Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMontgomery Watson Americas, Inc (MWA) - 1989-01-01 1472.002 October 8, 1996 D RAFT Thomas R. Gill, Esq. Manning, Marder & Wolfe First Interstate Tower, 45th Floor 707 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90017 Re: City of Huntington Beach v. Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., etc; et al. Orange County Superior Court Case No. 765940 Dear Mr. Gill: Enclosed please find the response of the City of Huntington Beach to the First Demand for Production of Documents propounded by Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. (the "Response"). At this time, the City of Huntington Beach ("City") is assembling all of the files which the Water Operations maintained in connection with the design and construction of the Project. These files consist of the project files maintained by the Project Engineer, Deborah Debow, and the Project Inspector, Ron Winslow. The files should be available for inspection and photocopying, at Water Operations, on October 26, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. In addition to the foregoing, we have asked the other City employees involved with the Project to confirm that they do not have "special" or "personal" files in their offices. At this point in time, we do not know if these files, if any, will be available on October 26, 1996. Finally, we wish to advise you that the City Clerk maintains certain original documents at City Hall. Since these documents are public records, they are available for inspection at City Hall. According to City Policy, you must submit a written request to the City Clerk to review f Thomas R. Gill, Esq. October 8, 1996 Page 2 these documents. We are informed that copies of most of these documents appear in the files maintained by Water Operations. Please telephone me after you have had an opportunity to review this correspondence so that we can confirm the arrangements for your inspection of City's files. Very truly yours, William D. Locher of GIBBS, GIDEN, LOCHER & ACRET WDL:th Enclosures cc: City of Huntington Beach 1:\W 10CFFR\HUNTINCrr\P ECK\LTR\ GILL.103 FE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK January 27, 1995 Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. 301 North Lake Avenue, Suite 600 Pasadena, Ca 91101 Attention: Mr. Ashok K. Dhingra, Vice President The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the meeting held January 17, 1995 approved Amendment No. 4 to Engineering Design Services Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Montgomery Watson America, Inc. for the Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station Complex. Enclosed is an executed copy for your records. If there are any questions regarding this matter please call the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 536-5227. Connie Brockway City Clerk Evelyn Schubert Deputy City Clerk Enclosure cc: Deborah DeBow (Telephone: 714-536-5227) e • REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCILACTION Date January 17 , 1995 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator''5�/ Prepared by: /P1 Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator/ VV�J Acting Director of Public WorksP(2-) Subject: PROJECT CC-696; PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Consistent with Council Policy? [XI Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception crrYCLERK Statement of Issue, Recommended Action, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: Statement of Issue: On December 20, 1993 , Council approved professional services Contract Amendment No. 3 to Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. (MWA) for an amount not-to-exceed $118 , 800 for construction support services for Cash Contract No. 696; Peck Reservoir Renovation. It has become necessary to extend the scope of services and increase the contract amount by an additional amount not-to-exceed $59, 620 for a total contract amount of $178, 420, to encompass an extended construction contract time period and unique field conditions encountered during the renovation. Additionally, a recent audit has revealed that an unpaid balance of $24 , 200 exists on a prior year purchase order to MWA for the original engineering design of the Peck Reservoir Renovation. Due to a mutual oversight, this balance has not been paid and is now due and payable. Funds previously approved for use to pay this invoice in Fiscal Year 1993/94 are no longer available due to the close-out of FY 93/94 funding. This balance of $24 , 200 requires Council approval to pay at this time. Recommended Action: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to: 1. Execute Contract Amendment No. 4 for additional construction support with Montgomery Watson Americas Inc. , for Project CC-696; Peck Reservoir Renovation. l� January 17, 1995 • • Project CC-696; Peck Reservoir Renovation Additional Construction support Page 2 2 . Authorize the expenditure of an amount not-to- exceed $59, 620 for the additional construction support services necessary to complete the job. 3 . Authorize the expenditure of $24, 200 for the original design services provided by Montgomery Watson in 1993 . Analysis• Background The Peck Reservoir Renovation project generally consists of the renovation of the existing 16 million gallon reservoir structure, and rebuilding of the existing pump station, including the following: (a) Reinforcing the reservoir structure and rebuilding the pump station building to meet the requirements of the seismic regulations of the current Uniform Building Code. (b) Replacing deteriorated reservoir roof panels, decayed structural members, and supporting roof hardware on the reservoir. (c) Replacing the reservoir lining to reduce leakage. (d) Replacing one pump and adding one new pump to the existing pump station. (e) Adding a liquefied petroleum gas fuel system for secondary power for use in emergencies. (f) Adding safety ladders and required access ways. On February 6, 1989, Council approved the selection of James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, (now known as Montgomery watson Americas, Inc. ) to perform a seismic analysis and to provide preliminary design services necessary for renovating the Peck Reservoir water storage facility. On June 26, 1989, Council approved Contract Amendment No. 1. This authorized MWA to prepare the construction contract drawings and specifications for the renovation, using the design criteria established during the preliminary design phase. January 17, 1995 • • Project CC-696; Peck Reservoir Renovation Additional Construction Support Page 3 On September 17, 1990, Council approved Contract Amendment No. 2 with MWA to provide pump station mechanical modification design services. On December 20, 1993 , after the project had been on hold for some time, Council approved Contract Amendment No. 3 with MWA for completion of design services and for construction support services. On November 1, 1993 , City Council awarded a construction contract to Pro Contracting Corp. , in the amount of $2 ,793 , 027 for the construction of the Peck Reservoir Renovation. Construction activity began in March 1994, and the project is now approximately 75% complete. The anticipated completion date for the project is March, 1995. Also on November 1, 1993 , City Council awarded a professional services contract to CMI Engineering Consultants to provide construction management, inspection and quality control services for this project in an amount not-to-exceed $98, 670. Construction Support Throughout the project duration, construction support services have been provided by Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. , the designers of the renovation. Construction support involves the intimate review of construction shop drawings, calculations and details specific to the Contractor's chosen method of construction. All of these must be consistent with the design engineer's original concepts and specifications. Construction support services are necessary in order to maintain the high level of quality control necessary for the construction of this project. Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. , as the project design engineer, has an intimate knowledge of the project and its specific design criteria, and has provided consistent professional services throughout the duration of the project. Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. , has recently advised staff that the services they have been providing have been significantly greater than what they had anticipated, and beyond their original scope of work. Additionally, it has become evident that authorizing MWA to provide critical path method (cpm) scheduling assistance at this time is a critical step toward contractor claim avoidance, and will help to minimize change order costs to the City. Without a contract amendment, a shortfall of construction January 17, 1995 • Project CC-696; Peck Reservoir Renovation Additional Construction Support Page 4 support services may occur, as a result of the need for these additional services. The extent of these additional services is explained in a letter from Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. , attached as Exhibit A. Difficult soil conditions, discrepancies between actual field conditions and historical drawings, the condition of the existing structures, and the potential for contractor claims against the City have all contributed to the need for additional construction support services. Additionally, the construction contract time has been extended by approximately 115 working days, or 65 percent of the original contract time. Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. , is requesting an additional fee not-to-exceed $59, 620 (approximately 50% of their original contract amount) to complete their services for this project, resulting in a total fee of $178, 420 for these construction support services. Typically, the fee for construction support services for this type of project is equal to approximately 5 percent of the total construction costs, or in this case approximately $180, 000. Staff feels that Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. Is proposed total fee of $178,420 for complete construction support services, including cpm schedule monitoring and reconciliation, is a fair and reasonable fee and recommends the approval of Contract Amendment No. 4 , to increase the contract by an amount not-to-exceed $59 , 620. Note that this is a not-to-exceed fee. If all of the additional services are not required, the actual payment to Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. will be less than $59, 620. Prior Year Design Services Engineering design of the Peck Reservoir renovation was completed by Montgomery Watson in early summer of 1993 . It has recently come to our attention that the final payment, in the amount of $24 , 200 on this original purchase order, has not been paid. Montgomery Watson had satisfactorily performed the work and this payment was due and payable in May of 1993 . To be fair, it should be paid as soon as possible. Funding Source• Funds allocated for this project in the total amount of $4, 232 , 330 are budgeted in the Water Division Capital Improvement Account E- EW-PW-849-6-39-00. Of this total amount, $150, 000 has been approved in the FY 94/95 Budget for anticipated supplemental expenses necessary to complete the project. $87, 600 of this $150, 000 currently remains unencumbered. January 17, 1995 • • Project CC-696; Peck Reservoir Renovation Additional Construction Support Page 5 An expenditure of $59, 620 for construction support services and $24, 200 for prior year design services will leave a remaining $3 ,780 for anticipated supplemental expenses. Consequently, no additional funds are required at this time. Alternative Actions: 1. Deny request and utilize City staff to provide construction support services. Because City staff was not the design engineer for the project, it is not practical nor cost effective for staff to provide construction support which requires an intimate knowledge and familiarity with the design specifics. 2 . Do not approve the contract amendment and direct staff on how to proceed. Without continuous construction support and design clarification services, construction activity would stop. This action would result in a delay claim by the contractor, with a potential cost to the City of several thousands of dollars per day. 3 . Stop construction. This project is critical to the operation of the City water system. Stopping construction is not recommended because of the impact on the water system, as well a the financial settlement committed to the contractor. Attachments• Contract Amendment No. 1 with Exhibit A: Letter of Request from Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. RS:JRR:DMD: lb AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC. FOR THE PECK RESERVOIR AND PUMPING STATION COMPLEX THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day Of �, 1995 by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR are parties to that certain contract, dated February 7, 1989, entitled "Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and James M. Montgomery, Inc. for Engineering Design Services to the Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station; and CITY and CONTRACTOR wish to amend the original contract to reflect the additional work not covered in the original contract or amendments 1 through 3 (see Exhibit "A"), NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows: 1. ADDITIONAL WORK FOR COMPLETION OF PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION - ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES. CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY such additional services as described in Exhibit"A" and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION In consideration of the engineering services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR the additional total sum not to exceed an additional Fifty Nine Thousand Six Hundred Twenty Dollars ($59,620) (including ten percent (10%) contingency) for construction support services. 1 6/agree/mont3/01/04/95 3. REAFFIRMATION Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the original contract shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this amendment as of the date first above written MONTGOMERY WATSON CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a AMERICAS, INC., a California California municipaZ oration corporation ayor k K. Dhingra, President APPROVED,AS TO FORM: Ji Calhoun,,Secretary -L ow- Q'ty Attorney ATTEST: iL��T/ y ��. � ^ INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Clerk i(i q*- Director of blic Works REVIEWED AND APPROVED City Administrator 6/agree/mont3/12/14/94 2 MONTOOM MATSON •Ashok K,ohlnG re � Yiea Arle(dMl January 4, 199 Ms. Deborah Haw Associate Civil ngirteor Cityy of an licach I Hutrdn Street Post Office Bo 190 I Huntington h, CA 92648 Subject: ontract Amendment No. 4 for Additional Services during Construction- k Reservoir i Dear Ms.Deacw; As you ate aware, the expected da' of completion for the sub act project has been moved back to April 1 1995 with betty occupancy oupcc W by h , 1995. Our a rent witt the City stipule certain number of RFTs, shop drawinss and site visits. As a result of is delay the effort y our staff in each of these categories is going to exceed the original bix t. We would thofore,respectfully request additional budget for our services as enu tad b4ow. 1. ne agm ment called fora aximum of 48 Me to be proceltsed. To date we've answeied 54 RFI's and 33 RFI'a for a total of 87. For the anticipated comple ion date of s VM,920. ect, we ex t another 18 RFI's for a to W of 1051tFY`s, Our initial budget w We oust an additional budget fee of$13,100, 2. Tha ent stipulated 7q sh drawings. To date 76 shop drawings have been Movie wed and returned. We ti+ pam appro mately b mom, Our original budget was $56. 00, We request a> additionai budget fee of$4,9b4, 3. The meat was based orb 64 man hours for site visits during construction for a total f1 $10,160. Additional visits were to be $1,180 der day. We request a fee of$9, for 8 additional si� visits to the end of the anticipated period. 4. There w no budget establi had to review change order,we estimate the nosed to review a ximately 5 addiitonal change orders for which we requost a budget fee of $6,800. 5. The Cityy as requested chat the Contractor's construction schedule be reviewed. Schedu'l Review would include the following; a. 4alikl a baaelirro soh ulo, b. poroj"t statusc. audit trail by f work activities as they impact acheduko:. d. pastlappraved hangs order resolutions as they impact contractor . o. project status review meting with contractor, City and the Resident . 6. -'The abov tasks in item 5 mist be completed prior to reviewing the first schedule. Twoscluduleswillberevie ed as folk ws: a. Evalt ate two schedules i luting the months of January- March 1995. 301 North I eke Ave up Ti:918 795 9141 Serving the World's Environmental Needs Suits do D10n:A 18 568 6150 Pasadena,californ a fa ,818 568 6102 91101 F kOM WATER OPERATIONS 'ti�� ��5 I A 5 PI'l P n • Letter to Ms. w 02• • January 4 1994 b. Total of two meetings w1th City to discuss each of the two schedules. It is impotent i o establish a b=16 schedule and a realistic schedule of past activities that took pp nlace duri g construction. S#ch schedule is extmmly vital in reducing,mitigating or avm cons coon claims. in �rice an similar projects,it is not unusual to see dolay claims Our ex i the order of$5,Oi to$10,000 per day. Our estimate for schedule review .s$22,000. Our estimate is based on receivin_gg as electronic cM of each of the con4actan schedule including the approved baseline schedules If ole Mnic files u t not available from the conuu or,then we understand that the city 3t ft would recor�t the files by inputting the data under our direction. The total of th w ad itional wrvi S is$56,200. With a 10%condn ency for services described in I ms 1 through 4_an no contingency for Items 5 and 6, the total is$599620, We request contract be amcn4#d from $118,500 (including 10%contingency)to $178,420. Tf s meets with yourl approval please sign one copy of this letter and return it for our records Should there be 4ny questions,please do not hesitate to call me at (818)568-61501 Sincerely, ACCBPM BY: i Ashok K.Dhi gm I Deborah DeBow Da I I ' E i f i E I t Pkulvl WATER OPERATIONS [i1-05-i5 1 1 GPM F, DATE(MWDD/YY) �. 1� /1:11� CERTIFIC/1 ®F INSURANCE 10/26/94 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND' CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE JARDINE INSURANCE BROKERS LOS ANGELES INC. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 801 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 700 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. ILOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-5563 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE TEL: (213) 599-4000 COMPANY NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CONTACT: MARY BAKER (213) 599-4002 A COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH,- PA INSURED COMPANY HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY/ MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC., B HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. POST OFFICE BOX 7009 COMPANY 1 PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91101-7009 C f COMPANY -- ------ ----- --------- D COVERAGES . `` THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO I TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATIOLTRIN LIMITS DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) GENERAL LIABILITY -GEGENNEERAL AGGREGATE_ A X 1 __$COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG� $ _1,Q 00 O OO*-i1 I GL 590-8333 8-31-94 8-31-95 ----- - -- - CLAIMS MADE Lxi OCCUR PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1 OOO 000* f I X}{ OWNER'S&CONT PROT *($100,OOO. SIR) EACH OCCURRENCE j $ 1,000,000* FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $ 5 0 Q 0 0 0* �1 - - TL�.1NSlJRED ENIDv u,: Ri i r; `J ------ - -- - ADD O cc n , MED EXP(Any one person) $ _ 5- 0 O 0* j -- - - - --- L -- --I --- j AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY �� COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 I B X ANY AUTO 72UEN MX4660 8-31-94 8-31-95 - ---- — -----E ALL OWNED AUTOS f 72-UENMX4662 8-31-94 8-31-95 I BODILY INJURY I I X j $ j SCHEDULED AUTOS (TEXAS) (Per person) !� X HIRED AUTOS 72MCPMX 4663 1 I XI NON-OWNED AUTOS (MASS) 8-31-94 8-31-95 (PerD cILY ciden)RY- $ i 7 PROPERTY DAMAGE $ i GARAGE LIABILITY , ANY AUTO ----- -- - ---.._- . --- - AUTOONLY EA ACCIDENT $ l y &t+6rne — y a1 e OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY - - --- - ----- i -EACH ACCIDENT $ _ aL AGGREGATE $ GATE - - - --- -i jI� ---- - -- I EXCESS LIABILITY I ��V � 1 I � EACH OCCURRENCE j $ � UMBRELLA FORM iAGGREGATE _ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM $ e -- ----- --- WORKERS COMPENSATION ApftiP l r1iV r GL ���,I�� C.t. STATUTORY LIMITS j EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ---.-_- r EACH ACCIDENT $ --- - +, THE PROPRIETOR/ �� PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE %1`�"• "'ice - PA1IE ( DISEASE POLICY LIMIT $ OFFICERS ARE EXCLj i i_l7 CHFD DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE 1 $ - OTHER WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II) is amended �o include As an insure person or organization] ( shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of "your work" for that; insured by or for you. Such insurance shall be considered Primary & Not Contributory to any; other—v-a1.i_d-insr_uan6.e-�ailable—t-o—certi.ficate_holde11 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS _ -1 iAll Operations of the. Named Insured i i CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,. ITS AGENTS, I EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL>Mk4MXO MAIL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES I0_STICE T E CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, 2000 MAIN STREETXxP.O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 XI } {.�ATTN: DENNIS COULTER AUTHORIZE I i MB/hh/jHM4.Cer ACORD 25-5(3/93) ACORD CORPORATION 1993 ��_ _ POLICY NUMBER: GL 590 8333 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Endorsement Effective Date: October 26, 1994 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS (FORM B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART. SCHEDULE Name of Persontor Organization: ALL OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES 2000 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 ATTN: DENNIS COULTER (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of"your work" for that insured by or for you. Should the above described policy be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will mail 30 days written notice (10 days for non-payment) to the certificate holder. Such Insurance shall be considered primary and not contrib to to any oth r valid insurance available to the certificate holder. A�JTH IZ REPRES ' ATIVE CG 20 10 11 85 /94)JMM_B.End Policy Number: 72 UEN MX4660/72UENMX4662/72MCPMX4663 NAMED PERSON(S) OR ORGANIZATIONS) AS INSURED This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM GARAGE COVERAGE FORM TRUCKERS COVERAGE FORM This endorsement changes the policy effective on the inception date of the policy unless another date is indicated below: Endorsement Effective: October 26, 1994 Named Insured: MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC. ET AL Countersigned by: Named Person(s) or Organization(s): ALL OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES 2000 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 ATTN: DENNIS COULTER (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) Each person or organization named above is an "insured" for LIABILITY COVERAGE, but only to the extent that person or organization qualifies as an "insured" under the WHO IS AN INSURED provision of SECTION II - LIABILITY COVERAGE Should the above described policy be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will mail 30 days written notice (10 days for non-payment) to the certificate holder. Such insurance shall be considered primary and not contributory to any. other valid insurance available to the certificate holder. Form HA 99 02 01 87 (Rev.9/94)JMM_E.End A1:/1�:�1 CERTIFICA� OF INSUR/ IVCE °�oizi94 x PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND'CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE JARDINE INSURANCE BROKERS LOS ANGELES INC. HOLDER, THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 801 South Figueroa Street, Ste. 700 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-5563 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE CONTACT: MARY BAKER (213) 599-4002 COMPANY TWIN CITIES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY/ I A HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY INSURED COMPANY 1 MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC. , B POST OFFICE BOX 7009 COMPANY PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91101-7009 C COMPANY D COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD I INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, _ EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE- I POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS POLICY NUMBER LTR DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM DDlYY) GENERAL LIABILITY I GENERAL AGGREGATE $ I COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 1 LRODUCTS-COMPIOP AGG_ $ _ CLAIMS MADE L-! OCCUR j PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ j OWNER'S&CONT PR OT EACH OCCURRENCE - FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $ MED EXP(Any one person) $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY __ - 1 I COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1 ANY AUTO I - - ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) $ NON-OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ i I j HIRED AUTOS (Per accident) I l --I ----Ii -------- -------- i PROPERTY DAMAGE - j $ --� I I I I I I CGARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ I - -_-- I ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY EACH ACCIDENT AGGREGATE $ EXCESS LIABILITY 1 EACH OCCURRENCE $ - - UMBRELLA FORM j AGGREGATE________,_!-$ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM -il _-- _ _-- —� 1 $ � WORKERS COMPENSATION AND _LSTATUTORY LIMITS r—` A EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY 72-WBMX4661 5-1-94 5-1-95 — 1- 000�000-1 EACH ACCIDENT T$ rHEPROPRIEroR/ --, 72-WBMX4661 5-1-94 5-1-95 --- - -j-1,-000-000----1 j INCL , DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $_ - PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE: EXCL,I j DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE $ --- , OTHER --------j --.-- - -- --1- ------ I ' DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS I t All Operations of the Named Insured I 1 i j CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ITS AGENTS, EXPIRATION TE THEREOF, THE IS NG COMPANY WILLXEPWRO MAIL i OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES 30 DAY RI EN N TICE TO T C RTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, 2000 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 190 L'ixxxLNUAK N IX NKV& )wKxMkxx=06Kj§1!tX"M � HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 RFXX`N ATTN: DENNIS COULTER AUTHORIZED REP SENT TIV MB/H1i/JMM7.Cer • ACORD 25-S(3/93) �O A ORD CORPORATION 1993 (The Attaching Clause need be completed only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to preparation of the policy.) ENDORSEMENT GU 207 (Ed.6-78) This endorsement, effective on October 26, 1994 AT 12:01 a.m. standard time, forms a part of Policy No. 72 WBMX 4661 of the HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY Issued to MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC. ETAL By: (Aukorize Re resentative) It is hereby understood that the following coverages are included: SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED BELOW. ALL OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES 2000 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 ATTN: DENNIS COULTER (Rev. 9/94) JMM J2.End V E I�'�/"��--®� _'��v l�,\V ,, z i ,*•-a. ` DATE(MM/DD/YY)....#z 10/26/94 r•PRODUCER _ THIS CERTIFICATE 19 ISSUED AS A .MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE JARDINE INSURANCE BROKERS LOS ANGELES INC. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 801 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 700 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-5563 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE TEL: (213) 599-4000 COMPANY CONTACT: MARY BAKER (213) 599-4002 A LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY INSURED COMPANY MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC. , — B LLOYDS & CERTAIN COMPANIES POST OFFICE BOX 7009 COMPANY PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91101-7009 C COMPANY D I COVERAGES z,.... : ..._. ...._ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS LTR DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY I PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ CLAIMS MADE 1:1 OCCUR PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ OWNER'S&CONT PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ - ___ FIRE DAMAGE(Anyone fire) r$ MED EXP(Any one person) $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITYC �"p L COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ I I ANY AUTO k�i m i Q , ` v [! - ALL OWNED AUTOS y ��Yv BODILY INJURY -- $ i SCHEDULED AUTOS R U� (Per person) HIRED AUTOS r— NON-OWNED AUTOS — POeDaccident)ILY RY --- $ -{ - PROPERTY DAMAGE $ ! GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ -- ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: EACH ACCIDENT I I i --AGGREGATE I-$----------------'I XLXX9 CLC P-YEXCESS PROFESSIONAL EACH 5 000_000 kX.._Clai __�-_ UMBRELLA AGGREGATE ` $ 5,000,000 _ 1 s -X P X-16 7 3 8/31/9 4 8/31/9 5 -------------- OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM }11 claims made (excess of �5,_000,000 Ui der ,.ng�_ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND --I STATUTORY LIMITS EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY EACH ACCIDENT $ THE PROPRIETOR/ j INCL DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE --' -- --- OFFICERS ARE: EXCL DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE $ _- OTHER I � A ( Professional ! Each Claim $5,000,000* I Liability PX-1672 8/31/94 8/31/95 Aggregate $5,000,000 j (claims made) *Excess of $3,000,0,,00 SIR DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS iAll Operations of the Named Insured CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION ( SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ITS AGENTS, EXPIRATIO AT TH EOF, THE SUING COMPANY WILLX RWnXO MAIL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES 30 DA S W TTE NOTICE TO HE ERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, 2000 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 1 AUTHORIZEDR RE T � �ATTN: DENNIS COULTER HB/hh/JHH_9X.Cer LAC�RD 25-S(3/93) A ACORD CORPORATION 1993`,y } ENDORSEMENT NO: 205a INSURED: Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. Etal ENDORSEMENT TO BE EFFECTIVE: at inception POLICY NO.: PX-1673 TYPE OF POLICY: Engineers E&O REFER. NO.: It is understood and agreed that in the event of any material change or cancellation in this Certificate Jardine Insurance Brokers Los Angeles Inc., will mail thirty days prior written notice to: ALL OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES 2000 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 ATTN: DENNIS COULTER NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED SHALL BE HELD TO VARY, ALTER,WAIVER OR EXTEND ANY OF THE TERMS, CONDITIONS OR LIMITATIONS OF THE POLICY TO WHICH THIS ENDORSEMENT IS ATTACHED OTHER THAN AS ABOVE STATED. Dated at this day of , 'IQ Authorize 7 resentative JMN1 K21ND S ENDORSEMENT NO: 206a INSURED: Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. Etal ENDORSEMENT TO BE EFFECTIVE: at inception POLICY NO.: PX-1672 TYPE OF POLICY: Engineers E&O REFER. NO.: It is understood and agreed that in the event of any material change or cancellation in this Certificate Jardine Insurance Brokers Los Angeles Inc., will mail thirty days prior written notice to: ALL OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES 2000 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 ATTN: DENNIS COULTER NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED SHALL BE HELD TO VARY, ALTER,WAIVER OR EXTEND ANY OF THE TERMS, CONDITIONS OR LIMITATIONS OF THE POLICY TO WHICH THIS ENDORSEM T ATTACHED OTHER THAN AS ABOVE STATED. Dated at th' _ day of �Qh � ( I r W-) V, Authorized Si at r (Rev. 9/94) JHH K1.END - ., ii REQUESFOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date December 20 , 1993 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrat Prepared by: ��,Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works Subject: PROJECT CC-696; PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL/Z o2-.O r 9 3 Statement of Issue, Recommended Action, Analysis, Funding Source, Alte native Actions, ttac men s. 9 ;9 'CLERK Statement of Issue: Pursuant to City Council authorization on November 1, 1993 , proposals to provide design and construction support services for Project Cash Contract 696; Peck Reservoir Renovation have been received, and Contract Amendment No. 3 is ready to be executed. Recommended Action: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to: a. Execute Contract Amendment No. 3 with Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. , (MWA) for Project CC-696, Peck Reservoir Renovation and; b. Authorize the expenditure of an amount not-to-exceed $186 , 750. 00 to MWA, for the completion of design and for construction support services. Analysis: On February 6, 1989 , Council approved the selection of James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, (now known as Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. ) to perform a seismic analysis and to provide preliminary design services necessary for renovating the Peck Reservoir water storage facility. This renovation includes the following: • Replacing deteriorated roof panels, decayed structural members, and supporting roof hardware. i Replacing the reservoir lining to reduce leakage. 0 Adding safety ladders and required accessways. December 6, 1993 • • Project CC-696; Peck Reservoir Renovation - Design and Construction Support Services Page 2 • Replacing one pump and adding one new pump. • Reinforcing the reservoir structure and rebuilding pump station building to meet the requirements of the seismic regulations of the current Uniform Building Code. 0 Adding a liquefied petroleum gas fuel system for secondary power. On June 26, 1989, Council approved Contract Amendment No. 1. This authorized MWA to prepare the construction contract drawings and specifications for the renovation, using the design criteria established during the preliminary design phase. On September 17 , 1990, Council authorized Contract Amendment No. 2 with MWA to provide pump station mechanical modification design services and to delete the construction support services from Amendment No. 1, as they had become inappropriate. Drawings and specifications were then completed, bids were received, and on November 1, 1993, City Council took formal action to: a. Award a construction contract to Pro Contracting Corporation in the amount of $2 , 793 . 027 . 00. b. Award a Professional Services Agreement to CMI Engineering Consultants for a fee not-to-exceed $98, 670. 00 for the construction management, inspection, and quality control for CC-696. C. Appropriate $360, 000. 00 for anticipated project supplemental expenses (including inspection and construction support services) . Design Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. , provided the engineering design services for this project in accordance with Contract Amendment No. 2 . These services have been completed, however, due to City Staff manpower deficiencies and other technical considerations, this project had to be delayed until March 1993 , when design resumed. Due to this time delay, additional design fees accrued. These fees include plan revisions resulting from changes in requirements (1990 to 1993) , the services of a specialized sub- consultant for the reservoir liner, additional bidding assistance and printing, and design upgrades resulting from an extensive review. December 6, 1993 • Project CC-696; Peck Reservoir Renovation - Design and Construction Support Services Page 3 Because of this, in July, 1993 MWA presented a request for additional design fees in the amount of $90, 600. 00. In November 1993 , Staff met with representatives of MWA to negotiate these additional fees. As a result, the fees requested for additional design services were then reduced to $67 ,950. 00. Staff believes these fees to be reasonable and recommends that they be paid. Construction Support Construction support involves random site inspection by MWA and their sub-consultants, as well as the intimate review of construction shop drawings, calculations and details specific to the Contractor's chosen method of construction. All of these must be consistent with the design engineer's original concepts and specifications. Construction support services are necessary in order to maintain a high level of quality control necessary for the renovation of this reservoir and pumping station. The required construction support expertise and number of dedicated hours required for a project of this magnitude is not available from City Staff members. MWA, as the project design engineer, has an intimate knowledge of the project, and its specific design criteria. MWA submitted a proposal to provide these construction support services in an amount not-to-exceed $108, 000. 00. In summary, the Director of Public Works recommends that the Council approve Amendment No. 3 with MWA in an amount not-to-exceed $186,750. 00. This amount includes the $67 , 950. 00 in fees for design completion and $118, 800. 00 for construction support ($108, 000. 00 + 10% contingency) . Funding Source• On November 1, 1993 , Council appropriated $360, 000. 00 from Water Division Capital Improvement Account E-EW-PW-849-6-39-00 for project supplemental expenses which includes construction support services. On November 1, 1993 , City Council authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a consultant agreement with CMI Engineering Consultants for professional inspection services in an amount not- to-exceed $98 , 670. 00, leaving a balance of $261, 330. 00 for construction support services. With a contract amendment to MWA in the amount not-to-exceed $186, 750. 00 for completion of design and construction support services, no additional funds are required. December 6, 1993 Project CC-696; Peck Reservoir Renovation - Design and Construction Support Services Page 4 Alternative Actions: 1. Deny request and utilize City Staff to provide construction support services. Because City Staff was not the design engineer for the project, it is not practical nor cost effective for Staff to provide construction support, which requires an intimate knowledge and familiarity with the design specifics. In addition, other work, such as day to day operations, would suffer delays. 2 . Deny request and direct Staff on how to proceed. The Contractor is ready to begin construction within the next 30 days. It is not advisable to begin construction without professional construction support services under contract. Attachments• Contract Amendment No. 3 . LFS:JRR:DMD: jaa CERTIFICAT&F INSURANCE ISSUE DATE(MM/DD/YY) • November 9, 1993; PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND ` JARDINE INSURANCE BROKERS LOS ANGELES INC.CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE 11835 W. OLYMPIC BLVD. , 5TH FL. ( DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064 POLICIES BELOW. TEL: (310) 444-3333 i COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE i CONTACT: MARY BAKER (310) 444-3405 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ETTERNY A COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA 1 i COMPANY B HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY/ INSURED LETTER HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC. , FORMERLY KNOWN AS OMPANY c JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING f ENGINEERS, INC. ET AL COMPANY POST OFFICE BOX 7009 LETTER D PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91101-7009 COMPANY i LETTER E 1COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. { CO TYPE•OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS LTfl DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE— $ 2 r UOR r 000 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG. $ 1,000 r 000* CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR. GL 590-5173 8-31-93 8-31-94 PERSONAL&ADV.INJURY $ 1,000,000* X OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT. *($100,000. SIR) EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,500 000* I FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $ i 000* t _ MED.EXPENSE(Any one person) $ 5,000* AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY T COMBINED SINGLE 1,000,000 B X ANY AUTO LIMIT $ X ALL OWNED AUTOS 1 BODILY INJURY $ I X SCHEDULED AUTOS 72-UENMX4660 8-31-93 8-31-94 (Per person) X HIRED AUTOS 72-UENMX4662 8-31-93 8-31-94 BODILY INJURY X NON-OWNED AUTOS (TEXAS) (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE r $ EXCESS LIABILITY _- _- - --- EACH OCCURRENCE $ UMBRELLA FORM i/� AGGREGATE $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM _ �v j WORKER'S COMPENSATION STATUTORY LIMITS EACH ACCIDENT $ AND DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT $ i EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY DISEASE—EACH EMPLOYEE $ OTHER Certificate Holder is named as an additional insured but solely with respect to operations of'i the named insured. Such insurance shall be considered Primary & Not Contributory to any other, valid insurance available to certificate holder. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS JMM JOB#: 9818.5289 - OVERMYER RESERVIOR RENOVATION (CC-896) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE j' EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL lf�J, NX= CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I i MAIL._i 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE 2000 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 190 LEFT, OI}4XI� XX> XtXIz�3�N �12�pfXi7{IXXI �X�XII§ CXIXIKIX�f HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA. 92648 44A4iR�C4�FX�—I—RD44TJ�R4R {��XXIXa XX#R�iIKR {16. ATTN: DEBORAH DEBOW, P.E. AUTHORIZED EP ESENTATIVE MBgMM4.Ccr ACORD 25-S (7/90)__ ©ACORD CORPORATION 1990 CEARTIFICATIWF INSURANCE 13SUE DATE Nova. _ PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ON, CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTit_ JARDINE INSURANCE BROKERS LOS ANGELES INCDOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY . 11835 W. OLYMPIC BLVD. , 5TH FL. POLICIES BELOW. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064 TEL: (310) 444-3333 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE CONTACT: MARY BARER (310) 444-3405 COMPANY TWIN CITIES FIRE INSURANCE CO./A � LETTER HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. COMPANY B INSURED LETTER MONTGOMERY. WATSON AMERICAS, INC. JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, COMPANY LETTER C+ CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. , ETAL POST OFFICE BOX 7009 COMPANY PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91101-7009 LETTER D I COMPANY LETTER E jCOVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, I EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LTR — DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE S COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG. $ ' CLAIMS MADE OCCUR. PERSONAL&ADV.INJURY S OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT. EACH OCCURRENCE S FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) S MED.EXPENSE(Any one person) S —� I I AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE j ANY AUTO S LIMIT i ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY S SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) HIRED AUTOS 1 BODILY INJURY S NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) i GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE $ j EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S I UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE S i OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKER'S COMPENSATION STATUTORY LIMITS A AND 72—WBMX4661 5-1-93 5-1-94 EACH ACCIDENT $ 1, 00,000 i I DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 � EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY 72—WBMX4661 5-1-93 5-1-94 I- DISEASE—EACH EMPLOYEE S 1,000,000 OTHER With respect to Company A the company agrees to waive att rights of subrogation against certificate holder for losses paid under; the terms of this policy which arise out of work performed by the named insured. I _ _ I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS JMM JOB#: 9818.5289 — OVERMYER RESERVIOR RENOVATION (CC-896) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION _ i SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH / =' EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL a=x)Y�KXf:KIX 2000 MAIN STREET ` 'MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE P.O. BOX 190 LEFT,SIX}SDK}�f ?t� AXtX1KM��tX}4k�At�CXXK1�}C�4�YXX j HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92.648 � x } XIXc #�EI � ATTN: DEBORAH DEBOW, P.E. r � ; '� '��' + 7REPR!5N AUTHORIZE ATIVE i MBIAIM&CER ACORD 25-S (7/90) pACORD CO ORATION 1990 All CERTIFICAT E INSURANCE ISSUE DATE(MM/D 9, November 1993 PRODUCER ! THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE JARDINE INSURANCE BROKERS LOS ANGELES INC.DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE 11835 W. OLYMPIC BLVD. , 5TH FL. POLICIES BELOW. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE I TEL: (310) 444-3333 COMPA CONTACT: MARY BAKER (310) 444-3405 ETTERNYA LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY COMPANY LETTER B LLOYDS & CERTAIN COMPANIES INSURED COMPANY C MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC. , LETTER i FORMERLY KNOWN AS j JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING COMPANY D ENGINEERS, INC. ET AL LETTER POST OFFICE BOX 7009 COMPANY PASADENA, CA 91101-7009 LETTER E rCOVERAGES j j THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD I I INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER j LTR DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) GENERAL LIABILITY `S Y GENERAL AGGREGATE _$ ~Y COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG. $ CLAIMS MADE OCCUR. PERSONAL&ADV.INJURY $ I OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT, EACH OCCURRENCE $ FIRE DAMAGE(Any one tire) $ 1 MED.EXPENSE(Any one person) $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE $ LIMIT ANY AUTO t ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ j (Per person) SCHEDULED AUTOS i HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ (Per accident) NON-OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE $ i �it4A@�(9ct�#k)IRXX EXCESS PROFESSIONAL EACHO§�CyllRt} Qr Clairl� 5,000,0001 . J! UMBRELLA FORM LIABILITY PX-1642 8-31-93 8-31-94 AGGREGATE $ 5,000,000', j B X OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM (Claims Made) --— _^ —(.excess_o.f_$5.,_000,.000_Under_ly i ng)�! i STATUTORY LIMITS WORKER'S COMPENSATION i EACH ACCIDENT $ AND DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT $ EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY. -J --� DISEASE—EACH EMPLOYEE $ OTHER PX-1641 8-31-93 8-31-94 Each Claim 5,000,000* A Professional Liability Aggregate 5,000,000 i (Claims Made) *Excess of $3,000,000 SIR DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS JMM JOB#: 9818.5289 — OVERMYER RESERVIOR RENOVATION (CC-896) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION �N SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE --EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL KF0E6X0RXXX CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE 2000 MAIN STREET LEFT, E�} }W[/g{pCE6t0}3?ORINIK�}�ICIXXUQIR� 3CP9�X}DXLGYdRiKN) ( P.O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648X _ __ �' _ )'' ATTN: DEBORAH DEBOW, P.E. AUTHORIZED RfiPRESENTATIVE ' MB/JMM9.Ccr ACORD 25-S(7/90)____ _ __ ©ACORD CORPORATION 1990 ENDORSEMENT NO: 119a INSURED: Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., Formerly Known As James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. ENDORSEMENT TO BE EFFECTIVE: at inception POLICY NO.: PX-1641 TYPE OF POLICY: Engineers E&O REFER. NO.: It is understood and agreed that in the event of any material change or cancellation in this Certificate Jardine Insurance Brokers Los Angeles Inc., will mail thirty days prior written notice to: JMM JOB#: 9818.5289 - OVERMYER RESERVIOR RENOVATION (CC-896) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 ATTN: DEBORAH DEBOW, P.E. NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED SHALL BE HELD TO VARY, ALTER, WAIVER OR EXTEND ANY OF THE TERMS, CONDITIONS OR LIMITATIONS OF THE POLICY TO WHICH THIS ENDORSEMENT IS ATTACHED OTHER THAN AS ABOVE STATED. Dated at�Gl%�t1T �� this day of Aut iz i ure JMM_Kl.END CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK December 22, 1993 Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. P. 0. Box 7009 Pasadena, CA 91109-7009 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting held Monday, December 20, 1993, approved Amendment No. 3 to Engineering Design Services Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. , for the Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station Complex. Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records. Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:bt Enc. 1 Telephone:714-536-5227) w AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC. FOR THE PECK RESERVOIR AND PUMPING STATION COMPLEX THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 20th day of December , 1993 by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR are parties to that certain contract, dated February 7, 1989, entitled "Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and James M. Montgomery, Inc. for Engineering Design Services to the Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station; and CITY and CONTRACTOR wish to amend the original contract to reflect the additional work not covered in the original contract or amendments 1 or 2 for the design phase (see Exhibit "A"). In addition, this amendment covers construction support (see Exhibit "B"), NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows: 1. ADDITIONAL WORK FOR COMPLETION OF PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION - ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES. CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY such additional services as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION In consideration of the engineering services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR the additional total sum not to exceed One Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($186,750). This sum includes Sixty 1 6/agree/mont3/11/23/93 Seven Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty Dollars ($67,950) for completion of the design phase, and One Hundred Eighteen Thousand, Eight Hundred Dollars ($118,800 plus ten percent (10%) contingency) for construction support services. 3. REAFFIRMATION Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the original contract shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this amendment as of the date first above written MONTGOMERY WATSON CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a AMERICAS,.INC., a California California municipal corporation corporation Mayor Ashok K. Dhingra, Vic esident APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jim Calhoun„,Secretary City Attorn y ✓ATTES-1 /ii 2 I ITIATED AND AP VE City Clerk Director of blic Works REVI ED AND APPROVED City Administrator 6/agree/mont3/11/23/93 MONTGOMERY WATSON November 22, 1993 City of Huntington Beach 19001 Huntington Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: Mr. Jeffrey R. Renna Water Operations Manager Subject: Contract Amendment for Additional Work on Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station Gentlemen: Pursuant to a meeting between Ms. Deborah DeBow and Mr. Jeffrey Renna of the City and Messrs. David Mosher and Ash Dhingra of Montgomery Watson on November 15, 1993, we are pleased to submit the contract amendment for additional fees as renegotiated in that meeting. A summary of additional services and costs is provided. Summary Of Additional Services and Costs Item No. Description of Service Cost 1. Design of multiple access hatches and sampling ports at the $ 2,000 reservoir roof in accordance with the new requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act. 2. Special modifications to drawings and specifications to 3,500 accommodate the numerous equipment items furnished by the Owner and to be installed by the Contractor. 3. Design of a 3-way valve system for Well No. 7 and 2,000 modifications to the valving on the blow-off. 4. Various miscellaneous mechanical equipment revisions 2,500 including changing the reservoir feed line from 8-inch to 12- inch and relocating valve operators in the pump suction header sump from below grade to above ground. EXHIBIT "A'" 301 North Lake Avenue Tel:8187969141 Serving the World's Environmental Needs Suite 600 Fax:818 568 6101 Pasadena,California 91101 City of Huntington Beat 2 November 22, 1993 Item N o. Description of Service Cost 5. Modifications to pump discharge pipes to remove sleeve 750 couplings and moving the meter in plan and sections. 6. Revising conduit routing from ceiling to below concrete floor. 2,000 7. Design of grating and platforms to be installed over the valve 2,000 pit area and showing valve operator support detail. 8. Show and design supports for newly relocated catalytic 750 converters. 9. Architectural detail including changes from split face CMU to 2,500 stucco and from stucco to CMU with acrylic plaster finish. Providing drawing and specification details for architectural improvements for the Well No. 7 and chemical buildings to blend in with the new pump station building. 10. Changing the door from hinge to rollup doors on the west side 1,000 of the pump station. 11. Changing the light fixtures from incandescent to fluorescent 750 lights. 12. Changing the engine exhaust supports from I-beam to box 1,500 section for appearances. 13. Changing pump station roof access from ladder to stairway 4,500 and the addition of a doorway and bridge to allow access to the reservoir roof. 14. Producing two sets of contract documents for bidding the two 6,650 projects separately including printing. 15. Six additional meetings with City staff to review the design 6,000 drawings and to discuss details and changes throughout the design period. i City of Huntington Be.101 3 November 22, 1993 Item N o. Description of Service Cost 16. Five site visits to check and confirm details. 4,500 17. Bid promotions and assistance and handling numerous call 2,500 from contractors and responding to questions and clarifications on two projects. 18 Providing a site survey to confirm grades and elevations for 2,200 the AC pavement and replacement around the pumping station and to design grades for drainage at the LPG station. 19. Providing additional sets of Contract Documents during the 1,600 bidding period: 20 sets for Rehabilitation of Peck Reservoir @ $35/set, and 15 sets for Peck Pumping Station Renovation @ $60/set. 20. Retained the services of subconsultant,Mr.William Kays, a 3,000 lining expert,for technical recommendations and specifications for a new flexible membrane liner for reservoir vertical walls. 21. Design and details for new framing louvers and screening at 750 top of walls. 22. Respond to plan check comments and making necessary 15,000 revisions to plans and specifications and revisiting the City in any construction contract change negotiations,a not to exceed fee. TOTAL $67,950 We respectfully request authorization for an increase in our fees in the amount of$67,950 for the services described above. This fee will not be exceeded without prior written approval of the City. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. If there are any questions or additional information is required,please do not hesitate to call us at your convenience. City of Huntington B ., 4 November 22, 1993 If the above proposal meets with your approval,please prepare a contract amendment, or this proposal may be accepted by affixing the proper signature in the space provided. Respectfully submitted, ACCEPTED BY: MONTGOMERY WATSON CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMERICAS, INC. By: Ashok K. D n a Vice Pr ' ent Date: cc: Mr. Louis Sandoval, Director of Public Works City of Huntington Beach Mr. David Mosher,Montgomery Watson MONTGOMERY WATSON November 19, 1993 City of Huntington Beach 19001 Huntington Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: Ms.Deborah DeBow Subject: Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station Renovation Proposal to Provide Engineering Services for Construction Support Gentlemen: In response to your request, Montgomery Watson is pleased to submit this proposal for furnishing engineering support services for the construction phase of the Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station Renovation Project. A. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND We understand that the City has received favorable bids for construction of the subject project. The City has retained a third party consultant to furnish construction management services including administration of the construction contract and inspection of the work. Therefore, Montgomery Watson's role during construction will be to provide support and engineering services related to the project design and specialized observation during construction for the liner installation. B . SCOPE OF WORK The required work to be performed by Montgomery Watson for this project is identified in the following tasks: Task 1 - Attend Preconstruction Conference Montgomery Watson's project manager will attend the preconstruction conference. Task 2 - Respond to RFI's and RFC's and Alternative Design Review Respond to requests for information and for clarification of the drawings and specifications. The effort estimated for this task is based on a total of 48 individual written requests. EXHIBIT r'B" 301 North Lake Avenue Tel:8187969141 Serving the World's Environmental Needs Suite 600 Fax:818 568 6101 Pasadena,California 91101 City of Huntington Beach 2 • November 19, 1993 Provide a general overview and comments on the alternative designs proposed by the Contractor. The exact extent and scope of this item cannot be determined at this time so a limited number of manhours are budgeted for this item. Task 3 - Review Shop Drawing Submittals Review submittals by the contractor of shop and working drawings of manufactured materials and fabricated equipment for substantial conformity with the intent of the drawings and specifications. The effort estimated for this task is based on a total of 70 submittals with up to one resubmittal broken down by the number of anticipated for each design discipline as follows: Architectural - 17, Electrical - 5, Mechanical - 13, and Structural - 35. These estimates are based on separate and individual packaging of the submittals and shop drawings for different specified material and equipment items. Grouping of different items into a submittal package, while reducing the number of submittals, would not reduce the level of review effort. However, it would make them more difficult to log and track. Task 4 - Site Visits Make periodic visits to the project site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction, two visits per month (64 man-hours), to observe the progress and quality of the executed work, and submit a written report to the City. Task 5 - Membrane Liner Inspection Montgomery Watson will construct the services of a subconsultant, experienced in the installation of flexible membrane liners, to observe and monitor the installation of the Hypalon® wall liner in the reservoir. The effort for this task is based on a construction schedule that will require these services for two days a week over a period of four weeks. Task 6 - Final Inspection Assist in the final inspection and testing of the project and submit a written report to the City Engineer. Task 7 - Record Drawings Revise the original design drawing mylars to show changed conditions for record drawings. The revisions would be based on a set of red-lined blueprints provided by others. City of Huntington Beach 3 • November 19, 1993 C. CITY FURNISHED SERVICES The following services will be furnished by the City: 1. Conduct the Preconstruction Conference. 2. Administration of the construction contract and coordination with other consultants. 3. Provide daily full-time field observation during construction including monitoring of the work, coordination of the soils and material testing laboratories, technical observation and evaluation of materials and completed work for compliance with drawings, specifications and design concepts. Visually inspect and review suitability of materials, equipment and supplies delivered to the construction site for compliance with the specifications, and review reports of testing laboratories. 4. Negotiate and process change orders. 5. Process progress payment requests. 6. Conduct final inspection and project close-out. D. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 1. Site visits by Project Manager/Engineer to the site of work during construction in addition to the visits defined in Task 4 of the above scope of work. 2. Review of alternative design submittals by the Contractor in excess of the hours allocated for the task as described in Task 2 above. E. SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CONDITIONS Engineering services described in the Scope of Work contained herein would be provided in accordance with the attached terms and conditions of our original contract. A current schedule of hourly rates that will be utilized for billing purposes is attached. We have prepared an estimate based on the scope of work presented herein, and our understanding of the project and the level of effort that will be required. The basis of our estimate including the breakdown of man-hours and other costs is provided in the attached Table. We propose that $108,000 be budgeted for the work. This amount would not be exceeded without first obtaining the prior written approval of the City. For additional site visits, a fee of$1,180 per day would be charged. Cityof Huntington Beach 4 November 19, 1993 g We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. If there are any questions or additional information is required,please do not hesitate to call us at your convenience. If the above proposal meets with your approval, please amend our contract by $108,000, or this proposal may be accepted by affixing the proper signature in the space provided. Respectfully submitted, ACCEPTED BY: MONTGOMERY WATSON, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMERICAS, INC. By: Ashok K. Dhi Vice Press en Date: Julius C. Calhoun 1&9-/ Secretary Estimated Manhours and Fee . ............ ....................... ...........:.:...........:::.v..;'::::: :.:.:::::.r.:...:..... ............+. ...............:.::.:. .:.�.}� ::::.. ..............:. �::.n......+} i,. .: .. v......... ..... .�...........,.....n......•..v..v. ::4:::4:::.v ..::::::::v::.:: ..n. :;:y,v : : .4r$$:: ..S ). J: $'AY$ •;{Ji:J}. M...:..:. ..1r'ifetF.:'.i:"f;+•ir' v:: �� ..:. .• +.b:.:,:i...{vn$�: ''>� '•$:i.+:$$�::3.•:' ���%.b. +yr�..�.::.....$;. ♦..:.....4 •a;:•::•:;:•>:.>:'.::.:).Z.,..,:,.:;..i:.::.:..;...+::::.. ::r ,..r,.:::....::{, ':g �i't;g;::%,fi�i'•} .{ ..r �:...:�•.,fi:$:n'4:<..vi• :: 'ii:ry::./.:•�i: � nit:::.:.:::{:::: •'• /.U.:r:i:i: •• l.Aatr :150 =135 $100 $70 f48 1 mand Preconsirucuon C dwence 6 1 2 8 50 950 2 Rnpond to RFrs and RFCs 48 24 12 12 96 480 10,9200 Raw low of Alenmdw Designs 24 24 80 3,660 3 Rwisw Shop DrawkV Subrtrsals 240 60 60 30 60 40 490 1,400 52.700 4 gq Vie" 9 64 16 as 600 11,360 5 m m xww UDW lrnpection 6 4 12 5,750 7.010 6 RnW SM Up and Assistarws 20 80 28 129 1,400 16,460 7 1PAcotd DrawkW 1 4 1 1 1 60 1 64 200 4 940 TOW Hours 52 1 450 1 84 72 30 1 120 1 102 910 Tool Cost 7,800 1 60,750 1 8,400 1 6 220 1 1 1 600 1 6 400 1 4.590 1 1140 10s City of Huntington Beach Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station Renovation . 1993 MW MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS SCHEDULE FOR HOURLY RATES FOR ENGINEERING FEES* EFFECTIVE April 1, 1993 Senior Company Officer $150 per hour Principal Professional $135 per hour Principal Administrator $130 per hour Supervising Professional $100 per hour Senior Professional $ 85 per hour Senior Administrator $ 70 per hour Professional $ 70 per hour Associate Professional $ 60 per hour Administrator $ 50 per hour Assistant Professional $45 per hour Senior Designer $ 70 per hour Designer $ 50 per hour Drafter $ 40 per hour Senior Resident Engineer $ 100 per hour Resident Engineer-Inspector $ 65 per hour Secretary $ 45 per hour Reproduction Typist(Typist and Data Processor) $ 40 per hour Clerk(Reproduction Technician and Clerk) $ 35 per hour * The individual hourly rates includes salary, overhead and profit. ** To be determined on an individual basis. NOTE: OTHER DIRECT CHARGES, INCLUDING OUTSIDE SERVICES, WILL BE CHARGED AT ACTUAL COST PLUS 15%. /- C-A Z&1'� - 600 . /o REQ UER FOR CITY COUNCIPACTION Date Septeaiber 17 , 1990 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator�� - ' Prepared by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works li"'.- Subject: PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION; CC-696 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 9- /7 19-20 Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception CITY tLERk Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On February 6, 1989, Council authorized James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers to complete the design of the seismic upgrade renovations to the Peck Reservoir water storage facility. Council authorization is now needed to include additional mechanical modifications of the booster pump station within the project scope of work. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached Amendment No. 2 to Consultant Contract with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers which consists of the following: o Providing pump station mechanical modification design services for a fixed fee of $93 , 000 . x o Deleting the construction support services, valued at $30 , 000,, from Amendment No. 1 . ; The above actions will increase the total contract amount by $63 , 000. o Extension of the contract completion date for design services from June 28, 1990, to February 28, 1991 . ANALYSIS: On February 6 , 1989, Council approved the selection of James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers to perform a seismic analysis and to provide preliminary design services necessary for upgrading the Peck Reservoir facility for a fee of $48, 700. These services established the design criteria for the renovation of this facility to meet current seismic requirements of an essential water supply reservoir. PI O 5/85 Page two PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION; CC-696 September 17 , 1990 On June 26, 1989, Council approved planned Amendment No. 1 to the contract for a fee of $179, 000 . This authorized James M. Montgomery to prepare the construction contract drawings and specifications for the renovation, using the design criteria established during the preliminary design phase above. This work is currently in progress. The original Request for Proposal assumed only reinforcement of the existing reservoir and pump station structures, including walls, footings, and roof, etc. During the seismic analysis, however, it was found that total reconstruction of the pump station building walls and roof would be more cost effective than attempting to reinforce them. Working with the consultant, the Water Division has also found it appropriate at this time to include significant mechanical modifications to optimize the pump station' s capacity in accordance with the 1988 Water Master Plan. In staff ' s attempt to successfully author the original Request for Proposal , the magnitude of the mechanical modifications needed was not anticipated and, therefore, was not included within the original scope of work. These modifications will require major additions to the consultant' s work already authorized, specifically: 1 . Enlarging the overall pump station to accommodate a fourth pumping unit and necessary maintenance work space. 2 . Raising the height of the roofline to accommodate an overhead crane. 3 . Adding approved waste oil catchments. 4. Adding emission control equipment to comply with the latest mandated AQMD requirements. 5 . Redesigning maintenance equipment access to increase safety and convenience. 6 . Inspecting and refurbishing existing pump plumbing to prolong life and allow installation of metering equipment. 7 . Upgrading the control system to accommodate the required changes . B . Provisions for an emergency backup Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) fuel system for the pump station. 9. Utility modifications and enhancements for the pump station. The Water Division requested a fee proposal from James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers for this additional work. No other requests were sought because James M. Montgomery was already heavily involved with this project as the Engineer of Record. Therefore, staff found it appropriate to work with the original consultant for this additional work to maintain the continuity of the work in progress and professional liability responsibilities. Page three PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION; CC-696 September 17 , 1990 The original contract and Amendment No. 1 were valued at $227 , 700 ( $48,700 and $179, 000 , respectively) . The net value of the work included in the proposed Amendment No. 2 is $63 , 000 and reflects a 28% increase in the cost of work authorized previously. Therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3 .03 Professional Services, of the Municipal Code, the Public Works Department recommends that the Consultant Contract with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers be amended as follows : o Provide pump station mechanical modification design services for a fixed fee of $93 , 000 . o Delete the construction support services from Amendment No. 1 (valued at $30 , 000 ) and redirect the funds for use in Amendment No. 2 . Construction support services will not be needed until November/December 1991 , which is the next window in which construction can occur. The construction support services can be addressed at that time. o Extend contract from June 28, 1990, to February 28 , 1991 , to allow the incorporation of this additional work within the construction contract documents. FUNDING SOURCE• Sufficient additional revenues of $63, 000 are available in Fiscal Account E-EW-PW-921-6-39-00 . ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1 . Deny request. This option would leave only the rehabilitation of the pump station and reservoir structures and will not include any of the mechanical modifications. This is contrary to the needs identified in the 1988 Water Master Plan. 2 . Deny request and direct staff to solicit other proposals . This option would delay the final design and would create a dual responsibility in establishment of an Engineer of Record. 3 . Deny request and stop all work currently in progress. This option would delay construction indefinitely, and may jeopardize the surrounding area and our water supply system should a seismic event of sufficient magnitude occur. ATTACHMENT: 1 . Contract Amendment No. 2 2 . City' s request for additional services letter dated June 14, 1990 3 . Consultant response letter dated July 17, 1990 4. RCA dated February 6, 1989 5 . RCA dated June 26, 1989. c � +SSuE DATE(MM/DDNY) 4;t d lAll / Lj 213eft 89 PRODUCER S fA FiF C OHEN THIS CERTIFICATE I$ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS ,JWIM DLTr & CHAN)IER IDS AWILSISj M. NO RfOHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES:'SOT. AMENDI, 11835 Z,EST OVITIC Wf0 ,EVARD, 5TH F4XR EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. L1JS ANGETES, CALIIVVIA 90+064 I'ELEPH'.�PIE N[IM13ER. ' -',j 33 _ MPAN►ES AFFORDING COVERAGE TELEX MI LMER: 69-1260 COMPANY NATIONAL, UNION FIRE MI LTA0C.'E LETTER p O.?PX4Y OF PTTT58[Ts�_PENS il%TkNTA ----__.— - COMPANY INSURED LETTER B - -iwzmm. ilfLyd3(.'F. (Ao uP GUMPANY JAIES M. NDNIG-ftRY 0X5'ULTING, LETTER LANDMARK _HiSTRANcE c ANX ENGINEERS, INC;. ET AL COMPANY D 250 R)RTR KdV LYJN AVEWE LETTER PASADENA, CALfFORNIA 91103 COMPANY _ LETTER E THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED S=--.-h°HAVE DEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TEAM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT Off OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CON01- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LT" TYPE OF INSURANCE I POLICY NUMBER POUCI EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIPATiO:U - _-- 'EIM>1aG'*'r'; ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS GENERAL LIABILITY 9ENEP4,.AGGREGATE $ � (J X ,^,OMMERCIAL GENERAL LMSILi"i PRnO!JC-S w4MP<<,PS AGGREGA`t I� 1(� C'.AIMS MADE 4 1;;4FF PERSONAL&ADVERT'$ING O JUR'r A QA 59011°7 &37�[38 �3-31.-€#9 $ 1 00Qk 1{ YN:R$8 C7!'-RAf,T?Rj CRi E Ti':E EACH OCC'LRREtiCE 1 oc)ok - — F HE DAMAGE 1NY O'vE FIRE) $ - --- ----- 9950-,000 CTR { MEDICAL EXPENSE;ANY O"!F PEAsUR; $ ALkT ANY AUTO LIABILITY � ANY AUTO I , {�{ ALL OWNED AUTOS �[y ��S TO F RM•1 I;EU'AY SGHEDULEO AUTOS Z' � Jg 13"31-88 8-31-89 PER�ERjQ4t a HIRED auro5 GAIL HUTTON 1 7 P i I firhT NQN{]nVNEU AUTOS ! CI ( A cROENT GARAGE LIABILITY By• PROPERTY DAMAOF $ EXCESS LIABILITY --- --Deputy-Gi-ty-Att Y EAvn a.}ryRgy,�Tg I GGCVRRE'J�E IJM 60014?!1 ± $--31-68 8-31-6.9 $ IO,000 '$ 10,000 OTHER THAN UM8RELLA FORM -- P WOHKERS'COMPENSATION 72WBMX4661E 5-1-88 5-1-89 $ 1.000 {EACH ACCIOPrIT) AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY $ 1,00 (OUCASC-roLlCa IMITS $�� �Oj-u blEA.Se EACk EMPLOYEE! OTHER ; 9818.3706- SUCH INSURANCE A� FFORDED BY POLICTES GL A 5901157, 72UENMX4)60E AND i1ll "001424, I SLI D BY COMI'ANIES A, B, C SHALL BE CONSIDERED PRIMARY AN NOT CONT IBUTORY TO ANY OTHER VALID INSURANCE AVATLABLF, T j CITY OF I NTIN_GTON__ EACH. OCSOPIPTiON OF OPERATION$,'LOCATIONS I VEHICLES�RESTRICTIONS !A L ITEMS SUCH INSURANCE AS IF AFFORbED BY FOLTCTES GIJA5901187, 72UE NMX46f�DE, & U1,46001424 ISSUED BY (,'QMFANlES A, B, & C, SHALL ALSO APPLY TO THE CITY OF. I UNTINGTON BEACH, ITS OFFICERS AiNi) EMPLOYEES AS ADDITIONAL INSURED BUT SOLELY AS RESPECTS THE OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED. SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DE$GR+BED POLICIES 9E CANCELLED BEFOAE THE EX. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PIRATIUN GATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL sko" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT' MAIL 30 DAY$ WRITTEN NONCE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER AmME!Q TO THE 2000 MAIN STREET LEFT, P. 0. BOY 190 s - - HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA a 9264B AUTHORIZED REPRF$ENTATI'4E ' MERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY NUMBER: GA 59Ji ' WT THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSIIRE - DESIGNATED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This andorsemertt modifies insurance provided under the following! COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART, SCHEDULE Name of person or Organizations THF. CITY OF IiMINGTON BEACH, ITS OFFICERS AND WLOYEES AS RESPECTS JOB 9818.3706 (If no entry appears above, information requirad to complete this endorsement wiii ae shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) n or on nsure Schedule as an insured butWHO IS AN INSURED6onlylw� e ith specamendetto liability a isto Incie as nglout #youer o erso Sc operations o premilspremisesowedlby or S rented to you. NAIIIIED INSURED: JAMES M. MONTGOMLRY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. CG 20 26 11 85 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc, 1984 a lIY r rrWow IEaSLIE DATE,MM/D0fYY) 2 9 _ PRODUCER THIS L;EzHiIFId:ArE Is ISSUEfl AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS Sv(x2 COS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, jARDOJE EYM & CTWDtER Uri AMELES INC. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 11835 WET CL)34>Ir E0U EVAP,D, 5TH FLrOM � COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE LX AgcIQm, CATjFM4TA 90064 _. 'QEPEi tnr : u -3333 C MPANY Fp a TE�EK Nt 69�-1260 IEKTAIG"1%_LL0)BS & CERTAIN OUVANM3 COMPANY B INEUrIED — LETTER L IOGIT LLOY93 & CH"AIN CCMPANMS JAt_S M. Mnrklq RY CO NSULTW Cc'ON'PANY c SNUINf+ �ft.St INC. ET AL LETTER - - 250 NOF7'I'H WISCX AVUM Q PASADENA, CALZ NIA 91101 LE TER ` s-COMHANY LETTER E i THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT{KITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HERE;N IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. CO rvPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER PtSLI t v'4- Dr..I,- FAD Ia':)�� LTR �� E Ia+tr; rr GA E,4�+ p�', ALL LIMITB IN THOUSANDS ORNERAL LIABILITY — CE ER;..Al-,-C IF„ATF CVMEROIAL GENERA'- LIABILIT` eR;C�CTS'04ac Cc5 A�GPF A'e GLAA4SL',CE ❑X;_RREI,C' +'E,RSOV4- eF7:ER-;,.VGILJ,1Rl OWNER S&�,A'RA;T')R; j _;i'',: tACH L. wH�ENCE $ r''R_Et}{tcir AM, a`,r c[RE; -- — - - '�'- -- --- Mrfl ?. E'­c",cf_Rei'ti ONF i'CRSu': AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO APP VFD AS TO FORM:] q�` $ ALL OWNED AUTOS GAI ' HUTTON NJ'JRY SCHEDULED AUTOS CIT n N PFP PEH5vv HIpEO AVTD$ 8y: 4du v NON-OWNED AUTOS Deputy City Atto ey I AccigEh-I GARA(E LIABILITti PRgP[R #C4AGEAI]CIREGA7E Profemi"_ Li.abilit JE 101'J i8/31/$$ 8/31/91 $ 2,000OTHER''HAN UMBRE,LA ORM A WORKERS'COMPENSATION AND iEACM ACC�CE'if, EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY iD SEASE PCUCY L'Mi'; ID•SEASF._k%K f!t1PL7YFE1 OTHER PF40ES�TG+IAb ,JEC-1008 8/31!88 8/31/91 $8,000 Pe,, r oourmnoe LTASIL,n't i & AB81-NlPte DE$CKIPTIONOFOPERATI,0!4S,LOGATICNSrVEHI[,LE3rRESTHti•;IIUNbt61 L,AL 'TLYS Uffill owl TAPLITHORiZED HOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX City Of Huntington Beach IRATIEtN DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL "XX�{Qi�'i Public Works Department AIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICES TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE 2000 Main Street EFT, WXXy,4[MX �'X%4jX)j'X0WKnow �� k A G9E�P�!R�f1E P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 REPRESENTA"IVE �� :, AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR PHASE II AND PHASE III OF THE RENOVATION OF THE PECK RESERVOIR (CC-696) THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 is entered into this 17th day of September , 1990, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. , a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR. " WHEREAS, since the original agreement , dated February 7 , 1989 , it has been determined by the parties that additional work is required by CITY to complete this phased project . NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between CITY and CONTRACTOR that paragraph 1 (Work Statement) is amended by adding the following : a . CONTRACTOR shall perform mechanical modifications to the subject pump station. This would include the rehabilitation of several mechanical workings , exclusive of the building as described in the request for modifications request dated June 14 , 1990 , (hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit "B" ) , which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference . Such services shall be compensated by CITY to CONTRACTOR in an amount not to exceed NINTY-THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($93 , 000 . 00) in a manner pursuant to the terms of the original contract . b. The tasks to be performed under Section a above shall be completed by February 28, 1991 . The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement to Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than the time specified in this Agreement . -1- All other terms and conditions of the original agreement shall remain in full force and effect . IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No . 2 as of the date hereinafter set forth. JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. A municipal corporation a California corporation of the tate of California By: Mayor I t s By: Its ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: awX4� p, C City Clerk Jr 23-y0 y REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Adminis rator Directo of Public Works -2- a i. CITY OF HUNTINGTON 2000 MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 June 14, 1990 Mr. Ashok Dhingra, P.E. ,S.E. , Vice President James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. P. O. Box 7009 Pasadena, CA 91109-7009 SUBJECT: Peck Reservoir Rehabilitation; CC-696 Pump Station Mechanical Modifications Dear Mr. Dhingra: The City of Huntington Beach is interested in having your firm perform mechanical modifications to the subject pump station. This would include the rehabilitation of several mechanical workings , exclusive of the building . The following listed items are to be included in this work: 1 ) Replacement of the gas engine for Unit No. 2 with the modern Waukesha Replacement ( F2895 ) . 2 ) Provide a backup LPG System for the pump station ( 50% station capacity for 72 hours) . The design should include room for future expansion of the LPG System for our Well No. 7 facility. 3 ) Construction of a restroom facility including site location alternatives and elevations of the final site selected. 4 ) Add inline meters on all discharge lines , if possible . Meter inflow/outflow of the reservoir at the very minimum. 5 ) Replacement of the gate valves on suction side of lower manifold with modern resilient wedge valves. 6 ) Inspection and servicing of all check valves by the contractor. 40 Page two Peck Reservoir Rehabilitation; CC-696 Pump Station Mechanical Modifications June 14, 1990 7) Modify pump can suction piping on unit No. 3 (existing can suction piping is offset by 1" to 2" ) at the suction manifold connection. 8) Utilities for engines (electric, oil , cooling, etc. ) to be installed in troughs with grating covers and drains incorporated into the design. 9) Provide piping modifications for a future hydroelectric generation facility. Coordinate with the Southern California Edison Company on any requirements for this facility. 10 ) Provide the lead and assist City personnel with AQMD permitting as well as modifications in accordance with AQMD rules. 11 ) Rehabilitation of all piping and valving for the pump station including having the contractor inspect and repair the pipe linings and coatings. 12 ) Installation of a new Murphy series 500 pump station central control panel . 13 ) Redesign or modify the underdrain sump system. 14 ) Modify the engine/floor elevations to remove existing engines from skids . 15 ) Installation of a gantry-type crane system. 16 ) Installation of a waste oil drain tank system. 17 ) Evaluate the use of dual drive gas engine and electrical motor combination units to replace gas engine only drive systems . 18 ) Installation of a new pump assembly and drive for Unit No. 4 . This will tie-in with No. 17 above. If No. 17 above shows no promise, a gas engine drive will be used. 19) Electric power drawings for bringing a three phase 480 volt system to the site. Coordination with the Southern California Edison Company requirements, if No. 17 above proves beneficial . 20 ) Incorporate all the above in the Contract Plans your firm is currently working on. r • Page three Peck Reservoir Rehabilitation; CC-696 Pump Station Mechanical Modifications June 14, 1990 Furnish my office with fees that are associated with this request no later than June 20, 1990, so that an amendment to your contract can be prepared. Also provide a revised project schedule reflecting these additions . Very truly yours, P /`� a ra ions Manager JRR: EC: bb-P#37 cc: General Correspondence CC-696 Louis F. Sandoval Fred Reber, Crewleader Water Production • • '01ATER DIVISION Serving the World's 250 North Madison Avenue Telephone `I''' 9 1990 Environmental Needs PO Box 7009,Pasadena. (818)796-9141 or(213)681 4255 California 91109 7009 CITY O HUNTINGTON BEACH JWM James M.Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc. July 17 1990 Mr. Jeffrey R. Renna Water Operations Manager Department of Public Works - Water Division City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Subject: Peck Reservoir Rehabilitation; CC-696 Pump Station Mechanical Modifications Dear Mr. Renna: This is to confirm my telephone conversation with Mr. Eric Charlonne yesterday. It is our understanding that the City would like the plans and specifications ready by November 1, 1990. In consideration thereof, we are pleased to submit the following proposal. The pump station modifications will be incorporated in the plans currently under preparation. The twenty (20) items contained in your letter dated June 14, 1990 outline the work required. Item No. 9 of the letter is included as it relates to piping modifications only and coordination in this aspect with Southern California Edison Company, but not any FERC permitting, etc. Based on our understanding of the work detailed in the letter for the design of these modifications, our fees will be a lump sum of $105,000. The additional fees for services during construction of these modifications will be $20,000. The terms and conditions of our original contract will apply. An amendment to our contract will be required. The date of November 1, 1990 for plans and specifications is based on receiving a notice to proceed on August 7, 1990 and a quick review time (not exceeding one (1) week) for the City between submittals. If there are any questions or clarifications, please call. Very truly yours, Ashok K. Dhingra Vice President cc: Eric Charlonne AKD/pbs/#183 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNUL ACTION Date February 6, 1989 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Prepared by: i-ouis F. Sandoval, Oirector of Public Works Subject: PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION: CC-696 Consistent with Council Policy? [ jYes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: >� Proposals were requested from qualified civil engineering firms for the preparation of preliminary engineering services (Phase I) final design (Phase II) and construction engineering (Phase III) for the renovation of the City's Peck Reservoir facility. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the selection of James M. Montgomery to perform the preliminary engineering design, Phase I, for the renovation of Peck Reservoir. 2. Establish a project budget of $51,135.00 (this will include consultant agreement and miscellaneous costs, if required). 3. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached consultant agreement with James M. 'vlontgomery for a fee of not to exceed $48,700.00. ANALYSIS: Peck Reservoir requires major renovation due to its age (24 years) and the buildinq requirements in effect at the time of construction. The proximity of the site to the Newport - Inglewood fault places the reservoir in a zone of significant hazard. The proposal was to establish design criteria from a review of existinq plans and specifications, performing a seismotectonic study, structural (roof, walls, footings, etc.) evaluation, and establishment of the project budget for construction. Phase II and Phase III will be negotiated with the design consultant after comnletion of Phase I for Council approval. Therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3.03 "Professional Services" of the Municipal Code, rr,nuests were solicited from qualified enqineering firms. Requests were received on December 21, 1988. Staff reviewed each of the three proposals received and recommends the selection of James M. 'll1ontgomery. Plo 5/85 Request for Council Action Renovation of Peck ?eservoir; CC-595 February 6, 1989 Page 2 FUNDING SOURCE: Engineering Design Services (Phase I) $48,700.00 Miscellaneous Costs 1@ 5% 2,435.00 Total Project Budget (Phase I) $51,135.00 Revenue Source: Water Division Capital OutlayAccount No. 921687. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny approval x ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Consultant Agreement 3. Consultant's Proposal 4. Request- for Proposal LFS:ER C:lw 1947g REQUAST FOR CITY COUNk ACTION Date June 19, 1989 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Submitted to: Honorahle Mayor and City Council �Q Submitted by: haul F. Cook, City Administrator Prepared by: !_orris F. Sandoval, Oirector of 1-'ublic Works ciT _ ci; C --- Subject: PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION: CC-696, PHASES II III `" CC -i n u c c�rn L Consistent with Council Policy? j Yes ( ] New Policy or Exception r-' Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachm ts:�, L STATEMENT OF ISSUE: James M. Mont:go nery Fv�s completed Phase I, preliminary engineerinq services, for the renovatinn of the Pack R nservnir facility. Per the consultant's proposal, Phases II and III were suhject to negotiatinns upon the cnmpletion of Phase I. RECOMMENDATION: I . Approve the amendment to the contract as follows: A. Phase II design engineerinq for a fixed fee of $149,000.00. R. Phase III construction support on an hourly rate plus costs hasis for a fee not.-to-exceed $30,000.00. 2. Estahlish a project budget of $179,000.00. 3. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached amendment to the consultant agreement dated February 7, 1989 with James M. Montgomery for a fee not-to-(-xceed $ 179,000.00. ANALYSIS: On February 6, 1989, Council approved the selection of James M. Montgomery for the preliminary engineerinq services (Phase I). The city's request for proposal and the consultant's proposal dated 1)ecelnher 21, 1988 called for Phases II and III to he negotiated upon completion of Phase 1. On June 5, 1989 the city received the consultant's proposal to furnish services for Phases II and III. The proposal was negotiated in good faith prior to final suhrnittal. Therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3.03 "Professional Services" of the Municipal Code, the Public Works Oenartment recommends the contract to he amended. FUNDING SOURCE: Phase II $149,000.00 Phase III 30,000.00 Total Project Budget $179,000.00 Request for Council Action Peck Reservoir Renovation June 19, 1989 Page 2 Water Division Account No. 921687 $148,735.27 921639 30,264.73 TOTAL $179,000.00 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1. Request new proposals for Phases II Ill. 2. Do not pursue the renovation project. ATTACHMENTS: I. Consultant's Proposal 2. Contract Amendment 3. Previous Council Action LFS:ERC:dw 2091g CE °iT-,IFI � i E -.�� ����4I0 !A,\�6� EP. irQ'. ISSUE DATE(MM/GD/YY) .r;z_.. AUGU ` PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUE Q(RWIIIAfiESPORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS I JARDINE INSURANCE BROKERS LOS ANGELES INC. NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, I11835 W. OLYMPIC BLVD. , 5TH FL. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064 TEL: (213) 444-3333 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE CONTACT: MICKEY LEE (213) 444-3752 COMPANY NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE LETTER A CODE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA i SUB-CODE i COMPANY i INSURED LETTER B HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING COMPANY ENGINEERS, INC. ET AL Y LETTER C LANDMARK INSURANCE COMPANY 250 N. MADISON AVENUE n I PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91101 s/ COMPANY D (� LETTER COMPANY E LETTER COV,ERAGES% w THIS IS TO CERTIFY.THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD j INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE:POLICY EXPIRATION ALL LIMITS INTHOUSANDS LTR DATE(MMlDD/YY) ! DATE(MM;pDlYY) GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2 000,)C A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRO DUCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $ 1,,000,X t j CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR.; GL 5903820 8-31-90 8-31-91 PERSONAL&ADVERTISING INJURY $ 1,0O0,*I OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT. ($10,000. SIR)* EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000 S __. FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $ 500, t MEDICAL EXPENSE(Any one person) $ 5,4c) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED X' ANY AUTO SINGLE B $ 1,000, j LIMITy X ALL OWNED AUTOS ,t Q BODILY X! SCHEDULED AUTOS 72 UENMX 4660E $-�31�9*1111 U 591 INJURY $ }{ �+1 L !�.� (Per person) I HIRED AUTOS ,pF(•�t .Cne'1 BOD INJURY $Y ���u X NON-OWNED AUTOS C1 L U �y'�y 'Y/ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITYPROPER/'[� C 'y� DAMAGE $ ,... L I EXCESS LIABILITY - - EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE C X UMB 6001891 ' 8-31-90 8-31-91 $ 10,000,$ 10,000, OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM _ STATUTORY j WORKER'S COMPENSATION 'j/� {i AND � /h $ (EACH ACCIDENT) EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY. I !'__ _ $ _ - (DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT) HAN $ (DISEASE---EACH EMPLOYEE) K AS RESPECTS: GENERAL, AUTOMOBILE & UMBRELLA LIABILITY: SUCH INSURANCE SHALL INCLUDE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, 1TS1 iOFFICERS & EMPLOYEES AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED, BUT SOLELY AS RESPECTS THE WORK PERFORMED BY THE NAMED INSURED. RE. 9818.3706 { DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS!LOCATIONS!VEHICLES!RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS AS RESPECTS GENERAL, AUTOMOBILE & UMBRELLA LIABILITY: SUCH INSURANCE SHALL BE CONSIDERED PRIMARY & NOT CONTRIBUTORY TO ANY OTHER VALID INSURANCE AVAILABLE TO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ITS OFFICERS &i I EMPLOYEES. i 1 i CERTIFICATE HOLDER i CANCELLATION I CITY OF HUNTINGTONBEACH SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE j PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL j 2000 MAIN STREET MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE I P.O. BOX 190 LEFT, 6c XX I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 LXare`�L�{ Y �v ' �r} � - � I AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' ACORD 25-& 3/88 I ) _ (DACORD CORPORATION 1988 r_ a ISSUE- - DATE(MM/DD/YY) CERTIFICATE OF fNSURANCE 916190 ML PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPOWTHE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, Jardine Insurance Brokers Los Angeles Inc. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW 11835 W. Olympic Blvd. , 5th Fl. - --- Los Angeles, California 90064 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Tel: (213) 444-3333 I Attn: Mickey Lee COMPANY CODE SUB-CODE LETTER A Twin Cities Fire Insurance Company COMPANY B I INSURED LETTER i James M. Montgomery COMPANY i C ,Consulting Engineers, Inc. etal LETTER i 250 N. Madison Ave. COMPANY j i Pasadena, CA 91101 LETTER D i COMPANY E LETTER COVERAGES y C I THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS III CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, i EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO j LTR POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION_ TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS DATE(MM/DO/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) GENERAL LIABILITY _ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE S CLAIMS MADE OCCUR. PERSONAL&ADVERTISING INJURY $ OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT. EACH OCCURRENCE $ FIRE DAMAGE(Any one tire) $ j MEDICAL EXPENSE(Any one person) $ i AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE $ ANY AUTO LIMIT f ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY I i SCHEDULED AUTOS INJURY $ (Per person) HIRED AUTOS BODILY NON-OWNED AUTOS INJURY $(Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY $ DAMAGE EXCESS LIABILITY _ EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE $ $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKER'S COMPENSATION STATUTORY A AND 72 WBMX 4661E 05/01/90 05/01/91 $ 1,000, (EACH ACCIDENT) EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY $ 1,000, (DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT) I $ 1,000, (DISEASE--EACH EMPLOYEE OTHER i I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS ` I CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE c' DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL i t'XQtji• i 2000 MAIN STREET MAIL_30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE P.O. BOX 190 LEFT, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 j AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ATTN: RISK MANAGEMENT i G ACORD 25-S (3/88) CACO CORPORATION 1988 RD CO I 4 -7 RE U E FOR CITY COUNCILO Q ACTION Date J�ine 19, 19,99 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council �o Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Q. Prepared by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works ciT LF Subject: PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION: CC-696, PHASES II R III Co U-C f7 fry N m r. � a n,C c7 xj R1 Consistent with Council Policy? >]C ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception r-- Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachm 1i3ts: L STATEMENT OF ISSUE: James M. Montgomery has completed Phase I, preliminary engineering services, for the renovation of the Peck Reservoir facility. Per the consultant's proposal, Phases II and III were subject to negotiations upon the completion of Phase I. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the amendment to the contract as follows: A. Phase II design engineering for a fixed fee of $149,000.00. B. Phase III construction support on an hourly rate plus costs basis for a fee not-to-exceed $30,000.00. 2. Establish a project budget of $179,000.00. 3. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached amendment to the consultant agreement dated February 7, 1989 with James M. Montgomery for a fee not-to-exceed $179,000.00. ANALYSIS: On February 6, 1989, Council approved the selection of James M. Montgomery for the preliminary engineering services (Phase I). The city's request for proposal and the consultant's proposal dated December 21, 1988 called for Phases II and III to be negotiated upon completion of Phase I. On June 5, 1989 the city received the consultant's proposal to furnish services for Phases II and III. The proposal was negotiated in good faith prior to final submittal. Therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3.03 "Professional Services" of the Municipal Code, the Public Works Department recommends the contract to be amended. FUNDING SOURCE: Phase II $149,000.00 Phase III 30,000.00 Total Project Budget $179,000.00 P10 5/85 M Request for Council Action Peck Reservoir Renovation June 19, 1989 Paqe 2 Water Division Account No. 921687 $148,735.27 921639 30,264.73 TOTAL $179,000.00 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1. Request new proposals for Phases II 9< III. 2. Do not pursue the renovation project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Consultant's Proposal 2. Contract Amendment 3. Previous Council Action LFS:ERC:dw 2091g w,y , r • AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR PHASE II AND PHASE III OF THE RENOVATION OF THE PECK RESERVOIR (CC-696) THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 is entered into this 6 t,4_ day of 1989 , by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" , and JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. , hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR" . WHEREAS, since the original agreement , dated February 7, 1989 , it has been determined by the parties that additional work is required by CITY to complete this phased project . NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between CITY and CONTRACTOR that paragraph 1 (Work Statement) is amended by adding the following : a . CONTRACTOR shall provide all design engineering services for Phase II of PROJECT as described in the Proposal to Furnish Engineering Services dated June 1, 1989 , (hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit "A" ) , which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Such services shall be compensated by CITY to CONTRACTOR in an amount not to exceed ONE HUNDRED FORTY-NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($149 , 000 . 00) in a manner pursuant to the terms of the original contract . b. CONTRACTOR shall provide construction support as outlined in Phase III of the Proposal to furnish engineering services dated June 1, 1989 . Such services shall be compensated by CITY to CONTRACTOR on an hourly rate and costs - 1 - basis not to exceed THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($30, 000) . The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement to Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than twelve months from the date of this Agreement . All other terms and conditions of the original agreement shall remain in full force and effect . IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No . 1 as of the date hereinafter set forth. CONTRACTOR: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, A municipal corporation CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. of t e State of Califo Mr. Ashok K. Dhingra, V.P. Mayor / kl . � Ms . Carol H. Tate, V.P. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: a44 C* - — 'J� City Clerk e_'�-k,*City Attorne �-- 7 below REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: s City Administrator Director of Public Works - 2 - G/ 3 _/ z- - v(,or A*r IND. CERTIFICATEW INSURANCE issuApril 3, 589 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS JARDINE IIKETT & CHANDLER LOS ANGELES INC. NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, INSURANCE BROKERS EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW 11835 West Olympic Boulevard, 5th Floor Los Anglees, California 90064 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Telephone (213) 444-3333 Telex: 69-1260 -- Facsimile 444-3444 COMP RNY A Twin City Fire Insurance Company CODE SUB-CODE COMPANY B INSURED7_(j LETTER JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ETTERNY `. ENGINEERS, INC. etal 250 North Madison Avenue COMPANY D LETTER Pasadena, California 91101 COMPANY E LETTER COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS LTR DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE S COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PROD UCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE S CLAIMS MADE OCCUR. PERSONAL&ADVERTISING INJURY $ OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT. EACH OCCURRENCE $ FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) S MEDICAL EXPENSE(Any one person) S AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED ANY AUTO SINGLE S LIMIT ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY SCHEDULED AUTOS INJURY $ (Per person) HIRED AUTOS BODILY NON-OWNED AUTOS INJURY $ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY l PROPERTY $ EXCESS LIABILITY DAMAGE EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKER'S COMPENSATION STATUTORY $ 1,000 000 (EACH ACCIDENT) A AND 72WBMX4661 E 5/1/89 5/1/90 $ 1 1000 (DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT) EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY $ 1,000 (DISEASE—EACH EMPLOYEE)I OTHER �p F6��ttorneY i REF: 9818.37061,�1t0 � ,A Cyt DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION �l SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLY tSr BE CANCELt EFORE THE ) City of Huntington Beach EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL EKNKAIbXiXXO Public Works Department MAIL K DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE 2000 Main Street LEFT, #v�ILxll #4r1 � 7����R P.O. Box 190 xt#4�it# �5�#FixI �51�i# 3c�1n4D€ V ?� Huntington Beach, California 92648 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE i I (ACORD 25-S (3/88) ACORD CORPORATI N 1988_ 0 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK June 27, 1989 James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers , Inc. P. 0. Box 7009 Pasadena, CA 91109-7009 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the adjourned regular meeting held June 26, 1989 approved Amendment No. 1 to Agreement between City of Huntington Beach and James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers , Inc. , for engineering design services for Phase II and Phase III of the renovation of the Peck Reservoir, CC-696. Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records . Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:bt Enc. (Telephone: 714-536-5227) REQUEs r FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date February 6, 1989 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator �= Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works Prepared by: , APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL. Subject: PECK RESERVOIR RENOVATION: CC-696 Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes ( ] New Policy or Ex tion crT cL x� Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: ] STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Proposals were requested from qualified civil engineering firms for the preparation of preliminary engineering services (Phase I) final design (Phase II) and construction engineering (Phase III) for the renovation of the City's Peck Reservoir facility. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the selection of James M. Montgomery to perform the preliminary engineering design, Phase I, for the renovation of Peck Reservoir. 2. Establish a project budget of $51,135.00 (this will include consultant agreement and miscellaneous costs, if required). 3. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached consultant agreement with James M. Montgomery for a fee of not to exceed $48,700.00. ANALYSIS: Peck Reservoir requires major renovation due to its age (24 years) and the building requirements in effect at the time of construction. The proximity of the site to the Newport - Inglewood fault places the reservoir in a zone of significant hazard. The proposal was to establish design criteria from a review of existinq plans and specifications, performing a seismotectonic study, structural (roof, walls, footings, etc.) evaluation, and establishment of the project budget for construction. Phase II and Phase III will be negotiated with the design consultant after completion of Phase I for Council approval. Therefore, pursuant to Chapter 3.03 "Professional Services" of the Municipal Code, reouests were solicited from qualified engineering firms. Requests were received on December 21, 1988. Staff reviewed each of the three proposals received and recommends the selection of James M. Montgomery. P10 5/85 Request for Council Action Renovation of Peck Reservoir; CC-696 February 6, 1989 Page 2 FUNDING SOURCE: Engineering Design Services (Phase I) $48,700.00 Miscellaneous Costs ' 5% 2,435.00 Total Project Budget (Phase I) $51,135.00 Revenue Source: Water Division Capital OutlayAccount No. 921687. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map l 2. Consultant 3. Consultant's Agreement Prop sal — �" �' /e- 4. Request for Proposal LFS:ERC:lw 1947g N li a ZONING INDEX MAP 9-5- 10-5-II protect site D D LEGEND CC 696 19-6-10-SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE 16- -11 15- -11 14- 11 w DM 22-DISTRICT MAP 22 DM18 � 717 MI5 P___ \ i 24-5� 19-5-11 -5-11 21- -11 22-5-11 2 -5-11 24 `1 DM 2!� DM 21 f D 24 D 25 S DM 27 30-5-II ', 29-5-11 y�\Dkf33 28.=d,1.1 27- -11 2 -5-11 25- -11 AM 35 DM 34 32 M 31 D 0 'n32-5\`ii 33 5-II 36- -11 DM 36\ DM 37 _=(b 38 39 OM 40 M 5-6-II ��1 3-6-II 2-TTo-11 1-6-11 6-6-10 /10 DM4 ` DM3 2 D I DM6 DMS` i f 9-6-II 0-6-II 11- -II� 12-6-II 7-6-10 8-6-10 DM 10 DM 12 DM13 DM 7 'DM8 © 14-\ --13-6-II 18-6-10 17-6 10 CITY OF �F-�21 Ml14 DM20 DM19 HUNTINGTON BEACH - ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA / 24-6-I 19- -10 34 �.. DM 29 w22// MO'iED YUICY CI.IN, RMMM4 COYYUSiOM IICSOW1gN pT CWNCiI-MOINMQ 1q�N AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE RENOVATION OF THE PECK RESERVOIR (CC-696 ) / THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day c° Of , 19 , by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. , a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR. " WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of an engineering design contractor to provide plans, estimates and specifications . .for the renovation of the Peck Reservoir in the City of Huntington 'Beach; and CONTRACTOR has been selected to perform. said services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows : 1 . WORK STATEMENT CONTRACTOR shall provide all services as described in the Request for Proposal, dated December 1, 1988 and CONTRACTOR' S proposal , dated December 21 , 1988 , (hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit "A" ) , which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference . Said services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as "PROJECT. " CONTRACTOR hereby designates ASHOK DHINGRA, who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement . 2 . CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONTRACTOR in the performance of this Agreement . 3 . TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement . The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than three months from the date of this Agreement . These times may be extended with the written permission of the CITY The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be as shown in the Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule . This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed by the CITY and CONTRACTOR. 4 . COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the engineering services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a fee of FORTY EIGHT THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED Dollars ($48 ,700 ) . 5 . EXTRA WORK In the event of authorization, in writing by the CITY, of changes from the work described in Exhibit "A" , or for other written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for such Extra Work, so long as the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6 . METHOD OF PAYMENT A . CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to progress payments toward the fixed fee set forth in Section 4 herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit A" . B. Delivery of work product : A copy of every technical memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to the - 2 - CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks . In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted. C . The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY an invoice for each progress payment due . Such invoice shall : 1) Reference this Agreement; 2 ) Describe the services performed; 3 ) Show the total amount of the payment due; 4 ) Include a certification by a principal member of the CONTRACTOR'S firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and 5 ) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed . Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONTRACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30 ) days ' of receipt of the invoice by CITY . Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld . If the CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of the reasons for non-approval, within seven ( 7 ) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to - 3 - Section 12 hereof. D. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by the CITY shall be invoiced separately to the CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required under paragraph 6C, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time . Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate . Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement . 7 . DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared hereunder , including all original drawings, designs , reports, both field and office notes, calculations , maps and other documents, shall be turned over to CITY upon termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first . In the event this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY in the completion of PROJECT . Title to said materials shall pass to the CITY upon payment of fees determined to be earned by CONTRACTOR to the point of termination or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is applicable . CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder . 8 . INDEMNIFICATION, DEFENSE, HOLD HARMLESS CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and save and hold harmless City, its officers and employees, from any and all liability, - 4 - including any claim of liability and any and all losses or costs arising out of the negligent performance of this agreement by CONTRACTOR, its officers or employees or from any willful misconduct of CONTRACTOR, its officers or employees while engaged in the performance of this agreement. 9 . WORKERS ' COMPENSATION CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers ' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar state or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all claims , demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature and description, including attorney ' s fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against CITY, for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement . CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish evidence to CITY of maintenance of statutory workers ' compensation insurance and employers ' liability in an amount of not less than $500 ,000 bodily injury by accident, each accident, $500 ,000 bodily injury by disease, each employee, and $1 , 000 ,000 bodily injury by disease, policy limit . 10 . INSURANCE In addition to the workers ' compensation insurance and CONTRACTOR'S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain and furnish to CITY the following insurance policies covering the - 5 - PROJECT : A. General Liability Insurance . A policy of general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage . Said policy shall indemnify CONTRACTOR, its officers, agents and employees, while acting within the scope of their duties, against any and all claims of arising out of or in connection with the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not less than the following amount : combined single limit bodily injury and property damage, including products/completed operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of $1 ,000,000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1 ,000 ,000 . Said policy shall name CITY, its officers, and employees as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage and that CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall be primary. B. Professional Liability Insurance . CONTRACTOR shall acquire a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder . Said policy shall provide coverage for CONTRACTOR'S professional liability in an amount not less than $500 ,000 per claim. A claims made policy shall be acceptable. Certificates of Insurance for said policies shall be approved - 6 - in writing by the City Attorney prior to the commencement of any work hereunder . All Certificates of Insurance (and the policies of insurance or endorsements thereof) shall provide that any such Certificates and policies shall not be cancelled or modified without thirty ( 30 ) days ' prior written notice to CITY . CONTRACTOR shall notify CITY immediately if and when any of said policies is reduced in coverage or limits due to payment of a claim by its insurance carrier . 11 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor . CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any and all payments of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder . 12 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner . CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR'S services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete . Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing through the City Engineer, notice of which shall be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16 herein. 13 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR to - 7 - i any other person or entity without the consent of CITY . 14 . COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CONTRACTOR shall not apply for a patent or copyright on any item or material produced as a result of this Agreement, as set forth in 41 CFR 1-9 . 1 . 15 . CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement . No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of California Government Code Sections 1090 et seq. 16 . NOTICES Any notices or special instructions required to be given in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal delivery to CONTRACTOR 'S agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY 'S Director of Public Works , as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Services, addressed as follows : TO CITY: TO CONTRACTOR: Mr . Louis Sandoval Mr . Ashok K. Dhingra, Director of Public Works Vice President City of Huntington Beach James M. Montgomery 2000 Main Street Consulting Engineers, Inc . Hntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 7009 Pasadena, CA 91109-7009 REST OF PAGE NOT USED - 8 - 17 . ENTIRETY The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth the entire Agreement between the parties . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers the day, month and year first above written. CONTRACTOR: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, A municipal corporation CONSULTING E INEERS, INC. of the ,State of Californ}.a . 1 r "krh ' a, V.P . Mayor a!4- Swart, SAec . ATTE APPROV D AS TO M: r' 171 City Clerk City A torney��i-1%-�'` REV -A= AP O E IN �IATIE b.APPROVED: City Administrator Direct r of Public Works 1-'1.S'-gc1 rf - 9 - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Public Works Department (714) 536-5431 December 1, 1988 Mr. R.E. Bachman Fluor Daniel, Inc. 333 Michelson Drive Irvine, CA 92730 Subject: Request For Proposal - Peck Reservoir Renovation; CC-696 Gentlemen: The City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public ";orks is requesting proposals frorj, qualified civil engineering firms for the seismic analysis, preparation of preliminary plans, final working drawings, contract specifications and other related contract documents fnr the renovation of the City's 16 Million Gallon Peck Reservoir Facility. The scope of work for which r-Proposals are being solicited includes the following tasks: PHASE I - PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1. Review all existing plans, specifications and corrective recommendations detailed in an inspection report prepared by Kenneth I. Mullen, Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated March 13, 1986. 2. Prepare a comprehensive seismic, hydro-seisIY,ic and structural analysis of the entire reservoir structure and booster pump station (roof, walls, footings, etc.) in accordance with the current uniform building code requirements and Arnerican ,Eater Norks Association guidelines. 3. Performance of all necessary field investigations and measurements required to perform Tasks I and 2 above. 4. Formulate options and make recommendations to the City for the following. A. Complete new lining B. Repair and/or replacement of existing roof materials. C. Structural modifications required resulting from analyses describe in Task 2 above. D. Modifications necessary but not shown on existing renovation plans. 5. Provide back-up information and assistance to City in processing environmental documents. y I f / RF P-Peck Reservoir Renovation; CC-696 December 1, 1988 Page 2 6. Attend a minimum of two (2) meetings with City staff during Phase I (Excluding field investigations performed). PHASE II FINAL DESIGN 1. Prepare final working drawings, specifications and other contract documents necessary for bidding based on decisions made in Phase I. Final plans to be on city-furnished mylars with no "sticky-backs". Final plans will be property of the City . 2. Provide all structural calculations for the proposed renovation project. Coordination with the City of Huntington Beach Building Division to ensure approval by them during the permit process (City will apply for permit). 3. Cost estimate for all work in final design. 4. Provide support to the City at their request during bid advertisement. 5. Attend a minimum of four (4) meetings with City staff during Phase II one of which will be the pre-bid meeting. 7. Based on approval of preliminary drawings, specifications and cost estimate, the consultant shall, provide forty (40) sets of the following: A. Final Construction Drawings B. All contract documents required for bidding. PHASE III CUNST RUCTION 1. Provide construction support through weekly meetings and or telephone calls. 2. Provide shop drawing review. (Note: Tasks 1 and 2 above will be coordinated through the City's representative.) 3. Provide one (1), acceptable to the city, reproducible set of "record" mylar drawings. (Note: 10% of contract amount will be withheld until "record" mylar drawings are submitted and accepted.) GENERAL REQUIREfv1ENTS The consultant shall furnish proof of the following minimum insurance requirements with their proposals: 1. General Liability coverage - $1,000,000 CSL per occurrence (Mote: If provided coverage is under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1,000,000). RF P-Peck Reservoir Renovation; CC-696 December 1, 1988 Page 3 2. Professional liability coverage - $500,000 per occurrence (Note: A claims made policy is acceptable). 3. Norkers' Compensation coverage in an amount of not less than $500,000 bodily injury by accident, each accident $500,000 bodily injury by disease, each employee, $1,000,000 bodily injury by disease, policy limit. The advertising for bids and awarding of a construction contract for this project will be administered by City staff. In addition, City personnel will control contract administration and perform required construction inspections. The consultant shall recommend any special inspection procedures to be used. Proposals for this project must be submitted to my attention no later than 4:00 P.M. on December 21, 1988 with the notation "Peck Reservoir" on the envelope. Each proposal should include the following information: 1. A list of similar projects that your design team has recently worked on. 2. A statement of understanding as to the scope of work and the tasks necessary to complete the project. 3. A brief outline of how your firm will handle this project, if awarded, and time schedule for completing the project. The project must be under construction in October/November 1989. 4. A list of personnel, including the proposed project manager, who will be assigned to design team on this project along with their brief resumes (One must be a registered structural engineer). 5. A detailed listing of each task to be performed the corresponding man hours and costs for each task, number each task as outlined. This will be used as the progress payment form. 6. Your fee based on an hourly rate. .A maximum not-to-exceed fee should also be specified for Phase I. Phase II and III may be a expressed as a percentage of the ,approved construction cost estimate and negotiated upon completion of Phase I.. Submit Item No. 6 in a separate sealed attached envelope with the notation "fees." 7. All consultants are invited to view the project site on December 13, 1988 at 10:00 A.M. Peck Reservoir is located at 14561 Sprinqdale Street in Huntington Beach. After the receipt of proposals, proposals will be screened and ranked relevant to: 1. Expertise and experience. 2. The approach to be used as outlined in the proposal. RF P-Peck Reservoir Renovation; CC-696 December 1, 1988 Page 4 3. Ability to complete the project in a timely and consistent manner. The most qualified consultants may be interviewed prior to the final evaluation. After ranking of proposals, fee envelopes will be opened and compared. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the City's Standard Consultant Contract (see Attachment "B"). Hopefully this sample contract will prove useful in developing your proposal. Should you have any questions or concerns reqarding this project, please contact Eric Charlonne, Project Engineer, at (714) 536-5431. Very truly yours, L Louis F. Sa doval Director of Public `Norks LFS:EC:dw cc: Les Evans, City Engineer Jeff Renna, Nater Superintendent "ill Patapoff, Principal Engineer Robert Taylor, Supervisor Eric Charlonne, Project Engineer Attachments: Attachment "A" - Location Map Attachment "B" - Sample Contract 1857gl878g r ^_ I V CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OMPT, OF PUBLIC WORKS JUN 05 1999 - , PROPOSAL TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 16 MG PECK RESERVOIR AND PUMPING STATION REHABILITATION JUNE 1989 f JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Z50 North Madison Avenue P.O. Box 7009 Pasadena, California 91109-7009 Serving the World's � Telephone Environmental Needs (818)796-9141 or(213)681-4255 250 North Madison Avenue P.O.Box 7009,Pasadena, California 91109 7009 JW James M.Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc. June 1, 1989 4 City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Louis F. Sandoval Director of Public Works Subject: Proposal to Furnish Design and Construction Engineering Services for 16 MG Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station Rehabilitation Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for furnishing engineering services for the 16 MG Peck Reservoir and Pumping Station rehabilitation. It is understood that the reservoir is to be lined with a new concrete liner, and the existing roof replaced with a new roof along with some additional framing members, hangers and straps for seismic resistance. The existing pumping station building will be demolished and replaced with a new building with better sound insulation. Existing pumping station equipment will remain. Also, modifications to the inlet piping, access hatch and accessories such as new ladders will be incorporated in the design. Based on our previous discussions, we propose to perform the following work on the terms and conditions as outlined herein. Upon acceptance of this proposal and authorization to proceed, we will commence work within three days of the Notice to Proceed. SCOPE OF WORK A. PRASE II - DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES 1. Preparation of drawings and specifications for the subgrade preparation and construction of the concrete slab liner for Peck Reservoir including all legal forms necessary for receiving competitive bids. Design of a new building for the pumping station per predesign report would also be included. Based on the available information, the plans will include the details and extent of repairs or City of Huntington Beach -2- June 1, 1989 replacement required for a stable foundation for the concrete lining. Existing drawings may be utilized insofar as practical. 2. Prepare final construction cost estimates. 3. Assistance during bid period including attendance at a pre-bid kmeeting with prospective bidders. B. PEASE III - SUPPORT SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION 1. Attend a preconstruction meeting. 2. Review and approve product information and samples submitted by the contractors, shop and working drawings of manufacturers and contractors for substantial conformity with the intent of the contract plans and specifications. Review and approve concrete mix design, joint sealant and other laboratory tests as required during construction. 3. Assist the City staff in the correct interpretation of the plans and specifications, including the preparation of elementary sketches if required to clarify details. 4. Provide engineering assistance for telephone consultation during normal business hours for construction problems or questions. 5. Visits by the Project Manager/Engineer to the site of the work during construction on an average of two visits per month. 6. Assistance in final inspection and tests. 7. Upon completion of construction, prepare a final construction report summarizing the project, construction problems, changed conditions based on the information furnished by the City, final testing and final acceptance. C. PHASE IV -FIELD ENGINEERING SERVICES 1. Field engineering surveys to determine topography, profile data, and location of physical features and property boundaries in connection with the design work to be performed. 2. Construction staking. 3. Detailed field observation during construction for an inspector/resident engineer as required for the entire duration of the construction period. • • City of Huntington Beach -3- June 1, 1989 D. PHASE V- ADDITIONAL SERVICES 1. If remedial measures are required for embankment, then details would be developed and included with the plans and specifications should it deemed necessary upon dewatering of the facility. These measures may be applied to the interior of the embankment and/or foundation and may vary vertically and areally. 1p Z. If remedial measures are required, surveying of existing embank- ments would be conducted. CITY-FURNISHED SERVICES It is understood that the City of Huntington Beach would provide the following: 1. Reproducible drawings of the existing reservoir. Z. All available records of construction including shop drawings. 3. Any reports of inspections, modifications, rehabilitation, subsequent to construction. 4. Access to the reservoir site and any other pertinent information relative to the rehabilitation design, for the timely prosecution of the . work. 5. Distribution of plans and specifications to prospective bidders. 6. Dewatering of the reservoir facility, if needed. FEES AND CONDITIONS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES Engineering services are provided in accordance with our agreement dated February 7, 1989. Based on the information available to us, we propose the following fees for tasks described in Paragraphs A, B, C and D. 1. For Phase II, Paragraph 'A', Tasks 1 thru 8, we propose a fixed fee of $149,000. 2. For Phase III, Support Services During Construction, Phase IV - Field Engineering Services, and Phase V - Additional Services, our fees would be as follows: a. The fee for services will be based on salary cost plus 145 percent of said salary costs. Salary cost is the cost of salaries (including sick leave, vacation, holiday and incentive pay) of personnel for time directly chargeable to the project; plus unemployment, excise, and payroll taxes; contributions for social security, employment compensation insurance, retire- ment, medical, and insurance benefits and for the purpose of City of Huntington Beach -4- June 1, 1989 this project, salary costs are defined as 1.3 times actual payroll. Non-salary expenses directly attributable to the project like (1) living and traveling expenses of employees when away from the home office on business connection with the project, (2) identifiable communication expenses, (3) identifi- able drafting and stenographic supplies and expenses, and (4) identifiable reproduction costs applicable to the work will be charged at actual cost plus 15 percent service charge. For use of VAX 11/780 computer, word processors, etc., fees will be in accordance with the most recent fee schedule. b. The fee for Additional Services will be at actual cost plus 15 percent of actual cost to cover overhead and administration. 3. For Items 1 thru 7 described in Paragraph 'B', Support Services During Construction, based on a construction period of 6 months, our fee would not exceed $30,000. 4. For Items 1 thru 3 described in Paragraph 'C' based on a construction period of 6 months, we recommend an estimated budget of $63,000. 5. A fee of $900 per day would be charged for visits by the Project Manager in addition to visits described in Item 5 of Paragraph 'B', Support Services During Construction. TIME TO COMPLETE Time to complete this project is based on the Notice to Proceed as stated in our proposal dated December 21, 1988, and the completion date for the entire project is May 8, 1990. If the above proposal meets with your approval, we shall be pleased to enter into a contract embodying its terms, or this proposal may be accepted by affixing the proper signatures in the spaces provided. Respectfully submitted, ACCEPTED BY: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. By: By: Ashok K. Dhingra Vice President (Title) (Date) /dl 1 � � 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 Proposal to City of Huntington Beach 1 1 To Furnish Professional Services for 1 Rehabilitation of 16 Mg 1 Peck Reservoir (CC-696) 1 JW James M.Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc. 1 1 ' Serving the World's • Telephone Environmental Needs (818)796-9141 or(213)681-4255 ' 250 North Madison Avenue PO.Box 7009,Pasadena, California 91109 7009 JW James M.Montgomery ' Consulting Engineers Inc. December 21, 1988 DEFT. OF RU-31—IBC WORKS City of Huntington Beach ' 2000 Main Street C E C 21 1988 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: Mr. Louis F. Sandoval "JHMNWMK BMAC.H. CAUF ' Director of Public Works Subject: Proposal for Rehabilitation of 16 MG Peck Reservoir (CC-696) ' Gentlemen: James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. (JMM) is pleased to submit ' this proposal to the City of Huntington Beach in response to your December 1, 1988 request for proposal for engineering services in connection with the rehabilitation of the 16 MG Peck Reservoir. JMM, with over 40 years of experience, is qualified in all aspects of reservoir planning, design, construction and operation, and offers highly professional engineering services that will produce a cost-effective design. Our combination of experience, locally available personnel, complete in-house capabilities, and familiarity with local conditions will prove valuable to the City of Huntington Beach for this rehabilitation design project. Information requested by the City is contained in the Executive Summary with reference to applicable sections of this proposal. ' The content of this proposal documents our firm's qualifications to perform the subject project. In summary, they include: Experience: JMM has designed over 200 reservoirs, including all types of ' construction from steel to prestressed and conventional concrete, ranging in volume from 100,000 gallons to 65 million gallons. Some of our major reservoir projects were designed as multiple-purpose facilities with ' provisions for recreational or other functional facilities on the roof. JMM has received "engineering excellence" awards for many of its multi-use designs. We have been extensively involved in several major reservoir ' rehabilitation projects. Expert Project Team: The high quality of JMM's work depends largely on the competence of its individual employees and the judicious blending of ' their talents to meet the requirements of each particular project. To assure this quality, the company policy is to staff each project with those who have the requisite interest, time and skills, and to make provisions for their interaction. The project manager assigned to your project, Mr. Ashok K. Dhingra, has extensive experience in the engineering planning, design and construction of similar reservoir repair and rehabilitation projects. • 0 City of Alhambra -2- December 21, 1988 :Most recently he was the project manager on an 18.7 million gallon buried reinforced concrete reservoir for the City of Torrance. This project was completed last year. The proposed project engineer, Mr. David A. Mosher, has extensive experience in the design and construction of reservoirs. Most recently, he was the resident engineer on the 18.7 million gallon reservoir for the City of Torrance. Mr. Dhingra was the project manager for a similar .reservoir rehabilitation project, 16 MG Linden Reservoir for the City of Riverside. Complete In-House Capabilities: Our capabilities and in-house staff in all ' disciplines assures a project that is coordinated well. It results in a project with a minimum number of change orders because it has been checked by the disciplines involved. Historically on reservoir projects, the amount of change orders has been less than 1/2 percent of the contract amount. Our in-house capabilities will be supplemented by Geofon, Incorporated, geotechincal engineers and Globe Consulting Services for Hypalon or Butyl lining. We have prior experience with each of these companies and have a ' good working relationship. Quality of Work: JMM takes pride in its reputation for being a leader in the design of reservoirs. We feel that the project team we have proposed will provide the same level of experience, expertise and quality design on this reservoir rehabilitation project. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal and sincerely hope that we will have the pleasure of working with you and your staff on this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or desire additional information. Very truly yours, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Ashok K. Dhingra ' Vice President /j c 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Letter of Transmittal i Title Section No. Executive Summary 1 Project Approach 2 Method of Approach Scope of Work Project Schedule 1 Project Team 3 ' Related Experience 4 Company Background and Major Capabilities 5 1 1 1 aSECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This proposal is presented to the City of Huntington' Beach with the specific objective of demonstrating the capabilities of James M. Montgomery, Consulting. Engineers, Inc. (JMM) to .provide consulting engineering services for the rehabilitation of the 16 MG Peck Reservoir. This Executive Summary highlights the information presented in the proposal.. To facilitate the evaluation of this proposal, the format of the Executive Summary consists of responses to information requested and to the proposal evaluation criteria identified in the City's Request for Proposal (RFP). Each criterion for evaluating the capabilities of a consulting firm as outlined in the RFP is repeated in bold type followed by a response that summarizes JMM's capabilities. The Executive Summary also references other portions of this proposal. 1. Expertise and experience. The project manager, Mr. Ashok Dhingra, has over 20 years of experience in structural analysis, water system design, and project management. He is a registered Structural Engineer in California. He has been responsible for or involved in the design of over 50 water storage reservoirs and numerous. pipeline and pumping station facilities. Most recent concrete reservoir projects include reservoirs for the Cities of Torrance and Pomona. He was involved in the rehabilitation of roofing projects for the Cities of Ontario, Santa 'Maria and Upland. Other rehabilitation projects include a very similar project for the City of Riverside, 16 MG Linden Reservoir, Helix Reservoir No. 2, Reservoir No. 2 for California Polytechnic University Pomona and several .others: He has extensive experience in rehabilitation projects and is also a member of the ACI 364 Committee on Rehabilitation of Concrete Structures. The project engineer, Mr. David Mosher, has over 16 years of experience in the areas of project engineering and resident engineering for the design and construction of water and wastewater projects. The most recent project completed by Mr. Mosher was Resident Engineer for an 18.7 MG reservoir for the City of Torrance as referenced in Section 4, Related Experience. He has been involved in numerous reservoir projects including rehabilitation. A project organization chart identifying all of the key project team members is presented in Section 3 along with biographical data on each team member. ' 1-1 i Executive Summary An overview of our experience and capabilities is as follows: GENERAL The capability to successfully complete the proposed project is ensured by the ability of our project team to produce a practical and cost-effective approach to a design project. This section will summarize our capability for performing practical and cost effective projects with respect to specialized expertise, overall staff capabilities, and cost control. QUALITY OF WORK Quality of work is of utmost importance at JMM. The concept of a Technical Review Committee was developed to ensure that the entire project team's primary objective is engineering excellence in all aspects of work. Active participation of noted staff experts who are not directly involved with the project is achieved. JMM emphasizes doing its engineering "up front". This minimizes change orders and related delays which disrupt projects. The average change order ratio for projects designed by JMM is less than 1.5 percent of construction costs versus 2.0 percent considered excellent in the profession. COST CONTROL To maintain accurate control of project costs, members of our project team utilize in-house computers to summarize and report weekly job costs to the project engineers in order to compare the quantity of work to be completed with the remaining amount of money. This,system has enabled our engineers to consistently produce high-quality work within established budgets. In addition to control of project costs, JMM has an excellent record of producing accurate cost estimates for major construction projects. This cost estimating ability would be particularly valuable in developing accurate costs for facilities required to complete this project. tABILITY TO MEET SCHEDULES James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., realizes that maintaining project schedules, deadlines, and budgets are a very important aspect to the total project concept. It is important for the consultant to have control over each phase of the project in order to eliminate unnecessary delays and resultant increased costs. JMM's project teams have recognized this need and have established a reputation for consistently completing work on or ahead of any predetermined schedule. Having completed many similar projects, wew have demonstrated that JMM. is knowledgeable in the management procedures necessary to complete the proposed projects ina timely fashion. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY Development of innovative technology necessitates maintenance of a balance between cost-saving concepts and proven reliability. The i 1-2 Executive Summary i � challenge to engineers is basically threefold: (1) to have the creativity to apply new concepts to old problems, (2) to know which new concepts are practical, and (3) to ensure that these new processes provide long-term reliable and cost-effective service to clients. Innovative technology is continually being developed by our staff engineers. This technology is shared with other members in the engineering field through published articles and presentations. 2. Design Approach and schedule for completion of the work. JMM's general philosophy is to work closely with the client during all project phases to ensure that project goals are attained through the application of sound engineering concepts in a manner which is sensitive to local needs. The project approach with a detailed schedule is presented in Section 2. JMM understands the City's time constraints with respect to taking the reservoir out of service during the minimum demands and starting work by October/November 1989. Therefore, we have carefully developed a realistic schedule that will meet this requirement. The project schedule is summarized as follows: Preliminary Design 56 days ' Final Design 81 days Bid and Award 56 days Construction 180 days 3. Ability to complete the project in a timely and consistent manner. The following list presents a number of clients for which JMlv1 has recently completed design and rehabilitation projects. We would encourage you to contact any of our clients for references for completing the projects on time. City of Ontario Mr. Jim Kinley 303 East "B" St. (10 MG Campus Avenue Civil Engineer, Ontario, CA 91764 Reservoir) Utilities (714) 391-2529 ' City of Pomona Mr. Tony Skvarek 505 S. Gary Ave. (Repairing and Manager, Water Pomona, CA 91769 Recoating of Reservoirs Department (714) 620-2231 Nos. 2 and 8) City of Riverside Mr. Fred Lantz* (818) 953-8710 (16 MG Evans Reservoir) Water System Manager, ' Burbank ' 1-3 Executive Summary City of Riverside Mr. Dan Parks* (714) 736-2438 ' (16 MG Linden Reservoir) Asst. Director of Utilities Corona Rubio Canon Land and Mr. Austin Weston (818) 797-0509 Water Association Vice President, (Canon Reservoir) Operations ' City of Santa Maria Mr. Reese N. Riddiough (805) 925-0951 (6 MG Reservoir Roof) Director of Public Works City of Torrance Mr. Robert S. O'Cain 3031 Torrance Blvd. Water Department Water System Torrance, CA 90503 ' (Rehabilitation of Superintendent (213) 618-2856 Yukon Reservoir) City of Upland Mr. Larry T. Dilley 1370 N. Benson Ave. Water Department Water Utility Upland, CA 91786 (Construction of 15th Director (714) 982-1352 and 19th St. Reservoirs) ' *Was the project manager for this project in Riverside. ' 1-4 i SECTION 2 PROJECT APPROACH JMM proposes to provide the City of Huntington Beach with engineering services for the rehabilitation of 16 MG Peck Reservoir. ' METHOD OF APPROACH Background ' A study entitled, "Peck Reservoir Evaluation" by Kenneth I. Mullen, Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated March 13, 1986 recommends that the rehabilitation work, as a minimum, will include new roof panels in some areas, repairs to the existing butyl lining, additional new roof vents, blasting and coating of metal supports, brackets, hangers, bolts, etc. Since the construction work primarily consists of rehabilitation of existing structures, it will be necessary to provide sufficient information about these structures to enable contractors to bid competitively on the work. Ideally, interested contractors will have access to the record built drawings for these existing structures. Our Approach to the Project 1 The work will consist of the following three phases: Phase I Preliminary Design Phase Il Final Detailed Design ' Phase III Services During Construction A Preliminary Design Report will be prepared upon completion of the tasks listed ' under Phase I in the Scope of Work and will cover: geotechnical investigations, structural analysis, environmental concerns, cost estimates and construction scheduling. The Final Detailed Design services in Phase II will contain drawings and specifications, bidding documents and detailed construction cost estimates. The Services During Construction to be performed by the engineer in Phase III are also listed in the Scope of Work and include review of the contractor's submittals. JMM's general philosophy is to work closely with the client during all project phases to ensure that project goals are attained through the application of sound engineering concepts in a manner which is sensitive to local needs. Progress reviews with the City will be held for review of the Preliminary Design Report (10 percent completion of design) and at 50 percent and 90 percent Final ' 2-1 Project Approach Detailed Design levels. Additional meetings will be conducted on a periodic basis to review work accomplished and apprise the City's staff of progress. SCOPE OF WORK GENERAL ' The scope of engineering services can be categorized into three phases as f ollows: ' I. Preliminary Design H. Final Design III. Services During Construction Each of the above phases is discussed in detail below. PHASE I -PRELIlMIINARY DESIGN 1. Review all existing plans, specifications and corrective recommendations detailed in an inspection report prepared by Kenneth I. Mullen, Consulting ' Engineers, Inc. dated March 13, 1986. A minimum of two (2) visits to the reservoir site to perform visual observation/examination of the reservoir interior and the underside of the roof. The interior of the facility shall be examined for general conditions, cracks, deterioration and roof corrosion. 2. Prepare a comprehensive seismic, hydro-seismic and structural analysis of the entire reservoir structure and booster pump station (roof, walls, footings, etc.) in accordance with the current uniform building code requirements and American Water Works Association guidelines. This task involves performing the necessary and required analysis to determine the structural integrity/adequacy of the reservoir in relation to current codes, seismic standards and requirements. This task shall include the following: a. Structural analysis of the reservoir and the booster pumping station under the following loading conditions: (i) The dead and superimposed loads (reservoir empty). ' (ii) The dead, superimposed and hydrostatic loading (reservoir full). (iii) Seismic loading (reservoir empty). (iv) Hydrodynamic loading (reservoir full). This analysis shall be done in accordance with the guidelines established by AWWA, UBC 1985 and JMM design criteria. 2-2 Project Approach b. After the completion of this analysis and evaluation of all the results, we shall report our findings and all pertinent conclusions and evaluations in the preliminary design report. 3. Performance of all necessary field investigations and measurements required to perform Tasks 1 and 2 above. During this task, the need for any concrete testing by coring would be established by reviewing the results of analysis completed in Task 2. If deemed necessary, the City shall engage the services of a testing laboratory to do concrete coring. We will coordinate the efforts with the City and the testing laboratory. This task will include retaining the services of a state licensed geotechnical consultant and approved by the City of Huntington Beach. The geotechnical services shall consist of the following: a. Perform core penetration tests (CPT) at specifically determined locations on the reservoir site and perform all necessary testing and soil evaluations (CPT at two (2) 1 locations). b. The geotechnical consultant shall provide the following information: (i) Allowable soil bearing pressure (ii) Active and at rest soil pressure (iii) Seismic soil pressure (iv) Ground acceleration and the site response (v) Total spectra and differential settlement (vi) Groundwater, if any (vii) Potential for liquefaction C. The geotechnical consultant shall compile all the results of his investigations and recommendations in a final report. This report shall be submitted to the City for review. 4. Formulate options and make recommendations to the City for the following: a. Complete new lining. (i) Repair of existing membrane liner and existing joints. (ii) Removal of old liner and installation of a membrane liner on top of existing surface. ' (iii) Construction of a concrete slab liner on top of existing slab. r ' 2-3 Project Approach (iv) Prepare cost estimates for each basin restoration alternative including maintenance costs over a 50-year design lif e. b. Repair and/or replacement of existing roof materials. (i) A fire resistant material such as aluminum or corrugated steel roof with a supporting system consisting of treated lumber, aluminum, or steel members on new concrete or existing steel columns. (ii) A floating roof system. (iii) Prepare cost estimates for each roof alternative including maintenance costs over a 50-year design life. C. Structural modifications required resulting from analyses described in Task 2 above. d. Modifications necessary, but not shown on the existing renovations plans. 5. Provide back-up information and assistance to City in processing environmental documents. 6. Attend a minimum of two (2) meetings with City staff during Phase I (Excluding field investigations performed). 7. Prepare a noise study of the existing booster pump station. Formulate options and make recommendations to the City on ways to reduce the level of noise that is venerated by this station. 8. Submit a preliminary design report incorporating the rseults of analysis and findings of the tasks above. It shall include: a. A brief description of the finding of the geotechnical consultant and the structural evaluation. b. Descriptions and economic analysis of alternatives for basin restoration and construction of a new roof. C. Sketches showing plan and section of each alternative. d. Recommend the most cost-effective combination of lining and 1 roof construction to the City. 2-4 ' • Project Approach PHASE II- FINAL DESIGN ' 1. Prepare final working drawings, specifications and other contract documents necessary for bidding based on decisions made in Phase L Final plans to be on City-furnished mylars with no "sticky-backs". Final plans will be property of the City. 2. Provide all structural calculations for the proposed renovation project. Coordination with the City of Huntington Beach Building Division to ensure approval by them during the permit process (City will apply for permit). 3. Cost estimate for all work in final design. 4. Provide support to the City at their request during bid advertisement. I 5. Attend a minimum of four (4) meetings with City staff during Phase II, one of which will be the pre-bid meeting. ' 6. Based on approval of preliminary drawings, specifications and cost estimate, the consultant shall provide forty (40) sets of the following: a. Final Construction Drawings b. All contract documents required for bidding. ' PHASE III - CONSTRUCTION 1. Provide construction support through weekly meetings and/or telephone calls. 2. Provide shop drawing review. (Note: Tasks 1 and 2 above will be coordinated through the City's representative.) 3. Provide one (1), acceptable to the City, reproducible set of "record" mylar drawings. ' CITY-FURNISHED SERVICES 1. Provide all available plans and pertinent information relative to the design of the facility. 2. Reasonable access to the site. 3. Provide concrete coring and compression testing of samples in wall and floor. 2-5 Project Approach 4. Preparation of a Negative Declaration or other environmental documents as required. 5. Payment of all permits or fees required by various agencies. ' PROJECT SCHEDULE A time table for completion and submittals is presented below. The work will ' commence within three days of receipt of the City's written notice to proceed. Six copies of the Preliminary Design Report will be furnished for the City's review and approval, prior to the beginning of the design phase. Five copies of the preliminary plans will be furnished at the 10 percent level and at the 50 percent level for the City's review. Five copies of the preliminary plans and specifications will be submitted at the 90 percent level for the City's review and comment. The following activity schedule will be used as the basis for completion of the project. SCHEDULE Proposals Submitted December 21, 1988 Notice to Proceed January 23, 1989 Complete Draft of Preliminary Design Report (Phase n :'March 6, 1989 City Review of Complete Draft March 13, 1989 Submit Final Design Report March 20, 1989 Final Design (Phase II 50% Complete May 1, 1989 City Review May 8, 1989 Final Design (Phase II 90% Complete May 26, 1989 City Review June 5, 1989 Final Design 100% Complete June 30, 1989 Advertise for Bids July 10, 1989 Open Bids August 14, 1989 Award Construction Contract September 4, 1989 Pre-Construction ,'Meeting October 2, 1989 Construction Begins October 16, 1989 ' 2-6 r SECTION 3 PROJECT TEAM It is the policy of JM;vI to staff all projects from our own organization of experienced engineers. Staffing for this project will be assigned out of our Southwest Regional Office and Corporate Headquarters in Pasadena and supplemented by our local Irvine Office. This office has over 250 individuals, 85 of whom are registered professional engineers. All projects are carried out utilizing a team approach with close coordination maintained at all times between the client and the team. The project team has been selected to provide professional engineering and design services combined with proven experience. JMM has used this type of approach on all of its projects in recent years and has found it to be an effective means of achieving the excellence for which the firm strives. The following portions of this section present the capabilities and expertise of the team selected for this project. A project organization chart showing the qualifications of key project team members is presented. Complete biographical data indicating educational and experience qualifications for each of the team members are included at the end of this section. PROJECT MANAGER Due to the importance of this position, JMM has selected an experienced, highly qualified engineer to fill the position of Project Manager for this project. In this capacity he will hold full project responsibility and authority and will serve as principal contact between the City of Huntington Beach and project team members. Mr. Ashok K. Dhingra, a Vice President of JMM and Manager of the Water Department, would serve as Project Manager and would be responsible for the ' overall technical management of the project. He would also be responsible for project staffing, budget and schedule control, and adhering to the terms and conditions of the project. Mr. Dhingra is a registered Civil and Structural Engineer and has over 20 years of experience in structural analysis, water system design, and project management. He has been responsible for or involved in the design of over 50 water storage reservoirs and numerous pipeline and pumping station facilities. PROJECT ENGINEER Mr. David A. Mosher, Principal Engineer, would serve as Project Engineer and would be responsible for design, coordination, and the day-to-day activities of the project. Mr. Mosher, a Professional Engineer has over over 16 years of experience in project engineering, design and construction monitoring of water and wastewater projects. Mr. Mosher has recently completed construction project management of an 18.7 million gallon reservoir for the City of Torrance. He has also recently managed the construction for the 1.93 MG Summit 3-1 Project Team Reservoir No. 2 in Laguna Beach and for the 2 MG Reservoir at Lenain Filtration ' Plant in Anaheim Hills. Mr. Mosher has worked with JMM as resident and project engineer for several pipelines, pump stations and a wastewater treatment plant. ' DESIGN DISCIPLINES The project team for this project will also include a group of highly experienced ' design engineers and professionals. Mr. Osamu E. Abdel-Aal would be responsible for structural design, Dr. Janet L. Fahey for environmental issues, Mr. William T. McGivney for construction cost estimates, and Mr. A. Lee ' Ramage for surveying. TECffidICAL REVIEW COM?�iITTEE ' To ensure that JMM's extensive experience is focused on this project, the Technical Review Committee would review the project following the preliminary layout stage, the preliminary design stage and completion of the final design. ' The Technical Review Committee is composed of three of JMM's most experienced technical experts who are not involved in the project on a day-to- day basis. The expert's function is to provide an outside, truly objective view of all of the significant aspects of the project. The Technical Review Committee ensures that quality control of all JMM projects and is the City's insurance that their investment results in a efficient and cost-effective project. ' Philip Gatsoulis Mr. Gatsoulis, a JMM Senior Vice President, has over 29 years of experience in civil and structural engineering with primary involvement in the investigation, study and design of water storage reservoirs, pipelines, treatment plants, pumping stations and the preparation of master plans. He has an extensive background in administration, and direction of engineering personnel in development, planning and design of water works projects. He has supervised field personnel for numerous hydraulic structures and major water pipelines and served on numerous international assignments. ' Mr. Gatsoulis is currently the Group Manager of JMM's Southwest Region and Discipline Director of Water Retaining Structures and Structural Engineering. In ' addition, he is responsible for conceptual and technical design reviews of hydraulic structures, major pipelines and special projects. ' Kenneth G. Ferguson Mr. Ferguson, a Vice President of JMM, is currently the Chief Engineer for the Southwest Region and has 25 years of experience in civil and sanitary ' engineering with primary involvement in water treatment, storage and distribution. His background includes project engineering and management for domestic and overseas water treatment, water storage and water transmission and distribution systems. He also has public agency experience with the California Water Quality Control Board. Mr. Ferguson's recent waterworks experience includes serving as Technical Advisor for the 120 mgd expansion of ' the Jordan Valley Water Purification Plant, expansion and rehabilitation of the ' 3-2 Project Team Pasco Water Treatment Plant, the design of 16 mgd Highlands Ranch Water Treatment Plant, and the expansion of the 7.5 mgd Canyon Filtration Plant. Mr. Ferguson was the Technical Director for the study and design of the Eklutna Water Project involving 30 miles of pipe, a 70 mgd water treatment plant and other appurtenant facilities for the Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska, and for the 640 mgd Pantay Water Treatment Plant to serve the City of Manila, Philippines, and the study and design of rehabilitation of the 200 mgd Bull Run headworks and treatment facilities for the City of Portland, Oregon. ' R. Dewey Dickson Mr. Dickson has over 33 years of experience in civil engineering management and development of design concepts with primary involvement in water works and water resources projects. He currently holds the position of JMM's Corporate ' Chief Engineer. His background is extensive in feasibility investigations, master planning, and design analyses of water supply and distribution systems. He has been involved with feasibility studies, conceptual design, preparation of plans and specifications and construction monitoring for most of the large-diameter ' pipeline projects designed by the firm. He has been a leader in the AIA/CEAC sponsored Value Engineering Workshop and is a qualified value engineering analyst. Mr. Dickson is also a member of the AWWA Standards Council and ' Chairman of the AWWA Standards Committee on steel pipe. SUMMARY The JMM team represents a highly qualified group of engineers who will ensure the efficient design and construction of the City of Huntington Beach reservoir within established time and budget constraints. Detailed biodata for all of the project team are included at the end of this section. 1 3-3 PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES: PROJECT MANAGER NAME: Ashok K. Dhingra EDUCATION: M.S., Sanitary Engineering, Loyola University, Los Angeles M.S., Structural Engineering, California State University, Los Angeles B.S., Civil Engineering, Punjab Engineering College, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Structural Engineer in California EXPERIENCE SUMMARY: . Mr. Dhingra has over twenty years of experience in the structural analysis, design and project engineering of a variety of structures. His responsibilities as a project manager/engineer have included the preliminary and detailed design of various hydraulic structures and over 50 concrete reservoirs and numerous rehabilitation projects. Also responsible for bid analysis, administration of ' construction contract, shop drawing review and supervision of resident engineer during construction. He serves as a member on the American Concrete Institutes Committees for Sanitary Engineering Structures, Rehabilitation of Concrete Structures and also on Circular Prestressed Concrete Structures. He has been extensively involved in rehabilitation projects in California for cities of Riverside, Torrance, Upland, Santa Maria and also with a number of seismic analysis studies. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE: o City of Riverside, California PROJECT MANAGER/ENGINEER responsible for the technical design of the rehabilitation of the 16 million gallon Linden Reservoir. The work involved stability analysis of the embankment and lining of the reservoir. He was also the project manager for another similar project, rehabilitation of the 16 MG Evans Reservoir. Also responsible for bid analysis, support services during construction, shop drawing review, periodic monitoring during construction, final and warranty inspection. o City of Santa Maria, California PROJECT MANAGER for the crack repair, joint sealant, and beam seat pocket repairs of a 6 MG reservoir. Also responsible for the seismic analysis and roof replacement of the reservoir. o City of Redlands, California ' STRUCTURAL DESIGN ENGINEER responsible for the design of the 10 MG Highland Avenue Reservoir. Also responsible for structural analysis carried by STRUDL Computer Program. This reservoir required special seismic considerations because of close proximity to L earthquake faults. Also responsible for construction contract administration and services during construction. PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES: PROJECT ENGINEER NAME: David A. Mosher EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Michigan B.S., Engineering, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Deputy Building Inspector, Reinforced Concrete, City of Los Angeles EXPERIENCE SUMMARY: Mr. Mosher has over 16 years of experience both locally and overseas in planning, design, resident engineering, and construction of domestic water supply facilities such as transmission pipelines, pumping stations, water storage reservoirs and treatment plants. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE: o Laguna Reach County Water District, California RESIDENT ENGINEER for the construction of the 1.9 MG partially buried reinforced concrete Summit Reservoir No. 2. The space- restricted site required special considerations for footings, grading and landscaping. The structure utilized colored concrete for architectural aesthetic rendering. o City of Anaheim, California RESIDENT ENGINEER for the construction of the 2 MG buried reinforced concrete reservoir near the existing Lenain Filtration Plant. The work included sheeting and shoring near the existing facility, installation of pipelines in casings by borings and modifications to the telemetry system. o City of Torrance, California RESIDENT ENGINEER for the construction of the 18.7 MG buried reinforced concrete Ben Haggott Reservoir adjacent to the existing 10 MG Walteria Reservoir. The work included slope reconstruction, installation of transmission mains, modifications to a pump station, and construction of recreation facilities. o City of Alhambra, California Presently PROJECT ENGINEER for the design of the rehabilitation of the 5 MG Kewen Reservoir. The project involves structure modifications, a new aluminum roof, relining the concrete bottom and sloping sides, a transmission main and site improvements. o City of San Fernando, California Presently PROJECT MANAGER for the construction management of a 2.5 MG partially buried reinforced concrete reservoir. The work also includes over 11,000 feet of transmission mains and a new booster station. Also PROJECT ENGINEER for the design and CMS for the repair and rehabilitation of Reservoir No. 2 project, for which a description is included under the Related Experience Section. PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES: STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS NAME: Osama Abdel-Aal EDUCATION: M.S., Structural Engineering, City University, London, England B.S., Civil Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Civil Engineerin California, Egypt, and England ' EXPERIENCE SUMMARY: Mr. Abdel-Aal has over 16 years of experience in civil and structural engineering with primary emphasis on civil-structural design and project engineering of water and wastewater treatment plants, pumping stations, reinforced concrete reservoirs, steel storage tanks, pipelines and major hydraulic structures. His background also includes extensive design experience in heavy reinforced concrete and steel structures, rigid and flexible tunnels, ventilation buildings, cut-and-covr concrete structures, and underground stations for mass transit systems. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE: o City of North Las Vegas, Nevada As PRINCIPAL ENGINEER, Mr. Abdel-Aal served as PROJECT MANAGER for the structural design of a 20 million gallon reinforced concrete reservoir. In this capacity, he was responsible for the structural design effort. These tasks included project scheduling, supervising and reviewing work by the design team, preparation of cost estimates, and coordination between disciplines. o Southern California Water Company, California STRUCTURAL ENGINEER responsible for the construction of the Yukon precast prestressed concrete reservoir. He participated in the study and preparation of structural engineering designs for the reservoir. The design experience included: design of the reservoir concrete sections such as roof, wall, floor and column structures; checking of the working drawings; and structural engineering construction management services. o City of Upland, California Presently, Mr. Abdel-Aal is serving as STRUCTURAL ENGINEER for the construction management services during construction of a 5.0 MG and 5.5 MG prestressed concrete reservoirs. Mr. Abdel-Aal prepared the performance and detail structural specifications for the two reservoirs and is responsible for CMS structural engineering review. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH r PROJECT MANAGER TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ASHOK K. DHINGRA PHILIP GATSOULIS CHAIRMAN ' KENNETH G. FERGUSON R. DEWEY DICKSON PROJECT ENGINEER DAVID A. MOSHER HYPALON/BUTYL LINING GEOTECHNICAL GLOBE CONSULTING GEOFON SERVICES r DESIGN SUPPORT SERVICES STRUCTURAL OSAMA E. ABDEL-AaL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES JANET L. FAHEY SURVEYING A. LEE RAMAGE COST ESTIMATES WILLIAM T. McGIVNEY r PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART ASHOK K. DHINGRA VICE PRESIDENT EDUCATION: M.S., Environmental Engineering, Loyola University, Los Angeles M.S., Structural Engineering, California State University, Los Angeles B.S., Civil Engineering, Punjab Engineering College, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Structural Engineer in California SUMMARY: Mr. Dhingra has over twenty years of experience in the structural analysis, design, project engineering and project management of a variety of projects including water pipelines, pumping stations and reservoirs. His responsibilities have included the design of various hydraulic structures such as filters, clarifiers and sedimentation basins for water and wastewater treatment plants and over 50 concrete reservoirs and over 15 steel tanks. Responsibilities have included conducting economic analysis, cost studies using different types of framing systems, and alternatives considering different materials for preliminary design reports for various reservoir and pumping station projects. As a project engineer/manager, he has been responsible for various projects with the inception of the 1 project from preliminary design through the construction phase for new construction as well as rehabilitation work. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Manager of Water Department: Mr. Dhingra has served progressively as senior structural design engineer, project engineer, manager of Reservoirs and Structures Division and presently as manager of Water Department. In this capacity he is responsible for the supervision of project engineers for planning, water system analysis, design of pipelines, pumping stations and reservoir projects and provides technical direction and control during design and construction of the projects. Project Manager: As a project manager, Mr. Dhingra has been involved in many pipeline, pumping stations and reservoir projects. Concrete reservoir experience includes reservoirs ranging in capacity from 1 MG to 50 MG capacity consisting of circular, rectangular or square shapes with different types of roof framing systems. He has been in responsible charge of projects for the Cities of Torrance, Riverside, Montebello, Corona, Santa Maria, Anaheim and for Las Vegas Valley Water District, Yorba Linda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, Irvine Ranch Water District amongst others. Steel tank experience includes design and rehabilitation of steel tanks ranging in size from 1 MG to 5 MG and with different coating systems. Pumping station designs have included vertical turbine pumps, horizontal split case puxnps with electric driven or natural gas driven motors. Project Engineer: His responsibilities have included contract administration during construction, regular visits to the project sites and finding innovative solutions to complex structural problems encountered in the field due to change in site conditions or through lack of interdisciplinary coordination among the subcontractors. Structural Engineer: He was responsible for the seismic safety study for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory water system. He was also responsible for the structural analysis to verify conformance to current seismic design criteria and rehabilitation of an existing ASHOK K. DHINGRA (CONTINUED) VICE PRESIDENT 5 MG reservoir for the City of La Habra and an existing 6 MG reservoir for the City of Santa Maria. He has conducted numerous studies on alternative shapes, sizes, siting and framing systems for the reservoirs. He was responsible for developing standard designs of various reservoir capacities for Local Water Utilities Administration, Philippines and for developing a structural design manual (computer applications) for JMM. CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FI IM IN ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Project Engineer: Involved in the structural design and analysis for industrial and commercial buildings, primarily of tilt-up construction, including cost studies using different systems of framing. Responsibilities included field supervision, standardization of typical details and developing a library of programs for a desk calculator. Completed design projects include a seven-story ductile frame concrete building and a three-story concrete building for a school. Computer experience involved setting up the problem and loading conditions for STRUDL package program. CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FIRM IN PASADENA, CALIFORNIA Project Engineer: Mr. Dhingra participated in the conceptual and detailed design of various types of structures including commercial buildings, schools, church buildings, multi-story structures, trusses, transmission towers, tower cranes, and underground utility vaults. For complex structures, the stress analysis was performed by setting up the problem and loading conditions for data processing on an in-house IBM 1130 computing system using the STRESS package program. Responsibilities also included the development of an in-house library of programs and assisting the programmers in developing, refining and verifying the programs. Studies included research and development projects for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development using fiberglass construction for housing, optimization studies for an array of transmission towers for a major southern California utility company, transmission tower line for optimum broken cable loads for a Florida utility company, aesthetic towers and standardization of various underground utility vaults. AIRCRAFT COMPANY IN BURBANK, CALIFORNIA Design Engineer: Mr. Dhingra participated in the conceptual design of aircraft interior equipment for use in the Boeing 747, including food service equipment components and structural accommodations to fit within the given aircraft envelope, using honeycomb panels, fiberglass laminates, polyplastics, and sheet metal. MANUFACTURING FIRM IN HUNTINGTON PARK, CALIFORNIA Junior Engineer: Involved in the design of mechanical actuating components including linear actuators, hydraulic pumps and valves. His responsibilities included stress, fluid flow, and weight calculations used in the conceptual and final design. ORGANIZATION: American Concrete Institute Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Seismological Society of America Structural Engineers Association of Southern California COMMITTEES: Member ACI Committee 350 - Environmental Engineering a g Structures Member ACI Committee 344 - Circular Prestressed Concrete Structures Member ACI Committee 364 - Rehabilitation DAVID A. MOSHER EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Michigan B.S., Engineering, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Deputy Building Inspector, Reinforced Concrete, City of Los Angeles SUMMARY: Mr. Mosher has over 15 years of experience both locally and overseas in planning, design, and construction of domestic water supply and wastewater facilities such as pumping stations, treatment plants, transmission pipelines, and water storage reservoirs. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Resident Engineer: Mr. Mosher was the resident engineer for construction of an 18.7 million gallon buried reinforced concrete reservoir. Associated with this project were modifications to a pumping station to convert from natural gas to electric driven pumps. Also included in the project were several pipelines and extensive slope earthwork operations on a restricted site. This was a mixed use project providing recreational facilities including soccer field, tennis courts and clubhouse. He was resident engineer for the construction of an expansion and upgrading of an existing wastewater treatment plant to increase its capacity from 11.0 mgd to 16.5 mgd. Included in the project were additions or modifications to pumping stations, headworks, laboratory, aeration basins, primary and secondary clarifiers, primary and secondary digesters, a filter press system, odor control facility, and an energy recovery system. The work involved the installation of 69 new pumps in the various pumping stations. Mr. Mosher was resident engineer for the construction of other reinforced concrete reservoirs including a 1.9 million gallon partially buried reservoir and a 2 million gallon buried reservoir. The later two reservoirs were both built on space-restricted sites that required special considerations for footings, sheeting and shoring near adjacent facilities, grading and landscaping. He has also worked on site as the resident engineer for the construction of large diameter water transmission pipelines. The work involved construc- tion of over 7 miles of 42-inch, 36-inch, 30-inch, 27-inch, and 16-inch diameter pipeline using reinforced plastic mortar pipe and cement mortar lined and coated steel pipe. This construction project required particularly close inspection as all the pipe being installed was to replace a recently constructed pipeline that had been abandoned because of multiple severe failures. CARE, INC., NEW YORK9 OVERSEAS BRANCH Civil Engineering Consultant: Mr. Mosher was posted to Kenya and worked as engineering manager in CARE's water development program. He was responsible for writing and evaluating proposals for materials procurement and delivery to over 90 domestic water supply construction projects involving storage reservoirs, pumping stations and treatment plants. Working closely with the Government of Kenya, Mr. Mosher assisted with DAVID A. MOSHER (CONTINUED) planning, design, and construction coordination of water supply systems covering a variety of terrain and climates and utilizing various water sources including springs, rivers, lakes, dams, wells, and rain water catchments. He initiated a program for the installation of low-cost water filtration systems for rural water supplies. U.S. PEACE CORPS, M USTRY OF WATER DEVELOPMENT, KENYA Project Engineer: Mr. Mosher worked as construction manager in the Government of Kenya's rural water supply construction program. He supervised construction of domestic water supply facilities including roads, bridges, intake works, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and treatment plants. ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association R. DEWEY DICKSON EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT EDUCATION: B.E., Civil Engineering, University of Southern California REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Professional Engineer in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Nevada, South Dakota and Virginia Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers SUMMARY: Mr. Dickson has extensive experience in civil engineering management and development of design concepts with primary involvement in water works and water resources projects. Background is extensive in feasibility investigations, master planning, and design analyses of water supply and distribution systems. He has been involved with feasibility studies, conceptual design, preparation of plans and specifications and construction monitoring for most of the large-diameter pipeline projects designed by the firm. Mr. Dickson has also been ultimately involved in the design of numerous pumping stations, reservoirs and water treatment plants. He has been a leader in the AIA/CEAC sponsored Value Engineering Workshop and is a qualified value engineering analyst. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Mr. Dickson is executive vice president and chief engineering officer, and director of the firm. Since joining the firm in 1953, he has served progressively as design engineer, project engineer, office engineer, senior project engineer, head of the Water and Wastewater Engineering Department, and is presently in charge of corporate engineering. In the latter role, Mr. Dickson's primary responsibility is to maintain the firm's Engineering Excellence program. Mr. Dickson has served in various roles as project �. engineer, project manager and principal-in-charge for major transmission pipeline projects such as Las Vegas Valley Water District, San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, and the cities of Beverly Hills, Monrovia, and Pombna. As a member of the Standards Council and chairman of the Steel Pipe Committee of the American Water Works Association, he has gained broad knowledge of all types of piping materials and construction methods which have proven to be most cost- effective to the owners. As a principal engineer and senior company officer, he has been in charge of design of multimillion-dollar water works and water resources projects and has prepared feasibility studies and master plans for numerous municipalities, public agencies, and private water companies. CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN PASADENA, CALIFORNIA Design Engineer: Mr. Dickson's major function was the supervision of engineering design and drafting for various projects involving site layouts, roads, airports, storm drainage, water supply and distribution, wastewater collection systems, and liquid waste treatment and disposal. He was in charge of the civil engineering phase of design and preparation of construction drawings for a 15,000-man Marine Corps Base in California. R. DEWEY DICKSON (CONTINUED) EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT ORGANIZATIONS: American Academy of Environmental Engineers American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association American Public Works Association International Water Supply Association Chi Epsilon Scapa Praetor (University of Southern California School of Public Administration) David M. Wilson Associates (University of Southern California School of Engineering) COMMMTEES: Chairman, AWWA Standards Committee on Steel Pipe Vice Chairman of AWWA Standards Council PUBLICATIONS: "Z5 mg Capacity Reservoir Roof Provides Parking Area," Western Construction, July 1961. "Reservoir Roofs," paper presented at Orange County 'Water Association Meeting, February 1966. "Water Facilities Aesthetics - A Consulting Engineer's Viewpoint," Journal, AWWA, February 1966. "A Consulting Engineer's Viewpoint," Journal, AWWA, February 1968. "The Biggest in the West - Las Vegas Won't Gamble on Water Supply," The American City, June 1968. "Gas Engines Power Giant Water Booster Station," Water & Sewage Works, July 1968. "Huge Booster Station is Gas Fueled," Consulting Engineer, August 1969. "Giant Self-Contained Gas Engine Powered Pumping Station Nearing Completion," Consulting Engineer, 1969. "Consulting Engineer's Building Tailored to Needs," Consulting Engineer, April 1971. "Devil Canyon-Azusa Pipeline - Design Innovations," R. Dewey Dickson, S.J: Abrera, Junn-Ling Chao, Norbert Schneider; Journal, ASCE, January 1974. "Las Vegas Valley Water District Builds Largest Gas Engine-Driven Water Booster Station." 1 DR. JANET FAHEY EDUCATION: D. Env., Environmental Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles M.A., Biology, University of California, Los Angeles B.A., Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California and Arizona SUMMARY: Dr. Fahey has over 13 years of experience, both domestic and overseas, in the areas of wastewater and water supply facilities planning, wastewater reclamation and environmental analysis. Her background includes evaluation of environmental impacts relative to water treatment and storage, wastewater collection, treatment and disposal, shoreline development, wastewater reclamation, revegetation and aquaculture. She also has experience in field and laboratory analysis of water quantity, quality and biota, as well as in field instruction at the university level. Dr. Fahey currently heads the environmental group at JMM's Pasadena headquarters. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Principal Environmental Scientist: Since joining JMM in 1976, Dr. Fahey has prepared or directed many of the firm's environmental impact reports and studies relating to waste treatment and disposal and water supply, and performed numerous water quality studies on marine, fresh water and ground water systems. Dr. Fahey currently heads the environmental group at JMM's Pasadena headquarters. She is thoroughly familiar with both state and federal environmental regulations and guidelines pertaining to environmental documents, public participation in the environmental review process, endangered species, water and air quality, and historical and cultural resources. Her experience includes numerous assessments of potential impacts of wastewater discharges on receiving water flows, quality and biota in Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside, Imperial, San Diego and Los Angeles Counties. Dr. Fahey recently prepared the environmental assessment of river treatment and diversion and access restriction alternatives to abate pollution and public health hazards from the New River in Imperial County, considered the most polluted river in California. Dr. Fahey acted as project manager on the Mittry Lake Wildlife Area Revegetation Project for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Soil, water and biological studies of the 300-acre site culminated in the design and construction of a state-of-the-art drip irrigation system for over 6,000 native trees and shrubs planted along the Colorado River northeast of Yuma, Arizona. Dr. Fahey recently acted as project engineer on the EIR for the Malibu Wastewater Facilities Plan, a major study of provision of a regional sewage collection, treatment and disposal system to replace failing septic tank systems. Critical issues evaluated included public health hazard, traffic, growth inducement, archaeology, riparian and nearshore marine habitat protection, noise, recreational use and quality of life. For this controversial project, Dr. Fahey arranged and conducted nine public meetings in Malibu, and coordinated with all responsible federal, state, regional and local public agencies plus more than 55 active homeowners associations. DR. JANET FAHEY (CONTINUED) Environmental studies include a water quality study for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, in which Dr. Fahey analyzed existing algae and midge fly problems and control alternatives for the San Joaquin Reservoir, an open drinking water reservoir source for potable water. She also assessed the expected impacts on taste and odor of blending waters from two sources for the North Texas Municipal Water District. Dr. Fahey has been responsible for environmental studies of the impacts of effluent collection, treatment and disposal facilities on a regional as well as an individual treatment plant basis. In federal Environmental Impact Statements/Assessments for four Puget Sound discharge treatment plants in the Metropolitan Seattle area, Dr. Fahey ' evaluated the impacts of a variety of alternative wastewater management plans with particular emphasis on effects of effluent discharge and combined sewer overflows on Puget Sound and regional lakes and rivers. Dr. Fahey acted as assistant project engineer on the Environmental Assessment of the Dallas-Fort Worth Areawide Water Quality Management (Section 208) Plan. On the Orange and Los Angeles Counties Water Reuse Study, Dr. Fahey acted as assistant project engineer, directing efforts to characterize the magnitude, location, type and constraints of potential uses of reclaimed wastewater in urban Los Angeles and Orange Counties. This pioneering study involved potential reclaimed water service areas for ten major wastewater treatment facilities in which over 500 potential industrial and landscape irrigation uses were identified, and determination of the feasibility of reclaimed water distribution systems. She also acted as project engineer on the design of improvements to wastewater treatment, disposal and reclamation facilities for the California Institution for Men at Chino, a facility of the California Department of Corrections. Dr. Fahey was also heavily involved in preparation and editing of the recent EIR for Chino Basin Ground Water Storage Project, a major conjunctive use project proposed for southern California. On an overseas assignment, Dr. Fahey evaluated physical, biological and human resources impacts, with emphasis on ground and surface water quantity and quality, public health and wastewater reuse potential, of proposed improvements to water supply and wastewater management and drainage facilities for Madaba, Karak, Tafila and Ma'an, four cities in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. In eastern Sudan, she evaluated a full range of impacts of additional ground and surface water supply development for Gedaref Town and neighboring Ethiopian refugee settlements. On Antigua, W.I., Dr. Fahey prepared an environmental assessment of ground and surface water development on water use patterns, public health, existing septic tank disposal systems, tourism and endangered species. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES Graduate Research: Dr. Fahey investigated the effects of suburban development and recreational use on the water quality of the Bishop Creek Drainage in the Sierra Nevada Range, Inyo County, California. The study included field sampling, data processing and data interpretation which culminated in the formulation of land and water use policy recommendations. Another investigation involved the institutional and water quality aspects of hydroponics and aquaculture projects using reclaimed wastewater. • 0 DR. JANET FAHEY (CONTINUED) FRIDAY HARBOR LABORATORIES, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Dr. Fahey evaluated the feasibility and potential impacts of a major shoreline planned unit development and salmon hatchery proposed for San Juan Island, Washington. Field sampling and literature reviews were used to evaluate physical, biological and human environmental settings and impacts, with special reference to recreational use, aqua- culture potential, marine and stream water quality planning. iREGIONAL WATER QIIALTTY CONTROL BOARD, LOS ANGELES REGION (4) Graduate Student Assistant: Dr. Fahey prepared an evaluation of the present and projected discharges to surface and ocean waters of the Region. She participated in activities of the Board's Environmental Group, including field sampling and laboratory evaluation of water quality. Dr. Fahey has also acted as field instructor for courses in southern California ecology, Hawaiian natural history and general oceanography, the last on board the oceanographic vessel R/V Vantuna. PUBLISHED REPORTS: Fahey, J., Perrine, R.L. and Dracup, J. (eds), "Waste Nutrient Recycling Using Hydroponic and Aquacultural Methods," Environmental Science and Engineering, UCLA, 1975 (editor and contributor). Kawaratani, R.K. and Perrine, R.L. (eds), "Wilderness Water Quality: Bishop Creek Baseline Study, 1974," Environmental Science and Engineering, UCLA 1975 (contributor). ORGANIZATIONS: American Association for the Advancement of Science American Chemical Society Association of Environmental Professionals American Society of Professional Ecologists Environmental Science and Engineering Society Water Pollution Control Federation r KENNETH G. FERGUSON VICE PRESIDENT ' EDUCATION: M.S. Sanitary Engineering,'neering, Washington State University B.S., Civil Engineering, Washington State University REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer in Oregon Civil Engineer in Washington and California Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers SUMMARY: Mr. Ferguson has 25 years of experience in civil and sanitary engineering with primary involvement in water treatment, storage, and distribution. His background includes project engineering and management for domestic and overseas water treatment, water storage, and water transmission and distribution systems. He also has public agency experience with the California Water Quality Control Board. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. Mr. Ferguson has been employed by JMM for over 20 years and is currently serving as Chief Engineer for the firm's Southwest Region. ' Mr. Ferguson's recent waterworks experience includes serving as: • Technical Advisor for the 120 mgd expansion of the Jordan Valley Water Purification Plant, expansion and rehabilitation of the Pasco Water Treatment Plant, the design of the 16 mgd Highlands Ranch Water Treatment Plant and the expansion of the 7.5 mgd Canyon Filtration Plant. • Technical Director for the study and design of the Eklutna Water Project involving 30 miles of pipe, a 70 mgd water treatment plant and other appur- tenant facilities for the Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska; and.for the 640 mgd Pantay Water Treatment Plant to serve the City of Manila, Philippines; and the study and design of rehabilitation of the 200 mgd Bull Run headworks and treatment facilities for the City of Portland, Oregon. • Project Manager and/or Project Engineer for the study and design of the 100 MG Salt Lake County Terminal Reservoir; the 32 MG Eastside Reservoir for the City of Seattle; the City of Portland's 10,000 foot 60-inch-diameter Phase IV of the Washington County Supply Line and 200 mgd Bull Run Fluoridation Facilities; and the study, design and construction services for the City of Portland's 50 MG Powell Butte Reservoir and the City of Everett's Reservoir No. 6 project including 20 MG of storage and a 22 mgd pumping station. 1 In addition, Mr. Ferguson served as project engineer for the rehabilitation of a major water treatment plant and the design of a new 400 mgd plant for Manila, Philippines. As project manager on a general consulting services contract in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Mr. Ferguson was responsible for design supervision of the 750 mgd Guarau Water Treatment Plant; construction supervision of the treatment plant, and 50 kilometers of transmission KENNETH G. FERGUSON (CONTINUED) VICE PRESIDENT pipeline ranging from 30 to 84 inches in diameter; training of plant operators; rehabilitation design of eight existing treatment plants; and advisory services on telemetering, mechanical maintenance, and water system operation. He has also served as project engineer and assistant project engineer on several projects including the design of a 37.5 mgd water filtration plant for the City of Escondido; the design of a 2.5 MG and a 13.0 MG reservoir and an 18 mgd water filtration plant for the San Dieguito Irrigation District; and the design of various water transmission main projects. CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN OXNARD, CALIFORNIA Project Engineer: Mr. Ferguson was responsible for project and resident engineering on enlargement of a waste treatment plant; modifications of existing sewer force main system, wastewater collection system, and water distribution system; design of several water transmission mains and water treatment facilities; and preparation of feasibility studies for water and wastewater projects. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COASTAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD Sanitary Engineer: Mr. Ferguson was responsible for administering self-monitoring programs for all waste discharges on the central coast, inspection of waste treatment plants and investigation of alleged pollution of fresh and salt waters. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Research Assistant: Mr. Ferguson worked on the investigation of adequacy of water distribution systems, membrane filter techniques in comparison to the MPN test, and domestic waste treatment by oxidation ponds. ORGANIZATIONS: American Academy of Environmental Engineers American Water Works Association Tau Beta Pi Phi Kappa Phi i i 1 . PHH" GATSOULIS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT EDUCATION: M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Texas B.S., Civil Engineering, Robert College, Istanbul, Turkey REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California and Oregon Structural Engineer in California, Nevada and Oregon Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers SUMMARY: Mr. Gatsoulis has over 28 years of experience in civil and structural engineering and project management with primary involvement in the investigation, study, and design of water storage reservoirs, pipelines, treatment plants, pumping stations, and the preparation of master plans. He has an extensive background in administration, and direction of engineering personnel in development, planning and design of water works projects. He has supervised field personnel for numerous hydraulic structures and major pipelines, water and wastewater collection projects, and master planning. In addition to water works engineering, he has been responsible for structural design and planning of bridges, commercial buildings, industrial plants, military installations, and recreational park developments. EXPERIENCE: ' JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Mr. Gatsoulis is Discipline Director of hydraulic structures. As Discipline Director, he is responsible, company-wide, for conceptual and technical design reviews of hydraulic structures, major pipelines and special projects. Project Manager: He has participated in the design of several water storage reservoirs and reservoir covers including the 32 mg Seattle Eastside Reservoir. He was structural engineering manager for the EPCOT (Experimental Prototype ' City of Tomorrow) Seas Pavilion in Walt Disney World, Florida. He has participated in special studies and investigations on pipeline failures, foundation repairs and structural integrity. Project Engineer: Experience includes the design of a 64.5-million-gallon buried reinforced concrete reservoir for East Bay Municipal Water District, a reservoir and pumping station for the city of Monrovia, California, and other reservoirs for ' the cities of Pomona, Beverly Hills and Redlands, California; and a 60-million- gallon reservoir and pumping station for the City of San Francisco. He was involved in the design of a reinforced concrete bridge to the San Antonio- Calaveras water treatment plant in San Francisco and for numerous reservoirs, buried or partially buried, with multi-purpose utilization of the roof area. PHU" GATSOULIS (CONTINUED) SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Structural Engineer: Mr. Gatsoulis' experience includes potential seismic and dynamic force analyses for earthquake resistant design of major liquid retaining structures and buildings. Earthquake resistant designs for which Mr. Gatsoulis was responsible were the multi-purpose-use buried reinforced concrete Greystone and Dunsmuir reservoirs, the access bridge across the Arroyo Seco to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, and numerous other facilities. International Assignments: Assignments include Brazil, the Philippines, Australia and Indonesia, either as a project engineer or for technical review on water treatment and distribution projects. CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN LOS ANGELES Structural Designer: Mr. Gatsoulis was directly involved with the structural design and planning supervision of pulp mills, industrial plants and the Matterhorn Mountain in Disneyland, California. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION FIRMS IN LOS ANGELES ' Structural Designer: Work involved designs for chemical process plants, support facility buildings, aircraft hangars, petrochemical facilities and an atomic reactor facility for the Atomic Energy Commission, presently the Department of Energy (DOE). Assistant Engineer: Mr. Gatsoulis participated in the design and preparation of structural plans for substation equipment support structures, a steam plant, and miscellaneous other structures. ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers American Concrete Institute American Water Works Association Structural Engineers Association of Southern California American Academy of Environmental Engineers 0 OSAMA ABDEL-AAL EDUCATION: Engineering Management Program, California Institute of Technology, expected completion, late 1988 M.S., Structural Engineering, City University, London, England B.S., Civil Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California, Egypt, and England SUMMARY: Mr. Abdel-Aal has over 16 years of experience in civil and structural engineering with leading consulting engineering firms. This experience has covered all aspects of project design management, project engineering and structural design, specifications, construction documents preparation, construction management, and job site inspections. The primary emphasis of this experience has been the civil-structural design and project engineering of water and wastewater treatment plants, pumping stations, reinforced concrete reservoirs, steel storage tanks, pipelines and major hydraulic structures. Mr. Abdel-Aal's background also includes extensive design experience in heavy reinforced concrete and steel structures, rigid and flexible 1 tunnels, ventilation buildings, cut-and-cover concrete structures, and underground stations for mass transit systems. In addition, Mr. Abdel-Aal has performed structural design of airport facilities, industrial, educational and recreational projects, along with construction management and supervision, construction scheduling, reviewing contractor and subcontractor work, and acting as liaison between contractors and clients. ' EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULT]NG ENGINEERS, INC. As Principal Engineer in the firm's structural division, Mr. Abdel-Aal has served as project design manager and structural project engineer responsible for the design of various water and wastewater treatment plants, operations and administration buildings, and architectural and industrial projects. In this capacity he has been responsible for the design effort, budget preparation, manpower requirements, scheduling, supervising, reviewing and coordinating various disciplines, specifications and contract documents. ' Mr. Abdel-Aal's previous experience with the firm was in the capacity of supervising structural project engineer. He was responsible for the structural design of water and wastewater treatment plants including responsibility for specifications, preparation of contract documents, and job site inspections. OSAMA ABDEL-AAL (Continued) Projects on which Mr. Abdel-Aal was responsible for the structural design are as follows: • Eastern Wastewater Treatment Plant, Sunnymead, California • Hale Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant, Escondido, California • Quincy Water Treatment Plant, Aurora, Colorado • Salt Lake County Water Conservancy District's Southeast Regional Water Treatment Plant • Ute Water Treatment Plant, Colorado 1 Watsonville Wastewater Treatment Plant, Watsonville, California • East Bank Wastewater Treatment Plant, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana • Centennial Water Treatment Plant, Colorado • Marrero Wastewater Treatment Plant, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana • Wastewater Treatment Plant for the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, California ' • Hinckley Water Treatment Plant, Redlands, California • The New York City Aquarium, New York • The Living Seas Pavilion for EPCOT Center, Walt Disney World, Florida • 20 mg Reservoir, City of North Las Vegas • Yukon Reservoir, City of Los Angeles MAJOR CONSULTING FIRM, NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA As senior engineer in the special design office, Mr. Abdel-Aal served as project engineer and assistant to the project manager for the structural design of a $70 million advanced wastewater treatment plant for the City of Orlando, Florida. In this capacity, he was responsible for the design effort, scheduling, supervising, ' and reviewing of work done by the design team, and the preparation of project specifications, cost estimates and the coordination between disciplines. Sat WILLIAM HALCROW AND PARTNERS, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ' LONDON, ENGLAND Mr. Abdel-Aal served as a civil-structural engineer in the Tunnels Department. 1 He participated in studying and preparing structural and civil engineering designs of several local and overseas tunnels. The design experience included main layout, open approaches, retaining walls, cut-and-cover concrete sections, bored rigid and flexible tunnels and underground stations, Specification preparation and checking working drawings were part of his responsibilities. The main projects in which Mr. Abdel-Aal participated were the Hong Kong Mass Transit System Tunnels; Heathrow Airport Underground Station (London, England); the Suez Tunnel (Egypt); and El Sharjah Tunnel (Persian Gulf). THE ARAB CONTRACTORS, OSMAN A. OSMAN, CAIRO, EGYPT Mr. Abdel-Aal served as structural engineer in the design office where he participated in the structural design of several projects. The expansion of Cairo i • • OSAMA ABDEL-AAL (Continued) IInternational Airport, the new control tower and the schools of pharmacy (Tanta University) were some of these projects. Mr. Abdel-Aal served as resident engineer for the construction of several civil engineering projects. In this capacity he was responsible for planning and scheduling the different stages of construction and work progress valuation. I Contract administration, supervising and overseeing the subcontractors and handling relationships between client, engineer, subcontractors and the public were also included in his responsibilities. ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers ' American Concrete Institute SEAOC ' PUBLICATIONS: 1 Abdel-Aal, M. O. "Analysis of Cable Stayed Bridges." London University, England. 1978. I I I I WILLIAM T. McGIVNEY EDUCA17ION: M.S., Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island B.S., Economics, California Polytechnic University SUMMARY: Mr. McGivney provides highly specialized cost estimating services and economic analytical assistance to JMM engineering projects. This expertise is based on years of practical experience with construction planning techniques. Since joining our firm he has been involved with review and implementation of state-of-the-art computer-assisted cost estimating programs at JMN1. His experience includes in-depth financial and accounting analysis as controller for a major manufacturing firm. Mr. McGivney is also responsible for the complete project scheduling effort in support of JMM engineering projects. This support takes the form of both production work and educational seminars throughout the many regional offices of JMM. He has published an in-house series on CPM scheduling which has been video-taped and made available for the indoctrination of new and experienced JMM engineers. The main thrust of this scheduling production effort is CPM scheduling, delay claims analysis, and construction management and is carried out by an expert staff of engineers and technical support personnel. IEXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Senior Schedule Analyst: Mr. McGivney has been responsible for establishing and developing the scheduling effort at JMM. He has developed the Project Controls Master ' Schedule system for all in-house design production work in the Southwest Region. He is responsible for primary schedule submittal review for all Construction Management Services projects, and in this capacity reviews the project specification and contract submittals. Senior Cost Estimator: Mr. McGivney is assigned to the firm's Financial Studies Division as principal estimator. He is responsible_for the preparation of final cost estimates on water and wastewater treatment plants, pumping stations, reservoirs, transmission pipelines, operations and control buildings, and other associated plant facility designs produced by the firm. In this capacity, Mr. McGivney provides updating of all price indexing and unit price changes relating to component materials common to water and wastewater construction. He is also directly involved with the firm's various computer models used in the analysis of treatment plant costs and project cost optimization developed to assist project engineers with both preliminary and detailed cost estimates as well as alternative design selection. He recently completed an estimate for a JMM designed project (in joint venture with another firm) with the City of Los Angeles involving more than two thousand contract drawings and over seventeen thousand pages of specifications with an estimated construction cost in excess of $200 million. MAJOR MANUFACTURING FIRM, LOS ANGELES ' In the role of plant controller, Mr. McGivney was responsible to corporate officers for continuous detailed analysis of plant operating costs and profit analysis for all product ' lines. He maintained a current data base for the computer inventory system (M.I.S.) including reconciliation of printout reports to verify system integrity. ' WILLIAM T. McGIVNEY (CONTINUED) 1 PRIVATE BUSINESS Mr. McGivney spent a number of years in the private business sector in the construction ' market. He spent two years as general manager of two cabinet and millwork companies performing all management functions, all cost estimating, and the fixing of profit margins for the entire product spread. Mr. McGivney was self-employed for several years in commercial and residential construction. He operated as a general contractor and was directly responsible for estimating, project management, and coordination of all partici- pating trades. i 1 1 1 1 i i 1 0 A. LEE RAMAGE EDUCATION: International Correspondence School, Courses in Surveying SUMMARY: ' Mr. Ramage has over 28 years of experience as a surveyor for civil and sanitary engineering projects. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Surveyor - Chief of Party: Mr. Ramage has been a surveyor with the firm for over 23 years. He has performed field survey work for all the major water and wastewater facilities designed by JMM during that time. These projects include water and wastewater treatment plants, water storage reservoirs, water distribution pipelines, transmission mains, and wastewater collection and disposal systems. Recently completed design projects which are typical of Mr. Ramage's surveying experience are the 36-mile Devil Canyon-Azusa Pipeline which is transporting water to Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, California; the 75 mgd Escondido-Vista Filtration Plant; and a 45 mgd water treatment plant and 10 mg water storage reservoir for the city of Fairfield, California. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA Surveyor: Performed survey work for sanitary engineering projects which included sewage treatment and collection facilities, trunk lines and interceptors. ! • • ! SECTION 4 ! RELATED EXPERIENCE Over 200 reservoirs have been designed by the firm, ranging from a 20,000 gallon steel tank to a 1 billion gallon asphaltic-lined open reservoir with a compacted earth embankment. Reservoir designs have included reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete, precast concrete arch-panel, and steel construction for buried, partially-buried, ground level, and elevated structures. The firm also designed the 64,400,000 gallon, 40 foot deep reinforced concrete Dunsmuir Reservoir in Oakland, California. This storage facility is the largest reservoir of its type in the United States and is also the deepest buried reservoir of large size in the country. JP,QM was awarded an Engineering Excellence Award by the Consulting Engineers Council of the United States for the design of the 19.3 million gallon Greystone Reservoir for the City of Beverly Hills, California. Other awards for reservoir projects have included the Engineering Excellence Award by the Consulting ! Engineers Association of California for. the Florin Reservoir and Pump Station in Sacramento, California and the Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement Award by the American Society of Civil Engineers, San Diego Section, for the Pechstein Reservoir, Vista Irriation District, California. JMM has also been involved in numerous reservoir rehabilitations including seismic studies, structural repair, joint replacement, lining, flexible covers, roof ! repair, and new roof construction. Specific examples of recent reservoir rehabilitation projects include projects for the Cities of Alhambra, Beverly Hills, Riverside, Seal Beach, San Fernando, San Francisco, Torrance, Whittier; Helix Water District and for California.State Polytechnic University, Pomona. New reservoirs with lining include the 40 MG Val Vista Reservoir for the City of ' Phoenix, Arizona and the 40 MG Leonard R. Fayle Reservoir for the Las Vegas Valley Water District. A brief description of the projects performed for the above mentioned clients is given below. A representative list of JMM's reservoir projects is provided at the end of this section. Beverly Manor Reservoir, City of Seal Beach, California JMM was selected by the City of Seal Beach to prepare plans and specifications ! for the installation of a 45-mil reinforced hypalon lining floor system. The project also included construction of a corrugated aluminum roof supported by glue-laminated wood framing and reinforced concrete columns to cover the 3.9 million gallon facility which was uncovered because of deterioration of a floating cover. This is a partially buried, 210-foot square reservoir. Also included were piping and paving modifications. ! 4-1 Related Experience Reservoir No 2, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California This project involved the preparation of plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of the walls and floor of a 1 million gallon circular concrete reservoir. The work included sandblasting of the wall, floor and columns, sealing �l of joints and cracks in the reservoir wall and floor, coating the interior wall, floor and column surface areas, and installing a stainless steel ladder. Linden Reservoir, City of Riverside, California This project involved the rehabilitation of the concrete basin of a 16 MG reservoir constructed in 1927. JMM was retained to perform an evaluation of the structural integrity of the facility and analyze alternative schemes to reline the basin; to prepare detailed plans and specifications for the design of a new liner; and to provide construction management services. Due to the poor condition of the reservoir basin, a 6-inch thick cast-in-place slab was placed on the slopes and a 5-inch thick slab placed on the floor on top of the existing concrete. The work also involved the removal of approximately 200 existing concrete column stubs and recoating approximately 100linear feet of the existing inlet pipeline. Kewen Reservoir, City of Alhambra, California Currently under design, this project involves the rehabilitation of a 5 MG concrete-lined embankment fill reservoir constructed in 1927. JMM was retained to prepare detailed plans and specifications for a new roof, new site piping, and a new cast-in-place 6-inch concrete liner on the slab and slopes. Due to low compaction density in the embankment fill, some of the sloping side walls are being replaced with new vertical concrete walls. Reservoir No. 2, San Fernando, California Construction work is set to begin on this project which involves the repair and rehabilitation of a circcular 3 MG partially buried concrete reservoir. JMM prepared plans and specifications and is doing CMS for the work which includes repair of concrete construction joints, sealant replacement, and repair or replacement of piping, vents, ladder and other fixtures. rWalteria Reservoir, City of Torrance, California Currently under design, this project involves crack repair and construction joint sealant replacement in a 10 MG reinforced concrete buried reservoir constructed in 1952-53. Also involved is replacement of drain valves and rehabilitation of outlet valves and other fixtures. Evans Reservoir, City of Riverside, California This rehabilitation project of an existing 16 MG above ground reinforced concrete reservoir consisted of the replacement of deteriorated joint sealant, crack reparation in the floors and walls, replacement or renovation of corroded galvanized metal items, cleaning the reservoir and miscellaneous other work. 1 4-2 Related Experience Rehabilitation of Stanford Heights Reservoir, City of San Francisco, California This project consisted of relining the floor with a new concrete lining and miscellaneous other modifications to piping system and other appurtenances. The reservoir is located in a residential neighborhood. Rehabilitation of Helix No. Z Tank, Helix Water District, La Mesa, California This project consisted of thickening the existing wall by placing concrete for a thickness of 12 inches on the outside. The reservoir had an inside diameter of 55 feet and a capacity of 0.36 MG. The work also involved sealing of wall cracks and widening of existing footing on this above-ground reinforced concrete reservoir. Construction of 40 MG Val Vista Reservoir, City of Phoenix, Arizona JMM was selected by the City of Phoenix to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of a 40 million gallon partially buried, rectangular reservoir with overall dimensions of 634 feet by 458 feet. The floor is a hopper-bottom type with porous asphaltic concrete and lined with a 45 mil fabric-reinforced hypalon lining system. The reservoir roof has a structural steel framing system with aluminum V-beam roofing and is supported by reinforced concrete columns. This project also included earthwork, instrumentation, fencing, an access road and miscellaneous other work. Construction of 40 MG Leonard R. Fayle Reservoir, Las Vegas Water District, Las Vegas, Nevada Las Vegas Valley Water District retained JMM to prepare plans and specifica- tions for the construction of a 40 million gallon above ground, rectangular reservoir with overall dimensions of 675 feet by 418 feet. The vertical walls of the rservoir has an appearance of an embankment-type structure. The floor is hopper-bottom type with porous asphaltic concrete and lined with a an EPDM lining system. The roof has structural steel framing system with corrugated aluminum roofing. The reservoir is divided into two equal units by a dividing wall. This project also included grading, paving, fencing, electrical and miscellaneous other work. Investigation of Reservoir No. 7, Monterey Park, California JMM was retained by the City of Monterey Park to conduct a seismic analysis of a circular 3 MG above ground reservoir. The structure, a prestressed concrete design, had been removed from service due to severe damage caused by the Whittier earthquake. JMM performed a field investigation, analyzed the structural design, and provided a report of findings along with recommendations. Rehabilitation of 6 1MG Reservoir, City of Santa Maria, California JMM was retained for the design and construction services of the rehabilitation of an existing 6 MG reservoir roof. The specifications incorporated three alternative bids; a complete roof replacement with an aluminum roof deck, a complete roof replacement with a galvanized steel roof deck, or replacement of 4-3 Related Experience a portion of the existing roof deck. The actual construction involved the aluminum roof deck option. Under a separate construction contract, also designed by JMM, joint sealant from the gunite floor and slope joints was removed and replaced with polyurethane sealant. Reservoir No. 5 City of Ontario California JMM was selected for the fast track design-for the rehabilitation of a portion of the aluminum roof of a 10 MG reservoir that was blown off due to high winds in excess of 100 mph. The work involved replacing 49,000 square feet of aluminum roofing, and associated roof framing, vents, and access hatches. Rubio Canyon Reservoir, Rubio Canyon Land and Water Association, California In January 1985, high winds associated with a cyclone storm caused severe damage to the 3.5 MG rubio Canyon Reservoir. This reservoir is the sole storage for the Association's upper supply zone and therefore required urgent repair. The project required the complete rebuilding of over 16,000 square feet of roofing and associated supporting structure. JMM was able to assess the damage, prepare specifications, drawings and contract documents, and provide construction management services that allowed the reservoir to be back in service within 90 days of the storm. LReservoirs No. 1 No. 5 and the Two West End Reservoirs City of 'Ulan Calif ornia JMM has been retained by the City of Upland to rehabilitate four reservoirs within the water system. The reservoirs vary in diameter from 100 feet to 150 feet in diameter and require replacement of the supporting structure and roofing material. Two of the reservoirs also require replacement of the joint sealant material. Two reservoirs are currently in the bid phase and the remaining two are currently being designed. i 4-4 tREPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIRS Capacity Client Name of Reservoir (gallons) Anaheim, California, City of 4,000,000 Lenain Filtration Plant 21000,000 Arcadia, California, City of Orange Grove Reservoir 3 ,500,000 Santa Anita Reservoir 4,100,000 ASD Corporation 600,000 Azusa, California, City of 600,000 Ballard, Utah 200,000 Basic Management, Inc., Nevada 1 ,500,000 Bellflower, California, City of 2,000,000 Beverly Hills, California, Reservoir 4B 1,000,000 City of Reservoir 5 1,000,000 Reservoir 6 1 ,000,000 Reservoir 7 1,200,000 Greystone Reservoir 19,330,000 Lower La Cienega 200,000 Sunset Reservoir 6,000,000 Buena Park, California, City of 20,000,000 Bunkerhill Company Kellogg, Idaho 500,000 Centerville, Utah, City of 500,000 Chino Basin Municipal Water Feeder Reservoir 31000,000 District Fontana Reservoir 3,000,000 Contra Costa County Water Bailey Reservoir #1 2,000,000 District Bailey Reservoir #2 47500,000 Bollm an Filtration Plant 10,000,000 Reservoir Country Club Reservoir #1 3,000,000 Cowell Ranch Reservoir 1 ,400,000 Divide Tanks (2) 250,000ea Elderwood Tank 1,700,000 Kirker Pass Reservoir 3,000,000 Lime Ridge Reservoir 3,000,000 Newhall Reservoir 3,000,000 Nob Hill Tank 500,000 Pine Hollow Reservoir (2) 2,000,000ea San Miguel Reservoir (2) 2,000,000ea Sand Quarry Reservoir 1,400,000 Copperton, Utah, City of 1,000,000 Corona, California, City of Temescal Basin Storage Facilities Concrete Reservoirs (2) 2,000,000 Glen Ivy Reservoir 2,000,000 Covina, California, City of 3,000,000 REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIRS (continued) Capacity Client Name of Reservoir (gallons) Crescenta Valley County Water Gross Reservoir 500,000 District Oakland Reservoir 1 ,500,000 Smith Reservoir 500,000 Cucamonga County Water District Banyon Avenue Reservoir 1 ,000,000 Duarte Water Company New Scott Reservoir 1 ,500,000 East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. Dunsmuir Reservoir 64,400,000 Everett, Washington, City of Reservoir No. 6 20,000,000 Fairfield, California, City of Fairfield Waterman Water Treatment Plant Reservoir 10,000,000 Farmington, Utah, City of 1,000,000 Farmington, Utah, City of 5001000 Folsom, California, City of Service Area #1 Reservoir 3,000,000 ' Ashland Reservoir 500,000 Foothill Municipal Water Dist. La Canada Reservoir 1,000,000 Paschall Reservoir 1,000,000 Ft. Duchesne, Utah 400,000 Fountain Valley, California Euclid Street Reservoir 5,000,000 City of Fullerton, California, City of Reservoir 2D-1 6,500,000 Reservoir 2D-2 6,500,000 Reservoir 2D-3 6,500,000 Reservoir ZD-4 6,500,000 Reservoir ZD-5 6,500,000 Reservoir 3BC 5,000,000 Acacia Reservoir #2 5,000,000 Acacia Reservoir 5,000,000 Laguna Reservoir 2,000,000 Garfield County, Ticaboo Special Service District No. 1 500,000 Grand County Water Conservancy District, Utah 1 ,000,000 Helix Water District Grossmont Reservoir 30,000,000 Inglewood, California, City of Morningside Reservoir 15,000,000 International Paper Company 1,250,000 Irvine Ranch Water District San Joaquin Reservoir 990,000,000 Kaysville, Utah, City of 2,000,000 Kimball-Lodder Develop Co. Centerville, Utah 500,000 Laguna Beach County Water Summit Reservoir #2 1,930,000 District, California REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIRS (continued) Capacity Client Name of Reservoir (gallons) Las Vegas Valley Water District Campbell Reservoir 20,000,000 (formerly Flamingo) Charleston Heights #1 30,000,000 Charleston Heights #2 10,000,000 (2 tanks) each Fayle Reservoir 40,000,000 Pico Reservoir 20,000,000 47,000,000/ult. Luce Reservoir (formerly 20,000,000 Smoke Ranch) Underhill Reservoir 20,000,000 (formerly West_Central) Rice Reservoir 20,000,000 40,000,000 ult. Southwest Reservoir 3,200,000 Liberty, Utah, City of 200,000 Long Beach, California, City of 14,000,000 Mapleton, Utah, City of 2,000,000 Mayfield, Utah, City of 100,000 Meadow View Ranch Summit County, Utah 25,000 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 25,000,000 Monrovia, California, City of Cloverleaf Reservoir 6,500,000 Emerson Flats Reservoir 500,000 Avenue Reservoir 3,200,000 Mountain Avenue Reservoir 5,000,000 Norumbega Reservoir 1,000,000 Monterey Park, California, City of 3,000,000 Napa, City of Hennessey Treated Water 5,000,000 Reservoir (2 cells) Newport Beach, California Big Canyon Reservoir 196,000,000 City of North Lauderdale, Florida, City of 2,000,000 North Marin County Water District Pacheco Reservoir 5,000,000 North Ogden, Utah, City of 1,000,000 Oceanside, California, City of El Camino Reservoir 3,000,000 Ontario, California, City of Boles Reservoir 2,000,000 Fern Avenue Reservoir 20,000,000 Totman Reservoir 5,570,000 Opa Locka, Florida, City of 800,000 REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIRS (continued) Capacity Client Name of Reservoir (gallons). Pasadena, California, City of Coronet Reservoir 1,400,000 Hastings Reservoir #2 17400,000 Jones Reservoir 50,000,000 Pembroke Pines, Florida, City of Storage Reservoir #2 27000,000 Pomona, California, City of Reservoir 2B 2,000,000 Reservoir 2C 3,000,000 Reservoir 4B 1,000,000 Reservoir 5B 10,000,000 Reservoir 7B 3,000,000 Reservoir 8A 3,000,000 Reservoir 8B 3,000,000 Reservoir 9 5,400,000 Portland, Oregon, City of Powell Butte Reservoir 50,000,000 Rancho California Water District Reservoir #1 2,200,000 Alvarez Reservoir 1,000,000 Anza Reservoir 2,200,000 Buck Mesa Reservoir 1 ,6007000 DePortola Reservoir 2,200,000 General Kearny Reservoir 2,200,000 Palomar Reservoir 3,000,000 Redlands, California, City of Country Club Reservoir 2,000,000 Dearborn Reservoir 7,500,000 Highland Avenue Reservoir 107000,000 Reedy Creek Improvement District Pumping Station "A" Reservoir 3,000,000 Riverside, California, City of Campbell Reservoir 4,900,00.0 (formerly Crest) Heustis Reservoir 2,000,000 (formerly New Canyon) Mockingbird Reservoir 20,000,000 Piedmont Reservoir 17000,000 Ross Reservoir 2,000,000 (formerly Central) Riverton, Utah, City of 3,000,000 Sacramento, California, City of Contact Basin 190007000 Florin Reservoir 15,000,000 Riverside Treatment Plant Clearwell 3,000,000 Salt Lake County Water Conservancy District, Utah 3,000,000 San Bernardino, California, Perris Hill Reservoir 10,000,000 City of San Diego, California, City of So. San Diego Reservoir 15,000,000 REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIRS (continued) Capacity Client Name of Reservoir (gallons) San Dieguito Water District Santa Fe Irrigation Dist. Joint Reservoir 13,000,000 Balour Drive Reservoir 29500,000 San Francisco, California, Crystal Springs Reservoir 60,000,000 City of Stanford Heights Reservoir 11,000,000 Santa Ana, California, City of Cambridge Reservoir 1,200,000 East Reservoir 6,000,000 South Reservoirs (2) 6,000,000ea Walnut Reservoir 79000,000 West Reservoir 6,000,000 Santa Barbara, California, City of 5,000,000 Santa Maria, California, City of 7,000,000 Santa Monica, California, City of Riviera Reservoir 25,000,000 Santa Rosa Ranches Water District Carancho Reservoir 1 ,500,000 Sierra Madre, California, City of Auburn Reservoir 1,300,000 Mira Monte Reservoir 2,000,000 Soquel Creek County Water Dist. Crestline #2 700,000 Mar Vista #2 300,000 Austrian Way 500,000 Seascape 1,200,000 Aqua View 560,000 South Davis CO. Wtr. Impr. Dist. 250,000 South Ogden, Utah, City of 1,000,000 St. Helena, California, City of Louis Stralla Reservoir 19500,000 Stinson Beach County Water Dist. Laurel & Highlands Res. 320,000 ea Stockton East Water District Stockton East Water Treatment Plant Res. 10,000,000 Sunny Slope Water Company Reservoir #4 6,000,000 Sweetwater Park Rich County, Utah 1509000 Tooele, Utah 2,000,000 Torrance, California, City of 10,000,000 Umark, Inc. - West Covina Zone I Steel Reservoir 7,000,000 Upland, California, City of 15th Street Reservoir 4,000,000 19th Street Reservoir 5,400,000 Uintah Highlands Water & Sewer Improvement Dist., Weber County, Utah 500,000 Ute Indian Tribe Ft. Duchesne, Utah 400,000 REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIRS (continued) Capacity Client Name of Reservoir (gallons) . Ventura, California, City of Foothill Reservoir 750,000 Golf Course Reservoir 200,000 Sexton Reservoir 2,600,000 Willis Reservoir 1 ,000,000 Vernon, California, City of Civic Center Reservoir 10,000,000 Vista Irrigation District HP Reservoir 5,000,000 HB Reservoir 5,000,000 Deodar Reservoir 1,300,000 Pechstein Reservoir 20,000,000 Weber County Rec. Dept. 60,000 West Jordan, Utah, City of 2,000,000 Woodland, Utah 100,000 Woods Cross, Utah, City of . 500,000 Yorba Linda County Water Dist. Two Reservoirs 3,000,000ea East Side Reservoir 7,000,000 De Los Reyes Reservoir 8,000,000 Zone 3, Bryant Ranch Reservoir 2,300,000 Zone 5, Baldwin Reservoir 800,000 r SECTION 5 COMPANY BACKGROUND AND MAJOR CAPABILITIES COMPANY BACKGROUND James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. was established in 1945. Corporate and Southwest Regional offices are located in Pasadena, California, with branch offices located in Anchorage, Bethel and Juneau, Alaska; Phoenix, Arizona; Irvine, and La Jolla, California; Fort Collins, Colorado; Ft. Lauderdale, Gainesville, Lake Worth, Port Charlotte, and Port St. Lucie, Florida; Boise, Idaho; Des Moines, Iowa; Wayzata, Minnesota (Minneapolis Area); New Orleans, Louisiana; Las Vegas, Nevada; Oregon; Ogden and Salt Lake City, Utah; Seattle, Washington; Laramie, Wyoming; and regional offices in Walnut Creek, California, Denver, Colorado, and Reston, Virginia (Washington, D.C. area). The firm has overseas offices in Medan, Indonesia; Bankok, Thailand; Caracas, Venezuela; Manila, Philippines; Sydney, Perth, and Adelaide, Australia; Cairo, Egypt; and Gedaref, Sudan. The staff consists of over 900 employees including 310 registered professional engineers; 240 have post-graduate degrees in civil and sanitary engineering. Thirty-nine members of the staff are diplomates of the American Academy of Environmental Engineers. Since its establishment, the firm has acquired broad experience and expertise in the field of civil and sanitary engineering. To support its basic engineering capability, the firm has its own in-house services in the disciplines of mechanical, structural, electrical, environmental, architectural, geological and chemical engineering. Field support services include surveying and, construction supervision. In addition, the firm has its own EPA certified water quality laboratory and VAX-11/780 computer system. Within the engineering disciplines, primary emphasis is placed on planning, design, preparation of plans and specifications, and construction inspection. The following is a partial summary of water and wastewater projects which have been completed by the firm. ' Wastewater and Industrial Water Treatment Plant Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ill Major Pipeline Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Over5000 miles Ocean Outfall Designs • • • 17 Master Plans, Feasibility Studies, and Project Reports (water supply and wastewater) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330 . . . . . . . . . . Water Treatment Plant Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 Pumping Station Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 Storm Drain Designs • : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 170 Reservoir Designs 210 Water Well Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 Rate and Financial Analysis Studies Environmental Impact Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 60 Automatic Control and Telemetering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Facility Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) In the past thirty-five years, we have planned, designed, and inspected construc- tion of, over $3.0 billion in water and wastewater projects for over 2,286 separate clients. MAJOR CAPABILITIES 1. Water Treatment Plants. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., has a long history in the development of water treatment techniques and is recognized nationally as a leader in the field. The staff has prepared studies and designs for over 66 water treatment plants ranging in capacity from 1.0 to 750 mgd. Our firm is associated with most of the advances in the field of water treatment. Innovations which have been incorporated in facilities we have designed include pumped blenders (flash mixing), tapered hydraulic flocculation, designed compartmentalization, vacuum sludge removal, backwash conditioning, simplified filter controls, high-rate filtra- tion, direct filtration, air lift backwashing, ion exchange, and reverse osmosis. In addition, the firm offers extensive services relative to pre- design studies. Pilot facilities for pre-treatment, ozonation, chemical feeding, filtration, and continuous monitoring are available for on-site investigations. JMM initiated particle count monitoring in addition to the monitoring of turbidity and other physical and chemical parameters. 2. Master Plans and Feasibility Studies. Over 321 master plans and feasibility reports for water, wastewater, storm drainage, and industrial waste systems have been prepared by the firm. Many of the water system master plans and feasibility studies included detailed investigations of alternative sources of supply, management, financial, economic, and technical soundness analyses, as well as the preparation of preliminary plans, specifications, and cost estimates. In addition, JMM has prepared numerous other engineering studies, investigations, and reports on related subjects such as ground water development, special water and wastewater treatment problems, reservoirs, treatment plants, distribution systems, corrosion, water rates, appraisals, etc. Many of our engineering studies contain complete financial recom- mendations along with management techniques. 3. Wastewater Facilities Planning (201). JMM has prepared over 79 EPA 201 grant program reports, many of which involve detailed analysis of existing treatment facilities with recommendations for upgrading modifications and expansion. The staff is well-versed in the requirements of the EPA 201 Grant Program. These facilities have ranged in size from less than 100,000 gallons per day to over 90 million gallons per day. The processes utilized have included all types of primary, secondary, and advanced waste treatment. Many of the projects have involved reclamation of the effluent for industrial, agri- cultural, and recreational uses. JMM has unique capabilities in evaluating existing treatment facilities for increased performance and/or expansion through its experienced staff of sanitary engineers and treatment plant operators; this is best indicated by the selection of JMM by the Environ- mental Protection Agency to perform their post-construction evaluation of treatment performance in Nevada and California. Because of our 0 • Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) experience in planning, design, cost estimating, financin g, and ation of all types of treatment facilities, JMM has the backgroundotor provide realistic water quality planning. Several facility plans recently completed or currently being prepared concern large metropolitan areas involving consolidation of several systems, abandoning certain existing facilities, evaluating alternative advanced waste treatment processes, and developing the institutional/financial solutions. Included have been the regional systems for San Diego, California, and Clark County, Nevada. Since the enactment of PL 9Z-500 in 1972, JMM has prepared twenty-eight facility plans for wastewater facilities in conform- ance with the provisions of the Act. 4. Areawide Water Quality Management (208 and 303e). JMM has provided consulting services for a number of agencies responsible for areawide water quality planning. This experience includes 303(e) river basin plans and 208 ' plans (completed and active) as authorized by PL 92-500 and a number of federally financed special management plans. To date, we have participated in twelve 208 studies. Methods of conserving and safely utilizing natural resources part of this planning effort as is defining opportunities for environmental enhancement. As a part of these management plans, an evaluation is conducted of nonpoint waste sources, waste quantities, and the effect upon the planning area. Included in this evaluation are municipal wasteloads, facility evaluations, agricultural irrigation return flow wasteloads, solid waste disposal leachates, urban and rural runoff wasteloads, and nonpoint wastes from such industries as logging, mining, and chemicals. Typical requirements of a 208 project may include the following considerations: waste treatment, collection and disposal; in-stream management; land use; monitoring; and intergovernmental programs. The thrust of the proposed constraints involve (1) minimizing the adverse water quality impacts from construction runoff and urbanization; (2) defining viable guidelines for Optimizing the overall facilities servicing future growth patterns; (3) stream management policies (including low flow augmentation); (4) protection of sensitive soil/slope and water-influence areas; (5) eria for wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal; and performance(6) a suring the tcoordin- ation of public and private programs that affect water quality. Work in this area covers a wide variety of disciplines and responsibilities from very technical aspects of waste management control to overall contract management and program administration. Among the projects currently underway or recently completed are water quality, land capability, and ground water studies for the Flathead Drainage 208 Agency in Kalispell, Montana; a watershed management study for the city of Ashland,Oregon/Rogue Valley Council of Governments; an industrial waste analysis for the Mid-Willamette Council of Governments; a study of mining, silvi- culture, and construction-generated nonpoint wastes for the Mid- Yellowstone Areawide Planning Organization in Billings, Montana; eight preliminary community wastewater facilities studies for Panhandle Planning and Development Council, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho; the evaluation of effluent • • Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) disposal alternatives for the Sussex County, Delaware, Planning Authority; and an overall program responsibility and contract administration for the Regional Intergovernmental Council at Charleston, West Virginia. 5. Wastewater Collection System. We have designed several hundred miles of major sanitary sewers in diameters up to 114 inches. One of our larger projects was the $52 million interceptor sewerage system for metropolitan San Diego, California. This system consists of 116,000 feet of 42- to 114-inch diameter interceptor sewers, pumping facilities (including one of the world's largest wastewater pumping stations), an 80 mgd wastewater treatment plant, and a 108-inch diameter ocean outfall. Another major project was the non-reclaimable wastewater collection system designed for the Chino Basin Municipal Water District. This project, costing over $12 million, involved over 30 miles of pipelines in diameters up to 42 inches. Collection systems can be both analyzed and designed by ICES SEWER, a computer program developed by the Civil Engineering Systems Laboratory at M.I.T. ICES (Integrated Civil Engineering System) was the result of a major research and development effort initiated by M.I.T. in 1964. The system handles both storm and sanitary networks flowing full or partially full under the influence of gravity. 6. Wastewater and Industrial Waste Treatment. Our firm has been active in wastewater treatment and reclamation for more than 25 years. We have designed 105 wastewater and industrial waste treatment plants ranging in capacity from 0.5 to 90 mgd. Our designs have included primary treatment, biological secondary treatment, and tertiary treatment involving a variety of unit operations including alum coagulation, multi-media filtration, carbon adsorption, ion exchange, electrodialysis, and reverse osmosis. In a number of projects, wastewater is reclaimed for industrial, agricultural, or recrea- tional reuse. A recent project involved pilot plant testing and prototype design for a pure oxygen activated sludge plant to oxidize a high-strength industrial waste containing approximately 10,000 mg/l BOD to a stable effluent. 7. Ocean Outfalls. Engineering studies and designs have been completed for 17 ocean wastewater outfalls. The outfalls range in capacity from 0.7 to 300 mgd and vary in diameter from 12 to 108 inches. These designs were preceded by detailed oceanographic studies and computerized hydraulic analysis. In addition to our in-house capabilities in estuarial and oceano- graphic evaluation, the firm also maintains a close association with recog- nized authorities in the fields of marine biology and oceanographic investi- gation and services. When required, these specialists are added to the project team for specialized research or consultation regarding outf all study and design. i8. Water Transmission and Distribution Systems. We have designed numerous ■ major pipeline systems. These designs include more than 3,785 miles of pipelines in diameters up to 144 inches and installations under the most adverse conditions of surface congestion, underground utilities, rugged terrain, and unstable and corrosive soils. Designs have included open trench, tunnel, jacking, submarine, and other types of installations. For analysis of Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) complex distributions stems we utilize - p systems, our own network program and in- house computer facility. Our staff has specialized knowledge and exper- ience in corrosion and corrosion control and actively participates in corro- sion research and seminars. 9. Federal and State Loans and Grants. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., has had extensive experience in preparing applications and assisting clients with obtaining loans and grants from state and federal agencies. Federal grants and loans have come primarily from the Depart- went of Housing and Urban Development and the Environmental Protection Agency. The firm has assisted over 60 clients in obtaining over $125 million in governmental assistance programs. 10. Water Storage Facilities. Over 183 reservoirs have been designed by the firm, ranging from a 20,000-gallon steel tank to a 1 billion gallon asphaltic- lined open reservoir with a compacted earth embankment. Reservoir designs have included reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete, precast concrete arch-panel, and steel construction for buried, partially-buried, ground-level, and elevated structures. The firm also designed the 64,400,000-gallon, 40-foot deep reinforced concrete Dunsmuir Reservoir in Oakland, California. This storage facility is the largest reservoir of its type in the United States and is also the deepest buried reservoir of large size in the country. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. was awarded an Engineering Excellence Award in 1972 by the Consulting Engineers Council of the United States for the design of the 19.3-million-gallon Greystone Reservoir for the city of Beverly Hills, California. 11. Pumping Stations. Over 209 water and wastewater pumping stations have been designed ranging in capacity from 230 gpm to 250,000 gpm with total connected horsepowers up to 18,000 HP. These stations have included all types of pumps, both electric and natural gas driver units, electrical controls for both local and remote operations, and telemetering. Our experience includes the world's largest natural gas engine-driven water pumping station located in Las Vegas, Nevada. 12. Automatic Process Control and Telemetry. Modern water and wastewater transmission, storage, distribution, and treatment systems require automa- tion to facilitate efficient operation, optimization, and to allow ease of expansion. JMM utilizes state-of-the-art control technology and includes the latest field-proven equipment approaches in the configuration of water and waste- water treatment systems. JMM's staff of electrical and control system engineers is experienced in all aspects of automated control of a wide range of treatment processes as well as data acquisition, computer-based control, and data handling. Our in-plant designs reflect the depth of experience required to understand and control complex process interrelationships and to provide an operator-oriented approach . to centralized control of these processes. A thorough knowledge of the latest treatment process equipment is utilized by the engineers to apply control concepts effectively. Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) In addition to hundreds of in-plant automation applications, JMM has provided study, design and support engineering services, and start-up related to telemetry systems for over 20 years with more than 51 separate clients worldwide. Telemetry system applications include various aspects of water transmission, storage, and distribution as well as wastewater collection. In many cases, the design is preceded by a feasibility study and pre-design effort which sets forth the remote functions to be monitored and/or controlled, the central control configuration, alternatives in equipment approach, cost alternatives, improvements to be expected in operation, and the savings to be realized. 13. Water Rate Studies. Over 66 analytical and statistical studies relating to water rates and wastewater rates and costs have been completed. These studies have been prepared in support of recommended rates as well as in opposition to suggested rate changes. Most supporting studies are based on detailed investigation of water consumption patterns and their projections. Many rate studies are prepared as an integral part of a complete financial analysis which considers bond issue financing, taxation on real property, reserve funding, disposal of excess utility property, other income sources, and ability to pay. The range of clients for whom rate studies have been prepared included municipalities, water and irrigation districts, private utility companies, government agencies, and individuals. 14. Appraisals. Over 40 appraisal reports primarily involving the value of utility properties have been prepared. The purpose of these reports has been to establish value for the buyer, the seller, or for both. In some instances, the objectives have been to evaluate system condition and depreciation requirements as adjuncts to rate investigations, eminent domain proceedings, and negotiated ownership transfers. Appraisals of various types of utilities have been prepared ranging from single water wells to large irrigation and domestic municipal systems. Appraisal techniques used include reproduction cost new less depreciation, original cost, substitutional methods, present-worth concepts, comparable sales, and capitalization. 15. Basin Management and Hydrogeology. Staff members have had extensive experience in the field of hydrogeological studies and ground water basin management. In all of the many master plans for water system development prepared by our firm, a great amount of effort has been expended on comparing alternative sources of supply and evaluating the economic potential of these sources. Coordination of imported sources of supply with local surface and ground water supply has always been a major factor in our studies. We have participated in an operational economic study of a large ground water basin in cooperation with a public agency. A mathematical model (digital) of the ground water basin has been developed by the agency. The model has been verified by geologic and hydrologic analyses, and alternative operational plans are presently being studied. Numerous surface and subsurface studies for both local and regional water resource development programs have been conducted utilizing geologic, hydrologic, and geophysical water studies. Combining legal and institutional policies with water resource potential, basin operations have been developed Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) which are consistent.with sound ground water basin management. The firm has also participated in a number of water rights litigation cases, in which it has been necessary to recognize proper basin data and then, through the use of these data, correlate surface hydrology, ground water hydraulics, and water quality. 16. Desalination. Extensive experience in the desalination processes is avail- able within our firm. Completed projects include unit design and pilot plant studies on treated wastewater effluent by reverse osmosis and electro- dialysis. Our firm particiated in the feasibility study for the 150 mgd nuclear desalting and power generation plant for southern California. This project was jointly sponsored by the MWD, AEC, and the Office of Saline Water. Work has included the design of the Anaheim Lake Demonstration Desalination Plant for the Orange County Water District. This pilot program was an experimental step towards the design of a major 75 mgd desalting plant to remove salt from ground water. The work consisted of preliminary engineering, negotiations with the principal domestic and overseas manufacturers of desalting equipment, and the detail design and preparation of plans and specifications for the pilot plant. The plant processes included pretreatment, filtration, and water softening equipment; two ion exchange modules; two electrodialysis modules; and two reverse osmosis modules. Extensive considerations have been given by JMM and the district's consultants to the effect of the pilot and proposed ultimate plants on the environment. In addition, the firm designed and put into operation a 5 mgd reverse osmosis wastewater demineralization facility at Water Factory 21 for the Orange County Water District. Several other demineralization projects are located in California, Florida, Idaho, and on San Nicolas Island for the U.S. Navy. 17. Storm Drainage. The firm has had broad experience in all phases of flood control and storm drain work, both in preparation of comprehensive master drainage plans and in detailed design and preparation of plans and specifi- cations for drainage projects. We have provided designs for approximately 102 storm drain projects, many of which were constructed under the 1958 and 1964 bond issue programs ($320 million) of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. 18. Computer Facilities. JMM computer facilities include a large interactive VAX-11/780 computer system. The VAX-11/780 is a high-performance multiprogramming computer system. It combines a 32-bit architecture, efficient memory management, and a virtual memory operating system to provide essentially unlimited program address space. The VAX-11/780 is one of the fastest systems available. Its processor includes an 8K byte write-through memory cache that results in an effective 290 nano-second memory access time. This VAX/VMS virtual memory operating system provides a multi-user multi-language programming environment on the VAX-11/780 hardware. The integral floating point ' instructions, efficient scheduler and optional FORTRAN IV-PLUS language are ideal for time-critical and scientific computational environments. Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) Peripheral facilities of the VAX-11 780 include a ra nge ange of small and large capacity disc drives, magnetic tape plotter, hard copy and video terminals, line printers and card readers. Its languages include the VAX-11 Macro assembly language and optional VAX-11 FORTRAN IV-PLUS, VAX-11 DATATRIEVE, and VAX-11 COBOL-74/VAX. Use of this facility ensures optimization of the analytical capability of our firm in all phases of engineering service. Numerous staff members have been trained and are active in a continuing educational program in order to provide our clients with the advantages of computer-applied system design economics. Specialized new programs developed by our staff, in addition to existing standard programs, offer an extensive range of applications, including hydraulic networks, structural, critical path and statistical computations, traverse calculations, information sorting, and mathematical optimization. Utilization of the computer system is employed whenever evaluations of the situation indicate a valuable consideration in time consumption and financial benefit to the client. A number of computerized information retrieval services exist where use is essential in large-scale search operations. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. contacts those firms which have established data bases in the areas of concern. These bases include: o Toxline o Medline o NAL/CAIN o NTIS o Environ o APTIC o EIC In addition, JMM maintains several time-sharing terminals which are used to take advantage of the services of various time-sharing systems available. Such systems allow data storage and retrieval on a global basis. 1 19. Laboratory Facility. Our firm is equipped with a complete water and wastewater laboratory certified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The facilities of this laboratory permit us to evaluate all of the ' parameters related to modern practices of water treatment and wastewater treatment and disposal. Major equipment items include gas chromatographs, atomic absorption spectrometer, total organic carbon analyzer, particle size analyzer, and incubators for viral and bacteriological tests. 20. Architectural Design. Visual appearance of all structures is given prime consideration in the development of project design plans. Our design philosophy incorporates creative architectural concepts based on environ- mental conditions and economical factors of the project. The firm's fields of competence in architecture include architectural design, furniture and fixture selection, graphics and signing, and color coordination. Our registered architectural staff has been responsible for the architectural Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) design of numerous civil, industrial, commercial, and residential building ' projects. 21. International Operations. Our firm has provided consulting services for numerous international engineering projects involving the design of water supply, wastewater, and storm drainage systems. In addition to design and construction supervision of overseas projects, we have prepared master plans, feasibility and prefeasibility studies, hydrogeological studies, financial analyses, and cost appraisals in order to establish parameters for sound engineering design. We have also provided administrative assistance for institutional development of foreign water and sanitation agencies and have developed effective programs for training personnel in the design, operation, maintenance, and management of water and wastewater systems. Our firm, having been involved in many programs financed under the auspices of the United States Agency for International Development, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the Asian Development Bank, is familiar with the lending and data-processing requirements of these agencies. 22. Plant Start-Up and Operation. Staff engineers have had extensive exper- ience in the design, construction, and start-up of industrial process pilot and prototype installations. Industrial piloting has also included wastewater concentration and reclamation for reuse by reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, and ion exchange techniques. Biological wastewater treatment pilot work has involved both industrial and municipal waste systems and has been used to obtain design data for plants now under construction. Certified waste- water treatment plant operators on the staff are qualified in plant start-up and operation, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, and on- site investigations. 23. Environmental Impact Studies. Multidisciplinary teams of environmental specialists in the fields of biology, hydrology, planning, and engineering have prepared numerous environmental assessments in compliance with applicable federal, state, or local regulations. Environmental studies have concen- trated on water and wastewater related projects. The scale of these projects and accompanying assessments has ranged from areawide waste treatment management plans and comprehensive wastewater facilities plans to individual projects such as reservoirs, pipelines, or treatment facilities. ' The JMM staff is experienced in environmental regulations and public participation techniques as well as in the more technical elements of environmental assessments. 24. 'paining Programs. In addition to on-the-job training programs associated with design, start-up, and operation and maintenance of water and waste- water treatment plants, JMM has provided specialized in-house observation and training programs for engineers sponsored by the Agency for Interna- tional Development and by our international clients. Typical programs ranging from one month to a year include observation and practical training ' in water utility management and operation, long-range financial planning, water treatment design, water resources development, and ocean outfall Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) design. Trainees involved in master planning and, treatment plant design programs actively participate in actual project work. 25. Construction Management Services. JMM provides some degree of construction management services for virtually all facilities designed by JMM. These services have ranged from fast-tracking design and construc- tion, monitoring construction, performing all engineering work, and keeping all books and records associated with a project down to simply providing occasional professional assistance during construction. For a typical job, in addition to design, JMM assists its clients during the procurement process, monitors construction progress, checks shop drawings, negotiates change orders, makes final inspections, assists with start-up, and performs a large part of the book work associated with .a project. JMM is extremely conscious of time and money constraints and gears its work to stay within the boundaries given. JMM project engineers assist contractors and operating personnel in achieving design criteria, especially during plant start-up. Project design engineers periodically return to completed projects to observe their operation and assist operating personnel. Information obtained from these visits is used to refine subsequent designs. 26. Marine Science and Aquaculture. The Marine Sciences' staff has a wide range of experience in the management and planning of aquaculture research and development as well as experience in commercial aquaculture operations. The staff can draw on diverse capabilities covering virtually any water-related problem and has the complete range of experience to deal with the multi-disciplinary problems of aquaculture production. The firm has applied this expertise in aquatic life support systems in the design and operation of several aquatic parks including the $15 million installation at Sea World of Florida and sophisticated closed systems for recycling water at the Baltimore Aquarium and Sea World of Ohio. Wastewater aquaculture concepts have been developed in planning studies for W.E. Disney Enterprises and the San Diego Region Water Reclamation ' Agency relative to a $1.7 million study evaluating the use of aquatic plants and animals for wastewater treatment. The firm has experience in the design of salmonid fish hatcheries in the Pacific Northwest and has designed the hatchery facilities for the state of Washington. Aquaculture specialists are available for consultation regarding all phases of commercial aquaculture feasibility studies and facility design. 27. Institutional and Financial Planning. The firm has developed an extensive background in the development of alternative institutional and financial arrangements in support of water, wastewater, and water quality plans. Members of the JMM staff have extensive backgrounds and particular expertise in the preparation of institutional, economic, and revenue programs including federal/state loan grant programs, prospective prepara- tion for the municipal financing market, and economic feasibility reports in support of bond issues. Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) JMM has successfully completed over 100 analytical and statistical financial studies of water and wastewater systems. As part of 201 facility plans, JMM financial staff members have prepared financial and revenue plans in accordance with the latest federal and state requirements in states where special local requirements exist. These plans have been prepared with careful consultation with the client and other levels of involved government. In this way, the means and approach for funding that portion of the project not grant eligible, and in creating a revenue program for payment of annual debt service and operation and maintenance costs, has been acceptable to all parties that are concerned with the financial success of the project. Many water and wastewater system master plans completed by the firm in recent years have also required implementation plans which include scheduling, financing, and the development of systems for cost allocations to the ultimate system, customer. Rate studies and revenue programs require accurate backup data of con- sumption or discharges by customer classification, as well as other specific information. Where such data are nonexistent or questionable, our staff has had wide experience in creating usable data from the examination of water records, building department records, aerial photographs, census data, and physical field surveys. Computer programs have been designed by our firm to utilize these data in accordance with state guidelines allocating costs to various combinations of loading parameters. Z8. Comprehensive and Land Use Planning. JMM offers comprehensive planning services involving land use on either a community or areawide basis. Our projects of this type have included community land use plans; land capability and existing land use mapping; improvement and expansion of public facilities, services, and utilities; preservation and conservation of natural resource areas; lake shore development criteria; community design; public and private recreation systems; open space; flood plain management; transportation; fish, wildlife, and water quality preservation; the determina- tion of future growth areas; and zoning regulations, model ordinances, and plan implementation. Our experience and personnel cover a wide range of land use planning considerations. We are particularly qualified to provide land use planning assistance to communities experiencing growth and needing to expand public facilities or preserve environmental resources. Our background in public works facilities and environmental studies adds an important depth to our comprehensive planning capabilities. We have provided comprehensive planning services to the Clark County Regional Planning Council at Vancouver, Washington; Gervais, .Oregon; and Mountain Home, Idaho. In the Mountain Home plan, emphasis was placed on the protection of natural resources, including an important ground water system; projecting future population growth; directing new development into a "primary urban service area;" preservation of agricultural lands; and ' coordination with ongoing county planning efforts. We assisted the State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources in the development of the state's renewable resource plan, and worked with the Shoshone-Bannock Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) Tribes in eastern Idaho on the formulation of water-related land develop- ment policies for the Fort Hall Indian Reservation. The Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District contracted with JMM to prepare a park system plan and a recommended action program which focused on future budget priorities for alternative park sites that were associated with school sites. In addition, we prepared a component of the Oregon State Outdoor Recreation Plan covering future developments, acqui- sitions, and capital improvements for the Oregon State Park System. ' Our firm also has in-depth experience in mapping land capability and existing land use. JMM prepared land capability maps for the Flathead River Drainage Basin in northwest Montana concerning erosion hazard areas and septic tank suitability. We prepared eight land capability/charac- teristic/use maps for the Fort Hall Indian Reservation. Four state of Idaho agencies contracted with JMM to prepare land use and land capability maps for ten land characteristics and numerous wildlife and environmental quality parameters as part of the Idaho Environmental Overview Study. JMM is also a frequent contractor to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to perform flood insurance studies, including the preparation of flood plain maps. In a water quality plan prepared for the Ada Planning Association, JMM prepared a plan which emphasized land use constraints on steep slopes and sensitive soils, land adjacent to streams, and the phasing of future growth with facility service expansion. ' 29. Silviculture. As part of non-point pollution sources as defined under PL 92-500, the firm has been involved in several projects involving water pollution from logging, residue management, and reforestation activities and their impact on water quality. Emphasis has been placed on solving problems and making recommendations relative to siltation and thermal and organic pollution due to the demonstrated significance of these pollutants associated with the logging industry. Members of the staff have also prepared technical reference reports for use by private and public forest managers, planners, regulatory agencies, contractors, consultants, public forest managers, planners, regulatory agencies, contractors, consultants, public officials, and interested individuals to determine, implement, and monitor water quality control systems and procedures that are both effec- tive and efficient and that would implement PL 92-500 concerning non-point sources of pollutants generated by silviculture activities (excluding the construction and maintenance of logging haul roads and forest chemical applications). ' 30. Expert Testimony and Technical Assistance to Counsel. Because of the broad experience of senior JMM employees and the specialized expertise of the 21 doctorate holders on the JMM staff, these employees are frequently utilized by clients for their expert testimony and technical assistance to counsel. In preparing for testimony, these expert witnesses have available the facilities of the JMM, Cal Tech, UCLA, and USC libraries in southern California, and the UC Berkeley library in northern California. In addition, modern, fully-equipped laboratory and computer facilities are available for Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) their use. Employees are encouraged to write technical articles and develop specialized areas of expertise in meeting company needs. 31. Other Services. In addition to capabilities in investigations, studies, and preparation of plans and specifications, we can provide mill inspection and witness performance tests on all water and wastewater systems equipment manufactured in the United States. When required, assistance to the client in direct procurement of project materials is provided. On a majority of the domestic design projects, surveying, field inspection, and contract admini- stration services are also furnished as a part of the engineering contract. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Public Works Department (714) 536-5431 ' Peck Reservoir Renovation Request for Proposal CC-696 _MD CUj �J' Addenda No. One E � -1 DEC 2 0 1988 December 15, 1988 W Q Mr. Robert Seeman James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers 30 Corporate Park Suite 310 Irvine, CA 92714 ' Add the following item to your proposal: ' Phase I Preliminary Design 7. Prepare a noise study of the existing booster pump station. Formulate options and make recommendations to the city on ways to reduce the level of noise that is generated by this station. Very truly y urs, Louis F. andoval Director f Public Works This is to acknowledge receipt of Addenda No. One, dated December 15, 1988. It is understood that the revision shall be included in your proposal. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. Company BY Ashok K. Dhingra December 21, 1988 Vice President Date • , y/. j/ i ------------- b 2 <a� „r Proposal to l 9 ` I t<<. a X;� City of Huntington Beach To Furnis�i Pprofessional Sur `f '(SFr Rehabilitation of 16 Mg Peck Reservoir (CC-696) �O 'rvinc!it Vt ej 0 NoW, Box i;�, 1 P "i i,o'f!, Y: - :1!q"V� December 21, 1988 L City of Huntington Beach D F_FT. 0 F F`J­31-1 VV(DRK10 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 1988 Attention: Mr. Louis F. Sandoval )f UbrmomoN BEACH. CALIF. Director of Public Works Subject: Proposal for Rehabilitation of 16 MG Peck Reservoir (CC-696) Gentlemen: James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. (JMM) is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Huntington Beach in response to your December 1, 1988 request for proposal for engineering services in connection with the rehabilitation of the 16 MG Peck Reservoir. JMM, with over 40 years of experience, is qualified in all aspects of reservoir planning, design, construction and operation, and offers highly professional engineering services that will produce a cost-effective design. Our combination of experience, locally available personnel, complete in-house capabilities, and familiarity with local conditions will prove valuable to the City of Huntington Beach for this rehabilitation design project. Information requested by the City is contained in the Executive Summary with reference to applicable sections of this proposal. The content of this proposal documents our firm's qualifications to perform the subject project. In summary, they include: Experience: JMM has designed over ZOO reservoirs, including all types of construction from steel to prestressed and conventional concrete, ranging in volume from 100,000 gallons to 65 million gallons. Some of our major reservoir projects were designed as multiple-purpose facilities with provisions for recreational or other functional facilities on the roof. JMM has received "engineering excellence" awards for many of its i-nulti-use designs. We have been extensively involved in several major reservoir rehabilitation projects. Expert Project Team: The high quality of JMM's work depends largely on the competence of its individual employees and the judicious blending" of their talents to meet the requirements of each particular project. To assure this quality, the company policy is to staff each project with those who have the requisite interest, time and skills, and to make provisions for their interaction. The project manager assigned to your project, Mr. Ashok K. Dhingra, has extensive experience in the engineering planning, design and construction of similar reservoir repair and rehabilitation projects. t City of Alhambra -2- December 21, 1988 Most recently he was the project manager on an 18.7 million gallon buried reinforced concrete reservoir for the City of Torrance. This project was completed last year. The proposed project engineer, Mr. David A. Mosher, has extensive experience in the design and construction of reservoirs. Most recently, he was the resident engineer on the 18.7 million gallon reservoir for the City of Torrance. Mr. Dhingra was the project manager for a similar ,reservoir rehabilitation project, 16 MG Linden Reservoir for the City of Riverside. Complete In-House Capabilities: Our capabilities and in-house staff in all disciplines assures a project that is coordinated well. It results in a project with a minimum number of change orders because it has been checked by the disciplines involved. Historically on reservoir projects, the amount of change orders has been less than 1/2 percent of the contract amount. Our in-house capabilities will be supplemented by Geofon, Incorporated, geotechincal engineers and Globe Consulting Services for Hypalon or Butyl lining. We have prior experience with each of these companies and have a good working relationship. Quality of Work: JMM takes pride in its reputation for being a leader in the design of reservoirs. We feel that the project team we have proposed will provide the same level of experience, expertise and quality design on this reservoir rehabilitation project. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal and sincerely hope that we will have the pleasure of working with you and your staff on this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or desire additional information. Very truly yours, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Ashok K. Dhingra Vice President /j c Y TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal Title Section No. Executive Summary 1 Project Approach 2 Method of Approach Scope of Work Project Schedule Project Team 3 Related Experience 4 Company Background and Major Capabilities 5 SECTION 1 EXECUnVE SUMMARY 1 This proposal is -presented to the City of Huntington' Beach with the specific objective'of demonstrating the capabilities of James M. Montgomery, Consulting. Engineers, ` Inca :(JMM) to provide _consulting engineering services for the rehabilitation of the 16 MG Peck Reservoir. This Executive Summary highlights the information presented in the proposal. To facilitate the evaluation of this proposal, the format of the Executive Summary consists of responses to information requested and to the. proposal evaluation criteria identified in the City's Request for Proposal (RFP). 'Each criterion for evaluating the capabilities of a consulting firm as outlined in the RFP is repeated in bold type followed by a response that summarizes JMM's capabilities. The Executive Summary also references other portions of.this proposal. i 1.. Expertise and experience. .' The .:project. manager, Mr. Ashok Dhingra, has over ZO years of experience in structural'analysis,:water system design, and project management. He is a registered._Structural.Engineer in California. He has been responsible for or involved 'the-design of over 50 water storage reservoirs and numerous ` pipelines and :pumping:.station facilities. Most recent concrete reservoir protects riclude reservoirs for the`Cities of Torrance and Pomona. He was ` involved in the rehabilitation of roofing projects for the Cities of Ontario, ',Santa--,.;Maria and Upland. Other` rehabilitation p projects. include a very - similar project. for the City of Riverside, 16 MG Linden Reservoir, Helix Reservoir .No. 2, Reservoir_ No Z, for California Polytechnic University j Pomona And several others-.:, He has extensive experience in rehabilitation projects and is also.a member of the ACI 364 Committee on Rehabilitation of Concrete Structures. The ro ect e, ine M p .� ng er, r David Mosher, has over 16 years of experience in the areas of:.project engineering and resident engineering for the design and construction.`of water. and:. wastewater projects. The most .recent project completed ,by Mr.`Mosher..was :Resident Engineer for. an 18.7.MG reservoir for the City;:;of Torrance as: referenced in Section 4, Related Experience. He has been involved in numerous reservoir -projects including ( rehabilitation. A`, project organization chart identifying all of.,the key project team ^members is ,presented in'°`Section 3 along with biographical data' on each teammember. ti z t 1 1 r 1 Executive Summary i An overview of our experience and capabilities is as follows: GENERAL:. . The capability-to successfully complete the proposed project is ensured by the ability of;our project team. to produce a practical and cost-effective approach to, a_design project. This section will summarize our, capability for performing practical and cost Ineffective projects with respect to i specialized expertise, overall staff capabilities, and cost control. QUALITY OF WORK Quality of work is of utmost importance at JMM. The concept of a Technical Review Committee. was 'developed to ensure that the entire project;team's primary objective is engineering excellence in all aspects of work Active participation of :noted staff experts who -are not directly involved with the project is achieved. JMM 'emphasizes ,doing its engineering "up front"'. This minimizes change orders and related.delays which disrupt projects. -The average change order ratio :for projects designed by J.MM is less than 1.5 percent of construction costs versus 2.0 percent considered excellent in the profession. COST CONTROL To :maintain accurate control of;.;project ,.costs2'_'members of our project team.utilize in-house computers to summarize and report weekly job costs" { to i the:project engineers in order. to`:compare the quantity of work to be completed with the remaining amount of ;money. This,system.has enabled ' . our engineers to consistently produce high-quality-work°within established budgets. In addition to control of project costs, JMM has an excellent record of `<producing ..accurate cost' estimates : for major construction i' projects. This cost .estimating ability would be particularly valuable in developing accurate costs for facilities required to,complete this project. 1 ABILITY TO MEET SC13EDULES James: M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., realizes that `maintaining'project schedules, deadlines, and budgets are a very important s aspect: to: the total project concept. It is important for the consultant to have control over, each ,phase :.of. the project": in order to eliminate unnecessary.."delays 'and resultant increased costs. JMM project''teams `-have recognized; this:: need and have established a reputation for consistently completing: work'on or."ahead of any predetermined'.schedule. .Having completed many similar 'projects; wew. have demonstrated .that JMM . is lm'owledgeawe in , the management procedures: necessary to complete the proposed protects inaaiely:_fashion.,; INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY:; Development ,:6 >innovd ive technology necessitates `maintenance of a balance between cost saving , concepts and' proven reliability The - 4 s M l E , Executive Summary r challenge.to engineers is basically three=fold: '(1) to.have the creativity to , `apply new ,concepts to.did problems, (Z) to know which new concepts are practical, and (3) to ensure';:that ahese` new processes provide, long-term reliable .and cost--effective service .to clients. Innovative technology is continually=; being- developed by our staff:.,engineers. This technology is i shared;, with. 'other members in the „engineering -field through° published articles and presentations. { 2.. Design'Approach and schedule for'completion of the work. JMM's;general philosophy is to work closely with the client during all project phases to ensure that project goals .are attained through the application`of sound engineering concepts in a manner which is sensitive to local needs. ;. . The project approach with a detailed schedule is presented in Section Z. JMM understandsthe City's time constraints with respect to taking the reservoir out of service;during the minimum demands and starting work by t October/November. 1989. Therefore, .-`we have carefully developed a realistic schedule;that will meet this requirement.'-The project schedule is s follows: summarized:>a 1 ;. 1 Preliminary`Design 56 .`days. in Design 81"'days Bid and Award 56 days Construction ''180 days 3. AbiHtV-.to complete the project in a timely and consistent manner. The following list presents a number of clients for which JMNI has recently 1 _ completed design and rehabilitation projects. We would encourage you to contact any;of our clients for references for completing the projects on time City of.Ontario Mr. Jim Kinley 303 East"B" St. (10 MG Campus Avenue Civil Engineer, Ontario, CA 91764 Reservoir) IItilities (714) 391-2529 #City of Pomona Mr Tony Sknarek ; 505. S. Gary Ave. (Repairing and Manager,. ater Pomona CA 91769 R ecoating of Reservoirs Department (714) 620-2231 Nos 2 and 8) City of Riverside Mr Fred Lantz* (818 .953-8710 (16 MG%Evans,Reservoir) Water. System Manager, Burbank ,y �' � s i'�iiw�4..ar:7'<'✓i._'�.f'.r"'�.,;,R`�'i�b�&`�'�rq+R rr-�'z sr, Ott .��''€``7{n {vhYt'�Y �7:G { M' C�a ,.>. �- E.. .a.: - , A l M f Z .S'Z jt 4:, ''kZ•4ib�i.,.��t.11�'a0.} }: '1 a "4 � ~."' 1x _ � { _ - - r Executive Summarq Cit o'f Riverside -Mr Dan Parks*• - , y (714) 736-2438 (16 MG Linden Reservoir) Asst. Director.of F. :Utilities Rubio Canon Land and Mr. Austin.Weston (818) 797-0509 I ater:Association Vicd-President, (Canon Reservoir)_ Opetions •` City of Santa Maria �ir..Reese:N Riddiough (805) 925=0951 (6 MG Reservoir Roof) Director of.-Public Works City,of Torrance Mr. Robert>S.:O'Cain: 3031 Torrance Blvd. Water Department ;'Water System Torrance, CA 90503 (Rehabilitation of Superinten( ent .(213) 618.-2856 Yukon Reservoir) . City of Upland,:::,' Mr .Larry T Dilley = 1370 N. Benson Ave. Water-Department Water Utility Upland, .CA�91786 (Construction of 15th ` Director,: (714) 982-1352- and.-19th St.:Reservoirs) *Was:the project<manager far this.`project in'Riverside. . i - f . r_ "-�: .k� x.,,^r. w.i ,Y*,a�r�;�i �sF�.;•f a ,q:N r .d -..- _ t } ) Aq i 1-4 SECTION 2 PROJECT APPROACH JMM proposes to provide the City of Huntington Beach with engineering services for the rehabilitation of 16 MG Peck Reservoir. METHOD OF APPROACH Background A study entitled, "Peck Reservoir Evaluation" by Kenneth I. Mullen, Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated March 13, 1986 recommends that the rehabilitation work, as a minimum, will include new roof panels in some areas, repairs to the existing butyl lining, additional new roof vents, blasting and coating of metal supports, brackets, hangers, bolts, etc. Since the construction work primarily consists of rehabilitation of existing structures, it will be necessary to provide sufficient information about these structures to enable contractors to bid competitively on the work. Ideally, interested contractors will have access to the record built drawings for these existing structures. Our Approach to the Project The work will consist of the following three phases: Phase I Preliminary Design Phase II Final Detailed Design Phase III Services During Construction A Preliminary Design Report will be prepared upon completion of the tasks listed under Phase I in the Scope of Work and will cover: geotechnical investigations, structural analysis, environmental concerns, cost estimates and construction scheduling. The Final Detailed Design services in Phase II will contain drawings and specifications, bidding documents and detailed construction cost estimates. The Services During Construction to be performed by the engineer in Phase III are also listed in the Scope of Work and include review of the contractor's submittals. JMM's general philosophy is to work closely with the client during all project phases to ensure that project goals are attained through the application of sound engineering concepts in a manner which is sensitive to local needs. Progress reviews with the City will be held for review of the Preliminary Design Report (10 percent completion of design) and at 50 percent and 90 percent Final 2-1 0 Project Approach b. After the completion of this analysis and evaluation of all the results, we shall report our findings and all pertinent conclusions and evaluations in the preliminary design report. 3. Performance of all necessary field investigations and measurements required to perform Tasks 1 and 2 above. During this task, the need for any concrete testing by coring would be established by reviewing the results of analysis completed in Task 2. If deemed necessary, the City shall engage the services of a testing laboratory to do concrete coring. We will coordinate the efforts with the City and the testing laboratory. This task will include retaining the services of a state licensed geotechnical consultant and approved by the City of Huntington Beach. The geotechnical services shall consist of the following: a. Perform core penetration tests (CPT at specifically determined locations on the reservoir site and perform all necessary testing and soil evaluations (CPT at two (2) locations). b. The geotechnical consultant shall provide the following information: (i) Allowable soil bearing pressure (i0 Active and at rest soil pressure (iii) Seismic soil pressure (iv) Ground acceleration and the site response (v) Total spectra and differential settlement (vi) Groundwater, if any (vii) Potential for liquefaction C. The geotechnical consultant shall compile all the results of his investigations and recommendations in a final report. This report shall be submitted to the City for review. 4. Formulate options and make recommendations to the City for the following: a. Complete new lining. (i) Repair of existing membrane liner and existing joints. (ii) Removal of old liner and installation of a membrane liner on top of existing surface. (iii) Construction of a concrete slab liner on top of existing slab. 2-3 • r Project Approach (iv) Prepare cost estimates for each basin restoration alternative including maintenance costs over a 50-year design life. b. Repair and/or replacement of existing roof materials. (i) A fire resistant material such as aluminum or corrugated steel roof with a supporting system consisting of treated lumber, aluminum, or steel members on new concrete or existing steel columns. (i0 A floating roof system. (iii) Prepare cost estimates for each roof alternative including maintenance costs over a 50-year design life. C. Structural modifications required resulting from analyses described in Task 2 above. d. Modifications necessary, but not shown on the existing renovations plans. 5. Provide back-up information and assistance to City in processing environmental documents. 6. Attend a minimum of two (2) meetings with City staff during Phase I (Excluding field investigations performed). 7. Prepare a noise study of the existing booster pump station. Formulate options and make recommendations to the City on ways to reduce the level of noise that is venerated by this station. 8. Submit a preliminary design report incorporating the rseults of analysis and findings of the tasks above. It shall include: a. A brief description of the finding of the geotechnical consultant and the structural evaluation. b. Descriptions and economic analysis of alternatives for basin restoration and construction of a new roof. C. Sketches showing plan and section of each alternative. d. Recommend the most cost-effective combination of lining and roof construction to the City. 2-4 Project Approach PHASE II - FINAL DESIGN 1. Prepare final working drawings, specifications and other contract documents necessary for bidding based on decisions made in Phase L Final plans to be on City-furnished mylars with no "sticky-backs". Final plans will be property of the City. Z. Provide all structural calculations for the proposed renovation project. Coordination with the City of Huntington Beach Building Division to ensure approval by them during the permit process (City will apply for permit). 3. Cost estimate for all work in final design. 4. Provide support to the City at their request during bid advertisement. 5. Attend a minimum of four (4) meetings with City staff during Phase II, one of which will be the pre-bid meeting. 6. Based on approval of preliminary drawings, specifications and cost estimate, the consultant shall provide forty (40) sets of the following: a. Final Construction Drawings b. All contract documents required for bidding. PHASE III - CONSTRUCTION 1. Provide construction support through weekly meetings and/or telephone calls. 2. Provide shop drawing review. (Note: Tasks 1 and 2 above will be coordinated through the City's representative.) 3. Provide one (1), acceptable to the City, reproducible set of "record" mylar drawings. CITY-FURNISHED SERVICES 1. Provide all available plans and pertinent information relative to the design of the facility. Z. Reasonable access to the site. 3. Provide concrete coring and compression testing of samples in wall and floor. 2-5 Project Approach 4. Preparation of a Negative Declaration or other environmental documents as required. 5. Payment of all permits or fees required by various agencies. PROJECT SCHEDULE A time table for completion and submittals is presented below. The work will commence within three days of receipt of the City's written notice to proceed. Six copies of the Preliminary Design Report will be furnished for the City's review and approval, prior to the beginning of the design phase. Five copies of the preliminary plans will be furnished at the 10 percent level and at the 50 percent level for the City's review. Five copies of the preliminary plans and specifications will be submitted at the 90 percent level for the City's review and comment. The following activity schedule will be used as the basis for completion of the proj ect. SCHEDULE Proposals Submitted December 21, 1988 Notice to Proceed January 23, 1989 Complete Draft of Preliminary Design Report (Phase n 'March 6, 1989 City Review of Complete Draft March 13, 1989 Submit Final Design Report March 20, 1989 Final Design (Phase II) 501/o Complete May 1, 1989 City Review MI ay 8, 1989 Final Design (Phase U 90% Complete May 26, 1989 City Review June 5, 1989 Final Design 100% Complete June 30, 1989 Advertise for Bids July 10, 1989 Open Bids August 14, 1989 Award Construction Contract September 4, 1989 Pre-Construction ?Meeting October 2, 1989 Construction Begins October 16, 1989 2-6 SECTION 3 PROJECT TEAM It is the policy of JM'M to staff all projects from our own organization of experienced engineers. Staffing for this project will be assigned out of our Southwest Regional Office and Corporate Headquarters in Pasadena and supplemented by our local Irvine Office. This office has over 250 individuals, 85 of whom are registered professional engineers. All projects are carried out utilizing a tearn approach with close coordination maintained at all times between the client and the team. The project team has been selected to provide professional engineering and design services combined with proven experience. JMM has used this type of approach on all of its projects in recent years and has found it to be an effective means of achieving the excellence for which the firm strives. The following portions of this section present the capabilities and expertise of the team selected for this project. A project organization chart showing the qualifications of key project team members is presented. Complete biographical data indicating educational and experience qualifications for each of the team members are included at the end of this section. PROJECT MANAGER Due to the importance of this position, JMM has selected an experienced, highly qualified engineer to fill the position of Project Manager for this project. In this capacity he will hold full project responsibility and authority and will serve as principal contact between the City of Huntington Beach and project team members. Mr. Ashok K. Dhingra, a Vice President of JMM and Manager of the Water Department, would serve as Project Manager and would be responsible for the overall technical management of the project. He would also be responsible for project staffing, budget and schedule control, and adhering to the terms and conditions of the project. Mr. Dhingra is a registered Civil and Structural Engineer and has over 20 years of experience in structural analysis, water system design, 'and project management. He has been responsible for or involved in the design of over 50 water storage reservoirs and numerous pipeline and pumping station facilities. PROJECT ENGINEER Mr. David A. Mosher, Principal Engineer, would serve as Project Engineer and would be responsible for design, coordination, and the day-to-day activities of the project. Mr. Mosher, a Professional Engineer has over over 16 years of experience in project engineering, design and construction monitoring of water and wastewater projects. Mr. Mosher has recently completed construction project management of an 18.7 million gallon reservoir for the City of Torrance. He has also recently managed the construction for the 1.93 MG Summit 3-1 Project Team Reservoir No. 2 in Laguna Beach and for the 2 MG Reservoir at Lenain Filtration Plant in Anaheim Hills. Mr. Mosher has worked with JMM as resident and project engineer for several pipelines, pump stations and a wastewater treatment plant. DESIGN DISCIPLINES The project team for this project will also include a group of highly experienced design engineers and professionals. Mr. Osama E. Abdel-Aal would be responsible for structural design, Dr. Janet L. Fahey for environmental issues, Mr. William T. McGivney for construction cost estimates, and Mr. A. Lee Ramage for surveying. TECHNICAL REVIEW C OMM. I=E To ensure that JMM's extensive experience is focused on this project, the Technical Review Committee would review the project following the preliminary layout stage, the preliminary design stage and completion of the final design. The Technical Review Committee is composed of three of JMM's most experienced technical experts who are not involved in the project on a day-to- day basis. The expert's function is to provide an outside, truly objective view of all of the significant aspects of the project. The Technical Review Committee ensures that quality control of all JMM projects and is the City's insurance that their investment results in a efficient and cost-effective project. Philip Gatsoulis Mr. Gatsoulis, a JMM Senior Vice President, has over 29 years of experience in civil and structural engineering with primary involvement in the investigation, study and design of water storage reservoirs, pipelines, treatment plants, pumping stations and the preparation of master plans. He has an extensive background in administration, and direction of engineering personnel in development, planning and design of water works projects. He has supervised field personnel for numerous hydraulic structures and major water pipelines and served on numerous international assignments. Mr. Gatsoulis is currently the Group Manager of JMM's Southwest Region and Discipline Director of Water Retaining Structures and Structural Engineering. In addition, he is responsible for conceptual and technical design reviews of hydraulic structures, major pipelines and special projects. Kenneth G. Ferguson Mr: Ferguson, a Vice President of JMM, is currently the Chief Engineer for the Southwest Region and has 25 years of experience in civil and sanitary engineering with primary involvement in . water treatment, storage and distribution. His background includes project engineering and management for domestic and overseas water treatment, water storage and water transmission and distribution systems. He also has public agency experience with the California Water Quality Control Board. Mr. Ferguson's recent waterworks experience includes serving as Technical Advisor for the 120 mgd expansion of the Jordan Valley Water Purification. Plant, expansion and rehabilitation of the 3-2 Project Team Pasco Water Treatment Plant, the design of 16 mgd Highlands Ranch Water Treatment Plant, and the expansion of the 7.5 mgd Canyon Filtration Plant. Mr. Ferguson was the Technical Director for the study and design of the Eklutna Water Project involving 30 miles of pipe, a 70 mgd water treatment plant and other appurtenant facilities for the Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska, and for the 640 mgd Pantay Water Treatment Plant to serve the City of Manila, Philippines, and the study and design of rehabilitation of the 200 mgd Bull Run headworks and treatment facilities for the City of Portland, Oregon. R. Dewey Dickson Mr. Dickson has over 33 years of experience in civil engineering management and development of design concepts with primary involvement in water works and water resources projects. He currently holds the position of JMM's Corporate Chief Engineer. His background is extensive in feasibility investigations, master planning, and design analyses of water supply and distribution systems. He has been involved with feasibility studies, conceptual design, preparation of plans and specifications and construction monitoring for most of the large-diameter pipeline projects designed by the firm. He has been a leader in the AIA/CEAC sponsored Value Engineering Workshop and is a qualified value engineering analyst. Mr. Dickson is also a member of the AWWA Standards Council and Chairman of the AWWA Standards Committee on steel pipe. SUMMARY The JMM team represents a highly qualified group of engineers who will ensure the efficient design and construction of the City of Huntington Beach reservoir within established time and budget constraints. Detailed biodata for all of the project team are included at the end of this section. 1 3-3 PROJECT RESPONSIBI1=S: PROJECT MANAGER NAME: Ashok K. Dhingra EDUCATION: M.S., Sanitary Engineering, Loyola University, Los Angeles M.S., Structural Engineering, California State University, Los Angeles B.S., Civil Engineering, Punjab Engineering College, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Structural Engineer in California EXPERIENCE SUMMARY: Mr. Dhingra has over twenty years of experience in the structural analysis, design and project engineering of a variety of structures. His responsibilities as a project manager/engineer have included the preliminary and detailed design of various hydraulic structures and over 50 concrete reservoirs and numerous rehabilitation projects. Also responsible for bid analysis, administration of construction contract, shop drawing review and supervision of resident engineer during construction. He serves as a member on the American Concrete Institutes Committees for Sanitary Engineering Structures, Rehabilitation of Concrete Structures and also on Circular Prestressed Concrete Structures. He has been extensively involved in rehabilitation projects in California for cities of Riverside, Torrance, Upland, Santa 'Maria and also with a number of seismic analysis studies. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE: o City of Riverside, California PROJECT MANAGER/ENGINEER responsible for the technical design of the rehabilitation of the 16 million gallon Linden Reservoir. The work involved stability analysis of the embankment and lining of the reservoir. He was also the project manager for another similar project, rehabilitation of the 16 MG Evans Reservoir. Also responsible for bid analysis, support services during construction, shop drawing review, periodic monitoring during construction, final and warranty inspection. o City of Santa Maria, California PROJECT MANAGER for the crack repair, joint sealant, and beam seat pocket. repairs of a 6 MG reservoir. Also responsible for the seismic analysis and roof replacement of the reservoir. o City of Redlands, California STRUCTURAL DESIGN ENGINEER responsible for the design of the 10 MG Highland Avenue Reservoir. Also responsible for structural analysis carried by STRUDL Computer Program. This reservoir required special seismic considerations because of close proximity to earthquake faults. Also responsible for construction contract administration and services during construction. PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES: PROJECT ENGINEER NAME: David A. Mosher EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Michigan B.S., Engineering, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Deputy Building Inspector, Reinforced Concrete, City of Los Angeles EXPERIENCE SUMMARY: Mr. Mosher has over lb years of experience both locally and overseas in planning, design, resident engineering, and construction of domestic water supply facilities such as transmission pipelines, pumping stations, water storage reservoirs and treatment plants. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE: o Laguna Beach County Water District, California RESIDENT ENGINEER for the construction of the 1.9 MG partially buried reinforced concrete Summit Reservoir No. 2. The space- restricted site required special considerations for footings, grading and landscaping. The structure utilized colored concrete for architectural aesthetic rendering. o City of Anaheim, California RESIDENT ENGINEER for the construction of the 2 MG buried reinforced concrete reservoir near the existing Lenain Filtration Plant. The work included sheeting and shoring near the existing facility, installation of pipelines in casings by borings and modifications to the telemetry system. o City of Torrance, California RESIDENT ENGINEER for the construction of the 18.7 MG buried reinforced concrete Ben Haggott Reservoir adjacent to the existing 10 MG Walteria Reservoir. The work included slope reconstruction, installation of transmission mains, modifications to a pump station, and construction of recreation facilities. o City of Alhambra, California Presently PROJECT ENGINEER for the design of the rehabilitation of the 5 MG Kewen Reservoir. The project involves structure modifications, a new aluminum roof, relining the concrete bottom and sloping sides, a transmission main and site improvements. o City of San Fernando, California Presently PROJECT MANAGER for the construction management of a 2.5 MG partially buried reinforced concrete reservoir. The work also includes over 11,000 feet of transmission mains and a new booster station. Also PROJECT ENGINEER for the design and CMS for the repair and rehabilitation of Reservoir No. 2 project, for which a description is included under the Related Experience Section. PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES: STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS NAME: Osama Abdel-Aal EDUCATION: M.S., Structural Engineering, City University, London, England B.S., Civil Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Civil Engineerin California, Egypt, and England EXPERIENCE SUMMARY: Mr. Abdel-Aal has over 16 years of experience in civil and structural engineering with primary emphasis on civil-structural design and project engineering of water and wastewater treatment plants, pumping stations, reinforced concrete reservoirs, steel storage tanks, pipelines and major hydraulic structures. His background also includes extensive design experience in heavy reinforced concrete and steel structures, rigid and flexible tunnels, ventilation buildings, cut-and-covr concrete structures, and underground stations for mass transit systems. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE: o City of North Las Vegas, Nevada As PRINCIPAL ENGINEER, Mr. Abdel-Aal served as PROJECT MANAGER for the structural design of a 20 million gallon reinforced concrete reservoir. In this capacity, he was responsible for the structural design effort. These tasks included project scheduling, supervising and reviewing work by the design team, preparation of cost estimates, and coordination between disciplines. o Southern California Water Company, California STRUCTURAL ENGINEER responsible for the construction of the Yukon precast prestressed concrete reservoir. .He participated in the study and preparation of structural engineering designs for the reservoir. The design experience included: design of the reservoir concrete sections such as roof, wall, floor and column structures; checking of the working drawings; and structural engineering construction management services. o City of Upland, California Presently, Mr. Abdel-Aal is serving as STRUCTURAL ENGINEER for the construction management services during construction of a 5.0 TAG and 5.5 MG prestressed concrete reservoirs. Mr. Abdel-Aal prepared the performance and detail structural specifications for the two reservoirs and is responsible for CMS structural engineering review. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PROJECT MANAGER TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ASHOK K. DHINGRA PHILIP GATSOULIS CHAIRMAN KENNETH G. FERGUSON R. DEWEY DICKSON PROJECT ENGINEER DAVID A. MOSHER PH7YPAALO'N/BUTYL LINING GEOTECHNICAL GLOBE CONSULTING SERVICES GEOFON DESIGN SUPPORT SERVICES STRUCTURAL OSAMA E. ABDEL-AaL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES JANET L. FAHEY SURVEYING A. LEE RAMAGE COST ESTIMATES WILLIAM T. McGIVNEY PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART ASHOK K. DHINGRA VICE PRESIDENT EDUCATION: M.S., .Environmental Engineering, Loyola University, Los Angeles M.S., Structural Engineering, California State University, Los Angeles B.S., Civil Engineering, Punjab Engineering College, Panjab University; Chandigarh, India REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Structural Engineer in California SUMMARY: Mr. Dhingra has over twenty years of experience in the structural analysis, design, project engineering and project management of a variety of projects including water pipelines, pumping stations and reservoirs. His responsibilities have included the design of various hydraulic structures such as filters, clarifiers and sedimentation basins for water and wastewater treatment plants and over 50 concrete reservoirs and over 15 steel tanks. Responsibilities have included conducting economic analysis, cost studies using different types of framing systems, and alternatives considering different materials for preliminary design reports for various reservoir and pumping station projects. As a project engineer/manager, he has been responsible for various projects with the inception of the project from preliminary design through the construction phase for new construction as well as rehabilitation work. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Manager of Water Department: Mr. Dhingra has served progressively as senior structural design engineer, project engineer, manager of Reservoirs and Structures Division and presently as manager of Water Department. In this capacity he is responsible for the supervision of project engineers for planning, water system analysis, design of pipelines, pumping stations and reservoir projects and provides technical direction and control during design and construction of the projects. Project Manager: As a project manager, Mr. Dhingra has been involved in many pipeline, pumping stations and reservoir projects. Concrete reservoir experience includes reservoirs ranging in capacity from 1 MG to 50 MG capacity consisting of circular, rectangular or square shapes with different types of roof framing systems. He has been in responsible charge of projects for the Cities of Torrance, Riverside, Montebello, Corona, Santa Maria, Anaheim and for Las Vegas Valley Water District, Yorba Linda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, Irvine Ranch Water District amongst others. Steel tank experience includes design and rehabilitation of steel tanks ranging in size from 1 MG to 5 MG and with different coating systems. Pumping station designs have included vertical turbine pumps, horizontal split case pumps with electric driven or natural gas driven motors. Project Engineer: His responsibilities have included contract administration during construction, regular visits to the project sites and finding innovative solutions to complex structural problems encountered in the field due to change in site conditions or through lack of interdisciplinary coordination among the subcontractors. Structural Engineer He was responsible for the seismic safety study for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory water system. He was also responsible for the structural analysis to verify conformance to current seismic design criteria and rehabilitation of an existing ASHOK K. DHINGRA (CONTINUED) VICE PRESIDENT 5 MG reservoir for the City of La Habra and an existing 6 MG reservoir for the City of Santa Maria. He has conducted numerous studies on alternative shapes, sizes, siting and framing systems for the reservoirs. He was responsible for developing standard designs of various reservoir capacities for Local Water Utilities Administration, Philippines and for developing a structural design manual (computer applications) for JMM. CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FIRM IN ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Project Engineer: Involved in the structural design and analysis for industrial and commercial buildings, primarily of tilt-up construction, including cost studies using different systems of framing. Responsibilities included field supervision, standardization of typical details and developing a library of programs for a desk calculator. Completed design projects include a seven-story ductile frame concrete building and a three-story concrete building for a school. Computer experience involved setting up the problem and loading conditions for STRUDL package program. CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FIRM IN PASADENA, CALIFORNIA Project Engineer: Mr. Dhingra participated in the conceptual and detailed design of various types of structures including commercial buildings, schools, church buildings, multi-story structures, trusses, transmission towers, tower cranes, and underground utility vaults. For complex structures, the stress analysis was performed by setting up the problem and loading conditions for data processing on an in-house IBM 1130 computing system using the STRESS package program. Responsibilities also included the development of an in-house library of programs and assisting the programmers in developing, refining and verifying the programs. Studies included research and development projects for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development using fiberglass construction for housing, optimization studies for an array of transmission towers for a major southern California utility company, transmission tower line for optimum broken cable loads for a Florida utility company, aesthetic towers and standardization of various underground utility vaults. AIRCRAFT COMPANY IN BURBANK, CALIFORNIA Design Engineer: Mr. Dhingra participated in the conceptual design of aircraft interior equipment for use in the Boeing 747, including food service equipment components and structural accommodations to fit within the given aircraft envelope, using honeycomb panels, fiberglass laminates, polyplastics, and sheet metal. MANUFACTURING FIRM IN HUNTINGTON PARK, CALIFORNIA Junior Engineer: Involved in the design of mechanical actuating components including linear actuators, hydraulic pumps and valves. His responsibilities included stress, fluid flow, and weight calculations used in the conceptual and final design. ORGANIZATION: American Concrete Institute Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Seismological Society of America Structural Engineers Association of Southern California COMMITTEES: Member ACI Committee 350 - Environmental Engineering Structures Member ACI Committee 344 - Circular Prestressed Concrete Structures Member ACI Committee 364 - Rehabilitation DAVID A. MOSHER EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Michigan B.S., Engineering, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Deputy Building Inspector, Reinforced Concrete, City of Los Angeles SUMMARY: Mr. Mosher has over 15 years of experience both locally and overseas in planning, design, and construction of domestic water supply and wastewater facilities such as pumping stations, treatment plants, transmission pipelines, and water storage reservoirs. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Resident Engineer: Mr. Mosher was the resident engineer for construction of an 18.7 million gallon buried reinforced concrete reservoir. Associated with this project were modifications to a pumping station to convert from natural gas to electric driven pumps. Also included in the project were several pipelines and extensive slope earthwork operations on a restricted site. This was a mixed use project providing recreational facilities including soccer field, tennis courts and clubhouse. He was resident engineer for the construction of an expansion and upgrading of an existing wastewater treatment plant to increase its capacity from 11.0 mgd to 16.5 mgd. Included in the project were additions or modifications to pumping stations, headworks, laboratory, aeration basins, primary and secondary clarifiers, primary and secondary digesters, a filter press system, odor control facility, and an energy recovery system. The work involved the installation of 69 new pumps in the various pumping stations. Mr. Mosher was resident engineer for the construction of other reinforced concrete reservoirs including a 1.9 million gallon partially buried reservoir and a 2 million gallon buried reservoir. The later two reservoirs .were both built on space-restricted sites that required special considerations for footings, sheeting and shoring near adjacent facilities, grading and landscaping. He has also worked on site as the resident engineer for the construction of large diameter water transmission pipelines. The work involved construc- tion of over 7 miles of 42-inch, 36-inch, 30-inch, 27-inch, and 16-inch diameter pipeline using reinforced plastic mortar pipe and cement mortar lined and coated steel pipe. This construction project required particularly close inspection as all the pipe being installed was to replace a recently constructed pipeline that had been abandoned because of multiple severe failures. CARE, INC., NEW YORK, OVERSEAS BRANCH Civil Engineering Consultant: Mr. Mosher was posted to Kenya and worked as engineering manager in CARE's water development program. He was responsible for writing and evaluating proposals for materials procurement and delivery to over 90 domestic water supply construction projects involving storage reservoirs, pumping stations and treatment plants. Working closely with the Government of Kenya, Mr. Mosher assisted with DAVID A. MOSHER (CONTINUED) planning, design, and construction coordination of water supply systems covering a variety of terrain and climates and utilizing various water sources including springs, rivers, lakes, dams, wells, and rain water catchments. He initiated a program for the installation of low-cost water filtration systems for rural water supplies. U.S. PEACE CORPS, MINISTRY OF WATER DEVELOPMENT, KENYA Project Engineer: Mr. Mosher worked as construction manager in the Government of Kenya's rural water supply construction program. He supervised construction of domestic water supply facilities including roads, bridges, intake works, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and treatment plants. ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association R. DEWEY DICKSON EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT EDUCATION: B.E., Civil Engineering, University of Southern California REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Professional Engineer in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Nevada, South Dakota and Virginia Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers SUMMARY: Mr. Dickson has extensive experience in civil engineering management and development of design concepts with primary involvement in water works and water resources projects. Background is extensive in feasibility investigations, master planning, and design analyses of water supply and distribution systems. He has been involved with feasibility studies, conceptual design, preparation of plans and specifications and construction monitoring for most of the large-diameter pipeline projects designed by the firm. Mr. Dickson has also been ultimately involved in the design of numerous pumping stations, reservoirs and water treatment plants. He has been a leader in the AIA/CEAC sponsored Value Engineering Workshop and is a qualified value engineering analyst. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Mr. Dickson is executive vice president and chief engineering officer, and director of the firm. Since joining the firm in 1953, he has served progressively as design engineer, project engineer, office engineer, senior project engineer, head of the Water and Wastewater Engineering Department, and is presently in charge of corporate engineering. In the latter role, Mr. Dickson's primary responsibility is to maintain the firm's Engineering Excellence program. Mr. Dickson has served in various roles as project engineer, project manager and principal-in-charge for major transmission pipeline projects such as Las Vegas Valley Water District, San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, and the cities of Beverly Hills, Monrovia, and Pomona. As a member of the Standards Council and chairman of the Steel Pipe Committee of the American Water Works Association, he has gained broad knowledge of all types of piping materials and construction methods which have proven to be most cost- effective to the owners. As a principal engineer and senior company officer, he has been in charge of design of multimillion-dollar water works and water resources projects and has prepared feasibility studies and master plans for numerous municipalities, public agencies, and private water companies. CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN PASADENA, CALIFORNIA Design Engineer: Mr. Dickson's major function was the supervision of engineering design and drafting for various projects involving site layouts, roads, airports, storm drainage, water supply and distribution, wastewater collection systems, and liquid waste treatment and disposal. He was in charge of the civil engineering phase of design and preparation of construction drawings for a 15,000-man Marine Corps Base in California. R. DEWEY DICKSON (CONTINUED) EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT ORGANTZATIONS: American Academy of Environmental Engineers American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association American Public Works Association International Water Supply Association Chi Epsilon Scapa Praetor (University of Southern California School of Public Administration) David 'M. Wilson Associates (University of Southern California School of Engineering) COMMITTEES: Chairman, AWWA Standards Committee on Steel Pipe Vice Chairman of AWWA Standards Council PUBLICATIONS: "25 mg Capacity Reservoir Roof Provides Parking Area," Western Construction, July 1961. "Reservoir Roofs," paper presented at Orange County 'Water Association '.Meeting, February 1966. "Water Facilities Aesthetics - A Consulting Engineer's Viewpoint," Journal, AWWA, February 1966. "A Consulting Engineer's Viewpoint," Journal, AWWA, February 1968. "The Biggest in the West - Las Vegas Won't Gamble on 'Water Supply," The American City, June 1968. "Gas Engines Power Giant Water Booster Station," Water & Sewage Works, July 1968. "Huge 3ooster Station is Gas Fueled," Consulting Engineer, August 1969. "Giant Self-Contained Gas Engine Powered Pumping Station Nearing Completion," Consulting Engineer, 1969. "Consulting Engineer's Building Tailored to Needs," Consulting Engineer, April 1971. "Devil Canyon=Azusa Pipeline - Design Innovations," R. Dewey Dickson, S.J. Abrera, Junn-Ling Chao, Norbert Schneider; Journal, ASCE, January 1974. "Las Vegas Valley 'Water District Builds Largest Gas Engine-Driven 'Water Booster Station." DR. JANET FAHEY EDUCATION: D. Env., Environmental Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles M.A., Biology, University of California, Los Angeles B.A., Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California and Arizona SUMMARY: Dr. Fahey has over 13 years of experience, both domestic and overseas, in the areas of wastewater and water supply facilities planning, wastewater reclamation and environmental analysis. Her background includes evaluation of environmental impacts relative to water treatment and storage, wastewater collection, treatment and disposal, shoreline development, wastewater reclamation, revegetation and aquaculture. She also has experience in field and laboratory analysis of water quantity, quality and biota, as well as in field instruction at the university level. Dr. Fahey currently heads the environmental group at JMM's Pasadena headquarters. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Principal Environmental Scientist: Since joining JMM in 1976, Dr. Fahey has prepared or directed many of the firm's environmental impact reports and studies relating to waste treatment and disposal and water supply, and performed numerous water quality studies on marine, fresh water and ground water systems. Dr. Fahey currently heads the environmental group at JMM's Pasadena headquarters. She is thoroughly familiar with both state and federal environmental regulations and guidelines pertaining to environmental documents, public participation in the environmental review process, endangered species, water and air quality, and historical and cultural resources. Her experience includes numerous assessments of potential impacts of wastewater discharges on receiving water flows, quality and biota in Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside, Imperial, San Diego and Los Angeles Counties. Dr. Fahey recently prepared the environmental assessment of river treatment and diversion and access restriction alternatives to abate pollution and public health hazards from the New River in Imperial County, considered the most polluted river in California. Dr. Fahey acted as project manager on the Mittry Lake Wildlife Area Revegetation Project for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Soil, water and biological studies of the 300-acre site culminated in the design and construction of a state-of-the-art drip irrigation system for over 6,000 native trees and shrubs planted along the Colorado River northeast of Yuma, Arizona. Dr. Fahey recently acted as project engineer on the EIR for the Malibu Wastewater Facilities Plan, a major study of provision of a regional sewage collection, treatment and disposal system to replace failing septic tank systems. Critical issues evaluated included public health hazard, traffic, growth inducement, archaeology, riparian and. nearshore marine habitat protection, noise, recreational use and quality of life. For this controversial project, Dr. Fahey arranged and conducted nine public meetings in Malibu, and coordinated with all responsible federal, state, regional and local public agencies plus more than 55 active homeowners associations. DR. JANET FAIIEY (CONTINUED) Environmental studies include a water quality study for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, in which Dr. Fahey analyzed existing algae and midge fly problems and control alternatives for the San Joaquin Reservoir, an open drinking water reservoir source for potable water. She also assessed the expected impacts on taste and odor of blending waters from two sources for the North Texas Municipal Water District. Dr. Fahey has been responsible for environmental studies of the impacts of effluent collection, treatment and disposal facilities on a regional as well as an individual treatment plant basis. In federal Environmental Impact Statements/Assessments for four Puget Sound discharge treatment plants in the Metropolitan Seattle area, Dr. Fahey evaluated the impacts of a variety of alternative wastewater management plans with particular emphasis on effects of effluent discharge and combined sewer overflows on Puget Sound and regional lakes and rivers. Dr. Fahey acted as assistant project engineer on the Environmental Assessment of the Dallas-Fort Worth Areawide Water Quality Management (Section 208) Plan. On the Orange and Los Angeles Counties Water Reuse Study, Dr. Fahey acted as assistant project engineer, directing efforts to characterize the magnitude, location, type and constraints of potential uses of reclaimed wastewater in urban Los Angeles and Orange Counties. This pioneering study involved potential reclaimed water service areas for ten major wastewater treatment facilities in which over 500 potential industrial and landscape irrigation uses were identified, and determination of the feasibility of reclaimed water distribution systems. She also acted as project engineer on the design of improvements to wastewater treatment, disposal and reclamation facilities for the California Institution for Men at Chino, a facility of the California Department of Corrections. Dr. Fahey was also heavily involved in preparation and editing of the recent EIR for Chino Basin Ground Water Storage Project, a major conjunctive use project proposed for southern California. On an overseas assignment, Dr. Fahey evaluated physical, biological and human resources impacts, with emphasis on ground and surface water quantity and quality, public health and wastewater reuse potential, of proposed improvements to water supply and wastewater management and drainage facilities for Madaba, Karak, Tafila and Ma'an, four cities in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. In eastern Sudan, she evaluated a full range of impacts of additional ground and surface water supply development for Gedaref Town and neighboring Ethiopian refugee settlements. On Antigua, W.I., Dr. Fahey prepared an environmental assessment of ground and surface water development on water use patterns, public health, existing septic tank disposal systems, tourism and endangered species. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES Graduate Research: Dr. Fahey investigated the effects of suburban development and recreational use on the water quality of the Bishop Creek Drainage in the Sierra Nevada Range, Inyo County, California. The study included field sampling, data processing and data interpretation which culminated in the formulation of land and water use policy recommendations. Another investigation involved the institutional and water quality aspects of hydroponics and aquaculture projects using reclaimed wastewater. DR. ;JANET FAHEY (CONTINUED) FR7DAY HARBOR LABORATORIES, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Dr. Fahey evaluated the feasibility and potential impacts of a major shoreline planned unit development and salmon hatchery proposed for San Juan Island, Washington. Field sampling and literature reviews were used to evaluate physical, biological and human environmental settings and impacts, with special reference to recreational use, aqua- culture potential, marine and stream water quality planning. REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, LOS ANGELES REGION (4) Graduate Student Assistant: Dr. Fahey prepared an evaluation of the present and projected discharges to surface and ocean waters of the Region. She participated in activities of the Board's Environmental Group, including field sampling and laboratory evaluation of water quality. Dr. Fahey has also acted as field instructor for courses in southern California ecology, Hawaiian natural history and general oceanography, the last on board the oceanographic vessel R/V Vantuna. PUBLISHED REPORTS: Fahey, J., Perrine, R.L. and Dracup, J. (eds), "Waste Nutrient Recycling Using Hydroponic and Aquacultural Methods," Environmental Science and Engineering, UCLA, 1975 (editor and contributor). Kawaratani, R.K. and Perrine, R.L. (eds), "Wilderness Water Quality: Bishop Creek Baseline Study, 1974," Environmental Science and Engineering, UCLA 1975 (contributor). ORGANIZATIONS: American Association for the Advancement of Science American Chemical Society Association of Environmental Professionals American Society of Professional Ecologists Environmental Science and Engineering Society Water Pollution Control Federation KENNETH G. FERGUSON VICE PRESIDENT EDUCATION: M.S., Sanitary Engineering, Washington State University B.S., Civil Engineering, Washington State University REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer in Oregon Civil Engineer in Washington and California Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers SUMMARY: Mr. Ferguson has 25 years of experience in civil and sanitary engineering with primary involvement in water treatment, storage, and distribution. His background includes project engineering and management for domestic and overseas water treatment, water storage, and water transmission and distribution systems. He also has public agency experience with the California Water Quality Control Board. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Mr. Ferguson has been employed by JMM for over 20 years and is currently serving as Chief Engineer for the firm's Southwest Region. Mr. Ferguson's recent waterworks experience includes serving as: • Technical Advisor for the 120 mgd expansion of the Jordan Valley Water Purification Plant, expansion and rehabilitation of the Pasco Water Treatment Plant, the design of the 16 mgd Highlands Ranch Water Treatment Plant and the expansion of the 7.5 mgd Canyon Filtration Plant. • Technical Director for the study and design of the Eklutna Water Project involving 30 miles of pipe, a 70 mgd water treatment plant and other appur- tenant facilities for the Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska; and for the 640 mgd Pantay Water Treatment Plant to serve the City of Manila, Philippines; and the study and design of rehabilitation of the 200 mgd Bull Run headworks and treatment facilities for the City of Portland, Oregon. • Project Manager and/or Project Engineer for the study and design of the 100 MG Salt Lake County Terminal Reservoir; the 32 MG Eastside Reservoir for the City of Seattle; the City of Portland's 10,000 foot 60-inch-diameter Phase IV of the Washington County Supply Line and 200 mgd Bull Run Fluoridation Facilities; and the study, design and construction services for the City of Portland's 50 MG Powell Butte Reservoir and the City of Everett's Reservoir No. 6 project including 20 MG of storage and a 22 mgd pumping station. In addition, Mr. Ferguson served as project engineer for the rehabilitation of a major water treatment plant and the design of a new 400 mgd plant for Manila, Philippines. As project manager on a general consulting services contract in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Mr. Ferguson was responsible for design supervision of the 750 mgd Guarau Water Treatment Plant; construction supervision of the treatment plant, and 50 kilometers of transmission • KENNETH G. FERGUSON (CONTINUED) VICE PRESIDENT pipeline ranging from 30 to 84 inches in diameter; training of plant operators; rehabilitation design of eight existing treatment plants; and advisory services on telemetering, mechanical maintenance, and water system operation. He has also served as project engineer and assistant project engineer on several projects including the design of a 37.5 mgd water filtration plant for the City of Escondido; the design of a 2.5 MG and a 13.0 MG reservoir and an 18 mgd water filtration plant for the San Dieguito Irrigation District; and the design of various water transmission main projects. CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN OXNARD, CALIFORNIA Project Engineer: Mr. Ferguson was responsible for project and resident engineering on enlargement of a waste treatment plant; modifications of existing sewer force main system, wastewater collection system, and water distribution system; design of several water transmission mains and water treatment facilities; and preparation of feasibility studies for water and wastewater projects. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COASTAL WATER QUAI_= CONTROL BOARD Sanitary Engineer: Mr. Ferguson was responsible for administering self-monitoring programs for all waste discharges on the central coast, inspection of waste treatment plants and investigation of alleged pollution of fresh and salt waters. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Research Assistant: Mr. Ferguson worked on the investigation of adequacy of water distribution systems, membrane filter techniques in comparison to the MPN test, and domestic waste treatment by oxidation ponds. ORGANIZATIONS: American Academy of Environmental Engineers American Water Works Association Tau Beta Pi Phi Kappa Phi • • PHILIP GATSOULIS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT EDUCATION: M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Texas B:S., Civil Engineering, Robert College, Istanbul, Turkey REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California and Oregon Structural Engineer in California, Nevada and Oregon Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers SUMMARY: Mr. Gatsoulis has over 28 years of experience in civil and structural engineering and project management with primary involvement in the investigation, study, and design of water storage reservoirs, pipelines, treatment plants, pumping stations, and the preparation of master plans. He has an extensive background in administration, and direction of engineering personnel in development, planning and design of water works projects. He has supervised field personnel for numerous hydraulic structures and major pipelines, water and wastewater collection projects, and master planning. In addition to water works engineering, he has been responsible for structural design and planning of bridges, commercial buildings, industrial plants, military installations, and recreational park developments. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Mr. Gatsoulis is Discipline Director of hydraulic structures. As Discipline Director, he is responsible, company-wide, for conceptual and technical design reviews of hydraulic structures, major pipelines and special projects. Project Manager: He has participated in the design of several water storage reservoirs and reservoir covers including the 32 mg Seattle Eastside Reservoir. He was structural engineering manager for the EPCOT (Experimental Prototype City of Tomorrow) Seas Pavilion in Walt Disney World, Florida. He has participated in special studies and investigations on pipeline failures, foundation repairs and structural integrity. Project Engineer: Experience includes the design of a 64.5-million-gallon buried reinforced concrete reservoir for East Bay Municipal Water District, a reservoir and pumping station for the city of Monrovia, California, and other reservoirs for the cities of Pomona, Beverly Hills and Redlands, California; and a 60-million- gallon reservoir and pumping station for the City of San Francisco. He was involved in the design of a reinforced concrete bridge to the San Antonio- Calaveras water treatment plant in San Francisco and for numerous reservoirs, buried or partially buried, with multi-purpose utilization of the roof area. PHILIP GATSOULIS (CONTINUED) SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Structural Engineer: Mr. Gatsoulis' experience includes potential seismic and dynamic force. analyses for earthquake resistant design of major liquid retaining structures and buildings. Earthquake resistant designs for which Mr. Gatsoulis was responsible were the multi-purpose-use buried reinforced concrete Greystone and Dunsmuir reservoirs, the access bridge across the Arroyo Seco to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, and numerous other facilities. International Assignments: Assignments include Brazil, the Philippines, Australia and Indonesia, either as a project engineer or for technical review on water treatment and distribution projects. CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN LOS ANGELES Structural Designer: Mr. Gatsoulis was directly involved with the structural design and planning supervision of pulp mills, industrial plants and the Matterhorn Mountain in Disneyland, California. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION FIRMS IN LOS ANGELES Structural Designer: Work involved designs for chemical process plants, support facility buildings, aircraft hangars, petrochemical facilities and an atomic reactor facility for the Atomic Energy Commission, presently the Department of Energy (DOE). Assistant Engineer: Mr. Gatsoulis participated in the design and preparation of structural plans for substation equipment support structures, a steam plant, and miscellaneous other structures. ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers American Concrete Institute American Water Works Association Structural Engineers Association of Southern California American Academy of Environmental Engineers • OSAMA ABDEL-AAL EDUCATION: Engineering Management Program, California Institute of Technology, expected completion, late 1988 M.S., Structural Engineering, City University, London, England B.S., Civil Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California, Egypt, and England SUMMARY: Mr. Abdel-Aal has over 16 years of experience in civil and structural engineering with leading consulting engineering firms. This experience has covered all aspects of project design management, project engineering and structural design, specifications, construction documents preparation, construction management, and job site inspections. The primary emphasis of this experience has been the civil-structural design and project engineering of water and wastewater treatment plants, pumping stations, reinforced concrete reservoirs, steel storage tanks, pipelines and major hydraulic structures. Mr. Abdel-Aal's background also includes extensive design experience in heavy reinforced concrete and steel structures, rigid and flexible tunnels, ventilation buildings, cut-and-cover concrete structures, and underground stations for mass transit systems. In addition, Mr. Abdel-Aal has performed structural design of airport facilities, industrial, educational and recreational projects, along with construction management and supervision, construction scheduling, reviewing contractor and subcontractor work, and acting as liaison between contractors and clients. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSIILMNG ENGINEERS, INC. As Principal Engineer in the firm's structural division, Mr. Abdel-Aal has served as project design manager and structural project engineer responsible for the design of various water and wastewater treatment plants, -operations and administration buildings, and architectural and industrial projects. In this capacity he has been responsible for the design effort, budget preparation, manpower requirements, scheduling, supervising, reviewing and coordinating various disciplines, specifications and contract documents. Mr. Abdel-Aal's previous experience with the firm was in the capacity of supervising structural project engineer. He was responsible for the structural design of water and wastewater treatment plants including responsibility for specifications, preparation of contract documents, and job site inspections. OSAMA ABDEL-AAL (Continued) Projects on which Mr. Abdel-Aal was responsible for the structural design are as follows: • Eastern Wastewater Treatment Plant, Sunnymead, California • Hale Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant, Escondido, California • Quincy Water Treatment Plant, Aurora, Colorado • Salt Lake County Water Conservancy District's Southeast Regional Water Treatment Plant • Ute Water Treatment Plant, Colorado • Watsonville Wastewater Treatment Plant, Watsonville, California • East Bank Wastewater Treatment Plant, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana • Centennial Water Treatment Plant, Colorado • Marrero Wastewater Treatment Plant, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana • Wastewater Treatment Plant for the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, California • Hinckley Water Treatment Plant, Redlands, California • The New York City Aquarium, New York • The Living Seas Pavilion for EPCOT Center, Walt Disney World, Florida • 20 mg Reservoir, City of North Las Vegas • Yukon Reservoir, City of Los Angeles MAJOR CONSULTING FIRM, NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA As senior engineer in the special design office, Mr. Abdel-Aal served as project engineer and assistant to the project manager for the structural design of a $70 million advanced wastewater treatment plant for the City of Orlando, Florida. In this capacity, he was responsible for the design effort, scheduling, supervising, and reviewing of work done by the design team, and the preparation of project specifications, cost estimates and the coordination between disciplines. SIR WMLIAM HAT CROW AND PARTNERS, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LONDON, ENGLAND Mr. Abdel-Aal served as a civil-structural engineer in the Tunnels Department. He participated in studying and preparing structural and civil engineering designs of several local and overseas tunnels. The design experience included main layout, open approaches, retaining walls, cut-and-cover concrete sections, bored rigid and flexible tunnels and underground stations, Specification preparation and checking working drawings were part of his responsibilities. The main projects in which Mr. Abdel-Aal participated were the Hong Kong Mass Transit System Tunnels; Heathrow Airport Underground Station (London, England); the Suez Tunnel (Egypt); and El Sharjah Tunnel (Persian Gulf). THE ARAB CONTRACTORS, OSMAN A. OSMAN, CAIRO, EGYPT Mr. Abdel-Aal served as structural engineer in the design office where he participated in the structural design of several projects. The expansion of Cairo OSAMA ABDEL-AAL (continued) International Airport, the new control tower and the schools of pharmacy (Tanta University) were some of these projects. Mr. Abdel-Aal served as resident engineer for the construction of several civil engineering projects. In this capacity he was responsible for planning and scheduling the different stages of construction and work progress valuation. Contract administration, supervising and overseeing the subcontractors and handling relationships between client, engineer, subcontractors and the public were also included in his responsibilities. ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers American Concrete Institute SEAOC PUBLICATIONS: Abdel-Aa1, M. O. "Analysis of Cable Stayed Bridges." London University, England. 1978. WILLIAM T. McGIVNEY EDUCATION: M.S., Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island B.S., Economics, California Polytechnic University SUMMARY: Mr. McGivney provides highly specialized cost estimating services and economic analytical assistance to JMM engineering projects. This expertise is based on years of practical experience with construction planning techniques. Since joining our firm he has been involved with review and implementation of state-of-the-art computer-assisted cost estimating programs at JMM. His experience includes in-depth financial and accounting analysis as controller for a major manufacturing firm. Mr. McGivney is also responsible for the complete project scheduling effort in support of JMM engineering projects. This support takes the form of both production work and educational seminars throughout the many regional offices of JMM. He has published an in-house series on CPM scheduling which has been video-taped and made available for the indoctrination of new and experienced JMM engineers. The main thrust of this scheduling production effort is CPM scheduling, delay claims analysis, and construction management and is carried out by an expert staff of engineers and technical support personnel. EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Senior Schedule Analyst: Mr. McGivney has been responsible for establishing and developing the scheduling effort at JMM. He has developed the Project Controls Master Schedule system for all in-house design production work in the Southwest Region. He is responsible for primary schedule submittal review for all Construction Management Services projects, and in this capacity reviews the project specification and contract submittals. Senior Cost Estimator: Mr. McGivney is assigned to the firm's Financial Studies Division as principal estimator. He is responsible_for the preparation of final cost estimates on water and wastewater treatment plants, pumping stations, reservoirs, transmission pipelines, operations and control buildings, and other associated plant facility designs produced by the firm. In this capacity, Mr. McGivney provides updating of all price indexing and unit price changes relating to component materials common to water and wastewater construction. He is also directly involved with the firm's various computer models used in the analysis of treatment plant costs and project cost optimization developed to assist project engineers with both preliminary and detailed cost estimates as well as alternative design selection. He recently completed an estimate for a JMM designed project (in joint venture with another firm) with the City of Los Angeles involving more than two thousand contract drawings and over seventeen thousand pages of specifications with an estimated construction cost in excess of $200 million. MAJOR MANUFACTURING FIRM, LOS ANGELES In the role of plant controller, Mr. McGivney was responsible to corporate officers for continuous detailed analysis of plant operating costs and profit analysis for all product lines. He maintained a current data base for the computer inventory system (M.I.S.) including reconciliation of printout reports to verify system integrity. WILLIAM T. McGIVNEY (CONTINUED) PRIVATE BUSINESS Mr. McGivney spent a number of years in the private business sector in the construction market. He spent two years as general manager of two cabinet and millwork companies performing all management functions, all cost estimating, and the fixing of profit margins for the entire product spread. Mr. McGivney was self-employed for several years in commercial and residential construction. He operated as a general contractor and was directly responsible for estimating, project management, and coordination of all partici- pating trades. 3 A. LEE RAMAGE EDUCATION: International Correspondence School, Courses in Surveying SUMMARY: Mr. Ramage has over 28 years of experience as a surveyor for civil and san engineering projects. itary EXPERIENCE: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Surveyor - Chief of Party: Mr. Ramage has been a surveyor with the firm for over 23 years. He has performed field survey work for all the major water and wastewater facilities designed by JMM during that time. These projects include water and wastewater treatment plants, water storage reservoirs, water distribution pipelines, transmission mains, and wastewater collection and disposal systems. Recently completed design projects which are typical of Mr. Ramage's surveying experience are the 36-mile Devil Canyon-Azusa Pipeline which is transporting water to Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, California; the 75 mgd Escondido-Vista Filtration Plant; and a 45 mgd water treatment plant and 10 mg water storage reservoir for the city of Fairfield, California. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA Surveyor: Performed survey work for sanitary engineering projects which included sewage treatment and collection facilities, trunk lines and interceptors. SECTION 4 RELATED EXPERIENCE Over 200 reservoirs have been designed by the firm, ranging from a 20,000 gallon steel tank to a 1 billion gallon asphaltic-lined open reservoir with a compacted earth embankment. Reservoir designs have included reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete, precast concrete arch-panel, and steel construction for buried, partially-buried, ground level, and elevated structures. The firm also designed the 64,400,000 gallon, 40 foot deep reinforced concrete Dunsmuir Reservoir in Oakland, California. This storage facility is the largest reservoir of its type in the United States and is also the deepest buried reservoir of large size in the country. JMM was awarded an Engineering Excellence Award by the Consulting Engineers Council of the United States for the design of the 19.3 million gallon Greystone Reservoir for the City of Beverly Hills, California. Other awards for reservoir projects have included the Engineering Excellence Award by the Consulting Engineers Association of California for. the Florin Reservoir and Pump Station in Sacramento, California and the Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement Award by the American Society of Civil Engineers, San Diego Section, for the Pechstein Reservoir, Vista Irriation District, California. JMM has also been involved in numerous reservoir rehabilitations including seismic studies, structural repair, joint replacement, lining, flexible covers, roof repair, and new roof construction. Specific examples of recent reservoir rehabilitation projects include projects for the Cities of Alhambra, Beverly Hills, Riverside, Seal Beach, San Fernando, San Francisco, Torrance, Whittier; Helix Water District and for California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. New reservoirs with lining include the 40 MG Val Vista Reservoir for the City of Phoenix, Arizona and the 40 MG Leonard R. Fayle Reservoir for the Las Vegas Valley Water District. A brief description of the projects performed for the above mentioned clients is given below. A representative list of JMM's reservoir projects is provided at the end of this section. Beverly Manor Reservoir, City of Seal Beach, California JMM was selected by the City of Seal Beach to prepare plans and specifications for the installation of a 45-mil reinforced hypalon lining floor system. The project also included construction of a corrugated aluminum roof supported by glue-laminated wood framing and reinforced concrete columns to cover the 3.9 million gallon facility which was uncovered because of deterioration of a floating cover. This is a partially buried, 210-foot square reservoir. Also included were piping and paving modifications. 4-1 Related Experience Reservoir No. 2, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California This project involved the preparation of plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of the walls and floor of a 1 million gallon circular concrete reservoir. The work included sandblasting of the wall, floor and columns, sealing of joints and cracks in the reservoir wall and floor, coating the interior wall, floor and column surface areas, and installing a stainless steel ladder. Linden Reservoir, City of Riverside, California This project involved the rehabilitation of the concrete basin of a 16 MG reservoir constructed in 1927. JMM was retained to perform an evaluation of the structural integrity of the facility and analyze alternative schemes to reline the basin; to prepare detailed plans and specifications for the design of a new liner; and to provide construction management services. Due to the poor condition of the reservoir basin, a 6-inch thick cast-in-place slab was placed on the slopes and a 5-inch thick slab placed on the floor on top of the existing concrete. The work also involved the removal of approximately 200 existing concrete column stubs and recoating approximately 1001inear feet of the existing inlet pipeline. Ke-xen Reservoir, City of Alhambra, California Currently under design, this project involves the rehabilitation of a 5 MG concrete-lined embankment fill reservoir constructed in 1927. JMM was retained to prepare detailed plans and specifications for a new roof, new site piping, and a new cast-in-place 6-inch concrete liner on the slab and slopes. Due to low compaction density in the embankment fill, some of the sloping side walls are being replaced with new vertical concrete walls. Reservoir No. 2, San Fernando, California Construction work is set to begin on this project which involves the repair and rehabilitation of a circcular 3 MG partially buried concrete reservoir. JM"'4 prepared plans and specifications and is doing CMS for the work which includes repair of concrete construction joints, sealant replacement, and repair or replacement of piping, vents, ladder and other fixtures. Walteria Reservoir, City of Torrance, California Currently under design, this project involves crack repair and construction joint sealant replacement in a 10 MG reinforced concrete buried reservoir constructed in 1952-53. Also involved is replacement of drain valves and rehabilitation of outlet valves and other fixtures. Evans Reservoir, City of Riverside, California This rehabilitation project of an existing 16 MG above ground reinforced concrete reservoir consisted of the replacement of deteriorated joint sealant, crack reparation in the floors and walls, replacement or renovation of corroded galvanized metal items, cleaning the reservoir and miscellaneous other work. 4-2 Related Experience Rehabilitation of Stanford Heights Reservoir, City of San Francisco, California This project consisted of relining the floor with a new concrete lining and miscellaneous other modifications to piping system and other appurtenances. The reservoir is located in a residential neighborhood. Rehabilitation of Helix No. 2 Tank, Helix Water District, La Mesa, California This project consisted of thickening the existing wall by placing concrete for a thickness of 12 inches on the outside. The reservoir had an inside diameter of 55 feet and a capacity of 0.36 MG. The work also involved sealing of wall cracks and widening of existing footing on this above-ground reinforced concrete reservoir. Construction of 40 MG Val Vista Reservoir, City of Phoenix, Arizona JMM was selected by the City of Phoenix to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of a 40 million gallon partially buried, rectangular reservoir with overall dimensions of 634 feet by 458 feet. The floor is a hopper-bottom type with porous asphaltic concrete and lined with a 45 mil fabric-reinforced hypalon lining system. The reservoir roof has a structural steel framing system with aluminum V-beam roofing and is supported by reinforced concrete columns. This project also included earthwork, instrumentation, fencing, an access road and miscellaneous other work. Construction of 40 MG Leonard R. Fayle Reservoir, Las Vegas Water District, Las Vegas, Nevada Las Vegas Valley Water District retained JMM to prepare plans and specifica- tions for the construction of a 40 million gallon above ground, rectangular reservoir with overall dimensions of 675 feet by 418 feet. The vertical walls of the rservoir has an appearance of an embankment-type structure. The floor is hopper-bottom type with porous asphaltic concrete and lined with a an EPDM lining system. The roof has structural steel framing system with corrugated aluminum roofing. The reservoir is dividedinto two equal units by a dividing wall. This project also included grading, paving, fencing, electrical and miscellaneous other work. Investigation of Reservoir No. 7, Monterey Park, California JMM was retained by the City of Monterey Park to conduct a seismic analysis of a circular 3 MG above ground reservoir. The structure, a prestressed concrete design, had been removed from service due to severe damage caused by the Whittier earthquake. JMM performed a field investigation, analyzed the structural design, and provided a report of findings along with recommendations. Rehabilitation of 6 MG Reservoir, City of Santa Maria, California JMM was retained for the design and construction services of the rehabilitation of an existing 6 MG reservoir roof. The specifications incorporated three alternative bids; a complete roof replacement with an aluminum roof deck, a complete roof replacement with a galvanized steel roof deck, or replacement of 4-3 • i Related Experience a portion of the existing roof deck. The actual construction involved the aluminum roof deck option. Under a separate construction contract, also designed by JMM, joint sealant from the gunite floor and slope joints was removed and replaced with polyurethane sealant. Reservoir No. 5, City of Ontario, California JMM was selected for the fast track design-for the rehabilitation of a portion of the aluminum roof of a 10 MG reservoir that was blown off due to high winds in excess of 100 mph. The work involved replacing 49,000 square feet of aluminum roofing, and associated roof framing, vents, and access hatches. Rubio Canyon Reservoir, Rubio Canyon Land and Water Association, California In January 1985, high winds associated with a cyclone storm caused severe damage to the 3.5 MG rubio Canyon Reservoir. This reservoir is the sole storage for the Association's upper supply zone and therefore required urgent repair. The project required the complete rebuilding of over 16,000 square feet of roofing and associated supporting structure. JMM was able to assess the damage, prepare specifications, drawings and contract documents, and provide construction management services that allowed the reservoir to be back in service within 90 days of the storm. Reservoirs No. 1, No. 5 and the Two West End Reservoirs, City of Upland, California JMM has been retained by the City of Upland to rehabilitate four reservoirs within the water system. The reservoirs vary in diameter from 100 feet to 150 feet in diameter and require replacement of the supporting structure and roofing material. Two of the reservoirs also require replacement of the joint sealant material. Two reservoirs are currently in the bid phase and the remaining two are currently being designed. 4-4 � s REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIRS (continued) Capacity Client Name of Reservoir (gallons) Las Vegas Valley Water District Campbell Reservoir 20,000,000 (formerly Flamingo) Charleston Heights #1 30,000,000 Charleston Heights #2 10,000,000 (2 tanks) each Fayle Reservoir 40,000 ,000 Pico Reservoir 20,000,000 47 ,000)000/ult. -Luce Reservoir (formerly 201000,000 Smoke Ranch) Underhill Reservoir 20,000,000 (formerly West _Central) Rice Reservoir 20,000,000 401000,000 ult. Southwest Reservoir 3 )200 ,000 Liberty, Utah, City of 200,000 Long Beach, California, City of 14,0001000 Mapleton, Utah, City of 21000,000 Mayfield, Utah, City of 100,000 Meadow View Ranch Summit County, Utah 25,000 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Z510001000 Monrovia, California, City of Cloverleaf Reservoir 615001000 Emerson Flats Reservoir 500,000 Avenue Reservoir 3 ,200,000 Mountain Avenue Reservoir 510001000 Norumbega Reservoir 1,000,000 Monterey Park, California, City of 3,0001000 Napa, City of Hennessey Treated Water 5,000,000 Reservoir (Z cells) Newport Beach, California Big Canyon Reservoir 196,000,000 City of North Lauderdale, Florida, City of 21000,000 North Marin County Water District Pacheco Reservoir 5,000,000 North Ogden, Utah, City of 1 ,000,000 Oceanside, California, City of El Camino Reservoir 310001000 Ontario, California, City of Boles Reservoir 2,000,000 Fern Avenue Reservoir Z01000,000 Totman Reservoir 5,570,000 Opa Locka, Florida, City of 800,000 REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIRS (continued) Capacity Client Name of Reservoir (gallons) Pasadena, California, City of Coronet Reservoir 1 ,4001000 Hastings Reservoir #2 1 ,4007000 Jones Reservoir 50,000,000 Pembroke Pines, Florida, City of Storage Reservoir#2 2,000,000 Pomona, California, City of Reservoir 2B 2,000,000 Reservoir 2C 3,0001000 Reservoir 4B 1 ,0001000 Reservoir 5B 10,000,000 Reservoir 7B 3 ,000,000 Reservoir 8A 3,0001000 Reservoir 8B 3 ,000,000 Reservoir 9 5,400,000 Portland, Oregon, City of Powell Butte Reservoir 50,000,000 Rancho California Water District Reservoir #1 2,200,000 Alvarez Reservoir 110001000 Anza Reservoir 2,2001000 Buck Mesa Reservoir 1 ,600,000 DePortola Reservoir 2,200,000 General Kearny Reservoir 2,200,000 Palomar Reservoir 310001000 Redlands, California, City of Country Club Reservoir 2 ,000,000 Dearborn Reservoir 7,500,000 Highland Avenue Reservoir 10 ,000,000 Reedy Creek Improvement District Pumping Station "A" Reservoir 3 ,000,000 Riverside, California, City of Campbell Reservoir 4,900,00.0 (formerly Crest) Heustis Reservoir 2,0001000 (formerly New Canyon) Mockingbird Reservoir 20,000,000 Piedmont Reservoir 1 ,0001000 Ross Reservoir 21000,000 (formerly Central) Riverton, Utah, City of 3,0001000 Sacramento, California, City of Contact Basin 11000,000 Florin Reservoir 1570001000 Riverside Treatment Plant Clearwell 3 ,000,000 Salt Lake County Water Conservancy District, Utah 31000,000 San Bernardino, California, Perris Hill Reservoir 10,000,000 City of San Diego, California, City of So. San Diego Reservoir 15,000,000 REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIRS (continued) Capacity Client Name of Reservoir (gallons) San Dieguito Water District Santa Fe Irrigation Dist. Joint Reservoir 131000,000 Balour Drive Reservoir 2,500,000 San Francisco, California, Crystal Springs Reservoir 6010001000 City of Stanford Heights Reservoir 11 ,000,000 Santa Ana, California, City of Cambridge Reservoir 1 ,200 ,000 East Reservoir 6)000,000 South Reservoirs (2) 6,000,000ea Walnut Reservoir 7,000 ,000 West Reservoir 6,000,000 Santa Barbara, California, City of 5,000,000 Santa Maria, California, City of 7,000,000 Santa Monica, California, City of Riviera Reservoir 25,000,000 Santa Rosa Ranches Water District Carancho Reservoir 11500,000 Sierra Madre, California, City of Auburn Reservoir 1 ,300,000 Mira Monte Reservoir 2,000,000 Soquel Creek County Water Dist. Crestline #2 700,000 Mar Vista #2 300,000 Austrian Way 5007000 Seascape 112001000 Aqua View 560,000 South Davis CO. Wtr. Impr. Dist. 250,000 South Ogden, Utah, City of 1 ,000,000 St. Helena, California, City of Louis Stralla Reservoir 1 ,500,000 Stinson Beach County Water Dist. Laurel & Highlands Res. 320,000ea Stockton East Water District Stockton East Water Treatment Plant Res. 10)000,000 Sunny Slope Water Company Reservoir #4 6,000,000 Sweetwater Park Rich County, Utah 1501000 Tooele, Utah 2,000,000 Torrance, California, City of 10,000,000 Umark, Inc. - West Covina Zone I Steel Reservoir 7,0007000 Upland, California, City of 15th Street Reservoir 4,000,000 19th Street Reservoir 5,4001000 Uintah Highlands Water & Sewer Improvement Dist., Weber County, Utah 500,000 Ute Indian Tribe Ft. Duchesne, Utah 400,000 REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIRS (continued) Capacity Client Name of Reservoir (gallons) Ventura, California, City of Foothill Reservoir 750,000 Golf Course Reservoir 200,000 Sexton Reservoir Z,600,000 Willis Reservoir 1 ,000,000 Vernon, California, City of Civic Center Reservoir 1010001000 Vista Irrigation District HP Reservoir 51000,000 HB Reservoir 5,000,000 Deodar Reservoir 11300 ,000 Pechstein Reservoir 20;000,000 Weber County Rec. Dept. 60,000 West Jordan, Utah, City of 2,000,000 Woodland, Utah 100,000 Woods Cross, Utah, City of 5007000 Yorba Linda County Water Dist. Two Reservoirs 3 ,000,000ea East Side Reservoir 71000,000 De Los Reyes Reservoir 8,000,000 Zone 3, Bryant Ranch Reservoir 2,300,000 Zone 5, Baldwin Reservoir 8001000 SECTION 5 COMPANY BACKGROUND AND MAJOR CAPABILITIES COMPANY BACKGROUND James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. was established in 1945. Corporate and Southwest Regional offices are located in Pasadena, California, with branch offices located in Anchorage, Bethel and Juneau, Alaska; Phoenix, Arizona; Irvine, and La Jolla, California; Fort Collins, Colorado; Ft. Lauderdale, Gainesville, Lake Worth, Port Charlotte, and Port St. Lucie, Florida; Boise, Idaho; Des Moines, Iowa; Wayzata, Minnesota (Minneapolis Area); New Orleans, Louisiana; Las Vegas, Nevada; Oregon; Ogden and Salt Lake City, Utah; Seattle, Washington; Laramie, Wyoming; and regional offices in Walnut Creek, California, Denver, Colorado, and Reston, Virginia (Washington, D.C. area). The firm has overseas offices in Medan, Indonesia; Bankok, Thailand; Caracas, Venezuela; Manila, Philippines; Sydney, Perth, and Adelaide, Australia; Cairo, Egypt; and Gedaref, Sudan. The staff consists of over 900 employees including 310 registered professional engineers; 240 have post-graduate degrees in civil and sanitary engineering. Thirty-nine members of the staff are diplomates of the American Academy of Environmental Engineers. Since its establishment, the firm has acquired broad experience and expertise in the field of civil and sanitary engineering. To support its basic engineering capability, the firm has its own in-house services in the disciplines of mechanical, structural, electrical, environmental, architectural, geological and chemical engineering. Field support services include surveying and construction supervision. In addition, the firm has its own EPA certified water quality laboratory and VAX-11/780 computer system. Within the engineering disciplines, primary emphasis is placed on planning, design, preparation of plans and specifications, and construction inspection. The following is a partial summary of water and wastewater projects which have been completed by the firm. Wastewater and Industrial Water Treatment Plant Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ill Major Pipeline Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Over 5000 miles Ocean Outfall Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Master Plans, Feasibility Studies, and Project Reports (water supply and wastewater) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330 Water Treatment Plant Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 Pumping Station Designs . • 215 Storm Drain Designs . • 170 . . . . . . Reservoir Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 Water Well Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 210 Rate and Financial Analysis Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 Environmental Impact Studies 60 Automatic Control and Telemetering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 FacilityPlans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) i In the past thirty-five years, we have planned, designed, and inspected construc- tion of, over $3.0 billion in water and wastewater projects for over 2,286 separate clients. MAJOR CAPABILTiTES 1. Water Treatment Plants. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., has a long history in the development of water treatment techniques and is recognized nationally as a leader in the field. The staff has prepared studies and designs for over 66 water treatment plants ranging in capacity from 1.0 to 750 mgd. Our firm is associated with most of the advances in the field of water treatment. Innovations which have been incorporated in facilities we have designed include pumped blenders (flash mixing), tapered hydraulic flocculation, designed compartmentalization, vacuum sludge removal, backwash conditioning, simplified filter controls, high-rate filtra- tion, direct filtration, air lift backwashing, ion exchange, and reverse osmosis. In addition, the firm offers extensive services relative to pre- design studies. Pilot facilities for pre-treatment, ozonation, chemical feeding, filtration, and continuous monitoring are available for on-site investigations. JMM initiated particle count monitoring in addition to the monitoring of turbidity and other physical and chemical parameters. 2. Master Plans and Feasibility Studies. Over 321 master plans and feasibility reports for water, wastewater, storm drainage, and industrial waste systems have been prepared by the firm. Many of the water system master plans and feasibility studies included detailed investigations of alternative sources of supply, management, financial, economic, and technical soundness analyses, as well as the preparation of preliminary plans, specifications, and cost estimates. In addition, JMM has prepared numerous other engineering studies, investigations, and reports on related subjects such as ground water development, special water and wastewater treatment problems, reservoirs, treatment plants, distribution systems, corrosion, water rates, appraisals, etc. Many of our engineering studies contain complete financial recom- mendations along with management techniques. 3. Wastewater Facilities Planning (201). JMM has prepared over 79 EPA 201 grant program reports, many of which involve detailed analysis of existing treatment facilities with recommendations for upgrading modifications and expansion. The staff is well-versed in the requirements of the EPA 201 Grant Program. These facilities have ranged in size from less than 100,000 gallons per day to over 90 million gallons per day. The processes utilized have included all types of primary, secondary, and advanced waste treatment. Many of the projects have involved reclamation of the effluent for industrial, agri- cultural, and recreational uses. JMM has unique capabilities in evaluating existing treatment facilities for increased performance and/or expansion through its experienced staff of sanitary engineers and treatment plant operators; this is best indicated by the selection of JMM by the Environ- mental Protection Agency to perform their post-construction evaluation of treatment performance in Nevada and California. Because of our Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) experience in planning, design, cost estimating, financing, and operation of all types of treatment facilities, JMM has the background to provide realistic water quality planning. Several facility plans recently completed or currently being prepared concern large metropolitan areas involving consolidation of several systems, abandoning certain existing facilities, evaluating alternative advanced waste treatment processes, and developing the institutional/financial solutions. Included have been the regional systems for San Diego, California, and Clark County, Nevada. Since the enactment of PL 92-500 in 1972, JMM has prepared twenty-eight facility plans for wastewater facilities in conform- ance with the provisions of the Act. 4. Areawide Water Quality Management (208 and 303e). JMM has provided consulting services for a number of agencies responsible for areawide water quality planning. This experience includes 303(e) river basin plans and 208 plans (completed and active) as authorized by PL 927500 and a number of federally financed special management plans. To date, we have participated in twelve 208 studies. Methods of conserving and safely utilizing natural resources are also a major part of this planning effort as is defining opportunities for environmental enhancement. As a part of these management plans, an evaluation is conducted of nonpoint waste sources, waste quantities, and the effect upon the planning area. Included in this evaluation are municipal wasteloads, facility evaluations, agricultural irrigation return flow wasteloads, solid waste disposal leachates, urban and rural runoff wasteloads, and nonpoint wastes from such industries as logging, mining, and chemicals. Typical requirements of a 208 project may include the following considerations: waste treatment, collection and disposal; in-stream management; land use; monitoring; and intergovernmental programs. The thrust of the proposed constraints involve (1) minimizing the adverse water quality impacts from construction runoff and urbanization; (2) defining viable guidelines for Optimizing the overall facilities servicing future growth patterns; (3) stream management policies (including low flow augmentation); (4) protection of sensitive soil/slope and water-influence areas; (5) performance criteria for wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal; and (6) assuring the coordin- ation of public and private programs that affect water quality. Work in this area covers a wide variety of disciplines and responsibilities from very technical aspects of waste management control to overall contract management and program administration. Among the projects currently underway or recently completed are water quality, land capability, and ground water studies for the Flathead Drainage 208 Agency in Kalispell, Montana; a watershed management study for the city of Ashland, Oregon/Rogue Valley Council of Governments; an industrial waste analysis for the Mid-Willamette Council of Governments; a study of mining, silvi- culture, and construction-generated nonpoint wastes for the Mid- Yellowstone Are.awide Planning Organization in Billings, Montana; eight preliminary community wastewater facilities studies for Panhandle Planning and Development Council, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho; the evaluation of effluent .Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) disposal alternatives for the Sussex County, Delaware, Planning Authority; and an overall program responsibility and contract administration for the Regional Intergovernmental Council at Charleston, West Virginia. 5. Wastewater Collection System. We have designed several hundred miles of major sanitary sewers in diameters up to 114 inches. One of our larger projects was the $52 million interceptor sewerage system for metropolitan San Diego, California. This system consists of 116,000 feet of 4Z- to 114-inch diameter interceptor sewers, pumping facilities (including one of the world's largest wastewater pumping stations), an 80 mgd wastewater treatment plant, and a 108-inch diameter ocean outfall. Another major project was the non-reclaimable wastewater collection system designed for the Chino Basin Municipal Water District. This project, costing over $12 million, involved over 30 miles of pipelines in diameters up to 42 inches. Collection systems can be both analyzed and designed by ICES SEWER, a computer program developed by the Civil Engineering Systems Laboratory at M.I.T. ICES (Integrated Civil Engineering System) was the result of a major research and development effort initiated by M.I.T. in 1964. The system handles both storm and sanitary networks flowing full or partially full under the influence of gravity. 6. Wastewater and Industrial Waste Treatment. Our firm has been active in wastewater treatment and reclamation for more than 25 years. We have designed 105 wastewater and industrial waste treatment plants ranging in capacity from 0.5 to 90 mgd. Our designs have included primary treatment, biological secondary treatment, and tertiary treatment involving a variety of unit operations including alum coagulation, multi-media filtration, carbon adsorption, ion exchange, electrodialysis, and reverse osmosis. In a number of projects, wastewater is reclaimed for industrial, agricultural, or recrea- tional reuse. A recent project involved pilot plant testing and prototype design for a pure oxygen activated sludge plant to oxidize a high-strength industrial waste containing approximately 10,000 mg/l BOD to a stable effluent. 7. Ocean Outfalls. Engineering studies and designs have been completed for 17 ocean wastewater outfalls. The outfalls range in capacity from 0.7 to 300 mgd and vary in diameter from 12 to 108 inches. These designs were preceded by detailed oceanographic studies and computerized hydraulic analysis. In addition to our in-house capabilities in estuarial and oceano- graphic evaluation, the firm also maintains a close association with recog- nized authorities in the fields of marine biology and oceanographic investi- gation and services. When required, these specialists are added to the project team for specialized research or consultation regarding outfall study and design. 8. Water Transmission and Distribution Systems. We have designed numerous major pipeline systems. These designs include more than 3,785 miles of pipelines in diameters up to 144 inches and installations under the most adverse conditions of surface congestion, underground utilities, rugged terrain, and unstable and corrosive soils. Designs have included open trench, tunnel, jacking, submarine, and other types of installations. For analysis of Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) complex distribution systems, we utilize our own network program and in- house computer facility. Our staff has specialized knowledge and exper- ience in corrosion and corrosion control and actively participates in corro- sion research and seminars. 9. Federal and State Loans and Grants. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., has had extensive experience in preparing applications and assisting clients with obtaining loans and grants from state and federal agencies. Federal grants and loans have come primarily from the Depart- went of Housing and Urban Development and the Environmental Protection Agency. The firm has assisted over 60 clients in obtaining over $125 million in governmental assistance programs. 10. Water Storage Facilities. Over 183 reservoirs have been designed by the firm, ranging from a 20,000-gallon steel tank to a 1 billion gallon asphaltic- lined open reservoir with a compacted earth embankment. Reservoir designs have included reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete, precast concrete arch-panel, and steel construction for buried, partially-buried, ground-level, and elevated structures. The firm also designed the 647400,000-gallon, 40-foot deep reinforced concrete Dunsmuir Reservoir in Oakland, California. This storage facility is the largest reservoir of its type in the United States and is also the deepest buried reservoir of large size in the country. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. was awarded an Engineering Excellence Award in 1972 by the Consulting Engineers Council of the United States for the design of the 19.3-million-gallon Greystone Reservoir for the city of Beverly Hills, California. 11. Pumping Stations. Over 209 water and wastewater pumping stations have been designed ranging in capacity from 230 gpm to 250,000 gpm with total connected horsepowers up to 18,000 HP. These stations have included all types of pumps, both electric and natural gas driver units, electrical controls for both local and remote operations, and telemetering. Our experience includes the world's largest natural gas engine-driven water pumping station located in Las Vegas, Nevada. 12. Automatic Process Control and Telemetry. Modern water and wastewater transmission, storage, distribution, and treatment systems require automa- tion to facilitate efficient operation, optimization, and to allow ease of expansion. JMM utilizes state-of-the-art control technology and includes the latest field-proven equipment approaches in the configuration of water and waste- water treatment systems. JMM's staff of electrical and control system engineers is experienced in all aspects of automated control of a wide range of treatment processes as well as data acquisition, computer-based control, and data handling. Our in-plant designs reflect the depth of experience required to understand and control complex process interrelationships and to provide an operator-oriented approach to centralized control of these processes. A thorough knowledge of the latest treatment process equipment ' is utilized by the engineers to apply control concepts effectively. 4 R . • Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) r In addition to hundreds of in-plant automation applications, JMM has provided study, design and support engineering services, and start-up related to telemetry systems for over 20 years with more than 51 separate clients worldwide. Telemetry system applications include various aspects of water transmission, storage, and distribution as well as wastewater collection. In many cases, the design is preceded by a feasibility study and pre-design effort which sets forth the remote functions to be monitored and/or controlled, the central control configuration, alternatives in equipment approach, cost alternatives, improvements to be expected in operation, and the savings to be realized. 13. Water Rate Studies. Over 66 analytical and statistical studies relating to water rates and wastewater rates and costs have been completed. These studies have been prepared in support of recommended rates as well as in opposition to suggested rate changes. Most supporting studies are based on detailed investigation of water consumption patterns and their projections. Many rate studies are prepared as an integral part of a complete financial analysis which considers bond issue financing, taxation on real property, reserve funding, disposal of excess utility property, other income sources, and ability to pay. The range of clients for whom rate studies have been prepared included municipalities, water and irrigation districts, private utility companies, government agencies, and individuals. 14. Appraisals. Over 40 appraisal reports primarily involving the value of utility properties have been prepared. The purpose of these reports has been to establish value for the buyer, the seller, or for both. In some instances, the objectives have been to evaluate system condition and depreciation requirements as adjuncts to rate investigations, eminent domain proceedings, and negotiated ownership transfers. Appraisals of various types of utilities have been prepared ranging from single water wells to large irrigation and domestic municipal systems. Appraisal techniques used include reproduction cost new less depreciation, original cost, substitutional methods, present-worth concepts, comparable sales, and capitalization. 15. Basin Management and Hydrogeology. Staff members have had extensive experience in the field of hydrogeological studies and ground water basin management. In all of the many master plans for water system development prepared by our firm, a great amount of effort has been expended on comparing alternative sources of supply and evaluating the economic potential of these sources. Coordination of imported sources of supply with local surface and ground water supply has always been a major factor in our studies. We have participated in an operational economic study of a large ground water basin in cooperation with a public agency. A mathematical model (digital) of the ground water basin has been developed by the agency. The model has been verified by geologic and hydrologic analyses, and alternative operational plans are presently being studied. Numerous surface and subsurface studies for both local and regional water resource development programs have been conducted utilizing geologic, hydrologic, and geophysical water studies. Combining legal and institutional policies with water resource potential, basin operations have been developed Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) i, which are consistent with sound ground water basin management. The firm has also participated in a number of water rights litigation cases, in which it has been necessary to recognize proper basin data and then, through the use of these data, correlate surface hydrology, ground water hydraulics, and water quality. 16. Desalination. Extensive experience in the desalination processes is avail- able within our firm. Completed projects include unit design and pilot plant studies on treated wastewater effluent by reverse osmosis and electro- dialysis. Our firm particiated in the feasibility study for the 150 mgd nuclear desalting and power generation plant for southern California. This project was jointly sponsored by the MWD, AEC, and the Office of Saline Water. Work has included the design of the Anaheim Lake Demonstration Desalination Plant for the Orange County Water District. This pilot program was an experimental step towards the design of a major 75 mgd desalting plant to remove salt from ground water. The work consisted of preliminary engineering, negotiations with the principal domestic and overseas manufacturers of desalting equipment, and the detail design and preparation of plans and specifications for the pilot plant. The plant processes included pretreatment, filtration, and water softening equipment; two ion exchange modules; two electrodialysis modules; and two reverse osmosis modules. Extensive considerations have been given by JMM and the district's consultants to the effect of the pilot and proposed ultimate plants on the environment. In addition, the firm designed and put into operation a 5 mgd reverse osmosis wastewater demineralization facility at Water Factory Zl for the Orange County Water District. Several other demineralization projects are located in California, Florida, Idaho, and on San Nicolas Island for the U.S. Navy. 17. Storm Drainage. The firm has had broad experience in all phases of flood control and storm drain work, both in preparation of comprehensive master drainage plans and in detailed design and preparation of plans and specifi- cations for drainage projects. We have provided designs for approximately 102 storm drain projects, many of which were constructed under the 1958 and 1964 bond issue programs ($3Z0 million) of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. 18. Computer Facilities. JMM computer facilities include a large interactive VAX-11/780 computer system. The VAX-11/780 is a high-performance multiprogramming computer system. It combines a 3Z-bit architecture, efficient memory management, and a virtual memory operating system to provide essentially unlimited program address space. The VAX-11/780 is one of the fastest systems available. Its processor includes an 8K byte write-through memory cache that results in an effective Z90 nano-second memory access time. This VAX/VMS virtual memory operating system provides a multi-user multi-language programming environment on the VAX-11/780 hardware. The integral floating point instructions, efficient scheduler and optional FORTRAN IV-PLUS language are ideal for time-critical and scientific computational environments. Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) Peripheral facilities of the VAX-11/780 include a range of small and large capacity disc drives, magnetic tape plotter, hard copy and video terminals, line printers and card readers. Its languages include the VAX-11 Macro assembly language and optional VAX-11 FORTRAN IV-PLUS, VAX-11 DATATRIEVE, and VAX-11 COBOL-74/VAX. Use of this facility ensures optimization of the analytical capability of our firm in all phases of engineering service. Numerous staff members have been trained and are active in a continuing educational program in order to provide our clients with the advantages of computer-applied system design economics. Specialized new programs developed by our staff, in addition to existing standard programs, offer an extensive range of applications, including hydraulic networks, structural, critical path and statistical computations, traverse calculations, information sorting, and mathematical optimization. Utilization of the computer system is employed whenever evaluations of the situation indicate a valuable consideration in time consumption and financial benefit to the client. A number of computerized information retrieval services exist where use is essential in large-scale search operations. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. contacts those firms which have established data bases in the areas of concern. These bases include: o Toxline o Medline o NAL/CAIN o N TIS o Environ o APTIC o EIC In addition, JMM maintains several time-sharing terminals which are used to t.ake advantage of the services of various time-sharing systems available. Such systems allow data storage and retrieval on a global basis. 19. Laboratory Facility. Our firm is equipped with a complete water and wastewater laboratory certified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The facilities of this laboratory permit us to evaluate all of the parameters related to modern practices of water treatment and wastewater treatment and disposal. . Major equipment items include gas chromatographs, atomic absorption spectrometer, total organic carbon analyzer, particle size analyzer, and incubators for viral and bacteriological tests. 20. Architectural Design. Visual appearance of all structures is given prime consideration in the development of project design plans. Our design philosophy incorporates creative architectural concepts based on environ- mental conditions and economical factors of the project. The firm's fields of competence in architecture include architectural design, furniture and fixture selection, graphics and signing, and color coordination. Our registered architectural staff has been responsible for the architectural Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) design of numerous civil, industrial, commercial, and residential building projects. 21. International Operations. Our firm has provided consulting services for numerous international engineering projects involving the design of water supply, wastewater, and storm drainage systems. In addition to design and construction supervision of overseas projects, we have prepared master plans, feasibility and prefeasibility studies, hydrogeological studies, financial analyses, and cost appraisals in order to establish parameters for sound engineering design. We have also provided administrative assistance for institutional development of foreign water and sanitation agencies and have developed effective programs for training personnel in the design, operation, maintenance, and management of water and wastewater systems. Our firm, having been involved in many programs financed under the auspices of the United States Agency for International Development, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the Asian Development Bank; is familiar with the lending and data-processing requirements of these agencies. 22. Plant Start-Up and Operation. Staff engineers have had extensive exper- ience in the design, construction, and start-up of industrial process pilot and prototype installations. Industrial piloting has also included wastewater concentration and reclamation for reuse by reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, and ion exchange techniques. Biological wastewater treatment pilot work has involved both industrial and municipal waste systems and has been used to obtain design data for plants now under construction. Certified waste- water treatment plant operators on the staff are qualified in plant start-up and operation, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, and on- site investigations. 23. Environmental Impact Studies. Multidisciplinary teams of environmental specialists in the fields of biology, hydrology, planning, and engineering have prepared numerous environmental assessments in compliance with applicable federal, state, or local regulations. Environmental studies have concen- trated on water and wastewater related projects. The scale of these projects and accompanying assessments has ranged from areawide waste treatment management plans and comprehensive wastewater facilities plans to individual projects such as reservoirs, pipelines, or treatment facilities. The JMM staff is experienced in environmental regulations and public participation techniques as well as in the more technical elements of environmental assessments. 24. Training Programs. In addition to on-the-job training programs associated with design, start-up, and operation and maintenance of water and waste- water treatment plants, JMM has provided specialized in-house observation and training programs for engineers sponsored by the Agency for Interna- tional Development and by our international clients. Typical programs ranging from one month to a year include observation and practical training in water utility management and operation, long-range financial planning, water treatment design, water resources development, and ocean outfall Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) design. Trainees involved in master planning and treatment plant design programs actively participate in actual project work. 25. Construction Management Services. JMM provides some degree of construction management services for virtually all facilities designed by JMM. These services have ranged from fast-tracking design and construc- tion, monitoring construction, performing all engineering work, and keeping all books and records associated with a project down to simply providing occasional professional assistance during construction. For a typical job, in addition to design, JMM assists its clients during the procurement process, monitors construction progress, checks shop drawings, negotiates change orders, makes final inspections, assists with start-up, and performs a large part of the book work associated with a project. JMM is extremely conscious of time and money constraints and gears its work to stay within the boundaries given. JMM project engineers assist contractors and operating personnel in achieving design criteria, especially during plant start-up. Project design engineers periodically return to completed projects to observe their operation and assist operating personnel. Information obtained from these visits is used to refine subsequent designs. 26. Marine Science and Aquaculture. The Marine Sciences' staff has a wide range of experience in the management and planning of aquaculture research and development as well as experience in commercial aquaculture operations. The staff can draw on diverse capabilities covering virtually any water-related problem and has the complete range of experience to deal with the multi-disciplinary problems of aquaculture production. The firm has applied this expertise in aquatic life support systems in the design and operation of several aquatic parks including the $15 million installation at Sea World of Florida and sophisticated closed systems for recycling water at the Baltimore Aquarium and Sea World of Ohio. Wastewater aquaculture concepts have been developed in planning studies for W.E. Disney Enterprises and the San Diego Region Water Reclamation Agency relative to a $1.7 million study evaluating the use of aquatic plants and animals for wastewater treatment. The firm has experience in the design of salmonid fish hatcheries in the Pacific Northwest and has designed the hatchery facilities for the state of Washington. Aquaculture specialists are available for consultation regarding all phases of commercial aquaculture feasibility studies and facility design. 27. Institutional and Financial Planning. The firm has developed an extensive background in the development of alternative institutional and financial arrangements in support of water, wastewater, and water quality plans. Members of the JMM staff have extensive backgrounds and particular expertise in the preparation of institutional, economic, and revenue programs including federal/state loan grant programs, prospective prepara- tion for the municipal financing market, and economic feasibility reports in support of bond issues. Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) JMM has successfully completed over 100 analytical and statistical financial studies of water and wastewater systems. As part of 201 facility plans, JMM financial staff members have prepared financial and revenue plans in accordance with the latest federal and state requirements in states where special local requirements exist. These plans have been prepared with careful consultation with the client and other levels of involved government. In this way, the means and approach for funding that portion of the project not grant eligible, and in creating a revenue program for payment of annual debt service and operation and maintenance costs, has been acceptable to all parties that are concerned with the financial success of the project. Many water and wastewater system master plans completed by the firm in recent years have also required implementation plans which include scheduling, financing, and the development of systems for cost allocations to the ultimate system, customer. Rate studies and revenue programs require accurate backup data of con- sumption or discharges by customer classification, as well as other specific information. Where such data are nonexistent or questionable, our staff has had wide experience in creating usable data from the examination of water records, building department records, aerial photographs, census data, and physical field surveys. Computer programs have been designed by our firm to utilize these data in accordance with state guidelines allocating costs to various combinations of loading parameters. 28. Comprehensive and Land Use Planning. JMM offers comprehensive planning services involving land use on either a community or areawide basis. Our projects of this type have included community land use plans; land capability and existing land use mapping; improvement and expansion of public facilities, services, and utilities; preservation and conservation of natural resource areas; lake shore development criteria; community design; public and private recreation systems; open space; flood plain management; transportation; fish, wildlife, and water quality preservation; the determina- tion of future growth areas; and zoning regulations, model ordinances, and plan implementation. Our experience and personnel cover a wide range of land use planning considerations. We are particularly qualified to provide land use planning assistance to communities experiencing growth and needing to expand public facilities or preserve environmental resources. Our background in public works facilities and environmental studies adds an important depth to our comprehensive planning capabilities. We have provided comprehensive planning services to the Clark County Regional Planning Council at Vancouver, Washington; Gervais, Oregon; and Mountain Home, Idaho. In the Mountain Home plan, emphasis was placed on the protection of natural resources, including an important ground water system; projecting future population growth; directing new development into a "primary urban service area;" preservation of agricultural lands; and coordination with ongoing county planning efforts. We assisted the State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources in the development of the state's renewable resource plan, and worked with the Shoshone-Bannock Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued). Tribes in eastern Idaho on the formulation of water-related land develop- ment policies for the Fort Hall Indian Reservation. The Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District contracted with JMM to prepare a park system plan and a recommended action program which focused on future budget priorities for alternative park sites that were associated with school sites. In addition, we prepared a component of the Oregon State Outdoor Recreation Plan covering future developments, acqui- sitions, and capital improvements for the Oregon State Park System. Our firm also has in-depth experience in mapping land capability and existing land use. JMM prepared land capability maps for the Flathead River Drainage Basin in northwest Montana concerning erosion hazard areas and septic tank suitability. We prepared eight land capability/charac- teristic/use maps for the Fort Hall Indian Reservation. Four state of Idaho agencies contracted with JMM to prepare land use and land capability maps for ten land characteristics and numerous wildlife and environmental quality parameters as part of the Idaho Environmental Overview Study. JMM is also a frequent contractor to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to perform flood insurance studies, including the preparation of flood plain maps. In a water quality plan prepared for the Ada Planning Association, JMM prepared a plan which emphasized land use constraints on steep slopes and sensitive soils, land adjacent to streams, and the phasing of future growth with facility service expansion. 29. Silviculture. As part of non-point pollution sources as defined under PL 92-500, the firm has been involved in several projects involving water pollution from logging, residue management, and reforestation activities and their impact on water quality. Emphasis has been placed on solving problems and making recommendations relative to siltation and thermal and organic pollution due to the demonstrated significance of these pollutants associated with the logging industry. Members of the staff have also prepared technical reference reports for use by private and public forest managers, planners, regulatory agencies, contractors, consultants, public forest managers, planners, regulatory agencies, contractors, consultants, public officials, and interested individuals to determine, implement, and monitor water quality control systems and procedures that are both effec- tive and efficient and that would implement PL 92-500 concerning non-point sources of pollutants generated by silviculture activities (excluding the construction and maintenance of logging haul roads and forest chemical applications). 3.0. Expert Testimony and Technical Assistance to Counsel. Because of the broad experience of senior JMM employees and the specialized expertise of the 21 doctorate holders on the JMM staff, these employees are frequently utilized by clients for their expert testimony and technical assistance to counsel. In preparing for testimony, these expert witnesses have available the facilities of the JMM, Cal Tech, UCLA, and USC libraries in southern California, and the UC Berkeley library in northern California. In addition, modern, fully-equipped laboratory and computer facilities are available for I Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued) (f their use. Employees are encouraged to write technical articles and develop specialized areas of expertise in meeting company needs. 31. Other Services. In addition to capabilities in investigations, studies, and preparation of plans and specifications, we can provide mill inspection and witness performance tests on all water and wastewater systems equipment manufactured in the United States. When required, assistance to the client iii direct procurement of project materials is provided. On a majority of the domestic design projects, surveying, field inspection, and contract admini- stration services are also furnished as a part of the engineering contract. i i i L jig CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LO" 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK February 7, 1989 James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers , Inc. P. 0. Box 7009 Pasadena, CA 91109-7009 Attn: Mr. Ashok K. Dhingra The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting held Monday, February 6, 1989, approved Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. for Engineering Design Services for the Renovation of the Peck Reservoir, CC-696. Enclosed is an executed copy of the agreement for your records. Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:bt Enc. (Telephone:714-536-5227)