HomeMy WebLinkAboutKleinfelder Inc - 1989-03-20 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
February 22, 1990
Kleinfelder, Inc.
2121 N. California Blvd., #570
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Attn: Thomas E. Bailey
Dear Mr. Bailey:
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting held
Tuesday, February 20, 1990 approved Amendment No. 2 to Agreement between
the City of Huntington Beach and Kleinfelder, Inc. for engineering design
services for the property on and adjacent to the Huntington Beach Landfill.
Enclosed is an executed copy of the Agreement for your records.
Sincerely,
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
CB:me
Enclosure
0996K
(Telephone: 714-536-5227)
j • •
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH AND KLEINFELDER, INC. FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN
SERVICES FOR THE PROPERTY ON AND ADJACENT TO
THE HUNTINGTON BEACH LANDFILL
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 is entered into this 20th day
of February , 1990, by and between the CITY of HUNTINGTON
BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" , and KLEINFELDER, INC. ,
hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR" .
WHEREAS, since the original agreement, dated March 20, 1989 ,
and amended August 7, 1989, it has been determined by the parties
that additional payment is required of CITY to complete the project .
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between CITY and
CONTRACTOR that paragraph 4 (COMPENSATION) is amended to read to add
the following :
The statement of work is amended to add services described in
Exhibit "C" , which is attached hereto and incorporated into this
Amendment No. 2 by this reference. The increased cost for the
additional work, including expense reimbursement, increases the
contract by an amount not to exceed SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND THREE
HUNDRED AND SIXTY DOLLARS ($72,360) . This amount is to be added to
the original agreement cost of THIRTY-NINE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED
SIXTY DOLLARS ($39, 860) and amendment number one cost of TWO HUNDRED
FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($240, 000) for a total amended project cost
of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY-TWO THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND TWENTY DOLLARS
($352, 220) .
PAGE END
-1-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this
Amendment No . 2 as of the date hereinabove set forth.
CONTRACTOR: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,
KLEINFELDER, INC. A municipal corporation
a California corporation of the State of California
BY:
Mayor
Its
By:
Its
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: !INITIATED TD APPROVED:
_ I
City Administrator irec-toc of Public Works
1 .. $ "G1O
-2-
.J
75b).
c�
.. f
j V j �. .Utiwn J 1
.r S• �`.. `J�b•
cu
<.f
•�.t�t �''_ i C�f l.tee T l i SaLy FLEA�E
%
c J ' A, J :j
=WASH
;NCE RO� .
SULLY-MILLER-'LAKE
COMMUNITY PROGRAM
LLuernmWE P e I,
EXHIBIT
OCEAN VIEW ESTATES #
r�M�pld
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH dtir�f l►_L.�l
CX,<�fjiT
k" KLEI N FELDER
January 5, 1990
File 70-1158-01
Change Order #2
UEF)i. Or PUSLIC WORKS
City of Huntington Beach '�� `��U
2000 Main Street
P.O. Box 190 HUNnNGTON BEACH. CALIF.
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Lou Sandoval
Subject: Proposal for a Modified Closure Plan
Change Order#2
Dear Mr. Sandoval:
Kleinfelder is pleased to submit this proposal to provide a modified closure plan to the City
that will take into consideration the decision by the City to develop the landfill property as an
irrigated golf course and mobile home park. Kleinfelder has the experience and capability to
provide the City with a reliable and cost-effective system.
Enclosed with this letter is a Modified Closure Plan which describes the project background ,
project approach and scope of work. Included with the scope of work is a cost proposal which
identifies a total not-to-exceed cost of $96,580 to perform the total project, including the
additional items necessary as a result of the irrigation of the proposed golf course.
Kleinfelder recommends that the existing budget of $50,000 for a closure plan for the landfill
to be used as open space be applied toward this latest scope of work. Therefore, Kleinfelder
recommends that the budget be amended by $46,580 to allow for the increased costs
associated with the development of the golf course and mobile home park.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please call Hugh Walker.
Kleinfelder looks forward to working with the City on this important project.
Sincerely,
KLEINFELDER, INC.
Hugh A.'Walker
Manager, Solid Waste Services
Douglas M. Isbell, P.E.
Engineering Manager
(14)C89-603
KI EINFEI DER i26 Hofgaarden Street, Cite of Industry, CA 91744 (818) 369-22 2.1
REOUER FOR CITY COUNCIPAC ON
Date
February 20, 1990
Honorable Mayor and City Council ,T
Submitted to:
Submitted by:
Paul E. Cook, City Administrator ry
j n'+rn
Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works t�.3 =<�rn
Prepared by:
„rnm
CITY OWNED LANDFILL PROPERTY PLAN
Subject: R i ,
Consistent with Council Policy? b(] Yes [ ] New olsy or Exceptinn
cry ci. -K
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
To develop the City's landfill property, a closure plan needs to be developed and implemented in
addition to the methane control system.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve the amendment with Kleinfelder Incorporated and authorize the Mayor to sign the
aggreement.
2. Establish a budget of $85,000 for the additional work and permit fees.
ANALYSIS:
Since 1983, the City has been on notice by the State Solid Waste Management Agency that the
City owned property at the southeast corner of Golden West Street and Talbert Avenue is
generating unacceptable levels of methane gas. This property was the site of a County landfill
that was closed some years ago and then acquired by the City as part of the Central Park site.
The local enforcement agency of the Solid Waste Management Agency allowed the City to
postpone installation of a methane gas recovery system because of uncertainties of future use
for the property until 1988 when they directed the City to contain the gas.
Kleinfelder, Incorporated was retained in January 1989 to perform methane gas measurements
and field observations at the property. Methane gas was found to be migrating off the
property. To mitigate the gas migration, the installation of a control system was recommended.
The migration of the gases onto the Mushroom Farm property to the south posed a hazard as
possible concentration of gases in the buildings could occur. Testing was continued to monitor
the concentration and movement of the gas. Test results, project proposals and schedules were
required to be reported to the County of Orange Solid Waste Enforcement Agency.
Kleinfelder was contracted to do borings to characterize the site, design an above ground gas
migration control system and a closure plan for the site as it existed, undeveloped and
non—irrigated. This was an expedient method for construction of the system and accomplish the
mitigation within the time requirements.
P10 5/85
Request for Council Action
City Owned Landfill Property
Methane System and Closure Plan
February 20, 1990
Page 2
As the purchase of the Mushroom Farm, plans for the mobile home park expansion, the proposal
of the golf course and additional park improvements came together, the collection system and
landfill closure plan needed to be re—evaluated. The purchase of the Mushroom Farm will now
allow the removal of the buildings and technically now the gas is not migrating off City
property. This relieves the immediate need to construct the control system.
Kleinfelder has met with the three principal regulatory and permitting agencies from which
approvals will be needed. They are: California Integrated Waste Management Board through the
Local Enforcement Agency, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana
Region and South Coast Air Quality Management District.
Whenever there is a change in the present land use to any use where a water irrigation system
would be used, the Water Quality Board will at a minimum, require the grading of the site to
improve drainage run—off, the placement of a geomembrane (plastic) liner, the placement of a
drainage system above the liner, the placement of a geotextile material over the drainage zone
and the placement of a final dirt layer. The cost of this work is estimated between $70,000 and
$80,000 per acre, $2 million to $3.7 million for the site; however, the exact areas, methods and
cost will need to be determined by the development of a closure plan. The methane gas
collection system would be installed below the water intrusion protection layer.
The Waste Management Board is now developing new standards and requirements for
developments on landfills. This may complicate placement of structures on this area.
The proposed realignment of Talbert Avenue to the south between Gothard Avenue and Golden
West Street will cross the landfill. This realignment needs to be evaluated considering the
requirements related to the landfill. Presently plans for the library expansion parking are being
developed based on the proposed realignment. If the construction of the roadway is not possible
as proposed alternates will need to be considered.
To proceed with any development plans for the landfill will require the closure of the site. A
closure plan will need to be developed, processed thru the permitting agencies, designed and
construction documents prepared. To determine the limits of the debris in the landfill,
additional borings and sampling will be needed on the County Transfer property, the recently
acquired Mushroom Farm property and the Talbert alignment area.
At our request, Kleinfelder Incorporated has presented a proposal to complete the boring and
sampling, investigate the Talbert Avenue alignment and perform all tasks to prepare; design;
process through all regulatory agencies; prepare construction plans, specifications and
estimates to accomplish the closure plan for the City's land affected by the landfill. The cost
of the additional boring will be $20,840; the cost to investigate the Talbert alignment will be
$4,940; the cost for the work to finalize the closure plan will be $46,580.
1
Request for Council Action
City Owned Landfill Property
Methane System and Closure Plan
February 20, 1990
Page 3
Permit application fees are expected to be $10,000 and are also being asked to be budgeted.
The following is a recap of the Kleinfelder contract including the requested amendment:
Amount Date
Testing, field investigation and action plan $10,700 02/27/89
Regulation compliance, flare design and
specifications 39,860 03/20/89
Geotechnical boring and sampling, methane
gas control system, closure (existing
conditions) 240,000 08/07/89
Total to date $290,560
Proposed amendment:
Additional geotechnical $20,840
Talbert Ave. investigation 4,940
Closure plan, design, process,
construction plans 46,580
Total of amendment $72,360
Total to date and proposed amendment $362,920
FUNDING SOURCE:
Park Acquisition and Development Funds Account E-SK-ND-101-3-90-00.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Consider alternate development plans for the property.
ATTACHMENTS:
Contract Agreement
Kleinfelder, Inc. proposal letters
Site plat
LFS:JFM:lw
2323g/2-4
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
HUNTINGTON BEACH LANDFILL MODIFIED
CLOSURE PLAN
DECEMBER 29,1989
INTRODUCTION
On January 11, 25, and 26, 1989, Kleinfelder, at the request of the City, initiated
some cursory methane measurements and field observations at the Huntington
Beach Landfill. As a result of these investigations, Kleinfelder recommenced to the
City that a gas migration control system be installed at the landfill to control gases
that were migrating off site. The proposal submitted to the City outlined a scope-of-
work to provide engineering services for an above ground gas migration control
system. Included in this proposal was also a scope-of-work for a closure plan for a
landfill to be closed as non-irrigated open space.
With the subsequent decision by the City to develop the subject property as an
irrigated golf course and mobile home park, Kleinfelder met with the Santa Ana
Regional Water Quality Control Board to determine what changes in design criteria
the Board would require as a result of the change of land use. Kleinfelder was
informed that at a minimum a geomembrane (plastic) liner would have to be
placed over the regraded surface. Additionally, a drainage system would need to be
installed above the liner for adequate control of excess irrigation and rain water.
Above the drainage layer, a geotextile material must be placed before the final
vegetative layer is installed. These structures must be carefully engineered in order
to have the golf course and mobile home park constructed with minimum
difficulties.
Project Understanding
Kleinfelder's design philosophy will be to advocate the simpler, least cost alternative
design over those which are more complex and therefore more expensive to
construct and maintain. Section II Study Methodology details a work effort
commencing with a conceptual engineering approach which will incorporate not
only the geotechnical information gathered but will include consideration of the
plans for the golf course development.
The proposed final closure plan will be dictated by principally three regulatory
agencies. They are: California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB)
through the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA), California Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region and the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD).
(14)C89-603.PRP 1
t ,
Of the three agencies the RWQCB will have the lead role regarding performance
standards on closure of inactive landfill sites as seat forth in Title 23, Subchapter 15
of the Water Code. Additionally, the CIWMB has acquired new permitting
authority during closure and post closure activities including gas monitoring probes,
landfill gas collection systems and groundwater monitoring wells, and closure design
and construction. Currently the areas of overlap between the two agencies is being
discussed in Sacramento.
The following minimum design criteria will be addressed in accordance with
�1
Subchapter 15. The CIWMB or RWQCB or SCAQMD may impose more stringent
requirements to accommodate regional and site specific conditions. Factors that
will be evaluated in the designs for the closure will include:
c,
A. Size of the waste management unit
B. Permeability and transmissivity of underlying soils
C. Depth to ground water <M
D. Background quality of ground water
E. Current and anticipated use of the ground water.
F. Annual precipitation.
Some of the design criteria normally associated with new landfills will be used when
and where applicable for closure of the existing landfill. Sections of Subchapter 15
that may apply to the design of the closure are as follows:
Section 2533 (c) states that existing landfills will be designed, constructed, operated
and maintained to prevent inundation or washout due to floods with a 100-year
return period.
Section 2533 (d) indicates that landfills are required to have containment structures
that are capable of withstanding ground accelerations associated with the maximum
probable earthquake.
Section 2533 (e) identifies the need for containment structures to be designed,
constructed and maintained to preclude failure.
Section 2540 (c) requires . landfill containment structures which are capable of
preventing degradation of waters of the state as a result of waste discharges to the
landfill if site characteristics are inadequate.
(14)C89-603.PRP 2
1 .
Section 2546 (a) states that landfills and containment features will be designed and
constructed to limit, to the greatest extent possible, ponding, infiltration, inundation,
erosion, slope failure, washout and overtopping under the precipitation conditions
i
specified.
Section 2546 (c) indicates the diversion and drainage facilities shall be designed and
constructed to accommodate the anticipated volume of precipitation and peak flows
from surface runoff under the precipitation conditions specified.
Section 2546 (d) identifies the requirement that collection and holding facilities
associated with precipitation and drainage control systems will be empties
immediately following each storm or otherwise managed to maintain the design
capacity of the system.
Section 2546 (e) requires surface and subsurface drainage from outside of a landfill
shall be diverted from the landfill.
Section 2546 (f) states the cover materials will be graded to divert precipitation
from the landfill to prevent ponding of surface water over wastes and to resist
erosion as a result of precipitation with the return frequency specified.
Section 2580 through Section 2581 identifies the general requirements for closure
which incorporates the precipitation and drainage controls in Article 4 identified
above and monitoring program requirements outlined in Article 5 of subchapter 15.
In addition to the engineering requirements the regional board will require the
discharger to establish an irrevocable closure fund or provide means to ensure
closure and post-closure maintenance of the landfill in accordance with an approved
plan.
Therefore, Kleinfelder proposes to modify its existing closure plan scope-of-work to
include the following additional work elements.
STUDY METHODOLOGY
The approach to the design effort has been laid out in three stages of development:
conceptual designs; preliminary designs; and final designs suitable for construction.
The Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board staff have stated that a Report of
Waste Discharge (ROWD) in addition to the Closure Plan must be prepared. The
ROWD will provide a general description of the closure and post closure activities
and will be the vehicle for formal approval of the site closure by subsequently
issuing a permit for that purpose. The closure plan provides the specific details on
the design of the closure systems. Approval of the ROWD can take up to six
(14)C89-603.P" 3
months for approval. Indications are that construction activities can take place in
advance of the formal approval of the ROWD as long as there is concurrence with
regional Board staff on the closure plan. Kleinfelder intendeds to prepare the
ROWD for the RWQCB at the earliest possible date.. The closure plan itself will
proceed almost independently of the ROWD and require frequent meetings with
the regional board staff to negotiate actual design details as required. Meetings will
also be held with the California Waste Management Board (CWMB) to apprise
them of the proposed project. It is not anticipated that the CWMB will have
controlling interest in this project, but recent adoption of performance standards for
closed sites by the Board, makes the degree of the Board's involvement currently
unclear. Likewise close coordination will be maintained with the SCAQMD on the
design of the landfill.
The scope-of-work for the closure plan identified herein has been prepared in
response to the preliminary golf course design drawings submitted by American
Golf Corporation dated September 21,1989. During the preparation of the closure
plans obstacles to the proposed golf course and mobile home development may
become apparent. Kleinfelder will be available to meet with the golf course
developer and City staff in an attempt to resolve any conflicts.
Although, the scope does address the necessary permit application for the Report
of Waste Discharge, the $10,000 fee for the permit application is not included.
Likewise, Kleinfelder recognizes certain structures are interrelated with the golf
course development and with past operating features of the landfill, such as the
Talbert Road alignment and Sully Miller Lake storm water run off system
respectively. These features, which may need to be specifically designed, but are
currently unknown are not included as part of this scope-of-work Furthermore, it is
understood that the California Environmental Quality Act compliance as required
by the processing of the Report of Waste Discharge and CIWMB will either be
handled by STA Inc. or by the City of Huntington Beach as required.
1.0 CONCEPTUAL FACILITY PLAN
The intent of the Conceptual Facility Plan is to identify the type of landfill closure
system that will be required to allow for the construction of a golf course and mobile
home park on top of the Huntington Beach Landfill. This plan will also address
restrictions or mitigation measures that should be incorporated into the final facility
design. The plan will also be used for preliminary regulatory approval and as the
basis for an Environmental Impact Report.
By it nature, the engineering associated with this plan will be conceptual in nature,
however it will address the critical elements set forth in Section 3 PRELIMINARY
DESIGN.
(14)C89-603.PRP 4
1.1 SITE PLAN
°s
A site plan will be prepared which depicts the location and general features of the
proposed golf course and mobile home pads as shown on the American Golf
drawings dated September 21, 1989 or as subsequently modified by American Golf r
or the City based on geologic and other information provide by Kleinfelder. The
site plan will also show the limits and depths of refuse; surface drainage control
structures; limits and types of cover systems; and landfill gas collection headers and
wells. The existing 100 scale topographic map recently flown will be used as a basis
map
Kleinfelder has assumed that the City will provide timely directions as to the
disposition of the Orange County Transfer Station; the City's police shooting range;
and the golf course and mobile home development plans. Delays in these decisions '
could result in project delays and increased project costs.
1.2 GRADING PLAN
A grading plan will be prepared for the landfill portions of the project area which
delineate the final elevations necessary to provide adequate drainage for the cover
systems. This plan will also show areas where existing cover material may have to
be excavated and recompacted to provide foundation support for mobile home pads
or other structures.
This grading plan is to serve as the sub-base for the golf course and mobile home
development.
1.3 COVER SYSTEM
A drawing(s) of the cover system(s) components will be prepared which delineate
the types of materials to be used for sub-base preparation, synthetic liner, drainage
layer, and protective earth cover. Special liner details that may be required for the
golf course will be included.
It is assumed that a-drainage system will not be required under the synthetic liner
material and that any dirt required for the grading of the golf course or the mobile
home park will be in addition to the protective earth cover.
1.4 REGULATORY REVIEW
The conceptual drawings will be submitted to the.Regional Water Quality Control
Board to obtain agreement in principal of the over all development concept.
(14)C89-603.PRP 5
1.5 COST ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTUALIZED FACILITIES
A cost estimate will be prepared based upon the most likely development plan and
submitted to the City for review.
1.6 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY FOR PREFERRED DESIGN
A report will be developed and submitted to the City which will summarize the
regulatory environmental issues, data gathered, site specific conditions,
conceptualized facilities along with a matrix which addresses the advantages and
disadvantages of each overall design. Recommendations will be made to the City as
to which design would be the preferred designs for preliminary engineering.
1.7 REGULATORY REVIEW
After City approval, the conceptual designs will be submitted to the RWQCB and
the CIWMB for review and comments regarding the preferred concept.
2. PREPARATION OF THE REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE
2.1 MEET WITH ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF REGIONAL BOARD
:3
Once the engineering section of the Board has responded to the conceptual designs,
Kleinfelder proposes to meet with the enforcement section of the Board to discuss
any special requirements they may have relative to the project.
2.2 PREPARE APPLICATION FOR REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE
An application for an Waste Discharge Permit indicating the site will undergo
closure will be prepared for the City's signature and submitted with a formal Report
of Waste Discharge identified in Task 2.3
Kleinfelder has assumed that the City and the County of Orange will resolve their
respective responsibilities for closure, environmental monitoring, post closure
maintenance and funding prior to submission of the ROWD. We will be available
to assist in this matter, however no funds for this activity have been included in this
proposal.
(14)C89-603.PRP 6
2.3 PREPARE REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE (ROWD)
A ROWD will be prepared in accordance with Section 2590 of Subchapter 15.
Typical information contained in such a report will include information on waste
characteristics, geologic and climatologic characteristics of the landfill and the E
surrounding region, installed features, operation plans for waste containment,
precipitation and drainage controls environmental monitoring closure and post
closure maintenance plans and finding of such plans as set forth in Sections 2594
through 2597 of Subchapter 15.
2.4 REGULATORY REVIEW
Kleinfelder has budgeted two meetings with the enforcement section of the
RWQCB and bone public hearing before the Board, to answer any questions
proposed so that the permit maybe expedited.
3. PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Work in this task includes preliminary engineering design for the preferred project.
It includes a further refinement of the conceptualized facility plans prepare during
Section 1 and will contain preliminary drawings (80 percent complete) and
preliminary specification for the Huntington Beach landfill facilities. Drawings and
specifications will be prepared in a manner that incorporates all facilities for each
type of improvement into a separate set of documents, if appropriate for staged aft
construction. The drawings and specifications will be based on a format approved
by the City during the conceptual design phase and will be submitted at appropriate _
time to the regulatory agencies including RWQCB, local enforcement agency (LEA) '
CWMB and SCAQMD.
'3
3.1 LINER DESIGN
In a meeting between Kleinfelder and the RWQCB staff indicated that, at the least,
a geomembrane (Plastic) liner will be necessary to be placed over regraded in place
fill (not clay).
_. During this task Kleinfelder will investigate alternative methods and types of
geomembranes which will be evaluated for cost effectiveness and ability to protect
the refuse mass from infiltration of surface water. The evaluation will address the
types and availability of materials, construction methods and the necessary quality
assurance programs.
(14)C89-603.PRP 7
3.2 DRAINAGE CONTROL
At the same meeting with the RWQCB discussed above staff indicated that a
.drainage system should be installed in permeable material above the liner for
adequate drainage.
In addition to the proposed irrigation of the golf course, a drainage control plan will
be developed to provide a run-on control system to prevent flow into the landfill
during the peak Discharge of a 25-year storm. This element will provide the plans
necessary to in corporate into the liner and gas migration control systems. The plan
will also address the need for retention basins to provide run-off control form the
surface of the landfill to collect and control at least the water volume resulting from
a 24-hour, 100 year storm.
3.3 SEISMIC DESIGN
Although there are no known active faults on site, the proposed closure must be
designed to withstand peak ground acceleration expected from a maximum
anticipated earth quake. The seismic design plan will determine the expected peak
ground acceleration and determine the appropriate design parameter for fill slope
stability, such as along the slopes adjacent to Sully Miller Lake, containment
structures and ancillary facilities.
3.4 GROUNDWATER MONITORING
A state licensed land surveyor will provide coordinates and reference elevations for
existing piezometer, and pumping or monitoring wells. It is anticipated that most of
the information is contained in Kleinfelder's water SWAT prepared for Orange
County.
3.5 LANDFILL GAS COLLECTION PLAN
The design for the gas system would be integrated with the overall development
during this design element. The gas system design element is covered by a separate
contract with the City. It design will be carefully coordinated with the development
of the golf course so that the gas system will not unduly interfere with golf course
designs.
(A)C89-WIPRP 8
n
` 3.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
In addition to an exhaustive in-house QA review the project team will submit
preliminary drawings and specifications for review by the City at two levels of
completion (50 and 90 percent). Upon receipt of comments, revisions and additions
will be made and final documents prepared.
3.7 REGULATORY REVIEW
Due to the negotiated nature of the design with the RWQCB and CWMB,
Kleinfelder recommends a meeting be set up to discuss comments and questions the
Boards may have after each Board staff has had a chance to review the preliminary
drawings.
3.8 CITY REVIEW
Once the RWQCB and the CWMB have made their comments, a summary of the
comments with recommendations will be made to the City for approval before
incorporation into final designs.
4. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT COMPLIANCE
(STA, INC)
Once the project has evolved through the preliminary phases of project
development, the exact nature of the project will have been defined well-enough to
begin the CEQA compliance process. This process must be completed in order to
receive the Waste Discharge Permit for closure and eventual operation of the
development as a golf course.
It is Kleinfelder's understanding that STA will be performing this element for the
City.
5. PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS
This task will include the preparation of construction drawings for each type of
improvement including final grades, drainage structures and liners. The landfill gas
system final designs will not be duplicated in this task as they are addressed in a
different scope-of-work and will proceed in advance of the landfill closure
development element.
(14)C89-603.PRP 9
s
t
6. PREPARATION OF COST ESTIMATES OF FINAL DESIGNS
The purpose of this task will be to prepare construction cost estimates based on the
types and quantities of materials specified in the technical specifications and derived
from the construction drawings with labor and.material unit prices applicable to the
geographic region. The estimated cost of quality control field and laboratory testing
and documentation will also be included. F
A
F
�3
I
k
'A
(14)C89-603.PRP 10
KLEINFELDER
December 28, 1989 ,,
Project No. 57-G890-04 C r C F. I V F.
DEPT. OF PUSLIC WORKS
City of Huntington Beach .!A N C; ? 1990
Public Works Department
2000 Main Street HU(V'i1NGTON REACH. CAILIF.
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Louis F. Sandoval
Director Of Public Works
Subject: Proposal for Phase II Geotechnical Services
Huntington Beach Landfill
Huntington Beach, California
Dear Mr. Sandoval:
Kleinfelder, Inc., (Kleinfelder) is pleased to present this proposal for Phase II geotechnical
services at the Huntington Beach Landfill. The scope of work described in this proposal
complements and is an expansion of the Phase I geotechnical study that was described in
our report entitled, "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Huntington Beach Landfill,
Huntington Beach, California," dated November 2, 1989. The following paragraphs present
our understanding of the proposed project, proposed scope of work, estimated schedule
for completing the study, and the lump-sum fee for providing the services. A proposed
scope and fee for evaluation of the subsurface conditions along the proposed Talbert
Avenue realignment has been included as an option to the City of Huntington Beach (City).
BACKGROUND
A proposed mobile home residential development is proposed for the site of the former
Huntington Beach Landfill. Recreational facilities consisting of a golf course and a club
house are also proposed. The former landfilling included two separate operations:
municipal, Class II dumping in the 1950's and disposal of Class III construction debris in
the late 1960's.
In June 1989, Kleinfelder submitted a proposal to the City of Huntington Beach to design
a landfill gas collection system. Included in that proposed scope of work, we had
City of Huntington Beach Page 2
December 28, 1989
Project No. 57-G890-04
recommended that a geotechnical study be conducted to assist the City in determining an
appropriate end use for the former landfill. The geotechnical data gathered in the study
was to be be used primarily to identify areas not underlain by refuse so that gas monitoring
probes could be installed and to evaluate the subsurface conditions where structures were
proposed.
The first, or Phase I, geotechnical study was performed to evaluate the lateral and vertical
extent of the landfill materials and to develop preliminary geotechnical recommendations
for the proposed development. The Phase I study did not include the former mushroom
farm site or the former Orange County Transfer Station site due to access restrictions.
The purpose of the Phase II study will be to:
• evaluate the subsurface conditions at the sites of the former mushroom farm
and transfer station
• further evaluate the transition area located between the areas used for Class
II and Class III landfilling
• further evaluate the thickness and consistency of the existing cover materials
• develop more specific geotechnical design recommendations for the proposed
development
In addition to the items listed above, we expect that some evaluation of the subsurface
conditions along the proposed Talbert Avenue realignment will also be required. Study of
this area has been excluded from the scope of earlier geotechnical work, and is included
as an option.
PROPOSED SCOPE
Based on our understanding of the proposed development and our knowledge of the
subsurface conditions in the area, we have developed a scope of work for this geotechnical
study. Our proposed scope is presented below.
Task 1 - Utility Clearance
We will clear all proposed subsurface exploration points with the landowners/operators and
the local utilities through Underground Service Alert (USA). One trip to the site will be
required to complete this effort.
KI_EINFFL1)FR 15375 li. mimr i Pxk\%:i , tiui( ' 1-III I, lain(,, (-�\ `)I-Iti (7141 727-4406
Cityof Huntington Beach Page 3
December 28, 1989
Project No. 57-G890-04
Task 2 - Field Exploration
We propose excavating 8 to 10 backhoe test pits at various locations throughout the site.
Several test pits will be excavated in the transition area between the former Class II and
Class III landfills. We will also excavate several test pits in the Class III landfill area to
generate more data on the presence and extent of the cover materials there. The remaining
test pits will be excavated in areas within the Class II landfill where additional soil cover
material data would be helpful. We estimate that the backhoe work will require two days
to complete.
We also propose to advance 12 hollow-stem-auger borings. We recommend that four
borings be advanced in the former mushroom farm area and four borings be advanced in
the Orange County Transfer Station area. The remaining four to six borings will be
advanced in the Class II/Class III transition area and in other areas of the Class II landfill.
We estimate that about 4 days will be required to complete the hollow-stem-auger borings.
The backhoe and hollow-stem-auger work will be completed concurrently.
An engineer/geologist will supervise the field operation and will log the borings and test
pits. Representative bulk, disturbed, and intact samples will be retrieved, sealed, and
transported to our laboratory for further evaluation. The number of blows necessary to
drive both a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler and a California-type sampler will
be recorded. The depth to ground water will be measured.
If the City makes the decision to proceed with the evaluation of the Talbert Avenue
realignment, we propose to advance four borings along the realignment. There may be a
need to excavate a couple of test pits also, but they may be completed within the scope of
the original Phase II study. The proposed scope is based on our understanding that most,
if not all, of the proposed realignment will be underlain by native soil and will not be
affected by Class II landfill material.
Task 3 - Laboratory Testing
Laboratory testing will be performed on representative bulk, intact, and remolded samples
to substantiate visual, field classifications and to provide engineering parameters necessary
for geotechnical design. Testing may consist of: moisture/density, grain size, laboratory
maximum density, remolded, direct shear, consolidation, and chemical analyses.
Task 4 - Seismicity Evaluation
To estimate the seismic shaking potential at the site,we will use an integrated historical and
deterministic approach facilitated by a number of commercially available computer
programs (EQSEARCH and EQFAULT).
K1,1-1iN1:FID1:R, 1:7):i75 R.ur,ui� i I';irk i tiuitt' I Illl, Ininr, CAA 'Y'71ft (714) 7 00
City of Huntington Beach Page 4
December 28, 1989
Project No. 57-G890-04
The computer program EQSEARCH will be used to evaluate the effects of historical
seismicity at the site. The. historical evaluation provides an estimate of how earthquakes
throughout the short historical seismic record may have shaken the site. The computer
program EQFAULT will be used to deterministically estimate the maximum credible and
maximum probable earthquake accelerations that may occur at the site.
Task 5 - Geotechnical Analyses
The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing for this phase of the study will
be combined with the results of the earlier Phase I study. The combined data will be
evaluated to estimate the extent of the Class II and Class III landfills. Emphasis will be
placed on:
• evaluation of the subsurface conditions at the former mushroom farm site and
the Orange County Transfer Station site
• estimating the limits of the Class II landfill within the previously defined
transition area adjacent to the Class III landfill site (See our November 17,
1989 report)
• further evaluation of the existing soil cover materials at both the Class II and
Class III landfill sites
• developing recommendations for potential construction techniques for
structures placed above the Class II landfill
• foundation design recommendations for structures and utilities placed above
the Class II landfill
Task 6 - Report Preparation
A report will be prepared presenting the findings of this study. We will discuss our
conclusions and recommendations with respect to the proposed development. We will
present recommendations for foundation type(s), allowable bearing pressure, estimated
settlement, passive resistance, lateral earth pressure for retaining structures, soil
expansiveness and corrosivity, and seismicity. Alternatives for reducing likely Class Il
landfill settlements will also be presented. The report will contain logs of the borings and
test pits, laboratory test results, and seismic computer analyses. Five copies of the final
report will be provided.
KLFINFELDER 1::3-._> Bmranr,i Pxkwav, ` LIik' 1-101, hvinc. CA 92' 1tt (714) 72--4400
• City of Huntington Beach Page 5
December 28, 1989
Project No. 57-G890-04
ESTIMATED FEES
We propose that our services be compensated on a lump-sum basis. We estimate that we
can complete the subject study for a lump-sum value of $20,840. This fee includes
attendance at one meeting in Huntington Beach. The additional fee for evaluating the
Talbert Avenue realignment is $4,940. This fee includes the field exploration, laboratory
testing, geotechnical analysis, and appropriate section in the final report associated with
Talbert Avenue. This fee does not include time for evaluating site
improvement techniques such as dynamic compaction if Class iI landfill materials are
encountered below the proposed realignment. A detailed scope and fee proposal can be
provided for evaluation of alternate site improvement techniques at a later date if desired.
Costs incurred for any services provided that are outside the scope of this proposal will be
invoiced on a time-and-expense basis in accordance with the attached fee schedule after
receiving proper authorization to proceed. This proposal is valid for a period of 60 days
from the date of the proposal. We reserve the right to review our scope and costs if an
agreement to provide our services has not been reached within the 60-day period.
The estimated fees are based on the assumption that the sites are accessible to a typical
backhoe and hollow-stem-auger drill rig. If weather, access, Orange County permitting, or
site conditions restrict our field operations, we may need to revise our fee estimate.
However,we would contact you for authorization before proceeding with any unanticipated
or additional work.
SCHEDULE
We anticipate that the planning and coordination for the field exploration phase of the
study can begin when we receive verbal authorization to proceed. We estimate that the
field work can be started approximately one week after receipt of authorization. The final
report can be issued about five to six weeks after completing the field exploration phase of
the study. Preliminary results can be presented in a letter or via a meeting with the
designer before the report is issued. Our proposed schedule does not include factors
beyond our control, such as availability of appropriate field exploration equipment,
inclement weather, limited site access, etc.
CLOSURE
We have assumed that the City will provide accurate locations of underground utilities and
services in the areas we are planning to explore. We will coordinate this phase of our work
with your office. Disruptions of utilities not adequately located will be the responsibility
of the City. We are available to provide continued consultation,.including review of plans
KLE IN'I=ELDEK 1,5375 kmi,i ( i I'mkw,w, Suitt" J-101, Irriiw. CA ') (71-11 17-4166
City of Huntington Beach Page 6
December 28, 1989
Project No. 57-G890-04
and specifications with design team members, after our final report is issued. Also,we can
provide construction observation and testing services during site development. It is not
possible at this time to estimate the fees for these services, but they would be provided on
a time-and-expense basis in accordance with the attached fee schedule.
We understand that this work will be performed as an addition to our existing contract with
the City. We further understand that a change order covering the fees described in this
proposal and those in the accompanying Solid Waste Group proposal is forthcoming. We
will invoice on a 30=day cycle.
Our work will be performed and findings, conclusions, and recommendations rendered in
substantial conformance with the geotechnical engineering practice that exists within the
area at the time of our study. No warranty, either expressed or implied, is intended or
made.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with
you on this project. Please call the undersigned if you have any questions or comments or
if the scope of work we have developed differs from that you intended.
Respectfully submitted,
KLEINFELDER, INC.
B. Michael Yacyshyn
Branch Manager
BMY:db
Attachments
c: Jack Miller, City of Huntington Beach
Peter North, City of Huntington Beach
Richard Mandeville,Kleinfelder-Industry
Douglas Isbell, Klei nfelder-Industry
Hugh Walker, Kleinfelder-Industry
KLEIN FUDER 15:375 [,,it ram i I'mkwav, Suitt' 1-101, Irvine, CA `)"?718 (71-1) -7 -4400
. c
KLEINFELDER R E C E I V E
November 20, 1989 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
File 70-1133-02
<: 2 1089
Mr. Louis F. Sandoval
Director of Public Works HuNnNGTCN BEACH. CALIF.
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California
Subject: Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
Dear Mr. Sandoval:
On October 17, 1989, I presented to you, your staff and others in a meeting in your offices
findings from a geotechnical investigation performed by Kleinfelder. Based upon these
findings, Kleinfelder indicated to the City that the cost for closure to develop the golf course
as presented could approach $100,000 per acre, excluding golf course, park development, and
engineering design costs. At 46 acres, the cost to close this site for the above-mentioned
purposes would approach $5 million.
On November 13, 1989, Douglas Isbell, Engineering Manager of our Industry office, and I
attended a meeting in Riverside with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
(SARWQCB) to further discuss the Board's requirements for closure should the City proceed
with the development of a golf course on top of the landfill. The SARWQCB was represented
by Dixie Lass and Albert Johnson.
Kleinfelder presented to the Board staff the concepts for development along with a copy of
the results of the geotechnical investigations. Based upon this initial presentation to the
SARWQCB, Board staff indicated that, at the least, a geomembrane (plastic) liner should be
placed over regraded, in-place fill (not clay). In addition, a drainage system should be
installed in permeable material above the liner for adequate drainage. Above the drainage
layer, a geotextile material must be placed before the final vegetative layer is installed. At
this time, the Board is not requiring a clay liner beneath the geomembrane due to the depth
of the existing cover. Without preparing a detailed cost estimate, Kleinfelder estimates that it
will cost between $70,000 and $80,000 per acre for this level of protection over the areas of
the property underlain by refuse. The cost for the site could vary from $2 million to $3.7
million to close the site according to SARWQCB's criteria given the present end use.
In addition to the SARWQCB's requirements, Kleinfelder has recently learned that the
California Waste Management Board's (CWMB) new post closure standards for landfills may
be retroactive to previously closed landfills under the RWQCB's Subchapter 15, or landfills
which became inactive before engineered closures were required. This would include the
F; Huntington Beach Landfill.
If the CWMB's new prohibitions for certain kinds of developments on landfills, including pile
foundations, are allowed to stand, it will further complicate the proposed golf course and
mobile home development. Kleinfelder is seeking modifications to the regulations to allow
e` for development consistent with using standard of care engineering practices. These
measures, when applied by a qualified engineering firm, will preclude any adverse
environmental impacts on the area.
r'
KLEINFELDER 526 Hofgaarden Street, Citv of Industry, CA 91744 (818) 369-2224
t
Because the cost implications for closure, in conjunction with the golf course and mobile
home park development, are large, Kleinfelder now needs more definitive direction to either
proceed with a design of an above grade gas collection system or divert that budget for the
design of a below grade gas collection system to accommodate the development of mobile
home pads and a golf course. If additional detailed costing is necessary to support our
preliminary cost estimates, please advise us. We felt it might be more beneficial for the City
to reevaluate its position at this time rather than continue to go forward with the golf course
development plan without consulting with you on our findings at the SARWQCB meeting.
Both Hugh Walker and Doug Isbell are on vacation the week of November 20. I will be
giving you a call after you have had a chance to review my comments.
Very truly yours,
KLEINFELDER, INC.
7
0""0
'
Richard T. Mandeville
Vice President
RTM:gIs
cc: Doug Isbell
Hugh Walker
t
(13)C89-532.RTM 2
KLEINFELDER 526 Hofgaarden Street, City of Industry, CA 91744 (818) 369-2224
REQUE4 FOR CITY COUNCO ACTION
r
Date August 7, 1989
'i
Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROYEDBY Submitted to: CITY COUNCIi, -;
l '
Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator 19Z I 3
Al
i
Prepared by: £Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works
- TY C ERK
Subject: METHANE GAS CONTROL SYSTEM AT THE HUNTINGTON BEACH LAND
Consistent with Council Policy? [ Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception `t
W
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
f
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
The Orange County Solid Waste Enforcement Agency has nut the City on notice to stop the
migration of methane gas from City property at the southwest corner of Golden `Vest and
Talbert Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION:
I . Approve the amended agreement with Kleinfelder, Incorporated for design services for
control of methane gas and authorize the 'iayor to Execute the agreement.
2. Establish a budget of $240,000 to perform the work.
ANALYSIS:
Since 1983, the City has been on notice by the State Solid Waste 11'1anagement Agency that the
City—owned property at the southeast corner of Golden West and Talbert Avenue is generating
unacceptable levels of methane gas. The local enforcement agency, until recently, has allowed
the City to postpone installation of methane gas control systems because of uncertainties over
the future use of the property. Now, the Orange County Solid Waste Enforcement .Agency feels
that the gas must be contained. The City requested proposals for the design of methane gas
control systems compatible with future development of the affected portion of Central Park.
On ".larch 20, 1989, the City Council approved an agreement with Kleinfelder to prepare a
Design Report for approval by the Solid y/aste Enforcement Agency. The report was prepared
and approved. The next step is to prepare construction plans, construct the system and place it
in operation. Kleinfelder has offered to provide these services as well as obtain the necessary
permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCR) and the Solid Waste Management Agency. They will also prepare a
landfill closure plan, if required by the RVYOCR.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Park Acquisition and Development Funds in the Amount of $500,000 are budgeted for this
project. p
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
I . Select another firm to design the system.
2. Do not design the facilities and instruct staff on how to /
R 3li
LFS:LE:lw
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH AND KLEINFELDER, INC FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN
SERVICES FOR THE PROPERTY ON AND ADJACENT TO
THE HUNTINGTON BEACH LANDFILL
A
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 is entered into this day of
1989 , by and between the CITY of HUNTINGTON
BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" , and KLEINFELDER, INC. ,
hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR" .
WHEREAS, since the original agreement , dated March 20 , 1989 ,
it has been determined by the parties that additional payment is
required of CITY to complete the project .
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between CITY and
CONTRACTOR that paragraph 4 (COMPENSATION) is amended to read to add
the following :
The statement of work is amended to add services described in
Exhibit "B" , which is attached hereto and incorporated into this
Amendment No . 1 by this reference . The increased cost for the
additional work, including expense reimbursement , increases the
contract by an amount not to exceed TWO HUNDRED FORTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($240 , 000) . This amount is to be added to the original
agreement cost of THIRTY-NINE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS
($39 , 860) for a total amended project cost of TWO HUNDRED
SEVENTY-NINE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS ($279 , 860) .
PAGE END
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the -parties hereto have executed this
Amendment No . 1 as of the date hereinabove set forth.
CONTRACTOR : CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,
KLEINFELDER, INC. A municipal corporation
a California corporation of the State of California
Thomas E . Bailey Mayor
Regional Manager/Principal
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk Atto ey� �:j; mot`
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED ND APPROVED:
City Administrator Direct r of Public Works
'1r - Z. C. S g
2 -
June 30, 1989
File 70Y89251
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention; Mr. Les Evans
Reforencc; Proposal for Flare Station and Gas Collection System Engineering
at the Huntington Beach Landfill
Dear Mr. Evans:
Mandeville & Associates (M&A), a Division of Kleinfelder, Inc., is pleased to submit
this proposal to provide engineering services for a landfill gas collection and flare
system at the Huntington Beach Landfill. We have the experience and capability to
provide the City with a reliable and cost-effective system. Attachment A, Company
Qualifications provides information on gas control projects we have completed.
Additionally, Attachment F gives project references for M&A.
In addition, N1&A can provide technical observation services during construction to
verify that all facets of the project are constructed in accordance with the plans and
specifications. M&A has an Operations Division with the capability to provide either
qualified operators or comprehensive training to the City employees and management
services to oversee operation by the City.
The attached proposal discusses Background, Scope of Work and Project Budget. The
Scope of Work covers the non-construction aspects required for a flare station. These
aspects include: preliminary work; permitting and applications; engineering; contract
administration and technical observation; and start-up, operations and training. The
Project Budget is based on the items in the Scope of Work and on certain
assumptions listed in the proposal.
(2)70Y8925la
i
The Project Manager for this project will be Hugh A. Walker who has many years
experience in landfill gas collection and control.
Please call Hugh X Walker if you have any questions or require additional
information. We thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal to the City of
Huntington Beach and look forward to working with the City.
Sincerely,
MANDEVILLE & ASSOCIATES,
A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDEI , INC.
Hugh A. Walker f
Manager, Solid Waste Services
Douglas M. Isbell, P.E.
Engineering Manager
rl�s
Attachment :
cc: R. Prosser
D. Isbell
R. Mandeville
File: 70Y89251
J
2
PROPOSAL FOR FLARE STATION ENGINEERING
AT THE HUNTINGTON BEACH LANDFILL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
1 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . 1
2 SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3 PROJECT BUDGET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4 PROJECT SCHEDULE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . g
5 PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
ATTACHMENT A COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS
ATTACHMENT B DRAWING TITLES
ATTACHMENT C SPECIAL PROVISION SPECIFICATIONS
ATTACHMENT D KLEINFELDER 1989 FEE SCHEDULE
ATTACHMENT E PROJECT SCHEDULE
ATTACHMENT F PROJECT REFERENCES
ATTACHMENT G RESUMES
70Y89251a 3
1
1 BACKGROUND
y
In order to bring the Huntington Beach Landfill into compliance with South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1150.2 regulations and California Waste
Management Board (CWMB), measures must be taken to reduce the subsurface
emissions and control off site gas migration. At the request of the City of Huntington
Beach, Mandeville & Associates (M&A), a Division of Kleinfelder, Inc., has prepared a
proposal for gas control engineering.
M&A has provided design engineering, construction documents and technical observation r
during construction for landfill flare stations since 1978. In addition to engineering
services, the company is able to provide permitting services. Attachment A, Company
QuaUflcations contains a matrix illustrating our flare station engineering experience at w
a number of landfill sites. F'
70Y89251a 1
i
Y
j
2 SCOPE OF WORK
ti4
The Scope of Work covers the non-construction aspects required for a gas collection
system flare station. Preliminary activities include determining the placement of the flare
station, the soil conditions at the site, survey coordinates and elevations for all aspects
of the work and easement and utility investigation. Consideration is given to the amount
of gas that can be- expected so the City has the information necessary to make an
informed decision on the size of the flare station. A Basis of Design Report was
prepared for the City May 12, 1989. It recommended installation of gas monitoring
probes, gas collection webs, gas collection header, condensate water handling system, gas
blower, flare and electrical controls.
The next phase of work is to prepare detailed engineering and to submit the necessary
applications for the required permits. In many instances, permits are a 'long lead' item
and it is wise to submit the appropriate applications as early in the project as possible.
These engineering designs will be based upon the ultimate end use being undetermined
(open space). Therefore, the header will be an above grade installation rather than
below grade, It is anticipated that either a Negative Declaration or a Statement of
Exemption will be required for the flare station. In addition, SCAQMD may require air
modeling of the flare exhaust, costs for this have been included in the budget, No costs
for gas or condensate water analysis has been included; M&A is planning on using
available solid waste assessment test (SWAT) data for air modeling purposes, if
additional analytical data is required then it will be extra to the proposed budget.
Additionally, the proposal is based on returning no condensate water to the landfill.
Depending on the ultimate method of condensate water handling, additional engineering
may be required to design a water treatment system. No costs for this are included in
the proposed budget,
In order to assist the City in recommending an appropriate land use of the landfill,
Kleinfelder recommends that a geotechnical investigation be conducted to determine
subsurface conditions within, below, and immediately adjacent to the landfill, The data
gathered will be used to identify not only areas not in refuse, to locate gas monitoring
probes, but to identify soil types underneath proposed structures to be placed on site.
Kleinfelder proposes to investigate the subsurface conditions within, below and
immediately adjacent to the landfill as follows,
Drill up to thirty exploratory borings with hollow-stem auger to the depths
required to encounter the underlying soil beneath the landfill debris. We
anticipate that boring depths will range from approximately 10 to 40 feet.
One deep boring will be drilled to a depth of up to 60 feet in the vicinity
of the proposed clubhouse,
Excavatc up to thirty exploratory trenches with a backhoe to depths up to
15 feet. The in-situ density of the cover material will be measured at
selected depth intervals in the trenches with a nuclear density gauge.
70YB925la 2
Perform seismic refraction surveys with a single-channel seismograph,
Tho subsurface material encountered in the exploratory borings and trenches will be
logged by our staff geologist as the holes are advanced. Bulk and drive samples will be
obtained for further laboratory testing and evaluation.
We will attempt to drill as many exploratory borings as possible. However, based on our
experience with similar landfill investigations, we anticipate that refusal will be
encountered in many of the borings due to the nature of the landfill debris. Drilling the
Class III demolition debris will be particularly difficult.
Laboratory testing will be performed on selected, representative soil samples. The testing
program is anticipated to include, but may not necessarily be limited to, tests for unit
weight, moisture content, gradation, compaction, plasticity, index, direct shear, and
consolidation.
In conjunction with the field exploration and laboratory testing program, we will review
aerial photographs. Based on information obtained during the field exploration and
laboratory testing program, engineering analysis, and aerial photograph and literature
review, we will provide opinions and recommendations regarding the following:
Thickness, density, and relative compaction of existing landfill cover material
Vertical and horizontal limits of existing debris within the landfill
- Suitability of on-site cover material for use in site development
- Effect of groundwater on site development, if encountered
- Estimates of long-term settlement
- Preliminary foundation recommendations for "light" structures, such as
mobile homes, rest rooms, tennis courts, gazebos, etc.
- Preliminary foundation recommendations for the proposed clubhouse
Regional and site geological conditions including the presence of faulting
at or near the site, and the potential for any secondary geologic hazards.
Our opinions and recommendations will be presented in a written report complete with
logs of the borings, trenches, and laboratory test results.
70Y89251a 3
I
• Two separate bid packages will be prepared for the gas collection system. The first bid
is for all flare station hardware. In order to obtain the SCAQMD Permit to Construct,
it is necessary to submit the guaranteed flare performance, manufacturer and size, and
blower information. Once the bids for this first package are received, the City can
proceed with the purchase and the data will be transmitted to SCAQMD. The second
bid package will be for the complete construction of the flare station and installation of
the gas well field. This bid will include construction plans and detailed specifications.
For both bid packages it is presumed that the City will incorporate the special provisions
provided by M&A with the City's general provisions.
7
When the engineering bids have been released, M&A can assist the City with selection
by providing technical assistance during bidding. This assistance may include answering
questions, conducting a job walk for prospective bidders and helping with bid review and
evaluation. Once a contractor has been selected, M&A will do periodic reviews at the
site review and approve contractor submittals and provide technical assistance during
construction. When construction is complete, M&A will conduct an acceptance job walk
and perform acceptance testing.
The final step in the successful completion of the project is start-up and training. A list
of the instruments and equipment necessary to operate the station will be prepared and
submitted to the City for direct purchase. One week of training, for City personnel in
the proper use of all instrumentation as well as plant operation and gas well adjustments
is recommended. Additionally, an Operations and Maintenance Manual to assist in
training and in long-term operation is recommended.
Safely is of the utmost concern, M&A has included an allowance to provide 40 hours
of safety training for two people in accordance with Federal Register fart 29 CFR
1910.120. The cost for this training assumes it will be done at a M&A/Kleinfelder
conducted course when offered during the next year. M&A will keep the City fully
apprised of the training course schedule.
The scope of work discussed has been broken down into the following tasks.
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 Preliminary Work
1,1 Project mobilization including meetings with LEA to determine special
requirements. Also, review conceptual design option for the gas control system and
flare station with the City.
1.2 Determine uldniaLe land use.
1.3 Identify limits of refuse to locate monitoring probes.
1.4 Evaluate condensate removal and disposal options and processing requirements
70Y89Z51a 4
. . . . . . _ . .
1.5 Preparation of the piping and Instrument diagram for the gas flare station.
1.6 Soils report for the proposed Flare Station.
1.7 Preparation of a construction cost estimate.
1.8 Easement investigation.
1.9 Utilities identification and location map.
1.10 Meetings with the City.
Task 2 Geotechnical Investigation
2.1 Drill 30 exploratory borings.
2.2 Excavate 30 exploratory trenches.
2.3 Perform seismic refraction survey.
2.4 Laboratory testing.
2.5 Review and photographs.
2.6 Perform bilateral search.
2.7 Make recommendations.
2.8 Prepare written report.
Task 3 Permitting and Applications
3.1 Submittal of data to the SCAQMD for the permit to construct.
3.2 Meetings with the City.
70Y8925la 5
i
Task 4 Engineering a
4.1 preparation of flare equipment bid, (An early bid and flare selection is desirable
to expedite the project so that this data can be submitted to SCAQMD.)
a
4.2 Preparation of engineering drawings. Attachment B, Drawing Titles contains the
list of anticipated sheets for this project.
4.3 Prcparation of Special Provision Specifications, Attachment C, Special Provision
Specifications lists the chapter titles that are anticipated for this project. x
H
i
Task S Site Survey
5.1 Complete' a site survey of the proposed gas piping and well locations.
Task 6 CEQA Compliance and Permitting
6.1 Assist the City with CEQA compliance. (Negative Declaration or Statement of
Exemption only.)
6.2 Air modeling, if required, for the SCAQMD. The cost included for this task
assumes that the gas analysis performed during the SWAT test is sufficient and no
additional analytical work will be required.
6.3 Preparation of Southern California Edison Company power service application,
6.4 Preparation of telephone service application.
Task 7 Engbieering
7.1 Prcparation of engineering drawings and specifications for condensate water
treatment system.
7.2 Prcparation of engineering drawings and specifications for sewer connection,
7.3 Process drawings and specifications through Huntington Beach Building
Department,
70Y8925la 6
I
f.
Task 8 Contract Administration and Technical Observation
N
8.1 Respond to questions from bidders and provide bidding assistance.
8.2 Pre-bid job walk.
8.3 Review of bids with City, k.
r
8.4 Recommendation of flare supplier.
8.3 Assistance with General Contractor selection.
8.6 Job kick-off meeting.
8.7 Technical observation. r
8.8 Preliminary project. completion check. k
8.9 Final project job walk and acceptance testing.
8.10 Notice of project completion.
Task 9 Start-Up, Operations and Training
9.1 Preparation of an equipment list of items the City should purchase in order to
safely operate the Flare Station.
9.2 Preparation of the Operations & Maintenance Manual.
9.3 Flare Station and gas well field start-up.
9.4 40 Hour EPA Safety Training per CFR 1910.129, (The cost included is per man.
Training to be done during a routine Kleinfelder training session held in the L.A.
area within the next 12 months.)
9.3 Flare Station operation training. (3 days)
9.6 Well adjustment procedure operation training. (3 days)
M
i
�44
jdy}
9
rt
70Y8925la 7
Task 10 Subchapter 13 Closure If Required by Santa Ana Regional Water Control
Board
10.1 Rcgulatory requirements,
10.2 Final cover system, a
10,3 Waste coutaminant grading and drainage plans.
10.4 Oroundwatcr monitoring plan,
10.5 (has control plan.
10.5 Closure plan scheduling.
10.7 Final use plan.
10.8 Pom-closure rmiintenance plan,
10.9 Closure/Post-clvsurc cost estimates,
70YB925la 8
3 PROJECT BUDGET
The project budget given is an estimated cost .for the required and optional work
described under the Scope of Work section of this proposal. The intent of the work is
to supply complete engineered plans and specifications including fully detailed drawings
and a detailed bill of materials. M&Xs experience has shown that in the long run
preparing fully engineered plans and specifications prior to bid provides the highest
quality job for the lowest cost.
PROJECT BUDGET (REQUIRED)
r�
'i
Task 1 Preliminary Work $ 12,900
Task 2 Geotechnical Investigation 36,000
Task 3 Permitting and Applications 60000 `
x.
Task 4 Engineering 581000
Flare Station Equipment
Collection Field Construction
Drawings
Specifications
Tank 5 Site Survey $ 3,800
Task 6 Permitting and Applications 179800
Task 7 Engineering 10,000
Condensate Water Treatment System
Sewer Line Drawings and Specifications
i
Task 8 Contract Administration and Technical
Observation* 25,000
Task 9 Shirt-Up, Operations and Training 21,200
Task 10 Closure Plan 50.000
TOTAL $ 240,000
* Technical observation budget estimated at $15,000; this budget may vary
considerably depending on the contractor used.
70Y8925la 9
I
s
Note; In preparing the Project Budget, the following assumptions have been made:
1. The new flare station will be on native soil at a location on the landfill property.
2. No special provisions for noise abatement will be required.
Ji
3. An allowance for permitting has been included. Because all requirements for
permitting are not known, should costs exceed the allowance, additional budget
dollars will be requested.
4. The costs are for preparing the special provisions and the contract drawings and
do not include interfacing and compiling them with the City's bid documents.
5. An allowance to prepare a Negative Declaration is included.
G Tlie acceptance testing of the completed facility will be done by M&A. A one day
allowance for this has been included in the budget.
7 The initial start-up and training of City personnel is for five days.
S All rates used in this proposal are based on Kleinfelder's 1989 .Fee Schedule.
(Attachment A). New rates become effective on April 1, 1990. We request that
any work remaining after that date be done at the 1990 rates. This may require
a small increase in the remaining budget to allow sufficient hours to perform the
remaining work.
9. Money from tasks not included in the project will be deleted from the total
contract amount.
10. No sampling, analysis or source testing is included in this proposal.
11. No permit or plan check fees are included.
70Y8925la 10
` A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDER
MANDEVILLE & ASSOCIATES
environmental engineering services
November 7, 1988
File No. 70YP8156A
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Lou Sandoval, Director of Public Works
Dear Mr. Sandoval:
As discussed in our recent conversation, Mandeville & Associates (M&A), a Division of
Kleinfelder is pleased to submit this proposal for providing Environmental Assessment Services
for the property on and adjacent to the Huntington Beach Landfill.
BACKGROUND
The City of Huntington Beach, hereinafter referred to as the City, is interested in developing
certain properties bordered by Golden West Street on the west, Gothard Street on the east,
Talbert Street on the north and Ellis Avenue on the south. The City either owns, or is in the
process of acquiring, all associated parcels. The City desires to expand the development of a
mobile home park currently on the southern part of the property. Plans also include a park
and/or executive golf course on the portion of the property that was operated as a landfill.
The property includes former Class II and Class III landfills previously owned and/or
operated by Orange. County. Due to landfill gas (methane) migration control problems
resulting from the decomposition of organic matter in these landfills, the City contracted with
CalScience Research, Inc. in 1983 to undertake an investigation. This investigation included
an examination of site characteristics, experimental system design and testing, and based on
test results, preliminary design of a methane control system and cost estimate. The current
status of this program is not known. According to California law, AB 1897, the disposal
operator has certain responsibilities to perform air and water quality solid waste assessment
tests (SWATs). Depending on legal interpretation and as enforced by responsible regulatory
agencies, the City could be held responsible for any remediation work required, pending the
results of the SWATs, and the need to bring landfill closure up to current standards.
526 Hofgaarden
City of Industry. CA 91744
(818)369-2224
1
The City wishes to ascertain the environmental constraints imposed on this property because
of the landfill disposal activity. In keeping with this goal, the Cite has requested that M&A
submit an unsolicited proposal for an environmental assessment program and, if required,
based upon results of field monitoring of methane levels, a basis of design report will be
prepared specifying the type of gas migration control best meets the City's needs.
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
M&A proposes the City consider a twelve task program beginning with field investigations
and ending with operations management. The first four tasks will include a review of all
pertinent data on the site; inspection of any existing monitoring or remediation systems
currently employed; reconfirmation of landfill gas migration and landfill gas emissions;
discussions with appropriate agencies on regulatory compliance status; and recommendations
for additional investigation(s). Pending findings in Phase I, Phase II (Tasks 5 through 7) will
consist of some combination of additional investigation(s) and design of appropriate
remediation system(s). Phase III (Tasks 8 and 9) will include construction of required
remediation system(s) and Phase IV (Tasks 10 through 12) will consist of startup and
operation of required remediation system(s) consistent with land use plans.
A more detailed breakdown of specific tasks and estimated costs follows.
SCOPE OF WORK
In preparing this scope of work, it is assumed that landfill gas is the only contaminant of
concern. As a result, no effort has been placed on any possible contamination of groundwater
or contamination of soils caused by leachate. Part of this scope of work, however, will be a
system to handle condensate water that forms as a result of gas collection. This will be
incorporated in the final design and the necessary applications will be submitted to the
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for their approval. Corrections to the
necessary drawings will be submitted to the RWQCB for their approval.
(1)YP8156A.HAW 2
The major tasks for the scope of work are identified as follows:
PHASE I INVESTIGATION
Task 1. Field investigation
Task 2. Preliminary gas migration evaluation
Task 3. Regulatory Compliance
Task 4. Basis of Design Report
PHASE II PERIMITTING AND DESIGN
Task 5. Permits (gas migration control)
Task 6. Flare design specifications, detailed gas system drawings and specifications
Task 7. Bid preparation and evaluation assistance
PHASE III CONSTRUCTION
Task 8. Technical observation
Task 9. Operation and maintenance manual
PHASE IV STARTUP AND OPERATION
Task 10. Startup
Task 11. Employee training
Task 12. Operations management
To further clarify each of these tasks, a brief summary of what each one involves is described
here.
PHASE I INVESTIGATION
Task 1. Field Investigation
The field investigation will determine the extent and type of migration; the type of soils
surrounding the site so that the nature of the gas control system that will be required can be
ascertained; and the amount of gas that is anticipated from the site. This is an essential part
of the investigation as it will determine where gas migration control will be required; the
(1)YP8156A.HAW 3
t 1
particular needs of the gas migration control system, that is the spacing of the gas wells; the
type of gas wells; the amount of vacuum required; and the flows that can be anticipated. The
field investigation will culminate in the preliminary evaluation in Task 2.
Task 2. Preliminary Gas Migration Evaluation
The preliminary evaluation will be a report generated from the field investigation. This will
define the nature and extent of gas migration and also will give some information concerning
the amount of gas that can be anticipated from the site. (Note: This task commenced
January 11, 1989).
Task 3. Regulatory Compliance
In order to comply with the necessary standards, those standards will be defined and the
relative values that need to be addressed will be compared with those standards. This will
give a clear cut definition of the work required to comply with the regulatory agencies and
laws of the State of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach.
Task 4. Basis of Design Report
The Basis of Design Report will lay out in reasonable detail the gas migration control system
design, as well as the method of disposal of the gas that will be engineered for the City. The
report is an essential first step in order to accomplish work effort in a cost effective manner.
Once the Basis of Design Report has been prepared, a meeting will be held with the City to
confirm that this is acceptable. Part of this Basis of Design Report will include an engineering
cost estimate for the proposed system as submitted. The Basis of Design Report will be
modified by input from South Coast Air Quality Management District during Task 5 and will
be finalized before final designs, Task 6 is commenced.
PHASE II PERMITTING AND DESIGN
Task 5. Permits (Gas Migration Control System)
The primary long lead permit is the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) Permit to Construct. This project may also require the California Environmental
Quality Assurance Document (CEQA). The CEQA document typically can be handled by
(1)YP8156A.HAW 4
any negative declaration or a statement of negative impact. If additional work is required
beyond a statement of negative impact, this will be beyond the proposed scope of work.
SCAQMD typically takes three to six months to issue permits. In order to obtain a permit, it
is necessary to submit specific manufacturers of flare and blowers that will be used in the gas
migration control system as well as the design flow rates. As a result, the engineering design
will be done in two phases in Task 6. The first phase will be to determine the manufacturer
of the flare and blowers; the second phase will be for the bidding of all other equipment and
installation. In this manner, the City will make a purchase of the flare and blowers separate
from the contract acquisition and installation of the complete system. The drawings, when
completed, will also be submitted to Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for
approva'1 for the return of condensate water collected in the gas system to the landfill refuse
mass.
Task 6. Flare Design Specifications, Detailed Gas System Drawings and Specifications
Engineering design will require detailed specifications for a landfill gas flare and blower
which will be purchased separately from the system in order to satisfy the submittal
requirements to SCAQMD. The second portion of the engineering will require detailed
drawings and specifications of the landfill gas system and the flare station for competitive
bidding of the project. Included in Appendix A is a list of drawings and specification sections
that are anticipated to satisfy this engineering design requirement.
Task 7. Bid Preparation and Evaluation Assistance
M&A will incorporate the engineering specifications and drawings into a bid document for
the City and will also assist the City during the bidding process by answering questions for
4'
I..
contractors, conducting job walks, and helping to evaluate bids when complete. It will be
} necessary for the City to submit to M&A copies of all standard contract documents that need
w
to be included in the bid package including required bonds, statements of non-discrimination,
contract language, etc.
H
r
r
d
(1)YPS156A.HAW 5
PHASE III CONSTRUCTION
Task 8. Technical Observation
In order to verify that the contractor installs the system as designed, technical observation of
materials and workmanship is recommended. First, approvals will be required for the
equipment that the contractor submits for this facility. While the specifications will be specific
to make and manufacturer of certain equipment, should the contractor choose to deviate from
the specifications by using an approved equal, an approval will need to be made.
Additionally, whenever equipment is installed in the ground, testing is required, and safety is
an issue. M&A can assist the City with these items. Finally, the system should be tested to
verify that it has been constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications as part of
the technical observation task.
Task 9. Operation and Maintenance Manual
In order to allow the City to operate the system as effectively as possible, an Operations and
Maintenance Manual will be prepared. This manual will detail the startup, shutdown and
system balancing procedures as well as safety precautions that need to be taken during the
operation of the system. The actual operation and maintenance literature for individual
devices and components will be supplied as part of the contract for construction. This
information supplied by the contractor will be incorporated in the operations and
maintenance manual.
PHASE IV STARTUP AND OPERATION
Task 10. Start Up
Startup will be accomplished once the completed system has been approved. This involves
the running equipment, setting controls, testing alarms as well as opening all valves to their
appropriate point for the wells. It is anticipated that two men for two days and one man for
three days will be utilized for startup.
a
5
i
(1)YP8156A.HAW 6
Task 11. Employee Training
If the City desires, M&A will provide training for City employees in the operation of the
system. In order to be most cost effective, the employees should be available during the
startup and will actually take part in the startup process. As a result, the only additional
training beyond that which is included in the startup will be 40 hours of safety training so that
they are familiar with the hazards in working with landfill gas and the methods required in
order to protect them from the hazards. This training will be done in accordance with
29 CFR 1910.120 of the Federal Register which requires 40 hours of training.
Task 12.' Operations Management
M&A will assist the City by reviewing data collected and make periodically doing independent
inspections of the gas system to make sure that the City is operating the system properly. The
extent of the involvement of M&A in this task will be determined by mutual agreement
between M&A and the City.
A schedule for the above tasks can vary significantly. The key functions for the schedule will
be the first five tasks, including the investigation, evaluation and report, the evaluation of the
laws that comply with, determining the design and cost estimate and obtaining the necessary
permits. It is anticipated that this process could take as long as six months. While the permits
are being obtained, engineering can proceed. In fact, it will be necessary for the flare and
blowers to be purchased prior to submitting this data to SCAQMD. It is anticipated that the
engineering design work for this job will take approximately three months to complete. Once
SCAQMD Permit to Construct has been issued, the bidding assistance and legal requirements
of the City will need-to be considered and typically takes between one and two months. The
amount of time allocated for construction will be defined in the contract; however, normally
construction time on this type of project, including the delays required to obtain the materials,
will be approximately 100 working days. Startup and training will be done within a one month
period and the operations and maintenance manual will be prepared during the construction
of the facility.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
M&A acknowledges the City's intent that all materials prepared hereunder, including all
original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notes, calculations, maps and other
(1)YP8156A.HAW 7
documents, shall be turned over to the City upon termination of this Agreement or upon
project completion, whichever shall occur first. However, M&A is entitled to retain copies
thereof for our own records only. Any use of reuse of the plans and specifications except for
the specific project intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications without
the prior specific written consent of M&A shall be at the sole risk of the City. The City agrees
to hold harmless and indemnify M&A against all damages, claims and losses including
defense costs arising out of any such use, reuse or alteration or revision.
PROJECT BUDGET
M&A proposes to provide the services outlined in Phase I (Tasks 1 through 4) of the Scope of
Services on a time-and-expense basis against a budget of $39,860, using Kleinfelder's 1988
Standard Schedule of Charges, Appendix B. A detailed cost breakdown is found in
Appendix C. M&A will keep the City fully advised on project progress and will not start on
any tasks or additional phases that do not have a budget without the prior consent of the City.
Written authorization will be obtained prior to exceeding any of the listed cost estimates.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Phase I (Tasks 1 through 4) will take approximately 12 to 15 weeks to complete. As part of
Phase I, a project schedule will be prepared to reflect Phases II, III and IV.
COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS
Mandeville & Associates is a scientific and engineering consulting firm with an extensive
background in solid waste management with specialization in the fields of landfill gas
management and related environmental quality assessment and control.
M&A has developed particular expertise in assessment and control of potential hazards from
subsurface gas migration and surface emissions. M&A's technical professionals have worked
with numerous City and County agencies and private sector clients engaged in energy
exploration and resource development, sanitary and hazardous waste disposal site operation
and cleanup, and land use planning and management, to ensure protection of designed and in-
place structures and site personnel from the dangers associated with subsurface combustible
gases and toxic or noxious gaseous emissions. Substantial work has been devoted to gas
(1)YP8156A.HAW 8
migration control, including identification of existing and potential gas hazards and the
development and implementation of mitigation/prevention measures.
M&A is prepared to proceed as soon as authorization is received. Such authorization can be
in the form of a purchase order utilizing the scope of services and prices presented in this
proposal.
Very truly yours,
MANDEVILLE &ASSOCIATES,
A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDER, INC.
4Hug . Walker
Project Manager
Douglas M. Isbell, P.E.
Engineering Manager
HAW:DMI:gls
cc: Les Evans
i
c
(1)YP4156A.HAW 9
APPENDIX A
DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS
z:
Y.
a:
�u
�i
r-
t
3
ii
ik
S?
Ny.
kpt
µµ
i;
G'
DRAWING TITLES
T1 Title Sheet with Location Map
C1 Flare Station Grading Plan
C2 Flare Station Foundation Plan
C3 Flare Station Concrete Details
C4 Plan and Profile, showing the connection pipe between the Perimeter
Gas System and the Flare Station
C5 Piping Details
C6 Gravity Drain Condensate Water Handling System
C7 Horizontal Well Details
C8 Vertical Well Details
C9 Probe Details
C10 Gas Well and Probe Plan
M1 Flare Station Assembly Drawing*
M2 Flare Station Assembly Details*
E1 Electrical Equipment Backboard Detail*
E2 Control Backboard Electrical Equipment Assembly*
E3 Control Panel Detail*
E4 Control Wiring Schematic*
E5 Electrical Interconnection Diagram*
E6 Power Wiring Diagram and Load Schedules*
E7 Electrical Plot Plan Details*
*(If a flare is used. This will be determined in the Basis of Design Report.)
This drawing and specification list is based on using a landfill gas flare. If an alternate
disposal device is used, these lists may change significantly.
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-2
SPECIAL PROVISION SPECIFICATIONS
GENERAL
Project Definition
Safety
Project Requirements
Precedence Relationship
Material Substitutions
Abbreviations
Definitions
Technical Contacts
SCOPE OF WORK AND BASIS OF PAYMENT
WARRANTY OF WORK
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WORK AND PROJECT COMPLETION
INTENT OF DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONTROL OF WORK
y
Authority of Engineer
r Conformity with Drawings and Allowable Deviations
M1
Coordination and Interpretations of Drawings and Specifications
`y Inspection
. Drawings and Equipment Submittals
r:
l
z -
E
l
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-3
LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Complying with Rules and Regulations
Permits and Licenses
Patented Devices
Property Marks
Protection of Public and Private Property
Utilities on Site
Service Roads, Walkways and Bridges
Irrigation Facilities
Roads and Fences
EXISTING UTILITIES
Location of Existing Utilities
Connection to Existing Utilities
DISPOSAL OF REFUSE
SITE SECURITY
QUALITY CONTROL
General
Authority of Inspector
1
Inspection
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
General
Electrical Services
Accident Prevention
Construction Facilities
Staging and Shoring
Temporary Facilities
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-4
TEMPORARY FACILITIES (continued)
Warning Devices and Barricades
Hazards in Public Right of Way
Project Security
Fire Extinguishers
Dust Control
Odor Control
Sealing Open Holes
CONSTRUCTION SITE MAINTENANCE
General
Clean-Up
Waste Disposal
EARTHWORK
General
Staking of Line and Grade
Obstruction
Excavation
Bracing and Shoring Trenches
Pipe Bedding
Earth Backfill
Disposal of Excavated Refuse
Structural Excavation and Backfill
Final Clean-Up
Compaction and Testing
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-5
PLASTIC PIPING
General
Excavation, Trenching and Backfill
Depth of Trench
Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe and Fittings
Steel Pipe
P.E. Pipe and Fittings
Pipe Laying
PIPE SUPPORTS
FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS
Flexible Connectors for PVD and CPVC Pipe
Flexible Connectors for Rotating Equipment
Flexible Connectors for Water Piping
PRESSURE TESTING PIPE
CONCRETE
ACI Conformance
Material
Concrete Class
Design Mix
Admixtures
Concrete Placement
Testing
Contractor Furnished Materials
ANCHOR BOLTS AND BOLTING
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-6
LAINTDFILL GAS BLOWERS
General
Design Performance
Blower Specifications
ELECTRICAL
General
Codes and Regulations
Materials and Workmanship
Temporary Power
Cutting and Repairing
Drawings
F As-Built Drawings
Scope
Grounding
F
h
Equipment
Control Panel Constructions
Conduit
Field Wiring
Lighting
Additional Requirements
ALARM SYSTEM
b.
4
p; General
u'
Scope
3:
E,
General Requirements and Codes
Telephone
a
w
F
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-7
PAINT AND TOUCH-UP
Paint
Touch-up and Repair
O&M LITERATURE AND DATA REQUIREMENTS
PROPANE BOTTLES AND PIPING
INSTALLATION OF OWNER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT
START-UP
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT, SAFETY EQUIPMENT AND SIGNS
FLOW TRANSMITTERS AND FLOW INDICATORS
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION SHEETS
GAS WELLS
GAS PROBES
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-8
PURCHASE ORDER
!` GO of Huntington Bech
2000 MAIN STREET
' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 PURCHASE ORDER ,
(714) 536-5221 This number must
Billing Inquiries: (714) 536-5448 appear on
Packages and Invoices.
DATE
12"/U9 4F37953793
?9.17'�.
v s
T N "R�lNf E' IL�.E (/ f�Sa1•{�. ", CITY OF. H'UNTINGTON P)EA .4
D �2S .PI€3"GAARDEN P ?01)1 KAI N ST ,
R . :. .I7Y..OE f, USTRY CA .91744 T `AUNT1 GT9N-.BEACH CA 54 '.
F.O.B. Destination Deliver within Confirm�% Plus Frt.Prepay &Add: e� Terms:
YES Y days P y $
OUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
59at LYSI F9 ' `TUANE `( uA:` VIE{
ESTATE `flEP PROPOSAL DATED DEC 9; 1983)
T1 ME'VID 1 PENSE NOT TO EXCEED
(RC)
t
f_, � ��i't,,ram {�'" �j ;yr k•.�.e.r. --g L�';� � ...�..�.�...) C , _.,.r.-t..cW.�. ,
r c�?..,�. w_..- �..�/+.c;,.er...r__�=• �_�`,.: �;fr-fT- �fJ. c'i,r,.. . ' r. C-/o
i
a7-3q
y e 1 C.to I '$
4e� t,�i required .... ••
bb 3Y• r t.
L.ion
OTAL
TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON REVERSE
...,.s
FORM A PART OF THIS ORDER
lard Amadril,Purchasing lyt3nager-City of Huntington mad a
HB/PO No.113 Rev.6188 t]
1{fj
417504/ 535 3 .740 .. 0
•� a
RED. NBR. AMOUNT - REQ. NBR. AMOUNT RED. NBR. AMOUNT -�
ra
A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDER
., MANDEVILLE & ASSOCIATES
environmental engineering services
December 9, 1988
The Robert Mayer Corporation
660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1050
P. O. Box 8680
Newport Beach, CA 92658-8680
Attention: Mr. Matthew T. Kane, Assistant Project Manager
Subject: Ocean View Estates, Ellis & Golden West
Soil Analysis for Methane
Dear Mr. Kane:
Mandeville & Associates (M&A), a Division of Kleinfelder, is pleased to submit this proposal
for methane analysis for Ocean View Estates. This proposal complies with the sampling
requirements outlined by Paragraph 2, "Soil Analysis for Methane," City of Huntington Beach
Inter-Departmental Communication from Kelly Main to Raymond C. Picard dated November
18, 1988. (Attachment A.)
Background
The Robert B. Mayer Corporation is involved in the final development of Ocean View Estates,
a mobile home park. The City of Huntington Beach Fire Department has stipulated that in
order to determine whether or not there is methane present in surface'or near surface soil in
the development area, the soil must be tested for the presence of methane gas. M&A has
extensive experience in conducting testing of this nature and is prepared to complete the work
in compliance with the Fire Department requirements.
Proposed Scope of Senices
To meet the testing requirements for the property, M&A proposes a scope of services
consisting of three tasks.
Task 1 - Installation of Gas Monitoring Probes
On the basis of the Phase 2 Site Plan, Florian Martinez Associates, revised November 23, 1988,
M&A estimates that five driven probes are required to conform with the grid system specified.
Based upon a review of this requirement with Mr. Dennis Groat, Deputy Fire Marshal, driven
probes are adequate for this purpose.
M&A will fabricate, furnish and install five(5) driven probes to a depth of ten feet.
Estimated not-to-exceed cost for Task 1: $1,140.00
526 Ho`aaarae"
City of Ina:,stry, CH 91744
(1)70YP8164 818) 3&9-222-*
December 9, 1988 •
Page 2
A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDER
MANDEVILLE & ASSOCIATES
environmental engineering services
k
`i
Gt
Task 2 - Testing & Monitoring
r{
Consistent with the site plan and a review with Mr. Dennis Groat, approximately fifty (50)
barhole punches, to a depth of two to three feet, will be located on a grid system of one f
hundred (100) feet lengths. The driven probes and the barholes will be tested for the presence
of methane, and readings will be recorded in percent of Lower Explosive Limit LEL) of
methane. A written report summarizing the data will be provided for your review.
Estimated not-to-exceed cost for Task 2: $1,600.00
Task 3 - Mitigation
Based upon the data obtained, and the guidelines in the Roberti Methane Study, M&A will
assist The Robert Mayer Corporation with defining and implementing a quick course of action
for mitigation, should this be necessary.
Estimated not-to-exceed cost for Task 3: To be determined.
Project Budget
M&A proposes to provide the services outlined in Task 1 and Task 2 on a time and expense,
not-to-exceed cost of$2,740.00, using Kleinfelder's 1988 Fee Schedule (Attachment B). Should
the services outlined in Task 3 be necessary, costs will be determined on a time and expense
basis against the fee schedule. These services will be authorized through a Request to Perform
Additional Services (Attachment C).
Project Schedule
M&A will proceed with the project as soon as authorization is received.
Project Summary
M&A is prepared to proceed as soon as authorization is received. Such authorization can be in
the form of your purchase order utilizing the Scope of Services and estimated costs presented in
this proposal or by the execution of the Meinfeider Standard Agreement that accompanies this
proposal. (Attachment D.)
(1)70YP8164
December 9, 1988 •
Page 3
A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDER
MANDEVILLE & ASSOCIATES
environmental engineering services
I will contact you in the near future to discuss our proposal further. If you have any questions,
please feel free to call me at (818) 369-2224. We look forward to working with The Robert
Mayer Corporation.
Very truly yours,
MANDEVILLE & ASSOCIATES,
A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDER, INC.
Uday Singh
Manager, Environmental Services Division
Douglas M. Isbell
Engineering Manager
US:DMI:ah
Encl.
cc: RTM
CTK
File
(1)70YP8164
PURCHASE ORDER
Gig of Huntington Bech
2000 MAIN STREET
' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 PURCHASE ORDER
(714) 536-5221 This number must.
Billing Inquiries: (714) 536-5448 appear on
Packages and-invoices
DATE 195�379
i 471 ':r
V.'. S
N J ulNDEV II Lr . j ASSOC. " CITY OF 4. VNTT`.`d W4 SEACH
0.Ft CITY OF INDUSTRY CA �- 174a T i-WNTINGTON BEAt'»�d v 9264 '
:: . 0 ATTN: COMM"SEWCES11 ES EVANS
F.O.B. Destination YFS ry Delivery within Confirm 4 Plus Frt.Prepay &Add: Terms:
J days °
QUANTITY' DESCRIPTION
A C T 1 N PLAN TO C01'ITROL METHANE MIGRATIOM
FROM THE CITY Or LANDFILL TASKS 1-5
TIME ,AID EXPFMS" NOT 'TO EXCEED 6300 10 ..
�tRr)
�i
C( q s
TOTAL -� I�
TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON REVERSE !
FORM A PART OF THIS ORDER
....
Richard Amadril,Purchasing Manager-City of Huntington Beach
HB/PO No.113 Rev,6/88
117905 7907S-1 0 -0.3
REQ. NBR. AMOUNT S REQ.NBR. AMOUNT REQ. NBR. AMOUNT
77 7
November 7, 1988
File No. 70-YP8156
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Lou Sandoval, Director of Public Works
Dear Mr. Sandoval:
As discussed at our recent meeting, Mandeville & Associates (M&A), a Division of
Kleinfelder, is pleased to submit this proposal for providing Environmental Assessment Services
for the property on and adjacent to the Huntington Beach Landfill.
Background
The City of Huntington Beach, hereinafter referred to as the City, is interested in developing
certain properties bordered by Golden West Street on the west, Gothard Street on the east,
Talbert Street on the north and Ellis Avenue on the south. The City either owns, or is in the
process of acquiring, all associated parcels. The City desires to expand the development of a
mobile home park currently on the southern part of the property. Plans also include a park
and/or executive golf course on the portion of the property that was operated as a landfill.
The property includes former Class II and Class III landfills previously owned and/or
operated by Orange County. Due to landfill gas (methane) migration control problems
resulting from the decomposition of organic matter in these landfills, the City contracted with
CalScience Research, Inc. in 1983 to undertake an investigation. This investigation included
an examination of site characteristics, experimental system design and testing, and based on
test results, preliminary design of a methane control system and cost estimate. The current
status of this program is not known. According to California law, AB 1897, the disposal
operator has certain responsibilities to perform air and water quality solid waste assessment
tests (SWATs). Depending on legal interpretation and as enforced by responsible regulatory
agencies,the City could be held responsible for any remediation work required, pending the
results of the SWATS, and the need to bring landfill closure up to current standards.
• • �� KLEIN FELDER
The City wishes to ascertain the environmental constraints imposed on this property because
of the landfill disposal activity.. In keeping with this goal, the City has requested that M&A
submit an unsolicited proposal for an environmental assessment program for this property.
Proposed Scope of Services
M&A proposes the City consider a four phased program. The first phase will include a review
of all pertinent data on the site; inspection of any existing monitoring or remediation systems
currently employed; reconfirmation of landfill gas migration and landfill gas emissions;
discussions with appropriate agencies on regulatory compliance status; and recommendations
for additional investigation(s). Pending findings in Phase I, Phase II will consist of some
combination of additional investigation(s) and design of appropriate remediation system(s).
Phase III will include construction of required remediation system(s) and Phase IV will consist
of startup and operation of required remediation system(s) consistent with land use plans.
A more detailed breakdown of specific tasks and estimated costs follows:
PHASE I INVESTIGATION
Estimated
Task Task Description Cost
1 Review City files on property and land use plans, $ 2,000
inspect site, formulate environmental assessment plan
2 Review status of existing monitoring/remediation To Be
system(s) currently employed including Determined
including field investigation, if appropriate
3 Determine regulatory compliance status on landfill(s) 2,400
closure (Subchapter 15); SCAQMD Rule 1150.2
landfill gas emissions); Health and Safety Code Section
(HSC) 41805.5 (Calderon AB 3525 and 3374) Air Solid Waste
Waste Assessment Test (SWAT); California Code of
Regulations 66795.53 and 66795.54 HSC 41805.5 and 4231.5
and Water Code Section 13273 (Calderon AB 3525 and 3374)
Water SWAT through discussions with California Waste
Management Board (CWMB), South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD), Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), Orange County General
Services Agency (Waste Management Program) and Orange
County Solid Waste Enforcement Agency (LEA)
2
. --- • KLEI \ I EI UER
PHASE I INVESTIGATION (Continued)
Estimated
Task Task Description Cost
4 Pending findings in Tasks 1-3, recommend additional 1,200
environmental assessment investigation(s)*
5 Provide services to conduct recommended investigations To Be
in Task 4 Determined
6 Pending findings in Tasks 2-5, recommend appropriate 1,200
remediation for land use plans determined in
Task 1 and as required by responsible regulatory
agencies
7 Prepare report on findings and recommendations; 3.900
meet with City
SUBTOTAL $10,700
*This may include additional environmental assessment work on that part of the property that
is not landfilled. A Kleinfelder internal guidance document is provided in Appendix A to
illustrate the breadth of assessment work that may be required if not already accomplished.
PHASE II ENGINEERING
Estimated
Task Task Description Cost
1 Based on findings in Phase I, prepare basis To Be
for design for necessary remediation; review Determined
with City
2 Prepare engineering design drawings and To Be
specifications for remediation construction bid Determined
package
PHASE III CONSTRUCTION
Task Task Description EstimatedCost
1 Assist City in general contractor.evaluation To Be
and negotiations Determined
2 Provide equipment inspection and technical To Be
observation services Determined
3
• • kn KLE11FELDER
PHASE IV STARTUP/OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Estimated
Task Task Description Cost
1 Prepare O&M manual To Be
Determined
2 Provide operator training To Be
Determined
3 Provide startup services To Be
Determined
4 Provide troubleshooting and initial operations To Be
services Determined
5 Pending availability of City personnel, provide To Be
continuing O&M services Determined
Project Budget
M&A proposes to provide the services outlined in Phase I of the Scope of Services on a time-
and-expense basis against a budget of $10,700, using Kleinfelder's 1988 Standard Schedule of
Charges, Appendix B. M&A will keep the County fully advised on project progress and will
not start on any tasks or additional phases that do not have a budget without the prior consent
of the County. Written authorization will be obtained prior to exceeding any of the listed cost
estimates.
Project Schedule
Phase I will take approximately 10 weeks to complete. As part of Phase 1, a project schedule
will be prepared to reflect Phases H, III, and IV.
Company Qualifications
E Mandeville & Associates is a scientific and engineering consulting firm with an extensive
f background in solid waste management with specialization in the fields of landfill gas
management and related environmental quality assessment and control.
4
• - ki KLEI FEL1)EK
M&A has developed particular expertise in assessment and control of potential hazards from
subsurface gas migration and surface emissions. M&A's technical professionals have worked
with` numerous city and county agencies and private sector clients engaged in energy
exploration and resource development, sanitary and hazardous waste disposal site operation
and cleanup, and land use planning and management, to ensure protection of designed and in-
place structures and site personnel from the dangers associated with subsurface combustible
gases and toxic or noxious gaseous emissions. Substantial work has been devoted to gas
migration control, including identification of existing and potential gas hazards and the
development and implementation of mitigation/prevention measures. Additional company
qualifications can be found in Appendix C.
Project Summary
M&A is prepared to proceed as soon as authorization is received. Such authorization can be
in the form of a purchase order utilizing the scope of services and prices presented in this
proposal or execution of a Kleinfelder Agreement (Appendix D).
I will contact you in the near future to discuss our proposal further. We look forward to the
opportunity of working with the City on this project.
Very truly yours,
MANDEVILLE & ASSOCIATES,
A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDER, INC.
Richard T. Mandeville
Douglas M. Isbell
Engineering Manager
RTM:DMI:gls
5
PURCHASE ORDER
Ci*0of Huntington Bftch
2000 MAIN STREET
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 PURCHASE ORDER
(7 1 4) 536-5221 This number must appear on
Billing Inquiries: (714) 536-5448 Packages and Invoices.
DATE
V • S •
E H
IN
D
P T
0
T 7,;Aj
R T
0 r
F.O.B. Destination Delivery within Confirm Plus Frt. Prepay &Add: Terms:
days
i� Q ANT I+Y U IT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
T rj j i 0
"ST AT'-
if xr*' r-',[r! i,l,''r T' f
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ARTICLES STATED ABOVE HAVE BEEN RECEIVED
O
CAREFULLY WEIGHED, MEASURED OR COUNTED. THAT QUALITIES AND / T�-�TO�TAA_
QUANTITIES ARE CORRECTLY STATED. THAT SERVICES REPORTED HEREON
WERE PERFORMED AS ORDERED.
Amadril, Purchasing Manager--city C
SIGNED -DATE RECEIVED a,d Amadril, Purch
HB/PO No 113 Rev.6188
` Ir 1,
REG. NBR. AMOUNT REG. NBR. AMOUNT REQ. NBR. AMOUNT
SEND THIS COPY TO PURCHASING DEPARTMENT WHEN THIS ORDER IS COMPLETE
h" K L E I N F E L D E R
GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR APPENDIX A
A PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
(PHASE I INVESTIGATION)
GENERAL
The purpose of this guidance document is to provide detailed information on what constitutes
an acceptable preliminary environmental assessment or Phase I investigation.
This document should be used as a reference to conducting a Phase I investigation. If
properly followed, the resulting written report should be of professional quality and contain
adequate information on a site as to identify any environmental concerns, operating risks and
potential liabilities because of past or current activities.
The scope of work outlined in this guidance will not be applicable in all cases and will need to
be tailored to fit the particular situations.
PHASE I INVESTIGATION
In general, a Phase I investigation is a mechanism to identify and analyze the potential
environmental risks and liability associated with a real estate or other financial transaction.
More specifically, the investigation will:
Provide adequate data to support a transaction or warrant further investigation.
Qualify the level of environmental risk and liability associated with past and current
practices and make recommendations.
Demonstrate 'Due Diligence" and good faith as to support potential future defense
claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund).
It is therefore critical that certain standards of performance be set and a minimum scope of
work be performed in a consistent manner.
SCOPE OF WORK
Task Elements of a Phase I Investigation
TASK 1 - Conduct site survey
TASK 2 - Surrounding land use survey
TASK 3 - Geological, Hydrogeological, Topography and Meteorological
Assessment
TASK 4 - Historical review of the site
TASK 5 - Regulatory review of current and past activities
TASK 6 - Data evaluation
TASK 7 - Report preparation
• • hn KLEI -NFELDER
I
CONDUCT SITE SURVEY - TASK 1
The purpose of a site survey is .to visually inspect the property, buildings, associative
structures, equipment and operational procedures for actual or potential sources of
environmental contamination or impairment. Besides looking at the current situation,
information fathered, can in many cases, be an indication of past contamination and
indicative of inappropriate procedures. Some of these past activities, left unattended, could
become a source of future environmental impairment and liability. The site survey attempt to
collect all available information that will help qualify any environmental risks associated with
the site. A site assessment will vary in scope and complexity.
At a minimum, and not limited to, the following items will be assessed. All the items
mentioned may not apply and others not mentioned may. It is the intent of the site survey to
identify any and all features that may have environmental implications.
ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES TO ASSESS
Interview with management on current and past equipment, processes and procedures.
All environmental file documents and records.
All point source discharges and existing control devices.
- Chemical storage, waste streams, and waste storage areas.
Above and below ground storage tanks and piping.
Fuel dispensing equipment.
All electrical equipment for PCBs.
Asbestos
Spill control, containment devices or the lack of.
Lagoons, impoundments, retention basins, sumps, pits, dry wells, water wells.
Signs of illegal dumping.
Drainage patterns, ditches, streams, storm and sanitary sewers.
Pesticide and herbicide application practices.
Stained soil, odor, fouled water, obvious past spills, impaired vegetation.
General housekeeping and maintenance, obvious areas of mismanagement and
noncompliance, environmental setting.
Take photographs to document, in the report, environmental features of the site.
Photographs will be 35 millimeter color prints of a business quality.
Easements.
• y '• hn KLEINFELDER
SURROUNDING LAND USE SURVEY - TASK 2
A survey of the surrounding land use will be conducted to identify potential off-site sources of
contamination that could be an environmental threat to the site or areas that could be, a threat
from the subject site.
The survey should consider at least the following elements:
Actual or potential sources of j)ollution, known contaminated areas, groundwater,
uncontrolled listed sites, proximity to underground tanks, downwind from known air
discharges or sources of odor, chemical storage and process areas.
Proximity to sensitive ecological areas, floodplain, wetland, wildlife refuges, coastal
zones, surface water, wells and drinking sources, residential areas.
Zoning, land use.
GEOLOGICAL, HYDROGEOLOGICAL HYDROLOGY, TOPOGRAPHICAL AND
METEOROLOGICAL ASSESSMENT - TASK 3
An assessment of the &,eological, hydrogeological, hydrology, topographical, and historical
meteorological trends will be made of the site and surrounding areas. This assessment will aid
in the development and understanding of the environmental transport routes, dispersal
patterns and risks, of past, present or future pollutants spilled or discharged on, or into the
ground or water or pollutants discharged to the air. This assessment should take into
consideration:
Soil profile of the site (if available) and surrounding areas. Past boring logs or
governmental and private surveys of the site and area geology. A description of any
brought in fill at the site should be known.
Information on the hydrogeological conditions at the site and the surrounding area.
This should document water table location quality and usage, subterranean structures
that may effect the movement of water or contaminants. Water analyses for wells on
site or in the area should be attached if available.
Hydrological conditions should be researched. Proximity of drainage patterns and
surface water to the site. Surface water quality, classification and usage should be
identified.
Topographical characteristics that may effect the transport and migration of spilled
chermcaps should be elaborated on.
Historical meteorological trends such as prevailing wind speed and direction, air
inversions should be identified if air pollutants and toxics are used in the area or at the
site that could have an adverse impact on the area.
- -- `- � kq KLEI .NFELnER
HISTORICAL REVIEW OF THE SITE - TASK 4
This task involves the historical search of all available and readily obtainable documents to
determine past uses of the property including land and improvements.
Consideration should be given to the following sources of information:
Date of initial construction and date and nature of major additions or alterations.
Plans for future construction.
Title research, land use records, archival records, publications, past tenant usage
records.
Historical aerial photos, site map and plans. Map out potential sources of impairment,
such as underground tank location.
Interview with personnel knowledgeable of the property history. Adverse press
reports.
Other primary sources of information.
REGULATORY REVIEW OF CURRENT AND PAST ACTIVITIES - TASK 5
An appropriate inquiry needs to be made to any governmental agency that may have some
jurisdiction over environmental matters at a site.
Information needs to be collected and documents and records reviewed that may apply to past
or present activities at the site.
Examples of agencies that could be contacted are: Federal and State EPA, and/or agencies
under the jurisdiction of the Federal and State EPA (i.e., regional water Quality Control
Boards, etc.), County Health Department, City Engineering Department, Fire Department,
Courthouse, etc.
Items that should be considered during this search include:
National Priority List (NPL) review for the site being assessed and any surrounding
sites within a one-mile radius.
Listings on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Information System (CERCLIS) for facilities within a one-mile radius of the site and
the site itself.
State "Superfund" list within one mile of the site and the site, itself.
Regulatory enforcement actions compliance orders, citations, etc.
Permits, required notifications, registrations, applications, etc.
Required testing, analyses, monitoring reports, etc.
Incident and spill reports, hazardous waste manifests, RCRA Biennial reports, etc.
a
• hn KLE, .Nf ELDER
DATA EVALUATION - TASK 6
This task involves the evaluation of all data collected during the Phase I assessment and
should appear in the final report as a narrative. Minimum areas to include, but not limited to
are:
Summary of findings which describe current environmental features of the site and
perceived past environmental and historical conditions.
Compliance, risk, hazard and liability assessment for on and off the site.
Discussion of actual or potential on site and off-site contamination and the ability to
migrate on the surface of the ground, under the ground, in groundwater, through
sewers or drainage patterns, surface water, or in the air. This discussion should also
include environmental target areas such as residential areas, wetlands, coastal zones,
etc.
Recommended corrective alternative, and cost estimates. Recommendation for a
specific action (i.e., install monitoring wells) or additional investigation, a Phase II
assessment.
REPORT PREPARATION - TASK 7
The final task for the Phase I assessment is the preparation of a written report. This report
should be a concise and logical presentation of all the information gathered during the
assessment. The report should summarize the significant findings by expanding on each task,
identify actual and potential environmental risks and liabilities. Evaluate the risks and make
recommendations on risk reduction and the potential costs involved.
Two bound copies, each with colored photographs will be submitted to the Principal Financial
Group. The following report format is suggested:
Coversheet
Letter of Transmittal
Table of Contents
List of Illustrations
List of Tables
List of Photographs
Executive Summary
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
Scope of Services (Phase I Tasks)
Site Location (includes site map)
1kn KLEI ,NFELDFK
SITE ASSESSMENT (Past and Present Ownership Review)
Site History and Aerial Photographs
Site Description and Survey Results
Surrounding Land use (include vicinity map)
Geological, Hydrogeological, Topography, and Meteorological
Assessment
Regulatory Review of Past and Current Activities
Evaluation
Conclusions and Recommendations
(including statement of relative acceptable risk or need
for further investigation)
References
Appendices
Boring Records
Analytical Results
Other Documentation
• �/��n. 7�e l�/En
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION S.I.C. 90-001 F
(714) 536-5990 Issued 1/31/90 ;
3
;i
CERTIFICATE OF SELF-INSURANCE 3
This is to certify that the City .of Huntington Beach, California
is a self-insured public entity. This City is self-insured for
liability and workers' compensation.
Suitable cash reserves to afford coverage for uninsured anticipated
losses are maintained at $1,000,000. This City will furnish 10
days written notice of any changes in the above.
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
za a,
z
Connie Brockway Gail Hutton
City Clerk City Attorney
INITIATING DEPARTMENT:
Edward H. Thompson
Risk Manager
This form is provided to the County of Orange in conjunction with
geotechnical testing to be performed by Kleinfelder, under contract
with the City of Huntington Beach. Testing will be located at the
Gothard Transfer Station, Huntington Beach, for a period of approxi-
mately five days between the dates of February 1, 1990 and March 1,
1990.
Address inquiries regarding City insurance coverage and limits to the
Risk Manager. All claims shall be filed with the City Clerk, 2000
Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648.
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH AND KLEINFELDER, INC FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN
SERVICES FOR THE PROPERTY ON AND ADJACENT TO
THE HUNTINGTON BEACH LANDFILL
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 is entered into this day of
1989 , by and between the CITY of HUNTINGTON
BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" , and KLEINFELDER, INC. ,
hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR" .
WHEREAS, since the original agreement, dated March 20 , 1989 ,
it has been determined by the parties that additional payment is
required of CITY to complete the project .
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between CITY and
CONTRACTOR that paragraph 4 (COMPENSATION) is amended to read to add
the following :
The statement of work is amended to add services described in
Exhibit "B" , which is attached hereto and incorporated into this
Amendment No . 1 by this reference. The increased cost for the
additional work, including expense reimbursement, increases the
contract by an amount not to exceed TWO HUNDRED FORTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($240 , 000) . This amount is to be added to the original
agreement cost of THIRTY-NINE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS
($39 , 860) for a total amended project cost of TWO HUNDRED
SEVENTY-NINE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS ($279 , 860) .
PAGE END
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this
Amendment No. 1 as of the date hereinabove set forth.
CONTRACTOR: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,
KLEINFELDER, INC. A municipal corporation
a California corporation of the State of California
Thomas E. Bailey Mayor
Regional Manager/Principal
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk tic 1, .City AttoXneyc�
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED ND APPROVED:
' f
City Administrator Direct r of Public Works
1 - 'Lee -6 41
- 2 -
YI IISSUE DATE(MM/DDNY)�PRODucER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
FRANK B. HALL & CO. OF' CAL I FORN I A NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
200 PR I NGLE AVE. , SUITE 400 I EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
P. O. BOX 805E COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596-8053
COMPANY A
LETTER
CODE SUB-CODE _.-.____- __ _.-.-..NAT I.O.NAL _UNION INSURANCE CO.
Z`) COMPANY
I LETTER B
INSURED NORTHBROOK
INSURANCE_ CO. _
THE KLEINFELDER GROUP COMPANY
LETTER C
21L1 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD.
SUITE 570 LETTER Y D
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
COMPANY
LETTER E
COVERAGES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
�T — POLICY EFFECTIVE'POLICY EXPIRATION
TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER I ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
LTR � I DATE(MM/DD1YY) I DATE(MM/DD/YY)
j GENERAL LIABILITY T— j GENERAL A66REGATE —j i—�2000
�A X j COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY I GL 5901574 ! 07/0 1/89 07/0 1/9 PRODUCTS•COMPIOPS AGGREGATE S 2000.
CLAIMS MADE X 1 OCCUR
1( ! PERSONAL 6 ADVERTISING INJURY $ 1000
j X j OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT, EACH OCCURRENCE
FIRE DAMAGE ( i 1000
__.....
X i CONTRACTUAL I '
' ; MAGE(My one Ilre) � S
I I MEDICAL EXPENSE(My one person)i $
.-.—_ .._
{
I AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
COMBINED
(
SINGLE $ h t`
�( X1 ANY AUTO CA 0819026 j 07/01/89 07/01/9QI LIMIT 1000
ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY "¢
INJURY S�
SCHEDULED AUTOS I (Per person) -
_1 .— rya
X I HIRED AUTOS (INJURY S ?
}{� NON-OWNED AUTOS ` DILY
(Per scclden—l-)� —___ rri►,{ qr1
GARAGE LIABILITY I ! I PROPERTY
DAMAGE $
EXCESS LIABILITY y ai EACH AGGREGATE
4 OCCURRENCE
y�{ 4
5
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM 1 1 sy
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
STATUTORY L°' �
f R ttOS'Cti9'4 r = (EACH ACCIDENT)
AND (DISEASE—POLICY
P_.O LIICY LIMIT)
_..__
EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY � �+ S I (DISEASE—EACH EMPLOYEE
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS THE CITY OF HUNT I NGTON BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES ARE NAMED AS ADDITIONAL
INSUREDS' AS RESPECTS FILE N0:70-YP8156 KLOO24
CERTIFICATE HOLDER;
r•. .�:�x.;.• :... �� .�� .. . '�its CANCELLATION . :�;' :.o.�c. .. .`:�5 _.. .
SHOULD ANY OF T�E AB.OVE,DqSqRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
CITY OF HUNT I NGTON BEACH EXPIRA• ION DATE ;THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
2000 MAIN STREET
MAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
HUNT I NGTON BEACH, CA 90648 LEFT. BPFAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR
LIABILITY PF ANY;KIND UPON THE%COMPANY,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORLUD REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD;25=$(3/88). ELLSt ] tT, l� V.ICE P B@I�AFiPORATION=:1988
ISSUE DATE(MM/DD/YY) `
a/alia�a CERTIFICA F INSURANCE
i PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER,THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, I
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
1-r;
I
°('`` ''":'` ' ``'' COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE j
::o.(.;�....,:4 i:i:�l.....::'•i'':••.:' COMPANY A 4
CODE SUB-CODE LETTER
I
COMPANY B
INSURED Y
LETTER j
1:++.ii• 'If't,j t:{:'{; !-' 1 1"+ii) !>: i"''�r:l 1" i T7 tc? .. f'1`.'ii•e/..:+.! .,
i
i`,(...I....I.I`a"1::.1...;..'t::.t"•: .. COMPANY `.
::a..,i:J. !`•!: i..;:l i. 1 'f i}l...i'f ! �:l :',t:!.!. i.iiti•'�:' !Y (:(
LETTER
COMPANY D
W1 ..f 1.rl u 1. i.,I' 1'+:If i l LETTER
COMPANY E
LETTER
tCOVERAGES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS: j
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. j
CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
LTR DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY)
GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PROD UCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $ II
CLAIMS MADE OCCUR. PERSONAL&ADVERTISING INJURY $
i OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT. EACH OCCURRENCE $
T? 7� TO FORtd9
�'� ' FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $
MEDICAL EXPENSE(Any one person) $ )
<<,V COMBINED
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY v .. SINGLE $ j
ANY AUTO }t, LIMIT j
ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY j
Ip(?}lY L"y' v rJ 't INJURY $
SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) {
HIRED AUTOS BODILY
INJURY $
' NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) i
GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY S
i DAMAGE $
EXCESS LIABILITY EACH AGGREGATE
OCCURRENCE
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKER'S COMPENSATION - --- STATUTORY ,
$ (EACH ACCIDENT)
AND ..•. ?�:A;.ti....-. •, •..;�.. 'd f a:L t:F'';� $ ..+� ` (DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT
EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY f�� [ij� ... '. 1
$ ;;,v(:• (DISEASE—EACH EMPLOYEE)
OTHER
:.l.(.�f�f�[. t: f f`.P•F:r{; r+..;.. .i.. '��+;} ?I. ,�}{i r f�'I::•t�1 I I
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS I
i!. 1. i T i {::drl'('t4r I l i7 ....•
:I{:{t;i I '(' 1 :]Y'f,., ;'r..:t r'...... intl Tit i'i:i.i1'ii'i::'(' 1'i? Fi'fliLt?;'@i7S:i... i+'i` i:• i'{::7iiiiiid .�.r'rEE:tAI"t:`C:(
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
MAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
2000 H,.Y t it ! I t.}c. I. LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR
I•'It.tr41 i T19'('0rl it+:'.L•cfi::l'I (:;r; `i�.:'.sarP
LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DE,MYENT0td,AA.t 7 3 s J%A i. I ii` F' f 'l' (tr'v y
AV
j ACORD 25-S(3188) y __ OACORD CORPORATION 1.988
A�1aet1. CERTIFICATE OF INSUMNCE ISSUE DATE(MMIDOM)
8/31/89
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER,THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
DEAIL.EY o RENYON Q ASSOC• EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
100 Oak 8fi-e et COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
Oak Land r CA 94604
415 -465.E-3090 COMPANY
LETTER A Emp L oyee Penef i is 1 nsura nce C
CODE IUD-CODE
COMPANY g
INSURED LETTER
KLE 1 NFELDER COMPANY
212,1 N. C-aLif;ornia Doulevard LETTER C
Suite .970 COMPANY
wa I nut Creek tk-TER D
CA 94596 COMPANY C . .. .
LETTERCOVERAOIES
G
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDJNG ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ALL LIMITS TdOIAN
YA TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUWER DATE(MM/)DIYY) DATE(MMIDOIYY)
GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE 6
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMPIOPS AGGREGATE i
CLAIMS MADE OCCUR. PERSONAL♦<ADVERTISING INJURY j
OWNER'S&CONTTWTOR'S PROT, EACH OCCURRENCE 6
FIRE DAMAGE(Any vne fire) 6
MEDICAL EXPENSE(Any one person) i
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED
SINGLE S
ANY AUTO LIMIT
ALL OWNED AUTOS
PPRCpE TO D AS F,Obb�� t BODILY 9
/M�e
SCHEDULED AUTOS (C�A dt �' TT 0,V 1 � (Pe+PNOW)
1
HIRED AUTOS `�' BODILYINJURY S
NON�OWNED AUTOS ; (Per mccWenq
GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY
A 1--gr DAMAGE
"CESS LIABILITY EACH AGGREGATE
OCCURRENCE
s S
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORXER'D COMPENSATION RENEWAL OF STATUTORY
2,000 lfe ACCIDENT)
A AND 30 48 71 9/01/89 9/01/ 90 = ( 2,000 BABE—POLICY LIMIT)
EMPLOYERS'LIAWLITY :MA5E—EACH EMPLOYEE)
OTHER
D[8CRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEMCLE&IMSTMC'TIONSM"CIAL r►EW
All California operations.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER i 'a�;' . NCELiAT9iN'rl', �� I',I. ,r� or
Les Evans, City Engineer SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
of Huntington Beach EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
City
City of Strut MAIL 0 ^AYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LjEFr, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR
i++ LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES,
i
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 128980000
DEALBY:�llLOP, &�-�/..
„ .
GL 20 09
(Ed- 01 73)
f
TW endorsement forms a part of the policy to which attached,effectie on the in=tion date of the policy unless otherwise stated h"n.
Ube f D[Wwint information is requced only when this endorwrWTt is issued subsequert to preparation of polic7.)
Endorsement effective 6/2 0/8 9 ftK7 No. LP 1132574 00 Et►dorsement No.
Named Insured THE KLEINFELDER GROUP, MANDEVILL E A
INCL. 6b-111(—�
Additional Premium S . — me
44, (Authorized RepresenULve)
F K B. HALL & CO .
This endorsement modifies such insurance as is afforded by the provisions of the policy relating to the following:
COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
MANUFACTURERS AND CONTRACTORS LIABILITY INSURANCE
ADDITIONAL INSURED
(Owners or Contractors)
0 FORIJ:1
(''� Schedule .
Name of Person or,grtamzstnon
(Additional Insured) ; �1Z✓ t� t2rnrgT� location of Covered Operations
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Premium Bum Rates Advance Premium
Bodily Injury Liability Cost $100 of cost $ I NCL.
Property Damage Liability Cost ;100 of cost $ INCL.
Total Advance Premium $ INCL.
It is agreed that
1. The "Persons Insured” provision is amended to indude as an insured the person or organization named above (hereinafter called "additional insured"),
but only with respect to liability arising out of (1) operations performed for the additional insured by the named insured at the location designated above
or(Z)acts or omissions of the additional insured in connection with his general supervision of such operations.
Z None of the exclusions of the policy,except exclusions(a),(c),(f),(g),(i),(j)and(m),apply to this insurance.
3. Additional Exclusions This insurance does not apple
(a) to bodily injury or property damage occurring after
(1) all work on the project(other than service,maintenance or repairs)to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured at the site of the
covered operaiium has ktn completed or
(2) that portion of the named insured's work out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization
other than arrother contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project:
(b) to bodily inqury or property damage arising out of arty act or omission of the additional insured or any of his employees, other than general Super-
vision of work performed for the additional insured by the named irsured;
(c) to property damage to
(1) property owned or occupied by or rented to the additional insured.
(2) property used by the additional immured,
(3) property in the are, custody or control of the additional insured or as to which the additional insured is for any purpose exercising physica
control,or
(4) work performed for the additional insured by the named insured.
4- Additional Definition When used is referent to this insurance,"work"indudes materials.puts and equipment furnished in connection therewith.
GL 20 09 01 73
• 074
iA
k" KLE1 N FELDER
i ;89 LOF
C
�z
August 1, 1989
Mr. Richard Barnard
Deputy City Manager
City of Huntington Beach
Public Works Department
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mr. Barnard:
The attached Board resolution shows Thomas E. Bailey as a Regional Branch Manager.
Since that time Thomas has become a District Manager and is authorized to sign contracts
up to $500,000. A Board resolution stating this fact will be passed at our next Kleinfelder,
Inc., Board meeting on August 9, 1989.
If you should require additional information or have any questions,please give me a call.
Sincerely,
KLEINFELDER, INC.
ames H. Kleinfelder
Chairman
la
cc: Louis F. Sandoval
C(89)0087
KLEINFELDER 2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 570, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (415) 938-5610
MINUTES OF MEETING OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF
i -
KLEINFELDER, INC.
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
HELD
AUGUST 10, 1988
The Directors of Kleinfelder, Inc. , a California Corporation
held a Board of Directors Meeting in the conference room of the
Corporation ' s Headquarters Office in Walnut Creek, California, on
August 10, 1988.
There were present: Directors Cyril M. McRae, Edward Rinne,
Thomas Bailey, Robert D. Howell, Gerry Salontai , and Michael E.
Mahoney.
Absent: None
Others present: Richard M. Wary, James H. Kleinfelder, Geoff
Colton, and Harvey Merrill, all for periods of
time.
President Cyril M. McRae presided as Chairman of the meeting
and Secretary Michael E. Mahoney served in that capacity for the
meeting.
The initial topic of discussion was the financial status of the
Corporation in relation to the annual plan. The chief financial
officer Geoffry Colton presented a summary report entitled, "First
Quarter-End Summary" . This report indicated that the gross
operating profit at the end of the first fiscal quarter was
$1, 193, 000. This was cose to the annual plan.
Further discussion on financial status indicated that the gross
income for the initial quarter is $8, 944, 000 which is up 54 percent
from the same quarter last year and somewhat above the plan. This
quarter included one week more than the same quarter last fiscal
year.
Discussion then turned to cash flow. Mr. Colton indicated the
bank debt which the Parent Corporation currently has is $2 . 5
million. He further indicated that this debt includes the payment
of $350, 000 allocated for profit sharing and the payoff of
outstanding loan for the Mandeville Corporation.
F
{
• *Kleinfelder, Inc.
August 10, 1988
s Page 3
i
Discussion then turned to the performance of management reviews
of various operating centers within the Company. The following
offices were selected for management review. Walnut Creek, San
Ramon, Rohnert Park, Stockton, Spectrum, Los Angeles, San Diego
Geotech and Environmental combined, Phoenix, Los Vegas, and
Mandeville. The selection of reviewers will be made by Director
Howell.
Discussion then turned to criteria for designating managers. A
motion was made by Director Bailey to adopt the criteria developed
by Director McRae with a single amendment of office size revised
from $1.8 million to $2 million from the original proposal. This
motion was seconded by Director Salontai and a unanimous vote was
had in favor of this motion.
The next item of discussion was signing authority for
contracts . Director McRae proposed a policy for signing authority
for various personnel within the Corporation. After discussion
several additions were made on this policy including "all outside
contracts must be reviewed by the Principal-in-Charge or a Board
member" . Motion was made by Director Bailey that this policy be
adopted as amendment. Motion was seconded by Director Howell and a
vote was had unanimously in favor of this motion.
A committee was established consisting of Directors Bailey,
McRae, and Mahoney to review the format for Engineering Managers
meetings in order to maximize the value of these meetings to both the
managers and the Corporation. A report will be presented by this
committee at the next Board of Directors meeting.
The Board then turned to a discussion of reports of various
committees including contracts, marketing, and loss prevention and
quality control, and training.
Financial Officer Geoff Colton was called upon to provide a
report on the status of our computer accounting system. Mr. Colton
indicated that a Florida firm has been selected as the software
supplier for the Corporation ' s accounting and project management
system. Mr. Colton indicated that he anticipated that the system
will be on-line in all Corporation offices by the end of the fiscal
year.
Discussion then turned to adoption of Corporation ' s personnel
policy and in particular modification of the Corporation ' s vacation
policy. The Board discussed a policy proposed by Amy Slavin dated
August 5, 1988. This policy included providing three weeks of
vacation after five years rather than the present 8 years in the
Corporation ' s policy. Motion was made by Director Howell and
• *Kleinfelder, Inc.
August 10, 1988
s
Page 4
�4
seconded by Director Mahoney that the vacation policy proposed in
the August 5, 1988 memo be adopted with the exclusion of
retroactivity provisions. This motion was unanimously adopted by
the Board of Directors.
Discussion then turned to a review of Chapter 6 of the Company
policy as developed by Amy Slavin. No action was taken on Chapter
6 subject to our review of the Corporation ' s vehicle policy.
As a final matter Mr. James Kleinfelder presented a discussion
on contracts issues within the Corporation. As a result of this
discussion a committee was set up consisting of Richard Wary,
Thomas Bailey, Jim Kleinfelder and chaired by Michael Mahoney to
develop some specific criteria on contract terms for the
Corporation to follow in its future dealings with clients and
consultants.
There being no further business the Board of Directors Meeting
of Kleinfelder, Inc. was adjourned at 2:00 PM on August 10, 1988.
iij
g y�
Michael E. Mahoney
Secretary
t
t
Approved 8-10-88
i
POLICY
Sub ect: Signing Authority
The Board of Directors of Kleinfelder, Inc. , hereby authorizes authority to
sign contracts to personnel in the following positions.
Position Level of Authority
District Manager & Above $ 500,000
(Level 14 and Above)
Regional Branch Manager $ 250,000
Branch Manager $ 100,000
For contracts over $ 500,000, a second level 14 or above person (District
J1 Manager or above) must review and co-sign the contract.
Attached is a listing of current personnel in the above positions. In
r_
addition, the following personnel are specifically authorized by the Board to
sign contracts up to $ 50,000.
Lloyd Crask
Edward E. Rinne
Gregory Ruf
William Lorbeer
Gale L. Paddock
No other persons are authorized to sign contracts for Kleinfelder, Inc. The
President should be notified prior to persuing any project where the contract
amount would meet or exceed $2,000.000.
All outside contracts (other forms than Kleinfelder, Inc. ) such as purchase of
equipment, materials, leases, client contracts, and purchase orders must be
reviewed by a Principal-in-Charge (PIC) or Board Member.
la
3
i
}
MANAGEMENT LEVEL IDENTIFICATION
August 10, 1988
File: Bud.203
LEVEL TITLES INCUMBENTS
17 Chairman James H. Kleinfelder
16 President Cyril M. McRae
15 Executive Vice President Michael E. Mahoney
and Senior PIC Richard M. Wary
Robert D. Howell
14 District Manager Gerald J. Salontai
13 Regional Manager Thomas E. Bailey
Raymond Costa
Raymond Davis
William F. Galli
Ronald T. Heinzen
Brad C. Kleinfelder
Donald K. Rothenbaum
12 Branch Manager John Ficke
Douglas Isbell
Jeremiah Jackson
Rick Larson
Larry Peterson
Thomas Ries
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AND KLEINFELDER, INC. FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN
SERVICES FOR THE PROPERTY ON AND ADJACENT TO
THE HUNTINGTON BEACH LANDFILL
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this --ae I%k- day
of /EI/�,y_Gfti , 19 'I by and between the CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of
California , hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and KLEINFELDER,
INC . , a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"CONTRACTOR. "
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of an engineering
design contractor to provide plans, estimates and Environmental
Assessment Services for the property on and adjacent to the
Huntington Beach Landfill in the City of Huntington Beach; and
CONTRACTOR has been selected to perform said services,
NOW, THEREFORE , it is agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows :
1 . WORK STATEMENT
CONTRACTOR shall provide all services as described in the
CONTRACTOR 'S Proposal for Environmental Assessment Services, dated
November 7, 1988 , (hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A" ) , which
is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this
reference . Said services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred
to as "PROJECT . "
CONTRACTOR hereby designates Mr . Douglas M. Isbell , who
shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all
consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement .
2 . CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE
CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly
-1-
with CONTRACTOR in the performance of this Agreement .
3 . TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence of this Agreement . The services
of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after the
execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A"
shall be completed no later than three ( 3 ) months from the date of
this Agreement . This time may be extended with the written
permission of the CITY . The time for performance of the tasks
identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be as shown in the
Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule . This
schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed
by the CITY and CONTRACTOR.
4 . COMPENSATION
In consideration of the performance of the engineering
services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay
Thirty-Nine Thousand Eight Hundred
CONTRACTOR a fee not to exceed � xt� x � � txi �t�t � x�t�xa�
Sixty and no/ 100 Dollars ($39 ,860 . 00) . ---\�/
5 . EXTRA WORK
In the event of authorization, in writing by the CITY, of
changes from the work described in Exhibit "A" , or for other
written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated
herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for such Extra
Work , so long as the prior written approval of CITY is obtained .
6 . METHOD OF PAYMENT
A . CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to progress payments
toward the fixed fee set forth in Section 4 herein in accordance
with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit A" .
B . Delivery of work product : A copy of every technical
-2-
memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to the
CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks . In the
event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall
identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any
such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by
CITY shall be deemed accepted .
C . The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY an invoice
for each progress payment due . Such invoice shall :
1 ) Reference this Agreement;
2 ) Describe the services performed;
3 ) Show the total amount of the payment due;
4 ) Include a certification by a principal member
of the CONTRACTOR'S firm that the work has been
performed in accordance with the provisions of
this Agreement; and
5 ) For all payments include an estimate of the
percentage of work completed.
Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is
satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward
completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement , CITY shall
promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made
within thirty (30 ) days ' of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such
approval shall not be unreasonably withheld . If the CITY does not
approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of the
reasons for non-approval , within seven ( 7 ) calendar days of
receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth
in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that
past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or has been brought into
-3-
compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to
Section 12 hereof.
D . Any billings for extra work or additional services
authorized by the CITY shall be invoiced separately to the CITY.
Such invoice shall contain all of the information required under
paragraph 6C, and in addition shall list the hours expended and
hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be
approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the
extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is
satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is
accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any
dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice
shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing
performance of the remainder of this Agreement .
7 . DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder ,
including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and
office notes , calculations , maps and other documents, shall be
turned over to CITY upon termination of this Agreement or upon
PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first . In the event
this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY
in the completion of PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit . Title
to said materials shall pass to the CITY upon payment of fees
determined to be earned by CONTRACTOR to the point of termination
or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is applicable . CONTRACTOR
shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder .
8 . INDEMNIFICATION, DEFENSE, HOLD HARMLESS
CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify and save and hold
-4-
harmless CITY, its officers and employees, from any and all
liability, including any claim of liability and any and all losses
or costs arising out of the negligent performance of this
agreement by CONTRACTOR, its officers or employees or from any
willful misconduct of CONTRACTOR, its officers or employees while
engaged in the performance of this agreement .
9. WORKERS ' COMPENSATION
CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the
Workers ' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of
California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the
California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar
state or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify,
defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all claims,
demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of
every nature and description, including attorney' s fees and costs
presented, brought or recovered against CITY, for or on account of
any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by
reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this
Agreement .
CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish evidence to CITY of
maintenance of statutory workers ' compensation insurance and
employers ' liability in an amount of not less than $500 ,000 bodily
injury by accident, each accident, $500 ,000 bodily injury by
disease, each employee, and $1 ,000 ,000 bodily injury by disease,
policy limit .
10 . INSURANCE
In addition to the workers ' compensation insurance and
CONTRACTOR 'S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain
-5-
and furnish to CITY the following insurance policies covering the
PROJECT :
A. General Liability Insurance.
A policy of general public liability insurance, including
motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall indemnify
CONTRACTOR, its officers , agents and employees , while
acting within the scope of their duties, against any and
all claims of arising out of or in connection with the
PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not less than the
following amount : combined single limit bodily injury
and property damage, Council approval and blanket
contractual liability, of $1 ,000 ,000 per occurrence . If
coverage is provided under a form which includes a
designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit
must be no less than $1 ,000 ,000 . Said policy shall name
CITY, its officers , and employees as Additional Insureds,
and shall specifically provide that any other insurance
coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be
deemed excess coverage and that CONTRACTOR 'S insurance
shall be primary.
B . Professional Liability Insurance.
CONTRACTOR shall acquire a professional liability
insurance policy covering the work performed by it
hereunder . Said policy shall provide coverage for
CONTRACTOR 'S professional liability in an amount not less
than $500,000 per claim. A claims made policy shall be
acceptable.
-6-
Certificates of Insurance for said policies shall be approved
in writing by the City Attorney prior to the commencement of any
work hereunder . All Certificates of Insurance (and the policies
of insurance or endorsements thereof) shall provide that any such
Certificates and policies shall not be cancelled or modified
without thirty (30 ) days ' prior written notice to CITY.
CONTRACTOR shall notify CITY immediately if and when any of said
policies is reduced in coverage or limits due to payment of a
claim by its insurance carrier .
11 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR is , and shall be, acting at all times in the
performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor .
CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any
and all payments of all taxes , social security, state disability
insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other
payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents and
employees and all business licenses , if any, in connection with
the services to be performed hereunder .
12 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good
and workmanlike manner . CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR 'S services
hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not
PROJECT is fully complete . Any termination of this Agreement by
CITY shall be made in writing through the City Engineer, notice of
which shall be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16
herein .
13 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement is a personal service contract and the
-7-
supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to
any other person or entity without the consent of CITY.
14 . COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS
CONTRACTOR shall not apply for a patent or copyright on
any item or material produced as a result of this Agreement, as
set forth in 41 CFR 1-9 . 1 .
15 . CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS
CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any regular
CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement .
No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest
in this Agreement in violation of California Government Code
Sections 1090 et seq.
16 . NOTICES
Any notices or special instructions required to be given
in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal
delivery to CONTRACTOR'S agent (as designated in Section 1
hereinabove) or to CITY ' S Director of Public Works, as the
situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed
envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United
States Postal Services, addressed as follows :
TO CITY : TO CONTRACTOR:
Mr . Louis Sandoval Mr . Douglas M. Isbell
Director of Public Works Mandeville & Associates
City of Huntington Beach 526 Hofgarden
2000 Main Street City of Industry, CA 91744
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
REST OF PAGE NOT USED
-8-
17 . ENTIRETY The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto,
set forth the entire Agreement between the parties .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers
the day, month and year first above written .
CONTRACTOR: CITY 0 HUNTINGTON BEACH,
KLEINFELDER, INC . A muni ipal corporation
a is rporati of the State of ifo is
Thomas E. Bailey Mayor
Regional Manager/Principal
ATTE APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk aity Attorney
h` --ec1e'►.
REVIEWE ND PROVED; JjNITIATED A APPR�O�VE_DQ:
KJ
City Administrator Director of Public Works
-s 4-6
rf
-9-
= �� ISSUE DATE(M!d,'DD/YY) y
® CERTIFICAV..; OF INSUFMNCE
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS '
» NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
FRANK B. HALL & CO. OF CALIFORNIA EXTEND ORI R THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
200 PRINGLE AVE SUITE 400
P. O. BOX 8053 ,I.' COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596-8053 ---- --- -
` rCOMPANY A
LETTER -UNI-TED—P-ACIF__IC--INSURANCE CO.
'OMPANY
INSURED LETTER B AFPitOVK) AS TO FOR:d:4
THE,EINFELDER GROUP LETfERNY C GA ITUTTON
2121-M. CALIFORNIA BLVD. C_." . A"' ORHEY.
SUITE 570 COMPANY p $ ,
LETTER
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 --- ---,- y� ------ -
COMPANY E
LETTER
x
P, , COVE AcES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUEDTO THE INSUPWO NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY
BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI-
TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
CO POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIABILITY' LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE 1P.W Da, ) DATE(MMORNY) FACH AGGREGATE
LIRE NICE
GENERAL LIABILITY
. (BODILY
COMPREHENSIVE FORM c 2 .;N.JURY I � $
y. A LP 1132�74 00 05/25/88 05/c8/89
' A PREMISES/OPERATIONS I F'i90PEPTY
UNDERGROUND (DAMAGE Iw $
' EXPLOSION&COLLAPSE HAZARD
° PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS —�
CONTRACTUAL COMBINED(g ]QjQJ $ i000
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS
BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE
PERSONAI INJURY PERSONAL INJURY $
ti
'a. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY —�� -
SAY $
A ANY AUTO N
LP 1132574 00 05/25/88 05/^5/89W�EPc,."'
ALL OWNED AUTOS(PRIV. PASS.)
(OTHER THAN) `Ea R A r
ALL OWNED AUTOS PRIV PASS./ � c a'I $
HIRED AUTOS
PROPERTY
NON-OWNED AUTOS DAMAGE $
GARAGE LIABILITY
el a Po
COMBINED $ "1�0
EXCESS LIABILITY
UMBRELLA FORM RI&PC) t
COMBINED $ $
-o OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM I I
�---—r--------____�
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY �$ { •`-A5F-PULICY LIA11T1-
$ i;ISiASE EACH F."PL DYE EI
OTHER
[',`SCRIPTION c:F OPERATION S/LOCATiONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEM; THE CITY OF HUNT I NGTON BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES ARE NAMED AS ADDITIONAL
INSUREDS' PER ATTACHED ENDORSEMENT GL2009. (KL0024) FILE NO:70—YP8156
. • : '
CITY OF HUNT I NGTON BEACH S
HOULD ANY OF THE AS^':E DESCRIBED POLICIES BE C�NCcLLED BEFORE THE EX-
CITY DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY 'WILL QGXiX:�GASitY Xr]4
���� MAIN STREET iL 30 DA7S WRITTEN NOTICE T,) THE CF-,FIFICC-.lc . C�CEi NA. `.^. THt �t
HUNT I NGTON BEACH CA 92648 � � XX-"X X X X x�r X-t{' ( X'fc�jC`7C X X X7C XX'X"?k XSC X X X-X�(X XXX'r _ (f
8184)
;. LLSWORTH ASST. VICE" PRESIDENT"',
ISSUE DATE(MM/DD/YY)
• +
PRODUCER
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
- EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
C:II:::F�II...i=:Y,!��'I:::I�7t:)i',! r� Fl :i;:;l.1t.;•:
A.
�:� k.. :t:;r1 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
�{c`.>::f.... �l ':�''1 COMPANY
LETTER A .t..ii't 'I"(:` :•. I"!a v 1 Tic.! .L T?':i:. C',ii
COMPANY B
INSURED LETTER
I\!...I" .i.hkl-!::.L..DF.'F'; COMPANY
?.I.:':1. INs C".,i 1. 1 .1:co...TY 1 a :t:;o :t'i-11 LETTER C
I -1: `:f f'.; COMPANY
W!:? 1.YYLl't' l.:T'c:?c:k LETTER
(."A COMPANY E
LETTER
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY
BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI-
TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
LTR DATE(MM/OO/YY) DATE(MWDD/YY)
GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $
CLAIMS MADE aOCCURRENCE PERSONAL&ADVERTISING INJURY $
OWNER'S&CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $
FIRE DAMAGE(ANY ONE FIRE) $
MEDICAL EXPENSE(ANY ONE PERSON) $
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO CSL $
ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY
NJURY
SCHEDULED AUTOS (PER PERSON) $
HIRED AUTOS BODILY
INJURY
((PE
NON-OWNED AUTOS ACCIR OENTI $
GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY
DAMAGE $
EXCESS LIABILITY EACH AGGREGATE
OCCURRENCE
$ $
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
STATUTORY
WORKERS'COMPENSATION $ (EACH ACCIDENT)
AND
EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY $ (DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT)
$ (DISEASE EACH EMPLOYEE;
OTHER
.. - :L.:>::?....II•?P�... 7'J :I-..I"i;'.:' '' I. r. (.!.. c:?' :!l.l: 'r.:.'. _,...i•1..f'1
L..:1.ADa:!...:!:..t..Y 'h:1. ;•i)t)':)"11
00 x:ll:DTIt.lt.;..j:B
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS
r I . 1I +.!I. I I r• ).
.. (ii'}' ! '� 1 (::•d;a'I;,.;, !}O (: (P i iii .`.,'{}
;it(: (: 1 't I i? T?r.? I. I TYiii t!.'i'(;:•ia UJ 'i•i•, , :..:::::..........(. .!'ii i•:`i!? i r, .:: ; i' .t.i.I. �':).-,a.;::.,-; • I ,;.I
44:101 Rol •
JAU:THORIZE
ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX
t.: l t;r 0'I' !'ll!.T7 (: ! i?::I'tt:,Y? 1st:',.It..
DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
.yiJC)�T 1, ,:, 1 T? `.:+'4'?",;::•:+'t' - �YS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
T FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR
OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
D REPRESENTATIVE
r-I t't�TY: i_.(r�s F:: ::I.rl,:, OEALEY, NTON & S IAT S: s;'=t:;(1e.)c:;r.
BY /
ISSUE DATE(MM/DD1YY) �
CERTIFICAT F INSURANCE 11/28/88
-PRODUC2(R THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A ISER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
Deal ey, Renton & Assocai tes NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
100 Oak Street _
Oakland, CA 94604 (�I-� ' -,.j
(415) 465-3090 `�oMPANIES'74FFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
LETTER A E-nlDyne,Pe efi't!�-,( nsurance Co.
CODE SUB-CODE
COMPANY
INSURED �f21 3 LETTER B
KLE INFELDER COMPANY
2121 N. California Blvd. LETTER C
Suite 570 COMPANY D
Walnut Cteek, CA 94596 LETTER
COMPANY E
LETTER
COVERAGES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
LTR DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY)
GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $
CLAIMS MADE OCCUR. PERSONAL&ADVERTISING INJURY $
OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT, EACH OCCURRENCE $
FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $
MEDICAL EXPENSE(Any one person) $
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED
ANY AUTO SINGLE $
LIMIT
ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY
NJURY
SCHEDULED AUTOS I $
(Per person)
HIRED AUTOS BODILY
INJURY $
NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident)
GARAGE LIABILITY
PROPERTY $
DAMAGE
EXCESS LIABILITY EACH AGGREGATE
OCCURRENCE
$ $
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKER'S COMPENSATION STATUTORY
A AND 304871 9/01/88 9/01/89 $ 2000 (EACH ACCIDENT)
EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY $ 2(0�0�Q-1.-((DDISS�EA$SE-POLICY LIMIT)
$AY`=RAVE �g�1 VI r $E EACH EMPLOYEE)!
OTHER
Crs• TrlTrl 011
C1� Y 1 i0rU1�-�..,Y
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS ,D, put 1C1 i * Attorney
fThe certificateholder shall be an additional insured with respects t this co
All California operations of the insured.
3 CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
I SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
City of Huntington Beach EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL E%MKXXJPxX0�
2000 Main Street MAIL�DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE I!
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LEFT, � ccx�cncxxnxcccxxlw�o�x�caacgxnxis� c���a >xc�� `
i ATT: Lou Sandoval Lai) XA K XIJQffiI Kx XI;xxX0a) x K0V0Qrxm)m.
AU H IZED P E ENT IVE 1
ACORD 25-S (3/8�_ _ OO AC RD CORPORATION 1988
• • GL200�
• � � � (Ed 01 7:
ltis andorsannat tongs a part d tM poGcY to which attachad,dtecb on the mcaption date of the policy unless oo wiu stated hereirL
(TM felA *hdanesH is reryhed awy when this W40umtO is issued>srisar+- to preparation of policy.)
12—0 9—8 8 PONCY PAL LP 113 2 5 7 4 00 Endorsement No-
Named lnured MANDEVILLE & ASSOC. , A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDER
Additionaf Premium= TNCI,_ �� ' IyLQ�
(Authorized Repreuntative)
FRANY, P. J,,\_T,T� ? CO.
This endorsamW modifies such insurance as a afforded by the provisions of the policy rebbrig to the following:
COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL UABILITY INSURANCE
MANUFACTURERS AND CONTRACTORS LIABILITY INSURANCE
A00r?iONAL INSURED
(Owns or Contractors)
lthadule
Nmne of Person or Orpniation CI^v OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
(Additional Insured) 2000 MAIN STREE` lion of Co'mvd Dporttiorts
1-•UN^'IP�ip�i ,AC�I, CA
t6tes Advance Premium
Bodily Injury Liability Cost VDO of cost 3 INCL.
/ Property Damage liability cost 5100 of cost 3 INCL.
Total Advance Premium 3 INCL.
k is agreed that
L The -Persons Insured"provision is amended to include as an arsured the person or organization named above(hereinafter called"additional insured"),
but oNy with respect to liability arising out of (1)operations performed for the additional insured by the named insured at the location designated above
car(2)acts or omcssions of the additional insured in connection with his general supervtuon of such operations.
2. None of the exclusions of the policy,except exclusions(a).(c),(0,(9).(i),G)and(m)•apply to this insurance
3. PAddienai ExeWsions This insurance does riot apply-.
(a) to buddy imjrry or property dseaage occurring after
(1) all wort on the project(other than service,maintenance or repairs)to be performed by or on behad of the additional insured at the site of the
covered operations has been completed or
(2) that portion of the named iraund's went out of which the injury or damage arises-has been put to its intended use by any person or organization
ether than another Contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project:
(b) to buddy injury or praperty damage arising out of any ad or omission of the additional insured or any of his employem other than general super-
vision of wort performed fof the additiord insured by the named insured;
(0 to vr wr ty dunnage to
(1) property owned or occupied by or ranted to the additional insured.
(2) Property used by the additional inured.
(3) property in the Ore. orstody or control of the additional inured or as to which the additional insured is for any purpose exercising physical
Control.or
(4) wort performed for the additional insured by the canned iawured.
4. Wili.d Datimi ien When used in r feraae to this iasurance.'work"includes matariek parts and epripmet Nrwshed in connection tlreyewith.
QL 20 09 01 73 -
Comprehensive General Liability Insurance
Additional Insured
(owners or Contractors)
It is agreed that with respect to "Additional Insured" endorsement GL 2009.
The following provision is added.
This insurance shall be considered primary insurance as respects
any other valid and collectible insurance this additional insured
may possess, including any self-insured retention, and any other
insurance the additional insured does possess shall be considered
excess insurance only.
Name of Person or Organization
(Additional Insured) :
CITY OF HUNTING-ON n^ACH
2000 MAIN ^^_R7_
HU?:^I;7('mGN 5'F7\.C-'1, CIS 92649
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
f;
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
September 13, 1989
Kleinfelder, Inc.
2121 N. California Blvd.
Suite 570
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting
held August 7, 1989, approved Amendment No 1 to agreement beweeen the
City of Huntington Beach and Kleinfelder, Inc. , for engineering design
services for the property on and adjacent to the Huntington Beach
Landfill .
Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records.
Connie Brockway, CIVIC
City Clerk
CB:bt
Enc.
(Telephone: 714-536-5227)
REQUEAOFOR CITY COUNCIfCTION
Date August 7, 1989
Submitted to: Honorable Playor and City Council APPROVEC -7 COUNCIL
Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator �' '- o - r 19
Prepared by: £Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works �.
TY C ERK
Subject: METHANE GAS CONTROL SYSTEM AT THE HUNTING ON REACH LAN
Consistent with Council Policy? [ Yes ( ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
The Orange County Solid Waste Enforcement Agency has put the Citv on notice to stop the
migration of methane gas from City property at the southwest corner of Golden 'Vest and
Talbert Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION:
I. Approve the amended agreement with Kleinfelder, Incorporated for design services for
control of methane gas and authorize the "Iayor to Execute the agreement.
Establish a budget of $240,000 to perform the work.
ANALYSIS:
Since 1983, the City has been on notice by the State Solid Waste Planagement Agency that the
City-owned property at the southeast corner of Golden West and Talbert Avenue is generating
unacceptable levels of methane gas. The local enforcement agency, until recently, has allowed
the City to postpone installation of methane gas control systems because of uncertainties over
the future use of the property. Now, the Orange County Solid Waste Enforcement Agency feels
that the gas must be contained. The City requested proposals for the design of methane gas
control systems compatible with future development of the affected portion of Central Park.
On March 20, 1989, the City Council approved an agreement with Kleinfelder to prepare a
Design Report for approval by the Solid Waste Enforcement Agency. The report was prepared
and approved. The next step is to prepare construction plans, construct the system and place it
in operation. Kleinfelder has offered to provide these services as well as obtain the necessary
permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Regional Water Ouality
Control Board (RWQCB) and the Solid Waste Management Agency. They will also prepare a
landfill closure plan, if required by the RWQCR.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Park Acquisition and Development Funds in the Amount of $500,000 are budgeted for this
project.
1 �
ALTERNATIVE ACTION: s
I. Select another firm to design the system. �1.k3
2. Do not design the facilities and instruct staff on how to )q-* /
LFS:LE:lw
P10 5/85
71QOn/7
REQUE OR CITY COUNC t CTION V
Date March 20, 1989
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator oL C 19 8LI
Prepared by: E Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works 0 '
CI19 Y CLb:RK
Subject: Methane Gas Control System at the Huntington Beach Landfill
Consistent with Council Policy? [xJ Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: LJ
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
The Orange County Solid Waste Enforcement Agency has put the City on notice to stop
the migration of methane gas from City property at the southeast corner of Golden West
and Talbert.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve the agreement with Kleinfe_lder, Incorporated for Design Services for
control of Methane Gas and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
2. Establish a budget of $39,860 to perform the work.
ANALYSIS:
Since 1983, the City has been on notice by the State Solid Waste Management Agency that
the City-owned property at the southeast corner of Golden West and Talbert Avenue is
generating unacceptable levels of methane gas. The local enforcement agency, until
recently, has allowed the City to postpone installation of methane gas control systems
because of uncertainties over the future use of the property. Now, the Orange County
Solid Waste Enforcement Agency feels that the gas must be contained. The City
requested proposals for the design of methane gas control systems compatible with future
developement of the affected portion of Central Park. Staff recommends the selection of
Mandeville and Associates to perform this work. Other firms considered were Lockman
and Associates and SCS Engineers.
FUNDING SOURCE:
The FY 88-89 budget includes $500,000 in Park Acquistion and Development Funds for
design and construction of these improvements.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1. Select another firm to design the system.
2. Reject all proposals and instruct staff on how to proceed.
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Agreement
2. Location Map
PEC:LFS:LE:dw
Pio r'fQY79g/10
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
March 23, 1989
Kleinfelder, Inc.
2121 N. California Blvd.
Suite 570
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting
held March 20, 1989 approved an agreement between Kleinfelder inc. and
the City of Huntington Beach for engineering design services for the
property on and adjacent to the Huntington Beach Landfill .
Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement.
Connie Brockway, CMC
City Clerk
CB:bt
Enc.
(Telephone:714-536-5227)
A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDER
MANDEVILLE&ASSOCIATES
environmental engineering services
November 7, 1988
File No. 70YP8156A
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Lou Sandoval, Director of Public Works
Dear Mr. Sandoval:
As discussed in our recent conversation, Mandeville & Associates (M&A), a Division of
Kleinfelder is pleased to submit this proposal for providing Environmental Assessment Services
for the property on and adjacent to the Huntington Beach Landfill.
BACKGROUND
The City of Huntington Beach, hereinafter referred to as the City, is interested in developing
certain properties bordered by Golden West Street on the west, Gothard Street on the east,
Talbert Street on the north and Ellis Avenue on the south. The City either owns, or is in the
process of acquiring, all associated parcels. The City desires to expand the development of a
mobile home park currently on the southern part of the property. Plans also include a park
and/or executive golf course on the portion of the property that was operated as a landfill.
The property includes former Class II and Class III landfills previously owned and/or
operated by Orange County. Due to landfill gas (methane) migration control problems
resulting from the decomposition of organic matter in these landfills, the City contracted with
CalScience Research, Inc. in 1983 to undertake an investigation. This investigation included
an examination of site characteristics, experimental system design and testing, and based on
test results, preliminary design of a methane control system and cost estimate. The current
status of this program is not known. According to California law, AB 1897, the disposal
operator has certain responsibilities to perform air and water quality solid waste assessment
tests (SWATS). Depending on legal interpretation and as enforced by responsible regulatory
agencies, the City could be held responsible for any remediation work required, pending the
results of the SWATs, and the need to bring landfill closure up to current standards.
526 Hofgaarden
City of Industry, CA 91744
(818)369-2224
The City wishes to ascertain the environmental constraints imposed on this property because
of the landfill disposal activity. In keeping with this goal, the City has requested that M&A
submit an unsolicited proposal for an environmental assessment program and, if required,
based upon results of field monitoring of methane levels, a basis of design report will be
prepared specifying the type of gas migration control best meets the City's needs.
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
M&A proposes the City consider a twelve task program beginning with field investigations
and ending with operations management. The first four tasks will include a review of all
pertinent data on the site; inspection of any existing monitoring or remediation systems
currently employed; reconfirmation of landfill gas migration and landfill gas emissions;
discussions with appropriate agencies on regulatory compliance status; and recommendations
for additional investigation(s). Pending findings in Phase I, Phase II (Tasks 5 through 7) will
consist of some combination of additional investigation(s) and design of appropriate
remediation system(s). Phase III (Tasks 8 and 9) will include construction of required
remediation system(s) and Phase IV (Tasks 10 through 12) will consist of startup and
operation of required remediation system(s) consistent with land use plans.
A more detailed breakdown of specific tasks and estimated costs follows.
SCOPE OF WORK
In preparing this scope of work, it is assumed that landfill gas is the only contaminant of
concern. As a result, no effort has been placed on any possible contamination of groundwater
or contamination of soils caused by leachate. Part of this scope of work, however, will be a
system to handle condensate water that forms as a result of gas collection. This will be
incorporated in the final design and the necessary applications will be submitted to the
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for their approval. Corrections to the
necessary drawings will be submitted to the RWQCB for their approval.
(1)YP8156A.HAW 2
• •
The major tasks for the scope of work are identified as follows:
PHASE I INVESTIGATION
Task 1. Field investigation
Task 2. Preliminary gas migration evaluation
Task 3. Regulatory Compliance
Task 4. Basis of Design Report
PHASE II PERMITTING AND DESIGN
Task 5. Permits (gas migration control)
Task 6. Flare design specifications, detailed gas system drawings and specifications
Task 7. Bid preparation and evaluation assistance
PHASE III CONSTRUCTION
Task 8. Technical observation
Task 9. Operation and maintenance manual
PHASE IV STARTUP AND OPERATION
Task 10. Startup
Task 11. Employee training
Task 12. Operations management
To further clarify each of these tasks, a brief summary of what each one involves is described
here.
PHASE I INVESTIGATION
Task 1. Field Investigation
The field investigation will determine the extent and type of migration; the type of soils
surrounding the site so that the nature of the gas control system that will be required can be
ascertained; and the amount of gas that is anticipated from the site. This is an essential part
of the investigation as it will determine where gas migration control will be required; the
(1)YP8156A.HAW 3
• / ' •
particular needs of the gas migration control system, that is the spacing of the gas wells; the
type of gas wells; the amount of vacuum required; and the flows that can be anticipated. The
field investigation will culminate in the preliminary evaluation in Task 2.
Task 2. Preliminary Gas Migration Evaluation
The preliminary evaluation will be a report generated from the field investigation. This will
define the nature and extent of gas migration and also will give some information concerning
the amount of gas that can be anticipated from the site. (Note: This task commenced
January 11, 1989).
Task 3. Regulatory Compliance
In order to comply with the necessary standards, those standards will be defined and the
relative values that need to be addressed will be compared with those standards. This will
give a clear cut definition of the work required to comply with the regulatory agencies and
laws of the State of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach.
Task 4. Basis of Design Report
The Basis of Design Report will lay out in reasonable detail the gas migration control system
design, as well as the method of disposal of the gas that will be engineered for the City. The
report is an essential first step in order to accomplish work effort in a cost effective manner.
Once the Basis of Design Report has been prepared, a meeting will be held with the City to
confirm that this is acceptable. Part of this Basis of Design Report will include an engineering
cost estimate for the proposed system as submitted. The Basis of Design Report will be
modified by input from South Coast Air Quality Management District during Task 5 and will
be finalized before final designs, Task 6 is commenced.
PHASE II PERMITTING AND DESIGN
Task 5. Permits (Gas Migration Control System)
The primary long lead permit is the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) Permit to Construct. This project may also require the California Environmental
Quality Assurance Document (CEQA). The CEQA document typically can be handled by
(1)YP8156A.HAW 4
• ' 1 0
any negative declaration or a statement of negative impact. If additional work is required
beyond a statement of negative impact, this will be beyond the proposed scope of work.
SCAQMD typically takes three to six months to issue permits. In order to obtain a permit, it
is necessary to submit specific manufacturers of flare and blowers that will be used in the gas
migration control system as well as the design flow rates. As a result, the engineering design
will be done in two phases in Task 6. The first phase will be to determine the manufacturer
of the flare and blowers; the second phase will be for the bidding of all other equipment and
installation. In this manner, the City will make a purchase of the flare and blowers separate
from the contract acquisition and installation of the complete system. The drawings, when
completed, will also be submitted to Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for
approval for the return of condensate water collected in the gas system to the landfill refuse
mass.
Task 6. Flare Design Specifications, Detailed Gas System Drawings and Specifications
Engineering design will require detailed specifications for a landfill gas flare and blower
which will be purchased separately from the system in order to satisfy the submittal
requirements to SCAQMD. The second portion of the engineering will require detailed
drawings and specifications of the landfill gas system and the flare station for competitive
bidding of the project. Included in Appendix A is a list of drawings and specification sections
that are anticipated to satisfy this engineering design requirement.
Task 7. Bid Preparation and Evaluation Assistance
M&A will incorporate the engineering specifications and drawings into a bid document for
the City and will also assist the City during the bidding process by answering questions for
contractors, conducting job walks, and helping to evaluate bids when complete. It will be
necessary for the City to submit to M&A copies of all standard contract documents that need
to be included in the bid package including required bonds, statements of non-discrimination,
contract language, etc.
(1)YP8156A.HAW 5
• I • •
PHASE III CONSTRUCTION
Task 8. Technical Observation
In order to verify that the contractor installs the system as designed, technical observation of
materials and workmanship is recommended. First, approvals will be required for the
equipment that the contractor submits for this facility. While the specifications will be specific
to make and manufacturer of certain equipment, should the contractor choose to deviate from
the specifications by using an approved equal, an approval will need to be made.
Additionally, whenever equipment is installed in the ground, testing is required, and safety is
an issue. M&A can assist the City with these items. Finally, the system should be tested to
verify that it has been constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications as part of
the technical observation task.
Task 9. Operation and Maintenance Manual
In order to allow the City to operate the system as effectively as possible, an Operations and
Maintenance Manual will be prepared. This manual will detail the startup, shutdown and
system balancing procedures as well as safety precautions that need to be taken during the
operation of the system. The actual operation and maintenance literature for individual
devices and components will be supplied as part of the contract for construction. This
information supplied by the contractor will be incorporated in the operations and
maintenance manual.
PHASE IV STARTUP AND OPERATION
Task 10. Start Up
Startup will be accomplished once the completed system has been approved. This involves
the running equipment, setting controls, testing alarms as well as opening all valves to their
appropriate point for the wells. It is anticipated that two men for two days and one man for
three days will be utilized for startup.
(1)YP8156A.HAW 6
Task 11. Employee Training
If the City desires, M&A will provide training for City employees in the operation of the
system. In order to be most cost effective, the employees should be available during the
startup and will actually take part in the startup process. As a result, the only additional
training beyond that which is included in the startup will be 40 hours of safety training so that
they are familiar with the hazards in working with landfill gas and the methods required in
order to protect them from the hazards. This training will be done in accordance with
29 CFR 1910.120 of the Federal Register which requires 40 hours of training.
Task 12. Operations Management
M&A will assist the City by reviewing data collected and make periodically doing independent
inspections of the gas system to make sure that the City is operating the system properly. The
extent of the involvement of M&A in this task will be determined by mutual agreement
between M&A and the City.
A schedule for the above tasks can vary significantly. The key functions for the schedule will
be the first five tasks, including the investigation, evaluation and report, the evaluation of the
laws that comply with, determining the design and cost estimate and obtaining the necessary
permits. It is anticipated that this process could take as long as six months. While the permits
are being obtained, engineering can proceed. In fact, it will be necessary for the flare and
blowers to be purchased prior to submitting this data to SCAQMD. It is anticipated that the
engineering design work for this job will take approximately three months to complete. Once
SCAQMD Permit to Construct has been issued, the bidding assistance and legal requirements
of the City will need to be considered and typically takes between one and two months. The
amount of time allocated for construction will be defined in the contract; however, normally
construction time on this type of project, including the delays required to obtain the materials,
will be approximately 100 working days. Startup and training will be done within a one month
period and the operations and maintenance manual will be prepared during the construction
of the facility.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
M&A acknowledges the City's intent that all materials prepared hereunder, including all
original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notes, calculations, maps and other
(1)YP8156A.HAW 7
a 0
documents, shall be turned over to the City upon termination of this Agreement or upon
project completion, whichever shall occur first. However, M&A is entitled to retain copies
thereof for our own records only. Any use of reuse of the plans and specifications except for
the specific project intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications without
the prior specific written consent of M&A shall be at the sole risk of the City. The City agrees
to hold harmless and indemnify M&A against all damages, claims and losses including
defense costs arising out of any such use, reuse or alteration or revision.
PROJECT BUDGET
M&A proposes to provide the services outlined in Phase I (Tasks 1 through 4) of the Scope of
Services on a time-and-expense basis against a budget of $39,860, using Meinfelder's 1988
Standard Schedule of Charges, Appendix B. A detailed cost breakdown is found in
Appendix C. M&A will keep the City fully advised on project progress and will not start on
any tasks or additional phases that do not have a budget without the prior consent of the City.
Written authorization will be obtained prior to exceeding any of the listed cost estimates.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Phase I (Tasks 1 through 4) will take approximately 12 to 15 weeks to complete. As part of
Phase I, a project schedule will be prepared to reflect Phases II, III and IV.
COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS
Mandeville & Associates is a scientific and engineering consulting firm with an extensive
background in solid waste management with specialization in the fields of landfill gas
management and related environmental quality assessment and control.
M&A has developed particular expertise in assessment and control of potential hazards from
subsurface gas migration and surface emissions. M&A's technical professionals have worked
with numerous City and County agencies and private sector clients engaged in energy
exploration and resource development, sanitary and hazardous waste disposal site operation
and cleanup, and land use planning and management, to ensure protection of designed and in-
place structures and site personnel from the dangers associated with subsurface combustible
gases and toxic or noxious gaseous emissions. Substantial work has been devoted to gas
(1)YP8156A.HAW 8
migration control, including identification of existing and potential gas hazards and the
development and implementation of mitigation/prevention measures.
M&A is prepared to proceed as soon as authorization is received. Such authorization can be
in the form of a purchase order utilizing the scope of services and prices presented in this
proposal.
Very truly yours,
MANDEVILLE &ASSOCIATES,
A DIVISION OF KLEINFELDER, INC.
Hug . Walker
Project Manager
Douglas M. Isbell, P.E.
Engineering Manager
HAW:DMI:gls
cc: Les Evans
(1)YP8156A.HAW 9
APPENDIX A
DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS
DRAWING TITLES
T1 Title Sheet with Location Map
C1 Flare Station Grading Plan
C2 Flare Station Foundation Plan
C3 Flare Station Concrete Details
C4 Plan and Profile, showing the connection pipe between the Perimeter
Gas System and the Flare Station
C5 Piping Details
C6 Gravity Drain Condensate Water Handling System
C7 Horizontal Well Details
C8 Vertical Well Details
C9 Probe Details
C10 Gas Well and Probe Plan
M1 Flare Station Assembly Drawing*
M2 Flare Station Assembly Details*
El Electrical Equipment Backboard Detail*
E2 Control Backboard Electrical Equipment Assembly*
E3 Control Panel Detail*
E4 Control Wiring Schematic*
E5 Electrical Interconnection Diagram*
E6 Power Wiring Diagram and Load Schedules*
E7 Electrical Plot Plan Details*
*
(If a flare is used. This will be determined in the Basis of Design Report.)
This drawing and specification list is based on using a landfill gas flare. If an alternate
disposal device is used, these lists may change significantly.
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-2
SPECIAL PROVISION SPECIFICATIONS
GENERAL
Project Definition
Safety
Project Requirements
Precedence Relationship
Material Substitutions
Abbreviations
Definitions
Technical Contacts
SCOPE OF WORK AND BASIS OF PAYMENT
WARRANTY OF WORK
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WORK AND PROJECT COMPLETION
INTENT OF DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONTROL OF WORK
Authority of Engineer
Conformity with Drawings and Allowable Deviations
Coordination and Interpretations of Drawings and Specifications
Inspection
Drawings and Equipment Submittals
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-3
• I •
LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Complying with Rules and Regulations
Permits and Licenses
Patented Devices
Property Marks
Protection of Public and Private Property
Utilities on Site
Service Roads, Walkways and Bridges
Irrigation Facilities
Roads and Fences
EXISTING UTILITIES
Location of Existing Utilities
Connection to Existing Utilities
DISPOSAL OF REFUSE
SITE SECURITY
QUALITY CONTROL
General
Authority of Inspector
Inspection
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
General
Electrical Services
Accident Prevention
Construction Facilities
Staging and Shoring
Temporary Facilities
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-4
TEMPORARY FACILITIES (continued)
Warning Devices and Barricades
Hazards in Public Right of Way
Project Security
Fire Extinguishers
Dust Control
Odor Control
Sealing Open Holes
CONSTRUCTION SITE MAINTENANCE
General
Clean-Up
Waste Disposal
EARTHWORK
General
Staking of Line and Grade
Obstruction
Excavation
Bracing and Shoring Trenches
Pipe Bedding
Earth Backfill
Disposal of Excavated Refuse
Structural Excavation and Backfill
Final Clean-Up
Compaction and Testing
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-5
PLASTIC PIPING
General
Excavation, Trenching and Backfill
Depth of Trench
Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe and Fittings
Steel Pipe
P.E. Pipe and Fittings
Pipe Laying
PIPE SUPPORTS
FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS
Flexible Connectors for PVD and CPVC Pipe
Flexible Connectors for Rotating Equipment
Flexible Connectors for Water Piping
PRESSURE TESTING PIPE
CONCRETE
ACI Conformance
Material
Concrete Class
Design Mix
Admixtures
Concrete Placement
Testing
Contractor Furnished Materials
ANCHOR BOLTS AND BOLTING
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-6
•
LANDFILL GAS BLOWERS
General
Design Performance
Blower Specifications
ELECTRICAL
General
Codes and Regulations
Materials and Workmanship
Temporary Power
Cutting and Repairing
Drawings
As-Built Drawings
Scope
Grounding
Equipment
Control Panel Constructions
Conduit
Field Wiring
Lighting
Additional Requirements
ALARM SYSTEM
General
Scope
General Requirements and Codes
Telephone
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-7
PAINT AND TOUCH-UP
Paint
Touch-up and Repair
O&M LITERATURE AND DATA REQUIREMENTS
PROPANE BOTTLES AND PIPING
INSTALLATION OF OWNER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT
START-UP
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT, SAFETY EQUIPMENT AND SIGNS
FLOW TRANSMITTERS AND FLOW INDICATORS
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION SHEETS
GAS WELLS
GAS PROBES
(1)70YP8156A.HAW A-8
APPENDIX B
FEE SCHEDULE
k4 KLEINFELDER
1988 FEE SCHEDULE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Kleinfelder is a consulting firm which provides services in hydrogeology, environmental engineering,
geochemistry, industrial health and safety, geotechnical engineering, engineering geology, mining engi-
neering, water resources, agricultural engineering, and materials engineering and testing. Since 1961, the
firm has provided consulting services to industries, governmental agencies, commercial firms, developers,
and other design professionals.
PRINCIPAL OFFICES TESTING LABORATORIES
FAIRFIELD SACRAMENTO MERCED
125 A Grobric Court 9795 Business Park Drive,Suite C 1575 West Main Street
Cordelia,CA 94585 Sacramento,CA 95827 Merced,CA 95340
(707) 864-1393 (916) 366-1701 (209) 384-7552
FRESNO SAN DIEGO
1975 E Street 9771 Clairemont Mesa Blvd.,Suite G MONO COUNTY
Fresno,CA 93706 San Diego,CA 92124 85 Sera Manor Road
(209)486-0750 (619) 541-1145 Post Office Box 362
Mammoth Lakes,CA 93546
INDUSTRY SAN LUIS OBISPO (619) 934-6829
526 Hofgaarden Street 880 Industrial Way,Suite 130
City of Industry,CA 91744 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 REDDING
(818) 369-2224 (805) 546-8592 930 Merchant Street
LAS VEGAS SAN RAMON Redding,CA 96002
6000 South Eastern, Bldg. 5-D 4750 Norris Canyon Road,Suite A (916) 221-1873
Las Vegas, NV 89119 San Ramon,CA 94583
(702) 736-2936 (415) 866-8378 ST. GEORGE
212 North 1000 East
LOS ANGELES SEATTLE St. George, UT 84770
17100 Pioneer Blvd.,Suite 350 1900 112th Avenue NE,Suite 101 (801) 628-5231
Artesia,CA 90701 Bellevue,WA 98004
(213) 860-5559 (206) 451-2877
PHOENIX STOCKTON
4920 E. McDowell,Suite 101 2825 East Myrtle Street
Phoenix,AZ 85008 Stockton,CA 95205
(602) 231-0992 (209) 948-1345
RENO SUNNYVALE
3189 Mill Street 524 Weddell Drive,Suite 3
Reno, NV 89502 Sunnyvale,CA 94089
(702) 323-7182 (408) 734-4950
ROHNERT PARK WALNUT CREEK
5865 Labath Avenue,Suite 5 2121 N. California Blvd.,Suite 570
Rohnert Park,CA 94928 Walnut Creek,CA 94596
(707) 585-8608 (415) 938-5610
1
BASIS OF CHARGES
1. Listed herein are typical prices for environmental services most frequently performed by
Kleinfelder. Prices for other services provided by the firm or other environmental
services not listed will be given upon request, as well as special quotations for programs
involving volume work.
2. The client agrees to limit the consultant's liability to the client and to all contractors and
subcontractors on the project due to professional negligent acts, errors or omissions of
the consultant to the sum of$50,000 or the consultant's fee, whichever is greater.
3. Invoices will be issued on a monthly basis, or upon completion of a project, whichever is
sooner. The net cash amount of this invoice is payable on presentation of the invoice. If
not paid within 30 days after the date of the invoice, the unpaid balance shall be subject
to a FINANCE CHARGE of 11/2% per month, which is an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE
of 18%.
4. A two-hour minimum charge will be made for all field services. A four-hour minimum
charge will be made for field hours in excess of two hours. An eight-hour minimum
charge will be made for field services in excess of four hours per day. A one-hour
minimum charge per day will be made for any office services.
5. An overtime premium of $15.00 per hour will be charged for all personnel services in
excess of eight hours per day or Saturday, and $30.00 per hour on Sundays or Holidays.
6. Per diem will be charged at a rate of $72.00 per day per person or expenses + 20%,
whichever is greater.
7. Outside services will be charged at cost+ 20% unless otherwise noted.
8. We are protected by Worker's Compensation Insurance (and/or Employer's Liability
Insurance), and by Public Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property darnage, and
will furnish certificates thereof upon request. We assume the risk of damage to our own
supplies and equipment. If your contract or purchase order places greater responsibilities
upon us or requires further insurance coverage, we, specifically directed by you, will
take out additional insurance (if procurable) to protect us at your expense, but we shall
not be responsible for property damage from any cause, including fire and explosion,
beyond the amounts of coverage of our insurance.
9. All environmental samples may be returned to clients at Kleinfelder's discretion 30 days
after submission of final report, unless prior arrangements are made.
2
h� K L E I N F E L D E R
1988 FEE SCHEDULE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL STAFF RATES
Design Engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 65.00/hour
Environmental Systems Supervisor . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 65.00/hour
Environmental Specialist/Scientist . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 65.00/hour
Assistant Engineer/Geologist * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 65.00/hour
Operations Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 74.00/hour
Staff Engineer/Geologist * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 74.00/hour
Project Engineer/Geologist * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 86.00/hour
Senior Engineer/Geologist * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 98.00/hour
Project Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 98.00/hour
Industrial Hygienist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 98.00/hour
Senior Project Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $110.00/hour
Principal Engineer $120.00/hour
Special Consultant(s) ** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Request
ADM IfNISTRATIVE/TECHNICAL STAFF RATES
Clerk/Typist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 30.00/hour
Technical Typist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 45.00/hour
Purchasing Agent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 45.00/hour
Project Administrative Assistant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 45.00/hour
Drafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 45.00/hour
Graphic Artist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50.00/hour
Designer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 55.00/hour
Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40.00/hour
Environmental Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50.00/hour
Senior Environmental Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60.00/hour
Research Assistant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60.00/hour
Technical Writer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60.00/hour
* Also applies to Hydrogeologists, Hydrologists and Computer Specialists.
** Applies to Senior Principals, Geophysicists, Geochemists, Meteorologists,
Expert Testimony and Special Projects.
3
ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING AND TEST EQUIPMENT
Suspended Sediment Samplers
DH48 Hand-Held Low Flow . . . . . $ 40/day
D49, D74 High-Flow with Suspension System and Winch . . . . . . . . . $ 70/day
Bed Load Samplers
Hand-Held Low Flow . . . . . $ 40/day
High Flow with Suspension System and Winch . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 70/day
Level or Transit and Rod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 70/day
Hand Auger and Soil Sampler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100/day
Isco Composite Water Sampler Unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $135/day
Groundwater Sampling Truck/Trailer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60/hour
(Complete with generator,air compressor,sample pump and reel assembly,steam
cleaner and water tank,water level indicator,conductivity,ph and temperature
monitor,teflon bailer) - 4 hour minimum
Portable Generator (1.5 to 4 kw) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 70/day
Portable Generator (greater than 4 kw) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 90/day
Air Compressor (3 - 10 cfm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 80/day
Portable Air Compressor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50/day
Trailer Mounted 4"Submersible Pump and Reel Assembly . . . . . . . . . . $275/day
Steam Cleaner (.5 to 2 gpm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 90/day
Conductivity Based Water Level Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35/day
Acoustic Water Level Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 90/day
Stevens Meter Water Level Recorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35/day
Teflon Bailer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 30/day
Conductivity, pH,and Temperature Monitor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35/day
Current Meter/Flow Measurement Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 70/day
Isco Flow Recorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 90/day
Peristatic Pump . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60/day
Well Development Tool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40/day
Transducer and SE1000 Recorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $180/day
$700/week
Line/Cable Locater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60/day
Pump Bladders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50/each
Organic Vapor Analyzer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $145/day
Organic Vapor Analyzer with Strip Chart Recorder . . . . . . . . . . . . $170/day
Field Gas Chromatograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $475/day
Sound Level Meter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35/day
Combustible Gas Analyzer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 45/day
Draeger Quantimeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 90/day
Draeger Tubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10/each
Syringe Sampler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $125/day
Diaphram Surface Pump . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60/day
Video Camera . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50/day
4
KLEINFELDER
AIR/GAS SAMPLING AND TEST EQUIPMENT
Rate/Day Rate/Week Rate/Month
Mandeville and Associates Test Trailer $300 $1,800 $6,000
Mandeville and Associates Test Skid 250 1,500 5,000
Gas Production Curves 300 each run
Gas Chromatograph 50 each run
HNU 125
Organic Vapor Analyzer 150 370 1,300
Gastech GX-3N 45 285 839
Gastechtors 45 285 839
Teledyne 02 Analyzer 50 316 933
Bacharach 02 Combustible 25 158 466
Gastech NP-204 and IP-204 45 285 839
Fyrite CO2 Indicator 10 30 100
Fyrite 02 Indicator 10 30 100
Kurz Velocity Meter 17 70 220
VWR pH Meter 15 60 200
Magnehelics 8 30 100
Pitot Tubes 8 30 100
Vibration Analyzer 50
Barometer 8 30 "100
Absolute Pressure Transducer 15 50 125
Differential Pressure Transducer 15 50 125
Strip Chart Recorder (single pen) 10 40 100
Strip Chart Recorder(dual pen) 12 60 200
Power Inverter 10 25 50
Variable Voltage Supply 15 50 125
Portable Brailsford pump or equivalent 20 70 220
Nalgene Hand Pump 10 25 50
Slack Tube Manometer 5 20 40
Irromete'r 5 20 40
Moisture Meter 5 20 40
Digital Thermometer 5 20 40
Analog Thermometer 5 20 40
Voltmeter 5 20 40
5
Rate/Day Rate/Week Rate/Month
Walkie Talkie Set 10 30 100
Portable Generator 25 120 375
Portable Air Compressor 10 50 150
Metal Detector 5 10 20
Measuring Wheel 5 10 20
Pipe Cutter and Threader 15 50 100
Solder Iron 8 20 45
Orifice Plate 15 30 75
Brunsit Transit 40 100 200
Range Finder 5 10 25
Stainless Steel Bomb 2
Shipping Container 5
Calibration Gas Regulator 5 20 60
Calibration Gas 5
Centrifugal Water Pump 8 24 40
Wind Speed and Direction Indicator
(one system each) 300 1,200
Dual Ambient Air Sampler 50 125 500
Integrated Surface Sampler 25 80 250
Barhole Punch 10
6
k%1 KLEINFELDER
MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION MATERIALS
2" 4"
Casing, Blank Schedule 40, PVC with Threaded Joints -
10 foot lengths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.50/ft. $11.00/ft.
Casing, Blank Schedule 40, PVC with Threaded Joints
5 foot lengths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7.00/ft. $15.00/ft.
Casing,Screens,0.02" Slots,Schedule 40, PVC with
Threaded Joints,10 foot lengths . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7.00/ft. $17.00/ft.
Casing,Screens,0.02" Slots,Schedule 40, PVC with
Threaded Joints,5 foot lengths . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8.00/ft. $25.00/ft.
Casing, PVC Plug . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.50/ea. $20.00/ea.
Casing, PVC Cap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10.00/ea. $25.00/ea.
Sand,100#bag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 20.00/bag
Bentonite Pellets,50#bucket . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 90.00/bucket
Granulated Bentonite, 50#sack . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35.00/sack
Concrete/Bentonite Slurry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $200.00/yard
Security Tops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $175.00/each
Brass Tubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6.00/each
Dedicated Pumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Request
* Quotes on prices for greater than 4"diameter PVC well casings and other
materials (stainless steel,teflon,etc.) provided on request.
HEALTH AND SAFETY EQUIPMENT
Portable Personnel Decontamination Trailer . . . . . . . . . $200.00/day
Personnel Air Sampling Pump . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 70.00/day
Borehole Ventilation System . . . . . . . . . . . . . $150.00/day
Level A Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Request
Level B Protection * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $180.00/day/man
Level C Protection * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100.00/day/man
Level D Protection * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35.00/day/man
Limited Level D Protection *
(no chemical resistant coveralls required) . . . . . . . . $ 25.00/day/man
* Charges for each protection level are based on dry work conditions and use
of uncoated tyvek and PVC/nitrile/neoprene gloves. Additional nominal
charge for wet work conditions requiring coated tyvek or special chemical
resistant coveralls (i.e.,Saranex) and gloves (i.e.,Viton).
SPECIAL MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE COSTS
Baseline physical costs are covered by the company; however, project-specific medical tests will be
charged at cost plus 200/,,.
7
EQUIPMENT CHARGES
DRILLING SERVICES
Truck-Mounted Drilling Equipment
Flight or Hollow Stem Auger with Operator& Helper . . . . . . . . . $145.00/hour
Rotary Wash or Air,with Operator& Helper . . . . . . . . . . . . $160.00/hour
Diamond Bit Coring,with Operator& Helper (NX size) . . . . . . . . . $160.00/hour
Travel to and from site charged at hourly rate.
Skid-Mounted Drilling Equipment
Flight or Hollow Stem Auger with Operator& Helper . . . . . . . . . $145.00/hour
Travel to and from site charged at hourly rate for
truck transport or at cost+20%for other transport
Overtime Premium For Drill Crew
Over 8 hours/clay and Saturday . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 20.00/hour
Over 12 hours/day,Sunday and Holidays . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40.00/hour
Hand-Carried Power Drilling & Sampling Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40.00/hour
Dutch Cone Penetrometer Mounted on Drill Rig . . . . . . . . . . . . Drill Rig
rate+$ 5/ft.
Long Tube Continuous Soil Sampler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Drill Rig
rate+$ 8/ft.
* Does not include operator unless otherwise noted.
4-hour minimum rate for all drilling equipment. Premium for drilling and sampling
on sites requiring respiratory protection from hazardous substances$15/man-hour.
GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORATION EQUIPMENT
Seismograph,Single Channel Bison Model 1570C or Nimbus
Model ES-125 . . . . . . . . . . . $150.00/day
Seismograph,Twelve Channel Nimbus Model ES121OF . . . . . . . . . . $400.00/day
Resistivity Meter, Bison Model #2390 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $130.00/day
Soil Test Model R-40C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100.00/day
Megger Earth Tester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 85.00/clay
Magnetometer, Portable Proton-C:Pnn,etr�C. �.� $150.00/day
xilo
Eiectromagnetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . $175.00/day
Ground Penetrating Radar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Request
VEHICLES
Vehicle,2 Wheel Drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 7.00/hour or$50/day
Vehicle,4 Wheel Drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$10.00/hour or$80/day
Mileage,2 Wheel Drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.45/mile
Mileage,4 Wheel Drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.50/mile
Utility Trailer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25/day
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
Microcomputer, basic software systems and supporting hardware" . . . . . . $ 50/hour
Mainframe Computer Time-Sharing (per CPU minute)** . . . . . . . . . $ 5/minute
Computer Connect Time** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4/hour
Disk Storage (per megabyte)** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50/month
Interactive Surface Modeling (ISM} Software Surcharge** . . . . . . . . . $ 15/hour
Environmental Information Management System Software Surcharge** . . . . . $ 5/hour
Project Management and CPM Software Surcharge** . . . . . . . . . . $ 5/hour
Reproduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.22/page
Facsimile Copies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.20/page
Report Surcharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25/copy
**Discounts available for project-specific support services.
8
APPENDIX C
DETAILED COST BREAKDOWN
0 r 4 0
COST PER TASK SCHEDULE
HUNTINGTON BEACH INVESTIGATION AND
FLARE STATION ENGINEERING COSTS
WORK TASK TOTAL
COST
1.00 FIELD INVESTIGATION 16080
1.01 PROBE DESIGN AND PLACEMENT DRAWING 2170
1.02 CONSTRUCTION PREPARATION 1640
1.03 GAS PROBE INSTALLATION (5-50- PROBES) 8460
1.04 FIELD MONITORING ONE WEEK 3070
1.05 MEETINGS 740
2.00 PRELIMINARY GAS MIGRATION EVALUATION 4530
2.01 REVIEW ALL DATA 870
2.02 MAP DATA ON SITE MAP 1900
2.03 PREPARE REPORT 1030
2.04 MEETINGS 730
3.00 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE 3130
3.01 DETERMINE THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 870
3.02 COMPARE REGS. WITH THE SITE CONDITIONS 490
3.03 DETERMINE OTHER SAFETY ISSUES 250
3.04 REPORT 790
3.05 MEETINGS 730
(1)70YP8156A.HAW C-2
4.00 BASIS OF DESIGN 16120
4.01 GAS PRODUCTION CURVE 740
4.02 EVALUATION OF GAS AVAILABILITY 1160
4.03 CONDENSATE OPTIONS 670
4.04 SOILS REPORT 2610
4.05 BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT 4290
REVIEW GAS DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES
4.06 PIPING AND INSTALLATION DIAGRAM 1080
4.07 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 1660
4.08 EASEMENT INVESTIGATION 540
4.09 UTILITIES IDENTIFICATION 510
4.10 SURVEY 2070
4.11 MEETINGS 790
TOTAL $39,860
(1)70YP8156A.HAW C-3