Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. - 2007-06-05
r CONTRACTS SUBMITTAL Tn i�Q3 SAP 10 PM 3. Q CITY CLERK'S OFFICE i tt 1, at..3 C To: JOAN FLYNN, City Clerk Name of Contractor: Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Purpose of Contract: For Example: Audit Services or Water Quality Testing Huntington Lake —Huntington Central Park Analysis Report for Sewer Lift Station "D" Amount of Contract: $80,370.00 Copy of contract distributed to: The original insurance certificate/waiver distributed ❑ Initiating Dept. ❑ to Risk Management Finance Dept. ❑ ORIGINAL bonds sent to Treasurer ❑ Date://d ZQ' -7 Na a/Ext sion City Attorney's Office X" v lo G:AttyMisc/Contract Forms/City Clerk Transmittal PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. FOR INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS REPORT FOR SEWER LIFT STATION "D" THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to perform an independent analysis report for Sewer Lift Station "D"; and Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts have been complied with; and CONSULTANT has been selected to perform these services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in the Request for Proposal, and CONSULTANT's proposal dated May 18, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A"), which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Said services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as "PROJECT." CONSULTANT hereby designates Gregory S. Bazydola, who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 07-909/10419 1 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. 3. TERM; TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of CONSULTANT are to commence on June 5, 2007 (the "Commencement Date"). This Agreement shall automatically terminate three (3) years from the Commencement Date, unless extended or sooner terminated as provided herein. All tasks specified in the Scope of Services shall be completed no later than July 31, 2007 from the Commencement Date. The time for performance of the tasks identified in the Scope of Services are generally to be shown in the Scope of Services. This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed to in writing by CITY and CONSULTANT. In the event the Commencement Date precedes the date of final execution, CONSULTANT shall be bound by all terms and conditions as provided herein. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT on a time and materials basis at the rates specified in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference into this Agreement, a fee, including all costs and expenses, not to exceed Eighty Thousand Three Hundred Seventy Dollars ($80,370.00). 5. EXTRA WORK In the event CITY requires additional services not included in the Scope of Services or changes in the scope of services described in the Scope of Services CONSULTANT will undertake such work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 07-909/10419 2 6. METHOD OF PAYMENT CONSULTANT shall be entitled to payments toward the fixed fee set forth herein in accordance with the payment schedules set forth in Exhibit `B." 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT agrees that title to all materials prepared hereunder, including, without limitation, all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, computer code, language, data or programs, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall belong to CITY, and CONSULTANT shall turn these materials over to CITY upon expiration or termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. These materials may be used by CITY as it sees fit. 8. HOLD HARMLESS To the fullest extent permitted by law (including, without limitation, California Civil Code Sections 2782 and 2782.6), CONSULTANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature or liability of any kind or nature) arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT's (or CONSULTANT's subcontractors, if any) negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct related to performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement by CONSULTANT, its officers, agents or employees. CITY shall be reimbursed by CONSULTANT for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by CITY in enforcing this obligation. CONSULTANT will conduct all defense at its sole cost and expense, and CITY shall approve selection of CONSULTANT's counsel. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies 07-909/10419 3 are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONSULTANT. 9. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall furnish a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. This policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT's professional liability in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and in the aggregate. The above -mentioned insurance shall not contain a self -insured retention, "deductible" or any other similar form of limitation on the required coverage except with the express written consent of CITY. A claims -made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the initiation of the scope of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. CONSULTANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following PROJECT completion. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULTANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of at least two (2) years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this Agreement. 10. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage as required by this Agreement; the certificate shall: A. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; 07-909/10419 4 B. state that the policy is currently in force; and C. promise that such policy shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice; however, ten (10) days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSULTANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverage in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverage shall not derogate from the provisions for indemnification of CITY by CONSULTANT under the Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of the policy of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on the insurance hereinabove required. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor herein and not as an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its own cost and expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the PROJECT and/or the services to be performed hereunder. 12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not the PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as provided herein. In the 07-909/10419 5 event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, exhibits, report, and evidence shall, at the option of CITY, become its property and shall be promptly delivered to it by CONSULTANT. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION This Agreement is a personal service contract and the work hereunder shall not be assigned, delegated or subcontracted by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the prior express written consent of CITY. If an assignment, delegation or subcontract is approved, all approved assignees, delegates and subconsultants must satisfy the insurance requirements as set forth in Sections 9 and 10 hereinabove. 14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement. 15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 16. NOTICES Any notices, certificates, or other communications hereunder shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, to the addresses specified below; provided that CITY and CONSULTANT, by notice given hereunder, may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices, certificates or other communications will be sent: 07-909/10419 6 TO CITY: TO CONSULTANT: City of Huntington Beach Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. ATTN: Eric R. Charlonne ATTN: Gregory S. Bazydola 2000 Main Street 8001 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1100 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Irvine, CA 92618 17. CONSENT When CITY's consent/approval is required under this Agreement, its consent/approval for one transaction or event shall not be deemed to be a consent/approval to any subsequent occurrence of the same or any other transaction or event. 18. MODIFICATION No waiver or modification of any language in this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by both parties. 19. SECTION HEADINGS The titles, captions, section, paragraph and subject headings, and descriptive phrases at the beginning of the various sections in this Agreement are merely descriptive and are included solely for convenience of reference only and are not representative of matters included or excluded from such provisions, and do not interpret, define, limit or describe, or construe the intent of the parties or affect the construction or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. 20. INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, void, illegal or invalid, such holding shall not invalidate or affect the remaining covenants and provisions of this Agreement. No covenant or provision shall be deemed dependent upon any other unless so expressly provided here. As used in this Agreement, the masculine or 07-909/10419 7 neuter gender and singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the other whenever the context so indicates or requires. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrary to which the parties have no right to contract, then the latter shall prevail, and the provision of this Agreement which is hereby affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law. 21. DUPLICATE ORIGINAL The original of this Agreement and one or more copies hereto have been prepared and signed in counterparts as duplicate originals, each of which so executed shall, irrespective of the date of its execution and delivery, be deemed an original. Each duplicate original shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. 22. IMMIGRATION CONSULTANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. 23. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSULTANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSULTANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 07-909/10419 8 24. ATTORNEY' S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to construe, interpret and/or enforce the terms and/or provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, such that prevailing party shall not be entitled to recover its attorney's fees from the nonprevailing party. 25. SURVIVAL Terms and conditions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement shall so survive. 26. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 27. SIGNATORIES Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify CITY fully for any injuries or damages to CITY in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. 27. ENTIRETY The parties acknowledge and agree that they are entering into this Agreement freely and voluntarily following extensive arm's length negotiation, and that each has had the opportunity to consult with legal counsel prior to executing this Agreement. The parties also acknowledge and agree that no representations, inducements, promises, agreements or warranties, oral or otherwise, have been made by that party or anyone acting on that party's behalf, which are not embodied in this Agreement, and that that party has not executed this Agreement in reliance on any representation, inducement, promise, agreement, warranty, fact or circumstance not expressly set forth in this 07-909/10419 9 Agreement. This Agreement, and the attached exhibits, contain the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior understandings and agreements whether oral or in writing between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers on the date written below. MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. By: A. print name ITS: (circle one) Chairman/President/(ice President Signed on:, 1 y,,- 2 � 2 o0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California irector of P6fic Works�,,a (Pursuant To HBMC §3. 03.100) REVIEWED AND APPROVED: AND City Administrator (only for contracts $50, 000.00 and over) Dan,Qr �. Shauchi k print name ITS: (circle one) ret / hief Financial Officer/Asst. Secretary — Treasurer Signed on: L 07 07-909/10419 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM: f' 2,4i- ,6 ity Attorney !a'W S ^3w -off Date ' Z 0 ` Q-7 LIFT STATION D — INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS EXHIBIT "A" A. STATEMENT OF WORK: (Narrative of work to be performed) Work includes an engineering review (audit) of the existing Lift Station D design and compares it to the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Engineering Design Standards. A report will be written outlining the findings of the review. After the report has been approved by the City, the Engineer will produce design documents of the recommended improvements suggested in the report. The design documents shall include drawings and specifications, which will be transmitted to the construction contractor for pricing. The Engineer will assist the City in coordination of this effort both with the construction contractor and OCSD. B. CONSULTANT'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Produce the summary report outlining the findings of the audit. 2. Coordination assistance between the City, construction contractor and OCSD C. CITY'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Coordination between MP and OCSD 2. Review and approval of written reports. D. WORK PROGRAM/PROJECT SCHEDULE: Attached is the proposed schedule for this work. jmp/contracts group/exA/8/29/07 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LIFT STATION D INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS REPORT PROJECT SCHEDULE ID Task Name Duration Start Finish February March Aril _ _ _ 1/14 2/4 12/11 2/18 2/25 3/4 l/211/28 _ _ 3/11 3/18 3/25 4/1 4/8 4/15 4/22 1 Initial Meeting with OCSD 0 days Thu 1/25/07 ; Thu 1/25/07 O 1/25 2 Scope Review and Budget Development 14 days I Fri 1/26/07 ? Wed 2/14/07 3 Meeting with City to Review Status 0 days Thu 2/8/07 Thu 2/8/07 ® 4/8 4 Submit Draft Scope and Budget to City 5 days t Mon 2/12/07 1 Fri 2/16/07 5 Acceptance and Notice to Proceed from City 0 days Fri 2/16/071 Fri 2/16/07 O 2/1li i 6 Independent Analysis Report 30 days Mon 2/19/07 Fri 3/30/07 7 Hydraulics Review 10 days ; Mon 2/19/07 Fri 3/2/07 € 8 Wet Well Design Review 8 days Mon 3/5/07 Wed 3/14/07 f �. 9 Maintenance and Access Review 7 days I Thu 3/15/07 Fri 3/23/07 �. Designy- Fri 3/2/07 € �+ 10 Instrumentation menttat on Design Review 14 days Mon 3/5/07 Thu 3/22/07 12 Draft Report 5 days Mon 3/26/07 Fri 3/30/07 13 Submit Draft Report to City 0 days Fri 3/30/07 Fri 3/30/07 O 3/30 14 City and District Review 14 days Mon 4/2/07 ' Thu 4/19/07 15 Review Meeting with City and District 0 days Thu 4119/07 Thu 4/19/07 O 4/19 16 Design Changes Approved 0 days Thu 4/19/07 Thu 4/19/07 O 4/19 Project: HB Lift Station D Audit Report Group Task Milestone O Date: Mon 2/12/07 Page 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LIFT STATION D SCOPE OF WORK INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS REPORT AND DESIGN ASSISTANCE INTRODUCTION: Lift Station D is a wastewater pumping station located in the City of Huntington Beach (City). Lift Station D is under construction and is currently owned by the City. There have been discussions that the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will eventually take ownership of this station some time in the future. As of the date of this scope of work, the OCSD Board of Directors has not approved any proposal to take ownership of this pump station. OCSD has raised concerns that the station does not meet their current design standards and requested that Malcolm Pirnie Inc. review the station for compliance prior to any board action. The following scope of work outlines the proposed review of Lift Station D and shall provide a written report comparing the current station design elements with the OCSD Design Guidelines Revision F. 1. HYDRAULICS REVIEW: A. SEWERSHED FLOW ANALYSIS REVIEW The Consultant shall review the existing information provided by the City of Huntington Beach (City) to determine if the hydraulic flow study meets the standards of the OCSD Design Guidelines. The flow study completed by the City needs to have been based upon a planning level hydraulic model of the local sewershed upstream of the City's Warner Avenue Lift Station (or Lift Station D). The Consultant shall determine the basis of the hydraulic design and compare it with OCSD's policy of a combination of local land usage including projected population densities as well as measured or projected Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) volumes to determine expected flows at the pump station. B. PUMP CAPACITY ANALYSIS REVIEW The Consultant shall perform a hydraulic flow capacity analysis for the actual pumps that were selected and have been or will be placed in the City's Lift Station D. The pump capacity analysis will take the results of the sewershed flow analysis for expected minimum and maximum flows and estimate what the maximum flow rate will be from the new Lift Station D. The pump capacity analysis shall estimate what the minimum flow rate will be and how many starts per hour will be expected during low flow conditions, City of Huntington Beach Lift Station D —Independent Analysis Report May 2007 Page I of 5 high dry weather flow conditions and high wet weather flow conditions from the actual pumps and wet well configuration. C. EFFECT OF PUMP STATION HYDRAULICS ON DOWNSTREAM OCSD SANITARY SEWERS The Consultant shall take the results of the output flow capacity analysis and superimpose those results on the existing OCSD hydraulic model of the existing Warner Avenue Relief Sewer System, which is a gravity flow sewer system on Los Patos Avenue and Warner Avenue between Lift Station D and the OCSD Slater -Springdale Trunk Sewer at Springdale and Warner Avenues. The Consultant shall work with the District to confirm this requirement. This scope of work does not include the development of a model; only the coordination required and summary of the output. The Consultant shall confirm that under wet weather peak flow conditions when all the pumps from Lift Station D could be running, the maximum instantaneous flow rate and effect on the OCSD trunk sewers downstream of the pump station and estimate whether there will be any surcharging that could cause a sewer spill in the OCSD gravity sewer system. 2. WET WELL DESIGN REVIEW: A. WET WELL CAPACITY REVIEW The Consultant shall verify the capacity and operating levels of Lift Station D and determine if the starts per hour are within the recommended range set forth by the pump manufacturer, the Hydraulic Institute guidelines and OCSD standards. The Consultant shall also evaluate operating levels within the wet well for the starting and stopping of each of the pumps (lead, lag and standby). B. WET WELL CLEANING CAPABILITY REVIEW The Consultant shall verify the ability of the wet well design and operation to allow cleaning and maintenance of the wet well without extraordinary measures. C. WET,WELL CORROSION RESISTANCE REVIEW The Consultant shall verify and document what corrosion control measures (such as wet well lining systems) are in place and what it would take to get bring them up to OCSD standards. D. WETWELL ODOR CONTROL REVIEW The Consultant shall verify what odor control measures are or will be in place in and around the pump station and compare them to the OCSD standards on odor control. The Consultant shall evaluate the design and especially the type of openings into the wet well and determine if these openings can be sealed to prevent odors from escaping and causing odor problems in the residential area surrounding the pump station. City of Huntington Beach Lift Station D —Independent Analysis Report May 2007 Page 2 of 5 E. WETWELL LEVEL MEASUREMENT DEVICES The Consultant shall verify what level control measures, including the type of equipment and controls, are or will be in -place in the pump station and compare them with the OCSD standards. 3. MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS REVIEW: A. MAINTENANCE STANDARDS REVIEW The Consultant shall verify the ability of OCSD maintenance workers to be able to work on, have adequate access space, and be able to remove and service the main operating pumps, valves, motors, shafts, variable frequency drives, generators, level monitoring devices, HVAC systems, meters, electrical switchgear and other pieces of mechanical and electrical equipment. This analysis will include mention of equipment handling devices such as monorail cranes, a -frame mounted cranes or hoists, jib cranes, bridge cranes, etc. (if any) and the ease and ability to have access shafts or other means to retrieve mechanical equipment from the dry pit and onto the ground surface surrounding the pump station. B. STANDARD ACCESS AND CLEARANCES The Consultant shall verify the ability for OCSD operating and maintenance personnel to safely access and have clearance for all types of personnel, equipment supplies needed at the pump station. This includes standard manufacturer recommendation for clearance, etc. regarding maintenance and repair of equipment. 4. ELECTRICAL DESIGN AND CODE REVIEW: A. OCSD ELECTRICAL DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW The Consultant shall verify compliance of the pump station with the OCSD Electrical Design Guidelines (Ref. F). B. NFPA, NEC, UL and other ELECTRICAL and MECHANICAL CODE COMPIANCE REVIEW The Consultant shall verify and make interpretation of the latest NFPA Code (in particular NFPA 820) and any other code requirements such as NEC code and UL code requirements or recommended practices with what is in place or will be in place in the pump station. C. MECHANICAL VENTILLATION REQUIREMENTS associated with NFPA or NEC Codes The Consultant shall verify how many air changes per hour will occur for the ventilation that is specified in any of the spaces within the pump station, but especially in those spaces that have been rated for electrical safety hazard classification such as Class 1, Division 1, Class 1, Division 2, or Unclassified City of Huntington Beach Lift Station D —Independent Analysis Report May 2007 Page 3 of 5 spaces. The consultant shall also verify and report on how the operational considerations of lack of ventilation in classified areas, if present, will govern how the pump station is allowed to run or be shut down and whether or not any of the above would occur automatically. 5. INSTRUMENTATION REVIEW: A. OCSD INSTRUMENTATION DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW The Consultant shall verify compliance of the pump station with the OCSD Instrumentation Design Guidelines (Ref. F). B. OCSD INSTRUMENTATION TAGGING AND SCADA COMPLIANCE REVIEW The Consultant shall verify compliance of the pump station with the OCSD instrumentation tagging and SCADA monitoring system standards. This will include a comparison of existing Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&ID), instrumentation loop diagrams, how the pump station instrumentation and equipment tagging compares to OCSD standards and how compliant it is to the existing OCSD SCADA system. It is anticipated that the existing OCSD "CRISP" SCADA system has capacity for expansion and that key OCSD personnel would actually program logic diagrams and various additional monitoring screens for the "CRISP" expansion. Also, it is anticipated that communication between the pump station and the OCSD "CRISP" SCADA system, would be via Modicon Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC's) and physical "leased line" telephone cable communications. 6. DESIGN ASSISTANCE: A. Electrical Design Components: Provide modifications to the existing electrical equipment in order for the systems to meet the OCSD Design Guidelines. Deliverables will include sketches and drawings for the contractor to provide cost proposals for the work. B. Field Assistance: Provided assistance to the City field staff during the installation of the electrical components designed in item 6A above. 7. DELIVERABLES, MEETINGS AND BUDGET: A. DELIVERABLES The Consultant shall provide a total of ten copies of the draft report and ten copies of the final report. In addition, electronic copies in PDF format shall be provided for each submittal. B. MEETINGS City of Huntington Beach Lift Station D — Independent Analysis Report May 2007 Page 4 of 5 The Consultant has budgeted three two hour meetings for this effort. C. BUDGET The Consultant budget for this scope of work is attached as Table 1.0. City of Huntington Beach Lift Station D —Independent Analysis Report May 2007 Page 5 of 5 LIFT STATION D — INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS EXHIBIT "B" Payment Schedule 1. Charges for time during travel are normally not reimbursable and will only be paid if such time is actually used in performing services for CITY or as otherwise arranged with CITY. 2. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to a full payment towards the fixed fee set forth herein in accordance with the following: Payment shall be based on actual hours completed on the project. The hourly rate shall be based on a burden labor of 1.51%, a fixed overhead of 95% and a profit of 10%. The budget for this effort is provided in the original contract information package from the consultant. /,4-, 3. Delivery of w pro uct: A copy of every memorandurh, letter, report, calculation and other documentation prepared by CONSULTANT shall be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. 4. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall: 1) Reference this Agreement; 2) Describe the services performed; 3) Show the total amount of the payment due; 4) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULTANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and 5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSULTANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT in writing of the reasons for non -approval and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" may at the option of CITY be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULTANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement has expired or is terminated as provided herein. 5. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized in advance and in writing by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any jmp/contracts group/exB-I/8/29/07 dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. jmp/contracts group/exB-1/8/29/07 TABLE 1.0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SCOPE OF WORK AND BUDGET LIFT STATION D INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS REPORT LABOR CLASSIFICATIONS TOTAL Task Description E/S - C E/S - B I E/S-A I E/S-6 I E/S-4 I E/S-3 I T/A - 3 HOURS PMT PROJECT MANAGEMENT A Meetings and Site Visits 1 161 161 1 12 44 B Management & QA/QC 1 101 1 18 28 Subtotal 10 0 34 16 0 121 01 72 1 HYDRAULICS REVIEW A Sewershed Flow Analysis Review 16 40 56 B Pump Capacity Analysis Review 4 40 44 C Effect on PS Hydraulics on Downstream Sewer 4 40 44 Subtotal 0 0 24 0 0 120 0 144 2 WET WELL DESIGN REVIEW A Capacity Review 3 16 19 B Cleaning Capability Review 2 9 11 C Corrosion Resistance Review 2 8 10 D Odor Control Review 2 8 10 E Level Measurcement Devices 2 8 12 22 Subtotal 0 0 11 8 0 53 0 72 3 MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS REVIEW A Maintenance Standards Review 2 8 10 B Standard Access and Clearances 2 8 10 Subtotal 0 0 4 0 0 16 0 20 4 ELECTRICAL DESIGN AND CODE REVIEW A OCSD Electrical Design Standards Review 1 24 25 B NFPA, NEC, UL and other Elect & Mach code compliance 32 32 C Ventillation Requirements 3 16 19 Subtotal 0 0 4 56 0 16 0 76 6 INSTRUMENTATION DESIGN REVIEW A Instrumentation Design Standards Review 16 16 4 36', B Instrumentation Tagging and SCADA Compliance Review 8 16 4 28 Subtotal 0 0 0 24 32 8 0 64 6 DESIGN ASSISTANCE A Electrical Design 8 50 58 B Field Assistance 8 40 48 Subtotal 0 01 16 90 0 0 0 106 Total Labor Hours 10 0 93 194 32 .225 0 554 Burden Labor Rates (Based on 2006 Rates) $ 138.92 $ 107.21 $ 101.93 $ 81.01 $ 60.78 S 39.26 $ 34.73 Total Burden Labor $ 1,389 $ $ 9,479 $ 15,716 $ 1,945 $ 8,834 $ - 37,363 Overhead @ 95.0 % $ 1,320 $ $ 9,005 $ 14,930 $ 1,848 $ 8,392 $ 35,495 Profit @ 10.0 % $ 271 $ $ 1,848 $ 3,065 $ 379 $ 1,723 $ 7,286 Subtotal Labor Fee 2,980 20,333 33,711 4,172 18,948 80,143 Expenses: Report Reproduction $150 Mileagel 1601 4 trips 40 milesttrip @ $0.48/mile $77 (1) Travel and Subsistence Total Expenses $ 227 SubConsultants: Total SubConsultants: $ Total Budget $ 80.370 -7- AGORP. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 07/02/2007 PRODUCER (908)654-0300 FAX (908)654-0332 Slapin-Lieb & Co. 200 Sheffield Street Suite 104 Mountainside, NJ 07092-2314 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC S INSURED Malcolm Pirn a Inc. 104 Corporate Park Drive P. 0. BOX 751 White Plains, NY 10602-0751 INSURERA: American Int'l Specialty Lines 26993 INSURERS: INSURERC: INSURERD: INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADIrL TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATIONingionrinn LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY DAMAGE TO RENTED $ _ CLAIMS MADE OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY S GENERAL AGGREGATE $ GENL AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS- COMPIOP AGG $ POLICY JPEGOT LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ BODILY INJURY (Per Person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY -EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA ACC AUTO ONLY: AGG $ ANY AUTO $ EXCESSIUMBRELIA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ OCCUR CLAIMS MADE cG , > Atto r/ 5 1 � AGGREGATE $ $ $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC STATU- OTH- EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNERIEXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE -EA EMPLOYE $ OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? U yes, describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $ A TH Liab/Contractors o7lution Liab. Ins. 2190394 02/01/2007 02/01/2009 $10,000,000 per Claim $10,000,000 Aggregate Including Claims Expense DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS! VEHICLES 1 EXCLUSIONSMDED BY EN EMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS E: Huntington Beach Independent Analysis Reportttor Lift Station D, Job # 5925-004. Operations of the Named Insured, including above) Except 10 days premium non-payment. City of Huntington Beach Public Works Attn: Joe Dale 2000 Alain Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30* DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER. ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Z-17 ACORD 25 (2001108) OACORD CORPORATION 1988 IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD 25 (2001108) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Professional Service Contracts Purchasing Certification 1. Date: 8/27/2007 2. Department: Public Works 3. Requested by: Travis Hopkins 4. Name of consultant: Malcolm Pirnie 5. Attach the written statement of the specification, conditions, and other requirements for the requested services provided to solicited consultants. Not available - was on a verbal basis 6. Amount of the contract: $80,370.00 7. Are sufficient funds available to fund this contract?' ® Yes ❑ No 8. Is this contract generally described on the list of professional service contracts approved by the City Council?' ❑ Yes ® No 9. Company number and object code where funds are budgeted: 51189001.82600 10. Is this contract less than $50,000? ❑ Yes ® No 11. Does this contract fall within $50,000 and $100,000? ® Yes ❑ No 12. Is this contract over $100,000? ❑ Yes ® No (Note: Contracts requiring City Council Approval need to be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk. Make sure the appropriate signature page is attached to contract.) 13. Were formal written proposals requested from at least three available qualified consultants? ❑ Yes ® No 14. Attach list of consultants from whom proposals were requested (including a contact telephone number). We were required to use Malcolm Pirnie as a condition of OCSD in order to modify an ongoing construction project to OCSD standards. 15. Attach proposed scope of work. See #15 attached - Exhibit'A' 16. Attach proposed payment schedule. See #16 attached - Exhibit V CHARD AMAD iL urchasing and Central Services Manager 1. If the answer to this question is "No," the contract will require approval from the City Council. phone: (714)962-2411 fax: (714) 962-0356 www.oesd.com mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley. CA 92726-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-701B Member Agencies • Cities Anaheim Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Garden Grove Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda County of Orange Sanitary Districts Costa Mesa Midway City Water Districts Irvine Ranch ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT June 15, 2006 Mr. Joseph A. Lauria Malcom Pirnie, Inc. 8001 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1100 Irivne, CA 92618 Subject: Professional Services Agreement for Replacement of Rocky Point Pump Station, Job No. 5-50 Enclosed herewith please find one fully executed copy of subject agreement for your files. The assigned Purchase Order Number issued to this project is 102494 OB. ti Corina Chaudhry Principal Staff Analyst CMC:MD:bm EDMS: 003811632 Enclosures c: P. Kyle M. Larkin E. Smith M. Dix C. Chaudhry Project File Chron File To maintain world -class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into to be effective the 24th day of May, 2006 by and between the ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC., for purposes of this Agreement hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, DISTRICT has determined the need for dproject report to be prepared under REPLACEMENT OF ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION, JOB NO.5-50; and, WHEREAS, DISTRICT desires to engage a CONSULTANT to Provide engineeing services to replace the existing Rocky Point Pump Station on new land acquired by the Orange County Sanitation District and, WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to provide the necessary services in connection with these requirements and has agreed to provide the necessary professional services; and, WHEREAS, DISTRICT has adopted procedures for the selection of professional services and has proceeded in accordance with said procedures to select a CONSULTANT to perform this work; and, WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on May 24th, 2006 the Board of Directors, by Minute Order, accepted the recommendation of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee to approve this Agreement between DISTRICT and CONSULTANT. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual benefits, which will result to the parties in carrying out the terms of this Agreement, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. SCOPE OF WORK. CONSULTANT agrees to furnish necessary professional and technical services to accomplish those project elements outlined in the Scope of Work attached hereto as "Attachment A", and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. 2. COMPENSATION. Total compensation shall be paid to CONSULTANT for services in accordance with the following provisions: A. Total Compensation. Total compensation shall be in an amount not to exceed $2,475,973. Total compensation to CONSULTANT including burdened labor (salaries plus benefits), overhead, profit, direct costs, and subconsultant(s) fees and costs shall not exceed the sum set forth herein, broken down as follows: PDSA -1- JOB NO. 5-50 Revised 2117/00 DESIGN SERVICES INCLUDING: Consultant Raw Labor $552,810 Fringe Rate 51 % (% X Raw Labor) $281,933 Burdened labor $834,743 (Raw Labor + Fringe Rate) Overhead 95% $793,006 (% X Burden Labor) Subtotal (Burden Labor + Overhead) $1,627,749 Profit 6.04265% $98,359 (overhead + burdened labor) Total Direct Costs, not $99,700 to exceed TOTAL — "Consultant" Consulting Services, not to exceed. $1,825,808 Subconsultant "A" Ninyo and Moore Raw Labor $30,957 Fringe Rate 25% (% X Raw Labor) $7,739 Burdened labor $38,696 (Raw Labor + Fringe Rate) Overhead 104% $40,244 (% X Burden Labor) Subtotal (Burden $78,940 Labor + Overhead) Profit 10% (overhead $7,894 + burdened labor) Total Direct Costs, not $37,514 to exceed TOTAL — Subconsultant "A" Consulting Services, not to exceed. $124,348 Subconsultant "B" E2, Inc Raw Labor $96,038 Fringe Rate 38% (% X Raw Labor) $36,494 PDSA -2- JOB NO. 5-50 Revised 2/17/00 Burdened labor $132,532 (Raw Labor + Fringe Rate) Overhead 77.5% $102,712 (% X Burden Labor) Subtotal (Burden $235,244 Labor + Overhead) Profit 9.96% $23,430 (overhead + burdened labor) Total Direct Costs, not $8,000 to exceed TOTAL — Subconsultant "B" Consulting Services, not to exceed. $266,674 Subconsultant "C" Technology Performance Group Raw Labor $51,041 Fringe Rate 23% (% X Raw Labor) 11 739 Burdened labor (Raw Labor + Fringe Rate) Overhead 61.095% (% X Burden Labor) $62,780 38 355 Subtotal (Burden Labor + Overhead) $101,135 Profit 10% $ 10,114 (overhead + burdened labor) Total Direct Costs, not $22,250 to exceed TOTAL — Subconsultant "C" Consulting Services, not to exceed. $ 133,499 Subconsultants under $100,000 Melchior Land Surveying, Inc. Darnell & Associates Sofeprobe, Inc. Wilson, Ihrig, & Associates, Inc. Subtotal GRAND TOTAL for Design Services, not to exceed: $35,500 $21,000 $32,544 $36,600 $125,644 $2,475,973 PDSA -3- JOB NO. 5-50 Revised 2/17/00 * For any Subconsultant whose fees for services are greater than or equal to $100,000 (excluding out-of-pocket costs), Consultant shall pay to Subconsultant total compensation in accordance with Subconsultant services above. ** For any subconsultant whose fees for service are less than $100,000, Consultant may pay to Subconsultant, total compensation on an hourly rate basis. DISTRICT shall pay to Consultant the actual costs of Subconsultant fees and charges, in an amount not to exceed $125,644. Profit for Consultant and Subconsultants shall be a percentage of consulting services fees (Burdened Labor and Overhead). When the consulting or subconsulting services amount is $250,000 or less, the maximum Profit shall be 10%. Between $250,000 and $2,500,000, the maximum Profit shall be limited by a straight declining percentage between 10% and 5%. For consulting or subconsulting services fees with a value greater than $2,500,000, the maximum Profit shall be 5%. Addenda shall be governed by the same maximum Profit percentage after adding consulting services fees. B. Labor. As a portion of the total compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT, DISTRICT shall pay to CONSULTANT a sum equal to the burdened salaries (salaries plus benefits) actually paid by CONSULTANT charged on an hourly -rate basis to this project and paid to the personnel of CONSULTANT. Upon request of DISTRICT, CONSULTANT shall provide DISTRICT with certified payroll records of all employees' work that is charged to this project. C. Overhead. As a portion of the total compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT, DISTRICT shall compensate CONSULTANT for overhead at a rate equal to 95% of burdened labor paid by CONSULTANT pursuant to paragraph B hereof. DISTRICT shall compensate Subconsultant A for overhead at a rate equal to 104% of burdened labor as shown in the table. DISTRICT shall compensate Subconsultant B for overhead at a rate equal to 77.5% of burdened labor as shown in the table. DISTRICT shall compensate Subconsultant C for overhead at a rate equal to 61.095% of burdened labor as shown in the table D. Profit. As a portion of the total compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT, DISTRICT shall pay a profit of $98,359 for all services rendered by CONSULTANT for this project. District shall pay a profit of $7,894 for all services rendered by Subconsultant A for this project. District shall pay a profit of $23,430 for all services rendered by Subconsultant B for this project. PDSA -4- JOB NO. 5-50 Revised 2/17/00 District shall pay a profit of $10,114 for all services rendered by Subconsultant C for this project. E. Subconsultants. For any subconsultant whose fees are greater than or equal to $100,000, CONSULTANT shall pay to subconsultant total compensation in accordance with paragraphs B, C, and D above. For any subconsultant whose fees are less than $100,000, CONSULTANT may pay to subconsultant, total compensation on an hourly -rate basis per attached Schedule. DISTRICT shall pay to CONSULTANT the actual costs of subconsultant fees and charges in an amount not to exceed $125,644. F. Direct Costs. DISTRICT shall pay to CONSULTANT the actual costs of permits and associated fees, travel and licenses for an amount not to exceed $99,700. DISTRICT shall also pay to CONSULTANT actual costs for equipment rentals, leases or purchases with prior approval of the District. Upon request, CONSULTANT shall provide to DISTRICT receipts and other documentary records to support CONSULTANT's request for reimbursement of these amounts. All incidental expenses shall be included in overhead pursuant to paragraph C above. (See Attachment B). DISTRICT shall pay to Subconsultant A the actual direct costs for an amount not to exceed $37,514. DISTRICT shall pay to Subconsultant B the actual direct costs for an amount not to exceed $8,000. DISTRICT shall pay to Subconsultant C the actual direct costs for an amount not to exceed $22,250. 3. REALLOCATION OF TOTAL COMPENSATION. DISTRICT, by its Director of Engineering, shall have the right to approve a reallocation of the incremental amounts constituting the total compensation, provided that the total compensation is not increased. 4. PAYMENT. A. CONSULTANT may submit monthly or periodic statements requesting payment for those items included in paragraphs 213, 2C, 2D, 2E and 2F hereof in the format as required by DISTRICT. Such requests shall be based upon the amount and value of the work and services performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement and shall be prepared by CONSULTANT and accompanied by such supporting data, including a detailed breakdown of all costs incurred and project element work performed during the period covered by the statement, as may be required by DISTRICT. Upon approval of such payment request by DISTRICT, payment shall be made to CONSULTANT as soon as practicable of one hundred PDSA -5- JOB NO. 5-50 Revised 2/17/00 percent (100%) of the invoiced amount on a per -project -element basis. If DISTRICT determines that the work under this Agreement or any specified project element hereunder, is incomplete and that the amount of payment is in excess of: The amount considered by DISTRICT's Director of Engineering to be adequate for the protection of DISTRICT; or The percentage of the work accomplished for each project element. He may, at his discretion, retain an amount equal to that which insures that the total amount paid to that date does not exceed the percentage of the completed work for each project element or the project in its entirety. B. CONSULTANT may submit periodic payment requests for each 30-day period of this Agreement for the profit as set forth in section 2D above. Said profit payment request shall be proportionate to the work actually accomplished to date on a per -project -element basis. in the event the DISTRICT's Director of Engineering determines that no satisfactory progress has been made since the prior payment, or in the event of a delay in the work progress for any reason, DISTRICT shall have the right to withhold any scheduled proportionate profit payment. C. Upon satisfactory completion by CONSULTANT of the work called for under the terms of this Agreement, and upon acceptance of such work by DISTRICT, CONSULTANT will be paid the unpaid balance of any money due for such work, including any retained percentages relating to this portion of the work. D. Upon satisfactory completion of the work performed hereunder and prior to final payment under this Agreement for such work, or prior settlement upon termination of this Agreement, and as a condition precedent thereto, CONSULTANT shall execute and deliver to DISTRICT a release of all claims against DISTRICT arising under or by virtue of this Agreement other than such claims, if any, as may be specifically exempted by CONSULTANT from the operation of the release in stated amounts to be set forth therein. 5. PREVAILING WAGES To the extent Consultant intends to employ employees who will perform work during the design and preconstruction phases of a construction contract, as more specifically defined under Labor Code Section 1720, Consultant shall be subject to prevailing wage requirements with respect to such employees. 6. INSURANCE. PDSA -6- JOB NO. 5-50 Revised 2/17/00 A. General. i. Insurance shall be issued and underwritten by insurance companies acceptable to DISTRICT. ii. Insurers must have an "A-" Policyholder's Rating, or better, and Financial Rating of at least Class Vill, or better, in accordance with the most current A.M. Best's Guide Rating. However, the District will accept State Compensation Insurance Fund, for the required policy of Worker's Compensation Insurance subject to District's option to require a change in insurer in the event the State Fund financial rating is decreased below "B". Further, the District will require Contractor to substitute any insurer whose rating drops below the levels herein specified. Said substitution shall occur within 20 days of written notice to Contractor, by the District or its agent iii. Coverage shall be in effect prior to the commencement of any work under this Agreement. B. Worker's Compensation. If CONSULTANT intends to employ employees to perform services under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain, during the term of this Agreement, worker's compensation/employer's liability insurance in the statutory amount as required by state law. Such worker's compensation insurance shall be endorsed to provide for a waiver of subrogation against the DISTRICT. C. Errors and Omission Coverage. CONSULTANT shall maintain in full force and effect, throughout the term of this Agreement, standard industry form professional negligence errors and omissions insurance coverage written on basis in an amount of not less than Two Million (2,000,000) Dollars per claim or occurrence, in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. If the policy of insurance is written on a "claims made" basis, said policy shall be continued in full force and effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, and for a period of five (5) years from the date of the completion of the services hereunder. In the event of termination of said policy during this period, CONSULTANT shall obtain continuing insurance coverage for the prior acts or omissions of CONSULTANT during the course of performing services under the terms of this Agreement. Said coverage shall be evidenced by either a new policy evidencing no gap in coverage or to obtain separate extended "tail" coverage with the present or new carrier. In the event the present policy of insurance is written on an "occurrence" basis, said policy shall be continued in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, or until completion of the services provided for in this Agreement, whichever is later. In the PDSA -7- JOB NO. 5-50 Revised 2/17/00 event of termination of said policy during this period, new coverage shall be obtained for the required period to insure for the prior acts of CONSULTANT during the course of performing services under the terms of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall provide to DISTRICT a certificate of insurance in a form acceptable to DISTRICT indicating the deductible or self - retention amounts and the expiration date of said policy, and shall provide renewal certificates not less than ten (10) days prior to the expiration of each policy term. D. Notice of Cancel lation/Termination of Insurance. The above policy/policies of insurance shall not terminate, nor shall they be canceled, nor the coverage reduced, until after thirty (30) days' written notice is given to DISTRICT, except that ten (10) days' notice shall be given if there is a cancellation due to failure to pay a premium. E. Proof of Insurance Requirements. CONSULTANT shall submit the certificate of insurance, including the deductible or self -retention amount, to DISTRICT's Insurance Administrator for certification that the insurance requirements of this Agreement have been satisfied prior to commencement of any work under this Agreement. 7. SCOPE CHANGES. In the event of a change in the scope of the proposed project, requested by DISTRICT, the parties hereto shall execute an addendum to this Agreement setting forth with particularity all terms of the new Agreement, including but not limited to any additional CONSULTANT's fees. 8. PROJECT TEAM AND SUBCONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT shall provide to DISTRICT, prior to execution of this Agreement, the names and full description of all subconsultants and CONSULTANT's project team members anticipated to be used on this project by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall include a description of the scope of work to be done by each subconsultant and each CONSULTANT's project team member. CONSULTANT shall include the respective compensation amounts for CONSULTANT and each subconsultant on a per -project -element basis, broken down as indicated in paragraph 2 above. There shall be no substitution of the listed subconsultants and CONSULTANT's project team members without prior written approval by DISTRICT. 9. ENGINEERING REGISTRATION. The personnel of CONSULTANT is comprised of registered engineers and a staff of specialists and draftsmen in each department. The firm itself is not a registered engineer, but represents and agrees that wherever in the performance of this Agreement requires the services of a registered engineer. Such services hereunder will be performed under the direct supervision of registered engineers. PDSA -8- JOB NO.5-50 Revised 2/17/00 10. LEGAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PARTIES. The legal relationship between the parties hereto is that of an independent contractor and nothing herein shall be deemed to make CONSULTANT an employee of DISTRICT. 11. \thvent ATION. DISTRICT may terminate this Agreement at any time, cause, upon giving thirty (30) days written notice to CONSULTANT. In of such termination, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to sation for work performed on a prorated basis through and including ctive date of termination. CONSUL NT shall be permitted to terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days writte notice only if CONSULTANT is not compensated for billed amounts in a cordance with the provisions of this Agreement, when the same are due. Notice of terminat n shall be mailed to DISTRICT at: ORANGE COUNTY NITATION DISTRICT P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 927 -8127 Attention of Board Secreta Notice of termination shall be Nailed to CONSULTANT at: MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. 8001 Irvine Center Drive, #1100 Irvine, CA. 92618 A+� ; �aseeR R. Lnhu(&%N I P r_' . 12. DOCUMENTS AND STUDY MATERIAL . The documents and study materials for this project shall become the roperty of DISTRICT upon the termination or completion of the work. CON ULTANT agrees to furnish to DISTRICT copies of all memoranda, correspo dence, computation and study materials in its files pertaining to the work desc ed in this Agreement, which is requested in writing by DISTRICT. 13. COMPLIANCE. CONSULTANT certifies by the exe tion of this Agreement that it pays employees not less than the minimum wa as defined by law, and that it does not discriminate in its employment with rega to race, color, religion, sex or national origin; that it is in compliance wit all federal, state and local directives and executive orders regarding non-discri ation in employment; and that it agrees to demonstrate positively an aggressively the principle of equal opportunity in employment. 14. CONTRACT EXECUTION AUTHORIZATION. Both DISTRICT d CONSULTANT do covenant that each individual executing this do ument by and on behalf of each party is a person duly authorized to execute ntracts for that party. 15. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event of a dispute arising between the parties regarding performance or interpretation of this Agreement, the disp to IN PDSA -9- JOB NO. 5-50 Revised 2117/00 10. LEGAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PARTIES. The legal relationship between the parties hereto is that of an independent contractor and nothing herein shall be deemed to make CONSULTANT an employee of DISTRICT. 11. TERMINATION. DISTRICT may terminate this Agreement at any time, without cause, upon giving thirty (30) days written notice to CONSULTANT. In the event of such termination, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to compensation for work performed on a prorated basis through and including the effective date of termination. CONSULTANT shall be permitted to terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice only if CONSULTANT is not compensated for billed amounts in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, when the same are due. Notice of termination shall be mailed to DISTRICT at: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention of Board Secretary Notice of termination shall be mailed to CONSULTANT at: MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. 8001 Irvine Center Drive, #1100 Irvine, CA. 92618 R++„ ; aosco K R. Li�oj(b 12. DOCUMENTS AND STUDY MATERIALS. The documents and study materials for this project shall become the property of DISTRICT upon the termination or completion of the work. CONSULTANT agrees to furnish to DISTRICT copies of all memoranda, correspondence, computation and study materials in its files pertaining to the work described in this Agreement, which is requested in writing by DISTRICT. 13. COMPLIANCE. CONSULTANT certifies by the execution of this Agreement that it pays employees not less than the minimum wage as defined by law, and that it does not discriminate in its employment with regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin; that it is in compliance with all federal, state and local directives and executive orders regarding non-discrimination in employment; and that it agrees to demonstrate positively and aggressively the principle of equal opportunity in employment. 14. CONTRACT EXECUTION AUTHORIZATION. Both DISTRICT and CONSULTANT do covenant that each individual executing this document by and on behalf of each party is a person duly authorized to execute contracts for that party. 15. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event of a dispute arising between the parties regarding performance or interpretation of this Agreement, the dispute PDSA -9- JOB NO.5-50 Revised 2/17/00 shall be resolved by binding arbitration under the auspices of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service ("JAMS"), or similar organization or entity conducting alternate dispute resolution services. 16. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND NECESSARY DISBURSEMENTS. If any action at law or inequity or if any proceeding in the form of an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which he may be entitled. 17. PROGRESS REPORTS. Monthly progress reports shall be submitted for review by the tenth day of the following month and must include as a minimum: 1) current activities, 2) future activities, 3) potential items that are not included in the Scope of Work, 4) concerns and possible delays, 5) percentage of completion, and 6) budget status. 18. WARRANTY. CONSULTANT shall perform its services in accordance with generally accepted industry and professional standards. If, within the 12- month period following completion of its services, DISTRICT informs CONSULTANT that any part of the services fails to meet those standards, CONSULTANT shall, within the time prescribed by DISTRICT, take all such actions as are necessary to correct or complete the noted deficiency(ies). 19. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT. In no event shall CONSULTANT have any liability to District for special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages, including specifically but without limitation, loss of profits or revenue, or loss of use. 20. INDEMNIFICATION To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend (at CONSULTANT'S sole cost and expense and with legal counsel approved by DISTRICT, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld), protect and hold harmless DISTRICT and all of DISTRICT'S officers, directors, employees, consultants, and agents (collectively the "Indemnified Parties"), from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities, causes of action, suits, arbitration awards, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, disbursements and court costs, and all other professional, expert or CONSULTANT'S fees and costs and DISTRICT'S general and administrative expenses; individually, a "Claim"; collectively, "Claims") which may arise from or are in any manner related, directly or indirectly, to any work performed, or any operations, activities, or services provided by CONSULTANT in carrying out its obligations under this Agreement (including, without limitation, the negligent and/or willful acts, errors and/or omissions of CONSULTANT, its principals, officers, agents, employees, CONSULTANT'S suppliers, consultants, subconsultants, subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them) regardless of any contributing negligence or strict liability of an PDSA -10- JOB NO. 5-50 Revised 2/17/00 Indemnified Party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require CONSULTANT to indemnify the Indemnified Parties from any Claim arising solely from: (1) the active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties; or (2) a natural disaster or other act of God, such as an earthquake; or (3) the independent action of a third party who is neither one of the Indemnified Parties nor the CONSULTANT, nor its principal, officer, agent, employee, nor CONSULTANT'S supplier, consultant, subconsultant, subcontractor, nor anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them. Exceptions (1) through (3) above shall not apply, and Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify the Indemnified Parties, from Claims arising from more than one cause if any such cause taken alone would otherwise result in the obligation to indemnify hereunder. CONSULTANT'S liability for indemnification hereunder is in addition to any liability CONSULTANT may have to DISTRICT for a breach by CONSULTANT of any of the provisions of this Agreement. Under no circumstances shall the insurance requirements and limits set forth in this Agreement be construed to limit CONSULTANT'S indemnification obligation or other liability hereunder. The terms of this Agreement are contractual and the result of negotiation between the parties hereto. Accordingly, any rule of construction of contracts (including, without limitation, California Civil Code Section 1654) that ambiguities are to be construed against the drafting party, shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement. DUTY TO DEFEND The duty to defend hereunder is wholly independent of and separate from the duty to indemnify and such duty to defend shall exist regardless of any ultimate liability of CONSULTANT. Such defense obligation shall arise immediately upon presentation of a Claim by any person if, without regard to the merit of the Claim, such Claim could potentially result in an obligation to indemnify one or more Indemnified Parties, and upon written notice of such Claim being provided to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT by any Indemnified Party or the payment or advance of defense costs by any Indemnified Party shall not be a condition precedent to enforcing such Indemnified Parry's rights to indemnification hereunder. CONSULTANT'S indemnification obligation hereunder shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement until such time as action against the Indemnified Parties for such matter indemnified hereunder is fully and finally barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 21. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the Parties and supersedes all previous negotiations between them pertaining to the subject matter thereof. PDSA -11- JOB NO. 5-50 Revised 2/17100 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed in the name of DISTRICT, by its officers thereunto duly authorized, and CONSULTANT as of the day and year first above written. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Approved Date ng Manager MD:eh EDMS: 003810255 Attachments Scope of Work (Attachment "A") By `0/ air, Board of Director Date _Secretary,- and ofPirectors Date B-id-aC Co acts/Pur n haling Mager Date ,4P 4aj t a. PDSA -12- JOB NO.5-50 Revised 2/17/00 ATTACHMENT "A" SCOPE OF WORK REPLACEMENT OF ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-50 January 17, 2006 Revised May 15, 2006 Revisions reflect changes to the scope of work resulting from contract negotiations with selected Consultant and from the implementation of Revision F of the OCSD Design Guidelines. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 1 of 73 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................4 II. BACKGROUND, GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PROJECT ELEMENTS ....... 4 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................4 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................5 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ELEMENTS.........................................................................5 1. New Pump Station Design...........................................................................................5 2. Modification to Gravity Sewers and Force Mains......................................................5 3. Demolition and Abandonment of Existing Pump Station.........................................6 4. Demolition of Existing On -site Buildings...................................................................6 5. Mitigation of Existing Geological/Geotechnical Conditions.....................................6 6. Coordination with the OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship and Community Outreach.......................................................................................................................6 III. PROJECT SCHEDULE........................................................................................................7 IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION...........................................................................................8 1. Phase 1 — Project Development (Performed by District staff, not included in project).........................................................................................................................9 2. Phase 2 — Preliminary Design.....................................................................................9 2.1 Preliminary Design Report(PDR)..........................................................................9 2.1.1 RCM — Functions, Performance Standards and Operating Context 10 2.1.2 Quantification of Risks 11 2.1.3 Technical Memorandum 1 — Design Parameters 11 2.1.4 Technical Memorandum 2 — Utility Research and Agency Contacts 12 2.1.5 Technical Memorandum 3 — Facility Operation and Maintenance 15 2.1.6 Technical Memorandum 4 — Preliminary System Hydraulic Analysis 16 2.1.7 Miscellaneous Hydraulic Analysis 21 2.1.8 Technical Memorandum 5 — Electrical 21 2.1.9 Technical Memorandum 6 — Instrumentation and Controls 22 2.1.10 Technical Memorandum 7 — Implementation Plan 23 2.1.11 Miscellaneous Plans 24 2.1.12 Technical Memorandum 8 — Noise Report 25 2.1.13 Technical Memorandum 9 — Draft Odor Assessment and Control Plan 25 2.1.14 Technical Memorandum 10 — Summary of Existing Geotechnical Data and Mitigation Recommendations 29 2.1.15 Technical Memorandum 11 — Architectural 30 2.1.16 Technical Memorandum 12 — Preliminary Drawings 30 2.1.17 RCM/RCS Analysis 32 2.1.18 Life Cycle Costing 33 2.1.19 Justification of RCM/RCS Recommendations 33 EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 2 of 73 2.2 Project Management...........................................................................................33 2.2.1 Project Integration 33 2.2.2 Scope Management 34 2.2.3 Project Scheduling 35 2.2.4 Progress Reporting 35 2.2.5 Project Invoicing 36 2.2.6 Project Communications 36 2.2.7 Quality Control 41 2.2.8 Management of Subconsultants 43 2.2.9 Coordination with other Projects 43 3. Phase 3 — Design.......................................................................................................43 3.1 Final Design........................................................................................................43 3.1.1 Design Submittal 1 (DS1) 44 3.1.2 Design Submittal 2 (DS2) — NO LONGER REQUIRED, AS NEGOTIATED 47 3.1.3 Design Submittal 3 (DS3) 48 3.1.4 RCM Gap Analysis and Evaluation 49 3.1.5 Final Design Submittal (FDS) 50 3.2 Project Management...........................................................................................51 3.2.1 Project Integration 51 3.2.2 Scope Management 51 3.2.3 Project Scheduling 51 3.2.4 Project Reporting 51 3.2.5 Project Invoicing 51 3.2.6 Project Communication 51 3.2.7 Quality Control 58 3.2.8 Management of Subconsultants 58 3.2.9 Coordination with other Projects 62 3.3 Bid Support Services...........................................................................................62 3.4 Environmental Documentation............................................................................63 3.5 Permitting............................................................................................................63 4. PHASE 4 — CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION SERVICES ...............................65 5. PHASE 5 — COMMISSIONING SERVICES.................................................................66 6. PHASE 6 — CLOSE OUT.............................................................................................67 V. GENERAL REQUIREMEMENTS.......................................................................................67 1. GENERAL...................................................................................................................67 2. PROJECT -SPECIFIC DEVIATIONS FROM ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES..69 VI. STAFF ASSISTANCE........................................................................................................72 EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 3 of 73 I. SUMMARY The existing Rocky Point Pump Station (station) has reached the end of its useful life. Because of age, physical size of the station, restricted work area, and the inability to keep the current station running while making all repairs and improvements, rehabilitation of the existing station is not possible. Therefore, the Consultant will provide engineering services for the replacement of the existing Rocky Point Pump Station on new land acquired by the Orange County Sanitation District (District). The new station will be designed and constructed to meet current electrical, building, safety and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards, as well as, improved operation and maintenance access. The existing station would be decommissioned upon startup of the new station. II. BACKGROUND, GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PROJECT ELEMENTS BACKGROUND The existing Rocky Point Pump Station is located at 1575 West Coast Highway in the City of Newport Beach. The station lies within the boundaries of the Balboa Bay Club (1221 West Cost Highway), adjacent to the Orange Coast College (OCC) School of Sailing and Seamanship. The station was built in the early 1940's for the City of Newport Beach and later transferred over to the District. The new replacement station will be located on a four -parcel site, 1700 through 2000 West Coast Highway, across the street from the OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship. The existing station consists of a small above ground electrical control panel and a below ground wet well and pump/electrical room that houses the electrical switch gear. The pump room is equipped with two duty and one stand-by pump rated for a total designed capacity of 4.39 million gallons per day (mgd). Presently, the station can handle approximately 5.5 mgd when all three pumps are running under high wet well levels. Flows in excess of the station's maximum capacity or during power outages are stored in the upstream collection system. Storage in the collection system is estimated to be approximately 15 minutes at peak flows and as much as two hours at low flows. Future one -hour average flows, according to the 1989 Master Plan, are projected to reach 5.84 mgd by 2020. In 1999, the District hired MacDonald Stevens Engineers to prepare an assessment report on 17 pump stations throughout the service area. The report entitled, Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations, documented the deficiencies and recommended modifications or relocation for each pump station. The report found deficiencies related to the latest federal and state codes (e.g. seismic, electrical, safely) and District standards pertaining to operation and maintenance, safety and spill prevention. Therefore, the District is proposing to replace the station to increase capacity, provide station reliability and personal safety, and reduce the potential for sewage spills. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 4 of 73 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The purpose of this project is to prepare the construction documents necessary to complete the relocation of the Rocky Point Pump Station and to construct a new facility that meets national and state codes, utilizing current District Design Guidelines, Rev. F (see Exhibit 1). Consultant will be provided with an example of the deliverable requirements of a similar project that includes detailed design features. The project will include the design of a new pump station and all appurtenances located on property acquired by the District across the street from the existing station. The project would consist of a below ground wet well and pump room, and an above ground electrical control building and generator room. The project would also involve reconfiguring the upstream gravity sewers feeding the existing station's current site and the discharge force main piping. The existing station shall remain in service while the new station is being built. The demolition and abandonment of the existing pump station and on -site buildings is part of this design. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ELEMENTS This project includes the following key functional Project Elements: 1. New Pump Station Design The design of the new pump station will include the wet/dry well underground structure, the electrical/controls building above grade, standby generator with soundproof enclosure, power service from Edison, all power and instrumentation conduits interconnecting these facilities, slope stability mitigation measures, necessary modifications and improvements to the adjacent sidewalk (including landscaping, curb and gutter), all other on site components required to provide a fully functionally pump station. The design shall be closely coordinated with and shall take into account the requirements of the future facility proposed by the OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship. Another entity directly affected by the project consists of residents in the neighborhood located on the bluff above the site. The design shall also include measures to minimize the inconveniences these residents may be subjected to as identified in the 2004 Rocky Point Pump Station Replacement Project Final Environmental Impact Report (Rocky Point Final EIR). The entrance switchboard shall be designed to supply power to the pump station only. The OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship facility will be fed from a separate power source. Each shall have its own revenue meter. 2. Modification to Gravity Sewers and Force Mains The proposed new pump station is located approximately 350-400 feet west of the existing one. The modifications to the gravity lines and force mains, which are required to connect the new pump station to the existing system, present a number of challenges. The existing station must be kept operational during the construction of the new station and pipelines. Additionally, most of the pipelines to be modified are located in or along the Pacific Coast Highway and fall under Caltrans jurisdiction. It is vital that pump station service disruptions be minimized to avoid EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 5 of 73 sewage spills. Also, the design and construction of the new connecting pipelines should strive to minimize inconveniences to the public and surrounding businesses. 3. Demolition and Abandonment of Existing Pump Station The demolition and abandonment of the existing pump station will take place on the property of the Balboa Bay Club. The existing station would be abandoned upon startup of the new pump station; its equipment and piping would be salvaged. The upper five (5) feet of the below grade structure would be removed. The hole created by the removal and remaining portion of the structure would then be filled with cement slurry and the pavement repaired to match existing conditions. Careful planning is required to avoid significant disturbances to the residents. 4. Demolition of Existing On -site Buildings Four structures currently exist on the project site: 1) one 1,250 square foot (sf) building that serves as an office for the H&S Yacht boat sales operation, 2) a 480 sf building used for storage, 3) a two-story office building, and 4) an antique shop. The on -site structures and utilities shall be demolished to make room for the new pump station and the new OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship educational building. The existing buildings may contain asbestos and lead paint. Therefore, the Consultant shall perform a hazardous materials survey of the existing buildings. All existing building components, including utilities, grade beams and slabs, will be removed. The entire site will be graded and paved for use as a parking lot. 5. Mitigation of Existing GeologicallGeotechnical Conditions The new pump station is located at the foot of a slope, which may present some risk of slippage. The Consultant shall carefully evaluate such possibility, and recommend and implement the design required to stabilize the slope and prevent a landslide. A second known geological condition was revealed during the preliminary subsurface investigation. Naturally occurring crude oil was found at relatively shallow depth. This project element has to mitigate the naturally occurring oil odors and gases, such that these emissions would not impact the community during and after construction. 6. Coordination with the OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship and Community Outreach The new pump station will be located on a four parcel property that will leave a significant portion of the property available for other uses. The OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship is looking to expand their educational programs and build a two-story building and pedestrian bridge linking this property with their main educational facilities located directly across the street at 1801 West Coast EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 6 of 73 Highway. Therefore, close coordination between the two agencies will be necessary throughout the project. Coordination may include but is not limited to: attending design, landscaping and architectural coordination meetings, assisting District staff with subdivision work or lot line adjustment of unused property, and reviewing College design plans to insure they do not conflict or restrict the use of the new pump station. During site investigation, preliminary plans were prepared showing how the new station and the new OCC educational building would co -exist on the property. These preliminary plans will be provided to the Consultant. Consultant is also required to assist District staff with community outreach. Architectural alternatives will be created and presented to the community and City of Newport Beach staff for review and approval. Community outreach will be done during preliminary design to avoid extensive rework later in the project. It is vital that the new pump station architecture be approved before proceeding further with design. Ill. PROJECT SCHEDULE Consultant shall adhere to the following schedule: Major Milestones Deadline (weeks from the contract start- NTP) Kickoff Meeting 1 Preliminary Engineering Workshop 1 (PEW-1) 9 Preliminary Engineering Workshop 2 (PEW-2) 14 Preliminary Engineering Workshop 3 (PEW-3) 18 PDR Constructability Workshop 24 Provide Draft Preliminary Design Report (PDR) 37 Provide Final Preliminary Design Report (FPDR) 43 Provide Design Submittal Workshop 1 (DSW 1) 47 Provide Design Submittal 1 (DS 1) 51 Constructability Workshop 55 Provide Design Submittal Workshop 2 (DSW 2) 60 EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 7 of 73 Provide Design Submittal 2 (DS 2) 64 Provide Design Submittal Workshop 3 (DSW 3) 73 Provide Design Submittal 3 (DS 3) 77 Provide Final Design Submittal (FDS) 87 Provide Bidding Services 91 Complete Construction and Installation Services 183 Complete Commissioning Services (begins during const.) 183 Proiect Closeout 209 TOTAL SCHEDULE TIME 209 The above schedule takes into account the District review period for each project submittal as specified in Exhibit 2 — Project Milestone Matrix of to the Scope of Work. The review is typically one (1) month for major milestone submittals. The Consultant shall proceed with the design after each major milestone submittal. The Consultant's schedule in the proposal must include all the major milestones listed above as well as District review periods for major submittals and workshops. The District may consider an alternate Consultant -proposed schedule provided it reduces the overall project schedule and meets the District's objectives. Schedule reductions are only acceptable during the preliminary design report and the final design preparation. IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION All District Projects are to be delivered using the Capital Project Management Life Cycle. Consultant shall provide engineering services for all Project Elements listed in Section II of this Scope of Work in the following phases: 1. Phase 1 — Project Development (Performed by District staff, not included in project) 2. Phase 2 — Preliminary Design 3. Phase 3 — Design 4. Phase 4 — Construction and Installation Services 5. Phase 5 — Commissioning Services EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 8 of 73 6. Phase 6 — Close Out Consultant shall provide engineering services for all Project Elements listed in this Scope of Work for all the Phases, except Phase 1. 1. Phase 1 — Project Development (Performed by District staff, not included in roiect 2. Phase 2 — Preliminary Design Preliminary Design includes two main elements: Preliminary Design Report and Project Management. Consultant shall develop man-hour and cost estimates for the tasks in each of these elements and include them in the Cost Proposal. As part of the Work Breakdown Structure submittal for the proposal (see subsection 2.2.2 Scope Management), the District may also require a further breakdown of costs and request that they be included in the monthly invoice. This will be discussed in the kick-off meeting. Consultant shall refer to Section V of this Scope of Work, Modifications to the Engineering Design Guidelines, Section 01.4 "Preparation of Project Deliverables" for PDR deliverable requirements. Descriptions of the tasks and deliverables for each of the two main elements are provided below. 2.1 Preliminary Design Report (PDR) The purpose of the Preliminary Design Report (PDR) is to design a replacement pump station that meets the District's design requirements. The PDR shall consist of a series of technical memoranda that document the conceptual design of the proposed facilities. The memoranda shall be prepared and submitted to the District for review as they are completed and subsequently discussed in detail through a series of review meetings and workshops. The District's intention is for all significant equipment decisions and building space layouts to be made before the start of Phase 3 — Design. At the end of Phase 2 — Preliminary Design, all major design elements shall be fixed and major equipment, building footprints, building architecture, major structural elements and process pipelines, electrical single line diagrams, process flow diagrams, Process and Control Diagrams (P&ID), SAT Input and Output List, Local Control Panel (LCP) layout and size, and operating philosophies should be well defined and established. The extent of the design and the number and type of drawings should also be established. Written comments provided by the District during the meetings and workshops shall be incorporated into the draft technical memoranda. When technical memoranda are complete, they shall be combined to form a Draft PDR. The District's comments to the Draft PDR shall be incorporated into the Final PDR for submission to the District. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 9 of 73 Consultant shall refer to Section V of this Scope of Work, Modifications to the Engineering Design Guidelines, Section 01.4 "Preparation of Project Deliverables" for PDR deliverable requirements. Consultant shall also refer to the Project Milestone Matrix (see Exhibit 2) and the applicable Sections of Appendix A of the District Engineering Design Guidelines for additional design submittal requirements. Documents that must accompany the PDR include but are not limited to the following: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, construction cost estimates, Decision Log, meeting and workshop notes, Project Support Documentation including calculations, information research and other required materials and construction costs and backup data. The PDR shall include: 2.1.1 RCM — Functions. Performance Standards and Operating- Context 1. The Consultant is required to document the functions and performance standards of the asset to be designed. In other words, define where and how the asset is being used (operating context) to fulfill a specific function or functions, together with the associated desired standards of performance. The Consultant is to accomplish this through a RCM facilitation process with management and technical staff. The RCM methodology utilized for this process is required to meet the SAE JA 1011 Standard: "Evaluation Criteria for Reliability -Centered Maintenance (RCM) Processes." The asset functions will form the basis for the design and will periodically be reviewed as the design is developed. 2. As background, the District performed a RCM analysis subsequent to the design of the Bitter Point Pump Station. This information will be provided to the Consultant upon request. 3. The Consultant is required to use software, spreadsheet and/or database in support of the SAE JA 1011 Standard for RCM. This software shall document all the functions, functional failures, failure modes, failure effects, preventative and predictive maintenance tasks, operational tasks, and design change recommendations. The maintenance recommendations shall reference the equipment loop tag number (primary key) and be provided to the District for eventual import into the District's Computer Maintenance Management System. 4. The Consultant shall provide a half -day training session on RCM and how it will be used to affect design. This training will be provided to all project staff and will be delivered at the start of this RCM task. The training shall also provide project staff with an understanding of the terminologies and concepts of RCM, and introduce staff to the steps that will be performed to accomplish the RCM requirements listed in this SOW. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 10 of 73 5. The Consultant is to secure approval of the functions, performance standards, and operating context from the District Project Manager before moving to the next step. 2.1.2 Quantification of Risks 1. The Consultant will utilize the RCM process to define the business goals and quantify the risks associated with the total system that is being considered. Risks are to be quantified for the following areas: safety, environment (i.e., spills) and operations. In order to determine life -cycle -costing and support design recommendations, it is important to quantify and understand the risks. This will allow the design review team to improve the design, maintenance and stocking policies based on risk acceptance criteria. Through the design, operations and maintenance of these assets, the responsible staff may attempt to improve reliability and reduce associated risks beyond what is expected and acceptable. Thus, it is important to produce an equipment list ranked by overall business criticality and goals. The quantification of risks will be facilitated by the Consultant and system experts. 2. The Consultant is to secure approval of the design risk criteria from the District Project Manager before moving to the next step. 2.1.3 Technical Memorandum 1 — Design Parameters 1. Consultant shall complete a review of the District's 1999 Final Report for the Rehabilitation of the Outlying Pump Stations (this document will be available for review only at the District's Engineering Trailer Project Management Office). 2. Consultant shall review and follow the design guidelines as provided in the District's Engineering Design Guidelines and Standards Rev. F (see Exhibit 1). 3. The Technical Memorandum (TM1) shall present a narrative, tables, and figures of the design concepts for the replacement of the pump station, including but not limited to the following: a. Building codes and regulations b. Structural requirements c. Fire Protection requirements d. All potential permit requirements (i.e., Caltrans, City of Newport Beach, etc.) e. Design safety requirements f. American Disability Act requirements g. South Coast Air Quality Management District requirements EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 11 of 73 h. Regional Water Quality Control Board construction storm water and dewatering requirements 4. Actual preliminary design calculations shall be prepared under pertinent Technical Memoranda herein (i.e., TM4, TM5, TM10, etc.). 2.1.4 Technical Memorandum 2 — Utility Research and Agency Contacts 1. Agencies and Utilities: Consultant is responsible for determining which agencies and utilities have facilities and/or jurisdiction in the project area and the utility owners within the project area, whether listed as follows or not. a. City of Newport Beach b. County of Orange c. Orange County Public Facilities Resources Department d. Orange County Flood Control District e. Orange County Water District f. Metropolitan Water District g. Air Quality Management District (AQMD) h. California Coastal Commission i. Southern California Gas Company (Distribution and Transmission) j. Southern California Edison Company (Distribution and Transmission) k. GTE, SBC, Pacific Bell, and/or other telecommunications companies I. Cable Television Companies m. Oil Companies n. Railroads and/or railroad agencies o. State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) 2. Notification and Determination of Scheduled Projects: a. Consultant shall contact, in writing, all jurisdictional agencies and utilities to inform them of District's project. Consultant shall request plans showing any of the agency's or utility's facilities, pipelines, etc. in the project area. Consultant shall also request plans and schedules for any proposed construction in the project area. Consultant shall arrange for collection of utility information in person, if required by any agency. The District Project Manager shall arrange for any letters of verification that may be required by various agencies as a pre -requisite to information release. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 12 of 73 b. Consultant shall develop a schedule to minimize project conflicts and/or coordinate local agency projects with the District. 3. USA Contact: Consultant shall contact Underground Service Alert (USA) and request a substructure listing for the project area. The list is not intended to be inclusive, but to serve as a utility owner checklist to insure that each utility owner is notified and utility plans are requested and received. 4. Utility Research: a. Consultant shall perform a thorough search of all utilities, regardless of size and all other facilities above or below ground. The search shall include utilities within the public right - of way and those located on private property impacted by the proposed project. The search shall include the records and plans of the District and all public and private companies and utilities. Consultant shall personally visit each agency/company and search through all available plans, files and documents. b. District's "As Built/Record" plans may be incomplete in regards to the routing of individual utilities, pipelines, etc. in the vicinity of the Rocky Point Pump Station. Consultant shall cross reference District's records with those of the other agencies, companies and utilities owner records. 5. Detailed Search: For all areas that may need to be excavated, Consultant shall complete a detailed search by cross referencing District's records with those of the other agencies, companies and other utilities owner records. These may include, but not limited to, oil, gas, fuel, water, and sewer pipelines; traffic control facilities, telephone and electrical conduit and duct banks, storm drains, manholes, and other structures. 6. On -Site Inspection: An on -site inspection shall be made of each area. During the on -site inspection, Consultant shall note all visible features that indicate utilities within the project area. Agency utility plans shall be compared to actual on -site visible features. Non - visible features will be located using a Utility Locating Subcontractor. The Subcontractor will mark the location of all buried utilities within the excavation zones. The Consultant will provide the Subcontractor with preliminary utility plans. After the field research is complete, the Consultant will be responsible for correcting the preliminary utility plans so that all Subcontractor located utilities are shown. Utility discrepancies must be resolved by the Consultant before utility plans are finalized. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 13 of 73 7. Documentation: Consultant shall document the contacts and information requested and received, including those from USA. District shall be copied on all correspondence between Consultant and public and private agencies, and utility companies. Consultant shall submit a copy of all documentation to the District with an itemized submittal letter. Consultant's Project Manager shall sign the transmittal cover letter and the cover letter shall confirm that Consultant has sent a representative to each agency/company/utility, performed on -site inspections for each utility, and has listed the utilities. The list of utilities shall include service laterals. 8. Spot Excavation of Key Utilities: Consultant shall "pothole" all key utility locations, obtain missing design data and document all information in a manner acceptable to District. Consultant shall provide all work necessary, including, but not limited to, documentation of information, notification of USA's "Dig Alert", providing field survey, obtaining required permits, submission of traffic control plans, setting up traffic control, excavating, backfilling, repairing pavement, and incorporating the "pothole" information into the construction documents. "Soft" excavation methods such as vacuum extraction are preferred; however, excavation methods shall be chosen to adequately define the utility. Crosscut trenches may be preferred for defining some utility locations. 9. Pothole Survey & Subcontractor Work: Consultant shall provide a licensed land surveyor or hire a licensed survey subcontractor(s) to field locate potholes as necessary. Surveyed locations of potholes shall be tied to the same controls as used by the District. Consultant shall supply and supervise survey work and subcontractors needed to perform the pothole work. 10. Pothole Backfilling and Pavement Repair: Consultant shall backfill and repair potholes consistent with the requirements of the agency responsible for the street in which the excavation was conducted. If Consultant is unable to determine agency requirements prior to obtaining an excavation permit, Consultant shall assume the following requirements: a. The materials removed from the excavation may not be used for backfill. b. Excavation holes will need to be filled with a cement slurry mix. c. Pavement will need to be replaced to full depth plus 4 inches with Portland cement concrete. d. The excavated materials will need to be tested for hazardous materials and disposed of offsite accordingly. Testing shall be EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 14 of 73 the minimum required for classifying the materials. Minimum testing shall include an on -site Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA) test for potential hydrocarbon contaminants. Minimum testing shall include Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene and Xylene (BTEX) test per EPA guideline 8020 and Total Hydrocarbons (TPH) tests per EPA guideline should the OVA reading be equal to or greater than 45 ppm. e. If the responsible agency allows reuse of excavated material to fill potholes, then the material shall be placed with a maximum lift thickness of 4 inches and mechanically compacted. Otherwise, the Consultant shall be responsible for hauling off excess pothole material. 11. Pothole Cost: Consultant's fee proposal shall include a cost for "survey and potholes". The costs shall provide for a minimum of 25 potholes and associated survey work. 12. Utility Plots: All utilities shall be plotted both in plan and profile on a scaled drawing that can later be incorporated into scaled (1" = 40') plan drawings. 2.1.5 Technical Memorandum 3 — Facility Operation and Maintenance 1. Process Flow Diagram (PFD): Consultant shall prepare a single PFD according to the Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.8 "Process Flow Diagram (PFD)" for requirements. 2. Operating Philosophies which includes preliminary process control descriptions with information on normal, abnormal and emergency operating criteria. It is expected that this document will serve as the basis for operation and control of the facility. The Operating Philosophies will ultimately become part of the O&M manual (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.7 "Operating Philosophy" for requirements). 3. Preliminary assessment of O&M staffing requirements, consisting or identifying labor hours and types of staff (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.11 "Asset Management Plan" for requirements). 4. Technical Definitions (Process Design Criteria): This includes a definition of equipment process parameters (design criteria) needed to qualify and select process equipment. Technical definitions shall be developed for major equipment which is defined as equipment which receives preventative maintenance as part of the District's Asset Management Plan. The District's standard motor control diagrams and process control software standards shall be included in the technical definitions where application to select the equipment (see Engineering Design EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 15 of 73 Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.5 "Technical Definitions and Assumptions" for requirements). 5. Preliminary Equipment Data Sheets: Consultant may use their own forms as long as they comply with District requirements (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.13 "Equipment Catalog Data Sheets" for requirements). 6. Preliminary Equipment and Instrument Database (EID): District will provide a copy of the EID database for Consultant to begin populating. This table shall identify all equipment and instruments. For purposes of the proposal, Consultant shall estimate the number of equipment items and I/Os that will be inputted into the table during the project. Consultant shall submit the preliminary EID database for the project with information included in the equipment data sheets (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.12 "Equipment and Instrument Database (EID)" for requirements). 2.1.6 Technical Memorandum 4 — Preliminary System Hydraulic Analysis 1. The Newport Beach Trunk Sewer System (NBTSS) serves the City of Newport Beach and surrounding areas through tributary systems that are operated and maintained by their sanitary districts. The NBTSS consist of nine primary flow segments serving the major tributary areas, and seven pump stations to transport the sewage flow to OCSD's Plant No. 2. 2. Of the seven pump stations, currently four are directly responsible for the final flow conveyance to the treatment plant. These are Bay Bridge, Rocky Point, Lido and Bitter Point pumps stations. The existing configuration places these four stations in parallel, discharging to two common parallel force mains along the Pacific Coast Highway and through West Newport Oil production facilities. The discharge point of this network is an existing junction structure on the east bank of the Santa Ana River. The waste water then gravity flows through inverted siphons beneath the river into the plant for treatment. 3. OCSD hired Lee & Ro, Inc. in 2003 to model the force main network to look for ways to improve the system's capacity and redundancy. Four configurations were modeled. Results from the models are summarized in the report entitled "Newport Trunk Force Main Pipe Network System Operation Study (5-50)" and is available for review at the District's Engineering Trailer Project Management Office. Of the four configurations, the District's preferred alternative is for Bay Bridge, Rocky Point, and Lido to remain in parallel but discharge into the new Bitter Point Pump EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 16 of 73 Station using one force main. Bitter Point would then pump all flows to the plant through a single force main. 4. The existing force main system consists of two main lines (north and south mains) of various diameters (as indicated on the exhibit), a number of valves, and several cross connections between the two mains. The valves in the system are in various operational conditions. However, for the purpose of designing the new Rocky Point pump station, all valves shall be assumed fully operational, unless otherwise noted. a. Valve C-00507 on the north main is frozen in the 50% open position. This valve is critical for the operation of the system. It is assumed that this valve will be fully operational by the time the new pump station becomes functional. The current status of the valve will be considered only to establish the baseline operation system parameters and system calibration. b. Valve C-00602 from the existing Rocky Point pump station to the north main has failed in the closed position. This valve will be abandoned when the new pump station is built. The current status of the valve will be considered only to establish the baseline operation system parameters and system calibration. c. Valve C-00523 between the existing Bitter Point pump station and the north main has failed in the open position. While this open valve may slightly impact the current hydraulic behavior of the system, it is not anticipated to affect the future hydraulics when the new Bitter Point pump station will be in service. The current status of the valve will be considered only to establish the baseline operation system parameters and system calibration. 5. The Bay Bridge pump station is not currently scheduled to be upgraded from a hydraulic capacity point of view. The VFD and other electrical equipment will, however, will be replaced in the near future. 6. The goal of the District is to minimize the short and long term cost of the improvements by maintaining the Bay Bridge pump station at the current operating parameters, avoiding building replacement or parallel piping in PCH, and providing maximum possible flexibility for the operation and maintenance of the system. However, the Consultant will evaluate several possible alterations to the existing system to evaluate the operational and economical impact of such modifications. 7. The hydraulic analysis of the NBTSS shall evaluate several pumping schemes as described below. The Consultant is requested to augment the level of analysis as a function of the EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 17 of 73 results derived from the identified schemes. "What if' analysis, capital improvement costs, and life cycle cost analysis shall also be provided by Consultant for the "what if' scenarios. This information has to be thoroughly discussed in the body of TM4 and shall be summarized in a table to facilitate the comparison of pluses and minuses of all scenarios under consideration. 8. Below are brief descriptions of pumping schemes to be included in the hydraulics modeling: a. Baseline operation. • This will provide a reference to current conditions for the operation of any other scenario. • Under this scenario both force mains will be in operation, all valves open (with the exceptions indicated above), the four pump stations (Bitter Point, Lido, Rocky Point, and Bay Bridge) will be modeled based on the existing pump curves and set levels. • The force mains will discharge into the existing junction box. b. Replacement Rocky Point pump station only. • Under this scenario both force mains will be in operation (existing condition), all valves open, the three parallel pump stations (Lido, Rocky Point, and Bay Bridge) will be modeled based on the existing pump curves and set levels. • Both force mains will discharge into the new Bitter Point wet well. • Evaluate the ability of existing pump stations (Lido and Bay Bridge) to meet pumping requirements. • Size the pumps for Rocky Point to adequately meet pumping requirements. c. North force main open, south force main closed. • Analyze this scenario including the new Rocky Point and existing Bay Bridge and Lido. The force main will discharge into the new Bitter Point wet well. • Analyze system with valve C-00507 open and all other valves on this main open. • Evaluate the ability of existing pump stations (Lido and Bay Bridge) to meet pumping requirements when using only the open force main. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 18 of 73 • Determine the maximum pumping capacity of the existing pump stations (Lido and Bay Bridge) when using only the open force main. • Determine the maximum pumping capacity of Rocky Point Pump Station when using only the open force main. Assume that the pump station is equipped with the pumps selected under scenario b above. • Determine what components of the system (Lido and Bay Bridge pumps, pipes, cross -connections, etc.) would have to be upgraded to allow for adequate operation under peak wet weather flow with only the subject main open. • Determine upfront and long term costs to build, operate, and maintain the theoretically upgraded system. d. Closure for repairs and construction. • This scenario will provide only operational information when a section of force main is closed for repairs or construction (includes both south and north mains). This analysis shall not be used to size the Rocky Point pumps. Consultant shall carefully evaluate the force main system and select segments on either force main whose closure would affect the system operation the most. • Analyze this scenario including the new Rocky Point as sized under scenario b above, and existing Bay Bridge and Lido pump stations. • Analyze system with various valves closed such that various segments of either force main can be isolated and drained for repairs, valve replacement, or new tie-ins. • The force mains will discharge into the new Bitter Point wet well. • Evaluate the ability of existing pump stations (Lido and Bay Bridge) to meet pumping requirements when closing various segments of either force main. • Determine the maximum pumping capacity of the existing pump stations (Lido and Bay Bridge) when closing various segments of either force main. • Determine the maximum pumping capacity of the new Rocky Point as sized under scenario b above when closing various segments of either force main. 9. Consultant shall perform the hydraulic analysis for scenarios a-d above. The District will provide the pump station design capacity for Rocky Point. The District shall also provide the flow information EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 19 of 73 for the all other pump stations included in this system that operate in parallel. Once the information is provided by the District, the Consultant shall proceed with the hydraulic analysis. a. The hydraulic analysis to size the new Rocky Point pump station shall be done for 2 possible pump configurations (duty pumps of equal capacity and duty pumps of unequal capacities) each include 3 possible pump selections. The District prefers pumps of equal capacity; therefore, the selection and analysis of duty pump of unequal capacity shall be performed when no pumps of equal capacity can be found to meet the District's hydraulic criteria. b. The hydraulic analysis shall include case studies at each end of the speed range for each combination of pumps, high and low wet well level and high and, low force main(s) pressure. Force main pressures shall include variations due to flow from the other pump stations (Bay Bridge and Lido) as well as the range of the Hazen -Williams coefficient. The force mains also need to be evaluated to determine if the existing pipeline can afford the increased pressure and/or flow developed under some pumping conditions at Rocky Point only. Consultant shall determine if a transient analysis is required. c. The analysis shall also include a summary of the dynamics of the wet well level and pump speeds with the starting or stopping of a pump including fill and draw calculations. The analysis must show suitable overlap in capacity with the starting and stopping of a pump. Detailed calculations and graphic representation of each hydraulic case shall be submitted. d. Exhibit X contains sample hydraulic graphs prepared for the Bitter Point Pump Station Project. The Bitter Point pump station operates in series with the other stations so the hydraulic analysis was not influenced by the other stations. Since Rocky Point is only one of three stations pumping into a common force main network, the other stations must be included in the Rocky Point preliminary hydraulic analysis. Graphs shall include but not be limited to the following: • pump and system curves • overlapping pump curves • cleaning cycle system curves • NPSH normal operations graph • NPSH cleaning cycle graph e. During the hydraulic analysis, the Consultant shall focus especially on avoiding cavitation conditions (see Section 09.2.2 of the District Design Guidelines) and pump ragging. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 20 of 73 f. After selecting the pumps that best meet the design criteria for Rocky Point, the Consultant shall contact the pump manufacturer and request a system natural frequency analysis report for the selected pump and design configuration. The analysis report shall be included in the PDR submittal. 2.1.7 Miscellaneous Hydraulic Analysis 1. This separate task is hereby included to address unforeseen miscellaneous hydraulic analysis. This task does not have a defined scope of activities and is included for additional minor hydraulic modeling tasks. Therefore, the Consultant shall perform work under this task only if requested by the District's Project Manager. 2. The District reserves the right to delete this task at any time and to deduct the allocated budget from the overall project contract budget. For purpose of this proposal the Consultant shall include the fixed amount of $35,000.00 under this task. 2.1.8 Technical Memorandum 5 — Electrical 1. Consultant must obtain the District's most recent Electrical Design Policies on the following subjects before proceeding with the preliminary electrical design: tagging procedures, neutral grounding, distribution equipment naming conventions and standby generators. 2. The single -line diagram (approximately 90% complete) shall be coordinated with the Operating Philosophies and shall show information regarding auxiliary system and equipment (e.g., HVAC, lighting, sump pumps, etc.) to enable the Consultant to conservatively size equipment, rooms and occupancies at this design point. This includes loads and dimensions (see Exhibit 4). 3. Load List with motor horsepower and total demand: This list shall show all electrical loads for each voltage level. In addition, this list shall be used to classify the equipment for asset management. This shall designate equipment items which are classified as "run - to -failure" (items that are not maintained and are designed to be replaced when fail) for preventative maintenance or for predictive maintenance. 4. Electrical site plan and electrical equipment room plan: When estimating the size requirements of the Electrical Room, the Consultant will attempt to use the largest equipment available. 5. Standby power requirements: The Consultant is to provide generator sizing calculations and design criteria including fuel type, EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 21 of 73 fuel tank requirements, emission control, and noise abatement methods. 6. Demolition drawings: List of electrical, electronic, alarm, and telephone conduit and cables that pass through an existing area to be demolished but serve facilities which remain in service after the project is completed. List of equipment to be scrapped or returned to the District as spare parts. 7. Security and camera systems, including control and interface between the camera system and the lighting system. 8. Electrical system analysis report. 2.1.9 Technical Memorandum 6 — Instrumentation and Controls 1. The District has established standards for Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Programming, Operator Interface (OI) programming, a database propagation system and register addressing. The Consultant shall incorporate District standards in the P&ID drawings and in all control strategies. Control logic diagrams are not required for this project. Exhibit 6 in this SOW presents an example of the Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&I D's). 2. Non-ISA standard symbology is used to depict the District's standard logic templates in the P&ID. Control strategies shall call out appropriate District standard logic templates and describe interconnecting and custom logic. Consultant shall provide particular attention to the following: a. Tag Numbering System. Provide the basis for equipment tag numbers as developed from numbers provided by District. Consultant shall develop proposed Area Numbers for all major equipment for District review and approval. b. Process & Instrumentation Diagrams (P&ID). Each P&ID shall be coordinated with Technical Memos 1 and 3 and show all major equipment and most auxiliary equipment, valves and instrumentation and shall include I_O signal identification. The P&IDs shall be coordinated with the Operating Philosophies developed during TM3. c. Control cabinet locations, quantity, sizes and configuration. Cabinet sizes shall be based on the largest components available from District approved manufacturers and shall conform to the District's standard PLC cabinet layout for pump stations. These layout dimensions will be carried out through the final design, and shall be labeled as "maximum layout length/width/height". EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 22 of 73 d. Preliminary Communications Block Diagrams including data network block diagram, preliminary CCTV block diagram and preliminary telephone block diagram. (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.2.21 "Network Block Diagram" for requirements) e. Interim Control Plan shall be integrated into and become a part of the Implementation Plan developed during TM7. f. SAT database. Modify copy of the database provided by the District to reflect the demolition of existing facilities (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.14 "SCADA Administration Tool (SAT)" for requirements; also see exception in Section V of this Scope of Work). 2.1.10 Technical Memorandum 7 — Implementation Plan 1. Consultant shall prepare an Implementation Plan to be submitted with the Draft PDR for review. The Implementation Plan shall include but not be limited to: a. Preliminary Construction Sequencing Plan, including detailed electrical and control systems plans. At this stage the Consultant shall begin development of a detailed narrative of construction constraints and sequencing of the actual work and tie-ins, for each of the project areas. The electrical and control system portion must include a detail "Interim Control Plan" which will outline the steps necessary to migrate the electrical and controls systems from the old to the new system. This shall include, at a minimum, methods for transferring PLC control back and forth between the old and new system during testing, space consideration for the new and old equipment, maintaining the full functionality of the existing system 24/7. This information will be used to develop a detailed Critical Path Method (CPM) construction schedule during Phase 3 — Design of the project. b. Constructability issues such as, but not limited to: • Pipeline construction in or along West Coast Highway • Geotechnical issues (i.e., slope stability) • Odor control and odor collection/treatment facilities • Demolition of existing structures, including removal and disposal of hazardous materials such as asbestos and lead based paint (provide stand alone evaluation study). • Coordination with the proposed OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship facilities • Public relations 2. Temporary Handling of Sewage Flow Plan during construction, if required, that will ensure the continuity of sanitary sewer service to EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 23 of 73 each facility connected to the District facilities (see District Master Specifications, Section 02999). 3. Preliminary construction Schedule in Primavera Project Planner (P3) and Cost Estimate (see Section V of this Scope of Work, "Project Specific Deviations from Engineering Design Guidelines", Section 01.2.7 "Opinion of the Cost of Construction"). 2.1.11 Miscellaneous Plans 1. Traffic Management Plan as described in Rocky Point Final EIR: The Traffic Management Plan is necessary to reduce the impact of construction to users of West Coast Highway and neighboring business. The plan would be reviewed and approved by Caltrans and the City of Newport Beach. The plan would include the following topics: a. Restriction of construction in West Coast Highway to off peak or non -rush hour periods (and other encroachment permit conditions) b. Maintaining one lane open in each direction at all times c. Posting signage two weeks prior to any proposed lane closure d. Construction coordination with Caltrans and the City of Newport Beach in regards to other public works project already planned in the affected locations e. Restoring traffic lanes at the end of the construction day 2. Community Outreach Plan: Consultant shall prepare a community outreach plan that would be reviewed and approved by the District's Public Information Office. The plan shall include the following items: a. Identify the individuals or local groups (i.e. home owners, home owner associations, City of Newport Beach staff, businesses, etc.) to keep informed b. Narrative of strategies to keep key players informed of design and construction milestones c. Narrative describing when to best perform outreach and what to present to local groups d. Narrative describing how to solicit architectural ideas from the City of Newport Beach and community e. Narrative describing how to gain architectural approval and strategies for gaining overall project approval f. Outreach schedule g. Flowchart diagramming the overall outreach process EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 24 of 73 2.1.12 Technical Memorandum 8 — Noise Report Consultant shall secure the services of a Subconsultant to prepare a Field Findings Noise Report. Consultant shall include this report in the PDR submittal and shall include the recommendations in the Final Construction Documents to minimize noise generation during construction activities and during normal operation of the rehabilitated facility. This report shall include but not be limited to the following: a. Visit site and conduct ambient noise measurements to establish baseline b. Identify external sources of noise c. Identify potential methods for defining noise impacts d. Develop noise model consistent with noise impact assessment methods e. Determine exterior noise levels and compliance with assessment standards f. If required, develop mitigation measures to meet design standards g. Incorporate in the report the noise mitigation measures identified in the Rocky Point Final EIR h. Determine compliance with OSHA's regulations i. If needed, determine mitigation measures to meet OSHA's requirements j. Prepare written report on findings and recommendations 2.1.13 Technical Memorandum 9 — Draft Odor Assessment and Control Plan Consultant shall determine based on the Consultant's field investigation and sample analysis, and in conjunction with District staff, the requirements for an odor control/gas mitigation system prior to and during the construction phase (Temporary Equipment) and during normal operations (Permanent Equipment) of the proposed facilities if required. Consultant shall refer to Section V of this Scope of work, Modifications to the Engineering Design Guidelines, Section 01.2 "General Design Considerations" and Subsection 01.1.12 — "Odor Control." Consultant shall also refer to the following reports: a. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, dated November 4, 2003 (Phase I Report) b. Soil Gas Survey Report, dated January 19, 2004 EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 25 of 73 c. Preliminary Feasibility Study of Subsurface Gas Mitigation Alternatives for the Proposed Rocky Point Pump Station, dated May 27, 2004 (Gas Mitigation Study) d. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Section for Input into EIR for the Proposed Rocky Point Pump Station, dated May 27, 2004 e. Rocky Point Final EIR, dated August 2004 2. The Soil Gas Survey Report discovered elevated concentrations of methane (greater than 50,000 parts per million by volume) and hydrogen sulfide in the shallow subsurface and recommended "extreme caution when performing subsurface work in this area." Passive or active venting of subsurface gases may be necessary prior to, during, and after construction. 3. The Consultant shall develop a Draft Odor Assessment and Control Plan (OACP) for the construction and operation of the rehabilitated facilities included in this project. The Draft OACP shall be submitted to the District for approval prior to implementation. The Draft OACP shall include but not be limited to the following: a. List of potential odor and methane gas releasing activities during normal operation and during construction, including naturally occurring odors from the existing crude oil. The Consultant shall include the location, and expected duration of each activity with the potential for release of odors and methane gas during construction. Also, the Consultant shall consider the release of potential odors from sewage bypass activities if required. b. List of receptors, distance to receptors and potential impacts c. Baseline Conditions: The Consultant shall prepare and implement an odor and methane gas monitoring program to assess odor concentrations and explosive gas concentrations (baseline conditions) at the existing facilities. The monitoring program shall include but not be limited to: • Monitoring of ambient hydrogen sulfide concentrations (gaseous phase) and methane gas at the perimeter of the existing facilities and adjacent receptors. The monitoring shall be performed continuously for a week, in order to collect representative data to assess the potential for odor and explosive gas release under normal operating conditions of the existing facilities. • The monitoring data shall be used by the Consultant to determine odor and methane gas mitigation measures, if any, that should be implemented during construction and normal operation of the proposed facilities. The program shall include the proposed monitoring locations, and EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 26 of 73 locations for installation of gas analyzers, data recording frequency and intervals, prevailing wind direction and velocity, and the monitoring methodology. • Monitoring of hydrogen sulfide concentration in the sewage (liquid phase): The monitoring of the liquid phase shall include a sampling protocol to collect and analyze three (3) liquid samples per day at each location where there will be a potential for the release of nuisance odors during construction and/or during normal operation of the proposed facilities. The three liquid samples shall be taken at different times: one during low flow period, a second during high flow period and the third one in between. Consultant shall include the proposed sampling locations and methodology for implementation of the monitoring activities. d. Consultant shall complete the analysis and interpretation of the results from the monitoring program and categorize the different areas into high and low areas with potential for odor and methane gas release. Consultant shall consider seasonal changes and physical and chemical conditions for the recommendations of mitigation measures before, during and after construction (during the normal operations of the proposed facilities). e. Construction Monitoring Program: Consultant shall prepare a construction monitoring program to assess hydrogen sulfide and methane gas concentrations at the perimeter of the construction area and at adjacent receptors during construction. The program shall specify the monitoring equipment and requirements during construction. The program shall include but not be limited to proposed location of gas analyzers, equipment set up, data recording frequency and intervals, prevailing wind direction and velocity, and the monitoring methodology. The monitoring plan requirements shall be incorporated in the Final Construction Documents. f. List and description of recommended "Gas Analyzer" equipment to be used and the calibration procedures recommended by the manufacturer. The recommended equipment shall be capable of recording hydrogen sulfide concentrations below the threshold level of 10 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) and shall allow the downloading of the recorded data into a computer system to perform the analysis of it (see Modifications to the Engineering Design Guidelines, Section 01.1 "General Design Considerations" and Subsection 01.1.12 — "Odor Control'). g. Notification Protocol: Consultant shall include a Notification Protocol to communicate District Staff of a condition when the EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 27 of 73 ambient hydrogen sulfide concentrations reach the threshold value of 10 ppbv during construction. The same shall be true for methane gas concentrations that exceed 50,000 parts per million by volume (Lower Explosive Limit). This protocol shall be included in the Final Construction Documents. 4. Gas Collection and Treatment: After reviewing the historic documents the Consultant may determine that additional monitoring and exploration is necessary to mitigate the naturally occurring methane and hydrogen sulfide concentrations (gaseous phase) that exist at the site. The Consultant shall recommend appropriate mitigation measures as required by the Rocky Point Final EIR (the design of the collection and treatment equipment, if necessary, will be provided during DS1). The Consultant shall perform the following tasks: a. The Consultant shall propose a preferred gas mitigation alternative. Prior to proposing a preferred mitigation alternative, Consultant shall review the odor mitigation alternatives presented in the Gas Mitigation Study prepared by Environmental Support Technologies, Inc. in May, 2004. This document is available for review at the PMO trailer. b. The Consultant shall prepare a matrix to identify mitigation measures that may be implemented before, during, and after construction (normal operation of the proposed facilities) to prevent the release of nuisance odors and flammable gas. The matrix shall include a list of treatment facilities or technologies that may be implemented to minimize the release of nuisance odors and flammable gas before, during, and after construction if required. The Consultant shall determine the cost and pros/cons of each alternative. c. Consultant shall recommend a preferred gas collection and treatment alternative. The selection of the preferred alternative shall be based on review of the historic reports listed above, additional field measurements (if required), and the Consultant's gas mitigation experience. 5. Consultant shall include the cost for monitoring during the assessment of the Base Line conditions and the analytical work, including unit prices and labor requirements. Based on the actual number of tests performed in the project as determined and agreed upon by Consultant and the District, District will pay the final price in accordance with the per -unit allowance in the Consultant's proposal. 6. Consultant shall include labor hours and fees for the preparation of the Draft OACP in the proposal. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 28 of 73 2.1.14 Technical Memorandum 10 — Summary of Existing Geotechnical Data and Mitigation Recommendations 1. It is known that crude oil is naturally occurring on site at relatively shallow depth (the subject site is located above oil and gas producing strata). The site is located at the foot of an approximately 70 foot high bluff. At the top of the bluff there are several residential units, and a small public park. 2. The focus of TM10 is to thoroughly evaluate and mitigate the geotechnical concerns before, during, and after construction. Geotechnical concerns include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Gas Collection and Treatment (addressed in TM9) b. Soil and groundwater contamination (including construction dewatering disposal and costs) c. Shoring requirements d. Excavation and shoring adjacent to slopes e. Support of existing retaining walls during demolition and new construction Soil corrosion potential 3. Consultant shall review all known existing soils and inspection reports, including any applicable reports on file at the District. In addition to the reports listed in TM9, Consultant shall review the following report that was prepared for the Rocky Point EIR: a. Geotechnical Investigation Rocky Point Pump Station Replacement Project, dated April 27, 2004 (Geotechnical Report) 4. Additional field and subsurface investigation may be required to acquire appropriate data that was not investigated in the 2004 Geotechnical Report. Such work will be performed by the Consultant or Consultant's Subconsultant. The scope of work for any field and/or subsurface investigation is the responsibility of the Consultant. 5. Consultant shall submit in TM10 a comprehensive interpretation of existing and newly acquired data followed by mitigation options and recommendations. The narrative shall cover soils classification and properties that affect the final design and construction of the proposed improvements. 6. The technical memorandum shall also make recommendations for any additional soil investigation, USA "Dig Alert" notifications, and traffic control for additional geotechnical work required for the preparation of the final construction documents in Phase 3. TM10 shall be submitted with the Draft PDR (see subsection 2.2.8 Management of Subconsultants in this document). EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 29 of 73 2.1.15 Technical Memorandum 11 — Architectural 1. Consultant shall prepare a minimum of three architectural alternatives for the new electrical -controls room and on -site improvements. All renderings must comply with the requirements of the City of Newport Beach Mariner's Mile planning concepts. 2. The main purpose and theme of the architectural improvements is to blend the new facility with the community and to minimize visual impacts to the public. Along with District staff, the Consultant shall meet and gather requirements from the City of Newport Beach Planning staff, OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship, local homeowners and homeowners associations. The ensuing architectural design alternatives should strive to meet the identified requirements. 3. Along with District staff, the Consultant shall present the three architectural design alternatives to the participating groups, gain their approval, and identify a preferred choice that will be developed through design. 4. To communicate the "look and feel" of each alternative to the community, the Consultant is to prepare a conceptual rendering of the new electrical -controls room and on -site improvements. The conceptual rendering shall and be formatted for public presentation (i.e., color, hard back mounted, and reproduced to a size no smaller than 36 x 24 inches). Consultant is to prepare two presentation renderings for each architectural alternative. 2.1.16 Technical Memorandum 12 — Preliminary Drawings 1. Provide under separate cover the preliminary drawings for all project elements in 11 x 17 inch format according to the requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.2 "Construction Drawings". 2. Survey requirements: Consultant shall refer to subsection 2.2.8 Management of Subconsultants for survey requirements that must be incorporated into the preliminary design. 3. Facility layout study and evaluation: The current preliminary site layout places the pump station components as follows: • Electrical building and wet/dry pit assembly at the east end of the property • Stand by generator and odor control equipment in the existing slope cut-out in the middle of the property • Power transformer at the west end of the property 4. It is the intention of the District to evaluate the possibility of moving all pump station components to the west end of the property, EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 30 of 73 attempting at the same time to accommodate the requests of the OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship. The Consultant shall prepare and include in TM12 a minimum of three layout alternatives for the pump station. The layout alternatives shall include overall structure dimensions, access clearances, and all other functional elements necessary to determine the layout adequacy. District staff will be closely involved in the preparation of all layout alternatives. 5. Civil requirements: Consultant shall provide general civil plan, sidewalk and street improvement plans, landscape improvements, sections, and elevations for each project element, as applicable. 6. Consultant shall provide preliminary building plans that reflect conservative sizing for electrical equipment, electrical building and for other associated appurtenances, with location and footprint of each major piece of equipment. 7. Consultant shall provide preliminary paving and grading plans. 8. Preliminary off -site piping plans: These plans shall establish size and routing of major piping (greater than 12-inches in diameter). Smaller diameter piping (8-inches in diameter and lower) shall be shown only if their routing is critical to the site layout. 9. Architectural elevations: For each of the three architectural alternatives, Consultant shall prepare architectural elevations including plan and section views. 10. Mechanical plans: Consultant shall provide preliminary mechanical plans with location and footprint of each major piece of equipment. 11. Area classification: Consultant shall prepare area classification plans (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 10, Section 10.6.1 "Hazardous Areas" for requirements). 12. Electrical single -line diagrams and P&ID: Consultant shall provide electrical single -line diagrams and P&ID drawings. 13. Demolition Plans: Consultant shall provide demolition plans for the existing Rocky Point Pump Station and appurtenances. In addition, the Consultant shall perform a detailed inspection of the existing pump station prior to the preparation of the demolition plans. Inspection of the Pump Station shall be scheduled and coordinated with District staff through the District's Project Manager. 14. Demolition of Existing On -site Structures: The property must be cleared to accommodate the construction of both the new pump station and OCC's new classroom facilities. The Consultant shall perform a detailed inspection of the existing on -site buildings prior to the preparation of the demolition plans. Four buildings currently exist on -site as described in Project Element 4 — Demolition of EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 31 of 73 Existing On -site Buildings. Care must be taken to demolish the existing building that retains a portion of the slope without disturbing the existing slope. The Geotechnical Report recommends leaving the existing wall in place or installing soil nails or tiebacks to stabilize the slope prior to demolishing and constructing a new retaining wall. The existing buildings may contain asbestos and lead paint so a hazardous materials survey shall be performed. These unknown conditions must be discovered prior to DS1.Other existing structures to be demolished include, but may not be limited to, the following: a. Above and below ground utilities b. Pavement c. Trees, plants, and other landscaping features d. Signs and other above ground obstructions 15. If Consultant personnel will be entering confined spaces, they must attend a "Job Hazard Analysis" training class scheduled with the District Safety Division. A Safety Plan must be submitted for District review prior to performing any confined space entries. The Safety Plan shall be prepared according to the District Safety Division and, as a minimum, shall include the entry and work procedures, applicable Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) and Rescue Plan. All work within a confined space shall be performed under the requirements of the District's Confined Space Program and CAL -OSHA, Title 8, § 5157 Permit Required Confined Space Entry requirements. The Consultant shall comply with all OSHA regulations applicable to the work activities of the project. 2.1.17 RCM/RCS Analysis 1. The detailed RCM analyses will be performed after review and acceptance of the Technical Memorandums. The RCM analyses will be performed by the Consultant on all of the systems anticipated in the technical memorandums. The analyses will be performed with appropriate District staff chosen by the District Project Manager. 2. The Reliability Centered Spares (RCS) analyses will be performed by the Consultant to determine the critical spare part requirements to support maintenance and operations. 3. The results from the RCM/RCS analysis will provide: a. Performance standards b. Design requirements (redesigns and modifications) c. Maintenance strategy (PM's) d. Operating philosophy EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 32 of 73 e. Critical Spare Parts 2.1.18 Life Cycle Costing 1. The Consultant will perform an economic analysis to determine if the lowest life cycle cost has been accomplished for the assets being designed. This is to take into account the design, maintenance and operation of the assets. 2.1.19 Justification of RCM/RCS Recommendations 1. The Consultant will list in a table all the recommendations from the RCM/RCS and Life Cycle Costing analysis. This table will provide an explanation justifying each recommendation. 2. The Consultant will review the recommendations with management and key staff from all applicable departments. The approved recommendations are to be incorporated into the design prior to the detailed design. 2.2 Proiect Management Project Management includes tasks that will be performed by the Consultant throughout Phase 2. These tasks are included in a separate section of the Scope of Work of Phase 2 to facilitate tracking of man-hours and fees by both the Consultant and District. These services include: project integration, project communication, scope management, project scheduling, progress reporting, project invoicing, project communication, quality control, management of Subconsultants, and coordination with other projects. 2.2.1 Proiect Integration 1. Consultant shall be responsible for detailed management of the project including the Subconsultants and shall periodically update the status of the project. 2. Consultant shall conduct two monthly, recurring project meetings with the District's Project Manager. Manager's Meeting 1. The first monthly meeting shall be attended by the District's Project Manager and Consultant's Project Manager at a mutually agreeable day and time. The purpose of the meetings shall be to review the Consultant's progress report (the status of the project scope, schedule, and budget) and any issues which may affect completion of the project. 2. The Consultant shall budget 1 hour for this meeting. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 33 of 73 Coordination Meeting The second monthly meeting shall be technical in nature. Both technical staff and project management will attend this meeting to verify project progress and discuss project issues. During the preparation of the Technical Memorandums, the Consultant shall provide two draft copies of work in progress to be reviewed during this meeting. Work in progress may include draft reports and other draft deliverables including 11 x 17 inch preliminary plans. 2. The Consultant shall budget 2 hours for this meeting. 3. Other meetings shall be scheduled on an as needed basis (see task Focused Meetings in subsection 2.2.6 Project Communications). 2.2.2 Scope Management The Consultant shall submit a project Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) with their proposal. A WBS is a deliverable -oriented grouping of project elements that define the total scope of the project. The WBS shall include a matrix indicating the budget amounts and man-hours for each task. For purposes of the proposal, the WBS shall match the tasks described in the Scope of Work. The Consultant may add additional tasks to their proposal; however, as a minimum, they must include the tasks identified in this Scope of Work. 2. A sample WBS hierarchy is as follows (each level is a more detailed representation of the level above): a. Level 1: Rocky Point Pump Station Replacement b. Level 2 (Phase Level): Phase 2 — Preliminary Design, Phase 3 — Design, Phase 4 — Construction & Installation, etc. c. Level 3 (Work Package): Preliminary Design Report, Project Management, etc. d. Level 4 (Major Task): TM1, TM2, Project Integration, etc. 3. The approved WBS shall form the basis for reporting the status of each Scope of Work task in the monthly project progress report and the project invoices. Unless otherwise specified, the reporting detail will coincide with WBS level 4. 4. At the beginning of the project, the District's Project Manager may require further breakdown of tasks (i.e., down to the fifth level of detail) in order to monitor project progress. This will be discussed with the Consultant and adjustments shall be made to the WBS. 5. Consultant is to gain formal acceptance of the project deliverables and work results to insure they conform to the requirements of this Scope of Work. Acceptance requires reviewing deliverables and EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 34 of 73 work results to ensure that all were completed correctly and satisfactorily. While quality control is primarily concerned with "correctness" of work, this task is concerned with "acceptance" of work by the District's Project Manager. The Consultant shall provide a form for recording deliverable approval. 2.2.3 Project Scheduling 1. Consultant shall create a detailed project schedule using Primavera Project Planner (P3) or Microsoft Project. The schedule will conform to the WBS and, at a minimum, include the following: a. Start and finish date for each task of the project b. Task dependencies c. Milestones for each task d. Project deliverables submittal dates e. Meeting and workshop dates f. District review periods g. Physical percent complete for each project task 2. Consultant shall maintain and submit the project schedule with the Consultant's monthly progress report. 2.2.4 Progress Reporting 1. Consultant shall submit a monthly progress report by email three (3) days prior to the monthly progress meeting. Progress report shall include the following: a. Work completed during reporting period b. Work scheduled for the next reporting period c. Project risks (potentially impacting scope, schedule, time or quality) d. Potential changes in project scope of work e. Project Decision Log (this Excel spreadsheet will be provided to the Consultant) f. Updated WBS (if changed) g. Applicable billing/outstanding invoices h. Task performance spreadsheet containing: • Original contract budget • Current approved budget • Actual costs • Estimated cost to complete • Estimated cost at completion • Variance at completion • Planned value EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 35 of 73 • Earned value • Cost variance • Schedule variance • Cost Performance Index • Schedule Performance Index • Physical percent complete i. Consultant's recovery plan to complete project within budget (if estimated cost to complete is greater than approved budget) j. Bar chart showing historic cash flow and 4 months of projected cash flow k. Trend graph charting cumulative planned, earned and actual costs I. Project schedule 2. On a periodic basis the District may conduct audits to the Consultant's work at their facilities to ensure conformance with project progress reported to the District Project Manager. 2.2.5 Project Invoicing 1. Consultant shall prepare and submit monthly invoices to the District. The invoices shall document the man-hours and billing rate for each person that works on the project for each task in the WBS. Overhead, profit and any direct costs shall also be shown for each task. As part of the summary section of the invoice, Consultant shall include the following information per task: a. Original contract budget b. Current approved budget c. Current billing for "This Period" d. Previously billed amount (total invoiced before current invoice) e. Billed to date (cumulative amount including current invoice) f. Remaining budget g. Total physical percent complete to date 2. The cost component breakdown for each element above shall conform to the requirements of the District Project Manager. 3. The District will provide a sample invoice structure to Consultant at the beginning of the project. 2.2.6 Project Communications General Communications 1. Consultant shall hold meetings and workshops throughout the project to keep the District appraised of the job progress, review EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 36 of 73 work -in -progress, share information, discuss project submittals, present findings of technical analyses, receive and resolve comments, and obtain decisions and direction by District staff. This task defines the major meetings and workshops to be held by the Consultant in accordance with the requirements of the District's Engineering Design Guidelines. Consultant shall also hold additional meetings as required to keep the District appraised of the job status, to review work -in -progress, and to receive and resolve comments. 2. Consultant shall prepare and submit an agenda to the District by e- mail for review at least three (3) business days prior to each meeting or workshop. The agenda package shall include a copy of the formal agenda and applicable review materials such as draft design criteria, design memoranda, associated drawings and specifications, to support meeting or workshop goals. 3. Consultant shall prepare minutes for each workshop or meeting and submit them to the District's Project Manager for approval within three (3) business days following the meeting or workshop. 4. Consultant shall refer to the Project Milestone Matrix to determine the District review period for each major milestone submittal (usually accompanied by a workshop). The District review period is typically one (1) month for each of these submittals, unless otherwise indicated in this document. For minutes from Focused Meetings, Consultant shall allow a District review period of two (2) weeks. The Consultant shall continue to work on the project during the review period of major milestone submittals. At the end of the review period, Consultant shall meet with District staff to receive and review District comments. 5. Consultant shall not take any comments from District staff without direct instructions from the District Project Manager. 6. Upon receipt of District comments on each project submittal and each set of meeting or workshop materials, the Consultant shall address the comments and submit a comprehensive set of all District comments together with Consultant's detailed responses, each written next to the respective District comment. District will provide a template for submission of these comments. A hard copy of the responses shall be submitted no later than 30 days after receipt of the District comments and at least 30 days prior to the next submittal date. 7. Consultant shall keep an ongoing record of decisions made on the project in a "Decision Log" and shall submit a copy of the updated Decision Log with each monthly Progress Report. The Decision Log Excel spreadsheet shall be provided by the District. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 37 of 73 8. Submittals that contain gross deficiencies or errors requiring a significant amount of District staff time for checking shall be returned without review until the District is satisfied that a thorough Consultant's review, checking and correction for coherence, consistency, spelling, etc. has been performed. Consultant shall make all the corrections required to complete the submittal at no additional cost to the District. Workshops 1. The focus of workshops is to review project progress to date and the technical decisions that have been made in focused meetings. Consultant shall conduct up to three (3) Preliminary Engineering Workshops and one PDR Constructability Workshop during Phase 2 - Preliminary Design to review project progress. The subjects to be covered in each workshop are discussed below in this subsection. 2. Each workshop shall be 4 hours in length and shall be held at District Facilities. The District's Project Manager shall schedule workshop time, location and invite workshop participants. Preliminary Engineering Workshop 1 (PEW 1) 1. PEW 1 shall be held to present Technical Memorandums 1 - 4. This workshop shall demonstrate project progress and summarize the decisions made at focused meetings. 2. In addition, the Consultant shall include the following topics: a. an overview of the project goals and objectives b. the main factors to be considered for the selection of preferred equipment c. required permits d. additional field work that may be necessary to discover unknown conditions 3. If additional field work is deemed necessary, the Consultant shall assist District Staff by identifying the field work requirements. District staff will use the identified requirements to prepare the scope of work for additional field services. 4. PEW 1 comments shall be incorporated into the Draft PDR. Preliminary Engineering Workshop 2 (PEW 2) 1. PEW 2 shall no longer be required, as negotiated. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 38 of 73 PDR Constructability Workshop 1. The PDR Constructability Workshop shall be held to present Technical Memorandums 7 -12. This workshop shall demonstrate project progress and summarize the decisions made at focused meetings concerning constructability issues. 2. The workshop shall be held prior to the submittal of the draft PDR to identify any fatal flaws in the design relative to constructability. Some of the subjects that shall be covered in this workshop include the following: conflicts with other projects, geotechnical considerations, construction sequencing, safety, operational requirements, access for maintenance, staging areas, parking requirements and constraints, permitting, public nuisance issues, other local conditions and constraints. 3. Consultant shall be responsible for completing the following tasks relative to the workshop: a. Prepare constructability review package for meeting participants. The package shall consist of detailed plans and specifications and other information selected by Consultant. b. Summarize the constructability review comments and actions taken for each Technical Memorandum comment. c. All workshop comments and recommendations shall be incorporated into the contract documents at no additional cost to the District. 4. PDR Constructability Workshop comments shall be incorporated into the Draft PDR. Preliminary Engineering Workshop 3 (PEW 3) 1. PEW 3 shall be held to present the Draft PDR to District staff. 2. Draft PDR comments shall be incorporated into a final PDR for submission to the District. Kickoff Meeting A four hour project kick-off meeting shall be held with District staff to introduce principal members of District and Consultant's teams. This meeting shalll be scheduled within the first week after the Notice to Proceed (NTP). The discussion topics shall include: District responsibilities, Consultant's responsibilities, invoice procedures, personnel badges, parking, site access, Consultant's Scope of Work, detailed project schedule with milestones, Work Breakdown Structure requirements, and District confined space and other safety policy training. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 39 of 73 2. Consultant shall also establish contact with the District Project Team participating in this project. Consultant shall work in partnership with the Project Team which shall provide the information and input for the project. 3. Consultant shall provide a work breakdown structure (WBS) at the kick-off meeting in accordance with the requirements set forth at the meeting and as described in more detail in subsection 2.2.2 Scope Management. Focused Meetings 1. Focused meetings shall be held throughout preliminary design to discuss specific issues in detail and generate comments and direction from District staff. The following tentative list of topics may be covered in these meetings. a. Pipeline modifications b. Operations and Maintenance (O&M) considerations c. Traffic and other safety requirements d. Confined space and other safety requirements e. Fire Department requirements f. Permits g. QA/QC issues h. Operating Philosophies issues i. Electrical -Controls System requirements j. Architectural requirements k. Mechanical requirements I. Survey and geotechnical requirements m. Landscaping requirements (if required) n. Potholing o. Utilities p. Construction Methods q. Construction sequencing r. Environmental Documentation s. CEQA mitigation requirements t. Coordination with other projects u. Other topics as necessary 2. Meetings shall generally be 4 hours in length. Consultant shall determine how many meetings will be needed to cover these topics. Consultant may suggest additional topics as necessary. 3. Consultant shall hold a specific focused meeting to review the Final Preliminary Design Report (FPDR). Supplementary meetings EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 40 of 73 may be scheduled with District staff, as necessary to allow sound coordination between the Consultant and District staff. 2.2.7 Quality Control 1. The Consultant shall develop a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan for implementing the Scope of Work. The QA/QC Plan should also address strategies for QA, QC and quality improvement. The Consultant's QA/QC Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the District Project Manager. The Consultant shall identify the individual(s) within their organization that will be responsible for enforcing the QA/QC plan through the duration of the project. These individual(s) must be different from the people responsible for the content of the work. The resume of this person(s) shall be included with the Consultant's QA/QC plan to the District Project Manager. It is expected that the individual(s) responsible for the checking of the Electrical and I&C sections will have a strong background in electrical / control system design as reflected on their resume. 2. As part of the District's own QA procedures, the District shall conduct audits of the Consultant's work at their facilities to ensure conformance with the QA/QC Plan. The individual(s) identified as responsible for the QA/QC implementation along with the Consultant's PM will review the District's comments and concerns. If the District determines that there has been a deficiency in the implementation of the plan, the Consultant's PM will write a corrective action plan. This plan will be detailed enough to insure the District that the deficiencies will be corrected. The District will notify the Consultant when these audits will occur. For this project at least one audit will be completed before the PDR submittal. Consultant shall respond to any District comments made during the audit within two (2) weeks. If comments are extensive, the District will schedule a follow-up audit within 30 days after the comments are received. 3. A detailed description of the QA/QC Plan requirements is included in the Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 01, Design Guidelines — General Requirements, Section 01.7 "Quality Control System" as revised in Section V of this Scope of Work, "Project - Specific Deviations from District Design Guidelines". Major elements of the QA/QC Plan include the following: a. Consultant shall be responsible for the technical adequacy and quality control of his work. b. Consultant controls shall assure that planning and design inputs are correctly translated into planning and design EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 41 of 73 documents such as drawings, procedures, specifications, reports and calculations. c. Consultant shall be responsible for the physical control, security and distribution of controlled documents required for performance of the Scope of Work. d. Consultant's planning and design activities will be controlled through the review process, including discipline checks, inter - discipline cross-checks and multidiscipline reviews by an Independent Project Review Team. e. Consultant shall perform discipline check and review all drawings, specifications, studies, reports, calculations and any other deliverable required by the Scope of Work. These requirements must be implemented by those Project Team members responsible for the specific planning or design activity. Documentary evidence of such checking shall be provided to the District with each project submittal. f. Consultant shall perform an inter -discipline coordination cross- check. Documentary evidence of such checking shall be provided to the District with each project submittal. Consultant shall refer to the Project Milestone Matrix, Engineering Design Guidelines, Sections 01.2.3 and 0.1.6 for additional requirements. g. Consultant shall identify a Project Review Team consisting of qualified individuals not directly involved in the design or supervision of the work. This Team shall conduct a multidiscipline preliminary design review to provide coordination and avoid conflicts. Documentary evidence shall include a copy set of all in-house review comments with design engineer's detailed responses, each written next to the respective checker's comment with the PDR submittal. No formal document format, document organization or "professional look" for the copy set is required (e.g., hand- written checker's comments and engineer's responses shall be acceptable). h. All submittals shall be accompanied by a transmittal letter signed by Consultant's principal -in -charge or Project Manager, if appropriate, indicating that the submitted documents have been checked, and identifying the reviewer's name. Signatures of the respective checkers shall be included where appropriate. All submittals shall be checked with a goal of insuring accuracy and consistency. i. Changes to contracted services shall be documented by formal change orders and contract amendments. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 42 of 73 j. Acceptance of Consultant professional services shall be based on the result of audits conducted on the elements of the approved QA/QC Plan and the incorporation or resolution of comments resulting from these audits. k. Taking corrective action or performing quality improvement to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the project. 2.2.8 Management of Subconsultants If Consultant requires the contracting of Subconsultants for the preparation of the PDR documents, the proposal shall include a list of the Subconsultants and their scope of work, along with a level of effort and fee. For more information see Section 3.2.8 Management of Subconsultants. 2.2.9 Coordination with other Projects The project shall be a complete and fully functional facility that is integrated with existing facilities and coordinated with other construction projects. Consultant must coordinate the project with all District and other projects that are in connection with the design and construction of the Rocky Point Pump Station. Consultant shall continuously monitor the ongoing project in the area and shall develop a list of issues that require coordination and a coordination plan. 3. Phase 3 — Design Design includes five main elements: Final Design, Project Management, Bid Support Services, Environmental Documentation and Permitting. Consultant shall develop man- hour and cost estimates for the tasks in each of these elements and include them in the Proposal. As part of the Work Breakdown Structure submittal at the beginning of the Project, the District may also require a further breakdown of costs and request that they be included in the monthly invoice. This will be discussed in the kick-off meeting. Consultant shall refer to Section V of this Scope of Work, Modifications to the Engineering Design Guidelines, Section 01.2.1 "Deliverables — Project Documentation, Analysis and Databases" for Final Design deliverable requirements. Descriptions of the tasks and deliverables for each of the main elements are provided below. 3.1 Final Design Consultant shall prepare one package of biddable plans, technical specifications and other contract documents as required based on the design concepts and criteria developed during Phase 2 - Preliminary Design. The Final Design will be documented in four (4) packages. These packages shall be submitted to the District for review in accordance with the schedule outlined in Section III of this Scope of Work. Formal workshops shall be conducted to review each package with the District. Focused meetings shall also be held throughout the Design Phase to EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 43 of 73 solicit input from District staff. Consultant shall refer to the task Workshops and Focused Meetings in subsection 3.2.6 Project Communications for requirements. Consultant is expected to continue work on the project while District staff reviews each submittal. Consultant shall maintain an up-to-date comments log in electronic format on all District comments received as a result of each submittal review. The Consultant shall address all District comments in writing within two weeks of receipt. Consultant shall meet with District to discuss the written comments. Any changes in the District's Engineering Standards, District's Design Guidelines, and changes in design concepts and facility layouts that may occur through Design Submittal 1 (DS 1) as a result of District comments, shall be incorporated into the Design by Consultant at no additional cost to the District. 3.1.1 Design Submittal 1 (DS1) Design Submittal 1 shall include the following: DS1 — Design Information 1. Written response log to District comments on the PDR 2. Final survey notes report 3. Size critical equipment (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 01, Section 01.1.15.2 "Size Critical Equipment" for requirements) 4. Draft Final Geotechnical (field findings) Reports (see subsection 3.2.8 Management of Subconsultants for requirements) 5. List of proposed suppliers for major equipment including MCCs, VFDs, switch gear, pumps, etc. 6. Final Odor Assessment and Control Plan for the project 7. List of measures to minimize noise in accordance with the recommendations from Phase 2. 8. Project Support Documentation consisting of calculations, phone/fax quotes, catalog cuts, design period memoranda, and meeting notes. DS1 — Facility Operation and Maintenance 1. Final Operating Philosophies (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.7 "Operating Philosophy" for requirements and Exhibit 5 of this Scope of Work for a Sample Operating Philosophy) 2. Final Operations and Maintenance staffing requirements (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.11 "Asset Management Plan" for requirements) EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 44 of 73 3. Sketches of graphic screens for each process area in accordance with the list developed as part of the PDR. The District will develop the SCADA screens from these sketches at a later date. 4. Updated EID Database (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.12 "Equipment and Instrument Database (EID)" for requirements) DS1 — Electrical 1. Updated electrical distribution single -line diagram (approximately 98% complete). 2. Area classification drawings (100% complete) 3. Updated load list 4. Updated standby generator sizing calculations, as applicable 5. Electrical System Analysis Report which includes Field Data Collection and Verification Report, Short Circuit Study Report, Load FlowNoltage Drop Study, Harmonic Study Report, Projective Device Application and Evaluation Report, and Motor Starting Study (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 10, Section 10.2.1 "Electrical Data Collection, Measurements and Analyses" for requirements and Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.2 "Electrical System Analysis Report" for requirements). 6. Preliminary Conduit and Cable Schedule format and type of information (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.2.15 "Conduit and Cable Schedule" for requirements) DS1 — Instrumentation and Controls 1. Completed Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&ID). P&IDs are to act as a "master document" in that the P&ID is assumed to be correct and all other documents are synchronized to them (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.2.18 "Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs)" for requirements). Example P&IDs are presented in Exhibit 6 of this Scope of Work. 2. Completed SAT database for all the Real I_O points. At this points all the Consultant fields, as described in the Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.3.14 "SCADA Administration Tool (SAT)" shall be filled -in. Consultant must perform a database synchronization check between the SAT database and the PDS- 2D database to insure all Real I_O points shown on the SAT database are on the P&IDs. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 45 of 73 3. Appendix A of the Control Strategy with the completed information for all major equipment. This will be furnished in lieu of the control strategy because the District will be programming the Modicon / CRISP PLC. 4. Completed Local Control Panel (LCP) layout. The layout of the LCP will be the same as the layout used at "A" and 14th street pump stations. It is the intent of the District to maintain uniformity, as much as possible, in the design of the panel layout for the different pump stations. 5. Completed Cleaning Panel (LCP-A) layout 6. Completed Sump Pump panel layout 7. Complete Pump Control Elementary Diagrams for the Main Sewage Pumps, Sump Pumps and Ventilation Fans 8. PLC & Remote 1/0 Block Diagram 9. LCP Terminal Block Elementary Diagram DS 1 — Construction Cost Estimate and Schedule 1. Updated construction cost estimate update (see Section V of this Scope of Work, "Project Specific Deviations from District Design Guidelines, Chapter 01, Section 01.4.6 "Construction Cost Estimate"). 2. Updated construction sequencing plan 3. Updated construction schedule in Primavera Project Planner (P3) based on an updated construction sequencing plan and quantify take -offs from the contract documents. At the DS1 stage, the schedule may be general in nature. As the design progresses, more information shall be included in the schedule. Consultant shall engage the services of a least one construction individual to review the quantity takeoffs from Consultant staff and use this information to assist in the development of the detailed construction schedule. Consultant may use their own staff if they are qualified or hire a Subconsultant to assist in this activity. The goal is to develop a realistic schedule based on project information not a "rule of thumb" (see subsection 3.2.8, Management of Subconsultants for requirements). 4. Consultant and District shall identify individuals to serve on a Commissioning Team which shall begin to meet after the DS1 submittal through the end of design. The purpose of the Commissioning Team shall be to prepare a commissioning plan, address construction issues and begin to identify the appropriate construction sequencing and commissioning strategy which shall be included in the specifications (for additional requirements see EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 46 of 73 subsection 3.2.6 Project Communications, task Workshops and Focused Meetings). DS 1— Plans 1. DS 1 Plans shall include the following sheets: a. General Drawings b. Civil and Yard Drawings c. Demolition Drawings d. Gravity and force main sewer Piping Plans and Profiles e. Architectural Elevations f. Preliminary Landscaping Plans (in accordance with the Mariner's Mile design criteria) g. Irrigation plans h. Street and sidewalk improvement plans and profiles i. Traffic Control and Detour Plans j. Structural Plans and Sections of Major Process Areas k. Mechanical Plans and Sections of Major Process Areas I. Ventilation Plans m. Preliminary Electrical Site and Power Plans including control panels in plan views. n. Preliminary Electrical Control Room Plan o. Preliminary Electrical Equipment Elevation Drawings p. Preliminary Electrical Lighting Plans q. Preliminary Grounding Plan r. Final area classification drawings s. Preliminary Panel Schedules — 3 Phase and 1 Phase t. Single -line diagrams with additional information to match the P&I Ds 2. Consultant shall evaluate the impact of other "adjacent" on -going projects, bring conflicts to the District's attention, and adjust the design accordingly (see subsection 3.2.9 Coordination with Other Projects). 3. Consultant shall also refer to the Project Milestone Matrix and District's Engineering Design Guidelines, Sections 01.1, 01.2, 01.6, 10.2, 10.14, 11.3, 11.4 and applicable sections of Appendix A for additional design submittal requirements. 3.1.2 Design Submittal 2 (DS2) NO LONGER REQUIRED, AS NEGOTIATED EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 47 of 73 3.1.3 Design Submittal 3 (DS3) 1. This submittal shall include all finished, checked and complete plans and specifications. New drawings and/or specification sections shall not be expected after this stage. All District comments on the previous submittal shall have been resolved, rejected, addressed and/or incorporated in this submittal. The project is essentially finished and submitted as 100% complete. The only missing effort is the District final review with comment incorporation. 2. Consultant's checking shall include a review of all deliverables within each discipline (i.e. drawings, detailed specifications, project support documentation, etc.) and an in-house Integrated Multidiscipline Design Quality Review of all deliverables to ensure that every document is consistent with all other documents containing the same equipment. Consultant shall incorporate corrections into the project deliverables prior to DS3. 3. A copy of the in-house Integrated Multidiscipline Design Quality Review comments with Consultant's detailed responses, written next to each respective checker's comments on the checked Contract Documents, shall be made and submitted to the District along with DS3. A typical I/C cross-check shall compare the Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs), Singe -Line Diagrams (SLDs), motor control schematics, 1/0 information, communications schematic, communications plan, control strategy, plans, schedules, and specifications so that each instance of a loop tag number will be consistent between documents. 4. The Electrical System Analysis Report and other discipline calculations and databases, construction cost estimates, schedules, and other project support documentation shall reflect the status of the Drawings and Detailed Specifications and shall support the Design Submittal 3 workshops. 5. Design Submittal 3 shall include the following: a. Written response log to District comments received on DS1 and previous submittals b. All completed plan sheets c. Final Traffic Control and Detour Plans. Consultant, in conjunction with Staff, shall obtain acceptance of the plans by local and state governing agencies. The plans shall be suitable for obtaining encroachment permits. Consultant shall assist District in securing City traffic control permit. Consultant may elect to secure the services of a specialized traffic consultant to address City or other permitting agency requirements. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 48 of 73 d. Detailed project specifications except for front-end specifications (bid documents, Division 00- General Conditions and Division 01- General Requirements) which will be prepared by the District e. Completed project EID database. At this point all the Consultant's fields, as described in the Engineering Design Guidelines, Appendix A, Section A.2.37 "Equipment and Instrument Database" and the "Sample EID and Dictionary," shall be completed. f. Final Electrical System Analysis Report including coordination curves, relay settings and/or breaker trip setting schedule g. Final detailed construction schedule in Primavera Project Planner (P3) and cash flow analysis (see subsection 3.2.6 Project Communications task Workshops and Focused Meetings for requirements) h. Final Commissioning Plan i. Final list of spare parts j. Updated construction cost estimate (see Section V of this Scope of Work, Project Specific Deviations from District Design Guidelines, Chapter 01, Section 01.4.6 "Construction Cost Estimate") k. Project Support Documentation consisting of calculations, phone/fax quotes, catalog cuts, design period memoranda, and meeting notes (see Appendix A, Design Guidelines Sections A.2.6 "Project Support Documentation" for requirements) 6. Refer to the Project Milestone Matrix, the Engineering Design Guidelines, Sections 1.1, 01.2, 10.2, 11.3, 11.4 and the applicable sections of this Appendix A for additional design requirements. 7. The DS3 submittal shall be reviewed by the District's Safety Department for compliance with District Safety Policies. 3.1.4 RCM Gap Analysis and Evaluation 1. The Consultant is required to perform a gap analysis and evaluate the design process. The gap analysis is to be performed after Design Submittal 3 is provided. The purpose of this is to find any differences in the final design and RCM/RCS analyses recommendations from the pre -design. These differences will be discussed with District staff for potential rectification. 2. An evaluation is to be performed after the gap analysis to document what went right, what went wrong, lessons learned, and most importantly, how the process can be improved in the future. Finally, the evaluation should address the savings gained through EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 49 of 73 RCM. How much did the RCM design recommendations save the District in construction and maintenance costs? How did the recommendations make the pump station more maintainable for field staff? 3.1.5 Final Design Submittal (FDS) 1. Following receipt of all District review comments on DS3, Consultant shall prepare and submit the Final Design (FDS). The FDS shall include finished, checked and complete plans and specifications and shall incorporate all District comments from previous submittals, workshops and constructability review as appropriate. Prior to submittal of the FDS, Consultant shall have performed an inter -discipline cross-check of the design changes made since DS3 and corrected the related discrepancies. Consultant shall not add any new drawings or make any changes to the plans or specifications that are not a result of comments received by the District or a final in-house quality control check. Consultant shall document in-house changes and submit them to the District along with the FDS. 2. The process of assisting the District in obtaining the required permits, as specified in Phase 3, section 3.5 Permitting, has been completed. 3. Final submittal deliverables as described in the Project Milestone Matrix shall consist of camera ready documents and digital documents, suitable for final reproduction by the District. In addition, the FDS shall include remaining project support documents on paper form consisting of calculations, phone/fax quotes, catalog cuts, design period memoranda, and meeting notes. 4. All plans and, detailed specifications and engineering calculations shall be stamped and signed by a Registered Engineer in the State of California. 5. Refer to the Project Milestone Matrix, the Engineering Design Guidelines, Sections 1.1, 01.2, 01.6, 10.2, 11.3, 11.4 and the applicable sections of this Appendix A for additional design requirements. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 50 of 73 3.2 Proiect Management Project Management includes tasks that will be performed by the Consultant throughout Phase 3 — Design of the project. These tasks are included in a separate section of the Scope of Work to facilitate tracking of man-hours and fees by both the Consultant and District. These services include many of the same services that were required during Phase 2 — Preliminary Design; only the changes in service will be noted in this section. The Consultant shall assume that Project Management services will continue as described in Phase 2 — Preliminary Design unless otherwise noted in this Project Management section. 3.2.1 Project Integration No changes see section 2.2.1 Project Integration. 3.2.2 Scope Management No changes see section 2.2.2 Scope Management. 3.2.3 Project Scheduling No changes see section 2.2.3 Project Scheduling. 3.2.4 Proiect Reporting No changes see section 2.2.4 Project Reporting. 3.2.5 Proiect invoicing No changes see section 2.2.5 Project Invoicing. 3.2.6 Proiect Communication General Communication 1. No changes see General Communication in section 2.2.6 Project Communication. Workshops 1. The focus of workshops is to review project progress to date and the technical decisions that have been made in focused meetings. Consultant shall conduct workshops in Phase 3 — Design after each design submittal (i.e., DS1 and DS3) and a Final Design Constructability Workshop. A description of each workshop is presented below. 2. Each workshop shall be 4 hours in length and shall be held at District Facilities. The District's Project Manager shall schedule workshop time, location and invite workshop participants. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 51 of 73 Design Submittal Workshop 1 (DS1 Workshop) 1. The DS1 submittal workshop shall be held to review all elements required in the DS1 submittal. The DS1 workshop shall consist of three (3) components: kick-off workshop, focused meetings and validation workshop. Kickoff Workshop a. The DS1 Kickoff Workshop shall be held immediately after the DS1 is submitted. This workshop shall be held to summarize decisions made at the focused meetings and shall include an overview of the project to date. Key review issues shall be discussed to facilitate District staff review of the submittal. b. This workshop shall be 4 hours in length. Focused Review Meetings c. Up to 5 focused review meetings shall be held at approximately the midpoint of the District's review period. The focused meetings shall be working sessions that bring together District and Consultant staff to discuss specific design issues in detail. Each drawing shall be reviewed relative to the operation and maintenance of the facilities (i.e., space between equipment, utility requirements, maintenance concerns, etc). In addition, Consultant shall also address questions that District staff has identified during the first two weeks of their review of the design submittal. Meetings shall be scheduled to cover the following disciplines: • Electrical — one meeting • I&C — one meeting • Process/Mechanical — one meeting • Civil/Architectural/Structural — one meeting • Construction — one meeting d. Each meeting shall be 4 hours in length. A particular meeting may be scheduled to cover more than one discipline; Consultant shall coordinate closely with District Project Manager to cover all disciplines. Validation Workshop a. The DS1 Validation workshop shall no longer be required, as negotiated. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 52 of 73 Design Submittal Workshop 2 (DS2 Workshop) — NO LONGER REQUIRED Design Submittal Workshop 3 (DS3 Workshop) 1. The DS3 submittal workshop shall be held to review all elements required in the DS3 submittal, validate the design progress since the DS1 submittal and ensure that all comments on the DS1 submittal are resolved in order to avoid rework with accompanying schedule delays. The DS3 workshop shall consist of three (3) components: kick-off workshop, focused meetings and validation workshop. 2. The same District and Consultant staff that attended the DS1 workshop should attend the workshops and meetings. Kickoff Workshop a. The DS3 Kickoff Workshop shall be held immediately after the DS3 is submitted. This workshop shall be held to summarize decisions made at the focused meetings and shall include an overview of the project to date. Key review issues shall be discussed to facilitate District staff review of the submittal. b. This workshop shall be 4 hours in length. Focused Review Meetings a. Up to 5 focused review meetings shall be held at approximately the midpoint of the District's review period. The focused meetings shall be working sessions that bring together key District and Consultant staff to discuss specific design issues in detail. The main focus of these meetings shall be to review previous District comments to ensure that the comments have been incorporated into the Final Design and address any new comments that District staff has identified during the first two weeks of their review of the design submittal. Meetings shall be scheduled to cover the following disciplines: • Electrical — one meeting • I&C — one meeting • Process/Mechanical — one meeting • Civil/Architectural/Structural — one meeting • Construction — one meeting b. Each meeting shall be 4 hours in length. A particular meeting may be scheduled to cover more than one discipline; Consultant shall coordinate closely with District Project Manager to cover all disciplines. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 53 of 73 Validation Workshop a. The DS3 Validation workshop shall no longer be required, as negotiated. Constructability Workshops 1. A constructability workshop shall be held prior to the DS3 submittal and shall be a 2 day workshop. The constructability review is intended to provide the District with an objective third party review of the construction documents for effectiveness in communicating information to prospective bidders. The review shall determine if the contract documents have sufficient information needed to bid and construct the project, and avoid misunderstandings and misinterpretations that may lead to conflict, confusion or claims during construction. This review is not a comprehensive plan check, a dimensional check or a value engineering assignment. Further, it is recognized that comments may only be given on the level of detail provided at this level of design. 2. Constructability review participants shall include highly experienced individuals from construction companies, District construction management staff and Consultant construction management staff. Specialty consultants and discipline engineers may also be included. 3. Each constructability review participant shall receive a package at least two weeks in advance. The package shall include plans and specifications, general conditions, the CPM schedule, the construction cost estimate, permits and other pertinent information. The confirmation statements regarding the size -critical equipment as required in the Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 01, Design Guidelines — General Requirements, Section 1.1.11.2 "Size Critical Equipment" shall also be included in the review package. 4. The constructability review shall be held off -site to avoid disturbances. 5. Day 1 shall start with a short presentation by the Consultant, followed by a question and answer period. This is anticipated to take about 1/2 day. The second half of Day 1 and first half of Day 2, shall be individual work days for the Constructability Review Team. The Consultant shall not attend, although one designated individual from the Consultant's Design Team shall remain available at all times to answer questions and gather additional information that the constructability review team might need. 6. On the afternoon of Day 2, the Consultant shall return and listen to comments from the Constructability Review Team. A designated EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 54 of 73 individual shall record the comments, and take notes from the workshop, to document the process. 7. Topics the Constructability Review Team shall consider include: a. Project consistency, discrepancies and constructability issues b. Contradictions, bid package strategies and bidding issues c. Power outages and equipment shutdowns d. Size critical equipment requirements and constraints e. Utility company requirements f. Construction methods and mitigating impacts g. Viability of equipment relocation h. Operational requirements i. Access for maintenance j. Access to make proper connections k. User friendliness and safety I. Coordination with other projects m. Draft Commissioning Plan n. Public nuisance issues o. Risk sharing p. Construction sequencing and schedule, materials storage and work zone accessibility q. Clarity of the scope of work, and interface activities r. Impacts on existing operation s. Access t. Cost control u. Partnering with contractor v. Other local conditions and constraints B. The Constructability Review Team shall provide a list of comments and the Consultant shall respond to each comment, selecting those comments to be included in the final plans and specifications. 9. To facilitate the Constructability Review Workshop, Consultant shall complete the following tasks: a. Prepare package for constructability review participants. The package shall consist of detailed plans and specifications and other information selected by Consultant. The package shall be mailed to participants at least two weeks prior to the workshop. b. Arrange for off -site location for Constructability Review Workshop. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 55 of 73 c. Provide for a constructability review facilitator. d. Prepare presentation on the project for the Constructability Review Team. e. Meet with Constructability Review Team to receive comments. f. Provide listing of constructability review comments and action taken on each comment. (The summary report of constructability review comments shall be prepared by the Constructability Review Team.) 10. All comments and recommendations of the workshop shall be incorporated into the contract documents at no additional cost to the District. 11. As necessary and prior to DS3, the Commissioning Team shall also conduct an additional constructability review of the final contract documents to review clarity of the bid package, project completeness and other issues. This review meeting shall take place at the District's Engineering Facilities and shall be a full day session. Consultant shall coordinate with District Project Manager to schedule this meeting. Focused Meetings 1. Focused meetings will be held throughout final design to discuss specific issues in detail and generate comments and direction from District staff. The following tentative list of topics may be covered in these meetings. Focused meetings prior to DS1: 1. P&IDs (several meetings based on number of P&IDs) 2. SAT and EID databases 3. Control strategy 4. Tag numbering 5. Power distribution and standby generator requirements 6. Electrical System Analysis Report 7. PLC relocations (if required) 8. Electrical Building/control room layouts 9. Lighting, camera system, and grounding 10. Noise Report 11. Odor Assessment and Odor Control Plan EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 56 of 73 Focused meetings after DS1 1. Bid procedures 2. Control logic diagrams 3. Control strategy 4. SCAQMD permit package 5. Other permits 6. Fire protection 7. Control panel layouts 8. O&M staff review 9. Constructability review comment resolution Focused meetings between DS1 and DS3 Meetings as required Safety meeting Meet with Safety Department as necessary after DS3 to review the plans and specifications in accordance with District safety policies. Commissioning Team Meetings Bi-monthly basis after DS1 submittal 2. The Commissioning Team meetings shall cover the following: a. Provide a detailed review of the proposed construction sequencing plan and make recommendations for improvements. These recommendations shall be incorporated into the plans and specifications as appropriate. Possible incentives for the contractor to finish the project early shall be explored. b. Identify procedures, testing requirements and sequencing for commissioning c. Develop a detailed outline of a commissioning plan based on the results of the recommended construction sequencing plan d. Identify timing within the construction contract schedule when commissioning activities are required, including hold points for testing and inspection e. Identify roles and responsibilities of the Project Manager, Resident Engineer, Inspector, Project Engineer, PCI, Engineering support, Design Consultant and Contractor f. Develop a time line of commissioning g. Develop a commissioning specification EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 57 of 73 h. Develop standard forms for testing and commissioning documentation 3. Meetings will generally be 4 hours in length. Consultant shall determine how many meetings shall be needed to cover these topics and organize the topics accordingly. Consultant may suggest additional topics as necessary. Supplementary meetings may be scheduled with District staff, as necessary, to allow coordination between Consultant and District staff. 3.2.7 Quality Control The Consultant shall update the QA/QC Plan developed in Phase 2 Preliminary Design to implement of the Scope of Work in Phase 3. The Consultant's updated QA/QC Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the District Project Manager. The updated QA/QC plan shall include quality improvements and lesson learned from Phase 2. 2. The District shall conduct an audit of the Consultant's work to ensure conformance with the QA/QC Plan. The District shall notify the Consultant when the audit will occur. For this Phase of the project the audit shall be completed after the DS1 submittal. Consultant shall respond to any District comments made during the audit within two (2) weeks. If comments are extensive, the District shall schedule a follow-up audit approximately 30 days after the comments are received. 3. A detailed description of the Plan requirements is included in the Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 01, Design Guidelines — General Requirements, Section 01.7 "Quality Control System " as revised in Section V of this Scope of Work, "Project -Specific Deviations from District Design Guidelines". Major elements of the QA/QC Plan are described in Phase 2 Preliminary Design, Project Management, 2.2.7 Quality Control. 3.2.8 Management of Subconsultants 1. Consultant shall provide for and manage the activities of Subconsultants. The proposed subconsultants shall be listed in the proposal along with a description of their effort and fee. Consultant shall include the general scope of work for each Subconsultant in the proposal as a basis for the fee. 2. If a Consultant believes that additional subconsultants are required on the project, then the Consultant shall include them in the proposal, explain why they are needed and highlight their specific tasks. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 58 of 73 Geotechnical Subconsultant 1. Consultant shall secure the services of a qualified Geotechnical Engineering firm to prepare a Geotechnical Report that addresses geotechnical concerns for all applicable Project Elements of the project Scope of Work. 2. Consultant shall identify a geotechnical Subconsultant and include the Subconsultants proposal with the response to this RFP. Soil Borings a. The geotechnical services shall include soil borings necessary to observe, test, classify soils and monitor groundwater. The number and spacing of borings shall be based on the geotechnical professional's interpretation of needs and recommendation; however, a maximum of five hundred feet (500') shall be allowed between pipeline alignment borings. Borings shall also be taken at or near the upstream and downstream connection points. The depth of the borings shall be adequate to characterize the soils to a depth of at least five feet below any proposed facility or sewer invert elevation. At least two borings shall extend twenty feet below the proposed sewer invert. If unexpected or unique soils are encountered, an adequate number of borings shall be taken to try and define the limits of the anomaly. b. Consultant shall specify in the proposal the required number of borings as well as a unit price allowance per boring in the proposal base price. Based on the actual number of borings performed in the project as determined and agreed upon by Consultant and the District, District will pay the final price in accordance with the per -unit allowance in the Consultant's proposal. Soil Boring Sampling a. Soil samples for testing shall be collected as needed based upon Consultant's professional judgment. However, samples intervals shall not exceed two -foot depth intervals in each boring. Sample requirements are two feet ring and then two feet standard penetration (SPT — ASTM 1586), and shall commence below the asphalt and base section. Soil Boring Locations a. The location of all borings shall be plotted on a map and attached to the Geotechnical Report. Preferably, the borings shall include survey coordinates consistent with the project survey. Complete logs of the soil profiles shall be included in the report. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 59 of 73 Geotechnical Report a. The Geotechnical Report shall address, but not be limited to, protection of District facilities during an earthquake, soil contamination, groundwater presence, ground water levels, groundwater contamination, construction dewatering, pipe bedding requirements, trench shoring requirements, settlement potential, excavating of soils, location of rock, backfill suitability and backfill compaction. b. Consultant shall be responsible for establishing the actual scope of work for the Geotechnical Report. The Geotechnical Report shall emphasize specific construction concerns and concerns regarding the integrity of sewers, pavement and structures. c. The Geotechnical Report shall address in detail the excavation impact of the proposed work on all existing utility trenches in the vicinity of the proposed project. The Geotechnical Report shall also focus on the potential collapse of the earth prism located between existing parallel utilities and the trench excavated for any proposed sewer installation. d. In addition to the above parameters, the Geotechnical Report shall address, as a minimum, the following items: • The findings of the Preliminary Geotechnical Report • Soil classification of each strata in accordance with Unified Soil Classification system • Physical descriptions of the soils encountered • Water table/ground water encountered • Seasonal variations of water table • Existing pavement and base material thickness • In -situ unit weight and moisture content as tested by Consultant • Laboratory test on the following: moisture content, density, gradation, Atterberg limits, consolidation, shear resistance, expansion, R-value, and corrosivity tests (pH, chloride content, sulfate content and resistivity) • Assessment of the geologic/seismic hazards of the site • California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and/or Sand Equivalent values for soils under pavement that is being replaced, if required by the permit agencies • Coefficients of internal friction and cohesion of in -situ undisturbed soils • On -site Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA) test results for potential hydrocarbon contaminants • Benzene, Toluene and Xylene (BTX) test per EPA guideline 8020 and Total Hydrocarbons (TPH) tests per EPA EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 60 of 73 guideline should the OVA reading be equal to or greater than 45 ppm Report Recommendations Specifications a. The Report shall make recommendations regarding the provisions to be included in the construction specifications. Recommendations shall be prepared for the following topics: dewatering, trench shoring, backfill compaction, and road repairs. In order to evaluate dewatering requirements for inclusion in the specifications, the Subconsultant shall conduct a hydrogeologic investigation. Geotechnical Report Recommendations for Design a. The Report shall make recommendations regarding the design of the facilities. Recommendations shall include active, at -rest, passive and dynamic earth pressures, foundation type, allowable bearing pressure, coefficient of friction between the foundation and soils/sub-grade, pile or mat foundation design data, settlement potential, pipe bedding and trench shoring/maximum cut slope requirements, soil contamination/corrosion potential, structural needs, pipe stability, expected earthquake displacement, and other Consultant needs. Delivery of Geotechnical Report a. The Draft Final Geotechnical Reports shall be submitted as specified in Design Submittal 1 (DS1). The Geotechnical Report shall be subject to review and comment by the District, any comments received regarding the Geotechnical Report shall be addressed in the final document. Final Geotechnical reports shall be submitted prior to Design Submittal 3 (DS3). b. Some of the related design requirements can be found in the Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 02, Chapter 8, Chapter 9, and Appendix F. Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR) a. The Geotechnical Baseline Report shall be written by a senior geologist or geotechnical engineer. Consultant may refer to American Society of Civil Engineer's (ASCE) "Geotechnical Baseline Reports of Underground Construction: Guidelines and Practices" or other applicable references for structuring the report. The GBR must be submitted with the Final Geotechnical Report. The GBR shall be specific to the site and shall include a narrative of all known soil conditions. The GBR shall be specific regarding recommendation to the contractor EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 61 of 73 and actions to be taken by the contractor during construction, excavation, and backfill stages. Surveying Subconsultant The Consultant is responsible for providing all field design survey, right of way research, exhibits associated with right of way or real property transfers. If Consultant does not have adequate in-house resources, Consultant shall secure the services of a specialized firm to function as a Subconsultant. Consultant shall be entirely responsible for the work performed by Subconsultant. Utility Coordination 1. Consultant shall coordinate with adjacent properties and utilities in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Engineering Design Guidelines. 2. If Consultant requires the services of a Subconsultant for the utility coordination Task, the proposal shall include the name of the Subconsultant and the Scope of Work, along with a level of effort and fee. Traffic Control 1. Consultant shall develop and prepare comprehensive traffic control and traffic detour plans to the satisfaction of local and state governing agencies. These plans shall be included in the Final Construction Documents. 2. Consultant, in conjunction with District staff, shall obtain approval of the plans by local and state governing agencies. The plans shall be suitable for obtaining encroachment permits. Consultant shall obtain encroachment and city traffic control permits on District's behalf. 3.2.9 Coordination with other Proiects No changes see section 2.2.9 Coordination with other projects. 3.3 Bid Support Services Consultant shall provide the following services during the bid period: 1. Participate in the pre -bid meeting, Consultant shall be prepared to describe the project and answer questions from potential bidders 2. Prepare project drawing set and project specification addenda to resolve errors and omissions identified prior to bid opening 3. Prepare conformed drawings and specifications that incorporate the addenda (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 01, EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 62 of 73 Design Guidelines - General Requirements, Section 1.4.4 "Construction Documents" for requirements as modified in Section V of this Scope of Work, "Modifications to the Engineering Design Guidelines" and the requirements of the CAD Manual). 4. Participate in the evaluation of the submitted bids, furnish consultation and advice District staff and assist with all the related equipment, cost and other analyses as required to finalize the award decision. 5. Refer to the Project Milestone Matrix for additional requirements. 6. Consultant shall include labor -hours and fees related to the Bid Support Services in the proposal. 3.4 Environmental Documentation Upon request by the District, the Consultant shall attend meetings that may be required by the City, County, or other agencies. Assume eight (2 hour) meetings, four (2 hour) District meetings to discuss the project documentation requirements and two (4 hour) public meetings. Public meetings may occur after normal business hours. Suggested Consultant's agency meeting attendants are the Principal Engineer and the Project Engineer in charge of this project. Consultant shall prepare displays or materials as needed by District for these meetings. 3.5 Permitting - For all applicable Project Elements of this Scope of Work, Consultant shall provide contract documents, which ensure that facility features and performance and construction procedures comply with all conditions of existing permits and permits required to construct this project. Construction drawings, specifications and supplemental drawings shall be prepared, as necessary in the format required to obtain all permits. Consultant shall assist the District in obtaining permits. This assistance shall include completing applications (except for SCAQMD permits for items of work lasting in excess of one year, which shall be completed by the District) and preparing supporting documentation for the permit applications as required by the issuing agency, furnishing the required number of copies of all construction drawings and exhibits and attending meetings with permitting agencies at the request of the District. District staff shall execute all applications. All permit fees shall be paid directly by the District and shall not be deemed part of Consultant's fee. Consultant shall submit all supporting documentation in a timely fashion for all permits required for this project which may include, but are not limited to, the following: EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 63 of 73 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). District shall perform air dispersion modeling and health risk assessment as necessary to satisfy current SCAQMD regulations and procedures and obtain a Permit to Construct. Consultant shall provide design calculations and diagrams as necessary to support this work. 2. Fire Department 3. Dewatering 4. California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) 5. California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (RWQCB) 6. California Public Utilities Commission for Certification of Convenience and Necessity 7. California State Department of Industrial Relations - Occupational Safety and Health Administration (CAL -OSHA) 8. City of Newport Beach "Approval in Concept" for Coastal Development Permit (The Coastal Development Permit is typically issued by the California Coastal Commission unless local jurisdiction applies) 9. California Coastal Commission (for pipeline work in West Coast Highway and the demolition of the existing Rocky Point Pump Station) 10. Local Development Permit (if the city has local jurisdiction over the coastal zone then this permit applies and a California Coastal Commission permit does not apply) 11. California State Lands Commission 12. Caltrans 13. Orange County Transit Authority 14. Orange County Planning and Development Services 15. Orange County Health Care Agency - Environmental Health Division Hazardous Waste Management 16. Orange County Public Facilities and Resource Department - County Property Permits Division 17. Cities within OCSD Service Area 18. Southern California Edison Company (SCE) 19. Other Permitting EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 64 of 73 Consultant shall participate in meetings with the staff of the applicable agencies as necessary to ensure that the design of facilities is consistent with the agency requirements. If water line crossings are involved, Consultant shall submit two sets of the construction documents to the District for submittal to the State of California Health and Welfare Agency, Department of Health Services/Office of Drinking water for review of compliance with Department of Health requirements. If applicable to the project, Consultant shall send two copies of construction documents to OCSD for submittal to the State of California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupation Safety and Health, Mining and Tunneling unit. The transmittal of the documents shall include a request for underground classification, in accordance with California Labor Code Section 7955, for areas where pipe may be jacked in place or tunneling may be done Consultant shall assume four (4) 2 hour District meetings to discuss the support documentation and ten (10) 2 hour agency meetings. Suggested Consultant's agency meetings attendants are Principal Engineer and one Project Engineer. 4. PHASE 4 — CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION SERVICES The District will administer and provide field inspection for construction contracts. Construction and installation support services shall be provided by the Consultant as requested by the District. Consultant shall refer to the Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 01, Section 01.2.11 "Construction Stage Services" for detailed requirements. For purposes of the proposal, Consultant shall include labor -hours and fees in the Proposal for appropriate personnel classifications to perform the following tasks: 1. Attend a pre -construction conference: 4 hours 2. Biweekly Construction Meetings: 4 hours each 3. Telephone/Fax/email Consultation: 120 hours 4. Review Shop drawings: 80 submittals at 4 hours each, and 40 re - submittals at 2 hours each. 5. Review vendor manuals, tests, and certification reports: 40 hours 6. Request for Information (RFI's): 80 RFI's at 4 hours each 7. Geotechnical Support: 40 hours 8. Assist District with Change Orders (CO's): 40 CO's at 4 hours each 9. Attend meetings as requested by the District to resolve construction issues: 120 hours 10. Prepare O&M Manuals and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and attend meetings: 240 hours EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 65 of 73 11. Review and other support for programming and databases: 40 hours 12. Attend other meetings as requested by District: 60 hours Consultant shall be familiar with District policies, as reflected in District's standard specifications, regarding construction liability. Standard specifications include District's requirement for the construction contractor to carry bodily injury, including death, and property damage liability insurance that names, among others, the Consultant as an additional insured. Standard specifications require the construction contractor to indemnify the Consultant, among others, against liability and claims arising out of Contractor's obligations, except for claims arising through sole negligence or sole willful misconduct. District may renegotiate the labor -hours and associated fees with Consultant at the end of Phase 3 - Design as appropriate. Consultant shall include project management support labor -hours related to Construction and Installation Services under this Phase for the subtasks described above. 5. PHASE 5 — COMMISSIONING SERVICES Consultant shall provide commissioning services as requested by the District. For purposes of the proposal, Consultant shall include man-hours and fees in the Proposal for appropriate personnel classifications to perform the following tasks: 1. Review EID and SAT databases for consistency: 24 hours 2. Assist the District in finalizing lock -out tag -out procedures: 24 hours 3. Attend Commissioning Team Meetings: 20 hrs 4. Finalize O&M Manuals and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) based on District review comments and attend meetings (electronic media submittal is required): 40 hours 5. Prepare final Operating Philosophies to reflect as -built conditions and ready to merge into O&M Manual Model documentation (electronic media submittal is required): 40 hours 6. Conduct staff training: 20 hours for operations training and 8 hours of manufacturer's training for each major piece of equipment new to the District 7. Conduct PCI staff training: 16 hours (see Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 11, Section 11.5.3.8 "Training" for more requirements) 8. Startup and initial operation assistance: 40 hours EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 66 of 73 For all services except PCI training, Consultant shall refer to Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 01, Section 01.2.11 "Construction Stage Services" for detailed requirements. The operator training hours shown above are based on four separate shifts and a minimum of five sessions lasting approximately four hours each. The maintenance training hours shown above are based on a minimum of 16 hours of technical training for each discipline and a minimum of 4 hours for operational training for each discipline. District may renegotiate the labor -hours and associated fees with Consultant at the end of Phase 3 - Design as appropriate. Consultant shall include project management support labor -hours related to Commissioning Services under this Phase for the subtasks described above. 6. PHASE 6 — CLOSE OUT Consultant shall provide Close Out Services as requested by the District. For purposes of this proposal, Consultant shall include labor -hours and fees for the appropriate personnel categories to perform the following Tasks: Prepare record drawings: 4 hours per drawing, assume 150 drawing for preparation of the fee proposal. This will be modified based on the actual drawing count. Attend a 4-hour meeting 6 months after final payment to the contractor to evaluate the effectiveness of the scope of work and project management procedures and to consider improvements for future projects. The Consultant shall prepare an agenda for the meeting. Consultant shall submit a final invoice at the completion of the project. Consultant shall include project management support labor -hours related to Close Out Services under this Phase for the subtasks described above. V. GENERAL REQUIREMEMENTS 1. GENERAL District Engineering Design Guidelines and Strategic Plan Consultant shall refer to and adhere to the requirements of Revision F of the Engineering Design Guidelines (Exhibit 1) except for the deviations specified below. The Engineering Design Guidelines define what plant design concepts /tools/ methods and project management requirements shall be adhered to and in what manner they shall be used/provided by Consultants, e.g., requirements regarding design concepts, submittals, documentation details, use of the District Master Specifications and other related District Standards, etc. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 67 of 73 The project Scope of Work and the Milestone Matrix (Exhibit 2) define whether or not each specific deliverable described in the Engineering Design Guidelines shall be part of the project and when each task shall take place. The Project Scope of Work and Milestone Matrix also include requirements that supplement and/or modify the Engineering Design Guidelines requirements for this project. The Project Scope of Work, Project Milestone Matrix and the Engineering Design Guidelines impact Consultant's project cost. Except as specified in this Scope of Work, design of all facilities shall conform to the recommendations of the 1999 Strategic Plan and shall incorporate all applicable mitigation measures of the Rocky Point Final EIR. In addition, the District may require Consultant to follow subsequent revisions of the District Engineering Design Guidelines and other District Standards referenced therein as they become available up to the point of Design Submittal 1 (DS1). Project Phases and Tasks Project tasks and deliverables shall include, but not be limited to, the requirements described in this Scope of Work and Project Milestone Matrix (Exhibit 2). Consultant shall also refer to Appendix A of the District Engineering Design Guidelines for the level of detail requirements for individual deliverables in each Phase of the Project not covered in the Scope of Work. Construction Sequencing and Constraints Consultant shall develop with District staff and include in the contract documents detailed requirements for construction sequencing and constraints. These shall ensure safe and reliable operation and maintenance of the District facilities. The facilities must be kept on-line and fully operational with minimal interruptions throughout construction. Working Hours Meetings with District staff shall be scheduled from Monday through Thursday between the hours of 8:00 AM and 4 PM. Consultant's on -site staff shall conform to District work schedules. Consultant shall refer to the Engineering Design Guidelines, Chapter 01, Section 01.3.5 "Access to Facilities, Equipment and Personnel" for further requirements. Meetings with outside contacts including local government agencies, stakeholders, property owners, regulators, etc., shall be scheduled during normal business hours. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 68 of 73 2. PROJECT -SPECIFIC DEVIATIONS FROM ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES The following Scope sections change the Engineering Design Guidelines requirements for this project and apply to all its Project Elements: Section 01.1 Add the following Subsection: 01.1.12 Odor Control The District has completed an Odor Control Master Plan in 2002 to investigate different treatment technologies for odor control and mitigation at District facilities. One of the District's goals is to implement the design and construction of projects with "Zero Complaints" from the public including local communities, government agencies and visitors near the construction areas. To support the implementation of the "Zero Complaints" goal, the Consultant shall develop an Odor Assessment and Control Plan (OACP). The OACP is to evaluate the potential for the release of nuisance odors and to recommend the implementation of mitigation measures to control the release of nuisance odors during the construction and normal operations of the proposed facilities. As part of the OACP the District may require monitoring activities to assess existing hydrogen sulfide concentrations in the ambient. In addition District may require collection and analysis of wastewater samples to determine concentration of hydrogen sulfide in the liquid phase. In general, a nuisance odor is characterized by the concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide - Equivalent (HSE) in the foul air. A concentration of Hydrogen Sulfide -Equivalent greater than 10 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) has the potential to generate complaints from residents or people located near existing facilities or near a construction site (nearest receptor). A receptor is defined as a person in the general public that may be exposed to odors resulting from the construction activities or from the normal operation of a facility. District experience in quantifying HSE has resulted in the use of hydrogen sulfide concentration as the indicator for the threshold value of 10 ppbv for characterization of a nuisance odor. The Consultant shall consider the following when preparing the OACP Plan: 1. Examples of potential nuisance odor release activities during construction include the opening of pipes, structures, and manholes associated with the collection and conveyance of sewage. Other activities include pipe demolition, tie-ins, sewage by-passing and dewatering. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 69 of 73 2. Examples of mitigation and control measures include the feeding of chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide, caustic soda and magnesium hydroxide at key locations. Other measures include the use of chemical or activated carbon scrubbers for the treatment of odors in the gaseous phase. 3. Examples of odor prevention measures or practices include covering manholes and openings where sewage by-pass equipment is used with plywood or other suitable materials, and sealing of cracks and edges with caulking materials; sealing open sewer pipes during tie-ins; keeping the duration of open manholes to a minimum; plugging of sewers as necessary to reduce odor emission during construction activities and performing of sewage by-pass activities in closed conduits only. 4. Provisions for traffic control and truck access activities for the proper operation and maintenance of the odor control equipment. 5. Public safety during the addition of chemicals into a trunk sewer. This activity shall be stopped if significant rain is expected. Chemical treatment will not be permitted in areas with insufficient access for the proper maneuvering of the delivery truck and access to operating staff. Consultant shall incorporate all the recommended activities and mitigation measures from the OACP into the Final Construction Documents (e.g., General Requirements, Section 7 Environmental Control, 7-H Odor Control and 7-M Groundwater Dewatering, DS 02999, etc.) as needed for each activity of the construction work. The Consultant shall work closely with District staff during the preparation of the OACP. The OACP plan shall be submitted to the District for review and comments prior to the implementation of it. Section 01.4.2.2 "Software" Replace the second to last paragraph with the following: The number and type of required deliverables for each project submittal are defined In Exhibit 9 of this Scope of Work. Section 01.4.4.2 Phase 4 "Construction and Installation" and Phase 5 "Commissioning" Replace the last paragraph of this section with the following: EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 70 of 73 Consultant shall refer to Exhibit 15 of this Scope of Work for O&M Manual and Standard Operating Procedures deliverables format requirements. Consultant shall assist the District in the start-up planning, actual startup, initial operation of the facilities and in conducting special on -site inspections at the District request. Consultant shall prepare document containing the startup requirements, procedures and schedule and submit it to the District for review and comments. All comments shall be incorporated into the startup document. A meeting shall be held to review the startup procedures and schedule and coordinate startup activities. Consultant shall be available to offer advice on the startup procedures, operation of the equipment, troubleshooting and computer operations when a manufacturer's representative is on -site to assist in the startup of major equipment. The Scope of Work specifies the man-hour allowance that shall be included in the Consultant's Cost Proposal. Section 06.7 "Vibration Analysis for Rotating Electrical Equipment" Replace the 1 st paragraph with the following: "Consultant shall include in the vibration analysis the following equipment: Sewage Pumps. Consultant shall obtain (from the manufacturers of the rotating equipment) the exciting frequencies, both torsional and lateral, caused by the equipment." Replace the 2nd to last paragraph with the following: "The final post -installation vibration testing for the structures and equipment involved as required by the District's Master Specifications to verify correctness of the design and installation shall include only the following equipment: Sewage Pumps. Section 10.2.1.19 "Report - Cost -benefit Analysis for Alternatives" Cost -benefit Analysis shall not be required for this project. Section 11.4.1 "Requirements Study" The Requirements Study shall not be part of the Scope of Work. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 71 of 73 Guidelines Chapter 4 Replace in its entirety with Exhibit 10. Section 11.3.1.2 "Loop Diagrams (ILD)" Replace with the following: Consultant is not required to prepare Loop Diagrams (ILD) Section 11.3.1.2. "Process Control Program Flow Diagram" Replace text with the following: The Process Control Flow Diagram is not required for this project. Section 3.8 "Process Flow Diagram" Delete entire section as it is not applicable to the project. Section A.3.15 "PLC, CRISP and SAT Software" Replace this section with the following: This section is information only for Consultant. The District shall develop PLC programming and SCADA configuration using the District's SCADA Administration Tool (SAT). The District shall test the software in the District's Process Controls Integration Lag environment. After successful lab testing, the software shall be loaded into the stand-alone process computers/PLC for startup testing. After successful startup testing, PCI will integrate the PLC, SCADA and SATAF software into the District's master software libraries for distribution into the production systems. Section A.2.19 "Instrument Loop Diagram (ILD)" Omit entire section A.2.19 VI. STAFF ASSISTANCE The District staff member assigned to work with Consultant on the design of this project is Martin Dix, (714) 593-7831, fax at (714) 593-4775, e-mail: mdixa-ocsd.com. EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 72 of 73 EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT 1 — OCSD Engineering Standards on CD-ROM, Parts 1 and 2 EXHIBIT 2 — Project Milestone Matrix for Electrical and I/C Deliverables EXHIBIT 3 — NOT USED EXHIBIT 4 — Sample single line diagram EXHIBIT 5 — Sample Operating Philosophy EXHIBIT 6 —Sample Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) EXHIBIT 7 — NOT USED EXHIBIT 8 — NOT USED EXHIBIT 9 — Deliverables List EXHIBIT 10 — Revised Chapter 4, "Process Design Criteria" EHHIBIT 11 — NOT USED EHHIBIT 12 — NOT USED EXHIBIT 13 — Sample Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate Format EXHIBIT 14 — Sample Final Construction Cost Estimate Format EXHIBIT 15 — Sample O&M Manual organization and description of contents EXHIBIT D8 — District Tagging Procedure EXHIBIT X — Sample Curves for Pump Selection EDMS: 003800445 CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 73 of 73 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1 OCSD Engineering Standards on CD-ROM, Parts 1 and 2 EXHIBIT 2 Project Milestone Matrix for Electrical and I/C Deliverables EXHIBIT 2 - PROJECT MILESTONE MATRIX FOR ELECTRICAL, I/C AND RELATED PROJECT DELIVERABLES No Project Deliverables PDR Submittal DS1 Submittal DS2 Submittal DS3 Submittal FDS Submittal Construction Period (•) Closeout I O&M Manual (•) ELECTRICAL 1 Load List Preliminary for major (each Updated preliminary for all NR NR NR NR NR piece) and auxiliary (lumped) equipment; Lumping of auxiliary equipment (part of TM5) loads is allowed 2 Single -Line Diagrams Completed from MCC level up In progress for all equipment; Draft Final for all Final for all equipment Final for all equipment Part of shop drawings As -Built Final. OCSD to merge it with all major electrical loads; Lumping of auxiliary equipment equipment; Lumping of review with Facility Model (part of TM5); review of draft at is allowed equipment is not allowed documentation the PEW workshops is required. ` 3 Plans: Electrical Site Plan Preliminary sketch (part of TM5) Preliminary Plan In progress Draft Final Final NR As -Built Final Power Plan NR Preliminary for all equipment In progress for all Draft Final for all Final for all equipment NR As -Built Final equipment equipment Electrical And Control Room Preliminary electrical equipment NR (part of power plan) NR (part of power plan) NR (part of power plan) NR (part of power plan) NR As -Built Final (part of power Plan layout (part of TM5) plan) Electrical Demolition Plans Preliminary for major equipment In progress for all equipment In progress for all Draft Final for all Final for all equipment NR NR (part of TM5); review of sample equipment equipment drawings and impacted major facilities list is required at the PEW workshops Lighting Plans NR Preliminary In progress Draft Final Final NR As -Built Final Grounding Plans NR Preliminary In progress Draft Final Final NR As -Built Final Hazardous Area Classification General requirements (part of Draft Final for all areas Final for all areas Final for all areas Final for all areas NR As -Built Final. OCSD to merge it Plans (updated baselines and TM5) with Facility Model new) documentation Fire Detection System (riser NR Preliminary Draft Final Final Updated Final NR As -Built Final diagram) 4 Electrical Equipment NR Preliminary for all equipment In progress for all Draft Final for all Final for all equipment Part of shop drawings As -Built Final Elevations equipment equipment review 5 Schedules: Panel Schedules (I-PhaseNR Representative schedule In progress Draft Final for all Final for all equipment NR As -Built Final And 3-Phase) equipment Cable, Tray And Conduit NR Orientation; discuss In progress Draft Final for all Final for all equipment NR As -Built Final Schedules (electronic media representative samples equipment in OCSD format is also required) Lighting Fixture Schedule NR Representative schedule In progress Draft Final for all Final for all equipment Part of shop drawings As -Built Final equipment review 6 ETAP Presentation Screens NR Representative screens In progress Draft Final Final Part of shop drawings As -Built Final And Printouts review 7 Electrical System Analysis Preliminary calculations (part of Preliminary In progress Draft Final Final Finalized calculations NR Report: TM5); ETAP software not updated to reflect the mandated actual values per the shop drawings (part of shop drawings review). See individual entries below A. Electrical Analysis Summary Preliminary Updated preliminary In progress Draft Final Final Part of shop drawings NR review CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 1 of4 Printed on 08-22-2005 EXHIBIT 2 - PROJECT MILESTONE MATRIX FOR ELECTRICAL, VC AND RELATED PROJECT DELIVERABLES No Project Deliverables PDR Submittal DS1 Submittal DS2 Submittal DS3 Submittal FDS Submittal B. Electrical Measurements/ Collect measurements Final NR NR NR Recording, if Scope -required C. Electrical Field Data Collect and verify field data Verified as needed Verified as needed Verified as needed Verified as needed Col IectionNerification D. Short Circuit Analysis Preliminary calculations Preliminary In progress Draft Final Final E. Load Flow/Voltage Drop Preliminary calculations Preliminary in progress Draft Final Final Study F. Protective Device And Preliminary device settings Preliminary In progress Draft Final Final Coordination Study G. Motor Starting Study Preliminary calculations if Preliminary In progress Draft Final Final needed H. Harmonic Study And The NR Preliminary In progress Draft Final Final Related Measurements I. Neutral Grounding Study, if NR Preliminary In progress Draft Final Final required by Scope J. System Stability Study, if NR Preliminary In progress Draft Final Final required by Scope K. Standby Power Requirements General requirements; Updated preliminary equipment In progress Draft Final Final Analysis preliminary equipment sizing sizing L. Plant ETAP Database Model NR Preliminary In progress Draft Final Final updated to create the Project Model (electronic media is required) M Electrical Load Criticality Preliminary (part of TM5) Updated preliminary Draft Final Final Final Ranking Table N Arc Flash Analysis Preliminary, provide approach NR NR Draft Final Final recommendations. O Lighting Calculations NR Preliminary P Cable temperature rise and NR Preliminary load capability calculations, cable tray fill calculations, etc. 8 Electrical Masterplan Concept Preliminary (part of TM5) Updated preliminary Update, if required by Scope 10 Electrical interconnection NR NR Wiring Diagrams 11 EID Database Discussion of sample EID at a Worksheets in progress (worksheets: electrical, driver, focused meeting is required. transformer) - this deliverable is listed under I&C tasks of the Scope of Work 12 Specifications List applicable specification Review specification sections; Obtain updated Master requirements for color coding Specifications and other identification means for equipment, cables, and In progress Draft Final Final In progress Draft Final Final In progress Draft Final NR NR Draft Final (design portion Final filled out) Draft Final Final Construction Period (') Closeout / O&M Manual (') NR NR NR NR Part of shop drawings NR review Part of shop drawings NR review Part of shop drawings NR review Part of shop drawings NR review Part of shop drawings NR review; Post -installation harmonic content measurements per VFD specifications NR NR NR NR NR NR Finalized database model As -Built Final (including the updated to reflect the protective device settings per the actual values per the shop Acceptance Testing Report). drawings (part of shop OCSD to merge it with Facility drawings review) Model NR As -Built Final Part of shop drawings NR review (based on protective device settings recommended at shop drawing stage) NR NR NR NR Final NR NR NR Part of shop drawings As -Built Final. Consultant to review merge it with O&M Manuals Final NR NR [Contractor to submit As - Built Final to CMMS Group - design and construction portions filled out.) Final NR NR CONTRACT NO.5-50 Page 2 of 4 Printed on 08-22-2005 No Project Deliverables PDR Submittal EXHIBIT 2 - PROJECT MILESTONE MATRIX FOR ELECTRICAL, I/C AND RELATED PROJECT DELIVERABLES DS1 Submittal DS2 Submittal conduit at DS1 workshops. DS3 Submittal FDS Submittal Construction Period (•) Closeout / O&M Manual (') 13 Elementary Diagrams NR Representative drawings Draft Final for all Final for all equipment Final for all equipment Part of Shop drawings (Control Schematics) equipment review INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL 1 I/C Requirements Study, if Final (based on PEW Updated final (based on DS1 NR NR NR NR required by Scope workshops) - part of TM6 workshops) 2 Technical Definitions Final for major process NR NR NR NR NR equipment (partof TM2) 3 Process Control Strategies NR Draft Final Final Updated Final Updated Final NR 4 SCADA G hics List ra hics and provide Final graphic screens (sketches) NR NR NR NR As -Built Final NR NR As -Built Final. OCSD to merge it with O&M Manuals NR rap g p overview graphic for each major for each major process area process area (part of TM2) 5 EID Database Discussion of sample EID at a Worksheet in progress for all Draft Final (design portion Final Updated Final NR NR [Contractor to submit As- (worksheet: instrumentation) focused meeting is required. new equipment and modified filied out) Built Final to CMMS Group — existing equipment (design design and construction portion filled out): portions filled out.] 6 P&IDs Preliminary 100 % complete for Draft Final (tagging is required) Final Updated Final Updated Final NR As -Built Final. OCSD to merge it major project elements and most with Facility Model auxiliary equipment (part of documentation TM6); Discussion of basis for equipment tag numbering for next submittal at a focused meeting is required 7 SAT Database Discussion of sample SAT at a In progress for new and Draft Final Final Final NR NR [Contractor or PCI to focussed meeting is required. demolition of existing equipment submit As -Built Final — design and construction portions filled out.] 8 Network Block Diagrams Preliminary (part of TM6) Draft Final Final Final Final Part of shop drawings As -Built Final review 9 Control Panel Layouts NR Preliminary layout and plan view Draft Final for all panels; Final Final Part of shop drawings As -Built Final (RIO/PLC) no typicals review 10 Control Panels (Local)- NR NR In progress Final Final Part of shop drawings As -Built Final Elevations and Schematics review 11 Instrument Details NR In progress Draft Final Final Final Part of shop drawings As -Built Final review 12 Control Logic Diagrams, if NR In progress Draft Final Final Final Part of shop drawings As -Built Final. OCSD to merge it required by Scope review with Facility Model documentation 13 A. Instrument Loop Diagrams- NR Representative Loop Draft Final Representative Final Representative Final Representative NR NR (consultant -developed if Loop; loop for each type of Loop; loop for each type Loop; loop for each type required by the Scope of instrument and associated of instrument and of instrument and Work) adapter tables associated adapter tables associated adapter tables B. Instrument Loop Diagrams NR NR NR Draft Examples by Final Examples by NR As -Built Final. Consultant to (contractor -developed if Consultant for Contractor Consultant for merge it with O&M Manuals. required by the Scope of Contractor [OCSD to merge As -Built Final Work) with Facility Model documentation] CONTRACT NO.5-50 Page 3 of 4 Printed on 08-22-2005 EXHIBIT 2 - PROJECT MILESTONE MATRIX FOR ELECTRICAL, I/C AND RELATED PROJECT DELIVERABLES No Project Deliverables PDR Submittal DS1 Submittal DS2 Submittal DS3 Submittal 14 Specifications List applicable specification NR Draft Final Final sections; Obtain latest Master Specifications OTHER RELATED DELIVERABLES FOR ELECTRICAL AND I&C 1 Constructability Reviewand Preliminary (part of TM7); based Discuss as needed Discuss as needed Final based on DS3 Sequencing, (if require per on PDR Constructability Constructability Scope) Interim Control Plan Workshop Workshop 2 Process Flow Diagram (PFD) Final (part of TM2); review of NR NR NR draft for each project option at PEW workshops is required. PFD sign -off procedure completed 3 Operating Philosophies Final (based on PEW Updated final (based on DS1 NR NR workshops) -part of TM2 workshops) LEGEND: 1. Preliminary = draft documents; may have missing or preliminary information 2. Representative = templates showing general format to be used on actual documents 3. In progress = deliverable progress in between preliminary and Draft Final 4. Draft Final = 100% completed design deliverable, except for incorporation of District's final review comments 5. Final = 100% completed design deliverable with incorporation of District's review comments 6. As -Built Final = Final deliverable developed during design phase, except: updated to reflect as -built conditions as part Record Documentation Submittal 7. AR = submittal not required NOTES: (') — the tasks flagged with this sign are to be performed by the consultant whose Scope includes Construction Services for the project. FDS Submittal Construction Period (') Closeout! O&M Manual (') Final NR NR NR Construction support per NR Scope NR NR As -Built Final. Consultant to merge it with O&M Manuals NR NR As -Built Final. Consultant to merge it with O&M Manuals CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Page 4 of 4 Printed on 08-22-2005 EXHIBIT 3 NOT USED EXHIBIT 4 Sample single line diagram e N 10 00 a N PU SCE CONNECTION UTILITY TI METERING h SERVICE ENTRANCE SWITCH MAIN. 600A, 277/48OV, 30, 4W, 42000 AIC I I M I 55EDPNI13 l AF I 'SC AVAILABLE = 25,500 AIC ©225 / DEMAND = 48.8 KVA 225AT i c`croAT POWER FACTOR = 0.85 PP�TYPICAL POW( (EXCEPT 55E'. 2 1 i 225AF I r I I SSEMBKI2 II I TVSS 5SESBK126 _� 200AF 200AT II N.O. L7 _ 2 _ 3 _ IS 200 WP 15SERECOl 5SEOPNI26 MCC B 48OV, 30, 3W, 600A, 42000 AIC 55EMCC130 IOOAF T 3A I Ak T 3A I I I (U© 100A I PS 30AT I MCP I MCP 65EMBK300A 55EMBK130 1100AF I 20AT I t 1 3P SPARE SPACE (SPACE I 1 I I I I 15 — 16 P15 MB+ , P TO P 3 SUMP PUMP 2 PANEL LCP ypL SEPMPO 17 18 NOTES: O FOR POWER SERVICE CONNECTION, CONTACT SCE PLANNER MATT WA2M 895-0109. O2 SERVICE ENTRANCE SWITCHBOARD 600A, 277/48OV, 30, 4W, 4; VIEWING WINDOW WITH BOTTOM UG PULL SECTION, VANDAL PRO 03 300A COPPER GROUND BUS O4 1 12/0 BARE COPPER GROUND TO GROUND GRID. SO NOT USED Q: © PROVIDE AUXILIARY CONTACTS IN CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR ANNUNCIATION 01 POSITIONS TO PLC. O7 NOT USED ® 120/208V, .3PH, 200A, 4W, 22,000 AIC POWER PANEL O9 EACH 480V AC RECEPTACLE AND PLUG (CROUSE-HINDS SRD3424, OR EC DIFFERENT PIN CONFIGURATIONS. LABELS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH )NFORMED BIDDING DOCUMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION 10 FOR CONTROL WIRES RECEPTACLE SEE OWG NC120 Q E ADDENDA ISSUED DURING THE BIDDING PERIOD ARE UNIFIED IN THIS 1 1 NEMA 4X TERMINAL BOX Q ,CUMENT. IF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE UNIFIED SET AND THE BIDDING SET =LUOING THE ADDENDA ARE FOUND, THE BIDDING SET WITH THE ORIGINAL 12 SEE OWG. E 1004 FOR GENERATOR RECEPTACLE SPECIFICATION. DENDA SHALL GOVERN. SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM AND CONTROL DIAGRAM UPDATE 07 DES PROJECT NO. T-LOCK PVC T oI REHABILITATION OF FRP DOOR CHANGE /n DRA "A" STREET PUMP STATION 5-52 RFI NO. 31 3 25 CH DRAWING NO. RFI No ze 3t5 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM EGOO1 WEATHER STATION REMOVAL 315 RK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR 72 103 EXHIBIT 5 Sample Operating Philosophy Orange County Sanitation District Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement, Job No. 132-66 OPERATING PHILOSOPHY NO. 5 GRIT BASINS FINAL April 2003 <4 caro��v 3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92704 • (714) 540-4300 • FAX (714) 540-4349 H:\Client\Ocsd_SAOW\6047a10\Rpt\OpPhil\Op Phil_5Final.doc ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PLANT NO.2 HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT OPERATING PHILOSOPHY NO. 5 GRIT BASINS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 5-1 2.0 CONTROL STRATEGY OVERVIEW..................................................................... 5-1 3.0 GRIT BASIN INLET AND OUTLET GATES........................................................... 5-1 3.1 Field/Local Manual Control........................................................................... 5-2 3.2 Local Interlocks.............................................................................................5-2 3.3 Remote Manual Control................................................................................ 5-3 3.4 Remote Automatic Control........................................................................... 5-3 3.5 Remote Software Interlocks......................................................................... 5-4 3.6 Adjustable Setpoints..................................................................................... 5-5 3.7 Alarms.......................................................................................................... 5-5 4.0 GRIT BASIN MIXERS............................................................................................ 5-5 4.1 Field Controls............................................................................................... 5-6 4.2 Local Manual Control....................................................................................5-6 4.3 Local Interlocks............................................................... .............................. 5-6 4.4 Remote Manual Control................................................................................ 5-6 4.5 Remote Automatic Control........................................................................... 5-7 4.6 Remote Software Interlocks......................................................................... 5-7 4.7 Adjustable Setpoints..................................................................................... 5-7 4.8 Alarms.......................................................................................................... 5-8 5.0 GRIT BASIN DRAIN VALVES................................................................................ 5-8 5.1 Field/Local Manual Control........................................................................... 5-8 5.2 Local Interlocks.............................................................................................5-8 5.3 Remote Manual Control................................................................................ 5-9 5.4 Remote Automatic Control........................................................................... 5-9 5.5 Remote Software Interlocks......................................................................... 5-9 5.6 Adjustable Setpoints..................................................................................... 5-9 5.7 Alarms........................................................................................................ 5-10 6.0 CHANNEL LEVEL MONITORING SYSTEM........................................................ 5-10 6.1 Adjustable Setpoints...................................................................................5-10 6.2 Alarms........................................................................................................ 5-11 7.0 NORMAL OPERATION........................................................................................ 5-11 H:\Client\Ocsd_SAO\M6047a10\Rpt\OpPhil\Op Phil_5Final.doc 8.0 ABNORMAL OPERATION................................................................................... 5-12 8.1 Grit Basin Out of Service............................................................................ 5-12 8.2 Grit Basin Mixer Out of Service.................................................................. 5-12 8.3 Sluice Gate Repairs.................................................................................... 5-13 8.4 Pump Downs.............................................................................................. 5-13 9.0 EMERGENCY OPERATION................................................................................ 5-13 9.1 Power Outage............................................................................................. 5-13 9.2 PLC Out of Service..................................................................................... 5-13 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 5.1 Grit Basin Process Flow Diagram............................................................... 5-14 H:1Client\Ocsd_SAOM6047a101Rpt\OpPhil\Op Phil_SFinal.doc Operating Philosophy No. 5 GRIT BASINS 1.0 SUMMARY The grit basin system consists of grit basin inlet and outlet channels and six vortex grit basins. Vortex grit basins work on the principles of gravity and centrifugal action to capture grit in the center hopper of the circular tank. The system is designed to process a peak wet weather flow of 340 mgd with six grit basins on-line. During normal flow conditions, four grit basins would be on-line. The fifth and sixth grit basins would be brought on-line during high flow events. Each grit basin system includes one mixer, one inlet gate, one outlet gate, and one drain valve. Closing the inlet and outlet gates of a grit basin would isolate the basin and take it off-line. Water flows into the grit basins from the influent pump station discharge channel. Effluent from the grit basins flows into the primary splitter structure and from there to the existing primary influent distribution structures and primary sedimentation basins. 2.0 CONTROL STRATEGY OVERVIEW The grit basin system includes mixers, inlet gates, outlet gates, drain valves, and a channel level monitoring system. All gates would be equipped with motorized operators. Local Manual, Remote Manual, and Remote Automatic controls would be provided for the grit basin gates and mixers. As described below, in Remote Automatic mode grit basins would be placed on-line automatically by opening inlet and outlet gates. Grit basin mixers would be started when the associated grit basin is placed on-line. Grit basin drain valves would be equipped with pneumatic actuators. Local Manual and Remote Manual controls would be provided for the grit basin drain valves. All valves with pneumatic actuators will be designed to fail in last position, unless otherwise noted. Under normal flow conditions, four vortex grit basins would be on-line. To optimize the flow split to the grit basins, it is recommended that two of the three east grit basins and two of the west grit basins be on-line. When the plant total influent flow rate exceeds a predetermined adjustable value, additional grit basin(s) would be automatically brought on-line as needed to handle the peak flow event. After the peak flow event has passed and the total plant influent flow decreases, the additional grit basin(s) could be taken off-line manually at the operator's discretion to return to the normal condition of four grit basins on-line. 3.0 GRIT BASIN INLET AND OUTLET GATES Each grit basin would be provided with an inlet gate and an outlet gate for isolation. The inlet and outlet gates would be open when the associated grit basin is on-line, and the gates would be closed when the basin is off-line. Each gate would be equipped with a 5-1 H:\Client\Ocsd_SAO=6047a10V2pt\OpPhil\Op Phil_5Final.doc motorized operator with provisions for Field/Local Manual, Remote Manual, and Remote Automatic controls. A minimum of four grit basins would normally be on-line at all times. If fewer than four grit basins are on-line (as indicated by the respective inlet and outlet gates in the "fully open" position), the PLC will activate an alarm. 3.1 Field/Local Manual Control The field control station for each grit basin gate would be provided at the associated motorized operator. Limit switches provided on the gate provide positive indication of "fully open" and "fully closed" gate positions. Field mounted control and indication devices include the following: • LOCAL -STOP -REMOTE (L-S-R) switch — Lockable in the STOP position. • OPEN and CLOSE pushbuttons. • OPENED and CLOSED indicator lights. When the L-S-R switch is placed in the LOCAL position, the local OPEN and CLOSE pushbuttons are enabled and allow local control of the gate. When the L-S-R switch is placed in the REMOTE position, the gate would be controlled remotely from the SCADA system. 3.2 Local Interlocks Local hardwired interlocks associated with the grit basin inlet and outlet gates are described below. 3.2.1 Life Safety Permissives 1. None. 3.2.2 Equipment Permissives 1. None. 3.2.3 Other Interlocks The following hardwired interlocks would be active in all modes of operation: 1. Motor Over Temperature: Stop the motor and activate an alarm. 2. Motorized Operator Over Torque: Stop the motor and activate an alarm. 5-2 H:1ClientlOcsd_SAONA6047a101Rpt1OpPhillOp Phil 5Final.doc 3.3 Remote Manual Control The L-S-R switch in the field must be placed in the REMOTE position to allow remote control from the SCADA system. An operator may remotely open and close a gate using the OPEN -CLOSE soft switch at the HMI Auto/Manual Control Station (A/M Station). 3.4 Remote Automatic Control The L-S-R switch in the field must be placed in the REMOTE position to allow remote control from the SCADA system. The gate is placed in Auto mode by selecting the AUTO soft switch at the A/M Station. Under normal flow conditions, four vortex grit basins would be on-line. The fifth and sixth grit basins would be designated as Lag 1 and Lag 2 at the HMI. Any two of the six grit basins may be designated as the Lag 1 and Lag 2 grit basins. In Auto mode, the Lag 1 and Lag 2 grit basins would be brought on-line when the plant influent flow rate or liquid level in the influent pump station discharge channel exceeds adjustable setpoints, as described below. The Lag 1 and Lag 2 grit basins would be taken off-line manually at the operator's discretion to return to the normal condition of four grit basins on-line. The procedure for taking a grit basin off-line is described in Section 6.0, Normal Operation. In Auto mode, the inlet and outlet gates would be opened automatically by the PLC to bring additional grit basins on-line based on the total influent flow rate and liquid level in the influent pump station discharge channel as follows: 1. Additional grit basins (Lag 1 and Lag 2) would be brought on-line when the plant total influent flow rate, as measured by the influent flow meters, exceeds adjustable setpoints. 2. Additional grit basins would also be brought on-line when the liquid level in the influent pump station discharge channel, as measured by the channel level monitoring system, exceeds an adjustable setpoint and stays above that level for an adjustable time duration. If the high level in the influent pump station discharge channel persists after the inlet gate of the first additional grit basin starts to open and after a preset adjustable time delay, then a second additional grit basin would be brought on-line. In Auto mode, the inlet and outlet gates would be opened automatically by the PLC to bring an additional grit basin on-line if the grit pump associated with one of the on-line grit basins fails. Refer to Operating Philosophy No. 6 for a definition of grit pump failure. 5-3 H:\Client\Ocsd SAOV,6047a10\Rpt\OpPhil\Op Phil SFinal.doc In all cases, before bringing a grit basin on-line, the PLC would first check the status of the associated grit pump. If the grit pump is "Out -of -Service" or not in Remote Auto mode, then the PLC would activate an alarm and skip to the next available grit basin. If no other grit basin is available, the PLC would activate another alarm and proceed with bringing a grit basin on-line, even though its grit pump may not be available. The sequence for bringing additional grit basins on-line is as follows: 1. Lag 1 with Pump. 2. Lag 2 with Pump. 3. Lag 1 without Pump. 4. Lag 2 without Pump. To bring a grit basin on-line, the PLC would open the corresponding inlet and outlet gates and start the grit basin mixer as described below. If an inlet or outlet gate does not reach its "fully open" position within a preset adjustable time delay after the "open" signal is sent, a "Gate Fail" alarm would be activated and the program would then skip to the next available grit basin, regardless of the status of associated grit pump. The grit pump associated with a grit basin would be interlocked with the grit basin inlet gate to start after the grit basin is brought on-line as described in more detail in Operating Philosophy No. 6 - Grit Handling System. 3.5 Remote Software Interlocks Remote software interlocks associated with the grit basin inlet and outlet gates are described below. 3.5.1 Wait Mode Conditions 1. None. 3.5.2 Process Disable Conditions 1. None. 3.5.3 Other Software Interlocks The following software interlocks would be active in Remote Manual and Remote Auto Mode: 1. Motorized Operator Over Torque: Stop the motor and activate an alarm. 2. Motor Over Temperature: Stop the motor and activate an alarm. 3. Other (as required by OCSD templates). 5-4 H:\Client\Ocsd_SAOM6047a10\Rpt\OpPhil\Op Phil_5Final.doc 3.6 Adjustable Setpoints Adjustable setpoints for various operating parameters defined by a programmer or an operator include the following: 1. Plant Total Influent Flow Rate to Bring an Additional Grit Basin On -Line. 2. Plant Total Influent Flow Rate to Bring Another Additional Grit Basin On -Line. 1 Level in Influent Pump Station Discharge Channel to Add Grit Basin. 4. Alarm setpoints. 5. Various time delays. 3.7 Alarms A preliminary list of alarms associated with the grit basin gates follows. Additional alarms may be added as the control system design proceeds. 1. Motorized Operator Motor Over Temperature. 2. Motorized Operator Over Torque. 1 Motorized Operator Common Failure. 4. Less than four grit basins are on-line (as indicated by respective inlet and outlet gates in the Full Open position). 5. Fail to Open: Activate an alarm if the gate does not reach the Full Open position within an adjustable time delay after an "Open" signal has been sent by the PLC. 6. Fail to Close: Activate an alarm if the gate does not reach the Full Closed position within an adjustable time delay after a "Close" signal has been sent by the PLC. 7. Grit basin is called to be brought on-line and associated pump is not in Remote Auto mode, not In -Service, or if a pump interlock or WAIT condition is present. 8. Other (as required by OCSD templates). 4.0 GRIT BASIN MIXERS The grit basin mixers operate to keep lighter organic material suspended. When a grit basin is on-line (i.e. inlet and outlet gates are fully open), the associated mixer would run. The grit basin mixers would be provided with Field, Local Manual, Remote Manual, and Remote Automatic controls. As described below, in Automatic mode, a grit basin mixer would be started when the associated grit basin gates are fully open, following an adjustable time delay. 5-5 H:\Client\Ocsd_SAOW\6047a10\Rpt\OpPhil\Op Phil_5Final.doc 4.1 Field Controls The field control station for each mixer is provided at the associated mixer. Field mounted control devices include the following: • LOCKOUT STOP pushbutton. • Jog Switch. 4.2 Local Manual Control A local control station for each mixer will be located at the MCC with the following control and indication devices: • LOCAUREMOTE switch. • START and STOP push buttons. • Status and Alarm lights. When the L-R switch is placed in the LOCAL position, an operator may start and stop a mixer using the local start and stop push buttons. When the L-R switch is placed in the REMOTE position, the mixer will be controlled remotely from the SCADA system. 4.3 Local Interlocks Local hardwired interlocks associated with the grit basin mixers are described below. 4.3.1 Life Safety Permissives 1. None. 4.3.2 Equipment Permissives The following hardwired interlocks would be active in Local Mode only: 1. Motor Over Torque: Stop the motor and activate an alarm. 4.3.3 Other Interlocks The following hardwired interlocks would be active in all modes of operation: 1. Motor Overload: Stop the motor and activate an alarm. 4.4 Remote Manual Control The L-R switch at the MCC must be placed in the REMOTE position to allow remote control from the SCADA system. At the HMI A/M Station, an operator may remotely start/stop a mixer using the ON/OFF soft switches. H:\Client\Ocsd_SAO\M6047a10\Rpt\OpPhll\Op Phil_5Final.doc 4.5 Remote Automatic Control The L-R switch at the MCC must be placed in the REMOTE position to allow remote control from the SCADA system. The grit basin mixer is placed in Automatic mode by selecting the AUTO soft switch at the A/M Station. In Auto mode, the grit basin mixer would be operated automatically by the PLC as follows: • The PLC would start a grit basin mixer when the associated grit basin is on-line (i.e., associated inlet and outlet gates are fully open as indicated by limit switches on the gates) following an adjustable time delay. • If the grit basin mixer fails to start within a preset adjustable time delay after the "start" signal is sent, a "Mixer Fail" alarm would be activated. • When the associated basin's inlet or outlet gate is closed to take a grit basin off-line as monitored by a "fully closed" signal from the gate limit switch, the PLC would stop the mixer after an adjustable time delay. • If the grit basin mixer fails to stop within a preset adjustable time delay after the "stop" signal is sent, a "Mixer Fail" alarm would be activated. 4.6 Remote Software Interlocks Remote software interlocks associated with the grit basin mixers are described below. 4.6.1 Wait Mode Conditions The following software interlocks would be active in Remote Manual and Remote Auto Mode only: 1. Motor Over Torque: Stop the motor and activate an alarm. 2. Motor Overload: Stop the motor and activate an alarm. 3. Other (as required by OCSD templates). 4.6.2 Process Disable Conditions The following software interlocks would be active in Remote Manual Mode only: 1. As required by OCSD templates. 4.7 Adjustable Setpoints Adjustable setpoints for various operating parameters defined by a programmer or an operator include the following: 1. Various time delays. 5-7 H;\Client\Ocsd_SAOM6047a10\Rpt\OpPhil\Op Phil_5Final.doc 4.8 Alarms A preliminary list of alarms associated with the grit basin mixers follows. Additional alarms may be added as the control system design proceeds. 1. Motor Overload. 2. Motor Over Torque. 3. Grit basin is on-line and the associated mixer is not in Remote Auto or not in-service. 4. Fail to Start: Activate an alarm if the mixer does not start within an adjustable time delay after the "Start" signal has been sent by the PLC. 5. Fail to Stop: Activate an alarm if the mixer does not stop within an adjustable time delay after the "Stop" signal has been sent by the PLC. 6. Other (as required by OCSD templates). 5.0 GRIT BASIN DRAIN VALVES A drain valve would be provided for each grit basin to allow draining the basin to the bar screen inlet channel when a basin is taken off-line or out of service. Each valve is equipped with a pneumatic actuator with provisions for Field/Local Manual and Remote Manual controls. 5.1 Field/Local Manual Control The field control station for each drain valve is provided in the field at the associated valve operator. Limit switches on the valve actuator provide indication of "fully open" and "fully closed" valve positions. Field -mounted control and indication devices include the following: • O-C-R switch. • LOCKOUT STOP push button. • OPENED and CLOSED indicator lights. When the O-C-R switch is piaced in the OPEN position, the valve opens. When the O-C-R switch is placed in the CLOSE position, the valve closes. When the O-C-R switch is placed in the REMOTE position, the valve would be controlled remotely from the SCADA system. 5.2 Local Interlocks Local hardwired interlocks associated with the grit basin drain valves are described below. 5-8 H:\Client\Ocsd_SAOV,A6047a10\Rpt\OpPhil\Op Phil_5Final.doc 5.2.1 Life Safety Permissives 1. None. 5.2.2 Equipment Permissives 1. None. 5.2.3 Other Interlocks 1. None. 5.3 Remote Manual Control The O-C-R switch in the field must be placed in the REMOTE position to allow remote control from the SCADA system. An operator may remotely open and close a valve using the OPEN -CLOSE soft switch at the HMI A/M Station. 6.4 Remote Automatic Control None. 5.6 Remote Software Interlocks Remote software interlocks associated with the grit basin drain valves are described below. 5.5.1 Wait Mode Conditions 1. None. 5.5.2 Process Disable Conditions 1. None. 5.5.3 Other Software Interlocks The following software interlocks would be active in Remote Manual Mode only: 1. Grit basin inlet gate "not closed": Do not allow the drain valve to open if the inlet gate of the associated grit basin is not fully closed. 2. Grit basin outlet gate "not closed": Do not allow the drain valve to open if the outlet gate of the associated grit basin is not fully closed. 3. Close drain valve if the limit switch for associated grit basin inlet and/or outlet gate changes from "closed" to "not closed." 5.6 Adjustable Setpoints 1. Various time delays 5-9 H:\Client\Ocsd_SAOW\6047a10\RptlOpPhiKOp Phil_5Final.doc 6.7 Alarms A preliminary list of alarms associated with the grit basin drain valves follows. Additional alarms may be added as the control system design proceeds. 1. Fail to Open: Activate an alarm if the valve does not reach the Full Open position within an adjustable time delay after an "Open" signal has been sent by the PLC. 2. Fail to Close: Activate an alarm if the valve does not reach the Full Closed position within an adjustable time delay after a "Close" signal has been sent by the PLC. 3. Other (as required by OCSD templates). 6.0 CHANNEL LEVEL MONITORING SYSTEM The channel level monitoring system measures liquid level in the influent pump station discharge channel and transmits level data to the SCADA system for remote monitoring and control. The data will be used by the PLC to activate a High Level alarm for the influent pump station discharge channel and automatically bring additional grit basins on-line as described above for the Grit Basin Inlet and Outlet Gates, Remote Automatic Control mode. The channel level monitoring system includes two ultrasonic level sensors and transmitters. One sensor would be mounted in each of the two sides of the influent pump station discharge channel to accommodate the condition that one half of the channel is isolated and out of service. The dual devices also provide a level of redundancy. Level data from each device would be transmitted to the SCADA system for remote monitoring of channel level. Each ultrasonic level sensor/indicating transmitter would include a level alarm contact for indicating a High Level alarm. In addition, the PLC would generate Soft Level alarms based on the level transmitter signal. Each ultrasonic level sensor would be provided with an In-Service/Out-of-Service soft selector switch at the HMI Configuration Screen. The Configuration Screen would also include a soft selector switch to select one of the channel sensors as the Primary level device to be used by the PLC for control purposes. If both of the channel ultrasonic level sensors are in-service, the PLC will compare the level measured by the two sensors. If the difference between the two levels exceeds an adjustable setpoint, an alarm will be activated. 6.1 Adjustable Setpoints Adjustable setpoints for various operating parameters defined by a programmer or an operator will include the following: 1. High Liquid Level. 2. Differential between the two level sensors. 5-10 H:\Client\Ocsd_SAOM6047at0\Rpt\OpPhil\Op Phil_5Final.doc 3. Various time delays. 6.2 Alarms A preliminary list of alarms associated with the channel level monitoring system follows. Additional alarms may be added as the control system design proceeds. 1. High Level. 2. High Differential. 3. Other (as required by OCSD templates). 7.0 NORMAL OPERATION Under normal operating conditions, the grit basin system would be operated in Remote Auto mode as described above, with control provided through the SCADA system from a SCADA System Workstation. The L-S-R selector switches at the inlet and outlet gates would be placed in the REMOTE position and all gates would be placed in AUTO mode at the HMI A/M station. The L-R selector switch for each grit basin mixer at the MCC would be placed in the REMOTE position and all mixers would be placed in AUTO mode at the HMI A/M station. All stop plates would be removed and the inlet and outlet gates for on-line grit basins would be open. The number of on-line grit basins would depend on the total plant influent flow rate. As described above for Grit Basin Inlet and Outlet Gates — Remote Auto mode, under normal flow conditions, four grit basins would be on-line and additional grit basins (Lag 1 and Lag 2) would be brought on-line automatically as needed under high -flow or high-level conditions. The grit basin mixers in all on-line basins would be running. The Lag 1 and Lag 2 grit basins would be taken off-line manually at the operator's discretion to return to the normal condition of four grit basins on-line. When a grit basin is to be taken off-line, an operator would put the associated inlet gate and outlet gate in Remote Manual mode and close the gates. When an inlet or outlet gate is "fully closed", the associated grit basin mixer would be stopped automatically by the PLC as described above. If an inlet or outlet gate does not reach its "fully closed" position within a preset time delay after the "close" signal is sent, a "Fail to Close" alarm would be activated. After a grit basin is off-line, the associated inlet and outlet gates are fully closed and the mixer is off, an operator would open the drain valve (using Remote Manual or locally at the valve) to drain the grit basin by gravity back to the bar screen inlet channel. When the basin has been completely drained and/or is ready to be made available for service, an operator must first close the associated drain valve. When the valve is fully closed, the operator would put the associated inlet gate and outlet gate in Auto mode. 5-11 H:\ClientkOesd—SAOM6047alO\RptNOpPhil\Op Phil_5Final.doc The grit basins control system does not limit the District to operating four grit basins during normal dry weather conditions in any mode, including the Remote Auto mode. The grit basins control system has built-in flexibility to allow five or six grit basins on-line during dry weather conditions. For example, it is very possible the District operators may elect to keep all six grit basins on-line at all times. The District operators should make their decision during the start-up phase or optimization phase of the project or any time thereafter. Operation's decision should be based on actual wastewater characteristics (which differ substantially from plant to plant), actual diurnal flow pattern at the time, and observed performance of the overall grit removal system under peak diurnal, average, and minimum flow conditions. The operator can decide the minimum number of grit basins on-line (four or more) in the Remote Auto mode by inputting relatively low values for the plant total influent flow rate setpoints that bring the Lag 1 and Lag 2 basins on-line. 8.0 ABNORMAL OPERATION Abnormal operating conditions would require adjustment to normal operating procedures as follows. 8.1 Grit Basin Out of Service The grit basin facility is designed with six grit basins sized to handle the design peak wet weather flow with all basins on-line. During dry weather conditions, a minimum of four vortex basins would be on-line. If a grit basin is out of service for maintenance, the associated inlet and outlet gates should be closed and Locked Out in accordance with District standards. If the inlet and outlet gates for a grit basin are not in Remote Auto mode, the grit basin would be skipped over by the automatic control program and the next available grit basin in the sequence would be brought on-line. 8.2 Grit Basin Mixer Out of Service The grit basin facility is designed with six grit basins sized to handle the design peak wet weather flow with all basins in-service. If a grit basin mixer is out -of -service, the basin may remain in-service if necessary to handle peak flows. The mixer functions to keep organics in suspension. Therefore, if a grit basin is used while the mixer is out -of -service, flow through the basin and grit removal would not be inhibited. However, the grit product may contain more organic material with greater odor generation potential at the grit handling facilities. If a grit basin mixer is out -of -service and the basin is not needed to handle peak flows, then it may be preferred to take the grit basin out of service until the mixer is repaired. The associated grit basin could be taken out of service completely as described above. Alternatively, the basin could be designated as the Lag 2 basin so that it could be brought on-line if necessary to accommodate a peak flow event. 5-12 H:\Client\Ocsd—SAOM6047alOMRpt\OpPhilkOp Phil 6Final.doc 8.3 Sluice Gate Repairs The grit basin facility would include provisions for isolating each sluice gate from common channels with stop plates and/or using other gates. If a gate must be taken out of service for maintenance, the associated grit basin would be taken out of service and a stop plate would be installed to isolate the gate from the common channel. 8.4 Pump Downs In the event that a pump down scenario is initiated, take all grit basin gates that are not open out of Remote Auto mode. That way, the influent pump station discharge channel's high-level alarm will not open these gates unnecessarily during the pump down scenario. Once the pump down has commenced, put the affected gates back into Remote Auto and continue with normal grit basin operation. 9.0 EMERGENCY OPERATION Emergency operating procedures are as follows. 9.1 Power Outage In the event of a utility power outage simultaneous with a CEN-GEN power outage, the Level 3 headworks standby power generators could provide power to the grit basin gates and mixers. However, the Level 3 Headworks standby generators are not sized to handle the mixer loads under the design peak wet weather loading condition. Therefore, under this scenario, the gates and mixers will not operate in the Remote Auto mode. The grit basins could still operate and remove grit with the mixers not running. The District operators can assess the status of the Level 3 generators and decide whether enough power is available to turn on the mixers. Grit basin operation should be verified following both the startup of standby power and the restoration of utility/CEN-GEN power. 9.2 PLC Out of Service In case of PLC failure, the associated equipment must be operated temporarily using local controls. Place the L-S-R selector switches to LOCAL for all inlet and outlet gates. Gates are then controlled with the OPEN and CLOSE push buttons located at the motorized operators. Switch the L-R switches for the grit basin mixers to LOCAL at the respective MCC, and push the START or STOP push button based on whether the basins are on or off-line. Operators would determine the number of basins that should be on-line, based on potential weather conditions. For normal conditions, make sure that a minimum of four basins are on-line. For peak events, make sure all six basins are on-line. Once the PLC has been restored, return all the switches to the Remote mode and resume normal operation. 5-13 H:\Client\Ocsd_SAOM6047a10\RptlOpPhil\Op Phil_5Final.doc GRIT U31N 01 GRIT a -SIN GRIT BASIN M 6' MANUAL MIXER 01 M INLET GATE MI W (TYP) GMT EIAM 1 ULTRASONIC A" PUNT WATER _ OUTLET GATE %1 Q� IEVEI SENSOR (�)S #1 {" MANUAL J 3 PNEUMATIC WATER SCOUR BV (TYP) PLUG VALVE TO PUNT WATER (Typ) GRIT PUNP GRIT BWN #2 GRIT BASIN (Typ) NI%ER p2 CRR BASIN M % ORAN M�-(NPA M INLET GTE /2 GRIT BASIN TO PRIMARY 1 1/2' PNEUMATIC OUTLET GATE +2 SPL97ER AIR SCOUR STRUCTURE BV MP) CRIT BASIN 13 GRIT BASIN MIXER 03 GRIT BASIN INLET FATE QS M M GRIT WIN OUTLET GATE {3 FROM INFLUENT PUMP STATION DISCHARGE CHANNEL CRIT &SIN /R CRIT BASIN MIXER M1 GRIT BASIN Y INLET HATE MA M f-- CRIT BASIN _— OUTLET GATE YA GRIT WIN p5 GMT BASIN MIXER /5 M TO FIMRY GRIT BASIN M 4 INLET FATE NS n STRtrTSPUTTERURE —' OOYkk?? GRIT BASIN OUTLET GTE {5 ULTRASONIC Q�LEVEL SENSOR '>SUd " CRR BA31N /6 GRIT BASIN GMT BASIN INLET INLET GAIT: %6 / / M `/ MIXER y6 CRIT BASIN OUTLET GATE %6 COrOLLO onsinser■ ' `-6' PNEUMATIC PLUG VALVE TO ISAR SCREEN (ORNN) (TIP-6) INLET CHANNEL GRIT BASINS PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM FIGURE 5.1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT '* �y EXHIBIT 6 Sample Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) Ul 55EfCP56B CLEARING PANEL LCP A i xsTr l R ry I TSrC3 w, w.w_________________________________________________________—_...____-- _ WrmlSw w tnF K SEM-11f ! I!Y w5 HIIC IIM --� 1YF l e1w-w Y meTw slnF-nR ____________________________ ______-_____________ I ._, ui lw Tr Tri u1 I 55ETUBIBBR 5 IOB IUF IIAI UEFL 511Ir 6F �I-_(•^. , LONMot SECTION VARIABLE ABLE SPEED NIS ifM FYD � � R--------------------------------------------------- i--- ------------------------- ------------ ------- --- _ -------- ---------- 5OB CONSTANT SPEED) PUMP SEOLIENCE SELECTION ■ IA wwC & . I'M WWw —T.—. 55EPMPIOO . wrzy A SSIACT K w 6 OEMTWWOWIIa K 51wML 10 YF4 SSFITR r•UR NFR �a PUMP I P SLrt YF'iNIA L ULFSf wrwlx NWIM - UI H — MN NBR SWt•STATw U Ar Iti�M YwS K m W O = � 2 MIX Cw m3 S I(W ST IUp TS FIT IUF S alm o• NIF FAGS F MK woe TOES wl. S MNhw lm M M<DOT Ism wV _ 10 n1w f W. L SEIttT N ]EtlEK +WN1Y w Hli YAIMOMA! NNSEFirQ. F U Ofim LOW klkm MKITES NO'oo Iul NnnU 6 RuwlC » wtlllTaF 1 w Ar u¢ YRprETTELL u n AwN F Lw axlRas w w+AssEq ¢�raFonrirsim ro rlfOtW aFw lErk11 BIDDING DOCUMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION WtK slam m wmwx INPNR ro aVx SEK. Too �wriA IIWY6 STwT r0 OEIwu T[i UESEL owtw NmIwIEL [gEAmLL FIFS Swr-0iF RFLSaE YYY[ aoiq wD am ICONFORMED SEI MDaYIEIM X.. R CIUK. ii ii WN SST NQV II[ IWQIOR NIE FM- SON 91 vIM n( w¢IIK aN:I FR oIBN�fR ofMYG IwD9e fWa FDKIa 11 .. SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM AM CONTROL DAlIlAll I. - RMAEBLITATION OF TtOCW PVC_ • ��LEESRO:Inc.SANITATION ORANGE COUNTY 'A' STREET PUMP STATIONI PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAMr xo�71HwOL RFI N0. 2eWEATHER STATION REMOVALF „' ` i sR<<rr" DISTRICT WASTEWATER PUMP NO.1 55E—NP-120 OISCRIPIIw YN nWT t'-scar .ttWOlxwYi Ilwn 2I I 4 5 B 7 1 8 I a 10 5ps--I �-W— W 4).-A L Y' A A 55EU039 DAIPLfREWPOWER NDNIIOR,, JAII'd ------------ on! 47 (4)m am -------------- 55EUIS060 ps ...... ill Ifly, I it C N c 1-46 ------------- 1 011 (4-0 (Z'l LM Sr %F 55ETUB288A 20 55ETLIB2 L LCONTROL SECII ---------- L —11- VARIABL SPEED CONSTANT.7 SPEED [DSTALINENT.POWER E ----------------------------------------------------------- Ma FEN YnN (W) E ---------------------- xanrX0 --------------------------- ------------------- T 6— IN varrSA 2 8 KINP I F r L AJINP FAILS IF NLIE Ara TINES W. C0110F11110 811DINI DDIUMINT FOR CONSTRUCTION oE`MEEN 11N`UTES *I MVAt LW.-F.=Il IF NW m1m � MXME.&REPOT TE ff.NNIH. T.—""t L V� NO IDCAFN FEX K amGlw C7_7 FtR��l I sr - I. 101TR= FW tMEME-M.— 1p" 5EPSA yr A ISINGLE LINE DIAGRAM AND CONTROL DIAGRAWOPE I) "A" 11 F.— JA LEE&R&Inc. ORANGE COUNTY 'A* UTATION OF REHAB STREET PUMP STATION 552 IT-tDCK FVC FAP ODOR CNANGE I IR �I NO 11 I PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM FIFI NO. 24 Flu" ill", SANITATION DISTRICT WASTEWATER PUMP NO.2 55E-NP-130 ME'I.E. IIAT... REMOVAL V;-L D(SCRIP11M WE :IF 2--SCKE 11-01-11 1 2 3 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 8 9 10 I, _ � sAr�uB sFuxla SSR,BNI 59F�r131 Aux Nm4nP3 if/wa —• -—'—�-^—•—•—•-- ""I YNOL -- ,a �,,� -- .—' •--'�—'-- N e■m rsFcs "m n a _ XS fls mrfxa w,fs, � 3 � ` La�'.srloi'xmwsf Imm NL ,Amn nas swL INMi Rmn ssesmrwl coF T Q p as ! Inwa calAnz slow ABIVRI r/m ro fu n]i surly z 8 /�o; I- I �, ? 5 s Iwrn[ wrmui R+InI nm munKs fa ua vr. 3 9i n SNN A I A O6 a IBWC H1 ffl flRN[S Mm A IMS SBEif-IH . -.-•_ _._ _ �� �_----.-.-.--�--- --_.-.-..� . -.-.-- / IBpC lBIX wr[S Ilm6 a4x i; -•-.-^---•-•--. 4; � - �, �,!'i --. I I tlM 6 fl]B0 fyY � t � M A YgLI R a 6 HFM11nLBfnLL R SIBYL N IN S[YilnblFA FBa Kt;4/m fiVItD R ro bn Of NBm[E. � � L n3P nB5 i vK1E pEll 1Mf Brt. I I -T.-�_ v511 ._._--_,�-.-. L- [LI TI L Np rNm SYlla Sid H 3[I n SIIFII tlrAx CrtlL IB■110.1K vlrL rn BE BERsiCO iIIBv 11A RC rm LBa a rLt IPNnI IBx m/a YLL xmf rMlm/ %N falNl BRmMB Ri01 lC1 A NBm SYIIDEL IA A RL NmE mflN1mE NBHABfaEs CaNA1E0 /B A YiYA Rln NNIIWI arM Mm GDFMiFO f101 IN 4RM vIYE ff6ttml IRf1r0. N �NM QMEN iIBNEiFN FIfm3 INN4NF3 A fIaRAR fNNA1Q rwn il[ LM1tlR tlBS BF A SBYAF NBi � IIFi I IS mmiE0.lq nUN]L CItlE q mSFBlE0. �\1/1Y1BII/ 8 8 I I �` /�RtfMw C,0.f EB tltF If[ 1SG BB A/C p ■ ■ s ■ �aI �{jAi r; j I F i , r: dt ri sc nl ~' m sn s wrm`Nux�onux sffBR N afn n Q manna , C q, ----------- ---------- sevwc m yy�ml� faconp 1 >e<M•I]/ -�I/ .___ vFWM,Gw q 1N gsEr ♦ a / I _..� ]/BI sw Rrn \ a ]"/ s SNmq zsfn/w i06Mml 0 smlu ZfVxH ------' /""\ I --1 ! ! /\ Slq ']IIC ]RFB I ,.f' ,.1- \ I -jyl I M iLIFIH FmNFIMm 1— SFPq]B ■-F"-yrt-Sq �~ Mf65 SR Ni ] lBV ILi1 SM if n I 55E,UBNOA SECTION / / \ \ 55EYFO300 VARIABLE SPEED \ 55ETUB300 CONSTANT SPEED ! _ I / O D LCON1Rp. ..-..-.- ..-..-..-.. ..-.---..-...-..fw i i i , SSEV-tu SSRIInR uTn mrgl Im u sra mE �pK nl RmtD FI ----- i___-_. 1 ' � M ; : __________________________________________________________ NI/ IFN vp0 ' a ao N fl ]FB. i{ ��` iLa .._.__._ IV • tla _ A[w,E �W4iB c S5FM-1 o mxt/os rin 331 .1a1TNM nNse E q/611W iiif-N/ rW ]RYfINt1 lSeti .___________._.____.___ _______________________ yr ____..__.____ ___-_____ � Y cs OOraH SYMR ; :: rmna�ws/ � � .---.---- _�� : 1 ,noes/ DY9]®�_ : �I °� °� E Sf3RIi, 55EPWIBB PUMP 7 ftt rs R11 ,iql MB�i J SS S53 >!S SSH 9i ■� � A '• n-M-Stt SgM S18`.ST6 � rih �€ Pg SYa/-li B I i BN�IH REC,mE141H11 i4n351-Si NFN-,Y ISBM i ^ sgRI w $IN rNM ObC111BN B �� F NM 1 BeCNeO; N s _ Iwsrt-xA �� � F .cd A 1 i� P ss�.,pl Ypr,xnmtl CONFORMED BIDDING DOCUMENT FOR CONSTRlIC110N rK wRw1 ISSLEB aNw ,N slmlw RBmo xK W IfD n INs mBlNw.i BI]f/■rY(Ns l,wa IK Ini1f0 Sf, NB IN IIapB III Ne F,iq rK BmBBi SFI YNN M WB1fL of xB. Y,o� 51n1� } _ LINE DIAGRAM AND CONTROL DIAGRAM LFDATE t Bcs icxro e+. x„x.•+,..:. �.. Blu.x ]r: Yx..., .. c.... - ,Is ^.+.' �� LEE�'RO:If1C.PROCESS a ORANGE COUNTY. REHmiu ATION OF 'A' STREET PUMP STATION PP° N0 5 52 PYC UR CHANGf tFFtP n � __ AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM ttfl DISTRICT WASTEWATER PUMP NO.3 55E—NP-140 STATION flEMOY11SANITATION OESCRIPIIa DAI[ 1PPR. xB1 1'-5<.c[ xtt°x0 ix°I r, alu L_� un Yxro+wnw D.K: q I 5 8 1 7 8 _— 9_—___t�—_ 10 � A vrlvcv3,[ mwRCRsnrr nul Lx'-tYlN-Sw ?IrLTrwE Mia TNPLY, WSIMtII IVY[LI' n w IPIA RIO 1. uNsn olxarNE wra xx rAam IIPIY anss xen sEta ut'sullal saurns z ama soda Esrm rEwuns wn mwr aoM. A 11?-IYiSPRw SNOW] PI UR rM.x I vzxvl• � � zN la S-IYSAdxf rw ,o nrr vArER Km wBR 1 t a a 8 cwarss wPaYeee g smNwiEA taltCLia � Sl9rx1 ' �� � I 55EFCP002 an TRAP PRIMEN_ n n so sRrvEu us of a C p M`AA AW aPMn QM 8 I xYAnA nlr ___�\IIN Ci rxnT UM1 rY1E 8 Yvle Irl - W IRRGIaI ¢aiE T11 VI' un 1[aR x _ / j-.dial ■ ^-I�(}A;� �I iy' uo 0 I � \ a W•_______________________ eI "' ' 1 1 • dT I----- e rm roolw xw I -` rim �--- E � xeBNnt w �, Nn �Iasnlc � I SSEFCPB29 SUMP PUMP CONTROL PNL Big � � , SPI ' E ss sw lssw\ j QI m n. nT I '• xt ,E� n, 1—��.--1Pr ar a ar EsaaR Ssantl warm 0 1 x+ 9sP neP asaxt A I I rPx-arsw wEcrRm ssasa saa,vlM r„ ORYWELL u Ise VA.14 M n Rw Me1P aswvKE e F; F oT F „ a DRYWELL SUMP CI NFOIMEO BIODING 06CUMENT FOR CDNSTRUCTION rxt wale IssYTo aalw Enwlw Nam AN' was Ix ,Ns Oasltn.6 attlENKNT BFIYPa ME IMRae TEI AT 11( NOWT "I WYc. SSEPM02 55EPW025 ecslalc ➢E x0000x An Ppla w nssl In1. rx THEaoaNx asc xn----- amUox sxxs tarEAM -- _ SUIP PUMP 1 SUMP %RP 2 q„ _S SINGLE LINE OhsRIN MOCONTROL DIAGRAM UPoATE I ots mxEo eY: xa.•• •...•. xs.x m: x...we c.... � ��LEE&RO,Inc. a ORANGE COUNTY REFiABIUTATION OF •A' STREET PUMP STATION xxoIscr W. 5 52 _ 47I FAIRAxcE _ cxsaso e,: n.M, +u.. ,» _ PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM ox'"Ix` W. 2NO. i IxcxtT E SANITATION DISTRICT DRYWELL SUMPI._ 55E—NP-150 REMOVAL ettORO iwGai0 1. AND SUPPLY WATER w orNT ARtaSa,Pi10N DA,C AFPP, t+T, rxov+[-+rl0x O+IE� z 'I 1 X DRY HELL — dN61 iM ffI rn �.� -------------------------------- MWNL NAEF I I N a0E I 1 55ECHP032 55EFCP030 &BRIER PANEL BPI 4 N0.r ptSa .INONO IM NImN m N+ FEIMO]II.EFI Ara aA061f01M i MN TELL 11p11Ea S H FRaI MIaFII�°GLmK emu` [��ipKmPa'iEurtr w"°°0i ive[ n`�c N w Lm'a`ro ao meeE wa tplfFa3 Ni NEt MjW 11E LEL1m lF1Q WiInIFXf Na ► PEAT KW. 1 u'El nEfAl.ilmNm AO aLMIlY m uru N NLNL iliac f. NO WX ♦ IIOE4 OPFNp! mIM FIL f11Ma ININ OINL NME NFFIr'!E' OMIEx IAGINL 4 O6N'1 lmN EIEFN 1rMMK MO 9Y Na 9NW '" m Lerx uFN IONS • fA NNN Fa W FIN • a1LNO51 MM DIV. Nlit. TYm OO E At.EN rxem .riN IO c Ea li ;IrM 61 Frwm Nf FPW OR m+Jll a NINu m uK.mE rr E KINK LF.a mMa mtct eNNLII a ulMmer NM rINMNH i MNEm PE NAI RNIN OfNEJE6.LL NLtuONaua LNIn f. Fea AFROSIIr. im AAMLs uaa Mt m MEN M.r. A OM ONO ON mF m IN �]LN iiIN p Q: 1. 2' g. s` _ fl? 1 r 1 1[Kl aa1101 , ----------------------------------- I Nea,a e N paeFmNamr n MmntrEE, ®vu 1.'I e n / _ 'r� ___ SaamaMM, ENui "rMN NFL+eK[IilLriMllifEU _NnSmWu afw�o.NN P-�vNBn MNfIlswx 1 e e OIUN � � -•_ �- -- •-• —•� -•_..J I NNMOP�M NiTIJ F 55EFCPB36 PLC PANEL LCP FNNJIW ImNI — BE�I-NO � IaNNNY t OWN �� F4-N-EN r+-stLitc IBN.NM 1 'JSarJO Kr+P-Is r+-mieF ,� t-r-snys rea,nFr. rsIFB1I NNFEa �r-� F•onc-xs to BLw �y.W sE 0- Am tANNIHC1AipU i M+ mI j AFMNc K KIIEE ---- 7 LL4LrT__Nµ_---___------- ________________________________ y.Ne / � nJe ILa uNt our m FnFF ai uts fxFi OFF � l CONFtNiI¢0 BODING DOCLWENT FOR CONSTRUCTIpN ` - sF'N-IN aE MRmI Ifs® ANL llE OmIW HOOD MF 1r61m M MS /W J lIN U'9 9AI 6F IEWEaI.► EIYBMrIIf EI1EW rN NiIN EI e'O tIE NmNG El aa. S EPSA �$ SINGLE LINE 019RAN AN WORM OIACRAN Nppill T{OCR rt Arc EsirxtE e.:.µ m.N e.: ..s 1" n ORANGE COUNTY F6iWLRATION OF w STREET PUMP STATION _ x`r ' 5 52 _. DP.e I.c +E. Alk FRF BDm CHANCE RFI W. JI Ixa(.^ L,•.1 LEE&R0: Inc. PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM o` pF, tB rI.0 L, six SANITATION DISTRICT PLC. VENTILATION. PUMP STATION 55E—NP-110 rtir1ER STAfiON MNOVN nor +•-.cnc . MISCELIANIOUS EOUIPMENi .c NFE OEUEivrim E+rE JPPR. .lr K 610 EXHIBIT 7 NOT USED EXHIBIT 8 NOT USED EXHIBIT 9 Deliverables List EXHIBIT 9 DELIVERABLES LIST Rlocation of Rocky Point Pump Station CONTRACT NO. 5-50 i • • rrrrrr 8r1 rr �': _:��r • - r • - , ; `� ��rrr rrrrrr r� m d1 ,�y O&A MANUALrrri■ irrr�rirri rr rr rr {{{� �rrr rrrrrr rr r r HARDCOPY :"µ ;:;rrrrrrrrrrrrri (1) ON CD (2) MULTIPAGE TIFF (3) MYLAR OR BOND (4) BID SETS PREPARED BY DISTRICT FROM FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONTRACT DOCUMENTS (5) PDR, GEOTECH REPORT, ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS, SPECIAL MEMORANDUMS (6) HARDCOPY AND E-MAILED (7) REPORTS SUBMITTED EACH MONTH OVER DURATION OF PROJECT (8) THIS INCLUDES COPIES FOR THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS: O&M (1); INSPECTORS (3); RESIDENT ENG (1); CONSULTANT (2); EXTRA (3). SPECIFIER CAN MODIFY THIS VALUE UPWARD BUT IT SHOULD NOT BE LESS THAN 10. (9) DRAFT O&M MANUALS AND SOPs ARE SUBMITTED DURING CONSTRUCTION; THESE ARE UPDATED AT STARTUP BUT PRIOR TO THE 24 HOUR TEST AND PERSONNEL TRAINING; THE FINAL O&M MANUALS AND SOPS ARE SUBMITTED WITH THE RECORD DRAWINGS. DELIVERABLES LIST CONTRACT 5-50 1 of 1 1/17/2006 EXHIBIT 10 Revised Chapter 4, "Process Design Criteria" 04 PROCESS DESIGN CRITERIA Table Of Contents 04 PROCESS DESIGN CRITERIA................................................................................... 04-i 04.0 HISTORY OF CHANGE...........................................................................................................04-1 04.1 GENERAL............................................................................................................................ 04-2 04.2 CHEMICAL FACILITIES......................................................................................................... 04-2 04.2.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................04-2 04.2.2 TANK FILL SYSTEM......................................................................................04-4 04.2.3 TANK FILL PANEL.........................................................................................04-4 04.2.4 TANK OPERATORS PANEL..........................................................................04-5 04.2.5 TANKS...........................................................................................................04-5 04.2.6 METERING PUMPS.......................................................................................04-6 04.2.7 CARRIER WATER..........................................................................................04-7 04.2.8 CONTROL STRATEGY..................................................................................04-7 04.2.9 HUMAN -MACHINE INTERFACE (HMI) DETAILS..........................................04-7 04.2.10 MISCELLANEOUS DETAIL............................................................................04-8 04.3 VALVE ACTUATORS ................................. 04.3.1 GENERAL ....................................... 04.3.2 SELECTION CRITERIA ................... 04.3.3 CONTROL STRATEGY ................... Last Revised: 07-15-2001 OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines ................................................................... 04-5 ...........................................................04-8 ...........................................................04-8 ...........................................................04-9 Page 04-i 04.0 HISTORY OF CHANGE Revision Author Date Change and Version Al Lee & Ro draft- Apr 99 A2 J. Herberg 05-17-99 -JS added this chapter developed by Lee & Ro in Apr 99; also edited by J. Herberg to match the Strategic Plan A3 JS Priority Draft before Review - compiled on 5-17- 99; need to re -number the table3s here and check the numbering for figures and tables elsewhere A4 MS Incorporated priority comments made by OCSD staff by August 31, 1999. A5 J.Herberg/M Deleted in its entirety. Smith A6 JKT Dec 1999 Added chemical facilities design criteria D1 J. Harris Jun 2001 Miscellaneous clarifications. E1 J. Thomsic Oct 2002 Insert chemical station automation standards as decided October 17, 2002. Includes John Lin comments. Includes 11-12-02 meeting results. Includes Lin 11-22-02 and Cook comments for group consideration. JKT:js chap04-Process Design criteria asof 10-2002 by JKT REV 05.doc OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines Page 04-1 04.1 GENERAL Coordinate with other disciplines (e.g., the "Coordination with Other Disciplines" of the "Electrical Design Criteria" Chapter). 04.2 CHEMICAL FACILITIES 04.2.1 GENERAL As in any wastewater treatment plant, the district uses a variety of chemicals to enhance process performance. The system utilizes primarily above ground storage tanks for chemical storage, mixing and delivery. Underground storage tanks are used for diesel storage and waste. Typical on -site chemicals include: • Ferric Chloride • Polymer • Bleach • Caustic • Diesel Fuel • Waste Storage • Acid The current system is basically hands off for operations staff. Truck deliveries are completed by the chemical suppliers and district staff monitors the delivery. Typically the truck driver checks into Operations and shares delivery information with the operator on duty. Operations sets up the proper tank fill — only the appropriate tank fill valve is opened to prevent errors. The truck then drives to the target tank, the driver makes the fill connection and the air supply connection (when used), and the driver monitors the tank fill operation. The truck driver notifies Operations via telephone when the load is complete and Operations returns the tank fill system to non -fill status. 1 A design goal is to minimize exposure to chemicals during tank load, operation, and maintenance. Design shall support operation by a truck driver only — no District intervention other than as described above. 2 Safety is the most important aspect of the design. Coordinate the design with OSHA Standards, Section 5189. Also, SAFE Bulletin 002 (available on the Safety and Health Division Intranet site) discusses the placement and need for emergency eyewash and shower stations. In addition to the SAFE requirements, provide a flow switch and SCADA alarm to indicate the shower is in use. 3 Design sites and apron area with non -reactive materials i.e.: concrete apron vs. asphalt for peroxide areas, epoxy coatings in acid areas, etc. 4 Separate pump containment from tank containment with a low, 12-inch wall periodically perforated at floor level. The purpose of this divider is to slow down a spill so people in the pump containment area can escape. Use walls not to exceed 36-inches for the overall tank containment. OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines Page 04-2 5 Include a LSHH float and SCADA alarm in the containment sump to signal when there is liquid in the containment area. Provide a LSHH level switch near the sump and one -inch above the finish floor to alarm when the floor is flooded. 6 Drain the apron directly to sewer whenever possible. Create a low-rise berm around the apron so liquids are contained. Use more slope to drain to assure good drainage. Use a non -reactive pipe system. 7 Electrical conduit for power and control should be placed underground and rise within the pump stands. Consider a electrical conductor trench at the power and control panel. 8 Provide drains directly from containment area to sewer system whenever possible. Use a valve positioned outside the containment area on the drainpipe. The valve should allow an adjustable rate of discharge to sewer so containment chemicals can be metered into system. If a sump must be pumped, provide a siphon -draw pump so the chemical is diluted before being discharged into the process. Provide the design for a complete system, including all source water and discharge piping. Use manual valves to control the siphon source water. 9 Always use a fail -closed actuated tank discharge valve. Support it properly. Automate it for remote monitoring & control with local control from outside containment. 10 Design the area lighting so that the unloading area and the pumps are well lit, at least 25 foot-candles. Use a pushbutton mounted on the Tank Load Station and connected to a maximum two hour time delay timer set for one hour to turn the lights on. Provide an override pushbutton to turn the lights off. 11 Design a containment area washdown system. This could consist of manually valved, perforated plant water pipe along one or more walls, and sloped containment deck to drain. 12 Use more aggressive slopes within containment and apron areas to avoid ponding on the surfaces. 13 Consider automating any valve located in the containment area. Think about access to valves and equipment when the containment is partially filled with liquid. Generally the actuator controls shall be placed outside the containment area in the tank operator panel, and the actuator with safety disconnect shall be placed inside the containment area but above the rim of the containment walls. 14 The actuator local controls shall match the pump local controls. If the pump is UR, START, STOP (3-wire control), the actuator shall be UR, OPEN, CLOSE, OPENED, CLOSED; if the pump is HOR (2-wire control), the actuator shall be OPEN/CLOSE/REMOTE, OPENED, CLOSED. 15 Design a minimum of 36 inches clearance between pumps/pedestals for access. Provide protective shields for tight installations. 16 Consider using double wall pipe and splashguards on joints, where logical. OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines Page 04-3 17 Design dual, independent level systems. Normal level sensor is sonic, high -high level sensor is a float. Use really loud horns indicating the tank level is high enough to spill to containment. 18 Position the tank fill quick disconnect within a containment area. Use a fully - supported gooseneck with quick disconnects aimed down to ease connection to the tanker truck. Use a valve manifold to minimize the number of connections made when filling multiple tanks. 19 Install TV camera(s) at the loading area integrated with the existing visual monitoring system. 20 The minimum tank size should normally be 12,000 gallons so an empty tank can receive a complete tanker truck load. 21 Generally a seven day supply of chemicals should be included in the design; however, chemical quantities should be discussed during preliminary engineering. 22 The chemical containment system should be sized a minimum of 110% of the largest tank. 04.2.2 TANK FILL SYSTEM 1 For two or more tanks fed from a single TANK FILL PANEL, provide individual remotely controlled valve actuators for each tank feed. All fill valves will normally be closed. The operator can computer manually open the appropriate tank fill valve after discussion with the driver so chemical cannot inadvertently be delivered to the wrong tank. A "FILL xxxx (Specific Type of the Chemical)" SCADA pushbutton will be provided as computer auto mode. When pushed, the correct fill valve will be opened based on the tank number sequence. 2 Provide a regulated process air supply at the truck unloading point. Air is used to expedite the delivery process by pressurizing the truck chemical tank. Provide a 3-way manually -operated quarter turn valve that will allow air to flow to the truck in one position and will safely discharge the tanker air through a muffler in the other position. Generally the exhaust will be extended away from the 3-way valve and into the containment area; preferably into the sump. 3 No flowmeter will be installed on the FILL PANEL tank fill pipes. The District will normally trust the suppliers to accurately invoice for material delivered; if the operator suspects problems, the trucks will be weighed. 04.2.3 TANK FILL PANEL 1 Design a TANK FILL PANEL for the truck driver's use. Include a horn that mimics a car alarms and operates on a 5-minute timer set to 1-minute and with a horn acknowledge pushbutton; a strobe; a telephone; large level indicators as well as TANK FULL lights for each tank, a white OK TO FILL light, the AREA LIGHT ON and OFF pushbutton, and OPENED and CLOSED indicator lights for each tank fill valve. The OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines Page 04-4 OPENED and CLOSED indicator lights should be aligned with the appropriate level indicator. 2 The OK to Fill is lighted when one of the fill valves is opened and the tank level is below Tank Full setpoint. This light is energized by a PLC discrete output. 3 Provide a sign with "EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER x. 222" and the statement "AFTER COMPLETING LOAD, CALL x._." (7025 for P1, and 7625 for P2). 04.2.4 TANK OPERATORS PANEL 1 Design a TANK OPERATORS PANEL. Include all valve actuator hardwired local controls and tank level indication for each tank. Do not design manual controls at the actuator. 2 Provide one 120VAC fused disconnect, one 24VDC fused disconnect, and a signal isolator for each level loop within the Tank FILL PANEL. Provide a design location for the chemical supplier to mount a 24" x 24" x 8" radio unit. These devices will be used by the chemical supplier as connection points for the suppliers' automatic replenishment system. 3 Locate the TANK OPERATORS PANEL separately from the Tank FILL PANEL. 04.2.5 TANKS 1 Install manual valves only on the tank drain lines. Provide a header system so that the tank drainage is discharged to the sump rather than to the containment floor. Discharge pipe into sump must be visible to staff outside containment, so they can check for flow 2 There are five operator -adjustable level setpoints. (a)Set a HI -HI level alarm setpoint. This will generate an alarm at the SCADA when the level is above the setpoint. This alarm is generated from 4-20 mA level signal and is one of the two ways to activate a horn via PLC discrete output (with acknowledge pushbutton on the tank FILL PANEL). The other horn activate is generated by the LAHH float. If not acknowledged at the field, the horn will be automatically silenced after time out of a hardwired time delay relay, initially set at 2 minutes. (b)Set a HI level alarm setpoint. This will generate an alarm at the SCADA when the level is above the setpoint. This alarm is generated from 4-20 mA level signal and is one of the two ways to activate a strobe via PLC discrete output. At this level, the PLC opens all the discharge valves on multi -tank installations. The discharge valves and strobe light activated by the Hl level alarm shall return to the previous configuration after the HI level alarm has cleared and 30 seconds have passed. OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines Page 04-5 (c) Set a "Tank Full" level setpoint. This is a normal operating condition. A TANK FULL light on the tank FILL PANEL will light. If a Tank Full level is detected, the next tank will be filled. (d)Set a "Tank Switchover" level setpoint. A tank will be designated the "EMPTY ME" tank until a switchover level is detected for the tank. If a switchover level is detected, the next sequence valve will open. After confirming the next sequence valve has opened, the EMPTY ME tank valve will close. (e)Set a LO-LO level alarm setpoint. This will generate an alarm at the SCADA when the level is below the setpoint. This alarm is generated from 4-20 mA level signal. The pumps will be shut down when the tanks with opened discharge valves are below this setpoint. 3 Field configure a HI -HI alarm level just below the overflow connection. This alarm will be generated from the float contacts and is hardwired to activate a horn (with acknowledge pushbutton on the tank FILL PANEL) . If not acknowledged at the field, the horn will be automatically silenced after time out of a hardwired time delay relay, initially set at 2 minutes. Display this alarm at SCADA. 4 Field configure a HI level alarm about 6 inches below the overflow. This alarm will be set from the contacts in the Milltronics LiquidRanger ultrasonic level sensor and is hardwired to activate a strobe mounted on the tank FILL PANEL. The strobe light activated by this HI level alarm shall stop after the HI level alarm has cleared. Display this alarm at SCADA. 5 Field configure another contact in the Milltronics LiquidRanger ultrasonic level sensor as transmitter failure alarm. If the transmitter fails on the designated "FILL ME" tank or "EMPTY ME" tank, the next available tank will be used and the fill valve or the discharge valve of the "transmitter fail tank" will be closed. Display this alarm at SCADA. 04.2.6 METERING PUMPS 1 Set the metering pump platforms as well as piping, metering, instruments, actuators, etc. even with the top of the containment wall so they will not be damaged if the containment area is flooded. Set the tank high enough so the metering pump suction will remain flooded when the tank has just a few inches of liquid in it. 2 For 1 to 4 duty pumps per injection point, include one standby pump. Discuss pump layout and strategy during the engineering design phase. The standby pump should utilize a common discharge header with individual valves for each duty pump. Control strategy shall include automatic activation of the standby pump and associated valve changes on failure of one duty pump. Do not include "swing pumps" in the design. A swing pump is defined as a pump piped to more than one injection point. 3 Do not include diaphragm metering pumps in the design. Specify variable speed peristaltic, centrifugal, or positive displacement gear pumps and a magnetic flowmeter. Size the meter as part of the preliminary design process. Do NOT USE CROSS -OVER OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines Page 04-6 DELIVERY BEFORE THE METER; THE METER SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE COMMON LINES ROUTED TO THE PROCESS. 4 From the SCADA, the operator can select from multiple duty sequences. 04.2.7 CARRIER WATER 1 Provide carrier water if required. 2 Provide local rotameter, manual flow control valve, isolation valve(s), flow switch connected to SCADA, solenoid valve as needed, and a local pressure gage. 04.2.8 CONTROL STRATEGY 1 Tanks will be selected for filling by an automatic sequence of the fill valves, based on the tank number sequence. A tank will be designated the "FILL ME" tank. It is shown on the SCADA by its fill valve being open. If a TANK FULL level is detected, the next sequence valve will open so the next tank in the sequence receives the chemical delivery. After confirming the next sequence valve has opened, the FILL ME tank fill valve will close. The next sequence tank becomes the new FILL ME tank. If the next tank is actively supplying product to the metering pumps, the next tank will be skipped and the next next tank in the sequence receives the chemical delivery. However, if all other tanks have been filled up, the tank actively supplying product will be filled up last. 2 The tank discharge valves are also selected to open in sequence, based on the tank number sequence. A tank will be designated the "EMPTY ME" tank. It is shown on the SCADA by its discharge valve being open. If a Tank Switchover level is detected, the next sequence valve will open. After confirming the next sequence valve has opened, the EMPTY ME tank valve will close. The next sequence tank becomes the new EMPTY ME tank. If a tank is currently being filled (i.e. FILL ME tank), the opening of the same tank discharge valve will cause the filling sequence to go to the next tank. After confirming the next sequence valve has opened, the FILL ME tank fill valve will close. The next sequence tank becomes the new FILL ME tank. 04.2.9 HUMAN -MACHINE INTERFACE (HMI) DETAILS 1 Each tank HMI display should include tank level as well as the number of gallons on hand. Provide the total gallons on hand for two or more tanks. 2 All the individual tanks, tanks shown as groups, and fill/discharge valves should be depicted on one screen. Provide a LOAD COMPLETE pushbutton for each group of tanks for the operator to activate after receiving the call from the truck driver that the load is done. Pushing the LOAD COMPLETE button closes the tank fill valves. 3 Provide a 60 minute hardcode watchdog timer alarm on all tank FILL PANEL valves to alarm so the operator can hit LOAD COMPLETE. The computer auto fill timer starts after the first fill valve is opened. Reset the timer when all the fill valves are closed. OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines Page 04-7 04.2.10 MISCELLANEOUS DETAIL 1 When multi -feed point chemical injection is required, use manual valves with position indication if the valves are seldom used; if the valves are regularly changed as part of the process control, provide electric valve actuators. 2 Design in -line mixers as required. 3 Design heat trace with insulation as required. 04.3 VALVE ACTUATORS 04.3.1 GENERAL 1 The District has had good experience with both electric and pneumatic valve actuators. Thus, the following guidance is general only; select the best actuator for the installation at hand. 2 Four types of actuators are described below: (a) Spring and Diaphragm (b) Pneumatic Piston (c) Electric Motor Drive (d) Electrohydraulic 04.3.2 SELECTION CRITERIA 1 Select pneumatic valve actuators if the process calls for FAIL OPEN or FAIL CLOSED. Use the appropriate spring -loaded actuator. Select an electric actuator if the process calls for FAIL LAST POSITION. 2 Consider the availability of instrument air. If instrument air is as readily available as electrical power, do not use availability as selection criteria. Outlying pump stations are a good example where electric actuators should be used because no instrument air source is available. 3 Use pneumatic actuators when the actuator is subject to flooding. Be sure to design vent or shaft extensions so a flooded actuator is not damaged. 4 Attempt to use the same valve type after selecting a valve type for an area. 5 Electrically -operated actuators should be AC, not DC. 6 If none of the above criteria limit the actuator choice, the District preference is as follows: OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines Page 04-8 OPEN/CLOSE SERVICE (a) Use direct -acting solenoid valves for 1 Y2" or smaller service and only for clean fluids such as industrial water, GAP water, and air. Independently prove the valve has opened; for example, solenoid valves used for pump seal water control must be independently proven by PSL (pressure switch low) digital inputs and equipment protectives. (b) Use %-turn electric actuators for Y2" — 12" service. (c) Use %-turn pneumatic actuators for 6" — 24" service. (d) Use pneumatic piston actuators for medium and large valves. (e) Use electric actuators for gates. Use electrohydraulic actuators for large gates. MODULATING SERVICE (f) Use pneumatic actuators for Ys" — 12" service. (g) Use electric actuators for 14" — larger service. (h) Use electrohydraulic actuators for largest service. 04.3.3 CONTROL STRATEGY 1 Use two DO contacts rather than 4-20mA for large gates. One contact will OPEN the gate; the other contact will CLOSE the gate. This is to prevent gate movement upon control system failure. 2 Use two DO contacts rather than 4-20mA for any FAIL LAST POSITION application. OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines Page 04-9 EHHIBIT 11 NOT USED EHHIBIT 12 NOT USED EXHIBIT 13 Sample Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate Format EXHIBIT 13 Orange County Sanitation District Opinion of the Cost of Construction (Cost Estimate Summary Sheet) Cost Index: ENR Index = 7420 Company: Consultants Company Date: 15-Sep-03 Project: J-99-A Rehab of Junction Structures Estimator: KHM Submittal: PDR Checker: RS, JD Specification Division Primary Effluent Junction Box JB-8 Total Division 0 - General Conditions $ - $ - $ - Division 1 - General Requirements $ - $ - $ 200,000 Division 2 - Sitework $ 7,000 $ 5,500 $ 12,500 Division 3 - Concrete $ - 150 cu yds of concrete $ 65,000 $ 65,000 200 cu yds of concrete $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Division 4 - Mason $ - $ - $ - Division 5 - Metals $ 10,000 $ 6,500 $ 16,500 Division 6 - Wood and Plastics $ 30,000 $ 22,000 $ 52,000 Division 7 - Thermal and Moisture Protection $ - $ - $ - Division 8 - Doors, Windows, and Hardware $ - $ - $ - Division 9 - Finishes $ - $ - $ - Division 10 - Specialities $ - $ - $ - Division 11 - Equipment $ - $ - $ - 2 sluice gates @ each JB $ 80,000 $ 100,000 $ 180,000 Division 12 - Furnishings $ - $ - $ - Division 13 - Special Construction $ - $ - $ - Division 14 - Conveying Systems $ - $ - $ - Division 15 - Mechanical $ 20,000 $ 40,000 $ 60,000 Division 16 - Electrical $ 10,000 $ 50,000 $ 60,000 Division 17 - Instrumentation $ - $ - $ - Totals ,000 04,00 72 ,00 Project Level Allowance Subtotal The percentages shown here for Profit, Bond & insurance are an example only. The Consultant shall determine appropiate values for the particular project. The Project Level Allowance shall be appropiate for the project and the submittal. See the attached Guidelines. Insurance Subtotal Profit Subtotal Bond Grand Total Accuracy Range Low High Engineers Estimate 15% $ 108,900 $ 834,900 2% $ 16,698 $ 851,598 7% $ 59,612 $ 911,210 2% $ 18,224 $ 929,434 +/- 30% +/- $ 278,830 $ 650,604 $ 1,208,264 SPECIFICATION DIVISION SUMMARY SHEET FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY $ 1,208,264 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT 14 Sample Final Construction Cost Estimate Format EXHIBIT 14 a Orange County Sanitation District 5 Cost Estimate Company: Consultants Company Date: 15-Sep-03 Project: J-99-A Rehab of Junction Structures Estimator: KHM Submittal: FINAL Checker: RS, JAD Cost Index: ENR L.A.CCI = 7420 SCHEDULE OF PRICES Item No. Approx. Item Unit Price Total Price Qty. 1 Lump Furnish all labor, materials and equipment necessary for Sum sheeting, shoring and bracing for protection of life and limb in trenches, open excavations and confined spaces in conformance with the plans and specifications for the lump sum price of.... L.S. $ 6,000 2 Lump Furnish all labor, materials, equipment, and services for Sum the construction of the rehabilitation of the Primary Effluent Junction Box and Junction Box No. 8, for the lump sum price of.... L.S. $ 1,087,298 Lump Mobilization in accordance with Section 46, Division 01, Sum General Requirements, for the lump sum price of .... L.S. $ 18,500 Total of Bid Items 1 through 3, inclusive L.S. $ 1,111,798 Provision is made here for the bidder to include and addition or deletion in its bid, if it wishes, to reflect any last minute adjustments in prices. Addition (+) or Deduction (-)" 4a. Lump Cost of Builder's "All Risk" Insurance for the contract Sum amount as required under Proposal and Bond Forms, Insurance Requirements, plus flood, earthquake and tidal wave, in the amount equal to the contract price (deletable item) for the lump sum price of.. L.S. $ 15,500 TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID SCHEDULE OF PRICES FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY The Schedule of Prices submitted as part of DS-3 and the Final Submittal and shall match the Schedule of Prices in the bid documents for that project. Attachment 2 Page 1 of 6 $ 1,127,298 EXHIBIT 14 b Orange County Sanitation District Opinion of the Cost of Construction (Cost Estimate Summary Sheet) Company: Consultants Company Date: 15-Sep-03 Project: J-99-A Rehab of Junction Structures Estimator: KHM Submittal: FINAL Checker: RS, JAD Cost Index: ENR L.A.CCI = 7420 Summary of costs Specification Division Primary Effluent Junction Box JB-8 Total Division 0 - General Conditions Division 1 - General Requirements $ - $ - $ 256,232 Division 2 - Sitework $ 6,577 $ 5,655 $ 12,232 Division 3 - Concrete $ - 200 cu yds of concrete $ 80,580 $ 80,580 300 cu yds of concrete $ 85,751 $ 85,751 Division 4 - Mason $ - $ - $ - Division 5 - Metals $ 9,598 $ 9,598 $ 19,195 Division 6 - Wood and Plastics $ 27,384 $ 27,384 $ 54,768 Division 7 - Thermal and Moisture Protection $ - $ - $ - Division 8 - Doors, Windows, and Hardware $ - $ - $ - Division 9 - Finishes $ - $ - $ - Division 10 - Specialities $ - $ - $ - Division 11 - Equipment $ - 2 sluice gates @ each JB $ 87,425 $ 123,358 $ 210,783 Division 12 - Furnishings $ - $ - $ - Division 13 - Special Construction $ - $ - $ - Division 14 - Conveying Systems $ - $ - $ - Division 15 - Mechanical $ 41,330 $ 74,575 $ 115,905 Division 16 - Electrical $ - $ 72,477 $ 72,477 Division 17 - Instrumentation $ - $ - $ - Totals 252,894 398,797 The percentages shown here for Profit, Bond & Insurance are an example only. The Consultant shall determine appropiate values for the particular project. The Project Level Allowance shall be appropiate for the project and the submittal. See the attached Guidelines. � n No. C99999 \ Exp. / Project Level Allowance 0% $ - Subtotal $ 907,923 Insurance 2% $ 18,158 Subtotal $ 926,082 Profit 7% $ 64,826 Subtotal $ 990,907 Bond 2% $ 19,818 Grand Total $ 1,010,725 Accuracy Range +/-10% +/- $ 101.073 Low $ 909,653 High $ 1,111,798 Engineers Estimate $ 1,111,798 SPECIFICATION DIVISION SUMMARY REPORT Attachment 2 Page 2 of 6 Orange County Sanitation District _' ,-.t Opinion of Construction Cost Summary Report EXHIBIT 14 c Company: Consultants Company Date: 15-Sep-03 Project: J-99-A Rehab of Junction Structures Estimator: KHM Submittal: FINAL Checker: IRS, JAD Drnrnee I inir ernes nr Ruiidinnc niv 1 - 'eneral Renuirements Cost Index: ENR L.A.CGI = 7420 Specification Section Item or Description QuantitA Unit Material Installation Total Unit $ Cost Unit $ Cost Div. 1 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE 1 ILS $ - $ - $ 21340.00 $ 2,340 $ 2,340 Div. 1 DRINKING WATER 24 MO $ 118.03 $ 2,833 $ - $ - $ 2,833 Div. 1 EID DATA SHEETS 1 LS $ $ - $ 10,197.67 $ 10,198 $ 10,198 Div. 1 EQUIPMENT START-UP 1 LS $ $ - $ 7,800.00 $ 7,800 $ 7,800 Div. 1 EROSION CONTROL 4000 LF $ 2.67 $ 10,667 $ 1.54 $ 6,175 $ 16,842 Div. 1 GRAVEL CONTRACTORS STAGING AREA 2041 SY $ 4.00 $ 8,164 $ 5.92 $ 12,083 $ 20,247 Div.1 OWS 1 LS $ - $ - $ 4,131.00 $ 4,131 $ 4,1 31 Div. 1 PROTECTION OF EXISTING FACILITIES 1 ILS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000 $ 1,654.00 $ 1,654 $ 3,654 Div. 1 SANITATION FACILITIES 24 MO $ $ - $ 590.14 $ 14,163 $ 14,163 Div.1 SURVEY 1 LS $ $ - $ 4,530.00 $ 4,530 $ 4,530 Div. 1 TEMPORARY FACILITIES 1 LS $ 4,556.00 $ 4,556 $ 3,989.00 $ 3,989 $ 8,545 Div. 1 TEMPORARY FENCING 1 LS $ 1,230.00 $ 1,230 $ 800.00 $ 800 $ 2,030 Div. 1 LOOP DIAGRAMS 86 EA $ $ $ 420.47 $ 36,160 $ 36,160 Div. 1 DUST CONTROL 1 LS $ $ $ 3,400.00 $ 3,400 $ 3,400 Div. 1 SANITATION FACILITIES 36 MO $ $ $ 1,097.67 $ 39,516 $ 39,516 Div.1 DEWATERING 1 LS $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500 $ 7,800.00 $ 7,800 $ 12,300 Div. 1 FINAL CLEAN-UP 1 LS $ $ $ 7,543.00 $ 7,543 $ 7,543 Div. 1 TRENCH SHORING DESIGN BY PE 1 LS $ - $ $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Div. 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $ $ $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Div.1 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION 1 LS $ $ $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Otals � 7 `« �'" w" 3 ,94 �. az _ 222,283 6,232 Note: Division 0 and 1 should be broken out in more detail than the technical specifications. SPECIFICATION SECTION SUMMARY REPORT FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Attachment 2 Page 4 of 6 EXHIBIT 14 d Orange County Sanitation District Opinion of Construction Cost r, Sumary Report Company: Consultants Company Project: J-99-A Rehab of Junction Structures Submittal: FINAL Area: Primary Effluent Junction Box Date: 15-Sep-03 Estimator: KHM Checker: RS, JAD Cost Index: ENR L.A.CCI = 7420 Specification Section Material Costns a a ion Cost I o a 02200 Earthwork $ 1,457 $ 5,120 $ 6,577 03100 - Concrete Formwork $ 8,064 $ 19,878 $ 27,941 03200 - Reinforcement Steel $ 10,034 $ 21,350 $ 31,384 03300 - Cast -in -Place Concrete 200 cu yds of concrete $ 14,370 $ 6,885 $ 21,255 05500 Miscellaneous Metalwork $ 6,398 $ 3,199 $ 9,598 06620 Plastic Liner (Polyvinyl Chloride) $ 13,692 $ 13,692 $ 27,384 11293 - Sluice and Shear Gates 2 Sluice Gates $ 108,220 $ 15,137 $ 123,358 16010 - Electrical General Provisions $ 3,550 $ 1,235 $ 4,785 16050 - Basic Materials and Methods $ 8,225 $ 2,354 $ 10,579 Totals 17 ,0 8, SPECIFICATION SECTION SUMMARY REPORT FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Attachment 2 Page 5 of 6 EXHIBIT 14 e Orange County Sanitation District '��� - Opinion of Construction Cost �, w.... Summary Report � M Company: Consultants Company Project: J-99-A Rehab of Junction Structures Submittal: FINAL Area: Junction Box No. 8 Date: 15-Sep-03 Estimator: KHM Checker: RS, JAD Cost Index: ENR L.A.CC1= 7420 Specification Section Material Costns a a ion Cost I o a 02200 Earthwork $ 1,225 $ 4,430 $ 5,655 03100 - Concrete Formwork $ 11,095 $ 28,716 $ 39,811 03200 - Reinforcement Steel $ 14,895 $ 31,045 $ 45,940 03300 - Cast -in -Place Concrete 300 cu yds of concrete $ 21,556 $ 9,490 $ 31,046 05500 Miscellaneous Metalwork $ 6,398 $ 3,199 $ 9,598 06620 Plastic Liner (Polyvinyl Chloride) $ 13,692 $ 13,692 $ 27,384 11293 - Sluice and Shear Gates 2 Sluice Gates $ 108,220 $ 15,137 $ 123,358 16010 - Electrical General Provisions $ 12,347 $ 11,768 $ 24,115 16050 - Basic Materials and Methods $ 34,124 $ 14,238 $ 48,362 ota s 3, 53 1 16 55, 68 SPECIFICATION SECTION SUMMARY REPORT FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Attachment 2 Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 15 Sample O&M Manual organization and description of contents. Exhibit 15 Example O&M Manual Organization and Description of Contents A typical Table of Contents for such a Consultant's O&M manual.is shown below: Example O&M Manual Plant Unit Process Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope 1.2 Process Overview 13 Abbreviations 2. Unit Process Name 2.1 Theory of Operation 2.1.1 General layout of Process 2.1.2 Design Data 2.13 Process Controls 2.1.4 Equipment Control Description 2.2 Process Description 2.2.1 Component/System Discussion 2.2.2 Compooent/System Discussion 2.2.3 ComponetWSystem Discussion 2.2.4 Odor Control System 2.2.3 Ventilation System 2.2.6 Electrical System 2.2.7 Lighting System 2.2.5 Exits and Fire Extinguishers 2.2.9 Plant Water, hydrants, and Hose Bibs (Washdown) 3. Operating Procedures 3.1 Normal Operating Procedures 3.1.1 System Operation Overview ILIA Automatic Mode 3.1.1.2 Manual Mode 3.1.2 Pre -Startup and Safety Checks 3.1.3 Startup Procedures 3.1.4 Standard Operating Procedures 3.1.5 Shutdown Procedures 3.1.6 Records and Reports 3.2 Abnormal Operating Procedures 3.2.1 Abnormal Operation Overview 3.2,1.1 Equipment Malfunction 3.2.1.2 Power OmageiFailure 3.2.1.3 Key Alarms 3.2.1.4 Others as needed 4. Maintenance 4.1 Lubrication 4.2 Periodic Inspection and Preventive Maintenance 4.2.1 Maintenance Log Sheet 4.2.2 Daily Checks 4.2.3 Weekly Checks 4.2.4 Monthly Checks 4.2.5 Special Checks 4.3 Abnormal Operating Indicators (Troubleshooting Guide format) 5. Plant Safety 5.1 Process -Specific Hazards 5.2 MSDSs Table 1 below describes the general content expected in an O&M Manual for plant processes. O&M manuals for subprocesses would have similar orgaization and content. Table 1. Technical Information Requirements for Unit Process EOMs Chapter Technical Information Required Front Matter 1. Introduction • The purpose of the Introduction is to provide the user with the broad context of the O&M manual. The following subsections should be included 1.1 Purpose and Scope . Clearly state the purpose or objective of the manual, that is, what the user can expect to gain from using the manual and the intended audience. • Include a general description of the scope of the information in the manual, that is, the types of information covered. • If important, identify information not covered in the manual and include any reference to where information not covered in the manual may be accessed. • Include a graphic or graphics as needed, showing location and perhaps layout or flows. 1.2 Process Overview . Briefly describe the process including inputs, major equipment or stages of the process and outputs. Detailed descriptions will be provided in later sections. 1.3 Abbreviations • Include a list of abbreviations and acronyms used in the text. The acronyms should be defined when first used in the text also. A two column format is recommended. Use District standard acronyms. 2. Unit Process Name • In this chapter the key technical information about the process is discussed. 2.1 Theory of • In this section provide a detailed description of how the process Operation fits into the Plant's operational philosophy. Include engineering drawings and/or other graphics as needed. 2.1.1 General • Provide a description of the general physical layout of the process. Layout Include engineering drawings and/or other graphics as needed. 2.1.2 Design Data . Include the design data for the process; include such information as flow data and equipment -specific design data. A table format is recommended. 2.1.3 Process • Provide an in-depth discussion of how the system works, Controls physically and chemically. Include graphs as appropriate and/or pertinent photographs that convey concepts to the reader. Chapter Technical Information Required 2.1.4 Equipment • Provide a description of the control loop for the system including Controls interlocks and permissive. Describe operating strategies to convey the intent of the original design. Include the use of flowcharts, schematics, site plans, and drawings. A photograph of each equipment system and major control panels is recommended. 2.2. Process • In this section the key technical information is further detailed by Description components, systems, and functions. Use of engineering drawings and other graphics are expected. Need help 2.2.1 Components and • Provide a table that shows the major components of the process System and their associated systems. The major components will be discussed in detail in the following subsections. If appropriate, subprocesses may be referenced.by hyperlinks to their separate sub -manual. 2.2.1 Component and . Provide a detailed description of how each component fits in to the System process. 2.2.2 Component and . Provide a detailed description of how each component fits in to the System process. 2.2.3 Component and • Provide a detailed description of how each component fits in to the System process. Contu:ue`ca�m ` nent'A ci 'bons sit se 064n as needed: 2.2.4 Odor Control • Provide a detailed description on the odor control system. Use System graphics as needed. This may need to be broken down into subsystems, such as acid, caustic, bleach, etc. 2.2.5 Ventilation • Provide a detailed description on the ventilation system. Use System graphics as needed. 2.2.6 Electrical System • Provide a detailed description on the electrical system. Use engineering and single line drawings. This section may have several subsections. Topics for subsections include control buildings, load control panels, and distribution panels. 2.2.7 Lighting System • Provide a detailed description on the electrical system. Use engineering and single line drawings. This section may have several subsections. Topics for subsections include control buildings, load control panels, and distribution panels. 2.2.8 Exits and Fire • Provide a detailed description of the location of fire exits and fire Extinguishers extinguishers. Use a graphic to show location. 2.2.9 Plant Water, . Describe the plant water systems (including plant water, potable, Hydrants, and Hose industrial and reclaimed systems) including the location of fire Bibs hydrants and hose bibs if applicable. 3. Operating • This chapter contains the basic operations and procedures for Procedures normal operations and abnormal operations. Typical sections include 3.1. Operating . This section contains the operating procedures that will be used by Procedures operators. Chapter Technical Information Required 3.1.1. System . Provide a narrative describing the operational sequence for the Operation Overview process for both automatic and manual modes of operation. Use of engineering drawings and other graphics are expected. 3.1.2. Pre -startup and . Provide step-by-step instructions for performing pre -startup and Safety Checks safety checks. Use a checklist as applicable. 3.1.3. Startup • Provide step-by-step instructions for starting up the process. Use Procedures an accepted procedure writing guidelines for all procedural material. 3.1.4. Routine • Provide step-by-step instructions for the routine operation of the Operating Procedures process. Create a separate subsection and procedure for each major task. Use an accepted procedure writing guidelines for all procedural material. 3.1.5. Operations • Provide step-by-step instructions for the routine maintenance Maintenance Procedures performed by operators (not mechanical, electrical, or instrumentation). (Consult with District as to which maintenance procedures will be performed by operators.)Create a separate subsection and procedure for each major task. Use an accepted procedure writing guidelines for all procedural material. 3.1.6. Shutdown • Provide step-by-step instructions for the shutting down the Procedures process. Create a separate subsection and procedure for each major task. Use an accepted procedure writing guidelines for all procedural material. 3.1.7. Records and . Describe the records and reports associated with this process. Reports Ensure that documentation mentioned in this section is also mentioned in the appropriate procedure as required. Create specific forms as required. 3.2. Abnormal • This section contains the non -normal operating procedures that Operating Procedures will be used by operators. 3.2.1. Abnormal • Provide a narrative describing the conditions that could exist that Operation Overview would cause the process to be operated in an abnormal fashion. Chapter Technical Information Required 3.2.2. Response • Provide step-by-step instructions for operating the process while in Procedures an abnormal state. Be sure to have a separate abnormal operating procedure for each condition mentioned in Section 3.1.1. A three -column (e.g., Indicator/Observation — Probable Cause — Corrective Action) Operational Troubleshooting Guide format is recommended. • The Operations Troubleshooting Guide is used as a quick reference to guide an operator's thought process and actions to correct a specific condition. The list of indicators and conditions are listed in order from the most probable to the least probable. In using the troubleshooting guide, an operator is expected to perform the required actions. If the required actions are not successful in correcting the condition, the operator would go to the next item on the list 3.2.3. Alarm • Provide step-by-step instructions for responding to KEY alarms. Response Procedures A three -column (e.g., Indicator/Observation — Probable Cause — Corrective Action) Alarm Response Troubleshooting Guide format is recommended. • The Alarm Response Troubleshooting Guide is used as a quick reference to guide an operator's thought process and actions to correct a specific condition. The list of indicators and conditions are listed in order from the most probable to the least probable. In using the troubleshooting guide, an operator is expected to perform the required actions. If the required actions are not successful in correcting the condition, the operator would go to the next item on the list 4. Maintenance • This chapter contains the basic maintenance tasks that will be performed by mechanical, electrical, or instrumentation technicians. Typical sections include the following: 4.1. Lubrication • List the criteria for lubrication of specific equipment in the process. 4.2. Periodic • List the specific activities performing preventive maintenance and Inspection and inspections. Include specific procedures and forms as required. Preventive Maintenance Typical subsections may include: - Daily Checks - Weekly Checks - Monthly Checks - Special Checks (as required) Chapter Technical Information Required 4.3. Abnormal • Provide step-by-step instructions for addresses specific indicators Operating Indicators of abnormal operation. A three -column (e.g., Indicator/Observation — Probable Cause — Corrective Action) Maintenance Troubleshooting Guide format is recommended. The Maintenance Troubleshooting Guide is used as a quick reference to guide an operator's thought process and actions to correct a specific condition. The list of indicators and conditions are listed in order from the most probable to the least probable. In using the troubleshooting guide, an operator is expected to perform the required actions. If the required actions are not successful in correcting the condition, the operator would go to the next item on the list 5. Safety • This chapter addresses safety -related issues and programs for the safety of employees and the safe operation of the process. Related material may include facility -wide programs such as confined spaces, lockout/tag out, etc. as appropriate. Typical sections include the following: - Chemical Hazards - Use of Eye Washes - Required PPE in the process area - MSDSs for materials used in the process area - Fire - Electrical Shock - Noise - Lockout/tagout - Confined Space Entry Good Housekeeping Practices An O&M manual should be organized in a way appropriate to the level of complexity of the project, and may include subsidiary sections for sub -processes that are organized in a similar way to the above. For example, if a general process has a complex subprocess it might be appropriate for the subprocess to be described in a general way in the higher level manual, and in detail in a "sub -manual" which is referenced by hyperlink in the higher level manual. Note that Consultant's O&M Manuals are to be submitted in both paper and electronic format as described elsewhere in the Scope of Work and Design Guidelines. EXHIBIT D8 District Tagging Procedure (deviation from Rev E Standards) OCSD TAGGING PROCEDURE EXHIBIT D8 - OCSD TAG NOMENCLATURE FOR COMMON INSTRUMENTS TABLE D8.1 The following table provides standard function code and suffix assignments for commonly used switches, indicator lights, pushbuttons, and SCADA signals. Use these conventions when assigning Loop Tag Numbers (LTN). Entries marked with r"77771 shall receive LTN physical tags in accordance with OCSD master specifications, or the LTN shall be integrated with the device descriptive tag; no other entries receive physical tags. The xxx is a variable and does not necessarily indicate the block number is the same for all device LTNs. See the notes at the back of the table for more explanation of the assignments. DESCRIPTION DEVICE INDICATION 110 SIGNAL 110 LTN LTN First LOS HSxxx — — — First JOG or OPEN or OPEN -OFF- CLOSE HSxxxA — — — LR or HOR or OCR or HA selector switch HSxxxB — REMOTE HSxxxB Second LOS or CLOSE HSxxxC — — — Second JOG HSxxxD — — — STOP pushbutton HSxxxE — — — START or FORWARD or FAST pushbutton or FAST/SLOW HSxxxF — — — selector switch SLOW pushbutton HSxxxG — — — First RESET HSxxxH — — — OL TRIP ISHxxx IAHxxx OL TRIP ISHxxx Any local electronic display — Ulxxx — ON or ON FORWARD or ON FAST ON, YSxxx YLxxx FORWARD, YSxxx FAST READY SCADA signal (Not the same as the LOCAL READY YSxxxA — READY YSxxxA indication ON or ON FORWARD or ON FAST indication — YLxxx — -- OFF — YLxxxA — — LOCAL READY indication — YLxxxC — — TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB ON SLOW YSxxxG YLxxxG SLOW YSxxxG OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 1 Printed: May 15, 2006 DESCRIPTION DEVICE INDICATION 1/0 SIGNAL 1/0 LTN LTN RESET HSxxxH — -- — 00 Spin orfan-stattdar LTN ft t =QJ , nd xxxJ anr! A rPR x cJ a s F{ 'S�ocx hi§her higher PRIAT hag�ier For LTN other than the above listed devices, the suffix can generally start with a blank, and proceed through the alphabet. The following table presents equipment, instruments, and electrical components normally found in wastewater facilities. Nate the.rni, ri s highlighted- ri yellow'n ttie,tal le bboVe. TABLE D8.2 Each device shall normally be equipped as indicated in the following list unless marked with an *; the designer will decide if the device is needed. Loop Tag Numbers shall be assigned as shown (precede each with the location code): ITEM DEVICE LTN INDI- CATIONFSIGNAL I/O I/O LTN ACTUATOR, ELECTRIC, OPEN/CLOSED Software Template OCV, C4 STOP pushbutton HSxxx LOS — — — Local OPEN pushbutton or O-C selector switch HSxxxA — — — LOCAL -REMOTE (LR) switch in REMOTE or L-O-R selector switch HSxxxB — REMOTE HSxxxB DI Local CLOSE pushbutton HSxxxC CLOSE — — — OPEN valve control (for flow control valve) FVxxx — OPEN FVxxx DO CLOSE valve control (for flow control valve *FVxxxA — CLOSE *FVxxxA DO OPEN valve control (for level control valve *LVxxx — OPEN *LVxxx DO CLOSE valve control (for level control valve *LVxxxA — CLOSE *LVxxxA DO Safety disconnect SWlxxx — — — Motor ON YSxxx — ON YSxxx DI TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI Fail too en alarm *ZAOxxx FAIL OPEN *ZAOxxx DO Fail to close alarm *ZACxxx FAIL CLOSE *ZACxxx DO Valve OPENED ZSOxxx ZLOxxx I OPENED ZSOxxx DI Valve CLOSED ZSCxxx ZLCxxx CLOSED ZSCxxx DI OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 2 Printed: May 15, 2006 ITEM -7 DEVICE LTN INDI- CATION 110 SIGNAL 1/0 LTN ACTUATOR, PNEUMATIC, OPEN / CLOSE Software Template OCV, C4 OPEN valve FVxxx — OPEN FVxxx DO CLOSE valve *FVxxxA — CLOSE *FVxxxA DO OPEN -CLOSE -REMOTE (OCR) HSxxxB — selector switch in REMOTE OCR REMOTE HSxxxB DI Safe disconnect SWlxxx — — — Valve OPENED ZSOxxx ZLOxxx OPENED ZSOxxx DI Valve CLOSED ZSCxxx ZLCxxx CLOSED ZSCxxx DI ACTUATOR, ELECTRIC, MODULATING Software Template MV, C6 Local OPEN pushbutton HSxxxA OPEN — — — LOCAL-OFF-REMOTE(LOR) selector switch in REMOTE HSxxxB LOR — REMOTE HSxxxB DI Local CLOSE pushbutton HSxxxC CLOSE -- - - Valve position control (for flow control FVxxx — POS CON FVxxx AO Valve position control (for level control valve *LVxxx — POS CON *LVxxx AO OPEN valve control (for gate *FVxxx — - OPEN *FVxxx DO STOP valve control for ate *FVxxxB — STOP *FVxxxB DO CLOSE valve control for ate *FVxxxA — CLOSE *FVxxxA DO Safetydisconnect SWlxxx — — — Motor ON YSxxx — ON YSxxx DI TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI Valve position transmitter Z(I)Txxx *Zlxxx POS IND Z(I)Txxx Al Valve OPENED *ZSOxxx *ZLOxxx OPENED *ZSOxxx DI Valve CLOSED *ZSCxxx *ZLCxxx CLOSED *ZSCxxx DI ACTUATOR, PNEUMATIC, MODULATING Software Template MV, C6 LOCAL -OFF -REMOTE (LOR) selector switch in REMOTE -- REMOTE HSxxxB DI Valve position control (for flow control FHSxxxB — POS CON FVxxx AO Valve position control (for level control valve *LVxxx — POS CON *LVxxx AO Safety disconnect SWlxxx — — — TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI Local valve position potentiometer Z(I)Kxxx — — — OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 3 Printed: May 15, 2006 ITEM DEVICE INDI- 1/0 LTN CATION SIGNAL 1/0 LTN Valve position transmitter Z(I)Txxx *Zlxxx POS IND Z(I)Txxx Al ACTIVE FILTER Software Template RT, C13 + TS, C12F Active filter running YSxxx YSxxx ACTIVE FILTER ON YSxxx DI Active filter fault YSxxxB YAxxxB ACTIVE FILTER FAIL YSxxxB DI AIR COMPRESSORS, PLANT (1) AIR COMPRESSORS, INSTRUMENT (2) Software Template Custom Discharge air pressure (1, 2) PTxx1 PIxx1 DISCHARGE PRESS PTxx1 Al Discharge air temperature (1, 2) *TTxx2 *Tlxx2 DISCHARGE TEMP *TTxx2 Al Compressor percent capacity (1, 2) *QTxxx *Qlxxx % CAP *QTxxx Al Sump Pressure (1) *PDTxxx PDlxxx SUMP PRESS *PDTxxxAl Plant air flow rate 1, 2) *FTxx3 FIxx3 AIR FLOW *FTxx3 Al Compressor run hours 1, 2 YSxxx — ON YSxxx DI Temperature high (1, 2) TSHxx2 TAHxx2 TEMP HI TSHxx2 DI Motor overload 1, 2 ISHxxx IAHxxx O/L TRIP ISHxxx DI Change air filter 1, 2 PDSHxxx PDAHxxx PDSHxxx DI Change lubricant filter (1, 2) *PDSHxxx A PDAHxxxA *PDSHxxxA DI Change air/lubricant separator (1,2) *PDSHxxx B *PDAHxxxB *PDSHxxxB DI Dryer ON 2) YSyyy YLyyy DRYER ON YSyyy DI Air Conditioning Software Template RT, C13 + TS, C12F Unit ON YSxxx — A/C ON YSxxx DI Room Air Temperature High TSHxx1 — ROOM TEMP TSHxx1 DI Analyzers — (112S, pH, COND, etc) Software Template TS, C12A + TS, C12F Analysis element AExxx — — — Analysis (Indicating) Transmitter A(I)Txxx Alxxx Variable (pH, CONDUC- TIVITY, etc) A(I)Txxx Al Analyzer set point contacts high *ASHHxxx *AAHHxxx pH HIHI high *ASHHxxx DI Analyzer set point contacts high *ASHxxx *AAHxxx pH HI *ASHxxx DI Analyzer set point contacts low *ASLxxx *AALxxx pH LO *ASLxxx DI OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 4 Printed: May 15, 2006 ITEM DEVICE LTN INDI- CATION 110 SIGNAL 110 LTN Analyzer set point contacts low low *ASLLxxx *AALLxxx pH LOLO *ASLLxxx DI Safety disconnect SWIXxx — — — TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI Bubbler Systems Software Template TS, C12A + TS, C12F Level transmitter L(I)Txxx Lxxx LEVEL L(I)Txxx Al Low level hard wire(stop pumps) *LSLxxx STOP PMPS *LSLxxx DI Derived low level alarm — — — LITxxx LLA Derived medium level alarm — — — LlTxxx _HA, LITxxx LA, Derived high level alarm — — — LITxxx _HHA Low low level switch *LSLLxx1 *LALLxx1 LEVEL LOLO *LSLLxx1 DI Medium level switch (intermediate normal operating ranges), use A for lowest level *LSMAxxx *LSMBxxx *LAMAxxx *LAMBxxx *LEVEL ??? *LEVEL ??? *LSMAxxx DI *LSMBxxx DI High level switch *LSHxx1 *LAHxx1 *LEVEL HI *LSHxx1 DI High high level switch *LSHHxx1 *LAHHxx1 *LEVEL HIHI *LSHHxxl DI Flushing solenoid FVxxx — — — Blocking solenoid(during flush FVxxxA — — — Air supply pressure low switch PSLxx2 PALxx2 AIR PRESS LOW PSLxx2 DI Fan, Continuous Running Software Template Custom Lock -out Stop pushbutton HSxxx LOS — — — Air flow switch *FSLxxx *FALxxx FAN FAIL *FSLxxx DI READY (overload set+disconnect switch closed+control power on+LOS closed+*safety disconnect closed YSxxxA — READY YSxxxA DI OL TRIP ISHxxx IAHxxx OL TRIP ISHxxx DI Fan ON YSxxx YLxxx ON YSxxx DI Safety disconnect Gas Detection System Software Template TS, C12A + TS, C12F Gas sensor AExxx — — — Gas concentration *A(I)Txxx Alxxx ??% CONC *A(I)Txxx Al OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 5 Printed: May 15, 2006 ITEM DEVICE LTN INDI- CATION 110 SIGNAL 110 LTN High LEL gas concentration *ASHxxx *AAHxxx ??% CONC *ASHxxx DI High High LEL gas concentration *ASHHxxx *AAHHxxx ??% CONC *ASHHxxx DI Derived gas concentration alarm — — — *ASHxxx—HA, ASHHxxx HH A Gas monitoring panel TROUBLE i YSxxxB YAxxx13 TROUBLE YSxxxB DI Magmeters Software Template TS, C12A + TS, C12F Flow F(I)Txxx Flxxx FLOW F(I)Txxx Al Integrator output — *FQlxxx — I — TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI Motor Software Template CSM, C1 + TS, C12F, some custom for multi -speed motors Moisture sensor *MExx1 — — — Moisture transmitter *M(I)Txx1 *MIxx1 MOISTURE *M(I)Txx1 Al Moisture switch high *MSHxx1 *MAHxx1 MOISTURE HIGH *MSHxx1 DI Speed high switch *SSHxx2 *SAHxx2 SPEED HI *SSHxx2 DI Speed low switch *SSLxx2 *SALxx2 SPEED LO *SSLxx2 DI Winding temperature sensor *TExx3, TExx3A... — — — Winding temperature transmitter *TTxx3, TTxx3A... *Tlxx3 WIND TEMP *TTxx3, TTxx3A Al Bearing temperature sensor *TEyyy, TE A.... — — — Bearing temperature transmitter *TTyyy, TT A... *Tlyyy LOWER BRG TEMP *TTyyy, TTyyyA Al Derived temperature high alarm — — — TSHxxx_HA Winding temperature switch *TSHxx3 *TAHxx3 WIND TEMP HI *TSHxx3 DI Bearing temperature switch *TSHyyyA *TAHyyyA BEAR TEMP HI *TSHyyyA DI Oil level low switch *LSLxx4 *LALxx4 OIL LO *LSLxx4 DI Vibration sensor *VExx5 — — — Vibration transmitter *V(I)Txx5 *Vlxx5 VIB IND *V(I)Txx5 Al Vibration switch *VSHxx5 *VAHxx5 VIB HI *VSHxx5x DI 2-Wire Motor Control LOCK -OUT STOP pushbutton (First) HSxxx (LOS) — — — OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 6 Printed: May 15, 2006 INDI- 1/0 1/0 ITEM CATION SIGNAL LTN JOG pushbutton (First) EHSxxxA HAND -OFF -REMOTE (HOR) xxx — REMOTE HSxxxB DI switch (HOR) LOCK -OUT STOP pushbutton *HSxxxC — — — (Second) (LOS) JOG pushbutton (Second) *HSxxxD — — — JOG Motor run/stop control Load — ??? RUN ???xxx DO (PMP; etc)xxx READY(overload trip+control YSxxxA — READY YSxxxA DI power off+LOS open+*safety disconnect closed LOCAL READY Light — YLxxxC — — OL TRIP ISHxxx IAHxxx OL TRIP ISHxxx DI ON YSxxx YLxxx ON YSxxx DI OFF — YLxxxA — 2-Wire Forward/Reverse Motor Control Above except FORWARD pushbutton HSxxxF — --- — F ON FORWARD YSxxx YLxxx FORWARD YSxxx DI 2-Wire Slow/Fast Motor Control Above except FAST/SLOW Selector Switch HSxxxF — — — RUN SLOW Load — ???xxx ???xxx DO (PMP; SLOW etc xxx RUN FAST Load --- ???xxxA ???xxxA DO (PMP; FAST etc)xxxA ON FAST YSxxx YLxxx FAST YSxxx DI ON SLOW YSxxxG YLxxxG SLOW YSxxxG DI 3-Wire Motor Control LOCK -OUT STOP pushbutton HSxxx — — — First (LOS) JOG pushbutton (First) HSxxxA — — — JOG LOCAL-REMOTE(LR) switch HSxxxB — REMOTE HSxxxB DI LR OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 7 Printed: May 15, 2006 DEVICE INDI- 1/0 1/0 ITEM LTN CATION SIGNAL LTN LOCK -OUT STOP pushbutton *HSxxxC — — — (Second) (LOS) JOG pushbutton (Second) *HSxxxD — — — JOG STOP pushbutton *HSxxxF — — — S START pushbutton *HSxxxF — — — S) Motor run/stop control Load RUN ???xxx RUN ???xxx DO (PMP; etc)xxx READY (overload trip+control YSxxxA — READY YSxxxA DI power off+LOS open+*safety disconnect closed LOCAL READY light — YLxxxC — — OL TRIP ISHxxx IAHxxx OL TRIP ISHxxx DI ON YSxxx YLxxx ON YSxxx DI OFF 3-Wire Forward/Reverse Motor Control Above except FORWARD pushbutton HSxxxF — — — F ON FORWARD YSxxx YLxxx FORWARD YSxxx DI 3-Wire Slow/Fast Motor Control Above except FAST pushbutton HSxxxF — — — F SLOW pushbutton HSxxxG — — — S RUN SLOW Load SLOW SLOW ???xxx DO (PMP; etc)xxx RUN FAST Load FAST FAST ???xxxA DO (PMP; etc)xxxA ON FAST YSxxx YLxxx FAST YSxxx DI ON SLOW YSxxxG YLxxxG SLOW YSxxxG DI Neutral Ground Unit Software Template TS, C12F NGU TROUBLE YSxxx) YAxxxJ 7 NGU YSxxxJ DI TROUBLE Outlying Pump Stations Wetwell Level Controls HS030J YL030J BUB HS030J DI Selector Switch — Bubbler SELECT OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 8 Printed: May 15, 2006 DEVICE INDI- 110 1/0 ITEM LTN CATION SIGNAL LTN Selector Switch — Sonic HS035J YL035J SONIC HS035J DI SELECT Raise HS034J — SP UP HS034J DI Lower HS034K — SP DN HS034K DI Level Controller LC030 — — Level Indicator -- L1030 — — Pump Sequence Selection Software Template Custom Position 1 — 2 — 3 HSO49J YL049J SEW HSO49J/ YL049J Position 1 — 3 — 2 HSO49K YL049K SEQ2 HSO49K/ YL049K Position 2 — 1 — 3 HSO49L YL049L SEQ3 HSO49U YL049L Position 2 — 3 — 1 HSO49M YL049M SEQ4 HSO49M/ YL049M Position 3 —1 — 2 HSO49N YL049N SEQ5 HSO49N/ YL049N Position 3 — 2 —1 HSO49P YL049P SEQ6 HSO49P/ YL049P Position ... Repeat pattern ? ? ? ? PLC Software Template TS, C12F PLC -A TROUBLE YSxxxJ PLC -A YSxxxJ DI TROUBLE PLC-B TROUBLE *YSxxxK PLC-B *YSxxxK DI TROUBLE 24VDC power supply TROUBLE YSxxxB — 24VDC YSxxxB DI TROUBLE Pressure Switch Software Template TS, C12F Pressure switch high high *PSHHxxx *PAHHxxx PRESSURE *PSHHxxx DI HIHI Pressure switch high *PSHxxx *PAHxxx PRESSURE *PSHxxx DI HI OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 9 Printed: May 15, 2006 ITEM DEVICE LTN INDI- CATION 1/0 SIGNAL 1/0 LTN Pressure switch low *PSLxxx *PALxxx PRESSURE LO *PSLxxx DI Pressure switch low low *PSLLxxx *PALLxxx PRESSURE LOW *PSLLxxx DI Pressure switch high & low (same unit). Device is PSHLxxx. *PSHxxx *PALxxx PRESSURE HI *PSHxxx DI *PSLxxx *PALxxx PRESSURE LO *PSLxxx DI Pressure switch medium A (OFF point) and medium B (ON point) (same unit) used for control. Device is PSHLxxx *PSMAxxx ... *PSMBxxx — PRESSURE OFF *PSMAxxx DI — PRESSURE ON *PSMBxxx DI OFF point PSMAxxx — — — Lowest ON point PSMBxxx — — — Next lowest ON point, and so forth PSMCxxx — — — Pump Software Template Custom Bearing temperature sensor *TExx1 — — — Bearing temperature transmitter *TTxx1 *TSHxx1 *Tlxx1 TEMP IND *TTxx1 Al Bearingtemperature switch hi h *TAHxx1 TEMP HI *TSHxx1 DI Leak detection YSxxxJ YAxxxJ LEAK DETECTED YSxxxJ DI Vibration element *VExx2 — — — Vibration indicator/recorder *V(I)Rxx2 *VRxx2 — — Vibration switch high *VSHxx2 *VAHxx2 VIB HI VSHxx2 DI Vibration switch high high *VSHHxx2 *VAHHxx2 VIB HIHI VSHHxx2 DI Water seal low pressure *PSLxx3 *PALxx3 PRESS LO PSLxx3 DI Water seal low flow *FSLxx4 *FALxx4 FLOW LO FSLxx4 DI Run Time NONE NONE YSxxx RT template (C 13) Standby Generator Software Template TS, C12A + TS, C12F Day tank level high LSHxx1 LAHxx1 DAY TANK LEVEL HI LSHxx1 DI Day tank level high high *LSHHxx1 *LAHHxx1 DAY TANK LEVEL HIHI *LSHHxx1 DI Day tank leak YSxx2J YAxx2J DAYTANK LEAK YSxx2J DI OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 10 Printed: May 15, 2006 ITEM DEVICE INDI- CATION 110 I/O LTN SIGNAL LTN Day tank level low LSLxxx LALxx1 DAY TANK LSLxx1 DI LEVEL LO Day tank level low low *LSLLxxx *LALLxx1 DAY TANK *LSLLxx1 DI LEVEL LOLO Engine coolant temp high TSHyyy TAHyyy COOLANT TSHyyy DI TEMP HI Engine coolant temp high high *TSHHyyy *TAHHyyy COOLANT *TSHHyyy DI TEMP HIHI Engine coolant temp low TSLyyy TALyyy COOLANT TSLyyy DI TEMP LO Engine emergency shutdown YSyyyH — GEN YSyyyH DI EMERG Engine coolant level low LSLyyy LALyyy COOLANT LSLyyy DI LEVEL LO Engine oil pressure low PSLyyy PAyyy PRESSURE PSLyyy Dl LO Engine oil pressure low low *PSLLyyy *PALLyyy PRESSURE *PSLLyyy DI LOLO Engine ON YSyyy YLyyy ON YSyyy Engine over speed shutdown YSyyyJ YAyyJ OVER- YSyyyJ DI SPEED Engine overcrank YSyyyK YAyyK OVER- YSyyyK DI CRANK Engine starting battery low ESLyyy EALyy BATT LO ESLyyy DI Engine/Generator HSyyyB — AUTO HSyyyB DI RUN/OFF/AUTO Engine/Generator common YSyyyB YAyyyB TROUBLE YSyyyB DI TROUBLE Generator — Emergency stop HSxxxJ Engine/Generator READY YSyyyH YLyyyC READY YSyyyA DI Fuel transfer pump AUTO HSwwwB — AUTO HSwwwB DI Fuel transfer pump OL TRIP ISHwww IAHwww OL TRIP ISHwww DI Fuel transfer pump ON YSwww YLwww ON YSwww DI Generator CB CLOSED ZSCzzzA — CB CLOSED ZSCzzzA DI Generator CB TRIPPED ISHzzzA IAHzzzA CB ISHzzzA DI TRIPPED Generator stator temperature TSHzzz TAHzzz STATOR TSHzzz DI high TEMP HI Generator stator temperature *TSHHzzz *TAHHzzz STATOR *TSHHzzz DI high high TEMP HIHI Generator phase A, B, C amps IlzzzA, B, — — — C OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 11 Printed: May 15, 2006 ITEM DEVICE LTN INDI- CATION 110 SIGNAL 1/0 LTN Generator phase A, B, C amps I(I)TzzzA, B, C IlzzzA, B, C CURRENT I(I)TzzzA, B, C Al Generatorsync fail YSzzzB YAzzzB SYNC FAIL YSzzzB DI Storage tank level high LSHvvv LAHvvv TANK LEVEL HI LSHvvv DI Fuel tank leak YSvvvJ YAvvvJ TANK LEAK YSvvvJ DI Fuel tank leak detector TROUBLE YSvvvB YAvvvB TROUBLE YSvvvB DI Fuel tank level L(I)Tvvv L(I)Tvvv LEVEL L(I)Tvvv Al Fuel tank sump level high LSHvvvA LAHvvvA 7SUMP LEVEL HI LSHvvvA DI Station Battery Charger Software Template Custom AC power fail ESLxxxA EALxxxA AC POWER FAIL ESLxxxA DI DC ground detected YSxxx YAxxx DC GND YSxxx DI Battery charger TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI Hi or Lo DC voltage ESHLxxx EAHLxxx HULO DC VOLTS ESHLxxx DI Battery discharging ISHxxx IAHxxx BATT DISCHARGE ISHxxx DI Sump Pumps Software Template RT, C13 + TS, C12F Lead Lag Selector Switch HSxxxJ — — — Pump 1 ON — *YLxxx P1 ON YSxxx DI Pump 2 ON — *YLyyy P2 ON YSyyy DI Sump Level Hi LSHzzz LAHzzz LEVEL HI LSHzzz DI Pump 1 OL TRIP ISHxxx IAHxxx — — Pump 2 OL TRIP ISHyyy IAHyyy — — TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI Switchgear Software Template Custom Feeder CB CLOSED ZSCyyyA *ZLCyyyA CB CLOSED ZSCyyyA DI Feeder CB TRIPPED *ISHyyyA *IAHyyyA CB TRIPPED *ISHyyyA DI Main CB CLOSED ZSCwww A *ZLCwwwA CB CLOSED ZSCwwwA DI Main CB TRIPPED *ISHwww A *IAHwwwA CB TRIPPED *ISHwwwA DI Standby generator CB CLOSED ZSCzzzA *ZLCzzzA CB CLOSED ZSCzzzA DI Standby generator CB TRIPPED *ISHzzzA *IAHzzzA CB TRIPPED *ISHzzzA DI OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 12 Printed: May 15, 2006 ITEM DEVICE LTN INDI- CATION 1/0 SIGNAL 110 LTN Switchgear in AUTO YSvvv — SWGR IN AUTO YSvvv Tie CB CLOSED ZSCxxxA *ZLCxxM CB CLOSED ZSCxxxA DI Tie CB TRIPPED *ISHxxxA *IAHxxxA CB TRIPPED *ISHxxxA DI Temperature Switch Software Template TS, C12F Temperature switch hiqh *TSHHxxx *TAHHxxx TEMP HIHI *TAHHxxx DI Temperature switch hi*TSHxxx *TAHxxx TEMP HI *TSHxxx DI Temperature switch lo*TSLxxx *TALxxx TEMP LO *TSLxxx DI Tem erature switch lo*TSLLxxx *TALLxxx TEMP LOLO *TSLLxxx DI Temperature Controller Software Template Custom Temperature sensor TExxx -- - - Local temperature controller T(I)Cxxx Tlxxx — — Temperature (indicating) Transmitter T(I)Txxx Tlxxx TEMP IND T(I)Txxx Ai Temperature controller output (4- 20 mA TVxxx — TEMP CON TVxxx AO Transfer Switch, Automatic Software Template Custom Auto position HS7xB — AUTO HSxxxB DI Standby source connected YSxxx 1 YAxxx STANDBY YSxxx DI Transfer Switch, Manual Software Template Custom *Standby source connected I *YSxxx I *YAxxx *STANDBY *YSxxx DI Transformer, Power Software Template TS, C12F Oil level low LSLxxx *LSLLxxx LALxxx LEVEL LO LSLxxx DI *Oil level low low *LALLxxx LEVEL LOLO *LSLLxxx DI Temperature high TSHxxx TAHxxx TEMP HI TSHxxx DI *Temperature high high *TSHHxxx *TAHHxxx TEMP HIHI *TSHHxxx DI Pressure Hi PSHxxx *PSHHxxx PAHxxx OVER PRESSURE PSHxxx DI *Pressure HiHi *PAHHxxx PRESSURE HIHI *PSHHxxx DI TVSS (Transient Voltage Surge Suppressor) Common TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 13 Printed: May 15, 2006 ITEM DEVICE LTN I INDI- CATION UO SIGNAL 1/0 LTN Uninterruptible Power Supplies (1) FOR OUTLYING PUMP STATIONS ONLY Common TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI AC On JSxxx JLxxx — JSxxx DI Inverter On 1 YSxxxJ YLxxxJ — YSxxxJ DI On Bypass 1 YSxxxK YAxxxK — YSxxxK DI Low Battery 1 ESLxxx EALxxx — ESLxxx DI Ultrasonic Level Sensors Software Template TS, C12A + TS, C12F Level element LExxx — — — Level(Indicating) transmitter L(I)Txxx Llxxx LEVEL IND L(I)Txxx Al *Low low level switch *LSLLxxx *LALLxxx LEVEL LOLO *LSLLxxx DI High level switch *LSHxxx *LAHxxx LEVEL HI *LSHxxx DI *High high level switch *LSHHxxx *LAHHxxx LEVEL HIHI *LSHHxxx DI Programmable level contacts (A is lowest level) *LSMAxxx *LLMAxxx ... ... *LLMExxx *LSMExxx (contact use) *LSMAxxx ... LSMExxx DI Safety disconnect SWlxxx — — — - TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI Variable Frequency Drive Controller w/ Bypass Software Template VSM, C2 + Custom Devices Common to VFD and Bypass Local LOCK -OUT STOP (First) HSxxx (LOS) HSxxxA HSxxxB (HOR) HSxxxC (LOS) — — — Local JOG selector switch First — -- — HAND -OFF -REMOTE (HOR) switch in REMOTE — REMOTE HSxxxB DI Local LOCK -OUT STOP (Second) — — — Local JOG selector switch Second HSxxxD — — — HAND -OFF -REMOTE (HOR) switch in HAND (outlying pump stations only) — — HAND HSxxxJ DI VFD/BYPASS in variable speed mode HSxxxK (VS/CS) — VS SELECTED HSxxxK DI CABINET OVERTEMP TSHppp TAHppp CAB TEMP HI TSHppp DI VFD Controls OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 14 Printed: May 15, 2006 ITEM DEVICE LTN Load (PMP; etc)xxx INDI- CATION 110 SIGNAL I/O LTN VFD RUN control — ???xxx RUN ???xxx DO Motor Speed Transmitter STxxx Slxxx SPEED IND STxxx Al Motor Speed Transmitter (Separate tach STmmm SICxxx Slmmm SPEED IND STmmm Al Local motor speed control (may be pot or keypad) — — Motor SPEED CONTROL — — SPEED CON SCxxx AO READY(disconnect switch closed+control power on+LOS closed+"life safety) YSxxxA — READY YSxxxA DI LOCAL READY light — YLxxxC — — VFD ON YSxxx YLxxx VFD ON YSxxx DI VFD OFF — YLxxxA — — TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE YSxxxB DI RESET *HSxxxH — RESET *HSxxxH DI PLC RESET — — PLC RESET PMP100H *PMP100H DO CS Controls CS READY (disconnect switch closed+control power on+LOS closed+*life safety) YSxxxL — READY YSxxxL DI CS ON YSxxxJ YLxxx) CS ON YSxxxJ DI CS OFF — YLxxxK — — CS OL TRIP ISHxxx IAHxxx CS OL TRIP ISHxxx DI VFD DATA STREAM Software Template Custom VFD current IlxxxA, I lxxxB, IlxxxC — PH A, (B), (C) CURRENT IlxxxA_CUR, I IxxxB_CUR, IlxxxC CUR Weight Scales Software Template TS, C12A + TS, C12F Weight sensor WExxx — — — Weight (indicating) transmitter W(I)Txxx Wlxxx WEIGHT IND W(I)Txxx Al Weight trip point alarm high *WSHxxx *WAHxxx WEIGHT HI *WSHxxx DI Derived weight trip point alarm _��7 — — — *WSHxxx _HA WSLxxx LA TROUBLE YSxxxB YAxxxB TROUBLE I YSxxxB DI OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 15 Printed: May 15, 2006 NOTES: 1. When a physical device inputs a signal to the PLC, the signal is given the LTN of the physical device. An example is 10CPSHxxx in the field defines the signal as 10CPSHxxx in the PLC. 2. L (Light) is used external to the PLC to show physical indicator lights. Use four "light rays" to indicate a lamp for the physical indicator lights. A (Alarm) is used external to the PLC to show physical alarm indication. 3. When the PLC outputs a digital signal to a physical device, the PLC output signal is the LTN number of the final controlled device. Suppose you have a PLC analog output signal controlling a variable frequency drive 10CVFD100 feeding a motor 10CMTR100 that is driving pump 10CPMP100. The PLC digital output signal is 10CPMP100. The PLC Analog In signal will be 10CST102 (speed loop tag no. differs from VFD loop tag no.) if speed is measured with separate speed measuring device. If speed is generated internally by the VFD, then signal no. will be 10CST100. 4. When a value is derived from a physical signal, the derived value takes on the LTN number of the physical device as the root, and then adds a PCI extension. Thus, the flow signal from flowmeter 10CFIT100 is identified as 10CFIT100; a high flow alarm derived from the flowmeter is 10CF1T100_HA; these signals with extensions are only for HMI communication. 5. The digital output from the PLC takes on the LTN number of the device to which it is wired; i.e. the flow signal from flowmeter 10CFIT100 is identified as 10CFIT100, and the PLC output signal to indicator 10CFI100 is identified as 10CFI100. If the PLC output is wired to more than one instrument, the assigned LTN number will be the lowest LTN number, i.e. if the output is wired to three indicators in series with tag nos. 10CF1100, 10CF1100A and 10CF110013, then LTN number will be 10CF1100. 6. When signals are fed from PLC to PLC, the tagging will be as shown in the table: LTN No. of Field Instrument PLC(1) input signal No./ type PLC(1) output signal No./type PLC(2) input signal No./type PLC(3) input signal No./type 10CFIT100 10CFIT100/AI 10CF1100/AO 10CF110OA/Al 10CF110OB/AI 10CHS101 10CHS101/DI 10CYS101/DO 10CYS101A/DI 10CYS101 B/DI 10CPSH1021 10CPSH102/Di 10CPSH102A/DO 10CPSH102B/DI 10CPSH102C/DI 7. When one device is wired in several PLC's, the signal No. to the first PLC will be the LTN number of physical device, and the signal No. for subsequent PLC's will be the LTN number with a unique suffix. Thus, if the flow signal is identified as 10CFIT100 for first PLC, it will be 10CFIT100A for second PLC and so on. 8. Use separate instrumentation bubbles on the P&IDs for the STOP and START hand switches. OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 16 Printed: May 15, 2006 9. When two signals are derived from the same operator with two contact sets, show one physical bubble for the switch and two 10 triangles, each marked with the appropriate signal designation, i.e. 10CHS100B (HOR selector switch) will generate two input signals 10CHS100E and 10CHS1OB. This convention shall be extended to multiple contacts. 10. Remote control is typically two -wire control with a maintained -closed PLC contact. Three - wire control is used only when the load must not come on-line after a power failure (large loads; loads unsafe to start up on return of power). 11. ES (Emergency Stop) is an independent HS. LOS (LOCK OUT STOP) is used at every motor (except HVAC equipment with local safety disconnects) and cuts off control power. Safety disconnects are also used at most control panels to deenergize the interior of the panel. 12. Do not use HOA unless the equipment is automatically controlled locally, such as sump pumps. 13. HOR (Hand -Off -Remote) implies the HAND position hard -wire runs the motor, OFF position stops the motor and Remote disconnects HAND and OFF, and allows remote operation. This scheme is two -wire control and is used without local SS (Start -Stop) pushbuttons. 14. Use LOR (LOCAL -OFF -REMOTE) where LOCAL allows the use of SS (START -STOP pushbuttons) or OSC (OPEN -STOP -CLOSE) pushbuttons, OFF stops the motor and REMOTE allows remote operation only. 15. Safety circuits, such as combustible gas detectors and alarms, are wired fail-safe and will alarm on power failure or FAIL. 16. "Black Boxes" showing field control panels are allowed. Show all signals in and out of the control panel with written description. Show all indicators and controls mounted on the face of the panel. ALARMS — GENERAL RULES FOR HH, H, L, LL 17. The first activated alarm is H or L. The second activated alarm is HH or LL. No third alarms are used. OCSD Tagging Procedure Exhibit D8 Last Revised: 11-1-2005 Page 17 Printed: May 15, 2006 EXHIBIT X Pump selection curves 11 No m 9 0 - H rl Wj 11 FA k ffiffi) V 9 jo 9, "p" 0 MMMMPA wj. 4 wLw. 0, ?RA 10 I!kM 11LRMAIMProject\PROJ%34W)1 -Bitter Poin"neeffing CdcUabons\Hydraulics%Pump Selection L12K-H.)ds.xls - Figure 5-1 1 of 12 New Pipe Force Main Study used C=155 Figure 5-2 Pump Station Study used E=0.0273 One v.s. Two Pump Overlapping Capacity (New Pipe) Wemco-Hidrostall-Pump L12K-H 100 95 90 as so 75 70 65 90 +T a ss so 2 i� 45 O ~ 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 ............ System Curve Legend —One Pump Operating Alone (at set point) -... _... 2Pump- ' ... - .........' Two Pumps Operating in Parallel (at set point) 1 Pump 850 RPM ............./ .. _ 850 RPM ... ... .. .. / ........ .. ............ _..... .... _ _ _ .. - 1 Pump 2 Pump S10RPM510RPM 00, Ile doe Overlaprng Pumping Capacity. �r 0 2500 50D0 7500 1DODO 12500 150D0 17500 20000 22500 25000 27500 3000D Q Total (gpm) 1\LRMAIMProjecflPROA343\01-Bitter Point\Engineering Calculations\Hydraulics\Pump Selection L12K-H.)ds.As - Figure 5-2 2 of 12 New Pipe - - - Force Man Study used C=155 Figure 5-3 Pump Station Study used E=0.0273 g Two v.s. Three Pump Overlapping Capacity (New Pipe) Wemco-Hidrostall-Pump L12K-H 100 s 3P ; System Curve Legend _ .............. _... ......._ .... _. ,. _. _...... 85ORPM ., .. .. _ ..... _..... _... _. . —Two Pumps Operating in Parallel (at set point) p .. :... ! _......_ ..... _ .. `',.... .... ....... ... .. _ _ Three Pumps Operating in Parallel (at set point) 1350RPM p... .._ .. _ .. • .. . _ _ .. ... ... .. .. 00, r f _ 5 l f 1 51ORPM r 51ORPM q.. .. _. .. _.. _ .._ .. .. .. _.. .000 .00 5 .. ... .. .... .. ... .. _ %Overlaping?umpingCapaury ...... .. .. .... 0 0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500 20000 22500 25000 27500 30000 Q Total (gpm) luLRMAIMProjecAPROJl343101-Bitter PointlEngineering CalcLdations%Hydraulics%Pump Selection L12K-H.xls.xls - Figure 5-3 3 of 12 New Pipe Force Main Study used C=155 Figure 5-4 Pump Station Study used E=0.0273 Three v.s. Four Pump Overlapping Capacity (New Pipe) Wemco-Hidrostall-Pump L12K-H 100 95 90 85 8o 75 70 0.5 80 m 55 to 87 50 O) 2 N 45 O H 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2500 $000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500 20000 22500 25000 27500 30000 Q Total (gpm) \1LRMAIMProject%PROJ1343101-Bitter Point\Engineering Calculations\Hydraulics\Pump Selection L12K•H-xls.xls - Figure 54 4 of 12 New Pipe Force Main Study used tr155 Figure 5-5 Pump Station Study used E=0.0273 Four v.s. Five Pump Overlapping Capacity (New Pipe) Wemco-Hidrostall-Pump L12K-H 100 95 90 85 a0 75 70 55 60 m 4-11 55 1, m 50 S A 45 O [- 40 N 25 20 15 1c 0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500 20000 22500 25000 27500 30000 Q Total (gpm) \\LRMAIN\Pmject\PR0J\343\01-Bitter Point\Engineedng Ca culabons"dreulics\Pump Selection L12K-H bs.xls - Figure SS 5 of 12 Old Pipe Force Main Study used C=130 Figure 5-6 Pump Station Study used E=0.6620 One v.s. Two Pump Overlapping Capacity (Old Pipe) Wemco-Hidrostall-Pump L12K-H 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 .-, 60 at 55 d 50 45 F 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2 Pump System Curve Legend 850 RPM .... _ One Pump Operating Alone (at set point) . '. _ ......_ ......... ._ _.. '_ _ .../ .. Two Pumps Operating in ParaHei (at set point) 1 Pump 850 RPM `,.... / Jp 2 Pump .. YPump 510 RPM 510 RPM - �� �rer'bping Pimaping Capacity . 0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500 20000 22500 25000 27500 30000 Q Total (gpm) 11LRMAIMProjecAPROA343101-Bitter PoinhEngineering CalculabonslHydraulicsWump Selection L12K-H.xls.xls - Figure M 6 of 12 Old Pipe Force Main Study used CG 130 Figure 5-7 Pump Station Study used E=0.6620 Two v.s. Three Pump Overlapping Capacity (Old Pipe) Wemco-Hidrostall-Pump L12K-H 100 95 so 85 80 75 70 85 80 C y- 55 10 m 50 2 le 45 O ~ 40 35 3C 2° 21 1! LD System Curve Legend ..... .: _ .... _... _ _; ... ..._ ._ ..:.. ........... _ ..... ....... _ .. _... _. _' ... ..... ................. —Two Pumps Operating in Parallel (at set point) 3 Pump - Three Pimps Operating in Parallel (at set point) .. .... _.:.... .....:........2.P�......`... rnp ._ ..._ 850RPM . - 850RPM -. 1 ....... • l f 3 Pump f ...... 51ORPM_...... _ :... . _ .. _ . _...... _ ... _. _ .. _. _. .. .. .... .... .. .. _.... _ 2 Pump 51ORPM �• - . : 0-1 0-0 .00 .... .. .; .... _ Ow3rlapingPumping Capacity� ... ........ - 0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500 20000 22500 25000 27500 30000 Q Total (gpm) \\LRMAIN\Prgect\PROA343\01-Bitter Point\Engineering Calculations\Hydraulics\Pump Selection L12K-H.xls.xls - Figure 5-7 7 of 12 Old Pipe - - - — Force Main Study used G130 Figure 5-8 Pump Station Study used E=0.6620 Three v.s. Four Pump Overlapping Capacity (Old Pipe) Wemco-Hidrostall-Pump L12K-H 11LRMAIN\Prc*t\PR0J\343\01-Bitter Point\Engineering Calculations\Hydraulics\Pump Selection L12K-H.xis.xls • Figure 5.8 8 of 12 Old Pipe Force Main Study used C=130 Figure 5-9 Pump Station Study used E=0.6620 Four v.s. Five Pump Overlapping Capacity (Old Pipe) Wemco-Hidrostall-Pump L12K-H 100 95 90 65 90 75 70 65 6o w ,G. 55 �o m 50 R 45 O F 4C 3! 3C 2! Z 1: tl 0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500 20000 22500 25000 275M 30000 Q Total (gpm) 11LRMAIMProjecI\PROJl343101-Bitter PointlEngineering Calculations\HydraulicsWump Selection Ll2K-H.ws.xls- Figure s-9 9 of 12 \1LRMAIN1PrcjecttPROJ%Z4M1-Bitter Point%Engineenng Calculations%Hydraulics\Pump Selection L12K-H.XIs.XIs - Figure &10 10 of 12 Old Pipe Force Main Study used C=130 Pump Station Study used E=0.6620 New Pipe Force Main Study used C=155 Pump Station Study used E=0.0273 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 Figure 5-11 Pump and System NPSH During Normal Operation at Wet Well SP Wemco-Hidrostall-Pump L12K-H HWL LWL 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 Suction Flow Rate (gpm) \\LRMAIN\Project\PROA343W1-Bitter PoinhEngineedngCalculalionsWydraulics\NPSHLI2K-H.xls.xls-Normal 11 of 12 New Pipe Force Main Study used C=155 Pump Station Study used E=0.0273 Figure 5-12 Pump and System NPSH During Cleaning Wemco-Hidrostall-Pump L12K-H 40 Start of Cleaning 39 Cycle at HWL 38 Start of Cleaning 11,400 gpm 37 Cycle at LWL .. .. ... 880 m �._..__......: 36 35 ...� .�...�.. �. - _HWL 34 Does Not Satisfies OCSD Satisfies OCSD >1.5 SF ... LWL 33 .... >1.5 SF but does satisfy 32 Cleaning Cycle NPSHa pump manufactrues NPSHr _ ....... _. 31 as function of dropping curve. - 30 water level, change in29 A.13 28 rpm from 100 to 80% ,=" ..... . SF 27 Pump speed. 261 25 24 23 `- 22 -End ....., .a .... of Clening— ra, +--,.-....;-,� ..•�, � = .-_ ... 21 at Suction Bell A 2.3' , 20 80%Speed : _ . . A 6.0' 1.10 SF 19 :- 1.35SF 18 . 7200 gpm - - Cleaning Cycle NPSHa 17 680 rpm ... - . - - •_ ' as function of dropping 16 - - - - • " • •' End ;of Cleaning . . water level, rpm 15 -Legend at Suction Bell - constant at 100°h 14 : 100% Speed. 13 NPSHa at HWL 9750 gpm - 12 11 NPSHa at LWL 850 rpm 10 -.. - NPSHa at Suction Bell g 8 _. . Pump NPSHr at Max RPM 7 6 NPSHr • 1.5 5 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000 9500 10000 10500 11000 11500 Suction Flow Rate (gpm) \\LRMAINWrojectWROJ%343\01-Bitter Point\EngineedngCalculations\Hydraulics\NPSHL12K-H.)ds.xls-Cleaning 12 of 12 ATTACHMENT "B" DIRECT COSTS Long Distance Toll Charges All long distance toll charges incurred will be reimbursed as direct costs. Toll charges to area codes serving Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties will not be reimbursed. Facsimile Transmission Charges Facsimile transmission charges will not be reimbursed, except the long distance toll charges, as described above. Reproduction Charges In-house reproduction of records and documents will not be reimbursed by the District. Use of an outside copy service for specialty items and volume reproduction will be reimbursed at direct cost. Overnight Mail Deliver and Messenger Service Use of Federal Express, Express Mail, UPS, or such similarly -related service, as well as a Messenger service, will be reimbursed at direct cost only when necessary. Postage Incidental postage will not be reimbursed by District. Printing Use of a professional printing service will be reimbursed at actual cost. Film Processing Film processing will be reimbursed at actual cost. Computer Usage Computer use by Consultant and/or support staff will not be reimbursed. Mileage Per mile reimbursement will be at the current rate set by the Internal Revenue service. Temporary Staff The use of outside temporary support staff will be reimbursed at direct cost with prior approval of District. Office Supplies The purchase of office supplies by Consultant will not be reimbursed. EDMS: 003717955