The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutKENNEDY, JENKS, CHILTON - 1986-07-21 (4)@�. , 20d0 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK July 23, 1986 Mr. Lynn M. TakaicVi, Vice President Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton 17310 Red Hill Suite 220 Irvine, CA 9271 RE: Engineering Services Agreement - Peck Reservoir Repairs Enclosed is a duly executed agreement between the City and your firm for the Peck Reservoir Repairs - CC 696. For further information please contact Mr. Bill Patapoff, Department of Public Works - 536-5231. ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, CITY CLERK 'By: Connie Brockway Deputy City Clerk AMR cb enc. cc: Bill Patapoff, DPW Wayne Lee, Finance Dept. i (Telephones 714.53"227) Letter of Transmittal Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton 17310 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 220 Irvine, Caliiornfa 92714 714.261.1577 Tc_ _ City of Huntington Beach Date: 7/8186 Job No.: 0004 2000 Main Streat Attention: —Mr. Bill Patatoff Huntington Beach California 92648 Subject: Engineering Services Agreements We are sending you: ® Attached or ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: 0 Plans ❑ Prints ❑ Specifications ❑ Samples t7 Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Copies Date No. Description 1 _ Engineering Services Ag ment for P ce k RP-;Pryo-. epai s 1 Enpineering ervicP, Agreement for icigntown Water T.;n _ These are transmitted as checked 'below: ® For information and coordination ❑ For approval ® As requested Remarks: -----� ❑ For review and comment ❑ Resubmit copies for review ❑ Returned after loan to us ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ ❑ Return__ corrected prin. is our tirm can nave original ex•,,'tea c]ocuments also r Copies to: Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton If enciosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ' HY'• -Lyna M. Takaichi Rev.1186186 REQUES10OR cITY COUNGI ° ION Date _ July 10, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. 'Thompson, City Administrato 6tV ' Prepared by: Paul E. Cbok, Directcr_ Public Works BY CITY CO NCC Subject: PECK "ESERWIR RENOVATION; Cu-696 - - ',----1= OLTY C6 Consistent with Council Policy? [YJ Yes [ I Now Policy or Exception v Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMIT OF ISSUE: Proposals were requested from qualified civil engineering firms for the preparation of preliminary plans and final work draaings/specifications for the renovation of the City's Peck Reservo-ir Facility. RECK)DWENDATION: 1. Approve the recommendation of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton and prepare plans and specifi- cations for the rerovation of Peck Reservoir. 2. Establish a budget of $23,800.00 (this will include Consultant Agreement and miscellaneous costs, as required) . 3. Authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the attached Consultant Agree- ment with Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton for a fee not to exceed $21,600.00. ANALYSIS: Renovation of the Peck Reservoir is necessary, based on the corrective recommendations detailed in an inspection report prepared by Kenneth I. Mullen, Consulting Engineers, Incorporated. The report indicates remval of sand and debris on the floor of the reservoir and repair of the metal support brackets and roof support system. Thh-_efore, pursuant to Chapter 3.03, "Professional Services" of the Municipal Code, requests were solicited from qualified engineering firms to prepare the construction drawings. Requests were received on May 21, 1986. Staff reviewed each of the proposals received and recommends the selection of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton. FUNDING SOURCE: Cbst of plan, and specifications $ 21,600.?O Miscellaneous cost @ 100 2,200.00 irtal. 23,800.00 Revenue Source Water Divisions Capital Improvement Accoun= #921639. ALTERNATIVE ACTION• Deny approval of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton and direct staff on how to proceed with these improvements. ATTACMIENI'S : 1. Vocation Map, 2. Consultant Agreemnt and 3., Com-ult:ant's Proposal " t PEC•BAP:EC ik Pro 5it� CC 6 9 4.8 - DM 18 ON 17 ON 15 OM 22 e 24 5\2 19-5 II 0 5-II 21 5-II 22 5-II 2 5 11 24- DM 2 OM 21 0M, y ON 24 D 25 " S DM 27 � ��30-5=1! 29-5-11 �►2Q -).1 27-1-11 _2—�-5-11 225- -II /uM 35 GM 34 \�Otvf 33 D 32 M317 1 ON 30 ad A� �32-5\�11 -11 35 •5-II 36-5-II DM 36 OM 37,! Ib 38 .30 ^ ` DM 40 1 - 1 } 2-fi II I-6-II 6 OM4 M4 \\! 9.6-11 ON 10 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA r.Wm�ca+w+ee>tx�aeaurw. cn, au+isti•aavrtt wen 0 0117 Y 'DM8 18-6-10 /17- 6 - K OM12O 0M19 GARFIELD ct �j ADAMS AVE.. f L •z � t m � :- t�" 9 � _: I 1� ��^yy g.T'.eu�.3.iL y;iFk y tin. ,ram s cu 'a • f n.. x�. aj,� p Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton 17310 Red Nil! Avenue, Suite 220 Irvine, California 92714 714-2611577 May 1986 21 Mr. Les Evans City Engineer C'�Ly of Huntington Beach` 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Subject: Proposal for Engineering Services Peck Reservoir Renovation Dear Mr. Evans: Kenaedy/Jenks/W.lton is pleased to submit this proposal. to pro- vide engineering services for the design of the City of Huntington Beach's Peck Reservoir Renovation. We greatly appre- ciate the opportunity to provide our project approach and quali- fications for your review. We believe we are especially qualified to perform the services required to complete this project because of the following considerations: f e Strong Technical Qualifications - For more than 65 years, Kenne,dyJenks/Chilton has been continuously involved in designing water storage and distribution facilities, conducting alternative investigations and other water system engineering services. We take pride in maintaining state-of-the-art in all areas of water supply engineering. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has extensive experience in planning, design, maintenance, and con- struction management of water storage facilities includ- ing membrane -lined reservoirs similar to the Peck Reser- voir. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton recently completed renova- tion of.the membrane -lined 15 mg reservoir at the Rinconada Water Treatment Plant. We routin('y provide reservoir maintenance assistance for many of our long- term clients in the water supply industry. Our proposal' highlights several projects relevant to the Deck Reser- voir renovation, which demonstrates the specialized experience of the firm and the proposed team for your project. our experience in directly applicable fields will enable us to identify optimum designs. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Mr. Les Evans City of Huntington Beach 21 May 1986 Page 2 a outstanding Project Team - In selecting our project team, we have assigned engineers with not only a strong theoretical background, but also good practical back- ground in the design, construction and maintenance of water storage facilities. Leading this highly experi- enced team will be Mr. Harold B. Tennant as Project Manager. He will be supported by a team of .highly qualified and experienced engineers, which can provide superior expertise to the design of the Peck Reservoir. The combined management and technical expertise of the team will permit them to quickly and accurately discern the most effective and efficient �dethods to accomplish the repairs and improvements and complete the project tasks in a timely manner. �► Ability to Proceed Expeditious?y _ We are prepared to begin work immediately upon. Notice -to -Proceed. Our ability to proceed expeditiously, combined with our technical capabilities and p-coject understanding should enable us to complete the design so that the project may be bid and construction completed during the winter months. In summary, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton meets or exceeds the selection criteria established in the City's RFP. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has over 65 years of experience in water supply facilities and has assigned a project manager with expertise to complete the project successfully to the satisf-action of the City. We have presented an approach to the project which is based on the suc- cessful completion of similar projects. We are prepared to start the project immediately and complete the project in time to meet the City's schedule. Our fee is reasonable and in line with: the high level of professional service provided by Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is capable of pro- viding the insurance coverage required to conduct business with t a a the City of Huntingon Beach. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Mr, Les Evans City of Huntington Beach 21,May 1986 Page 3 We are excited at the opportunity to conduct this valuable work for the City of Huntington Beach. We look forward to meeting with, you and discussing our approach and commitment to this project, and subsequently completing this project for you. Very truly yours, KEA7NEDY/,7EDlItS/CHIC 0 ion Ly M. Takaichi Vi e President LMT/WRW:jae Enc. a s ;I a 3 4 t 6Cennedy/Jenks/Chilton •r TABLE OF.CONTENTS PROJECT APPROACH 1.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION 2.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN 3.1 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS 4.1 APPENDICES i SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE GENERAL BROCHURE r x { i k e 4 �4 rr fr, �l This section of our proposal discusses the basis of our approach and specific work tasks in the design of the proposed repairs to Peck Reservoir. PROJECT OBJECTIVES Kennedy/Jenks/Chit ton has established clear project objectives as the basis for understanding the City's requirements and for developing a direct project approach. Through our site visits and discussions with Mr. Stan Farber and Mr. Les Evans from the City, the following key objectives have been defined for the efficient and cost effective completion of the repairs to the Peck Reservoirs • Preparation of accurate plans and s).ecifications which will result in a minimum construction. period. • Initiating construction during the winter months so that there will be minimum impact to the City's water storage capacity. • Implementing designated corrective measures to increase the life and servicability of Peck Reservoir. • Preparation of reproducible record drawings after con- struction. TECHNICAL ISSUES In ordaar to meet the objectives of the project, it is necessary to understand the technical problems currently being experienced at the Peck Reservoir. only then can preparation of plans and specifications which address the needs of the City at Peck Reservoir be prepared. We have reviewed the inspection report prepared by Kenneth I. Mullen, Consulting Engineers (Mullen)` interviewed Mr. Mullen, and discussed the findings with City staff. The report indicates that several key areas are in need of corrective action. These areas are, Repairs to the butyl liner at the treatment around roof columns. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton * Accumulation of sand around the well discharge and organic debris generally over the floor of the reser- voir. as Corrosion of hardware (hangers, bolts, brackets, and plates) and roof panels. ® Replacement and addition of -roof ventilators to improve air circulation within the reservoir. ® The reservoir must remain in service during design and may not be emptied for detailed inspection for prepara- tion of specific plans. The Mullen report indicates that the original method of con- struction around the column bases included only adhesive to seal secure the liner around the bases. Repairs to the butyl liner may be accomplished by means similar to new construction.. Where adhesive failures have occurred around the column bases, new stainless steel battens may be installed to secure and seal the membrane around the bases. Use of bolted battens will provide sealing through use of a sealant and compression from the bolted batten. Security is provided by the mechanical fastening of the bolts through the liner and batten into the concrete via red- head or ram -set fasteners. Seams may be repaired via field con- structed overlapping seams similar to original-onstruction. During the repairs, it is important that the surfaces to be repaired are clean and dry. The presence of moisture can inter- fere with the curing and bonding of the adhesive and dirt or foreign material can jeopardize the seam strength. The Mullen report also indicated a depression in the floor. This should be further_ investigated during construction to assure that the integrity of the main floor is intact. The Mullen report indicates that 12 to 15 cubic yards of sand have accumulated on the floor of the reservoir. Punctures and tears or other potential damages can be minimized if a type of non -mechanical device (e.g., suction hose or dredging head) is used to recover the material. Additionally, the bidding docu- ments should include unit pricing to allow for variations in the work required. Corroded metal base places, hangars, bolts, brackets, etc. are indicated in the report. The brackets, bolts and nuts are Kennedy/.Denies/Chilton recommended by Mullen to be replaced, other metal surfaces are recommended for sandblasting and recoating. The hardware which is indicated for repair only should be throughly inspected during construction to assure that excessive corrosion has not taken place on the back side of the metal and that sufficient metal remains provide structural integrity. City staff has indicated that roof panels used for original construction are no longer available. However, the manufacturer (Curoco) has indicated that the panels may be manufactured at a reasonable price if the quantity is sufficient. Additionally, the manufacturer indicates that three weeks are requried as lead time to prepare the panels. Ventilation in the reservoir is reported to be inadequate due to malfunctioning and insufficient ventilators, and blocked airway along the west wall, During interviews with City staff, it was indicated that the reservoir must remain in service during the design of repairs to the reservoir. The impact of this requirement is that specific repairs inside the reservoir cannot be called out in detail on the plans. This will require unit pricing for bids and a larger contingency should be included with the cost estimate. Conse-- guently, the Mullen report must be used to estimate the interior repairs. Exterior repairs may be confirmed by direct inspection prior to preparation of plans and sp��cificat.ions. Task Descriptions The task descriptions which follow have been developed by our proposed project team as the approach for accomplishing design and construction of repairs to the Peck Reservoir. These tasks are based upon the Scope of Work outlined in the City''s Request for Proposal. We have included tasks based upon our understand- ing of the project needs and our experience on similar projects. Task 0 v Project Management Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will provide project management which will include assignment and supervision of engineering staff, review of engineering work, in-house technical committee review, planning -and monitoring of budget ,and schedule, and meetings with the City to discuss project progress, status, =nd issues. e a 1.3 M I(ennedy/Jenks/Chilton Task l - Review Available Information and Conduct Cinsite Investigations Available reports and plans and specifications from original construction will be reviewed to develop basic background infor- mation for development of design criteria. City staff will be interviewed to confirm the findings from the file information. Onsite investigations will be conducted throughout the prelimi- nary design phase to accurately reflect actual site conditions. The City has indicated that draining the reservoir is not pos- sible during preliminary design. Therefore, much of the infor- mation about the interior must be derived from the Mullen report. Mr. Ken Mullen will be interviewed to confirm informa- tion in his report. Task 2 Prepare Preliminary Plans and Cost Estimates Based upon the findings of Task 1, a preliminary design memoran- dum will be prepared which summarizes the findings of Task l and presents the basis .for the design of repairs. The memorandum will include recommendations for: methods of repair to the butyl liner, including materials; method for removal of debris from the reservoir, which will prevent damage to the liner; recommendations for types and materials for hardware replace- ment; type of coatings and applications for coating of hardware; type and construction of ventilators; schematic drawings as necessary; and preliminary cost estimate for each major compo- nent of the construction phase. Task 3 - Meet with City Staff to Discuss Design Criteria Following preparation of the recommendations and the design memorandum, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will meet with City staff to discuss the recommendations of the memorandum. The objective of the meeting will be to obtain City approval of the design cri- teria for preparation of final working drawings and contrac documents/specifications. Task 4 Prepare Final Design Documents _Upon the City's approval of the design memorandum/criteria, the final design will be prepared in accordance with the established criteria. The work performed under this task will include: preparation of detailed construction drawings; construction sx� S '`f M LJ Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton specificati ns; construction cost estimate; construction schedule; reproduction of 40 sets of biddable plans and contract documents/specifications. Task 5 - Review Contractor Submittals Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton will provide bid advertisement and con- struction administration assistance to the City. Our services will include shop drawing review, review of change orders, and interpretation of contract plans and specifications. We will coordinate our efforts with the City, who will provide field inspection. Task 6 - Post Construction Activity Kennedy/3enks/Chilton will prepare one reproducible set of record mylar drawings based upon actual repairs by the contrac- tor to Peck Reservoir and on data provided by the City. The drawings will be provided to the City within two weeks of the City's final acceptance of the construction provision of the needed information. PROD EC' SCHEDULE Personnel can be assigned to the project and work can begin immediately after execution of an agreement. With the present Scope of Work as outlined, we anticipate we will be able to complete the project within ten weeks. Please note that the proposed schedule for project completion is dependent upon several factors outside out our control, such as review of submittals and availability of required data. Unanticipated delays by these outside factors would prolong the schedule accordingly. BUDGET ESTIMATE We propose to perform the services outlined above for an hourly maximum not -to -exceed fee of $21,600. It is estimated that professional services will be about $21,000 and that direct costs will be about $600. Reproduction of the bid documents and drawings will be provided at cost plus 10 percent. Provided or. the :Following page is our hourly rate schedule which would be used for this project. Client/ Address: City of Huntington Reach Kennedy/Jonks/Clhillton 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648' Contract/Proposal Date: 21 May 1986 Schedule of Charges January 1, 1986 Personnel. Compensation Classification Hourly Rate Drafter . ...... ........................$ 37 Designer ............................ 46 Engineer Scientist, Grade 3 ..................... 52 Engineer -Scientist, Grade 2 ..................... 61 Engineer -Scientist, Grade 1 ..................... 72 Senior Engineer -Scientist .... . ................. 90 Department Head .... 100 Principal and Chief Engineer ....................105 Laboratory Analyst ............................ 50 Laboratory Technician ......................... 40 Typist...................................... 35 Non -Technical" 33 *Non -technical time will be charged only for preparation of technical reports and similar material and does not apply to routine administrative -type activities, Direct Expenses Reimbursement for direct expenses, as listed below, incurred in connection with the work, will be actual cost plus ten percent for items such as: a. Costs of maps, photographs, reproductions, printing, equipment rental, and special supplies rela' id to the work. b. Costs of consultants, soils engineers, surveyors and contractors. C. Costs of rented vehicles, local public transportation and taxis, travel and subsistence. d. Costs of long-distance telephone and telegraph charges. e. Costs of special, fees, insurance, permits, and licenses applicable to the wor' f: Computer processing, computation, and proprietary programs purchased for the work Reimbursement for owned automobiles, except trucks and four-wheel drive vehicles, used in connection with the work will be at the rate of thirty-five cents (`>0.35) per mile. The rate for trucks and four-wheel drive vehicles will be twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per day and forty cents ($0.40) per mile. Rate for personnel for legal proceedings or as expert witnesses will be set for each assignment. In-house laboratory analysis charges will be per current rate schedule or special quotation. Excise taxes, if any, will be added as a direct expense. The foregoing Schedule of Charges is incorporated into the agreement for the services of the company. �t r , F no Y Sit _ � t 5 _ 1 TOT WAY t e is ,a cry f � M k t LIE! 1 Maws t t+ t � S MAY wk i Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton PROJECT ORGANIZATION This section provides information on our proposed project team. It also presents the organizational structure we anticipate usi:.q. More detailed information on the project work plan and specific details on relevant experience of the the firm are pro- vided in other sections of this proposal. We believe we have assembled a particularly well qualified proj- ect team. The project will be organized under the basic direc- tion of Messrs. Lynn M. Takaichi, Vice President of Kennedy/ Jenks/Chiltpr_, who will sflrve as Officer -in -Charge and Mr. Harold B. Tennant, Chief Engineer of the Irvine Office, who will serve as Project Manager. They will work directly with the City and will coordinate all administrative, design, and management functions. We feel that the succE-.s of this assignment will be determined by the consultant's knowledge and experience in the design of water storage and distribution facilities, the responsiveness of the consultant to the City's staff, the individual qualifica- tions of the key personnel, and the accountability of each key member for the tasks described in the Scope of Work. The proposed organization of key personnel and their task responsibilities are shown on the Project Organization Chart. Resumes of each member are also included in this section. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Harold B. Tennant - Project Manager Education: Stanford University, B.S. in Civil Engineering Registration: Civil Engineer in California and Oregon With more than 30 years of experience, Mr. Tennant is highly qualified in the planning, design, and construction management phases of engineering projects. He has worked in the areas of water distribution and storage, and other utilities. Mr. Tennant has recently se%ved as Project Manager on the Castaic Lake Water Agency's expansion program. Elements of the program include studies, design, and construction through several expansion phases. Specific projects are modifications Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton PROJECT ORGANIZATION 01ART CITY OF HUNTINbGTON BEACH OFFICER -IN -CHARGE Lynn M. Takaichi ------------------------ PROJECT MANAGER Harold B. Tennant TECHNICAL STAFF a _____.Robert y �i.sPurdie--_- Joseph G. Gillick Fred L. Hinkex ix 2.2 f: Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton to sedimentation basins and filters, construction of additional. treatment structures, relocation of large -diameter pipelines, and the installation of energy -efficient equipment. Mr. Tennant has served on numerous water distribution projects for private and public clients. He has managed investigations for soils, mapping, right-o��' ray acquisition, and utilities location work for several watr:- pipelines in urban areas. He has designed water pipelines using a variety of materials, and has served as resident engineer and construction manager on many of these projects. He has designed E-everal water storage facilities, including two covered reservoirs utilizing synthetic membrane Liners. On one of these projects, he was the resident engineer during construc- tion and assisted the owner in developing a repair and mainte- nance program. TECHNICAL STAFF The project manager will be supported by our multidisciplined staff of over 350 with the experience and technical resources to perform the project in a complete and expeditious manner. Key technical staff include Mr. Robert W. Purdie, who has over 38 years of experience in the des.gn, operation and maintenance of water Uupply facilities and is the coatings specialist for Kenna dy/Jenks/Chilton; Mr. Joseph G. Gillick, who has extensive relevant experience in water systems engineering; and Mr. Fred L. Hinker, who is the head of design and construction for the Irvine office and has over 17 years of experience in the design of mechanical systems including reservoir ventilation. Other support staff include specialists in the areas of water treatment, public health, and civil, environmental, sanitary, structural, mechanical, chemical, electrical, instrumentation and corrosion engineering. We also maintain a complete water quality and environmental laboratory. Our laboratory staff has performed water sampling, analysis, and pilot and bench scale testing for the firm and for outside clients and for more than 40 years. Education: Experience: Stanford University, BS Mr. Tennant has over 30 years' experience in the plan - in Civil Engineering ning, design, and construction management phases of engineering projects. He has worked in the areas of water and wastewater treatment, water distribution and Registration: storage, wastewater collection, storm drainage and Civil Engineer in other utilities. California and Oregon He has been involved with several water transmission Memberships: and distribution projects, most of then in congested urban areas. Recent designs include a 12-mile aque- ASCE duct serving the City of Calistoga and the $22 million SAME reclamation project being constructed by the City of Modesto. He has extensive experience in the design and con- struction of water storage facilities, including two semi -buried covered reservoirs and several ground level steel tanks. Clients include Santa Clara Valley Water District, Kern County Water Agency, and the City of Coachella. Previous work included the management of the construc- tion phases of the East Bay Dischargers Authority (EBDA) Regional Wastewater Management Program. The $140 million project includes an administration build- ing, a data acquisition center, pump stations, over 30 miles of 33" to 96" diameter outfall force main and 96" diameter outfail to San Francisco Ray. Construc- tion was divided into sixteen seperate contracts; Mr. Tennant was construction manager for eleven of the sixteen. u During -she planning stage of the EBDA project, Mr. Tennant managed surveys, soils investigations, utili- ties coordination, alignment definition, and right-of- way acquisition. He was the project engineer on the design of all of the EBDA force main, coordinating the designs with over 40 public agencies. Mr. Tennant planned and design utility projects on three University of California campuses (Berkeley,, Davis, and Santa Cruz). His assignments included water, sewer, storm drainage, telephone and electric ducts, manholes, service and construction roads, and ROBERT N. PURRIE Vice President Education: University of California, BS in Civil Engineering Registration: Civil Engineer in California and Hiwfaii Control Systems Engineer in California Mechanical Engineer in 99 California Memberships: ASCE SAME SEAL SEANC J u Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Experience: Mr. Purdie, Vice President of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton, has served as _ngineer-in-charge and project manager for more than 100 design and study report projects during his 37-year association with our firm. In recent years, he has specialized in the planning, design, and construction management of water reser- voirs and has been involved in nearly 30 water reser- voir projects. Reservoirs designed by Mr. Purdie or under his direc- tion have ranged in size from 0.1 mg to 18 mg and have included water tanks, balancing and storage reser- voirs, and clearwells. Materials have included rein- forced concrete, prestressed concrete, steel, asphal- tic membrane, and soil cement. As part of the Rinconada Water Treatment Plant Design Project, for which he was project manager, Mr. Purdie directed the planning, design, and construction man- agement of Rinconada Reservoir. This 15 mg facility serves as a balancing reservoir. Because the reser- voir is located on a hillside, an earthern embankment forms approximately one -quarter of the sidewali. Located in a seismically sensitive area above a popu- lation center, the structure includes safety features to minimize danger of rupture and meets the design requirements of the State Division of Dam Safety.. The reservoir also has a leakage detection system, which can be monitored from the adjacent treatment plant. Mr. Purdie has provided technical review on a number of storage tanks and reservoirs, including the Jack George Reservoir in Montclair, California. This proj- ect involved design and construction inspection assis- tance on a 3 mg, reinforced concrete underground reservoir. Design included three tennis courts to be located on the reservoir's roof slab. In addition, Mr. Purdie was design engineer on the San Francisco Water Department's Lombarj Street Reser- voir. This membrane -lined reservoir nas a prestressed concrete roof which has both tennis courts and a basketball court on it. During the 17 yearn that our firm served as Campus Engineer for the University of California at Davis, Mr. Purdie worked on a number of water utility proj- ects, including the design of the Davis System Reser- voir (a buried water st-rage reservoir under a recrea- tion area) and four el- vated steel elipsoidal tanks.. Education: Experience: University of Santa Mr. Gillick's experience includes planning, design, Clara, BS in Civil Engi- and construction supervision of water projects. Mr:,_ neering Gillick has participated in the design of a number of water treatment plants and associated pump stations and transmission pipelines. Most recent of these proj- Registration: ects is the expansion of the Earl Schmidt Filtration Civil Engineer in Plant for the Castaic Lake Water Agency. California For the Kern County Water Agency's 25 mgd ID 4 Water Water Treatment Operator Purification Plant, his responsibilities included the in California design of two treated water transmission pipelines totalling approximately nine miles. He also served as Water Distribution Opera- resident engineer during construction. Subsequent for in California projects involving the Agency include the, 1D 4 Water Purification Plant Expansion, Olcese-ID 4 Water Supply Study, Oswell Regulating Facility, and Cross -Valley . berships: Hydra Potential Study. ASCE AWWA Mr. Gillick was resident engineer during construction CWPCA of an 18 mg water reservoir in the San Francisco Bey WPCF Area. He was responsible for the construction manage- ment and inspection during the site preparation, exca- vation, construction, testing, and disinfection phases of the project. Other water -related projects undertaken by Mr. Gillick include the design, study, and operational optimiza- tion of domestic water systems. These projects involved application of sub -potable water well devel- opment and distribution conjunctive use well system planning and energy optimization of well water and treatment plant production systems. Prior to joining Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton, Mr. Gillick was employed by the Alameda County Water district, r where his other duties included design and administra- tion of water -related projects, as well as construc- tion management. } While serving as a Public Works Officer at the U.S. Naval facility at Antigua, he participated in the design, construction, start-up, and operation of a vapor compression seawater desalting unit. E During four years in the U.S. Navy Civil Engineer Corps, he served as Officer in Charge of Construction and in various other .public works and construction positions. Before joining the Navy, he was an assis- tant engineer with the City of Pasadena Water Depart- ment and a field engineer with a soils consultant, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton FRED LEE HINKER Civil and Mechanical Engineer Education: Experience: Stanford University, MS Mr. Hinker is experienced in the application of both in Civil/Environmental civil and mechanical engineering principles to the Engineering problems of planning, design, and construction manage- ment of pumping stations, water and wastewater treat - California State ment plants, pipelines, and energy management tech - University, Long nology. His pro-tct responsibilities have involved Beach, BS in Civil biogas cogeneration systems as well as traditional Engineering water and wastewater treatment and pumping. Reservoir experience includes design of mechanical Registration: appurtenances, piping, and control systems for steel Civil Engineer in and concrete reservoirs. His experience also includes California and Nevada inspection of buried concrete reservoirs for deterior- ation and structural damage. Mechanical Engineer in Alaska, California, and Mr. Hinker has served as project manager or engineer Nevada on several energy management projects. At the Irvine Ranch Water District, a comprehensive energy manage- ment plan was prepared which cut the wastewater treat- erships: ment plant's power cost by over 25 percer,6- at minimal ASCE capital cost. At the City of Thousand Oaks, an energy AWWA management plan included cogeneration, conservation, CWPCA WPCF and micro -hydropower elements. AAEE He has served as project engineer or project manager Tau Beta Pi of 17 wastewater collection, pumping, or treatment facilities. He was resident manager of the Metro Manila Sewerage Project, managing a multi -national staff of 65 engineers and technical personnel to com- plete the master plan for approximately $1.4 billion. of public works and to complete the design of the first stage, $200 million construction program. Pump station design experience includes potable water, stormwater, wastewater, and seawater. Mr. Hinker was project engineer for a 450,000 gpm brackish water pumping station in Panama and a 90,000 gpm stormwater pumping station in Orange County, California as well as for numerous water and wastewater pumping sta- tions. Gas engine driven pump stations include a potable water pumping station for the City of Fountain Valley, California. r k is i✓x i IT low. � 3 r Y k T 4w x e F X 7 YTf i } t 1 P(\O1 ECT. �MNAAq Y: S -x S lw � 6 yy t 1 XD { i 1•: v S i 9 On Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton PROJECT M2.NAGEMENT PLAN In our approach to every project, we believe that overall organization and team member responsibility are crucial to facilitating efficient exchange of information and assuring con- sultant client accountability. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is organ- ized to assure that each project meets both budget and schedule. A rigorously controlled system of checks and bal;3nces enables us to provide high gsality engineering services. PROJECT MANAGEMENT At Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton, our philosophy is that the rapport and communication between our client and the project manager is as important as the technical quality of our engineering. Our organizational structure provides the checks and balances neces- sary to assure not only high quality engineering services but also adherence to time schedules and budgets. Under our project management system, all members of a project team agree to a budget and schedule at the beginning of the pro- ject. Actual performance is compared to planned performance at frequent intervals. In this way, both the project manager and client stay informed regarding project cost and schedule. MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION The project will be directed by Mr. Lynn M. Takaichi, Vice President of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton. He will. be assigned Officer -in -Charge and will be responsible for job performance, negotiations, contractual matters, and coordination with the City. The project manager will be Mr. Harold B. Tennant, who will be responsible for the scheduling, preparation of docu- ments, and coordination of technical staff. PROJECT TEAM The principal resource of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton is the experi- ence and expertise of its staff. The personnel of Kennedy/ Jenks/Chilton have a wide variety of experience in the fields of environmental engineering, comprehensive management and planning programs and financial analyses. Our staff includes all of the technical disciplines necessary to provide the client with the consulting services required for the proposed renovation of Peck r Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Reservoir. Our multidisciplinary capability allows us to provide better coordination on our projects and adequately consider all aspects of the problem. RECORD OF PERFORMANCE - COST CONTROL AND TIME SCHEDULE Kennedy/aenks/Chilton has maintained outstanding client rela- tionships. A number of our clients have utilized our services for more than forty years. One measure of the effectiveness of our performance is the com- pleteness of our plans and specifications. This is validated by our record of low construction chance orders on major projects. Over the last twenty years, the ch.ange order extras on major projects, exclusive of changes in the scope of work, have aver- aged approximately one percent. We are very proud of this record and feel that it is indicative of our performance on studies as well as on design assignments. We are proud of our ability to meet schedules for work assign- ments. To aid us in maintaining an established timetable, a work schedule with milestone control points will be set up as an initial phase for the project. This will provide the necessary budget, time, and technical control needed to move the project through the many review and coordination requirements. COORDINATION WITH THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton believes that close coordination with the City of Huntington Beach during all phases of the project is anga essential function of project management. Responsibility for coordination and developing a close working relationship is shared by both the client and the consultant; however, the pri- mary responsibility for maintaining this mutual trust must lie with the consultant. This working relationship serves the dual purpose- of avoiding unnecessary waste of valuable study Hasid design time and assuring the client that the product is the most cost-effective effort achievable. We propose to develop a good working relationship with the City by scheduling regular review conferences and by providing management, technical and cost status reports. These procedures will insure an excellent com- munication flow. 11 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has provided consulting engineering ser- vices such as planning, design, and supervision of corstruction since 1917 to both public and private clients. During this time, we have completed over 3,500 projects. A great many of these projects have involved water storage and distribution facilities. Our record of performance on such projects can be best demonstrated by: • Client Relationships. A number of our clients have utilized our services for more than forty years. • Quality of Plans and Specifications. One measure of the effectiveness of our performance is the completeness of our plans and specifications. This is validated by our record of low construction change orders on major projects. Over the last twenty years, the change order extras on major projects have averaged approximately one percent. We are very proud of this record and feel that it is indicative of our perfor- mance on design and construction supervision work. ® Specific Reservoir Project Experience. The merits of speci- fic reservoir' project experience cannot only be assessed according to the reservoir projects with capacities exceeding 10 MG. Rather project experience must additionally be evalu- ated according to the similarities and applicability of design conditions, criteria and problems between past pro- jects �,nd the City of Huntington Beach Peck Reservoir. Kennedy/'Jenks/Chilton has completed a large number of reser- voirs ranging in size from 50,000 gallon tanks to 6,500 acre- feet, and varying in design for above -ground and below -ground locations. REPRESENTATIVE RESERVOIR PROJECT EXPERIENCE Representative reservoir projects have been selected for full description to demonstrate our experience with capacities greater than 10 MG, our familiarity with similar project issues and design criteria, the structural and operational reliability of our constructed reservoirs, and ongoing reservoir work. In addition, a list of our recent and ongoing reservoir projects within the past five years is presented in the following table. 4.1 Project/Client Project Status Size Material Water Reservoir- Des?:gn 3.6 mg Steel City of Coachella Qswell Regulating Facility Construction 7 mg Steel Kern County Water Agency ID4 Clearwell No. 3 Predesign 8 mg Not yet selected Kern County Water Agency ID4 Clearwell No. 2 Completed 3.2 mg Earth Embankment Kern -County Water Agency flexible lining and floating cover ID4 Clearwell No. I Completed 3.2 mg Earth Embankment Kern County Water Agency flexible lining and floating cover ID4 Storage Tank, Completed 500,000 Steel Kern County Water Agency gallons Jack; George Reservoir Completed 3 mg Reinforced Concrete Monte Vista Water District Upper. Zone Reservoirs Planning 6.5 mg Not yet selected City of Chino 5.25 mg Lower Zone Reservoirs Planning 3.2 mg Not yet selected City; of Chino 8.75 mg Lakewood Water Treatment_ Plant Clearwell* Under design review 200,000 Coated bolted steel Tuolumne RegionalWater District gallons Zone 10 Reservoir Under design review 200`,000 Coated bolted steel Tuolumne Regional Water Districts gallons Project/Client Project Status Size Material Tracy Clearweil Completed 1 mg Reinforced Concrete City of Tracy `Equalization Reservoir Under construction 4 mg Earth embankment, Central Marin Sanitation Agency hypalon lining Pearl Harbor Holding Tank Completed 600,000 Reinforced Concrete .U.S.. Navy gallons Concrete Diego Garcia Storage Tank Under construction 150,000 Reinforced Concrete U, S. Navy gallons Clark Air Force Base Reservoir Under design'review 250,000 Reinforced Concrete U.S. Navy/U.S<. Air Force gallons Flow_ EqualizationBasin Design completed 2.4 mg Compacted earth, Carmel Sanitary District asphalt concrete lined Flow Equalization- Basin Predesign 4 mg Not yet selected Cities of Reno -Sparks, Del 'Valle Reservoir Completed 2 mg Earth embankment with Alameda County FC« WCD, Zone 7 flexible lining and floating cover Kennedy/Jenics/Chilton Alameda County Reservoir Alameda County Water District Fremont, California Project Description: Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has designed and supervised the construction of an 18 MG reservoir. The major features of this reservoir are: .0 Optimization of reservoir capacity to 18 MG. Reservoir dimensions are 400 feet by 354 feet with a roof area of 3.25 acres and a maximum water depth of 30 feet. a Below ground reservoir with 170,000 cubic yards of excava- tion; Lined floor and side slopes below ground, upper reinforced concrete perimeter walls above ground! precast concrete columns. e Alternative reservoir roof designs developed for concrete, steel and wood materials according to cost and site land use requirements. The District chose glued -laminated tim- ber roof, supporting corrugated metal sheets treated with vinyl coating based on cost, aesthetics and operation and maintenance requirements. a Environmental/community acceptability. Reservoir location on a hill in a well -developed residential area required aesthetics and multiple land use considerations. 3 An overall view of the reservoir within its environmental set- ting and an interior view of the reservoir are presen-ed in the following figures. An idea of the community concerns and struc- tural design can be derived from these figures. Design Criteria: The design criteria for this project includes: 3: a Environmental/Community Acceptability. The reservoir site is located on a h%11 in a high rent residential district. Because of its highly visible position and the adjacent s homes, the District was concerned with the aesthetics and land use of the site. Several land use alternatives were developed: tennis courts, playgrounds, basketball courts, pavillions, a "reflective pool", and a reservoir roof - which blended into the surrounding landscape. The Dis- trict Planning Department and community organizations r agreed on a reservoir roof concept which blended in color -y and roof design to the adjacent houses. Due to the is 4.4 z k 's a'�� ,; st ado- � . "E�rFt, Y k . �' � tz .. �3 tt �5 YR �U` � � •t M' 4 tRR1A^A i.* PR t `x r � r � a � � . �}•; ,, ,.. �. + fit, ;. s r' ixi�c�. � S r5 4 � 71s �i: Kennedy/Jenks/Chlltoc reservoir's close proximity to residences, active recrea- tional land uses were ultimately considered potential sources of adverse noise and visual impacts. Without a' dual land use requirement, structural roof loadings were not as severe and significant cost savings could be realized. 0 Safety Requirements for the Division of Safety of Dams. The Division of Safety of Dams was primarily concerned with site seismicity, either shaking or faulting. Under coordination with the Division, pipe connections with the storage facility and the column and beam connections were designed to accommodate movement and resist seismic load- ings. These structural features would prevent damage to the reservoir itself and damage to the neighboring resi- dences. The cut side slopes extending from ground surface to the reservoir floor were specified at two to one and three to one ratios in accordance with Division require- ments for the site geological conditions. As an addi- tional safety provision, a valve box which automatically closes the outlet pipe in the event of an earthquake or in the distribution was rupture system provided. e Minimize Construction Costs. Various design alternatives were developed and compared to determine the most cost- effective reservoir facility that would meet storage and site requirements. Reinforced concrete and lined open cut reservoir design alternatives were prepared for the District's review. The District chose the open cut reser- voir to minimize cost, satisfy the Division of Safety of Dams' requirements, and meet storage requirements. s a Operation and Maintenance Requirements. The District required stringent structural provisions to facilitate operation and maintenance activities. To gain access into the large reservoir during cleaning and disinfection operations, roll -up doors in the side panels were provided to allow O&M personnel to drive vehicles and haul equip- ment into the interior. The cut sides of the reservoir were constructed at a two to one and three to one slope ; permitting ease in driving and walking within the reser- voir. Hose bibs were also set up at interior columns to facilitate hook up of hoses for chlorination during the disinfection of the large reservoir without diffirw? i-y or hazard to personnel. Kennedy/.Jenks/Chilton o Record of Performance. The project was completed on time and within the design/construction budget. The low bid was 96 percent within the engineering cost estimate. A reference for this project is: Mr. Carl Ngan, Engineer Alameda County Water District P. 0. Box 5110 Fremont, CA 94537 (415) 797-197P ,Tack George Reservoir Monte Vista County Water District Montclair, California Project Description: Kennedy/denks/Chilton has designed and assisted in the construction supervision of a 3 MG below -ground reservoir. The major features of this reservoir are: 4 e Multiple Land Use. Three tennis courts were constructed on the reservoir's roof slab to fulfill the City's Parks and Recreation Department's requirements and provide com- patible land use with the surrounding residential area. ® Below -ground structure with dimensions of 185 feet by 143 feet, a roof area of 0.6 acres, and a maximum water depth of 20 feet. e Reinforced concrete structure including a flat roof slab with drop panels, and reinforced concrete columns and walls. e Stringent design/construction budget and schedule. The immediate need for an operational reservoir: within the water system required a "fast track" design and construc- tion schedule and imposed budget constraints according to the limited funding availability. Both budget and schedule were met. a seismic design considerations. A site plan of the reservoir and a top plan of the reservoir slab and tennis courts are presented in the following drawings. These drawings are samples of the quality of our construction drawings (no construction change orders occurred) and are repre- sentative of the structural components and tennis court details of the project. 4.6 i(ennedy/Jenks/C;hilton Design Criteria: The design criteria for this project included: e Environme `al/Community Acceptability. The District specified multiple land use of the reservoir site through the construction of tennis courts. This dual recreational use of the site was planned in coordination with the Department of Parks and Recreation and the Departm>,.i. of Planning of the City of Montclair to meet both coi,,`<q.ity and aesthetic objectives. The spacing and dimensions of the courts were designed in accordance with the U. S. Tennis Association regulations to promote the possibility of future tournament use as a potential source of revenue for the City of Montclair. Specific specifications of appropriate material and installation for reservoir top membrane and playing surfaces on top of the reservoir roof, fencing, windscreen, and court markings were prepared. 9 Seismic Design. The majority of Southern California falls in the Zone 4 region of the Seismic Risk Map of the united States and is designated as being subject to occurrence of major destructive earthquakes. The Jack George Reservoir located in San Bernardino County and the proposed Walteria Reservoir located in the Torrance area are both subject to the structural requirements specified for the seismic zone: under the Uniform Building Code, "Tentative Provisions for. the Development of Seismic Regulation for Building ATC3-06(2)" prepared by the Applied Technology Council, and "Seismic Induced Loading on Sanitary.Facilities" co-authored by Donald B. Ballantine of Kennedy/Jenks Chilton. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has designed the Jack George Reservoir to resist seismic loadings in accordance with current codes and criteria and to accommodate move- ment between pipe connections and storage facilities. ® "Fast Track" Design/Construction Schedule. Due to the immediate need of the reservoir, a significant time con- straint was imposed on the completion of the project. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton completed the construction drawings and specifications within two months and the construction. of the reservoir was completed within ten months. The design and construction schedules were met. 4.7 'kr H1,7' Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton Record of Performance. With budget and schedule constraints, the project was completed on time and within budget. The engi- neering cost estimate for this project was $1,500,000; the final construction cost was $1,348,.000. No construction change orders were necessary. A reference for this project is: Mr. Robert W. Thompson General Manager Monte Vista County Water District 10575 Central Avenue Montclair, California 91763 (714) 624-0035 Rinconada Reservoir Santa Clara Valley Water District San ,Jose, California Project Descr-Lptions Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has designed and supervised construction of a 15 MG partially below/above ground reservoir. This project is unique in that the District required the maximum flexib*.lity in the reservoir design to obtain the most economical construction cost. Complete construction draw- ings and specifications were prepared for six different reser- voir alternatives, which varied in structural type and opera- tional concepts, on the same site. These alternatives included three prestressed and reinforced concrete reservoir designs, two steel tank designs and one lined earthfill reservoir design. The six construction packages for these reservoirs were bid. The lowest bid was obtained for the lined earthfill reservoir which was constructed. Design Criteria: The design criteria for this project includes: ® Minimize Construction Costs. One of the primary objec- tives of this project was minimizing the construction costs. In providing complete construction and bid docu- ments for six reservoir alternatives, the lined earthfill reservoir was bid and constructed for the lowest cost. The facility was paved with asphalt concrete; lined with a synthetic rubber membrane; had pre -cast concrete pillars; and had a timber roof structure with steel decking. The reservoir's location on a hillside presented an additional advantage in conserving excavation and material costs by using an earthen embankment as approximately one -quarter of the sidewall. Kennet y/Jenks/Chi ton a Seismic Design. The reservoir location in a seismically sensitive area and at a higher elevation directly above a population center, required stringent seismic design con- siderations. Comprehensive geotechnical and soil investi- gations were conducted. Based on the results of the investigations and the operational requirements, all six final reservoir alternative designs incorporated several safety features to minimize the danger of rupture during an earthquake. other features inclu f -d a leakage detec- tion system which could be monitored .from a remote moni- toring center located at the District's water treatment plant. Record of Performance. The project was completed on time and within budget and without construction change orders. A refer- ence for this project is: Mr. Bruce Ragadans Superintendent of Water Supply Division Santa Clara Valley Water District s 5750 Alamaden Expressway San Jose, California 95110 ( 408 ) 265--2600 Lombard Street Reservoir City of San Francisco San Francisco, Ca i ornia Project Description: Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has designed and supervised the construction of this 4.6 MG below -ground reser- voir. The major features of this reservoir are: Durable structural integrity and reliable operations. This reservoir was constructed over 25 years ago. Discus- sions with the City Water Department indicate that no structural or operation and maintenance problems have been experienced during this service time. Optimization of reservoir capacity to 4.6 MG. The site location on a steep slope of a hill and within a confined site area imposed restrict -ions on the reservoir configura- tions and dimensions. One of the primary objectives of this project was to maximize the reservoir capacities to the greatest extent within this set of site constraints. 4.9' Below -ground reinforced concrete reservoir with membrane lined floor and side slopes; precast concrete columns; and prestressed concrete roof for tennis courts. ® Environmental/community acceptability. Reservoir location in —a hills de in the center of a well developed residen- tial area required aesthetics and multiple land use con- siderations. An overall view and an interior view of the reservoir is pre- sented in the following figures. The environmental setting, site constraints, and physical condition of the reservoir can be observed from these photographs. Design Criteria: The design criteria is briefly s--ated as fol- lows: * Environmental/Community Acceptability. Because of the reservoir's highly visible and environmentally sensitive location, a multiple land use design was completed with: tennis and basketball courts. ® Seismic Design. Compliance with applicable seismic and structural criteria was accomplished. During the reser- voir's 25 years of operation, the San Francisco area has experienced seismic activity. No structural problems have resulted. Minimize Construction Cost. Due to the reservoir location on the hillside, conservation of costs in excavation and structural material was a major concern. Record of Performance. The project was completed on time and within budget. Although the age of the Lombard Street Reservoir exceeds 25 years, the reservoir still remains in good structural and operational condition. During the City's periodic checks of its system reservoirs, no leaks have been detected or reported__ for this Lombard Street Reservoir during its 25 years of ser- vice. As a result, rehabilitation or improvement work has not been necessary since its construction as of chis date. A refer- ence on the operational and maintenance condition of the reservoir is: Mr. George Nakagaki Manager of Water Department City of San Francisco 425 Mason Street San. Francisco, California 94102 Kennedy/JenksfChilton Oswell Reservoir Facility Kern County Water Agency Bakersfield, California Representative of our ongoing reservoir work, Kennedy/Jenks/ Chilton designed a reservoir which has a maximum capacity of up to 28 MG. This project will provide additional storage capacity to reduce rapid flow changes at Kern County Water Agency4s Water Purification Facility. The Oswell regulating facility must operate in parallel with the existing system and also be capable of being isolated from that system. As part of the preliminary design work, we are evaluating seven regulating facility alter- natives, including welded steel tanks, reinforced concrete tanks, precast concrete tanks, line earthen reservoirs,, and lined earthen reservoirs with vertical concrete walls above the existing grade. The major considerations in the ongoing planning phase are con- struction cost, efficient utilization of the available land area, site limitations, and operational requirements. our recommended project will maximize the storage capacity available at the existing site. A phased construction schedule is planned to accommodate financial constraints and to allow for future financial planning. Following this planning phase, complete construction drawings, specifications, and a bid package are being prepared for the Agency. Construction supervision will also be provided. ADDITIONAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE In addition to the detailed descriptions of selected reservoir projects which are similar to Peck Reservoir, we are including the following summary of other representative reservoirs which Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton has designed and supervised construction. This summary of projects is intended to demonstrate the range and versatility of our experience with reservoirs of different materials, structural types, varying storage capacities, site conditions, and operational requirements. 4.11 Kennedy/Jenks Engineers has exten- sive experience in the planning, design, ano construction management of water storage facilities, We have de- signed a variety of ground level, bur- ied, and elevated structures, ranging in size from .05 mg to 18 mg. Types have included water tanks, balancing and storage reservoirs, clearwP'.s, and agri- culture irrigation water holding basins. An important part of our project approach is alternatives evaluation. We stress cost-effectiveness, opera- tional flexibility, and esthetics. In addition, we strive to develop the most energy efficient designs possible, consistent with project aims, When designing a treated water reser- voir, we consider site selection and the capacity of both the reservoir and standpipes, and we make provi- sions for domestic, industrial, and free flow quantities. We also provide for mixing and disinfection, ventila- tion, maintenance, ease of inspection, conformance with applicable regula- tions, and the physical security of the area. In addition, we design structures to resist seismic loadings in accordance with current codes and to accom- modate movement between pipe con- nections and the storage facility. Construction materials are chosen to best suit the site, the needs of the area, and the client's budget. Materials specified have included prestressed concrete, cast -in -place concrete, soil, soil cement, steel, and redwood. Storage reservoirs have had basins sealed with bentonite, concrete, as- phalt, flexible membrane, and as- phaltic plank linings. Rinconada Water Treatment Plant 15mgreservoir and 3mgof'clearwell storage —SGVWD Most of our storage reservoir projects have included covers. For example, our design of a 3 mg underground reservoir included three tennis courts which are located on the concrete roof slab. Another cover has both tennis courts and a basketball court on it. Concrete roofs can also be covered with earth and serve as baseball diamonds, soccer fields, parks, or gardens. Our architectural division, Hunt and Company, Architects, designs a variety of reservoir covers, including those using concrete, steel, wood, and fabric. Our architects work closely with our engineering staff when siting and designing ancillary structures such as pump stations and access towers. During planning, design, and construc- tion, we work closely with local offi- cials and planning agencies and with state and federal health and safety regulatory agencies. In KAI, 0 Planning, design, and construction Reservoir covers design coordinated management of water storage facilities with our architectural division from .05 mg to 18 mg Design of structures to resist seismic Use of a wide range of materials loading and accommodate movement A project approach which stresses cost effectiveness, operational flexibility, and esthetics Representative Water Storage Projects Size Client Project Name/Type (mg) Description Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7 Del Valle Clear Well 3.0 EP!3M liner, concrete columns, vinyl coated aluminum roofing Alameda County Water District Warm Springs Reservoir 18.0 EPDM liner, concrete columns, glulam wood beams Beaulieu Vineyards Frost Protection Facility 13.0 Clay lined earth reservoir California, State of Cal Expo Tank 0.3 Elev..red steel pedestal tank Capella County Water District Storage Tank 0.05 Redwood tank Campbell Soup Company Sacramento Storage Facility 1.25 Prestressed concrete tank Chester Public Utility District Storage Tank 0.6 Ground level stee! tank Coastside County Water District Storage Tank 1.5 Ground level steel tank Elko, City of Reservoir 3.0 Ground level steel tank Fairbanks, City of Clear Weil 0.3 Buried reinforced concrete reservoir Gonzales, City of Storage Tank 0.1 Elevated steel water ball with triangular support system Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District Storage Reservoirs 2.0 Two covered, ground level steel tanks Kern County Water Agency I.D. 4 Clear Well 3.5 Two reservoirs with EPDM liners and floating hypalon covers Marin Municipal Water District Storage Tank 2.0 Prestressed concrete tank Monte Vista Water District Jack George Reservoir 3.0 Reinforced concrete reservoir with slab roof and tennis courts Redwood City, City of Easter Bowl Water Tank 1.2 Ground level steel tank Rio Lindo, City of Storage Tank 0.1 Elevated double ellipsoidal steel tank { t Sacramento, City of Storage Tank 0.1 Elevated, single pedestal supported, steel tank San Francisco Water Department Lombard Street Reservoir 4.6 Membrane liner, prestressed concrete roof used for tennis courts San Luis Obispo, City of Treated Water Tank 4.0 Ground level steel tank San Luis Obispo, City of Wash Water Storage Tank 0.16 Ground level steel tank Santa Clara Valley Water District Penitencia Clear Well 3.0 Covered, ground level steel tank Santa Clara Valley Water District Rinconada Reservoir 15.0 EPDM membrane liner, glulam wood beams, vinyl coated roofing Shelter Cove Resort Storage Tank 1.0 Ground level steel tank Squaw Valley/Olympic Facility Reservoir 0.5 Prestressed concrete tank U. S. Navy -Guam Storage Tank 0.1 Elevated, double ellipsoidal steel tank University of California, Davis Davis System_ Reservoir 1.5 Buried water storage reservoir under recreation area University of.California; Davis Storage Tanks 0.1 Three elevated steel ellipsoidal tanks A University of California, Davis Storage Tank 0.2 Elevated steel ellipsoidal tank s Kennedy/,Desks Engineers s 657 Howard Street t 3 San Francisco, California 94105 a 415 362-6065 543 Byron Street Palo Alto, Cal' arnia 94301 415-362-25', 1164 Bishop Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 808.524.0594 s. 2041 Business Center Drive Irvine, California 92715 714-752.5555 `Y 3030 Explorer Drive Sacramento, California 95827 916-362.3251 4109 Bridgeport Way W. Tacoma, Washington 98466 2061-565-5450 1101,955 I, Enfant Plaza North, Southwest 2 1 - University of California, Davis, Elevated Water Storage Tank Washington, D.C, 20024 1 ❑ 2 - Denniston Creek Water Storage Tank 202-554.2470 3 - City of San Francisco, Lombard Street Reservoir ; f �: . v ilm Oakland, CA 94604 ? (415) 465-3090 INSURED Kennedy/Jenks Engineers, Inc. 657 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105 a- a- 5 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLIIES OF W=RAW:9 LISTED BELOW HAVE SEEN PTO THEE INSF7: KMEn ABOVE FOR THE POLJCY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TEM OR CONDITION OF ANY CQAITRACT OR OTHER DENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY rr ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE E�SURARGCE AFFORDED BY THE PDLCtES DESt D HEREIN I5 SU32ECT TO ALL. THE TERMS, E CCLUSIONS, AND CONDt t TTdJPiS OF SUCH POLICIES. i~ S is i 1.. CO s � [i s TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER P STECIT4 O LIABILITY UMfTS�IN THOUSANDS, t OCt;URR AGGREGATE A GENERAL UASILTfY 801547B 7/l/85 7/1/86 $ $ CMAPREHENSTVE FORM WARY PROPERTY $ PREMISES(OPERAT)ONS $ + k UNDERGROUND EXPLOSION & COLLAPSE HAZM DAMAGE PROOUCTSICOMPLETED OPERATIONS �aPa '"n COMS690AD 1,000, 1,000, IIUX�� FORM PROPERTY DMAGE PERSMN L VimInCl pEp�p�] )N,�� L RY $ - r. B AUT04&09 LE UABH rrY AB 60905783 7/l/85 7/1/86 MM WAY $ 1, OOO , ANY AUTO fa Pu= IN ALL OWMM AUTOS (PRIV. PASS.) Mr ALL OWNED AUTOS (F"'ER TH tt WN 6SA� $ 1,000, , J ,. FWPSRTY$ 500, HIRED AUTOS N044 MED AUTOS DAMAGE R IV a PO COU&NED $ GARAGE LIABILITY EXCEW UAEILJTY UMBRELLA FORM CoMaINED $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM C WOR{CERS' COMPENSATION C2 234123-6 l/1/85 1/1/86- StAruroRr $ (EACH ACCIDENT) AND $ �T a (DISEASE -POLICY LAN`; $ (D5EASE•EACH EM0.- - C i OTHER Employer's Liability C2 234123-6 1/1185 111/86 $1,000J �................. 7:h:11J'=�IJ7�I_\tS.'IIE M_\vi�i:F--��(--7:1;.?��+: n_i�wC��7In-IL--1 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SHOULD AM OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE £t. PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL RT eANY_�Y 11NL I(I DAYS WRITTEN NOTE T4 THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMEDTOTHE LEFT. 76$ Zll�Ck « 7 , RENTON 1J, � � \ / Planning for water resources devel- Areas covered by Kennedy/Jenks opment usually requires a survey Engineers include: of alternatives with consideration Im hydrology of hydrology, geology, topography, water rights, and legal issues, as 0 surface water supply well as consideration of the eco- 0 groundwater supply nomics and environmental impacts of development alternatives. Imple- 0 water quality 1 mentation of water resource projects I% dams typically involves all of the foregoing considerations along with a broad is hydroelectric power range of engineering skills. in irrigation , -. L 9t' f i �✓ 'fi Iq '.}emu°' �. k � ♦ �S.�,..� ' ,�y1 % i, � - '•",� e a c w rwh �. � v a&�y� � ya �� ^ «� � w\»? 2j� � \� \� � �. . ,� � - • • • • *}Tu%V+ P 5'v i T° '.k s t «.Y ti ..rye,^ '�It' �,+?C�JL' ^ w; •t ' { { - ,ykSk� r'*� K ',N�'K'� �"'t"a`, �.,<, y`�+k ,:�•�:ir'„i§G€: 'tom. , � .t - - i V � r-t • �� '4' • • K.. _ h �/. CP PS'<j�"'ft� �,AL.tat�ip''sj{3' ,�,yi+�i+-y(}t 'y}',��fa$� ti't'' �'. t"� F3. ,1,�, t I- { 1 { C \r � } y i ZI St �5= L}La '� �.r`r J f z.i LM � S5 • • • I • • ii IDf r b 4. 1 �3K ...`y r�.. k� C y�� ,{� Y' ; ' � .,' T k. p _ ,E`a� :i7i: Ki. i i i • • A .., � r� Y�� f Ak � * ��. f � H't��. Wastewater systems require careful planning and skillful design to pro- vide facilities capable of meeting both future needs and changing requirements. Furthermore limited sources of financing necessitate V:, flexible strategies and innovative a: are f solutions to maximize results for each dollar spent. KennedyMenks y� Engineers has a tong tradition of r-- °' meeting challenges like these. We believe that wastewater systems carp be reliable, cost-effective; and innovative. Whether designing new facilities or upgrading and expand- ing existing ones, we bring to each project an experienced, capable f rfl 1 team; a flexible approach; and a ? _ responsiveness to clients` needs. Projects have involved development and design of: t m regional management plans � ®collection sewers 9 sewage pump stations a treatment plants expansions/improvements u J, —r : . r ` Is instrumentation and supervisory controls • _ ''' 0 energy conservation and 4 cogeneration systems °ems N disinfection and odor control ON facilities 0 outfalls and disposal systems r;- ® reclamation/reuse alternatives 0 operational training and monitoring programs r= VyS 1 Odor control facility at San Mateo California, Wastewater Treatment Plant 2 PhoStrip tanks at the Reno -Sparks, Nevada, Wastewater Treatment Facility -� 3 Central,Marin Sanitation Agency§ Wastewater Treatment Plant, San Rafael, California 4 InnovativelAlternative technology -funded oxidation ponds, Soledad, California °-. 5 Ninole Wastewater Treatment Plant, Kau, Hawaii a, P7 k " t :.Y �� :� r-. ��e t a� F? � •., ti'J .�' �a ti'c Kennedy/Jenks Engineers providesProjects have involved - comprehensive site planning and �� \ 0 fac,iitie airport s ., j C design of infrastructure and utilities, p `� ,� < >.� including redevelopment of existing in site utilities sites. Activities have included prepa- ix roads and parking facilities i F ration of master plans and incre- mental development plans, budget im fuel storage and handling scheduling, development of utility facilities record drawings, studies on rate ;:• 7 _ ® electric power generation and schedules and loads, and assistance in system operation. We have worked distribution, including emergency -� and uninterru tible owes cic�ely w;th major utilities,, state and p p r --'; - — , e federal agencies, colleges and uni- systems f; ,,� _.T ,� ; i r versities, and with all branches R gas distribution, including i 'G 1 r d r r� of the V.S. military, standby for interruptible supplies �� •,""'� 1 y..--' ✓..-- y��1. ✓ � !""�"-tom w r, `{ '''p ice•. ' ! � � e �vX _ ='�.. i¢. r9_% .KIT+-._P""�-."•' ��'.rJ'� 1.'�� 1+ _ ,.� y ♦' S� Z,,� !r � �. S+ y :fix 7r:. Satisfactory solutions to problems associated with storing, handling, and treating hazardous materials and wastes require a multidisci- plinary approach which includes consideration of possible soil or groundwater contamination, water pollution, air pollution, or public health impacts. This approach requires the services of environ- mental and chemical engineers, public health specialists, ground- water hydrogeologists, and geol- ogists, as well as equipment and process engineers. Regulations under RCRA, TSCA, and Superfund are subject to frequent modification; Kennedy/Jenks Engineers monitors these regulations to determine current requirements. We also offer services in: • hazardous waste characterization ® site contamination assessment • groundwater contamination assessment • development of remedial plans • design of site restoration treatment facilities ® hazardous material management • hazardous waste treatment • hazardous waste reclamation 93 evaluation of waste disposal alternatives m oily waste treatment 1 Drummed wastes requiring character- ization and proper disposal, private client 2 Process schematic, industrial wastewater treatment 3 Installation of pump in groundwater extraction well, private client 4 Carbon adsorption vessels, private client �� y� .�3 . ��: ��\�5 .�\». .� �� \ ®� -� ' �» ©:� t »`� �� ^�\»f �§.� � � �� >&/ �}��cymy� � � a a�� /� � . \2�� <� � C\f�z§� � �F��zw.wt.:� «��\��\��/ `ter \ � \�� ^� �` : < }\�� ?;� ?�j� % �2..:. :vim .� »:w a �� : \,\.� ,�� / �� .� � � � � � � � � \< \� � �� : ��/ �~ � � � ; :\� /> �� « � »� � �� \�� ;�� 3� � � Industrial Faciffties n / +vrt As a multidisciplinary firm, Kennedy/ Services provided to industry by Jenks Engineers provides coordi- Kennedy/Jenks Engineers include: nated industrial facilities engineering E industrial site planning services which range from site plan- ning,to design of new facilities. We m facility design also provide extensive services for 0 utilities design facility modification to meet new process needs, increase energy of f i- 19 high purity water production ciency, improve the working environ- g heating, ventilating, and air ment, and meet current environmental conditioning and safety standards. Projects have included handicapped access retrofit, rs wastewater treatment and award -winning wastewater treatment systems, and special environments recycling recovery M product for computers and clean room operations. a air pollution control M energy management is hazardous material and waste handling and storage T$ '.f �� l{ t, � _., tad C � y :Y +R•� .A ,. 4 �t 4 'tiv "�" tyy(�`sh(�' '�`rv� ti``. }7 "�'f:.,: .._ '',y-,a '�"�c+`�}`��yr�\{ a`+--. j 't o. i • • • • � � MU dd tT �P , Y� 'tf ax.+N`„d'ra X �' '�'7 "� y F.. 'r i t k� r"` { • • • 1 • • � � � ... Y � �{ r � k X� �1 i d+ 4'�or!•!'!tN_d �6 rt f VM{� • •' • tl \Y ' �'t�+��i��rv+'�,yw`t� ��'�� LL J�+='�"irJ� r .e:`}��1��'�`r�e�F+?4T� • - • 'NK.£`r � -.y7. yf u�,�� t� �`��'''.,,.,,Yt7��r� O x r #.r� '�' .�• ti _ _ sky T • t� y �n��"nk'�„ .m,.e.x'P' �+ �� ix } fi�.. • . • . • • • 1 '�'`" 1, d HF'° � �K � ,1.qy pt 1 dR A T r q +3'}X' k� �k !� $� {-} �� • • • • • • • • , 1 T e �•Y �'fr' �` 1 ~ � h. 4 T"� U � � •. Y t"i� i1y' X .. rt� \iiY 7 1 y ",a"4L ��..pp� "'�,��}�.t c•':` c� ''�:-Y"'-� � 2::s+T.c4 � 'N �•'� �+r • � • • i 'i . . �'�• i • - fT �1�+► •�} IY :... � �`.'.y �.��- qy cif" 3^1'r."'� i Y IN r t t' Y ro ^w { 4 �S il,5�4'• Y aY'Xjsi_ �-W.-No . Y ,Mt 5okiki'',r.y rafi� / /' • '' / / / • .. SI r, ;, ba' tMl Yri+� N 9� e,'�ii f��'i 4`,}�� r _r `.cep ;_,, �. • ' ,�c ,� � . t:ya +�, -- Ntt � 6 4 R j r?'mil TW r ...'•.J;,,,4"�.`^s: a..A- . �� ii' ti � J�'-rw: , c,�...�:t4; ce. �' � 5 .f .. �' s Solutions to environmental problems require the development of reliable data. Kennedy/Jenks Engineers has r the experienced personnel and field and laboratory equipment needed to obtain original site -specific environ- mental data and to evaluate existing information. Our laboratory maintains a Quality Assurance Program which includes computerized quality control Go, and routine analyses of EPA refer- . ence standards. It also participates y in interlaboratory references with state agencies, such as the Hazard- ous Materials Laboratory Section of the California Department of Health Services. Specific services include: a water quality analysis m soil and solid waste analyses M federal and state hazardous waste testing IN hazardous waste delisting and classification of non -hazardous waste ® limnology and aquatic biology ® aquatic toxicity testing * groundwater quality monitoring g environmental chemical mobility testing 13 environmental assessments A waste treatability tests 0 pilot plant evaluations 91 corrosion control Kennedy/Jenks Engineers offers a wide range of specialized services to help clients develop, finance, and implement their projects. We offer operational consulting and energy management services to assist both public and private sector clients in operating their facilities more effi- ciently and cost-effectively. If needed, we serve as District/City Engineer and take responsibility for overall project management. We also pro- dh vie liaison witpu is agencies an assist in acquiring necessary per- mits and project financings; 1 Operator training at Hayward, Cali - forma, Wastewater Treatment Plant 2 Construction surveillance for 60-lot residential subdivision on Island of Oahu, Hawaii 3 Heat recovery piping at Hayward, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant 4 Economic analysis of project afternatives 5 Permit and loan applications Municipal State and Federal Industrial Alameda County Agency for International Development American Petroleum Institute Anchorage AK Association of CaliforniL Water Amfac Bellingham WA Agencies American Smelting and Refining Calistoga CA Atomic Energy Commission Atlantic Richfield Company Carmel Sanitary District Bureau of Prisons Boeing Corporation Central Marin Sanitation Agency Bureau of Reclamation Burlington Northern Railroad Chino CA California Department of Corrections California -American Water Company East Bay Dischargers Authority California Department of Water California Pacific Utilities Company East Bay Municipal Utilities District Resourr,as Campbell Soup Company Fairbanks AK Department of Agriculture C. Bre-er and Company In County of Hawaii Department of Energy Citizen; Utilities Company Hayward CA Environmental Protection Agency Coca Cola Company Honolulu HI Forest Service DuPont Irvine CA General Services Administration Eastman Kodak Company Kern County Water Agency State of Hawaii Emhart Corporation Kodiak AK National Aeronautics and Space Exxon Marin Municipal Water District Administration Ford Motor Company Marysville CA National Park Service Foremost -McKesson so County of Maui National Science Foundation Foster Farms Modesto CA U.S. Air Force Glass Containers Corporation Napa Sanitation District U.S. Army Getty Oil Company Novato Sanitary District U.S. Coast Guard Hawaiian Electric Company Orange County Sanitation District U.S. Navy Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association M Orange County Water District. Hewlett-Packard Oro Loma Sanitary District Universities and Colleges Homart Development Co. Palo Alto CA Honakaa Sugar Company Pierce County California State University, Hayward Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Pleasanton CA and Sacramento Kekaha Sugar Company Reno -Sparks NV Stanford University Lanai Company San Francisco CA University ofAlaska Leadership Homes San Francisco Airports Commission University of California, Berkeley, Libby. McNeil -Libby San Joaquin County Davis, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Marwais Steel Company San Luis Obispo CA and Hastings College of the Law Matson Navigation Company San Mateo CA Western Washington State College Monterey Vintners Santa Clara County Pacific Gas & Electric Company Santa Clara Valley Water District International Purex Industries ' Santa Paula CA Safeway Stores Seattle WA Government of American Samoa Shell Oil Company Simi Valley County Sanitation District Government of Cambodia Southern California Edison Soledad CA Cartagena, Colombia Southern Pacific L,eveiopmenl Co. South Bayside System Authority Corporacion de Obras Sanitarias, Standard 01' Company of California South San Luis Obispo County S.D. Paraguay Tenneco Realty Development I Tacoma WA Direccion General de Obras Sanitarias, Todd Shipyards Tracv CA Peru TRW Energy Systems Tuolomne Regiorial Water District Empresas Publicas Mi„nicipales de United Airlines Ukiah CA ;' Palmira, Colombia Union Oil Company Union Sanitary District Government of Guar U.S Steel Company Upland CA ' Inter -American Development Bank Varian Associates Ventura County Obras Sanitarias de is Nacion, Western Pacific Railroad Vita Irrigation District Argentina Weyerhauser Company ,.....�+- �� r a '�'.� �� y tiby'C� a v' k r.�' � 9-. i � f a lax:- .a � ..�$ 3'� r�.� � � � '. Y � � �� a rz � IJ3 � �'Gd � �v .� ¢ ! ._tit ros.." i ' t a f � i t i ,: ?Cp4.. �_ ' 7_ JJ J�!+ �"M� � �._ +.._ ?, rt., . � T} Y.k��4� t,3>-1..1 ..2:'�. �+. it, n�.�. r��.. J,. 2) Describe the services performed; 3; Show the total amount of the- payment due; 4) Include a certification by a principal r:ambe- oL the CONTF.ACTOr, S firm that the work has been performed in accordance_ with the provi- sions of this Agreement; and 5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall promptly approve the invoice, in which evert payment shall be made within thirty (30) days', of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. if the CITY does not approve an invoice,. CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of the reasons for non -approval, within seven, (-7) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of ` performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or. has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof: D. &iy billings for extra work or additional servicesauthorized by the CITY shall be invoiced separately to the CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required under paragraph 6C,`:and in addition shall list the hours expended and: hourly rate charged for .such time Such invoices 'shall sbe,approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services'regiested, and if CITY is satisf%e� that the statement of hours worked and 3 �v�ew,ui5trk xc4r�c._--ham t.� cuss incurred is accurate:- Such approvai'shall not be unrea- sonably withheld: Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement: 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS ;ESTIMATES .AND ' OTHER DOCi3MENTS CITY acknowledges that CONTRACTOR'S plans and specifications are instruments of professional service; nevertheless CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder, including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notes, calculations, maps and other documents shall be turned over to CITY and shall become its property upon PROJECT completion or earlier termin-a-lion of this Agreement. In the; event this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY in completion of the PROJECT however, CITY agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend CONTRACTOR against all damages, claims and losses, including defense costs, arising out of CITY'S re -use of CONTRACTOR'S plans and specifications, except in the completion of the PROJECT inthecase of termination hereof, without CONTRACTOR'S prior written_ authorization 8, INDEMNIFICATION, -DEFENSE -HOLD HARMLESS CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers and employees from and against any and all liability, damages, costs, losses, claims and expenses, however caused, arising from CONTRACTOR'S negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of this Agreement_. The concurrent negligence or willful misconduct of any supervisory employee of CITY, if any, shall be compared to the negligence of CONTRACTOR in interpreting this provision. CITY and CONTRACTOR shall share such liability in proportion to thews respective degree of fault. 4..' e WORKERS' COMPENSATION CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the;;State of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of theCalifornia Labor Code and, all amendments thereto and all similar state or federal actsor laws applicable; and shall indemnify; defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature and description, including attorney's fees and costs presented,, brought or recovered against CITY, for or on account of any liability under any of :said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR' under this Agreement. 10. INSURANCE -In addition to the Workers' Compensation Insurance and CONTRACTOR'S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish to CITY: the following insurance policies covering the PROJECT A. General Liability Insurance. A policy of general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall name CITY, its officers and employees as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage: Which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage and that CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall be primary. H. Professional Liability Insurance.' CONTRACTOR shall acquire a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by ithereunder. Certificates of. Insurance_for said policies shall be approved in writing by the City Attorney prior to the commence -ment of any work hereunder. All Certificates of Insurance (and' the policies of insurance or endorsements thereof) shall provide that any such Certificates and policies shall not be cancelled. or reduced in coverage. or limits other than payments of claims ,without thirty (30) days' prior written notice to CITY. 5. 3 11. INDEPENDENT -CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor. CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense,- and be responsible for any and all payments of all takes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers_, agents and, employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection, with the services to be performed hereunder. 12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in accordance with the standards of the profession for similar professionals performing services in this are: at this time. CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR'S services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing through the City Engineer, notice of whic31 shall be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16 herein. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to any other person or entity without the consent of CITY. 14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CONTRACTOR shall not apply .fQr a patent or copyright on any, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement, as set forth in 41 CFR 1-9.1. 15. CITY`EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of California Goyernment'.Code Sections 1090 et seq.-< 6. 16, NOTICES Any notices or special instructions required to be given!iri writing under, this Agreement shall, be given either by personal delivery to CONTRACTOR'S agent (as designated in Section l.hereinabove) or to CITY'S Director 'of Public Works, as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the'-same;'in a sealed envelope., postage prepaid' and depositing the .same in the United States .Postal Services, addressed as follows: TO CITY: TO CONTRACTOR:' Mr. Paul Cook Mr. Lynn M. TaRaichi Director of Public Works Vice President' City of Huntington' Beach Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton 2000 Main Street 17310 Red Hill, Suite 220 " Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Irvine, California 92714 REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK - 7. i CITY . H TI AC 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 Paul E. Oook April 23, 1986 Public Works Bepairtgnant %ireCor (714) 536-5431 � Santina. & Thompson, Incorporated 1300 S. Beacon Street Suite 11.6 San Pedm, CA 9073 Attention: John Chalk r Subject: Peck Reservoir Repairs CC-696 Gentlemen: r: The City of Huntington Beach is requesting proposals from qualif irad Civil Engineering firms for the preparation of preliminary plans and final working drawings/specifications for the renovation of the City's Peck Reservuir facility (see attached Location Map). This renovation project shall be based on the corrective recommendations detailed in an inspection report prepared by Kenneth 1. Mullen, Consulting Engineers, Inc. (see Attachment A); p, The fkr which proposals are being solicited includes the following tasks: 1. Perform and/or provide all necessary field investigations required to ,prepare the preliminary plans and working drawings. i' 2. preliminary all Prepare p p ry plans and cost estimates. (Includes the cost of all miscellaneous printing, etc.), l` 3. Attending `periodic meetings with City staff during the preparation of preliminary t. plans and working drawirgs 4. Based on an approval of the preliminary plans and cost estimates, the engineer shall prepare and provide 40 sets of the (a) final working drawings (b) ` contract documents/specifications i„ The engineer shall, during bid advertisement and construction, pmvidesupport including interpretation of plans end specifications, review of shop drawings, review of and make recommendations on change orders. (s. Provide one acceptable set of reproducible "as -built" myiar drawings. (Note: 10°6 of the, contract amount will be withheld until the "as-builts" are submitted and approved). 7. Proposal teii %rm listing General Liability, Professional Liability QErrars & Omissions) and Worker's Compensation coverages. The advertising forbids and awarding of a.contract for this project will be le administered by Cityataff. In addition, City personnel will control contract orlrnlnisl'r�tl"�n and (sE'tform t tr rt•aj;lit' r: " .� r if Dealey Renton & Associates Insurance Brokers P. O. Box 12675 Oakland, CA 94604 (415) 465-3090 INSURED Kennedy/Jenks /Clii.lton 657 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPAEnER NY Security Insurance Co. of Hartford COMPANY �,'F LETTER Pirismans Fund d LETTER COMPANY C COMPANY D� LETTER Aetna — (CICNA) COMPAN LETTER Y E Security Insurance Co. of Hartford THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSThNDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OA CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HIEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLITIES. CO cc LTR TYPE OF INSUR 1NCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE IMMMUNY) POLICY EXPIRATION DATE WMMOIYY1 LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS EACR OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE GENERAL _ LIABILITY J BODILY A COMPREHENSIVE FORM RPL 620827 7/1/86 7/1/87 INJURY $ $ PROPERTY PREMISESAPEHA'IONS The City of Huntington 3each, its o ficers EXPLOSONU&DOLLAPSF.HAZARO and employees are inclll ed as additional DAMAGE $ $ PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS insureds. See the attac ed sample O CONTRACTUAL wording to be used in tie endorseme t and COMBNED $1,000, $ 1,000 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS pertinent language from the policy. BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY $ Iri,:l . AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 8MLY B ANY AUTO Renewal of 7/J/86 7/1/87 mr Pt41 $ A, L OWNED AUTOS (PRIV. PASS.) KM 5565312 o�gE i r ALL OWNED AUTOS (OTHER pASS See attached copy lye$ orm CA 001 HIRED AUTOS �o Part IV, D.3. `fib "eiial insure s . PROPERTY NON -OWNED AUTOS DAMAGE $ F31 & PD. GARAGE LIABILITY �� • e4��y $1,000 EXCESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FORM BI &PD COMBINED $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM D WORKERS' COMPENSATION AWS C2650892-7 Copy of waiver 3f subro 1/1/86 ation attac 1/1/87 ed . sraruroRY $100 TEACH ACCIDENT) $ 500 (DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT) AND In -the event O� cancel ation for ri n=payment EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY of premium nt.n0•_en)10 days notice Ehall be $100 (DISEASE -EACH EMPLOYEE) E OTHEI(,rofessional* 6 bo27��s�ee ota7/1/86 7/1/87 $1,000 ea. occur. Liability $1,000 aggregate _ $100 ded. each occur, " e1g6nMLxfAff "a`Ln ecveragei aggregate limit is the total insurance available claims Presented within the policy period for all operations of the named ire*urea. r57 reduced in limits by City of Huntington Beach 200 gain Street Huntington Beach, CA 92468 Proj; Peck Reservoir Repairs(cc-69 �� er , han tr SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRT=-• OLICIL`S BE CAN PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE GF.RT'FICATE LEFT„'17?RdS4CIE}dys:t Ef$3t3ilCSiBGGStX3GFii` , Renton F; Ass THE aART W. PABILITY. INSURANCE '£ WILL 'gAlf, a. Before it is moved from the place where it is accept - I,` kb'e wi!l pray all sums the In&vied legally must pay as ed by the insured for movement into or onto the covered auto, or " damages because of bodily injury orpropeny dam- age to which this insurance applies, caused by an b,. After it is moved from the covered autc to the place acci and resulting from the ownership, main- where it is finally delivered by the insured. ,ent tenanCe Or use of a Covered auto. g• Bodily injury or property damage resulting from the 4 We have the right and duty to, defend any suit asking movement of property by a mechanical device (other for these damages. However, we have no duty to than a hand truck) not attached to the covered, auto. defend suits fur bodily Injury or property damage not covered by this policy. We may investigate and 9. Bodily injury or property damage caused by the settle any claim or suit as we consider appropriate. dumping, disch::rge or escape of irritants, pollutants Our payment of the LIABILITY INSURANCE limit or contaminants. This exclusion does not apply) if the ends our duty to defend or settle. discharge is, sudden and accidental 3. WE WILL ALSO PAY. D. WHO IS INSURED. In addition to our limit of liability, we wil! pay fo: the 1. Yo'u are an insured for any covered auto. insured; 2. Anyone else is an insured while using wiffyo� ur per- 1. `Up to $250 for cost of bail bonds (including bonds mission a covered auto you own, hire or borrow ex - for related traffic law violations) required because cept: of an accident we cover. We do not have to furnish these bonds.. a. The owner of a covered auto you hire or borrow from one of your employees or a member of his or 2, Premiums on appeal bonds in any suit we defend, her household,, 3, Premiums on bonds to release imtachments in a b. Someone using a covered auto while he or she is suit we defend but only for bondsup to our limit of working in a business of selling, servicing, repairing tiabil-sty. or parking autos unless that business is yours. 4. All Costs taxed to the insured in a suit we defend: c. Anyone other than your employees, a lessee or bor- 5, All interest accruing after the entry of the judgment rower or any of their employees, while moving prop- g in a suit we defend. Our duty to pay interest ends erty to or from a covered auto. E When we. pay or tender our limit of liability. 3. Anyone liable for the conduct of an insured` de- 11 5r Up to $50 a day for loss of earnings (but not other scribed above is an insured but only tothe extent of income) because of attendance at hearings ortrials that liability. However, the owner or anyone else at our request) from whom you hire or borrow a covered auto is an 7. Other reasonable expenses incurred at our request. q insured only if that auto is atrailer connected to a • covered auto you own. WE WILL NOT COVER — EXCLUSIONS. E. "OUR LIMIT OF LIABILITY. This insurance does not apply to: 1- Regardles: of the number of covered autos, in- 1, Liability assumed under any contract or agreement. sureds, claims made or vehicles involved in 'he ac- 2. Any obligation for which the insured or his or her in- cident, the most we will pay for all damages result, ing from any accident is the LIABILITY INSUR- surer may be held liable under any workers' com• ANCE limit shown in the declarations.` pensation or disability benefits law or under any similar law, 2. All bodily injury and property damage resulting 3.. Any obligation of the insured to indemnify another from continuous or repeated` exposure to substan- tially the same conditions will be considered as re - for damages resulting from bodily imury to the in- suiting from one accident. surecrs employee. 4..Bodily injury to any fellow employee of the insured F. OUT OF STATE EXTENSIONS OF COVERAGE. arising out of ancf inthe course of his or her employ- 1. While a covered auto is awayfrom the state where it ment. is licensed we will; 5: Bodily injury, to any employee of the insured arising a. Increase this policy's liability limits to meetthose out of and, in the course of.his or her employment specified by a compulsory or financial responsi- by the insured. However, this exclusion does not ap• bility law; in the jurisdiction where the covered ply to bodily injury to domestic employees not en- auto is being used. titled to workers' compensation benefits. b. Provide the minirn;im amounts and types of Property darn≥to property owned or transported other coverages, such as "No fault", required of by the Insured or in the insureds care, custody or out of state vehicles bythejurisdiction where the control., covered auto is being used, Bodily injury or property.darnage resulting from the 2- We will not pay anyone more than once for the handling at property: same elementsof toss because of these extensions. f8Y3 Q1, (Ed. 01 RO) Page 2 of 5 Copyright, lnsuran� Services Office, '1977, 1979 e+.r ...Y J , t' L +'-tom.-� i Yni. e� � .Y • *rY __ _— - OESKN PROFESSIf LS r INSURANU COMPANY - ENDORSEMENT AMENDMENT OF COVERAGE PART II COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT , Ito It is agree,! that Covvrage Part II, ••Persuns Inswcd", n "Itnutt:d to inrludt Is an utsurctl file l,crsnn or t otganization designated below subject to tilt: folluwirnl p,nvr.uri,;• � c 1, The insurance with resprcl its curl, Iwlsta,t ur nr,l,u,ti.It rnn only appiws it)I,r,ddy injury or in the of opt•,ations la:rinrinrd lot such perscin or ptoperty damage wising out of and coolse organization by the named insured anti any sulscuntr,,cn,r the, :of :nxl general stii,crvision of such • operations by suchpersonor organization. 2� The insurance flocs n41 iq�t,ly 1u Ik,.11y injury or luni,e,ty rl:un•up: ansutct Out Of any at.t or th:u, gcnrrrd omission of such pctson us otganizatiun (itany u,nt,li,y,•,• ttu•u:uf, uttu:r supervision of operations l)erfurmed by the named tosOled I- sill-11 !n ru,n n, urU.ncti,,uun a. Nutwithstarttlinl► any_o( trio (oreuointt; thr Inn,ts ul ttat„I ty ul flu: <unq,,ny slt,dl l,t,t Ill.u•tara;eti .. and shall not exceed the limit slated ,rt tht. i1t:Cl,,,,,tun,; asd:uh ucrw,tncc (itaygtrgau::' l3esiyn,t,c,n of Person of Of(pntrtlion CONDITIONS — APPLICABLE TO COVI:I'IA(',l= PAITF Il !. OTHER 'IP SURANCE. The insurance afforded by this COVERAGE PART is primary insurance, except when stated to apply in excess of or contingent upon trio absence of other insurance. When this insurance is primary and the Insured has other insurance which is c;tatud to be applir:nble to tha loss on an excess or - contingent basis, the amount of the Comp toy':; liability 1,111001 tlli:; I)r,licy :.ball not bo reduce d by the existence of such other insurance. When both this Insurance :rid other insurance apply to the loss on the same basis, I'; ether primary, a excess or contingent, the Company ,,hall not be liable under this C`)VERAGE PAFj for a greater proportion of the foss than that stated in the applicable contribution provision below: A Contribution by Equal Shares. If all of such other valid and collectible insuranc(: providt ; for contribution by equal shares, the Company shall not be liable for a yrot lUl prahnrl,un ul un.l1 lu.;s than would be payablu jf each insurer 1 contributes an equal share until the: share; of oach imairor cIrlual:; tilt: luv:est Ltpplic;lblo limit of liability under any one COVERAGE PAF1T of trio full anluurlt of trio lc,,,; i:; paid. aiicf with respect to any amount of loss not so E)aid tho rom,611419 insutors then continuo to ror,lrihuto equal shares of the remaining amount of the loss until each such insuru liw; l,rti(I it:, limit in full oitho full amount of the loss .fs paid. B. Contribution by Limits. If any of such other insuranco does not provide forcontr itu,lion by equal :,hares, file Company shall not be liable fora greater proportion of such loss than tf le al )JAr:lblo iimitofliability under this COVERAGE PART for such -loss bears to tllc total ,applicaljl+: limit Of lialtilily of all vuiid ;!iid collectible insurance against such loss. e SEVI R—kBI'LITY OP JITTERZSTS (CROSS LIABILITY)t i The team "t-he inuiuredi is used severclly and not collectively, anti r the insuranco aff'orde l insider the liability coverage applies separately , to each inourad against whom c18is Is made or quit in brought, but the Inclusion horc9in of moan than one Ineurad ahall not operate to increase >rh� i1wit iq; of the company's litability. f i a . _. 16 d Letter of Transmittal Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton "17310 Red Hill Avenue, Suitb 220 Irvine,California 92714 714-261-1577 To: City of Huntington Beach Dater 7/21/86 Job No.: 0004 2000' Main Street Attention:Mrc Bill Pat:atoff Hunt-ingtn—n Rpar_h, Californin 92648 Subject- Certificates of Insurance We are sending you: ® Attached or ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Plans ❑ Prints ❑ Specifications 0 Samples ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Copies Date No, Description 1 118186 Certificate of Tnsurance for Pro ct CC-699 _ 1 7/18/86 Certificate of Insurance for Proiect CC-696 These are transmitted v, checked below: IN For information and coordination ❑ For review and comment p Resubmit copies for review ❑ For approval ❑ Returned after loan to us ❑ Submit copies for distribution As requested ❑. ❑ Return corrected prints Remarks Copies to, Kennedy/Jenk%tChiiton If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once, By: tx-,o LyrLh M. Takaichj. G•5 Rev. 1186