Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutKENNEDY, JENKS, CHILTON - 1986-07-21C*; TY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING, SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DOWNTOWN WATER LINE T81S AGREEMENT, made and entered into this .2157- day of _ , 19 * _, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and KE,,NEDY/ JENKS/CHILTON, a California corporation,: hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR,," WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of an engineer- ing consultant to prepare plans, specifications and cost estimates for the construction of a water service line in the downtown area of the City of Huntington Beach; and CONTRACTOR has been selected to perform said services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows: 1. WORK STATEMENT CONTRACTOR shall provide all engineering services as described in the Request for Proposal and Statement of Qualifications (hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A"), whiciz is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Said services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as "PROJECT." CONTRACTOR hereby designates Lynn M. Takaichi, who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 2. CITY STAFF ASSI.r-TANyCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONTRACTOR in the prosecution of `_-his Agreement, 1. 3: TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. Ths services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than four (4) months from the date of this Agree."�ent, with an additional (Z) ' for all revisions. These times irtay be extended with the written permission of the CITY. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be as shown in the Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROj:CT if mutually agreed by the CITY and CONTRACTOR. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the engineering services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a fee not to exceed one hundred twenty-five thousand, five hundred dollars ($125,500). 5. EXTRA WORK In the event of authorization, in writing by the CITY, of changes from the work described in Exhibit "A", or for other written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for .such Extra Work, so long as the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6. METHOD OF PAYMENT A. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to progress payments toward the fixed fee set forth in Section 4 herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit A". L. Delivery of work product: A copy of every techni- cal memo a5aa report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to the CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory comple- 2 4 tion: Any such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected, by CITY shall be deemed accepted. C. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY an invoice for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall: 1.) Reference this Agreement; 2) Describe the services performed; 3) Show the total amount of the payment due; 4) Include a certification by a principal member of the CONTRACTOR'S firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provi- sions of this }lgreement; and 5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days' of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of the reasons for non -approval, within seven (i) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof. D. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by the CITY shall be invoiced separately to the CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required under paragraph 6C,sand in addition shall list the hours en. -ended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such iavoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and `if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and 3: AWL costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unrea- sonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMA!rES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CITY acknowledges that CONTRACTOR'S plans and specifications are instruments of professional service; nevertheless CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder, including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notes, calculations, maps and other documents shall be turned over to CITY and shall become its property upon PROJECT completion or earlier termination of this Agreement. In the event this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY in completion of the PROJECT; however, CITY agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend CONTRACTOR against all damages, claims and Losses, including defense costs, arising out of CITY'S re -use of CONTRACTOR'S plans and specifications, except in the completion of the PROJECT in the case of termination hereof, without CONTRACTOR'S p..rior written authorization. 8. INDEMNIFICATION, DEFENSE, HOLD HARMLESS CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers and employees from and against any mad all liability, damages, costs, losses, claims and expenses, however caused, arising from CONTRACTOR'S negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of this Agreement. The concurrent negligence or willful misconduct of any supervisory employ, of CITY, if any, shall be compared to the negligence of CONTRACTOR in interpreting this provision. CITY and CONTRACTOR shall share such liability in proportion to their respective degree of fault. 9. WORKERS' COMPENSATION CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of. the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State. of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar state or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all claims, de— nds, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature and description; including attorney's fees and costs presented, brougl-t or recovered against CITY, for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement. 10. INSURANCE In addition to the Workers' Compensation Insurance and CONTRACTOR'S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish to CITY the following insurance policies covering the PROJECT: A. General Liability Insurance. A policy of general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall name CITY, its officers and employees as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage and that CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall be primary. B. Professional Liability Insurance. CONTRACTOR shall acquire a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. Certificates of Insurance for said policies shall be appro,ed in writing by the City Attorney prior to the commence- ment of any work hereunder. All Certificates of Insurance (and the policies of insurance or endorsements thereof) shall provide that any such Certificates and policies shaLl not be cancelled or reduced in coverage or limits other than payments of claims without thirty (30) days' prior: written notiee to CITY. 5. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor. CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any and all payments of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and ot,er payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. 12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A11 work required hereunder shall be performed in accordance with the standards of the profession for similar professionals performing services in this area at this time. CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR'S services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complt-te. :Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing through the City Engineer, notice of which shall be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16 herein. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to any other person or entity without the consent of CITY. , 14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CONTRACTOR shall not apply for a patent or copyright on any item or material produced.as a result of this Agreement, as set forth in 4.1 CFR 1-9.1. 15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITTemployee in the, work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of California GoyernAent Code Sections 1090 et seq. 6. 16: NO'T'IC S Any notices or special instructions required to be given in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal delivery to CONTRACTOR'S agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY'S Director of Public Works, as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed en-zelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Services, addressed as follows: TO CITY: TO CONTRACTOR: Mr. Paul Cook Mr. Lynn M. Takaichi Director of Public Works Vice President City of Huntington Beach Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton 2000 Main Street 17310 Red Hill, Suite 220 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Irvine, California 92714 •--REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLAUK-- 17. ENTIRETY The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth the entire Agreement between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers the day, month and year first above written. CONTRACTOR: KENNEDY/JENK S/CHILTON a California corpo rat CITY OF HUNT.INGTON BEACH, A municipa. corporation of the Str'-e of California es. Mayor 4 IfLaineL. RKrri"son, Sec. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Czty Clerk, �.� City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: I TIATED AND APPROVED: City Administrator ---Director of Public Works 1436L 8: Mr. William R. Whittenberg Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton 17310 Red Hill Avenue Suite 220 Irvine, CA 9271E Subject: Water Service Line for Downtown Redevelopment; CC-699 Gend emen The City of Huntington Beach is requesting proposals from qualified civil engineering ; firms for the preparation of plans, specifications and cost estimates for the construction of a water service line in the downtown area of the City. The water line must be designed to accommodate proposed major redevelopment projects and associated fire flow requirements. Attachment "A" (The Project Location Map) depicts the desired route of this water line and identifies the beginning and ending points of construction. Thee, ,�,,,�ui„ at rk for which proposals are being solicited includes the following tasks: 1. Design lane size to accommoda'x 8000 G.P.M. Consultant shall arrpnge to meet and confer with appropriatb personnel from the Public Works Water Di vision. 2. Provide any survey required for design. 3. Contact utilities, public and private, to determine location of all substructures. 4. Attend p--riodic meetings with city staff during preparation of preliminary and final working drawings. (Include the costs of all miscellaneous printing, etc.) 5. Based an an approval of preliminary plans/specifications and cost estimates, the engineer shall prepare and provide 40 sets of iLhe: a. Flinrd Working Dra;uings b. Contract documert.s/specifications 6. The engineer shall; during bid advertisement and construction, ,provide support i nc lu ding: a. Ir,+terpnetation of plans and specifications; b. Review of all shop drawings; e. Attend meetings as may be necessary during field construction. `� Water Service Line for Downtown Redevelopment; CC-699 April 23, 1966 Page 2 7. Provide an acceptable set of reproducible "as -built" mylar drawings (Note: 10% of the contract amount will be withheld until the "as•-builts" are submitted and approved.) B. _44roposal-4mzt Include an insurance accord form listing General Liability, Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions) and tl+orker's Compensation coverages. The advertising for bids and avrarding of a contract for this project will be administered by city staff. In addition, city personnel will control contract administration and perform the required construction inspections. Proposals for this project are to be submitted to my attention by May 21, 1986 with the notation"Water Service Line" on the envelope. Eech4=apasaI-- gId.AReJude the following information: 1. A list of sim , ar projects. 2. A statement of your understanding of the scope of work :and the steps necessary to complete the project. 3. A list of personnel, including the proposed project manager, who will be assigned to vmrk an this project and a brief resume for each, 4. A brief outline of how you propose to handle this project, if awarded to your firm, and a time -line for completing the project. 5. Your fee based on a hourly rate, or percentage of the final cost estimate. A maximum not -to -exceed fee should be specified. After the receipt of proposals, applicants will be screened relevant to: 1. Expertise and experience; 2. The; approach to be used as outlined in the proposal; 3. Ability to complete the project in a timely and consistent manner; 4. Fees; 5. Ability to provide General Liability, Professional Liability and Worker's Compensation coverages. 1 Ydater ServiceLine for Downtown Redevelopment; CC-699 April 23, 1986 Page 3 r Consultants may interviewed prior to the final selection. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the City's standard Consultant Contract (Attachment B) and a Certificate of Insurance form (Attachment C)for your use in developing a proposal. This form and the sample Consultant Contract am. for your use in developing a proposal. t Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this project, please contact Stan Farber of our Water Division at (714)536-5921. Very truly yoµrs, a Les Evans City Engineer t.E:DRN•dw Encl.. Attach "All - Project Location Map Attach "B" - Sample Consultant Contract Attach "C" - Certificate of Insurance Form cc: Charles Thompson Doug Le Belle Paul Cook Ed Elevatorski Stan Farber k,.-Don Noble CC File 699 "Gen. Corresp' Q485g 17310 Iced Hill Avenue, Suite 220 Irvine, California 92714 714-261-1577 Mr. Les Evans City Engineer ' City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: Mr. Bill Patapoff Subject: Evaluation of Water Service to Future Redevelopment Area Dear Pr. Evans: Based on our discussions with Mr. Jeff Renna of the City's Water Department, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is pleased to modify our proposed scope of services for a Seater Service Line for Downtown Redevelopment. The proposed addition to the scope of services will include an evaluation of water service to a future redevelopment area bounded by Beach Boulevard, Pacific. Coast Highway, lake Street, ,and Atlanta Avenue. We understand that the new water service will be primarily to provide fire protection for new development in this area. SCOPE OF SERVICES Based on our understanding of the required services, the following scope of services has been developed to supplement our proposal dated 21 May 1986: 1. Collect background information related to proposed redevelopment plans in the area described above, the existing water system in this area, and the proposed 12-inch water line along the Pacific Coast Highway. 2. Contact the City's Fire Department to assess the fire flog require- ments for the future redevelopment area. i 3. Assess the ability of the existing water system to meet the proposed fire flow requirements.' 4. if the existing system is not adequate, evaluate the following alter-- natives to provide adequate fire flow; Alternative A. Bsrtend the Proposed Backbone Pipeline to the Future Redevelopment Area Kennedy/JenlcW' hilton Mr. Les Evans City of Huntington Beach 10 June 1986 Page 2 Alternative B. Realign the Proposed Backbone Pipeline to the Future Redevelopment Area. ,.Alternative C. Connect the Proposed Backbone Pipeline to a New and/ or Existing System of Smaller Pipelines in the Redevelopment Area. 5. Prepare construction cost estimates for viable alternatives. 6. Recommend an alternative for implementation. 7. Prepare a brief letter report summarizing the evaluation and 'recom— mendation. T The above- scope of services is not intended to modify our scope outlined in our 21 May 1986 proposal and does not include the design of recommended facilities to serve the future redevelopment area, We would be pleased to provide a proposal for this design when the scope of the project is more fully defined COMPENSATION °1e propose to perform the above Scope of Services on a time and expense reim— bursible basis for an additional budget of $4,100. This additional budget increases > our proposed maximum fee to $125,500, which will not be exceeded without your authorisation. Reimbursible fees will be based on our Schedule of Charges dated January 1, 1986. SCHEDULE We ,estimate that the proposed evaluation can be completed within two to three weeks after the Notice —to -Proceed. Please note that the proposed schedule is dependent upon, several factor's outside our control and unanticipated delays would prolong the schedule accordingly., We also recommend that the proposed evaluation be performed prior to the initiation of topographic surveys and geotechnical investigations so that the 3tty may realize reduced mobilization ; costs if it is decided to serve the future redevelopment area with new facili— ties. We look forward to working with the City on this challenging assignment. Please contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Very truly yours KENNEDY/JENKS/C L QN .r Ly n M. Takafth V ce President LMT`: i ae t 7 $ r }e !£ 10 - ISSUE DATE (MM/DDIY f _ C r §$ rrt. E zS 4 a�j��d IN -s'•�, �::ai?S+hSSlY�a�•F:�,Ytt'�""e�a�,t.'� :� .. _ PROLIUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTERS OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES OF.LOW. Dealey Renton F Associates ---- — Insurance Brokers COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE P. C. Box 12675 - Oakland, CA 94604 LETTER Y (415) 465-3090 Security Insurance Co. of Hartford --- - COMPANY INSURED LETTER Firemans Fund Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton COMPANY c 657 Howard Street LETTER San Francisco, CA 94105 COMPANY l 111 LETTER Aetna - (CIaTA) - i COMPA ETTERNY E Security Insurance Co. of Hartford THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OFINSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUEDTOTHE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY RECUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBEC HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. .. CO LTR A TYPE OF INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY X COMPREHENSIVE FORM 1 v POLICY NUMBER RPL 620827 c� rt':;F aJ.!Cv ckrRriT:JN LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS ,,ATE NM1 DDAN_E „I LATE i...'.'JTi�YY' OCCURRENCE --- BODILY 7/1/86 7/1/87 INJURY $ AGGREGATE A $ X PREMISESIOPERATIONS UNDERGROUND The City of Huntington Are Beach, its 1 PROPERTY included DAMAGE X F.(PLOSI'N & COLLAPSE HAZARD officers and employees { as $ $ $ 1,000 ` X PRODUCTS;'CJMPLETED OPERATIONS {x CONTRACTUAL `additional insureds. See ( sample of wording to be the attaC ed j used in the i l �o�,B°, $1, 000, x INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS endorsement and pertine> v t language rom } X BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAfdAGE the policy. { f X PERSONAL INJURY { PESONAL ,NJURY $ Incl . f + FAUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ',3- X ANY AUTO Renewal of 1 7,/1/86 7/1/87 3. P,!, $ ALL OWNED AUTOS tPRT PASS,) j NyINA 5565312 i ac r ALL OWNED auTDs (P ILFRPAHS�) {See attached copy,'•P�y Form CF,0001 HIRED AUTOS {Part IV, D. 3 .f1�i�a1 insureds, PavPERTr NON -OWNED AUTOS q 9 C 1 �� i I DAMAGE $ GARAGE LIABILITY , a PO $1 000 I EXCESS LIABILITY Bi s PD UMBRELLA FORM I + { OOI,IBENEiJ $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM { WORKERS' COMPENSATION , (Copy M C 50892-7 ) 1 i /$6 1/l/87 STATUTORY OT walver o__ subro4r ati V ctP&cjed . 9 $ ?_70 (EACH ACCIOFNT) ANU In the event of cancellc&ticn for nop-payment $ 500 !DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT) q EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY_luf _._..� remium e t$n(10) da S notice Of .1ncellatlon $ 100 +DISEASE-EACHEMFtOYEE) .Y �) F OTHER Professional* S O�{Ti RIR � M fiven, erwi e see/hgow 7/1/87 $1,000 ea. occur. $1,000 aggregate Liability 1 1 9100 ded._each occur DE ,SGHI TION Or OPEHI%TION !LO.ATI K HICLEB.'SPECIAL ITEMS Pr • Dot to n P{ ter I ' n� -199 ) *For profession 1. 7. Ity coverage, the . ega' e `� iml is e a u`isurance available claims presented within the policy period for all operations of the named insured. ror reduced in limits by SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBE41)IILMIES_$g 'YNNL44M=a 'SPORE THE EX- City of Huntington Beach PIRATION 'DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL '0MCL1&XXi0 MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICO TE HOLDER NAMED TO THE 2000 Main Street LEFT,�XI,r}gsptg��xas�ax Huntington Beach, CA 92648xlptx�c:xxrrtx}'ztrlxx�sxaxY�x12fzti?klc��C - AUTHORIZED REPREgF,6.TAT1VF �qaley, Renton Assoc, ates� AMENDMENT OF COVERAGE: PART 11 COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT � .ra It is ayreeed that coverage Par; it. '•Pcrsun. Insured", n .utwilded to include as it- usured tilt: person or aty;ini2ation designated belowsubject to Ibe it) iluwi,I'I Inovuaun: t. The insurance with tesPect lR ;urh pla;u,) ur ntquu),Il ur only II)Ulu it) Illicitlyu,jury fir pfe�perty damage arisinu out of and in the rapist) of nIu•,.tt,r)rr; Ii:tUrrut,d tat .0 h person fit o Will any subruntrteh)I thctrant and yr'ncral sul,rrvtston uLsucL cruanization by the named insured operations'by such person or organitatian, 2: The instuance sloes not apply ta. Wilily injury or 7uni,rlty rl:itn:ty,: i,rtsnul out of any at.t or _ omission of such person ill oryanizaliur, 411 any ,:ml,lnyr,' tlu•,rnl, ,JI!nY thaw grt,cral sup'rv,s[fill of operations perfuntred by life named insured ful snrh I'rr:nn u, uryanv,tttun 3. Not with Mandinrl any 01 the fUreuoing, the Ill IIIs Il h.tIII Dly ul Ile: t unit'•,ny %II.[II „m l>,• ,ucrr:a•.ed and shall not exceed the limit slatt:if rr, lilt- derl.u.n,nn; 'If. -each ocruttence err ",yurc!ItU:.' Ut iynatiun of I'caon (I((JnJ.:nt::,uon CONDITIONS --- APPLICABLE TO COVEI'IAGI_ PAfTT 11 I. OTHER INSURANCE. The insurance afforded by this COVERAGE PART is primary insurance, except when stated to apply in excess of or contingent upon the. „ f) :enr;u of other insurance. When this insurance is primary and the Insured has other insurance which is -,f alud to be al'Iplicablc to they los- oil, n excess or contingent basis, the amount of the Company':; "'.11)hly ""tine fill:, PilICy t,lmll not be reciticud by the existence; of such other insurance. When both this insurance and other insurance apply to the loss on the same basis, whether primary, excess or contingent, the Company shall not be linblr; under this COVERAGE PART for a greaten proportion of the loss than that slated in the aipplicahlc contrihullr,n provision below: A. Contribution by Equal Shares. If all of such other valid and cull uctibk! insurance provub::; for c oidribution by equal shares, the Company shall not be liable lot n yrcalC! P101-"nitllJn of :u'.h I(J';:;11 utn VM)ld bu payable it each insurer contributes an equal share until Ulu ! ha)(; of 000 un,nmr t•rlu; 1:. II I0 luv-le! .l applicable fit nit of lial.lility under any one COVERAGE PART or the lull alnu'_nrt ul lilt; It,:,!; ):. 1)'Md, and with respect to any amount of loss not so imid tho rntinti)iiny insuiors thrall conlinttu 1:) conlributt) equal share, of the remaining amount of the loss until each such in,.urla het'; I ); lid il^ lirl iif in lull or tllc full an 1c,urrl of the loss ;is paid. B. Contribution by Limits. If any of such other insurance does not provide forconl16i lliontry c quail :hairs: , tilt Campanyshall net be liable for a greater proportion of such loss thann tltt; al,l>lir,:tl)Ir: lilt fit liability under this COVERAGE PART for such loss bears to file Jowl tl)plir;11JI" lirttlt Of It-NIAlly of all valid mid collectil)le insurance against such loss. SLVE1t.XB3'-r 1TF OF 11MERESTS (CROSS T IABIX.iZY) The term "the insured' is uved severally wid not collectively, and the insurance affcrdeea under the livability coverage applies separately to each insured a; !Anst whom claim La made or suite in brought., but the, incluzion heroin of more than one Insured shall not operate to increase the limito of thm company's liability. iirrirre�,�s.�r�nmssnwmFtmrRn�aa�i t�1 t :'AART'YV - LIABILITY INSURANCE WE WILL PAY. 1. We will pay all sums the insured legally must pay as damages because of bodily injury or property dam- age to which this insurance applies, caused by an accident and resulting from the ownership, main- tenance or use of a covered auto. 2. We have the right and duty to defend any suit asking for these damages. However, we have no duty to defend suits for bodily Injury or property damage not covered by this policy. We may investigate and settle any claim or suit as we consider appropriate. Our payment of the LIABILITY INSURANCE limit ends our duty to defend or settle. 3. WE WILL ALSO PAY, In addition to our limit of liability, we will pay for the insured: I. Up to $250 for cost of bail bonds (including tonds for related traffic law violations) required because a. Before it is moved from the place where it is accept- ed by the insured for movement into or onto the covered auto, or b. After it is moved from the covered auto to the place where it is finally delivered by the insured. 8. Bodily injury or property damage resulting from the moverent of property by a mechanical device (other than a hand truck) not attached to the covered auto. 9. Bodily injury or property damage caused by the dumping. discharge or escape of irritants, pollutants or contaminants. This exclusion does not apply it the discharge is sudden and accidental. 0. WHO IS INSURED. I. lfau are an insured for any covered auto. 2. Anyone else is an insured while using witli Your er- mission a covered auto you own, hire or borrow ex- cept: of an accident we cover. We do not have to furnish a. The owner of a covered auto you hire or borrow these Donds. from one of your employees or a member of his or 2. Premiums on appeal bonds ir any suit we defend. her household. 3. Premiums on bends to release attachments in a b. Someone using a covered auto while he or she is suit we defend but only for bonds up to our limit of working in a business of selling, servicing, repairing liability, or parking autos unless that business is yours. 4. All costs taxed to the insured in a suit we defend. c. Anyone other than your employees, a lessee or bor- 5. Ail interest accruing after the entry of the judgment rower or any of their employees while moving prop - in a suit we defend. Our duty to pay interest ends when we pay or tender our limit of liability. 6. Up to $50 a day for loss of earnings (but not other income) because of attendance at hearings or trials at our request.. 7. Other reasonable expenses incurred at our request. WE WILL NOT COVER -- EXCLUSIONS. This insurance does not apply to: 1. Liability assumed under any contract or agreement. 2. Any obligation for which the insured or his or her in- surer may be held liable under any workers' com- pensation or disability benefits law or under any similar law. 3. Any obligation of the insured to indemnify another for damages resulting from bodily injury to the in- sureds employee. 4. Bodily injury to any fellow employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of his or her employ- ment. 5, Bodily injury to any employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of his or her employment by the insured. However, this exclusion does not ap- ply to bodily, injury to domestic employees not en- titled to workers' compensation benefits. 6, Property damage to property owned or transported by the insured or in the insureds care, custody or control. 7. Bodily injury or propert, damage resulting from the handling of property: CA 00 01 (Ed. 01 80) erty to or from a covered auto. 3. Anyone liable for the conduct of an insured de- scribed above is an insured but only to the extent of that liability. However, the owner or anyone else from whom you hire or borrow a covered auto is an insured only if that auto is a trailer connecter' to a covered auto you own. E. OUR LIMIT 3F LIABILITY. 1. Regardless of the number of covered autos, in- sureds, claims made or vehicles involved in the ac- cident, the most we will pay for all ciarrioges r,tsuit- ing from any one accident is the LIABILITY INSUR- ANCE limit shown in the declarations. 2. All bodily injury and property damage resulting from continuous or repeated exposure to substan- tially the same conditions will be considered as re- sulting from one accident. F. OUT OF STATE EXTENSIONS OF COVERAGE. 1. While a covered auto is away from the state where it is licensed we will: a. Increase this policy's liability limits to rr,eetthose specified by a compulsory or financial responsi- bility law in the jurisdiction where the covered auto is being used. b. Provide the minimum amounts and types of other coverages, such as "No -Fault", required of out of state vehicles by the jurisdiction where the covered auto is being used. 2 Wo will not pay anyone more than once for the same elements of loss because of these extensions,. Page, 2 of 5 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, 1977, 1979 6 f 4; CIGNA Named Insured _ Endorsement TXXKX ISSUED KENNEDY/JENKS/CHILTCN 7/18/86 Policy Symbol Policy Number Policy Period Effective Date of Endorsement AWS C2650892-7 1/1/86-87 7/21/86 Issued By (Name of Insurance Company) AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY Insert the policy number. The remainder of the information is to be completed only when thisendorsement is issued subsequent to the preparation of the policy. WORKERS' COMPENSATION Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement IT IS AGREED THAT THE COMPANY WAIVES ANY RIGHT OF SUBROGATION THAT IT MAY ACQUIRE AGAINST: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I BY REASON OF ANY PAYMENT MADE ON ACCOUNT OF INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH RESULTING THEREFROM, SUSTAINED BY ANY EMPLOYEE OF THE INSURED. THE CHARGE FOR THIS ENDORSEMENT SHALL BE 10% OF THE TOTAL EARNED PREMIUM OF THE POLICY AS .RESPECTS ALL WORK DONE FOR City of Huntington Beach in connection with the following projects: Downtown Water Main(cc-699) Peck Reservoir Repairs(cc-696) Dealey, Renton & Associates DRA/JH 7/18186 byi-�� y �' C,/ Authoriled Agent CC-1E15 Ptd.In US.A p' L I L. Submitted to: Submitted by: Prepared by: Subject: RE UE FOR CITY COUNCIPACTION Honorable Mayor and City Council Charles W. Thomson, City A=rdstra Paul E. Cook, Director Public Works^ DOWNMIN WATER SEM710E LINE; CC-699 Date July 10, 1996 Consistent with Council Policy? Lxl `des ( i New Policy or Statement of issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE - Proposals were requested from qualified civil engineering firms to prepare plans-, speci- fications and cost estimates for the construction of a Downtown water main. R�'CGEENDATION: 1. Approve the recommendation of Kennedy/J'erils/Chilton to prepare plarss, specifications and cost estimate for the construction of a water service line for the Downtown area of the City. 2. Establish a budget of $138,000.00 (this will include Consultant Agreement and misc- ellaneous costs, as required) . 3. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached Consultant Agreement with Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton for a fee not to exceed $125,500.00. AIMLYSIS : With the Downtown Redevelopment in progress, a. necessary conmonent will be to bring added fire protection to the area. The corrective action necessary is to construct a new Downtown service main of a size that would ensure adequate fire flaws. Plans, specifi- cations and cost estimates for these improvements have not been prepared and, therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3.03, "Professional Services" of the Municipal Code, requests were solicited from qualified engineering firms to prepare the construction drawings. Re- quests were received on May 21, 1986. Staff reviewed each of the proposals received and recommends the selection of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton FUNDING SOURCES: Costs of plans and specifications $ 125,500.00 Miscellaneous cost @ 10% 12,500.00 total $ 138,000.00 Revenue Source; Water Funds on deposit in Account W301, to be lent to the Redevelopment Agency and deposited in expenditure Account 812699. ALTEEVATlVE ACTION: Deny approval of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton and direct Staff on how to proceed Hr th these improvements. " ATTACfIMENT5;,.4; 1. Location Map, 2. Consultant Agreement and 3. Consultants Proposal k It PIo 5/8P5EC :BPP •�:ik- 9- 5-i I 10- 5-I I DM9 DMII 16- -11 15- -II 14- 11� DM 18 x 0117 DM 1.5 24-5-112 19-5-II 0 5 II 21- -II 22-5-11 21-5-11 724tl . DM A, DM 21 OM D 4 D 25 DM 27 y 30-5-II 29-5-11 27- -11 2 -5-II 25- -11 /'DM 35 DM 34 33 ON 32 �M 31 DM 30 ' )322-5\`II 33-5-11 ram. f 3Y III 35-5-11 36-5-11 DM 36 i OM 37 �l , (b 38 fflfiw3g ` DM 40 f- 5-6-11 -IL \ 3-6-11 2 -11 1-6-11 6-6-10 5-6 DM4 D AD 1 DM oDM ADD CC 699 9-6-II 0- 11 111 M W12.6-11 7-6-10' 816-IC DM 10 DM DMJ3 DM 7 16M8 14.6-11 13 6-11 18-6-10 //17-6-10 CITY ®1 �M 6 DNfsj14 DM20 DM19 HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 24-6-I 19- -IO DM 29 D w22 scaam a m,,w /r RLSNA CWei9Cl .14 •[fCW MYLWMLM1•D.P!u.YCL wO.. ZONING INDEX MAP LEGEND 19-6-10 -SECTION -TOWNSHIP- RANGE OM 22-DISTRICT MAP 22 t I - ­ -J GARFIELD Lill JjMOSS ON I i i-LU I 4 1 J -1 r ADWS 11 �Jjljw' I 11060MA"Wo WWWWWO, wigs" July 23 1986 Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton 17310 Red Hill, Suite 220 Irvine, CA 92714 Attn: Mr. Lynn 4. Takai chi Vice -President Enclosed is a duly executed copy of the Engineering Services Agreement For Downtown Water Line between the City of Huntington Beach and your firm which was approved by the City Council on July 21, 1986. Please contact Bill Patapoff, Department of Public Works for further information 536-5431. ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, CITY CLERK By: 4wc.,_ a Deputy City Clerk 77 AMW:cb enc, agreement insurance certificate cc Bill Patapoff, Dept. of Public Works lTeleph me: 7546363227 ["M enefJecs/Chilton 17310 Red Hilt Avenue, Suite 220 Irvine, California 92714 714-261:1577 Mr. Les Evans City Engineer City oL Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92.648 Subject: Proposal for Engineering Services Water Service Line for Downtown Redevelopment Dear Mr,. Evans: Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is pleased to submit this proposal to ,.,ro vide engineering services for the design of the City of Huntington Beach's Water Service Line for Downtown Redevelop ment. We greatly appreciate the opportunity to provide our project approach and qualifications for your review. We believe we are especially qualified to perform the services required to complete this project because of the following con- siderations: + Strong Technical Qualifications - For more than 65 years, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has been continuously involved in designing water storage and distribution facilities, conducting alternative investigations and other water system engineering services. We take pride` in maintaining state-of-the-art in all areas of water supply engineering. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has extensive experience in planning, design, maintenance, and con- struction management of water transmission and distribu- tion systems, varying in length, pipe diameter, and con- struction materials. Many of these projects are very similar to the City of Huntington Beach's Water Service Line. The Experience and Qualifications Section of this proposal lists over 30 water systems projects. over 80 percent of the water system projects have included water transmission pipelines. Many of our clients have used our water system engineering services for more than 30 years. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is prepared to provide to the City the slime kind of expertise and service that has enabled us to maintain long and rewarding professional relationships with our clients. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Mr. Les Evans City of Huntington Beach 21 May 1986 Page 2 0 OutstandingProject Team - In selecting our project � g P 7 team, we have assigned engineers with not only a strong theoretical background, but also good practical back- ground in the design, construction and maintenance of water transmission and distribution facilities. Leading this highly experienced team will be Mr. Harold B. Tennant as Project Manager. Mr. Tennant has been proj- ect manager, construction manager, or project engineer on many of the pipeline projects listed in the Experi- ence and Qualifications Section of this proposal. He will be supported by a team of highly qualified and experienced engineers, which can provide superior exper- tise to the design of 'the Water Service Line. The com- bined management and technical expertise of the team will permit them to quickly and accurately discern the most effective and efficient methods to accomplish the repairs and improvements and complete the project tasks in a timely manner. a Ability to Proceed Expeditiously - We are prepared to begin work immediately upon Notice -to -Proceed. We have identified a project schedule which can meet the needs of the City. Our ability to proceed expeditiously, com- bined with our technical capabilities and project under- standing should enable us to complete the design so that It -he project may be bid and construction completed by the summer of 1987. In summary, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton meets or exceeds the selection criteria established in the City's RFP. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has over 65 years of experience in water supply facilities and has assigned a project manager with expertise to complete the project successfully to the satisfaction of the City. We have =s'asented an approach to the project which is based on the suc- :?ful completion of the project in time to meet the City's s/.,,heuule. Our fee is reasonable and in line with the high level of professional service provided by Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is capable of providing the insurance coverage required to conduct business with the City of Huntington Beach. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Mr, Les Evans City of Huntington Beach 21 May 1986 Page 3 We are excited at the opportunity to conduct this valuable work for the City of Huntington Beach. We look forward to meeting with you and discussing our approach and commitment to this project, and subsequently completing this project for you. Very truly yours, v L, wrm Lnv /-r L m w ca /n U T Fr Mn TAT J Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT APPROACH 1.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION 2.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN 3.1 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS 4.1 APPENDICES SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE GENERAL BROCHURE Y F y< f r t_ f a. - - 1+ Kennedy/J6nks/Chilton PROJECT APPROACH This section of our proposal discusses the basis of our project approach, indicates objectives and project understanding we identified during the preparation of this proposal, and presents the specific tasks and schedule necessary to accomplish the work. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND OBJECTIVES As a result of a review of the project requirements and discus- sions with Mr. Les Evans and Mr. Stan Farber of the City, we have formulated our understanding of the project objectives. Based on this work, we understand the objectives to be: a Design of a backbone pipeline to provide up to 8,000 gpm water service through the proposed downtown redevelop- ment area. =' 0 e Construction of the pipeline such ghat service may begin by the summer of 190. Assistance during bidding and during construction to minimize delays which may arise. ® Preparation of record drawings after construction. It is our understanding that the proposed pipeline will be designed as a backbone pipeline only. This is to mean that the pipeline will be designed to provide 8,000 gpm fire flow to the downtown area at pressure required by the Fire Department. The pipeline will connect to existing 30-inch and 42-inch service mains in Yorktown and Golden West, respectively. The pipeline may have fire hydrants and will not have service connections or interties with other parts of the existing water distribution system. The pipeline will have valves at appropriate spacing and up to six turnouts at locations mutually determined by the City and Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton. SCOPE OF WORK. Efficient accomplishment of the project objectives is dependent on z well -organized project approach which is defined by work tasks, The project approach establishes definition of the job, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton provides a simple means of keeping track of project status, and affords a means of documentation and review of project elements as they progress. The following is a suggested project approach outlined by tasks for the design of the Water Service Line for Downtown Redevelop- ment. Task 0 - Project Management Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will provide project management which will include assignment and supervision of task managers, engineering staff and subconsultants, review of engineering work, in-house technical review, planning and monitoring of budget and schedule, coordination with the City and milestone bi-weekly meetings with the City to discuss project issues, progress and status-i PHASE 1 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN The Preliminary Design Phase of the project will establish the technical requirements for the design and construction of the proposed Water Service Line. During this phase, there w-.11 be an evaluation of the existing conditions, soils, utilities, survey and mapping of the pipeline route, selection of materials and location of appurtenant features, procurement of permits, assessment of the need for cathodic protection, and preparation of a design memorandum which will provide guidance for the final design phase. Task 1 - Existing Information Research Available reports and data relative to the City°s water system and proposed project will be reviewed to develop basic back- ground information and to further assess the additional data needed for the project. on -site investigations will be con- ducted throughout the preliminary design phase so that the recommendations accurately reflect actual site conditions. Task 2 - Geotechnical Investigation Geotechnical investigation for the Water Service Line is pro- posed to include 16 borings each about 10 feet deep at approxi- mate quarter mile intervals and at changes in direction along the alignment. Samples will receive field and laboratory analy- sis for classification. Laboratory testing will include mois- ture content, dry density, shear strength, consolidation 1.2 i Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton sand equivalent and compaction. The investigation will yield a written report to be used in the design of the pipeline. The report will include field findings and results of laboratory tests, feasibility analysis, and recommendations for trenching, bedding, and backfill. Task 3 - Mapping of Pipeline Route Plan and profile sheets of the pipeline route will be prepared for use in the final design. Three options are available to the City depending on the level of detail desired by the City. The three options in order of descending cost are: A. Complete mapping .between existing right-of-way lines. This will include 20 plan and pro i�sheets with 3�Ih� 1" = 40' mapping and contour interval of one foot, field survey control for mapping, and complete field edit with inverts. 4. 2.40D 40r 'PA,{"L?? 4400 Go„'fvvrr( r�� B. Planimetric mapping with spot shots every 100 feet (no contours). This will include 20 plan and profile sheets with 1" = 401 mapping, field 2b�ga° control survey for mapping, and field editing to locate fire hydrants. C. Screened photography. This includes 20 plan and pro- file sheets with 1" = 40' screened photography and spot a elevations at 100-foot intervals, field control for ��41 photography, and field editing between curbs plus loca- tion of all fire hydrants. At the beginning of the project, we will meet with the City and provide samples of each alternative mapping procedure. The City *nay then select th:: preferred alternative for its project. Task 4 - Utility Search and Identification Potential interference or obstruction due to underground utili- ties, such as storm drain, sanitary sewers, oil, gas and elec- tric lines will be researched and plotted on the plan and pro- file sheet. Task 5 - Design. Criteria Development Based upon the existing information, discussions with City staff, soils report, survey and utilities research, the a Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton expertise and experience of the Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton project team, a design memorandum will be prepared which provides the basis for detailed final design of the pipeline. The memorandum will present the findings of the preliminary design work includ- ing selection of materials, status of permit procurement, evalu- ation' of the need for cathodic protection, location of tees, crosses, valves, etc., types of valves, etc. Typical details, which are not part of the City's standard details, will be sketched and presented for City review. PHASE 2 - FINAL DESIGN Upon approval of the preliminary design report by the City and the required reviews, the final design will be performed. The design will be in accordance with the established design cri- teria and recommendations established in the preliminary design memorandum. The work under the final design phase is discussed in the following tasks. Task 6 - Detailed Plans and Specifications Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will prepare detailed drawings suitable for bidding and construction of the proposed pipeline. The pro- posed pipeline route (from Huntington at Yorktown, along Lake Street to Third Street to Walnut to Golden West and terminating at Clay Street) is about 22,000 feet and will require about 20 sheets for plan and profile. About four additional sheets may be needed for the cover sheet and details. City standard details will be used as much as possible. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will prepare specifications suitable for bidding and construction of the proposed project. The specifi- cations will be prepared consistent with the Construction Speci- fications Institute standards and from in-house guide specifica- tions. The guide specifications serve as a basis of providing job specific specifications for each design project. General Conditions and Contract/Bid Forms will be provided by either the City or Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton. A Special Conditions section will be provided by Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton. A Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton peer review committee will review the plans and specifications at about the 50 percent, 90 percent and 100 percent levels of preparation. The City will be provided with a review of the documents at the 90 percent stage and the documents will be finalized and 40 copies reproduced for bidding following comments and approval by the City. 1.4 Ke-nnedy/J ernks/Ch i!$on Task 7 - Construction Cost Estimate and Schedule -' An estimate of the project construction cost will be prepared when the design is at its 100 percent completion level. The estimate will include a detailed breakdown to show the estimated costs for the major components of the design. Estimates will be prepared based on the price level projected for the anticipated midpoint of construction. At the end of the detailed design phase of the project, the con- struction schedule prepared for the preliminary design report will be reviewed and revised as required. The revised construc- tion schedule will depict the time frame from the significant items of design and construction work to be performed for the project, as well as the time frame for the overall project com- pletion. PHASE 3 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES As indicated in the City's RFP, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will pro- vide services during the advertisement, bidding, and construc- tion of the pipeline. Task S - Bidding Assistance Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will provide interpretation of the plans and specifications during the bidding phase of construction. Interpretations will be coordinated through the City. Task 9 - Contractor Submittal Review Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will provide shop drawing review (seven submittals, up to two reviews per submittal) of shop drawings provided by the contractor. Task 10 - Meeting Attendance Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will attend field meetings as necessary during the construction of the pipeline. For the purposes of this proposal, meetings are assumed to be at about one per month during the construction period (eight total). 9 0 0 L'J a LA Kennedy/Jenkks/Chllton PHASE 4 - POST CONSTRUCTION Task 11 - Prepare Recor Drawings Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will prepare one set of reproducible record mylar drawings based upon actual construction by the con- tractor and data provided by City. The drawings will be pro- vided to the City within two weeks of the City's final accep- tance of the construction and provision of the data by the City. PROJECT SCHEDULE Personnel can be assigned to the project and work can begin immediately af'_er execution of an agreement. With the present Scope of Work as outlined and the City's indicated desire to complete the project by the summer of 1987, we have prepared a tentative schedule which is presented on the following page With a Notice -to -Proceed in mid -June, the preliminary design activities may be completed about mid -August and final design completed for advertising about mid -October. We estimate that advertising and award of the contract will take about one month, with shop drawing review and procurement of materials to take about 10 weeks. We also estimate that a contractor using two to three crews may complete the work in about three months. The last month will be indicated for testing, disinfection, paving repair and other residual activities. The water line could be in service by 1 June 1987. Please note that the proposed schedule is dependent upon several factors outside our control, such as review of submittals and availability of required data. Unanticipated delays by these outside factors would prolong the schedule accordingly. BUDGET ESTIMATE We propose to perform the services outlined above on an hourly rate basis with a maximum not -to -exceed fee of $116,500 to $128,100, depending on the preferred mapping option. Subconsul- tant fees and reproduction of the bid documents and drawings will provided at cost plus 10 percent. This is estimated to be about $34,400 to 46,000, depending on the preferred survey and mapping option of the City. Included in this section is our hourly rate schedule, which would be used for this project. Additionally, some economy may be realized if both the Peck Reservoir and the Water Service Line designs are conducted by Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton. The estimated fee for Kennedy/Jenks/ Chilton professional services is about $82,100. .pe Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Professional Services $82,100 Rattray & Assocites* - Survey, Mapping and Utility Search A. $35,600 - - B. $26,800 C. $24,000 Harding, Lawson & Associates* - Geotechnical Investigation $ 8,600 Reproduction,, Travel, etc. $ 1,800 TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $116,500 - $128,100 - 3 7i 4 3 4 •.0 A. - Task No. and Description May June July Aug. Sept. o Project management 1 2 3� Preliminary Design 1. Research Existing Information 2: Solis Investigation ( - 3. Survey 4. Utilities Search S. Develop Design Criteria Final Design t3. 'Prepare Plans & Specifications 7. Prepare Cost Estimate and Schedule Construction Advertise and Award Contractor Activity S. Bidding Assistance -9. Shc�i Drawing Review 10. Meeting Attendance Post Construction 11. Prdptare Record 'Drawings. War Notes and Legend: 1. Proposal Due 2. Interview 3. Notice to Proceed ? 4. City Review and Finalization S. Shop Drawing Submittals �@ 6. Materials Delivery installation 7. Pipeline a. Clean Up and Testing X Meeting Event e x I x a a ;a G x Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Water Service Line Downtown Development Proposed Project Schedule '} May 1986 f Y" Sind: ir•�; =�w e_. i „s ']tc q�ky Client/Address: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Contract/Proposal Date: 21 May 1986 Schedule of Charges Personnel Compensation Classification Hourly Rate Drafter .................. .................. $ 37 Designer .................................... 46 Engineer -Scientist, Grade 3 ..................... 52 Engineer -Scientist, Grade 2 ..................... 61 Engineer -Scientist, Grade 1 ..................... 72 Senior Engineer -Scientist 80 Department Head ............................100 Principal and Chief Engineer ....................105 Laboratory Analyst ............................ 50 Laboratory Technician ......................... 40 Typist...................................... 35 Non -Technical* .............................. 33 * Non -technical time will be charged only for preparation of technical reports and similar material and does not apply to roitine administrative -type activities. Direct Expenses Reimbursement for direct expenses, as listed below, incurred in connection with the work, will be actual cost plus ten percent for items such as: r a. Costs of maps, photographs, reproductions, printing, equipment rental, and special supplies related to the work. b. Costs of consultants, soils engineers, surveyors and contractors. C. Costs of rented vehicles, local public transportation and taxis, travel and subsistence. '4 'rr d. � _sts of long-distance telephone and telegraph charges. e. Costs of special fees, insurance, permits, and licenses applicable to the work. I. Computer processing, computation, and proprietary programs purchased for the work. Reimbursement for owned automobiles, except trucks and four-wheel drive vehicles, used in connection with the work will be at the rate of thirty-five cents ($0.35) per mile, The rate for trucks and four-wheel drive vehicles wi'I be twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per day and forty cents ($0.40) per mile. Rate for personnel for legal proceedings or as expert witnesses will be set for each assignment, In-house laboratory analysis charges will be per current rate schedule or special quotation. Excise taxes, if any, will be added as a direct expense. 4 The foregoing Schedule of Charges is incorporated into the agreement for the services of the company. 5 Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton PROJECT ORGANIZATION This section provides information on our proposed project team. It also presents the organizational structure we anticipate using. More detailed information on the project work plan and specific details on relevant experience of the the firm are pro- vided in other sections of this proposal. We believe we have assembled a particularly well qualified proj- ect team. The project will be organized under the basic direc— tion of Messrs. Lynn M. Takaichi, vice President of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton, who will serve as Officer -in -Charge and Mr. Harold B. Tennant, Chief Engineer of the Irvine Office, who will serve as Project Manager. They will work directly with the City and will coordinate all administrative, design, and management functions. We feel that the success of this assignment will be determined by the consultant's knowledge and experience in the design of water storage distribution facilities, the responsiveness of the consultant to the City's staff, the individual qualifications of the key personnel, and the accountability of each key member for the tasks described in the Scope of Work. The proposed organization of key personnel and their task responsibilities are shown on the Project organization Chart. Resumes of each member are also included in this section. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Harold B. Tennant - Project Manager Education: Stanford University, B.S. in Civil Engineering t Registration: Civil Engineer in California and Oregon With more than 30 years of experience, Mr. Tennant is highly qualified in the planning, design, and construction management phases of engineering projects. He has worked in the areas of water distribution and storage, and other utilities. Mr. Tennant has served as project. Manager on the Castaic Lake Water Agency's expansion program. Elements of the program include studies, design, and construction through several µ` expansion phases. Specific projects are modifications to ` Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton sedimentation basins and filters, construction of additional treatment structures, relocation of large -diameter pipelines, and the installation of energy -efficient equipment. Mr. Tennant has served as project manager on numerous waterdis- tribution projects for private and public clients, including the City of Calstoga. He has managed investigations for soils, mapping, right-of-way acquisition, and utilities location work fc-,• several water pipelines in urban areas. He has designed water pipelines using a variety of materials, and has served as Resident Engineer and Construction Manager on many of these projects. He has designed several water storage facilities, including two covered reservoirs utilizing rubber liners. On one of these projects, he was the Resident Engineer during construction and assisted the owner in developing a repair and maintenance program. SU$CONSULTANTS Rattray & Associates - Surveying Rattray & Associates is a surveying and mapping firm which is currently registered in five states and provides service throughout the United States and Saudi Arabia. Rattray and Associates operates as a closed corporation with a sound earning rate of over one million dollars annually. The firm has a firm success rate for completion of projects on -time. Field experi- ence encompasses all phases of surveying and mapping for storm drainage systems and water and sewer lines. Their relevant experience includes work on the Adams Storm Drain Project for the Los Angeles County Flood Control. District in the City of Los Angeles; storm drain channels for a storm water pump station for the Coachella. Valley Water District; water and sewer lines for the County of Orange; water lines for the Cities of Escondido and San Diego; and storm drain channels for the County of Orange. Harding Lawson Associates - Geoter_hnical Harding Lawson Associates '(BLA) was established in 1957 in northern California and has grown to a firm of 400 employees y; with 12 offices in the weEtern United States. The HLA Tustin a Kennedy/Jenks/ChIiton officewas established in 1978, and offers the firm's full range of consulting services including: geotechnical engineering, engineering geology, groundwater engineering and waste manage- ment services. TECHNICAL, STAFF This project team will be supported by our multidisciplined staff of over 350 with the experience and technical resources to perform the project in a complete and expeditious manner. Sup- port staff include specialists in the areas of water treatment,, public health, and civil, environmental, sanitary, structural, mechanical, chemical, electrical, instrumentation and corrosion go engineering. We also maintain a complete water quality and environmental laboratory. Our laboratory staff has performed water sampling, analysis, and pilot and bench scale testing for the firm and for outside clients and for more than 40 years. �(enraedyf�iees�ss/C87ifgo F@�OLQ B o TENANT Senior Civil Engineer Education: Experience: Stanford University, BS Mr. Tennant has over 30 years' experience in the plan - in Civil Engineering ning, design, a-nd construe -ion management phases of engineering projects. He has worked in the areas of water and wastewater treatment, water distribution and Registration: storage, wastewater collection, storm drainage and Civil Engineer in other utilities. California and Oregon He has been involved with several water transmission Plemberships: and distribution projects, most of then in congested urban areas. Recent designs include a 12-mile aque- ASCE duct serving the City of Calistoga and the $22 million SAME reclamation project being constructed by the City of Modesto. He has extensive experience in the design and con- struction of water storage facilities, including two semi -buried covered reservoirs and several ground level steel tanks. Clients include Santa Clara Valley Water District, Kern County Water Agency, and the City of Coachella. Mr. Tennant planned and design utility projects on three University of California campuses (Berkeley, Davis, and Santa Cruz). His assignments included water, sewer, storm drainage, telephone and electric ducts, manholes, service and construction roads, and parking facilities. Previous work included the management of the construc- tion phases of the East Bay Dischargers Authority (EBDA) Regional Wastewater Management Program. The $140 million project includes an administration, build- ing, a data acquisition center, pump stations, over 30 miles of 33" to 96" diameter outfall force main and 96" diameter outfall to San Francisco Bay. Construc- tion was divided into sixteen separate contracts; Mr. Tennant was construction manager for eleven of the sixteen. During the planning stage of the EBDA project, Mr. Tennant managed surveys, soils investigations,. utili- ties coordination, alignment definition, and right-of- way acquisition. He was the project engineer on the design of all of the EBDA force main, coordinating the designs with over 40 public agencieso :; Kennedy/Jenks/Chiltcan FREO LEE HINKER Civil and Mechanical Engineer Education: Experience: Stanford University, MS Mr. Hinker is experienced in the application of both in Civil/Environmental civil and mechanical engineering principles to the Engineering problems of planning, design, and construction manage- ment of pumping stations, water and wastewater treat - California State ment plants, pipelines, and energy management tech - University, Long nology. His project responsibilities have involved Beach, BS in Civil biogas cogeneration systems as well as traditional Engineering, water and wastewater treatment and pumping. Mr. Hinker has served as project manager or engineer Registration: on several energy management projects. At the Irvine Civil Engineer in Ranch Water District, a comprehensive energy manage - California and Nevada ment plan was prepared which cut the wastewater treat- ment plants power cost by over 25 percent at minimal Mechanical Engineer in capital cost. At the City of Thousand Oaks, an energy Alaska, California, and management plan included cogeneration, conservation, Nevada and micro -hydropower elements. He has served as project engineer or project manager Memberships: of 17 wastewater collection, pumping, or treatment ASCE facilities. He was resident manager of the Metro AWWA Manila Sewerage Project, managing a multi -national CWPCA staff of 65 engineers and technical personnel to com- WPCF plete the master plan for approximately $1.4 billion AAEE of public works and to complete the design of the first stage, $200 million construction program. Pipeline experience includes water pipelines up to 120 inches in diameter and wastewater pipelines to 72 inches in diameter. He has been project manager of designs for over 70 miles of sanitary and storm sewers, including a 17-mile project in northern California and over 50 miles of sewer in Manila. Reservoir experience includes design of mechanical appurtenances, piping, and control systems for steel and concrete reservoirs. His experience also includes inspection of buried concrete reservoirs for deterior- ation and structural damage. Pump station design experience includes potable water, stormwater, wastewater, and seawater. Mr. Hinker was project engineer for a 450,000 gpm brackish water pumping station in Panama and a 90,000 gpm stormwater pumping station in Orange County, California as well as for numerous water and wastewater pumping sta- tions. Gas engine driven pump stations include a uotable water pumping station for the City of fountain ,alley, California. I(eneaeciy/.Jenks/Ch66ton JOSEPN G. GILLICK Civil Engineer Education: Experience: University of Santa Mr. Gillick's experience includes planning, design, Clara, BS in Civil Engi- and construction supervision of water projects. Since veering joining Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton, Mr. Gillick has parti- cipated in the design of a number of water treatment plants and associated pump stations and transmission Registration: pipelines. Most recent of these projects is the expan- Civii Engineer in sion of the. Earl Schmidt Filtration Plant for the California Castaic Lake Water Agency, Water Treatment Operator For the Kern County Water Agency's 25 mgd ID4 Water in California Purification Plant, his responsibilities included the MR design of two treated water transmission pipelines Water Distribution Opera- totalling approximately nine miles. He also served as for in California resident engineer during construction. Subsequent projects involving the Agency include the ID 4 Water Purification Plant Expansion, Olcese-ID 4 Water Supply Memberships: Study, Oswell Regulating Facility, and Cross -Valley ASCE Hydro Potential Study. AWWA CWPCA Mr. Gillick was resident engineer during construction WPCF of an 18 mg water reservoir in the San Francisco Bay Area. He was responsible for the construction manage - no and inspection during the site preparation, exca- vation, construction, testing, and disinfection phases of the project. Other water -related projects undertaken by Mr. Gillick include the design, study, and operational optimiza- tion of domestic water sy5—tems. These projects involved application of sub -potable water well devel- opment and distribution conjunctive use well system planning and energy optimization of well water and treatment plant production systems. Prior to joining Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton, Mr. Gillick was employed by the Alameda County Water District, where his other duties included design and administra- ti,on of water -related projects, as well as construc- tion management. During four years in the U.S„ ;Navy Civil Engineer Corps, he served as Officer in Charge of Construction and in various other public works and construction positions. Before joining the Navy, he was an E.ssis- tant engineer with the City of Pasadena Water Depart- ment and a field engineer with a soils consultant. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Pe SH(Ff�REN Civil Engineer Education: Experience: California State Univer- Since joining Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton in 1971, Mr. sity, San Jose, BS in Shogren has worked on many of our firm's water and Civil Engineering wastewater projects. He is particularly experienced in pipeline design and has prepared plans and specifica- tions for force mains, pipeline river crossings, and Registration: major plant system piping. In addition, he has pro - Civil Engineer in vided construction inspection services for treatment California plants, transmission systems, pump stations, and storage tanks. Memberships: Recently, Mr. Shogren completed design of a 13-1/2- ASCE mile transmission pipeline for the City of Calistoga. AWWA The pipeline transports water from the North Bay Aque- WPCF duct to the City. Mr. Shogren's design included several pipeline crossings of rivers and creeks with use of rock -filled gabions for errosion control. For the Santa Clara Valley Water District, Mr. Shogren designed majorplant system piping for the 20 mgd (40 mgd peak capacity) Penitencia Water Treatment Plant. As part of his responsibilities, he chose the routes for the pipe network and prepared a profile of the system. Mr. Shogren performed similar duties for the Kern County Water Agency's ID 4 Water Purification Plant. During this project, he designed much of the plant's major system piping and 10 miles of water main (16" to 33" in diameter), including a pipeline river crossing and jacked casing crossings for several highways and train tracks. He also contributed to the design of an associated pump station and two steel storage tanks. In addition, Mr. Shogren served as construction inspector for these facilities and assisted in the inspection of the 25 mgd (38 mgd peak capacity) treat- ment plant. He also designed the entire 24-mile land portion of a 31-mile wastewater conveyance system for the East Bay Dischargers Authority Water Quality Management Pro- gram. The reinforced concrete force main (33" to 96" in diameter) is designed to provide for reversible an flow in order to accommodate future reclamation. The design included several large river and flood control channel crossings and several jacked casing crossings of streets, railroad tracks, and highways. He was resident engineer for the construction of a seven -mile segment (33" diameter) of the system's 12-1/2-mile twin force main with two large valvse boxes and surge tower, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton W. FRANKLIN HELMICK Civil Engineer Education: Experience: California State Univer- Mr. Helmick's primary responsibilities at Kennedy/ sity, Chico B.S. in Civil Jenks/Chilton are as a project engineer or construc- Engineering tion inspector for civil/site development studies and design. His involvement includes commercial, residen- tial, institutional, and other site developments. Registration: Specific design work includes storm drainage facili- Civil Engineer in ties, street and roadway alignment, paving and earth- Califurnia work studies and design, water system design and repair, and sewage pump station design. Pleinberships: Recent experience in design includes: ASCE a Project engineer responsible for the design of the $2.3 million Mammoth Scenic Loop Road. Design of Awards: this six -mile road included route reconnaissance, Project Engineer - initial and final route location, computer -assisted Certificate of Merit and road design, colt estimations, storm drainage Cash Award for Out- facility design, and construction management. This standing Performance - fast -track project was completed eight months after 1980 and 1983 from USDA conception. Forest Service a Project engineer in charge of the design and con- struction of two back -country fish barriers on the FM South Fork Kern River. As project engineer on these two rock -filled gabion check dams, he was responsible for reconnaissance, feasibility analy- sis, structural analysis and design, construction management supervision, and cost accounting. a Project engineer of the design of a photovoltaic powered water system for the McGee Creek Camp- ground, California. This project involved struc- tural design of a tower to support photovoltaic panels, well pump sizing and control, water system design including a new control system and hookup 4 storage tank and existing facilities. Other projects Mr. Helmick was in charge of include: o Rock Creek Road and Bridges: two reinforced con- crete bridges, one mile of road reconstruction including aggregate base and AC pavement. ® Oak Creek Campground: water and sanitation system including comfort stations with holding tanks, a water system with stream intake, storage tank, and chlorination system. ® North Lake Road and Bridge: prestressed concrete bridge, two miles of road reconstruction, including storm drainage facilities, aggregate base and AC pavement. DARRELL R. DUPUY' Chief Cost Estimator Education: Experience: Bakersfield College Mr. DuPuy, our Chief Cost Estimator, has over 25 years' experience in engineered construction with par - University of Utah titular expertise in water and wastewater treatment, distribution, and transmission systems. University of California, Santa Barbara During our firm's recent $30 million utility improve- ments project for the U.S. Navy at Pearl Harbor, Mr. DuPuy prepared computerized "nuts and bolts" cost estimates and assisted the Navy during negotiations with the selected construction contractor. His experience with Kennedy/Jenks Engineers also includes responsibility for the generating of cost estimates and negotiating of contract change orders on a $140 million regional wastewater management program for the East Bay Dischargers Authority. The entire length of the land portion of the system (more than 20 miles) is designed to accommodate potential wastewater reclamation. Other Kennedy/Jenks experience includes inspection services during construction of a major water treat- ment plant, associated water transmission pipelines, and pump stations for the Kern County Water Agency. While employed by a major pipeline construction com- pany, he participated in the construction of both the California Aqueduct and the second San Diego Aqueduct, including the preconsolidation of soils for the California Aqueduct i n Kern County. For the same con- tractor, Mr. DuPuy estimated costs and was project manager on the construction of water, sewer, and gas lines as well as storm drainage and other utilities for an entirely new community. Kenne&,P J on ks/C hi [ton JOB% H. ZIEGLER Senior Civil Engineer Education: Experience: Washington State Mr. Ziegler brings more than 20 years of civil engi- University, BS in Civil neering experience to Kennpdy/Jenks/Chilton, primarily Engineering in the area of infrastructure/site development studies and design. His involvement has included project management as well as planning and design responsi.- Registration: bilities for feasibility studies and plan preparation Civil Engineer in for commercial, industrial, residential, military and California and Arizona institutional projects rangi-ng in size from less than one acre to more than 4,000 acres. Specific design tasks have included storm water pump stations, onsite Memberships: and offsite grading, drainage, utilities, roads and ASCE parking areas. A partial list of these projects is as Tau Beta Pi follows: s Previously worked for the City of Los Angeles, Public Works Department during which time he served as a member of a special design group. Work included design of pump stations with capacities up to 35,000 gpm and associated force mains. o Conceptual and final design for a more than $2-million project at the Twentynine Palms Marine Base to repair and/or replace existing roads anu utilities. Civil site grading and utilities design for the Toyota Motor Sales, USA headquarters complex in Torrance, CA, which consisted of three office buildings on a 15--acre site. e Design of the site work for three major parking structures at Los Angeles International Airport. a Design of one -mile section of major highway in con- junction with the Naval Regional Medical Center at San Diego, CA, including a large box culvert storm drain and desilting basin, and 1,500 lineal feet of sanitary sewer. 'i a Design for onsite and offsite improvements for High Energy Glass Laser Facility at Los Alamos Scien- tific Laboratory. x _ t: 1 t i, YET 1 MOA 00 Ni 4 r' f • t � i , i Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN In our approach to every project, we believe that overall organization and team member responsibility are crucial to facilitating efficient exchange of information and assuring con- sultant client accountability. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is organ- ized to assure that each project meets both budget and sched- ule. A rigorously controlled system of checks and balances enables us to provide high quality engineer4-ag services. PROJECT MANAGEMENT At Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton, our philosophy is that the rapport and communication between our client and the project manager is as important as the technical quality of our engineering. Our organizational structure provides the checks and balances neces- sary to assure not only high quality engineering services but also adherence to time schedules and budgets. Under our project management system, all members of a project team agree to a budget and schedule at the beginning of the pro- ject. Actual performance is compared to planned performance at frequent intervals. in this way, both the project manager and client stay informed regarding project cost and schedule. MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION FThe project will be directed by Mr. Lynn M. Takaichi, vice President of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton. He will be assigned Officer -in -Charge and will be responsible for negotiations, con- tractual matters, and coordination with the City. The Project Manager will be Mr. Harold B. Tennant, who will be responsible for the scheduling, preparation of documents, and coordination of technica.l staff and subconsultants. PROJECT 'TEAM The principal resource of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is the experi- ence and expertise of its staff. The personnel of Kennedy/ Jenks/Chilton have a wide variety of experience in the fields of environmental engineering, comprehensive management and planning programs and financial analyses. Our staff includes all or the technical disciplines necessary to provide the client with the consulting services required for the proposed design of the Water Service Line for Downtown Redevelopment. Our Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN In our approach to every project, we believe that overall organization and team member responsibility are crucial to facilitating efficient exchange of information and assuring con- sultant client accountability. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is organ- ized to assure that each project meets both budget and sched- ule. A rigorously controlled system of checks and balances enables us co provide high ;duality engineering services. PROJECT MANAGEMENT At Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton, our philosophy is that the rapport and communication between our client and the project manager is as important as the technical quality of our engineering Our organizational structure provides the checks and balances neces- sary to assure not only high quality engineering services but also adherence to time schedules and budgets. Under_ our project management system, all members of a project team agree to a budget and schedule at the beginning of the pro- ject. Actual performance is compared to planned performance at frequent intervals. In this way, both the project manager and client stay informed regarding project cost and schedule. MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION The project will be directed by Mr. Lynn M. Takaichi, Vice President of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton. He will be assigned Officer -in -Charge and will be responsible for negotiations, con- tractual matters, and coordination with the City. The Project Manager will be Mr. Harold B. Tennant, who will be responsible for the scheduling, preparation of documents, and coordination of technical staff and subconsultants. PROJECT TEAM The principal resource of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is the experi- ence and expertise. of its staff. The personnel of Kennedy/ Jenks/Chilton have a wide variety of experience in the fields of environmental engineering, comprehensive management and planning programs and financial analyses. Our staff includes all of the technical disciplines necessary to provide the client with the consulting services required for the proposed design of the Water Service Line for Downtown Redevelopment. our 3,1 I F_11�i` Kennedy/Jenks;/Chilton multidisciplinary capability allows us to provide better coordi- nation on our projects and adequately consider all aspects of the problem. RECORD OF PERFORMANCE - COST CONTROL AND TIME SCHEDULE ;Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has maintained outstanding client rela- tionships. A number of our clients have utilized our services for more than forty years. One measure of the effectiveness of our performance is the com- pleteness of our plans and specifications. This is validated by our record of low construction change orders on major projects. Over the last twenty years, the change order extras on major projects, exclusive of changes in the scope of work, have aver- aged approximately one percent. we are very proud of this record and feel that it is indicative of our performance on studies as well as on design assignments. We are proud of our ability to meet schedules for work assign- ments. To aid us in maintaining an established timetable, a work schedule with milestone control points will be set up as an initial phase for the project. This will provide the necessary budget, time, and technical control needed to move the project through the many review and coordination requirements. COORDINATION WITH THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Kerinedy/Jenks/Chilton believes that close coordination with the City of Huntington Beach during all phases of the project is an essential function of project mane.'Jement. Responsibility for coordination and developing a cl...se working relationship is shared by both the client and the consultant; however, the pri- mary responsibility for maintaining this mutual trust must lie with the consultant. This working relationship serves the dual purpose of avoiding unnecessary waste of valuable study and design time and assuring the client that the product is the most cost-effective effort achievable. We propose to develop a good working relationship with the City by scheduling regular review conferences and by providing management, technical and cost status reporting. These procedures will insure an excellent communication flow. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has both the technical capabilities and specific project experience required to provide engineering services for the design of the Downtown Water Service Line. The key points which. we wish to make about our experience area Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has a proven track record of engi- neering performance since 1917. is We have successfully completed over 3,500_projects, a significant number of which have been in the planning, preliminary design, final design and construction man- agement of water transmission and distribution systems. WATER TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has designed a wide range of water trans- mission and distribution systems, varying in length, pipe diame- ter, and construction materials. Often, these systems are analyzed as part of a water system master plan for a new or existing system. Many of these facilities have been designed in conjunction with treatment, storage, and pumping systems. Whether designing new facilities or investigating existing ones, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton offers clients sound technological experi- ence and a variety of in-house capabilities. Hvdraulic Analvsis Utilization of computer analysis of existing distribution sys- tems rapidly solves complex hydraulic and potential surge prob- lems. On many recent projects, we have used computer -ass -steel analysis as a tool to identify pipe network needs and demo- graphic changes which greatly affect fire flow demands. The hydraulic network analysis program KENTUCK is used by Kennedy/ Jenks/Chilton. This program, originally written by Professor Don J. Wood at the University of Kentucky, is judged to be one of the best tools- available today for the evaluation of water systems hydraulic performance. We have modified the program for improved output readibility and user friendliness and increased capacity. Kennedy/Jenks/Chffton The hydrauiic network analysis program KENTUCK is available for use on or in --house microcomputers (IMB PC) as well as others. such as the Apple II ad TRS 80. In addition, the original pro- gram is a public domain program which can be obtained for a nominal fee from the University of Kentucky. Thus the computer program, input data and instructions can be turned over to the client after project completion, for later updates. Special Considerations Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has extensive experience in the investiga- tion and design of internal and external corrosion protection measures for pipelines, tanks, and process equipment. Over the years, we have solved corrosion problems for a wide variety of municipal, industrial, and military clients. Because we have our own laboratory .division, we are able to offer clients an integrated package of laboratory and engineering services related to corrosion control. We have designed telemetry systems to optimize control and moni- tor operations of water transmission/distribution systems. Our instrumentation and control specialists have designed ,both digi- tal and analog telemetry systems, utilizing radio signals or leased or dedicated lines. Our goal is to provide cost-effec- tive telemetry systems that meet both immediate and long-term operational requirements. Fds s FA REPRESENTATIVE WATER TRANSMISSION PROJECTS � Water Treatment, Pumpinc,, and Distribution System City of Tracy, California Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton designed a water treatment, pumping, and distribution project for the City. The first phase involved con- struction of 21,000 feet of 36-inch-diameter pipeline and a 5 mgd average (10 mgd peak) water treatment plant. Construction of the pipeline and 'treatment plant was recently completed under Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton' supervision. Completion of this phase was timed to obtain funds from the Economic Development Agency's Drought Relief Program. These major additions to the City's water system necessitated the preparation of a master plan for the City's existing water sys- tem. As part of this study, we modified an existing computer program to set up various design configurations, simulating demands, flow contingencies, and calculating pressure throughout the system. Input to the program included present and projected futur6 use demands, together with demand locations throughout the City and proposed extensions to the City. To accommodate anticipated growth in an area not served by the present water system, we completed a master plan: for a ;higher elevation zone which will be an addition to the existing distri- bution system. As a result of these studies, we prepared a five-year capital improvement program for the City's water distribution system. The program included pipelines, improvement to wells, and chlori- nation facilities. We also provide routine engineering services to the City for implementation of their water distribution master plan, and also assist in the solution of wager system operational problems. Most recently, these services have included: examination of cast iron pipe failures within the distribution system, detailed checking of plans for a proposed booster pump station in an industrial development, and assi,mance in evaluating the use of zinc orthophosphate as a substitute for sodium hydroxide in con- trolling pH in the water distribution system. 4.3 i Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Water Supply Facilities Rehabilitation Vista Irrigation District, California Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton conducted a feasibility study, prepared design documents and supervised construction for the rehabilita- tion of a 50-year-old flume and canal system. Special attention was given to achieving the rehabilitation work with a minimum amount of system down time. This was achieved and further improvement of aeismic restraint, was also accomplished. On -site and Off -Site utilities California State Prison - Amador County California Department of Corrections Prior to final design, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton recently completed an evaluation of alternatives for expanding the City of Ione's water supply to accommodate the new 1700 cell (3200 population) State Prison near the City. We identified water supply sources, - projected water demands, conducted hydraulic analyses and identi- fied treatment options. All of the alternatives evaluated included a raw water supply pipeline to supplement the Ione Canal, a new or expanded water treatment plant at one of four locations, a new booster pump station at one of two locations, a new water storage tank and new treated water pipelines. As part of the alternative analysis, preliminary design parameters and cost estimates were developed. After completion of the aternative analysis, preliminary design of both on -site and off -site utilities was begun. On -site utili- ties included water sewer, storm drainage, natural gas and elec- trical systems. Water Treatment and Distribution Facilities Santa Clara Valley Water District Sari Jose, California This agency is a major water supplier with responsbili_ty for area -wide service to other purveyors. Over a period from 1962 through 1980, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has served this client with a series of planning reports, design concept reports and design for construction of area -wide facilities. The basic planning report provided demand forecasts by area and developed transmission and treatment concepts to meet these requirements. Subsequent reports developed design concepts and cost estimates for storage, transmission mains, pumping stations, treatment facilities, and 4.4 Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton telemetered supervisory control to implement this basic plan. Design and supervision of construction of reservoirs, pumping stations, and treatment plants have been completedby Kennedy/ Jenks/Chilton. Water Supply Facility City of Calistoga, California Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has provided engineering services for the City's water supply facilities for over 30 years. Our assign- ments have included investigations of feasible water supply sources and the design and construction supervision of transmis- sion lines and distribution system expansions. As a result of our recent evaluation of alternative water supply , sources, we are designing a 15-mile water transmission main to bring North Bay Aqueduct Water to the City.. Our responsibilities for the project include interfacing with Farmer's Home Adminis- tration, the agency providing funds f,=x- this project. ID4 Water Purification Plant and;._ .Appurtenant Facilities Kern County Water Agency Ankerrfi'eld_ CalifnrmA Pipelines ranging from 16 to 48 inches in diameter were needed to transport water to the new water treatment plant from the Cross Valley Canal and to deliver treated water to the Greater Bakers- field distribution system. The total length of cement -lines, steel -coated pipe exceeds 51,000 feet. Also included were the Oswell Pump Station, with a capacity of 2-1/2 mgd, and 50,000 and 500,000 gallon steel holding tanks. Supply System Analysis and Design Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District Eureka, Cal fornia Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton performed a detailed analysis of the District's water supply and distribution system. Engineering studies included investigations using portable corrosion test equipment and design of cathodic protection. Following these analyses, the firm designed additions and modifications to the District's high capacity groundwater infiltration wells. Design of a 20-mile, transmission pipeline, a 60 mgd pumping station, and storage reservoirs were also a part of the project. i Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Water '.Transmission Design Santa Clara County Flood Control and Water District This project included the design of 6,000 feet of 24-inch rein forced concrete pipeline. Water Transmission and Distribution_SXstems Obras Sanitarias de la Nacion, Ar entina Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton performe work on several transmission and distribution systems in Argentia including: 3uenos Aires - 20 miles of 4 mtr. concrete tunnel Cordova - 20 miles of concrete pipeline up to 1 mtr. diameter Mendoza 7 miles of 1.1 mtr. concrete pipeline Jujuy - 3 miles of 0.7 mtr. concrete pipeline Tucuman - 15 miles of 1.5 mtr. concrete pipeline Water Transmission and Distribution System Municipality of Asuncion, Paraguay Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton designed five miles of 30-inch concrete and, cast iron pipeline for this project. Water Transmission and Distribution System S hi anoukville, Cambodia 6 miles of 18-inch line steel pipeline. i Water Transmission and Distribution System q City of Eureka, California 30 miles of 36-inch wood stave and concrete cylinder pipeline. Water Transmission and Distribution System City of Phoenix, Arizona Verdi River Aqueduct, 35 miles of 60-inch concrete pipeline. Water Quality Management Program Easy Bay Discharges Authority (EBDA) San Lorenzo, California The EBDA project is one of the largest wastewater quality manage- ment programs in California. Although not a water supply proj- ect, its description is included because it indicates our compe- tence in managing a large, complex water conveyance project. 4.6 City of Celist®ga Water Transmission Pipeline How does a small, rural community with only one City Engineer oversee a $5 million water transmission project that re- quires interfacing with the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) and negotiating rights -of -way with local property owners? For the City of Calistoga, the answer was to ask Kennedyr'JenKs Engineers, its rongtime engineering consultant, not only to plan and design a new 14-mile potable water transmission system and pump station, but also to undertake the project management. The pipeline transports Calistoga's anrr!al allotment of 500 acre feet of North Bay Aqueduct (NBA) water to the City. The project is funded by a low interest loan from the FmHA, which purchased a City of Calistoga Revenue Bond upon comple- tion of the pipeline. Highlights: Project management of 14-mile potable water transmission pipeline Assistance securing low interest, FmHA loan and selling $5 million interim financing notes Because of the complex fine• sing, management of the project posed some interesting challenges. To obtain FmHA approval, the City hr;d to complete a number of extensive application forms as well as submit a preliminary engineering report that outlined project parameters and estimated construction costs. Ken- nedy/Jenks Engineers prepared the report and cost estimates and took responsibility for submitting the loan ap- plication. As part of this submittal, our Rates and Financial Services Division conducted a rate study to establish the water rates the City would need to repay the Joan. The City also had to sell interim financ- ing notes to construct the pipeline, since FmHA funds would not become available until project completion. Hs part of our Kennedy/Jenks Engineers Rights -of -way negotlaaons with major wineries and Southern Pacific Railroad Construction management servings and resident engineering management responsibilities, we helped the City's f�nancfal consultant and bond counsel wirh the sale of these notes. The $5 million obtained from the sale was used to make monthly progress payments during construction. To ensure that the City received the highest possible rate of return on the money remaining after each progress payment, we worked with the contractor to develop an estimated progress pay- ment schedule. This schedule was then given to four financial institutions, which bid on the right to invest the City's capital. Through these measures, Calistooa was able both to raise the funds needed for construction and receive a high interest rate. Another challenging aspect of the project management was the negotiation of the rights -of -way. Workirg with two City Coun- cil members and the City Attorney, we negotiated easement agreements with thirteen different property owners, among them Sterlirg Vineyards, Christian Brothers Winery, and Southern Pacific Railroad. Negotiations were complicated by the fact that some of the owners were in the process of purchasing the aoan- cloned right-of-way from Southern Pacific and had already planted vineyards on the property. Kennedy/Jenks Engineers also provided i- nstruction management and resident engineering services. i Representative Projects ' _Kennedy/Jenks%Ch1eton Distribution and Transmission Facilities Approximate Client Length of Pipeline. Size -/Type of Pipe Santa Clara Valley Water District, CA 1 mile 24 in./Reinforced concrete City of Elko,NV 2 miles 18 in./Cast iron 815 Chester Public Utility District, CA _3 mi!-_ „_ 14 in./Asbestos-cement U.S. National Park Service — Grand Canyon 3 miles_ 8 in./Aluminum San Joaquin County, CA 3 miles u_- 10 in./AWWA C-900 PVC City 9of Calisto a, CA _ 3 miles 8 in./Asbestos-cement, Steel (polyetheline lining) U.S. Army'— Fort Ord, CA — 4 miles — 20 in./Concrete cylinder 4 City of Tracy, CA, - - 4 miles 36 in./Steel (cement lined & cement coated) 24 in. & 27 in./Vitrified clay City of Pleasanton, CA 4 miles 18 in./Steel (cement lined & coated) l Municipality of Asu9cion, Paraguay 5 miles 30 in./Concrete & cast iron `. Coastside County Water District, CA 5 miles 24 in./Concrete cylinder n I Sihanoukville, . Cambodia 6 miles 18 in./Steel (lined) Paradise Irrigation r District, CA „, J0 miles _ 24 in./Concrete cylinder Pago Pago, American Samoa 10 miles, 12 in./Asbestos-cement US. Navy -Saipan 10 miles 24 in./Asbestos-cement Kenn County Water Agency, CA 10 miles '16.48 in./Cement lined, steel coated ' North Marin County Water District, CA - 10 miles _ 24 in./Concrete cylinder Humboldt Bay Municipal 27 in., &15 in./Steel lined) Water District, CA 20 miles 42 in., (cement mortar City of Eureka, CA 30 miles 36 in,/Wood stave & concrete cylinder Utility Lctal Improvement 6 in.-24 in./PVC, IS 'n.-66 inJReinforced concrete District 73.1, Pierce County, WA 190 miles 6 ft.-9 ft./Castrin-plac; concrete J Ell Representative Projects — Page 1 Proiect/Glient Project Description ` Yosemite NPS — Water System Rehabiiitaticn Preparation of contract documents for construction of new water transmis- ROMA Architects sion and distribution pipelines, including creek crossings, new 2.5 mg storage (on -going project) tank, new well and pump stations with standby power, and a new super- viso+y control system. y Oswell Regulating Facility Development of seven preliminary design alternatives with capacities rang - Kern County Water Agency ing to 28 mg. Design of first -stage 6.7 mg facility, standby diesel engine (ors -going project) generator system, and chlorination facilities. Provisions for additional capacity. Marine World/Africa USA Relocation Planning, design, and construction support for on -site and off -site utilities Chin & Hensolt Engineers (water, electrical, and natural gas systems). Facilities include potable water, (on -going project) raw water, irrigation water, fire enter, and washdown water systems: Au lone Water Supply and Treatment Project Evaluation of alternatives for doubling the treated water supply to the City i Anshen + Allen of tone to accommodate a new 1200•bed prison. Included a detailed in - i (on -going protect) vestigation of nec2:sary modifications required at water treatment plants. Also .included a computer analysis of the City's water distribuson system. Hetch Hotchy Pipeline No. 4 Altematives Study Identification and evaluation of base case and eight alternatives to adding' g, City and County of San Francisco a fourth, 4-6-mile pipeline to Hetch Hetchy System. Alternatives evatuatfld (on -going project) on basis of water quality and environmental considerations institutional issues: and operational, economic and engineering feasibility. 6eltz WTP Modifications Alternatives evaluation, report, design, and construction project manage - City of Santa Cruz, CA ment of a water treatment plant expansionlrehabilitation project 0aiwing (an -going project) of plant capacity from 1.5 to 3.0 mgd. Schmitz WTP interim Improvements Project Preliminary design, design, and construction inspection of filtration plant Castaic Lake Water Agency expansion, including pretreatment, filtration, disinfection, and THM control. (on -going project) Northside Storm Drainage r4cilities Evaluation of previous hydrologic and hydraulic analyses of existing storm : City of Alameda, GA drainage system. Design of over 6000 feet of relief storm drains ranging to (on -going project) diameter from 42 to 66 inches, and of 4a5 mgd stormwater pump station and outfall. Pipeline route crosses a major highway which must be open cut Water System Master Plan Preparation of a master plan for the City's raw water supply and distribution City of Vallejo, CA system which will effectively serve as a bas'.c +,'anning guideline for meeting { (on -going project) present and future needs within the curren ; projected service area for , the next five to ten years. Water System Master Plan Preparation of a master plan for a recently acquired water system. The plan City of Willits, CA will be utilized to 1) satisfy State of Californiaconcerrts regarding waMrgt:afi & (on -going project) :4quantity requ;rements, 2) develop ultimate service area requirements, . 31 develop a preliminary capital improvement program, and 4) provide the ; basis for a FmHA funding application. 6 #7 S Facilities 0 0 c m � m 0 E a r o. 3 Kennec. y Jenks Engineer". Services e 0 t: t° a Key Features U a. co 1 ® 0 0 O ® 0 ® ®a O 0 ® 0 0 a 0 0 ® ® 0 O • • W a ® 0 ID Completed or tlnrierway 0 Future Coordination with local, county, state and federal agencies. Structural elements to accommodate 100-year flood conditions. Features to mitigate impacts on park activities. Environmental acceptibility of new ft?alities in se, sitive and protected areas. Aesthetics including 3-tone paint scheme and special landscaping. Facilit will operate in parallel with existing system and also be capable of being solated from the system. Coordination with local agencies and utilifiep. Fast•tiack construction. Seismic considerations. Evaluation of social and environmental issues. Coordination with state and local agencies. All facets of water supply and treatment Discussions with East Say MUD. Santa Clara Valley Water District Califor- nia Department of Water Resource,,, and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation re- institutional feasibility of'afternatrves. garding operational. engineering, and Evaluation, of alternatives for expanding the treatment plant Consideration of alternative oxidizers and disinfectants, and mitigation of noise during'can- Struction and operation. Comprehensive assessment of water quality parameters including turbidi- ty, alkalinity, pH, coliform counts, corrosion potential, and potential for THM formation levels. Mitigation of serious utility and traffic interfererves. Mitigation of impacts to residential and commercial activities. ' Development of special construction techniques and special structures to minimize construction impacts. Staged program of facility improvements and operations to ii=prove system reliab,lity and cost-effectiveness, consistent with the City's objectives and policies. Identification of ke, :sues. Coordination with federal, state, and local agencies. Evaluation of alternative sources of water. R,,cornmendations for upgrading water treatment plant, distribution system, reservoir water quality. Representative Projects — page 2 Project/Client Project Description Vista Grande Storm Sewer Project City of Daly City, CA (on -going project) Vim,Facilities Master Plan City of Redwood City, CA (on -going project) Lakewood Area Project ULID 73.1, Pierce County, WA (on -going project) Sewer System Rehabilitation — Hamilton Field U.S. Navy (on=going project) Canstoga Water Supply Project City of Calistoga, CA (completed 1984) Upper Basin Project Tuolumne Regional Water District (completed 1984) = Bayside-Facilities Plan City and Countyof San Francisco (completed 1982) Water Quality Mariagement Program 64 East Bay Dischargers Authority (completed 1982) ' Evaluation of existing stormwater system to locate limitations in capacity, estimation of probable system flows for three design storms, insoection and evaluation of brick -lined tunnel for possible use under pressu t: and iden- tification and design of needed system improvements. Update existing water master plan originally prepared in 1965: Identify system deficiencies and recommend improvements. System includes approximately 2000 pipes and ten pressure zones, each with storage and booster pump stations. Planning, design, and construction management of $100 million wastewater collection system (including 180 miles of pipeline, 25 pump stations, pressure sewer system, and 2-mile tunnel) to provide sewerage service to one the largest unsewered urban areas in the United States. Evaluation of alternative sewer repair and replacement measures and recom- mendation of speck corrective actions. Subsequent preparation of design specfifcations, shop drawing review, construction support, and system start- up services. Devalopment of water master plan which evaluated conjunctive use of three water sources. Design and project management of 14-mile transmission pipeline to transport City's allotment of North Bay Aqueduct water Evaluation and design of improvements to aid consolidation of three water systems, including design of 11,000 feel of transmission main, a 4 mg raw water reservoir, two 200,000 gallon storage reservoirs, a new 1.0 mgd WTP, and miscellaneous distribution system improvements. Conceptual planning for a 590 mgd pump station, force main routing, and evaluation of existing wet weather facilities. Siting, evaluation, and cost estimates of numerous force main alternatives. Planning, design, and construction management of 31-mile wastewater con- veyance system, including six pump stations and seven pipeline (30" to 96") segments. Two force main segments designed with parallel pipes for future reclamation, qav Vista 7ranamission System Rehabilitation Planning, design, and construction support of a water transmission flume Vista Irrigation District with mazrmum capacity of 44 cfs (20,000 gpm). The 121/2-mile system con. (completed 1980) sists of Humes, sipho,,-pipelines, and tunnel. Jack George Reservoir Design zind construction management assistance on a 3 mg reservoir. Rein - Monte Vista Water District forced concrete roof' with three tennis courts. (completed 1980), v� m C O E - � iD n m m in H 0. m Services C 0 c i c CM c cl m (F> m n -, f" KennedyJenks Engineers Key Features Development of alternatives that maximize use of limited capital. Assistance to client in liaison with affected political jurisdictions and private entities. Final report will include recommendations of funding options f y to finance needed improv3ments. Technological evaluation of all facets of water supply and distrit 1. Five creek crossings designed to meet conditions of aesthetics, corrosion protection, slope protection, and potential vandalism. Liaison with several federal, state, and local agencies and with homeowners' associations. Coordiantion of crossing of Ignacio Boulevard and crossing of several railroad rights -of -way. Design of wet weather/dry weathe; (1900 gpmt1360 gpm) pump station. Detailed computer hydraulic network analysis. Assistance in obtaining FmHA low interest Ican and in selling interim financ- ing notes. flights -of -way negotiations and interfacing with City Council to develop best waver supply alternative. Project structured to rneet strict construction budget. Designed to meet seismic Zone 4 requirements. Bid alternative tank lining systems to meet 30-year life requirements. Analysis and evaluation of existing North Shore and Channel pump stations. Analysis of appropriate force main alternatives, including a wet weather force main. First prize in CEAC 1.981 Engineering Excellence Awards Competition. Design features to mitigate problems from area with unstable foundations and cor- rosion potential from soils, saltwater, and brackish groundwater. Rights -of -way liaison with private homeowners, industry, utilities, and railroads. Existing structure incorporated to mazimum extent, reducing cost and minimizing environmental and operationai disruption. Access hatches a unique plywood fiberglass combination with vandal -resistant lock -up system. Fast -track design and construction schedule to meet tight timetable. Seismic design considerations. Representative Projects — Page 3 43 ?tr •till i Project/Client Projc ct''ClescsRpti� n _ Panitencia WTP & Clearwell Planning, design, and construction managl3ment of 20 mgd plant and 3.0 Qy Santa Clara Va-ay Water District mg clearwell. Treatment of South Bay Aqueduct water. (completed 1978) Tracy WTF' & Transmission System Multi -phased program involving preparation of two master plans; design and City of Tracy, CA construction management services; and continuing operational assistance (completed 1978) for water supply, treatment (5 mgd), and distribution project which includes 1,0 mg clearw:ell. Del Valle WTP & Clearwell Planning, design, and construction support for original WTP (12 mgd) and Alszrrnsda County FC & WD, Zone 7 expanded plant (24 mgd). Design features include tube settling, continuously (expansion completed 1978) monitored pilot fitter, and standby activated carbon for taste and odor removal. 'i ID 4 WPP & Transmission System Planning, design, and construction management of 25 mga nominaU38 mgd Kern County Water Agency peak capacity water treatment plant and distribution system, including two (completed 1977) 3.5 mg cleanwelis, three associated boaster pump stations, and distribution pipelines: Treatment of raw water from the Ca!ifomia Aqueduct and the Kern River, Water Supply System Analysis/Facilities Design Engineering analysis of water supply system and design of additions and M Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District modifications to high capacity groundwater infiltration wells; a 20-mile (completed 1975) transmission pipeline; a 60 mgd pump station; and storage reservoirs:two 1.0 mg steel tanks. £no Various Wa'ur Supply Projects Series of projects including water facilities master plan, water treatment plant Cal -American Water Company and reservoir studies, water supply studies and preliminary facilities design, Monterey & Sweetwater Divisions and inventories and system valuations. (completed 1972) Master Plan & Implementation More than 80 separate construction projects over a 15-year period, including t4i University. of California, Davis domestic water system (deep wells, pump, elevated storage tank), utility water (completed 1972) system (shallow wellsj, and distilled water system. ? t^ Alameda County Reservoir Design and construction mar-%ement of an 18 mg reservoir. EPDM-lined, 111 Alameda County Water District concrete columns, glulam woud beams. Included an evaluation of rein - (completed 1971) forced concrete vs. lined ooen cut reservoir design. Alternative roof designs developed for concrete, wood, and steel materials. I Vasona Pump Station Planning, design, and construction management of a 104 mgd booster tM Santa Clara Valley Water District pui np station to provide supplemental water to users during peak demand (completes! 1971) periods between July and October. Piping arranged to accommodate four- k t teen operating conditions. Hinconada WTP & Reservoir Planning, design, and construction management of water treatment plant + Santa Clara Valley Water District (80 mgd peak.) and reservoir (15 mg). Treatment of South Bay Aquedtct f s original plant completed 1969; water. Design features include solids contact clarifiers, dual media filtration predesign report for plant expansion 1981) and air backwash, and analog instrumentation extended to centralized com- puter control. I isN Facilities Services Kennedy.Jenics Engineers f m s m c fl E o m rM O C S. a m ca 3. a, cis rn a Fn G 0. o U Key Features t1 (nn ® ® Design features include Horizontal flow -through sedimentation tanks, single unit filters with air plenum, and mixed media filtration. Plant designed for active seismic area. ® System designed to meet Zone 4 seismic requirements. Fast -track design and construction schedule. Treatment of Delta-A":.:,dots Canal water. Extensive external norrosion investigation as part of design. ® Treatment of South Bay Aqueduct water. (On another assignment for Zone 7, we designed Patterson Pass WTP, the first plant to treat State Water Proj- ect water. Bec—s use of the unknown water quality of this source, we car, led out extensive laboratory and pilot testing.) ® ® ( Design features include longitudinal flow basins, multi -point chemical feed, and muftirradia filtration with gravel support Booster pump stations include: 1) four 1000 hp electric motor -driven pumps which deliver 7000 gpm at an operating head of 440 feet, 2) three 300 hp pumps delivering 3500 gpm at 275 feet, and 3) five 75 hp pumps delivering 1800 gpm at 97 feet. ® +) ® Extensive corrosion control investigatiuris and cathodic protection system design. Design of submarine crossing and ocean outfall. Design of alter- native schemes to prevent fish entrapment on a major industrial water ouffail. ® ® ® ® Studies of surface and groundwater resources, including conjunctive use. Extensive laboratory and field investigations of internal and external corro- sion. Leak detection studies of 108-square mile project area. Valuations con- ducted for purposes of acquisition litigation. tj� ® Centralized distilled water system serves entire campus, replacing approx- imately 30 individual sources. Distilled water used primarily in experimental and research laboratories. ® Environmental/community acceptibility in well -developed residential area. Structural features to accommodate movement and resist seismic loadings. ®j Special sound•attenuatiing features to reduce noise. Landscaping to enhance visual attractiveness. Variety of pump sizes to meet a wide variety of flow and head requirements, W CJompfeted or Undenvay Q Future ® Plant and reservoir constrz^ted in hillside location. Earthen embankment as approximately 1/4 of Gio'ewall to minimize construction costs. Expansion study included comprehensive evaluation of existing processes, design criteria for expansion to 120 no and improvement of treatment capability, Assessment of water quality parameters affecting current and fraure treatment of four water sources. 0 ., .,,. :>."` k � i L £. �. r ...,. • r,:, r`" �'' +1 �p A,r �.�r T ,r.:-� i ".f4 '!{ WEE1111114111F mom LM PRODUCER 0ealey, Kenton & Associates TM CERTWICAT-M IS MSU AIR 140 TEWATM OF ONLY NAMP�IISUPON TH9 CERTIFICATE OT Bay 12675 OTENO on ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED sY THE Pouct" amow. �. Oakland-, CA 94604 (415) 465-3090 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY A LETTER COMPANY INSURED LETTER Kennedy/Jenks Engineers, Inc. fead c, COMPANY 657 Howard Street LEIMER San Francisc: 7 , CA 94105 COM�aNY � LETTER �4 LErnM =ZZ•. a • et �. r•' THIS IS TO CF.RTTFY THAT POUC= OF WISURAItCl LWEO FLOW 41AVE eft I9SIUEDTO T Ka MUFM NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POL= PERMID INDICATED. NOTVYTTHSTANOM ANY REGLIREMENT. TIC OR CO=T110N OF ANY CO -.TRACT OR 01MM O= MENT Wrilt REPECT TO WHICH THIS CE!{TRF=TE MAY is BE ISSUED OR WAY PERTAIN, T NE INSURANCE A1F»D BY Tm PoLx=s Bescrow HEiwm is SUB.tEGT TO ALL THE TERwS, EXCLLMMMS, AND CONDI° T IONS OF SUCH PO DES. - TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER a Y DUTY UMTS IN THOUSANDS 00CURRENCEnccREcar LCO A GENERAL LIABILITY 601547B 7/1/85 7/1/86 Kow"RLv S $ . co:tPREHe+slvE tit r P.R:MISESt'OP✓WtMIS `RETM $ $ UNO='RC)AOUNO EX-JtCS*N & COLLAPSE- NAPARO c PP000CTS`t0&v_q0 OPERATIONS � CONTRACTUALtl0 movemwBROAD III.; ffi"`�' 1,000, 1,000, RAM PROPfRW DMAAGE 'r B - Aoa�ofllL�L rnr AB 60905783 7/1/85 7/1/86 $ 1,000 ANY AM tDFT ? ALL OMEO AUTOS (PRN. PASS.) ALL OYINEO AUTOS rum $ 1, 000, PRAM. PA�SS.t� p DAMAM 500 - HIRED AUTOS W4,01 M AUTOS GARAGE UAOflJTY $ Ire EXCE= 1.05d TTY i UMBRELLA �A 111116 PO COMBINED $ W'HER TXM UMBITEILA R7RW C WORKERS•COMPENSATTON C2 23.4123-6 1/1/85 1/l/86- srATuroRr - _;, Aster $ (ETCH ACCIOENT) IDMEAST:•POUCY Uuu>✓- ' C TIAZA o,ployer's Liability C2 234123-6 l/l/85 1/1/86 $1,000, _F i�l4.M�IIJ,�� :t�:i�1:1�� _ll:�l�� 1�� MfY'�!:•.l'Y �'.y_!'r�7_`TI.J��FR\�II��LN City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92646 7 0 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE Et• RTRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL L:ODB YJ c 191A L 'Ail DAYS wRrrmm NOTICE TO THE CERTWF LATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE s RUNTON F?.41r _% ' t � 6 1 r rr . _ A . C T x 'Y I r�[ 7 Water Resources Planning for water resources devel- Areas covered by Kennedy/Jenks opment usually requires a survey Engineers include: of alternatives with consideration ® hydrology of hydrology, geology, topography, water rights, and legal issues, as M surface water supply well as consideration of the eco- groundwater supply nomics and environmental impacts of development alternatives. imple- 'a water quality ' mentation of water resource projects dams ' typically involves all of the foregoing considerations along with abroad 1 hydroelectric power ,r,• • range of engineering skills. ® irrigation ' M conservation _- - r - kid i w t s 8'- ,d r , ♦ a 1. lNater diversion- at Lyons Reservoir. .K , 7uotumne Gourity, Dalifornia 2 . Cascad? D.' part; of a hydroelectric power end distribution system.rehabllitation project in ' YAsem/ts'Natioiaal Park, California 3 i`ena Dan1 and Reservoil; Gram b r. ^� § 4 1 b ti4 z hc 1 N f Development of reliable water systems for potable or industrial water supplies requires a flexible approach that stresses technical. soundness, economic feasibility, and O & M efficiencies. In addition, facilities must be designed to be eas- ily modified or expanded to accom- IF modate increased growth, changed water quality criteria, or identifica- tion of trace contaminants in the supply. Kennedy/Jenks Engineers has planned, designed, and pro- vided construction management services on a wide variety of water facilities, including the expansion/ modification of existing facilities. -` In addition, we have conducted sys- tems analyses, energy audits, and safety surveys, and have provided performance monitoring and on -site training programs. Facilities include: 9 treatment m disinfection 0 storage 0 pumping a transmission ® distribution 4�t 0 fire protection a instrumentation, alarms, and supervisory control 0 internal corrosion control and cathodic protection Wastewator Systems Wastewater systems require careful planning and skillful design to pro- vide facilities capable of meeting 4 both future needs and changing requirements. Furthermore, limited sources of financing necessitate flexible strategies and innovative solutions to maximize results for each doll.3r spent. Kennedy/Jenks ` Engineers has a long tradition of meeting challenges like these. We believe that wastewater systems can be reliable. cost-6-active, and innovative. Whether designing new facilities or upgrading and expand ^x �. if existingones, we bring to each a - k project an experienced, capable team; a flexible approach; and a responsiveness to clients' needs. Projects have involved development and design of: NJ regional management plans s IM Collection sewers +�. It sewage pump statiians .-� `: # rhOV.o-_ " ® treatment plants expansions/improvements _ • 19 instrumentation and supervisory — — controls ®energy conserva±ion and _ cogeneration systems a m IN disinfection andoder control ---" facilities M outfalls and disposal systems N reclamation/reuse alternatives {3 01 operational training and monitoring t, programs - l i j � � alb t2 �'fm_—u .y�+7s+.� �I :. t'•��. � ice, t„ .; ..rk aan,.. �-N- "".r,,,, ,r � , t�'x" ,fix ,�"d8"" •- ,,sue Mtn, sesia ,®g•� c �,.. ��. y F y{•...A. � .. _ � . .,.{ i �wce " --...4 ! $r � 1. TU `; ..•" ��... . nM ♦ ^w:� -� 1M1 `�• - . nay , i� Mtn K} •Fiv' _ y A E� 4 3 Odor control facility at the San Mateo, California, Wastewater Treatment. Plant = ; 2 PhoStrip tanks at the Reno -Sparks, Nevada, Wastewater Treatment Facility 3 Central Marin Sanitation Agency's WasteN dter Treatment Plant, San Rafael, California 4 Innovative/Alternative technology -funded oxidation ponds, Sofedad California 5 Nincle Wastewater Treatment Plant, Ka'u, Hawaii 11 In 1 Electrical system expansion, San Francisco International Airport, California 2 Heating plant for the University of California, Santa Cruz 3 Ship Wastewater Collection System, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 4 Construction of comprehensive sewerage system, Pierce County Washington 5 Rincon Point -South Beach Redevelopment Pro%ectarea, San Francisco, California Ks^ �r :Jenks Engineers provides Projects have involved: comprehensive site planning and , \_ �-'�Cy a airport facilities design of infrastructure and utilities, \ t including redevelopment of existing M site utilities, -- sites. Activities have included prepa- roads and parking facilities ration of master plans and incre mental development plans, budget of fuel storage and handling » '� scheduling, development of utility facilities record drawings, studies on rate iii electric power generation and schedules and loads, and assistance' in system operation. We have worked distribution, including emergency closely with major utilities, state and and uninterruptible power federal agencies, colleges and uni- systems versities,and with all branches a gas distribution, including LPG of the U.S. military. standby for interruptible supplies.112 1T' F b 3 Y =„Ai^''"'� WASTEWATER • r':EMIGLS .Racvo aosormwe If 5LU, E MATEOW MA TOC T"EWEN SLuwt Satisfactory solutions to problems associated with storing, handling, and treating hazardous materials and wastes require a multidisci- plinary approach which includes consideration of possible soil or groundwater contamination, water pollution, air pollution, or public health impacts. This approach requires the services of environ- mental and chemical engineers, public health specialists, ground- water hydrogeologists, and geol- ogists, as well as equipment and process engineers. Regulations under RCRA, TSCA, and Superfund are subject to frequent modification; Kennedy/Jenks Engineers monitors these regulations to determine current requirements. We also offer services in: 6 hazardous waste characterization * site contamination assessment * groundwater contamination assessment development of remedial plans * design of site restoration _ treatment facilities * hazardous material management hazardous waste treatment hazardous waste reclamation I Drummed wastes requiring character - IN evaluation of waste disposal ization and proper disposal, private alternatives client 2 Process schematic, industrial '! ® oily waste treatment wastewater treatment 3 Installation of pump in groundwater extraction well, private client 4 Carhon adsorption vessels, '. private client i c t .ayL.: ��b� ... 11 r:.. ill =r?'+� . 1f •� :•-. .: ,r aar+G `` Industrial FacHities tea 1 � � t catili• I S.,G.: .:R..i.':2 �-� •tt�. , nY r � v As a multidisciplinary firm, Kennedy/ Services provided to industry by a Jenks Engineers provides 000rdi- Kennedy/Jenks Engineers include: nated industrial facilities engineering 13 industrial site planning services which range from site plan- ning to design of new facilities. We m facility design also provide extensive services for ® utilities design facility modification to meet new proui:ss needs, increase energy effi- a high purity water production cienzy, improve the working environ- ®Heating, ventilating, and air mr W, and meet current environmental conditioning and ;,afety standards. Projects have included handicapped access retrofit, m wastewater treatment and award -winning wastewater treatment - recycling - systems, and special environments ®product recovery ' for computers and clean room f operations. a air pollution control ® energy management a hazardous material and waste handlivg and storage . y hydrologic analysis of storm events, analysis of deficiencies in existing facilities, and risk assessment of "r damages for different levels of pro- tection. Since all flooding from pos- sible intense storms cannot be r controlled, storm drainage and flood control must be based on .= x =4 . �f y engineering analyses of cost effec- .. . _t =�' �• v � tive alternatives Kennedy/Jenks * x r Engineers provides: is hydrologic analysis and modeling 12 flood routing studies m design of storm drains, culverts, channel improvements, detention basins, and pump stations M dike and levee protection tr r # WI 1 Flood control master plan for Washoe County, Nevada g 2 Diversion of Temescal Creek, cti't Alameda County, California .'_...y. 3 Storm drainage channels, Redwood City, California i �r Solutions to environmental problems require the development of reliable data. Kennedy/Jenks Engineers has the experienced personnel and field and laboratory equipment needed to obtain original site -specific environ- mental data and to evaluate existing information. Our laboratory maintains a Quality Assurance Program which includes computerized quality control and routine analyses of EPA refer- ence standards. It also participates in interlaboratory references with state agencies, such as the Hazard- ous Materials Laboratory Section of the California Department of Health Services. Specific services include: * water quality analysis * soil anc- solid waste analyses ® federal and state hazardous waste testing ® hazardous waste delisting and classification of non -hazardous waste * limnology and aquatic biology * aquatic toxicity testing g groundwater quality monitoring ® environmental chemical mobility testing • environmental assessments m waste treatability tests IN pilot plant evaluations M corrosion control Kennedy/Jenks Engineers offers a wida range of specialized services to help clients develop, finance, and implement their projects. We offer operational consulting and energy management services to assist both public and private sector clients in operating their facilities more effi- ciently and cost-effectively. If needed, we serve as District/City Engineer and take responsibility for overall project management. We also pro- vide liaison with public agencies and assist in acquiring necessary per- mits and project financing. 1 Operator training at Hayward, Call- a forma Wastewater Treatment Plan? " arx ; ` w u, 4 r fi -q 2 Construction surveillance for $0-lot residential subdivision on Island of � �� : �s x� e is #� i 7k Oahu, Hawaii -af'k .x ; h d °� �ui�'" ,r �`� * 'd s,�•p , .r, _ i rY �'r'.N 3 Heat recovery piping at Hayward, q,+ly�i liu�California, Wastewater Treatment"�7�r{�y ' Plant'•pn?i*,'k'�"�''x","� % i4-,rye F+ 4 Economic analysis of project�Sv"«<��.r k v -.utt alteMative5.. 5 Permit and loan a l%Gallons �" #`' � RITMA Ap s. e hs w+.L�G soya dl ,yt^,k+q -'i Representativelit Municipal State and Federal Industrial Alameda County Agency for International Development American Petroleum institute Anchorage AK Association of California Water Amtac Bellingham WA Agencies American Smelting and Refining Calistoga CA Atomic Energy Commission Atlantic Richfield Company Carmel Sanitary District Bureau of Prisons Boeing Corporation Central Marin Sanitation Agency Bureau of Reclamation Burlington Northern Railroad Chino CA California Department of Corrections California -American Water Company East. Bay Dischargers Authority California Department of Water California Pacific Utilities Company East Bay Municipal Utilities District Resources Campbell Soup Company J Fairbanks AK Department of Agriculture C. Brewer and Company " County of Hawaii Department of Energy Citizens Utiiities Company Hayward CA Environmental Protection. Agency Coca Cola Company Honolulu HI Forest Service DuPont Irvine CA General Services Administration Eastman Kodak Company Kern County Water Agency State of Hawaii Emhart Corporation Koalak AK National Aeronautics and Space Exxon Marin Municipal Water District Administration Ford Motor Company Marysville CA National Park Service Foremost -McKesson County of Maui National Science Foundation Foster Fgrms Modesto CA U.S. Air Force Glass Containers Corporation Napa Sanitation District U.S. Army Getty Oil Company Novato Sanitary District U.S. Coast Guard Hawaiian Electric Company Orange County: Sanitation District U.S. Navy Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association Orange County Water District Hewlett-Packard Oro Loma Sanitary District Universities and Colleges Homart Development Co. Palo Alto CA Honakaa Sugar Company Pierce County California State University, Hayward Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Pleasanton CA and Sacramento Kekaha Sugar Company r Reno -Sparks NV Stanford University Lanai Company San Francisco CA University of Alaska Leadership Hornes San Francisco Airports Commission- University of California, Berkeley, Libby -McNeil -Libby San Joaquin County Davis, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Marwais Steel Company San Luis Obispo CA and Hastings College of the Law Matson Navigation Company San Mateo CA WesternWashingtonState College Monterey Vintners Santa Clara County Pacific Gas & Electric Company Santa Clara Valley Water District International Purex Industries Santa Paula CA Safeway Stores <+ Seattle WA Government of American Samoa Shell Oil Company Simi Valley County Sanitation District Government of Cambodia Southern California Edison Soledad CA Cartagena, Colombia Southern Pacific Development Co. ' South Bayside System Authority Corporacicn de Obras Sanitarias, Standard Gil Company of California South San Luis Obispo County S.D. Paraguay ' Tenneco Realt,,l Development Tacoma WA Direccion Goneral de Obras Sanitarias, Todd Shipyards Tracy CA Peru TRW Energy Systems Tuolornne Regional Water District Empresas Publicas Municipales de United Airlines. Ukiah CA Palmira,;Colombia j Union Oil Company Union Sanitary District Government of Guam U.S. Steel Company Upland CA Inter -American Development Bank Varian Associates Ventura County Obras Sanitarias de la Nacfon, Western Pacific Railroad Vista Irrigation District Argentina Weyerhauser Company llljill� Fill; W..{ . � A �$1 � � L .. ,.. J ... ._. i �. r .1 � <i 3 .. „ ✓ r _ t fr �c�f.s�} � .. Y..i .• r \ t ? r'R r: Lr ; is � ,. J tt- F., e-^ r ,. �' t t S +:� ,!r � a .V xl� _r }i�+p4+��dr -Yr 1 ?[iuf�y [(?h. y tkr �� ih }�}4��tyt 't-. ''Jh f rrr. 5yyJ1 ttt I t "{ V+ r 4 r r M. iFr4 L■ d. , 4 t� t t d , I + d �i. 2 it i ?{rf. K 4' y 7 II L Y F T k t 7d J .'Lift k j 3} j t }r 1 * . I r+ �ys�,4t ii ,+ , y q N i % I S y i Y, j Y1 i fi r( fi, 7} t , Y 7 4 3' I,, t. r S %. I Y t tr [ow-. t r 'N4�,, r NT r 5 d p ! ,f Ty ^V n _ F' r f' ,r ` # { 'i.4 F i y ty id r �r J y a t . � r , { I . + :7 Is y� f f e t ,r 11 . . } ! @c r rtq 3 , tt to � zt- <�} nqlat } s' r " yt + , 4 $�i . h , a^ P ' a `", t i : � ,; V{ ; t �.?, t i ? , Ki ! qpyn�4 F L x �} i', , �i !IN K V ><-[ , , a i t tr'1 i. � y ".} �y v_. 1 t n �1. [ w J. }, I t'I q I d - e WONi x i '£ ti P'S. p h C 'd, y r.t giro\ y Q L+ -1 ° + .e '� i��ii,- V1d a n 1, 3 b t IVa [ ,; C k �r § I �tAM—�e td I j %Y } r`+ S „? �� t'. r a y< .4N V� it y r c x, { lr�t r7 f n y, <. s, i J , 7 i r, i r '' z :Q N .- 1 > ., t i [ , y �,"1&= !�i is 'xIh r r r t tta 4 [� a 4 x} , , k. c t f La. r i �` ,• .. X y '''"ty . I k ! # S a j. �t ~ ` 1 jr , e }' L t' .A t Mym1z r, 16 �1 r Va X a,'�,, 1 t<-.+ t: t i £' e t;4 s } t. rj s, y i.. }y 1 F a r ns"ii„°.Sr. 1 '? II [� a �. .t 3� ate y. y> 2t 7" i .. c 1 1 ' t t L o r t{:. a s"��` li ar +ta .Ii e '.~!i t A r. e d e.+,u Ly .1 t 1 ! ar c, * :rf. yiti'Yx i ?:. t` a.rtrti rr,u d„ (a.r t t +.) >, }-y{ ' �, r t' , ,R x 'is ; ti , r n , "[-in,l k4 ,;;.y^,ur - E j } • !+ < s: s ?. rt 5 f ' �� s ro Y c's r 4 d ,�.. +' I ti S. ( I! Ic"" ; ' Via,,.,5,%{OVJIrpt(@@t t �ra,[t, h,, �I 3 :' r s �� }rt r `> Y7d1 , f ,' y .� :" £ t I 'S r , r _' e�! t r *8r! t rfl�ci O lCalrfOrrtiat94105 [ a [F rl y t i :., 1 1F t #; , " � 5 36 -6 < o- ' L i t . , 5 1 �,y , t �, :,..1, r ,—•-•�•st�...; °. ,^•-'-' ,*b.. _ _.+.? 7., 1rtS F •ry sy 4 ti i `•, �t< 7.,. 74t r,t 'y Ir t, 40 t t �y t{, t-.nt t .:. �•�y •i. , ) tt.�r d r: r i �b 5 i M.- +`�.k y+ I rr I 3 1 t 1 r �vN,r A f ', y t . r.j .= S. c= .. , 54$ Byrgn Sfreef V ;;, d ' y ,, . N , !t x iA ', ' ,gar^�� f xJ r Paio p�ito yCa(r3rrn+9¢301 r r z x ` y „ , > f` '' , ,! rat w"' ` A z at •} r rK '^ '' r rx1 Y,x y"t., r 'f 1 , ,y - ' ity 1 ;VA [ s J d -at• :. k it I f J , fg , r r V �v t r t i' s, t f ,. , >� Yak3 . ai�y�. 't d I y r V d i 17vf i. t 4 {7� } t [ i.,".' T . tk ,, -, iF \ rwr t iJ, 1 a r, t [ a I iy , 4 a +, ti y % (. Y :?•p-, ° i . hk I 7 v t y i t�'r[°S l[ a.' ^ z a:r fi �i 3 6� s r n o 1 w 1 , r'. �117 19tf Street a, +, ; s 6 i t J =, I f 3 t f -zy .n t i (' .a! t a, C: , •� r t r a w 1, F•+ " a r ,�srf"r'f"i � -» x �..,yf r „r.,++,.w:•• 'v+'"i1 - .�...:.: 6 , 4 ,�akerstield.� Calrforrna 93301r '* tUt e.A y is '�: iy.l ` L } ti, gV;Rwif ., c, , a i, ,rr U -� } 8(15 324 058 Y - : , q '� S t dV xtd s ryd MiJ d r ti fu F, a 1: t h k } t y , ... L s a T , i r y yV , t -:., i` Z E i i s _` e '' 1 yy f ]'.. tiiyj,�t, R ,[ Y �JJ,vY t �G [ Y y ` k ' r +4,� y A F, 0.t :- ♦t, ' 0j 1i n e 1: 47"} t 14 -r> "Jr 11 "xt y 7 t ry2y ! i k �.`ti k- t X 7':Jct't6�}dBl$hoq Stroet Sujte 1y4U0 :* r d �.t i4j n r i --r i P,s v t n ,r'! •i �i u'i'` .,,;M1 ,, -s+'4 .( t, �Q�l01ll�U�'.Hawali-96813L P� '' 1 4 t ! 't:e. a`4 f+5 e1 [ , iL5 , T[ '} zrye t`, a. J5 �`ts r.-�+, ,' £r y' ..; e =�t� - > V fi 8� S�4'059d ri § ) t i .} ,r i s 2 t, i g "t = s. �'t iy ", rq1 A iV' [i r j _.fit f i : a ,r ,yi •t<� Y.2 tys Y yS ?1�,, 5 i:et Vi - s y xt e4A`[[ aJ^e, 4 ' '� I f k '� ,. y r � ( F ed. -1. )W ertue "Su11e- 22Q ' S' x s " +' ! r j.1..,>n Ts J j� r ? r i >t:. ro, 1 R Yi F 7 A'L : t N 1. .. 2 ,':i t t,. i` - F :, IrvitiQ, "'.— pla 92714 , a t, AT�{ �y Yt t c fy a 4t L 'rt ' 4�+V1 4 ..i.'. t4 i. j �4 f ,[rl '`Sp 1 4' S i tl i h' �4• G {'. !; $.� } Won Y s -ti y y e y C u:,f 'f x ii r l t f� [ h�, t },'1} 1 1 y x yr ';r''k'v y ,`-"BIT -A f, x{ ° '1 s rl ti u ,, �, h y y, d y 4, 33�6 Brayshaw Road $u}te,:S20 T _ } ` _ ' ' �' " Ott • d S7acr�jamep10 dal igrn}a J5F�27,L , ' a ; .'; a Q; a, ' ^> t r "� j ,I 9�,6 10.3 .,1 s° t '4�, x,` r eim t�;a ?t .2 f% , Lt - Si, Fx . .f �t tL tt y!' i t of Y.. 'T: F�1}°r 3 301 fViiitl Aven a Soufhr uitd lflQ jt z , � * it", `',.. 1 ` `' ,' fir'{ ! dep�7al 1}[�VGaY, Was} Igt - 8(1—1 i x a F f n {"i 4206W4 Q555 ($eatttd) h 1 "? h 1{" R f . t i I i'Li y 7.: t L ,i 1 }l: 1 t11 206 927 , , (f0� 9,rrlfl) t t' > ' ® t r l �. +d�Yx Va` t.3•t` ♦::'i 1; , r 1 >. y + y' y -t+ s 1.t 9561 �nfarit P, Sza,IVdFt}f S1�1 Suite 1203 # ' f Ly t , ` `. rVl�ashingtop,; P.C{,, ?4 , 1 }'_t [ y, ,i 2Q2 554 2652 t'I ,t -' 1 f J+ [t i r r .4 ' y •. q _ I f- t II Q 2 l' r r t+ 3' ,y r r } - ptl"� 1 -;wl 1 L )V i s}t , y y d 2 r 1 :r �ib t r 1y ,MtrVr L 1 t £ T �e s S :�, 'I�.cV = r r �.f 1 L y t s: n., i z t• t y t } sr I % e . , a+ sty �. yet r A` k P I t�:r' .�� I11 1 .L.: t . 'JC'L : x, t t a v9 k 1: . �1' t 4 x y 9. e y i t 4 ,I 5 `# < 1a N b. ;I '' r ct16tx �r % tL i I I1 r yr, * t .�"'y . ' r i ' x ° r c rot a d i Kk r j / 1 d v t as SF y. i}' L k ; Y'iY: [ ry,� 4; t4R V } v I ,} 1 ro °,,% r + T }� t i i t t i 5 :, t ,t T 7' I,h _ �}. r [ a 4 1r n , ` y • yt ` r 6 } x rr t t$ } ti r t k k In . 1 $ + / S y a, t y .'a 1 r t ` l 1 ; ,f w 1 r{ t -'r , ti.1 9 4 i { k a t u �' +'l y 4"_,�4 , ,! `y a 7. ii++l,��H t � s s : 3 A "Yi / + q w+ yr ,\ '3, ., { ::p > i e + t: L i M p.-. rri ! .t ° I , i 7 t r Ly e+ 4 1 �.^ e y 7 k ! y�e , ' K ;„ yIr 2 }." 1 :} t', y s (7ta l,t .z 73 r r I , r r * t — w c ` rY Tta a 'z rr� s 4t--t— n- b ' s } ar ' i u