HomeMy WebLinkAboutJAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. - 1986-08-18CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
August 20, 1986
Mr. Richard A. Swart, Vice -President
James M. Montgomery
Consulting Engineers, Inc.
P.O. Box 7009
Pasadena, CA 91109-7009
Dear Mr. Swart:
Enclosed is a duly executed copy of the Engineering Services Agreement
Between the City of Huntington Beach and James M. Montgomery, Consulting
Engineers, INc. For Warner Avenue Sewer Pump Station.
Also enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Insurance that you submitted.
If you have any questions please call Don Noble - Department of Public
Works - 536-5431.
ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, CITY CLERK
By:
_ d..' , � 'P , � '/"�
Connie A. Brockway, Deputf City Clerk
Ar1l: cb
enc.
(Telephone: 714-536.5227)
REQUEWOR CITY COUNCPRCTION
Date August 5* 1996
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrat
�� D Ems' CIT i
(.�'"'" APPROVE
Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works 19
Subject: WARNER AVENUE SEWER PUMP STATION; CC— 74 f
CITY
Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Fundinq Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: —T'
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Proposals were requested from qualified engineering firms to design the improvements to the
sewer force mains and sewer pump stations on the Warner Avenue facilities.
RECOMMENDATION:
I. Approve the selection of James M. Montgomery to design the Warner Avenue sewer force
mains and sewer pump stations improvements.
2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached consultant contract with
James M. Montgomery for a fee not to exceed $27,300.
ANAI YCIS!
Based on a study completed by ASL Consulting Engineers, the Pacific Coast Highway/Warner
Avenue Trunk Sewer System needs to be improved. The essential improvements include
upgrading existing sewer pump stations and constructing an additional sewer force main. Plans,
specifications and cost estimates for these improvements have not been prepared and,
therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3.03 °Professional Services" of the Municipal Code, requests
were solicited from the following qualified firms: ASL Consulting Engineers, UMA Engineering
Inc., Moffat and Nichols, James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc., and Keith
Engineering Inc. Proposals were received from ASL, James Montgomery, and Keith
Engineering. Staff has reviewed each of these submittals and recommends that Council select
James M. Montgomery and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached
consultant contract with a fee structure not to exceed $27,300.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Revenues of $450,000 have been budgeted in fiscal account 805740 (PCH/Warner Relief Sewer)
to cover anticipated design and construction costs.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Project Location Map
2. Consultant Contract
CWT:PEC:DRN:dw
I066g
PIO 5/85
1\
aunew
VMTOW +
J
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
FOR WARNER AVENUE SEWER PUMP STATION
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this Af day of
19by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, here-
inafter referred to as "CITY," and JAMES M. MONTGOMERY,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., a California corporation, herein-
after referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of an engineer-
ing consultant to design and prepare preliminary plans, final
working drawings, contract documents, specifications, cost
estimates and bid and construction period consultations for
improvement construction on the Warner Avenue sewer pump
station, in the City of Huntington Beach; and
CONTRACTOR has been selected to perform said services,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR as
follows:
1. WORK STATEMENT
CONTRACTOR shall provide all engineering services as
described in the Request for Proposal and Statement of
Qualifications (hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A"), which
is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this
reference. Said services shall sometimes hereinafter be
referred to as "PROJECT."
CONTRACTOR hereby designates Richard A. Swart, who
shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all
consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement.
1.
1462L
2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE
CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly
with CONTRACTOR in the prosecution of this Agreement.
3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services
of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after
the execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in
Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than four (4) months
from the date of this Agreement, with an additional _14 working days
for all revisions. These times may be extended with the written
permission of the CITY. The time for performance of the tasks
identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be as shown in the
Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This
schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually
agreed by the CITY and CONTRACTOR.
4. COMPENSATION
In consideration of the performance of the engineering
services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay
CONTRACTOR a fee not to exceed twenty seven thousand, three
hundred dollars ($27,300).
5. EXTRA WORK
In the event of authorization, in writing by the CITY,
of changes from the work described in Exhibit "A", or for other
written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated
herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for such Extra
Work, so long as the prior written approval of CITY is obtained.
2.
1 dr,')T.
6. METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to progress payments
toward the fixed fee set forth in Section 4 herein in accordance
with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit A".
B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every techni-
cal memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to
the CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In
the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY
shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory comple-
tion. Any such product which has not been formally accepted or
rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted.
C. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY an invoice
for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall:
1)
Reference this Agreement;,
2)
Describe the services performed;
3)
Show the total amount of the payment due;
4)
Include a certification by a principal member
of the CONTRACTOR'S firm that the work has
been performed in accordance with the provi-
sions of this Agreement; and
5)
For all payments include an estimate of the
percentage of work completed.
Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is
satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward
completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY
shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall
be made within thirty (30) days' of receipt of the invoice by
CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the
3.
1462L
CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR
in writing of the reasons for non -approval, within seven (7)
calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of
performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until
the parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or
has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is
terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof.
D. Any billings for extra work or additional services
authorized by the CITY shall be invoiced separately to the
CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information
required under paragraph 6C, and in addition shall list the
hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such
invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in
accordance with the extra work or additional services requested,
and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and
costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unrea-
sonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning
payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and
apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this
Agreement.
7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
CITY acknowledges that CONTRACTOR'S plans and
specifications are instruments of professional service;
nevertheless CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared
hereunder, including all original drawings, designs, reports,
both field and office notes, calculations, maps and other
documents shall be turned over to CITY and shall become its
4.
1462L
property upon PROJECT completion or earlier termination of this
Agreement. In the event this Agreement is terminated, said
materials may be used by CITY in completion of the PROJECT;
however, CITY agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend
CONTRACTOR against all damages, claims and losses, including
defense costs, arising out of CITY'S re -use of CONTRACTOR'S
plans and specifications, except in the completion of the
PROJECT in the case of termination hereof, without CONTRACTOR'S
prior written authorization.
8. INDEMNIFICATION, DEFENSE, HOLD HARMLESS
CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold
harmless CITY, its officers and employees from and against any
and all liability, damages, costs, losses, claims and expenses,
however caused, arising from CONTRACTOR'S negligence or willful
misconduct in the performance of this Agreement. Any concurrent
negligence or willful misconduct of CITY, its officers and
employees shall in no way diminish CONTRACTOR'S obligations
hereunder.
9. WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of
the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State
of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of
the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all
similar state or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all
claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and
judgments of every nature and description, including attorney's
5.
1462L
fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against CITY, for
or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may
be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR
under this Agreement.
10. INSURANCE
In addition to the Workers' Compensation Insurance and
CONTRACTOR'S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain
and furnish to CITY the following insurance policies covering
the PROJECT:
A. General Liability Insurance. A policy of general
public liability insurance, including motor vehicle
coverage in the sum of $1,000,000 - per occurrence.
Said policy shall name CITY, its officers and employees
as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide
that any other insurance coverage which may be
applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess
coverage and that CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall be
primary.
B. Professional Liability Insurance. CONTRACTOR shall
acquire a professional liability insurance policy
covering the work performed by it hereunder in the sum
of $5,000,000 - per occurrence.
Certificates of Insurance for said policies shall be
approved in writing by the City Attorney prior to the commence-
ment of any work hereunder. All Certificates of Insurance (and
the policies of insurance or endorsements thereof) shall provide
that any such Certificates and policies shall not be cancelled
or reduced in coverage or limits other than payments of claims
without thirty (30) days' prior written notice to CITY.
6.
1 AA9T.
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the
performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor.
CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for
any and all payments of all taxes, social security, state
disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and
other payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents
and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection
with the services to be performed hereunder.
12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
All work required hereunder shall be performed in
accordance with the standards of the profession for similar
professionals performing services in this area at this time.
CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR'S services hereunder at any time
with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully
complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be
made in writing through the City Engineer, notice of which shall
be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16 herein.
13. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement is a personal service contract and the
supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR
to any other person or entity without the consent of CITY.
14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS
CONTRACTOR shall not apply for a patent or copyright on
any item or material produced as a result of this Agreement, as
set forth in 41 CFR 1-9.1.
7.
1462L
15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS
CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any
regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this
Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any
financial interest in this Agreement in violation of California
Government Code Sections 1090 et seq.
16. NOTICES
Any notices or special instructions required to be
given in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by
personal delivery to CONTRACTOR'S agent (as designated in
Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY'S Director of Public Works, as
the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a
sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the
United States Postal Services, addressed as follows:
TO CITY:
Mr. Paul Cook
Director of Public Works
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
TO CONTRACTOR:
Mr. Richard A. Swart
Vice President
James M. Montgomery,
Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Post Office Box 7009
Pasadena, CA 91109-7009
EP
1462L
17. ENTIRETY
The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set
forth the entire Agreement between the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized
officers the day, month and year first above written.
CONTRACTOR:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
s-;
Robert C. Siemak, Vice Pres.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,
a municipal corporation
4wq Va.
Mayor
ATTEST:
o
Richard A. Swart, Vice Pres. City Clerk
APPROVED:REVIEWE AND
INITIATED AND APPROVED:
Director of Public Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
9.
1462L
PRODUCER
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
EMETT & CHANDLER LOS ANGELES, INC.
NO RIGHTS THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THISDOS NOT
IPOLICIES BELOW. AMEND,
EXTEND OR ALOTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED YCTHE
11835 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, 5TH FLOOR
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064
TEL. NO.: (213) 444-3333 -
TELEX NO.: 69.1260
COMPANY A
LETTER International Insurance Companv
COMPANY B
LETTER
INSURED
Hartford an Company
COMPANY
C
James M. Montgomery Consulting
Engineers, Inc. et al
LETTER
International Insurance Comp an
COMPANY D
250 N. Madison Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91101
LETTER
COMPANY E
LETTER
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY
BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI-
TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
CO
LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE
DATE (MM/DDNY)
POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE (MM/DDIY/)
LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
EACH
OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE
GENERAL
LIABILITY
BODILY
COMPREHENSIVE FORM
INJURY
$
$
PREMISES/OPERATIONS
5 4 0- 6 8 3 6 3 4- 6
8/ 31 / 8 5
8/ 31 / 8 6
PROPERTY
UNDERGROUND
EXPLOSION & COLLAPSE HAZARD
RM
DAMAGE
$
$
PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS
AS T
FO�ttorne
CONTRACTUAL
VET
A*�pRa
mTdlj,
3- e5f
C Otto'.
BI & PD
COMBINED
$1, 000*
$1, 000*
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS
1; Xv
1
ity
BROAD FORM PROPERTY
DAMAGE
➢e�1t�
$y
PERSONAL INJURY
PERSONAL INJURY
$
* $250,000 SIR
1 000*
AUTOMOBILE
LIABILITY
BODILY
ANY AUTO
Such insurance
as is
afforde
by pol icy
INJU
(PERRPERSON)
$
ALL OWNED AUTOS (PRIV PASS)
# 5 4 0- 6 8 3 6 3 4- 6
issued
by Company
A s h a l
BODILY
ALL OWNED AUTOS OTHER THAN
PRIV PASS
be primary and
any
other ins
ranee car
INJURY
IDEN I)
$
HIRED AUTOS
by the City of
Huntington
Beach
shall
*ok
ess.
NON -OWNED AUTOS
DAMAGE
$
GARAGE LIABILITY
BI & PO
COMBINED
$
EXCESS LIABILITY
UMBRELLA FORM
BI & PD
COMBINED
$
$
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
STATUTORY
$ 5 0 0 (EACH ACCIDENT)
B
] 2 WB M X 4 6 61
5/ l/ 8 6
5/ 1/ 8 7
AND
$ 5 0 0 (DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT)
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
$5 no (DISEASE -EACH EMPLOYEE)
OTHER
C Professional
524-065-424-4
8/31/85
8/31/86
$5,000,000** each
Liability
*** $1,000 000
SIR
occurence
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
Such insurance as is afforded by policy
#.540-683634-6 issued by Company A shall
also apply to the City of Huntington Beach, its officers & employees as additio
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
ATTN: Mr. Paul Cook
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX-
PIRATION VATE . THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENBEAVBR• i6
MAIL 30 i DAYS -WRITTEN NOTICE TO Tjj1IE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
LEFT, BWf9(kM-UREWO MA}LSU0H-N0T4OE~bL4MP96E NG-G8W6MIAN4R+_IABILfTN
-eF-Aw*w( .T+IEi6MPiRNY-wdara &4i) .REPRES6IJiA7WGS.
JUL 3106
INS. & BENEFITS
PROPOSAL TO
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO PROVIDE
ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR DESIGN OF
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FORCE MAINS AND
SEWER PUMP STATIONS
ON WARNER AVENUE
C C -fr7 t- c,- -14 r
JUNE 1986
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Larox
EXHIBIT A
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
17802 Sky Park Circle, Suite 201, Irvine, California 92714 / (714) 261-7210
June 13, 1986
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Les Evans
City Engineer
Subject: Proposal for Providing Design Engineering Services for the
City of Huntington Beach Improvements to the Force Mains
and Sewer Pump Stations on Warner Avenue; CC-676
Gentlemen:
James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. (JMM) is pleased to submit this
proposal to the City of Huntington Beach in response to your request for proposal
for engineering services in connection with the design of Improvements to the
Force Mains and Sewer Pump Stations on Warner Avenue. JMM, with over 41
years of experience, offers highly professional engineering services to produce a
cost-effective design.
The content of this proposal documents our firm's unique qualifications to perform
the project. In summary, they include:
Expert Project Team: The high quality of JMM's work depends largely on the
competence of its individual employees and the judicious blending of their
talents to meet the requirements of each particular project. To assure this
quality, the company policy is to staff each project with those who have the
requisite interest, time and skills, and to make provisions for their
interaction. The project manager assigned to your project, Mr. Robert F.
Seeman, has extensive experience in the engineering planning, design, and
construction of wastewater collection system projects such as yours.
Related Experience: JMM has designed several hundred miles of major
sanitary sewers in diameters up to 114 inches. In addition, JMM capabilities
include complete wastewater collection systems such as the $52 million
interceptor sewerage system for metropolitan San Diego, California. This
system consists of 116,000 feet of 42 to 114-inch diameter interceptor
sewers, pumping facilities (including one of the world's largest wastewater
pumping stations), an 80 mgd wastewater treatment plant and 108-inch
diameter ocean outfall.
PLANNING ... RESEARCH ... ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
DAMES M. MONTGOMERY. CONSULIM. - ENGINEERS. INC. 17802 Sky Pa, _(Cie. Suite 201. Irvine, California 92714, (714) 261J210
Mr. Les Evans -2- June 13, 1986
City of Huntington Beach
JMM has designed over 200 water and wastewater pumping stations ranging in
capacity from 230 gpm to 250,000 gpm with total connected horsepowers up
to 18,000 HP. These stations have included all types of pumps, both
electrical and natural gas driver units, electrical controls for both local and
remote operations, and telemetering.
Complete In -House Capabilities: Our capabilities and in-house staff in all
disciplines assures a project that is coordinated well. It results in a project
with minimum number of change orders because it has been checked by the
disciplines involved. Historically, on wastewater collection system projects
the amount of change orders has been less than 1-1/2 percent of the contract
amount.
Familiarity with the Project Requirements: We have discussed the key facets
of the proposal with your staff, visited the site, and have a thorough
understanding of the City's requirements as set forth in your request for
proposal. Our experience in wastewater collection system design will enable
us to work closely with the City and to provide the City with a
comprehensive analysis of the various alternatives of pipe design, joint
design, material specifications and pump selection so as to ensure the
selection of the optimum design for the improvement of the existing
wastewater collection system.
We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal and sincerely hope that we
will have the pleasure of working with you and your staff on this project. Please
contact us if you have any questions or desire additional information.
Very truly yours,
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Robert C. Siemak
Vice President
:Manager, Irvine Office
SECTION 1
METHOD OF APPROACH
It is proposed that James M. Montgomery,
provide consulting engineering services to
design of Improvements to the Force Mai
Avenue.
Mains
BACKGROUND
Consulting Engineers, Inc. (JMM) will
the City of Huntington Beach for the
and Sewer Pump Stations on Warner
The improvements to the force mains and sewer pump stations on Warner Avenue
consist of upgrading the capacity of sewer pump station "D" on Warner Avenue in
the City of Huntington Beach to 2500 gpm, increasing the wet well capacity at
pump stations "C" and "D" and provide an additional parallel sewer force main out
of pump station "D" to the Orange County Sanitation District line at Los Patos
Avenue and 'Marina View Place. The scope of this project follows
recommendations of a PCH/Warner Avenue Trunk Sewer System Report prepared
in May 1985 by ASL Consulting Engineers for the City of Huntington Beach. The
report cited infiltration, manhole deterioration, and inadequate trunk sewer and
pump station capacities at the downstream portion of the system as major
problems.
OUR APPROACH TO THE PROJECT
We propose to divide the work into three tasks as follows:
Task A. Preliminary Design Phase
Task B. Design Phase
Task C. Construction Support Phase
The Preliminary Design Phase will consist of submitting a letter report evaluating
the proposed Scope of Work and developing alternative or additional strategies
towards the project problems, performing any necessary geotechnical or field
survey investigations, locating any utilities which may be affected by the project
scope, submitting preliminary cost estimates and schedules, attending periodic
meetings with City staff, and preparing monthly progress reports for City review.
The Design Phase will involve submitting a letter -report outlining design criteria
to be used to complete the project scope, preparing design, plans and
specifications, and the entire bid package for City approval, preparing a traffic
control plan, obtaining necessary permits for construction from the City and
attending periodic meetings with City staff. The Construction Support Phase will
consist of interpretation of plans and specifications, shop drawing review,
submittal of "as-builts" and attending periodic meetings with City staff.
JMTM's general philosophy is to work closely with the client during all phases of
the project to ensure that all project goals are attained through the application of
sound engineering concepts in a manner which is sensitive to local needs.
Progress review meetings will be held in all phases of the project schedule with
special emphasis at the Preliminary Design Phase and at the 50% and 90% design
completion levels (Detailed Design Phase). These meetings are outlined further in
the following Scope of Work.
SCOPE OF WORK
We understand the project Scope of Work to be as follows:
1. Upgrade sewer pump station "D" to a capacity of 2500 gpm,
2. Increase the wet well capacity at pump station "C" and "D", and
3. Provide an additional parallel sewer force main out of pump station
"D" to the OCSD line at Los Patos Avenue and :Marina View Place.
Based on the abovementioned Scope, we propose the following tasks to ensure the
successful completion of the design, plans and specifications, contract documents
and cost estimates for improvements to the force mains and sewer pump stations
on Warner Avenue.
Task A. - Preliminary Design Phase
1. Submit a letter report outlining strategies for improvements to the
recommended scope of work and consideration of alternate plans with cost
estimates. The report contents will be reviewed and approved by the City
prior to proceeding with the detailed design. One (1) meeting with the City's
staff is allocated for this sub -task.
1 •.
2. Perform any necessary field survey or geotechnical investigations pertinent
to the design.
3. Gather any plans, topographic surveys, reports, etc., available on past,
present and proposed projects near the project site. Review gathered
information and determine what additional information is needed.
4. Contact any utility companies, oil companies, etc., maintaining surface and
subsurface facilities in the work site area. Locate these facilities using as-
builts, topographical surveys, or maps obtained from these companies and
coordinate relocation of any of these facilities should conflicts with the
design arise.
5. Develop preliminary cost estimates and a project schedule.
6. Attend one (1) meeting with City staff to discuss and clarify any additional
conflicts or questions arising out of work performed during the predesign
phase.
7. Provide letter reports to the City on a monthly basis. These reports will
inform the City staff of all pertinent aspects of the project's progress during
the predesign and design phases.
Task B. - Design Phase
1. Determine or establish design criteria or requirements.
a. Determine basic design requirments for upgrading the pump station "D"
capacity including existing pump type and phasing, primary pump drive,
standby power source, future operational pump requirements and
ultimate flow characterisitcs.
1-2
b. Determine basic design requirements for increasing the wet well
capacity at pump stations "D" and "C" including existing and ultimate
flows and capacities, pump phasing, pump station layout, existing piping
and electrical controls.
c. Establish design criteria for the force main including sizing, pipe
materials and joints, lining, trenching and backfill methods, surge control
and sewage characteristics.
d. Prepare a letter report summarizing the design criteria or requirements
of a,b, and c for City review and approval. One (1) meeting with City
staff is allocated for this subtask.
2. Prepare civil, mechanical, electrical and structural design for the pump
station modifications based on design criteria in the City -approved letter
report. An operations plan will be developed for pumping stations "C" and "D"
along with the modifications. Force main sizing, alignment and design will
include plan and profile sheets and details showing all structures and
appurtenances. Plan and profile sheets will be prepared on a 1-inch equals 40
feet horizontal scale, and either a 1-inch equals 4 feet or 1-inch equals 8 feet
vertical scale. Three (3) meetings with City staff will be allocated during the
design and preparation of plans.
3. Prepare specifications and reduced drawings as one complete package for the
project, including all legal forms necessary for receiving competitive bids.
Contract documents will be prepared incorporating City -provided insurance
forms and front end documents. Drawings will include a cover sheet, location
map, index, and condensed plan and profile. The complete package will
include the contract documents, general provisions, technical specifications,
and drawings. One (1) set of reproducible final plans, specifications, and bid
documents will be submitted to the City.
4. Prepare traffic control and detour plans for the various phases of work, as
needed.
5. Obtain the necessary approvals and construction permits from the City's
Development Services Department for any mechanical, electrical, etc. work
required of the project.
Task C. - Construction Support Phase
1. Provide support to the City during bid advertisement and construction
including interpretation of plans and specifications, review and approval of
shop drawings, and recommendations for any needed changes that may arise
during construction.
2. Provide "as -built" plans, after construction, from City -provided information.
3. Three (3) meetings with City staff will be allotted during bidding and
construction.
1-3
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
If requested or required, the following services will be furnished at an additional
fee:
1. Preparation of additional design to reflect unanticipated field conditions.
2. Any items of work not previously mentioned above.
CITY FURNISHED SERVICES
It is understood that the City of Huntington Beach will provide the following
services during the project:
1. Printing of bid packages.
2. Advertisement of bids and awarding of contract.
3. Control of contract administration.
4. Performance of required construction inspections.
5. City supplied mylars.
6. Any other additional information available which the parties agree may be
beneficial to the project design.
PROJECT DESIGN SCHEDULE
TIME TO COMPLETE
The work will commence on the project immediately upon receipt of the City's
written Notice to Proceed. The design, plans and specifications will be completed
by October 14, 1986.
The following schedule will be used as a basis for completion of the project:
Notice to Proceed
Design 50% Complete
Design 90% Complete
Design 100% Complete
Advertise for Bids
Jume 30, 1986
September 1, 1986
September 30, 1986
October 14, 1986
November 1, 1986
This schedule does not account for delays beyond the control of JMM, including
but not limited to City reviews, requested design criteria changes, alignment
changes or inclement weather.
1-4
TASK DESCRIPTION
1986
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
LETTER REPORT
J
t
H
SOILS
m
INVESTIGATIONS
a�
z
FIELD SURVEY
mcwwwp
W
G
REVIEW EXISTING
o
INFORMATION
K
REPORTS LETTER
W O
O
SUBMITTAL O
ESIGN
SUB TTAL
3UiMITTAL
t�
O
d
PUMP STATION AND
o
FORCE MAIN DESIGN
�
W
U
PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS
i
OBTAIN PERMITS
CITY MEETINGS
Q Q
Q Q
Q
Q
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE MEETINGS
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE F.M.S. & P.S. ON WARNER AVENUE
PROJECT DESIGN SCHEDULE
1
SECTION 2
PROJECT ORGANIZATION
High quality engineering work, which is characteristic of JMM projects is based
upon the capabilities and competence of the total staff, the expertise of
individual employees, and the judicious blending of their talents to meet the
requirements of each project. The successful and timely completion of this
project for the City of Huntington Beach will require a project team of qualified
individuals working within a management structure designed to maximize
productivity and expedite completion. The project organization and project team
members are summarized in this section. The project team would be structured
- and managed in accordance with the organization chart presented at the end of
_ this section. The structure and control procedures are based on JMM's successful
experience with similar projects.
It is the policy of JMM to staff all projects from our own organization of
experienced engineers. If selected to design the Improvements to the Force Mains
and Sewer Pump Stations on Warner Avenue project for the City, the design would
be carried out by personnel assembled from the permanent staffs of our Irvine
Branch Office and Southwest Regional Office in Pasadena. These two offices
have a combined total staff of over 250 individuals, 85 of whom are registered
professional engineers. A project team has been selected from our staff to
provide innovative engineering and design combined with proven experience.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The design project for the City will require the skillful integration of expertise
from multiple disciplines. In order to assure productivity on all levels of project
input over the project schedule, project management must be carefully structured
• to define the role of each team member, his responsibilities, and his authority for
major decisions.
The role of team members principally involved in the supervising project functions
are described in the following subsections.
PROJECT MANAGER
The major responsibility of the Project Manager is -to provide overall supervision
and administration of the project. To achieve this, the duties of the Project
Manager include ensuring qualified staff are available to the project in adequate
numbers, directing the project approach and reviewing the quality of the output
product, monitoring its progress and meeting deadlines, and assuring cost control
of the total effort. The Project Manager will also determine what major issues
require input from the Technical Review Committee or other specialists and
arrange for meetings. He will also be responsible for all client contact and ensure
that the work performed is in accordance with the terms and conditions agreed to
with the City of Huntington Beach.
2-1
PROJECT ENGINEER
The Project Engineer will supervise the day -today activities of the project team
members and review their progress with respect to the total project schedule.
The Project Engineer will be responsible for the technical integrity of the project
and provide for uniform and consistent design and approach.
PROJECT STAFF
The qualifications of key individuals identified on the Project Organization Chart
are briefly summarized in the following paragraphs. Detailed biodata of team
members can be found at the end of this Section. All team members have been
selected on the basis of their qualifications as related to this project and are
available to participate within the time -frame established in the request for
proposal.
PROJECT MANAGER- Robert F. Seeman
Mr. Seeman, a JMM Principal Engineer, has over 16 years of experience in project
management, design and construction monitoring of water and wastewater
projects. Mr. Seeman would serve as Project Manager and also would be
responsible for design of the City of Huntington Beach Improvements to the Force
Mains and Sewer Pump Stations on Warner Avenue.
PROJECT ENGINEER - Raymond M. Hahn
Mr. Hahn, a Senior Project Engineer for JMM, has experience in the planning,
design, preparation of contract documents and specifications of water and
wastewater collection systems. His past projects include a sewer master plan for
the Moulton Niguel Water District and a predesign study of pump station, force
main and gravity sewer for San Diego County. He has a multitude of computer
experience including modeling of water and wastewater collection techniques,
surveying and various civil engineering and planning computer applications. Mr.
Hahn is a registered professional engineer in the State of California.
PROJECT SUPPORT STAFF
Mr. John A. Kamp would supervise the civil design and layout of the pump station
modifications and force main. Mr. Constantino Senon would handle the
mechanical design and specifications for upgrading the pump station facilities.
Mr. Marcos R. Santos would be responsible for the electrical design and
specifications of the project. Mr. Mark E. Fordham would supervise any
structural design necessary to complete expansion and upgrading of the pumping
station wet well capacities. Mr. William T. McGivney would be responsible for
quantity takeoff and preparation of final construction cost estimates. Mr. A. Lee
Ramage will provide field survey services necessary for design of the City's
project. Outside geotechnical services can be provided as necessary.
2-2
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
To ensure that JMM's extensive experience is focused on this project, the
Technical Review Committee would review the project following the preliminary
layout stage, the preliminary design stage and completion of the final design. The
Technical Review Committee is composed of three of JMM's most experienced
technical experts who are not involved in the project on a day -today basis. The
expert's function is to provide an outside, truly objective view of all of the
significant aspects of the project. The Technical Review Committee ensures the
quality control of all JMM projects and is the City's insurance that their
investment results in a efficient and cost-effective project.
CHAIRMAN - Philip Gatsoulis
Mr. Gatsoulis, a Principal Engineer, Chairman of Technical Review Committee
and JMM Vice President, has over 28 years of experience in civil and structural
engineering. He has supervised personnel in numerous water system and
wastewater collection system projects.
Mr. Gatsoulis is currently the Manager of JMM's Southwest Region and Discipline
Director of Water Retaining Structures and Structural Engineering. In addition,
he is responsible f9r conceptual and technical design reviews of hydraulic
structures, major pipelines and special projects.
R. Dewey Dickson
Mr. Dickson has over 30 years of experience in civil engineering management and
development of design concepts. His experience ranges from water supply
systems to wastewater pumping stations, two of the numerous areas in which he is
considered a JMM Discipline Expert. Mr. Dickson is also a leader in the
AIA/CEAC sponsored Value Engineering Workshop and is a qualified value
engineering analyst.
Robert C. Siemak
Mr. Siemak is a registered civil engineer in California and is presently the
Manager of JMM's Irvine Branch Office. He has an extensive background in civil
and sanitary engineering including design of water -.and wastewater facilities. In
recent years, Mr. Siemak has been involved in all areas of project management
and engineering ranging from evaluation, testing and selection to detailed design
and construction management. He has completed the AIA/ACEC Value
Engineering Workshop and is qualified for value engineering participation.
SUMMARY
The JMM Team represents a highly qualified group of engineers and architects
who will ensure the efficient design and construction of the City of Huntington
Beach project within the required time and budget constraints. Biographical data
on the key project team members are included in this section.
2-3
OUTSIDE SERVICES
GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATIONS
CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH
PROJECT MANAGER
ROBERT F. SEEMAN
PROJECT ENGINEER
RAYMOND M. HAHN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE
PHILIP GATSOULIS
(CHAIRMAN)
ROBERT C. SIEMAK
R. DEWEY DICKSON
DESIGN SUPPORT STAFF
CIVIL — JOHN A. KAMP
MECHANICAL — CONSTANTINO M. SENON
ELECTRICAL_— MARCOS R. SANTOS
STRUCTURAL— MARK E. FORDHAM
COST WILLIAM T. McGIVNEY
ESTIMATES
FIELD A. LEE RAMAGE
SURVEY
ti
R. DEWEY DICKSON
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
EDUCATION: B.E., Civil Engineering, University of Southern California
REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California
Professional Engineer in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maryland,
Nevada, South Dakota and Virginia
Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers
SUMMARY:
Mr. Dickson has extensive experience in civil engineering management and development
of design concepts with primary involvement in water works and water resources projects.
Background is extensive in feasibility investigations, master planning, and design analyses
of water supply and distribution systems. He has been involved with feasibility studies,
conceptual design, preparation of plans and specifications and construction monitoring for
most of the large -diameter pipeline projects designed by the firm. Mr. Dickson has also
been ultimately involved in the design of numerous pumping stations, reservoirs and water
treatment plants. He has been a leader in the AIA/CEAC sponsored Value Engineering
Workshop and is a qualified value engineering analyst.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Mr. Dickson is executive vice president and chief engineering officer, and director of the
firm. Since joining the firm in 1953, he has served progressively as design engineer,
project engineer, office engineer, senior project engineer, head of the Water and
Wasfewater Engineering Department, and is presently in charge of corporate engineering.
In the latter role, Mr. Dickson's primary responsibility is to maintain the firm's
Engineering Excellence program. Mr. Dickson has served in various roles as project
engineer, project manager and principal -in -charge for major transmission pipeline projects
such as Las Vegas Valley Water District, San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District,
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, and the cities of Beverly Hills, Monrovia, and
Pomona. As a member of the Standards Council and chairman of the Steel Pipe
Committee of the American Water Works Association, he has gained broad knowledge of
all types of piping materials and construction methods which have proven to be most cost-
effective to the owners. As a principal engineer and senior company officer, he has been
in charge of design of multimillion -dollar water works and water resources projects and
has prepared feasibility studies and master plans for numerous municipalities, public
agencies, and private water companies.
CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN PASADENA, CALIFORNIA
Design Engineer: Mr. Dickson's major function was the supervision of engineering design
and drafting for various projects involving site layouts, roads, airports, storm drainage,
water supply and distribution, wastewater collection systems, and liquid waste treatment
and disposal. He was in charge of the civil engineering phase of design and preparation of
construction drawings for a 15,000-man Marine Corps Base in California.
MARK E. FORDHAM
EDUCATION: M.S., Structural Engineering, University of Illinois
B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Illinois
REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California
Structural Engineer in California
Professional Engineer in Colorado and Oregon
SUMMARY:
Mr. Fordham has over 15 years of experience in structural and civil engineering in the
design and construction of reservoirs, commercial, port facilities, marinas, roads,
bridges, architectural and industrial facilities.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
As Supervising Engineer, Mr. Fordham designed the 32 million gallon, prestressed
concrete Eastside Reservoir for the Seattle, Washington Water Department. Since the
reservoir site is in a seismically active area, the structure was analyzed for earthquakes
using a finite element program on JMM's in-house computer system.
Mr. Fordham was responsible for the design of the waterholding structures for the Living
Seas Pavilion, EPCOT Center. The major aquarium is 200 feet in diameter with a 26-
foot water depth. The tank wall is penetrated by several large acrylic windows and two
tunnels which access a viewing pod near the center of the aquarium. He was responsible
for review of special finite elements analysis of the wall openings and acrylic windows.
He served as assistant to WED Enterprises' project engineer at the EPCOT Center to
expedite the construction of the fast -track project.
He was responsible for the structural design of the 18.2 million gallon Walteria Reservoir
for the City of Torrance, California. The reservoir has an irregular shape, requiring
specialized analysis for earthquake loadings.
MAJOR ENGINEERING FIRM, DENVER, COLORADO
Mr. Fordham served as project manager for the design and construction of the Yosemite
Street Overpass for the Greenwood South Metropolitan District, Greenwood Village,
Colorado. The four -span, precast, prestressed concrete bridge carries five lanes of
traffic over Interstate 25. The project required the construction of 30,000 square feet of
precast retaining wall to minimize right-of-way requirements for the roadway. The
project received the 1984 PCA Award of Excellence for the Rocky Mountain Region.
He was lead bridge engineer for the design of the Santa Fe/Evans Interchange for the
Colorado Department of Highways, Denver, Colorado. The urban interchange requires
four prestressed concrete box girder structures with a total length of 1,328 feet.
He has been involved in several other bridge design projects, including I-15, Power
County, Idaho; Kingsley Hydro Project, Ogallala, Nebraska; and Standard Bridge Designs,
Idaho Department of Transportation.
He was project manager for the structural design of the Johns Landing Office Building,
Portland, Oregon. The two-story structure utilized a combination of steel and wood
framing to minimize costs. The architect for the projects was Boor, Portland, Oregon.
MARK E. FORDHAM (Continued)
He was project manager for the structural design of the Red Rocks Christian Church,
Boise, Idaho. The square sanctuary was framed glued -laminated gables and concealed
tension straps on load -bearing masonry walls. The architect for the project was the
Design Planning Group, Boise, Idaho.
SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERIENCE:
Mr. Fordham has served as lead bridge engineer for the preliminary design of the Vista
Avenue railroad overpass for the Ada County Highway Commission, Boise, Idaho. The
single -span, steel -box, through -girder bridge will carry the Burlington Northern Railroad
over six lanes of traffic.
He has participated in the design of several water distribution and storage projects
including the Cherryvale pump station for Boulder, Colorado; Conduit No. 55 for the
Denver Water Department; and the pump stations and 52 million gallon steel reservoir
at the R.D. Nixon project, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
He provided the structural engineering for geothermal projects for Warm Springs Water
District, Boise, Idaho, and for the U.S. Department of Energy, Raft River, Idaho.
Mr. Fordham's power distribution experience includes structural design of the
138/12.5 kV Victory Substation for Idaho Power Company and a 96 kV transmission line
for Alaska Electric Light and Power Company, Juneau, Alaska.
Mr. Fordham has provided plan review and construction monitoring services for several
commercial projects including the Tabor Center and Ptarmigan Place, Denver, Colorado,
for Citicorp; the Salt Lake City Elks Club Office Conversion for Occidental Life
Insurance Company, for the Idaho Elks Rehabilitation Hospital, Boise, Idaho; Boise
Redevelopment Agency historic structures, Boise, Idaho; and the St. Joseph's Hospital,
St. Charles, Missouri.
In addition, Mr. Fordham was responsible for the structural design of several low-rise
office buildings for the MK Office Park, Boise, Idaho. The architect for the projects was
Dropping, Kelley and LaMarche, Boise, Idaho.
Mr. Fordham has participated in several energy -related projects. He as an L-security
clearance at the U.S. Department of Energy/Argonne National Laboratory, Idaho Falls,
Idaho. At that facility, he was project manager for the conceptual design of the
Transient Reactor Test Facility upgrade of buildings, facilities, and utilities and for the
design of modifications to the EBR III Reactor deckplate shielding.
Mr. Fordham has served as lead structural engineer for the design of several municipal
wastewater treatment plants including Colorado Springs, Denver, Boulder, and Widefield,
Colorado; Boise, Nampa, Burley, and Idaho Falls, Idaho; and Salem and Sweet Home,
Oregon.
He has also been responsible for the structural design of the Loveland, Colorado Water
Treatment Plant and the headworks/powerhouse and the flocculation/sedimentation
basins at the Denver Foothills Water Treatment Plant. In addition, he has provided
engineering design for modifications to both water treatment plants for Boulder,
Colorado.
ORGANIZATIONS: Structural Engineers Association of California
American Society of Civil Engineers
PHII.IP GATSOULIS
VICE PRESIDENT
EDUCATION: M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Texas
B.S., Civil Engineering, Robert College, Istanbul, Turkey
REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California and Oregon
Structural Engineer in California, Nevada and Oregon
Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers
SUMMARY:
Mr. Gatsoulis has over Z8 years of experience in civil and structural engineering and
project management with primary involvement in the investigation, study, and design of
water storage reservoirs, pipelines, treatment plants, pumping stations, and the prepara-
tion of master plans. He has an extensive background in administration, and direction of
engineering personnel in development, planning and design of water works projects. He
has supervised field personnel for numerous hydraulic structures and major pipelines,
water and wastewater collection projects, and master planning. In addition to water
works engineering, he has been responsible for structural design and planning of bridges,
commercial buildings, industrial plants, military installations, and recreational park
developments.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Management: Mr. Gatsoulis is Discipline Director of hydraulic structures and manager of
the southwest branch offices. As Discipline Director, he is responsible, company -wide,
for conceptual and technical design reviews of hydraulic structures, major pipelines and
special projects.
Project :Manager: Water master plans for the cities of La Habra, Redlands and Riverside,
California; wastewater collection system master plan for the city of Redlands; and
structural engineering manager for the EPCOT (Experimental Prototype City of
Tomorrow) Seas Pavilion in Walt Disney World, Florida. He has participated in special
studies and investigations on pipeline failures, foundation repairs and structural integrity.
Project Engineer: Experience includes the design of a 64.5-million-gallon buried rein-
forced concrete reservoir for East Bay Municipal Water District, a reservoir and pumping
station for the city of Monrovia, California, and other reservoirs for the cities of Pomona,
Beverly Hills and Redlands, California; and a 60-million-gallon reservoir and pumping
station for the city of San Francisco. He was involved in the design of a reinforced
concrete bridge to the San Antonio-Calaveras water treatment plant in San Francisco and
for numerous reservoirs, buried or partially buried, with multi -purpose utilization of the
roof area.
Structural Engineer: Mr. Gatsoulis' experience includes potential seismic and dynamic
force analyses for earthquake resistant design of major liquid retaining structures and
buildings. Earthquake resistant designs for which Mr. Gatsoulis was responsible were the
multi -purpose -use buried reinforced concrete Greystone and Dunsmuir reservoirs, the
access bridge across the Arroyo Seco to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, and
numerous other facilities.
® PSII.IP GATSOULLS (CONTINUED)
VICE PRESIDENT
International Assignments: Assignments include Brazil, the Philippines, Australia and
Indonesia, either as a project engineer or for technical review on water treatment and
distribution projects.
CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN LOS ANGELES
Structural Designer: Mr. Gatsoulis was directly involved with the structural design and
planning supervision of pulp mills, industrial plants and the Matterhorn Mountain in
Disneyland, California.
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION FIRMS IN LOS ANGELES
Structural Designer: Work involved designs for chemical process plants, support facility
buildings, aircraft hangars, petrochemical facilities and an atomic reactor facility for the
Atomic Energy Commission, presently the Department of Energy (DOE).
Assistant Engineer: Mr. Gatsoulis participated in the design and preparation of structural
plans for substation equipment support structures, a steam plant, and miscellaneous other
structures.
ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers
American Concrete Institute
American Water 'Works Association
Structural Engineers Association of Southern California
American Academy of Environmental Engineers
RAYMOND M. HAHN
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona, California
REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California
SUMMARY:
Mr. Hahn's background in civil engineering includes engineering feasibility studies,
master planning, preliminary and detailed design of transmission, pumping and
storage facilities, preparation of contract documents and specifications and
preparation of legal descriptions for improvement districts. He is also
experienced in computer modeling of water and wastewater systems, surveying
programs and various civil engineering and planning computer applications.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Senior Engineer: Mr. Hahn is responsible for the preparation of plans and
specifications, project coordination, shop drawing review and various design and
construction administration aspects of water and wastewater facilities. He has
participated in the design of a 36-inch water pipeline and a large domestic water
pumping station. He is currently participating in preliminary design studies of a
66-inch transmission main and pumping station to be used to divert storm water as
part of a ground water replenishment program. In addition, he is serving as
project engineer on several deep well pump station designs.
CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA
Project Engineer: Mr. Hahn was primarily responsible for the preparation of
engineering feasibility studies and master plans of water and sewer systems. He
has served as project engineer on numerous computer -based master plans for
clients throughout California and Arizona, many of which have included
development of flow coefficients, monitoring programs, infiltration and inflow
studies and other calibration techniques. He was also involved in design of
collection and trunk sewers, preparation of legal descriptions for large
improvement districts, preparation of specifications and irrigation studies for
reclaimed water applications.
ORGANIZATIONS: Orange County Water Association
JOHN A. KAMP
EDUCATION: Los Angeles State College
SUMMARY:
Mr. Kamp has over 27 years of experience in civil and structural engineering planning,
design and construction supervision. His background includes design development, survey,
field inspection, and project coordination of various water supply facilities and storm
drainage structures. He is experienced in siting, grading, paving, roadway alignment,
rotating structures orientation, preparation of design and contract documents, and overall
resident engineering services.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Supervising Senior Designer:' Mr: Kamp has participated in water and sewer facilities
design, site development, storm drain design, and street improvement projects for several
water districts, municipalities and private land development firms in the Orange County
area and Southern California. He has been responsible for design of water transmission
mains, pressure regulation stations, drilling and equipping of water wells, reservoir siting
and grading, preparation of parcel maps and legal descriptions. He has served as resident
engineer on several construction projects. Experience in this area was as resident
engineer on an 8-million-gallon buried concrete reservoir, and 2-1/2 miles of 39-inch-
diameter water transmission pipeline. He has also been responsible for construction
supervision, and resident engineering services for two major water districts in Orange
County.
He has been involved in design of storm drainage structures, street improvements and
utility alignments for several municipalities. Additional responsibilities included
preliminary site design of a mobile -home park and complete development of a 23-acre
landsite including underground utilities, street development,, grading and paving, parking
layout and building siting, preparation of parcel maps, street improvement and parking
master plans, miscellaneous legal descriptions for acquisitions, and quitclaims.
ENGINEERING -CONSTRUCTION IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
Design Engineer: Mr. Kamp's civil and structural engineering experience included such
diverse projects as missile launch and support facilities, airports and runways, communi-
cation facilities, roads, public utilities, and petroleum -chemical facilities. He was
responsible, as lead designer, on aircraft parking and taxi strips at Kirkland and Hickam
Air Forces Bases, including both ridged and flexible pavements, drainage, and mis-
cellaneous utilities. He was responsible for the design of a 3,000-foot runway extension
at Johnson Island area with facilities for washdown, fueling, and decontamination; an
aircraft maintenance facility at San Francisco International Airport; an $8.5 million
project for runway and taxiway design to accommodate 1.25-million-pound aircraft at Los
Angeles International Airport; paving, access roads, and utilities for COMSAT sites in
Hawaii, Virginia, California, and Puerto Rico; a Data Computation Center at Vandenberg
Air Force Base; and missile and deep space antenna sites in over 30 locations throughout
the world.
JOHN A. KAMP (CONTINUED)
CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA
Project Engineer: Mr. Kamp was responsible for survey, design and construction
activities. He handled approximately 19 projects for street improvement plans which
included storm drains, curbs, gutters, wastewater collection systems, and pavements in
Los Angeles, San Diego, and Orange Counties.
CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
Civil Designer and Draftsman: Projects involved design and drafting of Los Angeles
County Flood Control storm drain systems.
ENGINEERING -MANUFACTURING FIRM IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
Structural Designer and Draftsman: Mr. Kamp was responsible for design and drafting of
various types of electrical substation structures.
EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING FIRM IN ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA
Mechanical Draftsman: Layout detail and assembly drafting of mechanical equipment.
ENGINEERING -CONSTRUCTION FIRM IN ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA
Structural Designer and Draftsman: Design and drafting for various structural projects.
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
Civil Engineering Draftsman: Design and drafting of public works projects.
WILLIAM T. McGIVNEY
EDUCATION: M.S., Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island
B.S., Economics, California Polytechnic University
SUMMARY:
Mr. McGivney provides highly specialized cost estimating services and economic
analytical assistance to JMM engineering projects. This expertise is based on years of
practical experience with construction planning techniques. Since joining our firm he has
been involved with review and implementation of state-of-the-art computer assisted cost
estimating programs at JMM. His experience includes in-depth financial and accounting
analysis as controller for a major manufacturing firm.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Senior Cost Estimator: Mr. McGivney is assigned to the firm's Financial Studies Division
as principal estimator. He is responsible for the preparation of final cost estimates on
water and wastewater treatment plants, pumping stations, reservoirs, transmission
pipelines, operations and control buildings, and other associated plant facility designs
produced by the firm. In this capacity, Mr. McGivney provides updating of all price
indexing and unit price changes relating to component materials common to water and
wastewater construction. He is also directly involved with the firm's various computer
models used in the analysis of treatment plant costs and project cost optimization
developed to assist project engineers with both preliminary and detailed cost estimates as
well as alternative design selection. He recently completed an estimate for a JM:�i
designed project (in joint venture with another firm) with the City of Los Angeles
involving more than two thousand contract drawings and over seventeen thousand pages of
specifications with an estimated construction cost in excess of $200 million.
MAJOR MANUFACTURING FIRM, LOS ANGELES
In the role of plant controller, Mr. McGivney was responsible to corporate officers for
continuous detailed analysis of plant operating costs and profit analysis for all product
lines. He maintained a current data base for the computer inventory system (M.I.S.)
including reconciliation of printout reports to verify system integrity.
PRIVATE BUSINESS
Mr. McGivney spent a number of years in the private business sector in the construction
market. He spent two years as general manager of two cabinet and millwork companies
performing all management functions, all cost estimating, and the fixing of profit margins
for the entire product spread. Mr. McGivney was self-employed for several years in
commercial and residential construction. He operated as a general contractor and was
directly responsible for estimating, project management, and coordination of all partici-
pating trades.
�a a
A. LEE RAMAGE
i
EDUCA17ION: International Correspondence School, Courses in Surveying
SUMMARY:
Mr. Ramage has over 28 years of experience as a surveyor for civil and sanitary
engineering projects.
EXPERIENCE:
r ` , JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Surveyor - Chief of Party: Mr. Ramage has been a surveyor with the firm for over 23
years. He has performed field survey work for all the major water and wastewater
" facilities designed by JMM during that time. These projects include water and
wastewater treatment plants, water storage reservoirs, water distribution pipelines,
F transmission mains, and wastewater collection and disposal systems.
Recently completed design projects which are typical of Mr. Ramage's surveying
experience are the 36-mile Devil Canyon -Azusa Pipeline which is transporting water to
_ Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, California; the 75 mgd Escondido -Vista
Filtration Plant; and a 45 mgd water treatment plant and 10 mg water storage reservoir
for the city of Fairfield, California.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, LOS ANGELES,
CALIFORNIA
_. _. Surveyor: Performed survey work for sanitary engineering projects which included sewage
treatment and collection facilities, trunk lines and interceptors.
MARCOS R. SANTOS
EDUCATION: B.S., Electrical Engineering, Mapua Institute of
Technology, Manila, Philippines
Proficiency Certificate in Metering and Maintenance of
Electrical Apparatus, the David Ranken, Jr: School,
St. Louis, Missouri
REGISTRATION: Electrical Engineer in California
Professional Engineer in the Philippines
SUMMARY:
Over 18 years' experience in planning and design of electrical control, power and lighting
distribution systems. Background includes preparation of specifications, unit layouts, and
engineering plans, review of shop drawings, and field inspection of installations. Mr.
Santos has held teaching assignments in electrical engineering and is a specialist in
metering and maintenance of electrical apparatus.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Mr. Santos is presently assistant chief electrical engineer and has worked on electrical
? control, power and lighting distribution systems for various water works projects. He has
prepared specifications, performed electrical and control engineering and directed design
work for water treatment plant electrical systems, pumping stations, electrical sub-
stations, and is responsible for design review of installation and shop drawings. His
assignments have included work in Brazil, Indonesia, Philippines and Japan as specialist in
electrical and control engineering for water treatment plants.
ENGINEERING CONSULTANT - CONTRACTOR FIRM IN LOS ANGELES,
CALIFORNIA
Designed electrical power systems for large government facilities and airports. Work
involved layouts of indoor substations, generating units, motor control centers, lighting,
receptacles, cables and conduit routings, etc. Work also involved checking of calculations
for short-circuit currents, sizes and coordination of circuit breakers, wires, conduits,
pullboxes, etc.
ENGINEERING CONSULTANT - CONTRACTOR FIRM IN DETROIT, MICHIGAN
Prepared electrical plans for industrial plants and commercial buildings. Work involved
layout of unit substations, lighting, receptacles, cable trays, conduits, etc.
ATOMIC ENERGY ENGINEERING FIRM IN ONTARIO, CANADA
Assisted in the design and layout of motor control diagrams, relays, supervisory systems,
and associated apparatus as applied to nuclear power station operation.
MAPUA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY IN MANILA, PHILIPPINES
Instructor in elements and principles of ac-dc circuits and machineries; instructor in
electrical engineering laboratories. While a faculty member, was also self-employed as a
V
MARCOS R. SANTOS (CONTINUED)
professional engineer and prepared design and specifications for power distribution,
lighting and controls on commercial buildings, schools, shopping centers, and industrial
plants.
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR FIRM IN MANILA, PHIL.IPPINES
Duties included field work and preparation of design plans for various types of electrical
installations.
BUREAU OF PIIBUC SCHOOLS IN MANILA, PHII.IPPINES
Worked as an instructor in practical electricity in a vocational school in Manila. Was also
in charge of planning, installation and maintenance of the school's electrical system.
During this time, he attended a 1-year course in metering and maintenance of electrical
apparatus at The David Ranken, Jr. School in St. Louis, ;Missouri.
ROBERT F. SEEMAN
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Southern California,
Los Angeles, California
REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California
SUMMARY:
Mr. Seeman has over 16 years of experience in project management, engineering planning,
design and construction management of water, wastewater and drainage systems. Back-
ground includes water and wastewater system master planning, preliminary and detailed
design and project coordination of various water and wastewater transmission, pumping
and storage facilities, storm drainage master planning, engineering feasibility studies, site
improvement designs, environmental evaluations, and preparation of contract documents
and specifications. He is also experienced in the development and utilization of computer
programs in analyzing water and wastewater systems.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Principal Engineer: Mr. SebmaA has been responsible for the preparation of water,
wastewater and drainage master plans, feasibility studies, site grading plans, detailed
water, wastewater and drainage plans and specifications for a number of projects. He has
participated as project engineer in the detailed designs of several buried and semi -buried
concrete reservoirs for the Yorba Linda County and Laguna Beach County Water Districts
as well as the administrating and coordinating the construction of the reservoir projects.
Mr. Seeman has also managed and designed several steel tanks for agencies in the Orange
County area. He has been involved in the detailed designs of water and wastewater
pumping stations, transmission and distribution water mains, sewer force mains and storm
drainage collection systems.
Mr. Seeman has conducted water supply feasibility studies for several cities and water
agencies in the Orange County area. He has been responsible for the design and
construction inspection of water transmission and distribution facilities for Yorba Linda
County Water District, the City of San Clemente, Irvine Ranch Water District, Rancho
California Water District and Mesa Consolidated Water District. He has prepared water
system master plans for the Laguna Beach County Water District, Rancho California
Water District and the Yorba Linda County Water District, a sewer system master plan
for the City of Buena Park as well as the storm drainage master plan for the City of
Garden Grove. Additional experience has included site grading plans and field observation
of construction projects.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER
Civil Engineering Assistant: Mr. Seeman worked in the Structural Design Section which
was responsible for the design and preparation of plans for the Los Angeles Reservoir
Outlet Tower Complex. He worked in the master planning group which analyzed the Los
Angeles City's distribution and transmission systems. He has also worked on the
development of computer programs for the Water Design Division.
ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers
Orange County Water Association
r CONSTANTINO M. SENON
EDUCATION: B.S., Mechanical Engineering, Central Philippine
University, Iloilo City, Philippines
REGISTRATION: Mechanical Engineer in the Philippines
Professional Engineer (Mechanical) in California and Nevada
SUMMARY:
Over 15 years of experience in design and selection of mechanical equipment, piping and
flue work for various industrial plant facilities. Background includes design development,
drawing review, cost estimating, site inspection; and site supervision of water treatment,
high -temperature air pollution control, material handling, and sugar manufacturing
facilities.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Principal Engineer: Mr. Senon serves as assistant head of the firm's Mechanical Division
and is responsible for coordinating the efforts of various project engineers and other
support groups assigned to this activity. Mr. Senon has worked on the design of pumping
stations, piping, mechanical equipment, water and wastewater treatment plants with
energy recovery systems, HV/AC with passive solar systems, and energy calculations for
industrial and commercial buildings. These projects include the 50 mgd Central Utah
Water Conservancy District water treatment plant, City of North Las Vegas pumping
station, Costa Mesa operations facility building, Cucamonga County Water District water
treatment plant with variable -speed pumping station, Chino Basin MWD wastewater
treatment plant expansion, City of Corona wastewater treatment plant, Duchesne Valley
water treatment plant, Roxas City water treatment plant (Philippines), Tangerang water
treatment plant (Indonesia), and Oakview wastewater treatment plant. For the past three
years, Mr. Senon has worked on projects in the Philippines on the design and construction
supervision of Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System 5.0 cum./sec. Tondo
Ocean Outf all Pump Station, rehabilitation of 7 lift stations and 1,400 square meter water
and wastewater laboratory building.
MAJOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
Engineer: Designed piping, flue work, HV/AC, gas conditioning system (spray tower),
pneumatic control systems, ash handling systems, including the selection of fans, blowers,
and motors in sizes up to 500 hp.
MAJOR ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION FIRM IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Engineer: Designed material handling facilities for U.S. Postal Service. Design included
conveyors, monorail systems, automatic unloaders, HV/AC, pneumatic system, hydraulic
system, and dust collectors.
ENGINEERING FIRM IN THE PHILIPPINES
Engineer: Designed, selected and supervised fabrication of mechanical equipment for
sugar manufacturing facilities, cement and coal bulk material handling, ice plants and
power plants. Designs included calculations for each system, such as clarifiers,
CONSTANTINO M. SENON (CONTINUED)
evaporators, crystallizers, piping, flight, screw and bucket conveyors. Duties also
included the selection of gear reducers, chain drives, belts, motors, pumps, compressors,
heat exchangers, engines and accessories to complete the system.
ri
ROBERT C. SIEMAK
EDUCATION: M.S., Sanitary Engineering, University of California, Berkeley
B.S., Civil Engineering, Loyola University of Los Angeles
REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California, Utah and Arizona
Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade V
SUMMARY,:
Mr. Siemak's background in civil and sanitary engineering includes design in water and
wastewater, pilot plant operation and design, full-scale plant testing, construction
management, process selection studies, field investigation of domestic water systems, and
preparation of ground water monitoring programs. Mr. Siemak has completed both
facilities plans and water quality studies. He has also completed the AIA/ACEC Value
Engineering -workshop and is qualified for value engineering participation.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Principal Engineer: Mr. Siemak is the manager of the firm's Irvine Branch office. He
specializes in prototype treatment studies and conceptual and detailed design of water
and wastewater treatment systems. During recent years, Mr. Siemak has been involved in
all areas of project engineering and management ranging from process evaluation, pilot
and full scale plant testing and process selection, to detailed design and construction
management. Mr. Siemak served as project engineer on the 60 mgd water treatment plant
planning and design project for the City of Tucson, Arizona, project manager for the
IZ mgd Palmdale Water District water treatment plant and the 35 mgd WFA-JPA (Upland,
California area) water treatment plant. The Tucson project involved treatment of
anticipated Central Arizona Project water in the greater Tucson area. The Palmdale
Water District and WFA-JPA projects involved the treatment of State Project Water.
Other water treatment projects involvement include pilot plant design, construction,
' operation and process selection for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 600
mgd water treatment plant; full-scale plant testing of a 40 mgd water treatment plant for
the Santa Clara Valley Water District; preparation of a design report for a 27.5 mgd water
treatment plant for Casitas Municipal Water District; a preliminary evaluation of water
treatment systems for the Caino Basin Municipal Water District; and pilot plant
evaluations of water treatment plant operations for the Hunter District Water Board
(Australia).
Mr. Siemak has also been involved with construction management services for several
projects including the Plant No. 3 addition for the Camarillo Sanitary District, the plant
modification and upgrading for the Oak View Sanitary District, and the upgrading
modifications to the City of Thousand Oaks Olsen Road WWTP.
Mr. Siemak also has experience in wastewater treatment system design and evaluation as
demonstrated by his serving as project engineer on several projects including design of a
25 mgd wastewater treatment plant for the South Valley (Utah) Water Reclamation
Facility Board; odor control study for Clark County Sanitation District, and preliminary
design of a wastewater collection system at Independence Lake for WED (Disney)
Enterprises. As project manager, Mr. Siemak has also been involved with the preliminary
design, project management, and start-up of a an 8 mgd tertiary addition to the Las
Virgenes Municipal Water District's Tapia Facility. The project involved pilot testing to
optimize filter media design. He has served as the primary advisor to the Camarillo
Sanitary District on sanitary engineering matters.
-10 ROBERT C. SIEMAK (CONTINUED)
CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Assistant Engineering Specialist: Mr. Siemak was involved in field inspection of domestic
water systems. He evaluated each system for operational defects, health hazards and
proper monitoring programs; and recommended improvement that would enable the- water
r_ system to conform to public health standards.
-» CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER
Student Engineer: Mr. Siemak assisted in collecting and reviewing water quality data. He
was involved in conducting a feasibility study, in assisting in the preparation of a project
report on proposed water reclamation facilities and in operating a portable water
treatment plant to treat periodic high turbidity episodes in the Owens Valley supply.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING
Student Engineer: Mr. Siemak was a chainman on a street surveying crew.
ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers
American Water Works Association
Water Pollution Control Federation
PUBLICATIONS:
McBridge, D., Siemak, R., Tate, C., and Trussell, R., "Pilot Plant Investigations for
Treatment of Owens River Water," AWWA 96th Annual Conference Proceedings, Paper
14A-3 (May 1977).
Siemak, Robert, "Pilot Plant Investigation and Conclusions - Treatment of Owens River
Water," presented at the ASCE Environmental Group, Los Angeles Section Meeting (Nov.
1977).
Siemak, Robert C., Trussell, A., Trussell, R., and Umphres, M., "How to Reduce
Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water," ASCE Civil Engineering Magazine (February 1979).
Colbaugh, James E., Siemak, Robert C., Uhler, Robert B., and Wojslaw, Joseph A.,
"Monomedia Alternative to Filtration in Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plants,"
Canadian Society of Civil Engineering 1980 Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba (May
1980).
Colbaugh, James E., Siemak, Robert C., Uhler, Robert B., and Wojslaw, Joseph A., "Use of
Deep Bed Monomedia as an Alternative to Standard Dual Media Filtration in Advanced
Wastewater Treatment Plants," ASCE National Conference on Environmental Engineering,
New York, New York (July 1980).
Colbaugh, James E., Siemak, Robert C., Uhler, Robert B., and Wojslaw, Joseph A.,
"Evaluation of Deep Bed Monomedia in a Tertiary Filtration Application." Accepted for
-° presentation at 1981 ASCE Water Forum Conference, San Francisco, California (August
1981).
Siemak, R.C., "Tertiary Filtration Design: Practical Design Considerations," WPCF 1983
Annual Conference, Atlantic Georgia (Oct. 1983).
SECTION 3
PROJECT RELATED EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES
James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., was founded in 1945 and over
the past 41 years has gained extensive experience in the various disciplines of
water and wastewater engineering. This has involved the design of gravity sewer
pipelines and force mains, pumping stations, and other related facilities. In
addition to the firm's experience, members of the proposed project team have had
extensive experience in the design of these types of facilities. A summary of
recent experience for similar projects is presented in this section for your
convenience.
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
JMM has designed several hundred miles of major sanitary sewers in diameters up
to 114 inches. One of our larger projects was the $52 million interceptor
se'verage system for metropolitan San Diego, California. This system consists of
116,000 feet of 42 to 114-inch diameter interceptor sewers, pumping facilities
(including one of the world's largest wastewater pumping stations), an 80 mgd
wastewater treatment plant, and a 108-inch diameter ocean outfall. Another
major project was the nonreclaimable wastewater collection system designed for
the Chino Basin Municipal Water District. This project, costing over $12 million,
involved over 30 miles of pipelines in diameters up to 42 inches. Collection
systems can be both analyzed and designed by ICES SEWER, a computer program
developed by the Civil Engineering Systems Laboratory at M.I.T. ICES (Integrated
Civil Engineering System) was the result of a major research and development
effort initiated by M.I.T. in 1964. The system handles both storm and sanitary
networks flowing full or partially full under the influence of gravity.
PUMPING STATIONS
Over 209 water and wastewater pumping stations have been designed ranging in
capacity from 230 gpm to 250,000 gpm with total connected horsepowers up to
18,000 HP. These stations have included all types of pumps, both electric and
natural gas driver units, electrical controls for both local and remote operations,
and telemetering. Our experience includes the world's largest natural gas engine -
driven water pumping station located in Las Vegas, Nevada.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
JMM provides some degree of construction management services for virtually all
facilities designed by JMM. These services have ranged from fast -tracking design
and construction, monitoring construction, performing all engineering work, and
keeping all books and records associated with a project down to simply providing
occasional professional assistance during construction. For a typical job, in
addition to design, JMM assists its clients during the procurement process,
monitors construction progress, checks shop drawings, negotiates change orders,
makes final inspections, assists with start-up, and performs a large part of the
documentation associated with a project. JMM is extremely conscious of time
and money constraints and gears its work to stay within the budgets given. JMM
project engineers assist contractors and operating personnel in achieving design
criteria, especially during plant start-up. Project design engineers periodically
3-1
return to completed projects to observe their operation and assist operating
personnel. Information obtained from these visits is used to refine subsequent
designs.
ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
JMM maintains full engineering design capabilities at its Pasadena Corporate
office. Among the engineering and technical disciplines represented are
architectural, civil, electrical, mechanical, structural, communications,
instrumentation and controls and cost estimating disciplines. It is JMW. s
philosophy to design functional facilities which provide low operation and
maintenance costs, low energy consumption and high operational flexibility while
controlling construction costs. Emphasis is placed on obtaining high value,
durability and functional efficiency for the cost of construction. These goals are
fulfilled through the utilization of JMM's extensive experience with designs of
many varied facilities.
The following pages contain a representative list of major sewer and wastewater
pumping station projects designed by JMM, many of which include equipment
similar to that proposed in the City of Huntington Beach Improvements to the
Force Mains and Sewer Pump Stations on Warner Avenue Project. The projects on
this list reflect the deptb of design experience available at JMM to perform the
necessary work for the City of Huntington Beach in an efficient and cost-
effective manner.
3-2
REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WASTEWATER COLLECTION PROJECTS
Footage
Diameter
Agency
(feet)
(inches)
Albany, Oregon, City of
8,770
12-14
Alhambra, California, City of
19,000
8-21
Avalon, California, City of
4,000
12
Boulder City, Nevada, City of
169000
8-10
Canby, Oregon, City of
2,320
8-10
Castroville County Sanitation District
15,000
8-18
Castroville County Sanitation District
3,000
18
Central Weber Sewer Improvement District
Ogden, Utah
18,775
8-18
Chino Basin Municipal Water District
210,000
8-42
Clark County, Nevada
125,000
60
Clark County Sanitation District, Nevada
16,000
18
Coalville, Utah
47,380
4-18
Cucamonga County Water District
262, 000
8-30
Curitiba, Brazil, City of
75,000
18-81
Del Mar, California, City of
23,000
12-18
Dunsmuir, California, City of
8,000
15
East Salem Sewage & Drainage District
(Marion County, Oregon)
264,000
8-33
Fairfield -Suisun Sewer District, California
40,000
18-36
Farmington, Utah
1,870
8
Florida (Land Development)
108,000
8-24
Gervais, Oregon, City of
16,070
8
Guyaquil, Ecuador, City of
100,000
8-96
Halsey, Oregon, City of
17,750
8-10
Heber City, Utah
16,200
8-36
Independence, Oregon, City of
3,570
12
Jefferson, Oregon, City of
24,100
8-15
Junction City, Oregon, City of
12,000
12
Keizer Sewer District No. 1 (Marion
County, Oregon)
173,000
8-24
Kennewick, Washington, City of
32,000
12-36
Labish Village Sewer & Drainage District
(Marion County, Oregon)
8,100
8
Laguna Beach, California, City of
27,000
8-36
Lakepoint Sewer Improvement District,
Lakepoint, Utah
Phase 1
6,760
6-10
Phase 2
34,550
4-10
La Habra, California, City of
17,000
8-24
Las Vegas, Nevada (Land Development)
105,000
8-12
Las Vegas, Nevada, City of
23,475
42-54
REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WASTEWATER COLLECTION PROJECTS
(continued)
Footage
Diameter
Agency
(feet)
(inches)
Los Angeles, California, City of
9,000
48-69
Maple Hills Development, Bountiful, Utah
9,1Z0
8
Mendocino City Community Services District
30,000
6-15
Midway Sanitation District, Midway, Utah
79,880
8-15
Missoula, Montana, City of
7Z,300
8-36
Monmouth, Oregon, City of
10,000
1Z
Ogden, Utah
8-90
Norco, California, City of
4,000
8
Pajaro County Sanitation District
65, 000
8-14
Pomona Valley, MWD
25,000
26
Ramona Sanitation District
34,000
1Z-21
Rancho California WD
30,000
6-1Z
Reedy Creek Improvement District, Florida
56,000
12-18
Regional Highway Commission, Nevada
400
51
Russian River County Sanitation District
60, 000
6-Z4
Salem, Oregon, City of
290,000
6-30
San Diego, California, City of
116000
4Z-114
Santa Ana Watershed Project
57,000
Z7-48
Santa Cruz County Sanitation District
4Z, 000
Z4-36
Sierra Madre, California, City of
22,000
6-12
Skagway, Alaska, City of
15,500
8-10
South Davis County Sewer Improvement
District, Bountiful, Utah
100 miles
8-48
South Laguna Sanitary District
33,000
6-18
South Ogden, Utah
40th Street
1,851
8
Main Point
4,000
8-10
Adams Ave.
860
8
Sweetwater, Florida, City of
17,000
8-Z4
Sweetwater Park, Utah
29,700
8
U.S. Navy, Camp Pendleton
15,000
16
U.S. Navy, Travis Air Force Base
13,000
1Z-Z1
Ventura County, North Coast
100,000
1%-8
Washington Terrace, Utah
12,000
36
Wendover, Utah
8,110
1Z
West Jordan, Utah
2,37Z
10
Winters, California, City of
14,000
14
Woodburn, Oregon, City of
Z6 700
8-36
REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF SEWAGE PUMPDIG STATIONS
PUMPS
CLIENT
Type
No.
Design
Design
(fut.)
hp
gpm
— Avalon - Sewage
Vert
2
30
3,600
Goleta Sanitary District - Sewage
V.T.
2
90
6,000
Ontario - Sewage
V.T.
2(2)
105
3,500
• Ontario - Magnolia Ave. Sewage P.S.
Vert
2
23
12, 000
San Diego No. 2 - Sewage
1
Vert
4(4)
13,500
250, 000
San Diego No. 1 - Sewage
Vert
3 (3)
3,700
170,000
Santa Cruz CSD - Sewage A
Vert
2
60
1,700
Santa Cruz CSD - Sewage B
Vert
3
90
5,000
Santa Cruz CSD - Sewage C
Vert
3
338
5,000
Santa Cruz CSD - Sewage D
Vert
3
338
8,000
Notes:
Design kw and design gpm includes future
pumps.
( ) indicates number of future pumps to be installed
V.T. = Vertical Turbine
Vert = Vertical Centrifugal
e
e
REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLIENTS
y Alhambra, City of, California
Baldwinsville, New York, Brewery
Buena Park, City of, California
Camarillo Sanitary District, California
Carmel Sanitary District, California
Castroville County Sanitation District, California
Central Utah Water Conservancy District
• Chino Basin Municipal Water District, California
Contra Costa County Water, District, California
IL
Corona, City of, California
Cucamonga County Water District, California
• Del Mar, City of, California
• ' Escondido, City of, California
Fairfield -Suisun Sewer District, California
Folsom, City of, California
Directorate General Housing, Building, Planning and Urban Development, Jakarta,
Indonesia
y Gillette, Wyoming, City of
Goleta County Water District, California
Hampton Roads Sanitation District, Virginia
Helix Water District, California
' Irvine Ranch Water District
Kennewick, City of, Washington
REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLIENTS
(Continued)
Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District, California
Las Lomas-Pajaro, Monterey County Department of Public Works,, California
Las Vegas Valley Water District; Nevada
Livermore, City of, California
:Mandan, City of, North Dakota
:Maui, County of, Hawaii
Mendocino City Community Services District, California
Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS), Manila, Philippines
Missoula, City of, Montana
Mountain Home, City of, Idaho
North Lauderdale, City of, Florida
Oak View Sanitary District, California
Oceanside, City of, California
Palm Springs, City of, California
Rancho California Water District, California
Rohnert Park, City of, California
San Buenaventura, City of, California
San Gabriel Valley Municipal 'Water District, California
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, California
Sonoma, County of, California
South Valley Water Reclamation Facility Board, Utah
State Water Resources Control Board, Santa Ana Region, California
Stockton East Water District, California
Sunkist Growers, Inc., Coorona, California
Thousand Oaks, City of, California
REPRESENTATNE LIST OF
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLIENTS
{Continued)
Twin Falls, City of, Idaho
Ventura County Public Works Agency, California
Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority, California
Watsonville, City of, California
�3
-- CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY
1AMES M. MONTGOMERY. CONSULTLNG ENGINEERS. INC.
ON PIPELINES, PUMPING STATIONS IND RESERVOIRS
=�
_'
Z
J
_
NAME OF CLIENT
I YA.NIE OF PROJECT
G J 1 i
—
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority,
Riverside. California • I • I • I • j • I •
Santa Ana Regional Interceptor —
i
I
Reach IV I
1
1
City of Fairfield, California
I
FarrtieidSuuun Interceptors and • •
•
I •
•
• I • • I • !
Pumping Stations
! Chino Basin Municipal Water District;
Cucamonga. California
Chino Basin Municipal Water District • •
•
•
•
•
•
•
Interceptors and Pumping Stations
City of Del Mar, California
I ,
Del Mar Collection Sewers • •
• • • I •
Mendocino City Community Services
District, Mendocino, California
•
•
•
•
• •
•
Mendocino Sewer Collection System
it City of Oceanside, California
Oceanside Water Development
•
•
•
•
• I •
•
Program
I
I
i
Cucamonga County Water District.
I
�
i
Cucamonga. California
I
Cucamonga Pipelines and Pumping
I
•
•
•
•
•
•
Stations
i
San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water
District, San Gabriel, California
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
`I Devil Canyon —Azusa Pipeline
I
I
City of Corona, California
Corona Storage Facilities
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
I
s
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FLTNCTIONS PERFOR-titED BY
1AMES "rt. IvIONTGO:MERY. CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC.
ON PIPELINES. PU`IPING STATIONS AND RESERVOIRS
(CONTINUED)
NAME OF CLIENT
NA..ME OF PROJECT I =
_ _ ,
I
L -
Yorba Linda County Water District.
I
Yorba Linda, California
• •
• I I • • • I •
( •
Yorba Linda Transmission and
I
Storage Facilities
Las Vegas Vafley Water District,
Las Vegas. Nevada
Las Vegas Valley Water District I •
• •
f • I • •
Pipelines, Pumping Stations and
I Reservoirs
I I
Goleta County Water District, Goleta;
I I
I
California
•
•
j •
•
•
+ •
Goleta County Water District
I
Pipeline and Pumping S ;non
City of Ventura. California
I
i
`I
I
; I
i
Ventura Pipelines, Pumping Station
•
•
• I •
• 1 • • • j
and Reservoir
I I
I j
i
City of Buena Park California
I
•
Buena Park Pipelines and Reservoir
•
i • •
•
Irvine Ranch Water District. Irvine,
California
Irvine Ranch Water District Pipelines
I •
•
I •
I •
I •
•
and Reservoir
I
I
I
i San Marcos County Water District, San
I
f
I Marcos, California
•
•
I •
• • •
Richland Interceptor
i
Rancho California Water District.
Temecula, California
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Rancho California Water District
Pipelines
I
I
I
SECTION 4
FEE SCHEDULE
Consulting services are provided in accordance with the Schedule of Fees and
'a Conditions (CAl-SC(11/85)), a copy of which is included in this section. Based on
our understanding of the engineering services to be provided in Section 1-Scope of
Work, the following outlines our Fee Schedule:
1
FEE SCHEDULE
.y
The fee services described in Section 1-Scope of Work, Task A, Preliminary
Design Phase would be accomplished for a fee not to exceed $7,400.
■ The fee for services described in Section 1-Scope of Work, Task B, Design Phase
would be accomplished for a fee not to exceed $17,100.
The fee for services described in Section 1-Scope of Work, Task C, Construction
Support Phase would be accomplished for a fee not to exceed $2,800.
The fee for services described in Task A. Preliminary Design Phase, includes the
following subcontracted specialized consulting engineering services:
Geotechnical Investigations
-aThe total not to exceed fee for Tasks A, B, and C would be: $27,300 .1-1
A breakdown of estimated manhours and extenuated costs for individual tasks
described in Section 1-Scope of Work is shown on the following pages in this
section for your convenience.
4-1
Fee Schedule
ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND
• COST OF SERVICES
Consulting Engineering Services
Task A — Preliminary Design Phase
Estimated Estimated
Subtask Manhours Subcontractors Cost
1 16 920
2 42 1,500 3,980
3 4 190
4 '6 290
5 7 410
6 4 300
7 15 11110
Subtotal for Task A $7, 200
Printing do Reproduction 100
Travel and Miscellaneous 100
Total for Task A
4-2
$7, 400
Fee Schedule
ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND
COST OF SERVICES
Consulting Engineering Services
Task B - Design Phase
Estimated
Subtask
Manhours
1
26
2
197
3
71
4
60
5
3
Subcontractors
Subtotal for Task B
Printing do Reproduction
Travel and Miscellaneous
Total for Task B
4-3
Estimated
Cost
1,580
8,240
3,730
3,000
150
$16, 700
150
250
$17,100
F
ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND
COST OF SERVICES
Consulting Engineering Services
Task C - Construction Support Phase
Estimated
Estimated
Subtask
Manhours Subcontractors
Cost
1
30
1,690
2
18
480
3
6,
530
Subtotal for Task C
$2, 700
Printing do Reproduction
Travel and Miscellaneous
Total for Task C
50
50
$2, 800
4-4
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CONDITIONS
James M. Montgomery, Comailtiog Engineers, Inc.
A. FEES AND PAYMENT
I. The fee for services will be based an salary cost plus 140 percent of said salary costs. When field engineering services are to be
performed by field personnel, the fee will be salary cost plus 130 percent. Salary cost is the cost of salaries (including sick leave,
vacation, holiday and incentive pay) of personnel for time directly chargeable to the project; phis unemployment, excise, and payroll
taxes; contributions for social security, employment compensation insurance, retirement, medical, and insurance benefits and for the
purpose of this project, salary costs are defined as 1.3 times actual payroll. Non -salary expenses directly attributable to the project like
(1) living and traveling expenses of employees when away from the home office on business connected with the project, W identifiable
communication expenses, (3) identifiable drafting and stenographic supplies and expenses, and (4) identifiable reproduction costs
applicable to the work will be charged at actual cost plus 15 percent service charge. Charges for the use of computers, word processors
and associated equipment and services will be in accordance with the published schedule of fees in effect at the time the charges are
incurred. Charges for services provided by Montgomery's approved water quality laboratory will be in accordance with the published
laboratory fee schedule in effect at the time the services are furnished.
Z. The fee for Outside Services will be at actual cost plus 15 percent of actual cost to cover overhead and administration.
3. Payment shall be due within 30 days after date of monthly invoice describing the work performed and expenses incurred during the
preceding month.
4. In order to defray carrying charges resulting from delayed payments, simple interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per
annum (but not exceeding the maximum rate allowed by law) will be added to the unpaid balance of each invoice. The interest period
shall commence 30 days after date of original invoice and shall terminate upon date of payment. Payments will be first credited to
interest and then to principal. No interest charge will be added during the initial 30-day period following date of invoice.
B. COMMENCEMENT OF WORK
The work will be commenced immediately upon receipt of notice to proceed. If after commencement of work the project is delayed for
any reason beyond the control of Montgomery for more than 60 days, the terms and conditions contained herein are subject to revision.
C. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
1. BOOKS OF ACCOUNT. Montgomery will maintain books and accounts of payroll costs, travel, subsistence, field and incidental
expenses. Said books will be available at all reasonable times for examination by the owner at the Corporate office of Montgomery.
Z. INSURANCE/INDEMNIFICATION
(a) Montgomery will maintain insurance as will protect the client from claims under the Worker's Compensation Laws and from
General Liability and Automobile claims for bodily injury, or death, or property damage which may arise from the negligent
performance by its employees in the functions and services required under this Agreement.
(b) Montgomery warrants that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to the services and duties proposed to be performed
and that it shall perform such services and duties in conformance to and consistent with the standards generally recognized as being
employed by professionals of JMM's caliber in the same locality and to that end JMM agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Owner,
its officers and employees from and against any and all liability claims, suits, loss, damages, costs and expenses arising out of or
resulting from any negligent act, error or omission of JMM, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors in the performance of -
their services and duties hereunder. Further to assure the Owner that such standard will be maintained and to protect the Owner
from any negligent acts, error or omission on the part of JMM, JMM maintains Professional Liability insurance in the amount of
$5,000,000. The total aggregate of Montgomery's professional liability, however, to all parties related to this Agreement shall not
exceed $50,000 or the amount of Montgomery's fee for each phase of the Agreement.
(c) Although the insurance as stated is currently in effect, due to the instability of the world insurance market, it is recognized
that on periodic negotiation of policy renewals, it may not be possible to maintain the exact insurance coverage required under the
terms of this agreement. In such event, Montgomery will use its best efforts.to obtain insurance coverage that is reasonably
available and most nearly equivalent to the insurance coverage herein described.
(d) In consideration of the unavailability of professional liability insurance for services involving or relating to hazardous waste
elements of this agreement, if applicable, or the removal or encapsulation of asbestos, it is further agreed that the Owner shall
indemnify and hold harmless Engineer and their consultants, agents and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and
expenses, direct and indirect, or consequential damages, including but not limited to fees and charges of attorneys and court and
arbitration costs, arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work by Engineer, or claims against Engineer arising from
the work of others, related to hazardous waste or asbestos activity.
The above indemnification provision extends to claims against Engineer which arise out of, are related to, or are based upon, the
dispersal, discharge, escape, release or saturation of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, liquids, gases or any
other material, irritant, contaminant or pollutant in or into the atmosphere, or on, onto, upon, in or into the surface or subsurface
(a) soil, (b) water or watercourses, (c) objects, or (d) any tangible or intangible matter, whether sudden or not.
(e) Notwithstanding any provisions in this agreement to the contrary, if this project involves construction as that term is generally
understood, and the Engineer does not provide Engineering Services during construction including on -site monitoring, site visits, shop
drawing review, design clarifications, etc., the Owner agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Engineer from any and all liability
arising out of this project or Agreement.
CAI -SC (11/85)
3. DOCUMENTS
(a) All tracings, survey notes, and other original documents as instruments of service are and shall remain the property of
Montgomery, except where by law or precedent these documents become public property. The client agrees to hold harmless,
indemnify and defend Montgomery against all damages, claims, expenses and losses arising out of any reuse of the plans and
specifications without the written authorization of Montgomery.
(b) All computer programs, software and other like data developed during the course of the project, unless specifically developed
for the client, are and shall remain the sole property of Montgomery.
(c) Montgomery's liability to client for any computer programs, software products or related data furnished hereunder is limited
solely to the correction of residual errors, minor maintenance, or update as agreed. Montgomery makes no warranties of any
kind, including any implied warranty of merchantability or of fitness for any particular purpose or against infringement, with
respect to computer programs, software products, related data, technical information or technical assistance provided by
'.Montgomery under this Agreement. In no event shall Montgomery, its officers, agents or employees be liable under or in
connection with this Agreement under any theory of tort, contract, strict liability, negligence, or other legal or equitable
theory for incidental or consequential damages relating to any computer programs, software products or related data furnished
hereunder.
4. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT. If any portion of the work is terminated or abandoned by the owner then the provisions of this
Schedule of Fees and Conditions in regard to compensation and payment shall apply insofar as possible to that portion of the work not
terminated or abandoned. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any phase of the project, the fee for services performed
during such phase shall be based on Montgomery's reasonable estimate of the portion of such phase completed prior to said termination,
plus a reasonable amount to reimburse Montgomery for termination costs.
S. REVISION OF TERMS. If notice to proceed is delayed for any reason beyond 60 days, the terms and conditions contained in this
schedule are subject to revision.
,. 6. ATTORNEY'S FEES. If either party becomes involved in litigation arising out of this contract or the performance thereof, the court
in such litigation shall award reasonable costs and.expenses, including attorney's fees to the party justly entitled thereto. In awarding
attorney's fees, the court shall not be bound by any court fee schedule, but shall, if it is in the interest of justice to do so, award the
full amount of costs, expenses and attorney's fees paid or incurred in good faith.
7. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. All of the terms, conditions and provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the
parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns provided, however, that no assignment of the contract shall be made without
written consent of the parties to the agreement.
8. CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES. Estimates of cost for the facilities considered and designed under this Agreement are prepared by
Montgomery through exercise of its experience and judgement in applying resent available cost data, but it is recognized that
8 rY B xP j B PP lY � g presently �
Montgomery has no control over cost of labor and materials, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive
bidding prdcedures, market conditions, and unknown field conditions so that it cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or the
project construction costs will not vary from its cost estimates.
9. SITE VISITS. Visits to the construction site and observations made by Montgomery as part of Construction Management Services
under this Agreement shall not make Montgomery responsible for, nor relieve the construction contractor(s) of the obligation to conduct
comprehensive monitoring of the work sufficient to ensure conformance with the intent of the Contract Documents, and shall not make
Montgomery responsible for, nor relieve the construction contractor(s) of the full responsibility for all construction means, methods,
techniques, sequences, and procedures necessary for coordinating and completing all portions of the work under the construction
contracts) and for all safety precautions incidental thereto. Such visits by Montgomery are not to be construed as part of the
monitoring duties of the on -site monitoring personnel defined below.
10. ON -SITE MONITORING. When Montgomery provides on -site monitoring personnel as a part of Construction Management Services
under this Agreement, the on -site monitoring personnel will make reasonable efforts to guard the client against defects and deficiencies
in the work of the contractor(s) and to help determine if the provisions of the Contract Documents are being fulfilled. Their day-to-day
monitoring will not, however, cause Montgomery to be responsible for those duties and responsibilities which belong to the construction
contractor(s) and which include, but are not limited to, full responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences and progress of
construction and the safety precautions incidental thereto and for performing the construction work in accordance with the Contract
Documents.
t` CAl-SC (11/85)
•
j
PRODUCER
1
EMETT do CHANDLER LOS ANGELES, INC.
r 11835 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, 5TH FLOOR
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064
TEL NO.: (213) 444.3333
TELEX NO.: GO.1260
INSURED
James M. Montgomry, Consulting
1 Engineers, Inc.
250 N. Madison AVe.
Pasadena, Ca. 91101
`` ; ISSUE DATE (MM/DC/W;
5/18/86
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES BELOW.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
LETTER COMPANY A International Insurance Co.
COMPANY
LETTER B Hartford Insurance CO.
LETTER COMPANY C
Hartford Insurance Co.
COMPANY D
LETTER Internatianal Insurance Co.
COMPANY E
LETTER
THIS 15 TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY
BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI-
TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
"O
VTR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECT'VE
OATS MV.DO.^M
POLICY EXPQAT•ON
DATE ,MM,OOPM
LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
EACH
�-
OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE
L
GENERAL
LIABILITY
BODILY
COMPREHENSIVE FORM
INJURY
$
$
PREMISES/OPERATIONS
PROPERTY
UNDERGROUND
540-683634-6
8/31/85
8/31/86
DAMAGE
$
$
_
EXPLOSION d COLLAPSE HAZARD
X
PROOUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS
CONTRACTUAL
COMBINED
$ 1 000
$1, 000
X
X
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS
,
`
BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE
X
X
e
i
PERSONAL INJURY
*$250 , 000 SIR
PERSONAL INJURY
$ 1,000
L
AUTOMOBILE
LIABILITY
3w,.Y
3
ANY AUTO
PER
IPER PE950NI
$
X
ALL OWNED AUTOS TRIV PASS)
72UFNMX4660
2/2/86
2/2/87
X
my
Raa�
X
ALL OWNED AUTOS (OTHER THAN
l PRIV PASS
Pfq
$
HIRED AUTOS
X
PROPERTY
X
NON -OWNED AUTOS
DAMAGE
$
GARAGE LIABILITY
Ell aPD
COMBINED
$1 , 000
EXCESS LIABILITY
e
UMBRELLA FORM
81 a Po
COMBINED
$
$
-
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
72W34X4661
5/1/86
5/1/87
STATUTORY
$500(EACH ACCIDENT)
AND
$ cmo (DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT)
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
$ 500 (DISEASE -EACH EMPLOYEE,
OTHER
D
Professional I.iabili
524-065-424-4
8/31/85
8/31/86
$5,000*per occurence/a
JGSL;HIPTKJN OF UF'EHAIIUNS/LLX;ATUNS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS Ww :�j,000,UUU bix
" Such insurance as is afforded by policies issured by companies A&B (#540-683634-6 & 72W3,4K46
shall also apply to the City of Huntington Beach as an additional insured, but coley as resp
City of Huntington Beach SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX-
PIRATff DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
City Hall MAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
B Huntington. Beach, Ca. LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY
7 `�"• OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
COMPANY BACKGROUND AND MAJOR CAPABILITIES
COMPANY BACKGROUND
James M. Montbomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. was established in 1943.
Corporate and Southwest Regional offices are located in Pasadena, California,
with branch offices located in Phoenix, Arizona; Irvine, and La Jolla, California;
Ft. Lauderdale and Gainesville, Florida; Boise, Idaho; New Orleans, Louisiana;
Las Vegas, Nevada; Portland, Oregon; Ogden and Salt Lake City, Utah; Seattle,
Washington; Laramie, Wyoming; and regional offices in Walnut Creek, California,
Denver, Colorado, and Reston, Virginia (Washington, D.C. area). The firm has
overseas offices in Jakarta, Indonesia; Manila, Philippines; Sydney, Australia;
Cairo, Egypt; and Gedaref, Sudan. The staff consists of over 600 employees
including 2Z5 registered professional engineers; 163 have post -graduate degrees
in civil and sanitary engineering. Thirty-seven members of the staff are
diplomates of the American Academy of Environmental Engineers.
Since its establishment, the firm has acquired broad experience and expertise in
the field of civil and sanitary engineering. To support its basic engineering
capability, the firm has its own in-house services in the disciplines of
mechanical, structural, electrical, environmental, architectural, geological and
chemical engineering.. Fieid support services include surveying and construction
supervision. In addition, the firm has its own EPA certified water quality
laboratory and VAX-11/780 computer system.
Within the engineering disciplines, primary emphasis is placed on planning,
design, preparation of plans and specifications, and construction inspection. The
following is a partial summary of water and wastewater projects which have
been completed by the firm.
Wastewater and Industrial 'Water
Treatment Plant Designs ........................... 105
Major Pipeline Designs ........................ Over 4600 miles
Ocean Outfall Designs .................................. 17
Mast-:r Plans, Feasibility Studies, and
Project Reports (water supply and
wastewater) ...................................... 330
Water Treatment Plant Designs .......................... 9Z
Pumping Station Designs ................................ Z 15
Storm Drain Designs .................................... 170
Reservoir Designs ...................................... 210
Water Well Designs ..................................... Z10
Rate and Financial Analysis Studies ....................... 77
Environmental Impact Studies ............................ 60
Automatic Control and Telemetering ...................... 68
Facility Plans .......................................... 82
C,
Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
C
C
C
In the past thirty-five years, we have planned, designed, and inspected construc-
tion of over $2.0 billion in water and wastewater projects for over 1.300 separate
clients.
MAJOR CAPABILITIES
1. Water Treatment Plants. James M. '.Montgomery, Consulting Engineers,
Inc., has a long history in the development of water treatment techniques
and is recognized nationally as a leader in the field. The staff has prepared
studies and designs for over 66 water treatment plants ranging in capacity
from 1.0 to 750 mgd. Our firm is associated with most of the advances in
the field of water treatment. Innovations which have been incorporated in
facilities we have designed include pumped blenders (flash mixing), tapered
hydraulic flocculation, designed compartmentalization, vacuum sludge
removal, backwash conditioning, simplified filter controls, high -rate filtra-
tion, direct filtration, air lift backwashing, ion exchange, and reverse
osmosis. In addition, the firm offers extensive services relative to pre -
design studies. Pilot facilities for pre-treatment, ozonation, chemical
feeding, filtration, and continuous monitoring are available for on -site
investigations. JMM initiated particle count monitoring in addition to the
monitoring of turbidity and other physical and chemical parameters.
2. Master Plans and;Feagibility Studies. Over 321 master plans and feasibility
reports for water, wastewater, storm drainage, and industrial waste systems
have been prepared by the firm. Many of the water system master plans and
feasibility studies included detailed investigations of alternative sources of
supply, management. financial, economic, and technical soundness analyses,
as well as the preparation of preliminary plans, specifications, and cost
estimates. In addition, JMM has prepared numerous other engineering
studies, investigations, and reports on related subjects such as ground water
development, special water and wastewater treatment problems, reservoirs.
treatment plants, distribution systems, corrosion, water rates, appraisals.
etc. Many of our engineering studies contain complete financial recom-
mendations along with management techniques.
3. Wastewater Facilities Planning (201). JMM has prepared over 79 EPA 201
grant program reports, many of which involve detailed analysis of existing
treatment facilities with recommendations for upgrading modifications and
expansion. The staff is well -versed in the requirements of the EPA 201
Grant Program.
These facilities have ranged in size from less than 100,000 gallons per day to
over 90 million gallons per day. The processes utilized have included all
types of primary, secondary, and advanced waste treatment. Many of the
projects have involved reclamation of the effluent for industrial. agri-
cultural, and recreational uses. JMM has unique capabilities in evaluating
existing treatment facilities for increased performance and/or expansion
through its experienced staff of sanitary engineers and treatment plant
operators; this is best indicated by the selection of JMM by the Environ-
mental Protection Agency to perform their post -construction evaluation of
treatment performance in Nevada and California. Because of our
Comp. 9 Background and Major Capabilitit_ .continued)
experience in planning, design, cost estimating, financing, and operation of
all types of treatment facilities, JMM has the background to provide
realistic water quality planning.
Several facility plans recently completed or currently • being prepared
concern large metropolitan areas involving consolidation of several systems.
abandoning certain existing facilities, evaluating alternativo-advancedwaste
treatment processes, and developing the institutional/fi'nancial solutions.
Included have been the regional systems for San Diego. California, and Clark
County, Nevada. Since -the enactment of PL 92-500 in 197Z, JMM has
prepared twenty-eight facility plans for wastewater facilities in conform-
ance with the provisions of the Act.
4. Areawide Water Quality Management (208 and 303e). JMM has provided
consulting services for a number of agencies responsible for areawide water
quality planning. This experience includes 303(e) river basin plans and 208
plans (completed and active) as authorized by PL 92-500 and a number of
federally financed special management plans. To date, we have participated
in twelve 208 studies.
?dethods of conserving and safely utilizing natural resources are also a major
part of this planning effort as is defining opportunities for environmental
enhancement. As a part of these management plans, an evaluation is
conducted of nonpoint waste sources, waste quantities, and the effect upon
the planning area. Included in this evaluation are municipal wasteloads,
facility evaluations, agricultural irrigation return flow wasteloads, solid
waste disposal leachates, urban and rural runoff wasteloads, and nonpoint
wastes from such industries as logging, mining, and chemicals. Typical
requirements of a 208 project may include the following considerations:
waste treatment, collection and disposal; in -stream management; land use:
monitoring, and intergovernmental programs. The thrust of the proposed
• constraints involve (1) minimizing the adverse water quality impacts from
construction runoff and urbanization; (2) defining viable guidelines for
optimizing the overall facilities servicing future growth patterns; (3) stream
management policies (including low flow augmentation); (4) protection of
sensitive soil/slope and water -influence areas; (5) performance criteria for
wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal; and (6) assuring the coordin-
ation of public and private programs that affect water quality.
Work in this area covers a wide variety of disciplines and responsibilities
from very technical aspects of waste management control to overall
contract management and program administration. Among the projects
currently underway or recently completed are water quality, land capability.
and ground water studies for the Flathead Drainage 208 Agency in Kalispell,
Montana; a watershed management study for the city of Ashland,
Oregon/Rogue Valley Council of Governments; an industrial waste analysis
for the Mid -Willamette Council of Governments; a study of mining, silvi-
culture, and construction -generated nonpoint wastes for the Mid -
Yellowstone Areawide Planning Organization in Billings, Montana; eight
preliminary community wastewater facilities studies for Panhandle Planning
and Development Council, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho; the evaluation of effluent
Compai., Background and Major Capabilities ,_,)ntinued)
I.
disposal alternatives for the Sussex County, Delaware, Planning Authority;
and an overall program responsibility and contract administration for the
Regional Intergovernmental Council at Charleston, West Virginia.
S. Wastewater Collection System. We have designed several hundred miles of
major sanitary sewers in diameters up to 114 inches. One of our larger
projects was the $52 million interceptor sewerage system for metropolitan
San Diego, California. This system consists of 116,000 feet 'of 42- to 114-inch
diameter interceptor sewers, pumping facilities (including one of the world's
largest wastewater pumping stations), an 80 mgd wastewater treatment
plant, and a 108-inch diameter ocean outfall. Another major project was the
non -reclaimable wastewater collection system designed for the Chino Basin
Municipal Water District. This project, costing over $12 million, involved
over 30 miles of pipelines in diameters up to 42 inches. Collection systems
can be both analyzed and designed by ICES SEWER, a computer program
developed by the Civil Engineering Systems Laboratory at M.I.T. ICES
(Integrated Civil Engineering System) was the result of a major research and
development effort initiated by M.I.T. in 1964. The system handles both
storm and sanitary networks flowing full or partially full under the influence
of gravity.
6. Wastewater and Industrial Waste Treatment. Our firm has been active in
wastewater treatment and reclamation for more than 25 years. We have
designed 105 wastewater and industrial waste treatment plants ranging in
capacity from 0.5 to 90 mgd. Our designs have included primary treatment.
biological secondary treatment, and tertiary treatment involving a variety
of unit operations including alum coagulation. multi -media filtration, carbon
adsorption, ion exchange, electrodialysis, and reverse osmosis. In a number
of projects, wastewater is reclaimed for industrial, agricultural, or recrea-
tional reuse. A recent project involved pilot plant testing and prototype
design for a pure oxygen activated sludge plant to oxidize a high -strength
industrial waste containing approximately 10,000 mg/l BOD to a stable
effluent.
7. Ocean Outfalls. Engineering studies and designs have been completed for 17
ocean wastewater outfalls. The outfalls range in capacity from 0.7 to 300
mgd and vary in diameter from 12 to 108 inches. These designs were
preceded by detailed oceanographic studies and computerized hydraulic
analysis. In addition to our in-house capabilities in estuarial and oceano-
graphic evaluation, the firm also maintains a close association with recog-
nized authorities in the fields of marine biology and oceanographic investi-
gation and services. When required, these specialists are added to the
project team for specialized research or consultation regarding outf all study
and design.
8. Water Transmission and Distribution Systems. We have designed numerous
major pipeline systems. These designs include more than 3,785 miles of
pipelines in diameters up to 144 inches and installations under the most
adverse conditions of surface congestion, underground utilities, rugged
terrain, and unstable and corrosive soils. Designs have included open trench,
tunnel, jacking, submarine, and other types of installations. For analysis of
r.
Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
complex distribution systems, we utilize our own network program and in-
house computer facility. Our staff has specialized knowledge and exper-
ience in corrosion and corrosion control and actively participates in corro-
sion research and seminars.
9. Federal and State Loans and Grants. James M. Montgomery, Consulting
Engineers, Inc., has had extensive experience in preparing, applications and
assisting clients with obtaining loans and grants from state and federal
agencies. Federal grants and loans have come primarily from the Depart-
ment of Housing and Urban Development and the Environmental Protection
Agency. The firm has assisted over 60 clients in obtaining over $125 million
in governmental assistance programs.
10. Water Storage Facilities. Over 183 reservoirs have been designed by the
firm, ranging from a 20,000-gallon steel tank to a 1 billion gallon asphaltic -
lined open reservoir with a compacted earth embankment. Reservoir
designs have included reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete, precast
concrete arch -panel, and steel construction for buried, partially -buried,
ground -level, and elevated structures. The firm also designed the
64.400,000-gallon, 40-foot deep reinforced concrete Dunsmuir Reservoir in
Oakland, California. This storage facility is the largest reservoir of its type
in the United States and is also the deepest buried reservoir of large size in
the country. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. was awarded
an Engineering Excellence Award in 1972 by the Consulting Engineers
Council of the United States for the design of the 19.3-million-gallon
Greystone Reservoir for the city of Beverly Hills, California.
11. Pumping Stations. Over 209 water and wastewater pumping stations have
been designed ranging in capacity from 230 gpm to 250,000 gpm with total
connected horsepowers up to 18,000 HP. These stations have included all
types of pumps, both electric and natural gas driver units. electrical
controls for both local and remote operations, and telemetering. Our
experience includes the world's largest natural gas engine -driven water
pumping station located in Las Vegas, Nevada.
12. Automatic Process Control and Telemetry. Modern water and wastewater
transmission, storage, distribution, and treatment systems require automa-
tion to facilitate efficient operation, optimization, and to allow ease of
expansion.
JMM utilizes state-of-the-art control technology and includes the latest
field -proven equipment approaches in the configuration of water and waste-
water treatment systems. JMM's staff of electrical and control system
engineers is experienced in all aspects of automated control of a wide range
of treatment processes as well as data acquisition, computer -based control,
and data handling. Our in -plant designs reflect the depth of experience
required to understand and control complex process interrelationships and to
provide an operator -oriented approach to centralized control of these
processes. A thorough knowledge of the latest treatment process equipment
is utilized by the engineers to apply control concepts effectively.
Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
In addition to hundreds of in -plant automation applications, JMM has
provided study, design and support engineering services, and start-up related
to telemetry systems for over 20 years with more than 51 separate clients
worldwide. Telemetry system applications include various aspects of water
transmission, storage, and distribution as well as wastewater c'ollection. In
many cases, the design is preceded by a feasibility study and pre -design
effort which sets forth the remote functions to be monitored and/or
controlled, the central control configuration, alternatives in equipment
approach, cost alternatives, improvements to be expected in operation, and
the savings to be realized.
13. Water Rate Studies. Over 66 analytical and statistical studies relating to
water rates and wastewater rates and costs have been completed. These
studies have been prepared in support of recommended rates as well as in
opposition to suggested rate changes. Most supporting studies are based on
detailed investigation of water consumption patterns and their projections.
Many rate studies are prepared as an integral part of a complete financial
analysis which considers bond issue financing, taxation on real property,
reserve funding, disposal of excess utility property, other income sources,
and ability to pay. The range of clients for whom rate studies have been
prepared included municipalities, water and irrigation districts, private
utility companies, government agencies, and individuals.
14. Appraisals. Over 40 appraisal reports primarily involving the value of
utility properties have been prepared. The purpose of these reports has been
to establish value for the buyer, the seller, or for both. In some instances,
the objectives have been to evaluate system condition and depreciation
requirements as adjuncts to rate investigations, eminent domain
proceedings, and negotiated ownership transfers. Appraisals of various
types of utilities have been prepared ranging from single water wells to
• large irrigation and domestic municipal systems. Appraisal techniques used
include reproduction cost new less depreciation, original cost, substitutional
methods, present -worth concepts, comparable sales, and capitalization.
15. Basin Management and Hydrogeology. Staff members have had extensive
experience in the field of hydrogeological studies and ground water basin
management. In all of the many master plans for water system development
prepared by our firm, a great amount of effort has been expended on
comparing alternative sources of supply and evaluating the economic
potential of these sources. Coordination of imported sources of supply with
local surface and ground water supply has always been a major factor in our
studies. We have participated in an operational economic study of a large
ground water basin in cooperation with a public agency. A mathematical
model (digital) of the ground water basin has been developed by the agency.
The model has been verified by geologic and hydrologic analyses, and
alternative operational plans are presently being studied.
Numerous surface and subsurface studies for both local and regional water
resource development programs have been conducted utilizing geologic.
hydrologic, and geophysical water studies. Combining legal and institutional
policies with water resource potential, basin operations have been developed
Comp.m.y, Background and Major Capabilities ._ontinued)
which are consistent with sound ground water basin management. The firm
has also participated in a number of water rights litigation cases, in which it
has been necessary to recognize proper basin data and then, through the use
of these data, correlate surface hydrology, ground water hydraulics. and
water quality.
16. Desalination. Extensive experience in the desalination processes is avail-
able within our firm. Completed projects include unit design and pilot plant
studies on treated wastewater effluent by reverse osmosis and electro-
dialysis. Our firm particiated in the feasibility study for the 150 mgd
nuclear desalting and power generation plant for southern California. This
project was jointly sponsored by the MWD. AEC, and the Office of Saline
Water. Work has included the design of the Anaheim Take Demonstration
Desalination Plant for the Orange County Water District. This pilot
program was an experimental step towards the design of a major 75 mgd
desalting plant to remove salt from ground water. The work consisted of
preliminary engineering, negotiations with the principal domestic and
overseas manufacturers of desalting equipment, and the detail design and
preparation of plans and specifications for the pilot plant. The plant
processes included pretreatment, filtration, and water softening equipment;
two ion exchange modules; two electrodialysis modules; and two reverse
osmosis modules. Extensive considerations have been given by JMM and the
district's consultants to the effect of the pilot and proposed ultimate plants
on the environment. -In addition, the firm designed and put into operation a
5 mgd reverse osmosis wastewater demineralization facility at Water
Factory Zl for the Orange County Water District. Several other
demineralization projects are located in California, Florida, Idaho, and on
San Nicolas Island for the U.S. Navy.
17. Storm Drainage. The firm has had broad experience in all phases of flood
control and storm drain work, both in preparation of comprehensive master
drainage plans and in detailed design and preparation of plans and specifi-
cations for drainage projects. We have provided designs for approximately
102 storm drain projects, manv of which were constructed under the 1958
and 1964 bond issue programs ($320 million) of the Los Angeles County Flood
Control District.
18. Computer Facilities. JMM computer facilities include a large interactive
VAX-11/780 computer system. The VAX-11/780 is a high-performance
multiprogramming computer system. It combines a 32-bit architecture.
efficient memory management, and a virtual memory operating system to
provide essentially unlimited program address space.
The VAX-11/780 is one of the fastest systems available. Its processor
includes an 8K byte write -through memory cache that results in an effective
290 nano -second memory access time. This VAX/VMS virtual memory
operating system provides a multi-user multi -language programming
environment on the VAX-11/780 hardware. The integral floating point
instructions, efficient scheduler and optional FORTRAN IV -PLUS language
are ideal for time -critical and scientific computational environments.
1
E
WL
Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
Peripheral facilities of the VAX-11/780 include a range of small and large
capacity disc drives, magnetic tape plotter, hard copy and video terminals,
line printers and card readers. Its languages include the VAX-11 Macro
assembly language and optional VAX-11 FORTRAN IV -PLUS, VAX-11
DATATRIEVE, and VAX-11 COBOL-74/VAX. Use of this 'fagility ensures
optimization of the analytical capability of our firm in. all phases of
engineering service.
Numerous staff members have been trained and are active in a continuing
educational program in order to provide our clients with the advantages of
computer -applied system design economics. Specialized new programs
developed by our staff, in addition to existing standard programs, offer an
extensive range of applications, including hydraulic networks, structural.
critical path and statistical computations, traverse calculations, information
sorting, and mathematical optimization. Utilization of the computer system
is employed whenever evaluations of the situation indicate a valuable
consideration in time consumption and financial benefit to the client.
A number of computerized information retrieval services exist where use is
essential in large-scale search operations. James M. Montgomery,
Consulting Engineers, Inc. contacts those firms which have established data
bases in the areas of concern. These bases include:
o Toxline
o M edline
o NAL/CAIN
o NTIS
o Environ
o APTIC
o EIC
In addition, JMM maintains several time-sharing terminals which are used to
take advantage of the services of various time-sharing systems available.
Such systems allow data storage and retrieval on a global basis.
19. Laboratory Facility. Our firm is equipped with a complete water and
wastewater laboratory certified by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. The facilities of this laboratory permit us to evaluate all of the
parameters related to modern practices of water treatment and wastewater
treatment and disposal. Major equipment items include gas chromatography,
atomic absorption spectrometer, total organic carbon analyzer, particle size
analyzer, and incubators for viral and bacteriological tests.
Z0. Architectural Design. Visual appearance of all structures is given prime
consideration in the development of project design plans. Our design
philosophy incorporates creative architectural concepts based on environ-
mental conditions and economical factors of the project. The firm's fields
of competence in architecture include architectural design, furniture and
fixture selection, graphics and signing, and color coordination. Our
registered architectural staff has been responsible for the architectural
Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
design of numerous civil, industrial, commercial, and residential building
projects.
21. International Operations. Our firm has provided consulting services for
numerous international engineering projects involving the design of. water
supply, wastewater, and storm drainage systems. In addition to design and
construction supervision of overseas projects, we have prepared master
plans, feasibility and prefeasibility studies, hydrogeological studies.
financial analyses, and cost appraisals in order to establish parameters for
sound engineering design. We have also provided administrative assistance
for institutional development of foreign water and sanitation agencies and
have developed effective programs for training personnel in the design,
operation, maintenance, and management of water and wastewater systems.
Our firm, having been involved in many programs financed under the
auspices of the United States Agency for International Development, the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter -American
Development Bank, and the Asian Development Bank, is familiar with the
lending and data-processing requirements of these agencies.
ZZ. Plant Start -Up and Operation. Staff engineers have had extensive exper-
ience in the design, construction, and start-up of industrial process pilot and
prototype installations. Industrial piloting has also included wastewater
concentration and reclamation for reuse by reverse osmosis, electrodialysis,
and ion exchange techniques. Biological wastewater treatment pilot work
has involved both industrial and municipal waste systems and has been used
to obtain design data for plants now under construction. Certified waste-
water treatment plant operators on the staff are qualified in plant start-up
and operation, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, and on -
site investigations.
23., Environmental Impact Studies. Multidisciplinary teams of environmental
specialists in the fields of biology, hydrology, planning, and engin Bring have
prepared numerous environmental assessments in compliance with applicable
federal, state, or local regulations. Environmental studies have concen-
trated on water and wastewater related projects. The scale of these
projects and accompanying assessments has ranged from areawide waste
treatment management plans and comprehensive wastewater facilities plans
to individual projects such as reservoirs, pipelines, or treatment facilities.
The JMM staff is experienced in environmental regulations and public
participation techniques as well as in the more technical elements of
environmental assessments.
24. Training Programs. In addition to on-the-job training programs associated
with design, start-up, and operation and maintenance of water and waste-
water treatment plants, JMM has provided specialized in-house observation
and training programs for engineers sponsored by the Agency for Interna-
tional Development and by our international clients. Typical programs
ranging from one month to a year include observation and practical training
in water utility management and operation, long-range financial planning,
water treatment design, water resources development, and ocean outfall
Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
design. Trainees involved in master planning and treatment plant design
programs actively participate in actual project work.
25. Construction Management Services. JMM provides some degree of
construction management services for virtually all facilities designed by
JMM. These services have ranged from fast -tracking design and,6onstruc-
tion, monitoring construction, performing all engineering work, and keeping
all books and records associated with a project down to simply providing
occasional professional assistance during construction. For a typical job, in
addition to design, JMM assists its clients during the procurement process,
monitors construction progress, checks shop drawings, negotiates change
orders, makes final inspections, assists with start-up, and performs a large
part of the book work associated with a project. JMM is extremely
conscious of time and money constraints and gears its work to stay within
the boundaries given. JM'd project engineers assist contractors and
operating personnel in achieving design criteria, especially during plant
start-up. Project design engineers periodically return to completed projects
to observe their operation and assist operating personnel. Information
obtained from these visits is used to refine subsequent designs.
26. Marine Science and Aquaculture. The Marine Sciences' staff has a wide
range of experience in the management and planning of aquaculture
research and development as well as experience in commercial aquaculture
operations. The staff can draw on diverse capabilities covering virtually any
water -related problem and has the complete range of experience to deal
with the multi -disciplinary problems of aquaculture production.
The firm has applied this expertise in aquatic life support systems in the
design and operation of several aquatic parks including the $15 million
installation at Sea World of Florida and sophisticated closed systems for
-recycling water at the Baltimore Aquarium and Sea World of Ohio.
Wastewater aquaculture concepts have been developed in planning studies
for W.E. Disney Enterprises and the San Diego Region Water Reclamation
Agency relative to a $1.7 million study evaluating the use of aquatic plants
and animals for wastewater treatment.
The firm has experience in the design of salmonid fish hatcheries in the
Pacific Northwest and has designed the hatchery facilities for the state of
Washington. Aquaculture specialists are available for consultation regarding
all phases of commercial aquaculture feasibility studies and facility design.
27. Institutional and Financial Planning. The firm has developed an extensive
background in the development of alternative institutional and financial
arrangements in support of water, wastewater, and water quality plans.
Members of the JMM staff have extensive backgrounds and particular
expertise in the preparation of institutional, economic, and revenue
programs including federal/state loan grant programs, prospective prepara-
tion for the municipal financing market, and economic feasibility reports in
support of bond issues.
Compai., 3ackground and Major Capabilities ntinued)
JMM has successfully completed over 100 analytical and statistical financial
studies of water and wastewater systems. As part of 201 facility plans, JMM
financial staff members have prepared financial and revenue plans in
accordance with the latest federal and state requirements in states where
special local requirements exist. These plans have been. prepared with
careful consultation with the client and other levels of involved "government.
In this way, the means and approach for funding that portioa 'of the project
not grant eligible, and in creating a revenue program for payment of annual
debt service and operation and maintenance costs, has been acceptable to
all parties that are concerned with the financial success of the project.
Many water and wastewater system master plans completed by the firm in
recent years have also required implementation plans which include
scheduling, financing, and the development of systems for cost allocations
to the ultimate system customer.
Rate studies and revenue programs require accurate backup data of con-
sumption or discharges by customer classification, as well as other specific
information. Where such data are nonexistent or questionable, our staff has
had wide experience in creating usable data from the examination of water
records, building department records, aerial photographs, census data, and
physical field surveys. Computer programs have been designed by our firm
to utilize these data in accordance with state guidelines allocating costs to
various combinations of loading parameters.
28. Comprehensive and Land Use Planning. JMM offers comprehensive planning
services involving land use on either a community or areawide basis. Our
projects of this type have included community land use plans; land capability
and existing land use mapping; improvement and expansion of public
facilities, services, and utilities; preservation and conservation of natural
resource areas; lake shore development criteria; community design; public
and private recreation systems; open space; flood plain management;
transportation; fish, wildlife, and water quality preservation; the determina-
tion of future growth areas; and zoning regulations, model ordinances, and
plan implementation.
Our experience and personnel cover a wide range of land use planning
considerations. We are particularly qualified to provide land use planning
assistance to communities experiencing growth and needing to expand public
facilities or preserve environmental resources. Our background in public
works facilities and environmental studies adds an important depth to our
comprehensive planning capabilities.
We have provided comprehensive planning services to the Clark County
Regional Planning Council at Vancouver, Washington; Gervais, Oregon; and
Mountain Home, Idaho. In the Mountain Home plan, emphasis was placed on
the protection of natural resources. including an important ground water
system; projecting future population growth; directing new development into
a "primary urban service area;" preservation of agricultural lands; and
coordination with ongoing county planning efforts. We assisted the State of
Washington, Department of Natural Resources in the development of the
state's renewable resource plan, and worked with 'he Shoshone -Bannock
Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
Tribes in eastern Idaho on the formulation of water -related land develop-
ment policies for the Fort Hall Indian Reservation.
The Tualatin -Tills Park and Recreation District contracted with JMM to
prepare a park system plan and a recommended action program which
focused on future budget priorities for alternative park sites that were
associated with school sites. In addition, we prepared a cp-mponent of the
Oregon State Outdoor Recreation Plan covering future developments, acqui-
sitions, and capital improvements for the Oregon State Park System.
Our firm also has in-depth experience in mapping land capability and
existing land use. JMM prepared land capability maps for the Flathead
River Drainage Basin in northwest Montana concerning erosion hazard areas
and septic tank suitability. We prepared eight land capability/charac-
teristic/use maps for the Fort Hall Indian Reservation. Four state of Idaho
agencies contracted with JMM to prepare land use and land capability maps
for ten land characteristics and numerous wildlife and environmental quality
parameters as part of the Idaho Environmental Overview Study. JMM is also
a frequent contractor to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development to perform flood insurance studies, including the preparation
of flood plain maps. In a water quality plan prepared for the Ada Planning
Association, JMM prepared a plan which emphasized land use constraints on
steep slopes and sensitive soils, land adjacent to streams, and the phasing of
future growth with facility service expansion.
29. Silviculture. As part of non -point pollution sources as defined under
PL 92-500, the firm has been involved in several projects involving water
pollution from logging, residue management, and reforestation activities and
their impact on water quality. Emphasis has been placed on solving
problems and making recommendations relative to siltation and thermal and
organic pollution due to the demonstrated significance of these pollutants
associated with the logging industry. Members of the staff have also
prepared technical reference reports for use by private and public forest
managers. planners, regulatory agencies, contractors, consultants, public
forest managers, planners, regulatory agencies, contractors, consultants,
public officials, and interested individuals to determine, implement, and
monitor water quality control systems and procedures that are both effec-
tive and efficient and that would implement PL 92-500 concerning non -point
sources of pollutants generated by silviculture activities (excluding the
construction and maintenance of logging haul roads and forest chemical
applications).
30. Expert Testimony and Tecbnical Assistance to Counsel. Because of the
broad experience of senior JMM employees and the specialized expertise of
the 21 doctorate holders on the JMM staff, these emplovees are frequently
utilized by clients for their expert testimony and technical assistance to
counsel. In preparing for testimony, these expert witnesses have available
the facilities of the JMM, Cal Tech, UCLA, and USC libraries in southern
California, and the UC Berkeley library in northern California. In addition,
modern, fully -equipped laboratory and computer facilities are available for
L
C( any Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
their use. Employees are encouraged to write technical articles and develop
specialized areas of expertise in meeting company needs.
31. Other Services. In addition to capabilities in investigations, studies, and
preparation of plans and specifications, we can provide mill inspection and
witness performance tests on all water and wastewater"systems equipment
manufactured in the United States. When required, assistance to the client
in direct procurement of project materials is provided. On a majority of the
domestic design projects, surveying, field inspection, and contract admini-
stration services are algo furnished as a part of the engineering contract.
I