HomeMy WebLinkAboutOffice of Traffic Safety - 1982-05-17i
F3EQU T FOR CITY COUNAI ACTION
•
Date May 3, 1982
Submittedto: Honorable Mayor and Counc? Members
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administratb f 7__..
Prepared by: Earle W. Robitaille, Chief of Police I ---�
Subject: Office of Traffic Safety Project Agreement;-
,pecial Traffic Enforcement Team
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: nC
Statement of Issue
Authorization to enable the Huntington Beach Police
Safety Project Agreement with the California Office
reducing the effects of traffic collisions on t--at
which is in the City of Huntington Beach.
Recommendation
Department to enter into a Traffic
of Traffic Safety directed toward
portion of Pacific Coast Highway
Approve the Police Department's request to enter into the agreement.
Analysis
Traffic collisions and enforcement continue to be a major problem for the City of
Huntington Beach. This problem is even ;rare apparent on the ten -mile stretch of
Pacific Coast Highway that is within the City of Huntington Beach. This state highway
comprises only 2 percent of the city's roadways, but accounts for 31 percent of the
fatalities and 12 percent of the injury collisions. During the past year, 442 collisions
were reported on Pacific Coast Highway, as a result of which 168 persons were injured and
8 killed. These statistics require a concentrated effort be directed towards their
reduction. Over the past three years, calls for service have increased, thus reducing
traffic enforcement efforts.
The prinay objective of this project will be to br?:,g about a reduction in the deaths,
injuries and property damage due to traffic collisions on Pacific Coast Highway by
selectively enforcing traffic at the intersections and areas of the highway statistically
determined to be the most hazardous to both resident and transient motorists alike.
The project will create a special traffic enforcement team which will work together to
observe and apprehend violators. The team will consist of two motor officers and one
traffic officer who will work on an overtime basis for a period of 12 months.
The City's contribution would amount to an estimated $34,214.64 in personnel costs for
personnel to administer the program. All specialized items of equipment necessary for
this project are already a part of the F.-)lice Department's inventory and would be made
available. All other costs would be covered by project grant cronies.
Potential benefits to the community are expected to take the form of a 5-pe-rcent
reduction in the numbe.: of accidents along Pacific Coast tfighway and a eoncani.tant
reduction in the number of deaths, injuries and property loss resulting from same.
6 1 t
P;O ?Wbl
REQUEST FOR CrrY COUNCIL ACTION
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator
Prepared by: Earle W. Robitai.11e, Chief of Police
Subject: Office of Traffic Safety Project Agreerrrent;
Special Traffic Enforcement Team
Page Two
Funding Source
California Office cf Traffic Safety, Grant Program.
Alternative Action
Deny the Police Department's request.
Attachment
Copy of the project application.
Fati1R : JR: gsd 0
w
►'A'
State of California
Business and Transportation Agency
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT AGREalENT
(Under Section 2907, California Vehicle
Code, and Section 402(C) of Public Lau
89-564 as amended by Public Lair 91-605)
FART 1 - (To be Completed by Applicant Agency)
1. Project Title
SPrCIAL 'IMFFIC I 1.1 ORC13,TF!`7 TEAM
2. Name of Applicant Agency
C11i' OF IiUNTINGTON' BEACH
3. Agency Unit to Handle Project
IRMINGI'ONT BEACH POLICE DIE'RA2TM-17
..n•
SAFETY OFFICE USE ONL
oject Number
v sion Number
Date
Project Budget Estimnt-
Fiscal Yr. '.mount.
82/83 i+ 257 ,492. Z-1
Y
TOTAL 257,492.24
+• Project
Month -
From: 10
To: . 09
Period
Day - Year
01 82
30 85
5. Project Description (Sumaarize the proposed project plan covering the objectives,
of procedure, evaluation and end product in approximately 1C0 c.c:
This proiec:t will Provide for a Special Traffic Fnforcemant Team during Leak hours with
special emphasis directed towards the approximate 10 miles of State Route I whici runs
through our city, including; enforcement of the 55 h1P11 speed limit, and the detection and
arrest of the drinking driver. The overall objective of the project is to reduce the
pumbcr of Persons injured or killed by S percent during the project period. Extra traffic
enforcement will be implemented by the utilization of a three-man strike force coml-,risc•:i
of two motor officers and one radio car. This team will be deployed in the most officient
manner possible, with frequent reevaluation. .
I6• Federal Funds Allocated Under this Agreement Shall Not Exceed w 257, 491.24
I7. ACCEI TLNGE OF COirDITIONS - The provisions on the Reverse Side Hereof Constitute a Fart
of this aereement.
A Pro ect Director B. Authorizing Official_ of Applicant
Name EMU W. ROBITAILLE Phone S36-5902 Name C:IMLES 1110�tP50`' Phone 5:�6-y2��1
Address P.O. Box 70 Address P.O., Box 190
[hintington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Leach, CA 92648
SignaturLSignat•.ire(
Tit e Chief of olice I Title City Administrat r
C. Fiscal or Accounting Official D. Office Authorized to Receive Payments
Name F . R . ARGUELLO Name FINANCE DF.PARTNi nj T
Title Director of Financc I Address City of Fhmtington Reach
Phone 536-5236 ( 11.0. Box 190
I-hmtington Reach, CA 926,18
ATT
Project
Description
Schedule
A
'Project Task & Cost Category
Summary,SchoduO
Priority
and Contributions
Schsudle
A-1
Traffic Data Smm.ary
Detailed
Budget
Sehed,Lle
B
ton -Duplication Certificate
I
Time and
Cost Estimate
Schedule
C
Batch Art and E.O.A. Forms
, 3
e
•
1 . It .is undens.tood and agreed by .the Pno ject Dinecton
and Au.thotiz.ing O66.ic.iat that any grant nece.ived as
a nesuQt o6 this agreement .is subject .to att Pede•tat
and State negueati:ons governing gnan-ts and to .those
co►itArZ4 expressed .in the Ca.£.isonnia Tna66.i.c Satiety
Grant Pnognam Manuals which inc£ude, but are not
Umited to:
a. Ont y vef,-i .ied pant.ic.ipat.i.ng costs nesutt.ing Snom
activities descn.ibed in .this Agri--ement witt be
etig.ibte bon 1te.imbunsement;
b . Pnognes s Re ports must be submitted by .the Pno j ec-t
Viaecton to the 06sice os Tna6sic Sase.ty on
January 15, Apn.it 15, Ju.£y 15, and October 15,
dut.ing each yeah o6 project opefta.tion;
C. AU p•toject accounting %ecoiLds and supporct.i►ig
documentz mu6t be neta.i►ted bon audit purposes
bon at teast tltnee years a6ten heceip,t o6 6.inat
payment;
d. A 4inat pro jest nepont must be submitted to .the
O66ice of Tna66.ic Satiety w.Lthin 60 dads a6tert
the tv m.i,nation date o6 4-he project;
2. No at te-ta.tion o.t vatiation o6 the .tehms 06 this co►i.ttac.t`
sha.£t be va.£.id wiZess made .in wn.it-ing and signed by the
paAt.ies he.teto, and no onat undeutand.ing on agreement
not ineonpo•tated hene-in, shaft be binding on any oS the
panties ti eneto .
3. The obt.igatio►t o6 grant Sands Son successive 6isca£ uea.is
os mueti-yeah projects .is subject to the ava.itab.i£..itif
o6 Pedenat Sands.
C�
0
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT 71ESCfiIPTIGK
PART t -- Item 6
1. BACKGROUND
A. General Characteristics
The City of 1-1untington Beach is situated on the coast between the cities
of Long Beach and Newport Beach. It is composed of 31.4 square miles
of land area encompassing recreational, commercial, industrial anu
residential land uses. Within the incorporated city limits are eight
miles of recreational beach, a large recreational and residential harbor,
and a 250-acre regional park, as well as one of the larger comrmznity
colleges in the Southern California area.
17ie city, at this time, is approximately 90 percent developed, with
several high -density, populated areas separated by open land. Population
patterns and densities, as related to vehicle flora and volume, vary on
a seasonal basis. Wring four months of the year we suffer hea-vy traffic-
congestion on major arterial highways, which comprise approximately
36 percent of the roadway miles within the city limits. The area is
subject to moderate rains and dense fogs. The resident population of
the city is approximately 170,000 with seasonal influxes raising the
figure to in excess of a quarter of a million.
B. Streets and Highways
The total public roadway mileage within the City of Huntington Beach
is 362 miles. Encompassed within the jurisdiction of the city arc two
state highways and one interstate freeway.
Highway 1 Pacific Coast. highway 10 Mi.'es
Highway 39 Beach Boulevard 5.8 Miles
The city's major streets serve a
coast area to the Long Beach and
vehicular traffic flows increase
summer season, serving as access
beaches within the city limits.
2. PROBLDI IDFNTITY
commuter connectors from the south
metropolitan Los Angeles areas. The
considerably during the four -month
routes to the one city and two F.tate
Traffic collisions and enforcement continue to be a major problem for the
City of lhmtington Beach. In 1981 there were 4,342 traffic collisions in
the city, in which there were 1,407 persons injured and 26 fatal collisions
with 28 deaths.
Compared to 1980, the fatals increased over 100 percent: from 13 to 28. T`.:
1980 figure reflects the opening of the tratuna center, which employed ^ew
lifesaving techniques that were previously tmavailable. The tratmia center J
saved many persons who in previous years surely would have died. ,
M
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT nESCRIPTIM
PART I -- It:.em 6
In 1981, we saw a drastic increase in spite of the trauma center. As gasoline
became more expensive, motorists rescheduled long trips in favor'of shorter
ones, thus flocking to the beaches. The city continued to grow, though slower
than previous years, increasing the calls for service. More vehicles combined
with increased calls for service has resulted in reduced enforcement, especially
along Pacific Coast Highway, which every beach visitor finds himself using.
This increased usage is reflected in the collision pattern, as in both 1980 and
1981, 31 percent of :::1 fatalities occurred on the state highway. Pacific Coast
Highway accounts for 12 percent of all our injury collisions. The problem is
also reflected in the enforcement index, which has scon a downward trend the
past three years. The index has fallen to 16, which is below the accepted
minimum of 20. Without additional efforts, the index will continue to fall.
The Pacific Coast Highway also shows a higher percentage of collisions where
the driver was intoxicated. For the past two years, 15 percent of all collisions
involved the drinking driver, compared to 9 percent for the rest of the city.
The problem is very clear. This stretch of state highway, which comprises only
2 percent of our total roadway miles, accounts for 31 percent of all our
fatalities, and where drinking drivers are involved, 6 percent more than the
other roadways. This shows that special enforcement is urgently ;,eedcd along
this stretch of highway. f
EN ACCIDT RECAP
ALL ROADWAYS IN HUNITINGTON BEACH
1979 1980 1981
I
FATALS 23 13 26
INJURIES 1282 1270 1407
PROP. DIG. 3018 2977 2909 II
TOTAL 4323 4269 4342 I
PCF/DIJI
FATAL, T/C's
INJURY T/C's
PROP. DNIG . T/C' s
PCF/DUI T/C's
339= 80 of Total 368= 90 of Total
PACIFIC COAST HIGHIVAY: SR-1
1979 1980
5= 22% of Total 4= 310 of Total
160= 120 of Total
293= 10% of Total
48= 14% of Total
143= 11% of Total
319= 115 of Total
55= 15% of 'total
384= 94 of Total
1981
8= 31,. of Total
168= 124 of Total
266= 9 0 of Total
59= 150 of Total
07 -. -i (I "'. ''.
E
•
11
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PART f - Item 6
3. ATnMgS TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM
A. In February, 1973, in cooperation with the Orange County Alcohol Traffic
Safety Project (OCATS), the Huntington Beach Police Department entered
into an agreement to function as a contract city for the purpose of
identification and apprehension of alcohol -related driving offenses.
The Huntington Beach Police Department agreed to increase its table of
organization by two surcrn officers and apply the increased manpower
exclusively to the apprehension of drinking drivers.
Accident tir►r-3 were placed into increments to determine when the highest
percentage of accidents was occurring. Uprm averaging all DUI accidents
for 1972, it was ascertained that the time period when 76 percent of
drinking driver accidents occurred was 1700-0300 hours.
After analysis of existing information, a decision was reached to
utilize saturation patrol. The agreement called for additional officers
(2), which represented 80 man-hours per week. This 30 hours was utilized
to deploy two officers ,n Wednesdays and Thursdays between thr hours of �
2200 and 0300, a total of 60 hours per week. Basically, th.•ee motor
officers and three officers utilizing patrol units were assigned to
ASAP duty so as to facilitate maximum mobility and transportation ability
The officers selected to work ASAP were given additional training in the I
area of alcohol and its physical and psychological effects and alcohol- •!
related offenses. Training in report writing, courtroom testimony and
breathalyzer were also provided. County, city and state agencies having I
expertise in related areas were utilized for instruction purposes.
This method of operation proved to be very effective and was utilized
throughout the entire ASAP Program, with the turnover of personnel the
the only change.
B. In December of '-be Huntington Beach Police Department entered into
an agreement w4- to function as a contract city for the purpose of
a special traffi .rcunnent patrol during peak times with special
emphasis direct yard high accident producing areas and the detection
of and arrest • drinking driver. The overall object of the project
i:as to reduce th amber of accidents and the number of persons injured
or killed during tie project timetable.
The Huntington Beach Police Department ijVlemented extra traffic enforcement
by the utilization of four special two man teams comprised of one traffic
motor officer and one patrol officer. Manpower was provided on overtime basis
with alloted personnel. No additional personnel were added by this project.
The teams were equipped with radar units and were deployed in a ;wanner in line
with traffic accident data. The project ran from December 10, 1976 to
March 31, 1977, and compiled the following statistics; .7
60,
0
PAZ? 1 - Item 6
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT P"5CRIPTIM
HOURS WORKED MILES DRIVEN PRM"M COLLISION VIOLATIONS DUI
21757 30,204 11491 248
The objectives and quantitative goals of this project were to,
1. Reduce by 5% the number of accidents within the jurisdiction of thc:
City of fAmtington Beach.
2. To increase by 10o the issuance of primary collision violations.
3. To increase by 500 the arrests of drinking drivers over the correspondini
period of the proceeding three year average.
Average 1973, 74,
75, 76
1976/1977
GOALS
RESULTS
Traffic Accidents
834
I1144
-5e
+370
Issuance of Cites
7,361
',491
'109,
+IBi)
DUI Arrests
577
740
+50$
+291.
In st.^tmiary, the tvm previous attempts to solve the problem (Project ASAP and I
Project STEP) both succeeded to the degree that the productivity statistics
were high, however, failed to meet the quantative goals of the projects
because of uncontrollable circumstances such as increased population, roadway
miles, vehi,.1e 'registration and traffic flow patterns.
C.
I
i
In October 1977, the city received a grant from OTS for the implementation
of a Selective Enforcement Team. This team consisted of 3 motor officers'
2 car officers and I supervisor. They were deployed in the most eff-
icient manner based on priur'accident experience. The o-erall objective 4
of the project were ro reduce the number of accidents and injuries.
The Traffic Bureau personnel was increased by five persons so as not
to effect other operations within the bureau. At the conclusion, the
added personmel were retained within the bureau, per the conditions
of the grant.
The goals of this project were to reduce the collisions bf 10$, and
increase the issuance of citations by 100 and to increase the DUI
arrests by 25%.
The results of the latest project fell short #-f the goals by about 120
with regard to the reduction of collisions. This was because of un-
controllable circumtnnces such as increased population, roadway miles,
vehicle registration, traffic flow patterns and an above normal rain-
fall (2711/3211).
•
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT DZSCRIP:`ION.
PART I - Item G
4. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The primary objective of this project will be to bring about a reduction in the
deaths, injured and property damage due to traffic accidents along State
Highway 1, Pacific Coast Highway, by selectively enforcing traffic laws.
Major emphasis will be placed on enforcing; accident ..causing violations,
including enforcement of the SS MPH speed limit, and the detection and .arrest
of the drinking driver. The officers assigned will w.,rk only this stretch of
state highway for the duration of: the grant.
The team will consist of two motor officers and one car officer. Grant monies
will be used to purchase radar units for the enforcement of th:. speed violation.
The officers will be assigned, on a voluntary overtime basis, to work ten-hour
shifts, four nights a week. The hours on deployment will be flexible and will
be determined by prior accident experience.
The objective and quantitative goals of this project are to reduce by
five percent the number of accidents along, that portion.of Pacific Coast
Highway that is within the jurisdiction ofthe City of Ihintington Reach; to
increase by ten percent the issuance of citations; and to increase by ten
percent the arrests of drinking drivers over the corresponding period of the
proceeding three-year average. The duration of the prc_iect is twelve months,
at which time these goals should he achieved.
�. METHOD OF PROCEDURE
In order to meet the objectives and go, -.Is of this project, the I-`tmtington
Beach Police Department will follow the below listed steps or phases:
PHASE I Analyze existing automated traffic record reports to assess those
areas along Pacific Coast Highway where selective enforcement may best be
utilized. Primary assessment uill occur just prior to October, 1982.
Reassessment will be an ongoing process which will continue throughout the
entire timetable. This function will be done at tic cost to the project.
PHASE II Primary publicity will be handled by the Department's Public
Relations Bureau. Publicity will be an ongoing process throughout the project.
The program shall be publi,...ed to the cu=jiinity by making public presentations
to service dubs, community organizations, home c;.-ners' groups, the city's
Neighborhood Watch organization, and through the news media.
1. Develop safe driving slide presentations for in-house library.
2. Prepare safe driving literature in `he form of bulletins, newsletters,
posters and other miscellaneous handouts.
3. Provide for an alcohol workshop to be given at various service
organizations. This workshop will include a practical demonstration
of the breathalyzer test.
4. Safe driving literature distributed and posted at popular Bathe-ings.
'ITS-F-1 (-e • f
CAV I - I gem 6
6.
i 7.
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT j")ZSCRIPTION
S. Presentation and design of community information literature will be
coordinated through the Community Relations unit in conjunction with
the Neighborhood Watch Program.
PHASE III - Personnel for the to;un will be generated by overtime lists
posted in the Traffic Bureau. In the event of the insufficient ,,,!fsonnel,
the lists will be open to the Patrol Bureau.
PHASE IV - With the grant monies, purchase from Kustom Electronics, Shawnee
sslon, Kansas, two H-HR-8 hand held Radars, and one HR-12 moving radars. All
other equipment and vehicles for the project will be existing equipment at
no cost to the project.
PHASE V - Traffic enforcement will be implemented during late evening hours,
four days a week.
PHASE VI - Concurrent with IV and 1' wiIl be the utillzntion of a police
c er or the purpose of providing office: support in the areas of report
typing and filing, assisting in the booking procedure the filing of complaints,
the booking of evidence and the maintenance of a separate traffic enforcement
and drunk driver arrest log. i
PHASE VIII - Evaluation of the project will be done at the end of the project
The evaluation will be based upon the data collected throughout the project
implementation. The evaluation will include a discuss on of those areas
of the project which were both successful and unsuccessful and reconTiendat ions
as to the changes which might improve further implementation of this type of
project by this or other agencies.
TITHE REQUIRED - The proposed time, period for the project is 12 months.
STAMNE'W OF INTEtiT - It is the intent of the I=tuntangton i;:ach Police
partment to continue the Special Enforcement Team as part of an ongoing
operational activity to the extent permitted by local budgetary constraints.
8. PROJECT PERSONWEL - For the purposes of this grant, the project director
shall e t e c, 1ef of Police. The project coordinator will be the Traffic
Bureau Conminder, Lieutenant Reinholtz. All of the personnel will be
regularly employed by the Huntington Reach Police Department.
•
E.
0
SCHEDULE At,.
Priority Statement - Explain what type of priority this project has in your jurisdiction.
Traffic safety has always been a high priority for the City Council, City
Administrator and the Police Department of the City of Huntington Beach.
Programs directed towards saving lives and safety of the streets for our
citizens is of the utmost importance. With the alarming increase of fatalities
(100%) over the previous year, this project will be a top priority for the City
of Huntington Beach.
f I
Agency Contribution - Explain what services or funds are being contributed by your I
ncy in support of this project.
...wr.r r
The City of Huntington Beach will contribute all necessary administrative services
of both the finance and police department.
1. The city will provide all supervision, including a sergeant, to the Special
Traffic Enforcement Team.
i
Z. All specialized items of equipment necessary for this project will be supplied
by the city.
3. Office space and office Equipment will be supplied.
4. The city will utilize its existing Court Liaison Clerk for the follow through
of the complaint procedure.
5. The city will utilize its present office personnel to administer the clerical
duties of the project.
\ Y
r�
SCHEDULE
Detailed Budget
PART 1 Item 7 Bud•et Detail•
y • •• .�
- r - • • •
POSITIONS AND SALARIES
.f
yti
Rofficers
r
- d
' 44 408.00
' R officer T39�U06.40_1391006.40
oyeeBenefits I • •
Court Appearances
. .
*. : I • 1,819.20
i
I •,
'hrs, 854.00
�R� w
• f' Ar
• s - •I'
+1 • •
:u
,.- ..
• 315.43
5
Total Pcrsonnel• r241,273.40 1-,
B. Travel Expense
7
• r
r 1.
• � * 4 1 .
ContractualC. - 4
r
rContractual
.. Y-h n
Ik..
rarer- ,'�• ' .. •'c►' '.ram- . - j - +..,- _ 1 �,� � �. + y ��# � � ••,� 1
' •�' � - - n � f.' F � ', r.-.. :•'aft' -•. )s ��'; � �%: , f •r,
Y iF •.. ` , •k .. ... r' : * f ; Y. T. ' ' �r r x'' ••'1�l , a+► R al k A • - a'
. v
ti
t 1i+ a •(
• c.� •w.• fi w\.. A 'rt ,4j1, 'n:,a• ,•�k+ • _ _ Yam.-..: '+•�., ti- ,f
y
i
0 SCHEDULE B•-1
Budget Narrative
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
The Special Traffic Enforcement Team will consist of these members: two
motor officers and one traffic officer. The team members will work on a
Four -day, 10-hours per day week during the project.
Since this is to be accomplished on an overtime basis, all officers will be
paid at the overtime rate of one and one-half time per existing contract.
The Department established a senior officer program in October of 1981.
Therefore, the budget estimate is figured on the senior officer rate.
It is anticipated that some overti.m- slots will be filled with regular
officers which will result in a surf.lus in salaries. This surplus would
be returned.
The salary rate for a senior motor officer is $15.16 per hour or $22.74
per hour at the overtime rate.
The salary rate for a senior police officer is $14.23 per hour or $21.35
per hour at the overtime rate.
Employee benefits are based on an average cost as follows:
PERS pick up by City
7$
Retirement
25%
HoIiday Pay
40
Medical Insurance
74
Nntal Insurance
I.74
L.T.D.
1.7°;
Vacation Pay
70
Uniform Pay
1e
i ,orkman' s Comp.
6
Education Pay
II`.
These figures roflect a projected 91-0 calary increase that will take effect
on 10/9/82.
B. COURT APPEARANCE
The amount of: court time will be limited to those cases where violators chose
to plead not guilty to citations and to which the officer is subpoenaed to
appear. The cost of court time is figured on zin overtime basis. The police
of the Ifttington Beach Police Department is that any amount of time under
4 hours spent in court, or on call for court, is paid for a full 4 hours
f minimmi on an overtime basis.
For time In excess of 4 hours, the actual hours worked will be compensated on
an overtime basis. The total hours for court was estimated at 120 hours, or
2S percent of the total hours allocated for the selected patrol under this
i project. Of this tune, 80 hours was allotted to the motor officers and 40
i hours to the traffic officer and helicopter crew.
s
SCHEM1111: R
Detailed Budget Estimate
FART 1 - Item 7 Budget Derail
Cost Category l•C"'Y,•�r FLt:im" "ems
D. Non rxpenc-3 ie Pr-operty 82/83
1. Kustom Electronics 3137.60
HR-8 Radar 2 ea.
?. Kustom Electronics 2431.64
HR-12 Radar 1 ca.
Total. Non Expendable
.Other Direct Costs
VFJ-iiCI.E EXPENSES
Motorcycles
per mile @ 33,280 miles 6656.00
Automobile
rper mile @ 16,640 miles 3993.60
3137.60
2431 .6.1
5569.24
Total Other Direct Cosh; 10,649.60 10,G49.00
F. Indirect Costs
'otal Indirect Costs
TOTAL PtInCF.T E.CTXMATu
LA1.1 Cal.vgnrienj
,1_b'itS'��i�'i`!'lS1x:?•:. �i::�;.. r_�,i•��'t4'7� .., _ .,.... _
�1G,21R.R4
C.
SCHEDULE B--1
Budget Narrative
OTI-TER DIRECTED COSTS
In order to maintain the vehicles used under this project, the City will need
to keep them supplied with gas, oil, tires and regular maintenance checks.
In fiscal year 81/82 the cost per mile for patrol cars was calculated at 24.0
cents. The cost per mile for police motorcycles was calculated at 20.0 cents
per mile.
The estimated mileage for the traffic car is 16,640 miles. The motorcycles
are estimated to be 33,280 miles.
NON FUNDED COSTS - The following is an estimate of the cost of the services
to be borne by -The city. Salaries listed include estimated employee benefits
of 71.42 0.
TRAFFIC LIEUTENANT/PROJECT COORDINATOR - 6 man days 0 $322.94/day' = $1 ,937.64
TRAFFIC SERGEANT/PROJECT SUPERVISOR - 100 man days @ $301.41/day = $a09141.00
POLICE CLERK/CLERICAL DUTIES - 24 man days @ $85.44/day = $2,136.00
Support vehicles used by personnel of this project will be furnished by the
city, and are as follows:
T%qo Kawasaki Police motorcycles
One black and white police vehicle
Total non -funded costs - $34,214.54
I
67
SCHEDULE C
Project Time and Expend i tur,,2 Schedule
P C.
uv w
v w cn ro x
•n rd 1 f: (n
4S. I1. O H 1
z
II
III
Veh. maint.F�
IV 8231.64
equip.
V Salarie 60,318.35
and ct.
time
VI
VIII
VIII
7::�-,G�1J. .'!�'l�T�
)uarterly
Costs 68,549.99
2
1CLIAL-."
3
..
--
4
j
-
2662.40
2662.40
2562.40
60,318.35
�. 60,318.35
60,318.35
62,980.75
131,530.74
.r-�.s.-:f�fY�2aial:�i'.SK[`^• �XM.F�4�.'(�"/[lYt���P!►%-i/'�..�77
..T�...,�Iq..d•7,�...A..Ci4..'!�I
62,980.7S
194,511.49
.i-
s-,� ,.,�..7 s_,C.L.., �
1LY'�... _:.'..SL' .'+:':. '.�+..
621980.7S
257,492.24
L../T1►�Z.'1[iL YJ T31+[L u� �• .fw�i7r
:umlilative
Quarterly 68,549.99
Costs
i_w:t C..Slarrtis�a- .._�.r.r..r,���. �.- .._ ... .._.
Total
Project
Cost
By Task
16.218.84
241,273.40
257,492.24
257,492.24
�'�',, U V • r'
• • a
Project Task and Cost Category Stmmary
For Grant Year of.82183
C O S T C A T E G O R Y
OTS
Project
AWP STD/
Personnel
Travel
Contractual
Hon herd-
Other Direct
Indirect
Total Costs
Phase
SEP E TASK
Costs
D.,pense
Services
able Property
Costs
Costs
By Task
I
Iz
rrr
IV
5569.24
10,649.60
16,218.84
241,273.40
241,273.40
V
VI
VrI
VIIl
1
��
2-J- "192.24
El
GZN
� INITIAL EVALUATION DATA FORM
Cb /-
wn.
Schedule E -- 15a (Police
Traffic
Sarvices )
13 Years Ago.
1979
Start Date:
tan
1 Apr
1 Jul
1 Oct 1
-Completion Date:
Mar31 Jun30 Sep30 Dec31
Fatal (total)
3
1 5
19
r
6
1
A
bicyclist
1I 0
1 0
0
( 0
pedestrian
0
( 1
1 3
1 3
C
motorcyclist
0
1 1
1 2
I 2
D
E
Injury (total)
314
(356
618
1294
:1
bicyclist
26
i 38
147
I 41
T
pedestrian
15
I 14
12
16
S
motorcyclist
27
I 52
1 48
i 39
Property Damage Only
738
1 746
1775
1759
DWI (PCF 23101 & 2310
81
r 89
85
j 83
E
Arcy Total Citatione
8602
tt--
9612
I
`7028
N
183S7
Agcy Haz. Citations
61.93
� 247
15392
15003
0
R
Agcy 23101 & 23102
1
1
E
Arrests
781�
707
662
` 584
M
I
I
I
Agcy Speed Citations
1
1
*
1 *
1 *
I
T
{
I
I
AGENCY ENFCRCEIIENT INDEX
20
I 17
1 17
1 17~
POPULATION
1651000
MILES OF PATROLLED ROADWAY
346
Pop. Acci. Rate
'J.
v
in
En
�i
Agency: 1kmtington Beach Police Department
2 Year3 Ago 19 80 Last Year 19�,1 Base Year
Jan 1 Apr 1 Jul 1 Oct 1 Jan 1 Apr 1 Jul. 1 Oct 1 Jan 1 Apr 1 Jul. 1 Oct 1
MLr 31 Jurp30 Sep30 Dec31 RELr31 Jun30 Sep30 Dec3l 1, r31 Jun30 Sep30 Dec31
4 1 2 1 4 1 3 6 , 2 i 5 1 13 4.33 1 3 1 6 17.33
0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 10
0 1 2 1, 0 1 0 2 i 0 .33 1 1 1 2 11.66
2 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 2 2 1.33 i .33 1 1 11.66
1 I
288 1 344 1 323 1324 326 1389 1365 �27 309 1 S63 1335 1318
29 40 1 49 22 33 44 29 i 26 29 1 41 1 42 1 30
14 1 20 �2 , 28 2 1 20 18 17 12 2 111 38
36 55 , 42 38 45
78 i 37 1 39 37 2
707 650 844 1 776 669 1 788 ! 744 '708 705 ! 728- ' 788 1 748
84 ; 99 1 I j 83 93 ; 91 1122 ; 78 86 ! 93 !103 1 81
466 19210 17911 �7735 8178 '101571 9321 7189 8082',9660 118530 17317
970 I SS16 14377 15387 5682 1 6,1341 598q 5S65 5615 16066 15252 15318
.
639 1 637 1 527 1 475 496 1 5021 391 400 639 1 61S 1 528 ( 486
` 1 I
I 1 1 I
17 1 16 14 17 17 16 + 16i 16 18 17 L 15`116
170.500
353
172,813
362
A
i
California Traffic Safety Program
Application of the Hatch Act to State and Local Agencies Receiving
Funds Under the Highway Safety Act of 1966
This is to certify that all employees of this agency whose
principal employment is in connection with any Highway Safety
Project financed in whole or in part by loans or grants under
the Highway Safety Act of 1966 has been made aware of the pro-
visions of Section 12 (a) of the :':itch Act (S.U. S. C. 118k (a)) .
SIGNATURE:
Project Director -
City of Huntington Beach
Agency
California Traffic Safety Program
Applicdtion of the Hatch Act to State and Local Agencies Receiving
Funds Under the Highway Safety Act of 1966
This is to certify that all employees of this agency whose
principal employment is in connection with any Highway Safety
Project financed in whole or it part by loans or grants under
the Highway Safety Act of 1966 has been made aware of the pro-
visions of Section 12 (a) of the "=atch Act (5.U. S.C. 118k (a)) .
SIGNATURE:C.
Project Direeto Chief of Police
City of Bunt ington Beach Police i1e1it.
Agency
0
w
State of California
Business and Transportation Agency
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
CERTIFICATION OF NON --DUPLICATION
OF GRANT FUND EXPENDITURE
This is to certify that the City of Huntington Beach
State Agency/City/Coul:�y/Dtist,,;:ct, etc.
has no ongoing or completed projects under agreement with TOPICS, CCCJ
( LEAA) , HEW, or other federal fund sources, which duplicate or overlap
any work contemplated or described in this Traffic Safety Project
titled, Special Traffic Enforcement Team
It is further agreed that any pending or proposed request for other
federal grant funds which would duplicate or overlap work under this
Traffic Safety Project, will be revised to exclude any such duplication
of grant fund expenditures.
It is understood that any such duplication of federal fund expenditures
subsequently determined by audit will be subject to recovery by the
Office of Traffic Safety.
CERTIFIED
Earle W. Robitaille
i 1ay 18, 1982
Type Name and Title
S/18/82
Date
01S--F -37 11/76