HomeMy WebLinkAboutKAKU ASSOCIATES, INC - 1999-10-04CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
MEETING DATE: October 4, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID N P199-46��
Council/Agency Meeting Held:
&"a0.3d
7red/Continued to:
Approved ❑ Con itio y prove ❑ De ied u Clerk's Signature
r
Council Meeting Date: October 4, 1999 Department ID Number: :,T199i46
-;
s � �'c�=ai"�
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH -� �`� a�
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION/ REDEVELOPM NTaAGE1 ty
TN
3 �Tzo
SUBMITTED TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
SUBMITTED BY:
RAY SILVER, City Administrator • v
PREPARED BY:
HOWARD ZELEFSKY, Planning Director---�
DAVID C. BIGGS, Economic Development Director
SUBJECT:
APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH KAKU
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN EVALUATION
AND REVISION OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN
PARKING MASTER PLAN
Statement of Issue, Funding Source, Recommended Action, Alternative Actions), Analysis, Environmental Status,
Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue:
Transmitted for City Council's consideration is a request to enter into a Professional Services
Contract with Kaku Associates, Inc. to prepare an evaluation and revision of the Huntington
Beach Downtown Parking Master Plan (DPMP).
Funding Source:
The Redevelopment Agency will be funding the cost of this contract through a transfer to the
City's General Fund.
Recommended Council Action:
Motion to:
1. "Approve a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $74,690.00, as
prepared by the City Attorney, between the City and Kaku Associates, Inc., and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign."
•Z
PL99-46 .2- 09/28199 2:34 PM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ACTION
MEETING DATE: October 4, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: P199-46
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION:
2. Appropriate $74,690 to the Planning Services Account (AAPL23139000) and
increase the 1999/00 transfer from the Redevelopment Agency to the City General
Fund by $74,690.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
3. "Approve the waiver of Professional Liability Insurance as recommended by the
Settlement Committee at its meeting on July 20, 1999.
Alternative Actions :
The City Council may make the following alternative motions:
1. "Deny the Professional Services Contract between the City and Kaku Associates, Inc."
2. "Continue the item and direct staff accordingly."
Analysis:
A. BACKGROUND:
Addressing issues relating to available parking in the downtown area, the City Council
approved the Downtown Parking Master Plan in 1995. The DPMP is based on a shared
parking concept. Shared parking in effect allows one (1) parking space to serve two (2) or
more individual land uses without conflict. Shared parking relies on the variations in the
peak parking demand for different uses. In other words, parking demands will fluctuate in
relationship to the mix of uses by hour, day of week and season. The proper mix will create
an interrelationship among different uses and activities which result in a reduction of the
demand for parking.
Since its adoption by the City Council, the Downtown Parking Master Plan has been utilized
in determining the parking requirements for new development in the downtown area.
Because the City anticipates further development downtown, and the fact that the City is
approaching the thresholds identified in the DPMP, staff is recommending that the shared
parking concept be re -analyzed to accurately determine the downtown parking demand. The
review is necessary to insure adequate parking availability which is essential to the
successful operation of the downtown commercial area.
B. SCOPE OF WORK:
Kaku Associates, Inc. will be responsible for conducting an analysis of the current Downtown
Parking Master Plan, and for the development of all studies and documentation necessary to
prepare a revision to the 1995 Downtown Parking Master Plan, pursuant to the projected
development levels addressed in the Downtown Specific Plan, Section 4.2.14, Ordinance
No. 3280, as adopted April 17, 1995. Kaku will also participate in staff progress meetings,
committee meetings, and public workshops, as well as attending public meetings and
hearings for the Planning Commission, City Council, and the California Coastal Commission.
PL99-46 -3- 09/28/99 2:34 PM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ACTION
MEETING DATE: October 4, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: P199-46
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The key objective in undertaking an analysis and revision of the current Downtown Parking
Master Plan is to insure that as development progresses in the Downtown area the City
allows for sufficient available parking pursuant to the Downtown Specific Plan and the
DPMP.
Kaku Associates does not -maintain Professional Liability Insurance; however, there will be
limited Lability to the City because staff will be working closely with Kaku in assessing the
current DPMP and determining the new DPMP requirements.
Staff recommends the City Council approve the Contract, approve the waiver of Professional
Liability Insurance as recommended by the Settlement Committee on July 20, 1999, and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign.
Environmental Status:
Projects over which public agencies exercise ministerial authority, such as contracting for the
preparation of an evaluation and revision of the Huntington Beach Downtown Parking Master
Plan, are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to
Section 15300.1.
Attachment(s):
1. Professional Services Contract between the City and Kaku Associates, Inc.
2. Insurance Certificates.
3. Settlement Committee Waiver
RCA Author: Duane Bankey
PL99-46 -4- 09/28/99 2:34 PM
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
CALIFORNIA 92648
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL OF ITE`•I APPROVTD BY THE CITY COUNCIL/
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUCNTINGTON�BEACH
TO: /f-"q k 1-c, /i<ScSDG� /lL7�-�J ATTENTION: 01 (Cl h Rif' ZLZ
Namc �,
)4s� //J DEPARTNIENT:
Stre CUM7Q-fir
i3hg )J 0/7 i Cr9 . C. -, 1'D 510 I _ REGARDIl� G:_ i
City, Stam, Zip VI`�LZ[f}770/V �.0 ✓/dd,"6,4 pF
See Attached Action Agenda Item Date of Approval 17
Enclosed For Your Records Is An Executed Copy Of The Above Referenced Agenda Item.
Remarks:
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
Attachments: Action Agenda Page Agreement
RCA
CC: ze_1e-r-6 'W_
z Depa-trrretti
Nmrt De r merit
Name Depz.ment
Name
Bonds
Insurance
Deed
Other
RCA
Agree— t
Insurdn Other
RCA ,
Agrcewer,r _
Insurance� Other
RCA
Agrecnv t
Insurance Other
Department RCA AFcemccr Insurance Other
Risk Management Dept. Insurance
Received by Name - Company Name - Date
G:Fo11owup/covcr1tr
I Telephpne: 714536-62271
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN �+
THE CITY OF HL1- INGTON BEACH AND
K_AK L "ASSOCIATES, FOR PREPARATION OF AAN✓'� EVALUATION AND REVISION OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH
DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN
Table of Contents
WorkStatement...................................................................................I
CityStaff Assistance................................................................................................2
Timeof Performance...............................................................................................2
Compensation..........................................................................................
Priorities....................................................................................
ExtraWork...............................................................................................................2
Methodof Payment..................................................................................................3
Disposition of Plans, Estimates and Other Documents...........................................4
HoldHarmless.........................................................................................................5
Workers' Compensation Insurance..........................................................................5
General Liability Insurance......................................................................................6
Professional Liability Insurance..............................................................................6
Certificates of Insurance..........................................................................................7
Independent Contractor............................................................................................8
Termination of Agreement.......................................................................................8
Assignment and Subcontracting..............................................................................9
Copyrights/Patents ......................................................
.9
City Employees and Officials..................................................................................9
Notices.....................................................................................................................9
Immigration..............................................................................................................10
Legal Services Subcontracting Prohibited...............................................................10
Attorney's Fees.........................................................................................................10
Entirety.....................................................................................................................10
agree.lkakuf7 20r99;jmp k-
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND
KAKU ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR PREPARATION OF AN
EVALUATION AND REVISION OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH
DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 6�L PA—,
1999, by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of
California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and KAKU ASSOCIATES, INC., a California
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT."
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant for the preparation of an
evaluation and revision of the Huntington Beach Downtown Parking Master Plan; and
Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the
Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service
contracts have been complied with; and
CONSULTANT has been selected to perform said services,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows:
1. WORK STATEMENT
CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in the Request for
Proposal ("RFP"), and CONSULTANT's Proposal dated May 17, 1999 (both of which are
hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A"), and CONSULTANT's Cost Estimate dated June 22,
1999, hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "B", which are attached hereto and incorporated into
this AGREEMENT by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to
as the "PROJECT."
CONSULTANT hereby designates Mr. Dick Kaku, who shall represent it and be its sole
contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this AGREEMENT.
aueelkakuf9-28 99.,Afk-
2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE
CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the
performance of this AGREEMENT.
3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence of this AGREEMENT. The services of CONSULTANT
are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this AGREEMENT and all tasks
spfidiEibiit "A" shall be completed no later than twelve (12) months from the date of
this AGREEMENT. These times may be extended with the written permission of CITY. The
time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be shown in the
Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This schedule may be amended to
benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT.
4. COMPENSATION
In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees
to pay CONSULTANT a fee not to exceed Seventy Four Thousand Six Hundred Ninety Dollars
(574,690).
5. PRIORITIES
In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this
AGREEMENT, the CITY's RFP, or the CONSULTANT's Proposal, the following order of
precedence shall govern: 1) AGREEMENT, 2) the CONSULTANT's Proposal, and 3) the
CITY's REP.
6. EXTRA WORK
In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A," or
changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSULTANT will undertake such
2
agree.'kaW 7!20 99!jmpik
work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such
extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained.
7. METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to progress payments toward the fixed
fee set forth herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedules set forth in
Exhibit "A."
B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every memorandum, letter, report,
calculation and other documentation prepared by CONSULTANT shall be submitted to CITY to
demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on
any such product. CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any
such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by CITY shall be deemed
accepted.
C. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each progress
payment due. Such invoice shall:
1) Reference this AGREEMENT;
2) Describe the services performed;
3) Show the total amount of the payment due;
4) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULTANT's
firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the
provisions of this AGREEMENT; and
5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work
completed.
3
aereelo ku/7120/99'j mplk
Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSULTANT is
making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this AGREEMENT,
CITY" shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT in writing of the
reasons for non -approval within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the
schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that
past performance by CONSULTANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this
AGREEMENT is terminated as provided herein.
D. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by CITY
shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required
above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such
invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work
or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and
costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute
between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart
from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this AGREEMENT.
8. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
CONSULTANT agrees that all materials prepared hereunder, including all
original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, maps, memoranda,
letters and other documents, shall be turned over to CITY upon termination of this
AGREEMENT or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. In the event this
AGREEMENT is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY in the completion of the
4
agree.'kaS u!i/20i99/jmp:'k
PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit. Title to said materials shall pass to CITY upon payment of
fees determined to be earned by CONSULTANT to the point of termination or completion of the
PROJECT, whichever is applicable. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to retain copies of all data
prepared hereunder.
9. HOLD HARMLESS
CONSULTANT shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its
officers, officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, damage,
expenses, costs (including without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature) arising
out of or in connection with performance of this AGREEMENT or its failure to comply with any
of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT except -such loss or damage which was caused
by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY.
10. WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1861, CONSULTANT acknowledges
awareness of Section 3700 et seq. of said Code, which requires every employer to be insured
against liability for workers' compensation; CONSULTANT covenants that it will comply with
such provisions prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder.
CONSULTANT shall maintain workers' compensation insurance in an amount of
not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) bodily injury by accident, each
occurrence, One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) bodily injury by disease, each employee,
Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars (S250,000) bodily injury by disease, policy limit.
CONSULTANT shall require all subcontractors to provide such workers'
compensation insurance for all of the subcontractors' employees. CONSULTANT shall furnish
5
agreelkaku/ i/20?99!j mprlc
to CITY a certificate of waiver of subrogation under the terms of the workers' compensation
insurance and CONSULTANT shall similarly require all subcontractors to waive subrogation.
11. GENERAL LIABILITY INSURA\CE
In addition to the workers' compensation insurance and CONSULTANT's
covenant to indemnify CITY, CONSULTANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY, a policy of
general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage covering the PROJECT.
Said policy shall indemnify CONSULTANT, its officers, agents and employees, while acting
within the scope of their duties, against any and all claims arising out of or in connection with
the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not less than the followine, amount: combined
single limit bodily injury and property damage, including products/completed operations liability
and blanket contractual liability, of S1,000,000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a
form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less
than $1,000,000 for this PROJECT. Said policy shall name CITY, its agents, its officers,
employees and volunteers as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other
insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage
and that CONSULTANT's insurance shall be primary.
Under no circumstances shall the above -mentioned insurance contain a self -
insured retention, or a "deductible" or any other similar form of limitation on the required
coverage.
12. PROFESSIONAL LI_BILITY INSURANCE
This requirement was waived by Settlement Committee on July 20, 1999.
fi
agree <ak:::". 20 991)mp I
13. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULTANT shall
furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the
foregoing insurance coverages as required by this AGREEMENT; said certificates shall:
A. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy;
B. shall state that the policy is currently in force; and
C. shall promise that such policies shall not be suspended, voided or canceled
by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days prior written notice; however, ten (10) days prior written notice in the
event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium.
CONSULTANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverages in force until
the work under this AGREEMENT is fully completed and accepted by CITY.
The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverages shall not derogate
from the provisions for indemnification of CITY by CONSULTANT under the AGREEMENT.
CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of all
said policies of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the
premiums on all insurance hereinabove required.
14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this
AGREEMENT as an independent contractor. CONSULTANT shall secure at its expense, and
be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance
compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT
7
agreelkaku.l iPOr'991j mp.k
and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the
services to be performed hereunder.
15. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike
manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder at any time with or without
cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this AGREEMENT
by CITY shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as
provided herein.
16. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This AGREEMENT is a personal service contract and the supervisory work
hereunder shall not be delegated by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the
consent of CITY.
17. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS
CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material
produced as a result of this AGREEMENT.
18. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS
CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee
in the work performed pursuant to this AGREEMENT. No officer or employee of CITY shall
have any financial interest in this AGREEMENT in violation of the applicable provisions of the
California Government Code.
19. NOTICES
Any notice or special instructions required to be given in writing under this
AGREEMENT shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSU LTANT's agent {as
8
agree/kakul7/20/99!jrnplk
designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY's Director of Planning as the situation shall
warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same
in the United States Postal Service, addressed as follows:
TO CITY: TO CONSULTANT:
Howard Zelefsky Mr. Dick Kaku
Director of Planning KAKU Assoc iates,'14% L. p"
City of Huntington Beach 1453 Third Street, Suite 400
2000 Main Street Santa Monica, CA 90401
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
20. IMMIGRATION
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration
and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions
of the United States Code regarding employment verification.
21. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED
CONSULTANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any
subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside
the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSULTANT understands that pursuant to
Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for
CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any Iegal services expenses incurred by
CONSULTANT.
22. ATTORNEY'S FEES
In the event suit is brought by either party to enforce the terms and provisions of
this AGREEMENT or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's
fees.
9
agree/kaku 7;?0 99!jn, I
23. ENTIRETY
The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth the entire
AGREEMENT between the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be
executed by and through their authorized offices the day, month and year first above written.
� cy
KAKU ASSOCIATES,=IJ `•
.f
By:
S . NLOA f
print name
ITS: (circle one) Chairma Presiden ice President
rmt name
ITS: (circle on Secretary Chief Financial Officer/Asst.
Secretary — Treasurer
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: %l
s� J"
Cit Administrator
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a 4j
municipal corporation of the State of
California
Mayor
ATTEST: -
City Clerk /0��/99 `
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
INITIATED APPROVED:
� 4d-L
Director of Planning
agree/ka ku/7/21 /99/j mp/k
10
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of �. CoAngeles ss.
On AK j before me, � SCU SC1�t f�Gf N OU!y pt4L/) G
Da:e Name and Tice of Officer (e g-. -Jane Doe. Notary ublie)
personally appeared D[G� S. Kale►
Names) of Signers)
fRANCEM E_ SE=
Commission # 1222334
Noy Public - Caddartla
;cv
l—
LOS Angeles Cow* ff
AM Cgrrm F�nea Mott�9, �'i
personally known tome
r proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
to be the personfs} whose nameft isAafe
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she" executed
the same in his/#erftfte authorized
capacityoee� and that by his/494thpair
signature*on the instrument the person{s�, or
the entity upon behalf of which the persorr{s--
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Place Notary Seal Above Signal of Notary Pub'fc
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Poor
eff(o" !
Document Date:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Number of Pages: r 0
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signers
Signer's Name:
C Individual
A Corporate Officer — Title(s): Prcffd t P] t
C Partner — E Limited - General
C Attorney in Fact
E! Trustee
- Guardian or Conservator
r Other: _
Signer Is Representing: K aKcy A m a afri, DIG
J Top of ; Um. Here
V"-f:
Fi
C 199? Nat,onal Notary ASSOC-aaon - 9350 De Soto Ave.. P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 Prod. No. 5907 Reamer: Call Toll -Free 1.600-B76-6627
Exhibit A
[OUXUASSOCVITES
A Corporation
Transportation Planning
Traffic Engineering
Parking Studies
May 17, 1999
Mr. Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director MAY
City of Huntington Beach 1 17 1���
Planning Department DEPAgT,„'.,+4i OF p(A,�'(G
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Re: Request for Proposal Ref: P2261
To Provide Consulting Services for the
Preparation of a Parking Analysis for a
Downtown Parking Master Plan
Dear Mr. Zelefsky:
Kaku Associates, Inc. is pleased to respond to your Request for Proposal (RFP) to conduct a parking analysis to prepare
a parking master plan for downtown Huntington Beach. We are extremely aware of the importance of the parking
system to the economic health and well-being of the downtown areas and our proposed team has extensive experience
in the development of parking improvement programs for mixed -use environments similar to downtown Huntington
Beach. We recognize how sensitive and potentially fragile these environments can be. Members of the study team
have been involved in all aspects of parking analyses including demand and revenue forecasts, development of
comprehensive capital improvement programs, preparation and implementation of parking management plans, parking
operations, and parking conceptual layout. We are confident that our experience can respond to the challenges of your
RFP and will lead to a product which will be useful in successfully improving and maintaining the successful business
environment of Downtown Huntington Beach.
Kaku Associates, Inc., a certified Minority Business Enterprise, specializing in parking analyses and traffic
engineering, will serve as the lead for the study team. We provide a blend of strong technical expertise in conducting
parking studies with a familiarity of the traffic and parking issues associated with downtown areas. Kaku Associates
has conducted a variety of traffic and parking studies for downtown area throughout southern California including
Santa Monica, Whittier, Los Angeles, Hollywood, Pasadena, and Ojai. We will be assisted in the study by Walker
Parking, Inc., a full -service parking design and consulting firm. Walker provides a hands-on perspective toward
parking management and will be extremely useful in ensuring that the recommended strategies can be practically
implemented and that the projected results are realistic.
Please feet free to contact me should any questions arise during the proposal review.
Sincerely,
Di k S. Kaku
President
1453 Third Street. Suite 4W
Santa Monica. CA 90401
(310) 458.9916 Fax (310) 394-7%3
A PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CONSULTING SERVICES FOR
THE PREPARATION OF A PARKING ANALYSIS
FOR A DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN
May 17,1999
Submitted to:
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Submitted by:
KAKU ASSOCIATES, INC.
1453 Third Street, Suite 400
Santa Monica, California 90401
(310) 458-9916
In Association with:
WALKER PARKING, INC.
Ref: P2261
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Understanding of Project............................................................................................................... 1
Background....................................................................................................................... 1
Issues.............................................................................................................................. I
II. Approach to Project....................................................................................................................... 2
Overview of Approach..................................................................................................... 2
Scopeof Work.................................................................................................................. 2
Task 1: Initiate Project and Review Data............................................................ 2
Task 2: Document Existing Parking Supply ...................................................... 3
Task 3: Establish Existing Parking Demand ...................................................... 3
Task 4: Assess Current Parking Conditions....................................................... 4
Task 5: Project Future Demand......................................................................... 5
Task 6: Identify and Review Alternative Strategies ........................................... 6
Task 7: Evaluation of Alternatives...................................................................... 7
Task S: Recommended Parking Management Plan ............................................ 7
Schedule............................................................................................................................ 8
M. Statement of Qualifications........................................................................................................... 10
ProjectTeam..................................................................................................................... 10
Relevant Project Experience ............................................................................................ 12
I. UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
The City of Huntington Beach keenly aware of the value of its downtown area, seeing it evolve into one of the most
popular recreation areas in southern California. The area attracts patrons from throughout the region as well as being a
focal point for visitors to Southern California. The city also recognizes that the well-being of the area's economic future
ties with the city's ability to ensure that adequate parking will continue to be provided to its patrons and visitors.
BACKGROUND
In anticipation of potential future shortages, the Huntington Beach is interested in updating its downtown parking
master plan and develop a program that would optimize the use of both public and private parking facilities to improve
parking availability in the downtown area, especially at night and on weekends. The parking program could include
strategies that are designed to encourage the joint or shared use of lots, uniform pricing for all parking facilities within
the area to control their use and demand, and an incentive and marketing program that optimize usage of available
spaces.
ISSUES
The City recognizes that the most effective parking program for an area such as the downtown area of Huntington
Beach 7s a program that has a blend of facilities, services and opportunities. As such, the development and
implementation of a parking improvement program must consider a range of alternatives designed to provide for the
access and parking needs of its patrons and users. In order to identify and properly evaluate a range of alternatives, it is
necessary to develop and understand the range of issues and factors that affect the parking situation in the area.
Therefore, the city is interested in having a study conducted that includes a comprehensive and detailed data collection
effort, sufficient resources to evaluate and analyze this data to establish the necessary base of information to address all
concerns, needs and requirements from the perspective of business owners, property owners, city officials and the
patrons and users of the system. The study must also recognize that a broad range of alternatives must be identified and
evaluated using a set of criteria that addresses all the key issues. Finally, the program must be sensitive to the realities
of downtown Huntington Beach and the many constituents that make it the unique place that it is.
There are both limitations and opportunities associated with the existing parking supply located within the study area.
Ibis study must find the appropriate balance of services, facilities and methods to optimize the use of these available
resources in the development of a parking management program for the area that serves the best interests of all
interested parties. This program must recognize the pressures for additional parking that are likely to be generated by
the new activities and facilities within the area and the potential that these new uses in concert with the current uses will
generate additional per capita interest in the area to further reduce the available surplus parking supply in the area. The
parking program must use marketing, real time information systems, flexible policies regarding the use of available
supply, and pricing to ensure that adequate parking for all future uses can be provided.
II. APPROACH TO PROJECT
OVERVIEW OF APPROACH
The Kaku Associates approach to this project will be to take best advantage of our previous experience completing
similar parking studies to conduct, on one hand, a traditional study preparing a comprehensive demand analysis and, on
the other hand, bring to the City of Huntington Beach a wide variety of innovative techniques for making better use of
existing parking supply, both public and private. At the same time, we recognize the need to assist the City in
maintaining the economic vitality of the businesses and other activities in the downtown area, and to identify ways of
optimizing commercial and recreation -oriented assets that the area has to offer by providing the optimum parking
availability to its patrons.
Although increasing parking supply through capital improvements is in most cases the most direct and obvious means
of addressing a parking problem, the City cannot ignore efforts toward the identification and development of parking
management techniques that are designed to better utilize existing supplies. The provision of added parking may
provide comfort to traditional thinking on community economics, but it can be costly and may not be the most efficient
use of scarce resources. Conversely, techniques that are often viewed as punitive or burdensome, and are often untried
or unproven, may bring about a negative effect on business. Therefore, the solution must be a balance between the two
that recognizes the fragile nature of what makes one business area successful and another suffer.
The City has unique qualities with its attractive location and its ability to attract both visitors and residents to its
downtown business district. While the Huntington Beach downtown area is the center of the city's commercial district,
the city is an integral part of the Orange County metropolitan complex and is, therefore, affected by its growth,
development and transportation -related policies. What the City of Huntington Beach needs at this point in time is to
take a hard look at some alternatives to parking management which have been shown to be innovative and potentially
promising techniques that would lead to a unique but practical plan.
The following describes Kaku Associates' work program which illustrates how these goals will be achieved.
SCOPE OF WORK
The proposed work program developed by the Kaku Associates team and presented in this section will provide the
framework upon which the study's direction will build. It is designed to ensure that flexibility can be maintained
throughout the course of the study. Included as an integral part of the proposed work program is a series of meetings
with the City staff to provide for proper guidance and technical advice. These meetings will ensure that the products
are not only technically sound and developed in a manner consistent with the goals and standards of the City but are
also institutionally and politically realistic and acceptable to the public.
Meetings with property owners, merchants and business organizations are also included in the work program. Based
information in the RFP, the study includes a minimum of 9 meetings with the City staff, 6 with the parking committee
to be assigned to oversee this project, 2 public workshops, 3 study sessions with the Planning Commission, 2 public
hearings with the planning commission, 2 workshops with the city council, 2 public hearings with the city council, 2
study sessions/staff meetings with the California Coastal Commission, and 1 public hearing with the California Coastal
Commission.
TASK 1: INITIATE PROJECT AND REVIEW DATA
The primary purpose of this task is to permit the study team to define the parking issues with the downtown Hunting
Beach study area, and compare and discuss these views with City staff and with selected members of the various
2
interested groups in the business community. These include the Chamber of Commerce and other business
organizations, property owners, and merchants. These discussionslinterviews will provide information which will
ensure that the focus and the direction of the study as carried out by the study team will be consistent with the goals and
objectives of the City, its businesses, and its property owners.
The final element of this task is to develop an understanding of the currently available data base related to parking for
the study area The data to be reviewed will include any inventories of existing parking supplies, utilization surveys,
parking utilization 'surveys conducted by other agencies and/or organizations, and any aerial photographs which could
be used as part of the analysis process. The data collection program described in Tasks 2 and 3 will be based on the
availability of current information.
TASK 2: DOCUMENT EXISTING PARKING SUPPLY
This task involves an inventory of all available on -street and off-street parking spaces which currently exist within the
study area_ The study area has been defined by the RFP as two areas: Area I includes the area from 1st Street on the
east to 6th Street on the west and Pacific Coast Highway on the south to Orange Avenue on the north. Area 2 consists
of the three blocks north of Orange Avenue west of Jake Street and east of 6th Street. To properly conduct a parking
space inventory, it is necessary to determine various types of information associated with each space. These include the
location, its ownership (i.e., public or private), whether it is accessible for public use and if there are other limitations or
restrictions on its use, on -street or off-street, and any hourly restrictions and/or rates.
TASK 3: ESTABLISH EXISTING PARKING DEMAND
This task has several subtasks each of which has been designed to develop information necessary to establish the
existing parking demand in the study area
Subtask 3.1: Parking Utilization Survey
The fast element will be to conduct a comprehensive parking space utilization survey for each of the spaces in the study
area for each of the relevant time periods. This survey will be used to develop an hour -by -hour assessment of the
occupancy of each space on weekdays and on weekends during the summer months, and during the non -summer
months if found to be necessary. Data obtained from these surveys will be used to identify the peak period of parking
demand in the study area, the magnitude of this peak parking demand by location, and the hourly variation in demand
by location including subareas (e.g., block by block information) and for the study area as a whole. Based on
information from the RFP and discussions with the staff, it is anticipated that the surveys would be conducted from 9:00
am. to 11 p.m. on a weekday and weekend.
Subtask 3.2: Parking Duration Studies
The second element in this task is to conduct parking duration studies by type and location of space. Specific locations
within the study area will be identified to conduct an hourly parking duration survey to determine the length of stay of
each vehicle in each space. Notation will be made of the duration, the turnover rate, the number of illegally parked
vehicles, and any indication of insufficient supply (i.e., vehicle circulation through the lot or around the block looking
for spaces). The results of this survey will be used to develop a profile of the users in the study area indicating the
Percentage of parkers staying a specific period of time. This will lead to data which can be used to determine the
percentage of short-term versus long-term or all day parkers by location. This information will also identify the
magnitude of the ilIegalIy parked vehicles exceeding time limits. The duration surveys will also be conducted for each
of the relevant time periods.
Subtask 3.3: User Survey
A survey will be conducted of the users of the parking supply within each of the study areas. A random sample of
employees, tourists, shoppers, business visitors and any others would be surveyed to obtain information on their
behavior and attitudes. It will be of great use to determine the relative percentage of employees versus shoppers versus
visitors who utilize the various parking facilities within the study area by time of day. Past studies conducted by Kaku
Associates in other business/downtown areas indicates that the degree of fluctuation which can occur during the course
of the day may have an impact on current and future parking demand and the options which can be effectively
implemented_ The data collected on the questionnaire will be analyzed to determine the following types of information
for each user group.
Trip purpose
+ Arrival/departure time
Origin/destination (including zip codes of each)
• Where they parked
• Walking distance to activity
• Comments regarding distance they are willing to walk, amount they are willing to pay, and attitudes
toward parking structures
The method of survey shall be discussed with the City staff and agreement will be reached prior to start of the survey.
Although it is not necessary to obtain 100% coverage on all parking facilities in the study area, it is important to ensure
that a comprehensive distribution throughout the study area is achieved.
Subtask 3.5: Employee Survey
A survey of employees within the study area may be conducted to determine the following types of information:
• Employee type (retail, service commercial, office, government employee, etc)
• Location of place of employment
• Starting time, ending time, days of the week worked
• Mode of travel: auto driver, auto passenger, public transit, other
• For auto drivers, location of parking space and type of permit or regulation controlling parking
This survey should be distributed in the work place by the local employers. The cooperation of the various
organizations identified in Task 1 will be solicited for assistance in distributing and collecting the questionnaires.
TASK 4: ASSESS CURRENT PARKING CONDITIONS
Data from the previous tasks will be used to identify and quantify existing peak demands and existing parking
demand/supply relationships in the study area to identify problem areas.
The fast element of the task will be a careful assessment of the existing supply/demand conditions within the study
area_ This analysis will fast be conducted by dividing the study areas into several subareas, possibly on a block -by -
block basis, but certainly using a geographic system which relates to the activities in the area and the existing parking
supply. The supply/demand relationship for each of the subareas will fast be determined and then the analysis will be
extended by aggregating various combinations of these zones. This will be done to reflect the fact that it is possible for
parking spaces in one subarea to be considered as part of the supply to meet the demand generated in another adjacent
subarea. Various issues regarding the on -street versus off-street supply, short-term versus long-term demands, demand
by time of day, relative walking distances, and barriers will be considered in this portion of the analysis. The product of
this task will be the identification and quantification of any areas which may now have shortages in parking supply. A
typical standard such as 40 percent utilization will be used to define these areas.
4
A second element of this task will be the identification of any areas where a significant problem exists relative to
illegally parked vehicles. Various violations will be considered including parking in illegal spaces and time abuse of
time restricted spaces. The analysis will include an assessment of the sensitivity of this issue to adjoining land uses,
available parking, and time of day. The enforcement currently available will also be assessed as part of this task.
A third element of this task will be to review and analyze the Coastal Commission and City files regarding parking
requirements for development in the downtown. It is expected that the City will provide this information.
TASK 5: PROJECT FUTURE DEMAND
The next step in the analysis will be to project future parking demands for the study area These projections will
consider potential changes in land use, changes in parking demand as economic viability of the area improves and
impact of potential reduction in supply caused by the development or redevelopment of parcels in the area. Changes in
parking demand caused by other factors outside of or beyond the control of the City of Huntington Beach, such as gas
prices or regional, state or federal legislation will not be considered in this analysis.
Subtask 5.1: Development Forecasts for the Downtown Specific Plan Area
It is anticipated that the study team will obtain the City's cumulative projects list and growth projections for the
Downtown Specific Plan area. The development forecasts will be used as the basis for projecting changes in land use
and the related changes in parking demand within the study area.
Subtask 5.2: Parking Demand Forecasts
Development of future parking demand forecasts for the downtown Huntington Beach study area will consist of the
following major elements:
Incremental parking requirements generated by the development growth projections obtained in
Subtask 5.1 above will be estimated. Anticipated parking demand to be generated by new
development will be estimated through application of appropriate demand rates for the study area to
be developed as part of the study based on a review of parking demand ratios from the Urban Land
Institute and other independent sources, City code requirements, and the review of existing parking
demands in the Downtown Specific Plan area
Projections will be made of potential future parking supply for the future period both for the study
area as a whole and for each of the subareas formed for the study area. The projections of future
parking supply would incorporate estimates of the amount of new parking which would be provided
by the projected development growth (based on existing and anticipated City requirements for off-
street parking in the Specific Plan area as well identification of existing surface publicly -accessible
parking lots which may potentially be displaced by redevelopment of parcels, thus reducing supply.
The projected parking demands will be compared with the projected parking supply, again both for
the Downtown Specific Plan area as a whole and for each of the subareas within the study area, to
estimate the degree of potential shortfall that is projected to exist under these future conditions. A
base assumption to be made in'the parking demand forecasts will be that the various parking lots
serving the future demand would operate at similar market rates. Separate parking demand estimates
will be prepared for weekday versus weekend use and daytime versus evening use.
TASK 6: IDENTIFY AND REVIEW ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES
in this task, potential parking strategies will be identified and reviewed. - The potential alternative strategies will be
directed at those concepts that combine the use of public and private facilities to meet existing and future parking
demands. The development of parking management actions will require a detailed inspection of several issues related
to parking including:
The pattern of usage of current spares
Illegal parking
• Customer and employee parking behavior
Level of enforcement within the study area
The implementation of time restrictions and increased enforcement of these restrictions along with various types of
parking zones and measures to discourage employee use of the most desirable spaces are various techniques which will
be considered in this analysis. Measures to encourage better use of under-utilized facilities will also be considered. It
will also be necessary to recognize the difference between short-term (e.g., visitor) and long-term (e.g., employee)
parking demand and the effectiveness of these measures for each case.
If it is necessary to add new spaces to the study area, a variety of alternatives will be considered. The alternatives could
consist of the following general categories: ---
A few centrally located lots or structures which are intended to serve the needs of a wide geographic
area.
• Several smaller lots scattered in strategic locations which cumulatively provide adequate capacity.
This has the added feature of dispersing traffic onto several streets. This might be accomplished
through the use of other city -owned lots or privately -owned lots or structures that are not fully
occupied or unused during the peak periods of demand within the study area, i.e., during evening and
on weekends.
• A few fringe lots which are served by a convenient and fast public transit service which acts as a
peoplemover within the study area.
• Additional parking which is provided as part of the development of new commercial activities in the
area. These could include public, private, and joint public -private ventures.
As part of the initial data collection efi'ort in Task 2, a preliminary review of potential sites for parking facilities that
would fulfill the descriptions provided above will be identified. These would be primarily privately -owned facilities
that may function as overflow facilities during peak periods of demand within the study area which could be used as
part of a network of lots within the study area. All logical sites will be reviewed utilizing a screening process which
will include the following criteria:
• Size of lot
• Existing usage
• Ownership
• Location within the study area
• Access and egress
• Proximity to major regional or areawide access streets
• Potential for good public acceptance
These sites will be used along with the other potential actions to develop a series of alternative parking management
measures for the downtown Huntington Beach study area. The options to be considered include the use of remote lots
with the potential use of a shuttle bus system to transport users to the activity areas; the potential for establishing a
Pricing strategy between the downtown and the beach area that would allow users to access each of the activities while
parking only once; the use of a changeable and directional signing system that advises users on a up-to-date basis of the
location of available parking within the study area; and the use of validations or other incentive programs that allow for
6
universal use of parking within the entire study area.
It is recognized that the development of alternatives will recognize that the first goal should be to optimize the use of
existing city -owned parking facilities. This may involve the use of a series of message signs not only at each specific
garage, but at key access points, relaying the relative occupancy of each parking facility. This will allow users to adjust
their choices relative to the city -owned facilities. The second level of management would be to advise potential users of
additional, possibly Iess convenient city -owned facilities. Finally the third would be to guide users to privately -owned
facilities that are pail of a unified system with unified pricing.
Each of the various scenarios will include the following:
• Concept or strategy under consideration, i.e., remote lots, shuttle buses, signing program, etc.
+ Number, location and ownership of parking facilities under consideration
• Relationship of supply to demand, existing and projected
Estimated capital costs
• Operation and maintenance costs
• Bus costs, if relevant
• Parking management actions
Potential financing sources will be identified to implement the alternative parking scenarios. Financing mechanisms
could potentially include public funds, assessment districts, development fees, direct implementation of improvements
by the private sector, and revenue from parking facilities.
TASK 7: EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
In the first element of this task, each of the alternative scenarios identified above will be evaluated and fully discussed
with City staff and any other organizations determined by the City, such as the Chamber of Commerce or a downtown
merchant association. It should be recognized that the parking "problem" in the downtown area does not appear to be
an existing problem that has hampered the development of the area or has limited the economic profitability of its
merchants. It is one that is anticipated and one that relates to growth and development, the hope for continued
economic viability, and the image of the downtown study area As a result, any potential solutions which are seriously
considered should be evaluated on the basis of broader based criteria. Because many of these issues are anticipated and
not existing, many of the proposed solutions may not be effective if implemented today_ The key to this task is to
ensure that the study team can provide each of the groups identified above sufficient information about each of the
alternatives to allow them to make decisions about the course of action which they would like to take with the
recognition that many strategies will need an intensive marketing program and comprehensive public information to be
successful.
In the second element of this task, the results of this evaluation will be discussed with the City staff to select the
Optimum measures and/or strategies for further analysis. The optimum strategies may be a series of independent
measures or may be a program that include several related schemes that work in concert with one another. It is possible
the several variations of one scheme may be considered the best alternatives for further analysis. It should be noted that
it is expected that this activity is likely to be iterative and that it may be necessary to evaluate some strategies several
times to reflect modifications or adjustments refine its description.
TASK 8: RECOMMENDED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
The purpose of this task is not for the study team to independently develop a recommended parking management plan
for the downtown Huntington Beach Study area, but for the study team to work with the City during the evaluation to
make a decision on a course of action which the study team will refine. This task involves the development of
refinements for the preferred plan including the following:
7
Overall description of parking management plan including philosophic approach, concept, physical
requirement, operational requirements, and institutional requirements
• Description of each element of plan including relationship to other elements
Responsible agency or organization
Any capital improvements including additional parking supply, parking equipment needs to
implement various schemes or measures, signs and related equipment to implement a message and/or
public information system
• Capital costs
• Operation and maintenance costs
• Revenue estimates
Financing options
Priorities of implementation
• Parking management actions
• City council actions, e.g., new ordinances or changes to Downtown Specific Plan
The results of this task will be a final report which documents the analysis techniques, data collected and analyzed, the
existing conditions, future conditions, parking requirements, alternatives considered and the recommended plan. The
report will include the implementation requirements for the plan including the associated costs and projected revenues,
responsibilities for all relevant agencies, projected timeline for implementation, and the projected effectiveness of the
plan. If the final plan is not expected to fully address the future parking needs within the downtown area, the report
shall include a discussion of additional measures that could be considered by the City including expansion of the
recommended measures or other options such as remote parking with shuttles.
Product: Final Report Summarizing the Recommended Parking Management Plan for the Downtown
Huntington Beach study area. The following copies will be provided:
25 copies, I unbound original and I camera ready copy of Draft Report
50 copies, 1 unbound original and I camera ready copy of Final Report
Computer diskettes of data and reports
SCHEDULE
Figure I illustrates the project schedule. It can be seen that it is anticipated that the project can be completed 4 months
after notice to proceed_ The draft report will be presented at month 4 of the project schedule. The final report will
require 2 to 3 weeks to revise, depending on the changes necessary,
FIGURE 'I
HUNTINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
TASK
1 Initiate Project and Review Data
2 Document Existing Parking Supply
3 Establish Existing Parking Demand
4 Assess Current Parking Conditions
5 Project Future Demand
6 Identify and Review Alternative Strategies
7 Evaluation of Alternatives
8 Recommended Parking Management Plan
Months
0 i 2
3
KNWASSOCIATEs
A CoMoreh'on
41
III. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Kaku Associates, Inc. is a consulting firm specializing in transportation planning and traffic engineering with significant
background in the areas of transportation planning and engineering, traffic engineering, travel demand forecasting, transit
planning and operations, transportation systems management, parking analyses, and community planning. The firm has
considerable experience in the preparation of parking improvement and management plans which are feasible, effective and
sensitive to local concerns. Kaku Associates, Inc. has completed projects in the following areas of technical analysis:
• Parking analysis
• Traffic impact analysis/development planning
• Traffic engineering and operations
• Travel demand forecasting
Highway and corridor transportation planning
• Traffic management and control systems
• Transit planning and operations
• Intennodal transportation planning
• Campus circulation and parking
• Visitor, entertainment center and sports facility traffic and parking analysis
• Transportation systems management/transportation demand management
• Analysis of special generators -
Although the firm is Iocated in Santa Monica, California, our experience ranges in scope from small localized studies to
projects which have national significance. Projects have been completed in cities and communities throughout the Los
Angeles metropolitan area, in Kem. Mono, San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Alameda, Orange, San Bernardino,
Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties, and in Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, Alabama and
Virginia.
The following pages provide information on the proposed project team including the names, qualifications and related
-- experience of lead and support personnel, including their responsibilities; a description of the qualifications of our
subcontractor; a description of the project teams experience with projects of similar scope and character; and a list of
references with names, address and telephone number.
PROJECT TEAM
The proposed Kaku Associates study team has the knowledge, talent and background necessary to provide the City of
Huntington Beach with a comprehensive and workable analysis of the parking master plan for the downtown area of the
city. Proposed as project director is Mr. Dick Kaku, President and founder of Kaku Associates, Inc. Mr. Tom Gaul, Vice
President with the firm, will serve as the day-to-day Project Manager. Key personnel who will assist Mr. Gaul in this
study include Mr. Bruce Chow from Kaku Associates, and Mr. William Francis from Walker Parking, Inc. Figure 2
illustrates the project organization chart for the proposed team.
Proiect Director
As Project Director, Mr. Kaku will have overall technical responsibility for the study, and will be responsible for the
efficient performance of the study analysis. Mr. Kaku has completed parking studies for the City of Santa Monica, Phoenix,
Ojai, the Los Angeles County Chief Administrative Office, Hermosa Beach, and for many institutions in the metropolitan
area. He has recently completed parking studies in Santa Monica, Whittier, Hermosa Beach, Chinatown and downtown Los
Angeles, and for the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History and USC.
10
FIGURE 2
PROPOSED PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION
City of Huntington Beach
Planning Department
Project Director
Dick Kaku
Project Manager
Tom Gaul
Kaku Associates
Bruce Chow
Walker Parking, Inc
William Francis
CCNMA1SSO LIVES
As Project Director, Mr. Kaku will be available to attend any of the meetings with city staff, property owners, merchants,
business organizations and city council. He will have overall responsibility for all administrative and technical matters and
major policy issues. Mr. Kaku will devote approximately 100/9 of his time during the course of the project to this study.
Project Manager
Mr. Tom Gaul, Vice President with Kaku Associates, will serve as Project Manager. Mr. Gaul has over 15 years of
experience as a transportation planner and engineer, and has conducted numerous studies for public agencies and private
firms throughout the southern California region -and in Hawaii, Arizona, Alabama, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Mas-
sachusetts. He recently completed a parking and traffic study for the commercial area of Venice, a parking study for
Westwood Village and served as project manager for parking studies for the West Los Angeles Courthouse and Civic
Center, the downtown Carlsbad redevelopment project, and a number -of mixed -use developments throughout southern
California.
As Project Manager, Mr. Gaul will have day-to-day responsibility for all technical activities.
Proiect Staff
Mr. Bruce Chow, an Associate with Kaku Associates, has assisted Mr. Gaul on the Westwood Village Braxton Triangle
parking study and the St. Johns Health Center Replacement Project, and is currently assisting in the Santa Monica College
Master Plan activities which include a significant parking analysis.
Subcontractor
Walker Parking, Inc. will serve as a subcontractor to Kaku Associates on this project. The firm has served a wide variety
of properties as the designer parking facilities that have ranged in size from a few spaces to multiple -level buildings with
hundreds of spaces. The firm has developed efficient policies and procedures for managing parking facilities of all sizes,
types and configuration providing clients with accurate and timely financial reports including documentation for all on -site
expenses.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Santa Monica Downtown Parking Management Prorrram
Kaku Associates, Inc. is currently developing a parking management program for downtown Santa Monica, California. The
City of Santa Monica is interested in assessing the feasibility of implementing a downtown parking management program
that would coordinate the use of both public and private parking facilities to improve parking availability in the downtown
area, especially at night and on weekends. The study area includes the highly successful Third Street Promenade
entertainment and retail district as well as the Santa Monica Place shopping mall. An extensive data collection program was
F conducted to quantify existing parking characteristics in the area, including inventory, utilization, duration, and user surveys.
Future parking demands were projected for both weekdays and weekends, and alternative parking management strategies
were developed and evaluated. The recommended program includes immediate action items, short-term improvements, and
mid -range improvements, and includes a combination of strategies regarding such items as pricing, office parking
requirements, TDM, a parking advisory system (including real time directional and availability signage), use of private
parking at night and on weekends, and provision of additional parking supply in city structures. Client Reference: Ron
Fuchiwaki City Parking and Traffic Engineer, City of Santa Monica, City Hall, Room 115, 1685 Main Street, Santa
Monica, California 90401, (310) 458-8291. Project Cost: S99,700. Completion Date: July 1997.
12
Whittier Uptown Parkine Stud
Kaku Associates recently conducted a parking study in the Uptown area of the City of Whittier. The study was aimed at
developing an improvement program that would optimize the use of the existing public on -street and off-street parking
supply. The study included an assessment of the existing parking conditions in the Uptown area for three different days of
the week. Parking utilization and duration studies were conducted as part of the assessment. A parking user survey was
also conducted to better understand the parking characteristics of the Uptown area. Based on the data collected, a short-term
and long-term improvement program was developed. Some of the elements of the improvement program included: parking
restrictions, installation of parking meters, implementation of a signing program, and increased enforcement. Client
reference: David Mochisuki, City of Whittier, 13230 Penn Street, Whittier, California 90602, (562) 464-3510. Project Cost:
S35,190. Completion Date: May 1998
Canoga Park sad Reseda Business Areas Parking Management Stud
Kaku Associates recently completed a parking management study for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Los Angeles and the City of Los Angeles Council District Three. The study focused on the Canoga Park and Reseda
business areas located in the San Fernando Valley. Both of these communities determined that a crucial element of the
earthquake revitalization program is the need to improve the parking system in each business district. The study area
consisted of a 14 block area within the Canoga Park Business District and a 27 block area within the Reseda Business
District. The study involved assessing existing parking conditions both for a weekday and a Saturday and identifying
problem locations. Interviews with members of the business community were also conducted to help identify specific issues
and opportunities for each area. Based on the existing data collected, field observations, and the interviews,
recommendations were made for each business area. These recommendations included: converting one hour parking meters
to two hour meters; designating public lots for employeellong term parking; implementing a signing program; consolidating
parking lots; and providing and/or improving lighting and landscaping in public lots. Also, a detailed parking analysis,
which included estimating parking demand and assessing the potential for valet service, was conducted for the proposed
Madrid Theater which is part of the revitalization effort in the Canoga Park study area. Client reference: Dick D'Amico,
Community Redevelopment Agency, 354 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 900I3, (213) 977-2669. Project
Cost: S25,000. Completion Date: June 1996.
Westwood Village Broxton Triangle Parking Analysis
Kaku Associates led a team of economists and environmental specialists in preparing an analysis for the need and feasibility
of building a parking structure on the existing Broxton Triangle surface parking lot in the Westwood Village area of the City
` of Los Angeles. The study, conducted for the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, involved projecting future
_ parking demands in the Westwood Village area based on alternate future land use and economic development scenarios.
Assistance was provided to the City with the conceptual design and layout of the structure. A mitigated negative declaration
was prepared for the project as part of the study. Client reference: Ms. Karen Patterson, City of Los Angeles Department of
Transportation4-221 North Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, (213) 485-9543. Project Cost: $43,400.
Completion Date: March I996.
Venice Parking and Traffic Stud
Kaku Associates completed a parking and traffic study for the City of Los Angeles in the Venice Coastal Zone. This study
was directed at both current and future issues related to the parking and circulation system for the coastal area in Venice. A
detailed parking study was conducted as part of this study including an inventory of available parking, a utilization survey,
and a user survey_ The user survey was directed at both current parking facility users and non -users to determine the degree
to which visitors to the area arrive by bus. A key direction of the solution of parking for this area is a potential for remote
Parking lots with a system of shuttle buses. Client reference: Frank Parello, City of Los Angeles Department of Planning,
221 North Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, California, (213) 580-1167. Project Cost: $31,380. Completion Date: May I994.
13
10A M.ASSOCl/1TES
A Carporafion
DICK S. KAKU
President
Education Cornell Universiy, B.S. Civil Engineering
University of California, Berkeley, M.S., Civil Engineering
Previous Alan M. Voorhees & Associates, Vice President
Positions City of Los Angeles, Assistant Traffic Engineer
State of California (Caltrans), Junior Civil Engineer
U.S. Navy, Officer, Civil Engineer Corps
Experience Traffic En ineerin . Conducted traffic circulation studies for downtown redevelopment projects in
Los Angeles, Upland, Bakersfield, Inglewood, Baldwin Park, San Diego, Carlsbad, Oceanside and
Garden Grove, California; Scottsdale and Phoenix, Arizona; Honolulu, Waikiki, Kihei, and Lahaina,
Hawaii; Richmond, Hemden and Dumfries, Virginia; Memphis, Tennessee; and Seoul, Korea.
Conducted numerous traffic impact and site access studies for shopping centers, planned unit
developments, office complexes, recreational facilities, etc., in cities throughout the United States;
Caracas, Venezuela; Zurich, Switzerland; and Seoul, Korea.
Traffic QpSrafions. Was project manager of signal system studies in Pasadena, Bakersfield and
Escondido, California; Buffalo, New York; and Augusta, Georgia. Major participant in
development and design of centrally controlled traffic signal systems in Memphis, Tennessee, and
Solothurn, Switzerland. Conducted evaluation of ramp metering for interstate freeway in Pasadena,
California. -
Parking. Conducted parking studies for the Cities of Scottsdale and Phoenix, Arizona; Ojai,
Inglewood, Baldwin Park, Los Angeles, Irvine, Glendale, Encinitas, Solana Beach, Santa Monica,
Whittier, and West Hollywood, California; Lahaina and Honolulu, Hawaii; Annapolis, Maryland;
and Seoul, Korea. Also conducted parking studies for private developments, museums, colleges and
universities, hospital, and recreational facilities in cities throughout California, Arizona, and Hawaii.
Transportation Planning. Supervised transportation planning element of community plan studies for
the Warner Center, Hollywood, Chatsworth/Porter Ranch, Westwood/West Los Angeles, Tri-Cities,
Venice, Encino, Van Nuys, Northridge, Ventura/Cahuenga Boulevard Corridor and Hollywood
Redevelopment areas of Los Angeles. Project manager of transportation planning studies in Oahu,
Hawaii, Maui, and Kauai Counties, Hawaii; Kern, Riverside, Tulare, and San Bernardino Counties,
California.
Travel Demand_ Forecasting. Assisted in development of highway element of new travel demand
forecasting model for Honolulu. Supervised development of patronage and revenue forecasts for
report transit systems in Honolulu and Los Angeles. Supervised development of traffic forecasts for
planning studies in communities throughout Los Angeles, highway corridors in Los Angeles,
Honolulu, Bakersfield and Phoenix. Conducted travel demand forecasts for Los Angeles, Honolulu,
Maui, Kauai, Bakersfield and San Bernardino County as part of overall transportation planning
studies.
Hi ltway/Corridor Studies. Supervised alternatives analyses for Route I0/60 Corridor, North San
Gabriel Valley corridor, Glendale Boulevard Corridor, and Crenshaw Corridor in Los Angeles
County; Route 30 Corridor study in Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties; North/South
corridor in Honolulu; Kern River Canyon, Route 202 near Tehachapi, and Route 33 near Taft in
j Kern County.
License Traffic Engineer, California
r
Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Transportation Research Board
[OUXUASSOCIATES
A Corporation
THOMAS P. GAUL
Vice President
Education Massachusetts Institute of Technology, B.S., Civil Engineering
University of California, Berkeley, Graduate Course Work
Previous PRC Engineering, Transportation EngineerlPlanner
Positions Bryant Associates, Transportation Planner
Gordon Fay Associates, Transportation Planner
Chester County Planning Commission, Transportation PIanner
Experience Transportation Planning. Project manager for transportation elements of the Los Angeles Community
Plan Revision Program, Hollywood Community Plan update, Redondo Beach General Plan update,
-- the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program EIR, and the Los Angeles EIR Manual.
Project manager for development of the Oahu Regional Transportation Plan and the Hawaii Statewide
Plan. Project manager for development of transportation improvement programs for the Warner
Center and Westwood/West Los Angeles areas of Los Angeles, for the Tri-Cities area of Beverly
Hills, Los Angeles and West Hollywood, and for Waikiki, Hawaii. Conducted alternatives analysis
for the Route 30 Freeway. Prepared circulation element of the Las Vegas General Plan. Developed
methodologies and computer software for statewide highway needs studies for Alabama and Arizona.
_ Transit Planning. Project manager for studies analyzing guideway and station impacts of the
Honolulu Rapid Transit Program and the Northern San Gabriel -San Bernardino Valley Rail Transit
Corridor. Participated in development of transit improvement plans for the islands of Hawaii, Kauai,
and Maui, Hawaii. Assisted Kauai County with implementation of the emergency Iniki Express bus
system in the aftermath of Hurricane Ihiki. Prepared transit development plans for various
communities in Kern County, California. Evaluated a proposed people -mover system in Mammoth
Lakes, California. Assisted in preparation of the Union Station Transportation Plan and Metro Rail
station area plans in Los Angeles.
Traffic Envineerin. Conducted numerous traffic circulation, traffic impact, and site access studies
_ for residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational, and mixed -use developments in
communities throughout California, Arizona and Hawaii. Conducted circulation studies for
downtown redevelopment projects in Bakersfield, Carlsbad, Inglewood and Los Angeles, California.
Evaluated circulation options for downtown Phoenix, Arizona, as part of the Phoenix Municipal
Government Center Master Plan. Developed internal access plan for Playa Vista, a proposed Iarge
multi -use development in Los Angeles.
Traffic Operations. Project manager for the Santa Monica Freeway Smart Corridor Demonstration
Project and Operations Planning Element in Los Angeles. Conducted reversible operations/contra-
flow lane feasibility study for the Pali and Likelike Highways in Honolulu, Hawaii. Conducted signal
coordination studies for Los Angeles County and South Bay cities.
Transportation Demand Manaaeptent. Project manager of study to develop an integrated HOV
system plan for Los Angeles County. Developed TDM plans for the Ventura Boulevard Corridor and
— the Hollywood Redevelopment Project in Los Angeles, for metropolitan Bakersfield, California, and
for numerous private developments. Conducted study to evaluate the impact of changing school
hours on peak hour traffic volumes and congestion in Honolulu, Hawaii,
Pam. Project manager for development of a summer weekend parking and traffic control plan for
the Venice Beach area of Los Angeles. Conducted downtown area parking studies for Glendale, West
Hollywood, Encinitas, and Solana Beach, California, and for the Third Street Promenade in Santa
Monica, California. Conducted parking studies for private developments, government complexes,
museums and public garages in Los Angeles and Santa Monica.
Affiliations Institute of Transportation Engineers
Chi Epsilon
COMPANY PROFILE & RESUME
10 WALKER
PARKING CONSumws
Walker Parking Consultants is a multi -disciplined engineering firm
Mission Statement
specializing in parking studies, parking planning, parking design and concrete
Walker Parking Consultants will
restoration.
provide parking consulting,
Since our founding in 1965, Walker has grown to over 200 professionals, all
planning, design and restoration
services which meet our clients'
devoted to the parking design and planning industry. Over the past three
requirements and expectations.
decades, Walker has played an integral role in the planning and design of over
3,000 parking solutions. This represents over 250 million square feet of
We will expand our services in
experience in singular area parking. Our clients include corporations, developers,
existing and new markets,
hospitals, universities, colleges and governmental agencies located throughout
worldwide, through managed
the world.
growth
All projects awarded to the firm are directed by one of our principals and an
We will provide our services in a
experienced project manager, both of whom will stay actively involved from start
manner whereby our clients
to finish.
recognize we are the best firm
As testimony to our expertise, three members of our staff authored a text book
that has ever served them.
entitled PARKING STRUCTURES: Planning, Design, Construction, Maintenance
We will provide the desired
and Repair, first published by Van Nostrand Reinhold in 1989, with a Second
environment for our people to
Edition in 1996. Many industry experts consider this book the single best source
grow in their careers, and have
of information on parking facilities.
joy and pride in their work.
Walker continues research and development to improve design and materials
We will seek continual
specifications enabling us to present clients with the most durable, cost-effective
services and
parking facilities. In addition, all of our staff participated in a Quality Improvement
of the systems that support them.
of the systems that pprtt
Process to guarantee the high standard of our work. _
Our goal is to provide a quality service that conforms to our client's requirements;
We will maintain our financial
strength by meeting our profit
anything less is unacceptable. Our depth of staff, technological leadership and
goals and maintaining a strong
our unique approach to parking design are the primary reasons why Walker is
balance sheet.
considered the leading parking consultant in the country. The benefit: total client
satisfaction. This message is the directive for every Walker employee. The firm's
high percentage of repeat client is a testimony to Walker's ability.
William Francis is Managing Principal of the Walker Parking Consultants
Representative Projects:
Burbank office and oversees all aspects of the parking studies performed in the
Western United States. William has over 25 years experience in parking
Staples Center
management and consulting.
Los Angeles, California
Parking planning and operations
I
Prior to entering the parking consulting field an a full-time basis Mr. Francis was
consulting for the future home of
Part owner and General Manager of firms that managed parking facilities on
the Los Angeles Lakers, Clippers
behalf of Bixby Ranch Company, California Federal Savings, Brotman
and icings
Medical Center and such public sector clients as Clark County, Nevada; City
of Reno, Nevada and Ontario International Airport.
Hollywood & Highland
Mr. Francis has published several articles related to the parking industry, and he
Entertainment Complex
co-authored a research paper entitled 'The Effects of Subsidization on Human
Los Angeles, California
Behavior.' This dissertation has been utilized in developing transportation
Parking operations consulting and
management programs throughout the nation. He is also the co-author of a
financial feasibility study for the
recently published local government handbook entitled "Using Demand -Based
3,000 space parking garage that
Parking Strategies To Meet Community Goats."
will serve Hollywood's newest
entertainment retail complex, future
Mr. Francis has appeared as a speaker for the Society of Real Estate Appraisers,
home of the Academy Awards.
International Parking Institute, Building Owners and Managers Associafon,
Parking Association of California, American Association of Airport Executives and
California Public Parking Association.
City of West Hollywood
West Hollywood, California
Education:
Consulting on the City's parking
Masters of Public Administration, University of Southern California, 1972
master plan.
Bachelor of Arts, California State University, Long Beach, 1967
Exhibit B
06/23/99 RED 11:00 FAX 310 394 7663
Kakn Associates, iIIC.
Q002
MWASSocInTEs
memorandum
TO: Wayne Carvalho
FROM: pick Kaku
SU13JECT: Downtown Parking Master plat~ Update
Proposed Budget for PerMng Study
A corporation
7ransporar4n Planning
7rafflo $rginwirg
f'arx l? stffti
DATE: , .June 22, 1999 REF: P2261
Attached is the revised budget for the parking study. Table t summarizes the costs by line item
Including direct labor, other direct costs which includes the subcontractor and the temporary
labor, and the 2D% contingency. As illustrated, the total cost is $74,690 which includes the
fallowing elements:
• $46,240 for Kaku Associates labor
• $9,600 for the subcontractor
• $6,400 for temporary labor
• $12,460 for the 20% contingenoy
Table 2 provides a Summary of the hours by personnel by task. This table also includes the
subcontractor's hours which explains the difference In the total cost from line item A In Table 1.
If you have any questions or need additional Information, please call me at (310) 458-991 S.
1453 Third SlniL Su:la ♦AC
Sarta Maaica CA aWl
016) 49-99ie Fax !3►0i _,W•7W
06/23/99 WED 11:00 FAX 310 394 7663 Baku Associates, Inc. Q003
TABLE 1
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
Estimated
Hours *
Rate/Hr
Total
A. Direct Labor
Project Director —Dick Kaku
140
$150 .
$21.000
Project Manager --Tom Gaul
76
110
8,380 i
Project Planner: —Bruce Chow
128
75
; 9,600 j
Planning Assistant
112
65
7,280
Total Direct Labor
456 Hrs.
$48,240
B. Other Direct Costs
;
Subcontractor
96
$i 00
$9,6w
Temporary Labor
NA
NA
6,400
Total ODC
j
$16,000
C. Other
Contingency @ 20%
$12,450
C. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
$74.690
* See Table 2
TABLE 2
WORKLOAD ASSIGNMENT BY TASK
PERSONNEL
COST OF
Project
Project
Project
1 Subcntr,
LABOR ,
Dirt=
� Manager
Planner
Project
I (Walker
TOTAL
INCL Su$ �
TASK/8ubnesk
. Kaku
. Gau
. Ch
Planner
Parkin
HOURS
BY TASK
1
4
4
0
0
0
a
$1,040
2
3 3.1
$
; 8
I 6
6
12
16
0 i
16
0
0
26
46
z7w
4,100
3.2
4
4
16
16
0
40
3,2801
3.3
4
4
i 16
16
0
40
3,280
3.4
4
4
18
16
0
40
3,280
Subtotal
20
is
64
64
0
168
13,940
4
a
12
16
16
0
62
4.760
s
4
4
0
s
40
56
6.560
S
4
4
0
8
40
66
5,560
7
18
18
24
16
16
88
8.600
8
is
12
12
0
0
40
4,620
MeeUngs
60
0
0
0
0
60
91000
TOTAL
140
76
128
112
96
552,840
�1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: Connie Brockway, City Clerk
FROM: Duane Bankey, Planning Senior Department Analyst x v
SUBJECT: Documentation regarding RFP's for the contract between the City and
Kaku Associates, Inc. to prepare an evaluation and revision of the
Huntington Beach Downtown Parking Master Plan
DATE: September 23, 1999
Pursuant to Huntington Beach Municipal Code 3.03.060(b), written proposals from not less than
three Consultants are required prior to the City making a selection for a Consultant.
The Consultant selected to prepare an evaluation and revision of the Huntington Beach
Downtown Parking Master Plan is Kaku Associates, Inc. this selection was based on the
criteria contained in the Request for Proposal.
Additional bid proposals:
• Darnell & Associates, Inc.
• International Parking Design, Inc.
• Kaku Associates, Inc.
cc: Wayne Carvalho
$46,768
$46,980
$74,690
gAbankcylmcmosl.N19-47CB
ATTACHMENT 1
r ATTACHMENT 2 1
ATTACHMENT 3
�'•8ie9
F A
NqEE jmmiobtyvi
' ' 07/I4/1999
r
(626) 795-7059 FAX (626)792-2321 7ALTER
CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
unakoshi-Ito Insurance Services, Inc. CITYTHIS CERTIFICATE DOES HOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
99 South Lake Avenue, #300 Vii"7- F E COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Pasadena, CA 91101 ItA 600.3P COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
f1?per /0)z` /`� y' :'__---..--.-_.
COMPANY Great American Ins. Company --
Attn: Harvey Ah Sam E>R: 231 ! A
INSURED CO
_ ! MPPANY
Kaku Associates �� f/iY�rr1
14S3 Third St., Ste.40U
Santa Monica, CA 90401 f�65Q/Y�• COMPANY
C
--
COMPANY "--
D
Y.: it .S_C•'-•�; d ; ;? a'�1'J;F-. 1 .A- � Y - ':.Yf: �.!C�i. -t :u�:.r • ,.):- r. �,;_ .r�.,�--:
.ci
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ri IE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR mAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS.
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES- LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REOLICfiD BY PAID CLAIMS.
CD TYPE OF II!$I/RANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTNI I POLICY CXPIRATION - - LIIIIT9
LT
: I DATE (UMMuIYY) DATE )LIMIDOIYY) i
GENERAL UABILITY ! GENERAL AGGREWTE _ f.• y_._. 000. 000
X I COMPRODUCTS - CCNIpP AsM1 , 000 , 000
CLAIMS MADE . X J OCCUR ; � � PERSONAL i AOV INJURY ' S 1 , 000, 000
Aa - - ;PAC270263203 i OS/01/1999 ' 08/Ol/2000 -- - -- .._ ._. __ ._ ..
OWNER'S A CONTRACTOR'! PROT ; EACH OCCURRENCE is - 11000,000
FIRE DAMAGE ir'I+r ana e,.) s 100 , 000
VIED EXP (Any a- P-son) is 10,000
AUTOMOOMe LIACILITY
AUTO I I COMBINED DINGLE LIMIT S
ANY
! 1.000.-000
ALI, OWNED AUTOS ! SODLY INJURY
-- SCHEDULED AMOS I {Par pw. ) s
A PAC270263203 ! 08/01/1.999 r 09/01/2000-
X IHIREDAUTOS I BODILY ftwRY `
^X� IWMatMeEDAUTOS f (Peraeck9m) ; s
A5 TO FORM:] PROPERTY DAMAGE ; s
GE L,FA@IUTY ^"'�'"AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDYkT - E
GARA
QA T. _1U011 }-
I I ANY AUTO Fz�� i .�.•r. _�r-.'--y=� OTHER. THAN AUTO ONLY:.— �i*]
,.._-.I
I EACHACCOWN S
EXCESS UAMITY lI - r'i+.V AttorlleVEAcH OCCURRENCE > f
i i UMBRELLA FORM , AGGREGATE
! OTH;R Tww LWORELLA FOAM I s
VIORKERSCOMPENBATIONAND I f ; X ITORYLIMITS!.. ER
a., ,.:.ter.•:
ENnOYERW u'`MILITY i EL EACH ACCIDENT - s 11000,000
A - THE PROPRIETOIb ' = x i INCLC71}'619107 ! 06/Ol/1999 08/O1/2000 EL DISEASE • POLICY LIMIT S
PARTNERSAIMECUTNE ! ; x, 000 FOLIO
OFFICERS ARE: _ I EXCL EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE : s 1 000 000
I
i=RIPTION OF OPi ISO iirLWATION914I ICLESISPYCIAL fft"
ertificate Holder is named as an Additional Insured as respects to General Liability as their
interest may appear
(Except 10 day notice for nonpayment of premium)
CDf1s:''.•c-;;}'.:.is:;>":cyy��:ru�gca;l„�;-;.;I�ti.e'[ .?c`.,::_:rc='r>4i';J= :(`►+R TION`:: ;.__.c>'^'r;ir-- - - - ..:r•:' ---- -I;-. _--
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBiD POLICIES BC CANCELL1W SMRE THE
EXPIRATION DATE TMERROF, THB IGSMNG COMPANY WILL KN� 'Q� YA4
City of Huntington Beach, it's Agents i TO DAYS W11ITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE MOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,
Officers and Employees xx
2000 Main St. X
Huntington Beach, CA 9264E A oRIzED NTATIv
'�'t;?!'!,-�;�I�rf,"-.�SrtIF~ arr;°��PYi�"•�)�Ei"°v'.=�h.!�u9�"s�T'� �,, k t{�"wrr��"' y;r�ri`_,7St4' '{e::' jFSi:!";:n;'-ryuR�CQii t
-rI. ,.x. .u.. t '''�.;IFa''` r .�-• ..fl r 1'`F�: ,r- S. .r.. •.r.•. .,. D�CORPORl4TIOsL' 0
THU 12:02 FAX 310 394 7663 Kaku Associates, Inc. R/7" /01/JI4,1P-f Z001
U
•
•
C:
5.
6.
7.
CITY OF HUTIN71 �'GTON BEACH
APPLICATION FOR INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS WAIVER OR MODIFICATION
Name/Title/Department of Requesting Staff Member_ 1� '�-
Date of Request 4 //21 /-72
Name of ContractorTermince k1A1z . 4SSve- s
Description of work to be performed 'Ae ,,t.e arm•^
Leng-L`•t of Contract !
Type of Insur2a Vain orModification Requested:
(a) Units: (b) Coverage
Reason for Request for Waiver or Reduction of Limits r.
8. Idendfl - the risks to 6e City if s request for ve-Wer or modifications granted 6"74
/J e ✓ e .
Depai-Lment Bead Signature
(This section to be completed lay theRisk,Vanager)
Recommendzdon:
Approve Deny Risk Manager's Signatre.,Date
(Phis section to be completed by the City Attorne))
Recorranenclation :
Approve Deny City Attomey's SignatureMate I I I
Settlement Co ;-nincce appr -al [is) is not] requir :_; 4as vaiver. If Settlement Con=ttee appro tared,
submit farm to CityAnorney's a to be placed on tree agenda. Re.^ommendation: Approve env
City Council appro not] required for &l s waiver. If City Council approval is required, attac is form to the
RCA alter considers _ e Settlement Commintt. This insurance waiver (is) [is not] on City Council agenda.
jmpfK1resout+orAnsreg19lt 1 /97
7
0
RCA ROUTING SHEET
INITIATING PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT:
SUBJECT: APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT WITH KAKU ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR PREPARATION OF AN EVALUATION
AND REVISION OF THE HUNTINGTON
BEACH DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER
PLAN
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 4, 1999
RCA ATTAC H M E N TS
STATUS
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable)
Not Applicable
Resolution (wlexhibits & legislative draft if applicable)
Not Applicable
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits
Not Applicable
Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable)
(Signed in full by the City A ttomeyj
Attached
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc.
(Approved as to form by City Attorney)
Not Applicable
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the Cif Attorney)
Attached
Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000)
Not Appliiqmble
Bonds (If applicable)
Not Applicable
Staff Report (If applicable)
Not Applicable
Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable)
Not Applicable
Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial
Not A licable
EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS
REVIEWED
RETURNED
FORWARDED
Administrative Staff
Assistant City Administrator Initial
7wS 2,)'-
City Administrator Initial
City Clerk
EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM:
TiCe Notes
Office of the City Clerk
Huntington Beach, California � Z
+ Z A
v jr
W d' �