and includes a full', range of services such as the schematic design phase, design development phase, construction documents and bidding phases, and construction phase. We visualize the maxi, fee to be fight 'Thousand Dollars ($8i000>00). logo *V-b P' Qakview Day Care Center Phase 2 Mr. Stephen Kohler June 18, 1981 Page Three wstfi im blurock & partners al-Chmacts planners The Blurock Partnership is enthusiastic about your project and would like to exp+ain our qualifications to the architectural selection committee. We believe that we have the expertise and staff to design functional and aesthetically pleasing buildings. Very truly your ,; t ANTHONY AND LANGFORD AIA ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING ° PLANNING h June 18, `1981; .` Mr. Stephen V. Kohler P � Senior Community Development x City of Huntington Beach Department of Development Services ..� Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Architectural Services For Oakview Day Care Center Dear Mr. Kohler: n In accordance with your request for a proposal on the above referenced project we are submitting pertinent data reflecting our experience and capabilities to accomplish the work ;indicated for the Oakview Day Care expansion. x During the thirty (30) years of our practice we have accomplished a wide variety of public > projects for more than thirty (30) Southern California Cities. We have been active in school work as well as designing numerous school projects for s some fourteen school d;.stricts, one being the Ocean View School District for r whom we developed two projects; Golden. View and Mesa View schools. We have just completed a 10,000 square foot Child Development Care Center for Comptcn Community College, although it is larder than the one your city recently built at Oakview, much of the cri'�eria for its development was no doubt similar. Our services for this project would include the following; 1. Project criteria evaluation and schematic design. 2. Preliminary design including structural, mechanical and electrical concepts, 3 Preliminary project estimate. 4. _ Complete working drawings and specifications including bidding i documents S Agency approvalsincluding Office of the State Architect. 6. Bid evaluations 7. Construction observation. 8. Post. construction services. Architectural Fee Our-feo for the above listed services would be on an hourly basis not to exceed eight thousand four hundred dollars ($8,400 00) . 1010 `Bculh gtvd., Suite 201, Huntington SeLtch, California 92647 (714) 848.1818 ,. Mr, Stephen V. Kohler _2- p June 1$, 1981 Architectural Services For °. Oakview Day Care Center Reimbursibles; `. The charge for reimbursible expenses such as reproduction of bid documents ' for bidding purposes,postage and handling of drawings, models or special �• photography, if requested by the client, shall be a multiple of one and twenty-five hundredths (1,25) times the amounts expended by the architect. Proposed Schedule: s, The estimated time for completion of the phases indicated are as follows: Conferences, Reviews, Schematics 2 weeks Design Development Drawings 2 weeks Working Drawi",?s & Specifications 2 months Agency Checking & Approvals (O.S.A j 1-1/2 months Bidding & Construction 4 months We wouldlike to express our, interest in working vAth the City again and ' will look forward to meeting with T-ou soon. Respectfully submitted, ANTHONY an LANGk O /AA HIT'ECTS V. Wallace Langford, I.A. VWL/dg E ROGER WILLNER A.I.A EDUCATION: Pasadena City Coll ge University of Southern California LICENSE: Registered Architect .. ; California No. C-2334 PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES; American Institute of Architects California Council of Architects Construction Specifications Institute Ass ;data and principalin the firm of Anthony and Langford since 1955. BRUCE BUEHLEFI EDUCAT10Y. University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon Bachelor of Architecture` LICENSE: Registered Architect California No. 0-1205 PROFESMONAL SOCIETIES: California Council of Architects ; Project Arch Itectr/Associated with Anthony and Langford since 1953. K lit NN r T. V. ANTHONY 1I A I.A. EDUCATION University of Kansas ' University of Southern California Bachelor of Architectureti, ~_ LICENSE: Registered Architect California No. C-1260 Colorado No. C-961 ; I+tevada. No. 714 t" PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES: American Institute of Architects California Council of Architects California School Facilities Council SCARB (Honorary Architectural fraternity) Principal in the firm of Anthony and Langford since 1950. V. WALLACE LANGFORD, A I.A. EDUCATION; Compton College, Compton, California Associate of Arts University of Southern California Bachelor of Architecture LICENSE; Registered Architect California, No. C--2601 PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES: American Institute of Architects CaUforn a Council of Architects Southern California Architectural Guild Principal In the firm of Anthony and Langford since 1,950. ORGANE?A`fION Anthony and Langford was organized in 1950 as a partnership, and in 1969 Incorporated it order to provide incentive to key personnel and bett,_r serve Chen client;,. t Except for the very early years, the firm's staff has been anchored by a nucleous of six licensed architects, most of whom have been with the organi- zation for approximately 16 Wears, therefore, providing the firm with a core of dedicated" professionals with broad experience in all aspects of architectVral design and planning. During the past twelve years Anthony and Langford, A. T.A. have maintained a staff of text to fourteen members. The firm is comprised of three principals ,and include: seven licensed architects. Services offered by the firm includes feasibility studisw, feaster planning, project design, contract documents, estiriating, contract admints ration, construction observation and post Con- struction servl�:es.. In irore than a quarter century of architectural practice, Anthony and Langford has assembled reputable and highly qu.xiified consultants In all catagories of engineering- In addition to the civil, structural, electrical, mechanical and foundation engineers, we can provide consuttants in the fields of acoustics, communications, audio visual, traffic and landscaping comprising a .broad range of total services offered by the firm. G Ee e,- F P R O J E :.. T C A T A G n R 1 E S x FEASIBILITY STUDIES dig 9n x LIBRARIES q c ' CITY FlAl LS COMMUNITY CENTERS SE141OR CITIZENS CENTERS RECREATION PARKS -`«• REPRESENTATTJr- PROJECTS City of Banning 1980 Police Facility r . City of Seal Beach 1978 Mary Wilson Library City of Anaheim 1978 Joint Powers Fire Training Facility 1 & Communications Center Ztj Anaheim/Garden Grove/Orange ;. City of Tustin 1978 Corporation Yard City of La Mirada 1977 Performing Arts Theater +„ c ,: City of Garden Grove 1977 Civic; Center S°';e Development City of Ontario 1976-77 Master Plan for 15-Acre City Corporation Yard City of Carson 1976 Del Arno Park Activity Building City of Santa Ana 1976 Fire/Crash/Rescue Station Jahn Wayne Airport City of Paim Springs 1976 Fire Department Headquarters Airport Crash/Fire Rescue Facility City of Brea 1976 Maintenance/Corporation Yard City, of Santa Ee Springs 1976 L.i.jrary & Neighborhood Community Center Expansion. City of Garden Grove 1976 Community & Senior Citizens 1 Center City of Huntington Beach 1975 Joint Powers Fire Training Center Huntington Beach/Westrninster/ Fountain Malley/Seal Beach u i Harrison/Lorenzini arc ect ian j rt harrison aia y , david e. lorenzini csi June 18, 1981 Mr. Stephen Kohler City of Huntington Beach k P. 0. Sox_ 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648= Re: RFP - Oakview Day Care Center Expansion Dear Mr. Kohler: Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal for the Oak- ;. i view Day Care Center Expansion. Since our last proposal to you for a; -^ the Bushard Neighborhood Gym, our firm has expanded with the ;addition of several key technical personnel. We have also completed several related projects which we would like to bring to your attention. Our firm now has a technical staff of twelve, eight of whom are licensed or near -licensed. Seven members of our firm have had ex- tensive -experience with schools and public works construction. Five of them worked previously for William Blurock & Partners, two as associates. The individuals in our firm make up a team whose specialties cover , every responsibility of architectural practice. The specialties include design and planning, cost estimating and project scheduling, site engineering, production draalings and coordination, specifica- tions and contract administration, interior design and color coor- dination. our individual experience includes the design of several day and pre-schools in the Costa Mesa area. We have just recently completed a multi -purpose building for St. Vincent de Paul Parish on Talbert Street in Huntington Beach for the Diocese of Orange which was built on time and within the budget. More information on these projects is included on the fe ' l owi ng sheets 3420 irvine avenue newporl beach California 92660 714/751-3853 a division o� nebvpoit tollaborativE irx, r Mr. Stephen Kohler City of Huntington ,Beach June 18, 1981 Page Two We feel uniquely capable tv provide the services you are seeking ; because our principals' active involvement with every project.' We dr-- `Z, y with the client's staff and supervise the ;�repara- , Lion ..x. action documents. In addi ,,,n, our -firm can assign higher level personnel to carry out th- necessary services than larger firms which have very large- scale projects underway. Since both of our principals ind three other staff members also worked together at the Blurock Partnership at one time, we are familiar with their design philoso�hies and production systems. We also feel our team is more organized in the creation of an efficient operation which allows us to keep our fees as reasonable as possible without sacrificing the quality of our service. Finally, we utilize the same consultants for this type of work that the Blurock Partnership uses. Our concern for coordinating their activities has won us their loyalty over the years. This last point is crucial for any firm wishing to tackle the extension of mechani- cal and electrical services on this project. Our i,ae for the requested architectural services will be 8 ;_ the construction cost or a not -to -exceed fee of $7,000: We assume contract conditions equal or similar to the standard AIA Contract for small construction projects. The proposed schedule for completion of our services will be approxi- mately as follows: Preliminary Design & Staff Review 2 weeks Design Development & Staff Review 2 weeks Contract Documents 2 weeks Submission to Building Department & Staff Review 4 weeks Finalization & Bidding 4 weeks Contract Administration 16 weeks Total 30 weeks = 7months 3 is i i Vw- Mr. Stephen Kohler City of Huntington Beach June 18, 1981 Page Three e� We hope the enclosed material is sufficient for you to evaluate the qualifications of our firm. If you need any additional information,' we would be pleased to have you visit our office for a personal, tour and close-up look at our operation. We look forward to working b with you on this project. F' Sincerely yours, HARRISON/LORENZINI tom.. r David E. Lorenzini, C.S.I' DEL:pI Enclosures r i i } µ, a Harrison /Lorenzin arc4ects DESCRIPTION OF FIRM The firm of HARRISON/LORENZINI ARCHITECTS was formed in 1973 by a team of arhictects dedicated to the concept of providing$„. architecture exhibiting the highest standards of aesthetic I'} and functional Value. Members of the firm compliment each other's talents and expertise. They provide complete and:, ` comprehensive services by effective interaction with the client,' who is brought in an as a member of the team. Our clients recognize a spceial quality from this coordinated effort, resulting in a high market value for their products, repeat client commissions for HARRISON LORENZiNI ARCHITECTS and numerous building industry awards. The firm operated under its corporate name, Newport Calla- borative, Inc., for the first four years. The two princi- pals of the firm are Ian JX Harrison, A.I.A. and David E. Lorenzini, C.S.I., who have worked together since 1969. The addition of Tony Banzuelo as an associate in 1981 provided additional technical expertise in our pro0uction and scheduling of larger projects, A staff of twelve persons provides services to tommercial, f industrial, residential and ,public works client. Projects ' are located throughout California, and several out. -of -state locations, including Arizona and Hawaii. ` < M, .. �h r i Harrison/ Lorenzini .� ji :� .. DAVID E. LORENZINI, CSI architects s 'f Position Principal y Architectural Licenses California, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Oregon, !� New Jersey, NCARB Certified Education University of Pennsylvania Bachelor of Architectural Engineering University of Rome' Construction Technology ;k i.' University of Sydney ; Master of Building SciencE Professional Organizations Construction Specifications Institute, Director > 1980-81 & Chairman, Technical Documents Committee Civic Former City of Costa Mesa Planning Commission ' Former Member - Costa Mesa Housing and. Community Development Committee F Responsibiliti'es Architectural production, specifications, project scheduling, solar systems analysis, computer programming, construction cost forecasting, systems development, contract administration Major Experience Commercial and Industrial: manufacturing and process plants ' warehousing and truck terminals ; low/medium-rise office buildings shopping centers • 4 ... Public Works: fire stations" housing for the elderly county offices Educational & Institutional: elementary, junior and senior high schools, _. college buildings, religious multi -purpose buildings Residential: custom, tract and multi -family housing Positions Principal 7 years Project Architect: 8 years construction Superintendent*: 2 years Academic/Teaching: l year y r Harrison, Lorenzini architects IAN J.N. HARRISON, AIA � > Position Principal u Architectural Licenses California, C-6947, NCARB t 4 Arizona, I0432 Education California State Polytechnic University, S.L.O. Bachelor of Architecture State College International Program.k. Florence, Italy «z. Professional Organizations American Institute of Architects — Building Industry Association Responsibilities Architectural• design, program development, budget analysis, planning, feasibility studies Major Experience Commercial: low/medium-rise office buildings restaurants Public Works; city hall fire station city ,recreation buildings city corporation yard housing for the elderly civic auditoriums Educational;: elementary, jun4nr and senior high schools r.ol'lege and univLrsity buildings Residential; housing (tract and custom) condominums apartments a Blaster Planning; ci: is center/toianscape f planned unit development (PUD) Positions Principal: 7 years, =. Project Designer: 41 years_ �i 9 F 17 Harrison/ Lorenz (a"i rchitects v 1 TONY BANZUELii lam„ Position Associate Architectural Licenses California, C-11901 " Education Orange Coast College a Associate of Arts, architecture. at California State University, Long Beaci, Bachelor of Arts C J' Professional Organizations American Institute of Architects, A. Associate Member International Conierence of Building Officials Responsibilities Architectural production, design development, project scheduling, consultant coordination, construction management Maior Experience Commercials h office buil6ings retail shops Recreational YMCA facilities equestrian facilities golf course planning Public Works juvenile hall facilities S conrnunication centers Educationals pre-schools elementary and high schools retarded children's facilities .° Residential. housing (tract and custom) :. condominiums apartments hotels Positiofis; Associate; 1 year Project Manager: 1.0 years Academic/Teaching: 5 years r. f1 s kn Harriso*n/Lorenzini. A . arcnitects a, SELECTED PROJECTS �. . Mystic Hill San Clemente, California The Housing Group Tyashare Regional Headquarters - C-r)ress, California R 'i � Warland ,Investments, Ltd. St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish - Master Plan Competition - Irvine, California k y St. Elizabeth Ann Set -on Church "Golden Square Jewelry Kiosk - Mission Viejo, California Ed Cramer,, Allan Kolsky Back Bay High School (Conversion from Elementary) - Costa Mesas California Newpvrt-Mesa Unified School Dis.-rect >i Pointe Quissett - Anaheim Hills, California Gunston Hall Company (formerly W.R. Grace Properties, Inc.)' Pacific Coast Builders Corporate Office Building - Santa Ana, California Pacific Coast Builders, Inc. Lake Cahuilla,Concession Stand - Riverside, California Parks Department, County of Riverside District Attorney Family -Support Office Alterations, County Courthouse - Orange, California General Services Agency, County of Orange Parkway Village Shopping Center - Roseburg, Oregon G.D.V. Company ErDwhon`s Grocery Expansion, South Coast Village - Sarta Ana, California G.J. Segerstrom & Sons -y' Seablu`f Canyon Townhomes - Costa Mesa, California. Gregory Development Company Meat Mercantile Retail Store and Restaurant (Remodel) - ;osta Mesa, California Meati,ng Place Partners, Inc. .tin.: Selected Projects - Page 2 ' xtr... %. St. Vincent de Paul Parish Hall - Huntington Beach, California �. Diocese of Orange Feather Hill - Anaheim Hills, California Pacific Coast Builders, Woodbridge High School Supervision - Irvine, California Irvine Unified School" District. Kalatsky Residence - Laguna Beach, California Mr. and Mrs.Mark Kalatsky The Park Costa Mesa, California The Janes Co�,pany DiscoVision Associates Industrial Building Cypress, California } Warland investments, Ltd. Balboa Island Residences - Newport Beach, California Don Peterson and other private owners Waitaki Clarke's South Coast Plaza - Costa Mesa, Califcrnia Waal tah Clarke l Maintenance Building and Restrooms E1 Toro, California Environmental Management Agency, County of Orange �Pointe Surfside - Huntington Beach, California Curtis Huntington Beach Company �. Cresta Montaiosa Thousand Oaks, California Gunston Hail Company Paularino Street Office Building - Costa Mesa, California Val Ban i Harrison / Lorenzini architect k EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS' Back Bay HiDh School (Conversion from Elementary) -Costa Mesa, California �� Co ��(60 � Woodbridge }sigh School Supervision - Irvine, California � hAW 1 Individual Experience with another Firm DAY & PRE SCHOOLS 4 Playmate Pre -Schools (five locations) - Costa Mesa, California ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Masuda Elementary School -fountain Valley, California ' Las Palmas Elementary School - San Clemente, California Glenview Elementary School - Placentia, California Fairmont Elementary School - Placentia, California J.F. Kennedy Elementary Scho�.3 - Scranton, Pennsylvania -MIDDLE SCHOOLS Willard Intermediate School = Santa Ana, California Lathrop, Intermediate School —Santa Ana, California Spurgeon Intermediate School - Santa Ana, California ; D. Ruzsell Parks Intermediate School - Fullerton, California Richardson Junior High School -> San Bernardino, California Shandin Hills Junior High School - San Bernardino, California Curtis Junior High -School - San Bernardino, California El,, -Cajon Middle School - El Cajon, California E•i HIGH SCHOOLS 1 Gateway High School Aurora, Colorado �r Jefferson County High Schools - Denver, Colorado Hemet Ni_h School -, Hemet, Cal i-Fornia .il .. .,t Al - Educational Projects - Page d,H Corona del Mar High School Addition - Corona del Mar, California d Esperanza High School - Placentia, California S. 4X.AA COLLEGES 4 ' �S Marywood College Administrative Offices - Scranton, Pennsylvania I Marywood College School of Social Work - Scranton, Pennsylvania Orange Coast College Library - Costa Mesa, California Orange Coast College Administration - Costa Mesa, California Orange Coast College Faculty Offices - Costa Mesa, California Orange Coast College Fine Arts - Costa Mesa, California Cypress College Phase I & II - Cypress, California yAudio -Tutorial Remodel, Fullerton Junior College - Fullerton, California Santa Barbara College Master Plan - Santa Barbara, California MISCELLANEOUS Performing Arts Complex, Su)iny Hills High School - Fullerton, California Performing Arts Complex, Lowell High School - Fullerton, California .. Bus Maintenance Facility - Costa Mesa, California Three Swimming Pools - Orange, California Aurora Vocational Technical School - Aurora, Colorado Wilkes College Master Plan - Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania College Misericordia Space U4ilization Study . Dallas, Pennsylvania .. .. :�i..L�...ak4MiiWiiYeAh'LVkt44J�iliYAbe S1v1s::'v:tmw..:wuJ�.e,... ,.. ._ .^ems.. H rison /Lorenzini armfLeCU) A4. CLIENTS Gunston Hall Company (formerly W.R. Grace Properties, Inc.) Newport Beach, California George Mason, John Littmann The Housing Group - Irvine, California Robert Fritts General Services Agency, County of Orange*- Orange, California Cliff Endsley G.D.V. Company - Roseburg, Oregon Gary Moore M -K Service Company (subsidiary of California Federal Savings & Loan) Sacramento, California Charles Newman D.P.D. Development Company - Newport Beach, California David DeLancy Diocese of Prange - Orange, California Martin Sharpe C.J. Segerstrom & Sons - Costa Mesa, California Robert Fernandez Al Shankle Development Company - Santa Ana, California Al Shankle The Janes Coil�pany - Costa Mesa, California Mike Janes, George Alvarez G.L. Lewis Company - Crange, California Gerry Vewis The Knowleton Corporation Long Beach, California Bob McFarland Harrison / Lorenzini arch�ects AWARDS SENSIBLE GROWTH SPECIAL MENTION AWARD FOR PLANNING & DESIGN EXCELLENCE`` NAHB AND BETTER HOMES & GARDENS MAGAZINE, 1980 Seabluff Canyon Townhomes, Costa Mesa, California aw GOLD NUGGET MERIT AWARD, BEST ENERGY EFFICIENT HOME PACIFIC COAST BUILDERS CONFERENCE, 1979 # Seabluff Canyon Townhomes, Costa Mesa, California' GOLD NUGGET MERIT AWARD PACIFIC COAST BUILDERS CONFERENCE, 1979 Seabluff Canyon Townhomes, Costa Mesa, California GOLD NUGGET GRAND AWARD PACIFIC COAST BUILDERS CONFERENCE, 1978 Pointe Quissett, Anaheim, California • GOLD NUGGET HOME OF THE YEAR AWARD 'PACIFIC COAST BUILDERS CONFERENCE, 1978 Pointe Quissett, Anaheim, California GOLD NUGGET ;MERIT AWARD PACIFICCOAST BUILDERS CONFERENCE, 1978 Pointe Quissett, Anaheim, California GOLD NUGGET MERIT AWARD, INDUSTRIAL BUILDING CATEGORY PACIFIC COAST BUILDERS CONFERENCE, 1978 Robert Warmington Offices, Irvine, California In association with another architect: ORANGE COUNTY MASONRY INSTITUTE AWARD, 1974 Willard and Lathrop junior High Schools, Santa Ana, California MASONRY ' 114STITUTE AWARD, 1973 �j Performing Arts Complex, Fullerton, California i AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS 1AASA) AWARD, 1973 Jefferson County"High Schools, Deaver, Colorado r> t: rnson L z8 i sx f lne arc4ects SUMMARY k� Y � F Key benefits to be derived by the selection of HARRISON/LORENZINI,, ARCHITECTS are:. A. Chose attention to every detail and aspect of responsibilities u by working principals and consultants who work as a unit throughout the project development. 4 B. Specialized background in cost control and construction techniques based on education and experience. C. Utilization of production systems developed in-house to provide a more efficient development of the project. 0. 'immediate commencement of se:r,ices once selection is made. E. Thorough organizat,on and scheduling of all activities to insure coordination of all team members. F. In-house space planing to insure efficient utilization of all spaces. SUMMARY r Sme, r� � the ; ; y benefits to be derived by the selection of � 1'� 11,°'-,ilitENZINI, ARCHITECTS are as follows: A. Close attention to every detail and aspect, of responsibilities by working principals and consultants who work as a unit throughout the project development. N B. Specialized background in cost control and construction techniques based on education and experience. C. Utilization of in-house developed production systems to i i provide a more efficient development of the project. D. Immediate commencement of services once selection is made. E. Thorough organization and scheduling of all activities to insure coordination of all team members. F. In-house interior` design, space planning and graphics services to bisure both efficient utilization of all spaces and a well organized graphic control system. �. �� _ , .. ..,�. ._., .,.,: .. ., .. :.�.. ,... _ .. r. -, '.� v '.R: •: N'. bh'. ry �" - vie-,a,'7. n.r. �- r "� �gi . � a���;'4�.�,�,a. ''i�+��s `. • � � �µ ��.,�y':.ilcl �$p7L:� �re. S ��� r � ..,�.i •. * ; tit L - ts'.cxffa' ri '` M. 1 r+w+Nr (�•..1 !` A }� Mi'a✓��+'u.aya ��� va e�he r i`�f=ry1 �! ��jM [Md ST. ELIZABETH ANN SETA' PARISH, IRVINE, CALIF. Y V pc l 3` s,. Y •.....aeLt�ie. ;Y K'Fa�ti�� : mStYPk' e � r___ ._ _ OFFICES FOR PACIFIC COAST BUILDERS, SANTA MA. CALIF, I h M a Harrison/Lorenzini arch�ects AWARDS. SEA BLUFF CANYON TOWNHOMES, Costa Mesa, Calif. - Gold Nugget Merit Awards, Solar Efficient Community, Pacific Coast Builders Conference, 1979 k POINTE QUISSETT, Anaheim, Calif. - Gold Nugget Grand Award and � None of the Year, Pacific Coast Builders Conference, 1978 RO,65RT WARMINGTON OFFICES, Irvine, Calif. - Gold Nugget :sir L Award - Industrial Buil',g Category, Pacific Coast Builders Conference, 1978 In association with another architect; PERFORMING ARTS COMPLEX, Fullerton, Calif. - Orange County Masonry Institute Award; 1973 F WILLARD AND LATHROP JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS, Santa Ana, Calif. �- Orange County Masonry Institute Award, 1974 JEFFERSON COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLS, Denver, Cola. - American Association of School Administrators (RASA) Award, 1973